Turley Testifies Evidence Insufficient To Impeach Biden — But Warrants Inquiry
Jonathan Turley, George Washington University Law School Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law, testifies during a House Oversight Committee hearing titled “The Basis for an Impeachment Inquiry of President Joseph R. Biden, Jr.” on Capitol Hill September 28, 2023 in Washington, DC.
(Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

In testimony before Congress on Thursday, George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley said the House has not presented sufficient evidence to impeach President Joe Biden.

Delivering his opening statement, Turley underscored the early timing of the hearing in the impeachment process, as House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) announced a formal inquiry into corruption allegations only weeks ago.

“I want to emphasize what it is that we’re here today for: this is the question of an impeachment inquiry,” Turley said. “It is not a vote on articles of impeachment. In fact, I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment. That is something that an inquiry has to establish.”

Turley also said he believes the House “has passed the threshold for an impeachment inquiry into the conduct of President Biden, noting that three “inescapable facts” led him to such a conclusion.

He testified that Biden “has indeed spoken falsely” about foreign business deals, “was the focus of a multi-million dollar influence peddling scheme,” and “may have benefited” from that money.

“Now those facts should not be taken out of context,” Turley said, “they are merely allegations and they should not become presumptions of impeachable conduct.”


Turley claimed he had not liked any president since James Madison because they all had been dishonest. The legal expert, who has participated in multiple impeachment inquiries dating back to the Clinton administration, also indicated his written testimony lays out “guardrails” to stop both major parties from abusing the power.

“Presidential impeachment shouldn’t be a closed question” and “shouldn’t be a rush to judgment,” he said. Turley added that “confirmation bias” should be avoided and encouraged people to stand together before they judge the evidence.

Three other witnesses were sworn in at the hearing on Thursday.

The Republican majority had forensic accountant Bruce Dubinsky and former Assistant Attorney General Eileen O’Connor. Democrats invited Michael Gerhardt, a professor of jurisprudence at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

At the beginning of the hearing, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) said the committee would examine over two dozen pieces of evidence “revealing” Biden’s “corruption and abuse of public office.” He also pledged the Oversight Committee, while led by Republicans, will not pursue “witch hunts” based on “manufactured allegations, innuendo, and no real evidence.”

Democrats have dismissed the Biden impeachment inquiry as a politically motivated endeavor lacking evidence, while the White House has called on the media to assist in its efforts to ward off the investigation.

Create a free account to join the conversation!

Already have an account?

Log in

Got a tip worth investigating?

Your information could be the missing piece to an important story. Submit your tip today and make a difference.

Submit Tip
Download Daily Wire Plus

Don't miss anything

Download our App

Stay up-to-date on the latest
news, podcasts, and more.

Download on the app storeGet it on Google Play
The Daily Wire   >  Read   >  Turley Testifies Evidence Insufficient To Impeach Biden — But Warrants Inquiry