<p>CNN Republican commentator Scott Jennings left Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-MI) sputtering her objections during a panel discussion after he laid out several of the more unpopular cultural issues behind which her party has thrown its support.</p>
<p>Dingell began by expressing a sentiment that a number of Democrats have in recent weeks, saying that it clearly was not enough of a strategy to simply oppose President Donald Trump or oppose Republicans — and that in order to win elections going forward, the Democratic Party needed to paint a clearer picture of what it stood for.</p>
<p><strong>WATCH:</strong></p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">.<a href="https://twitter.com/RepDebDingell?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RepDebDingell</a> says the Democrats need to stand for something — but they already do!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll defend the Democrats. They have taken an unyielding stand for:</p>
<p>✅Illegal aliens<br />
✅boys in girls sports<br />
✅higher taxes <a href="https://t.co/cjE1j8UJeC">pic.twitter.com/cjE1j8UJeC</a></p>
<p>— Scott Jennings (@ScottJenningsKY) <a href="https://twitter.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1929183016737280028?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 1, 2025</a></p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Democrats have to stop being &#8216;against Donald Trump&#8217; and start being &#8216;for&#8217; something,&#8221; she said.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;ll defend the Democrats,&#8221; Jennings replied. &#8220;They are for things. Illegal aliens. You&#8217;re for boys in girls&#8217; sports. I mean, you are for things. And that&#8217;s why you have such struggles right now in your party, because you&#8217;re not for anything that&#8217;s on the right side of any of the 80-20 issues that are driving this cultural divide in America.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/?utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial&amp;utm_campaign=memorial&amp;utm_content=editorialmemorialday&amp;_gl=1*1qdq03s*_gcl_au*MTYyNDg0MTE0OS4xNzQxODk4NTMz*_ga*MTEzOTk1NjkxNi4xNzI2MzI1MDQz*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*czE3NDgzNzg2NDgkbzEwMDMkZzEkdDE3NDgzODEwMTckajU4JGwwJGgw" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><b data-stringify-type="bold">Get 40% Off New DailyWire+ Annual Memberships</b></a></p>
<p>Jennings then pivoted to address the Democratic Party&#8217;s bench going into the next presidential election cycle, and he conceded that he saw some talent in Governor Wes Moore (D-MD).</p>
<p>&#8220;The other person who spoke in South Carolina, Tim Walz, is a special mixture of extreme buffoonery and a mean spirit, which is a toxic brew,&#8221; Jennings continued. &#8220;He is not the future of the Democratic Party. Moore is interesting. Moore is interesting, probably more interesting than some of the radicals you have out there, Crockett, AOC, I mean those are the true leaders of your party right now —&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s not true — I&#8217;m not gonna even let you —&#8221; Dingell attempted to push back.</p>

<script async src="https://www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script async src="https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js"></script>

CNN Panel Gets Heated As Republican Reveals What Dems Really ‘Stand For’

CONTINUE READING

<p>House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) has issued a subpoena compelling former White House physician Kevin O&#8217;Connor to testify on Capitol Hill at the end of June.</p>
<p>A probe into the Biden White House — and any attempts that were made to hide the former president&#8217;s physical and cognitive decline from the American people — was announced earlier in the week. The investigation will also explore the extensive use of an autopen during Biden&#8217;s presidency, with particular attention paid to whether or not Biden was aware of what was being signed when the autopen was in use.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">🚨 COMER SUBPOENAS BIDEN&#8217;S DOCTOR TO TESTIFY ON AUTOPEN AND MENTAL DECLINE SCANDAL!</p>
<p>&#8220;The Committee expressed its interest in whether your financial relationship with the Biden family affected your assessment of former President Biden’s physical and mental fitness to fulfill his… <a href="https://t.co/ynYm8j0iuC">pic.twitter.com/ynYm8j0iuC</a></p>
<p>— Oversight Committee (@GOPoversight) <a href="https://twitter.com/GOPoversight/status/1930735148708032954?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 5, 2025</a></p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;<span class="r-b88u0q">COMER SUBPOENAS BIDEN&#8217;S DOCTOR TO TESTIFY ON AUTOPEN AND MENTAL DECLINE SCANDAL!&#8221; the X post from the Oversight Committee read.</span></p>
<p>The remainder of the message was directed at O&#8217;Connor, noting that the Committee had already requested that he appear voluntarily to address the issues at hand. Since he had refused to do so, the subpoena was the next logical step toward getting the necessary information.</p>
<p>Comer directed a <a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/2025.05.06-Subpoena-Cover-Letter-to-Dr.-Kevin-OConnor.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">letter</a> to O&#8217;Connor, which stated in part, &#8220;On May 22, 2025, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform requested that you — because of your role as former Physician to the President for President Joe Biden — appear for a transcribed interview on June 25, 2025, broadly regarding ‘the circumstances surrounding your assessment in February 2024 that former President Biden was ‘a healthy, active, robust 81-year-old male, who remains fit to successfully execute the duties of the Presidency.’&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://get.dailywire.com/gift/?utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=wisepops&amp;utm_campaign=dad&amp;utm_content=fathersdaygiftpopups" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>Gift Dad an All Access Membership. Use code DAD40 at checkout to save 40%!</strong></a></p>
<p>&#8220;The Committee expressed its interest in whether your financial relationship with the Biden family affected your assessment of former President Biden’s physical and mental fitness to fulfill his duties as President,&#8221; the letter continued. &#8220;Given your connections with the Biden family, the Committee sought to understand if you contributed to an effort to hide former President Biden’s fitness to serve from the American people. You refused the Committee’s request.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;On June 4, 2025, your counsel responded to the Committee’s request for testimony. Instead of complying with the Committee’s legitimate request, they wrote that you &#8216;cannot appear for the requested interview,&#8217; citing your legal obligations pursuant to &#8216;the provisions of D.C. Code § 14-407 [sic],&#8217; your ethical obligations pursuant to &#8216;Principal No. IV of the Code of Ethics of the American Medical Association (AMA),&#8217; and the &#8216;physician-patient privilege.&#8217; These arguments lack merit.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;To advance the Committee’s oversight and legislative responsibilities and interests, your testimony is critical,&#8221; Comer concluded. &#8220;Accordingly, please see the attached subpoena for testimony at a deposition on June 27, 2025.&#8221;</p>

<script async src="https://www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script async src="https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js"></script>

Congress Hits Biden’s Doc With Subpoena As Part Of Cover-Up Probe

<p>The attorney representing Mohamed Sabry Soliman — the terrorist charged with firebombing a peaceful pro-Israel demonstration in Boulder, Colorado — was reportedly barred from practicing law just six years earlier over what was described as “misconduct concerning an immigration matter.”</p>
<p>The Federalist’s Sean Davis shared the story in a post on X, explaining that attorney Susanna Dvortsin had been reprimanded by the South Dakota Supreme Court and barred from practicing law in that state in 2019.</p>
<p>“Guess who was banned from practicing law in 2019 for immigration misconduct? The attorney for the illegal immigrant family of the Egyptian terrorist who set a bunch of Jews on fire in Colorado.&#8221;</p>
<p>In 2019, the South Dakota Supreme Court prohibited Susanna Dvortsin from practicing law in the state due to ‘misconduct concerning an immigration matter,’” Davis began.</p>
<p>&#8220;The U.S. Department of Justice went even further in 2019 and banned Dvortsin from practicing law before the Department of Homeland Security,” he added.</p>
<p>The statement from the Justice Department read, “[Dvortsin] is immediately suspended from the practice of law before the Board [of Immigration Appeals], the Immigration Courts, or the DHS.”</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
<p lang="en" dir="ltr">Guess who was banned from practicing law in 2019 for immigration misconduct? The attorney for the illegal immigrant family of the Egyptian terrorist who set a bunch of Jews on fire in Colorado. </p>
<p>In 2019, the South Dakota Supreme Court prohibited Susanna Dvortsin from practicing… <a href="https://t.co/cUgJVnjmK0">pic.twitter.com/cUgJVnjmK0</a></p>
<p>&mdash; Sean Davis (@seanmdav) <a href="https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1930421323794198765?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 5, 2025</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Davis included a screenshot of a news story revealing that Dvortsin was the attorney representing Soliman and his family as President Donald Trump’s administration attempts to prosecute Soliman and facilitate the deportation of the rest of his family.</p>
<p><a href="https://get.dailywire.com/gift/?utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=wisepops&amp;utm_campaign=dad&amp;utm_content=fathersdaygiftpopups" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>Gift Dad an All Access Membership. Use code DAD40 at checkout to save 40%!</strong></a></p>
<p>He also included a screenshot of  the decision rendered by the Board of Immigration Appeals, which did not detail the nature of the “misconduct,” but affirmed the South Dakota Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling to bar her from practicing for 115 days and stated that she should also be barred from practicing law before the Board, DHS, or Immigration Courts. The order also stated that Dvortsin was to notify all parties in any pending cases set to go before those designated bodies of her suspension.</p>

<script async src="https://www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script async src="https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js"></script>

Lawyer For Colorado Terrorist Previously Banned From Practicing Over ‘Immigration Misconduct’

<p>Whoopi Goldberg came unglued during Thursday’s broadcast of “The View” on ABC, claiming even after living through all eight years of former President Barack Obama’s time in office, people keep telling her America “can’t elect a black man.”</p>
<p>Goldberg made the comment while complaining about the fact that, at least in her mind, Governor Wes Moore (D-MD) was not getting the kind of national buzz that she thought he deserved.</p>
<p>She began by claiming that she herself was so independent politically that even the term “independent” did not go far enough to describe her.</p>
<p>WATCH:</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
<p lang="en" dir="ltr">What century is Whoopi Goldberg living in?<br />Whoopi whines that no one is taking Maryland Governor Wes Moore (D) seriously for president because, &quot;You can&#39;t elect a black man.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/E8aanz7Qln">pic.twitter.com/E8aanz7Qln</a></p>
<p>&mdash; Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) <a href="https://twitter.com/NickFondacaro/status/1930645430368440670?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 5, 2025</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Sunny Hostin began the conversation, saying that Goldberg, to her knowledge, had “been independent for a while.”</p>
<p>&#8220;There’s no name for what I am,” Goldberg replied, prompting laughter from the audience as she went on to explain her point further. “There’s no name. Because there are some things that fit what I want and some things that don’t. And I am the crazy person who said, ‘Why don’t we have a Democratic president and a Republican vice president?’”</p>
<p>Her cohosts recalled that she had, in fact, suggested that arrangement in the past.</p>
<p><a href="https://get.dailywire.com/gift/?utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=wisepops&amp;utm_campaign=dad&amp;utm_content=fathersdaygiftpopups" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>Gift Dad an All Access Membership. Use code DAD40 at checkout to save 40%!</strong></a></p>
<p>“I believe that the only way to get stuff done is to have both parties represented at the same time — and people keep telling me I’m crazy,” she continued.</p>
<p>Goldberg went on to mention Moore, calling him a “perfect candidate” — and cohost Sara Haines agreed, interjecting, “I love Wes Moore.”</p>
<p>“But people are saying, ‘You can’t elect a black man,’” Goldberg complained, asking, “Why not?”</p>
<p>Her cohosts pointed out that the United States had elected a black man — former President Obama — twice, and while Goldberg conceded the point, she claimed that had done nothing to deter the people who continued to tell her that such a thing could not be done.</p>

<script async src="https://www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script async src="https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js"></script>

Whoopi Comes Unglued, Says People Keep Telling Her ‘You Can’t Elect A Black Man’ In America

<p>Longtime Democratic strategist James Carville claimed during a recent podcast episode that he knew of &#8220;wealthy Jewish donors&#8221; who were willing to sell out to literal &#8220;national socialists&#8221; as log as it preserved &#8220;their f***ing tax cuts.&#8221;</p>
<p>Carville made the claim during a recent episode of his &#8220;Politics War Room&#8221; podcast, while complaining about the number of wealthy Jewish Americans who refused to back the Democratic Party in the wake of antisemitic protests in places such as Columbia University.</p>
<p><strong>WATCH:</strong></p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
<p lang="en" dir="ltr">James Carville launches into an unhinged rant, accusing wealthy Jewish donors of not wanting to give him money for the Democrat Party at fundraisers over rampant college campus anti-Semitism. Carville claims Jews will vote for Nazis just to “get their f-cking tax cuts.” <a href="https://t.co/gM5EYHWlaQ">pic.twitter.com/gM5EYHWlaQ</a></p>
<p>&mdash; Bad Hombre (@joma_gc) <a href="https://twitter.com/joma_gc/status/1930416988788035950?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 5, 2025</a></p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;ll tell you who this exposes in a more profound way,&#8221; Carville began. &#8220;And I hear this all the time. A lot of — you go to try to raise money from really wealthy Jewish fundraisers, and they say, &#8216;Look, James, I&#8217;m a Democrat but I can&#8217;t be a part of the party because of what happened at Columbia.'&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;What the f*** did the Democrats have to do with what happened at Columbia, by the way?&#8221; Carville asked, making no mention of the fact that multiple elected Democrats had defended the antisemitic protests — that ultimately spread across many American college campuses — from the very beginning. &#8220;They have some students at Columbia that f***ing, you know, generally made an ass of themselves.&#8221;</p>
<p>He pivoted back to the wealthy Jewish donors then, saying, &#8220;&#8216;Well, I can&#8217;t do that, but I can be for a party that everybody endorses the alternative for Deutschland&#8217; — read: the modern incarnation of national socialism, if you will. And I just find these kind of people — literally, my instinct is, they tell me that, look me right in the eye, and I — &#8216;No, you just want your f***ing tax cut.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Most Jewish people see right through that,&#8221; Carville added. &#8220;But the ones that don&#8217;t see through it, they just don&#8217;t really — at the end of the day, they just want their f***ing tax cuts.&#8221;</p>

<script async src="https://www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script async src="https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js"></script>

James Carville Claims ‘Wealthy Jewish Donors’ Will Vote For Nazis If It Saves ‘Their F***ing Tax Cuts’

<p>President Donald Trump&#8217;s tariffs have driven a massive drop in the trade deficit — going from nearly $140 billion in March to $61.6 billion in April.</p>
<p>According to the latest numbers, which were detailed during a Thursday morning broadcast on CNBC, the sharp drop in the trade deficit also fueled a significant bump in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) — the Atlanta Fed GDP now was at 4.64%.</p>
<p>&#8220;The big news is there is how much it bolsters GDP — just look at Atlanta Fed GDP now, which is at 4.64%,&#8221; the anchor noted.</p>
<p><strong>WATCH:</strong></p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
<p lang="en" dir="ltr">CNBC: In April, the U.S. trade deficit fell to $61.6 billion — cut by more than HALF compared to March&#39;s $138.3 billion.</p>
<p>&quot;The big news is there is how much it bolsters GDP — just look at Atlanta Fed GDP now, which is at 4.64%.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/9R8hHlC9d6">pic.twitter.com/9R8hHlC9d6</a></p>
<p>&mdash; Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapidResponse47/status/1930610746276172238?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 5, 2025</a></p></blockquote>
<p>A New York Times report digging into some of the latest numbers indicated that the March trade deficit may have been slightly artificially inflated as imports surged to get ahead of the tariffs that everyone knew were coming. In addition, the NYT also noted the fact that the drop in the trade deficit almost exclusively reflected a decrease in imports — meaning that as production picked up domestically, that could also drive the deficit even lower.</p>
<p>President Trump celebrated the drop in the trade deficit one week earlier, playing video from another CNBC broadcast in the Oval Office.</p>
<p>&#8220;Personal income is up 0.8%. That is almost triple the expectation. The income numbers, really for the first four months of the year, they’re stellar. They’re really stellar. I mean, I could go back and look at the first four months of many different years, really very strong numbers,&#8221; anchor Rick Santelli said at the time.</p>
<p>&#8220;How the hell did they already fix the trade deficit? Or not fix it, but to cut it in half? That&#8217;s crazy,&#8221; Joe Kernen added.</p>
<p>&#8220;Yeah, I’ll tell you what, it really does call into question some of the conventional wisdoms. And you know it’s going to be interesting to see what happens next month, when we get this number, or we see some of the other numbers—like current accounts—see how they fared. Because I don’t know, I’ve been watching these numbers a long time. I don’t think I’ve ever seen the trade deficit cut in half for one month,&#8221; Santelli concluded.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
<p lang="en" dir="ltr">Trump Shows Off CNBC Touting Tariffs: &quot;How The Hell Did They Cut Trade Deficit In Half In One Month?&quot;<a href="https://t.co/RxWqWZSXdQ">https://t.co/RxWqWZSXdQ</a> <a href="https://t.co/FAzREzstRk">pic.twitter.com/FAzREzstRk</a></p>
<p>&mdash; RCP Video (@rcpvideo) <a href="https://twitter.com/rcpvideo/status/1928519212584009990?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 30, 2025</a></p></blockquote>

<script async src="https://www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script async src="https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js"></script>

‘Cut By More Than Half’: CNBC Details Massive Tariff-Driven Drop In Trade Deficit

<p>Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer made an attempt at renaming the Republican-led One Big Beautiful Bill on Wednesday, and the wave of backlash was almost immediate.</p>
<p>Schumer declared that President Donald Trump and Republicans were &#8220;lying&#8221; about what the bill would actually do — and claimed that a better name for it would be the &#8220;Well, We&#8217;re All Going To Die Act.&#8221; He then proceeded to argue that passing the bill would strip health care from 14 million Americans, cut 11 million people off from accessible food, and fund &#8220;tax cuts for billionaires on the backs of families.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>WATCH:</strong></p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">UNHINGED: <a href="https://twitter.com/SenSchumer?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SenSchumer</a> says &#8220;WE&#8217;RE ALL GOING TO DIE&#8221; if we pass the largest tax cut in history, block illegals from taxpayer-funded health care, and cut the deficit.</p>
<p>These are NOT serious people. <a href="https://t.co/AFeiDuaYjR">pic.twitter.com/AFeiDuaYjR</a></p>
<p>— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapidResponse47/status/1930308888437403877?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 4, 2025</a></p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Here&#8217;s the &#8216;We Are All Going To Die Act,'&#8221; Schumer read from his visual aid.</p>
<p>Critics quickly pointed out that if Americans died every time Democrats claimed that the passage of some Republican-led measure would kill them, most would have already been killed several times over.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m already dead from Net Neutrality, climate change, sequestration, and building a wall,&#8221; one said.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">I&#8217;m already dead from Net Neutrality, climate change, sequestration, and building a wall <a href="https://t.co/ITMUcnv5vU">https://t.co/ITMUcnv5vU</a></p>
<p>— Sarah (@sarah_wxtx) <a href="https://twitter.com/sarah_wxtx/status/1930328460955922693?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 4, 2025</a></p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;I was murdered by the repeal of Net Neutrality,&#8221; another said.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">I was murdered by the repeal of Net Neutrality <a href="https://t.co/6hoEh9SmAI">https://t.co/6hoEh9SmAI</a></p>
<p>— Fusilli Spock (@awstar11) <a href="https://twitter.com/awstar11/status/1930333466446704709?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 4, 2025</a></p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Doesn’t this act get old? Everyone was going to die if we repealed net neutrality. Passing a Georgia law that expanded voter access was going to bring back segregation. Passing tax cuts will kill everyone. Even the emotional value is gone because no one takes it seriously,&#8221; AG Hamilton posted.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Doesn’t this act get old?</p>
<p>Everyone was going to die if we repealed net neutrality. Passing a Georgia law that expanded voter access was going to bring back segregation. Passing tax cuts will kill everyone.</p>
<p>Even the emotional value is gone because no one takes it seriously. <a href="https://t.co/nZ8fQUt4yI">https://t.co/nZ8fQUt4yI</a></p>
<p>— AG (@AGHamilton29) <a href="https://twitter.com/AGHamilton29/status/1930324886863417441?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 4, 2025</a></p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;It really is like the Reason video when they mocked these clowns for saying &#8216;people will die&#8217; anytime a Republican proposed anything,&#8221; <a href="https://x.com/ProfessorF/status/1930356764136092033">another said</a>, sharing the video.</p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="Remy: People Will Die!" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/eXWhbUUE4ko?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>&#8220;No one should ever &#8211; ever &#8211; take these people seriously ever again ever,&#8221; CNN Republican pundit Scott Jennings concluded.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">No one should ever &#8211; ever &#8211; take these people seriously ever again ever. <a href="https://t.co/x5epm89Qp5">https://t.co/x5epm89Qp5</a></p>
<p>— Scott Jennings (@ScottJenningsKY) <a href="https://twitter.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1930323003818090905?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 4, 2025</a></p></blockquote>

<script async src="https://www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script async src="https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js"></script>

Chuck Schumer Renames Big Beautiful Bill, And No One’s Amused: ‘These Are Not Serious People’

News

Media

Politics

Scott Jennings

State of the Union

​​Tinder is experiencing a dip in paying subscribers. In what appears to be an attempt to boost sales, especially among the female demographic, they are rolling out a new feature: a height filter. These already superficial apps have just become even more miserable.

Hour 1

The Comments Section with Reagan Conrad

Tinder Just Declared War On Short Kings

Tinder Just Declared War On Short Kings [Member Exclusive]

In a stunning turn, the once-unstoppable alliance between President Donald Trump and DOGE founder Elon Musk has erupted into a public war of words. What caused the fracture? And how will this chaos affect the looming vote on Trump’s make-or-break “Big, Beautiful Bill”? Ben Shapiro dissects the feud, the fallout, and what it all means for the future of the America First movement.

The Ben Shapiro Show

Ben Reacts: Trump vs Elon: What The Hell Is Going On?

On3 and co-owner of DawsHQ joins the show for an early look preview into Georgia's 2025 season. Let us know your thoughts in the comments!

Menu

— News —

CNN Panel Gets Heated As Republican Reveals What Dems Really ‘Stand For’

Create a free account to join the conversation!