News

Tim Walz Repeatedly Misconstrued His Military Service. Here Are The Examples.

   DailyWire.com
Governor of Minnesota Tim Walz speaks to reporters after meeting with US President Joe Biden at the White House in Washington, DC, July 3, 2024.
JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz served in the U.S. National Guard for 24 years. He even re-enlisted after 9/11 to serve once again. Yet the circumstances around his retirement – and the way he has presented his military service since retiring – have caused an uproar over whether he has misled about his service.

Here are examples of Walz making a claim about his service that is not supported by the facts.

His Official Government Biography

As of this writing, Walz’s biography on the Minnesota government’s website says, “After 24 years in  the Army National Guard, Command Sergeant Major Walz retired from the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion in 2005.”

Walz briefly held the position of command sergeant major as a conditional promotion, provided he adhered to several stipulations, including one that he serve a specific amount of time after that promotion, which Walz failed to do. Thus, his rank reverted back to what he was before that conditional promotion: Master sergeant, which is still rank E8 out E10 and a major accomplishment.

The Minnesota National Guard, for which Walz served, confirmed that at the time of his retirement in 2005, Walz was a master sergeant “for benefit purposes because he did not complete additional coursework at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy.”

His Official Vice Presidential Campaign Biography

Walz’s biography on Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign website originally said he was a “retired command sergeant major,” Politico reported. That bio now says he “served as a command sergeant major.”

His Official Congressional X Account

Walz said in his own X profile that he was a “Command Sgt. Major.”

Saying He’s A “Retired Sergeant Major” In An Interview

During an interview in 2018 while running for governor of Minnesota, Walz said he was “a retired sergeant major,” even though he is a retired master sergeant.

Calling Himself A “Retired Command Sergeant Major” In An Address To Troops

In 2009, then-Rep. Walz sent a farewell message to soldiers deploying to Iraq, and called himself a “retired command sergeant major.”

Tweeting That He’s A “Retired Command Sergeant Major”

In a tweet on July 18, 2018, Walz referred to himself as “a retired Command Sergeant Major” in a post on X.

Not Correcting Someone Who Described Him As A Retired Command Sergeant Major

During a segment on MSNBC some years ago, General Barry McCaffrey described Walz as a “retired command sergeant major” who served “time in combat.” When Walz spoke, he didn’t correct McCaffrey.

Issuing A Congressional Challenge Coin Saying He Was A Command Sergeant Major

As a congressman, Walz issued a Congressional Challenge Coin supposed to represent himself and the district he represents. Members of of Congress have issued the coins as part of a military tradition, but Walz’s falsely listed him as a command sergeant major.

Saying He Was A Command Sergeant Major In A Campaign Ad

While running for congress in 2006, the Walz campaign ran an ad that listed him as a “command sergeant major” and implied he went to Afghanistan by saying he retired four years late “after a tour supporting the war in Afghanistan.”

Telling People He Carried Weapons “In War”

Walz said in a video shared by Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign that he supports limits to the Second Amendment. In the clip shared online, he says, “We can make sure that those weapons of war – that I carried in war – are the only place where those weapons are at.”

WATCH BEN SHAPIRO’S ‘SCAMALA: KAMALA HARRIS UNMASKED’ ON DAILYWIRE+

Walz, as a member of the military who specialized in artillery, would have experience with the weapons he is talking about, but he never carried them “in war” as he never saw combat. Even CNN correspondent Tom Foreman called out Walz’s misleading statement, which would seem to indicate he had been in combat.

“Walz did make a comment, speaking to a group — he’s done it a couple of times, where he has used language that suggested that he carried weapons in a fighting situation,” Foreman said on Wednesday, according to Fox News.

“There is a difference between being in a combat area, being involved in a time of war, and actually being in a position where people are shooting at you,” Foreman said, adding that there “is no evidence that at any time Governor Walz was in the position of being shot at, and some of his language could easily be seen to suggest that he was. So that is absolutely false when he said that about gun rights out there.”

Calling Himself An “Enduring Freedom Veteran” At A George. W. Bush Protest

In 2004, Walz organized a protest against then-President George W. Bush, The Washington Free Beacon reported. In a photo from that event, Walz can  be seen holding a photo that says “Enduring Freedom Veterans for Kerry.” Operation Enduring Freedom is a reference to the War in Afghanistan that began after the September, 11, 2001, attacks on the U.S.

But Walz never went to Afghanistan – he was sent to Norway and Italy in roles supporting the Afghanistan War, yet the mention of OEF leads people to assume he was in Afghanistan, which he was not.

In 2009, an Iraq war veteran mentioned this photo to Walz staffers and used it to suggest Walz may have violated Stolen Valor laws.

Implying He Served In Afghanistan In His First Campaign Announcement

During his first campaign in 2006, in which he ran for congress, Walz’s announcement indicated he was a “veteran of Operation Enduring Freedom,” in another example of Walz implying he had been to Afghanistan.

Saying He “Deployed In Support Of Operation Enduring Freedom” On C-SPAN

During an appearance on C-SPAN in 2007, Walz claimed he “deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom,” again implying he went to Afghanistan when he was actually in Italy.

Allowing Nancy Pelosi To Thank Him For His Service “On The Battlefield”

During a 2007 press conference, newly elected House Speaker Nancy Pelosi described then-freshman congressman Walz as a retired “command sergeant major” in the National Guard who had served “on the battlefield,” The Washington Free Beacon reported. Walz didn’t correct her, and the C-SPAN video of the event lists Walz as an “Afghanistan War Veteran,” even though he had never gone to Afghanistan.

Promoting Articles That Also Misled About His Military Service

In a 2006 kit sent to media during his campaign for congress, Walz included a list of articles, two of which gave false impressions about his military service, The Free Beacon reported. One article, from The Wall Street Journal, said that Walz “served overseas during the early war in Afghanistan.”

The Atlantic also published an article that described Walz as “a command sergeant major who’d just returned from fighting the war on terrorism.” This article also said Walz was one of a “number of veterans from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq” who were running for Congress that year.

In Press Releases During His 2006 Campaign

Press releases from Walz’s first congressional campaign also suggested he had served in Iraq, the Free Beacon reported. One of these press releases featured an “in the news section” that included two stories discussing “Iraq war veterans running for congress.” Walz never went to Iraq.

In A 2005 Profile From A Local Paper

The Austin Daily Herald published a profile of Walz in 2005 that described Walz as a “retired Command Sergeant Major in the National Guard, who served a tour of duty in Operation Iraqi Freedom…” giving the false impression that Walz went to Iraq or saw combat. And it appears Walz spoke to the paper for the profile, given the quotes from him in the article.

In Josh Green’s Articles Featuring Profiles Of Walz

In this example, it is unclear whether Walz is to blame for the misleading phrases, or the veteran Bloomberg reporter Josh Green. In a 2006 profile for the Atlantic, Green wrote that Walz left Minnesota “to serve overseas in Operation Enduring Freedom,” a clear implication that Walz went to Afghanistan.

Green also wrote that Walz was confronted by Bush staffers during his protest against the war, and said he had asked the Bush staffers if “they really wanted to arrest a command sergeant major who’d just returned from fighting the war on terrorism.”

And on Tuesday, Green wrote for Bloomberg that Walz served “in Iraq as part of Operation Enduring Freedom.” Bloomberg has since stealth edited the line to say that Walz had served in Italy instead of Iraq. Green posted the correction on his X account.

Create a free account to join the conversation!

Already have an account?

Log in

Got a tip worth investigating?

Your information could be the missing piece to an important story. Submit your tip today and make a difference.

Submit Tip
Download Daily Wire Plus

Don't miss anything

Download our App

Stay up-to-date on the latest
news, podcasts, and more.

Download on the app storeGet it on Google Play
The Daily Wire   >  Read   >  Tim Walz Repeatedly Misconstrued His Military Service. Here Are The Examples.