The latest ad for Los Angeles mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt is a send-up of the theme song from the 90s sitcom, &#8220;The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air.&#8221;
The hit show, which first aired in 1990, followed Will Smith&#8217;s character as he moved from the dangerous streets of West Philadelphia to live with his well-off aunt and uncle in their Bel-Air mansion. The new ad followed Pratt on a slightly more political journey.
Pratt&#8217;s long-shot campaign to unseat Democratic Mayor Karen Bass has seen a dramatic groundswell of support, thanks in part to a number of AI-generated viral ads and a televised debate, and the former reality star posted his latest effort with the caption, &#8220;Now this is a story all about how my life got flipped, turned upside down &#8230;&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Now this is a story all about how my life got flipped, turned upside down <a href="https://t.co/Zes4VRdZxX">pic.twitter.com/Zes4VRdZxX</a>
— Spencer Pratt (@spencerpratt) <a href="https://twitter.com/spencerpratt/status/2056406022680715435?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 18, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;&#8230;And I had to take a minute to run for mayor, I&#8217;ll tell you how I became the prince of a town called Bel-Air,&#8221; Pratt said, stepping out of the Airstream trailer that has replaced his Palisades home that burned to the ground in early 2025.
&#8220;In West Los Angeles, Palisades, in my backyard is where I spent most of my days,&#8221; Pratt sang. The graffiti on the fence behind him screamed &#8220;THEY LET US BURN!&#8221; in reference to the deadly Palisades fire. &#8220;Feeding hummingbirds, relaxing all cool, avoiding all the bums outside of the school, when a couple politicians that were up to no good, started making trouble in my neighborhood.&#8221;
&#8220;I got in one little fire, my mom got scared, and said, &#8216;You&#8217;re moving in with Harvey Levin in Bel-Air,'&#8221; Pratt continued, name-checking the founder of entertainment site TMZ.
&#8220;I pulled out from my lot about seven or eight, and I yelled to the rubble, &#8216;Yo home, smell ya later,'&#8221; he added. &#8220;I moved to my kingdom, I was finally there, to sit on my throne as a prince of Bel-Air.&#8221;
The scene finished with Pratt, sitting on the bumper of his trailer as it was parked outside in front of the Hotel Bel-Air, in another dig at TMZ over a recent hit piece about the former star of MTV&#8217;s &#8220;The Hills.&#8221; The piece had criticized Pratt, who has been vocal about the issues he and others have had getting approvals and permits to rebuild in the Palisades, for living in a hotel instead of the trailer he said he was living in.
Pratt pointed out the recent threats against him had made living in the trailer — along with his wife and two young boys — an unacceptable risk. He also reminded everyone that the fire that destroyed his home, in addition to prompting his run for office, was the only reason he wasn&#8217;t still living there.

Screenshot/Spencer Pratt

Spencer Pratt Ad Channels 90s Sitcom Royalty

New Spencer Pratt Ad Riffs On 'Fresh Prince' Theme Song

California

Los Angeles

political ad

Politics

Television

Will Smith

Comedian and HBO host Bill Maher ripped into Democrats he said were too chicken to appear on his program, telling guest will.i.am that many in the party avoid any show unless they know beforehand they&#8217;ll be met with admiration rather than scrutiny.
The Black-Eyed Peas frontman asked Maher who, of all the people he hadn&#8217;t been able to sit down with, he&#8217;d most like to interview — and Maher explained that he&#8217;d found it far more difficult to book Democrats for his show lately.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
💥NEW: <a href="https://t.co/vbvHjsGjXV">https://t.co/vbvHjsGjXV</a>: “Who haven’t you interviewed that you want to interview?”
Bill Maher: “Ironically, mostly Democrats — because they’re such p*ssies they won’t come on the show … Democrats are p*ssies about going anywhere that they’re not already pre-adored.” <a href="https://t.co/IDcyRN3obT">pic.twitter.com/IDcyRN3obT</a>
— Jason Cohen 🇺🇸 (@JasonJournoDC) <a href="https://twitter.com/JasonJournoDC/status/2056323059775045648?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 18, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Maher began with a story about a guest from earlier that evening — a Republican congresswoman — and said that if he&#8217;d only read what was said about her in the media, he would have believed that she was stupid or &#8220;a hot head.&#8221;
&#8220;She&#8217;s not any of those things,&#8221; he said. &#8220;We don&#8217;t agree on many issues, but you know what? I always say it, everybody&#8217;s a monster till you talk to them.&#8221;
The rapper interjected then, asking, &#8220;Who haven&#8217;t you interviewed that you want to interview?&#8221;
&#8220;Mostly — ironically, mostly Democrats — because they’re such p*ssies they won’t come on the show. Like the Clintons. After — I mean, you know — Kamala. I voted for you,&#8221; Maher replied.
&#8220;Really? You haven&#8217;t interviewed them yet?&#8221; will.i.am said, clearly taken aback by the revelation.
&#8220;I would love to,&#8221; Maher said. &#8220;They — you know — Democrats are p*ssies about like going anywhere that they’re not already pre-adored. Not all of them, but some of them — Kamala Harris, I mean, I always say to my woke friends, &#8216;We voted for the same person, you&#8217;re just why she lost, okay? You&#8217;re a little too precious.'&#8221;

Bill Maher

‘They’re Such P*ssies’: Bill Maher Says He Can’t Find Democrats To Come On His Show Anymore

'They're Such P*ssies': Bill Maher Says He Can't Find Democrats To Come On His Show Anymore

comedian

Democrats

Regular CNN commentator Scott Jennings exposed what he believed was the accused assassin&#8217;s flaw in targeting Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk.
In a speech that was originally given in February and <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KCxZqSUJfs&amp;t=1s">posted publicly</a> by Hillsdale College on Friday, Jennings told a crowd at Hillsdale College&#8217;s National Leadership Seminar in Amelia Island, Florida, that he thought the gunman&#8217;s ultimate goal was not just to kill Kirk himself, but to put an end to the movement he&#8217;d started — and that he&#8217;d failed because the ideas Kirk stood for could never be killed.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
💥Scott Jennings👏
“I think when the shooter pulled the trigger in Utah, he thought he was ending a movement. He thought if he could kill someone like Charlie Kirk, he could kill what Charlie stood for.”
“That the rest of us would get the message, that we would heed the… <a href="https://t.co/FfDgeh6wTs">pic.twitter.com/FfDgeh6wTs</a>
— Jason Cohen 🇺🇸 (@JasonJournoDC) <a href="https://twitter.com/JasonJournoDC/status/2056120753339138321?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 17, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Jennings began by pointing to some of the things being taught on college campuses across the United States — namely that the nation was built on racism, the traditional family unit was a tool of oppression, and capitalism was rooted in evil — and commended Kirk for seeing that and trying to make a difference.
&#8220;I think when the shooter pulled the trigger in Utah, he thought he was ending a movement. He thought if he could kill someone like Charlie Kirk, he could kill what Charlie stood for,&#8221; Jennings continued. &#8220;That the rest of us would get the message, that we would heed the warning: &#8216;Silence yourselves or we will do it for you.&#8217; That’s what they thought.&#8221;
&#8220;But in trying to silence one voice, I believe they’ve created thousands. And in trying to end one conversation, they have started millions,&#8221; he added, and applause began to break out around the room. &#8220;Ultimately, what Charlie stood for was faith and freedom. And here’s the thing about those two items: You can’t kill them. You can try to suppress it, and throughout our history people have tried to silence it, but they always find a way, like water finding cracks in a dam.&#8221;

Political Activist Charlie Kirk Shot Dead At Utah Valley University

Scott Jennings Exposes How Charlie Kirk Assassin Failed In His Ultimate Mission

Scott Jennings Exposes The Flaw In Charlie Kirk Assassination

assassination

Charlie Kirk

Donald Trump

Media

Scott Jennings

In an effort to smear Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, The New York Times relied on input from a supposedly impartial authority on ethics in government. Supposedly.
The article targeted Duffy&#8217;s recent Department of Transportation project, a YouTube series titled &#8220;The Great American Road Trip.&#8221; Kathleen Clark, an attorney and law professor at Washington University in St. Louis, was described by the NYT simply as someone &#8220;who specializes in government ethics.&#8221;
Weighing in on the fact that Duffy&#8217;s family members were brought along for the ride and featured in the YouTube series, Clark argued that because those family members were not officially contracted to the DOT and were taking part in the project anyway, they were essentially receiving &#8220;gifts&#8221; from the series sponsors.
&#8220;Gifts to the secretary’s family are absolutely not gifts to the department,&#8221; she said. &#8220;This is really gift laundering &#8230; This is an incredibly corrupt endeavor, and it’s dangerous, because it affects public safety.&#8221;
But the NYT left out a few key details when describing Clark&#8217;s credentials.
Clark, in her capacity as an attorney, served as counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee from 1991-1993 — during then-Sen. Joe Biden&#8217;s (D-DE) tenure as committee chair (1987-1995).
The Washington University Professor has also served on the board of directors (as Secretary) of American Oversight, Inc. — a nonprofit organization that also claims to be nonpartisan but has a clear bias against President Donald Trump — since its formation in 2017.
The group&#8217;s listed &#8220;priorities,&#8221; according to <a href="https://americanoversight.org">its own website</a>, are described as follows: &#8220;We were founded in 2017 in response to the unprecedented challenges that the Trump administration posed to our nation’s democratic ideals and institutions.&#8221;
Headlines posted on the American Oversight Inc.&#8217;s website in the last several weeks read like a typical left-leaning advocacy group:
<ul>
<li>ICE&#8217;s work with local police departments is being kept secret</li>
<li>American Oversight launches investigation into Trump admin&#8217;s politicized prosecution of the Southern Poverty Law Center</li>
<li>Statement from American Oversight and historians on today&#8217;s hearing to block Trump&#8217;s efforts to evade presidential records law</li>
</ul>
Clark&#8217;s page on Washington University&#8217;s website adds another layer to the story: while her history up to 2017 includes several ethics-based academic publications, she has none listed since that year. In addition, she has no media listings prior to 2025. But beginning in February of 2025, she has been sought out several times to provide comments to various outlets. Every one came after President Trump was sworn in to begin his second term. Every one is an attack either on someone serving in Trump&#8217;s administration or on the president himself.
<ol>
<li><a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-02-04/kash-patel-s-800-000-trump-media-award-raises-conflict-questions-for-fbi-pick?accessToken=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzb3VyY2UiOiJTdWJzY3JpYmVyR2lmdGVkQXJ0aWNsZSIsImlhdCI6MTczODY5MDQ1NywiZXhwIjoxNzM5Mjk1Mj" target="_blank" rel="noopener" aria-label="Kash Patel’s $800000 Trump Media Award Raises New Conflict Questions (opens in new tab)">Kash Patel’s $800000 Trump Media Award Raises New Conflict Questions</a></li>
<li><a href="https://contrarian.substack.com/p/musks-inexcusable-conflicts" target="_blank" rel="noopener" aria-label="Musk’s Inexcusable Conflicts (opens in new tab)">Musk’s Inexcusable Conflicts</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/02/13/nx-s1-5293124/special-government-employee-trump-musk-doge" target="_blank" rel="noopener" aria-label="Trump Hired Musk as a ‘Special Government Employee.’ Here’s What That Means (opens in new tab)">Trump Hired Musk as a ‘Special Government Employee.’ Here’s What That Means</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/02/14/elon-musk-public-financial-disclosure-form/78533975007/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" aria-label="Elon Musk Has to Fill Out a Public Financial Disclosure Legal Experts Say. Where Is It? (opens in new tab)">Elon Musk Has to Fill Out a Public Financial Disclosure Legal Experts Say. Where Is It?</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/24/health/dr-oz-medicare-finances-conflicts.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&amp;referringSource=articleShare" target="_blank" rel="noopener" aria-label="Dr. Oz: How His Millions Collide With Medicare (opens in new tab)">Dr. Oz: How His Millions Collide With Medicare</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.wsj.com/sports/golf/augusta-national-masters-emails-tickets-643b189b?st=JLy9Qe&amp;reflink=mobilewebshare_permalink" target="_blank" rel="noopener" aria-label="A Masters Tradition Unlike Any Other: Gifting Tickets to Government Officials (opens in new tab)">A Masters Tradition Unlike Any Other: Gifting Tickets to Government Officials</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/qatar-gifting-trump-400m-luxury-jet-raises-ethical-and-legal-concerns" target="_blank" rel="noopener" aria-label="Qatar gifting Trump $400M luxury jet raises ethical and legal concerns (opens in new tab)">Qatar gifting Trump $400M luxury jet raises ethical and legal concerns</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/04/21/trump-ballroom-donor-deal/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" aria-label="Trump fought to keep the ballroom fundraising contract secret. Here’s what’s in it. (opens in new tab)">Trump fought to keep the ballroom fundraising contract secret. Here’s what’s in it.</a></li>
</ol>
And Duffy brings her count up to nine.
And while one might be able to excuse away some of that by pointing out the fact that even some Republicans raised ethical questions about some of those same topics, Clark&#8217;s social media footprint is &#8230; just the Left foot.
Her X handle, which hasn&#8217;t posted since 2024, directs would-be followers to lefty-haven BlueSky — but her old posts include a slew of criticisms aimed at Trump ally Elon Musk. One <a href="https://x.com/clarkkathleen/status/1829953371601846524">thread</a> from August 2024 bashes Vice President JD Vance over a 2021 interview. She reposted several comments comparing Trump to former President Richard Nixon and trashing the Supreme Court over its ruling on presidential immunity. And she criticized Justice Samuel Alito for <a href="https://x.com/WashULaw/status/1796897053101916369">refusing to recuse himself</a> from January 6-related cases over his wife&#8217;s decision to hang a Revolutionary War-era flag at their home.

The New York Times Co. Post An 82 Percent Decline In 2nd Quarter Profi

New York Times ‘Impartial’ Ethics Expert Is Anything But

Ethics

New York Times

Los Angeles mayoral candidate <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/how-spencer-pratt-went-from-villain-to-hero">Spencer Pratt</a> has essentially run his entire campaign by saying the things that everyone is thinking but has been too afraid to say out loud — and his recent interviews are a fair indication that he plans to keep that up.
Pratt, during an interview on &#8220;The Joe Rogan Experience&#8221; last month, explained that some parents in Los Angeles often encourage their children not to look out the window as they drove to and from school, sports practices, or grocery stores. The reason? &#8220;Naked zombies&#8221; — drug addicts — wandering the streets and sometimes engaging in behaviors that parents would rather their children not see.
His comments on the issue have gone viral this week.
WATCH:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Spencer Pratt just said what parents have been thinking about ‘naked zombies’" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/G70I-trzlKw?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
&#8220;There&#8217;s parents that — when they drive to school — all across the city, this is not just one unique area, they have to have their kids in the back seat staring at an iPad and not to look out the window because meth addicts will just be having sex on the side of the street,&#8221; Pratt explained to host Joe Rogan.
&#8220;There&#8217;s just naked people everywhere now,&#8221; he continued. &#8220;Naked zombies. And the DEA will tell you, 90% of these homeless people have a drug problem. We have a drug addict problem. These aren&#8217;t people that just, like, missed a paycheck and we need to get them help and get back — this is a drug problem that needs mandatory treatment, not handing people needles and pipes and saying, &#8216;Oh, here&#8217;s a million-dollar bed.&#8217; If you&#8217;re a fentanyl zombie hanging upside down, you don&#8217;t care about a million-dollar empty bed because you&#8217;re just high, you sober up, and you go get high again.&#8221;
Pratt made a similar point during a televised debate with two of his opponents — incumbent Democratic Mayor Karen Bass and Democratic socialist City Councilwoman Nithya Raman — who have argued in favor of providing more beds and voluntary treatment for the homeless.
Pointing out that the vast majority of L.A.&#8217;s homeless had drug problems, Pratt <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/reality-tv-star-spencer-pratt-obliterates-leftist-policies-in-heated-l-a-mayoral-debate">challenged Raman</a> directly and said he&#8217;d even go with her to offer aid to the homeless — but warned her that they were far more likely to attack her than to accept her help.

Congressional hearing on the Palisades wildfire in Pacific Palisades

Spencer Pratt Says What Parents Have Been Thinking About ‘Naked Zombies’

Spencer Pratt Just Said What Parents Have Been Thinking About 'Naked Zombies'

Drugs

Karen Bass

Spencer Pratt

Secretary of State Marco Rubio says that his current job is different from any position he&#8217;s ever held, and he credits President Donald Trump for making that difference.
During a brief interview aboard Air Force One, en route to Beijing for <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/trump-set-to-land-in-china-for-high-stakes-talks-with-xi">President Trump&#8217;s summit</a> with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, Rubio explained that Trump was different because he was willing to actually do the things that most politicians only paid lip service to.
WATCH:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Why Rubio says working for Trump is unlike any job he’s ever had" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3TfXfDvIGM0?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Fox News host Sean Hannity, aboard the presidential plane, spoke with Rubio on a number of issues — but zeroed in on his jacket as they began to wrap things up: &#8220;I think just to be Secretary of State, that’s a pretty cool jacket they gave you.&#8221;
&#8220;Yeah, it was a gift that somebody gave me, and it’s good to wear it on the plane,&#8221; Rubio agreed.
&#8220;Are you in – look, you were a senator for all these years. I’ve known you for so many years. We’ve had a friendship for so many years,&#8221; Hannity said, asking, &#8220;How do you compare this job to everything else you’ve done? &#8221;
&#8220;Well, it’s quite different, right?  The work of a legislator involves constituent service, and it involves writing of legislation, committee meetings, oversight.  And I enjoyed doing all of that, and it was an important era in our life,&#8221; Rubio said of his previous experience in the Senate before pivoting to address his current role.
&#8220;This was a very different opportunity. This is in the Executive Branch. Here you’re actually executing on laws, and you’re – basically, you’re executing the President’s foreign policy. So I enjoy the role, I enjoy the job, and I enjoy working for this President because he’s willing to do what others talk about but don’t do,&#8221; Rubio added. &#8220;When you say, &#8216;Well, we can’t do that,&#8217; and you’ll say, &#8216;Why?&#8217; That’s his question. Why? Why can’t we do that? Why hasn’t this been done before? He is willing to do what others are not willing to do.  He is willing to solve unfinished business and not leave it for the next guy or gal. And I admire that, and it’s a lot of fun to be a part of it.&#8221;
Hannity also joked about the fact that Rubio has worn a number of hats within President Trump&#8217;s second administration — prompting a flood of memes and jokes as well as the open question whether he will be the one to at least temporarily fill any job that opens up in the future.
The former Florida senator has leaned in to the joke himself, popping into the briefing room to pose as acting White House Press Secretary the day after <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/marco-rubio-adds-another-job-title-to-his-resume">Karoline Leavitt</a> signed out to begin her maternity leave.

US-POLITICS-TRUMP

Rubio Reveals Why His Role Under Trump Is Unlike Any Job He’s Ever Had

Why Rubio Says Working For Trump Is Unlike Any Job He's Ever Had

Global Politics

Marco Rubio

Sen. Rand Paul&#8217;s (R-KY) son, William Paul, said Wednesday he is seeking treatment after unleashing a drunken antisemitic tirade at Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY), who is not Jewish.
&#8220;Last night, I had too much to drink and said some things that don’t represent who I really am. I’m sorry and today I am seeking help for my drinking problem,&#8221; William Paul <a href="https://x.com/TastyBrew1776/status/2054658199840559352?s=20">posted on X</a>.
The scene unfolded on Tuesday evening at a Washington, D.C. bar, where Lawler was speaking with News Of The U.S. (<a href="https://www.notus.org/congress/william-paul-mike-lawler-confrontation-antisemitism">NOTUS</a>) reporter Reese Gorman.
The younger Paul interrupted to inform Lawler that if Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) loses his upcoming primary, it will be because of &#8220;your people.&#8221;
&#8220;My people?&#8221; Lawler asked.
&#8220;Yeah, you Jews,&#8221; was Paul&#8217;s response.
Lawler was taken aback: &#8220;Do you think I&#8217;m Jewish? I&#8217;m not.&#8221;
Paul apologized for the assumption, but continued making antisemitic remarks, claiming Jewish people were &#8220;anti-American&#8221; and accusing Lawler&#8217;s supposed Jewish supporters of prioritizing Israel over the United States.
The New York congressman recounted the conversation for <a href="https://nypost.com/2026/05/13/us-news/sen-rand-pauls-son-erupts-in-drunken-tirade-against-gays-and-the-jews/">The New York Post</a>, explaining that Paul had already appeared to be pretty &#8220;drunk&#8221; and was behaving in a &#8220;belligerent&#8221; manner when he first approached — and had immediately launched his tirade.
&#8220;So Rand Paul’s f*cking son is sitting next to us at the bar … And he just like chimes in on our conversation, f*cking drunk and belligerent, and then starts going off about, you know, if [Rep. Thomas] Massie [R-KY] loses [his primary], it’s because of my people,&#8221; Lawler said, adding, &#8220;I’m like, ‘What people?’ He goes, ‘Jews,’ and I’m like, ‘Do you think I’m Jewish? … I’m Irish-Italian Catholic, buddy.'&#8221;
Lawler said that Paul claimed the United States was trying to steal land from Iran in order to give it to Jewish people, at which point he said he asked the younger Paul what he was talking about.
&#8220;This war, it’s all about the gays and the Jews, and I hate them both, and I don’t care if they die,&#8221; Paul reportedly told Lawler before advising him to watch more Tucker Carlson.
Lawler said he attempted to end the conversation, saying, &#8220;Well, you just seem to hate Jews, so there’s no point arguing anymore.&#8221;
Paul then accused Lawler of putting words in his mouth and gave him the middle finger before admitting that he was &#8220;really drunk&#8221; and making a quick exit.
Paul has had previous legal troubles stemming from a 2013 assault charge that was dropped and a <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2015/04/22/politics/rand-paul-son-dui">2015 DUI</a>, to which he pleaded guilty.
When asked about the situation, Sen. Paul told NBC News reporter Frank Thorp, &#8220;I don&#8217;t have anything for you on it.&#8221;

US-POLITICS-CONGRESS

Rand Paul’s Son Rants Against ‘Gays’ And ‘Jews’ During Alcohol-Fueled Tirade

antisemitism

Congress

Rand Paul

Thomas Massie

Senator Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) joined the rest of the Democrats in skipping a Wednesday on the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic — but he also took it a step further, walking by while the hearing was going on and appearing to mock it.
Not one of the Democrats on the Senate Homeland Security &amp; Governmental Affairs Committee — to include Gallego — attended the hearing, where CIA whistleblower James Erdman III testified that Dr. Anthony Fauci had intentionally worked to cover up information regarding the pandemic&#8217;s origins.
But while most Democrats on the committee stayed away from the hearing entirely, Fox News Congressional Correspondent Bill Melugin reported that Gallego — accompanied by at least one staffer — walked by while the hearing was still ongoing.
&#8220;Senator Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), who is on this committee, just walked by the hearing room and saw all the media cameras and said something along the lines of, &#8216;Wow, what’s going on here?&#8217; A staffer walking with him replied &#8216;I don’t know.&#8217; Unclear if they were trolling or not,&#8221; Melugin said in an <a href="https://x.com/BillMelugin_/status/2054574539611205713">X post</a>.
He later relayed the story to Fox News host Harris Faulkner, saying, &#8220;Senator Ruben Gallego, Democrat from Arizona, actually walked by us about 15 minutes ago. He saw the media cameras here, and we couldn’t tell if he was joking or trolling or not, but he said, &#8216;Hey, what’s going on here?&#8217; And his staffer said, &#8216;I don’t know,&#8217; and they walked past us. He is on that committee. He’s not in the room.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Fox’s Bill Melugin just exposed the stunning no-show by Senate Democrats at the CIA whistleblower hearing on Covid.
Not a SINGLE Democrat was in the room — even though several sit on the Homeland Security Committee.
MELUGIN: “There are no Senate Democrats inside of that hearing… <a href="https://t.co/dERE0QpHWY">pic.twitter.com/dERE0QpHWY</a>
— Overton (@overton_news) <a href="https://twitter.com/overton_news/status/2054587401851343065?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 13, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Gallego has been under increased scrutiny of late because of his close ties to disgraced former Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) — who resigned after several accusations of sexual misconduct, harassment, and even rape — and has claimed that the former California congressman had succeeded in hiding his &#8220;double life&#8221; even when the two were roommates.
At the hearing Gallego and the other Democrats missed, Erdman laid out the complex web of experts — most of whom were previously linked to Fauci — who had worked to control what information was eventually revealed to the American people.
Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) called out the federal agencies that had a part in handling the information, saying they had essentially given &#8220;the big middle finger&#8221; to the American people by not being more transparent at the time.
<iframe loading="lazy" title="COVID whistleblower blows lid off Fauci coverup, ‘middle finger’ to Americans" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/9gbBySuT4xs?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Ruben Gallego

Swalwell’s Best Buddy Didn’t Just Skip The COVID Hearing, He’s Accused Of Mocking It

Swalwell's Best Buddy Didn't Just Skip The COVID Hearing, He Mocked It

Anthony Fauci

COVID-19

Eric Swalwell

Virginia Democrats are gaslighting the American public after losing big on their redistricting gamble by attempting to sell a big lie to save face.
Prominent Democrats like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) are publicly complaining that because the Virginia Supreme Court issued its ruling — invalidating the newly-gerrymandered congressional map — after the referendum was over, the court should be under scrutiny for overturning the will of the people. What they are not saying is that Virginia Democrats demanded — in litigation filed with the court — that no ruling be issued until after the referendum was over.
&#8220;What is extremely disturbing about what has happened in Virginia is this court overturned the will of three million Virginians,&#8221; Ocasio-Cortez told reporters. While 3 million Virginians did vote on the referendum, only a little over half (1.6 million) voted in favor of the measure.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
AOC: What is extremely disturbing about what has happened in Virginia is this court overturned the will of three million Virginians. They can say what they want about the ballot initiative, but they explicitly chose to issue this ruling after the election happened. They had all… <a href="https://t.co/NC7kUsMikB">pic.twitter.com/NC7kUsMikB</a>
— Acyn (@Acyn) <a href="https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/2054357562620010862?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 13, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;They can say what they want about the ballot initiative, but they explicitly chose to issue this ruling after the election happened. They had all the time in the world to issue an opinion or an injunction before allowing this election to happen,&#8221; she continued. &#8220;They did not overturn a map — they overturned an election &#8230; It is the power of the American people that should be the ultimate check on all three branches.&#8221;
<a href="https://x.com/AdamParkhomenko/status/2052823708662649095">Adam Parkhomenko</a>, who served as an adviser to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, amplified a Bluesky account making the same argument. That argument was that the court, in waiting until after the election, was making its ruling — and thus invalidating the new map — after gaining only one new piece of information: how the people would vote on the issue.
&#8220;The best argument re: Virginia decision I’ve heard is this,&#8221; he said.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) issued a statement immediately after the ruling, trashing the Virginia Supreme Court for overturning the will of the people.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
The decision by the Virginia Supreme Court to overturn the will of more than three million voters will not stand. <a href="https://t.co/ZtayVJRw4T">pic.twitter.com/ZtayVJRw4T</a>
— Hakeem Jeffries (@RepJeffries) <a href="https://twitter.com/RepJeffries/status/2052776800984416429?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 8, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
But as Justice D. Arthur Kelsey wrote in his May 8 opinion, the delay had been the Democrats&#8217; idea. In fact, they had presented several legal arguments in favor of it, citing precedent and saying that the court could not lawfully rule on the validity of the measure until it was adopted.
&#8220;It is fair to ask whether we could have or should have reviewed the constitutionality of the proposed amendment prior to it being presented to the voters,&#8221; Kelsey wrote. &#8220;Throughout this litigation, the Commonwealth has insisted that we cannot lawfully decide this case prior to the referendum. In its motion for a stay in this case, the Commonwealth argued that longstanding Virginia precedent, Scott v. James, was &#8216;virtually indistinguishable&#8217; from this case and that it clearly held that &#8216;courts cannot interfere to stop any of the proceedings while this permanent law is in the process of being made,&#8217; and &#8216;[o]nly ‘upon the completion of the proceedings, [if] the validity of the amendment is assailed[] on the ground that the several provisions of the Constitution have not been complied with, then the courts can pass upon the validity of the amendment.'&#8221;
Kelsey also made it clear that the court was well aware that Democrats would attempt to turn the argument back on itself if they did not get their way, adding, &#8220;Having successfully insisted (over the objection of the Claimants)13 that we postpone judicial review of the constitutional amendment until after the election process, it might be tempting for the Commonwealth to think that the final vote implicitly stacks the deck in its favor — perhaps enough so that the exercise of any judicial review could be viewed as an ultra vires effort to overturn the will of the people.&#8221;
He concluded that Democrats were essentially attempting to set up a situation in which precedent prohibited the court from ruling before the referendum passed and &#8220;the will of the people&#8221; barred the court from ruling afterward — thus nullifying the court&#8217;s ability to act at all.
And Democrats like Ocasio-Cortez are quickly proving him right.

US-ENVIRONMENT-CLIMATE-DIPLOMACY

Democrats Try To Gaslight America After Redistricting Faceplant

Democrats Attempt To Sell Big Lie In Virginia

Courts

Redistricting

Virginia

Virginia Democrats

Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) accused federal agencies of giving Americans &#8220;the big middle finger&#8221; in refusing to come forward with information concerning the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Johnson and other Republicans questioned a CIA whistleblower during a Wednesday hearing, who claimed in his opening statement that Dr. Anthony Fauci&#8217;s role in the COVID cover-up &#8220;was intentional.&#8221; Not a single Democrat attended the hearing.
James Erdman III appeared before the Senate Homeland Security &amp; Governmental Affairs Committee on Wednesday morning to testify on what the federal government did to hide information from the public on the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.
WATCH: 
<iframe loading="lazy" title="COVID whistleblower blows lid off Fauci coverup, ‘middle finger’ to Americans" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/9gbBySuT4xs?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
&#8220;Public health policy would be very different had the American public been made aware that a virus from a lab in China was going to serve as the foundation for an emergency-use authorization mRNA products being mandated by the former administration,&#8221; Erdman began, adding, &#8220;Dr. Fauci&#8217;s role in the cover-up was intentional.&#8221;
No Democrats showed up for the hearing on the CIA whistleblower&#8217;s revelations.
Erdman went on to describe how Fauci — who served as former President Joe Biden&#8217;s top COVID adviser — had been a part of the process at every level.
&#8220;Dr. Fauci influenced the analytical process and findings by leveraging his position to ensure that the IC (Intelligence Community) consulted with a conflicted list of curated subject-matter experts, public health officials, and scientists,&#8221; Erdman explained, arguing that Fauci&#8217;s influence controlled which sources of information were accepted as reliable — and by extension, controlled what information the public would ultimately see.
&#8220;This included some of the authors of the paper &#8216;The Proximal Origin of SARS-COV2&#8217; and other public health experts who have been in his orbit for the last 20-plus years,&#8221; he said.
Erdman went on to argue that Fauci operated almost entirely without &#8220;oversight&#8221; that might have held him accountable.
&#8220;There was no oversight monitoring how this web of relationships influenced research, policy, and public health any holistic way,&#8221; he said, adding that some of those involved had worked with Fauci years earlier to rewrite the accepted definition of &#8220;gain-of-function&#8221; research in order to open doors — and gain access to funding — to more dangerous research.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
BOMBSHELL: Here is the entire opening statement from CIA whistleblower James Erdman lll. He testifies that Dr. Fauci&#8217;s role in the COVID cover-up was INTENTIONAL.
He stacked the intelligence community&#8217;s analysis with conflicted scientists funded by NIAID who pushed the natural… <a href="https://t.co/S1ZP9FlZGl">pic.twitter.com/S1ZP9FlZGl</a>
— Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) <a href="https://twitter.com/AndrewKolvet/status/2054572379200725050?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 13, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Not A Single Democrat Showed Up At COVID Hearing

COVID-19 Vaccine

Lockdowns

Pandemic

Virginia Democrats are desperate to grab onto anything that could potentially resurrect their gerrymandered 10-1 congressional map before the 2026 midterm elections — and the panic is really starting to show.
In the days since the Virginia Supreme Court struck down the map — over irregularities in the process by which it was adopted — Democrats have explored several avenues by which they might make their fever dream a reality.
An attempt to appeal to the United States Supreme Court, for example, was so rushed that the first page of the filing listed the wrong court.
&#8220;Good News: Dems managed to spell Virginia correctly. Bad News: They sent their emergency application to SCOTUS to the wrong court. Baby steps,&#8221; former Attorney General Jason Miyares (R-VA) posted via X, sharing a screenshot of the page.
Although the &#8220;Supreme Court of the United States&#8221; was named at the top of the page, across the bottom of the frame, it read, &#8220;ON EMERGENCY APPLICATION TO THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Good News: Dems managed to spell Virginia correctly. Bad News: They sent their emergency application to SCOTUS to the wrong court. Baby steps. <a href="https://t.co/Izi5FeKgbo">pic.twitter.com/Izi5FeKgbo</a>
— Jason Miyares (@JasonMiyaresVA) <a href="https://twitter.com/JasonMiyaresVA/status/2054155473763393573?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 12, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Others pointed out that the word &#8220;senator&#8221; was misspelled as &#8220;sentator&#8221; and even the name of the state was misspelled as &#8220;Virgnia&#8221; in the rushed filing.
The case was ultimately filed with the U.S. Supreme Court, and Chief Justice John Roberts has instructed Republicans to file a response to the Democrats by Thursday at 5 p.m. ET.
In addition to their appeal to the highest Court, Democrats in Virginia have also considered an even more dramatic move to force their map on the people: a complete dismantling of the state Supreme Court.
As The Daily Wire <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/democrats-float-dramatic-shakeup-that-could-force-out-virginias-entire-supreme-court">previously reported</a>, Virginia Democrats have considered lowering the mandatory retirement age for judges on the state&#8217;s highest court just enough to force the entire bench to retire. Then, with a Democratic governor and a Democratic super-majority in the legislature, they could ensure an entirely new bench that would be far more likely to rule in their favor.

Jay Jones

Dems Desperate To Force New Map On Voters Mark Case For Wrong Court

President Donald Trump was ready to rumble when he crossed paths with reporters on Tuesday afternoon, calling out several directly over what he considered to be stupid questions.
In one instance, Trump responded to a question about the latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) report — which showed an <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/inflation-rises-to-highest-level-in-three-years">uptick</a> in inflation largely driven by higher energy costs — and pushed back immediately on the suggestion that his policies might be causing it.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
WATCH LIVE: President Trump departs White House for China <a href="https://t.co/d1lwykVv7w">https://t.co/d1lwykVv7w</a>
— Fox News (@FoxNews) <a href="https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/2054257953423638838?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 12, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;You promised to bring inflation down. It&#8217;s now at its highest level in three years. Are your policies not working? What&#8217;s happening?&#8221; the reporter asked (3:45 mark).
&#8220;If you go back to just before the war, for the last three months, inflation was at 1.7%,&#8221; Trump pushed back, arguing that his policies had been working well before the launch of Operation Epic Fury — and that the cost of the war was what was reflected in the latest reports. That cost, he insisted, was worth it.
&#8220;Now, we had a choice. Let these lunatics have a nuclear weapon. If you want to do that, then you&#8217;re a stupid person, and you happen to be, I mean, I know you very well,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Anybody that wants them to have a nuclear weapon is a stupid person.&#8221;
Trump went on to say that he expects to see oil prices drop — and inflation along with it — when the war with Iran is over.
Another reporter <a href="https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/2054262466582851800">challenged the president</a> about the projected cost of the White House ballroom currently under construction, asking how he accounted for the fact that the cost had increased dramatically.
&#8220;We have a ballroom that&#8217;s under budget, it&#8217;s going up right here,&#8221; Trump said, pointing across the White House lawn. &#8220;I&#8217;ve doubled the size of it because we need that, and we&#8217;re right now on budget, under budget, and ahead of schedule.&#8221;
&#8220;The price has doubled!&#8221; one reporter exclaimed.
&#8220;I doubled the size of it, you dumb person!&#8221; he shot back. &#8220;I doubled the size. You are NOT a smart person.&#8221;
He went on to explain that he had decided to double the size in part because of things that had happened &#8220;in the last year,&#8221; likely a vague reference to at least one of the three assassination attempts against him.
Trump was leaving the White House on Tuesday to head to China for several days of meetings with President Xi Jinping.

President Trump Departs Washington For Trip To China

Trump Rips Into Reporter Outside White House: ‘YOU DUMB PERSON’

Trump Rips Into Reporter Outside White House: 'YOU DUMB PERSON'

Menu

Virginia Kruta