Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) issued a stark warning to El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele and other foreign leaders, cautioning that Democrats will not &#8220;look kindly&#8221; on those who cooperate with President Donald Trump when they return to power.
In a recent <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxYsbcWdjS0" target="_blank" rel="noopener">episode</a> of &#8220;Pod Save America,&#8221; Raskin spoke with host and former Obama aide Tommy Vietor about the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an illegal immigrant living in Maryland who was deported and sent to prison in his home country of El Salvador despite a 2019 court order prohibiting him from being sent back there. While at a White House meeting with Trump last week, Bukele <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/el-salvador-nayib-bukele-meeting-trump-white-house/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> his nation will not send Abrego Garcia back to the United States, even after the Supreme Court upheld an order for the federal government to <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/facilitate-not-effectuate-wh-responds-to-scotus-ruling-on-mistakenly-deported-salvadoran" target="_blank" rel="noopener">&#8220;facilitate&#8221;</a> his return.
Vietor said a &#8220;Latin America policy expert&#8221; suggested to him that &#8220;Democrats should threaten to take action against any foreign government that participates in the extraordinary rendition of American citizens.&#8221; He listed cutting off future aid and seeking to prosecute foreign officials as possible forms of retaliation.
Raskin, who is the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, said he liked the idea, calling it a &#8220;complement to something that we need to be doing right now, which is engaging in far more work of transnational democratic solidarity with the democratic governments and the democratic movements and peoples and parties of the world to try to prevent the spread of the lawlessness and the fascist chaos that&#8217;s been unleashed against us.&#8221;
&#8220;But implicit in it,&#8221; Raskin continued, &#8220;should be the idea that if and when we come back to power — and we will — we are not going to look kindly upon people who facilitated &#8230; authoritarianism in our country. That&#8217;s an assault on our Constitution and on our people.&#8221;
The comment prompted rebukes from some of Trump&#8217;s GOP allies on X.
&#8220;[Raskin] says he will go after Trump officials when he returns to power. They haven’t learned a single lesson,&#8221; <a href="https://x.com/RichardGrenell/status/1913810950060380439" target="_blank" rel="noopener">quipped</a> Richard Grenell, who is Trump&#8217;s special presidential envoy for special missions and interim director of the Kennedy Center.
&#8220;They aren&#8217;t coming into power any time soon if things continue as they are&#8230; that&#8217;s the only silver lining in their chaos and lunacy,&#8221; <a href="https://x.com/NancyMace/status/1914352540575048113" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC).
RELATED: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/trump-border-czar-tears-into-dem-senator-van-hollen-for-el-salvador-trip" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Trump Border Czar Tears Into Dem Senator Van Hollen For El Salvador Trip</a>

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD)

Raskin Threatens Countries Working With Trump, Says Dems Will Retaliate ‘When We Come Back To Power’

Democrats

El Salvador

Global Politics

Jamie Raskin

Politics

U.S. House of Representatives

On Wednesday, Rep. <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/jerry-nadler" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jerry Nadler</a> (D-NY) bowed out of the race to be the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, which has oversight of the Department of Justice, in the new Congress starting next year.
Nadler, who has held either the chairman or ranking member position in the panel for the past several years, revealed his decision in a <a href="https://x.com/FarnoushAmiri/status/1864402828405485670" target="_blank" rel="noopener">letter</a> to colleagues while vouching for Rep. <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/jamie-raskin" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jamie Raskin</a> (D-MD) to take his place during the first half of President-elect Donald Trump&#8217;s second term.
&#8220;As our country faces the return of Donald Trump, and the renewed threats to our democracy and our way of life that he represents, I am very confident that Jamie would ably lead the Judiciary Committee as we confront this growing danger,&#8221; Nadler wrote.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
News: Rep. JERRY NADLER will be stepping down from race to be the top Democrat on House Judiciary Committee, making the difficult decision after speaking with staff and Rep. Jamie Raskin who announced his bid for the job. Here’s the letter he sent to colleagues, obtained by AP <a href="https://t.co/Tgswdt8Yzu">pic.twitter.com/Tgswdt8Yzu</a>
&mdash; Farnoush Amiri (@FarnoushAmiri) <a href="https://twitter.com/FarnoushAmiri/status/1864402828405485670?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 4, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The announcement came amid <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/house-democrats-committee-leaders-ranking-members/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reports</a> of a push within the Democratic Party to pave the way for younger members to take on leadership roles after Republicans completed a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/republicans-projected-to-win-house-complete-2024-sweep" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2024 election sweep</a> that included the GOP keeping control of the House while winning back the Senate and the White House. <a href="https://x.com/daveweigel/status/1864401834799997247" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Nadler is 77</a> while Raskin is 61.
<a href="https://get.dailywire.com/gift-guide/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CHECK OUT THE DAILY WIRE HOLIDAY GIFT GUIDE</a>
Raskin, who led the January 6-focused impeachment inquiry against Trump and was a member of the now-defunct January 6 Committee, declared his candidacy to become the top Democrat on the judiciary panel earlier this week. In his own letter, Raskin spoke about combating Trump&#8217;s &#8220;MAGA&#8221; movement.
&#8220;In the 119th Congress, the Judiciary Committee will be the headquarters of Congressional opposition to authoritarianism and MAGA’s campaign to dismantle our Constitutional system and the rule of law as we know it,&#8221; Raskin wrote to his colleagues, adding: &#8220;I hope to be at the center of this fight.&#8221;
<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/top-dem-claims-he-hasnt-seen-proof-of-the-fbi-being-weaponized-against-the-gop" target="_blank" rel="noopener">RELATED: Top Dem Claims He Hasn’t Seen ‘Proof’ Of The FBI Being Weaponized Against The GOP</a>
Raskin has held the role of ranking member on the House Oversight Committee for the past couple of years. With Raskin stepping away, Rep. <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/alexandria-ocasio-cortez" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez</a> (D-NY) has expressed interest in taking his place, setting up a clash against <a href="https://x.com/AnnieGrayerCNN/status/1864047737517326415" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA)</a>.
&#8220;I&#8217;m having a lot of conversations with my colleagues,&#8221; Ocasio-Cortez <a href="https://x.com/KevinFreyTV/status/1864449492247867708" target="_blank" rel="noopener">told reporters</a>. &#8220;I think it&#8217;s incredibly important that we prepare ourselves fully for an incoming Trump administration as well as fighting for everyday working Americans.&#8221;

Jerry Nadler

Nadler Cedes Top Democrat Role On House Judiciary

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Congress

House Democrats

House Judiciary Committee

A top House Democrat asserted on Sunday he was not privy to any evidence that the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/fbi" target="_blank" rel="noopener">FBI</a> has been &#8220;weaponized&#8221; against any political party, which would include the GOP.
Rep. <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/jamie-raskin" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jamie Raskin</a> (D-MD), the ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, dismissed the idea that Republicans believe they have been unfairly targeted by the bureau during an interview on CNN&#8217;s &#8220;State of the Union&#8221; with host Kasie Hunt.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
.<a href="https://twitter.com/RepRaskin?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RepRaskin</a> when asked by <a href="https://twitter.com/kasie?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@kasie</a> if he&#39;s considering challenging Congressman Jerry Nadler as the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee: &quot;I&#39;m not ruling anything out at this point.&quot;<a href="https://twitter.com/CNNSOTU?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@CNNSOTU</a> <a href="https://t.co/foV9NQTYjH">pic.twitter.com/foV9NQTYjH</a>
&mdash; CNN This Morning with Kasie Hunt (@CNNThisMorning) <a href="https://twitter.com/CNNThisMorning/status/1863238375639068727?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 1, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;I haven&#8217;t seen what the proof is that the FBI has been weaponized against a political party, or the Department of Justice. Of course, this Department of Justice has brought charges against a Democratic U.S. senator in New Jersey, a Democratic congressman in Texas,&#8221; Raskin said, alluding to former Sen. <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/bob-menendez" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Bob Menendez</a> (D-NJ) and <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/democrat-henry-cuellar-indicted-in-federal-corruption-investigation" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-TX)</a>.
&#8220;And so some people just seem to think that it should go only in one direction, and, if it doesn&#8217;t, then somehow it&#8217;s politicized,&#8221; Raskin added. &#8220;And I think that&#8217;s what they mean when they talk about politicization and the deep state. I mean, the deep state, nobody&#8217;s ever defined it. Apparently, it just means anybody who doesn&#8217;t do the will of Donald Trump.&#8221;
President-elect Donald Trump <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/trump-nominates-fighter-kash-patel-for-fbi-director" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announced</a> on Saturday evening that he would be nominating Kash Patel to lead the FBI, saying that his pick would strive toward restoring &#8220;integrity&#8221; to the bureau. Republicans allies hailed the selection as one that will lead to rooting out partisanship.
&#8220;Listen, I don&#8217;t want a Republican Department of Justice. I don&#8217;t want a Democrat Department of Justice. I want a Department of Justice and an FBI that enforces the law regardless of party. And sadly, we haven&#8217;t seen that these last four years, &#8221; Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) <a href="https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/12/01/sen_ted_cruz_kash_patel_is_a_real_reformer.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> during a &#8220;Face the Nation&#8221; interview on CBS.
Raskin, who led the January 6-focused impeachment inquiry against Trump and member of the now-defunct January 6 Committee, is <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/30/us/politics/democrats-nadler-raskin.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reportedly</a> being talked about as potentially taking over as the lead Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, which is responsible for overseeing the Department of Justice — including the FBI.
When pressed by Hunt whether he wants to challenge Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) for the ranking member position in the judiciary panel, Raskin said, &#8220;I&#8217;m not ruling anything out at this point. And we&#8217;re engaged in conversations, all with the purpose of creating a strategic focus and capacity within the Democratic members of the House, so that we&#8217;re going to be a really effective and muscular opposition.&#8221;

Top Dem Claims He Hasn’t Seen ‘Proof’ Of The FBI Being Weaponized Against The GOP

U.S.

Liberal comedian <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/bill-maher" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Bill Maher</a> and Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) defended former President Donald Trump this week after the media and many Democrats falsely claimed that he had called for former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) to face a firing squad.
&#8220;I woke up today to the headline that Trump had called for a firing squad for Liz Cheney, and this is what I really don&#8217;t like about the media,&#8221; Maher said during his most recent broadcast of &#8220;Real Time&#8221; on HBO Friday evening.
&#8220;No, he didn&#8217;t,&#8221; he continued. &#8220;You don&#8217;t have to move me to not like Donald Trump. &#8221;
Maher noted that Trump was criticizing Cheney for “being a war hawk,” arguing that he could have expressed himself better.
“Just to be clear, this is exactly what hippies always said,&#8221; Maher said. &#8220;This is exactly what peaceniks always said. This is ‘Fortunate Son,’ the song. It’s like, it&#8217;s very easy to sit in your building and send young men to die, apropos of Ukraine, because I don&#8217;t know, that war doesn&#8217;t look like it’s going in the right direction.”
<a href="https://www.amiracist.com/?_gl=1*jtghwp*_gcl_au*ODQ1NjYzNTg2LjE3Mjg5MDk3OTE.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczMDEyMDgwOS40OS4xLjE3MzAxMjA4MzkuMzAuMC4w" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+</a>
&#8220;But just don&#8217;t lie to me. I don&#8217;t like Donald Trump,&#8221; he continued. &#8220;Don&#8217;t lie to me and tell me he wants her in front of a firing squad. He was saying something that, by the way, if it came out of the mouth, some of it, not the stupid part, again, sounds like what hippies used to say, not sending people to die.”
Raskin, who has always been fiercely opposed to Trump, agreed that the media was &#8220;lying&#8221; and that what they did was &#8220;ridiculous and absurd and counterproductive.&#8221;
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
On <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/RTOvertime?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#RTOvertime</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/billmaher?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BillMaher</a> scolded the media: “I woke up today to the headline that Trump had called for a firing squad for Liz Cheney. And this is what I really don’t like about the media. No, he didn’t&#8230;.If someone with a blue hat said it, people would nod along on the left.” <a href="https://t.co/hDsUArgT7d">pic.twitter.com/hDsUArgT7d</a>
— Brent Baker 🇺🇦 🇮🇱 (@BrentHBaker) <a href="https://twitter.com/BrentHBaker/status/1852562469408923689?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 2, 2024</a></blockquote>
Speaking at an event in Arizona on Thursday, Trump slammed Cheney as a “radical war hawk” who got to make decisions about war while “sitting in Washington in a nice building,” arguing that “she always wanted to go to war.”
“Let’s put her with a rifle, standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, okay? Let’s see how she feels about it, you know, when the guns are trained on her face,” Trump said.
The media, Cheney, and many Democrats responded to the remarks by claiming that Trump had called for Cheney to be executed.
&#8220;This is how dictators destroy free nations,&#8221; Cheney claimed. &#8220;They threaten those who speak against them with death. We cannot entrust our country and our freedom to a petty, vindictive, cruel, unstable man who wants to be a tyrant.&#8221;
CNN’s Kasie Hunt reported on Trump’s remarks, saying on Friday morning that he “is escalating his violent rhetoric, suggesting one of his most prominent critics, former Congresswoman Liz Cheney, should be fired upon.”
“Of course, violent rhetoric is not new for Trump,” Hunt added. “But this stark imagery represents an escalation at a tense moment when the country is on edge heading into Tuesday …”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
WATCH: Donald Trump suggests <a href="https://twitter.com/Liz_Cheney?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Liz_Cheney</a> should be fired upon
It&#8217;s an escalation of his violent rhetoric
My open of today&#8217;s <a href="https://twitter.com/CNNThisMorning?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@CNNThisMorning</a>
Cheney just responded to Trump &#8212; shown below <a href="https://t.co/85RJ5VGZG3">https://t.co/85RJ5VGZG3</a> <a href="https://t.co/oxV0taVsEk">pic.twitter.com/oxV0taVsEk</a>
— Kasie Hunt (@kasie) <a href="https://twitter.com/kasie/status/1852299148243980335?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 1, 2024</a></blockquote>

US-POLITICS-CONGRESS-SECRET SERVICE

Bill Maher, Jamie Raskin Slam Media For Lying About Trump’s Liz Cheney Remarks

Bill Maher

Donald Trump

Elections

Liz Cheney

Media

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) said the quiet part out loud in a recently surfaced video, suggesting that Democrats in Congress might move to block the results of the 2024 presidential election if former President Donald Trump were to win.
Raskin cited the Supreme Court&#8217;s March decision — a unanimous ruling that barred states from removing Trump from the ballot — and argued that because the Court had not acted to declare Trump ineligible to be president, Congress would have to do so on January 6 in the event that Trump won re-election in November.
&#8220;Even if voters unquestionably elect Donald Trump as President, no matter the margin, and even if the election is universally accepted as free and fair, top Democrats are calling on Congress to block certification of the results, and prep for civil war,&#8221; former Rep. Lee Zelda (R-NY) posted along with the video.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Even if voters unquestionably elect Donald Trump as President, no matter the margin, and even if the election is universally accepted as free and fair, top Democrats are calling on Congress to block certification of the results, and prep for civil war. <a href="https://t.co/U9QL5FZW10">pic.twitter.com/U9QL5FZW10</a>
— Lee Zeldin (@leezeldin) <a href="https://twitter.com/leezeldin/status/1820562086453182489?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 5, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;What can be put into the Constitution can slip away from you very quickly,&#8221; Raskin said, making it clear he blamed the Supreme Court for that. &#8220;And the greatest example going on right now before our very eyes is Section III of the 14th Amendment which they&#8217;re just disappearing with a magic wand as if it doesn&#8217;t exist even though it could not be clearer what it&#8217;s stating.&#8221;
&#8220;And so they want to kick it to Congress, so it&#8217;s going to be up to us on January 6th, 2025, to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he&#8217;s disqualified,&#8221; Raskin added with a smile. &#8220;And then we need bodyguards for everybody and civil war conditions all because the nine justices, not all of them, but these justices who have, not many cases to look at every year, not that much work to do, a huge staff, great protection, simply do not want to do their job and interpret what the great 14th Amendment means.&#8221;
<a href="http://www.amiracist.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.amiracist.com/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1722714742764000&amp;usg=AOvVaw1XzmEsRwzti1RFNuISwYgd">WATCH THE TRAILER FOR ‘AM I RACIST?’ — A MATT WALSH COMEDY ON DEI</a>
Red State&#8217;s Bonchie responded to the clip, saying, &#8220;Holy crap, this is as advertised. Raskin says Congress will have to tell Trump on January 6th, 2025 that he&#8217;s &#8216;disqualified&#8217; and that it&#8217;ll put the country on a civil war footing. He&#8217;s advertising plans to steal the election right out in the open.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Holy crap, this is as advertised. Raskin says Congress will have to tell Trump on January 6th, 2025 that he&#8217;s &#8220;disqualified&#8221; and that it&#8217;ll put the country on a civil war footing.
He&#8217;s advertising plans to steal the election right out in the open. <a href="https://t.co/uSe5MyoCJr">https://t.co/uSe5MyoCJr</a>
— Bonchie (@bonchieredstate) <a href="https://twitter.com/bonchieredstate/status/1820618830969717033?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 6, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;I believe this is called a criminal conspiracy to commit election interference,&#8221; Trump senior adviser Stephen Miller added.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
I believe this is called a criminal conspiracy to commit election interference. <a href="https://t.co/YmRgXdqL6F">https://t.co/YmRgXdqL6F</a>
— Stephen Miller (@StephenM) <a href="https://twitter.com/StephenM/status/1820562417048289754?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 5, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The Supreme Court did, as Raskin stated, leave the issue to Congress — but the ruling, according to <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/03/supreme-court-rules-states-cannot-remove-trump-from-ballot-for-insurrection/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ScotusBlog</a>, also noted that Congress would have to first pass &#8220;appropriate legislation&#8221; that would allow enforcement of the 14th Amendment. Congress would also have to determine that the person in question was actually guilty of insurrection in order to enforce Section 3 — and Congress, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/jamie-raskin-second-trump-impeachment-a-dramatic-success-trumps-lawyers-explosive-and-deranged" target="_blank" rel="noopener">led by Raskin himself</a>, ostensibly already tried and failed to do just that when they impeached Trump the second time.
<blockquote>But before disqualifying someone under Section 3, the justices observed, there must be a determination that the provision actually applies to that person. And Section 5 of the 14th Amendment gives the power to make that determination to Congress, by authorizing it to pass “appropriate legislation” to “enforce” the 14th Amendment. Nothing in the 14th Amendment, the court stressed, gives states the power to enforce Section 3 against candidates for federal office, nor was there any history of states doing so in the years after the amendment was ratified.</blockquote>

Congressional Lawmakers Continue Work On Capitol Hill

Jamie Raskin: Dems In Congress Will Have To ‘Disqualify’ Trump, Block Him If He Wins In November

Jamie Raskin: Dems In Congress Will Have To 'Disqualify' Trump, Block Him If He Wins In November

2024 Election

SCOTUS

Supreme Court

None of the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/house-democrats" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Democrats in the House</a> voted for a bill to add a citizenship question to the census questionnaire that passed through the GOP-led chamber on Wednesday.
The <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7109/text" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Equal Representation Act</a>, which was <a href="https://edwards.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-representatives-passes-edwards-bill-only-include-us-citizens" target="_blank" rel="noopener">introduced</a> by Rep. Chuck Edwards (R-NC), <a href="https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2024193" target="_blank" rel="noopener">received</a> 206 &#8220;yeas&#8221; from Republicans and 202 &#8220;nays&#8221; from Democrats. Twenty-two members, including 11 Republicans and 11 Democrats, did not vote.
The bill would require a citizenship question on the decennial census starting in 2030. It also demands the findings be reported and modify apportionment of House representatives and electoral votes to exclude noncitizens.
In a <a href="https://twitter.com/RepJamesComer/status/1788337410918539743" target="_blank" rel="noopener">statement</a>, Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-KY) said the House was &#8220;taking steps to proactively protect a fair electoral process&#8221; as he bemoaned how the &#8220;Biden Administration’s open border policies have created the worst border crisis in American history, impacting every American.&#8221;
The top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), pointed to one of the amendments to the Constitution in making a case against passing the census questionnaire legislation.
&#8220;The Fourteenth Amendment makes the census and reapportionment apply to &#8216;all persons.&#8217; Constitutional originalists, textualists and followers of precedent must reject unlawful GOP attempts to confine the census and Congressional apportionment to citizens,&#8221; Raskin <a href="https://twitter.com/RepRaskin/status/1788242159080026605" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> in a post to X.
Another Democrat who spoke out against the bill was Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-IL), who hails from a House district created after the 2020 census that was <a href="https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/chicago-politics/illinois-3rd-congressional-district-delia-ramirez-gil-villegas-among-5-competing-to-represent-states-new-hispanic-district/2853325/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">drawn to have a Hispanic plurality</a>.
&#8220;Today, Republicans forced a vote on H.R. 7109, an unconstitutional bill intended to make people afraid and to discourage their participation in the Census,&#8221; she <a href="https://twitter.com/repdeliaramirez/status/1788371249095229932" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> on X. &#8220;H.R. 1709 ultimately undercounts, underrepresents, and underfunds communities like ours, #IL03. I VOTED NO.&#8221;
With no support across the aisle, the GOP bill&#8217;s prospects in the Democrat-controlled Senate may not be very good. Still, Republican lawmakers and their allies rallied behind the legislation to boost their messaging about the issue of illegal immigration ahead of the 2024 election.
Stephen Miller, who served as a senior adviser to former President Donald Trump, <a href="https://twitter.com/StephenM/status/1788379168981327912" target="_blank" rel="noopener">warned</a> on X that &#8220;House Seats and Electoral College votes WILL BE added to areas with the most illegals (including all Biden illegals) unless [the] Senate passes the bill.&#8221; He added, &#8220;Invasion by design.&#8221;

Rep. Jamie Raskin

‘Invasion By Design’: No Dems Back House Bill On Adding Citizenship Question To Census

No Dems Back House Bill On Adding Citizenship Question To Census

Border Crisis

Census Bureau

Illegal Immigration

James Comer

Redistricting

Hecklers disrupted a prominent <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/house-democrats" target="_blank" rel="noopener">House Democrat</a>&#8216;s university lecture on democracy last week, after which the president of the school ended the event due to what he called a show of &#8220;free speech.&#8221;
Rep. <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/jamie-raskin" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jamie Raskin</a> (D-MD), the ranking member of the Oversight Committee, spoke at the University of Maryland (UMD) on Thursday until a commotion about the Israel-Hamas war led him to get sidetracked and open the room to questions.
Although UMD President Darryll Pines reportedly cut short the lecture and wished the disruptors had been more civil, he <a href="https://www.marylandmatters.org/2024/03/29/raskin-speech-at-umd-disrupted-by-protesters/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">told Capitol News Service</a> that the result was a positive one.
&#8220;[Raskin] came here to speak about where our democracy is going in our country,” Pines reportedly said. “What you saw play out actually was democracy and free speech and academic freedom.&#8221;
He added, &#8220;From our perspective as a university, there are the difficult conversations that we should be having.&#8221;
Raskin told the news outlet the &#8220;sentiments&#8221; of the protesters were &#8220;perfectly consistent&#8221; with his planned lecture, which was titled &#8220;Democracy, Autocracy and the Threat to Reason in the 21st Century.&#8221;
The congressman said he is &#8220;not really opposed to heckling&#8221; but noted that &#8220;it seems like heckling today is all about drowning out the speaker, and that’s totally antithetical to the spirit of free expression.&#8221;
As word of what transpired at the event and what Pines had to say about it spread on social media, people chimed in about their views on protesters effectively shutting down speakers.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Congressman Jamie Raskin tried to give a speech at <a href="https://twitter.com/UofMaryland?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@UofMaryland</a> on democracy and &quot;the threat to reason in the 21st Century.” 
It was relentlessly heckled and drowned out by people protesting Israel&#39;s invasion of Gaza. 
The speech was ultimately shut down by the university… <a href="https://t.co/DQVH2dkXoI">pic.twitter.com/DQVH2dkXoI</a>
&mdash; Nico Perrino (@NicoPerrino) <a href="https://twitter.com/NicoPerrino/status/1774482820678693194?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 31, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;President Pines is wrong,&#8221; <a href="https://twitter.com/NicoPerrino/status/1774482820678693194" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> Nico Perrino, executive vice president of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).
&#8220;What you saw play out was mob censorship,&#8221; he continued. &#8220;It was a bastardization of free speech and the antithesis of democracy. These shout-downs happen far too often on college campuses — and with the approval of college administrators.&#8221;
NBC News reporter Jonathan Allen, a UMD alumnus, suggested that Pines&#8217; comments should be called the &#8220;loudest-voice doctrine,&#8221; according to a <a href="https://twitter.com/jonallendc/status/1774788172091642176">post</a> on X.
&#8220;It’s debatable the degree to which federally funded schools have a duty to ensure free speech,&#8221; he <a href="https://twitter.com/jonallendc/status/1774817009168978403" target="_blank" rel="noopener">added</a>. &#8220;What’s not debatable is that the [First Amendment] also protects the right of assembly — to allow political discourse. Nor is it debatable that intimidation can fall outside protected speech.&#8221;
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1700760801843000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2PQrVSrJfhxNb4LcARqniG">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
UMD professor Howard Milchberg, who <a href="https://umdphysics.umd.edu/about-us/news/department-news/1934-milchberg-lect-24.html#:~:text=University%20of%20Maryland%20Professor%20of,parents%2C%20Renee%20and%20Irving%20Milchberg." target="_blank" rel="noopener">started the lecture</a> with his family in recognition of his late parents who survived the Holocaust, posited that the disruption of Raskin&#8217;s remarks was a good thing.
&#8220;It didn’t go as planned, but it maybe turned out better than normal,&#8221; Milchberg <a href="https://www.marylandmatters.org/2024/03/29/raskin-speech-at-umd-disrupted-by-protesters/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">told Capitol News Service</a>. &#8220;It was an actual exercise of democracy rather than a story about democracy.&#8221;

House Dem’s Lecture Derailed By Hecklers; University President Claims ‘Free Speech’ Prevailed

House Dem's Lecture Derailed By Hecklers; University President Claims 'Free Speech' Prevailed

Maryland

Protesters

University of Maryland

Two Democrat impeachment stars lashed out at former Hunter Biden business partner Tony Bobulinski during a Wednesday hearing, interrupting Bobulinski and complaining to the committee chair because he had accused them of lying.
Reps. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), who led the second impeachment against former President Donald Trump — and Dan Goldman (D-NY), who led the first — objected to Bobulinski&#8217;s opening statement, during which he called both of them liars.
Bobulinski – who also claimed during Wednesday&#8217;s hearing that Hunter Biden had <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/impeachment-witness-tony-bobulinski-claims-hunter-and-james-biden-perjured-themselves" target="_blank" rel="noopener">perjured himself</a> during his own testimony before Congress — said that Reps. Goldman and Raskin had both lied to protect President Joe Biden and predicted that they would continue to do so after the hearing was over.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
House Oversight Committee hearing goes off the rails when Hunter Biden&#39;s former business partner Tony Bobulinski calls out Reps. Jamie Raskin and Dan Goldman for lying on behalf of the Biden Crime Family. <a href="https://t.co/Xny4VTbhVc">pic.twitter.com/Xny4VTbhVc</a>
&mdash; Greg Price (@greg_price11) <a href="https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1770462772398088298?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 20, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;The same people preaching this mantra know better. They continue to lie directly to the American people without hesitation and remorse,&#8221; Bobulinski began. &#8220;Reps. Dan Goldman and Jamie Raskin, both lawyers, and Mr. Goldman a former prosecutor with the SDNY in New York, will continue to lie today in this hearing and go straight to the media to tell more lies.&#8221;
&#8220;Hunter Biden&#8217;s defense attorney Abbe Lowell weaponizes letters to Congress to try to smear my name —&#8221; Bobulinski continued, but he was interrupted.
&#8220;Mr. Chairman,&#8221; Raskin cut in, but Bobulinski continued.
The former Biden associate referenced his personal history in the U.S. Navy, but paused when he saw committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) speaking to Raskin.
&#8220;Am I supposed to say it&#8217;s my time, Mr. Raskin?&#8221; Bobulinski asked, jabbing at the members who had interrupted him with the same line.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1711032859554000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2P0xzacmznHQusvMgIAHpP">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
Comer apologized for the interruption and told Bobulinski to carry on with his opening statement, but Raskin was not finished.
&#8220;Mr. Chairman, save his time, but he called members of this committee liars,&#8221; Raskin complained. &#8220;And I just want to know whether the order and decorum requirements of House Rule 11 apply to witnesses before the committee. Does it apply or does it not?&#8221;
Comer, after a brief conference off-mic, replied that there were rules of decorum for the committee members but no language he knew of that applied the same rules to witnesses. Raskin did not appear to be thrilled with the ruling, but did not interrupt again.
Goldman also responded to Bobulinski&#8217;s comments, saying, &#8220;We have a very important hearing here, and we don&#8217;t have time for stunts.&#8221;
Later in the hearing, Goldman got into another testy exchange with Bobulinski, asserting that he had been the one who wanted Joe Biden involved and claiming that Hunter Biden had dumped him as a business partner because of that.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
&quot;That&#39;s a blatant lie Mr. Goldman, you know better&quot; 
Tony Bobulinski calls out Rep. Goldman for trying to cover for the Biden crime family. <a href="https://t.co/FcFQ5wz9zZ">pic.twitter.com/FcFQ5wz9zZ</a>
&mdash; Media Research Center (@theMRC) <a href="https://twitter.com/theMRC/status/1770486119869620332?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 20, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;That&#8217;s a blatant lie, Mr. Goldman, you know better,&#8221; Bobulinski shot back.

Rep. Raskin Holds Capitol Hill Press Conference On Biden Impeachment Inquiry

Democrat Impeachment Stars Lash Out At Tony Bobulinski After He Calls Them Liars In Committee Hearing

House Oversight Committee

Hunter Biden

Impeachment

Joe Biden

Tony Bobulinski

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) veered into conspiracy theory territory on Tuesday, arguing that the investigation into President Joe Biden&#8217;s handling of classified documents was simply a ruse to prevent the United States from sending more aid money to Ukraine.
Raskin made the comments during a hearing taking the testimony of Special Counsel Robert Hur, who interviewed President Biden in the course of his investigation into the classified documents found in his possession.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Democrat Rep. Jamie Raskin, delusional liar and conspiracy theorist, says Biden&#39;s classified documents scandal is actually about aid for Ukraine <a href="https://t.co/yPQnLf6PVa">pic.twitter.com/yPQnLf6PVa</a>
&mdash; RNC Research (@RNCResearch) <a href="https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1767569676379234381?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 12, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;This is a memory test,&#8221; Raskin began. &#8220;But it&#8217;s not a memory test for President Biden, it&#8217;s a memory test for all of America.&#8221;
Raskin immediately pivoted to warning language, suggesting that continuing the investigation into Biden and the classified documents was no different than embracing fascism.
&#8220;Do we remember fascism? Do we remember nazism?&#8221; Raskin asked. &#8220;Do we remember communism and totalitarianism? Have we completely forgotten the sacrifices of our parents and grandparents and prior generations?&#8221;
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1710096758317000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3iaq6q-Qs351snTwJA_ODg">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
Raskin went on to compare the Biden classified documents investigation to &#8220;silly&#8221; childhood games, arguing that they were simply being used to distract people long enough for former President Donald Trump to slip back into the White House.
&#8220;While we play pin the tail on the donkey in this wild goose chase, all of these silly games, Donald Trump entertains authoritarian hustler Viktor Orban at Mar-a-Lago for the weekend, and Orban comes out to declare that if we indeed sleepwalk into another Trump presidency, Trump will, quote, &#8216;not give a single penny to Ukraine,'&#8221; Raskin continued, adding, &#8220;That&#8217;s what all of this is about.&#8221;
Several others got heated during the Hur hearing, with Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) blowing up at Hur for using up his time by failing to give one-word responses to his questions. &#8220;Don&#8217;t filibuster,&#8221; Nadler complained at one point.

House Select Committee On January 6th Holds Its 7th Hearing

Jamie Raskin Dives Into New Conspiracy Theory During Hur Hearing

Ukraine

In the wake of Monday&#8217;s unanimous Supreme Court ruling, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) promised to &#8220;revive legislation&#8221; that would prevent anyone guilty of participating in an &#8220;insurrection&#8221; from running for president.
<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/supreme-court-rules-trump-cant-be-kicked-off-colorado-ballot">The ruling</a> came after three states — Colorado, Maine, and Illinois — declared former President Donald Trump ineligible to appear on primary ballots, citing Section 3 (the insurrection clause) of the 14th Amendment.
&#8220;States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency,&#8221; the unanimous decision read in part — but since it left the door open for Congress to use legislation to enforce Section 3, Raskin declared his intent to do exactly that.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Democrat Rep. Jamie Raskin immediately goes on CNN to announce he and Eric Swalwell are working to &quot;revive legislation&quot; to force President Trump off the ballot <a href="https://t.co/QcYhBQn0JK">pic.twitter.com/QcYhBQn0JK</a>
&mdash; RNC Research (@RNCResearch) <a href="https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1764703589916627041?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;We’ve been saying all along that section three of the 14th Amendment presents a clear and unequivocal statement that anyone who has sworn an oath of office — and, by the way, not just a president but members of Congress and others who hold federal office — who engage in insurrection or rebellion, having sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution against enemies foreign and domestic can never serve again in federal or state office,&#8221; Raskin told CNN&#8217;s Dana Bash, adding, &#8220;Donald Trump is disqualified.&#8221;
&#8220;I am working with a number of my colleagues, including Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Eric Swalwell to revive legislation that we had to set up a process by which we could determine that someone who committed insurrection is disqualified by Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,&#8221; he added.
&#8220;And the House of Representatives already impeached Donald Trump for participating in insurrection by inciting it,&#8221; Raskin said, despite the fact that the Senate had already failed to convict Trump on that charge once and no other court had tried him.
&#8220;So the House has already pronounced upon that, and there was also a 57 to 43 vote in the Senate. The question is whether Speaker Mike Johnson would allow us to bring this to the floor of the House,&#8221; he said.

House Democrat Promises To Legislate Trump Off The Ballot After SCOTUS Decision

Colorado

A House Democrat on Sunday chided anyone who does not believe the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/supreme-court" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Supreme Court</a> has justices who want to delay former President <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/donald-trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a>&#8216;s trials in the lead-up to the 2024 election.
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), a former <a href="https://raskin.house.gov/about" target="_blank" rel="noopener">constitutional law professor</a> who led the January 6-focused impeachment inquiry against Trump, talked about the high court with former White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki on her MSNBC program.
The conversation followed the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/supreme-court" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Supreme Court</a> announcing on Wednesday that it was taking up the issue of whether <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/donald-trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Trump</a> can invoke presidential immunity to shield himself from federal prosecution in a 2020 election case brought by special counsel Jack Smith.
&#8220;These justices know what their powers are, right? They know the court&#8217;s schedule. They have the same calendar. Do you look at this court and think some of these justices may want to delay these trials?&#8221; Psaki asked.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
.<a href="https://twitter.com/jrpsaki?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@jrpsaki</a>: &quot;Do you look at this court and think some of these justices want to delay these trials?&quot;<a href="https://twitter.com/RepRaskin?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RepRaskin</a>: &quot;Yeah. If you don&#39;t believe that, you&#39;re too innocent to be let out of the house by yourself at this point.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/Z0YI3r0cJH">pic.twitter.com/Z0YI3r0cJH</a>
&mdash; Inside with Jen Psaki (@InsideWithPsaki) <a href="https://twitter.com/InsideWithPsaki/status/1764345835813306783?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 3, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Raskin replied, &#8220;Well, yeah. If you don&#8217;t believe that, you&#8217;re too innocent to be let out of the house by yourself at this point.&#8221; He added, &#8220;This is a court driven by both Trump nominees and Bush nominees, and neither of those guys was elected with a popular vote majority.&#8221;
That leaves the United States, according to Raskin, with a Supreme Court &#8220;that is representing the choices of minority presidents.&#8221;
The Supreme Court <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23a745.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">scheduled</a> an oral argument for the week of April 22, 2024, raising doubts among legal experts that a trial could be held before the election in November. Smith sought to have the high court fast-track consideration of the matter last year but was denied.
Trump has pleaded not guilty in the case in which he is accused of unlawfully plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 election. His lawyers <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2023/10/05/trump-election-case-immunity-motion-00120225" target="_blank" rel="noopener">filed to dismiss</a> the case in October by arguing that Trump&#8217;s actions were &#8220;within the heartland&#8221; of his &#8220;official duties.&#8221; They also cited presidential immunity in a request to <a href="https://www.axios.com/2024/02/23/trump-classified-documents-presidential-immunity" target="_blank" rel="noopener">get a documents case also spearheaded by Smith dismissed</a>.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1700760801843000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2PQrVSrJfhxNb4LcARqniG">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
The Supreme Court is <a href="https://twitter.com/business/status/1764355614317109649" target="_blank" rel="noopener">expected</a> to rule on a bid to <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/clarence-thomas-corners-attorney-in-trump-ballot-case-by-asking-for-disqualification-examples" target="_blank" rel="noopener">remove Trump from the ballot</a> in Colorado under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, an insurrection clause dating back to the Civil War, over his actions leading up to the U.S. Capitol breach on January 6, 2021.

Democrat Scolds People Who Don’t Think Supreme Court Justices Want To Delay Trump Trials

Numerous House Democrats have signaled that they would not certify a 2024 presidential election win from Donald Trump, relying on the 14th Amendment to claim Trump is an insurrectionist and thus ineligible from holding office.
Democrats including Reps. James Clyburn (SC), Jamie Raskin (MD), Adam Schiff (CA), Eric Swalwell (CA), and even House Minority Leader Hakeem Jefferies refused to <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/02/democrats-congress-trump-january-6/677545/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">say</a> that they would confirm Trump to office if he won the 2024 election.
As Dan McLaughlin <a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/democrats-may-refuse-to-certify-a-trump-election-if-he-wins-the-supreme-court-could-prevent-that/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">explained</a> at National Review, Democrats could have the votes to sustain an objection to a Trump win if they take control of the House. &#8220;Only a simple majority is required, and unlike when the House chooses a president under the Twelfth Amendment, they don’t vote by states,&#8221; he wrote. &#8220;Unlike in 2016 or 2004, when they were in the minority, House Democrats could be playing with live ammunition.&#8221;
Still, a majority of senators would have to object to a Trump win, too. This would likely take 51 senators, and as McLaughlin pointed out, this would be a tough task for Democrats: They &#8220;either have to hold every seat they currently occupy (good luck in West Virginia), or take a Republican-held seat (the bluest of which is either Ted Cruz’s in Texas or Rick Scott’s in Florida),&#8221; he said.
A potential way around some of this chaos rests at the Supreme Court, which heard oral arguments earlier this month in Trump v. Anderson, a case about whether or not a state, in this case Colorado, can keep Trump off the ballot based on the 14th Amendment. If the high court gives clarity on the issue of Trump eligibility, specifically that he is eligible, then Democrats would not have room to object on this basis.
The arguments, so far, have bode well for Trump. Nearly every single justice, including the liberal ones, seemed exceedingly uncomfortable with siding with Colorado based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Notably, that provision was enacted immediately following the Civil War in an effort to keep anyone who engaged in an “insurrection” from holding office. 
Attorney Jonathan Mitchell, who argued on behalf of Trump, argued that Section 3 doesn’t mention “president,” but an “officer of the United States,” which he says includes appointed officials, not elected officials. Another argument centered around Colorado adding a qualification to Trump by deeming him an insurrectionist and then disqualifying him before the election.
Some of the strongest pushback to Colorado&#8217;s claims came from Justice Elena Kagan. “Why should a single state have the ability to make this determination not only for their own citizens but also for the nation?&#8221; she pressed the Colorado legal team. “It sounds awfully national to me … if you weren&#8217;t from Colorado, and you were from Wisconsin, or you were from Michigan, and what the Michigan secretary of state did is going to make the difference between whether candidate A is elected over Candidate  B is elected? I mean that seems quite extraordinary.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
BREAKING: Best Supreme Court Quote Just Now By Justice Kagan: &quot;The question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be President of the United States.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/ftN4tNV7sG">pic.twitter.com/ftN4tNV7sG</a>
&mdash; Simon Ateba (@simonateba) <a href="https://twitter.com/simonateba/status/1755633516727935055?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 8, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

US-POLITICS-VOTE-TRUMP

Democrats Signal They Might Not Certify A Trump Win In 2024

Adam Schiff

Hakeem Jeffries

Menu