<p>The debate over the coronavirus response seems to be centered around a false dilemma. We are told, mostly by left-wing media personalities, that the choice is either to slow the spread of the virus or not slow it, take it seriously or not take it seriously. According to this version, those advocating a protracted, economy-ruining, nationwide shut down are on the side of taking the disease seriously and slowing the spread. Those who feel apprehensive about intentionally plunging into another Great Depression are on the side of not taking the disease seriously and doing nothing whatsoever to slow its spread.</p>
<p>The caricaturing of the Let&#8217;s Not Destroy The Economy side gets even more absurd. Those of us on that end of the spectrum are accused of &#8220;putting the economy over people.&#8221; We are embracing &#8220;<a href="https://twitter.com/peterdaou/status/1242487514218278914">mass death</a>&#8221; and consigning our grandmothers to the morgue. As one media guy <a href="https://twitter.com/noyokono/status/1242183167081164806">put it to me</a>, we &#8220;have a hard-on for mass murder.&#8221;</p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Po5bnZevXF8" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but notice that nearly everyone making these points (though &#8220;points&#8221; may be too generous a term) is currently employed. They enjoy their uninterrupted income streams as they accuse out of work retail clerks and waitresses of being greedy money grubbers for wanting to earn a paycheck again to feed their families.</p>
<p>Of course, the whole notion that &#8220;people&#8221; and &#8220;economy&#8221; are two separate categories, and that one must choose between preserving the former or the latter, is ludicrous. The economy <em>is</em> people. When the economy crashes, people&#8217;s lives crash. If the economy is in ruins, people&#8217;s lives are in ruins. The argument is that tearing our economy to pieces will come at a cost &#8212; a human cost, not just an abstract economic cost &#8212; that is too great to pay. Perhaps this argument is wrong. But, wrong or right, any rational person can see that it is not an argument for devaluing human life. The disagreement is over the best, most ethical, most prudent way to preserve human life. The disagreement is not <em>whether</em> lives should be preserved in the first place.</p>
<p>And that brings us to the false dilemma I mentioned at the start. I have not seen any prominent person advocate that we throw these quarantines to the side all at once and get back to business as if everything is perfectly normal. I have not see anyone suggest that no measures be taken to address the pandemic or protect ourselves against it. There are a whole list of practical and effective (to what degree, I don&#8217;t know and neither does anybody else) measures that could be put in place while also salvaging what&#8217;s left of our economy. We have chosen to slow the spread by shutting everything down. That is not the only potential method.</p>
<p>What other methods might we choose? I already <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/walsh-we-dont-have-to-destroy-our-economy-to-prevent-mass-deaths-from-the-coronavirus-heres-a-different-plan">suggested</a> a few:</p>
<p>1) Open the economy back up. Let young and healthy people work and feed their families.</p>
<p>2) Encourage masks, or even require them, for certain industries where transmission might be especially likely.</p>
<p>3) Keep nursing homes quarantined.</p>
<p>4) Tell other at-risk people to remain in their homes for now.</p>
<p>5) Test aggressively and quarantine the infected.</p>
<p>6) Provide financial relief to at-risk people who cannot work.</p>
<p>7) Continued quarantines for specific regions where the outbreak is especially bad.</p>
<p>My suggestions certainly are not novel or very creative. I&#8217;m sure if smarter people than myself got to work thinking of solutions that don&#8217;t involve willful economic suicide, they could come up with some better ones. We are a nation of problem solvers. And good problem solvers find solutions that don&#8217;t create worse problems than they were meant to solve.</p>
<p>The strategies suggested above would certainly slow the spread to some extent. Would they slow it enough? I don&#8217;t know. Is their chance of slowing the spread good enough to justify opening up the economy to stave off a historic collapse that would ruin many millions of lives? I think so. Again, I could be wrong. But <em>this</em> is the argument I&#8217;d be wrong about. I would not be wrong that the virus is no big deal and therefore nothing should be done to fight it, because that is not an argument I am making or anyone else is making.</p>
<p>Enough with the caricatures and false dichotomies. This problem is too serious for those kinds of games.</p>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script async src="https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js"></script>
<script async src="https://www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script><div data-widget-host="revcontent" data-pub-id="165152" data-widget-id="290588"></div><script src="https://delivery.revcontent.com/165152/290588/widget.js"></script>

WALSH: The Media Is Presenting A False Choice On The Coronavirus 

CONTINUE READING

The Bizarre Strategy Where Losing Actually Helps You Win

Ilhan Omar Hits Rock Bottom With Her Dumbest Remarks Yet As Trump Delivers His Best Speech Ever

Trump Has Faced Six Assassination Attempts. After Him, They’re Coming For You.

Here’s What Nobody’s Telling You About The ‘Missing Scientists’ Cases

Is This The Worst Political Psy-Op In Modern History?

The Return Of Wokeness? Amazon Banning Books Is Just The Start

Opinion

COVID

A video goes viral showing a baby being refused his mother by two gay "dads". This is just the tip of the iceberg, which is why we will have an important discussion today about surrogacy. 

Hour 1

The Matt Walsh Show

Ep. 1765 - This Video Is One Of The Worst Things I've Seen In A Long Time 

The Strait of Hormuz officially opens for business (kind of), the Pope makes “shocking” comments on immigration, and President Trump promises UFO disclosure at TPUSA. 


The Michael Knowles Show

Ep. 1956 -  Pope Leo's "SHOCKING" Immigration Comments EXPLAINED

A false miscreed has corrupted our leadership class.


The Andrew Klavan Show

Ep. 1275 - Dumb, Dumber and Progressive

President Trump announces a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel, a murder-suicide involving former Democratic Lieutenant Governor Justin Fairfax shakes Virginia, and France and Britain hold a conference to secure the Strait of Hormuz – after the Iranian conflict ends. Get the facts first with Morning Wire.

- - -

Ep. 2738

- - -

Wake up with new Morning Wire merch: https://bit.ly/4lIubt3

- - -

Today's Sponsors:

Alliance Defending Freedom - Visit https://JoinADF.com/WIRE or text 'WIRE' to 83848 to learn more.

Pocket Hose - Text MORNING to 64000 to get a FREE pocket pivot and their 10-pattern sprayer with the purchase of ANY size Copper Head hose. Message and data rates may apply.

Morning Wire

U.S. Expands Hormuz Blockade & VA Fairfax Deaths Investigated | 4.17.26

U.S. Expands Hormuz Blockade & VA Fairfax Deaths Investigated | 4.17.26 [Member Exclusive]

A ceasefire goes into effect between Israel and Lebanon, a tragic murder-suicide rocks Virginia, and Dairy Queen deploys AI in the drive-thru. Get the facts first with Evening Wire.
- - -
Ep. 2737
- - -
Wake up with new Morning Wire merch: https://bit.ly/4lIubt3 
- - -
Today’s Sponsor:

Alliance Defending Freedom - Visit https://JoinADF.com/WIRE or text “WIRE” to 83848 to learn more.


Menu

— Opinion —

WALSH: The Media Is Presenting A False Choice On The Coronavirus