Voting has already kicked off in California for Proposition 50, which aims to redraw the state’s congressional maps more heavily in favor of Democrats until new maps are created after the 2030 census.
The proposal is meant to counteract Republicans’ gain of five seats in Texas under a redistricting plan approved by Texas Governor Greg Abbott in August, following a hard-fought battle in the state legislature.
“Proposition 50 is a direct response to a Republican power grab orchestrated by President Trump and state leaders in Texas, who redrew Congressional district lines to gain five more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives,” the California Democratic Party’s website states.
“Proposition 50 proposes new lines for many of California’s 52 congressional districts, which would negate the five Republican seats drawn by Texas. Under the proposed lines, Democrats could gain up to 5 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives,” the<a href="https://cadem.org/yes-on-proposition-50-faq/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> website</a> adds, saying that a Democratic majority could “fight back” against President Donald Trump’s agenda.
But if the Texas maps somehow fall through in a court battle, California’s new map, favoring Democrats, would still exist,<a href="https://www.kcra.com/article/california-proposition-50-explained/68888242" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> KCRA</a> reported.
The ballot measure has the backing of California Governor Gavin Newsom and many statewide Democrats, but Republicans and former California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger have voiced opposition to the proposition, as have the majority of district attorneys in the Golden State, according to<a href="https://www.sanluisobispo.com/opinion/us-viewpoints/article312447815.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> The Tribune</a>.
“If you believe gerrymandering is wrong, vote NO on 50,” Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-CA) posted to X on Sunday. “If you believe politicians should be bound by the Constitution, vote NO on 50.”
Still, opponents of the measure face an uphill battle, as a recent co/efficient poll released at the start of October shows that 54% of those surveyed support Prop. 50, whereas 36% are opposed and 10% are unsure, <a href="https://punchbowl.news/article/campaigns/prop-50-polling/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Punchbowl News</a> reported.
Both sides have been mobilizing on the issue, with former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi asking on X for people to volunteer for the effort, saying it would “help promote our vision of a more free, safer, and healthier California for all.” On Tuesday, former President Barack Obama released an <a href="https://x.com/MediumBuying/status/1978087770632380459" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ad</a> saying, “California, the whole nation is counting on you.”
However, opponents are optimistic despite being significantly outspent, according to <a href="https://www.politico.com/newsletters/california-playbook-pm/2025/09/29/the-incredible-shrinking-republican-campaign-against-prop-50-00585589#:~:text=But%20they%20are%20not%20doing,turnout%20from%20the%20Republican%20base." target="_blank" rel="noopener">Politico</a>, saying that once the meaning of the proposition’s technical language is explained, people typically oppose it.
On the California Secretary of State’s<a href="https://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/quick-reference-guide/50.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> website,</a> the proposition is tabled under the quick references guide as allowing  “temporary changes to congressional district maps in response to Texas’ partisan redistricting.”
“Yes, with two caveats, turnout and voter contact,” Los Angeles County GOP Chair Roxanne Hoge told The Daily Wire when asked if the proposition can be defeated.
“If we didn&#8217;t have the crazy title in summary that they had, it would be like Prop 36, right. Overwhelming. But given the title and summary we have, it&#8217;s neck and neck,” she added. Proposition 36 was a crime crackdown measure that passed with nearly 70% of the vote in 2024 despite opposition from many notable Democrats.
Election Day is November 4 in California.
California is one of several states that has descended into a redistricting battle. Missouri Governor Mike Kehoe approved an electoral map in September that could benefit Republicans with another congressional seat, but a referendum and legal challenges could jeopardize the plan, according to the <a href="https://missouriindependent.com/2025/09/22/missouri-voters-likely-to-deliver-final-verdict-on-congressional-map-initiative-changes/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Missouri Independent</a>.
“I was proud to officially sign the Missouri First Map into law today ahead of the 2026 midterm election,” the Republican said at the time in a statement. “Missourians are more alike than we are different, and our values, across both sides of the aisle, are closer to each other than those of the congressional representation of states like New York, California, and Illinois. We believe this map best represents Missourians, and I appreciate the support and efforts of state legislators, our congressional delegation, and President Trump in getting this map to my desk.”
New York and other states have also mulled new maps, and the debate has put an additional strain on Ohio’s ongoing redistricting process.
<a class="c-link" href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/?utm_campaign=fall40&amp;utm_content=fallsale&amp;utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/?utm_campaign=fall40&amp;utm_content=fallsale&amp;utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial" data-sk="tooltip_parent" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-2253">Get 40% off new DailyWire+ annual memberships with code FALL40 at checkout!</a>

Nancy Pelosi

Inside California’s Effort To ‘Fight Back’ Against Trump With Redistricting

California

Congress

Gavin Newsom

One lone Democrat has stepped up to call for Jay Jones, Democratic nominee for state attorney general in Virginia, to drop out of the race over several text messages he sent calling for the assassination of a political opponent.
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) spoke with Hugh Hewitt about the texts Jones sent to a Republican colleague, then-Delegate Carrie Coyner, in which he&#8217;d suggested then-state House Speaker Todd Gilbert should be shot and that he&#8217;d like to &#8220;piss on the graves&#8221; of other Republicans.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Congressman <a href="https://twitter.com/RoKhanna?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RoKhanna</a> calls on VA Democratic nominee for AG Jay Jones to drop out of the race, for Katie Porter to hold a long press conference, and for government to reopen though it took a long time to get to the last point.<a href="https://t.co/1xXRvtO21s">https://t.co/1xXRvtO21s</a> <a href="https://t.co/JJKbYaGQEn">pic.twitter.com/JJKbYaGQEn</a>
— HughHewittShowLinks (@HHSLinks) <a href="https://twitter.com/HHSLinks/status/1976386311998275773?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 9, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Hewitt asked the question point blank: &#8220;Should that man, Jay Jones, drop out of the race?&#8221;
&#8220;Well, it&#8217;s horrific. There&#8217;s no excuse for it,&#8221; Khanna began. &#8220;I fully condemn it. And yeah, I haven&#8217;t followed all the details, but if he was actually saying that, I certainly wouldn&#8217;t support him.&#8221;
While many Democrats have come forward to condemn Jones&#8217; remarks, they have repeatedly stopped short of calling for him to exit the race — and some have even <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/top-virginia-senator-says-jay-jones-still-has-his-support">defended him</a> staying in the race either by claiming that despite those texts, he was still a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/virginia-dems-say-candidate-who-fantasized-about-murdering-gop-leader-is-better-than-republicans">better choice</a> for attorney general than the Republican incumbent, Attorney General <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/is-the-virginia-way-dead-ag-jason-miyares-breaks-down-whats-really-at-stake-in-jay-jones-race">Jason Miyares</a>. Khanna became the first prominent member of the party to break with Jones.
Even former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) attempted to split the baby, telling CNN anchor Dana Bash that whether or not Jones should leave the race was a decision best left to leaders in Virginia — and then said that since he&#8217;d at least apologized, &#8220;What I understand is they say, on balance, he is a better person to be Attorney General.&#8221;
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
CNN: &#8220;The Democrat candidate for Attorney General in Virginia said a Republican deserved two bullets in his head&#8230; Should he get out of the race?&#8221;
Pelosi: &#8220;What I understand is they say, on balance, he is a better person to be Attorney General.&#8221;<a href="https://t.co/WOgV0EXk0v">pic.twitter.com/WOgV0EXk0v</a>
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) <a href="https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1975972670102741468?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 8, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

House Oversight And Accountability Members And Watchdog Group Court Accountability Focus On Supreme Court Ethics

FINALLY: A Democrat Calls For Jay Jones To Drop Out Of Virginia AG Race Over Despicable Texts

Jay Jones

Media

Politics

Virginia

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent declared on Wednesday that he will begin advocating for a ban on individual stock trading in Congress, arguing that major portfolio gains by lawmakers undermine voter confidence in the system.
When pressed during an <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aR85WkgO8bc" target="_blank" rel="noopener">interview</a> with &#8220;Bloomberg Surveillance&#8221; on whether President Donald Trump is prepared to sign off on stock trading legislation <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/senate-panel-votes-to-ban-stock-trading-for-lawmakers-president-and-vp-but-spares-trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">making its way</a> through Congress, Bessent said he did not believe a &#8220;perfect bill&#8221; had been introduced yet, but did express a desire for a crackdown.
&#8220;I am going to start pushing for a single stock trading ban because the — it is the credibility of the House and the Senate that you look at some of these eye-popping returns, whether it&#8217;s Representative Pelosi, Senator Wyden, every hedge fund would be jealous of them,&#8221; Bessent said.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
I am pushing for a ban on single-stock trading in Congress. The American people deserve better than politicians like <a href="https://twitter.com/RonWyden?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RonWyden</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/SpeakerPelosi?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SpeakerPelosi</a> with hedge-fund level returns. Public service should be about serving the people, not getting rich. <a href="https://t.co/yaXFGRfiMz">pic.twitter.com/yaXFGRfiMz</a>
— Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent (@SecScottBessent) <a href="https://twitter.com/SecScottBessent/status/1955713416292601876?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 13, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Bessent, a former hedge fund manager, was referring to former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) — both of whom are <a href="https://nypost.com/2025/06/21/us-news/pelosi-added-millions-to-net-worth-last-year-report/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">estimated</a> to be worth <a href="https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/net-worth-update-senator-ron-wyden-made-estimated-8241k-stock-market-last-month" target="_blank" rel="noopener">millions</a> of dollars.
&#8220;And you know, the American people deserve better than this. People shouldn&#8217;t come to Washington to get rich,&#8221; Bessent continued. &#8220;They should come to serve the American people and it brings down trust in the system because, I can tell you, that if any private citizen traded this way, the SEC would be knocking on their door.&#8221;
<a href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/?utm_campaign=summer&amp;utm_content=editorialsummersale&amp;utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial" target="_blank" rel="noopener">End of Summer Sale – Get 40% off New DailyWire+ Annual Memberships</a>
Pelosi&#8217;s well-known success in the stock market during her time in Congress has drawn intense scrutiny, but it may not be examined by the Securities and Exchange Commission or be a focus of any formal investigation any time soon. In fact, just last month, senators <a href="https://x.com/SenRickScott/status/1950637197272727566" target="_blank" rel="noopener">shot down</a> a measure seeking an inquiry into her trades.
During a recent appearance on CNN, Pelosi <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/nancy-pelosi-visibly-perturbed-by-cnns-random-act-of-journalism" target="_blank" rel="noopener">responded</a> to Trump accusing her of insider trading, rejecting the claim.
&#8220;That’s ridiculous,” Pelosi said. &#8220;In fact, I very much support the — stop the trading of members of Congress, not that I think anybody’s doing anything wrong, if they are, they are prosecuted and they go to jail. But because of the confidence it instills in the American people, don’t worry about this. But I have no concern about the obvious investments that have been made over time, I’m not into it, my husband is, but it isn’t anything to do with anything insider.&#8221;
As some other lawmakers <a href="https://www.notus.org/money/shri-thanedar-stock-act-violation" target="_blank" rel="noopener">violate</a> disclosure rules that are currently in place, Bessent pointed out that both <a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5267113-donald-trump-congressional-stock-trading-ban/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Trump</a> and House Minority Leader Hakeem <a href="https://punchbowl.news/article/house/bipartisan-group-eyes-stock-trading-ban/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jeffries</a> (D-NY) have voiced support for a congressional stock trading ban.
&#8220;The House and the Senate, they&#8217;re supposed to be working for the American people — their constituents,&#8221; Bessent said. &#8220;They&#8217;re supposed to be making law. And they shouldn&#8217;t be trading every day. I&#8217;m not going to name names, but there was one person in Congress who had 12 or 13 hundred trades two years ago. And you know, my hedge fund didn&#8217;t have that many trades.&#8221;
Bessent also warned, &#8220;There&#8217;s something going on on Capitol Hill in terms of information leakage that is statistically &#8230; not sound.&#8221;

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent

Bessent Targets ‘Eye-Popping’ Stock Gains Made By Members Of Congress

Scott Bessent

Stock Market

Treasury Department

Trump Administration

U.S.

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s (D-CA) indignant reaction to a recent question from CNN&#8217;s Jake Tapper gave away the game, revealing just how rare an occasion it is for a member of her party to be held to account by almost anyone in media.
Pelosi&#8217;s name had come up multiple times during spirited debate in the Senate over a bill — presented by Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) — that would bar members of Congress from owning stock. Tapper pressed Pelosi on the issue, using a comment from President Donald Trump to kick off the conversation.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Pelosi chastises Tapper for asking about Trump accusing her of insider trading:
“Why do you have to read that?&#8221;
“It isn&#8217;t anything to do with anything insider. But the president has his own exposure, he&#8217;s always projecting.&#8221;
“Let&#8217;s not give him any more time on that, please.&#8221; <a href="https://t.co/rMQbobt9eB">pic.twitter.com/rMQbobt9eB</a>
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) <a href="https://twitter.com/WesternLensman/status/1950667689711776189?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 30, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;Let me just read what he said,&#8221; Tapper stated, after technical difficulties prevented him from playing a clip he&#8217;d intended to air. &#8220;Nancy Pelosi became rich —&#8221;
&#8220;Why do you have to read that?&#8221; Pelosi demanded to know, clearly annoyed by the direction the interview was taking. &#8220;We‘re here to talk about the 60th anniversary of Medicaid. That&#8217;s what I agreed to come to talk about.&#8221;
&#8220;I wanted to —&#8221; Tapper tried again, but Pelosi interrupted him again.
&#8220;— And what that means, and the election,&#8221; she continued.
Tapper pushed back, saying that he had only &#8220;wanted to give you a chance just to respond. He accused you of insider trading, what&#8217;s your response to that?&#8221;
&#8220;That&#8217;s ridiculous,&#8221; Pelosi laughed. &#8220;In fact, I very much support the — stop the trading of members of Congress, not that I think anybody&#8217;s doing anything wrong, if they are, they are prosecuted and they go to jail. But because of the confidence it instills in the American people, don&#8217;t worry about this. But I have no concern about the obvious investments that have been made over time, I&#8217;m not into it, my husband is, but it isn&#8217;t anything to do with anything insider.&#8221;
Pelosi then attempted to make the conversation about President Donald Trump, suggesting that he was only shining a spotlight on her to deflect from something he must have done.
&#8220;The president has his own exposure, so he&#8217;s always projecting,&#8221; she claimed. &#8220;He&#8217;s always projecting, and let&#8217;s not give him any more time on that, please. We&#8217;re going forward here.&#8221;
She then pivoted again to claim that the man who entered her San Francisco home and attacked her husband had been &#8220;inspired by [Trump]&#8221; before suggesting that it would be better if they could just go back to talking about Medicaid.
Trump, as he gave remarks from the White House on Wednesday, called for Pelosi to be investigated and claimed, &#8220;Nancy Pelosi became rich by having insider information &#8230; I think that&#8217;s disgraceful &#8230; She has the highest return of practically anybody in the history of Wall Street.&#8221;
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
🚨 BREAKING: President Trump calls for Nancy Pelosi to be INVESTIGATED for insider trading
“Nancy Pelosi became rich by having insider information &#8230;I think that&#8217;s disgraceful.&#8221;
“She has the highest return of practically, ANYBODY in the history of Wall Street…
HOW DID THAT… <a href="https://t.co/M6pM9UR9Nn">pic.twitter.com/M6pM9UR9Nn</a>
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) <a href="https://twitter.com/nicksortor/status/1950616450126795233?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 30, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

US-POLITICS-VOTE-MIDTERMS-DNC

Nancy Pelosi Visibly Perturbed By CNN’s Random Act Of Journalism

Nancy Pelosi Visibly Perturbed By CNN's Random Act Of Journalism

Insider Trading

Jake Tapper

President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) should be investigated for insider trading.
The former speaker, along with her venture capitalist husband, has faced allegations of insider trading as her investments outperformed almost every major hedge fund in 2024, the New York Post <a href="https://nypost.com/2025/06/21/us-news/pelosi-added-millions-to-net-worth-last-year-report/">reported</a>.
&#8220;You know, Nancy Pelosi became rich by having inside information. She made a fortune with her husband, and I think that&#8217;s disgraceful,&#8221; Trump <a href="https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/1950617253952582084">said</a> during a press conference at the White House.
&#8220;And what I do think is Nancy Pelosi should be investigated, because she has the highest return of anybody practically in the history of Wall Street, save a few,&#8221; Trump added. &#8220;And how did that happen? It happened by she knows exactly what&#8217;s gonna happen, what&#8217;s gonna be announced, she buys stock, and then the stock goes up after the announcement&#8217;s made. And she ought to be investigated.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
.<a href="https://twitter.com/POTUS?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@POTUS</a>: &quot;Nancy Pelosi became rich by having inside [trading] information. She made a fortune with her husband — and I think that&#39;s disgraceful &#8230; She ought to be investigated.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/N8ydC2jGhF">pic.twitter.com/N8ydC2jGhF</a>
&mdash; Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapidResponse47/status/1950617253952582084?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 30, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Pelosi denied Trump&#8217;s allegations, calling them &#8220;ridiculous.&#8221;
&#8220;In fact, I very much support [stopping] the trading of members of Congress, not that I think anybody&#8217;s doing anything wrong. If they are, they are prosecuted, and they go to jail,&#8221; Pelosi <a href="https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/1950666092608901550">said</a> during an interview on CNN.
&#8220;But I have no concern about the obvious investments that have been made over time,&#8221; she added. &#8220;I&#8217;m not into it, my husband is, but it isn&#8217;t anything to do with anything insider.&#8221;
Trump&#8217;s comments come as the White House pushes back on Sen. Josh Hawley&#8217;s (R-MO) legislation moving through Congress that bans members of Congress, presidents, and vice presidents from trading stocks. Earlier on Wednesday, Trump said he &#8220;conceptually&#8221; supported the bill and said he would &#8220;take a look at it,&#8221; but later, he sounded off on social media, <a href="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114944074791548865">ripping</a> Hawley for voting with Democrats and saying that the senator &#8220;blocked a Review, sponsored by Senator Rick Scott, and with the support of almost all other Republicans, of Nancy Pelosi’s Stock Trading over the last 25 years.&#8221;
In order to get Democrats on board and get the bill out of committee, Hawley added bans on stock trading for the president and vice president, Axios <a href="https://www.axios.com/2025/07/29/white-house-lobbies-hawley-stock-trading-ban?__cf_chl_rt_tk=v9FeShaJe9kRh.Vx7PvbEJGvywlNI_9XmqpC9RtUiUI-1753913000-1.0.1.1-ViM7NXL.YFMoNgW53J4tR8B4w_cjg8pg1RWJM0guJE0" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reported</a>. Hawley&#8217;s legislation includes a carve-out for Trump and would not require the president to divest his holdings for the remainder of his term, POLITICO <a href="https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/07/30/congress/trump-comes-for-hawley-00485868">reported</a>. Hawley emphasized that carve-out and told reporters, “Listen, I want the President to sign the bill, so I’m happy to do whatever it would take to get him to say, ‘Yes, this is good.’”
A Senate panel advanced this version of the bill on Wednesday. Hawley voted with Democrats to advance the bill, with the other Republicans voting against it. It could now get a vote by the full Senate, which has a 53-seat GOP majority.
Pelosi also endorsed the bill.
&#8220;We must have strong transparency, robust accountability and tough enforcement for financial conduct in office because the American people deserve confidence that their elected leaders are serving the public interest — not their personal portfolios,&#8221; Pelosi said in a <a href="https://pelosi.house.gov/news/press-releases/pelosi-statement-support-congressional-stock-trading-ban">statement</a>. &#8220;I strongly support this legislation and look forward to voting for it on the Floor of the House.&#8221;
This article has been updated to include additional information on Hawley&#8217;s bill.

House Rules Committee Holds Late Night Meeting On Budget Bill

‘That’s Disgraceful’: Trump Says Nancy Pelosi Should Be Investigated For Insider Trading

Donald Trump

Josh Hawley

Hunter Biden is back.
There are a couple of reasons why that matters. One is that Hunter Biden is a stand-in for his father. When Hunter talks, Hunter is speaking for Joe Biden. And when he speaks for Joe Biden, he is speaking for the establishment wing of the Democratic Party.
The second reason is that Hunter Biden&#8217;s exposure of the entire Left for the fraud that it is, because of his father, is quite incredible.
It is worthwhile to remember that Hunter Biden was part of that inner coterie of people surrounding Joe Biden who knew that Joe was unhealthy, mentally unwell, and who left him in place because they were essentially playing at the presidency. When you listen to Hunter, you should understand he was at least partially the actual president of the United States for several years.
So that makes Hunter’s interview with Andrew Callaghan of Channel 5 on YouTube important.
He said Nancy Pelosi drove Biden out of the race. “You know who did not want Kamala Harris to be president and did not want her to be the nominee?” Hunter asked. “Nancy Pelosi didn&#8217;t want her to be; none of Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s people wanted her to be. They wanted an open convention. They wanted a floor fight. I don&#8217;t know what the hell they wanted, but they wanted to be the ones to anoint whoever they were going to anoint to become the next president of the United States. … All I know is that they definitely did not want Kamala Harris, which undermined her, which undermined the campaign.”
He also took some swipes at people like George Clooney and David Axelrod, saying:
<blockquote>You know what George Clooney did? He was given the blessing by the Obama team or the Obama people and whoever else, and David Axelrod and whoever the f*** else. &#8230; ‘We are going to insert our judgment over yours.’ We, me, and James Carville, who hasn&#8217;t won a race in 40 f***ing years, and David Axelrod, who had one success in his political life, and that was Barack Obama — and that was because of Barack Obama, not because of David Axelrod and David Plouffe and all of these guys, the Pod Save America guys who were junior speechwriters on Barack Obama&#8217;s Senate staff who have been dining out on the relationship with him for years, making millions of dollars, the Anita Dunns of the world, who&#8217;s made $40, $50 million off the Democratic Party &#8230; I don&#8217;t have to be nice. &#8230; What right do you have to step on a man who&#8217;s given 52 years of his life to the services of this country and decide that you, George Clooney, are going to take out basically a full page ad in The New York Times to undermine the president?</blockquote>
Hunter also suggested that he was totally qualified to be on Burisma&#8217;s board. One of the kind of seamy realities about the last election cycle is that some of it was about Joe Biden&#8217;s age. A lot of it was about a widespread perception of the Biden family&#8217;s absolutely deep and abiding corruption.
<h3><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/bss-ep-2243-member-exclusive?elementPosition=2&amp;row=2&amp;rowHeadline=Latest+Episodes&amp;rowType=Horizontal+Show+Episodes+Carousel">WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show</a></h3>
Hunter denied he had been put on the board of Burisma for any political reason, which, of course, is absolutely ridiculous. He had no experience in the energy sector. He couldn&#8217;t point out Ukraine on a map, and suddenly he was on the board of a Ukrainian energy firm?
It had nothing to do with his last name being Biden.
The last part of the interview was amusing — Hunter defending himself by making the argument that crack is somehow safer than alcohol, which is a hell of an argument.
But put all of this aside. Put aside the Biden administration and its corruption, the fact that Joe Biden was dead for several years, and that his family was essentially running the government. If you see Hunter as a stand-in for the Joe Biden moderate wing of the Democratic Party, things start to get interesting because Hunter Biden also spoke about policy.
There were two particular issues where Hunter Biden put specific focus: illegal immigration and Israel. These issues are the ones where Democrats are completely at odds with the American people, but they will not let it go. They are more likely to let go of the trans issue than to let go of illegal immigration and open borders, as well as the new flavor of the month, that Palestinians are the great victims in the Middle East, including Hamas, the Palestinian Authority, Islamic Jihad, and all the rest of the terrorist groups.
If you&#8217;re trying to figure out the direction of the Democratic Party, if you&#8217;re trying to get out the divining rod and determine which direction the Democratic Party is going to move into, the more moderate side or the more radical side, here’s the key: the moderates are already caving to the radicals.
They may separate from the trans stuff because it&#8217;s been so wildly unsuccessful for them. But the root cause of the Democratic Party is a belief that America is a great victimizer in the world, and therefore, America ought not to have borders, and also America’s foreign policy should be to abandon any strong ally, as long as it is beneficial to the Democratic Party.
“All these Democrats say you have to talk about and realize that people are really upset about illegal immigration,” he said. “How do you think your hotel room gets cleaned? How do you think you get food on your table? Who do you think washes your dishes? Who do you think does your garden? Who do you think is here, by the sheer, just grit and will that they figured out a way to get here because they thought that they could give themselves and their family a better chance, and he&#8217;s (Trump) somehow convinced all of us that these people are criminals? White men in America are 45 more times likely to commit violent crime than an immigrant.”
He actually concluded that statement by suggesting that we should actually force El Salvador to send back illegal immigrants. Which is funny, since the ones we&#8217;re sending to El Salvador are, by and large, people with actual criminal records.
This is vitally important because Hunter was Joe Biden&#8217;s partially functioning brain during the administration. This is the Democratic Party perspective on illegal immigration: America ought to be an open borders country because unfettered immigration, without any sort of real security, without any sort of concern about cultural assimilation, is an effective good.
That is something the Democratic Party deeply believes in. As we start discussing 2028 candidates understand, there will not be a Democrat on the stage who significantly calls for border security.
It&#8217;s not just with regard to immigration. The Democratic Party also realizes that the energy in its party is very much on the side of third-world-ism.
It&#8217;s the Zoran Mamdani belief that the Third World has been victimized by America and her allies, and therefore the Third World must have her revenge. Hunter was talking about the dramatic increase in antisemitism under his father&#8217;s administration and claimed the real reason for that is because of the Israelis. In other words, after Hamas murdered 1,200 Jews in Israel and took 250 hostage, a couple of dozen of whom are still being held hostage after a year and a half, it&#8217;s Israel&#8217;s fault that antisemitism broke out.
He quoted the noted hater of Israel, Tom Friedman, saying that the worst thing that&#8217;s happened to the Jewish people is the Israeli government. “Jewish people globally, the threats to their lives, the anti-Semitism that it has generated,” he said.
The worst thing that has happened to the Jewish people is the Israeli government, according to Hunter Biden. Then he bragged about how his father tried to hamstring Israel in its pursuit of getting back its hostages and ending Hamas, an actual, honest-to-god, American State Department-designated terrorist group in the Gaza Strip.
“He took away the bunker-busting bombs from the Israelis,” he boasted. “He tried to curtail Netanyahu&#8217;s thing. He forced Netanyahu to open up shipping lanes and aid lanes at the Rafah crossing to be able to get food aid in. He put pressure over and over and over again. And now, by the way, that is not even remotely happening. What is happening is that they were bombing food lines. There is no one in there to be able to record it. &#8230;There have been more journalists killed at this war in Gaza than in any other war combined, and nobody&#8217;s doing anything about it.”
This is propaganda on behalf of Hamas, because the reality is that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the GHF, which has been actually facilitating the entry of aid into Gaza, has been denying Hamas access to the food, which is why Hamas is shooting people and then attempting to insinuate itself among the population in order to shoot at Israeli soldiers, who then respond. That is the reality.
But these are the parts of the Democratic base that the Democrats are trying to woo. It is very important to them, illegal immigration, and third-world-ism. There is no systemic immunity for the Democratic Party against the radical base.
It does not exist. So if you think they&#8217;re going to nominate somebody who&#8217;s quasi-moderate in 2028, you’re wrong.
It is not going to happen.

Hunter Biden

The Hunter Biden Interview: Why It Matters For 2028

2024 Election

Burisma

Democratic Party

Democrats

George Clooney

Joe Biden

Kamala Harris

Opinion

Ukraine

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) reintroduced the anti-corruption PELOSI Act on Friday, aiming to ban members of Congress from trading individual stocks, while President Trump signaled he would sign such legislation into law.
The legislation, whose acronym PELOSI stands for &#8220;Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments,&#8221; and is named after former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, whose husband has drawn <a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/news/deceptive-tactic-nancy-pelosi-disclosed-180000159.html">scrutiny</a> for millions in suspected insider trading.
&#8220;Members of Congress should be fighting for the people they were elected to serve — not day trading at the expense of their constituents,&#8221; Hawley <a href="https://www.hawley.senate.gov/hawley-reintroduces-pelosi-act-to-ban-congress-from-trading-stocks/">stated</a>, according to a press release from his office.
&#8220;Americans have seen politician after politician turn a profit using information not available to the general public,&#8221; the Missouri Republican added. &#8220;It&#8217;s time we ban all members of Congress from trading and holding stocks and restore Americans&#8217; trust in our nation&#8217;s legislative body.&#8221;
Under Hawley&#8217;s proposal, elected officials and their spouses would be barred from owning individual stocks while serving in Congress.
The legislation would still allow investment in broader financial instruments such as mutual funds, ETFs, and Treasury bonds.
The bill provides a six-month grace period for compliance after enactment. Any lawmaker refusing to divest would face financial penalties and surrender profits to the federal treasury.
The Government Accountability Office would be required to audit congressional compliance with the law within two years of enactment and submit a report to congressional ethics committees, according to the <a href="https://www.hawley.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Hawley-PELOSI-Act.pdf">legislation</a>.
When asked on Friday by a reporter if he would support a ban on congressional stock trading, President Trump said he would “absolutely” sign such a bill.
&#8220;Well, I watched Nancy Pelosi get rich through insider information, and I would be okay with it. If they send that to me, I would do it,&#8221; the President said.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
It is time! Pass my PELOSI Act now &#8211; no stock trading by members of Congress <a href="https://t.co/w1enBmv0BG">https://t.co/w1enBmv0BG</a>
— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) <a href="https://twitter.com/HawleyMO/status/1915759963386822771?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 25, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
A 2022 New York Times investigation <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/09/13/us/politics/congress-members-stock-trading-list.html">identified</a> at least 97 members of Congress who reported stock trades that potentially intersected with their committee work, raising questions about whether elected officials were using privileged information to enrich themselves.
The issue has <a href="https://publicconsultation.org/united-states/stock-trading-by-members-of-congress/">garnered</a> bipartisan support for reform, with polls consistently showing over 80% of Americans favor banning congressional stock trading.
Similar legislation has been introduced in previous sessions of Congress but failed to advance to a floor vote in either chamber despite widespread public support.

119th Congress Begins Its Term On Capitol Hill

Sen. Hawley Reintroduces PELOSI Act To Curb Congressional Stock Trading, Trump Signals Approval

Corruption

Paul Pelosi

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt took a swipe at former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) during Tuesday&#8217;s daily briefing, pointing to the California Congresswoman&#8217;s previous statements on tariffs and saying that President Donald Trump was only doing what she&#8217;d suggested.
Leavitt referenced Pelosi&#8217;s stance on tariffs — and specifically, the United States&#8217; trade deficit with communist China — from nearly 30 years earlier, and argued that she should be pleased with the &#8220;retaliatory tariff&#8221; the Trump administration was placing on China.
Pelosi, in a recently-recirculated <a href="https://x.com/ThomasSowell/status/1907875133638705646" target="_blank" rel="noopener">clip</a> from 1996, stood on the House floor and laid out her reasoning for hitting back at China economically — among them the fact that China placed an average tariff of 35% on all goods coming from the United States, and only allowed some 2% of U.S. exports to cross the border into the country. In return, the United States had only a 2% tariff on Chinese goods — and allowed one-third of the goods produced in China to be imported into the country. The result of that deficit was 10,000,000 Chinese jobs supported by U.S. imports compared to only 170,000 American jobs supported by Chinese trade. That, she said, was a &#8220;status quo&#8221; that was unacceptable.
&#8220;On this day, your member of Congress could have drawn the line to say to the President of the United States, do something about this U.S.-China trade relationship that is a job loser for the United States,&#8221; she said at the time.
Leavitt, during Tuesday&#8217;s briefing, referenced that speech, saying, &#8220;Nancy Pelosi said, &#8216;How far does China have to go? How much more oppression? How big a trade deficit? How many jobs have to be lost for the American workers? How much dangerous proliferation has to exist before members of this House of Representatives will say, &#8216;I will not endorse the status quo&#8217;?&#8221;
&#8220;Well, President Trump is finally answering her call,&#8221; Leavitt continued. &#8220;Nancy Pelosi can thank President Trump today for the 104% retaliatory tariff that will be going into effect on China.&#8221;
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
WATCH: <a href="https://twitter.com/PressSec?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@PressSec</a> highlights Nancy Pelosi&#39;s own words on our unsustainable trade deficits: 
&quot;Well, <a href="https://twitter.com/POTUS?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@POTUS</a> is finally answering her call&#8230; years later. Nancy Pelosi can thank President Trump today for the 104% retaliatory tariff that will be going into effect on China.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/QQP5vJoHRI">https://t.co/QQP5vJoHRI</a> <a href="https://t.co/jigac6eyLd">pic.twitter.com/jigac6eyLd</a>
&mdash; Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapidResponse47/status/1909666590028935473?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 8, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Press Sec. Throws Shade At Nancy Pelosi Over ‘Retaliatory Tariff’ Aimed At China

Press Sec. Throws Shade At Nancy Pelosi Over 'Retaliatory Tariff' Aimed At China

Communist China

Economy

Tariffs

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) bucked calls from members of his own party to step down after he voted to support a Republican spending bill to keep the government open.
Schumer made the remarks during a Sunday interview on NBC News&#8217; &#8220;Meet The Press&#8221; with host Kristen Welker when he was asked if he was &#8220;feeling pressure to step down.&#8221;
&#8220;Look, I&#8217;m not stepping down,&#8221; Schumer fired back. &#8220;And let me just say this, Kristen. I knew when I cast my vote against the government shutdown that there would be a lot of controversy. And there was.&#8221;
&#8220;But let me tell you and your audience why I did it, why I felt it was so important,&#8221; he continued. &#8220;The CR was certainly bad, you know, the continuing resolution. But a shutdown would be 15 or 20 times worse. Under a shutdown, the Executive Branch has sole power to determine what is &#8216;essential.&#8217; And they can determine without any court supervision. The courts have ruled it&#8217;s solely up to the executive what to shut down. With Musk, and DOGE, and Trump, and this guy Vought, they would eviscerate the federal government.&#8221;
Welker later pressed Schumer over whether he was &#8220;making the same mistake that President Biden did&#8221; when he decided to run for re-election and later had to bow out at the last moment because of a disastrous debate performance against President Donald Trump.
&#8220;No, absolutely not,&#8221; Schumer said. &#8220;I did this out of conviction. And, look, in my caucus, we have a disagreement as to some people voted one way, some people voted the other. But we&#8217;ve all agreed to respect each other because each side saw why the other side felt so strongly about it. And our caucus is united in fighting Donald Trump every step of the way.&#8221;
Schumer also addressed criticism from former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), who claimed that Schumer gave into Republican demands and did not secure anything in return.
&#8220;Well, what we got, at the end of the day, is avoiding the horror of a shutdown,&#8221; Schumer replied. &#8220;There was no leverage point that we could&#8217;ve asked for things, they just would&#8217;ve said no. And because they control — let&#8217;s not forget, they control the House and Senate — they could force a vote, yes or no on the CR, without any additions.&#8221;
WATCH:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Schumer says ‘there was no leverage’ Democrats could have used in funding fight: Full interview" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/vW1davqMsb4?start=180&#038;feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>

President Biden Meets With Congressional Leaders To Discuss Legislative Priorities For End Of Year

Schumer Fires Back At Democrats Pushing His Ouster: ‘I’m Not Stepping Down’

Chuck Schumer

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) delivered a back-handed insult to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) over his eleventh-hour conversion on the Republican-led Continuing Resolution that passed on Friday, ensuring that the federal government would be funded through September.
Pelosi — who voted with nearly all of the Democrats in the lower chamber (save Maine&#8217;s Rep. Jared Golden) against the stopgap measure — suggested that Schumer had essentially given away his vote, giving President Donald Trump and the Republicans a win without getting anything in return for his own party.
&#8220;I myself don’t give away anything for nothing,&#8221; Pelosi said at a Tuesday <a href="https://sfstandard.com/2025/03/18/san-francisco-nancy-pelosi-chuck-schumer-medicaid-government-shutdown/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">press conference</a> in her hometown of San Francisco. &#8220;And I think that’s what happened the other day.&#8221;
Pelosi had <a href="https://pelosi.house.gov/news/press-releases/pelosi-statement-government-funding-bill-senate">lauded</a> her successor in House leadership, Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), and called on her party to reject the CR: &#8220;I salute Leader Hakeem Jeffries for his courageous rejection of this false choice, and I am proud of my colleagues in the House Democratic Caucus for their overwhelming vote against this bill.&#8221;
She went on to suggest that any shutdown would be blamed on President Trump in spite of the fact that Democrats — in the Senate in particular — were the only ones with the power to either push the bill across the finish line or stop it in its tracks. &#8220;America has experienced a Trump shutdown before – but this damaging legislation only makes matters worse. Democrats must not buy into this false choice. We must fight back for a better way,&#8221; she said.
Schumer argued that a shutdown, given the optics, would be far more damaging to the Democratic Party as a whole than the passage of the CR — but his party, thus far, does not appear to be buying his argument.
The Senate leader was even on his heels on ABC&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/i-think-you-caved-schumer-gets-an-absolute-grilling-on-the-view" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The View</a>&#8221; — which would typically be a relatively friendly audience for Democrats — as several of the hosts questioned not just his vote but also his leadership moving forward.
Even Jeffries, who typically would not cross Schumer in public, refused to answer when asked whether he felt the longtime senator was still the right person to lead the Senate.
One unnamed House Democrat, according to an <a href="https://www.axios.com/2025/03/19/chuck-schumer-house-democrats-hakeem-jeffries" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Axios report</a> published on Tuesday, said that Schumer&#8217;s popularity within the party was &#8220;hovering somewhere between Elon Musk and the Ebola virus.&#8221;

Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi

Pelosi Low-Key Trashes Schumer: ‘I Myself Don’t Give Away Anything For Nothing’

Pelosi Low-Key Trashes Schumer In Comment: 'I Myself Don't Give Away Anything For Nothing'

Hakeem Jeffries

Five years after former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) tore up President Donald Trump’s State of the Union speech after he had finished, Democrats are reportedly planning to disrupt Trump’s 2025 address to a joint session of Congress with the same kind of partisan malice.
“Some members have told colleagues they may walk out of the chamber when Trump says specific lines they find objectionable, lawmakers told Axios,” the media outlet <a href="https://www.axios.com/2025/03/04/trump-congress-address-democrats-disrupt-plan" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reported</a>.
Using props has reportedly been discussed, including noisemakers, signs with anti-Trump or anti-DOGE messages, hand clappers, and red cards.
Some Democrats are considering coordinating their clothes by using colors to protest: The Democratic Women&#8217;s Caucus wants its members to wear pink; female members of the Congressional Black Caucus might wear black; Ukraine supporters could show up wearing blue and yellow.
“Some Democrats have announced that they are bringing former federal employees as their guests, as part of a protest of the Trump administration’s mass firings,” The New York Times <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/04/us/politics/trump-speech-what-to-watch.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reported</a>.
In 2020, as she sat behind Trump, Pelosi made a grand show of ripping Trump’s speech four times. She <a href="https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-nancy-pelosi-ap-top-news-michael-pence-politics-f8edd0389a1a8ba41322e0e34098aafb" target="_blank" rel="noopener">boasted</a> the next morning, “I felt very liberated last night.”
On Monday, President Trump <a href="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114098542644386176%5C">declared</a> on Truth Social, “TOMORROW NIGHT WILL BE BIG. I WILL TELL IT LIKE IT IS!”
Although Trump&#8217;s Tuesday speech will be broadcast on live television and has many aspects of a traditional State of the Union address, usually delivered in January or February, it will focus on Trump&#8217;s legislative priorities and is classified as an address to Congress.
<a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/03/01/g-s1-50706/trump-will-address-congress-why-isnt-this-first-speech-called-a-state-of-the-union">According</a> to NPR, for the past four decades, some presidents have referred to their first speech as an address to Congress rather than the State of the Union.
President Ronald Reagan delivered a joint address to Congress in his first term in 1981. Presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton continued the tradition in 1989 and 1993, respectively, with speeches titled &#8220;Administration Goals.&#8221; President George W. Bush delivered a &#8220;Budget Message&#8221; in 2001, the Associated Press reported.

President Trump Delivers His Third State Of The Union Address To Joint Session Of Congress

Dems Scheming To Disrupt Trump’s Speech To Congress: Report

Disruption

Executive

House Speaker Emerita <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/nancy-pelosi" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Nancy Pelosi</a>&#8216;s (D-CA) daughter, Alexandria Pelosi, took a swipe at first lady <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/jill-biden" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jill Biden</a> in a burgeoning clash between two of the most powerful families in Democrat circles.
In a recent interview, Jill Biden <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/jill-biden-lashes-out-at-pelosi-after-2024-shiv-moment" target="_blank" rel="noopener">voiced displeasure</a> with how Nancy Pelosi fueled a Democrat revolt against President <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/joe-biden" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Joe Biden</a> during the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/2024-election" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2024 election</a>. Now, Alexandria Pelosi has sounded off with a not-so-subtle Shakespeare reference.
&#8220;If I was Lady McBiden, I’d put on my big girl pants, play the long game and think about my husband’s legacy,&#8221; said Alexandra Pelosi, according to <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/01/19/lady-mcbiden-alexandra-pelosi-first-lady-00199164" target="_blank" rel="noopener">POLITICO</a>&#8216;s senior political columnist and politics bureau chief Jonathan Martin. &#8220;There aren’t that many people left in America who have something nice to say about Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi is one of them.&#8221;
Martin&#8217;s report stressed that Alexandra Pelosi &#8220;made clear she was speaking only for herself,&#8221; but also noted the &#8220;deafening silence from the White House in response to a request for comment marks the culmination of the bitter feud between the president and onetime speaker, two of the age’s most prominent Democrats and the bookends of the party’s Obama-era high and Trump restoration low.&#8221;
Although he won the Democratic Party&#8217;s 2024 nomination with the support of more than 14 million primary voters, then-81-year-old Joe Biden bowed out of the White House race in July following a fumbling debate performance against former President <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/donald-trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a> under pressure from allies who raised concerns about his age, mental acuity, and electability. Vice President <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/kamala-harris" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Kamala Harris</a>, with Biden&#8217;s endorsement, quickly garnered support and became the Democrats&#8217; presidential nominee. Harris ended up losing to Trump.
<a href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/?_gl=1*1lail3r*_gcl_aw*R0NMLjE3MzIyMDEyNDkuQ2owS0NRaUEwZnU1QmhEUUFSSXNBTVhVQk9JSkM0VnNsMFVreURxYXUxVWVEVWdOdjZkNzR2Y1pEeEZQeHVBcGl2R3BLaTdBMjVzT1p5TWFBdG1nRUFMd193Y0I.*_gcl_au*NDUxNDQ0NzYwLjE3MzY3ODI2NDY.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczNjk1NzYwMy4zNDAuMS4xNzM2OTU3NzE2LjYwLjAuMA.." target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/?_gl%3D1*1lail3r*_gcl_aw*R0NMLjE3MzIyMDEyNDkuQ2owS0NRaUEwZnU1QmhEUUFSSXNBTVhVQk9JSkM0VnNsMFVreURxYXUxVWVEVWdOdjZkNzR2Y1pEeEZQeHVBcGl2R3BLaTdBMjVzT1p5TWFBdG1nRUFMd193Y0I.*_gcl_au*NDUxNDQ0NzYwLjE3MzY3ODI2NDY.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczNjk1NzYwMy4zNDAuMS4xNzM2OTU3NzE2LjYwLjAuMA..&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1737044212122000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3mp2MZNwEXBk00lKmCtOss">CELEBRATE #47 WITH 47% OFF DAILYWIRE+ MEMBERSHIPS + A FREE $20 GIFT</a>
During this time, CNN <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/17/politics/nancy-pelosi-biden-conversation/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reported</a> Pelosi privately told Biden that polls showed he could not defeat Trump like he did in 2020 and that he could hurt other members of his party in down-ticket races if he did not bow out. And, in what is widely viewed as a key tipping point — an interview on MSNBC’s &#8220;Morning Joe &#8221; — Pelosi <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/nancy-pelosi-stops-short-saying-biden-stay-race-says-time-running-shor-rcna161097" target="_blank" rel="noopener">emphasized</a> that she would support whatever decision Biden made about his political future at a time when the president was already insisting he would not leave the race. &#8220;It’s up to the president to decide if he is going to run,&#8221; she said. Her remarks on MSNBC <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/nancy-pelosis-art-of-power" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reportedly emboldened</a> more Democrats to turn on Biden.
The Washington Post published a <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/power/2025/01/15/jill-biden-interview-first-lady/?utm_campaign=wp_main&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_source=twitter" target="_blank" rel="noopener">report</a> on Wednesday about its &#8220;exit interview&#8221; with Jill Biden in which the first lady was quoted mentioning how she was thinking &#8220;a lot&#8221; about relationships and took a dig at Nancy Pelosi. &#8220;We were friends for 50 years,&#8221; Jill Biden said. &#8220;It was disappointing.&#8221;
As reported by Martin, Nancy Pelosi has received a wave of &#8220;messages, flowers and calls of concern from heads of state, colleagues in both parties and even royalty&#8221; since breaking her hip in Europe last month, but &#8220;it’s who she has not heard from that’s most remarkable, and that has infuriated Pelosi’s friends and family: Joe and Jill Biden.&#8221;
Martin wrote that he was informed that Nancy Pelosi has tried multiple times to speak with Joe Biden, only to be turned down. &#8220;She’s been told they’re not over it, don’t make more overtures because he’s blaming her,&#8221; an insider told the columnist. Martin&#8217;s report also noted that &#8220;Biden did briefly chat with Pelosi, her husband, Paul, and daughter Christine at a White House holiday party last month. But that encounter only served to remind them of the rupture.&#8221;

Nancy Pelosi and her daughter Alexandra Pelosi

Pelosi’s Daughter Disses Jill Biden In Growing Family Feud

General

Jill Biden

Menu