<p style="font-weight: 400;">Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard stoked the fires of those who believe in aliens from outer space, hinting, “We’re continuing to look for the truth and share that truth with the American people.”</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Gabbard was interviewed by Miranda Devine on her “Pod Force One” podcast, released on Wednesday.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">“Is there anything — we’ve had some declassification of some very strange videos that look like they are unidentified flying objects. Is there anything in the files that you think you could find or have found?” Devine asked.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">“Nothing that I am prepared to talk about today,” Gabbard replied, prompting Devine to say, “Ooh. So watch this space?”</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">“I’m just gonna say this: We’re continuing to look for the truth and share that truth with the American people,” Gabbard teased.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">“So do you believe that there could be aliens?” Devine persisted.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">“I, honestly, like, my personal belief — I have my own views and opinions,” Gabbard answered. “In this role, I gotta be careful with what I share. &#8230; My husband’s laughing in the corner because we have these same conversations, and obviously, I don’t share any classified information outside of my building with those who don’t have clearances, but this is fun that he’s here to watch this right now.”</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">“Cause it’s so interesting,” Devine enthused. “I think it’s one of those burning things we grew up with.”</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">“Of course. Of course,” Gabbard agreed. “There are a lot of questions. There’s a lot that’s been put out there. I’m still going through and looking through what do we know and what is it that we don’t know.”</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Speaking of the series of mysterious drones spotted last year over New Jersey, Gabbard remarked: “I still have a lot of questions around that. I’ve heard what the public official line is. I just personally still have a lot of questions that are unanswered, because it wasn’t just New Jersey. It was happening in different parts of the country.”</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">In late January, the Trump administration <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGDgxhchngU">said</a> the drones over New Jersey were part of an FAA research project. “After research and study, the drones that were flying over New Jersey in large numbers were authorized to be flown by the FAA for research and various other reasons,” said White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.</p>

<script async src="https://www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script async src="https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js"></script>

Gabbard Promises ‘Truth’ When Pressed On Potential Extraterrestrial Life

CONTINUE READING

<p style="font-weight: 400;">A Tennessee man who savagely shot to death his girlfriend and her six- and nine-year-old daughters in 1988 and was later condemned to death was executed on Tuesday. The headlines centered around critics of the execution who pointed to the fact that the state had refused to deactivate his implanted defibrillator, causing him pain while he was dying.</p>
<p>Before Byron Black, 69, executed his girlfriend, Angela Clay, 29, and her daughters, Latoya, 9, and Lakeisha, 6, he had been involved in a dispute with Clay’s husband, Bennie, from whom she was separated. Black shot Bennie Clay in the shoulder and was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment with work release permitted. When he was temporarily released, Black entered Angela’s Nashville dwelling on March 28, 1988.</p>
<p>Court records show that Black executed the family from point-blank range. Justia <a href="https://law.justia.com/cases/tennessee/supreme-court/1991/815-s-w-2d-166-2.html">summarizes</a> the findings below:</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><em>Investigation revealed the bodies of Angela and her nine year old daughter, Latoya, in the master bedroom. Angela, who was lying in the bed, had apparently been shot once in the top of the head as she slept and was rendered unconscious immediately and died within minutes. Dr. Charles Harlan, Chief Medical Examiner for Davidson County, testified that she was probably shot from a distance of six to twelve inches and that her gunshot wound was the type usually caused by a large caliber bullet.</em></p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><em>Latoya&#8217;s body was found partially on the bed and partially off the bed, wedged between the bed and a chest of drawers. She had been shot once through the neck and chest. Blood on her pillow and a bullet hole in the bedding indicated she had been lying on the bed when shot. Dr. Harlan testified that she was shot from a distance of greater than twenty-four inches from the skin surface. The bullet path and type of shot indicated that death was not instantaneous but likely occurred within three to ten minutes after her being shot. Bullet fragments were recovered from her left lung. Both victims were under the bedcovers when they were shot.</em></p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><em>The body of Lakeisha, age six, was found in the second bedroom lying facedown on the floor next to her bed. She had been shot twice, once in the chest, once in the pelvic area. Dr. Harlan testified that she had died from bleeding as a result of a gunshot wound to the chest. She was shot from a distance of six to twelve inches and died within five to thirty minutes after being shot. Abrasions on her arm indicated a bullet had grazed her as she sought to protect herself from the attacker. Bullet holes and blood stains on the bed indicated that she was lying in bed when shot and had moved from the bed to the floor after being shot. There were bloody finger marks down the rail running from the head of the bed to the foot of the bed.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>But the headlines focused on the legal battle fought over the execution of Black, after a judge ruled in July that his cardioverter-defibrillator should be deactivated to avoid causing him prolonged pain when he received a lethal injection of pentobarbital.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">On July 31, the Tennessee Supreme Court vacated a preliminary injunction that required the Tennessee Department of Corrections to deactivate Black’s cardioverter-defibrillator. Black’s attorneys filed requests for a stay of execution with the U.S. Supreme Court, claiming, among other contentions, that Black was at risk of a ​“prolonged” and ​“torturous” death. The Supreme Court denied all the stay applications on August 4.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">“This is hurting so bad,” Black <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/08/05/tennessee-execution-byron-black-heart-device-angela-clay/85523148007/">moaned</a> as he was dying, according to USA Today.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">“The fact that he was able to raise his head several times and express pain tells you that the pentobarbital was not acting the way that state’s experts claim it acts,” Black’s attorney Kelley Henry stated, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/05/tennessee-execute-inmate">adding</a>, “the state of Tennessee killed a gentle, kind, fragile, intellectually disabled man in a violation of the laws of our country simply because they could. No one in a position of power, certainly not the courts, was willing to stop them. What happened here was the result of pure, unbridled bloodlust and cowardice. It was the brutal and unchecked abuse of government power.”</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">“Henry had earlier unsuccessfully argued that Black shouldn’t be put to death due to his apparent intellectual disability,” the New York Post <a href="https://nypost.com/2025/08/05/us-news/tennessee-death-row-inmate-byron-black-cries-out-in-pain-during-lethal-injection-after-state-refused-to-deactivate-defibrillator-implant/">reported</a>.</p>
<p>The victim’s family says Black never apologized for his murders, and will take them to the grave with him.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">“His family is now going through the same thing we went through 37 years ago,” Clay’s sister, Linette Bell, said after the execution. “I can’t say I’m sorry because we never got an apology. He never apologized, and he never admitted it, even on his dying bed … He took it to his grave with him, and he knows he did it.”</p>

<script async src="https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js"></script>
<script async src="https://www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Vicious Killer Of Mother, Young Daughters Executed. Critics Say Death Caused Him Unnecessary Pain.

<p style="font-weight: 400;">Speaking alongside Texas Democrat legislators who fled their state in order to block the Texas GOP from pursuing redistricting, Illinois Democrat Governor J.B. Pritzker reached the zenith of hypocrisy, declaring that changing election maps in Illinois was “not something that I want to do,” while rhapsodizing, “We&#8217;re fighting for democracy.”</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Illinois <a href="https://twitter.com/GovPritzker?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@GovPritzker</a>: &#8220;Here in the state of Illinois, it is possible to redistrict. It&#8217;s not something that I want to do &#8230; We&#8217;re fighting for democracy. There are not rules anymore, apparently.&#8221; <a href="https://t.co/fvWnsaW1M2">pic.twitter.com/fvWnsaW1M2</a></p>
<p>— CSPAN (@cspan) <a href="https://twitter.com/cspan/status/1952760209434087518?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 5, 2025</a></p></blockquote>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Pritzker presided over a congressional redistricting in Illinois in 2021 that received an “F” for its partisanship from gerrymander.princeton.edu, a website that specializes in tracing gerrymandering across the nation.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">In 2018, in his first campaign for governor, Pritzker stressed the need for independent congressional and state legislative redistricting, <a href="https://www.nprillinois.org/statehouse/2021-04-27/gop-accuses-pritzker-of-breaking-campaign-promise-on-fair-maps">saying</a>, “We should amend the constitution to create an independent commission to draw legislative maps, but in the meantime, I would urge Democrats and Republicans to agree to an independent commission to handle creating a new legislative map.”</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">In January 2021, Pritzker reiterated that promise; his spokesman <a href="https://www.illinoispolicy.org/pritzker-breaks-promise-to-end-illinois-gerrymandering/">said</a> Pritzker “has been clear he <a href="https://www.sj-r.com/story/news/2021/01/05/illinois-house-republican-propose-redistricting-reform/6551834002/">will veto</a> a partisan map.” But by April 2021, he said he trusted state lawmakers — as both chambers of the state government were controlled by Democrats — to draw a fair redistricting map, claiming it was too late for an independent commission. Republican House leader Jim Durkin slammed Pritzker, saying he “seems to suffer from retrograde amnesia.”</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">U.S. Rep. Rodney Davis (R-IL) echoed, “Governor Pritzker lied to people of Illinois, plain and simple. When he was a candidate for Governor in 2018, Pritzker made an ironclad promise to voters that he would veto any redistricting proposal that was drawn by legislators. That turned out to be a lie. Now that he’s in power and the Democrats have maintained their supermajority control of the General Assembly, Pritzker is enabling a partisan redistricting process that will be used to tighten his party’s grip on power for another decade.”</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Illinois House Assistant Minority Leader Tim Butler (R-Springfield) pointed out Pritzker had previously said if there were not an amendment, he would support creating an independent commission. “Butler added that he has a bill ready to go, but Democrats have blocked the effort rather than Republicans as Pritzker now claims,” Illinois Policy reported.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">“I would say it’s your friends and the Democratic Party that are not engaging. And we need to have you hold to your word, governor, that you will veto, veto, a partisan map like your office has said,” Butler told the Illinois State House.</p>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script async src="https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js"></script>
<script async src="https://www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>

Mr. Hypocrisy: Pritzker Bashes Texas Maps, Forgets His Own Power Grabs In Illinois

<p style="font-weight: 400;">The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday unanimously rejected the Biden administration’s challenge to a Texas law requiring mail-in ballots to include a state identification number or partial Social Security number.</p>
<p>The law invalidates mail-in ballots that do not include the information.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">In September 2021, Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott signed the Election Integrity and Protection Act into law. It was immediately challenged by the Biden administration and other leftist groups, including the League of Women Voters, who claimed the law violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In November 2023, U.S. District Judge Xavier Rodriguez <a href="https://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/LaUnionDelPuebloEnteroetalvGregoryWAbbottetalDocketNo521cv00844WD/5?doc_id=X40B5HEB2GD95KRVH07PP7RUNCL">struck down</a> the provision of the Texas law requiring voters who used mail-in ballots to provide identification numbers.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">But last December, the 5th Circuit Court <a href="https://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/USAvPaxtonDocketNo23508855thCirDec052023CourtDocket/2?doc_id=X5HOV37ELCU86TASRM5FJ6HIJ3R">paused the 2023 injunction</a>, and on Monday, it dismissed the lower court’s claims. “Mail-in ballots are not secure,” staunch conservative Judge James Ho <a href="https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/23/23-50885-CV0.pdf">wrote</a>, adding that the law “fully complies with a provision of federal law known by the parties as the materiality provision of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. &#8230; The ID number requirement is obviously designed to confirm that each mail-in ballot voter is precisely who he claims he is. And that is plainly ‘material’ to determining whether such individual is qualified under State law to vote.”</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">“Merely requiring mail-in ballot applications to list the voter’s name and registration address triggers significant election security concerns. That information is easily available to anyone who simply requests it from Texas election officials — who readily provide copies of voter files with such information on request. As a result, any person can request and receive that information about a registered voter, use that information to apply for a mail-in ballot, and then cast the ballot, with minimal risk of detection,” he continued.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">“Plaintiffs insist that there isn’t enough evidence to show that the ID number requirement would meaningfully reduce voter fraud. Texas strongly disagrees. Our precedents compel us to side with Texas. We have made clear that States have a legitimate interest in combating voter fraud, and this enjoy ‘considerable discretion in deciding what is an adequate level of effectiveness to serve (their) important interests in voter integrity,” Ho concluded.</p>

<script async src="https://www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script async src="https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js"></script>

‘Mail-In Ballots Are Not Secure’: Court Gives Texas Green Light To Enforce Voter ID Law

<p style="font-weight: 400;">Famed conservative journalist Douglas Murray scored a major legal victory Tuesday, as a UK court dismissed a defamation lawsuit brought by a radical Islamist, ruling that the plaintiff “lied on significant issues” and presented evidence deemed “worthless.”</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
<p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Spectator and Douglas Murray win defamation claim brought by Mohammed Hijab <a href="https://t.co/VSK2Cgb58Z">https://t.co/VSK2Cgb58Z</a></p>
<p>&mdash; Douglas Murray (@DouglasKMurray) <a href="https://twitter.com/DouglasKMurray/status/1952717366359462057?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 5, 2025</a></p></blockquote>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">After Murray wrote a column in September 2022 in The Spectator that claimed Mohammed Hijab, whose legal name is Mohamad Nabil Hegab, “was a street agitator who, in the context of disturbances’ between local Muslims and Hindus,’ whipped up his followers and made disparaging comments about Hindus,” the court’s ruling explained, Hijab sued, claiming the article had caused reputational harm and loss of earnings.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">The judge dismissed Hijab’s defamation completely, <a href="https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/kb/2025/2043">writing</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><em>As a witness he was combative and constantly argumentative. He sought, at every turn, to debate with counsel, responding to questions with (rhetorical) questions of his own, arguing his case rather than giving straightforward responses, and denigrating the character of the second defendant to whom he bears palpable personal animosity. I am satisfied that he lied on significant issues, with the consequence that his evidence, overall, is worthless. Specifically, I am satisfied that he lied in respect of the event at Golders Green, the counter-protest at the rally for Israel, the seminar on Hinduism at the Sapience Institute, his repudiation of vigilantism, his evidence as to the involvement of the Hindutva, his evidence about his choice of language in his speech, and his evidence in support of his claim for financial losses.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">The Spectator <a href="https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-spectator-and-douglas-murray-win-defamation-claim-brought-by-mohammed-hijab/">reported</a>, “Hijab appeared to have invented contracts after Douglas’s article was published, in order to claim damages for their bogus cancellation. &#8230; The earnings Hijab claimed to have lost included a £3,500-a-month deal to be a brand ambassador for the charity One Ummah, a £1,500-a-month advertising contract with supplements company Nature’s Blends and £30,000 for a Ramadan fundraising campaign with the charity Salam. But messages that he relied on for these claims ‘have the appearance of being contrived for the purpose of these proceedings,’ the judge said.”</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Additionally, according to the court ruling, on May 23, 2021 — two and a half years before the Hamas October 7, 2023 massacre of Israelis — at a rally for Israel in the vicinity of the Israeli Embassy, Hijab grabbed a megaphone and “gave a speech to a group of men, many of whom were wearing masks and hoods.” He yelled, “The truth of the matter is we are with the brothers and sisters of Palestine, and we will get our vengeance in this dunya or the akhira. We will get our vengeance, and believe you me we believe in a god that is just, and we will get our justice either in this world or in the hereafter. And the difference between us and them is this … They think that life begins; for us, we believe that death begins. We believe that life begins at death. We don’t care about death. We love death.”</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">At one anti-Israel protest organized by Hijab, a protester declared, “We’ll find some Jews there. We want the Zionists. We want their blood,” the court reported.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">“Hijab sought to show that The Spectator had published something untrue,” The Spectator asserted. “He failed. But he also wanted to intimidate Douglas and the magazine. He sought damages of tens of thousands of pounds, and tried to recuperate his legal costs of hundreds of thousands of pounds. He attempted to use Britain’s legal system to silence journalists, and to paint himself as an upstanding citizen turned victim. This has backfired.”</p>

<script async src="https://www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script async src="https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js"></script>

Radical Islamist Sues Conservative Journalist, Loses Badly After Judge Slams ‘Worthless’ Testimony

<p style="font-weight: 400;">In an obvious attempt to portray their leftist darling, New York Democratic mayoral candidate, Zohran Mamdani, as palatable to New York’s Jewish population, despite Mamdani’s openly anti-Israel views, The New York Times ran a puff piece in which of the five people they quoted openly supporting him, two were part of his campaign. Two more were friendly with the anti-Israel groups, such as Jewish Voice for Peace or Jews for Racial and Economic Justice, and the fifth favored another erstwhile candidate, Brad Lander, over him.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
<p lang="en" dir="ltr">Of the 8 people this article quoted, 5 spoke positively about Mamdani. Of those, 2 were part of his campaign. Another 2 are from the anti-Israel Jewish Voice for Peace and JFREJ groups that already support Mamdani. The 5th ranked Lander ahead of him. </p>
<p>I think the New York Times… <a href="https://t.co/0t5r8jgMab">pic.twitter.com/0t5r8jgMab</a></p>
<p>&mdash; Hen Mazzig (@HenMazzig) <a href="https://twitter.com/HenMazzig/status/1952381025062920261?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 4, 2025</a></p></blockquote>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">In the piece, titled “<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/04/nyregion/zohran-mamdani-jewish-voters-gaza.html">Many Jewish Voters Back Mamdani. And Many Agree With Him on Gaza</a>,” the Times admitted, “It is difficult to determine how many Jewish voters supported Mr. Mamdani,” and acknowledged, “Neighborhoods with large numbers of Orthodox Jewish residents voted overwhelmingly for Mr. Cuomo. He also won other heavily Jewish areas like Riverdale in the Bronx. Still, the Times deflected, stating, “But Mr. Mamdani enjoyed a broad victory that suggests at least some backing from many different constituencies.”</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">To buttress their claim of significant Jewish support for Mamdani, the Times quoted a pro-Mamdani Manhattan bike mechanic who works as a canvasser for Mamdani, another canvasser for Mamdani, Mamdani’s communications director, a woman who attended an event for Jews for Racial and Economic Justice, a leftist group supporting Mamdani, a woman who said even Jews mad at Mamdani for his remarks  — which have included, as the Times noted, his endorsement of the view that Israel is conducting a genocide — would say they “couldn’t stand the Israeli government,”  and a woman rabbi from a leftist Jewish Reform synagogue.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Rabbi Marc Schneier, the founding senior rabbi of the Hampton Synagogue, declared, “Mamdani’s election is the greatest existential threat to a metropolitan Jewish population since the election of the notorious antisemite Karl Lueger in Vienna. Jewish leaders must come together as a united force to prevent a mass Jewish exodus from New York City.”</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">The Times’ notorious antisemitism has ranged from most recently running a misleading photo of a 20-month old child in Gaza and omitting the fact that he was suffering from a serious disease in order to paint a false picture of starvation (while eliding his three-year-old healthy brother from the photo), to <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/after-it-lied-about-israel-new-york-times-verification-badge-removed-by-x">lying</a> by reporting Israel bombed a hospital in Gaza, to lying in the past by <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/israel-hating-ny-times-calls-abbas-ouster-read-hank-berrien">stating</a> Palestinian Authority president Abbas favored a non-violent approach to Israel when it had been reported in August 2017 that Abbas insisted he would always <a href="https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/international/153840-170825-abbas-tells-us-he-won-t-stop-paying-terrorist-families">pay the families of murderous terrorists</a> who had been jailed by Israel, saying, “I don’t intend to cease payment for families of prisoner martyrs, even if it costs me my seat, I will continue to pay them until my last day.”</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">In the mid-twentieth century, the Times buried the Holocaust so it didn’t make the front pages, as described in “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Buried-Times-Holocaust-Important-Newspaper/dp/0521607825">Buried by the Times: The Holocaust and America’s Most Important Newspaper</a>.” In April 2019, the paper <a href="https://www.jns.org/opinion/why-does-the-new-york-times-incessantly-attack-israel/">published a cartoon</a> depicting former President Trump as a blind man wearing a skullcap while being led by Netanyahu, who was depicted as a dog on a leash with a Star of David collar.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">The Jewish Council for Public Affairs researched 107 editorials on Israel and Jews published in the Times since 2016; David Bernstein, president and CEO of the organization, accused the Times of “a decided institutional bias” against Israel. Roughly a decade ago, the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis (CAMERA) published a pamphlet titled “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Indicting-Israel-Coverage-Palestinian-Israeli-Conflict/dp/0966154878/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1356533395&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=indicting+israel">Indicting Israel: New York Times Coverage of the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict</a>,” that delineated the Times’ consistent bias against Israel.</p>

<script async src="https://www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script async src="https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js"></script>

NYT Claims, ‘Many Jewish Voters Back Mamdani.’ You Won’t Believe Who They Interviewed.

News

Air and Space

Extraterrestrial Life

Tulsi Gabbard

World

Salena Zito, author of "Butler: The Untold Story of the Near Assassination of Donald Trump and the Fight for America's Heartland," joins me for a riveting conversation detailing her experience of seeing President Trump nearly killed from feet away, as well as her optimism about Trump's presidency despite recent polling numbers.

Hour 1

The Andrew Klavan Show

The Woman Who Was FEET AWAY From Trump When He Was Shot | Salena Zito

We go through and break down Ohio State's 2025 football schedule; giving our record predictions. Let us know your thoughts in the comments, and don't miss all our season record predictions on our YouTube channel.

Crain & Company

OHIO STATE FOOTBALL 2025 Record Predictions

We go through and break down Ohio State's 2025 football schedule; giving our record predictions. Let us know your thoughts in the comments, and don't miss all our season record predictions on our YouTube channel.

Thanks for being a DailyWire+ member. This show is ad-free.

OHIO STATE FOOTBALL 2025 Record Predictions [Member Exclusive]

Country music artist and political commentator Alexis Wilkins shares her message of standing strong

Daily Wire News

Live: YAF's National Conservative Student Conference - Day 4 - Alexis Wilkins

CNN contributor and conservative strategist Scott Jennings brings a pragmatic, behind-the-scenes persepective at politics & media spin

Live: YAF's National Conservative Student Conference - Day 4 - Scott Jennings

DW Hosts Isabel Brown and Reagan Conrad take the stage at YAF’s National Conservative Student Conference with bold, inspiring messages for Gen Z conservatives. These two rising voices deliver truth, clarity, and fire for the next generation.

Menu

— News —

Gabbard Promises ‘Truth’ When Pressed On Potential Extraterrestrial Life

Create a free account to join the conversation!