In yet another example of lawless judicial activism, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an injunction against President Trump’s travel and refugee ban.
The court justifies the standing given to the plaintiffs, as they said that there was “concrete” harm for an Egyptian-American citizen whose Syrian mother-in-law would be prevented from coming to the United States because of the travel ban. The court also ruled that the other plaintiff, the state of Hawaii, had standing based on the notion that the travel ban would cause harm to its state university and prevent the state from letting in refugees on its own.
.png)
.png)
