<p style="font-weight: 400;">On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court warned public officials could get in trouble for blocking critics on social media.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">The case arose after James Freed created a private Facebook profile before 2008, later converting his profile to a public “page.” In 2014, Freed updated his Facebook page to note his new job as city manager of Port Huron, Michigan, but still posted about his personal life. He also posted information related to his job, responded to comments on his posts, and occasionally deleted comments that he considered “derogatory” or “stupid.”</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">After the COVID–19 pandemic began, Freed posted personal and job-related posts related to it. Facebook user Kevin Lindke commented on some of Freed’s posts, saying he disagreed with the city’s COVID policies. At first, Freed deleted Lindke’s comments, and later blocked him from commenting. Lindke then sued, claiming Freed had violated his First Amendment rights and that he had the right to comment because the page was a public forum.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">The District Court ruled for Freed in <em>Lindke v. Freed</em>; the Sixth Circuit affirmed the decision.</p>
<p>“[T]he Court warned that public officials face a high risk of liability when they operate a ‘mixed use’ social media page (i.e., posting both public and private topics) and block people from that page,” JDSupra.com <a href="https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/supreme-court-issues-key-decisions-on-5116377/">noted</a>.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">The Supreme Court vacated the judgment of the Sixth Circuit and remanded the case for further proceedings, <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-611_ap6c.pdf">writing,</a> “A public official who prevents someone from commenting on the official’s social-media page engages in state action under §1983 only if the official both (1) possessed actual authority to speak on the State’s behalf on a particular matter, and (2) purported to exercise that authority when speaking in the relevant social-media posts.”</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">The Court explained, “Section 1983 provides a cause of action against ‘[e]very person who, <em>under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or us- age, of any State</em>’ deprives someone of a federal constitutional or statutory right. Section 1983’s ‘under color of” text makes clear that it is a provision designed as a protection against acts attributable to a State, not those of a private person.’”</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">“The Sixth Circuit held that an official’s activity is state action if the ‘text of state law requires an officeholder to maintain a social-media account,’ the official ‘use[s] . . . state re- sources’ or ‘government staff’ to run the account, or the ‘accoun[t] belong[s] to an office, rather than an individual officeholder.’ These situations, the Sixth Circuit explained, make an official’s social-media activity ‘fairly attributable’  to the State.&#8221;</p>

<script async src="https://www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script async src="https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js"></script><div data-widget-host="revcontent" data-pub-id="165152" data-widget-id="290588"></div><script src="https://delivery.revcontent.com/165152/290588/widget.js"></script>

SCOTUS Warns Public Officials Not To Block Critics On Social Media

CONTINUE READING

Ultimate Betrayal: NY Jewish Dem Grovels To Anti-Israel Radicals To Buy An Election

What Happens When Your Therapist, Friend, And Ego Booster Become The Same Thing

Jeff Bezos Humiliates NYC’s Socialist Mayor

Talk Trash, Get Smashed: Never Write Checks Your Fastball Can’t Cash

Community Mourns Veteran Turned Civic Leader Killed In Violent Confrontation

Democrat Tries Telling Trump What He Can Say And Can’t Say

News

Free Speech

Supreme Court

A video goes viral showing a baby being refused his mother by two gay "dads". This is just the tip of the iceberg, which is why we will have an important discussion today about surrogacy. 

Hour 1

The Matt Walsh Show

Ep. 1765 - This Video Is One Of The Worst Things I've Seen In A Long Time 

The Strait of Hormuz officially opens for business (kind of), the Pope makes “shocking” comments on immigration, and President Trump promises UFO disclosure at TPUSA. 


The Michael Knowles Show

Ep. 1956 -  Pope Leo's "SHOCKING" Immigration Comments EXPLAINED

A false miscreed has corrupted our leadership class.


The Andrew Klavan Show

Ep. 1275 - Dumb, Dumber and Progressive

President Trump announces a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel, a murder-suicide involving former Democratic Lieutenant Governor Justin Fairfax shakes Virginia, and France and Britain hold a conference to secure the Strait of Hormuz – after the Iranian conflict ends. Get the facts first with Morning Wire.

- - -

Ep. 2738

- - -

Wake up with new Morning Wire merch: https://bit.ly/4lIubt3

- - -

Today's Sponsors:

Alliance Defending Freedom - Visit https://JoinADF.com/WIRE or text 'WIRE' to 83848 to learn more.

Pocket Hose - Text MORNING to 64000 to get a FREE pocket pivot and their 10-pattern sprayer with the purchase of ANY size Copper Head hose. Message and data rates may apply.

Morning Wire

U.S. Expands Hormuz Blockade & VA Fairfax Deaths Investigated | 4.17.26

U.S. Expands Hormuz Blockade & VA Fairfax Deaths Investigated | 4.17.26 [Member Exclusive]

A ceasefire goes into effect between Israel and Lebanon, a tragic murder-suicide rocks Virginia, and Dairy Queen deploys AI in the drive-thru. Get the facts first with Evening Wire.
- - -
Ep. 2737
- - -
Wake up with new Morning Wire merch: https://bit.ly/4lIubt3 
- - -
Today’s Sponsor:

Alliance Defending Freedom - Visit https://JoinADF.com/WIRE or text “WIRE” to 83848 to learn more.


Menu

— News —

SCOTUS Warns Public Officials Not To Block Critics On Social Media