Entertainment

Taylor Swift Re-Recording Albums Success Sparks Changes To Record Label Contracts

   DailyWire.com
Taylor Swift
Emma McIntyre/TAS23/Getty Images for TAS Rights Management

Taylor Swift’s success after re-recording her earlier albums has sparked record labels to change contracts to stop performers from ever being able to do the same — or at least to delay performers up to 30 years, in some cases, after they leave a label.

Labels like Sony Music Entertainment, Warner Music Group, and Universal Music Group, have recently overhauled the contracts they give out to new signees that would make the artists wait 10-30 years before they could re-record releases or never be allowed to after they leave a record company, top attorneys told Billboard magazine.

One veteran attorney Josh Karp said the first time he saw it pop up on a contract it definitely got his attention.

“The first time I saw it, I tried to get rid of it entirely,” Karp told the outlet. “I was just like, ‘What is this? This is strange. Why would we agree to further restrictions than we’ve agreed to in the past with the same label?'”

“It becomes one of a multitude of items you’re fighting,” Karp added.

Another attorney, Gandhar Savur, told the outlet he “recently did a deal with a very big indie that had a 30-year re-record restriction in it. Which obviously is much longer than I’m used to seeing.”

“I think the majors are also trying to expand their re-record restrictions but in a more measured way, they are generally not yet able to get away with making such extreme changes,” he added.

“Obviously, this is a big headline topic, the Taylor Swift thing,” Savur continued. “Labels, of course, are going to want to do whatever they can to address that and to prevent it. But there’s only so much they can do. Artist representatives are going to push back against that, and a certain standard is ingrained in our industry that is not easy to move away from.”

Before Swift announced she was re-recording her albums — in order to control her master recordings after Scooter Braun bought them from Big Machine Records, it was thought to be a niche thing. But after Swift’s had massive success releasing ‘Taylor Version’ of her biggest hits,  recording companies are taking steps because it’s driving down the value of the original recordings.

Previously a contract would state that an artists had to wait five to seven years from the release date of the original song, or two years after the contract expired. But now that timeframe has been pushed back much farther.

“Now, because of all this Taylor Swift s**t, we have an even new negotiation. It’s awful,” music attorney Dina LaPolt told the outlet. “We’re seeing a lot of ‘perpetuity’ s**t, When we were negotiating deals with lawyers, before we would get the proposal, we’d get the phone call from the head of business affairs. We literally would say, ‘If you send that to me, it will be on f***ing Twitter in 10 minutes.’ It never showed up.”

Related: Taylor Swift Hands Out Massive Bonus Checks To Eras Tour Truckers: Report

Create a free account to join the conversation!

Already have an account?

Log in

Got a tip worth investigating?

Your information could be the missing piece to an important story. Submit your tip today and make a difference.

Submit Tip
Download Daily Wire Plus

Don't miss anything

Download our App

Stay up-to-date on the latest
news, podcasts, and more.

Download on the app storeGet it on Google Play
The Daily Wire   >  Read   >  Taylor Swift Re-Recording Albums Success Sparks Changes To Record Label Contracts