ICE Agents Wear Masks After Threats To Their Families, But Top Dem Promises To ID All Of Them

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) has vowed to identify every single Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent who engages in raids while wearing a face mask — even though, according to acting ICE Director Todd Lyons, they’re wearing the masks to protect their families.

After weeks of facing death threats and having their photos and personal information published on the internet, Lyons confirmed that ICE agents have resorted to wearing face masks in order to avoid added risks.

WATCH:

🚨 WATCH: Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons returned to the press conference on Operation Patriot when a reporter asked why ICE agents wear masks:

“People are out there taking photos of the names and their faces and posting them online with death threats to their family.” pic.twitter.com/V7XqX8IrES

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) June 2, 2025

“People are out there taking photos of the names, their faces, and posting them online with death threats to their family and themselves,” Lyons explained.

Jeffries seemed unconcerned with the real reason that ICE agents had opted to cover their faces, and instead claimed that their efforts to enforce federal immigration law were “engaged in … aggressive overreach” and suggested the masks were simply an effort to avoid being held accountable for that.

WATCH:

🚨Hakeem Jeffries promises that masked ICE agents will be identified:

“This is America. This is not the Soviet Union. We’re not behind the Iron Curtain. This is not the 1930s. And every single one of them, no matter what it takes, no matter how long it takes, will, of course, be… pic.twitter.com/fPN1hQesK9

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) June 3, 2025

“Every single ICE agent who’s engaged in this aggressive overreach and are trying to hide their identities from the American people will be unsuccessful in doing that,” Jeffries said. “This is America. This is not the Soviet Union. We’re not behind the Iron Curtain. This is not the 1930s. And every single one of them, no matter what it takes, no matter how long it takes, will, of course, be identified.”