Yeshiva University has suspended all student club activities after the Supreme Court ruled against its request to overturn the recognition of an LGBTQ student organization.
The announcement was shared in an email to students on Friday that indicated the school would “hold off on all undergraduate club activities while it immediately takes steps to follow the roadmap provided by the U.S. Supreme Court to protect YU&#8217;s religious freedom.”
The change followed a 5-4 ruling on Wednesday that lifted a hold on a court order that <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/no-religious-group-is-safe-from-government-control-scotus-makes-yeshiva-university-return-to-ny-court-forces-acceptance-of-lgbtq-club" target="_blank" rel="noopener">required</a> Yeshiva University to recognize the YU Pride Alliance group.
“The stakes couldn’t be higher, not just for Yeshiva but for the country,” Mark Rienzi, president of the Becket Fund that is representing Yeshiva in the case, warned. “That’s why people of many different faiths filed briefs asking the court to protect Yeshiva. If Yeshiva can’t even make religious decisions on its own campus, then no religious group is safe from government control.”
Following Wednesday&#8217;s ruling, Becket Vice President Eric Baxter released a statement regarding the next steps in the case.
“Today the Supreme Court instructed Yeshiva University to make an additional effort to get the New York courts to grant them emergency relief and made clear that if that protection is not provided, they can return to the Supreme Court to seek its protection again,&#8221; Baxter said in a statement. “We will follow the Court’s instruction.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Today&#39;s <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SCOTUS?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#SCOTUS</a> order in YU Pride Alliance v. Yeshiva University can be found here: <a href="https://t.co/Pss6v41rqI">https://t.co/Pss6v41rqI</a>
Statement from <a href="https://twitter.com/esbax?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@esbax</a> <a href="https://t.co/ujkJ0zXdix">pic.twitter.com/ujkJ0zXdix</a>
&mdash; BECKET (@BECKETlaw) <a href="https://twitter.com/BECKETlaw/status/1570175012178636801?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 14, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The Supreme Court <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/supreme-court-sides-with-yeshiva-university-in-lgbtq-club-case" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ruled</a> on September 9 to temporarily block a New York judge’s order to force the school to recognize the YU Pride Alliance until the college’s religious freedom case is completed.
Justice Sonia Sotomayer signed the order that included no dissents in the ruling. Sotomayer signed the ruling as she is the circuit justice for the Second District that includes New York.
“Yeshiva shouldn’t have been forced to go all the way to the Supreme Court to receive such a commonsense ruling in favor of its First Amendment rights,” Baxter said in a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/supreme-court-sides-with-yeshiva-university-in-lgbtq-club-case" target="_blank" rel="noopener">statement</a> sent to The Daily Wire following the ruling.
“We are grateful that Justice Sotomayor stepped in to protect Yeshiva’s religious liberty in this case,” he added.
Just days later, the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision is now requiring Yeshiva University to pursue the matter in the state&#8217;s courts first, with the hold lifted effective immediately. The latest effort by the Jewish Orthodox school will keep any student organization from operating, including the pride group, until a legal decision can be made in the case.
<div class="article-body" data-qa="article-body">
Katie Rosenfeld, a lawyer for the pride group, <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/09/17/yeshiva-university-lgbtq-club/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">told</a> the Washington Post that the school&#8217;s decision is discriminatory, calling it “a throwback to 50 years ago when the city of Jackson, Miss., closed all public swimming pools rather than comply with court orders to desegregate.”
“The Pride Alliance seeks a safe space on campus, nothing more,” she said in an email Saturday. “By shutting down all club activities, the YU administration attempts to divide the student body, and pit students against their LGBT peers. We are confident that YU students will see through this shameful tactic and stand together in community.”
</div>

Yeshiva University

Yeshiva University Suspends All Student Club Activities After SCOTUS Sides With LGBTQ Club

Freedom of Religion

Jewish

LGBTQ

Religion

Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has temporarily forced Yeshiva University (YU), the famed Orthodox Jewish university in New York, to accept an LGBTQ club against its wishes.
The university had asked for a stay of a Manhattan judge’s order YU grant recognition to the Yeshiva University Pride Alliance; on Friday, Justice Sonia Sotomayor granted the emergency petition, but on Wednesday the court voted 5-4 to reject the stay and send the case back to the New York courts, where YU has lost before.
“The stakes couldn’t be higher, not just for Yeshiva but for the country,” Becket Fund president Mark Rienzi, had warned. “That’s why people of many different faiths filed briefs asking the court to protect Yeshiva. If Yeshiva can’t even make religious decisions on its own campus, then no religious group is safe from government control.”
The Becket Fund is representing YU.
The New York court contends that YU does not merit a religious exemption because it represents itself as an educational and not religious institution, wrote William McGurn , the former Chief Speechwriter for President George W. Bush, in The Wall Street Journal in a piece titled, “<a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/were-all-jews-now-supreme-court-free-exercise-yeshiva-university-lgbtq-student-club-judaism-pride-emergency-petition-11663016097">Yeshiva University Case Means We’re All Jews Now</a>.”
“What a cramped view this is, as if religion can be so easily separated into neat and distinct boxes—especially at a Jewish university,” he added.
But the Supreme Court, in denying the application, argued that YU had not requested the New York courts to expedite consideration of the merits of their appeal nor filed with the Appellate Division a corrected motion for permission to appeal that court’s denial of a stay to the New York Court of Appeals. The Court stated that if YU sought but did not receive expedited review or interim relief from the New York courts, they could return to the Court.
The four justices who sided with YU included Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Amy Coney Barrett. Alito <a href="https://becketnewsite.s3.amazonaws.com/20220914212316/22A184S.pdf">declared</a>:
<blockquote>
Does the First Amendment permit a State to force a Jewish school to instruct its students in accordance with an interpretation of Torah that the school, after careful study, has concluded is incorrect? The answer to that question is surely “no.” 
The First Amendment guarantees the right to the free exercise of religion, and if that provision means anything, it prohibits a State from enforcing its own preferred interpretation of Holy Scripture. Yet that is exactly what New York has done in this case, and it is disappointing that a majority of this Court refuses to provide relief. &#8230;
<div class="page" title="Page 6">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
It is our duty to stand up for the Constitution even when doing so is controversial.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Two “conservative” justices, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, joined the majority opinion against YU.

Yeshiva University Seeks To Block LGBTQ Club

‘No Religious Group Is Safe From Government Control’: SCOTUS Makes Yeshiva University Return To NY Court, Forces Acceptance Of LGBTQ Club

Religious Freedom

Vice President Kamala Harris attacked the legitimacy of the Supreme Court over its decision overturning federal abortion rights.
In an interview with NBC News&#8217;s &#8220;Meet the Press&#8221; that aired Sunday, Harris assailed the court&#8217;s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women&#8217;s Health Organization. She expressed doubts about whether the body can interpret the law fairly.
“I think this is an activist court,” Harris told NBC&#8217;s Chuck Todd. &#8220;We had an established right for almost half a century, which is the right of women to make decisions about their own body as an extension of what we have decided to be, the privacy rights to which we are all entitled, and this court took that constitutional right away.&#8221;
&#8220;We are suffering as a nation because of it,&#8221; she continued. &#8220;That causes me great concern about the integrity of the court overall, especially as someone who&#8211; my life was inspired by people like Thurgood Marshall, the work on that court of Earl Warren to bring a unanimous court to pass Brown v. Board of Education. This is the court that once sat Earl Warren and Thurgood Marshall, Sandra Day O’Connor. It’s a very different court.&#8221;
Harris went on to press the U.S. Senate to pass a law currently in the works that would take the abortion issue out of the hands of state governments and codify the right to the procedure into federal law.
&#8220;I believe government should not be telling women what to do with their bodies,&#8221; Harris said. &#8220;I believe government should not be telling women how to plan their families.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
WATCH: Vice President Harris says the Supreme Court is “an activist court” for overturning Roe v. Wade.<a href="https://twitter.com/VP?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@VP</a>: “We had an established right for almost half a century. … This court took that constitutional right away. And we are suffering as a nation because of it.” <a href="https://t.co/rXt8IRPSpI">pic.twitter.com/rXt8IRPSpI</a>
— Meet the Press (@MeetThePress) <a href="https://twitter.com/MeetThePress/status/1568954534222766082?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 11, 2022</a></blockquote>
Harris&#8217; comments follow months of similar attacks from prominent <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-democrats-explode-after-supreme-court-makes-it-harder-to-kill-unborn-babies" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Democrats</a> who have attacked the Court as &#8220;illegitimate&#8221; and &#8220;<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/democrat-nancy-pelosi-demonizes-extremist-supreme-court-as-dhs-warns-of-terrorism-against-judges" target="_blank" rel="noopener">extremist</a>&#8221; and pushed for <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/democrat-bill-would-impose-term-limits-on-scotus-justices-mandatory-replacements-every-two-years" target="_blank" rel="noopener">aggressive reforms</a> in reaction to the Dobbs decision.
Chief Justice John Roberts defended the Court from such attacks earlier this week.
“The court has always decided controversial cases and decisions always have been subject to intense criticism and that is entirely appropriate,” Roberts told an audience at the 10th Circuit Bench and Bar Conference in Colorado this week. “But I don’t understand the connection between the opinions people disagree with and the legitimacy of the Supreme Court.”
&#8220;[S]imply because people disagree with an opinion is not a basis for criticizing the legitimacy of the court,&#8221; he added.

US-politics-CAPITOL-unrest-ANNIVERSARY

VP Harris Attacks SCOTUS: ‘This Is An Activist Court’

VP Harris Attacks SCOTUS: 'This Is An Activist Court'

Abortion

Dobbs

Kamala Harris

Meet the Press

Supreme Court Chief Justice <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/john-roberts" target="_blank" rel="noopener">John Roberts</a> defended the court from attacks on its legitimacy.
Speaking to jurists at the 10th Circuit Bench and Bar Conference in Colorado Springs, Colorado, Roberts pointed out that the nation&#8217;s highest court has always handled controversial cases, and decided some cases that provoked strong reactions from the public. However, Roberts pushed back on recent attacks against the legitimacy of the court itself, saying that disagreeing with an opinion on a controversial issue does not call into question the legitimacy of the court.
“The court has always decided controversial cases and decisions always have been subject to intense criticism and that is entirely appropriate,” Roberts told attendees at the conference, via the <a href="https://nypost.com/2022/09/10/chief-justice-john-roberts-defends-supreme-court-legitimacy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">New York Post</a>. “But I don’t understand the connection between the opinions people disagree with and the legitimacy of the Supreme Court.”
“Yes, all of our opinions are open to criticism,&#8221; he added, according to <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/10/supreme-court-roberts-legitimacy/">The Washington Post</a>. &#8220;In fact, our members do a great job of criticizing some opinions from time to time. But simply because people disagree with an opinion is not a basis for criticizing the legitimacy of the court.”
Roberts pointed out that the distinct purpose of the Supreme Court is to interpret the law without regard to political opinions or concerns. “That role doesn’t change simply because people disagree with this opinion or that opinion or with a particular mode of jurisprudence,” he said.
The Supreme Court took up a number of controversial cases and handed down several controversial decisions during its term earlier this year. In June, the court ruled that state-level restrictions on concealed carrying firearms are unconstitutional, in the case of <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-scotus-strikes-down-new-york-concealed-carry-restrictions-restrictions" target="_blank" rel="noopener">New York State Rifle &amp; Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen</a>; then, the court ruled in <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/united-states-supreme-court-overturns-roe-v-wade-leaves-abortion-restrictions-to-states" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Dobbs v. Jackson Women&#8217;s Health Organization</a>, overturning Roe v. Wade and giving control of abortion back to the states; finally, the court ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency does not have the authority to set emissions caps on coal plants in <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/supreme-court-rules-against-bidens-epa-says-agency-does-not-have-authority-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-emissions" target="_blank" rel="noopener">West Virginia v. The Environmental Protection Agency</a>.
Democrats and left-wing activists responded to those three rulings, especially the Dobbs decision, by slandering the court as &#8220;<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/democrat-nancy-pelosi-demonizes-extremist-supreme-court-as-dhs-warns-of-terrorism-against-judges">extremist</a>&#8221; and saying the court &#8220;<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/sen-elizabeth-warren-claimed-scotus-burned-legitimacy-in-roe-verdict-calls-for-adding-more-justices" target="_blank" rel="noopener">set a torch</a>&#8221; to its legitimacy, and calling for it to be reformed or for more justices to be put onto the bench.
Roberts continued, warning about the dangers of allowing politics into the judiciary. “If the court doesn’t retain its legitimate function of interpreting the constitution, I’m not sure who would take up that mantle,” he said, via the <a href="https://apnews.com/article/abortion-us-supreme-court-colorado-springs-john-roberts-government-and-politics-cdff7d291a37c3b8459e787421c633d2" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Associated Press</a>. &#8220;You don’t want the political branches telling you what the law is, and you don’t want public opinion to be the guide of what the appropriate decision is.&#8221;
Roberts’ comments come after Vice President <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/meetthepressblog/vp-harris-attacks-activist-court-says-loss-rights-post-roe-led-sufferi-rcna47072" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Kamala Harris</a> attacked the legitimacy of the Supreme Court in reaction to the Court&#8217;s decision in Dobbs.
&#8220;I think this is an activist court,&#8221; Harris told Chuck Todd in a clip of an interview with NBC News’ &#8220;Meet the Press&#8221; Friday. &#8220;We had an established right for almost half a century [abortion]&#8230; And this court took that constitutional right away, and we are suffering as a nation because of it. That causes me great concern about the integrity of the court overall.&#8221;

Supreme Court Justices Pose For Formal Group Photo

Roberts Defends SCOTUS After VP Harris, Democrats Attack Court’s Legitimacy

Roberts Defends SCOTUS After VP Harris, Democrats Attack Court's Legitimacy

Biden Administration

John Roberts

Supreme Court Justice <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/neil-gorsuch" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Neil Gorsuch</a> said Thursday he hopes the report on the leaked draft opinion of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision comes soon.
“Improper efforts to influence judicial decision-making, from whatever side, from whomever, are a threat to the judicial decision-making process and inhibit our capacity to communicate with one another,” Gorsuch <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/09/supreme-court-abortion-leak-gorsuch/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> at a conference for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Colorado. The <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/justice-gorsuch-said-findings-of-probe-into-leaked-roe-draft-opinion-will-be-made-in-report-11662684240?st=6q2jaspsa8jvbky&amp;reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Wall Street Journal</a> and <a href="https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/top-court-leak-threatens-judicial-decision-making-gorsuch-says" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Bloomberg Law</a> reported on his comments.
“I very much hope we get to the bottom of this sooner or later,” he added.
Gorsuch didn’t comment on if the report would be released to the public, and reporters were not allowed to conduct interviews with him or other judges, at the conference’s direction, the Journal reported.
“The chief justice appointed an internal committee to oversee the investigation,” Gorsuch said. “That committee has been busy and we’re looking forward to their report, I hope soon.”
In May, Chief Justice John Roberts said the Supreme Court marshal would be in charge of an investigation to discover where the leak came from, but the high court has been silent on the matter since that time and not discussed the topic with the public. Investigators required the clerks at the high court to take part in interviews and hand over their cellphones this past summer. At the time, many of the clerks sought lawyers of their own due to the requirements.
The Dobbs opinion was leaked prior to the official ruling being released, setting the American public — on both sides of the debate — into a frenzy over the potential overturning of Roe v. Wade. When the majority opinion was released, it was very similar to the leaked draft, resulting in decades of precedent from the Roe v. Wade ruling no longer applying. The decision returned the topic of <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/abortion" target="_blank" rel="noopener">abortion</a> back to individual states, allowing them to pass and enact their own laws concerning the controversial procedure.
States have taken action over the past year to eradicate abortion, allow it in certain circumstances, or promote it and attract women from states where it is banned.
At the conference, Gorsuch discussed several topics in a joint public discussion with two circuit judges, including the steps American students must go through to become lawyers.
“That’s something we have to ask ourselves about: Does it really require seven years of collegiate education to become a competent lawyer?” Justice Gorsuch said.

94806F28-C250-41CE-B335-71EC012A8D76_1_201_a

Justice Gorsuch Says He Hopes Report On Dobbs Leak Will Come Soon

Justice Neil Gorsuch Says He Hopes Report On Dobbs V. Jackson Women’s Health Organization Leak Will Come Soon

Neil Gorsuch

Roe v. Wade's Long And Brutal Legacy

Screen Shot 2022-08-27 at 8.45.43 AM

Here’s A Look At Some Of The Activists Who Protest Outside The Supreme Court Justices’ Homes

These Are Some Of The Activists Protesting Outside The Supreme Court Justices' Homes

Amy Coney Barrett

Brett Kavanaugh

Clarence Thomas

Walmart will begin paying for employee abortions, a memo obtained by The Daily Wire shows.
An August 19 memo sent from Chief People Officer Donna Morris to all U.S.-based associates and global officers states &#8220;effective immediately, the Walmart self-insured healthcare plans will cover abortion when there is a health risk to the mother, rape or incest, ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage or lack of fetal viability.&#8221;
The memo also states, &#8220;given how recent events are resulting in state by state healthcare environments, we will expand our travel coverage.&#8221;
&#8220;We&#8217;ll provide travel support for our associates and their covered dependents so they can access services covered by our Walmart self-insured plan when they are not available within 100 miles of their location,&#8221; the memo said.
<div class="image"><img loading="lazy" class="alignnone wp-image-426476 size-large" src="https://www.dailywire.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Screen-Shot-2022-08-19-at-12.59.07-PM-474x576.png" alt="" width="474" height="576" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2022/08/Screen-Shot-2022-08-19-at-12.59.07-PM-474x576.png 474w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2022/08/Screen-Shot-2022-08-19-at-12.59.07-PM-247x300.png 247w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2022/08/Screen-Shot-2022-08-19-at-12.59.07-PM-768x934.png 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2022/08/Screen-Shot-2022-08-19-at-12.59.07-PM.png 1020w" sizes="(max-width: 474px) 100vw, 474px" /></div>
A Walmart associate who spoke anonymously to The Daily Wire said that it is &#8220;disappointing to see Walmart go the way of the rest of corporate America by condoning and funding a procedure that ends a human life.&#8221;
&#8220;Walmart is a family company patronized by millions of Americans who don’t want their go-to retailer taking a position on abortion,&#8221; said the associate, who asked to remain anonymous to preserve their job status. &#8220;Walmart says they reflect the communities they serve. If that’s true, they should not take a stance on such a divisive issue.&#8221;
The memo appears to be in response to the June overturn of Roe v. Wade, which sent the power to decide abortion back to the states.
Walmart did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Daily Wire.

Screen Shot 2022-08-19 at 1.01.25 PM

Walmart Will Pay For Some Employee Abortions, Out of State Travel Expenses, Leaked Memo Shows

Leaked Email Shows Walmart Will Pay For Some Employee Abortions

Walmart

The once-revered FBI has fallen on hard times. One might pinpoint the decline beginning as far back as former Director J. Edgar Hoover’s partisan machinations during the McCarthyism years. Yet in the last several years, the bureau’s reputational hits have piled higher and higher. Every American with access to a television or the internet has heard about federal law enforcement’s participation in election-interference in the 2016 election of President Donald Trump. Not content to have pressed its thumb on the scale of that election and throughout President Trump’s tenure, the FBI also set its sights on <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2021/11/13/raid-veritas-okeefe-biden-press-521307">journalists</a>, members of Congress, and even <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/fbi-whistleblowers-accuse-bureau-of-probing-parents-as-terrorist-say-gop-lawmakers">soccer moms</a> unhappy with the direction of their kids’ schools— all while turning a blind eye to brazen lawbreaking by political favorites. Some would say the agency is operating with no meaningful oversight or constraint, is increasingly erratic, and is willing to ignore the guardrails that once kept it above politics. 
  
Last Monday’s raid on former President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach County, Florida—ostensibly on behalf of the nation’s top librarians at the National Archives hunting for Presidential papers—marked a new nadir for an agency either woefully out of touch or willfully obtuse as to its own image, much less as to its proper role as a neutral observer and noncombatant in political tussles.
The Biden Justice Department appears to be drunk on power, given the audacious move to raid the former President’s home, foregoing the less drastic measure of a <a href="https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/3594412-justice-department-should-have-subpoenaed-documents-not-raided-trumps-home/">subpoena</a>. This has even drawn the criticism of disgraced former Democrat New York Governor <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/andrew-cuomo">Andrew Cuomo</a>, who <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/andrew-cuomo-doj-must-immediately-explain-the-reason-for-its-raid">demanded that the DOJ explain</a> the reasoning behind its raid or it, “will be viewed as a political tactic.” The DOJ appears to have responded by sending friendly talking heads and media flacks into damage control mode, without substantively addressing its extraordinary and unprecedented move, at least until Attorney General Merrick Garland’s two-minute nervous and scripted <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-biden-ag-merrick-garland-admits-he-personally-approved-trump-search-warrant">appearance</a> Thursday afternoon attempting to justify the raid, which he admitted he authorized, while he criticized the former President for being outraged at the violation of his private home. 
  
The trajectory is familiar; the first two years of Trump’s presidency were overshadowed by the fake Russia collusion conspiracy whose seeds were sown well before the 2016 election by the <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2018/02/09/did-hillary-clinton-collude-with-the-russians-to-get-dirt-on-trump-to-feed-it-to-the-fbi/">Clinton campaign</a> working hand in hand with White House operatives and senior FBI brass. The spectacle of a <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/08/30/james-comey-fbi-memo-leaks-trump-inspector-general-report-column/2157705001/">sanctimonious</a> James Comey, anointing himself as the savior of the Republic, distracted from the new administration’s efforts to govern. The resulting Mueller investigation further hobbled the administration’s agenda, with subpoenas of members of his 2016 campaign and presidential administration. The whole charade ended with a whimper, with <a href="https://www.americanbar.org/news/abanews/aba-news-archives/2019/03/mueller-concludes-investigation/">no evidence</a> that Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russians to elect him in 2016. But the damage had been done – with the full and enthusiastic participation of FBI leaders who <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/17/politics/fisa-court-slams-fbi-conduct">lied to the FISA court</a> to obtain surveillance on Carter Page and others, and doubtless many other transgressions that will remain hidden behind the blue wall. 
  
And what about those sacred government documents? Hillary Clinton, as Obama’s Secretary of State, used a private email server located in her bathroom in Chappaqua for official communications, including <a href="https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2016-02-29/state-dept-wins-dispute-over-clinton-email-on-north-korea">2,100 emails deemed classified</a>. Many of these emails were ultimately hacked and released to the public. Clinton was deemed to have violated <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1924">18 U.S. Code § 1924</a>, regarding the unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents and materials, yet despite other federal officers facing prison time for far less, Clinton got off with nothing more than public mockery. 
  
This open double standard continued full speed into Hunter Biden’s questionable dealings with China, Ukraine, etc. From 2013 to 2020, the president’s son served as a member on the board of the Chinese-based private equity fund BHR Partners, where two of the China-based asset managers were the Bank of China and Harvest Fund Management, a Chinese asset management company that harvests funds for financial services. Hunter secured a <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign">$1.5 billion deal to form BHR in December 2013</a>, when he joined his then-Vice President father and Secretary of State John Kerry on a diplomatic trip to China to discuss sensitive negotiations with the Chinese government over their expansionist activities in the South China Sea. 
  
Hunter’s overseas dealings also saw him and a friend join the board of the Ukrainian energy company, Burisma Holdings, from 2014 to 2019, earning compensation of <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukraine.html">up to $50,000 per month.</a> He joined amid numerous corruption probes in Ukraine related to the dealings of the company, as well as Vice President Biden’s public boasts about pushing for the firing of Ukraine’s top prosecutor who was investigating Burisma. Like Clinton, Hunter skated free, with no FBI investigation for corrupt foreign dealings while his father was running for President.
During the Biden administration, the FBI and DOJ have ramped up their brazen partisan approach, going after those they deem a threat to their order, carrying out a <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/capitol-violence">parallel investigation</a> to the January 6 committee in Congress, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/06/us/politics/james-okeefe-project-veritas-ashley-biden.html">targeting investigative journalists</a>, and <a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/garland-directs-fbi-to-target-parents-for-harassment-intimidation/ar-AAP8Fe1">going after PTA moms and dads</a> who attend school board meetings to voice criticism of woke ideology taking the place of learning 
  
In November 2021, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/06/us/politics/james-okeefe-project-veritas-ashley-biden.html">the FBI raided</a> the homes and offices of current and former Project Veritas investigative journalists, including its founder, James O’Keefe. From a source, Veritas obtained the personal diary of Ashley Biden, President Biden’s daughter, which Veritas decided not to publish because it could not verify its authenticity. Despite this, the FBI recklessly conducted raids on American journalists engaging in indisputably protected First Amendment activity, clearly at the behest of lawyers for the president’s daughter, who had openly threatened to call the feds when Project Veritas called asking for comment from Ashley Biden. This conduct was egregious and beyond the pale of proper federal law enforcement activity that civil rights and free press organizations, including the ACLU and the Committee to Protect Journalists—neither of which are friendly to Project Veritas—raised the alarm. 
The ACLU <a href="https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/aclu-comment-fbi-raid-project-veritas-founder">commented</a>, “Unless the government had good reason to believe that Project Veritas employees were directly involved in the criminal theft of the diary, it should not have subjected them to invasive searches and seizures.” The Committee to Protect Journalists agreed, <a href="https://cpj.org/2021/11/cpj-concerned-over-fbi-raid-on-home-of-project-veritas-founder-james-okeefe/">saying</a> that lacking “a clear link between members of Project Veritas and alleged of criminal activity&#8221; the FBI raids and seizure of evidence were a “dangerous precedent that could allow law enforcement to search and confiscate reporters’ unpublished source material in vague attempts to identify whistleblowers.”
While the FBI and the DOJ gleefully arrested hundreds of participants on January 6 and left many to languish in detention as political prisoners accused of minor offenses, the leaders of Black Lives Matter riots that tore apart the country for the better part of 2020, remain at large, marked safe by today’s FBI. 
 
Amid the outrage at school boards across the country last year and parents attending school board meetings demanding answers to the Critical Race Theory and sexualization of children in schools through woke curricula, the DOJ under the direction of Garland <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbi-targeted-parents-via-terrorism-tools-despite-garland-testimony">targeted parents</a> who attended these meetings with a threat tag created by the FBI’s counterterrorism division. These “extremists” were helpfully placed on the regime enemies list at the behest of the National School Boards Association, who <a href="https://dailycaller.com/2022/05/23/national-school-board-association-nonpartisan-moms-for-liberty/">asked the Biden administration</a> to utilize tools including the overreaching PATRIOT Act to deal with this supposed existential threat to national security. The same FBI that won’t lift a finger to stem massive and deadly fentanyl drug trafficking into the U.S. through a porous southern border, targets parents and other peaceful Americans that exercise their First Amendment rights to criticize the government and their natural rights to protect their children from harm. 
  
Amid the leftist backlash from the Supreme Court leak of the Dobbs decision, the FBI apparently missed the radical abortion extremists busy firebombing and attacking numerous pregnancy centers, churches, and pro-life organization’s offices. They have allowed the doxxing of the Supreme Court justices without providing protection, including an alleged <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/08/us/brett-kavanaugh-threat-arrest.html">assassination attempt</a> of Justice Kavanaugh as well as a group of radical abortion extremists that sought to intimidate him and his family <a href="https://news.yahoo.com/brett-kavanaugh-leaves-dc-restaurant-150359803.html">as they ate at a D.C. restaurant</a>. They still haven’t managed to find the leaker within a very small group of suspects working at the Supreme Court. The same FBI that can track a trespassing grandmother through her cell phone location and her Facebook posts, also can’t seem to find the person caught on video placing pipe bombs at the RNC and the DNC last January. 
  
The United States is a large and prosperous nation with federal laws and federal problems. It needs a federal law agency to enforce at least some of those laws, but the FBI’s top brass have completely abdicated their agency’s role as a reliable and impartial American federal investigation and enforcement arm. These leaders, through successive Democrat and Republican administrations, have allowed themselves to become partisan tools of the Democratic Party in their attempts to suppress opposition and consolidate power. We’ve reached the point where the FBI itself needs to be investigated for its one-sided and often unconstitutional investigative practices; it may be broken beyond repair based on the persistent pattern of hyper-partisanship and rogue behavior we have seen from the one-hallowed agency. Congressional Republicans call for hearings and “oversight.” What’s needed is radical reform, reshaping, and a re-commitment to faithfully execute the laws of the United States, while never being used as hatchet-men pursuing a political agenda.
Harmeet Dhillon is a nationally recognized lawyer, trusted boardroom advisor, and passionate advocate for individual, corporate and institutional clients across numerous industries and walks of life. Her focus is in commercial litigation, employment law, First Amendment rights, and election law matters.
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Daily Wire.

FBI Has Lost The Plot

‘Hatchet-Men Pursuing Political Agenda’: Why The FBI Is Due For Radical Reform

Burisma

Donald Trump

Hunter Biden

Project Veritas

Readers Pass

Sen. <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/marco-rubio" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Marco Rubio</a> (R-FL) accused leftists of showing a double standard with regard to threats of violence toward members of the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/fbi" target="_blank" rel="noopener">FBI</a>.
The Florida Republican condemned <a href="https://www.axios.com/2022/08/11/fbi-chief-threats-law-enforcement-trump-search" target="_blank" rel="noopener">threats of violence</a> against any members of the bureau, saying that those who threatened &#8220;violence over the Mar-A- Lago raid should be arrested.&#8221;
&#8220;But where was the outrage &amp; condemnation from the left &amp; many in the media when the threats were against Supreme Court justices over the abortion ruling?&#8221; Rubio asked.
The senator was referring to the repeated threats of violence against the Supreme Court justices, accompanied by protesting outside the justices’ homes and acts of vandalism against pro-life centers and churches.
These escalated into one man crossing the country and allegedly attempting to kill Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Anyone threatening violence over the Mar-A- Lago raid should be arrested 
But where was the outrage &amp; condemnation from the left &amp; many in the media when the threats were against Supreme Court justices over the abortion ruling?
&mdash; Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) <a href="https://twitter.com/marcorubio/status/1558183007072165889?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 12, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Twenty-six-year-old <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/armed-man-found-near-kavanaugh-home-pleads-not-guilty-to-attempted-murder/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Nicholas Roske</a><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/armed-man-found-near-kavanaugh-home-pleads-not-guilty-to-attempted-murder/">,</a> who has been charged with attempted murder, ultimately turned himself in to authorities, telling them that he was motivated to attempt to kill Kavanaugh by the leak of a draft decision overturning Roe v. Wade.
The incident dominated national news and prompted sharp calls to action from conservative lawmakers, but the close call apparently did not convince authorities to crack down on the protesting outside the justices’ homes.
On Monday, Rubio also criticized the FBI for the bureau&#8217;s handling of the attacks on churches and pro-life groups (at least <a href="https://catholicvote.org/tracker-church-attacks/">66</a> Catholic churches and <a href="https://catholicvote.org/pregnancy-center-attack-tracker/">63</a> pro-life groups and pregnancy centers, according to CatholicVote trackers).
&#8220;The FBI isn’t doing anything about the groups vandalizing Catholic Churches, firebombing Pro-Life groups or threatening Supreme Court justices,&#8221; he said in a tweet. &#8220;But they find time to raid Mar A Lago.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
The FBI isn’t doing anything about the groups vandalizing Catholic Churches, firebombing Pro-Life groups or threatening Supreme Court justices 
But they find time to raid Mar A Lago
&mdash; Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) <a href="https://twitter.com/marcorubio/status/1556800977541423105?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 9, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The FBI previously told The Daily Wire that while it would not comment on specific groups, the bureau is “investigating a series of attacks and threats targeting pregnancy resource centers and faith-based organizations across the country.”
On Wednesday, the bureau added, “The incidents are being investigated as potential acts of domestic violent extremism, FACE Act violations, or violent crime matters, depending on the facts of each case.”

Screen Shot 2022-08-12 at 4.20.00 PM

‘Where Was The Outrage’: Rubio Slams Leftists For Double Standards On Threats Of Violence To FBI Versus Supreme Court

Sen. Marco Rubio Accuses Leftists Of Double Standards On Threats Of Violence

Crime

Mar-a-Lago

Marco Rubio

The conservative Judicial Crisis Network (JCN) has released a new ad targeting Attorney General Merrick Garland as part of a massive $10 million campaign on &#8220;how Democrats are endangering the lives of Supreme Court justices.&#8221;
In an ad titled &#8220;Twelve Years,&#8221; the group highlights that Garland once worked with Justice Brett Kavanaugh. The ad, a $1 million cable and digital ad buy that is part of the group&#8217;s massive campaign, accuses the attorney general of catering to ideologues by failing to uphold federal law with regard to protesting at the justices&#8217; homes.
&#8220;Two people worked together for twelve years. Colleagues. Friends. Now one is being harassed, threatened, even an armed assassin was after him,&#8221; the ad says, referring to 26-year-old Nicholas <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/armed-man-found-near-kavanaugh-home-pleads-not-guilty-to-attempted-murder/">Roske</a>, who traveled all the way across the nation to Kavanaugh&#8217;s home before turning himself in to authorities.
Roske, who has been charged with attempted murder, allegedly told authorities that he was motivated to try kill Kavanaugh by the leak of a draft decision overturning Roe v. Wade.
The incident dominated national news and prompted sharp calls to action from conservative lawmakers, but the close call apparently did not convince authorities to crack down on the protesting outside the justices homes.
Garland, the ads says, &#8220;could stop it. But doesn’t.&#8221;
WATCH: 
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Twelve years" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/slISO8xGALs?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
&#8220;Merrick Garland is the attorney general,&#8221; the ad continued. &#8220;He should uphold the rule of law, protect his former colleagues and the court. Instead, he’s cowering to the woke mob. Merrick Garland. Bad for the court then. Bad for the court now.&#8221;
It will air both on cable and digitally in the D.C. market, according to a JCN press release.
<div>
<div>
&#8220;Merrick Garland has consistently bowed to the radical left’s agenda, whether it&#8217;s calling concerned parents &#8220;domestic terrorists&#8221; or suing states for protecting the unborn,&#8221; JCN President Carrie Severino said in a statement.
&#8220;What the Attorney General is clearly *not* doing is enforcing a federal law designed to protect judges at their homes, as mobs of protestors continue to harass six of the court&#8217;s justices at their homes, even after the attempted assassination of Brett Kavanaugh,&#8221; she added.
</div>
</div>
Polling <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/majority-of-americans-want-doj-to-crack-down-on-protesting-outside-supreme-court-justices-homes-poll-finds">released by JCN in late July</a> found that the majority of Americans (58%) believe <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/merrick-garland">Garland</a> should enforce federal law prohibiting protesting at the homes of the Supreme Court justices, while 61% of Americans believe protesting at the justices’ homes in this manner undermines American democracy.
The polling demonstrates that both President Joe Biden and Democrats are “wildly” out of touch with Americans when it comes to the protests outside the justices’ homes, according to JCN.

Screen Shot 2022-08-10 at 3.04.11 PM

Conservative Judicial Group Funnels $10M Into Campaign Accusing Dems Of Endangering Justices

Campaign Accuses Democrats, Garland Of Endangering Justices

Merrick Garland

More than 100 days have passed since a draft Supreme Court document leaked indicating that Roe v. Wade would be overturned, and authorities have still not uncovered the leaker&#8217;s identity.
That leak prompted protests across the nation, accompanied by an alleged assassination attempt on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, as well as attacks on pro-life pregnancy centers and Catholic churches.
It is widely believed that the leak was intended to intimidate justices. Chief Justice John Roberts, who directed the marshal of the court to launch an investigation into the leaker the day after the May 2 leak, <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/press/pressreleases/pr_05-03-22">stated</a> that the move was intended to “undermine the integrity of our operations.”
“It will not succeed,” he added.
Charles Stimson, senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation and deputy director of the Edwin Meese III Center, told The Daily Wire on Wednesday that most experts are operating under the assumption that the leaker has not been conclusively identified.
&#8220;One would think that the chief, who cares about the institutional integrity of the court, would, if anything surfaced of note, make that public,&#8221; he added.
The Daily Wire has repeatedly pressed the court as to what stage its investigation is at and whether the leaker has been identified. A spokeswoman for the Supreme Court has not addressed these requests for comment.
&#8220;Given that protestors have intimidated and harassed the justices at their homes for the last 100 days, with an assassination attempt against Justice Kavanaugh, ​finding the leaker should be a top priority for the Chief Justice,&#8221; Judicial Crisis Network President Carrie Severino said on Wednesday.
&#8220;The Dobbs leak has inflicted significant damage on the Court and letting it fade from memory unresolved is unacceptable,&#8221; she added.
<div id="attachment_422176" style="width: 670px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img aria-describedby="caption-attachment-422176" loading="lazy" class="wp-image-422176 " src="https://www.dailywire.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/GettyImages-1240755886-865x576.jpg" alt="" width="660" height="439" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2022/08/GettyImages-1240755886-865x576.jpg 865w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2022/08/GettyImages-1240755886-300x200.jpg 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2022/08/GettyImages-1240755886-768x511.jpg 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2022/08/GettyImages-1240755886-1536x1022.jpg 1536w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2022/08/GettyImages-1240755886-2048x1363.jpg 2048w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2022/08/GettyImages-1240755886-1800x1200.jpg 1800w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2022/08/GettyImages-1240755886-1200x800.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 660px) 100vw, 660px" />(Photo by Bonnie Cash/Getty Images)</div>
<div data-item-index="27" data-message-id="5328662c-2e2c-4c6c-bd57-350116ef9567">
<div class="module-message module-message--outgoing module-message--collapsed-below" role="row">
<div class="module-message__buttons module-message__buttons--outgoing">
<div class="module-message__buttons__menu--container">
<div class="react-contextmenu-wrapper">
The leak prompted attacks and vandalism directed toward at least <a href="https://catholicvote.org/tracker-church-attacks/">66</a> Catholic churches and <a href="https://catholicvote.org/pregnancy-center-attack-tracker/">63</a> pro-life groups and pregnancy centers, according to CatholicVote trackers.
One man, Nicholas Roske, 26, traveled all the way across the nation to Justice Brett Kavanaugh&#8217;s home, where he ultimately turned himself in and told authorities he intended to kill Kavanaugh. The man, who has been charged with attempted murder, allegedly told authorities that he was motivated by the leak.
The FBI previously told The Daily Wire that while it would not comment on specific groups, the bureau is “investigating a series of attacks and threats targeting pregnancy resource centers and faith-based organizations across the country.”  On Wednesday, the bureau added, “The incidents are being investigated as potential acts of domestic violent extremism, FACE Act violations, or violent crime matters, depending on the facts of each case.&#8221;
Stimson suggested the leaker is a former prosecutor, judge, or defense counsel, noting that whoever leaked the draft opinion &#8220;was very clandestine,&#8221; probably did not tell anyone else, and took photos of the draft on a cell phone.
&#8220;As Secretary Rumsfeld, who I used to work for in the Pentagon, said, &#8216;Washington is the only town where sound travels faster than light,'&#8221; Stimson said. &#8220;So we&#8217;ll find out about it eventually, if they put additional protocols and safeguards in place.&#8221;
&#8220;We have a situation where one of the most high profile, important decisions of the court in the last 50 years was leaked,&#8221; Stimson added, asking, &#8220;So what&#8217;s to prevent another person from doing the same thing?&#8221;
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Screen Shot 2022-08-10 at 11.05.42 AM

100 Days, Attacks, Protests, And An Alleged Assassination Attempt Later, The Supreme Court Leaker Remains Unknown

Supreme Court Leaker Remains Unknown 100 Days Later

Critics blasted <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/white-house">White House</a> Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre after she claimed that the United States <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/supreme-court">Supreme Court&#8217;s</a> decision to overturn Roe v. Wade was an &#8220;<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/constitution">unconstitutional action</a>.&#8221;
On Wednesday, Jean-Pierre reiterated President <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/joe-biden">Joe Biden&#8217;s</a> support for abortion rights access after Kansas voters rejected a referendum that would have removed the right to abortion from the state&#8217;s constitution.
“There has been an urgency from this president from day one, when the Supreme Court made this extreme decision to take away a constitutional right, it was an unconstitutional action by them,” Jean-Pierre said during a White House press briefing.
Roe created “a right that was around for almost 50 years, a right that women had to make a decision on their bodies and how they want to start their families,&#8221; she added.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Jean-Pierre says it was &quot;unconstitutional&quot; for SCOTUS to overturn Roe. <a href="https://t.co/zQyzdZxRh8">pic.twitter.com/zQyzdZxRh8</a>
&mdash; Greg Price (@greg_price11) <a href="https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1554885788772585475?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 3, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
In reaction to her comments, columnist David Marcus tweeted, &#8220;After well over a decade of wokeness in our universities we now have a generation of intelligent, well educated progressives who have never had their holy views challenged. And boy does it show.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
After well over a decade of wokeness in our universities we now have a generation of intelligent, well educated progressives who have never had their holy views challenged. And boy does it show. <a href="https://t.co/JpQXKokK5D">https://t.co/JpQXKokK5D</a>
&mdash; David Marcus (@BlueBoxDave) <a href="https://twitter.com/BlueBoxDave/status/1554940351424733188?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 3, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<div class="css-1dbjc4n">
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-1s2bzr4">
<div id="id__m9zvxecdlbq" class="css-901oao r-18jsvk2 r-1qd0xha r-1blvdjr r-16dba41 r-vrz42v r-bcqeeo r-bnwqim r-qvutc0" dir="auto" lang="en" data-testid="tweetText">
&#8220;Tell me you don&#8217;t understand what the Supreme Court does without saying you don&#8217;t understand what the Supreme Court does&#8230;&#8221; comedian Tim Young added.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Tell me you don&#8217;t understand what the Supreme Court does without saying you don&#8217;t understand what the Supreme Court does&#8230; <a href="https://t.co/JTYpgMKJ9r">https://t.co/JTYpgMKJ9r</a>
— Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) <a href="https://twitter.com/TimRunsHisMouth/status/1554918523687821312?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 3, 2022</a></blockquote>
&#8220;Is there no one in this entire administration who knows how government works?&#8221; columnist Derek Hunter.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Is there no one in this entire administration who knows how government works? <a href="https://t.co/kKoc5cpmwF">https://t.co/kKoc5cpmwF</a>
— Derek Hunter (@derekahunter) <a href="https://twitter.com/derekahunter/status/1554922907947630592?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 3, 2022</a></blockquote>
Biden signed an executive order Wednesday calling on Health and Human Services Secretary <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/xavier-becerra">Xavier Becerra</a> to aid women crossing state lines to obtain <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/abortion">abortions</a>.
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div dir="auto" lang="en" data-testid="tweetText">
“[Republicans] don’t have a clue about the power of American women,” the president said on Wednesday before he signed the order. “Last night in Kansas they found out.”
Biden’s order, a response to leftist panic following the overturn of Roe v. Wade, includes a provision that asks Becerra to invite states that are treating patients who have crossed state lines for abortions to apply for Medicaid waivers.
“In furtherance of the policy set forth in section 1 of this order, the Secretary of HHS shall consider actions to advance access to reproductive healthcare services, including, to the extent permitted by Federal law, through Medicaid for patients traveling across State lines for medical care,” the order said.
Medicaid is taxpayer-funded, and the Hyde Amendment prohibits the use of taxpayer funds for abortions. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Daily Wire on this point.
Mary Margaret Olohan contributed to this report.
Related: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/how-science-has-won-the-abortion-debate-and-why-democrats-choose-to-ignore-it">How Science Has Won The Abortion Debate (And Why Democrats Choose To Ignore It)</a>
</div>

Karine Jean-Pierre

Karine Jean-Pierre Says It Was ‘Unconstitutional’ For Supreme Court To Overturn Roe

Karine Jean-Pierre Says It Was 'Unconstitutional' For Supreme Court To Overturn Roe

Menu