I love to respond to Reddit users wondering if they are <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-87-something-strange-is-happening-with-our-egg-supply-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener">in the wrong</a> regarding certain social situations. 
These Reddit posts are known as “Am I The A**hole? (AITA)” and the users are asking the Reddit community if they are — well — an a-hole.
So today, I came across a <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/10rhn66/aita_for_telling_gf_that_i_will_not_stop_using/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Reddit post </a>that said, “AITA for telling GF that I will not stop using butter?”
Right off the bat, that title made me think he&#8217;s not an a-hole. Perhaps he’s doing something crazy. Maybe he&#8217;s using the butter for all the wrong reasons. 
Let’s review what he says, and then I will make a judgment. Here’s the post:
<blockquote>GF was a vegetarian when we started dating and is now completely vegan with no exceptions.
I am very meat conscious, and only eat it on holidays. I try to avoid animal products in general because of my GF, but personally have no problem with eating locally sourced/humane animal products including meat. I also eat eggs daily from my backyard chickens and butter for cooking. GF and I used to rotate cooking meals. GF now refuses to eat the meals I prepare because I use butter in most of my recipes.
I told her if she didn&#8217;t like what I made she doesn&#8217;t have to eat it, but I feel like I compromised a lot in order to satisfy her lifestyle, and it&#8217;s not fair for her to expect me to make completely vegan meals.
She says I am not respecting her choice to be vegan. She says she can&#8217;t make me vegan, but the least i could do is prepare vegan meals. I told her that I sacrificed eating lot&#8217;s of animal products i enjoy to respect her, while she hasn&#8217;t done anything for me. Such as eating my dishes were the only animal product is butter.
I told her I am making meals with no meat, no eggs, but I don&#8217;t like the vegan substitute for butter when I make my creamy dishes. such as pot pie (with fake chicken). I am trying to accommodate but it feels like i&#8217;m the only one giving anything up
AITA?</blockquote>
You are absolutely not the a-hole. 
The vegan here is the a-hole — which tends to always be the case. They&#8217;re very demanding. They decide they want to live a certain lifestyle, then it becomes a cult, and they try to force everybody to go along with it — especially those closest to them.
By the way, it’s great that you’ve decided to respect her so much by eating more of these substitute drops of crap. If you actually look at the ingredients in all these vegan substitutes, then you might as well just eat the real thing. It&#8217;s far healthier.
My real question is, what is she doing for you out of respect? You value her, but does she value you? Will she make you a chicken dish for example? Or, if she wants you to make her vegan meals, would she ever make you a carnivore meal?
Wouldn’t she probably say ‘Oh, I don&#8217;t want to do that because I have now decided that veganism is my new religion — and by religion, I mean cult.’ I think she would.
So it doesn&#8217;t really make sense for her to demand that you not consume butter — which, by the way, is a healthy fat that is good for you.
I don&#8217;t know the vegan rules. I do know there are way too many of them. I also know that if she continues being this strict vegan, then she&#8217;s probably going to end up sick because we are meant to eat meat.
Because I just said that, I also know I am going to have a ton of evil vegan people messaging me and saying evil vegan things.
Anytime I take on the vegans, I get bombarded.
It is a cult.
When vegans hear somebody give an opinion that is separate from their own beliefs, they attack and go ballistic online, and create videos, saying, ‘Oh my Goodness. Look at this person saying they proudly consume meat, what should we do? We&#8217;re all going to attack! We&#8217;re all going to attack because you can&#8217;t be a carnivore!’
Now, if you do eat meat and somebody says,’I&#8217;m a vegan!,’ most carnivores will say, ’OK, that&#8217;s fine. It&#8217;s your life, your choice.’
Not with vegans. Those freaks say, ‘I don&#8217;t eat meat, and neither should you.’
They are little princesses in their own minds. I find them all to be annoying.
To the Reddit poster, I think you need a new girlfriend. If you leave her and you date someone who eats meat, then you&#8217;re going to have a way better time.
Just try it. You’ll be reminded that people can go out to eat and not get accosted by a psychopath sitting across from them, yelling at them for eating butter.
I should also note it&#8217;s good to know where your meat comes from — making sure it’s humane and healthy. I do the exact same thing.
There is definitely a way to be a conscious meat eater, but I haven&#8217;t met one vegan whom I want to be friends with because they are just so cultish and demanding.
 So, Reddit boyfriend, I rule you not the a-hole.

Candace_3b16x9 copy 12 (2)

Reddit Boyfriend, You Need To Dump Your Vegan Girlfriend

Candace Owens

Readers Pass

Reddit

Social Issues

U.S.

Veganism

Question of the Day: Why do women wear <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-86-women-it-s-time-for-us-to-stop-wearing-yoga-pants-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener">yoga pants</a> everywhere?
This question was actually partially inspired by my colleague Ben Shapiro — but I have a different opinion than he does, for slightly different reasons. 
Here&#8217;s what he had to say about yoga pants on <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1660-if-you-re-black-and-cops-kill-you-the-vice-president-will-speak-at-your-funeral-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Ben Shapiro Show</a> today:
<blockquote>Listen, I made this case to my friend Ali Beth Stuckey, who&#8217;s like, &#8216;yeah, yoga pants are fine. Women can wear yoga pants.&#8217; But don&#8217;t be surprised when men stare at you because it hugs your ass. That&#8217;s just the reality. And when I say stare, it doesn&#8217;t mean to gawk at you. But if a man takes an occasional glance at the fact that you have a spray-painted ass, that is not a shock. That is not sexism. That is basic human biology.</blockquote>
Ben made a very fair point — absolutely. Yoga pants are sexier and men will look at you if you are wearing them. But, that&#8217;s not the only reason I wanted to cover this topic today. That&#8217;s not the issue I am most concerned with.
A few weeks ago I was at a dinner and looking up I saw an old photo of a very well-dressed gentleman working in a field taken decades ago.
The photo made me yearn for the olden days, when people dressed respectfully. That nostalgia was made even stronger when my husband and I recently went to the park, without kids, after eating out.
I looked around and I realized every single woman was wearing yoga pants. There were many variations, but they all were wearing yoga pants.
And I wondered, &#8220;Why is everyone wearing yoga pants?&#8221; These weren&#8217;t women who just left a workout — these were women who chose to wear yoga pants to the park. They grabbed yoga pants and put them on as if they were an appropriate outfit to wear outdoors.
Now, I need to be very careful here and tell you guys I&#8217;m a hypocrite, okay? I was that woman for a very long time — probably up until two weeks ago. 
So, there isn&#8217;t any &#8220;gotcha here!&#8221; if somebody digs up a photo of me in yoga pants. I admit it.
Yet something in my mind has transformed and I&#8217;ve realized how ridiculous it is to wear yoga pants.
Why are we wearing these yoga pants? When did this trend start? Did it start when it became trendy to wear spandex? Was it with Victoria&#8217;s secret with the folded own spandex pants?
For me — and a lot of ladies my age — wearing yoga pants became fashionable in college and we never let go of the trend. So, I asked women I know — at work, in my family, my friend groups: &#8220;Why do you wear yoga pants everyday as if they are a pair of jeans?
And the number one response I got was, &#8220;Well, it&#8217;s comfortable.&#8221; The second best response was that it&#8217;s &#8220;quick and easy.&#8221;
Well, that doesn&#8217;t entirely make sense when you think about it. You can wear comfortable jeans. It takes just as long to put on pants or wear a dress. Just because it&#8217;s effortless — doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s good for you.
Which is why I have a different opinion than Ben Shapiro on yoga pants. Yoga pants to me are part of the decline of our culture.
Everywhere I look, our culture has become relaxed, so careless, and intent on putting in as little effort as possible.
This occurs with our manners, our work ethic, and our grammar — as I have discussed in many of my shows — such as where I broke down <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/the-deadly-sin-that-terrifies-me-most-and-why-its-become-a-cancer-in-america" target="_blank" rel="noopener">the sin of slothfulness</a>. 
That is not progress. It&#8217;s regression. And now, we&#8217;re passing it on to our children. Everyone&#8217;s toddler looks like they&#8217;re going to the gym. They are all in sweatpants.
I do believe that how you dress children early on teaches them life lessons. They either learn to be presentable or that it&#8217;s okay to dress like a slob. That impacts their mindset.
The way we as adults dress influences our mindset and therefore our thoughts and actions. In turn, those actions shape our society.
As I&#8217;ve discussed, society is becoming less beautiful. When you see overseas culture — people in London or elsewhere in Europe — and you see how they make a little bit more of an effort, you quickly realize we&#8217;ve lost something here in America.
If we want to change that, then we need to start doing little things that will transform our mindset. And if we practice beauty on an individual level, we will begin to see beauty on an outward external level — and that can shape our nation for the better.
It has to start somewhere.  It starts with you, it starts with you at home. So, I will be the first one to bite the bullet. I think that we should stop wearing yoga pants everywhere. 
I have added this to my list of things I&#8217;m going to do this year — not be that weekend mom who throws on a pair of yoga pants. Small things can make a huge difference.
Humor me: This weekend, I challenge you to not wear yoga pants.

Candace_416x9 copy 23 (2)

Ladies, It’s Time To Stop Wearing Yoga Pants — But Not For The Reasons You Think

Ladies, It’s Time To Stop Wearing Yoga Pants — But Not For The Reasons You Think

Clothes

The Ben Shapiro Show

Women

Do you know how advanced artificial intelligence is these days? AI is so <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/chatgpt-passes-medical-license-exam-bar-exam-after-top-performance-on-wharton-mba-final" target="_blank" rel="noopener">unbelievable</a>, there are now tools you can use to create audio that sounds just like another person speaking in real life. You can essentially steal somebody&#8217;s identity with it.
So on today&#8217;s show, I thought I&#8217;d have some fun and steal my Daily Wire colleague Matt Walsh&#8217;s &#8220;Sweet Baby Gang&#8221; using AI technology. The experiment also raises some potentially very serious questions for our culture, law, and media.
So, a remarkable company called Eleven Labs has created an AI audio generator. A brief recap of how this works: you essentially type into your computer the phrase you want somebody to say via the generator. This technology takes a sampling of their voice and then uses it to create sound bites that sound exactly like the person you are imitating. The generator can read aloud entire audiobooks, speeches, and more.
If you <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-85-the-disturbing-truth-about-you-tube-kids" target="_blank" rel="noopener">watch my show today</a>, you can hear the spooky accuracy of how much this prompt sounds like my &#8220;non-friend&#8221; and &#8220;arch-nemesis&#8221; Matt Walsh:
<blockquote>Today on the Matt Walsh Show. I&#8217;ll be telling you why I&#8217;m formally stepping down as the leader of the sweet baby gang. I&#8217;ve searched long and hard for a successor and have finally found one. She is the host of my favorite podcast ever and has the best taste in bottled water. First, I have to admit that I was wrong. Dasani is absolute trash. Secondly, I am announcing that I am formally handing control of the sweet baby gang to my dear friend Candace Owens.</blockquote>
Here’s the video, listen for yourself:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="The Disturbing Truth About YouTube Kids | Ep. 85" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/X7Fb655fl9Q?start=807&#038;feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>
It is incredible, but also truly alarming. 
It reminds me of numerous conspiracies about the U.S. government. Some people estimate the CIA has had this sort of technology for decades. Like with other rumors about technology, before the government allows the general public to have it, they will use it to stage their advantage first. 
Documentaries on different historical events claim the CIA or FBI has used this sort of technology to fake phone calls from loved ones to stage certain events. It&#8217;s never been proven, but sounds like just the sort of thing our own government might do.
If that hasn&#8217;t happened before, the new technology available to the public today certainly can be used to do it now.
What else can AI potentially be used for?
Well, harrowingly, imagine it being used in court. Imagine, God forbid, that you&#8217;re trying to get custody of your child. To block that from happening, your spouse uses an AI generator to make a recording of horrendous things — things you never said.
How&#8217;s the court going to know that it&#8217;s a fake? This AI will only get better with time. What ghastly amount of money will the court system have to spend to create an entire forensic analysis team to determine the veracity of recordings?
Or think about commentators such as myself. Individuals like me could lose their entire platform in one day. Somebody could use an AI generator to create a voice memo that sounds as if I am saying I hate my fans and that I am secretly pro-choice. That would obviously go viral even before I have a chance to respond. Even if I do respond, it would be my word against what sounds like my own.
How scary is that?
In the future, how are we going to be able to determine what is fact and what is fiction?

Candace_4b_216x9 copy 33 (1)

Here’s How Incredible — And Terrifying — Artificial Intelligence Is These Days 

Artificial Intelligence

Big Tech

Is something diabolical permeating our culture? What does that term truly mean? How can we spot it?
After <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/its-time-to-say-goodbye-to-sam-smith-his-latest-music-video-belongs-in-the-trash" target="_blank" rel="noopener">recording my show yesterday</a>, I couldn&#8217;t stop thinking of the vulgarity in Sam Smith&#8217;s music video and what it says about the decay in our society. While talking with my husband about the topic, he reminded me of a sermon about the Devil from Venerable Fulton Sheen that we had listened to over the weekend. 
My husband and I also discussed the timeless lesson found in Adam and Eve’s fall from the Garden of Eden.
Grouped together alongside the current definition of diabolical — before the Left changes it — I perhaps we can answer the questions posted above. 
<blockquote>&#8220;What is the diabolic from the purely psychiatric point of view?&#8221; the late-Roman Catholic Bishop Sheen once <a href="https://bigccatholics.blogspot.com/2016/07/venerable-fulton-sheen-on-devil-as.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a>. “Dr. Rollo May analyzes the word diabolic, it comes from the Greek words dia and balime. Dia-balime is to tear apart, rend asunder. Anything, therefore, that breaks pattern, that destroys unity, that corrupts gestalt, produces discord, that is the diabolical. Now, there has been a great increase of the diabolic. Notice for example the discord in the Church, the discord in religious communities, the discord among the laity regards the Church, discord in the clergy. All these are manifestations of a spirit of the diabolic that surrounds us. Now this psychiatrist [Dr. May] analyzes the way in which the diabolic works. And he mentions three: First love of nudity. Secondly, violence, aggressiveness. Thirdly, split personalities, no inner peace, disjointed minds.&#8221; </blockquote>
<iframe loading="lazy" title="The Devil - Venerable Fulton Sheen" width="500" height="375" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/FuCw8UT5y6c?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Does anything explain Sam Smith&#8217;s music video better than that description? Under that definition, his new video is truly diabolical. 
It&#8217;s a love of nudity. It&#8217;s a love of violence. And, it even presents a split personality.
Sam Smith, once a normal individual, now identifies as &#8216;non-binary.&#8217; In other words, he has a split persona. He doesn&#8217;t know what he is. He&#8217;s everything. He has no identity. That&#8217;s what being &#8216;non-binary&#8217; effectively means. I have no identity. I think I can be anything and everyone at the exact same time.
He puts nudity on full display — in an aggressive and violent manner, no less — in the “Not Here To make Friends” music video. 
So, yes, according to the psychiatrist and Bishop Sheen, that is diabolic. 
Per The Oxford Learner’s Dictionary, the definition of diabolical <a href="https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/diabolical#:~:text=Look%20up%20any%20word%20in,Oxford%20Advanced%20Learner's%20Dictionary%20app.&amp;text=2(informal)%20extremely%20bad%20or,terrible%20The%20traffic%20was%20diabolical." target="_blank" rel="noopener">means</a> “morally bad and evil; like a Devil.”
That description brings me to the conversation I had with my husband on Monday.
&#8220;Why is Sam Smith doing this? His music is already great. Why does he have to stoop to this level and force us to say goodbye to his music? Why must we delete his songs from our library?&#8221; I more or less wondered out loud.
And my husband, who studied theology in school, began to discuss the Garden of Eden from the Bible. Everybody — even non-Christians — knows that in the Bible, The Garden of Eden was wholesome and full. It was peaceful and there was unity.
Then the serpent — something evil, wishing to tear that unity apart, and destroy that wholesomeness — came to trick Adam and Eve.
The Devil&#8217;s goal wasn&#8217;t just to get them to eat the forbidden fruit — it was to destroy the harmony in the Garden of Eden and separate Adam and Eve from God.
 After being separated, they then see they are naked and feel shame. They feel shame because they know they have done something God didn&#8217;t want. The first sin was eating the Forbidden Fruit.
So what does the Devil ultimately desire? He wants us to feel no shame about offending God and thus be disconnected from our Creator forever. If we don’t feel shame about doing evil things and never ask for forgiveness, then we will never be reunited with God.
So, now we have a culture infested with that exact same evil. An evil that wants all of us to feel no shame. It&#8217;s accomplished by “pushing boundaries” — as the Left loves to say — of what they describe as rude, crude, and crass “art.”
Sam Smith is naked. Who cares?! Children can see this on YouTube? So what?! Have no shame! In fact, you should feel empowered by it all!
Yet Smith&#8217;s music video is really just the tip of the iceberg for this garbage. Evil is everywhere.
So, we have to do our own little acts to fight against it. 
And that&#8217;s why I deleted all of Sam Smith&#8217;s music. I will pray for him. I hope whatever he is suffering from gets resolved.
As for the larger culture, perhaps it&#8217;s best we learn how to spot diabolical entertainment  — using the definition described thanks to Sheen, May, and the Oxford Dictionary.

Candace_416x9 copy 28 (1)

Is Something Diabolical Permeating Our Culture?

Entertainment

Music

Singer Sam Smith has released a new music video. First, let me say this about this incredible performer: I loved his music. 
But with his latest release “I&#8217;m Not Here to Make Friends,” I can no longer love it.
Even though Sam is tremendously talented, I am now going to have to dump his incredible music from my library.
Why?
It has nothing to do with his singing gifts — it&#8217;s how he&#8217;s choosing to use his unique abilities that is beyond the pale. 
My decision to ditch him is about who Sam is as a person and what he is introducing to culture now.
He&#8217;s no longer releasing beautiful music. His new song is not about him playing the piano and remembering old lovers.
His new music video is yet another example of what happens to an artist who has spent too much time in Hollywood — his &#8216;art&#8217; essentially becomes pornography.
His new music video, for the song, “I’m Not Here To Make Friends,” is almost too grotesque to even discuss. I go into more detail about it on my show today which can be watched <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/show/candace" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a>. 
The best way to describe it is like &#8220;Mrs. Doubtfire&#8221; meets &#8220;Moulin Rouge&#8221; — except it&#8217;s just men. It&#8217;s absolute filth. The entire thing is sexual, provocative, and inappropriate — replete with leather lingerie, suggestive images, nudity, and more. It&#8217;s graphic throughout.
What’s incredible is that this sort of thing is allowed on YouTube. You cannot question Big Pharma authority, and you can’t discuss your reaction to the vaccine, but this garbage is allowed for the world to see — including your children.
The video isn’t posted behind behind any sort of age restriction or verification — even though it is essentially gay smut.
Those who do speak out against this vulgarity being pushed on our kids are accused of being homophobic and hateful. It’s a bogus smear. 
It’s no secret I am against this agenda being pushed onto our children. Of course, my critics never focus on that. They instead choose to make the issue about the immutable characteristics of those I am criticizing.
So for example, when Cardi B makes the song “WAP” and I ridicule it and condemn it, people say “oh, it&#8217;s because Cardi B is black” — never mind my own skin color.
So, now that I&#8217;m commenting on Sam Smith and he&#8217;s white, I am being told I&#8217;m only speaking out because he&#8217;s gay and &#8216;gender-bending.&#8217;
No, I am speaking out because they are both disgusting.
This isn’t art. These are the products of two imbeciles corrupting our culture and future. It should be thrown out — not put on the internet for millions to see.
People should walk away from this. It shouldn&#8217;t be allowed on stage, let alone on your home computer where minors can see it.
When you put this into the arena — think about what it&#8217;s doing in people&#8217;s minds over time. In effect, it&#8217;s softening them to the idea of pornography. This music video belongs on Pornhub, and Pornhub belongs in the trash.
Yet instead of finding this crap in the gutter, you are seeing this sort of crudeness in the mainstream media. You&#8217;re getting this on YouTube. People are celebrating this.
The truly sad part is Sam is already talented. He doesn’t need to stoop to this level.
Why can’t he make a video of himself dancing and having a good time — without it being explicitly sexual? Does it really have to be so raunchy? No, of course not. So then why is he doing this?
Well, perhaps because he knows this is what sells now. The more disgusting you are and the more immoral you are, then the more attention Hollywood will give you.
That’s because Hollywood is perverse and satanic. And that&#8217;s all I&#8217;m going to say about that.

Candace_416x9 copy 22 (3)

It’s Time To Say Goodbye To Sam Smith — His Latest Music Video Belongs In The Trash

Pornography

sexual content

YouTube

I cannot express my appreciation enough for the amount of good that Project Veritas and citizen journalist James O&#8217;Keefe are doing for America.
Have you seen the investigative group’s latest undercover video? It allegedly shows a Pfizer executive bragging about the &#8220;directed evolution&#8221; of COVID vaccines.
The new video appears to show a Pfizer executive claiming that his company is exploring a way to mutate coronaviruses in order to advance the development of future vaccines. Why? So that Pfizer can make money, according to the person videotaped, duh.
Here is the Pfizer executive in his own words:
&#8220;One of the things we’re exploring is like, why don’t we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create — preemptively develop new vaccines, right?” the man says in the video <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/project-veritas-video-pfizer-official-says-firm-considering-ways-to-mutate-virus-via-directed-evolution" target="_blank" rel="noopener">released</a> Wednesday. “So, we have to do that. If we’re gonna do that though, there’s a risk of like, as you could imagine — no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f***ing viruses.”
He also purportedly claimed, “You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere, which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bulls***.”
The person in the video also admitted, “You’re not supposed to do gain-of-function research with viruses. Regularly not.&#8221; We can do these selected structure mutations to make them more potent. There is research ongoing about that. I don’t know how that is going to work. There better not be any more outbreaks because &#8230; ”
As The Daily Wire reported, the alleged Pfizer employee describes the relationship between Pfizer and government regulators as a “revolving door” which is “pretty good for the industry,” but bad for America.
“Because if the regulators, who review our drugs, you know that once they stop being a regulator, they want to go work for the company, they are not going to be as harsh on the company where they’re getting their job,” he says.
The full video can be seen here and should be watched completely:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
BREAKING: <a href="https://twitter.com/pfizer?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Pfizer</a> Exploring &quot;Mutating&quot; COVID-19 Virus For New Vaccines
&quot;Don&#39;t tell anyone this&#8230;There is a risk&#8230;have to be very controlled to make sure this virus you mutate doesn&#39;t create something&#8230;the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest.&quot;<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DirectedEvolution?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#DirectedEvolution</a> <a href="https://t.co/xaRvlD5qTo">pic.twitter.com/xaRvlD5qTo</a>
&mdash; Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) <a href="https://twitter.com/Project_Veritas/status/1618405890612420609?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 26, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
This person works at Pfizer, according to Project Veritas. And you know what&#8217;s going to happen to him and his colleagues?
Nothing. Nothing at all, because we exist under the greatest cartel in the entire world — the Big Pharma cartel.
Evidence indicates that our government has locked arms with pharmaceutical executives. These are glorified drug dealers and the federal government has tried to demand that people take their drugs. 
Remember the Biden administration tried forcing all employers with 100 or more employees to get vaccines or take a test? The Daily Wire was the first major company to file suit against that mandate and thanks to a Supreme Court ruling the mandate failed.
But, don’t forget the government didn&#8217;t want you to have a say, and in turn, Big Pharma made billions because the tax dollars were funding them.
That isn&#8217;t the free market at work. That&#8217;s more like socialism.
If companies realize they can use the government to create a market and not give people options, then they can make billions. That&#8217;s exactly what happened with the COVID vaccine — which isn&#8217;t true capitalism. It&#8217;s big government in bed with big business. People are understandably outraged by that abuse.
We all should be grateful for the bravery of the people at Project Veritas to go undercover and help expose these things.
But you should be more outraged at the fact that there is an entire ecosystem that will continue to protect this sort of system — Republicans and Democrats alike. Do not think this is one side versus the other.
So again, credit goes to the Project Veritas team for all of their brave work. 
What they&#8217;ve done has been so tremendous and we should support them.

Candace_3b16x9 copy 10

Bravo To Project Veritas For Investigating Big Pharma

Big Pharma

Pfizer

Project Veritas

Do you know what we haven&#8217;t had in a while? Race riots. 
Don&#8217;t worry, though, because <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/videos/the-greatest-lie-ever-sold" target="_blank" rel="noopener">George Floyd, 2.0</a> is potentially coming to Memphis, Tennessee.
At least, that&#8217;s what it seems like after listening to Memphis Police Chief Cerelyn Davis break down the death of Tyre Nichols. 
Nichols was involved in a traffic stop on January 7. He died three days later on January 10. As a result, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/5-former-memphis-police-officers-charged-in-mans-death-city-braces-for-possible-riots">five Memphis police officers</a> have been fired and charged with second-degree murder. 
Video footage of the incident hasn&#8217;t been released yet, but authorities are letting people know it&#8217;s a real doozy. It will reportedly be published Friday night.
&#8220;I expect you to feel outraged in the disregard of basic human rights as our police officers have taken an oath to do the opposite of what transpired on the video,&#8221; she explained in the video below. &#8220;I expect our citizens to exercise their First Amendment right to protest, to demand action and results. But we need to ensure our community is safe in this process. None of this is a calling card for inciting violence or destruction in our community or against our citizens.&#8221;
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Chief Cerelyn Davis&#039; remarks concerning Tyre Nichols" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/jpD2FDjBBr8?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>
So that&#8217;s the setup. She&#8217;s saying she expects you to feel “outraged” — which could be taken as a message that it’s okay for you to do whatever you want in protest. She did add a minor note at the end about safety and how violence won&#8217;t be tolerated, but that part was really glossed over. 
Worse, she is essentially saying this video is worse than you could ever imagine, conjuring all sorts of images for listeners. 
Of course, the Memphis police chief could have attempted to assuage concerns by giving you facts about the case. 
She didn&#8217;t, so I will.
Per <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/us/tyre-nichols-video-police-chief-warns-memphis-violently-body-cam-footage-release">Fox News</a>, &#8220;Nichols was pulled over on Jan. 7 around 8:30 p.m. for &#8216;reckless driving’ near Raines Road and Ross Road in Memphis. A &#8216;confrontation occurred&#8217; during the stop, which resulted in police chasing Nichols on foot, police said. He was later apprehended.&#8221;
“While attempting to take the suspect into custody, another confrontation occurred; however, the suspect was ultimately apprehended,” Memphis Police Department said. “Afterward the suspect complained of having shortness of breath, at which point an ambulance was called to the scene.&#8221;
Then, he was taken to a nearby hospital where he passed away three days later.
Now, based on that alone, a reasonable response would be, &#8216;I don&#8217;t know what that footage is going to show, but I think that we can already discern that had he complied with the police officers, and did not start running, thus causing a foot chase, and causing two separate confrontations with police then — perhaps he would be alive.&#8217;
Instead, though, citizens of Memphis and America are left feeling they should be infuriated before even seeing the video.
It should be noted that nowhere in that video did Davis show support for the police. She didn&#8217;t mention how things allegedly escalated because of Nichols&#8217; own actions, according to the report. 
So, in effect, she has now created a potentially very dangerous situation in Memphis. As with George Floyd, it&#8217;s highly possible violence will break out across the country like we saw in 2020 thanks to the BLM rioters.
Worse — we haven&#8217;t even seen the video yet.
What Davis did was irresponsible. It seems she didn&#8217;t want people to have the facts, she wanted people to have heightened emotions.
Ready your engines, people, because it could get very ugly in Memphis starting Friday night.
This article has been edited for clarity.

Candace_416x9 copy 30 (1)

Memphis Braces For Race Riots After Irresponsible Message From Police Chief

Democrats

Ku Klux Klan (KKK)

Racism

Questions of the Day: Have you ever considered how much the information you believe is based on authority alone? What happens when that authoritative trust is broken? And who is the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-80-weight-loss-drug-ozempic-causes-terrifying-side-effects-madonna-mocks-jesus-christ-in-vanity-fair-shoot-the-damar-hamlin-body-double-conspiracy-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ultimate source of authority</a>?
Lately, I&#8217;ve been reading passages from C.S. Lewis&#8217; best-selling book, &#8220;Mere Christianity.&#8221; So today, I read his thoughts about why he has faith in Christianity and God and I thought it was perfect for today&#8217;s discussion:
<blockquote>I have explained why I have to believe that Jesus was (and is) God. And it seems plain as a matter of history that He taught His followers that the new life was communicated in this way. In other words, I believe it on His authority. Do not be scared by the word authority. Believing things on authority only means believing them because you have been told them by someone you think is trustworthy. Ninety-nine percent of the things you believe are believed on authority. I believe there is such a place as New York. I have not seen it myself. I could not prove by abstract reasoning that there must he such a place. I believe it because reliable people have told me so. The ordinary man believes in the Solar System, atoms, evolution, and the circulation of the blood on authority—because the scientists say so. Every historical statement in the world is believed on authority. None of us has seen the Norman Conquest or the defeat of the Armada. None of us could prove them by pure logic as you prove a thing in mathematics. We believe them simply because people who did see them have left writings that tell us about them: in fact, on authority. A man who jibbed at authority in other things as some people do in religion would have to be content to know nothing all his life.</blockquote>
That passage is powerful because it is true. 
We all, of course, believe things mostly on authority. From the time we enter school, we&#8217;re taught certain subjects and believe what we&#8217;re learning to be true. We do it all the time as adults. Using an example from Lewis, many readers believe that Africa or Australia are real continents even if they&#8217;ve never been to them because they know people who have been there, read about them, or have seen pictures and evidence that they exist. You would never say, &#8220;I don&#8217;t believe Australia or Africa exists because I have never been there.&#8221;
So after I read that passage today, I logged onto Twitter and found it illuminating that a doctor was saying he took the COVID jab on the basis of the FDA&#8217;s authority. He submitted his body to the jab based on trust in the FDA. Yet, with the passage of time, he has deep regret for relying on the FDA to make his decision. In fact, it seems many doctors are saying similar things, and even people in academia are now questioning their decision.
Academics tend to believe everything they read in a book or a peer-reviewed paper must be true. They believe the &#8220;experts&#8221; even if what they are being told goes against their own experience or perspective.
In a sense, public education in America works that way also. Education works by establishing trust. We&#8217;re taught to trust the government from a young age, we repeat what we&#8217;re told, and we believe we&#8217;re getting smarter as we go from grade to grade.
And it&#8217;s true, we are taught some basic truths in school. Yet after we graduate, the government is able to tell us really big lies — based on the trust built up throughout our lives.
Yet it seems something is starting to change in American culture. More and more people are questioning the government and outright distrusting it. More than that, people are questioning the elites in every industry — media, medicine, education, and more.
Why? That&#8217;s what I was examining this morning, thanks to “Mere Christianity.”
Perhaps there&#8217;s a shift because the people who are supposed to be experts have stopped giving us that &#8216;little bit of truth&#8217; in the beginning. They&#8217;re now giving us &#8216;a few lies&#8217; at all times, all designed to advance the leftist agenda.
It&#8217;s not just the government doing it either, but every area of society is spewing woke propaganda.
For example, the Oxford Dictionary, something I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ve all used to look up the meaning of words, has now lost its authority.
Why?
The Oxford Dictionary has changed the definition of “woman.” So, Oxford Dictionary has relinquished its official role as a trusted source for definitions, because it is such a huge lie that men can give birth or you can change your gender.
Again, this sort of malignancy is everywhere. 
Because of that, many have had a great awakening of sorts. Individuals are recognizing that there is no manmade institution of authority. If there is a definitive authoritative figure — at least if you are Christian — then you know it is God.
Through prayer, reading Scripture, and other texts, we get to know God. In turn, we are able to recognize what is true and what is real. 
More than that, prayer enables you to recognize the lies we&#8217;re fighting today, because it connects you with the ultimate authority — God.

Candace_4b_216x9 copy 34

God Is The Only Institution Of Authority

C.S. Lewis

Christianity

You haven&#8217;t forgotten about Ghislaine Maxwell, have you?
Well, she recently gave an interview from prison, and it was shocking to hear her say she believes Jeffrey Epstein <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-79-scientists-say-lithium-should-be-added-to-drinking-water-to-prevent-suicides-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener">did not kill himself</a>.
As we all know, “Epstein didn’t kill himself” has become a bit of a punchline, but there are people who are actually saying he was taken out by other actors.
Now, it should be noted the circumstances surrounding his death are incredibly suspicious. When they removed Epstein’s dead body from prison in August 2019, for example, his face was left uncovered. When have you ever seen a person who committed suicide, taken out on a gurney — with their face uncovered?
Beyond that, there are obvious questions about how, in such a max-security prison, he was able to get away with it.
Given the rumors about who or what Epstein was, there certainly would be motives to take such a person out — possibly by governments or private actors.
Maxwell also thinks it’s all so utterly bizarre. Speaking from a Florida jail cell to a United Kingdom <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/ghislaine-maxwell-says-she-believes-jeffrey-epstein-was-murdered" target="_blank" rel="noopener">broadcaster on TalkTV</a>, she said of Epstein’s suicide, “I don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s real for a second.”
Maxwell explained she understood that Epstein was going to appeal his conviction.
“I believe that he was murdered. I was shocked and I wondered how it happened because … he was saying to me … I was sure he was going to appeal and I was sure that he was covered under the non-prostitution agreement,” she said. “But I wasn&#8217;t in the indictment. So I wasn&#8217;t mentioned. I wasn&#8217;t even one of the co-conspirators,” she said. “I obviously wish I&#8217;d never met him. You know, looking back now, I probably wish I had stayed in England.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
&quot;I believe that he was murdered.&quot;
Ghislaine Maxwell speaks on Jeffrey Epstein&#39;s death, adding that she didn&#39;t know &quot;he was so awful&quot; and &quot;wishes that she had never met him&quot;.<a href="https://t.co/cpCBxt3SJV">pic.twitter.com/cpCBxt3SJV</a>
&mdash; TalkTV (@TalkTV) <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkTV/status/1617606782892838913?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 23, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Later on in the interview, she implies how she has been victimized by this monster of the media. Her argument is that public opinion essentially wanted to prosecute Jeffrey Epstein, but now that he is out of the picture, the media still wants to see somebody held accountable.
Since the client list hasn’t been revealed, they&#8217;re going after her since she is now the face of the operation.
Is there some truth to that? Yes, absolutely. I believe there&#8217;s been such intense public interest in this story for good reason — because it&#8217;s completely horrific.
We’ve received no justice because Epstein has “killed himself.” 
Justice remains elusive because we know Epstein had a list of very important names connected to him. Yet, despite that, we don&#8217;t have a single name as to whom he was servicing. We know he was flying powerful figures to and from the island where his egregious sexual crimes took place. He has ties to Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, and countless others — yet nobody has been arrested.
And so instead, Maxwell takes the fall completely.
Now, is she guilty of some awful things? Yes, of course. Still, I suspect she&#8217;s become the sole scapegoat for this entire operation. Many more people should have been arrested.
What else is bizarre about this story? Well, Maxwell apparently thinks the British Royal, Prince Andrew, is innocent of the claims against him.
Prince Andrew was allegedly photographed with Virginia Giuffre — allegedly one of the underage girls trafficked by Epstein. The story has been he had sex with her, though it has never been proven.
Maxwell, however, says the infamous photo is fake. 
“I don’t believe it’s real for a second,” Maxwell said of the photo. “In fact, I’m sure it’s not … there’s never been an original. Further, there’s no photograph. I’ve only ever seen a photocopy of it.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
“I don’t believe it’s real for a second.”
EXCLUSIVE: Ghislaine Maxwell claims the photo of Virginia Giuffre and Prince Andrew is fake.
Don&#39;t miss Ghislaine Behind Bars with Jeremy Kyle. Monday at 7pm on TalkTV.<a href="https://twitter.com/jkyleofficial?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JKyleOfficial</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkTV?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TalkTV</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/GhislaineTalkTV?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#GhislaineTalkTV</a> <a href="https://t.co/UJ2OyyBklp">pic.twitter.com/UJ2OyyBklp</a>
&mdash; Jeremy Kyle Live (@JeremyKyleLive) <a href="https://twitter.com/JeremyKyleLive/status/1617130088633405443?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 22, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Prince Andrew has maintained his innocence through it all. Many people do not believe him.
Personally, I don&#8217;t know where I stand on it — not enough information has been revealed for me to have a well-formed opinion on it. A picture can be worth a thousand words, or it can be just a picture being entirely misconstrued.
Of course, if Prince Andrew is involved in this, then he should go to prison as well.
Needless to say, this isn’t over. Maxwell’s latest interview raises more questions than it answers.

Ghislaine Maxwell Thinks Jeffrey Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself. What Do You Think?

Ghislaine Maxwell

Jeffrey Epstein

Sex Trafficking

World

Do you remember Sha&#8217;Carri Richardson? She is a highly-talented, young athlete who qualified for the 2020 Summer Olympics as a sprinter in track and field. 
Due to COVID, the Olympics were postponed for a year, so she was set to compete in the summer of 2021. She then tested positive for cannabis which led to a one-month suspension right before the games were set to start. Because of that, Sha&#8217;Carri was passed over by Team USA for a spot on the Olympic team.
Many people were outraged by her suspension. Sha&#8217;Carri&#8217;s excuse was that she was anxious and emotionally upset over the loss of her estranged biological mother.
Granted, she had a very tough childhood, raised by her grandmother, and she was understandably distraught once she found out her real mom had died. Who wouldn&#8217;t be? So, she said smoked weed to deal with the tragedy.
Of course, that situation would be upsetting to anybody. 
Yet, knowing Olympic officials are going to perform a drug test, it doesn’t seem like a viable excuse for doing drugs. Those are the rules.
Many leftists and pro-BLM pundits, however, attempted to turn the situation into a racial injustice crusade — as if she were suspended because she&#8217;s black and passed over by Team USA due to her skin color.
Now, it must be said, Sha&#8217;Carri is a tremendously gifted young woman. I want her to come back and I want her to be successful in her career. We all want her to do great things in her sport and in life.
But people don&#8217;t become successful if they are handed excuses.
Making her situation into a racial one gives her the mentality that she has black privilege. It&#8217;s giving her the idea that she doesn&#8217;t have to abide by the rules, because she can say, &#8220;I&#8217;m black, I&#8217;m suffering. I&#8217;m the victim.”
<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-78-sha-carri-richardson-has-black-privilege-steven-crowder-needs-our-prayers-george-santos-needs-a-reality-check-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Don&#8217;t believe me</a>? 
Well, recently she was <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/shacarri-richardson-returns-to-the-track-finishes-last" target="_blank" rel="noopener">allegedly ejected</a> from an American Airlines flight because she was arguing with a flight attendant who asked her to stop using her phone as they were going to take off — which is something all passengers have to do.
As the video purports to show, she began arguing not only with AA employees, but other passengers. For some reason, Sha&#8217;Carri thought she could keep recording, even though she was asked to stop — as the flight attendant would do to every other passenger in that situation.
Here&#8217;s the video, watch for yourself.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Track star Sha&#39;Carri Richardson was kicked off a AA flight for arguing with Flight Attendant and recorded the whole incident. <a href="https://t.co/LEOhcRvyne">pic.twitter.com/LEOhcRvyne</a>
&mdash; Anthony Tilghman (@AnthonyTilghman) <a href="https://twitter.com/AnthonyTilghman/status/1616834246135488517?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 21, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Now, we&#8217;ve all been on these flights before. We have all seen that one person on board, acting like a jerk, causing a scene while delaying the entire plane.
Many of us have likely been told to get off our phones or computers prior to departure. I&#8217;ve been that passenger who is trying to wrap up a phone call, only for a stewardess to request I get off the phone as we’re moving toward the runway.
So, what do I do? I hang up the phone and say, &#8220;Sorry, I will have to call you back.&#8221;
Why? Because I know I am not a special person. I have to abide by the rules. I wasn&#8217;t targeted for being black — I was asked to get off the phone because that is what the airline requires.
Instead of doing that, it seems Sha&#8217;Carri spent her time trying to paint herself as a victim, and she continued recording.
To me, this is a perfect example of black privilege. I see this sort of thing all the time.
In fact, I experienced a similar situation while living in D.C.
I was pregnant, walking across a crosswalk, when a black woman in a car almost hit me. She was totally in the wrong. I called her an idiot — she almost ran me over when I had the right of way — and she rolled down her window, yelled back, and began recording me.
At that moment, said, &#8220;Look at my skin color. I&#8217;m black. So if you&#8217;re recording to paint yourself as a victim because you just almost hit somebody, then you&#8217;ve got the wrong person.&#8221;
I think at that moment, she thought, &#8220;Why am I recording?&#8221; because she stopped filming.
Yet, recording people has become a form of protection for people who want to make themselves the victim. It&#8217;s an intimidation tactic used to send a message to those being recorded. We all know a viral clip can be taken out of context and can make you look like some evil racist.
So, when I saw Sha&#8217;Carri recording, it seemed she was setting herself up to play the victim. In reality, all she had to do was listen and it would have been over in no time. She likely would have been able to use her phone up in the air.
Maybe she would have listened had people stopped handing her “black privilege excuses” throughout life. But, not enough people have done that, so I will.
Sha’Carri, these incidents are not happening to you because you&#8217;re black or a victim in the world. Both the weed suspension as well as the incident with American Airlines happened because you did not follow the rules.
Plain and simple.
Yet, you want to create drama in your life. You may have had a very tough childhood, Sha&#8217;Carri, I don&#8217;t doubt it.
But let me tell you something, you were handed some talents the rest of us don&#8217;t have, and that gave you a literal leg up in life, OK?
And you&#8217;re not acting like it. You&#8217;re not acting like you&#8217;re grateful, you&#8217;re acting like a brat and somebody needs to tell you to button it up and behave well.
That&#8217;s it. Stop smoking pot. Stop yelling. Stop throwing tantrums. 
Listen, you&#8217;re not special. I want you to go out in the world and I want you to be successful, and to do that you need to understand you are not a special snowflake and you are not a victim.

Candace_3b16x9 copy 16 (2)

Black Privilege Is On Full Display When This Track Star Is Removed From Flight

American Airlines

Track &amp; Field

Happy Friday, everyone. For today’s column, I am going to look at a post from Reddit and determine if somebody is in the wrong for not wearing a bra to work. 
I broke down a few other of these questions on my show and I also went over the potential dangers of fluoride. You can watch it all <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-77-friday-files-is-the-fluoride-in-our-water-poisoning-us" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a>.
Okay, here’s the context for today’s column courtesy of one of Reddit’s famous <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230119143451/https://www.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/10fzdt7/aita_for_refusing_to_wear_a_bra_to_work/">Am I The A**hole? (AITA?)</a> style posts. Here’s what one person asked:
<blockquote>I (23 Non-Binary AFAB) have stopped wearing a bra to work. I work as an early years teaching assistant so I am constantly bending down to speak to children, pick up toys, etc. And my bra digs into me all day and has been causing me a lot of pain. I have decided to start wearing a tank top under my clothes instead of a bra and I wear lots of layers anyway so, despite having a bigger than average chest, it really isn&#8217;t noticeable that I&#8217;m not wearing a bra.
The other day I was playing a running game with one of the children so I took my top layer off, I still had on the tank top, a t-shirt, some overalls and a baggy jumper so I was very much covered. Despite this, I was called in to discuss my clothing choices. I had no idea what my boss (42M) was talking about until he mentioned that I really should be wearing a bra around children. I was shocked that he&#8217;d even point it out. I told him I felt that I could live without one if it wasn&#8217;t obvious and that wearing one was causing me a lot of pain. He said that work was not meant to be comfortable and that I should stick to the &#8216;unwritten dress code&#8217;. I said I would not be wearing one going forward unless the school were willing to pay for one of the comfortable sports bras they make for larger chests (they usually range in price from £70-£150). My boss said I was being unreasonable with my requests and that I would have to wear a bra going forward. If there had been complaints from parents I would understand but no one has said anything apart from him.
AITA?</blockquote>
Yes, sweetheart, I am sorry to say you are the a**hole. Truthfully, I am a little confused why this even needs to be explained.
You&#8217;re asking this question and your role is to work with children. Obviously, you have to be appropriate. Your boss has been completely reasonable. His job is not to make you comfortable. Your duty is to come presentable to work.
There is a standard, of course, that when you show up to work, you&#8217;re supposed to look professional. You can&#8217;t just walk around wearing whatever you want. Whether you work with children or not, that’s true at every company.
The idea that your employer should have to pay because you want a special bra that will make you more comfortable is even more ridiculous.
Obviously, any parent who is dropping off their child at a school, daycare, club, or athletic team thinks the adult who shows up to work is going to be appropriately dressed. 
For some reason, many people have forgotten that decency matters — especially in front of kids.
This post sort of reminds me of a woman who applied for our nannying position. I kid you not, she arrived at my house wearing booty shorts. How could she possibly have thought we were going to hire her? She was wearing short-shorts and a low-cut top.
Why on earth would I want her walking around with my child at a park dressed like that?
It would be blatantly inappropriate.
It’s confusing to me that she would need somebody to sit her down in an office and essentially say, “Hey, you need to dress appropriately in front of small children.”
If the question “What’s appropriate for children?” is a difficult one for you to answer, then you probably shouldn&#8217;t have a job around kids.
To be honest, it doesn’t sound as if this person is even mentally fit for the job at all — and not just because she doesn’t want to wear a bra. That you are calling yourself non-binary definitely should have been a red flag for your bosses. You must believe in radical gender ideology that&#8217;s not based on truth and is wreaking havoc throughout the West.
This radical gender ideology, along with the nonsense it brings, needs to be taken out of classrooms. The entire goal of this ideology is to break down boundaries so that children can consent to certain sexual things — which they definitely cannot.
This is how you end up with “nonbinary” women thinking they are in the right to let their bare-chest hang loose sans a bra in front of minors.
So yes, to answer your question, you are the a**hole. Until this person puts on a bra, she needs to stay 300 feet away from every playground, daycare, and avoid all children.
It’s that simple.

Candace_4b_216x9 copy 32

Yes, Non-Binary Reddit Poster, You Obviously Should Wear A Bra To Work — Especially Around Children

nonbinary

Schools

Question of the Day: Are women ruining the workplace or are we enriching it? I&#8217;m asking that question seriously and would love to hear your thoughts.
This topic from <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-76-candace-reads-steven-crowder-his-rights" target="_blank" rel="noopener">my show’s opening monologue</a> today isn’t even meant to be a controversial topic.
My husband and I were debating the pros and cons of potentially sending our son to an all-boys school. My husband went to one and insists the environment made for better learning because there were no distractions for the students in terms of the fairer sex.
When you keep the sexes separate then they&#8217;re able to focus on their work and academics. It allows children to blossom, he claimed. It was an interesting argument.
Then I said, &#8220;But what happens to those kids once they get into the real world? There are women in the workplace. Will we be seen as a distraction?&#8221;
But the more I thought about it, I realized, yes, we kind of are a distraction.
If you think about what men have to deal with when they go to work now, it&#8217;s essentially filled with verbal and social landmines. There are inherent differences between men and women — including the way we speak and our humor — and they don’t always fit together nicely in an office setting. 
To be clear, I am not making an argument that women should not have the right to work and be relegated to staying in the house. 
I&#8217;m not saying that whatsoever. 
Yet, men do constantly face the pressure of having to avoid making innocent comments which could be taken the wrong way in the workplace.
&#8216;Do I say something, do I not say something? I have to be careful in how I speak to this person because she&#8217;s a woman. Oh, do I tell her she looks nice today? Or is she going to think that&#8217;s inappropriate? Is it appropriate, especially in the post-#MeToo era? Forget it. Do I say anything to her? Well, if I don&#8217;t say anything to her, well, she&#8217;s going to say that I&#8217;m ignoring her because I am a man.&#8217;
The internal dialog that men must be having at work at all times is unimaginable. This new dynamic has also changed the way the office functions.
For example, numerous corporations are now having dry Christmas parties. Presumably, a big reason for the shift is that having alcohol could lead to major major HR headaches. If you supply alcohol and there are men and women having a good time — things could happen that make work awkward. Perhaps inebriated men and women start flirting. Maybe men look around the party and say, “Oh, I always thought she was cute. She was kind of cool. Let me go talk to her.” 
But then what if it goes wrong? What if the woman thinks even saying hello in the wrong manner is inappropriate?
So, it seems reasonable for many businesses to now say, &#8220;Do what you do in your spare time, but at work, you have to keep it professional and that means no alcohol.&#8221;
Now, outside the office, women enrich the lives of men. For example, a bachelor pad or a man’s house is usually bland and lifeless. After marriage, it comes to life as men and women become one.
Yet, obviously, relations are different in the workplace which leads to a bit of tiptoeing and eggshells for everybody involved.
So during this discussion, I thought, “OK, well, what if you had a scenario where — similar to boys-only schools — only men are allowed to work in the office together? What would happen there?&#8221; 
Well, that already existed, so we know it works.
Then I thought, what if only women would work with each other? How would that office be? Weirdly enough, it would be a disaster. Women would kill each other. Consider “Mean Girls,” it&#8217;s taking a satirical stab at female culture. We attack each other all the time so we don&#8217;t flourish on our own — and that would be the same in an all-female workspace.
Then, curiously, I came across a Reddit post where a man shared how he got in trouble because he made some crass talk comparing his digestion issues to a female employee’s while the two were in the company&#8217;s gender-neutral bathroom. The female employee thought it was harassment, and in my opinion, it was a little weird — but I am not a man. 
For a guy, that situation might be normal. Men, for whatever reason, tend to be more comfortable with those sorts of jokes and hanging out in the bathroom in general. Women usually find the bathroom disgusting and don’t like jokes about it.
Yet because offices now have to be woke — gender-neutral bathrooms are pushed on men and women. And in turn, the differences between men and women clash with each other in awkward ways that interrupt work.
This happens at Christmas parties, gender-neutral bathrooms apparently, and other day-to-day activities that wouldn’t normally happen if women weren’t in the building.
So my opinion is, yes, women are ruining the workplace.
There is less laughter. There is less joking. Things are different. We are not enriching it by any means.

Candace_416x9 copy 25 (1)

Are Women Ruining The Workplace? 

Sexual Harassment

Menu