Amazon apparently decided Americans should never have to leave the house again.
The company is now <a href="https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/retail/amazon-now-30-minute-delivery">testing</a> a new delivery service that can reportedly get products to your front door in around 30 minutes. So, the days of realizing you forgot toothpaste, paper towels, coffee creamer, or phone chargers may officially be over.
At this point, Amazon isn’t competing with stores anymore. It’s competing with your ability to put on shoes and drive somewhere yourself.
The new service, called “Amazon Now,” is beginning to roll out in several major cities across the country, with more locations expected to follow. Customers will be able to order everything from groceries and snacks to electronics and household items through the ultra-fast system.
The idea behind it is simple: instead of shipping products from giant warehouses far outside city limits, Amazon is relying on smaller local hubs positioned much closer to neighborhoods and downtown areas.
That dramatically cuts delivery times and lets drivers move orders almost immediately after they’re placed.
Translation? Your impulse buys may soon arrive before you even regret making them.
The rollout is part of Amazon’s growing obsession with speed as the company keeps pouring money into faster shipping, AI-powered logistics systems, and even drone technology designed to bypass traffic altogether.
And yes, people are absolutely going to use this for ridiculous things.
Forgot hamburger buns right before the cookout starts? Amazon.
Need deodorant before a date? Amazon.
Realized five minutes before bedtime that the kids are out of toothpaste? Amazon.
The company says Prime customers will pay a small added fee for the rapid delivery option, while non-members will pay more.
Amazon has spent years training people to expect packages almost instantly. Now it’s pushing even further into a world where “I’ll just order it” becomes faster than making a store run yourself.
Honestly, we’re about two steps away from Amazon delivering things before people even realize they need them.

Cardboard package delivery at front door

Amazon’s Newest Delivery Push Feels Straight Out Of The Future

Amazon

Amazon Prime

John Fetterman just said the quiet part out loud about where he thinks today’s Democratic Party is heading and he does not sound thrilled about it.
During an appearance on Bill Maher’s “Club Random” podcast, the Pennsylvania Democrat expressed alarm over the growing normalization of socialism inside parts of the Democratic Party, warning the trend should concern Americans.
“And people that are proud to be labeled as a socialist, that used to be a smear,” Fetterman said. “Now it’s becoming more normalized, and now I think that’s a very dangerous slippery slope for us to be.”
Fetterman went even further, saying immigrants and people who have actually lived under socialist or communist governments often understand the consequences better than American progressives romanticizing the idea online.
“I’ve spoke to people that had to live under socialism and or communism, and they are like they are morons if they think that socialism is the answer,” he said.
The exchange quickly turned into a broader conversation about how dramatically political language on the Left has shifted in recent years.
Maher argued that while America already has some government-run systems like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, modern progressive activists are pushing something far beyond that. He then pointed to growing acceptance of openly communist rhetoric among some younger activists and political figures.
“What really was a dirty word, which isn’t anymore, is communism,” Maher said.
The HBO host specifically referenced comments from people connected to New York City’s socialist movement and warned that ideas once considered politically toxic are suddenly becoming socially acceptable in parts of elite progressive circles.
“I think we need to pause here and say, OK, this is a watershed moment in American history where we should pay attention,” Maher added.
Fetterman responded bluntly: “Well, I sure hope not.”
The conversation is notable because Fetterman has increasingly become one of the few Democrats willing to publicly criticize parts of his own party’s activist wing, especially after the October 7 Hamas attacks and the internal Democratic civil war over Israel, policing, socialism, and progressive activism.
While many progressives initially embraced Fetterman during his Senate run because of his populist image and anti-establishment style, he has increasingly frustrated the Left by sounding far more moderate on issues involving Israel, law enforcement, and now socialism itself.
The interview also highlights a growing panic inside parts of the Democratic Party ahead of 2028 as leaders try to figure out whether the future of the party belongs to moderates trying to win back working-class voters or activists pushing the party further left.
For conservatives watching the conversation unfold, hearing a sitting Democratic senator openly warn about socialism and communism becoming normalized probably says a lot about just how far the debate has shifted in recent years.

Senate Holds Confirmation Hearing For DHS Secretary Nominee Markwayne Mullin

Fetterman Says Democrats Are Flirting With Something Americans Used To Fear

Bill Maher

Communism

Democratic Socialism

Democrats

fetterman

The more wives, the bigger the government check. At least, that’s according to a little-known welfare rule tied to some polygamous households that is now paying out even more money this year.
But there’s a catch. Well, a few.
One, it’s not in America.
And two: The policy is in the United Kingdom, where certain overseas polygamous marriages can still be recognized under limited circumstances tied to older parts of the benefits system.
The marriages themselves cannot legally take place inside Britain. Instead, the rule applies to some people who were already legally married in countries where polygamy is allowed before later moving to the UK through separate immigration pathways.
Even though the policy has existed for years, newly updated payment rates are suddenly bringing fresh attention to it online.
Under updated government figures, qualifying households can now receive roughly $166 more per week for each additional spouse living in the home. The increase is part of Britain’s annual benefits uprating process tied to wage growth and inflation.
Government officials also maintain that the number of people affected is believed to be relatively small.
The controversy centers around how Britain handles certain foreign marriages already considered legally valid overseas. Parliamentary guidance published in recent years explains that while Britain bans polygamous marriages domestically, some foreign arrangements can still be acknowledged for specific administrative and legal purposes.
That recognition can extend into portions of the welfare system.
One detail fueling online backlash is that there does not appear to be a specific numerical limit on how many additional spouses could theoretically be counted under the older framework, though overall household benefit caps still apply.
The debate has already drawn political scrutiny.
Conservative lawmakers previously questioned why any part of the benefits system still accounts for polygamous households at all, especially as immigration and welfare spending remain major political flashpoints across Europe.
British officials continue emphasizing that polygamy itself remains illegal inside the country.
Still, the resurfacing of the little-known rule is quickly turning into another viral debate over immigration loopholes, government spending, and whether outdated welfare policies are quietly surviving long after most people assume they disappeared.

The Government Rule Quietly Paying Extra Cash For Each Additional Wife At Home

Polygamy

Welfare

“It&#8217;s more than memorizing statistics and facts. It&#8217;s how you are able to absorb such knowledge that elevates your thinking above the noise of this world.”
Erika Kirk delivers an emotional commencement speech Saturday at Hillsdale College, telling graduates that her late husband Charlie Kirk believes learning is about far more than facts, politics, or headlines. It’s about pursuing truth, defending liberty, and building a life rooted in purpose.
Kirk, who now serves as CEO and chair of Turning Point USA following Charlie Kirk’s assassination in September 2025, speaks to Hillsdale’s graduating class during the school’s 174th commencement ceremony in Michigan.
At times emotional and at times funny, the speech doubles as both a tribute to Charlie and a broader message about faith, family, responsibility, and what Kirk sees as a culture losing its direction.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<a href="https://t.co/PtXzaW1sEm">https://t.co/PtXzaW1sEm</a>
— Jordan Schroeder (@JordanESchro) <a href="https://twitter.com/JordanESchro/status/2053236933363482635?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 9, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> 
One of the most memorable moments comes when Kirk tells the story of their honeymoon, where Charlie still can’t fully disconnect from learning.
“When we got married and we went to our honeymoon the next day, we decided for our honeymoon that it would be a disconnected honeymoon,” Kirk says. “Meaning no computers, no cell phones.”
But Charlie still brings along what she jokingly calls a “bat phone” for emergencies.
While the two are working out at the gym, Kirk suddenly hears Hillsdale College President Larry Arnn’s voice coming from across the room.
“I walk over to him. Baby, what are you listening to?” she recalls. “He goes, I know. He was like, I&#8217;m almost done. He&#8217;s like, I have to finish just a few more lectures from Dr. Arn.”
Kirk says Charlie constantly took Hillsdale online courses and proudly screenshots every certificate of completion.
“He really understood that this institution wasn&#8217;t normal,” she says. “It was something that elevated his thinking to be a thought leader and really become a serious person, not just a political talking head.”
Throughout the speech, Kirk repeatedly points back to Charlie’s obsession with learning and his belief that education should shape how people think, not just help them memorize information.
“I would say, I love learning from you,” Kirk says, recalling date nights where she would ask Charlie to explain the Founding Fathers, Benjamin Franklin, or Winston Churchill.
“He just loved being able to share what he had learned in those moments,” she adds.
Kirk also uses the speech to warn graduates about chasing comfort and easy living instead of purpose and meaning.
“What you seek in life, you will get,” she tells graduates. “If you&#8217;re seeking the ugly, the conspiracy, the pain, you&#8217;ll find it. And if you&#8217;re seeking the good and the true and the beautiful, you will find that as well.”
“You are not made for a life that asks nothing of you,” she adds. “You were made for something higher.”
At several points, Kirk frames Charlie’s life as a blueprint for the graduating class, reminding students that Turning Point USA famously starts “in a garage in Lamont, Illinois” when Charlie is fresh out of high school with “no money, no connections, and no idea what he was doing.”
But she says he never saw the mission as random.
“He knew that with the Lord. That was his calling,” she says.
Kirk closes the speech with a direct message to graduates about preserving the country they are inheriting.
“Love your country,” she says. “Our country is not perfect, but my goodness is she good.”
“And as you start day one as a graduate, build carefully, choose wisely,” Kirk adds. “And aim not at what is easy or immediate, but what is beautiful and true.&#8221;

US-POLITICS-EDUCATION-KIRK

The Emotional Challenge Erika Kirk Delivers To Graduates About Charlie’s Legacy

Charlie Kirk

Erika Kirk

Turning Point USA

Iran keeps finding out the hard way that President Donald Trump’s foreign policy playbook does not leave a lot of room for stalling, bluffing, or endless empty negotiations.
As the regime weighs whether to respond to Trump’s latest nuclear proposal, officials and defense experts are openly warning what comes next if Tehran tries to drag this out too long: more crushing economic pressure, expanded military strikes, and a systematic dismantling of Iran’s ability to threaten the region.
Speaking Saturday morning to reporters, our commander-in-chief said he expects to hear from Iran “very soon” regarding the latest United States peace proposal and suggested Tehran still “very much” wants to reach a lasting agreement.
The president sounded cautiously optimistic but also made clear he is watching closely to see whether Iran is serious or simply trying to buy time, a tactic the regime has used throughout Operation Epic Fury.
“We&#8217;re getting a letter [from Iran] supposedly tonight, so we&#8217;ll see how that goes,” Trump told reporters Friday evening from his golf club in Virginia.
When asked whether Iran could be intentionally dragging out negotiations, Trump responded bluntly: “I don&#8217;t know. We&#8217;ll find out soon enough.”
That uncertainty is exactly why the situation still feels like it could explode at any moment.
Behind the scenes, negotiators are reportedly trying to piece together a preliminary framework tied to Iran’s nuclear program and possible sanctions relief. But former military officials say neither side actually trusts the other.
Meanwhile, the pressure campaign on Tehran has not exactly disappeared.
Just days after Iran launched missiles toward the UAE’s Fujairah Port, United States forces struck Iran’s Qeshm port and Bandar Abbas near the Strait of Hormuz.
Officials insist the operation did not officially restart the war or end the ceasefire, but it sent a very clear message that America is still holding the bigger stick.
And according to defense experts, Trump is intentionally keeping Iran guessing about how far he is willing to go.
If negotiations collapse, experts say the U.S. would likely begin by targeting the systems Iran relies on to intimidate the Middle East and threaten global shipping lanes.
That includes ballistic missiles, Revolutionary Guard infrastructure, command centers, naval attack boats, and air defense systems.
One major target would almost certainly be Iran’s fast attack boat fleet in the Strait of Hormuz, which Tehran has long used to harass oil tankers and pressure the global economy.
At the same time, Trump appears to be tightening the economic screws even further.
Some experts say a maritime blockade alone could slowly suffocate Iran’s oil exports and leave the regime economically cornered within months.
Others warn that if Iran refuses to deal, the next phase could become much more painful.
Trump has already warned Iran that America could target key energy infrastructure and export hubs if Tehran continues pushing toward a nuclear weapon.
The contrast with previous administrations is hard to miss.
Instead of pallets of cash, endless appeasement, and weak red lines, Trump is signaling that Iran has two choices: negotiate seriously or watch America squeeze the regime even harder from every direction possible.

Trump_Pigeon

The Iran Letter Trump Is Waiting For Could Decide What Happens Next

Foreign Policy

Iran

Operation Epic Fury

President Trump

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass is getting roasted online after an obscene verbal slip-up during a live mayoral debate became one of the night’s most viral moments.
The awkward exchange happened while Bass was defending her administration’s handling of the catastrophic Palisades fires that devastated parts of Los Angeles earlier this year.
“Was that a mistake?” the moderator immediately asked as Bass stumbled through the response. Attempting to explain problems with the city’s emergency response, Bass appeared to accidentally say “fire f*cks” instead of “fire trucks” before quickly correcting herself.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
Karen Bass makes obscene gaffe during live LA mayoral debate <a href="https://t.co/vgEXB5WlmC">https://t.co/vgEXB5WlmC</a> <a href="https://t.co/Gyp1EMAF3U">pic.twitter.com/Gyp1EMAF3U</a>
— California Post (@californiapost) <a href="https://twitter.com/californiapost/status/2052455751470428580?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 7, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Clips of the moment spread rapidly across social media, where critics mocked the mayor for looking flustered and unprepared during one of the most high-profile debates of the race so far.
The gaffe came during an especially rough night for Bass, who repeatedly found herself on defense over Los Angeles’ homelessness crisis, public safety concerns, and the city’s wildfire response. Several moments during the debate saw Bass interrupted or forced into lengthy explanations as challengers pressed her on the city’s ongoing problems.
Much of the criticism centered on Bass attempting to blame former Fire Chief Kristin Crowley for staffing issues during the deadly fires. Bass argued that firefighters had been sent home before conditions spiraled out of control — a claim that immediately sparked backlash online from critics accusing the mayor of trying to shift responsibility.
The debate quickly turned combative as frustration over the condition of Los Angeles dominated the discussion. Questions about rising crime, drug addiction, homelessness encampments, and taxpayer spending repeatedly put Bass on the defensive throughout the night.
Political observers noted that Bass often appeared tense and struggled to regain control during several exchanges as the audience reacted loudly to attacks over the city’s decline.
The viral debate performance now adds even more pressure to Bass as anger continues to build over the direction of Los Angeles ahead of the June 2 mayoral election.

Karen_Bass_Censored

Karen Bass Obscene Debate Gaffe Goes Viral For All The Wrong Reasons

Democratic Party

Karen Bass

Los Angeles

Former reality TV star Spencer Pratt says the only people standing against his surging Los Angeles mayoral campaign are “socialists and communists” — while insisting Democrats across the city are actually rallying behind him.
Pratt’s latest viral comments come just days after he dominated a televised debate against Democratic opponents Karen Bass and Councilmember Nithya Raman, where clips of the former “Hills” star torching city leadership over crime, homelessness, and public safety exploded online.
During a new interview circulating across social media, Pratt pushed back on the idea that he can’t win in deep-blue Los Angeles because he identifies as a Republican.
“It’s just the socialists and the communists that don’t back me,” Pratt said. “My supporters in L.A. are Democrats. Everyone I know, my family, are all Democrats. I grew up in L.A.!”
Pratt went on to claim that many of the people congratulating him after the debate were lifelong Democrats impressed by his message.
“Everybody that texted me last night, amazing, congratulations, are all Democrats,” he said. “So what people are confused on, the Democrats all are behind me.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
&#8220;Reality TV villain&#8221; turned potential mayor of Los Angeles, Spencer Pratt, told CBS News&#8217; Adam Yamaguchi he is confident he is &#8220;probably going to win with 51% on June 2nd because I don&#8217;t do a political message.&#8221; <a href="https://twitter.com/adamyamaguchi?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@adamyamaguchi</a> <a href="https://t.co/YgIxnmGEGg">pic.twitter.com/YgIxnmGEGg</a>
— CBS News (@CBSNews) <a href="https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/2052510122677539001?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 7, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The reality star-turned-political firebrand has increasingly positioned himself less as a traditional Republican candidate and more as an anti-establishment outsider focused on hyper-local issues impacting everyday Angelenos.
“I don’t do a political message. I don’t do national politics,” Pratt explained. “I don’t do tribal politics. I don’t talk about other states. I’m localized.”
Instead, Pratt says his campaign is centered around cleaning up Los Angeles streets, restoring public safety, and stopping taxpayer money from flowing to organizations he claims are profiting off the homelessness crisis.
“I just want to fix our streets, get the lights on. I want people to feel safe,” Pratt said. “I want to get our tax money to not be robbed by these literal criminal NGOs stealing from our tax to increase the homelessness!”
Pratt has become one of the internet’s most unexpected political stars in recent weeks thanks to a string of viral campaign videos, including ads attacking Bass and Raman over homelessness, drug addiction, and the city’s response to the devastating Palisades fires that destroyed Pratt’s home earlier this year.
Primary election day in Los Angeles is June 2.

Spencer Pratt Visits “Fox & Friends”

Spencer Pratt Says There’s Only One Group Standing In His Way

California

Mayor

Spencer Pratt

While hardworking Americans juggle grocery bills and sky-high property taxes, Ohio’s Medicaid money machine was apparently having a pretty great run.
Now Republican Ohio gubernatorial nominee Vivek Ramaswamy says it is time to slam the brakes.
After Daily Wire investigative reporter Luke Rosiak exposed what critics are calling a sprawling Medicaid cash pipeline operating across Ohio, Ramaswamy is now calling for prosecutions, taxpayer savings, and a crackdown on abuse inside the system.
“Common sense policies to say we&#8217;re respecting the rule of law,” Ramaswamy said on &#8216;Saturday in America with Kayleigh McEnany.&#8217; “Lawbreakers ought to be prosecuted. We should not apologize for that.”
The comments come after Rosiak uncovered a bizarre web of Medicaid-linked companies across Ohio, including one Columbus address tied to 94 separate businesses that reportedly billed taxpayers more than $66 million.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
The taxpayer is not a piggy bank to be bilked. We will comprehensively review Ohio’s $40BN+ Medicaid expenditures and aggressively prosecute illegal abuses of the program. That starts in early 2027 &amp; we won’t hold back. <a href="https://t.co/MFRAU4B69z">pic.twitter.com/MFRAU4B69z</a>
— Vivek Ramaswamy (@VivekGRamaswamy) <a href="https://twitter.com/VivekGRamaswamy/status/2053147627932577793?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 9, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The investigation blew the lid off some of the offices appearing practically deserted, with covered windows, generic “Home Health LLC” names, and little visible evidence that actual operations were taking place inside.
The reporting zeroed in on Ohio’s exploding Medicaid-funded home healthcare system, where loosely defined “homemaking” services like cooking and cleaning can generate massive taxpayer-funded payouts with limited oversight.
Rosiak’s investigation also highlighted how Columbus, home to one of the nation’s largest Somali immigrant populations, has seen entire neighborhoods flooded with Medicaid-billing home healthcare businesses as operators realized the government would pay people to provide “companionship” and care services to family members inside private homes.
Ramaswamy argued the issue goes far beyond bureaucratic waste.
To him, it is directly connected to why taxpayers feel squeezed in the first place.
“But these are taxpayer dollars that belong in the hands of citizens,” he said. “Property taxes in the state have gotten too high.”
<iframe style="border: none; width: 100%; height: 800px;" src="https://dailywireinteractives.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/medicaid/medicaid_series.html" scrolling="no"></iframe>
The Ohio Republican also connected the Medicaid controversy to his broader push to slash taxes across the state if elected governor this November.
“Income taxes in certain states are zero income tax,” Ramaswamy said. “I want Ohio to be such a zero income tax state as well, but that means we&#8217;re going to have to take a look at every other area of savings for the taxpayer.”
Rosiak’s reporting painted a picture not just of isolated fraud, but of an entire taxpayer-funded ecosystem where oversight appears weak, accountability appears scarce, and huge amounts of public money are flowing through companies that investigators say often raise obvious red flags.
One especially eye-popping detail involved a landlord whose buildings reportedly housed hundreds of Medicaid-related businesses billing the federal government hundreds of millions of dollars.
The investigation also highlighted how difficult the system can be to verify in practice. In some cases, family members are reportedly paid through Medicaid programs to “care” for relatives at home, with little meaningful oversight over whether services are actually being rendered.

Vivek_Money_Trail

The Reckoning Vivek Is Vowing After DW Exposed Medicaid Money Trail

Medicaid

Medicaid Millionaires

Vivek Ramaswamy

“Tower, Frontier 4345, we&#8217;re stopping on the runway. Uh, we just hit somebody&#8230; we have an engine fire.”
That transmission crackling over air traffic control audio Friday night after a Frontier Airlines jet struck a person on the runway during takeoff, triggering panic onboard and a fiery emergency evacuation.
It happened shortly after 11:15 p.m. as Frontier Flight 4345 was accelerating for departure at Denver International Airport.
According to officials and air traffic control audio, the aircraft hit an individual who had entered the runway area during takeoff.
Denver International Airport later confirmed the person had jumped the airport perimeter fence and was hit just minutes later while crossing the runway.
“The pedestrian is deceased, and is not believed to be an employee of the airport nor have they been identified,” the airport posted Saturday morning.
The person who was struck was killed. An official says the victim was at least partially pulled into one of the plane’s engines, sparking a brief fire that firefighters later extinguished.
Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy <a href="https://x.com/SecDuffy/status/2053106272967279068?s=20">labeled</a> the individual a &#8220;trespasser&#8221; who &#8220;deliberately scaled a perimeter fence and ran out onto a runway.&#8221;
&#8220;No one should EVER trespass on an airport,&#8221; Duffy said on Saturday morning.
Inside the cabin, passengers reportedly began noticing smoke as pilots slammed the brakes and stopped the Airbus A321 on the runway.
Emergency slides were deployed and travelers evacuated directly onto the tarmac before being bused back to the terminal. 
The flight was carrying 224 passengers and seven crew members.
Airport officials now say 12 people suffered minor injuries during the evacuation, with five transported to local hospitals.
Moments after the impact, the crew warned air traffic control that conditions onboard were deteriorating.
“We&#8217;ve got smoke on the aircraft, we&#8217;re gonna evacuate on the runway,” the pilot said.
Denver airport officials also said investigators examined the perimeter fence after the incident and found it to be intact, raising even more questions about how the person managed to access the restricted runway area before the collision.
The runway remained closed Saturday morning as investigators continued processing the scene, though airport officials said they expected it to reopen within hours.
The National Transportation Safety Board has been notified and Frontier says it is coordinating with airport officials to determine exactly what happened.
Frontier called the incident “deeply saddening” in a statement released early Saturday morning.
The flight to Los Angeles has since been rescheduled, with most passengers later departing Denver on another Frontier aircraft.

Holiday Travel Surge At Houston’s George Bush Intercontinental Airport

The Moment Pilot Realizes Plane Packed With Passengers Hit Person On Runway

Air Travel

Airlines

National transportation Safety Board

Travel

The Biden blob is apparently trying to make a comeback and even Democrats sound exhausted by it.
A growing fight is breaking out inside Democratic foreign policy circles as some of the same officials tied to President Joe Biden’s most controversial global decisions quietly begin regrouping for 2028. And according to a lengthy new report from Puck News, plenty of Democrats are openly asking the same question: seriously, these guys again?
At the center of the drama is former Biden National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and the network of Obama-Biden foreign policy operatives often referred to inside Washington as the “Biden bros.”
That circle includes familiar names like Antony Blinken, Jon Finer, Brett McGurk, and others who helped shape Biden-era policy on Afghanistan, Ukraine, Gaza, and Iran.
Now many of them are reemerging through a revived Democratic foreign policy group called National Security Action, which reportedly gathered party insiders in Manhattan recently to begin plotting what Democratic foreign policy could look like in 2028.
The reaction inside parts of the Democratic Party has not exactly been enthusiastic.
“This is the Jake and Jon Show: Redux, and nobody I know is happy about it,” one former senior State Department official told Puck.
That pretty much sums up the vibe.
The frustration appears to go far beyond Republicans criticizing Biden’s foreign policy record.
According to the report, Democrats themselves are increasingly furious over everything from the Afghanistan withdrawal to the administration’s handling of Gaza, while others remain angry over what they describe as efforts to cover up Biden’s decline while still clinging to power politically.
One Democrat quoted in the piece bluntly said the old Biden foreign policy crowd is “canceled and they don’t realize it.”
Ouch.
The article paints a picture of a Democratic Party quietly tearing itself apart behind closed doors over whether the same establishment figures who dominated the Obama and Biden years should continue controlling foreign policy heading into the next presidential cycle.
And the backlash is not just ideological. Some Democrats reportedly view the group as arrogant, insulated, and unwilling to let a younger generation take over. 
 The timing also matters.
President Donald Trump is back in office, global tensions continue escalating, and Democrats are now trying to figure out what exactly their foreign policy identity even is after years of internal fighting over Israel, Ukraine, interventionism, and progressive activism.
That is where the anxiety around Sullivan seems to hit hardest.
For progressives, Sullivan became closely tied to Biden’s support for Israel during the Gaza war.
For hawks, critics say the administration looked weak and indecisive abroad.
For others, the issue is simpler: they believe the same people who helped run the last administration are already trying to reclaim influence before voters have even fully processed what happened.
Still, the old guard does not appear interested in quietly disappearing.
The revived organization recently brought in Maher Bitar, a Palestinian-American foreign policy official tied to Adam Schiff and Biden’s National Security Council, as part of an effort to present a newer face for the group.
But even that move reportedly sparked skepticism from Democrats who saw it as little more than a rebrand of the same old network.
For now, one thing seems clear.
The Biden era may technically be over, but the people behind it are not ready to let go of power just yet.

Joe Biden Campaigns In Western Pennsylvania One Day Before Election

The Biden Blob Is Back And Nobody Wants This

Biden

Biden Admin

Jake Sullivan

America is still lovin’ it.
More than a year after President Donald Trump’s viral McDonald’s campaign stop took over the internet during the 2024 election, we are finally learning how the unforgettable fast-food moment actually came together.
Speaking this week about the now-famous campaign event, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles revealed it was the campaign team that pitched the idea of Trump working the fryer at a McDonald’s during the final stretch of the race.
Trump quickly signed off on it for one very simple reason: “He eats it every single day,” Wiles said.
Back on October 20, 2024, Trump stopped at a McDonald’s in battleground Pennsylvania and instantly created one of the defining images of the election cycle.
Wearing an apron and standing behind the fryer, Trump cooked fries, joked with workers, and handed food through the drive-thru window as supporters packed the area outside.
The stop was also widely viewed as a jab at then-Vice President Kamala Harris, who had previously claimed she worked at McDonald’s when she was younger, though the story later became heavily debated during the campaign.
But the event was about more than trolling political opponents.
The campaign reportedly saw the stunt as a way to connect directly with working Americans, especially considering roughly one in eight Americans have worked at McDonald’s at some point in their lives.
The message was simple: Trump wanted to position himself as someone who respected those jobs and the people working them every day.
The unforgettable campaign gimmick exploded into a massive viral moment.
Within hours, photos and videos of Trump behind the fryer flooded social media. Memes spread everywhere. Supporters turned the moment into merchandise. Even critics who mocked the stunt admitted it completely hijacked the news cycle.
Now Wiles is pulling back the curtain on why the campaign believed it would connect so strongly in the first place.
The answer was authenticity.
Trump has spent decades openly talking about his love of McDonald’s and fast food.
Whether aboard Trump Force One or on the campaign trail, stories about his McDonald’s habit have followed him for years.
The campaign apparently understood something many political consultants still do not. Americans can spot a fake photo-op from a mile away.
But Trump standing inside a McDonald’s looked less like a consultant-crafted stunt and more like something he would genuinely be doing on a random night.
More than a year later, people are still talking about it.

Trump McDonalds

We’re Still Lovin’ It! The Story Behind Trump’s Viral McDonald’s Shift

Donald Trump

McDonald’s

Disney is hitting reset on its own magic, and a new fairytale playbook is coming to life.
New CEO Josh D&#8217;Amaro is laying out a clear plan for where the company goes next, and it comes down to three things. Double down on Disney’s biggest franchises. Expand its reach globally. Lean into new technology like artificial intelligence.
In plain English, Disney wants to take what already works, its most popular characters and stories, and stretch them across everything. Movies. Streaming. Theme parks. Merchandise. Cruises. All of it.
That shift is already starting to show.
For the first time, Disney says its streaming business, including Disney+, is seeing real momentum, with double-digit revenue growth. The company now expects that growth to reach at least 10% this year. That is a big deal for a division that has been expensive and under pressure for years.
The bigger change is how Disney plans to get there.
D’Amaro made it clear the company sees AI as a major tool moving forward, not just in the background, but across everything from how content is made to how it is marketed and delivered to viewers. He also stressed that Disney plans to keep human creativity at the center, even as it experiments with new technology.
At the same time, Disney is betting heavily on its intellectual property, the franchises that already generate major revenue. Think sequels, spin-offs, and familiar characters showing up everywhere. The company pointed to the success of Zootopia 2 as a blueprint. A strong box office run, massive streaming numbers, and continued visibility in parks and retail.
It is all part of a larger strategy. Build once and profit across every platform.
Disney is also continuing to refine how people use its platforms. New features on Disney+ aim to keep viewers engaged longer and coming back more often. Over at ESPN, the company is still working to grow its direct-to-consumer business into a stronger long-term revenue driver.
Why does it matter?
This is not just corporate strategy. It is going to shape what people actually see.
Expect more sequels. More familiar franchises. More crossover between what you watch at home and what you experience in parks or buy in stores. Disney is clearly leaning into what already works and finding new ways to expand it.
At the same time, the push into AI and new technology could quietly change how content gets made behind the scenes, even if audiences do not notice it right away.
The big picture is simple: Disney is not tearing everything down. It is tightening the system and trying to make every part of it work together more efficiently than before.

Disney World

A Big Disney Reset Is Quietly Taking Shape

Disney

Disney Channel

Menu