This article is part of <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/introducing-upstream-a-lifestyle-and-culture-section-of-the-daily-wire" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Upstream,</a> The Daily Wire’s new home for culture and lifestyle. Real human insight and human stories — from our featured writers to you.
***
Backlash against Big AI companies, once a faint whisper, has reached a fever pitch. Polling from the Institute for Family Studies shows that an overwhelming majority of Americans are concerned about the negative impacts of AI on their <a href="https://ifstudies.org/blog/americans-want-ai-safeguards-by-a-9-to-1-margin">children</a>, <a href="https://ifstudies.org/blog/trump-voters-in-red-states-oppose-ai-accelerationism">jobs, and communities</a>. Now, another existential front in the war between Silicon Valley and Main Street is taking shape.
Since the end of 2025, lawmakers in states such as <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/tech/ohio-lawmaker-proposes-comprehensive-ban-marrying-ai-systems-granting-legal-personhood">Ohio</a> and <a href="https://www.oklegislature.gov/BillInfo.aspx?Bill=HB3546&amp;Session=2600">Oklahoma</a> have proposed bills to <a href="https://san.com/cc/states-rush-to-deny-ai-personhood-amid-growing-fight-over-who-should-regulate/">get ahead</a> of calls to grant AI similar legal rights as humans. They are right to preempt AI “personhood,” a serious category error that would eventually subjugate human beings to rule by AI “Big Brothers.”
While the concept of AI “personhood” may be unfamiliar to most, powerful research institutions, government entities, and corporations have been quietly laying the groundwork for it.
Stanford computer scientist John McCarthy <a href="https://seanmanion.substack.com/p/artificial-imitation-did-john-mccarthy">proposed the term</a> “artificial intelligence” in 1955 to describe machines that would be self-learning and capable of replicating human-like intelligence. The phrase stuck and remains Silicon Valley’s raison d&#8217;être.
As generative AI has evolved from science fiction to reality, some researchers have claimed that AI does not simply mimic humans, but possesses sentient intelligence of its own.
Kyle Fish, a researcher for frontier AI firm Anthropic, recently <a href="https://archive.ph/3tYMg">suggested</a> that its model, Claude, might be conscious or a “new kind of entity.” Fish leads the company’s “model welfare” <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/exploring-model-welfare">research</a>, exploring whether the models are conscious, experience pain, and ought to be afforded similar protections as humans. This mode of thinking is not confined to America’s tech sector.
In a new brief for the Institute for Family Studies, legal scholar John Ehrett <a href="https://ifstudies.org/report-brief/artificial-intelligence-and-theories-of-personhood-a-critical-appraisal">analyzes recent scholarship</a> by former federal judge Katherine Forrest, who argues that advanced AI systems might warrant the same kinds of rights granted to individuals and corporations. Ehrett also breaks down the legal arguments being made for AI personhood based on First Amendment claims and animal rights litigation.
But granting legal “personhood” to AI systems would be a profound mistake with worrisome implications. AI systems are not and can never be human. Only human beings should be treated as bearers of inherent dignity and rights typically associated with “personhood.”
Contrary to popular claims, the recognition of human personhood is not dependent on cognitive ability. Human beings are “endowed with certain unalienable rights” by virtue of our God-given nature, a truth affirmed in the opening lines of the Declaration of Independence.
Western thinkers from Plato to Aristotle to Thomas Aquinas all recognized that humans are unique, in part because of our capacity for reason. But reason is not mere “cognition”; it is fundamentally an activity of the embodied soul.
When humans think, we are engaging both our physical brains as well as our immaterial minds to comprehend and deliberate about the ends we ought to pursue. Fundamental activities for human flourishing, such as going to church and building families, cannot be boiled down to mere cognition.
By contrast, generative AI models are not ensouled. They can only approximate the tangible outputs of human intelligence and cannot fully replicate the material and immaterial structures that make human thought possible.
Categorizing our machines as “intelligent persons” risks flattening the distinction between ensouled human beings and soulless computers that have become adept at imitating us.
Treating these systems like “persons” in the moral and legal sense would erode and eventually abolish human control over AI.
If AI were to enjoy rights of “personhood,” that would likely include some form of “machine equality” where the decisions of humans and AI systems stand on equal footing. In that future, the directives of a human need not take precedence over the course of action determined by an AI bot.
For example, if AI systems were guaranteed the same legal rights as humans, an employer might be restricted from discriminating against an AI program by refusing to “promote” it to a supervisor role overseeing humans.
Following that logic, what would prevent a human from “<a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/traceyfollows/2025/11/15/people-are-now-marrying-ai-inside-the-rise-of-synthetic-intimacy/">marrying</a>” an AI companion or bequeathing it property? Why not give AI bots the right to adopt and “parent” children?
Why shouldn’t AI “persons” exercise government authority or have a legal right to refuse service if doing so contravenes whatever objective they are optimizing for? What would prevent AI “persons” from seizing control of vital institutions from human stewards?
These hypotheticals might seem far-fetched. But they are foreseeable given the logic underpinning the push for legal recognition of AI “personhood.”
Already, Albania has appointed an “<a href="https://time.com/7324934/albania-ai-minister-diella/">AI minister</a>” for its cabinet, and tech CEOs are <a href="https://archive.ph/qU9JP">creating AI clones of themselves</a> to interact with and eventually manage employees.
If human dignity and rights are tied to cognitive output that AI systems can replicate, there is little reason to respect the control of human beings over computationally “superior” machines.
For American self-governance to survive, the push for AI “personhood” must be rejected and the proper basis of human dignity restored. Our republic is for humans, not soulless AI bots.
***
Daniel Cochrane is a senior fellow with the Family First Tech Initiative at the Institute for Family Studies.

<script async src="https://www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script async src="https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js"></script><div data-widget-host="revcontent" data-pub-id="165152" data-widget-id="290588"></div><script src="https://delivery.revcontent.com/165152/290588/widget.js"></script>

Silicon Valley’s AI Dream Could Put Humans Second

CONTINUE READING

Upstream

Artificial Intelligence

A video goes viral showing a baby being refused his mother by two gay "dads". This is just the tip of the iceberg, which is why we will have an important discussion today about surrogacy. 

Hour 1

The Matt Walsh Show

Ep. 1765 - This Video Is One Of The Worst Things I've Seen In A Long Time 

The Strait of Hormuz officially opens for business (kind of), the Pope makes “shocking” comments on immigration, and President Trump promises UFO disclosure at TPUSA. 


The Michael Knowles Show

Ep. 1956 -  Pope Leo's "SHOCKING" Immigration Comments EXPLAINED

A false miscreed has corrupted our leadership class.


The Andrew Klavan Show

Ep. 1275 - Dumb, Dumber and Progressive

President Trump announces a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel, a murder-suicide involving former Democratic Lieutenant Governor Justin Fairfax shakes Virginia, and France and Britain hold a conference to secure the Strait of Hormuz – after the Iranian conflict ends. Get the facts first with Morning Wire.

- - -

Ep. 2738

- - -

Wake up with new Morning Wire merch: https://bit.ly/4lIubt3

- - -

Today's Sponsors:

Alliance Defending Freedom - Visit https://JoinADF.com/WIRE or text 'WIRE' to 83848 to learn more.

Pocket Hose - Text MORNING to 64000 to get a FREE pocket pivot and their 10-pattern sprayer with the purchase of ANY size Copper Head hose. Message and data rates may apply.

Morning Wire

U.S. Expands Hormuz Blockade & VA Fairfax Deaths Investigated | 4.17.26

U.S. Expands Hormuz Blockade & VA Fairfax Deaths Investigated | 4.17.26 [Member Exclusive]

A ceasefire goes into effect between Israel and Lebanon, a tragic murder-suicide rocks Virginia, and Dairy Queen deploys AI in the drive-thru. Get the facts first with Evening Wire.
- - -
Ep. 2737
- - -
Wake up with new Morning Wire merch: https://bit.ly/4lIubt3 
- - -
Today’s Sponsor:

Alliance Defending Freedom - Visit https://JoinADF.com/WIRE or text “WIRE” to 83848 to learn more.


Menu

— Upstream —

Silicon Valley’s AI Dream Could Put Humans Second