The legacy media is predictably horrified by the new Daily Wire movie “<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/videos/run-hide-fight-infidels?utm_campaign=rhf2&amp;utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial&amp;utm_content=editorial_na_creative00795_na" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Run Hide Fight: Infidels</a>,” calling it “deranged” and “Islamophobic drivel.”
These types of reviews are precisely what makes it worth seeing.
As usual, the creators are being criticized for telling the truth that’s obvious to everyone but Hollywood refuses to accept. While they fawn over narratives pushing white men as the villains, “Infidels” exposes the true threat to Western civilization: radical Islam.
<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/videos/run-hide-fight-infidels?contentProgram=Run%20Hide%20Fight%3A%20Infidels&amp;contentType=Video&amp;elementPosition=3&amp;location=Home%20Tab&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Home%20Featured%20Carousel" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: RUN HIDE FIGHT: INFIDELS</a>
A reviewer from <a href="https://variety.com/2026/film/reviews/run-hide-fight-infidels-review-1236864093/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Variety</a> insists that the film is “unworthy of its outrage,” dubbing it an “Islamophobic promotional campaign.”
“Rather than making a satirical point about liberal overreach, the movie argues that all this empathy for other people — including for the Indigenous tribes whose land was seized on behalf of the school, or Palestinians trying to hold onto theirs — is a purely oppressive force,” the review goes on. “Are you contemptuous of radical leftists who believe that others should be treated with decency, care and respect? If so, this is the film for you.”
Daily Wire Editor Emeritus Ben Shapiro <a href="https://x.com/benshapiro/status/2100253723628847380" target="_blank" rel="noopener">posted</a> a portion of the review, prompting followers to express how the reaction to the film was making them more excited about the movie&#8217;s premiere on Wednesday.
“Stop, I’m already [planning] on watching it, you don’t have to convince me,” one person <a href="https://x.com/GrageDustin/status/2100265159268720793" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a>.
Far-Left outlet <a href="https://slate.com/culture/2026/09/run-hide-fight-infidels-jonathan-majors-daily-wire.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Slate</a> begrudgingly complimented the film by calling it “Die Hard-ish” in terms of action sequences. The reviewer also pointed out that no terrorist event like the one in “Infidels” has occurred on a college campus, implying that the plot is extreme for suggesting it could. Who could ever imagine a violent terrorist attack by a radical islamist in the United States, right?
“There’s a feeling of evil glee to the carnage wrought in &#8216;Infidels&#8217; that goes beyond anything you see in the first &#8216;Run Hide Fight,&#8217; and beyond anything that happens in, say, a Taylor Sheridan show,” the Slate reviewer observed, concluding that the movie was ultimately “deranged.”
<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2026/sep/17/jonathan-majors-action-thriller" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Guardian</a> blasted “Infidels” for its “brazen political incorrectness” and claimed the &#8220;film’s &#8216;bad Muslim&#8217; conceit&#8221; was a “dated” concept.
Shapiro responded to that review, posting on X, “What they find disturbing, by the way, is that we depict ISIS doing ISIS things. This is unacceptable. ISIS must never be portrayed doing ISIS things. They must instead be portrayed as victims of Western imperialism.”
A reviewer from <a href="https://rogersmovienation.com/2026/09/17/movie-review-120-minutes-of-badly-written-poorly-acted-poison-run-hide-fight-infidels/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Movie Nation</a> also complained about the film, calling it, “a whole lot of hate packed into its 120 or so minutes of clumsy, lurching running time.” YouTube reviewer “Rama’s Screen” said it was a “torture session” just like it’s predecessor and insisted Shapiro wants “everyone to hate” all Muslims.
“The right wing propaganda is so on the nose,” he complained. “It’s not enough for the film to demonize Muslims. It also needs to validate and rationalize open carry and toxic masculinity.”
Rama took issue with the portrayal of Muslims especially, saying, “They don’t care about the fact that wearing a hijab is a personal choice, and that there are millions of moderate female Muslims out there who don’t wear any head scarves at all. The whole film is a heavy-handed, cartoonish, tone deaf political commentary.&#8221;
Everything above is both the reason the Daily Wire made the film and why you should run to watch it.
Those not carrying water for the radical Left had very different reactions to the film. Reviewer Christian Toto gave it solid marks, writing, “‘Infidels’ has little interest in subtlety. It’s a bare-knuckled assault on a Hollywood ecosystem that ignores reality and the Modern Left. &#8216;Infidels&#8217; reminds us of all the stories that should be told but aren’t.”
“It’s like ‘Citizen Vigilante,’ but with far more skill, humor and self-awareness,” he added.
The review site <a href="https://filmthreat.com/reviews/run-hide-fight-infidels/">Film Threat</a> also had positive things to say about the film. &#8220;It was a visceral experience watching this film. Rankin’s screenplay weaves in satire, romance, and explosive action in a tight package. All these tonal elements easily flow together,&#8221; the reviewer said.
&#8220;It is the right amount of high-stakes melodrama and light comedy, which evokes classical Hollywood filmmaking,&#8221; the review continued. &#8220;The stunt work, pyrotechnics, practical effects, and marksmanship are beautifully done. Action scenes never feel redundant, and the brutality from our disgusting antagonists is appropriately shocking without going into exploitation territory.&#8221;
The reviewer also notes the timeliness of the topic, concluding that it&#8217;s on par with Daily Wire hits including Matt Walsh&#8217;s documentaries &#8220;What is a Woman?&#8221; and &#8220;Am I Racist?&#8221;
&#8220;&#8216;Infidels&#8217; is an exhilarating blockbuster that will bring out the fighting American spirit this fall,&#8221; the review concludes.
“Run Hide Fight: Infidels” is <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/videos/run-hide-fight-infidels?utm_campaign=rhf2&amp;utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial&amp;utm_content=editorial_na_creative00795_na" target="_blank" rel="noopener">currently streaming on The Daily Wire</a>.

Run Hide Fight Infidels

Hollywood Hates ‘Infidels.’ That’s Exactly Why You Should Watch It.

daily wire

film criticism

hollywood

radical islam

run hide fight infidels

Comedian and HBO host Bill Maher destroyed the narratives pushed by revisionist historians on the 9/11 Islamic terrorist attacks.
Maher, during Friday&#8217;s broadcast of &#8220;Real Time,&#8221; reflected on the 25th anniversary of the attacks — through which Islamic terrorists murdered nearly 3,000 Americans — and ripped into those who still refuse to tell the truth about what happened.
&#8220;There was a war on terror, and we won. And yet, so much has changed since 9/11. For example, back then, we were against the terrorists,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Now, a lot of media outlets don&#8217;t even want you to say the &#8216;T-word.&#8217; On the 20th anniversary, four American journalism associations put out guidance that said &#8216;terrorism&#8217; should only be used in quotes because it&#8217;s emotionally and politically loaded.&#8221;
Noting that a number of media outlets had advised employees not to refer to the attackers as &#8220;terrorists&#8221; or the attacks themselves as acts of &#8220;terror,&#8221; <a href="https://x.com/billmaher/status/2098609787739226115">Maher</a> questioned the wisdom of failing to say aloud what the real cause of the attacks was.
&#8220;Really? We can&#8217;t anymore just say out loud who the bad guys were on that morning?&#8221; he asked. &#8220;Those 19 hijackers, they shared something — oh, let&#8217;s call it a world view, and it wasn&#8217;t astrology. But somehow, over time, we&#8217;ve decided not to harp on that, the whole business about who wanted us dead and why. Let&#8217;s not put a name on it.&#8221;
&#8220;When it comes to terrorist attacks, please, there are very fine people on both sides,&#8221; Maher quipped, mocking one of President Donald Trump&#8217;s most often misquoted comments about the removal of Civil War era statues.
Maher went on to mock Canadian State TV (CBC) for telling reporters not to refer to the attacks as &#8220;terrorist attacks&#8221; laying out the definition of terrorism and explaining why September 11th was a textbook example of terrorism.
&#8220;What should we call it then?&#8221; he asked. &#8220;Unruly passengers? A wrong turn taken at the Chrysler building? Why not just say the planes and the towers got into a fight?&#8221;
The BBC, he noted, told reporters that using the word &#8220;terrorist&#8221; could be a &#8220;barrier rather than an aid to understanding.&#8221;
&#8220;You know what&#8217;s really a barrier to understanding?&#8221; he asked before answering, &#8220;Lying.&#8221;
Maher went on to explain that 25 years later, some 20% of young people had a favorable view of al-Qaeda leader and 9/11 mastermind Osama bin Laden.
&#8220;Was this a clash of civilizations? It was, and it still is. Not between Muslims and Christians &#8230; But radical Islamism versus Western liberalism? Yes, that’s a real thing. Fighting people who hate freedom of religion and hate homosexuals. And hate the idea of women as equal and free humans, how did liberals wind up on their side? And many did,&#8221; Maher said.
The comedian then pivoted to call leaders in the Democratic Party &#8220;cowards,&#8221; saying that their failure to express the moral clarity of Islamic terror has bled into other areas of global conflict and political contention.
&#8220;Nowhere has this moral confusion become more obvious than in a place called Gaza, a little strip of land that was not part of the original Israel, but which they won in a war launched against them, but then gave back as a peace gesture. Did they tell you that part on TikTok, kids?&#8221; he said. &#8220;And the people who run Gaza, Hamas, who you celebrate as a liberation movement but are really a terrorist mafia gang, just like the one that terrorizes Haiti, only ever used it to stage attacks on Israel. I think Macklemore spoke for all clueless celebrities when he said, &#8216;I know enough to know this is a genocide.&#8217; Actually, you don’t know sh*t. It’s not a genocide, it’s a counter attack in a war.&#8221;

Bill Maher

Bill Maher Destroys Revisionist Historians On 9/11 Terrorist Attacks

bill maher

hamas

media bias

real time with bill maher

september 11 attacks

It’s been 25 years since September 11, 2001. But while the terror attacks may be seared into the memories of survivors forever, 9/11 remains a tragic piece of American history we can&#8217;t afford to forget.
“Everyone&#8217;s got a story,” human rights activist <a href="https://sujojohn.com/">Sujo John</a> tells The Daily Wire. He was working in the North Tower at the World Trade Center. He says he survived by the grace of God.
Excluding the hijackers, almost <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/history/cases-and-criminals/911-investigation">3,000 lives</a> were lost that day. But the deadliest attack on American soil saw continued fatalities in the aftermath. More than <a href="https://usafacts.org/articles/how-have-military-deaths-changed-over-time/">7,000 U.S. military</a> personnel were killed in subsequent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, along with nearly <a href="https://costsofwar.watson.brown.edu/costs/human/us-military-veterans-contractors-allies">8,000 U.S. contractors</a>. Those numbers don’t even account for the hundreds of thousands of allied troops and police who were also killed, and the millions of veterans now living with severe disabilities and PTSD.
Immediately following the attack, the congested air and debris surrounding the 14.6-acre Ground Zero site in Lower Manhattan became toxic. Decades later, many survivors and first responders endure an ongoing nightmare.  
“Victims of 9/11 who were exposed to all that stuff have died,” John reminds me. “There was a <a href="https://nypost.com/2026/09/05/us-news/nearly-6k-lives-lost-to-9-11-related-cancer-over-57k-others-diagnosed/">study</a> in the New York Post that said some 57,000 people have responded saying they have cancer.” Reported diagnoses include recent spikes in cancers of the thymus gland in the chest, stomach and bowel endocrine cancers, and breast cancer in men. Cases in survivors total <a href="https://nypost.com/2026/08/31/us-news/9-11-cancers-skyrocket-nearly-1700-ahead-of-25th-anniversary/">28,913</a>, now surpassing 28,131 of those in first responders. 
A quarter-century later, it’s still a political flashpoint. “You&#8217;re dealing with radical Islam,” John says, citing <a href="https://jewishonliner.org/p/inside-cairs-2026-2027-back-to-school-guide?utm_source=chatgpt.com">the Council on American-Islamic Relations</a>’ recent direction for schools not to &#8220;talk about 9/11 as a terrorist attack.” John describes a reporter who asked him, “If you were to face a group of kids, would you tell them it was a terrorist attack?” He’s shocked this is even up for debate. “It&#8217;s crazy that we were talking about something like that.”
John and his wife Mary had just moved to America from Calcutta, India, in February 2001. They were young and wanted to experience a new city early in their careers. He got a job in the North Tower; she worked in the South Tower. 
“I wrote an email at 8:05 in the morning,” John remembers, pulling up a message to a friend from church on his phone. He asks if I’m a person of faith. I say yes. He reads, “This is my sixth month in this country. God has been so good to us in so many ways … Back in India, although I had a secular job, I was involved in ministry. If church doors would be open, I would be there … Here, all I find myself doing is going to church on Sundays. I&#8217;m so ashamed to admit that I&#8217;m not involved in anything. Maybe this is what God wants me to go through right now, waiting for his will and purpose.” 
He had just signed a life insurance policy the night before, waking his wife up to alert her, “If something happens to me, this is who you need to call. This is the paperwork. We&#8217;ll never talk about this again.&#8221;
John had found real success in a short period of time. Still, there was something missing. “In the business world, you chase success and success shows up and yet there&#8217;s a hole in your heart. And you can&#8217;t fill that thing with stuff,” he explains. He employs a bit of gallows humor. “God reads email, I guess.”
American Airlines Flight 11 crashed into the 93rd through 99th floors of the North Tower of the World Trade Center 41 minutes after he sent that message. His office on the 81st floor became a chaotic scene of fire and twisted steel as walls immediately began to collapse. There were rumors that a wing of the plane had ripped through their floor. 
“Ten thousand gallons of jet fuel, flying at 440 miles an hour. You can only imagine how loud that was. But we all thought it was a small commuter plane. Nobody thought it was a large plane, let alone a terrorist attack.”
The E train stopped just short of the subway station at the South Tower, where Mary was headed into work. She was four months pregnant at the time, and running a little late that day. She stepped out onto the street as people jumped to their deaths around her. 
After rescuing a woman who had been trapped in a crumpled bathroom stall, John and his company made the hour-and-20-minute trek down the stairs. “We pass all these firemen, policemen, and we high-five them, saying, ‘You guys are the real heroes. God be with you,’” he recalls. “We had no idea that that would be the last time we would see their faces.”
“If you&#8217;ve heard the story of two men that carried a lady down in a wheelchair, both of them worked with me,” he says, calling his friends Michael Benfante and John Cerqueira heroes. “They brought a lady who was working for Port Authority down 68 flights, and then the building collapsed. They ducked under a firetruck. They all survived.”
“Nineteen Al-Qaeda terrorists attacked America that day. And the first response came through these men. They showed the world what this country is made of.”
John heard the second explosion from the stairwell, as United Airlines Flight 175 struck the South Tower at 9:03 a.m. Cell phones were jammed, so he made a desperate move to call his wife from a landline in an Asian bank on the evacuated 51st floor. His friends wouldn’t let go of him, but he remembers someone remarking, “What’s life for Sujo without his wife?” 
Moments later, a firefighter forced him back down the stairs. John says, “I&#8217;m absolutely sure that man that came and alerted me didn&#8217;t make it out of the building.”
When his group reached the concourse level, John recalls, “In between these towers, we see this picture of death and destruction. Bodies and body parts lying there.” Not knowing if his wife Mary was alive, he exited his building and headed toward the South Tower. 
“That&#8217;s when the unthinkable happens,” he remembers. “I made it through these revolving doors when I hear this incredible roar. This is the South Tower imploding and going down. I&#8217;m saying, ‘Okay, this is it. I&#8217;m going to die here.’”
“But I had this tremendous peace that if I were to die, I would make it to heaven.” He prayed with people near him, choking on thick soot. “That&#8217;s when I feel someone pull me. He says he&#8217;s with the FBI.” The two men followed a red flashing light from a crushed ambulance, leading them out of the ash and debris.
The agent told him, “‘I’ve got to go back and get more people.’ He runs back into the North Tower. The ground shakes again. The North Tower collapses. This American hero died that day.” Special Agent <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/history/wall-of-honor/leonard-w-hatton">Leonard W. Hatton</a> was the only active FBI agent to die in the 9/11 terrorist attacks. 
“Both the towers have collapsed and I&#8217;m saying, why am I spared?” Several excruciating hours later, John’s cell phone suddenly springs back to life. “When I said ‘Hello,’ it&#8217;s my wife on the other side … God had spared our lives.”
He couldn’t be more grateful to have survived that day. Along with becoming the least likely candidate to launch a public speaking career around his story of resilience and faith (he laughs about his Indian accent), he founded <a href="https://youcanfreeus.org/">You Can Free Us</a>, a global initiative to fight modern slavery. With a heart dedicated to helping others, he’s “involved in ministry,” just like he wrote in that email the morning of 9/11. His outreach works to free children from international sex trafficking and forced labor, providing the resources for kids to finally be kids. There are cartels and mafias. Enormous amounts of money. Predators setting traps in the not-so-dark fringes of Instagram and TikTok, promising fake summer jobs and modeling contracts. It’s difficult work, but he does it with purpose. 
I ask if there was ever a moment that he felt the pang of survivor’s guilt. “For the first few days and weeks, yes,” he says. “You used to hear these church bells. You used to see these funeral processions. But as I look back … I look at different small ways God has used my life.”
“We look at life on Earth in terms of years. But life on Earth is so short compared to life after this life,” John says. “What is important is living every day at peace within yourself, at peace with your loved ones, and at peace with God. That&#8217;s truly the secret to living a life that has purpose.”

The 9/11 Lesson This Survivor Says America Is Already Forgetting

9/11

al qaeda

human trafficking

world trade center

Michigan Democrat Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed kept a book on his shelf written by an Islamic scholar linked to the 1993 World Trade Center terrorist attack. 
The book, called “Dream Interpretation According to the Qur&#8217;an,” was written by Abu Ameenah Bilal Philips, an Islamic scholar listed as an unindicted co-conspirator in the first bombing attack on New York’s World Trade Center. The book was just one of several tied to radical Islam seen on El-Sayed’s shelf in resurfaced documentary footage.
El-Sayed&#8217;s campaign said in a statement the bookshelf was not his, but that he &#8220;reads widely.&#8221;
&#8220;This was not Abdul’s bookshelf. Abdul is a doctor and Rhodes Scholar who reads widely, including authors whose views he may disagree with. A book appearing in the background of documentary footage is not an endorsement of its content nor a reflection of his beliefs,&#8221; his campaign said in a statement. 
In the footage, El-Sayed <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-abdul-el-sayed-tells-film-crew-to-hide-his-qurans-from-shot">asked</a> the film crew to avoid filming the bookshelf. He told them, “You’re going to want to not get these things in the shot … we’re trying to keep the shot secular.”
The details on El-Sayed’s book collection were <a href="https://freebeacon.com/democrats/abdul-el-sayeds-secret-bookshelf-features-works-from-world-trade-center-bombing-unindicted-co-conspirator-and-radical-islamic-scholars/">flagged</a> by the Washington Free Beacon on Wednesday as the Michigan Senate candidate continues to face questions about his ties to radical Islam. A new <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/abdul-el-sayeds-mother-worked-for-terror-group-that-funded-bin-laden-and-taliban?author=Drew+Berkemeyer&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=1&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=Abdul+El-Sayed%E2%80%99s+Mother+Worked+For+Terror+Group+That+Funded+Bin+Laden+And+Taliban">report</a> Tuesday showed that El-Sayed’s mother worked for an American-based Islamic charity accused of financing Osama bin Laden.
Throughout his public work and advocacy, Philips <a href="https://d1.islamhouse.com/data/en/ih_books/single/en_Contemporary_Issues.pdf">defended</a> Muhammad’s marriage to a young child, <a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/canadians-with-alleged-terrorist-links-1.2839246#Dr.%20Abu%20Ameenah%20Bilal%20Philips">appeared</a> to justify suicide bombings as a &#8220;military action,” and has been banned from multiple countries. 
Other books on El-Sayed’s shelf included “Reflections on the Quran” by Irfan Ahmad Khan and “A Thematic Commentary on the Qur&#8217;an” by Sheikh Mohammed al-Ghazali. Khan was “<a href="https://www.islamicity.org/14713/loss-of-eminent-scholar-and-tireless-advocate-of-the-quran-dr-irfan-ahmed-khan/">active</a>” in the movement pushing for India to be governed by Sharia law before he moved to the United States, while Mohammed al-Ghazali was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. 
In the 1990s, Mohammed al-Ghazali <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1993/07/22/killing-apostates-condoned/68d0d42a-958f-4f42-8ad2-666a1629e2a0/">testified</a> in support of 13 Egyptian terrorists who gunned down a man who did not support Sharia law. During the trial, Mohammed al-Ghazali said that &#8220;the refusal of implementation of Sharia is apostasy,&#8221; adding that the death penalty was an acceptable punishment for apostasy under Islamic law. 
El-Sayed has also faced questions about previous comments he made to The New York Times about committing to following Sharia law. 
“Ultimately, the question is, when I die and I stand before God and go through everything I did in my life, I don’t want to say I did it the easy way instead of the Shariah-compliant way,” he said in 2009. “Not because of fear but because of obligation.”

MICHIGANDEMS

Abdul El-Sayed Displayed Book Written By Extremist Tied To 1993 World Trade Center Attack

1993 world trade center bombing

2026 midterm election

abdul el-sayed

michigan senate race

politics

Radical Leftists and radical Muslims have clearly formed an alliance. That alliance is ready to infiltrate the U.S. Senate, and pretty much everybody is afraid to talk about it. 
 
But for us at the Daily Wire, fear will never be an obstacle to telling the truth. 
 
We’ve talked about the Red-Green alliance in our coverage of the news on our podcasts and on social media, but America needs to see the reality of the Red-Green alliance for themselves. 
And there’s no better way to tell that story than through film. 
 
For decades, Hollywood has not made a single major film where the bad guys were Islamists. Villains are always Russian anarchist groups, white supremacists, or North Koreans. 
 
So while Hollywood avoids the fact that radical Islamic terrorists have perpetrated attacks around the world, the Daily Wire is going to lean into it. 
 
The film is called &#8220;Run Hide Fight: Infidels.&#8221; 
 
Starring Jonathan Majors, it’s a 1990s-style action blockbuster — think &#8220;Toy Soldiers&#8221; meets &#8220;Red Dawn&#8221; — where ISIS takes over a liberal American university.
<iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/sF4OZoLcCD0?si=F_3Q8SWo-MBxubat" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe> 
It&#8217;s exciting. It&#8217;s intense. It&#8217;s funny. It&#8217;s the biggest movie we&#8217;ve ever done. The radical jihadists lose, the red-blooded Americans win, and nobody apologizes for any of it. More importantly, it also says the thing: radical Islam is a threat to America, and we are all morons if we let it take over our country. 
 
When we dropped the trailer, Mehdi Hasan said it would be “difficult to come up with a more bigoted, Islamophobic and cliched trailer than this one.” 
 
Mehdi, why is it Islamophobic to point out what ISIS actually does and says? Why is it bigoted to say that ISIS wants to murder Americans? 
How exactly does depicting ISIS implicate all of Islam? 
 
Hasan also took issue with the claim that Hollywood has refused to tell the story of radical Islam, but you could probably count on one hand the number of major movies where Muslims are the villains. 
 
In fact, Hollywood has routinely changed Muslims from being the villains of films. Tom Clancy’s &#8220;The Sum of All Fears&#8221; was written with Palestinian terrorists originally, but in the film adaptation with Ben Affleck, the villains were neo-Nazis. 
 
I&#8217;m also old enough to remember when &#8220;24&#8243; had to deploy Kiefer Sutherland to publicly apologize for Islamophobia because there was one season where the Muslims were the bad guys. 

Meanwhile, streamer Sneako put out a tweet saying, “The kuffar are getting so desperate they&#8217;re trying to do Bush-era propaganda in 2026. No one cares anymore. We all know the Israelis are the real terrorists.”
The root of “kuffar” is also kafir, which means “infidels.” This is the same guy who congratulated Abdulrahman El-Sayed on his primary victory in Michigan with, “Islam will save America. Inshallah.” Sneako doesn’t want you to worry about Islam while he <a href="https://x.com/DrewPavlou/status/2043323509565530153?s=20">chants</a> on the streets of New York about the army of Muhammad returning to kill Jews. 
 
As for the notion that ISIS is simply not a threat anymore: according to the Global Terrorism Index, 20% of all terrorist attacks on planet Earth are attributable to ISIS right now. ISIS remains the chief threat of terrorism worldwide today. 
 
It is good to be able to say that the American people know their enemies. We ought to know what our enemies think, what they say, and what they do. 
 
Director Kyle Rankin’s script definitely does that. 
 
And if the Left is this pissed off at the trailer, just wait until they see the film.

Untitled (1200 x 800 px) (1200 x 675 px)

‘Run Hide Fight: Infidels’ Takes On The Enemy Hollywood Won’t Touch

mehdi hasan

the daily wire

The New York Times was savagely mocked for refusing to describe an Islamist attacker at a Berlin Pride event on Saturday who rammed his van into Tiergarten Park, killing one woman and injuring at least 29 others before he assaulted festivalgoers with what may have been a machete.
Online critics unloaded on the leftist outlet after it posted a whitewashed social media update about the deadly terror rampage. The paper&#8217;s bloodless bulletin on X casually reported that a &#8220;car plowed through a park&#8221; — completely ignoring the extremist monster behind the wheel and treating a deliberate, violent assault like a runaway vehicle accident.
“Breaking News: A car plowed through a park during Berlin’s biggest LGBTQ Pride event, killing at least one person and injuring more than a dozen others, city police officials said on Saturday,” the Times wrote.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Breaking News: A car plowed through a park during Berlin’s biggest LGBTQ Pride event, killing at least one person and injuring more than a dozen others, city police officials said on Saturday. <a href="https://t.co/NlqLMjtJB1">https://t.co/NlqLMjtJB1</a>
&mdash; The New York Times (@nytimes) <a href="https://x.com/nytimes/status/2081163850829758543?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 25, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
X users immediately slapped the paper with a harsh Community Note, pointing out the crucial facts the Left-leaning outlet conveniently left out: the vehicle was driven by a radical zealot with a deep rap sheet and known ties to violent extremism.
&#8220;Was the car a Chevrolet Radicalized Muslim?&#8221; Daily Wire Editor Emeritus Ben Shapiro wrote.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Was the car a Chevrolet Radicalized Muslim? <a href="https://t.co/fMUeYtn2C7">https://t.co/fMUeYtn2C7</a>
&mdash; Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) <a href="https://x.com/benshapiro/status/2081734552880300309?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 27, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;ARE YOU SUGGESTING A CAR AUTONOMOUSLY DROVE ITSELF INTO A CROWD OF LGBTQ PEOPLE?????&#8221; <a href="https://x.com/mattvanswol/status/2081457810609475739">wrote</a> social media commentator Matt Van Swol. &#8220;A MUSLIM INVADER WAS THE ONE WHO DROVE HIS CAR INTO THAT CROWD. WHY DO YOU CONTINUALLY HIDE THE TRUTH???? I TRUSTED YOU FOR YEARS, YOU ARE STRAIGHT GARBAGE!!!!!!!
&#8220;Hard to believe that the car got a mind of its own and plowed through the people. I also heard a knife stabbed someone this weekend in Chicago,&#8221; another person <a href="https://x.com/Jkylebass/status/2081515400001397153">commented</a>. &#8220;Headlines like this continue to decimate trust in the mainstream media. Awful…simply awful reporting.&#8221;
The actual story behind the media fail is far more chilling. German authorities launched an intense manhunt for 21-year-old Abdul Ballout after he weaponized the white van.
Officials swiftly raised the national threat level while warning of potential copycat violence. The manhunt eventually came to a lethal end in Berlin’s Spandau district, where law enforcement officers tracked down Ballout and <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/berlin-terrorist-attacker-shot-and-killed-by-police?author=Jacob+Wheeler&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=2&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=Berlin+Terrorist+Attacker+Shot+And+Killed+By+Police">shot him dead</a>.
It turns out Ballout was a walking red flag whom European authorities knew all too well. Born in Germany to a Lebanese mother, the young fanatic was a <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c3r2nz9ed3lt?post=asset%3A679975ea-dc63-4cff-b17e-cc95f0cbef6f">familiar face</a> to local law enforcement for his deep ties to the city&#8217;s extremist underworld. Even worse, he was a <a href="https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2026/07/26/abdul-ballout-berlin-pride-suspect-tried-join-islamic-state/">convicted terrorist</a> who had previously been snagged in Lebanon while attempting to cross into Syria to join the Islamic State.
After returning to German soil, he received a light slap on the wrist — sentenced to less than two years behind bars for plotting a major act of violence against the state. Prosecutors had begged for a longer stay behind bars, but the system let him walk free just months before he unleashed horror in the park.
Political figures across the globe slammed the attack, with critics pointing to the tragic incident as a grim wake-up call regarding the dangerous blind spots of Western political correctness.

Day After Berlin Pride Parade Attack

‘A Car Plowed’? NYT Shredded For Sanitizing Muslim Terrorist Attack

Berlin

terrorist attack

the new york times

An LGBTQ activist is doubling down, blaming white men after a Muslim man with known Islamist associations rammed a vehicle into Berlin’s Pride festival on Saturday before attacking bystanders with a machete, leaving one person dead and several others injured.
A viral video circulating online shows an <a href="https://x.com/iAnonPatriot/status/2081229875361325146?s=20">unidentified pink-haired woman</a> lamenting not the terror attack, but the public&#8217;s reaction to it.
“I&#8217;m getting really, really sick of this. I&#8217;m getting really tired of having to repeat myself over and over again,” she said. “So the suspect is an Islamic extremist. That&#8217;s their suspect right now. That&#8217;s what I read. Okay, I&#8217;m not going to say anything about the rest of the Muslim population because of actions of this one person.”
Then, the leftist shifted her focus and hurled unfounded accusations towards another demographic: white Christian men.
“But what I can say is the people who were celebrating about this were all white men, young white men with crosses in their profiles because we&#8217;ve all seen it. We&#8217;ve all seen how you guys react towards gay people, and how you wish harm on them constantly,” she said. “I get a constant hate on my videos, especially about trans people. You&#8217;re not going to hide behind another scapegoat group and pretend that they&#8217;re actually the violent ones when it&#8217;s you.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
OMG. Liberal women are blaming “white men” for the Islamic extremist who ran over people at an LGBTQ parade in Berlin.
“You’re not going to scapegoat the Muslim community like they’re the violent ones, when it’s actually you (white men).”
Can’t make this sht up. 💀💀 <a href="https://t.co/0nbsKYgqys">pic.twitter.com/0nbsKYgqys</a>
— American AF 🇺🇸 (@iAnonPatriot) <a href="https://x.com/iAnonPatriot/status/2081229875361325146?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 26, 2026</a></blockquote>
The woman claimed white Christian men share the same ideology as Abdul Ballout, who police say deliberately drove a white van into Berlin’s Tiergarten Park around 10 p.m., killing one woman and injuring at least 29 others before attacking festival goers with what authorities said may have been a machete. The 21-year-old convicted terrorist had previously attempted to join the Islamic State in Syria and was released from German custody just months before Saturday’s attack, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/known-islamic-terrorist-on-the-run-unleashed-machete-attack-after-plowing-van-into-crowd?topStoryPosition=undefined&amp;author=Jacob+Wheeler&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=0&amp;row=1&amp;rowHeadline=Top+Stories&amp;rowType=Top+Stories&amp;title=Known+Islamic+Terrorist+On+The+Run+Unleashed+Machete+Attack+After+Plowing+Van+Into+Crowd">The Daily Wire reported</a>.
Migration levels in the European Union remain high, with approximately <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20260227-1">4.2 million</a> immigrants arriving in 2024 and total foreign-born residents reaching roughly 64 million. Spain and Germany recorded the largest absolute numbers of new arrivals, according to the <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Migration_to_and_from_the_EU">European Commission</a>.
“You hold the same exact beliefs that this man who did this attack did, and you&#8217;re trying to distance yourself from it. And you know why you&#8217;re trying to do that? Because you&#8217;re ashamed, and you should be,” she said in the video.
The passionate defense highlights the growing, confounding alliance between LGBT activist groups and Islamic ideology in Western countries.
“Ahmad attacks people at a Pride Parade because Islam. White liberal woman with aposematic hair coloring concludes white men are to blame. Suicidal Empathy is a fatal disease of the human spirit,” Gad Saad, an evolutionary behavioral scientist, <a href="https://x.com/GadSaad/status/2081359046775275807?s=20">said</a> on X.
“Queers for Palestine real quiet about this one,” Kangmin Lee, a conservative digital content creator, <a href="https://x.com/kangminlee/status/2081243091629904336?s=20">reacted</a> on social media.
Germany’s latest terror attack, which is said to have left a “horrific scene,” left Pride attendees reeling, including Ricarda Hofmann, a presenter at one of Europe’s largest LGBTQ celebrations.  “What happened today has changed something in me,” she <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/DbPTNq6iDz4/?hl=en&amp;img_index=1">wrote on Instagram</a>.
On Sunday, organizers of the Berlin Pride festival vowed not to allow the Islamic terror attack to be used &#8220;for political ends.&#8221;
&#8220;People are trying to divide our society and set some people against others. As the CSD in Berlin, we will not allow this,&#8221; a representative for the group <a href="https://x.com/SkyNews/status/2081393662244646936?s=20">said</a> at a press conference.

NYC Pride

WATCH: Pink-Haired LGBT Activist Blames White Christian Men For Islamic Terror Attack

Christian

christianity

Germany

identity politics

islam

lgbt

lgbtq

Muslim

News

terror attack

terrorism

Initially, it was all very dapper: the tea, the crumpets, and the fanfare. They were all good and fine.
But then the King of England, King Charles III, decided to use his royal prerogative and lecture us on how to run our country, on how America ought to lead the world.
Shut the hell up.
It’s true that there are many lessons to be learned from Great Britain over the past century.
But the biggest one is this: Don’t do what they did.
King Charles is currently representing a civilization that no longer exists. He&#8217;s an empty crown, sitting atop a civilization that gave up the ghost a long time ago. There&#8217;s only one takeaway Americans should have from the King&#8217;s visit: If Great Britain has zigged, we ought to zag.
Britain is a cautionary tale. If we follow their path, we collapse the same way they have.
<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ben-shapiro-ep-2416?elementPosition=5&amp;row=5&amp;rowHeadline=Latest+Episodes&amp;rowType=Horizontal+Show+Episodes+Carousel"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-large wp-image-974957 aligncenter" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/511983dad25841c8b1ec058d75769bbe-1024x171.webp" alt="DailyWire+" width="1024" height="171" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/511983dad25841c8b1ec058d75769bbe-1024x171.webp 1024w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/511983dad25841c8b1ec058d75769bbe-300x50.webp 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/511983dad25841c8b1ec058d75769bbe-768x128.webp 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/511983dad25841c8b1ec058d75769bbe-1536x256.webp 1536w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/511983dad25841c8b1ec058d75769bbe-2048x341.webp 2048w" sizes=" (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a>
Charles’ visit to the United States began with Revolutionary-Era soldiers welcoming the king in the Rose Garden.
Somewhat ironic; the last king who experienced Revolutionary-era soldiers would not have been welcomed in quite this way.
As a student of American history and as a devotee of British philosophers ranging from John Locke to Edmund Burke, I love the fact that the United States is rooted in Anglican and English history. I love it. It&#8217;s great.
Charles called the bond between the United States and the UK priceless and eternal. He joked about the idea that if it were not for Great Britain, we would be speaking French, a response to President Trump saying that if it were not for us, the British would be speaking German (I assume Charles was referring to the French and Indian War, which doesn&#8217;t make a whole hell of a lot of sense, because if the French had won the French and Indian War, it is very likely that many of the settlers would have returned to England).
But then the king decided it was time to lecture the United States. And this is the part to which I object.
It began with him talking about Christianity. He said, “For many here and for myself, the Christian faith is a firm anchor and daily inspiration that guides us not only personally.”
So far, so good, although I&#8217;m not sure why Democrats were clapping.
“Together as members of our community, having devoted a large part of my life to interfaith relationships and greater understanding,” he continued. “It is that faith in the triumph of light over darkness, which I have found confirmed countless times through it. I am inspired by the profound respect that develops as people of different faiths grow in their understanding of each other.”
There we go. This was all going to lead up to a bit of a lecture about America&#8217;s foreign policy.
As a person who is not Christian, I have tremendous admiration for Christianity and what it has done in the world. I encourage people to go to church all the time, but it turns out that if you want a robust Christianity, that Christianity cannot be based on vague principles. It has to be based on faith.
So when you hear the Brits lecturing the United States, a much more religious country, about Christianity and interfaith relations, let&#8217;s be real: Great Britain has taken religion and trodden it through the mud.
The statistics don&#8217;t lie. According to the UK&#8217;s 2022 census, 51% of people in the UK identify as having no religion, according to a 2024 British Social Attitudes Survey. A paltry 9% of the population attends a religious service once a week or more.
And as far as Anglican identity, it doesn&#8217;t exist anymore. 2.6% of people aged 16 to 34 identify with the Church of England.
Meanwhile, the tremendous increase in radical Islam in the kingdom has been overwhelming. 15% of London, at a minimum, is Muslim. A huge percentage of those people are radicalized. According to one survey conducted in 2016 by the polling exchange, 4% of British Muslims say that 9/11 was executed by al Qaeda, 7% say the Jews, and 31% say the American government.
Great Britain imported millions of people who believe this. Millions of people. This is where their interfaith nonsense has gotten them.
So, as far as being lectured on Christianity and interfaith attitudes by the Brits, the answer is no.
You know where interfaith is going in Britain. Interfaith is about tolerance for radical Islam, which is why today, the day after King Charles visited the United States, there was an attack in Golders Green, which is a very heavily Jewish part of London, in which a radical Muslim took out a kitchen knife and started stabbing people who were wearing Jewish garb.
According to UK government data, there were 15,859 total reported incidents of knife crime in London in 2025 alone. We know that Great Britain&#8217;s interfaith tolerance allowed for gigantic grooming gangs to basically run the place for years on end, out of fear that there might be a backlash to open immigration.
King Charles also took the opportunity to lecture us on climate change. We should mention that the UK has destroyed its own economy on the basis of this nonsense.
Listening to the Brits lecture us on energy production is ridiculous. Roughly 78% of the UK&#8217;s energy still comes from hydrocarbons. That would be things like oil and natural gas. The UK is constantly on the economic edge because of its extraordinary regulations and low domestic gas storage capacity. According to an article in The American Spectator, there&#8217;s a 78% tax rate on North Sea gas production and a nuclear program that&#8217;s not going to deliver energy for a decade.
The energy programs in the UK have driven them into the dirt, economically speaking.
All of this culminated in King Charles lecturing the United States on how to beat swords into plowshares rather than plowshares into swords.
I understand: King Charles represents the monarchy. Keir Starmer&#8217;s government is an appeasement-oriented, left-wing pacifist government.
In order to understand my ire here, I think you have to understand that having the British Crown come to the United States and tell us all about the old-style civilization that Britain basically surrendered in favor of welfare statism is highly irritating. 
In 1933, there was a resolution at Oxford University at their debate club, the so-called King and Country Resolution, in which the students voted, “that this House will under no circumstances fight for its king and country.” This was reflective of British sentiments; an attempt in the aftermath of the course of World War I to recede from global leadership.
You know what ended up happening? It was a self-fulfilling prophecy.
I was recently reading Winston Churchill&#8217;s “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Gathering-Storm-Second-World-War/dp/039541055X/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0">The Gathering Storm</a>,” which is, of course, a classic. It is the first volume of his Second World War series. In the beginning pages of the book, Churchill explains his purpose in writing the book, saying he was writing to demonstrate “how the malice of the wicked was reinforced by the weakness of the virtuous, how the structure and habits of democratic states, unless they are welded into larger organisms, lacked those elements of persistence and conviction which can alone give security to a humble masses. How, even in matters of self-preservation, no policy is pursued for even 10 or 15 years at a time. We shall see how the counsels of prudence and restraint may become the prime agents of mortal danger. How the middle course, adopted from desires for safety and quiet life, may be found to lead direct to the bullseye of disaster.” 

He continued, “We shall see how absolute is the need of a broad path of international action, pursued by many states in common across the years, irrespective of the ebb and flow of national politics.”
Great Britain is currently telling the United States that we ought not do what we are doing in Iran. They are doing absolutely nothing to help us in the Strait of Hormuz. They are perfectly willing to allow China to maximize its global influence. Only in the case of Ukraine has Britain taken a leading role in any sort of way, and even there, it&#8217;s basically to beg us for money and armaments.
After World War II, Great Britain decided it would give up global leadership in favor of irrelevance and socialism.
No country has done as much damage to itself as Great Britain through pacifism, socialism, redistributionism, and open borders.
The Brits can&#8217;t even leave their kids money, because when you give up global leadership, free markets, private property, and skew in favor of socialist idiocy and global weakness, you become irrelevant.
You don&#8217;t get to come here and lecture us about any of this.

TOPSHOT-US-BRITAIN-ROYALS-POLITICS-DIPLOMACY

The Empty Crown: Why America Should Ignore King Charles

donald trump

England

Great Britain

king charles iii

opinion

In a recent <a href="https://tuckercarlson.com/april-14-2026-morning-note">Morning Note</a> newsletter, Tucker Carlson Network told subscribers: “The people in charge don’t want you to know this, but Muslims love Jesus.” The post <a href="https://x.com/TCNetwork/status/2044060521901576664?s=20">highlighted</a> Islam’s reverence for “Isa” as a major prophet and miracle-worker who will one day return to defeat the Antichrist. It even linked this supposed common ground to Iran’s president Masoud Pezeshkian’s outrage over a painting depicting Donald Trump as the Son of God.
This is classic Tucker: contrarian, anti-elite framing designed to expose what “they” don’t want you to know. But it collapses under scrutiny. It peddles an interfaith platitude that flattens irreconcilable theology, whitewashes 1,400 years of conquest and subjugation, and ignores the systematic, ongoing slaughter of Christians in Muslim-majority nations — facts documented year after year by credible monitors. Carlson, who built his brand exposing cultural rot and elite lies, is here recycling the very “religion of peace” trope he once mocked. Worse, his recent comments reveal a broader pattern of downplaying radical Islam as a threat while Christians die for the faith he claims to defend. Tucker appears to sympathize with Muslims (as individuals or against “hate”) more than he spotlights their brothers and sisters in Christ being hunted.
The doctrinal chasm makes true “love” impossible. Islam does revere “Isa,” but the Quran’s version is a human prophet, not divine. He never claimed godhood, never died on the cross for sins, and never rose from the dead. Explicitly: “They did not kill him, nor did they crucify him, but it was made to appear to them so” (Surah 4:157). The Trinity is condemned as polytheism (Surah 5:73). Isa is a forerunner to Muhammad, not the eternal Son of God whose blood atones. To say Muslims “love Jesus” while stripping Him of deity, crucifixion, and resurrection is like praising Abraham Lincoln while insisting he never opposed slavery. It is not the biblical Christ. Core Islamic texts treat Christianity as corrupted and superseded. The dhimmi system (Quran 9:29) codifies Christians and Jews as second-class subjects paying jizya tax in humiliation — protected only insofar as they submit. Apostasy from Islam carries the death penalty in traditional jurisprudence. Individual Muslims can be kind neighbors — especially as minorities in the West. But when Islamic ideology holds power, the pattern is subjugation or elimination, not “love.”
The data from Open Doors’ <a href="https://www.opendoors.org/persecution/WWL-2026-International-Advocacy-Report.pdf">World Watch List</a> 2026 is unambiguous and devastating. More than <a href="https://www.opendoorsus.org/en-US/stories/5-things-you-need-to-know-about-open-doors-2026-world-watch-list/">388 million Christians</a>, one in seven globally, face high levels of persecution and discrimination for their faith. In the top 50 countries alone, over 315 million endure very high or extreme levels. During the reporting period (October 2024 to September 2025), 4,849 Christians were killed specifically because of their faith. Nigeria alone accounted for 3,490 of those deaths — an increase from 3,100 the previous year. Sub-Saharan Africa saw 93 percent of all faith-related Christian killings worldwide.
After North Korea (No. 1, the only non-Islamic state at the top and it has held that spot for 24 years), the list is dominated by countries where Islamic extremism is the primary driver: Somalia (No. 2), Yemen (No. 3), Sudan (No. 4), Eritrea (No. 5), Syria (No. 6), Nigeria (No. 7), Pakistan (No. 8), Libya (No. 9), and Iran (No. 10). Open Doors identifies Islamic extremism as the main source of persecution in roughly 40 of the top 50 nations.
In Nigeria, Boko Haram, ISWAP, Fulani militants, and other jihadist groups have made the country the deadliest place on earth for Christians. Villages are burned, churches razed, and families slaughtered with near-total impunity — attackers have been recorded declaring their intent to destroy Christians. In Pakistan, blasphemy laws rooted in Islamic doctrine trigger mob lynchings and death sentences over alleged insults to Muhammad or the Quran. In Iran, Christian converts face arrest, torture, or execution. The pattern holds across the Middle East, North Africa, and parts of Asia: wherever Sharia influence grows, Christian populations shrink or vanish. This is not ancient history — it is 2024–2025 reality, and the numbers show Muslim-majority nations and Islamist groups are the world’s leading perpetrators of violence against Christians.
History confirms the incompatibility. Christianity was once the majority faith across the Middle East and North Africa. After the 7th-century Islamic conquests, jizya taxes, legal discrimination, church destruction, and periodic violence reduced it to scattered minorities. Christians comprised 13–20 percent of the region’s population a century ago. Today, they are roughly <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity_in_the_Middle_East">5%</a>. In Iraq alone, the Christian population fell from about 1.4 million before the 2003 U.S. invasion to between 300,000 and 500,000 now. North Africa’s once-thriving churches were virtually erased. This was gradual attrition under institutionalized inferiority — exactly what dhimmi status and apostasy laws enforce. When Muslims achieve demographic or political dominance, the ideology produces the outcomes Open Doors documents annually.
Carlson’s framing is especially disappointing because it mirrors the Left’s reflexive defense of Islam while ignoring the body count. But it’s jarring from him. In a December 2025 interview with <a href="https://www.theamericanconservative.com/tucker-carlson-talks-the-west-collective-punishment-and-antisemitism/">The American Conservative</a>, he dismissed fears of radical Islam in the United States as an “Israeli government psyop” pushed by “its many defenders and informal employees in the United States.” He stated flatly: “I don’t know anyone in the United States in the last 24 years who’s been killed by radical Islam.” He added that he sees “millions of Americans being destroyed, and none of it is at the hands of radical Islam,” and has called hostility toward Muslims “disgusting.” He has defended Muslims against anti-Islam rhetoric, praised Christian-Muslim “harmony” in places like Jordan, and criticized Protestant and evangelical leaders harshly while downplaying threats from Islamist ideology. Tucker appears to prioritize anti-Israel/anti-neocon rhetoric. As an Episcopalian who calls himself Christian, ignoring that “Isa” rejects Christ’s core claims — and that real followers of the real Jesus are being slaughtered — undermines the very faith he invokes.
The Iranian president’s offense at a Trump-as-divine painting is trivial next to the daily reality: Actual followers of Jesus are hunted, beaten, and murdered across the Islamic world. Scripture demands we discern spirits and false prophets, not pretend incompatible faiths “love” the same Lord. The data, doctrine, and history are not “Islamophobic,” they are simply facts. Ignoring them helps no one, least of all the persecuted.
***
Bethany Miller is the Director of Communications at NRB, Managing Editor of The Conservateur, and a Senior Fellow at Concerned Women for America.

Pakistani activists from the “Christian Helpline Pakistan”

No Tucker, Muslims Don’t ‘Love Jesus’

christian persecution

DW Opinion

tucker carlson

British police arrested a fourth person in connection with an arson attack on Jewish community ambulances, with the detention happening at a London court where three males already charged in the case were appearing, prosecutors said on Saturday.
Hamza Iqbal, 20, Rehan Khan, 19, and a 17-year-old who cannot be named for legal reasons, are accused of torching four ambulances belonging to the Jewish volunteer emergency service Hatzola on March 23 while they were parked near a synagogue in the Golders Green area of north London.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer described the incident at the time as a &#8220;deeply shocking antisemitic arson attack.&#8221;
The SITE Intelligence ​website has said an Iran-aligned multinational militant collective called Islamic ​Movement of ⁠the People of the Right Hand had claimed responsibility for the incident.
It said the group had been behind similar fires in Europe.
Counter-terrorism officers are heading the investigation in Britain, but as yet the incident is not being treated as terrorism.
A prosecutor from the Crown Prosecution Service said police believe four people were involved in carrying out the attack itself, with a fourth individual being arrested on Saturday morning as part of an ongoing investigation.
The Metropolitan Police said the fourth suspect was a 19-year-old man who had been arrested by officers at the court while attending the hearing, after officers recognised him as being linked to the attack. He was arrested on suspicion of arson with intent to endanger life and taken into custody.
Three men have been charged with arson with intent to damage property and being reckless as to whether life would be endangered. Two are British nationals, while the third holds dual British‑Pakistani citizenship.
All three were remanded in custody, with the 17‑year‑old ordered to be held in youth detention accommodation.
Hatzola is a not-for-profit volunteer emergency service that works alongside Britain&#8217;s National Health Service and primarily serves the Orthodox Jewish community.
The London Fire Brigade said explosions from cylinders on the vehicles shattered nearby windows, but no one was injured.
Attacks on Jewish people and Jewish targets have risen in Britain since the October 2023 Hamas assault on Israel that triggered the war in Gaza, according to police and community groups.
(Reporting by Sam Tabahriti; Editing by Joe Bavier and Toby Chopra)

U.K. Police Arrest Fourth Suspect Over Attack On Jewish Ambulances

Anti-Semitism

U.K.

world

Sarah Trone Garriott has a Harvard Divinity degree, a Lutheran ordination, and a history of calling Christianity a threat. Now she wants to be your Congresswoman.
Garriott, who is currently serving in the Iowa State Senate and running to flip Iowa’s Third Congressional District blue, made remarks in 2023 that should follow her to every campaign stop, debate stage, and Iowa church pew between now and November. Speaking about religious conservatives, she described them as &#8220;uncomfortable&#8221; — as something that “feels very threatening” — and linked Christianity itself to “political violence.” Not radical Islam. Not jihadist ideology. Christianity. 

She said this as an ordained minister of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.
Three years later, with Holy Week upon us and a string of Islamic terror attacks fresh in the national memory, Garriott’s remarks deserve to be exhumed, examined, and explained. Not because they were gaffes — they weren’t. They deserve attention because they are a window into exactly what the modern religious Left believes: that the greatest threat to civil society is not the ideology responsible for over 60,800 terror attacks in the last half-century, but the people filling church pews on Palm Sunday.
During Holy Week, as Christian communities are still burying their dead from coordinated massacres in Nigeria, this inversion of morality is morally obscene.
Christianity is the most persecuted religion in the world, so it was unfortunately not a complete shock that on Palm Sunday, while progressive politicians were busy casting aspersions on churchgoing Christians, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/30/world/africa/palm-sunday-attack-nigeria-dead.html">coordinated attacks</a> devastated Christian communities across central and northern Nigeria in what survivors are calling the Palm Sunday Massacres. Entire congregations were targeted. Families were slaughtered on one of the holiest days of the liturgical calendar. Christianity is not causing violence, Reverend Garriott; it is absorbing it. 
This is not an anomaly. It is an escalating pattern that cowardly politicians refuse to name. In March of 2026 alone, there were four confirmed Islamist terror attacks on Western soil, with at least four additional major plots thwarted before they reached fruition. As we approach the 25th anniversary of the September 11 terror attacks, the trend driving mass-casualty violence is not Christian nationalism — it’s the jihadist radicalism that’s been methodically seeping into this country for decades: Over 60,800 Islamic terror attacks were carried out globally in the last fifty years. The comparable figure for attacks attributed to Christian or Jewish extremism amounts to a few hundred. These are not remotely equivalent threats, and any elected official who pretends otherwise is either ignorant or dishonest. 
So what, precisely, does threaten these power-hungry clerics? It is not the Sermon on the Mount. It is not the notion that He is the way, the truth, and the life (John 14:6). What threatens them is the downstream consequence of a populace that actually lives by those words. Christians grounded in Scripture are harder to manipulate, less dependent on the government as their provider, and far less likely to hand power to pseudo-believers whose lives represent the antithesis of everything Christ commands. This dynamic was on full display just this week when Daily Wire host <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/daily-wire-host-fires-back-after-the-view-melts-down-over-her-support-for-young-families">Isabel Brown</a> was publicly castigated for the radical act of suggesting marriage and children are worth pursuing — a principle so foundational it runs from Genesis through the Pauline epistles. Garriott herself has voted against protecting women’s sports from biological males and against banning gender-transition procedures for minors. That is the true threat they fear — not violence, not extremism, but a people too grounded in faith to go along with these cultural lies. 
 
Certainly, there are wolves in the pulpit. There are leaders who have abandoned orthodoxy, twisted Scripture for popularity and applause, and led congregations into confusion rather than conviction. That apostasy is real and genuinely threatening to the Church and her faithful. But the solution to bad theology is not to hand political power to the theologians perpetrating it. In a world where America is still called the “Great Satan” by those who mean it literally, and where our cultural foundations are being eroded daily, authentic Christians are not the problem. They are the last best hope of restoring the Christian values upon which this republic was built.
Sarah Trone Garriott is a wolf in pearls — ordained, Harvard-educated, interfaith-credentialed, and deeply hostile to the faith she claims to represent. A minister who thinks Christianity is an imminent threat is not a pastor; she is a politician in a collar. Don’t let her do to Iowa’s Third District what Judas did in the garden — betray it with a kiss, wearing the vestments of a friend.

Midterm Fight Over Trump Bill, Tariffs Starts Early At Iowa Fair

She Said Christianity Feels ‘Threatening.’ Now She Wants Your Vote.

She Said Christianity Feels 'Threatening.' Now She Wants Your Vote.

congress

Elections

iowa

Leftists

religion

Last week, my home state of Michigan witnessed something truly terrifying: a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/police-respond-to-reports-of-active-shooter-as-michigan-synagogue-goes-up-in-smoke">terrorist attack</a> at a house of worship. The attacker drove a vehicle filled with explosives into a synagogue in West Bloomfield, a suburb of Detroit, just a few hours outside of my district.
Thankfully, on-site security personnel quickly intervened — stopping the terrorist and preventing any injury to the innocent children or staff inside. I am grateful to these guardians for responding quickly to safeguard those innocent lives, and I pray for the recovery of those injured in stopping this despicable attack.
This attack, however, isn’t an isolated incident. It is part of a broader and deeply troubling rise in antisemitism that has spread across our country since the October 7, 2023 massacre in Israel.
Nowhere is that rise more evident than on our college campuses.
Students have been whipped into an activist frenzy targeting Israel and the Jewish people.
Rather than stamping out the antisemitic fervor, faculty are fanning the flames. Many campus leaders seem completely unwilling to do anything about it.
<div id="attachment_1062451" style="width: 874px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1062451" class="size-large wp-image-1062451" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/03/GettyImages-2154554442-864x576.jpg" alt="TOPSHOT - Pro-Palestinian protesters, some wearing cap and gown, hold signs and chant at a rally in front of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on May 28, 2024. (Photo by Joseph Prezioso / AFP) (Photo by JOSEPH PREZIOSO/AFP via Getty Images)" width="864" height="576" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/03/GettyImages-2154554442-864x576.jpg 864w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/03/GettyImages-2154554442-300x200.jpg 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/03/GettyImages-2154554442-768x512.jpg 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/03/GettyImages-2154554442.jpg 1024w" sizes=" (max-width: 864px) 100vw, 864px" />JOSEPH PREZIOSO/AFP via Getty Images</div>
On campuses across the nation — regardless of size or location — student groups are organizing to harass and intimidate Jewish students. Groups like Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) are the ringleaders, often with the backing of similar faculty organizations.
At Columbia University, antisemitic demonstrators stormed a library, disrupted students, and chanted slogans like “from the river to the sea.” Eden Yadegar, my guest to President Trump’s Joint Address to Congress last year, described it as “disrupting one of the most basic functions of the university.”
All too often, this chaos leads to violence. The House Committee on Education and Workforce — of which I am the <a href="https://edworkforce.house.gov/">chairman</a> — heard from Michael Kaminsky, a student at DePaul University and a first-generation American who was assaulted by masked attackers for his efforts to promote dialogue about Israel and the Jewish faith. He was left with a fractured wrist, and his friend was knocked unconscious.
This is not what college should be. Students should be focused on learning and growing — not fearing harassment or assault because of their identities.
These actions are not happening in a vacuum. They are being encouraged — sometimes openly — by faculty.
At Haverford College, Tarik Aougab — a member of Haverford Faculty for Justice in Palestine (FSJP) — labeled pro-Israel students as “racist genocidaires” while praising the October 7 attacks as “a historic moment.”
At the University of California, Berkeley, a professor posted that he “could have been one of those who broke the siege.”
At MIT, former linguistics professor Michel DeGraff accused a student of having a Zionist “mind infection.”
<div id="attachment_1062465" style="width: 874px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1062465" class="size-large wp-image-1062465" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/03/GettyImages-2205276310-864x576.jpg" alt="Michel DeGraff a former professor of linguistics and now faculty at large of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) attends a protest at city hall in Cambridge, Massachusetts on December 9, 2024. The protest calls for the city to intervene and take action against MIT for its role in the Israeli and Palestinian conflict and for MIT to loose its non profit status. (Photo by Joseph Prezioso / AFP) (Photo by JOSEPH PREZIOSO/AFP via Getty Images)" width="864" height="576" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/03/GettyImages-2205276310-864x576.jpg 864w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/03/GettyImages-2205276310-300x200.jpg 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/03/GettyImages-2205276310-768x512.jpg 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/03/GettyImages-2205276310.jpg 1024w" sizes=" (max-width: 864px) 100vw, 864px" />JOSEPH PREZIOSO/AFP via Getty Images</div>
This kind of rhetoric has consequences.
Let’s be clear: for many Jewish Americans, Israel is central to their identity. When students are targeted under the guise of “anti-Zionism,” the line between activism and antisemitism is not just crossed — it’s erased.
And yet, too many university leaders have failed to meet this moment.
Time and again, university presidents have come before this Committee and refused to take responsibility. They hedge, they equivocate, and they fail to enforce even their own rules.
The result is what we see today: antisemitism that is spreading, intensifying, and, in some cases, turning violent.
My Committee has released a report documenting just how serious this problem has become.
The findings are clear: weak leadership, radical faculty, and emboldened student groups have created an environment where antisemitism festers — and Jewish students are paying the price.
This cannot continue.
* * *
Tim Walberg represents Michigan’s 5th Congressional District and is serving his ninth term in the U.S. House of Representatives. He currently chairs the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Protesters Gather Outside Pro-Palestinian Activist Mahmoud Khalil’s Court Conference In New York

The Profs Aren’t Alright: How Radical Faculty Fuel The Rise Of Campus Antisemitism

The Profs Aren't Alright: How Radical Faculty Fuel The Rise Of Campus Antisemitism

Menu