House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) was clearly uncomfortable when Fox News host Jacqui Heinrich pressed him on the accusations against Leftist Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner.
Heinrich, on the latest broadcast of &#8220;The Sunday Briefing,&#8221; pulled no punches when she asked Jeffries about claims that Platner had exhibited troubling behavior with women he&#8217;d dated in the past — and challenged him with the Democratic Party&#8217;s #MeToo mantra: &#8220;Believe all women.&#8221;
WATCH: <iframe style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; max-width: 100%; width: 100%; margin: 20px auto 5px; border: 0;" src="https://player.mux.com/1R5aTgsooyHUP01v86rI5ssagIA7Wtk006?metadata-video-content-type=embed_video&amp;metadata-video-id=04e2cd90-637d-4591-904c-c87c8abafcd7&amp;metadata-video-stream-type=on-demand&amp;metadata-video-title=WATCH%3A%20Top%20Dem%20sprints%20away%20from%20'believe%20all%20women'%20when%20as&amp;poster=https%3A%2F%2Fdailywireplus-v2.imgix.net%2Fimages%2Fembedded-videos%2Fa6fd4d29-fbc0-4d43-9fcf-440ae37c52e3.png&amp;autoplay=false&amp;accent-color=%23DB3D3B&amp;primary-color=%23ffffff&amp;secondary-color=%23000000" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
&#8220;What happened to believe all women?&#8221; Heinrich asked.
&#8220;I haven&#8217;t followed these allegations closely,&#8221; Jeffries began. &#8220;What I have said is that violence against women, in any way, shape, or form, is unacceptable. It&#8217;s a red line and nobody should cross that. And any accuser who comes forward has to be treated with dignity and respect.&#8221;
Jeffries went on to defend his ignorance regarding the furor surrounding a high-profile Democratic candidate by saying that he was only concerned with winning back control of the House of Representatives.
&#8220;I haven&#8217;t talked to [Rep.] Ro Khanna (D-CA) about this particular race, and in fact, I haven&#8217;t gotten involved in this particular race because we’re focused on taking control of the House of Representatives,&#8221; he added.
Khanna attempted to walk the line on Platner, saying that he believed the women who had come forward alleging that the Maine Democrat&#8217;s behavior was troubling. But Khanna stopped short of withdrawing his support for Platner — and even campaigned with him over the weekend — saying that he would certainly withdraw support if and when he saw evidence that the troubling behavior had ever escalated to violence.
Sen. <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/he-lied-to-everybody-fetterman-says-graham-platner-saga-isnt-over">John Fetterman</a> (D-PA) is one of the few Democrats who have spoken out against Platner, often referring to the candidate by his Reddit screen name — P Hustle — and suggesting that there probably are more skeletons in his closet that have not yet surfaced.

Maine Democratic Candidate For Senate Graham Platner Campaigns Across The State

SEE IT: Top Dem Sprints Away From ‘Believe All Women’ When Asked About Platner

WATCH: Top Dem Sprints Away From 'Believe All Women' When Asked About Platner

Hakeem Jeffries

Media

Politics

Democrats are up in arms over a decision by the Virginia Supreme Court that overturns their attempt to gerrymander the commonwealth’s Republican voters to the brink of oblivion. Virginia is considered a purple state where Kamala Harris won against Donald Trump by only about six percent of the voters, many of whom simply thought having an idiot president with a lunatic cackle might be the funnier choice.
But the gerrymander would have changed the commonwealth’s districts from a representative six blue versus five red, to an admittedly hilarious but totally unfair ten blue districts versus one red. The lone Republican district would be ringed in by high walls topped with barbed wire, while all voting booths would be located in the blue districts.
The court ruled that the ballot measure allowing the change violated procedural rules laid out in the Virginia Constitution under its &#8220;Don’t be a Schmuck&#8221; clause, which requires laws to be written by people who are not schmucks or can at least pretend not to be schmucks for ten straight minutes or, if that’s too much to ask, can at least ACT like they’re not schmucks for ten minutes even though everyone knows they are.
In a frantic group phone call among some of the Democratic Party’s top schmucks, schmucks from around the country expressed their concern at the court&#8217;s decision.
<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/andrew-klavan-ep-1279"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-974735 size-large" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/Klavan-watch-now-1024x171.jpg" alt="" width="1024" height="171" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/Klavan-watch-now-1024x171.jpg 1024w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/Klavan-watch-now-300x50.jpg 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/Klavan-watch-now-768x128.jpg 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/Klavan-watch-now-1536x256.jpg 1536w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/Klavan-watch-now.jpg 1800w" sizes=" (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a>
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a huge schmuck, said the Virginia Court’s move was part of a nationwide conspiracy against the Democrat party. The schmuck said:
<blockquote>
“First, the Supreme Court tells us we can’t gerrymander by race, so black people will be allowed to share districts with white people. That’s exactly what we’ve been trying to put a stop to since the Republicans won the Civil War. If voters stopped voting for skin color and started passing judgment on policies, the Democratic Party would cease to exist. Next, the Virginia Supreme Court says we&#8217;re violating the rule of law, and I’m, like, ‘What? What the hell are they even talking about?’ And now, Republicans in Congress want to require voters to have picture identification, which would limit the electorate to living people who actually exist. That’s a blatant attempt to disenfranchise imaginary Democrats across and under this great nation. And the only reason the Republicans haven’t been able to pass a voter ID law supported by 84 percent of the people is that none of them realize yet that their Senate Leader, John Thune, passed away last August. They think he’s just totally ineffective. Wait till they find out we propped him up in his seat and had him embalmed!” 
</blockquote>
As the group phone call continued, the Democrats started to strategize how to overturn the court’s decision. One idea was to lower the required retirement age of Virginia judges from the current 73 years old to two, so that the present judges would have to step down and could be replaced by judges who don’t know what’s in the Constitution and are dependent on others to feed them, either because they’re only two years old or just because they’re Democrats, I’m not sure which.
Another idea was to wait till election night, pretend there were water main leaks in voting venues, stop the count, then smuggle in boxes of fake ballots, and get The New York Times to run articles claiming it was the least corrupt election ever. But that idea was ultimately rejected, because Democrats felt no one would fall for such a silly trick twice.
Finally, Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones, a stupid schmuck, tried to file a motion to overturn the Virginia Court’s ruling to the United States Supreme Court. Jones wrote the motion — and God help me, I am not making this part up — he wrote the motion in which the speaker of the “Virgnia” House of Delegates, appealed against a State “Sentator” and then he filed the misspelt motion with the VIRGINIA Supreme Court instead of the United States Supreme Court, which has no jurisdiction in the matter anyway. When told he should have used a hot little item called spellcheck to help him write the motion, Attorney General Jones remarked, “Oh good, there’s nothing I like better than a hot check. Maybe I can sentate her some flounders and show her around Virgnia.”

Jeffries

Dems Furious After Court Rules Republicans Allowed To Vote

Democrats

gerrymandering

Redistricting

Virginia

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) is escalating his rhetoric as Democrats reel from a series of redistricting setbacks, accusing the Supreme Court of unleashing the “ghosts of the Confederacy” after recent rulings weakened Democrats’ efforts to preserve race-based congressional maps.
Speaking on Wednesday, Jeffries painted the high court’s decision as an existential threat to black political power, claiming, “The ghosts of the Confederacy has [sic] afflicted the United States Supreme Court majority and is [sic] invading and haunting the nation right now.”
The dramatic language comes as Democrats face a political reality they did not expect: years of legal and political maneuvers designed to secure favorable maps are beginning to unravel, threatening the party’s hopes of reclaiming the House before 2028.
Jeffries’ remarks followed the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/dems-erupt-after-scotus-rules-on-race-based-districts?author=Zach+Jewell&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=undefined&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=Dems+Erupt+After+SCOTUS+Rules+On+Race-Based+Districts">Supreme Court’s decision</a> reinterpreting the Voting Rights Act of 1965, allowing states to redraw districts without preserving certain majority-minority seats that had become a cornerstone of Democratic electoral strategy in the South. The ruling, combined with the Virginia Supreme Court&#8217;s <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/virginia-supreme-court-strikes-down-redistricting-in-brutal-blow-to-democrats">decision</a> to strike down a Democrat-backed map referendum, dealt a major blow to the party’s redistricting plans.
Rather than moderating his tone, Jeffries appeared to signal a broader Democratic retaliation campaign. In the same remarks, he vowed a “decisive and overwhelming response” before the 2028 election, saying Democrats would ensure voters, not Republicans, decide control of Congress and the White House.
<iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wUDLSm71ArI?si=mmzq8BsAzv9Bgm11" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
That message lines up with reporting from <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/14/house-democrats-redistricting-hardball-00920090">POLITICO</a>, which noted House Democrats are abandoning years of “good government” rhetoric about independent commissions and nonpartisan map-drawing in favor of openly discussing aggressive partisan redistricting in blue states. Democratic lawmakers are now considering new map fights in states including New York, Maryland, Colorado, and Washington.
Jeffries has framed the court’s decisions as a return to “Jim Crow,” but Republicans argue the rulings simply ended an unconstitutional system that prioritized race in congressional district design. The court’s reinterpretation of the VRA undercuts decades of legal precedent that effectively mandated racial sorting in elections under the guise of civil-rights enforcement.
The increasingly apocalyptic language from Jeffries suggests Democrats understand the stakes. With Republicans positioned to gain several House seats through redistricting changes in states like Texas, Florida, and Tennessee, the party’s path back to the majority has narrowed significantly.
If Democrats were confident that favorable political winds alone would carry them to victory, Jeffries likely would not be invoking Confederate ghosts and promising to “crush” political opponents’ “souls.” Instead, his comments reflect a party increasingly alarmed that the redistricting war may be slipping out of its hands — and willing to abandon its prior anti-gerrymandering rhetoric to fight back.

House Minority Leader Jeffries Holds Capitol Hill Press Conference

Hakeem Jeffries Starts Seeing ‘Ghosts’ As Democrats Panic Over Redistricting

Supreme Court

The only thing thicker than Hakeem Jeffries’ hypocrisy is the smog of self-delusion that follows him into every room, choking the life out of the very truths he claims to uphold.
Last week, Jeffries, the House minority leader, was <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkJG--0ScE0">practically doing a victory lap</a> in the end zone after Virginia Democrats pulled off the ultimate &#8220;Democracy™&#8221; maneuver: convincing 51.5% of voters to scrap an independent commission so the General Assembly could gerrymander a 10-1 split. To Jeffries, this wasn&#8217;t a power grab; it was a &#8220;big victory for America&#8221; and a &#8220;march toward a more perfect union.&#8221; Apparently, a &#8220;more perfect union&#8221; looks exactly like a map where half the voters get 90% of the representation.
Jeffries and the &#8220;Dollar-Store Obama&#8221; brigade framed this as a noble &#8220;firewall&#8221; against the orange man in the White House. Even Barack Obama emerged from his latest Netflix production to explain that gerrymandering is actually fine, as long as Democrats do it to &#8220;level the playing field.&#8221; It’s a bold strategy: saving democracy by destroying it first.
But fast forward to Monday, April 27, and Jeffries has suddenly rediscovered the sanctity of &#8220;Fair Districts.&#8221; The moment Florida Governor Ron DeSantis suggested that the Sunshine State—which has seen a decade of growth in just three years—might need its own mid-decade tune-up, Jeffries’s halo reappeared.
Jeffries took to X to huff and puff about &#8220;blatant partisan gerrymandering&#8221; and &#8220;nakedly targeting communities of color.&#8221; He actually wrote, &#8220;See you in Court,&#8221; without a hint of a blush, despite the fact that a Virginia judge just tossed his own party’s referendum into the trash for being unconstitutional.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
The DeSantis Dummymander blatantly violates Florida’s Fair Districts Amendment banning partisan gerrymandering.
It also violates the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by nakedly targeting communities of color. 
See you in Court. <a href="https://t.co/DeDqW84s7M">pic.twitter.com/DeDqW84s7M</a>
&mdash; Hakeem Jeffries (@hakeemjeffries) <a href="https://twitter.com/hakeemjeffries/status/2048812217915642288?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 27, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The hypocrisy is so thick you could carve it. When Virginia Democrats attempt a 10-1 sweep, it’s a &#8220;march toward justice.&#8221; When DeSantis looks at a map, it’s a &#8220;Dummymander&#8221; and a violation of the 14th Amendment. Jeffries has <a href="https://x.com/Breaking911/status/2046984191716340211">told</a> Florida Republicans to &#8220;F around and find out,&#8221; which sounds a lot like a threat from a guy whose own &#8220;victory&#8221; is currently stuck in judicial purgatory.
DeSantis, ever the happy warrior, has <a href="https://twitter.com/EricLDaugh/status/2047020226785493096">responded</a> by offering to pay for Jeffries’ plane ticket to Florida. He even offered to take him fishing.
It’s a generous offer: Jeffries could use the time on the water to practice his latest trick—complaining about the &#8220;rigged system&#8221; in Florida while the ink is still wet on his own attempt to rig Virginia.
If Jeffries wants a war, he’s found a battlefield, but he might want to check his own backyard before he starts crying about the neighbors&#8217; fences.

High Priest Of Hypocrisy: Hakeem Jeffries Demands Fairness In Florida Only After Rigging Virginia

Congress

Florida

Ron DeSantis

After the latest assassination attempt targeting President Trump at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, three of the Democrat Party’s youngest and most powerful leaders decried the incident on social media.
They got hammered.
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani wrote on X, “Political violence is absolutely unacceptable. I am glad the President and guests at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner are safe.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Political violence is absolutely unacceptable.
I am glad the President and guests at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner are safe.
&mdash; Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani (@NYCMayor) <a href="https://twitter.com/NYCMayor/status/2048231503532855755?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 26, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Responses included:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Your friend, Hasan Piker, openly calls for political assassinations
Your wife, Rama Duwaji, openly endorses political murders
Your staff, Alvaro Lopez, celebrated those who tore down posters of hostages as “heroes”
We are against political killings.
We fear you might not be.
&mdash; Elica Le Bon الیکا‌ ل بن (@elicalebon) <a href="https://twitter.com/elicalebon/status/2048499000857489701?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 26, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
More dishonesty from NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani.
Mayor Mamdani embraces as friend and comrade Hasan Piker. Piker calls for assassination of U.S. Senator, Trump, and for the streets to &quot;run with the blood&quot; of capitalists. Piker is also a raging antisemite and October 7 rape… <a href="https://t.co/YqFjf2uEc2">https://t.co/YqFjf2uEc2</a> <a href="https://t.co/HFGZRGuWqj">pic.twitter.com/HFGZRGuWqj</a>
&mdash; Adam Mossoff (@AdamMossoff) <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamMossoff/status/2048298156866392377?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 26, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Your wife literally celebrated October 7th, you idiot.
&mdash; Vivid.🇮🇱 (@VividProwess) <a href="https://twitter.com/VividProwess/status/2048547818478911820?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 26, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
You’ve advocated political violence for years with your free Palestine death cult crap. Sit the f*** down Mamdani.
&mdash; Emily Schrader &#8211; אמילי שריידר امیلی شریدر (@emilykschrader) <a href="https://twitter.com/emilykschrader/status/2048287359720956288?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 26, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
65 times Hasan Piker endorsed political violence and terrorism: <a href="https://t.co/lkBEghr8at">pic.twitter.com/lkBEghr8at</a>
&mdash; Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼 (@DrewPavlou) <a href="https://twitter.com/DrewPavlou/status/2048240301886910689?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 26, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Mamdani’s friendship with Piker calls into question his condemnation of violence; Piker has <a href="https://x.com/RNCResearch/status/2041540038714929217">called</a> for the murder of Florida GOP Senator Rick Scott, as well as saying of property owners, “Kill them. Kill those motherf*ckers and murder those motherf*ckers in the street. Let the streets soak in their f*cking red capitalist blood&#8221;; said, “Liberals, you need to be f*cking showing your opponent&#8217;s guts on there, okay? You need to be gutting them. You need to be shanking these motherf*ckers and letting their f*cking intestines just ride on stage.”
Mamdani’s wife, Rama Duwaji, <a href="https://jewishinsider.com/2026/03/zohran-mamdani-wife-rama-duwaji-social-media-oct-7/">reportedly &#8220;liked&#8221;</a> Instagram posts on the day of the October 7 Hamas massacre that featured live-streamed footage of terrorists breaching the Gaza border and commandeering Israel Defense Forces vehicles. One post she approved of hailed the attack as &#8220;breaking the walls of apartheid.&#8221;
More recently, Duwaji <a href="https://www.thefp.com/p/nyc-first-lady-liked-post-oct-7-rape-hoax">liked a post</a> that dismissed the documented mass rapes of Israeli women during the October 7 attacks as a &#8220;mass hoax&#8221; fabricated by the media.
Meanwhile, Democrat Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrote: “There is no place for political violence in our country. I am relieved that the President and the attendees at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner last night are safe.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
There is no place for political violence in our country.
I am relieved that the President and the attendees at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner last night are safe.
&mdash; Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@RepAOC) <a href="https://twitter.com/RepAOC/status/2048411512876773427?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 26, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
She was also torched for her comment:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
If you believe there is no place for political violence in our country why do you hang out with Hasan Piker, a man who has called for “capitalist blood” to “run in the streets,” who has suggested that someone needs to assassinate President Trump, and who called for the… <a href="https://t.co/nKkLS84h41">pic.twitter.com/nKkLS84h41</a>
&mdash; Megan Basham (@megbasham) <a href="https://twitter.com/megbasham/status/2048548037279072557?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 26, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
The Democrat Socialists of America, who endorsed you, recently had a vote on whether to kick a member of their political committee out after he repeatedly called for the murder of those on the right.
The same committee that endorsed you voted to keep him on the committee. Do you…
&mdash; Tara Servatius (@TaraServatius) <a href="https://twitter.com/TaraServatius/status/2048469124339085494?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 26, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
In October 2024, Ocasio-Cortez <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/28/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-bernie-sanders-kamala-harris#:~:text=She%20urged%20voters%20to%20recognize,the%20words%20of%20Adolf%20Hitler%E2%80%9D.">accused</a> Trump of “[echoing] the words of Adolf Hitler,” the Guardian noted. She ranted that she would not attend Trump’s 2025 inauguration, <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbOmsLTt_t4">saying</a>, “Let me make myself clear. I don’t celebrate rapists. &#8230; We are on the eve of an authoritarian administration.”
It might be instructive to note one of the motivations Cole Tomas Allen — the suspect in the shooting at the White House Correspondents&#8217; Dinner — cited for his actions was that Trump was a “rapist.” He wrote in his <a href="https://nypost.com/2026/04/26/us-news/read-whcd-gunman-cole-allens-full-anti-trump-manifesto/">manifesto</a>, &#8220;I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.&#8221;
Jeffries wrote: “Thankful for the swift law enforcement action to protect everyone from gunfire at the White House Correspondents Dinner. Praying for the safety of those who may remain in harm’s way. The violence and chaos in America must end.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Thankful for the swift law enforcement action to protect everyone from gunfire at the White House Correspondents Dinner.
Praying for the safety of those who may remain in harm’s way.
The violence and chaos in America must end.
&mdash; Hakeem Jeffries (@RepJeffries) <a href="https://twitter.com/RepJeffries/status/2048210669518958863?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 26, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Jeffries has said, “The threat right now to the American people are extreme MAGA Republicans. That’s the threat. That’s the problem, that’s the crisis we confront.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
You will be right back to this rhetoric tomorrow. <a href="https://t.co/ZffzzKH1kn">https://t.co/ZffzzKH1kn</a> <a href="https://t.co/lGd9IFcUzJ">pic.twitter.com/lGd9IFcUzJ</a>
&mdash; MAZE (@mazemoore) <a href="https://twitter.com/mazemoore/status/2048241734849597653?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 26, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Not a single word about the President or First Lady. Just limp platitudes about safety. 
Meanwhile, your party&#39;s violent rhetoric has caused the permission nutters use to harm our President. 
You&#39;re repugnant.
&mdash; Morgana Le Faye *Patriot *America 1st* 🇺🇸 (@Keltic_Spirit) <a href="https://twitter.com/Keltic_Spirit/status/2048389626256134650?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 26, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
We will continue to lecture you and your movement until you stop killing and trying to kill conservatives.
The Left is the party of murder, violence, and celebrating assassinations of they disagree with. <a href="https://t.co/dpE15PZ3Lc">pic.twitter.com/dpE15PZ3Lc</a>
&mdash; Matt Van Swol (@mattvanswol) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattvanswol/status/2048568738769682755?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 27, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Jeffries has also called for fighting the Trump administration’s agenda “in the streets.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
WATCH: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries calls for violence as he says people must &quot;fight&quot; President Trump&#39;s agenda &quot;in the streets.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/ZEEkhtIGbZ">pic.twitter.com/ZEEkhtIGbZ</a>
&mdash; Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapidResponse47/status/1885351963140739386?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 31, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

MixCollage-27-Apr-2026-10-39-AM-406

Top Democrats Torched For Condemning Trump Assassination Attempt After Years Of Violent Rhetoric

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

assassination attempt

Donald Trump

Zohran Mamdani

Florida could be the Republicans’ last stand in the mid-decade redistricting battle, as the state legislature prepares to convene a special session Tuesday to consider new congressional maps.
If approved, the proposed maps could add three to five seats that favor Republicans in the state, according to <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/04/23/florida-redistricting-desantis-republicans-maps-trump-00887120" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Politico,</a> potentially shaping the balance of power in a narrowly divided U.S. House.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) has criticized the effort, warning Florida Republicans to “F around and find out.”
“If they go down the road of a DeSantis dummymander, the Florida Republicans are going to find themselves in the same situation as Texas Republicans who are on the run right now,” Jeffries said at a Wednesday press conference.
Jeffries also expressed confidence that Democrats will win tough seats in red states, adding, &#8220;Under no circumstances are Texas Republicans picking up five seats. They&#8217;ll be fortunate if they get two or three. While in California, we are going to get all five.”
“The Republicans are dummymandering their way into the minority before a single vote is cast because they started this war and we&#8217;re going to finish it,” he continued.
Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis laughed off Jeffries&#8217; comments, suggesting that a national campaign by Democrats targeting the Sunshine State would only bolster the GOP.
“There’s nothing that could be better for Republicans in Florida to see Hakeem Jeffries everywhere around this state,” DeSantis said, according to <a href="https://floridapolitics.com/archives/792314-the-door-is-open-ron-desantis-scoffs-at-hakeem-jeffries-threat-to-expand-dem-efforts-in-florida/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Florida Politics</a>. &#8220;Please, be my guest. I will pay for you to come down to Florida and campaign. I’ll put you up in the Florida Governor’s mansion. We’ll take you fishing.&#8221;
Mid-decade redistricting efforts have rocked numerous states. In California, recent changes are expected to favor Democrats in several districts, while Texas Republicans have approved new maps to strengthen their position.
In Virginia, a Tuesday special election approved changes that could create four more Democrat-leaning seats, though a state circuit court judge has temporarily blocked the results from taking effect pending further legal review, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/virginia-dem-power-grab-faces-courtroom-showdown?author=Cameron+Arcand&amp;category=undefined&amp;elementPosition=3&amp;row=3&amp;rowHeadline=Latest+News&amp;rowType=Vertical+Carousel&amp;title=Virginia+Dem+Power+Grab+Faces+Courtroom+Showdown" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Daily Wire</a> reported.
When The Daily Wire reached out to DeSantis’ office for further comment, a spokesperson simply stated, “Stay tuned!”
At the state level, Democrats in Florida are also pushing back on the process. State Sen. Carlos Guillermo Smith criticized the lack of publicly released maps ahead of the session.
“Just 6 days out from the Florida GOP dummymander and still NO MAPS!” Smith posted to X on Wednesday. “They want rigged Congressional maps that keep Trump’s Republican party in power despite majority opposition from Florida voters.”
Florida&#8217;s current congressional delegation includes eight Democrats and 20 Republicans. Nationally, Republicans hold a slim 218-212 majority in the House, with several vacancies and a number of competitive races expected to factor into the chamber&#8217;s balance of power. The <a href="https://www.cookpolitical.com/ratings/house-race-ratings" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Cook Political Report</a> ranks 16 House races as &#8220;toss-ups,&#8221; with 14 contests considered &#8220;Lean Democrat&#8221; and two as &#8220;Lean Republican.&#8221;

GettyImages-2181789679

GOP Has One Final Chance To Counteract Dems Big Win

House of Representatives

The political war over the American map reached a fever pitch this week as Florida Governor Ron DeSantis delivered a blistering takedown of House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY). After the New York Democrat attempted to use a narrow, legally shaky victory in Virginia to threaten the Sunshine State’s redistricting plans, DeSantis didn&#8217;t just push back—he dismantled Jeffries’ entire political persona.
The spark for the confrontation was Tuesday’s referendum in Virginia. In a move that critics have slammed as a naked partisan power grab, Virginia voters narrowly approved—51.5% to 48.5%—a constitutional amendment allowing the Democratic-led General Assembly to bypass a bipartisan commission. The goal? Redrawing maps to transform a 6–5 Democratic edge into a crushing 10–1 advantage.
While Democrats celebrated the move as &#8220;defeating gerrymandering,&#8221; the victory was short-lived. A Virginia judge immediately threw a wrench in the works, ruling the referendum unconstitutional and blocking certification due to procedural failures.
That didn&#8217;t stop Hakeem Jeffries from &#8220;popping off,&#8221; as DeSantis put it. Flush with the Virginia news, Jeffries took to the microphones and social media to issue a warning to Florida Republicans. &#8220;Our message to Florida Republicans is F around and find out,&#8221; Jeffries barked, claiming Republicans are &#8220;dummymandering&#8221; their way into the minority and vowing to &#8220;crush&#8221; what he called the &#8220;DeSantis Dummymander.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Rep. Jeffries &quot;Our message to Florida Republicans is F around and find out. If they go down the road of a DeSantis &#39;dummymander&#39;, the Florida Republicans are going to find themselves in the same situation as Texas Republicans.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/RlNH0OH4Kp">pic.twitter.com/RlNH0OH4Kp</a>
&mdash; Breaking911 (@Breaking911) <a href="https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/2046984191716340211?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 22, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Democrats defeated Donald Trump’s gerrymandering scheme in Virginia tonight. 
We will crush the DeSantis Dummymander in Florida next.
Maximum warfare, everywhere, all the time. <a href="https://t.co/zM1oXhZT8K">pic.twitter.com/zM1oXhZT8K</a>
&mdash; Hakeem Jeffries (@hakeemjeffries) <a href="https://twitter.com/hakeemjeffries/status/2046754383707148505?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 22, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
DeSantis, who has called a special session for late April to address Florida&#8217;s massive population-driven malapportionment, was more than happy to accept the challenge.
&#8220;This guy, Jeffries, popping off in Washington about Florida,&#8221; DeSantis told reporters with a grin. &#8220;He wants to be Speaker of the House, and he&#8217;s kind of like—more liberal than Pelosi and all this other stuff from New York City. I just want to know: &#8216;Ooh, Florida. We&#8217;re going to go after Florida.&#8217; Please: be my guest.&#8221;
DeSantis then leaned into a devastatingly polite mockery, offering to pay for Jeffries’ travel and put him up in the Governor’s Mansion. &#8220;We&#8217;ll take you fishing,&#8221; DeSantis quipped. &#8220;We&#8217;ll do all this stuff. There&#8217;s nothing that could be better for Republicans in Florida than to see Hakeem Jeffries everywhere around this state. Voters will not like what they see.&#8221;
The governor then twisted the knife, pointing out that despite Jeffries’ attempts to move further left to appease his base, the radical wing of his own party remains unimpressed. &#8220;I kind of feel bad for the guy because he&#8217;s as Left as they come. He&#8217;s always going Left. And yet the far-Left hates him. You know, they call him a &#8216;dollar-store Obama.&#8217; They call him &#8216;AIPAC Shakur,&#8217; all these different derogatory names that they do. And so he&#8217;s tried to ingratiate himself with [them], but they&#8217;re just not drinking the Kool-Aid.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
🚨 HOLY CRAP! Gov. Ron DeSantis just BODIED Hakeem Jeffries threatening Florida if we re-draw our 2026 maps
&quot;&#39;Oh, we&#39;re gonna go after Florida.&#39; PLEASE. BE MY GUEST. I will PAY you to come campaign! I&#39;ll put you up in the Florida governor&#39;s mansion! We&#39;ll take you fishing.… <a href="https://t.co/uAN8gVXVHR">pic.twitter.com/uAN8gVXVHR</a>
&mdash; Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) <a href="https://twitter.com/EricLDaugh/status/2047020226785493096?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 22, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
While Jeffries relies on bravado, DeSantis has pointed to the cold reality of Florida’s growth. The governor has <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_lIyHRCw68">noted</a> that Florida has seen ten years of population growth in just three, rendering current districts unfair. He has also hinted at an upcoming Supreme Court decision, likely penned by Justice Samuel Alito, that could further solidify the legal standing for mid-decade adjustments.
As the legal battles in Virginia prove that Democratic overreach often hits a judicial wall, DeSantis made one thing clear: if Hakeem Jeffries wants a war in Florida, the governor is happy to provide the battlefield—and the fishing rod.

DeSantis Obliterates ‘Dollar-Store Obama’ Over Redistricting Threats

Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) is calling on President Donald Trump to force the Senate to return from their Easter break as the Department of Homeland Security shutdown drags on.
“President Trump has the power to convene the Senate under Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution ‘on extraordinary Occasions,’” the Utah Republican <a href="https://x.com/BasedMikeLee/status/2038407140675915995?s=20">posted</a> to X on Sunday.
“If a department with 260,000 employees (DHS) going unfunded isn’t an ‘extraordinary occasion’—especially while the Senate is out on a two-week recess during that shutdown with no plans to resolve the impasse beyond ‘we’ll deal with that in two weeks’—I don’t know what is,” Lee added.
The Senate held a pro forma session on Monday morning, but made no progress toward funding DHS. Last week, the Senate approved a DHS funding deal that excluded ICE and Border Patrol, which Trump opposes, whereas the House passed a bill late on Friday that would extend funding for 60 days for the entire department. Both chambers were permitted to go home after passing their bills.
During the White House press briefing on Monday afternoon, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said that Trump is &#8220;encouraging Congress to come back to Washington to permanently fix this problem and to fund and reopen the Department of Homeland Security entirely.&#8221;
A Republican aide told the Daily Wire on background that Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) on Monday morning &#8220;told his colleagues this weekend that he would not bring them back for a show vote but would bring them back if there were a bill that would have the support to pass the Senate.” The aide noted that there is still a preference for the House to pass the Senate-backed bill.
In another post, Lee criticized the Monday session, <a href="https://x.com/BasedMikeLee/status/2038630449720008744?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noopener">saying</a> that “no attempt was made to pass DHS funding by unanimous consent,” adding that “the Senate must convene now.”
Sen. John Hoeven (R-ND) told <a href="https://x.com/BillMelugin_/status/2038634941756359075?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Fox News</a> on Monday that an effort to pass the House’s bill, known as a continuing resolution, was not attempted because Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) was in attendance in order to kill any effort to do so, as it would ultimately send the legislation to the president’s desk.
However, the North Dakota lawmaker said there could be an attempt made to do so on Thursday, and that he would like to see a three-year-long DHS funding push through reconciliation instead. A reconciliation bill is not subject to a 60-vote threshold in the Senate.
As for Democrats, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has said that the 60-day CR from the House would be <a href="https://www.democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/leader-schumer-statement-on-house-republicans-plan-to-try-to-fund-dhs-through-a-60-day-cr-instead-of-passing-the-senate-passed-appropriations-bill" target="_blank" rel="noopener">“dead on arrival,”</a> and House Democrats largely wanted to pass the Senate deal, with all but three of them voting against the House Republican proposal.
“There is a bipartisan bill to end the chaos at airports,” House Minority Leader <a href="https://x.com/RepJeffries/status/2038638198788612366?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Hakeem Jeffries</a> (D-NY) posted to X on Monday. “House Republicans rejected it and left town on vacation. Bring the House back. End the GOP shutdown. NOW.”
Rep. <a href="https://x.com/RepMGP/status/2037736452469952621?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Marie Gluesenkamp Perez</a> (D-WA), one of the three Democrats who voted for the CR, said that she believes reforming ICE is “necessary” but wanted to make sure federal workers at DHS get paid.
‘The president has agreed to several reforms to ICE — including mandatory body cameras, ID numbers, ending enforcement at hospitals and schools, and other reforms — but only in exchange for full 2026 funding of ICE,” she posted.
“Walking away from DHS funding will not fix anything about ICE and it screws a lot of hard-working people. Ideological purity that empowers a broken system and hurts working people is not what I was sent to Congress to be part of,” the Democrat added.
The impact of the shutdown is expected to be lessened starting this week, after Trump&#8217;s executive order last week to provide TSA officers with pay, as callouts and resignations continue to strain airport security lines.
The Daily Wire reached out to the White House for comment.

U.S. Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT)

Calls Grow To Force Congress Back As DHS Shutdown Hinges On One Move

Chis Coons

homeland security

Immigration

Mike Lee

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) said on Tuesday that he didn&#8217;t understand a reporter&#8217;s question comparing President Donald Trump&#8217;s recent military action in Iran with former President Barack Obama&#8217;s military action in Libya in 2011.
Jeffries took the question from Fox News congressional correspondent Bill Melugin, who referenced 2011 comments from then House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). At the time, Pelosi had insisted that Obama did not need prior authorization from Congress to strike Libya, nor did he need authorization to continue military action there.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
NEW: I asked House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) about Nancy Pelosi saying in 2011 that President Obama didn&#8217;t need Congressional approval to bomb Libya, but Dems now say President Trump needs approval to bomb Iran?
Jeffries said Iran is &#8220;very different&#8221; &amp; told me &#8220;I… <a href="https://t.co/SkLr1R5wr1">pic.twitter.com/SkLr1R5wr1</a>
— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) <a href="https://twitter.com/BillMelugin_/status/2028932152126054616?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 3, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;House Democrats say Trump needs that approval to bomb Iran,&#8221; Melugin said. &#8220;What&#8217;s the difference?&#8221;
&#8220;Well, obviously, Libya and the circumstances connected to that were very different than the circumstance that we face in Iran right now,&#8221; Jeffries said, adding, &#8220;I mean, I don&#8217;t even understand the genesis or basis of that question, not suggesting you&#8217;re asking it in bad faith.&#8221;
&#8220;Libya went on for seven months,&#8221; Melugin pointed out.
&#8220;But I&#8217;ve said — as I&#8217;ve indicated — first of all, I was not in Congress at the time, so we&#8217;re dealing with what we&#8217;re dealing with right now, which is a catastrophic endless war as Donald Trump has characterized it,&#8221; Jeffries claimed despite the fact that the current operation was just over 72 hours old and Trump&#8217;s initial prediction was that the mission could be accomplished in a matter of weeks.
Jeffries went on to complain that the Trump administration had acted without intelligence indicating &#8220;a preeminent attack on the United States&#8221; or American interests and claimed that if such action was necessary, it meant that the president had not been telling the truth when he said that the airstrikes last year had completely wiped out Iran&#8217;s nuclear program.
Multiple Democrats — including Jeffries — have criticized Trump for authorizing action against Iran without first consulting Congress for authorization. Secretary of State <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/rubio-unloads-on-reporter-who-asks-why-trump-didnt-notify-congress-before-striking-iran">Marco Rubio</a> explained that the Gang of Eight had been informed, and then cited the War Powers Resolution of 1973 to assert that the Trump administration had done things by the book.
The War Powers Resolution states that the president can engage in military action for up to 48 hours without informing Congress, and can continue to wage war for up to 60 days — with an additional 30 days for any necessary troop drawdowns — without going to Congress for authorization. As Rubio also noted, no presidential administration — Republican or Democrat — has ever accepted the War Powers Resolution as constitutional.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) Holds News Conference

Top Dem Squirms When Obama Libya Flashback Collides With Iran Strike Outrage

Barack Obama

Iran

Libya

Military

As President Donald Trump prepares to deliver his State of the Union address next Tuesday, some congressional Democrats are planning to protest or skip the speech altogether.
MeidasTouch Network and MoveOn, two high-profile liberal organizations, are hosting the &#8220;People’s State of the Union” on the National Mall as counter-programming to Trump&#8217;s address. Hosted by leftist commentators Joy Reid and Katie Phang, the event will feature several Democratic lawmakers, including Sens. Ed Markey (MA), Tina Smith (MN), Chris Van Hollen (MD), Chris Murphy (CT), and Rep. Pramila Jayapal (WA), among others.
“While Trump lies, we’re lifting up the real stories shaping this country,” MoveOn posted to X.
At least 12 Democratic lawmakers have publicly said they will not attend Trump&#8217;s address, according to <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/democratic-lawmakers-plan-boycott-trumps-state-union-address-rally-rcna259552" target="_blank" rel="noopener">NBC News</a>.
“Next week, Trump will deliver his State of the Union address. I won&#8217;t be there,” Van Hollen posted to X on Wednesday. “Trump is marching America towards fascism, and I refuse to normalize his shredding of our Constitution &amp; democracy. This cannot be business as usual.”
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) said at a press conference that his “current plan is to attend.”
&#8220;We&#8217;re not going to Donald Trump&#8217;s house. He&#8217;s coming to our house,&#8221; Jeffries said. &#8220;It&#8217;s my view that you don&#8217;t let anyone ever run you off of your block.”
<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/18/us/politics/democrats-trump-congress.html?unlocked_article_code=1.NFA.2sNL.WXDK8ZL5nYsa&amp;smid=url-share" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The New York Times</a> reported that Jeffries has urged lawmakers to either remain quiet during the address or not attend at all. Last year, Rep. Al Green (D-TX) was censured by Republicans and 10 Democrats after interrupting Trump’s speech.
“You have no mandate to cut Medicaid!” Green shouted before being escorted from the chamber at House Speaker Mike Johnson&#8217;s request.
Protests at State of the Union addresses are not new. Many Democratic women wore pink in protest of Trump&#8217;s speech last year. In 2020, then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi tore up a transcript of Trump&#8217;s speech.
Another liberal activist group, Amplify Pledge, is urging lawmakers to skip the address as part of its “Young People Address the Nation” campaign, <a href="https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/02/17/gen-z-activist-group-calls-for-congress-to-boycott-trumps-state-of-the-union/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Daily Signal</a> reported on Tuesday.
The White House said the address will highlight Trump&#8217;s “agenda” and “results” as he marks his first year back in office. The speech comes as Congress and the administration remain at odds over funding the Department of Homeland Security.
“In terms of the written offer that was transmitted from the Democrats, the parties are still pretty far apart,” a White House official told The Daily Wire on background Tuesday. “The Administration remains interested in good faith conversations to end the Democrat shutdown before more Americans feel the impacts. But the Administration also remains committed to carrying out the President’s promise to enforce federal immigration law.”

US-POLITICS-TRUMP-SOTU

The Rival Event Democrats Have In The Works As They Skip Trump’s Address

Chris Van Hollen

Executive

State of the Union

Trump Administration

Polling firm Cygnal released a new survey on Wednesday showing broad support for voter identification requirements, including a majority backing among black, Hispanic, and white voters. The poll found that 72% of white voters, 69% of Hispanic voters, and 56% of black voters support requiring identification at the polls.  
“Hakeem Jeffries seems to think voter ID is voter suppression, but when you actually ask voters, 70% of American voters overall, 75% of swing voters, 69% of hispanics, 56% of black voters, and even 46% of democrats support voter ID,” said pollster and Senior Partner John Rogers. He added that Republicans view the issue as politically advantageous heading into the midterms. “It shows Republicans have another winning issue heading into the midterms if they lean into it with confidence.”
Jeffries has <a href="https://jeffries.house.gov/2026/02/08/leader-jeffries-on-cnn-we-need-to-ensure-that-there-are-legislative-changes-enacted-as-part-of-any-dhs-spending-bill/?utm_source=chatgpt.com">opposed</a> the SAVE Act, which would require documentary proof of citizenship to register for federal elections, arguing that the GOP is attempting to discourage voter participation. &#8220;What Republicans are trying to do is to engage in clear and blatant voter suppression,&#8221; said Jeffries. &#8220;They know that if there&#8217;s a free and fair election in November, they&#8217;re going to lose.&#8221;
The House passed a version of the bill in the fall, which is now under consideration in the Senate.
The Cygnal poll was conducted from February 3-4 among 1,500 likely 2026 midterm voters and has a margin of error of 2.51%. It found 70% support for requiring voter ID for federal elections, compared with 26% opposed. Support was strongest among Republicans at 92%, while 46% of Democrats said they favor voter ID requirements.
Cygnal’s findings align with other national surveys. A Gallup poll conducted last fall found that <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/652523/americans-endorse-early-voting-voter-verification.aspx#:~:text=requiring%20photo%20identification%20to%20vote%20(84%25)">84%</a> of Americans favor voter ID requirements, while the Pew Research Center reported almost identical findings, with <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2026/02/voter-id-is-overwhelmingly-popular-with-literally-everyone-except-democrat-politicians/">83%</a> support.
The SAVE Act would mandate that states obtain documentary proof of American citizenship before registering to vote in federal elections and would require the removal of noncitizens from voter rolls. 
In order for the SAVE Act to pass the Senate, a simple majority of fifty-one votes is required. However, the bill would need 60 votes to overcome a potential filibuster. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) has expressed support for voter ID requirements but acknowledged the measure might lack the votes to advance. &#8220;How we get to that vote remains to be seen,&#8221; he said.

TOPSHOT-US-VOTE-POLITICS-EARLY VOTING

Poll Undercuts Democrat ‘Voter Suppression’ Claims

Elections

John Thune

Poll

Voter ID

Two prominent Democrats — one in the House and one in the Senate — spoke out on Sunday against a move suggested by President Donald Trump even though both championed a similar move five years earlier when their party was in control.
For those who don&#8217;t spend their Sunday mornings glued to the television — and their Sunday afternoons attempting to dig through a week&#8217;s worth of network and cable news media spin — The Daily Wire has compiled a short summary of what you may have missed.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) and Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA) both responded to President Trump&#8217;s wild suggestion that Republicans should &#8220;nationalize&#8221; voting, saying that laws dictating election procedures, constitutionally speaking, belonged to the individual states.
Trump sparked the debate with an apparently off-the-cuff comment during an interview with former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino, when he said of the illegal aliens who&#8217;d flooded into the United States through former President Joe Biden&#8217;s open border, &#8220;If we don’t get them out, Republicans will never win another election.&#8221;
<p class="paragraph-elevate inline-placeholder vossi-paragraph_elevate" data-uri="cms.cnn.com/_components/paragraph/instances/cml7ho4w6000g3b63o4jdjpeq@published" data-editable="text" data-component-name="paragraph" data-article-gutter="true">&#8220;The Republicans should say, ‘We want to take over.’ We should take over the voting, in at least, many, 15 places,&#8221; Trump added then. &#8220;The Republicans ought to nationalize the voting.&#8221;
The White House later explained that Trump had been referring to states where he believed election fraud was a real problem, and the president has not previously pushed the notion of &#8220;nationalizing&#8221; voting — but that did not stop Jeffries and Schiff from running with the idea as if he had.
The House Minority Leader joined CNN anchor Dana Bash to discuss the situation on &#8220;State of the Union,&#8221; and she began by noting that Republicans had argued that passing the SAVE Act — which would require all voters in the United States to show proof of citizenship at the polls — was the best way to prevent voter fraud in any state.
&#8220;I understand that you don&#8217;t support things like a passport, for example,&#8221; Bash began. &#8220;But requiring basic ID in order to vote is really popular. A Pew poll from a few months ago showed 83% of Americans, including 71% of your fellow Democrats, support requiring an ID to vote. Why are they wrong?&#8221;
&#8220;I haven&#8217;t said that they&#8217;re wrong,&#8221; Jeffries insisted before explaining why he was still opposed to the measure. &#8220;We know that states are the ones that are empowered to conduct elections, and every state should be allowed to decide the best way to proceed to ensure that there&#8217;s a free and fair election.&#8221;
&#8220;The question is that — what Republicans are trying to do is to engage in clear and blatant voter suppression,&#8221; he added. &#8220;They know that if there&#8217;s a free and fair election in November, they&#8217;re going to lose! In fact, Republicans have been losing every single election since Donald Trump was sworn in in January of last year, including most recently, decisively, in Texas.&#8221;
Bash pressed again, asking whether it would be worth it, since Democrats favor voter ID laws as well, to &#8220;take that off the table&#8221; as a point of contention: &#8220;Maybe not a passport or a birth certificate, but show ID.&#8221;
&#8220;Every state is empowered to be able to make the decision on their own,&#8221; Jeffries protested. &#8220;What Donald Trump wants to do is try to nationalize the election. Translation: steal it. And we&#8217;re not going to let it happen.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries on Trump&#8217;s call for Republicans to &#8220;take over&#8221; running elections: &#8220;What Donald Trump wants to do is try to nationalize the election. Translation: steal it. And we&#8217;re not going to let it happen.&#8221; <a href="https://t.co/jGflGaguAn">pic.twitter.com/jGflGaguAn</a>
— State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) <a href="https://twitter.com/CNNSOTU/status/2020505995571548305?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 8, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Schiff took a similar tone with &#8220;This Week&#8221; host Jonathan Karl, who asked the California Senator to explain what the president meant when he&#8217;d told Bongino he wanted to &#8220;nationalize&#8221; voting in certain places.
&#8220;Senator, what does he mean? What do you think he means?&#8221; Karl asked.
&#8220;I think he fully intends to subvert the elections,&#8221; Schiff declared. &#8220;He will do everything he can to suppress the vote.&#8221;
Schiff, who still has not provided the evidence he claimed to have regarding President Trump and Russian collusion, went on to insist that Trump would take action if he did not like how the elections played out: &#8220;He&#8217;s prepared to try to take some kind of action to overturn the result, and we really shouldn&#8217;t question that.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Sen. Adam Schiff on President Trump’s call to “nationalize” state elections: “He&#8217;s prepared to try to take some kind of action to overturn the result, and we really shouldn&#8217;t question that.&#8221; <a href="https://t.co/mPgqzgikhs">https://t.co/mPgqzgikhs</a> <a href="https://t.co/qKxEiiUyuh">pic.twitter.com/qKxEiiUyuh</a>
— This Week (@ThisWeekABC) <a href="https://twitter.com/ThisWeekABC/status/2020518333938847909?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 8, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
And yet both Jeffries and Schiff were all in when their own party pushed for national control over elections via 2021&#8217;s H.R. 1 — laughably nicknamed the &#8220;For the People Act.&#8221;
The bill&#8217;s purpose, according to the Democrats who wrote it, sounded reasonable enough: &#8220;To expand American&#8217;s access to the ballot box, reduce the influence of big money in politics, strengthen ethics rules for public servants, and implement other anti-corruption measures for the purpose of fortifying our democracy and for other purposes.&#8221;
But as former Manager of Election Law Reform Initiative at The Heritage Foundation Hans Von Spakovsky explained, what <a href="https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/heritage-explains-if-hr-1-passes">the bill would actually</a> have done was pretty much the exact opposite of what its stated &#8220;purpose&#8221; suggested.
&#8220;A better description of it is that this bill would be a federal takeover and nationalization of the running and administration of elections, basically taking it away from the states,&#8221; he said.
Spakovsky, who has since joined Advancing American Freedom as a senior legal fellow, added, “It would change election rules to make it easier to cheat and easier to manipulate election results. And on the ethics and campaign finance rule changes, it&#8217;s designed to restrict and chill speech, political speech and political activity. So it&#8217;s just &#8230; this is one of the worst bills I&#8217;ve ever seen in my years in Washington.&#8221;

Spin Cycle: Democrats Come Out Hard Against The Thing They Voted For In 2021

ABC News

Adam Schiff

Menu