The release of the long-awaited 2024 election autopsy report threw Democrats into a nosedive on Thursday, with liberals questioning the veracity of the document and calling on the DNC&#8217;s top official to resign.  
Buried inside the report were some brutal admissions about former Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic brand, and the party’s growing disconnect from average Americans. The autopsy <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/democrats-finally-admit-what-went-wrong-in-2024?author=Jacob+Wheeler&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=0&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=Dems+Sat+On+Their+2024+Autopsy+For+A+Year.+Now+We+Know+Why.">painted a picture of a party</a> unable to listen to all voters, consumed by identity politics and led by a candidate — Kamala Harris — who failed to connect with young men, Latino men, irregular voters, rural voters, and working-class Americans.
&#8220;We either adapt to the changing conditions of the arena, or history will leave us behind,” the report stated. 
Notably, the autopsy made no mention of former President Joe Biden&#8217;s advanced age or the lingering distrust voters felt following his disastrous debate performance. Plus, the document repeatedly undercuts itself in real time with editor notes and annotations like “No evidence provided,” “Analysis not supported,” and “Contradicts public reporting.”
“An autopsy is a medical procedure you do over a corpse, and now it sounds like we need a malpractice attorney because we couldn’t even do the autopsy correctly,&#8221; Congressman Jared Moskowitz (D-FL) <a href="https://x.com/RNCResearch/status/2057500316220731673?s=20">said on CNN</a>. &#8220;We lost the last election, it wasn’t close, ok? But the fact that we can’t even tell people why, we’re too afraid to tell them the truth…they saw that we got killed in the election, we lost every swing state.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
BRUTAL
Democrat Jared Moskowitz: &#8220;We lost the last election, it wasn’t close, ok? But the fact that we can’t even tell people why, we’re too afraid to tell them the truth…they saw that we got killed in the election, we lost every swing state.&#8221; <a href="https://t.co/8O7znh1vEw">pic.twitter.com/8O7znh1vEw</a>
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) <a href="https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/2057500316220731673?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 21, 2026</a></blockquote>
The document repeatedly suggests Democrats leaned way too heavily on “Trump bad” messaging while failing to give voters a compelling reason to vote for Harris. 
“The national campaign did not effectively drive Trump’s negatives, and the White House did not effectively support Vice President Harris over three and [a] half years to improve her standing before the candidate switch,” the report said. “The idea Trump’s negatives were ‘baked in’ is a major failure of analysis and reality …” 
For months, Ken Martin, the Democratic National Committee chairman, resisted releasing the nearly 200-page report but <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/dnc-chair-pressed-on-why-party-is-hiding-2024-election-autopsy?author=Jacob+Wheeler&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=68&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=DNC+Chair+Pressed+On+Why+Party+Is+Hiding+2024+Election+Autopsy">relented under immense pressure</a> — with deep reservations. 
&#8220;When I received the report late last year, it wasn&#8217;t ready for primetime — not even close — and because no source material was provided, it would have meant starting over. I could not in good faith put the DNC&#8217;s stamp of approval on the report that was produced,&#8221; Martin said. &#8220;After last November&#8217;s massive Democratic wins, I didn&#8217;t want to create a distraction, but by not putting the report out, I ended up creating an even bigger distraction.&#8221; 
Tommy Vietor, the liberal cohost of &#8220;Pod Save America,&#8221; said Martin&#8217;s handling of the ordeal &#8220;raises more questions about his judgment, candor, and ability to lead the DNC.&#8221; 
&#8220;Ken Martin should resign,&#8221; David Hogg, who unsuccessfully ran for DNC Vice Chair, said on X. 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
My initial thoughts on the DNC autopsy release <a href="https://t.co/gQNTYGAc5d">pic.twitter.com/gQNTYGAc5d</a>
— David Hogg 🟧 (@davidhogg111) <a href="https://twitter.com/davidhogg111/status/2057506370203607173?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 21, 2026</a></blockquote>
&#8220;I was a BIG advocate for the DNC releasing the 2024 autopsy. Having now read it, I can see now why there was so much resistance within some corners of the party to releasing it,&#8221; independent journalist <a href="https://x.com/ChrisCillizza/status/2057490825693516044?s=20">Chris Cillizza said on social media</a>. &#8220;It is an utter disaster. And a failure on virtually every front.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
I was a BIG advocate for the DNC releasing the 2024 autopsy.
Having now read it, I can see now why there was so much resistance within some corners of the party to releasing it.
It is an utter disaster. And a failure on virtually every front.
— Chris Cillizza (@ChrisCillizza) <a href="https://twitter.com/ChrisCillizza/status/2057490825693516044?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 21, 2026</a></blockquote>
Democratic strategist Melissa DeRosa called the report a &#8220;dumpster fire.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
Democrat strategist Melissa DeRosa slams Democrats&#8217; report into why they lost in 2024:
&#8220;It’s difficult to properly communicate just what a dumpster fire this report was from beginning to end, 2024 was so badly botched by my party&#8230;&#8221; <a href="https://t.co/UeDMqO2tZx">pic.twitter.com/UeDMqO2tZx</a>
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) <a href="https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/2057552973564129541?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 21, 2026</a></blockquote>
Republicans, on the other hand, offered a more succinct explanation for the Democrats&#8217; 2024 election wipeout.
&#8220;I could write the autopsy for you really quick: Joe Biden was the worst President America has had in decades, surpassed in incompetence only by their next nominee, Kamala Harris,&#8221; Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders said.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
I could write the autopsy for you really quick: Joe Biden was the worst President America has had in decades, surpassed in incompetence only by their next nominee, Kamala Harris. <a href="https://t.co/AqGIv0o8yV">https://t.co/AqGIv0o8yV</a>
— Sarah Huckabee Sanders (@SarahHuckabee) <a href="https://twitter.com/SarahHuckabee/status/2057536883828085064?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 21, 2026</a></blockquote>

2024 Democratic National Convention: Day 4

Dems In Meltdown Mode Over ‘Dumpster Fire’ DNC Autopsy

Kamala Harris

Ken Martin

News

Democrats finally released their long-awaited 2024 election autopsy — and it reads less like a postmortem on President Donald Trump and more like a realization that voters may simply not like them anymore.
Buried inside the 192-page report are some brutal admissions about former Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic brand, and the party’s growing disconnect from average Americans.
&#8220;The sad truth is Democrats have lost ground at every level from inconsistent messaging and improper planning, even as the policies the Party advances continue to earn voter support at the ballot box,&#8221; <a href="https://democrats.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/May-20-2026.pdf">the report said</a>.
The document repeatedly suggests Democrats leaned way too heavily on “Trump bad” messaging while failing to give voters a compelling reason to vote for Harris. One especially rough section says Harris struggled to define herself beyond “not Trump” and “prosecutor vs. felon,&#8221; putting blame on the Biden White House.
&#8220;The national campaign did not effectively drive Trump’s negatives, and the White House did not effectively support Vice President Harris over three and [a] half years to improve her standing before the candidate switch,&#8221; the report said. &#8220;The idea Trump’s negatives were &#8216;baked in&#8217; is a major failure of analysis and reality&#8230;&#8221; 
The autopsy also openly acknowledges that Harris had a significant issue with male voters.
One section, titled “The Male Voter Problem,” points out that down-ballot Democrats consistently outperformed Harris with men. North Carolina Democrat Josh Stein, for example, won 51% of male voters while Harris managed just 40%.
And it gets worse.
The autopsy admits Harris struggled badly with young men, Latino men, irregular voters, rural voters, and working-class Americans. At one point, the report flatly says Democrats suffered from a “persistent inability or unwillingness to listen to all voters.” Another section warns that millions of Americans “do not see themselves reflected in the America of the Democratic Party.”
There are also some surprisingly direct shots at identity politics.
One passage praises candidates who focused “less on abstract issues and identity politics” and more on public safety, affordability, housing, and the economy.
The report found that the Trump attack ads were highly effective, particularly the “Kamala is for they/them” spot, with Democratic pollsters noting the campaign was effectively boxed in by footage of her own remarks showing Harris out of touch with voters focused on their pocketbooks.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
Kamala is for &#8220;THEY/THEM.&#8221;
President Trump is for YOU. <a href="https://t.co/Wbb0RgrtfL">pic.twitter.com/Wbb0RgrtfL</a>
— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) <a href="https://twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1852083025498014151?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 31, 2024</a></blockquote>
The document repeatedly undercuts itself in real time with editor notes and annotations like “No evidence provided,” “Analysis not supported,” and “Contradicts public reporting.”
DNC Chair Ken Martin defended releasing the report after delaying it for months, telling CNN: “After last November’s massive Democratic wins, I didn’t want to create a distraction, but by not putting the report out, I ended up creating an even bigger distraction.”
With nationwide redistricting underway, the report fired bleak warning shots for Democrats as more Americans continue fleeing blue states and voting with their feet.
&#8220;The future could become even more difficult. Demographic and population projections indicate an accelerating population shift away from traditionally Democratic states,&#8221; the report found. 
&#8220;With radical midterm redistricting efforts underway, the writing is on the wall, and the call is coming from inside the House. We either adapt to the changing conditions of the arena, or history will leave us behind.&#8221;

VP Kamala Harris

Dems Sat On Their 2024 Autopsy For A Year. Now We Know Why.

2024 Election

Democrats

Georgia voters on Tuesday rejected two state Supreme Court justice candidates backed and funded by Democrats, including former President Barack Obama and Vice President Kamala Harris.
Incumbent conservative justices Sarah Warren and Charles Bethel, both appointed to Georgia’s top court by Republican Gov. Nathan Deal, defeated liberal former state Sen. Jen Jordan and attorney Miracle Rankin. 
The nonpartisan races drew outsized attention as Democrats nationwide sought to flip the seats in a blue-leaning electorate and reshape Georgia’s high court ahead of looming redistricting and abortion battles
&#8220;Epic Dem flop, this is an electorate that should have gotten their Supreme Court candidates over the line. Good bit of Dem/abortion group spending but Dems went to polls and didn’t know who their candidates were,&#8221; Semafor political reporter <a href="https://x.com/daveweigel/status/2057080178325459014?s=20">David Weigel posted on social media.</a> 
In Warren’s race, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/us/elections/results-georgia-supreme-court-justice-warren-seat.html">the results reflected a blowout</a>, with the Republican-appointed justice winning nearly 60% of the statewide vote, including a chunk of the black vote, and carrying all but three counties.
&#8220;Sarah Hawkins Warren is pulling out legitimately insane numbers for a Republican,&#8221; Ryan Girdusky, a conservative political consultant, <a href="https://x.com/RyanGirdusky/status/2056892399788445899?s=20">said on X</a>. 
Zachary Donnini, head of data science at Vote Hub, said Warren&#8217;s victory likely preserves Georgia&#8217;s conservative court majority through 2030. 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Republican-backed Justice Sarah Warren has held her Georgia Supreme Court seat despite a blue-leaning electorate, likely preserving the GOP’s court majority until at least spring 2030.
The result could especially matter for future abortion and redistricting cases. <a href="https://t.co/fxwG8D9hkx">https://t.co/fxwG8D9hkx</a>
— Zachary Donnini (@ZacharyDonnini) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZacharyDonnini/status/2056888928817348750?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 20, 2026</a></blockquote>
In Charles Bethel’s race, the result was closer but produced a similar outcome, with the Republican-appointed incumbent defeating Obama-backed Miracle Rankin <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/us/elections/results-georgia-supreme-court-justice-bethel-seat.html">with 51% of the vote.</a>
&#8220;Georgia’s electorate is already D+7, and will grow with the Atlanta-area vote still out, but the key story is persuasion: many black Democratic voters backed incumbent Republican justices,&#8221; Donnini <a href="https://x.com/ZacharyDonnini/status/2056943230747398498">said</a> on X. &#8220;Dems probably needed to spend some money to tell their base who they should vote for.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Obama isn’t having a great night <a href="https://t.co/f0OF1UJfTA">https://t.co/f0OF1UJfTA</a>
— Ryan James Girdusky (@RyanGirdusky) <a href="https://twitter.com/RyanGirdusky/status/2056914990867562613?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 20, 2026</a></blockquote>
A sitting Georgia Supreme Court Justice has not lost re-election in more than a century, according to the <a href="https://www.ajc.com/politics/2026/04/georgia-supreme-court-races-turn-into-partisan-battleground/">Atlanta Journal-Constitution</a> — but this year’s races attracted Democratic heavy hitters — including former President Barack Obama and former Vice President Kamala Harris. 
&#8220;You have the chance to send Miracle Rankin and Jen Jordan to the Georgia Supreme Court. They are extraordinary leaders who will fight to protect your rights and uphold the rule of law,&#8221; Harris posted on social media. 
The high-profile endorsements ultimately fell short. 
&#8220;The decisions made by state supreme courts touch every part of our lives. And that’s especially important when voting rights and basic freedoms are being challenged,&#8221; Obama said on Election Day. &#8220;Let’s get this one right, Georgia.&#8221; 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
The decisions made by state supreme courts touch every part of our lives. And that’s especially important when voting rights and basic freedoms are being challenged.
Today, voters in Georgia can stand up for fairness and integrity by electing Miracle Rankin and Jen Jordan to…
— Barack Obama (@BarackObama) <a href="https://twitter.com/BarackObama/status/2056825363989459163?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 19, 2026</a></blockquote>

Barack Obama Joins Kamala Harris As She Campaigns For President In Georgia

Democrats Quietly Took A Big Loss In Battleground State

Barack Obama

Election

Georgia

Politics

With the 2026 midterm elections fast approaching, Democrats are still at odds over whether to go public with the party&#8217;s internal post-mortem on the 2024 election.
Democrats in Congress, many of whom are up for reelection, appear to favor releasing the information — as does former Vice President Kamala Harris, who lost spectacularly to Donald Trump after being thrust into the nomination when then-President Joe Biden bowed out with just over 100 days to go.
The Democratic National Committee has opted not to release the report, prompting some skepticism from within the ranks.
DNC Chair Ken Martin referred to the 2024 autopsy as a &#8220;distraction,&#8221; saying in mid-December that the party should be fully focused on winning the 2026 midterms.
&#8220;Here&#8217;s our North Star: Does this help us win? If the answer is no, it&#8217;s a distraction from the core mission,&#8221; he said <a href="https://www.axios.com/2025/12/19/dnc-2024-election-autopsy-backlash">at the time</a> — and he&#8217;s been facing criticism ever since over the decision to keep the post-mortem, for lack of a better expression, buried.
But the autopsy, which reads a bit like a military after-action report, as it breaks down what went right and what went wrong in any given election cycle, is supposed to be a tool that can help current and future campaigns avoid the mistakes and capitalize on the positives from past campaigns.
&#8220;Why haven’t we put it out?&#8221; Rep. Glenn Ivey (D-MD) asked before answering his own question. &#8220;Because we got our butts kicked. I think it’s going to be embarrassing, apparently, to some people.&#8221;
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) argued that the report was being scuttled in order to hide mistakes, saying, &#8220;They don’t want people to know the truth. They messed up. They didn’t listen to their Democratic base.&#8221;
Jeff Weaver, who served as campaign manager for Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) in 2016, suggested that the move might be an attempt to set the stage for Harris to run again in 2028: &#8220;Kamala Harris certainly benefits from not having an open discussion.&#8221;
Others have also argued that Harris stands to benefit the most if the autopsy never sees the light of day, primarily because it could help her avoid renewed scrutiny of any mistakes she may have made during her abbreviated campaign. The DNC also stands to benefit from no one looking too closely at how, without a single primary vote, Harris was crowned the de facto nominee after Biden&#8217;s abrupt exit.
But Harris herself, according to a <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dems-demand-release-hidden-dnc-autopsy-2024-collapse-got-butts-kicked?lid=mj809drs5uvi">report</a> from Fox News Digital, has signaled support for the post-mortem&#8217;s publication.
&#8220;I’ve said they should release it, and there’s no question,&#8221; Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA) agreed. &#8220;The report got done. I think it’s good to always review why things were successful or not.&#8221;
Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) was slightly more diplomatic in his approach, saying that he had no idea why the full report was still under wraps — and what&#8217;s more, he couldn&#8217;t speak to whether or not the DNC should release it.

Democrats At Each Other’s Throats Again Over Infamous 2024 Autopsy

2024

Somebody needs to remind former Vice President Kamala Harris of her own wisdom: &#8220;Do you think you just fell out of a coconut tree? You exist in the context of all in which you live and what came before you.&#8221; Because it seems she has forgotten that context entirely.
Harris may have lost both the Electoral College and the popular vote, performed horrendously in every swing state, and campaigned with all the intellectual rigor of a drunken stupor — but a woman of her talents refuses to sit idle. She&#8217;s already back at it, hosting &#8220;bad ideas only brainstorms&#8221; on the &#8220;Win With Black Women&#8221; podcast.
Not to be confused with their adversarial counterpart, &#8220;Losing With Annoying Women,&#8221; otherwise known as The View.
On Thursday&#8217;s <a href="https://x.com/i/status/2055057833628971435">episode</a>, Harris literally hosted, in her own words, a &#8220;no bad ideas brainstorm,&#8221; in which every single idea was a steaming pile of constitutional malpractice designed to rig the system, because her party cannot win fair and square.
Her three &#8220;novel&#8221; proposals, which have been trotted out by every radical Democrat in the country already, were to abolish the Electoral College, expand the Supreme Court, and grant statehood to Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico, all to &#8220;fight fire with fire&#8221; and &#8220;neutralize these red states from cheating.&#8221;
I laughed, but the frightening reality is that many people think this sounds not just fine, but necessary. A righteous effort to wrest power from the evil, fascist, bigoted, racist Republicans. It is not normal. It is dangerous and historically illiterate.
The Electoral College was clearly not covered properly in grade school or at university, because many self-described &#8220;educated Democrats&#8221; — <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/tim-walz-calls-for-the-electoral-college-to-be-abolished-we-need-a-national-popular-vote?utm_source=facebook&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=benshapiro">including</a> Minnesota Governor Tim Walz — don&#8217;t seem to understand the purpose of it at all. The Founders established it to protect smaller states from being dominated by high-population urban centers. By having electors meet in their respective states to vote on behalf of their people, the mechanism ensures the president is elected by a coalition of states, keeping this a federalist republic.
We are a republic, not a pure democracy, precisely so California and New York cannot steamroll Wyoming and North Dakota every four years. Without it, tyrannical majorities and wannabe presidents like Harris and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would barnstorm Los Angeles, Chicago, and the Acela Corridor while ignoring the rest of the map.
Clinton thought she didn&#8217;t have to campaign in Wisconsin. She <a href="https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college/2016">lost</a> 10 electoral votes because of it. Harris thought she could win Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin with a coastal, big-city progressive playbook and lost every single one of them because of it. The problem is not the system. The problem is that they cannot sell their agenda to enough states.
Can you imagine if President Donald Trump said he would abolish the Electoral College? The media moguls would have shaved their heads in anti-authoritarian solidarity within minutes.
Then Harris confirmed her IQ is somewhere south of room temperature when she expressed her desire to expand the Supreme Court — aka: Court-packing. A similar authoritarian power grab was <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Procedures_Reform_Bill_of_1937">attempted</a> by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in the 1930s, and even his own party rejected the banana-republic scheme.
The Court has nine justices because Congress set it that way in <a href="https://www.britannica.com/story/why-are-there-nine-justices-on-the-us-supreme-court">1869</a>, to establish independence, stability, and protection from the kind of naked partisan manipulation that had turned it into a political football for decades prior.
Harris and her cadre of angry partisans have been seething since Dobbs and continue to get struck down by the current Supreme Court because they continue doing illegal things. Instead of campaigning on popular policy, delivering results, and appointing justices when vacancies arise, their solution is to bypass those pesky checks and balances entirely. Stuffing the bench with 13 or 15 partisan hacks to rubber-stamp their agenda the minute they have the chance.
The Democratic Machine team is openly admitting they will turn our independent judiciary into a Democratic super-legislature. This “genius” politicking would backfire, as every other partisan power grab has, and the next Republican wave would pack it right back, to 17 or 19 justices, and so on and so forth, destroying the Court’s legitimacy.
<a href="https://repository.uclawsf.edu/hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly/vol29/iss3/4/">As James Madison warned in Federalist 47: &#8220;The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands&#8230;may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.&#8221;</a>
Politics is a game. Instead of playing to win, Democrats are simply trying to break the referee.
They&#8217;re also trying to add more players to their side of the field. The game is roughly even right now, but Harris and her fellow coconuts don&#8217;t like it even. That&#8217;s why they&#8217;re seriously pushing statehood for D.C. and Puerto Rico, all in an effort, per Harris, to &#8220;neutralize these red states from cheating.&#8221;
You know what would prevent cheating? Ceasing mail-in ballots, requiring voter-ID, not lying about the “freeness” and “fairness” of your elections via gerrymandering 50% of voters out of existence. But they hate that idea!
Cheating would be subverting our Founders&#8217; wishes by granting statehood to D.C., which was deliberately designed as a federal district, not a state, precisely to avoid creating a permanent swamp of congressional power brokers beholden to one party. It&#8217;s already 90% Democrat. Granting it statehood would hand Democrats two more senators and a House seat overnight. That&#8217;s not democracy. That&#8217;s pure power consolidation.
Puerto Rico, the homeland of the Caribbean&#8217;s <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtRD8hlIm9Y">baddest bunny</a>, is a welfare <a href="https://www.facebook.com/visualcapitalist/posts/visual-of-the-week-puerto-rico-leads-with-47-of-u-s-households-on-welfare-while-n/1196039162554504/">magnet</a> propped up by federal <a href="https://ffis.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/FY-2023-Per-Capita-Puerto-Rico.pdf">transfers</a>, with English as a non-dominant language, and their own referendums on statehood have been dismal with low turnout and mixed <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rico_status_referendums">results</a>. Forcing it to become America&#8217;s 51st state wouldn&#8217;t expand the map; it would expand the entitlement tab and deliver a couple more reliable electoral votes to the Left.
<a href="https://x.com/i/status/2052430680357777650">So much democracy. Which, if you haven’t already heard, is a newer concept created and perfected “by black Americans.”</a>
But red states simply existing and growing in population because of low taxes, limited government, and deregulation? That’s cheating.
The Left has tried impeaching, imprisoning, and indicting President Donald Trump. They have weaponized the IRS and DOJ against Christians and conservatives, control Hollywood, the corporate media, and universities, censor conservative voices through Big Tech, and have imposed top-down government control everywhere they can reach.
Brainstorming how to abolish the Electoral College, pack the Supreme Court, lower the voting age, import millions of illegal aliens, and add two new Democratic states is not brainstorming. It is a coordinated effort to end the republic.
As Benjamin Franklin warned, we can only keep it &#8220;if we can keep it.&#8221;
The Left is telling us exactly what they will do the moment they have the chance. This is why they have spent years dehumanizing, delegitimizing, and degrading their opponents, so that when the unconstitutional seizure comes, they can call it necessary. Protective. A heroic effort to save Americans from evil Republicans.
President Barack Obama <a href="https://x.com/i/status/2053143910088659001">claims</a> he wished conservatives respected the rule of law. Meanwhile, Democrats chip away at every constitutional guardrail, day after day.
The silver lining: while the Republican bench stacks up with Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, Democrats are giving us a preview of their 2028 primary. If Harris, fresh off her latest word salad, is the best they’ve got? Americans can expect to keep their constitutional republic a little while longer.

Kamala Harris’s Bad Ideas Brainstorm Struggle Session

DW Opinion

Former Vice President and Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris finally dropped the mask earlier this week, revealing a blueprint for a far-Left coup disguised as &#8220;reform.&#8221;
<a href="https://www.nysun.com/article/with-no-bad-idea-brainstorm-kamala-harris-rains-on-america-in-the-name-of-reform">Speaking</a> to the Win with Black Women podcast, Harris didn’t just suggest policy tweaks; she called for a &#8220;no-bad-idea brainstorm&#8221; that effectively serves as a wrecking ball aimed at the pillars of the American Republic.
“This is a moment where there are no bad ideas,” she pontificated. “‘No bad idea brainstorm’ is what I&#8217;d like to call it. And in that ‘no bad ideas brainstorm,’ we talk about what we need to do and think about doing around the electoral college.’”
That move would effectively disenfranchise millions of Americans in &#8220;flyover country&#8221; to the benefit of deep-blue coastal elites.
Then she launched into her laundry list:
<blockquote>
We talk about the idea of Supreme Court reform, which includes expanding the Supreme Court. We invite a conversation about multi-member districts. We talk about, that if we win the Senate — which we should and we will  — then the Senate Judiciary Committee should have rules that they put in place, so when these people come before as nominees to the Supreme Court and lie, that they are held to account and consequence, not just that somebody goes on cable news and says they lied, but that there are rules in place to actually penalize people for lying to a Senate Judiciary Committee. That we agree that it is right to have ethics rules for Supreme Court justices. And let&#8217;s put those in place.
</blockquote>
Of course, the court already adopted its own formal Code of Conduct in late 2023, organized into five &#8220;canons&#8221; that mirror the rules for lower federal judges but are tailored specifically for the Supreme Court. But Harris appears blissfully unaware of that.
To cement this dominance for Democrats after abolishing the Electoral College, she’s pushing for D.C. and Puerto Rico statehood — not out of a sense of civic duty, but to potentially manufacture four permanent Democratic Senate seats.
“Let&#8217;s talk about statehood for Puerto Rico and D. C.,” she continued. “These are the things I think that we&#8217;ve got to do.”
She kept going: “We&#8217;ve got to neutralize these red states from cheating. Including blue states expanding their maps. &#8230; Look, we got to fight fire with fire. These folks are playing to win. We got to play to win, too.”
Harris’s rhetoric about &#8220;neutralizing red states from cheating&#8221; is the height of leftist projection. While she bemoans GOP tactics, she ignores the fact that some Democrat states are so aggressively gerrymandered that Republican districts are practically extinct.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Kamala Harris is now calling for Democrats to hold a “No Bad Idea Brainstorm” where they discuss:
&#8211; Abolishing the Electoral College &#8211; Packing the Supreme Court &#8211; Making Puerto Rico and D.C. states
“We’ve got to neutralize these red states from cheating!” <a href="https://t.co/23MPJxn7fN">pic.twitter.com/23MPJxn7fN</a>
&mdash; Pat Adams (@PatAdams96) <a href="https://twitter.com/PatAdams96/status/2054923866758099369?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 14, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Vice President Kamala Harris hold a campaign rally in North Las Vegas

Kamala Demands ‘No Bad Ideas Brainstorm,’ Takes Aim At Pillars Of American Republic

Electoral College

Supreme Court

Democrats’ refusal to release the party’s long-promised autopsy of the 2024 election defeat is quickly becoming a fresh fault line inside the party, one that now directly intersects with former Vice President Kamala Harris and the emerging 2028 presidential field.
Even as Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin continues to defend the decision to keep the 200-page report private, Harris is signaling behind closed doors that she has no objection to making the findings public, according to <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2028-election/kamala-harris-dnc-release-autopsy-report-2024-campaign-rcna343453">NBC News</a>.
The divide comes as Harris appears to be laying the groundwork for another White House campaign following her 2024 loss to President Donald Trump. Harris has remained active on the national stage through speeches, donor outreach, and a nationwide tour promoting her memoir “107 Days,” while also privately consulting allies about a potential 2028 run.
But the unresolved fight over the party’s postmortem has become a growing source of frustration among Democratic strategists, donors, and activists still searching for answers after Democrats lost the White House and Republicans secured unified control of Washington in 2024.
Martin has <a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5858141-democrats-demand-2024-election-autopsy/">argued</a> that releasing the full report would amount to “navel-gazing” and distract Democrats from the 2026 midterms and the next presidential cycle. In recent interviews, he insisted there was “no smoking gun” in the document and said the party has already begun implementing lessons learned internally.
Critics inside the party, however, argue that withholding the report has only fueled suspicion. “It raises more questions than it answers to conduct an autopsy and then not release it,” Democratic strategist Christy Setzer said. Others within the party have warned the secrecy risks deepening distrust among Democratic voters already frustrated with party leadership after 2024.
The debate also carries direct political implications for Harris, who continues leading many early Democratic primary polls despite lingering questions about her failed 2024 campaign. Some Democrats believe a full public accounting of the campaign’s decisions — including its messaging, spending, and handling of issues like Israel and Gaza — could complicate another Harris run.
Questions surrounding the Harris campaign’s massive spending operation have also lingered well into 2026. Democrats and donors have continued pressing for answers after Harris and the DNC burned through roughly $1.5 billion during the condensed 107-day campaign, only to lose every battleground state to Trump. 
Internal documents also reportedly showed serious outreach problems, including claims that despite hundreds of millions of voter contact attempts, only a small percentage resulted in actual conversations with voters.
Others including Bernie Sanders delegate Norman Solomon <a href="https://www.salon.com/2026/05/05/the-democratic-national-committee-is-boosting-kamala-harris-for-2028/">argue</a> that shielding the report creates the appearance that party leadership is protecting Harris ahead of a potentially crowded 2028 primary field that could include figures like California Governor Gavin Newsom, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, Maryland Governor Wes Moore, and Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ).
For now, Martin appears unlikely to reverse course entirely, though he has recently floated releasing limited “top-line” findings instead of the full report.
That compromise has satisfied few inside a Democratic Party still struggling to answer a question many members believe remains unresolved nearly two years later: what exactly went wrong in 2024?

Kamala Harris Is Already Beefing With Her Own Party Ahead Of 2028 Comeback Tour

Actress Elizabeth Banks said women in real life, particularly Trump voters, should be more like the character she played in “The Hunger Games.”
The 52-year-old made the comments during an appearance on Bustle’s “One Nightstand” podcast this week.
“Effie for me is one of the characters that has the greatest arc that I’ve ever played because obviously she props up this fascist regime that she benefits from and it’s not until she really comes to care for and see how unfair it is when they want to pull Katniss and Peeta into the games again…” Banks said, referencing the plot of the popular films based on the dystopian book series. 
<iframe loading="lazy" title="One Nightstand With Elizabeth Banks | Bustle" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/I3nnXnxwt7w?start=1&#038;feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
“I think in ‘Catching Fire’ when she’s like, ‘I want to be part of this team,’ and you really see her struggling and then by the end she’s like a revolutionary… I wish more of us were becoming revolutionaries!” she went on. “Effie is the model, guys! I don’t understand the 53% of white ladies that didn’t vote for Kamala.”
Banks played Effie in all four installments of “The Hunger Games” movie franchise between 2012 and 2015. The character is known for being flamboyant and completely devoted to the system at first, but eventually starts doubting their motives after developing relationships with contestants in the fight-to-the-death games that pit human beings against each other.
Banks is a well-known Democratic supporter and liberal activist who frequently engages in political discourse, shills for abortion access, and takes particular issue with the president. At the 2016 Democratic National Convention, she compared Trump to her over-the-top character in the film series.
“Some of you know me from ‘The Hunger Games,’ in which I play a cruel, out-of-touch reality TV star who wears insane wigs while delivering long-winded speeches to a violent dystopia,” she <a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/dnc-2016-elizabeth-banks-226250">said at the time</a>. “So when I tuned in to Cleveland last week I was like hey, that’s my act.”

Elizabeth Banks

Actress Targets Female Trump Voters, Urges Them To Think Like Her Dystopian Character

Celebrities

Donald Trump

Entertainment

Movies

Former Vice President Kamala Harris returned to the national stage with a swipe at President Donald Trump, calling him a &#8220;mob boss&#8221; before breaking into an impersonation during a speech at the National Action Network Convention.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
🚨 WATCH: Kamala Harris mocks President Trump with horrible impersonation and refers to him as “mob boss” <a href="https://t.co/yl26o4ECTa">pic.twitter.com/yl26o4ECTa</a>
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) <a href="https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/2042636887261634603?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 10, 2026</a></blockquote>
Harris made the remarks while speaking with Rev. Al Sharpton, where she also confirmed she is considering another run for president in 2028. 
&#8220;I&#8217;m thinking about it,&#8221; Harris said, adding that her decision will depend on whether she believes she is the best person for the job.
“I spent countless hours in my West Wing office, footsteps away from the Oval Office. Countless hours in the Oval Office and the Situation Room,&#8221; she said. &#8220;I know what the job is and I know what it requires.” 
Harris also emphasized her broader message to voters, arguing that Americans are frustrated with government inefficiency. Drawing on her travels across the country, she said people “don’t want process, they want progress,” and stressed a need to cut government bureaucracy.
Speculation about Harris’s 2028 plans has grown in recent months, particularly after she declined to run for governor of California. That decision was widely seen as keeping the door open for a presidential bid. 
While news of Harris possibly running again excited conservatives eager to see another &#8220;failed presidential run,&#8221; Sharpton praised her during the interview, telling the audience that Democrats had already effectively chosen her when they voted for President Joe Biden. 
“When we ended up with President Biden stepping back, there were some that said we need a primary, and we said we already had it. When we voted for Biden, we voted for Harris.” 
She went on to rip Trump&#8217;s SAVE America Act, equating it to a poll tax and urging voters to check their registration status, claiming Trump has &#8220;cleaned voter rolls.&#8221;

National Action Network Holds Its Annual Convention In New York City

Kamala Harris Is Back With An Impersonation Of Trump As A Mob Boss

2028 presidential election

A California judge dismissed the case against pro-life investigator David Daleiden over undercover videos he released over a decade ago, showing Planned Parenthood executives discussing the sale of aborted baby body parts. 
Judge Brian Ferrall of the Superior Court of San Francisco approved the dismissal on Wednesday following an agreement between Daleiden and the state of California. The decision comes after state officials <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/california-finally-drops-prosecution-of-journo-who-exposed-planned-parenthood-with-damning-videos">agreed last year</a> to end the prosecution against Daleiden, but pro-abortion activists attempted to intervene and block the deal. 
“As promised, the final charge has been DISMISSED and the case completely expunged — after a couple months&#8217; administrative delay, and a truly bizarre last-minute ‘April Fool&#8217;s’ attempt by [Planned Parenthood] and [the National Abortion Federation] to overturn the State&#8217;s agreement,” Daleiden <a href="https://x.com/daviddaleiden/status/2039499385256751230">posted</a> on X. 
Court records show that groups like the Feminist Majority Foundation and the National Abortion Federation filed motions seeking to block the dismissal. 
The case against Daleiden was <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/kamala-harris-made-a-damning-planned-parenthood-video-disappear-now-its-public">launched</a> in 2016 by then-California Attorney General Kamala Harris, who would go on to become vice president during the Biden administration. It was over the videos released in 2015 by the Center for Medical Progress, a pro-life organization founded by Daleiden. The recordings showed Planned Parenthood officials discussing the sale of fetal tissue and organs. 
After the footage was released, California authorities raided Daleiden’s home and seized materials, claiming the videos were illegally recorded. The legal battle has stretched on for nearly a decade. 
In January 2025, the Center for Medical Progress said California prosecutors had agreed to end the case against Daleiden and fellow investigator Sandra Merritt. 
“The agreement — a negotiated settlement with zero punishment — is in exchange for a new ‘no contest’ plea by Daleiden and Merritt on a single video recording charge. It involves no jail time, no fines, no admission of wrongdoing, and no probation,” the Center for Medical Progress said at the time. 
According to the group, the no-contest plea would be entered as a misdemeanor and later converted to a not guilty plea before being dismissed and expunged.
The dismissal drew praise from Daleiden&#8217;s supporters, including Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights at the Justice Department, Harmeet Dhillon, who had previously represented him.
&#8220;Praise God! One of my favorite clients of all 33+ years of law practice in service to advancing liberty!!&#8221; Dhillon <a href="https://x.com/HarmeetKDhillon/status/2039875112871113095">said</a>.
Live Action President Lila Rose also celebrated the outcome, saying, &#8220;After a decade of California bureaucrats attempting to prosecute, bankrupt and imprison [Daleiden] for his courageous and groundbreaking pro-life reporting, they have officially FAILED.&#8221;
&#8220;David beat Goliath, and he’s only getting started,&#8221; she added.

Pro-Life Activist David Daleiden Appears In Court Over Planned Parenthood Video Sting

He Exposed The Grim Reality Behind Planned Parenthood. His Decade-Long Battle Is Finally Over.

Abortion

California

Center for Medical Progress

David Daleiden

Planned Parenthood

<div class="gmail_default">
This week&#8217;s scheduled debate at USC between the plethora of Democrats vying for the California gubernatorial nomination had to be<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/peak-california-usc-backs-out-of-gov-debate-over-lack-of-diversity"> canceled</a>. Not for any of the normal reasons debates get canceled — disputes about rules, moderators, venue, or the metrics used to determine candidate eligibility — all those were in order and agreed upon in advance. No, it had to be canceled for a more<a href="https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-03-23/california-leaders-call-to-boycott-debate-if-other-candidates-not-included"> basic reason</a>: all the candidates who qualified were noticeably, inconveniently, white. 
In an announcement, the university acknowledged that it canceled the debate because its selection criteria had “created a significant distraction from the issues that matter to voters.” That selection criteria was based on a combination of polling and fundraising, a fairly standard measure of potential success. Unfortunately for Democrats who want to project an image of diversity (even if all their leading candidates in this race are white), this effectively excluded former HHS Sec. Xavier Becerra, former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, Superintendent Tony Thurmond, and former State Controller Betty Yee from the debate. That&#8217;s racist, criteria! Bad criteria, bad.
The hue and cry that followed blamed a USC election professor for coming up with the racist popularity + money = viability metric, which has never previously been applied to politics, as each candidate demanded to be included and the university was afraid of saying no. Think of it as similar to California&#8217;s inability to pick a single state nut — it currently has almonds, pistachios, walnuts and pecans all occupying the same vaunted role. “[W]e have four state nuts, nobody wanted to be left behind,” Alex Vassar, the communications manager for the California State Library,<a href="https://www.politico.com/newsletters/california-playbook/2026/03/26/the-professor-at-the-center-of-the-debate-debacle-00845901"> told Politico</a> this week. Only four California nuts? Have you seen the debate stage? It has Eric Swalwell, Katie Porter, AND Tom Steyer — there have to be more than four.
</div>
<div>
<div id="attachment_1066875" style="width: 874px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1066875" class="size-large wp-image-1066875" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/03/GettyImages-2258201958-864x576.jpg" alt="PASADENA, CALIFORNIA - JANUARY 28: (L-R) Eric Swalwell, Xavier Becerra, Tom Steyer, Katie Porter, Louise Bedsworth, Sammy Roth and Mary Creasman attend &quot;Our Climate Future: A Forum with California's Next Governor&quot; on January 28, 2026 in Pasadena, California. (Photo by Matei Horvath/Getty Images for California Environmental Voters)" width="864" height="576" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/03/GettyImages-2258201958-864x576.jpg 864w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/03/GettyImages-2258201958-300x200.jpg 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/03/GettyImages-2258201958-768x512.jpg 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/03/GettyImages-2258201958.jpg 1024w" sizes=" (max-width: 864px) 100vw, 864px" />Matei Horvath/Getty Images for California Environmental Voters</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default">
<div class="gmail_default"></div>
<div>The problem that faced California Democrats presages the racial challenge they&#8217;re going to face in 2028, when their debate stage will almost certainly be dominated by white candidates. California&#8217;s own Gavin Newsom, former Transportation Sec. Pete Buttigieg, Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen, and Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly all routinely rank in the top ten candidates in early polling for 2028. The only non-white candidates who share the same status are &#8220;falling out of a coconut tree&#8221; 2024 disaster Kamala Harris and Democratic Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Maybe if Jasmine Crockett had more of an opportunity in Texas, she&#8217;d sneak into the top ten — but no, the party chose another bland-looking white guy because they think that&#8217;s what dumb voters want.</div>
<div>
Republicans would be wise to recognize the opportunity here. Having built an elitist left coalition overwhelmingly dependent on identity politics above all else — while offering minority voters nothing of substance when they hold power — Democrats are ripe to correct for Kamala in 2028 and nominate some white guy who they think is &#8220;safe&#8221; from a pool of candidates who all have to wear SPF 70 and above. When all the left has to offer is checking a racial box, it leaves an opening for the right to build on Donald Trump&#8217;s success in attracting voters who are tired of the visual pandering California Democrats think is more important than actual policy. If what they have to offer in 2028 connects with what people actually care about, maybe they can even do it with a white guy from Ohio. And as Kamala Harris showed us, play stupid DEI games, win stupid DEI prizes.
</div>
</div>

California Governor Gavin Newsom Continues Book Tour In San Francisco

2028 So White: Why California’s Canceled Debate Shows Democrats’ Incoming Race Problem

2028 So White: Why California's Canceled Debate Shows Democrats' Incoming Race Problem

Democratic Debate

Gavin Newsom

Opinion

Actor Jerry O’Connell said his wife, Rebecca Romijn, and the couple’s two teenage daughters &#8220;became physical” with him on election night after he commented on Kamala Harris’ campaign failures.
The 52-year-old “Stand By Me” alum said as much during an interview with Bill Maher released earlier this week. 
&#8220;If I say this, will I stay married?&#8221; he joked with the “Club Random” podcast host. O’Connell went on to describe how Romijn and their children weren’t open to hearing honest feedback. 
&#8220;I said something along the lines of &#8216;there was no planning. This is what they get. There should have been a primary.&#8217; I said something along those lines, you know, like I was just spit-balling ideas. It was a shock. My wife and daughters, without saying anything, became physical with me. They were filled with rage,&#8221; O&#8217;Connell said.
&#8220;So if I am being careful with you in how I say things, yes, I live in California. I live with not one, not two, but three people who, if I made any kind of joke, they&#8217;d become very angry with me,&#8221; the actor added.
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Jerry O&#039;Connell | Club Random with Bill Maher" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/g_7IpYkjCIc?start=3517&#038;feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Maher replied by saying he wouldn’t do well with that kind of behavior in his house.
&#8220;Whatever household situation I&#8217;m in, I say what I truly think, and if it makes you angry, I&#8217;m sorry. We&#8217;ll have to work that out. But I am not going to tuck my tail between my legs and just shut the f*** up,&#8221; Maher said.
O’Connell has been married to former supermodel Romijn since 2007, and their twin daughters, Dolly and Charlie, were born in 2008.
He actively supported Harris during the 2024 presidential election, even <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/C-EPwB9sGRE/">attending a rally</a> in Georgia.
Maher and O’Connell’s discussion about the 2024 presidential election came just after Maher criticized Hollywood for not recognizing Paramount+ hit “Landman” because it’s seen as a “conservative show.”
“First of all, even if it was a conservative show, that should be allowed,” Maher said. “This is f***ing America, you a**holes.”
He continued, “I mean, it’s just not exactly what you are. And so we have to ignore that and pretend it doesn’t exist. You want to know why people vote for Trump? That’s why. Your sh***y attitude is a real turnoff.”

Jerrry O’Connell Rebecca Romijn

Jerry O’Connell Says His Family ‘Became Physical’ With Him After Kamala Lost To Trump

Bill Maher

Liberals

Menu