As Michigan lawmakers debate next year&#8217;s budget, the Democratic lieutenant governor — who&#8217;s running for governor in 2026 — floated an idea to hit back at some of the Trump administration&#8217;s spending cuts and get more money into the state government&#8217;s coffers: raise taxes on the wealthiest Trump supporters.
In a video obtained by The Daily Wire, Lt. Gov. Garlin Gilchrist told a group of Democrats earlier this month that the Trump administration has &#8220;attacked our people&#8221; by cutting funding to universities and &#8220;attacking those of us who are getting our health care from Medicaid.&#8221; Gilchrist made the remarks during a video call with the Kent County, Michigan, Democratic Party on August 13 as he gears up for a competitive Democratic primary in the 2026 Michigan governor&#8217;s race.
&#8220;We&#8217;re going to fight back and say, &#8216;Hell no, we&#8217;re not going to accept that,'&#8221; Gilchrist added. &#8220;And frankly, it pisses me off that we don&#8217;t have enough money in Michigan to be able to afford to backfill this $1.1 billion hole we&#8217;ve blown in the budget. I know how we could get a little bit more of that money — if we actually tax the wealthiest mega MAGA rich people in this state &#8230; if we actually went after the biggest companies that got a tax cut from [former Republican Governor] Rick Snyder and the Republicans.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
In a video I&#8217;ve obtained for <a href="https://twitter.com/realDailyWire?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDailyWire</a>, Michigan Lt. Gov. Garlin Gilchrist — a top candidate for governor — tells a group of Democrats via video call that he wants to raise taxes on a specific political class: &#8220;mega MAGA rich people.&#8221; <a href="https://t.co/2rsPUCgFDK">pic.twitter.com/2rsPUCgFDK</a>
— Zach Jewell (@zach_d_jewell) <a href="https://twitter.com/zach_d_jewell/status/1961099735743557634?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 28, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Raising taxes on some people based on their political leanings wouldn&#8217;t be possible and would run into numerous legal issues if it were even attempted. Gilchrist&#8217;s suggestion to hit wealthy Trump supporters with higher taxes is also a questionable political tactic, given that Michigan is a swing state that President Trump won in both 2016 and 2024.
The lieutenant governor&#8217;s comments, however, played well with the Democratic base, as the audience broke out into applause and cheers when Gilchrist suggested taxing wealthy Trump supporters. In the video, Gilchrist calls into the meeting from an airport in New York City despite the Kent County Democratic Party <a href="https://midems.controlshift.app/events/kent-dems-august-2025-monthly-meeting?partner=kent-county-democratic-party&amp;source=facebook-share-button&amp;time=1754939773&amp;utm_source=facebook&amp;share=ac60ac7d-0558-48bf-a953-e21fa4e54b6f&amp;fbclid=IwY2xjawMIbFVleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHouCBhh02s5zXqIir3YTKs5Y9jSlIg_Y_sBS2GI86HNcKWrnwXnL_WB4Mho0_aem_fMy07Q0O2DqWgzEbplvKxg">saying</a> that the &#8220;Social Hour&#8221; would be &#8220;hosted&#8221; by the lieutenant governor.
The $1.1 billion figure referenced by Gilchrist refers to a report released last month by the Citizens Research Council of Michigan, which claims that because of Trump&#8217;s &#8220;Big, Beautiful Bill,&#8221; the state will have to come up with a massive chunk of money to make up for Trump&#8217;s cuts to Medicaid and SNAP food benefits, according to <a href="https://bridgemi.com/michigan-government/report-big-beautiful-bill-will-blow-11-billion-hole-michigan-budget/">Bridge Michigan</a>. The report <a href="https://crcmich.org/publications/the-one-big-beautiful-bill-act-and-its-impact-on-michigans-budget">stated</a> that Michigan &#8220;will need to cut around $1.1 billion in General Fund/General Purpose appropriations from the FY2026 Executive Budget proposal.&#8221;
Republican state Rep. Ann Bollin, however, told The Daily Wire that the House has put forward a plan that incorporates all of the federal guidelines under the &#8220;Big, Beautiful Bill,&#8221; such as the work requirements for Medicaid and SNAP, without putting the state in a financial hole.
&#8220;We have managed to build a budget that takes into account what those federal requirements are,&#8221; Bollin said. &#8220;Those federal requirements are not extensive. I mean, they are work requirements. That is not a high threshold.&#8221;
&#8220;We&#8217;re implementing the research and development tax credit, we&#8217;re incorporating the $250 million that the feds are giving us for rural hospitals. We are offering relief to individuals with the elimination of taxes on tips, overtime, and social security,&#8221; Bollin continued.
She added that it&#8217;s good for the Trump administration to implement work requirements for programs like SNAP, saying that &#8220;Michigan has to address its very high SNAP error rate,&#8221; and root out fraud.
&#8220;I think we&#8217;re going to find that this budget is going to deliver on protecting the most vulnerable and keeping within some financial constraints, but also that it&#8217;s fiscally sustainable for us as a state,&#8221; Bollin said.
The Michigan legislature is currently negotiating a budget for fiscal year 2026, which begins on October 1. Lawmakers have already passed the July 1 statutory deadline to present a budget plan to the governor, as the Democrat-controlled state Senate and Republican-controlled state House work to get something passed, The Detroit Free Press <a href="https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/2025/08/26/whitmer-budget-negotiations-shutdown-brinks-hall/85813967007/">reported</a>.
While Gilchrist is suggesting raising taxes on Michigan residents, Republicans have proposed slashing state government spending. On Tuesday, Michigan House Republicans, led by Republican Speaker Matt Hall, unveiled a $78.5 billion budget proposal that would cut state government jobs and spending, while still putting forward a $3 billion plan for fixing the roads, an issue that Democratic Governor Gretchen Whitmer said must be included in any budget proposal.
Michigan currently has a flat 4.25% income tax for all residents and a 6% corporate income tax, with a 1.8% alternative rate for small businesses. Last year, under Democratic leadership, the income tax increased from 4.05% to 4.25%.
The Gilchrist campaign has not responded to a Daily Wire inquiry asking how much Gilchrist wants to raise taxes on Michigan&#8217;s wealthiest Trump supporters.

Garlin Gilchrist/Trump supporters

Top Dem Gov Candidate Proposes Tax Hike On ‘Mega MAGA Rich People’ To Fix Potential Budget Hit

Democrats

MAGA

Michigan

Taxes

Trump Supporters

President Donald Trump warned Monday that countries imposing digital taxes on American tech companies will face significant tariffs if they don&#8217;t remove them.
Without naming a specific country, Trump said that some nations had given a “complete pass” to China’s tech companies while penalizing American competitors. Some countries, like Canada and India, have already backed away from digital taxes after pressure from the Trump administration. 
“As the President of the United States, I will stand up to Countries that attack our incredible American Tech Companies. Digital Taxes, Digital Services Legislation, and Digital Markets Regulations are all designed to harm, or discriminate against, American Technology,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. 
“This must end, and end NOW! With this TRUTH, I put all Countries with Digital Taxes, Legislation, Rules, or Regulations, on notice that unless these discriminatory actions are removed, I, as President of the United States, will impose substantial additional Tariffs on that Country&#8217;s Exports to the U.S.A., and institute Export restrictions on our Highly Protected Technology and Chips,” he added. “America, and American Technology Companies, are neither the ‘piggy bank’ nor the ‘doormat’ of the World any longer. Show respect to America and our amazing Tech Companies or, consider the consequences!”
<a href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/?utm_campaign=summer&amp;utm_content=editorialsummersale&amp;utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial" target="_blank" rel="noopener">End of Summer Sale – Get 40% off New DailyWire+ Annual Memberships</a>
In June, Canada <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/canada-caves-digital-tax-on-u-s-tech-scrapped-after-trump-pressure">rescinded</a> its Digital Service Tax as part of ongoing trade negotiations with the United States. The tax would have hit American tech companies like Amazon, Google, Meta, and Apple hard, and could have cost American businesses up to $2.3 billion annually. 
India also <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/india/india-proposes-remove-equalisation-levy-digital-services-government-source-says-2025-03-25/">backed away</a> from a 6% digital advertising tax in April after pressure from American officials. 
Many European countries, like France and Switzerland, have <a href="https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/eu/digital-services-taxes-europe/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">implemented</a> digital taxes, while others, like Belgium and the Netherlands, are considering implementing them. France taxes major tech companies 3% on revenue from digital services and targeted advertising. 
In the trade deal between the European Union and the United States, both entities agreed to address “unjustified digital trade barriers.” 
“In that respect, The European Union confirms that it will not adopt or maintain network usage fees,” the framework said. “The United States and the European Union will not impose customs duties on electronic transmissions.”
It is unclear if the agreement will address digital service taxes.

President Trump Signs Executive Orders In The Oval Office Of The White House

Trump To Foreign Governments: Drop Taxes On Big Tech Or Face ‘Consequences’

Trump To Foreign Governments: Drop Taxes On Big Tech Or Face 'Consequences'

China

Donald Trump

Economy

European Union

Executive

Politics

Tariffs

Technology

Trade War

The Trump administration appears to be all in on investing in American workers and our domestic manufacturing sector.
Just this week, the president <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/pittsburgh/news/trump-energy-ai-summit-pittsburgh-carnegie-mellon/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">traveled to Pittsburgh</a> to announce a historic $90 billion investment in energy and artificial intelligence that will spur much-needed economic development after decades of manufacturing decline. The Federal Trade Commission <a href="https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/ftc-declares-july-made-usa-month" target="_blank" rel="noopener">declared</a> July “Made in the USA” Month, pledging to educate consumers, celebrate domestic manufacturers, and crack down on the misuse of the patriotic label.
These are positive developments, but they may all be for naught. Because right now, “Made in America” doesn’t mean much of anything.
“Made in America” was once a laudable promise that stood for quality, grit, and jobs. Americans were proud to buy goods produced at home, and as recently as 2009, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/20/business/worldbusiness/20iht-wbmake.1.20332814.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">65%</a> of the products Americans bought were made by American producers.
Somewhere along the way, however, “Made in America” was hijacked by marketing departments and manipulated by corporations seeking to capitalize on patriotism while outsourcing the work overseas.
Today, “Made in America” labels are everywhere, but thanks to an ambiguous definition of the term, only <a href="https://netchoice.org/made-in-the-usa-three-factors-retailers-should-consider/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">11%</a> of goods sold in this country are actually made by American manufacturers. It’s high time that the FTC fixes its definition and works to reward companies that actually make products here.
The “Made in America” label is on everything from toolboxes to t-shirts. But take a closer look, and odds are the guts of that product were made overseas. American workers might have put the final touch on it, but should that qualify as “domestic manufacturing”?
This is a fraud on the American consumer. Worse, it’s a fraud that we’re subsidizing.
Billions in taxpayer-funded energy credits, tech subsidies, and manufacturing incentives are being awarded to companies that have figured out how to game the system. They ship in foreign components, do the bare minimum of assembly here, and collect the “Made in USA” bonus, all while undercutting the very supply chains we’re supposed to be rebuilding.
Solar panels have become the poster child for this shell game. For years, America didn’t produce a single solar crystalline cell, which is the key piece that actually converts sunlight into energy. But that didn’t stop companies from building flashy American facilities to bolt together foreign-made parts and claim the whole thing as “domestic manufacturing.” Meanwhile, jobs and genuine value are still being outsourced overseas.
The FTC <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/complying-made-usa-standard">says</a> “Made in America” should mean “all or virtually all” of a product is made here. Yet in practice, there’s little enforcement and even less clarity. “Assembled in America” is a catch-all term with so many loopholes you could drive a cargo ship through it. Companies are only too happy to exploit this confusion, especially when paired with hefty tax breaks.
Every time the federal government rewards these tactics, it’s sending your hard-earned dollars abroad. We undermine American manufacturers who play by the rules. We leave our supply chains vulnerable. And we trick millions of patriotic consumers who are trying to do the right thing by buying American.
This is how the United States loses industries. Not in some sudden collapse, but by letting the definition of “American-made” get so watered down that it becomes meaningless.
In order to reward deserving companies, the FTC needs to redefine its “Made in America” standard and actually enforce it. It should mean what it says. The core components, which give a product its value, have to be sourced as well as assembled here.
The FTC should also start cracking down by doing more than merely issuing guidance. It needs to slap punitive fines on companies abusing the label and misleading consumers.
Incentives should be reworked so that clean energy credits and manufacturing subsidies are tiered. Full credit for full domestic content. Partial credit for partial effort. No more handing out taxpayer dollars for companies doing the bare minimum.
Finally, the FTC needs to give consumers transparency. Labels should clearly show where the guts of a product come from to enable Americans to make informed choices.
If Washington can’t get this right, we frankly have no business talking about rebuilding anything. “Made in America” shouldn’t be a marketing gimmick. It has to be once again a badge of honor, earned by companies that invest, hire, and build here. To restore American manufacturing, we must stop rewarding fake patriotism and start standing up for the real thing.
Bret Manley is executive director of the <a href="https://eftc.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Energy Fair Trade Coalition</a>. He is a retired Naval Intelligence Officer and previously worked on Capitol Hill as chief of staff to a senior member of the Congressional Climate Solutions Caucus. Follow on X: <a href="https://x.com/bretmanley" target="_blank" rel="noopener">@bretmanley</a>.
<div>
<div id="post-body-text">
<div class="ep1tdco0 css-fgibv1">
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.
</div>
</div>
</div>

Operations Inside The Ford Motor Co. Kentucky Truck Manufacturing Facility

‘Made In America’? Not Exactly.

Federal Trade Commission

Joy Behar said on Thursday that she had a mind to just stop paying federal income taxes altogether if President Donald Trump and his administration continue to make cuts with regard to what those taxes will ultimately fund.
Behar joined her cohosts on ABC&#8217;s &#8220;The View&#8221; for a discussion about the recently passed &#8220;Big Beautiful Bill&#8221; — and the cuts that came with it — and argued that she should only have to continue paying state taxes &#8220;if they want the states to take care of everything.&#8221;
&#8220;I&#8217;d like to know, why am I paying federal taxes if they&#8217;re not going to do anything, by the way? Is there anybody that can tell me that?&#8221; Behar asked. &#8220;If they want the states to take care of everything, I&#8217;ll pay state taxes, and not federal taxes. Watch the IRS come after me now.&#8221;
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Whoopi Goldberg seems to suggest that Secretary Marco Rubio has been replaced by someone else, a &#8220;new Marco&#8221;: 
&#8220;People are imitating. You don&#8217;t know who Marco is anymore. You don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s Marco you talking to or, you know, some kind of new Marco.&#8221; <a href="https://t.co/6axwN1N29A">pic.twitter.com/6axwN1N29A</a>
— Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) <a href="https://twitter.com/NickFondacaro/status/1943328869571842543?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 10, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Cohost Alyssa Farah Griffin jumped in to talk about the role played by the National Security Council — and its acting head, Secretary of State Marco Rubio — when it came to parceling out aid, and cohost Whoopi Goldberg immediately made reference to a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/marco-rubio-impostor-uses-ai-to-deceive-high-ranking-officials">recent story</a> about an individual using AI to impersonate Rubio to contact various foreign and domestic officials.
&#8220;People are imitating Marco,&#8221; she pointed out. &#8220;You don&#8217;t know who Marco is anymore. You don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s Marco you&#8217;re talking to or, you know, some kind of new Marco.&#8221;
Goldberg recently raised eyebrows when both she and cohost Sunny Hostin claimed that black Americans in 2025 were facing more discrimination and worse circumstances than people living under the thumb of Iran&#8217;s Islamist regime.

ABC’s “The View” – Season 25

‘Watch The IRS Come After Me’: Joy Behar Says She’ll Skip Federal Taxes If Trump Keeps Making Cuts

'Watch The IRS Come After Me': Joy Behar Says She'll Skip Federal Taxes If Trump Keeps Making Cuts

Joy Behar

Media

The View

The IRS made clear its stance on churches endorsing political candidates in front of their congregations, saying in a court filing on Monday that houses of worship are free to push political candidates from the pulpit without fear of losing their tax-exempt status.
The IRS clarification came in a lawsuit court filing after two Texas churches and an association of Christian broadcasters sued, seeking an exemption from the ban on churches endorsing political candidates, The New York Times <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/07/us/politics/irs-churches-politics-endorse-candidates.html">reported</a>. While the plaintiffs sought a carve-out for all nonprofits, the IRS agreed in a court filing to allow churches to endorse candidates without penalty.
According to the IRS, the Johnson Amendment — which has been part of the U.S. tax code since 1954 — does not prohibit a church from communicating with its congregants about its preferred political candidates, comparing such endorsements to “a family discussion concerning candidates.”
“Thus, communications from a house of worship to its congregation in connection with religious services through its usual channels of communication on matters of faith do not run afoul of the Johnson Amendment as properly interpreted,” the agency wrote in the <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.232590/gov.uscourts.txed.232590.35.0.pdf">court filing</a>.
The IRS added that it has long refrained from enforcing the Johnson Amendment against churches &#8220;for speech concerning electoral politics in the context of worship services.&#8221; For several years, pastors from around the country organized to test the tax code during &#8220;Pulpit Freedom Sunday,&#8221; The Washington Post reported. The IRS only launched one investigation stemming from &#8220;Pulpit Freedom Sunday,&#8221; and the agency did not punish any churches.
The IRS statement will be celebrated by many conservative Christians who have long viewed the prohibition on political endorsements as infringing upon their free speech.
During his first term, President Donald Trump stated that he wanted to &#8220;totally destroy&#8221; the Johnson Amendment, which was introduced by then-Senator Lyndon B. Johnson (D-TX) in 1954.
“I will get rid of and totally destroy the Johnson Amendment and allow our representatives of faith to speak freely and without fear of retribution,” Trump <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-vows-to-totally-destroy-restrictions-on-churches-support-of-candidates/2017/02/02/fed9bad2-e981-11e6-bf6f-301b6b443624_story.html">told</a> Christians at the National Prayer Breakfast in 2017. “I will do that, remember.”
For the Johnson Amendment to be repealed, Congress would have to take action.
Proponents of the Johnson Amendment argue that the tax code is essential for guarding campaign finance laws. If the Johnson Amendment were repealed, some worry that political contributions could be funneled through tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organizations, and the contributions could remain undisclosed and tax-deductible.

Church

Trump’s IRS Says Churches Can Endorse Political Candidates Without Losing Tax Status

Christianity

Churches

Federal Government

Religion

U.S.

Canada ended a digital service tax that would have hit major American tech companies hard after President Donald Trump announced he was ending trade talks with the country over the levy.
Canada’s Department of Finance said Sunday that it would rescind its Digital Service Tax (DST) in “anticipation of a mutually beneficial comprehensive trade arrangement with the United States.” The reversal came after Trump said on Friday that he was “terminating” trade discussions. 
The tax, which was expected to take effect on Monday, was anticipated to have a significant impact on United States-based companies like Amazon, Google, Meta, and Apple. 
<a class="c-link c-link--focus-visible" href="https://get.dailywire.com/freedom/?utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial&amp;utm_campaign=freedom&amp;utm_content=freedomeditorial" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://get.dailywire.com/freedom/?utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial&amp;utm_campaign=freedom&amp;utm_content=freedomeditorial" data-sk="tooltip_parent" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-75638">JULY 4 SALE: Get Six Months Of DW+ Free</a>
“Canada’s new government is focused on building the strongest economy in the G7 and standing up for Canadian workers and businesses,” <a href="https://www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/news/2025/06/canada-rescinds-digital-services-tax-to-advance-broader-trade-negotiations-with-the-united-states.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> Minister of Finance and National Revenue François-Philippe Champagne. “Rescinding the digital services tax will allow the negotiations of a new economic and security relationship with the United States to make vital progress and reinforce our work to create jobs and build prosperity for all Canadians.”
Earlier this month, Champagne said that the Digital Service Tax would be implemented despite opposition from the United States. He <a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-digital-services-tax-1.7565966" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> on June 19 that the tax was “going ahead” as scheduled and would be applied. 
The digital service tax was <a href="https://www.canada.ca/en/services/taxes/excise-taxes-duties-and-levies/digital-services-tax.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">enacted</a> to require “foreign and domestic large businesses to pay tax on certain revenue earned from engaging with online users in Canada,” according to the Canadian government. The tax would have cost American businesses up to $2.3 billion annually, <a href="https://ccianet.org/research/reports/impacts-canada-proposed-digital-service-tax-united-states/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">according</a> to a study conducted by the Computer and Communications Industry Association. 
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said Sunday that he and Trump had agreed to continue trade discussions with the hope of signing an agreement by July 21. 
The resumption of talks follows Trump&#8217;s social media berating of Canada on Friday. 
“We have just been informed that Canada, a very difficult Country to TRADE with, including the fact that they have charged our Farmers as much as 400% Tariffs, for years, on Dairy Products, has just announced that they are putting a Digital Services Tax on our American Technology Companies, which is a direct and blatant attack on our Country,” Trump <a href="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114756567645919781">posted</a> on Truth Social. “Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately. We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period.”
Several other trade deadlines are looming, including a July 9 cutoff for the United States and the European Union to make a deal before 50% tariffs on European imports are imposed.

World Leaders Converge In Canada For G7 Summit

Canada Caves: Digital Tax On U.S. Tech Scrapped After Trump Pressure

Amazon

Apple

Big Tech

Canada

Google

Vogue World: Hollywood Press Announcement

California Had Fun, Fun, Fun — Until Voters Took The T-Bird Away

Business

California

Gavin Newsom

Immigration

Jobs

Opinion

Small Businesses

Planned Parenthood has long been synonymous with abortion, profiting from the violent destruction of preborn children. But now, the nation&#8217;s largest abortion chain has added another sinister revenue stream — mutilating young people in the name of “gender-affirming care.” It is past time for Congress to cut off the more than half a billion dollars in taxpayer funding that Planned Parenthood receives annually. Americans should not be forced to subsidize an organization that ends the life of preborn babies and irreversibly harms confused young people.
Planned Parenthood’s <a href="https://www.liveaction.org/news/report-details-planned-parenthood-record-abortions-funding/">total revenue</a> for 2023-24 was $2.03B, nearly the same as the previous fiscal year of 2022-23 at $2.05B. They took in a staggering $498 million just in donations in 2022 — and instead of improving the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/15/us/planned-parenthood-clinics.html">horrific conditions</a> inside its clinics, it funneled much of it into advancing its radical political and legal agenda. In 2024 alone, the abortion giant spent <a href="https://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/pressroom/statement-from-planned-parenthood-action-fund-on-presidential-election-results#:~:text=Planned%20Parenthood%20advocacy%20and%20political%20organizations%20made%20a%20record%2Dbreaking%20%2469.5%20million%20investment%20during%20the%202024%20election%20cycle.">$69.5 million</a> to defeat pro-life Republican candidates and policies.
<h3>Abortion: The Business of Death</h3>
According to its 2023-2024 <a href="https://www.liveaction.org/news/report-details-planned-parenthood-record-abortions-funding/">annual report,</a> Planned Parenthood performed 402,230 abortions in the 2022 to 2023 fiscal year. This breaks down to an average of 1,102 daily abortions, nearly 46 hourly, and one every 78 seconds Its business model revolves around ending innocent lives, and they are unapologetic about it. The science is clear: from the moment of fertilization, a unique human life begins. Yet Planned Parenthood treats preborn children as disposable. Their so-called &#8220;care&#8221; consists of poisoning or dismembering the youngest members of our human family.
This brutality is not an unfortunate byproduct of their work — it is their core business. Despite offering <a href="https://lozierinstitute.org/fact-sheet-planned-parenthoods-2023-24-annual-report/">fewer legitimate healthcare</a> services each year, Planned Parenthood’s abortion numbers continue to rise. Women in crisis deserve real support, not an organization that profits from their despair by ending their children’s lives.
Defunding Planned Parenthood is not about limiting healthcare access; it is about redirecting taxpayer dollars to organizations that actually serve women and children. Yet, year after year, Congress continues to funnel hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars into this abortion behemoth.
<h3>Gender Transitions: The Business of Mutilation</h3>
As if poisoning and dismembering preborn children weren’t evil enough, Planned Parenthood has also become one of the largest providers of cross-sex hormones, pushing powerful, life-altering drugs onto vulnerable teenagers with little to no medical oversight. According to <a href="https://www.thefp.com/p/how-did-planned-parenthood-become?utm_source=chatgpt.com">insurance claim data</a>, Planned Parenthood has prescribed gender transition hormones to at least 40,000 young adults in just one year, often after brief, <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/undercover-investigation-planned-parenthood-prescribing-hormones-minors-minimal-oversight">superficial consultations</a>.
One of us, Chloe, knows firsthand the devastation of this industry. As a teenager, she was encouraged to believe that she was born in the wrong body. Medical professionals — including those at organizations like Planned Parenthood — fast-tracked her onto puberty blockers, testosterone, and eventually a double mastectomy, all before she was old enough to legally drive. She was told it would bring her happiness. It didn’t. It left her with permanent scars, a deep voice, a damaged body, and the realization that she had been betrayed by the very people who claimed to help.
Planned Parenthood is not providing informed, compassionate care. They are running a conveyor belt of gender transition services, <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfoZCtbvdhM">pushing vulnerable young people</a> toward a medical pathway that results in permanent sterilization, sexual dysfunction, and lifelong regret. Many of those who detransition, like Chloe, find themselves abandoned by the medical community that once rushed them into these procedures.
<h3>No More Taxpayer Funding</h3>
The American people should not be forced to pay for the destruction of innocent lives or the mutilation of confused young people. Planned Parenthood has shown time and time again that it is not a legitimate healthcare provider. It is an ideological machine that profits off death and suffering.
According to a recent <a href="https://lozierinstitute.org/fact-sheet-planned-parenthoods-2023-24-annual-report/#_ftn14">report</a> from the Lozier Institute, &#8220;Taxpayer funding in the form of government grants, contracts, and Medicaid reimbursements hit $792.2 million, over $2 million per day&#8230;&#8221;
European nations such as Sweden, Finland, and the United Kingdom are now restricting the use of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones for minors, recognizing that the evidence supporting them is weak and the risks catastrophic. Yet, in the U.S., Planned Parenthood continues to push these treatments at record rates, all while receiving taxpayer dollars.
Enough is enough. Congress must act. Every dollar that funds Planned Parenthood is a dollar spent enabling the deaths of preborn children, the mutilation of young people caught in an identity crisis, and political attack ads on Republican leaders. That money should be invested in real healthcare — providers that support women, protect children, and offer genuine, life-affirming care and psychological help.
The fight to defund Planned Parenthood is not just a policy battle; it is a crossroads for our nation. Lives are at stake for both the preborn children who deserve the right to live and the young people being led down a destructive path from which they may never fully recover. We must demand that our lawmakers stand against this barbarism. It’s time to end taxpayer funding for an organization that kills and mutilates the most vulnerable in our community. Congress must defund Planned Parenthood now.
* * *
Lila Rose is a writer, speaker and activist. She is the founder and president of Live Action, a human rights nonprofit with the largest digital footprint for the global pro-life movement.
Chloe Cole, a poised and articulate 20-year-old woman, passionately advocates against the practice of transitioning minors.Driven by a noble mission to safeguard children from potentially harmful ideologies and medical interventions, Chloe draws from her personal experiences to shed light on the distressing consequences of gender-affirming care for adolescents. Having embarked on her own transition journey at the tender age of 12, only to subsequently detransition at 16, Chloe speaks with firsthand authority on the deeply traumatic effects experienced by minors undergoing such treatments. Follow her: @ChoooCole
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Planned Parenthood door

After Raking In $800M In Taxpayer Dollars, Planned Parenthood Now Offers Trans Services

Abortion

Children

Congress

Gender

Planned Parenthood

Pregnancy

Transgender

Women

Corporations that receive billions of dollars in taxpayer-funded federal contracts have a duty to be ideologically neutral, transparent, and accountable to the American people.
This shouldn’t need to be said. But 1792 Exchange’s <a href="https://1792exchange.com/contractors/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">new database</a> of top government contractors shows that it does.
One of the report’s most striking revelations is the fact that some government contractors most aggressively aligned with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are not even American. These include the United Kingdom-based BAE Systems, BP, Deloitte, and Rolls-Royce, and Ireland-based Accenture.
Many American contractors blatantly promote radical agendas — at this point, LGBT might as well stand for “Lockheed, General Dynamics, Boeing, Textron” — but allowing foreign firms to act as ideological agents within the American system is beyond the pale.
These firms exert extensive influence on federal agencies and provide essential services such as defense technology, energy logistics, financial auditing, and consulting, while actively promoting a worldview that the American electorate and our current administration reject.
As President Donald Trump made clear in executive orders rescinding federal DEI mandates, the “government should be focused on mission readiness, not ideological indoctrination.” This principle must encompass foreign contractors and consultants.
To grasp the scale of ideological encroachment, consider <a href="https://1792exchange.com/spotlight-reports/corporate-bias-ratings/?c_id=1073" target="_blank" rel="noopener">BAE Systems</a>, the British defense and aerospace giant, which received $7.7 billion in government contracts in 2023.
Despite serving as a primary contractor for the Department of Defense, BAE has <a href="https://www.baesystems.com/en-us/article/bae-systems-inc-releases-third-annual-dei-report" target="_blank" rel="noopener">adopted comprehensive DEI goals</a>, including race- and gender-based recruitment benchmarks and board composition — a commitment they called “<a href="https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/b/LSE_BA_2023.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Change the Race Ratio</a>” in their 2023 annual report — and ethnicity-based mentorship programs, such as RISE, implemented by KPMG.
In the United Kingdom, where BAE is allowed to take “<a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/positive-action-in-the-workplace-guidance-for-employers/positive-action-in-the-workplace#:~:text=communicate%20with%20staff.-,2.,is%20relevant%20to%20a%20case." target="_blank" rel="noopener">positive action</a>,” it must adhere to national expectations of not engaging in “positive discrimination.” Yet on American soil, with American funds, they behave as if potential violations of civil rights law are both normative and commendable.
Similarly, <a href="https://1792exchange.com/company/bp/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">BP</a> — the British energy conglomerate that obtained over a billion dollars in federal contracts from the United States government — publicly supports a vast range of DEI policies, <a href="https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/sustainability/bp-diversity-equity-and-inclusion-report-2020.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">including racial equity audits</a>, <a href="https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/investors/bp-directors-remuneration-report-2021.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">DEI-linked executive compensation schemes,</a> and <a href="https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/careers/life-at-bp/our-stories/bp-recognized-by-stonewall.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">gender identity training</a> protocols.
American citizens, through federal procurement budgets, are effectively subsidizing an imported ideology that increasingly lacks democratic legitimacy at home.
<a href="https://1792exchange.com/company/accenture/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Accenture</a> ($3 billion) and <a href="https://1792exchange.com/company/deloitte/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Deloitte</a> ($3.7 billion), incorporated in Ireland and the United Kingdom, respectively, have become deeply embedded in federal operations, making their cultural influence within agencies indistinguishable from that of internal leadership. These firms frequently promoted their DEI credentials in competitive bids, and until now, federal officials have often highlighted these characteristics as value-added features instead of liabilities.
It’s commendable that Accenture <a href="https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/accenture-dropping-corporate-dei-policies" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announced it would end its DEI initiatives</a>. However, given its history of establishing headquarters in foreign countries — first in Bermuda, then moving to Dublin in 2009 to avoid paying American taxes — it’s concerning that the company promoted this agenda at any point without being fully invested in the outcome of our nation.
Given that $3 billion of its $64.9 billion in revenue comes directly from American taxpayers, and its global CEO operates from an office in the Washington, D.C., area, one should question how Accenture can claim to be Irish. Notably, the company is aware of this line of inquiry, listing its Irish domicile as a risk factor in its <a href="https://www.accenture.com/content/dam/accenture/final/accenture-com/a-com-custom-component/iconic/document/Accenture-2024-10-K.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2024 10-K filing</a> with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Likewise, <a href="https://1792exchange.com/company/rolls-royce-holdings-plc/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rolls-Royce</a> ($1.1 billion), the British aerospace firm, completes the list of foreign-headquartered contractors that combine technological excellence with radical ideological activism. Although it <a href="https://www.thetimes.com/business-money/companies/article/rolls-royce-dei-us-diversity-backlash-9hcs2zdrm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reportedly</a> rolled back funding for its identity-based employee resource groups in the United States, Rolls-Royce previously enacted internal policies that reflect the most radical tenets of the DEI framework, including <a href="https://www.rolls-royce.com/~/media/Files/R/Rolls-Royce/documents/annual-report/2021/ar2021-strategic-report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">“anti-racism” events</a> and <a href="https://www.rolls-royce.com/country-sites/sea/our-stories/2019/women-in-stem.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener">unconscious bias training</a>.
The central paradox is this: as the United States reorients its federal policy around merit, neutrality, and excellence, some of the largest beneficiaries of government contracts are foreign actors advancing the very ideologies that Americans just voted to reject.
Congress and the Trump administration must act swiftly to align federal contracting policy with the new executive directives. A contractor’s country of incorporation must not allow it to launder political agendas through backdoor bureaucratic channels.
Ultimately, federal contracting is more than an economic matter; it is a matter of sovereignty. American taxpayers should not be subsidizing foreign entities that undermine American values. 1792 Exchange’s report has exposed this vulnerability. Now, it falls to policymakers to close the gap between the will of the people and the behavior of those paid to serve them.
Daniel Cameron is the CEO of the 1792 Exchange and the former attorney general of Kentucky.
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Davos become a showcase for global companies

Foreign Companies Use Taxpayer Dollars To Push DEI. That Needs To Stop.

Lockheed Martin

United Kingdom

The &#8220;Big, Beautiful Bill,&#8221; backed by President Donald Trump, fulfills one of Republicans&#8217; most provocative promises: to tax universities with massive endowments. The tax would help reduce the United States deficit by taxing multibillion dollar institutions of privilege as if they were hedge funds with classrooms attached — which critics say institutions like Harvard are.
The version of the bill passed by the House would institute hefty taxes on &#8220;net investment income&#8221; for universities with the largest endowments, topping out at 21% for colleges with endowments equivalent to more than $2 million per student. Colleges with endowments less than $500,000 per student wouldn&#8217;t be taxed, while those with endowments between $500,000 and $750,000 per student would be taxed 1.4%, with two other rates in between.
But the <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1/text">language</a> is not just designed to punish colleges that Republicans say have become liberal political organizations; it is written in a way that could benefit Americans by significantly increasing the slots available at high-level universities for citizens, rather than foreigners.
The calculation of endowment per student counts only students from the United States. So, one of the ways colleges can avoid taxes is by ensuring that more of their slots go to Americans. If a college has a $1 billion endowment and 1,000 students, that works out to $1 million per student, which would fall under a 7% tax rate. But if half of those students are foreigners, the rate would actually be based on dividing $1 billion by 500 students, resulting in a $2 million figure — and a much higher tax rate.
In some ways, the massive flow of foreigners to American colleges mirrors the surge in immigrants crossing the southern border. According to <a href="https://opendoorsdata.org/annual-release/international-students/">Open Doors</a>, which tracks international scholarship, more than 1.1 million foreigners studied at American colleges in the 2023-24 school year, up 7% from the previous year. The number of foreign graduate students was at &#8220;an all-time high,&#8221; it said, at 500,000. Most of the students came from India and China, and the highest growth rate came from sub-Saharan Africa.
The group said New York University had more than 27,000 international students, while Northeastern University had 21,000 and Columbia had 20,000. According to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/data/how-many-foreign-students-are-every-us-college-2025-05-22/">Reuters</a>, 42% of students at Carnegie Mellon were foreign, while the rate was 39% at Northeastern and Columbia, and 34% at NYU.
Universities say they prefer to admit foreign students because they are often wealthy people paying full tuition, and their progressive tuition model relies on charging high prices for some to subsidize financial aid for poor people.
But Republicans say that makes it more difficult for Americans to gain admittance to American schools at all, and that colleges get preferential tax treatment and significant government funding on the premise that they are educating American taxpayers.
Open Doors said that 55% of the foreign students pay for school using foreign money, typically from their family, while 41% are funded with money from the United States. In half of those cases, the money comes from the colleges, often through &#8220;federal government research grants disbursed to the student through the institution,&#8221; it said.
Republicans also say using American universities to train and conduct research by foreigners poses national security concerns. A common way that people begin residing illegally in the country is by coming on a student visa, and then never leaving when it expires. Mohammad K. Dabous of Jordan, for example, was arrested for allegedly ramming a truck through the gates of the Quantico military base after <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/illegal-who-tried-to-infiltrate-quantico-was-let-into-country-to-attend-u-s-college">overstaying a student visa</a>.
Giving foreigners, instead of Americans, a significant number of slots at elite institutions also leads to the argument that we need high immigration to staff the country with <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/the-h1-b-jobs-that-prove-the-visa-program-badly-needs-reform">doctors and engineers</a>, because there aren&#8217;t enough Americans with the necessary training.
The percentage of foreign students at some universities has become so high that instead of the American way of life rubbing off on a few visitors, antisemitism and third-world blood feuds have become a part of a dominant culture. Columbia, with its sizable international population, was at the epicenter of anti-Israel and anti-Western unrest, with Muslim immigrants radicalizing privileged Western leftists.
The &#8220;Big, Beautiful Bill,&#8221; which awaits passage by the Senate, would also overhaul how student loans are administered, forcing <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/heres-how-the-big-beautiful-bill-sticks-it-to-universities-that-churn-out-unemployed-debtors">colleges to eat the costs of bad bets when students can&#8217;t pay their loans</a>—in turn putting pressure on colleges to lower tuition, admit only qualified students, and deemphasize useless majors.
Related: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/george-washington-university-antisemitism-lawsuit">U.S. Diplomat Training Ground Let Antisemites Take Over Its Faculty, Lawsuit Says</a>

Pro Palestine Columbia students continue occupation of campus

How The Big Beautiful Bill Would Push Colleges To Educate Americans, Not Foreigners

Education

Universities

Senate Republicans unveiled their plan to secure the border, unleash domestic energy, and make President Donald Trump&#8217;s tax cuts permanent, hitting back against Democrats&#8217; backlash to Republican efforts to stop funding entitlement programs for illegal aliens. 
A <a href="https://www.republican.senate.gov/strongandprosperous/">website</a> launched on Wednesday outlines Senate Republican priorities for the bill while addressing panicked claims from Democrats about Republican plans for Medicaid. The page also allows visitors to check how much additional taxes they will have to pay if the 2017 Trump tax cuts are allowed to expire. For example, the expiration of the cuts would cost the average Floridian around $3,650. 
“Every single Senate Democrat supports the biggest tax hike in history, illegal aliens on Medicaid rioting in the streets, and more inflation— and we will make sure everyone knows it,” Senator Tom Cotton told The Daily Wire. “Americans support our plan for Safety and Prosperity because it does the opposite: keeps taxes low, reduces spending, and protects Medicaid for those who need it.”
Senate Republican priorities include funding Trump’s executive orders, securing the border, funding a border wall, and allocating funds to hire more ICE and Customs and Border Protection agents, as well as funding Trump’s Golden Dome missile defense project and building more Navy ships and drones. 
<div id="attachment_932871" style="width: 1568px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-932871" class="size-full wp-image-932871" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-11-at-12.21.10%E2%80%AFPM.png" alt="" width="1558" height="800" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-11-at-12.21.10%E2%80%AFPM.png 1558w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-11-at-12.21.10%E2%80%AFPM-300x154.png 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-11-at-12.21.10%E2%80%AFPM-1024x526.png 1024w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-11-at-12.21.10%E2%80%AFPM-768x394.png 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-11-at-12.21.10%E2%80%AFPM-1536x789.png 1536w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1558px) 100vw, 1558px" />Senate Republican Conference website.</div>
They also want to make the Trump tax cuts permanent, which they say will help Americans avoid a $4 trillion tax hike; make the small business tax deduction permanent; and increase oil and gas lease sales.
<div id="attachment_932873" style="width: 2609px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-932873" class="size-full wp-image-932873" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-11-at-1.13.20%E2%80%AFPM.png" alt="" width="2599" height="1348" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-11-at-1.13.20%E2%80%AFPM.png 2599w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-11-at-1.13.20%E2%80%AFPM-300x156.png 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-11-at-1.13.20%E2%80%AFPM-1024x531.png 1024w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-11-at-1.13.20%E2%80%AFPM-768x398.png 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-11-at-1.13.20%E2%80%AFPM-1536x797.png 1536w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-11-at-1.13.20%E2%80%AFPM-2048x1062.png 2048w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 2599px) 100vw, 2599px" />Senate Republican Conference.</div>
Some Senate Democrats, like Brian Schatz (HI) and Martin Heinrich (NM), have <a href="https://x.com/SenBrianSchatz/status/1932828301820674458" target="_blank" rel="noopener">claimed</a> that millions of people will be kicked off Medicare if the Republican proposal passes. Senate Republicans say they are only looking to cut fraud and waste, and ensure that illegal aliens aren’t benefiting from entitlement programs. 
The House has already passed its reconciliation bill, including reforms to entitlement programs. For Medicaid, these reforms include making illegal aliens ineligible and imposing basic work requirements for able-bodied Americans. 
Some Republicans are also pushing to end the funding of transgender procedures for both kids and adults in the bill. Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) introduced a bill last month ending funding for transgender procedures he said he hoped to get into the reconciliation bill, while Sens. John Cornyn (R-TX) and James Lankford (R-OK) <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/exclusive-senate-gop-proposal-would-end-federal-funding-for-genital-mutilation-procedures?author=Leif+Le+Mahieu&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=3&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=EXCLUSIVE%3A+Senate+GOP+Proposal+Would+End+Federal+Funding+For+‘Genital+Mutilation’+Procedures" target="_blank" rel="noopener">introduced</a> a similar bill on Tuesday.

Confirmation Hearing Held For Secretary Of Defense Nominee Pete Hegseth

EXCLUSIVE: Senate Republicans Lay Out Priorities For Spending Bill, Slam Democrat Attacks

Senate

Senate Republicans

Spending Bill

Governor Gavin Newsom is &#8220;threatening to commit criminal tax evasion,&#8221; Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Sunday, amid an escalating war of words between California and the Trump administration.
The warning from Bessent came in response to Newsom recently <a href="https://x.com/GavinNewsom/status/1931087538565054849" target="_blank" rel="noopener">suggesting</a> that his state &#8220;cut&#8221; off the more than $80 billion &#8220;more in taxes than we get back&#8221; in response to a CNN <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/06/politics/trump-california-federal-funding" target="_blank" rel="noopener">report</a> with sources claiming President Donald Trump was preparing a broad cancellation of federal funding for California.
&#8220;Governor [Gavin Newsom] is threatening to commit criminal tax evasion. His plan: defraud the American taxpayer and leave California residents on the hook for unpaid federal taxes,&#8221; Bessent <a href="https://x.com/SecScottBessent/status/1931763599116030322" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> in a thread posted on X.
&#8220;I am certain most California businesses know that failing to pay taxes owed to the Treasury constitutes tax evasion and have no intention of following the dangerous path Governor [Gavin Newsom] is threatening,&#8221; Bessent added. &#8220;I would warn state officials, including payroll managers, that federal law attaches personal liability to an &#8216;attempt to evade or defeat tax.'&#8221;
Newsom&#8217;s &#8220;comments are extremely reckless. Instead of committing criminal tax evasion, Governor Newsom should consider a tax plan for California that follows the Trump Tax Cuts model and reduces the onerous state tax burden to allow families to keep more of their hard-earned money,&#8221; Bessent concluded.
Bessent posted the thread as Newsom, a Democrat widely considered a potential candidate for the presidency, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/deranged-behavior-gavin-newsom-declares-war-on-pete-hegseth-gets-more-than-he-bargained-for" target="_blank" rel="noopener">clashed</a> with President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over troop deployments to California amid violent anti-ICE protests that have taken place in and around Los Angeles over the weekend.
After Hegseth said active-duty Marines at Camp Pendleton would be <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/pete-hegseth-puts-nearby-u-s-marines-on-high-alert-as-los-angeles-burns" target="_blank" rel="noopener">mobilized</a> to assist National Guardsmen if the chaos persists, Newsom accused the Defense Secretary of exhibiting &#8220;<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/deranged-behavior-gavin-newsom-declares-war-on-pete-hegseth-gets-more-than-he-bargained-for" target="_blank" rel="noopener">deranged behavior</a>&#8221; for &#8220;threatening to deploy active-duty Marines on American soil against its own citizens.&#8221;
In response, Hegseth said on X, &#8220;Deranged = allowing your city to burn &amp; law enforcement to be attacked. There is plenty of room for peaceful protest, but ZERO tolerance for attacking federal agents who are doing their job. The National Guard, and Marines if need be, stand with ICE.&#8221;

Menu