Former First Lady Michelle Obama is discussing America&#8217;s supposed racism and complaining about her time in the White House.
During an upcoming special, Good Morning America co-host Robin Roberts reads quotes from Obama&#8217;s new book, &#8220;The Look,&#8221; which, in part, opines about the scrutiny Obama says she felt from white people in America.
&#8220;You said, &#8216;We were all too aware that as the first black couple, we couldn&#8217;t afford any missteps,'&#8221; Roberts read. &#8220;And you also say, &#8216;As a black woman, I was under a particularly white hot glare.'&#8221;
&#8220;Did you feel that?&#8221; Roberts asked Obama.
&#8220;For sure,&#8221; she answered.
&#8220;You can&#8217;t afford to get anything wrong, because you didn&#8217;t &#8212; at least until the country came to know us &#8212; we didn&#8217;t get the grace that I think some other families have gotten,&#8221; the former first lady continued.
Radio host Buck Sexton commented on the remarks, &#8220;Starting to feel like maybe Michelle Obama is a bitter malcontent addicted to complaining about her incredibly privileged life.&#8221;
Join us now during our exclusive Deal of the Decade. Get everything for $7 a month. Not as fans. As fighters. Go to <a href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">DailyWire.com/Subscribe</a> to join now.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Starting to feel like maybe Michelle Obama is a bitter malcontent addicted to complaining about her incredibly privileged life. 
<a href="https://t.co/1JN7Mi8dMt">pic.twitter.com/1JN7Mi8dMt</a>
— Buck Sexton (@BuckSexton) <a href="https://twitter.com/BuckSexton/status/1984629297730998762?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 1, 2025</a></blockquote>
Obama has talked about her time in the White House previously, calling it isolating and complaining that the family had to pay for their food and travel. The Obamas are reportedly worth $70 million.
“Much is not covered,&#8221; Obama <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/michelle-obama-complains-it-was-expensive-to-live-in-the-white-house?utm_source=chatgpt.com">said</a> earlier this year. &#8220;You’re paying for every food, every bit of food that you eat … you’re not paying for housing and the staff in it … but everything, even travel, if you’re not traveling with the president, if you&#8217;re kids are coming on a Bright Star, which is the first lady&#8217;s plane, we had to pay for their travel to be on the plane.&#8221;
Obama has focused much on race. Just days ago, she <a href="https://people.com/michelle-obama-reveals-why-she-never-wore-braids-in-the-white-house-exclusive-11838287">complained</a> about black women having to spend &#8220;thousands of hours&#8221; and lots of money on their hair if they try to straighten in, instead of wearing it natural and curly.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
Michelle Obama complains that hairstyles are racist because black people have to spend more money and time to achieve them.
<a href="https://t.co/PkwP03MTpc">pic.twitter.com/PkwP03MTpc</a>
— ALX 🇺🇸 (@alx) <a href="https://twitter.com/alx/status/1983397897636024483?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 29, 2025</a></blockquote>
The former first lady also famously suggested in 2008 that it was the first time she was proud of her country as an adult woman when the nation voted for her husband during the Democrat presidential primaries.
&#8220;But what we’ve learned over this year is that hope is making a comeback,&#8221; she said at the time. &#8220;It is making a comeback and let me tell you something: For the first time in my adult lifetime, I’m really proud of my country.&#8221;
&#8220;And not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change,&#8221; Obama continued. &#8220;And I have been desperate to see our country moving in that direction and just not feeling so alone in my frustration and disappointment. I’ve seen people who are hungry to be unified around some basic common issues and it’s made me proud.&#8221;
Related: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/michelle-obama-says-creating-life-is-the-least-of-what-a-womans-reproductive-system-does">Michelle Obama Says Creating Life Is ‘The Least’ Of What A Woman’s Reproductive System Does</a>

First Lady Michelle Obama Hosts 3rd Annual “Beating The Odds”

‘White Hot Glare’: Michelle Obama Complains About America’s Racism, Time In White House

Michelle Obama Complains About America’s Racism, Time In White House

Barack Obama

Michelle Obama

Politics

Race

Racism

White House

Retired tennis star Serena Williams found apparently racist cotton decor at a New York City hotel this past week, and complained about it on Instagram.
Williams, who&#8217;s in NYC for a Kim Kardashian <a href="https://pagesix.com/2025/09/25/celebrity-news/serena-williams-calls-out-nyc-hotels-cotton-plant-decoration/">event</a>, shared video of her examining a vase filled with faux cotton stems and asking her followers how they &#8220;feel&#8221; about it. She said, &#8220;it doesn&#8217;t feel great,&#8221; and visibly shivered over the sight of it.
Williams shared the video via Instagram Stories, where the athlete has 18 million followers.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
Serena Williams gets triggered by a cotton plant at her luxury hotel
These people are so fu#%ing insufferable and performative
Acting triggered with a $250m net worth and a long blonde wig is wild
You crip-walked at the Super Bowl and your sister was killed by crips
Sit down <a href="https://t.co/Ej1yDaDl6u">pic.twitter.com/Ej1yDaDl6u</a>
— Amiri King (@AmiriKing) <a href="https://twitter.com/AmiriKing/status/1971634415395803144?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 26, 2025</a></blockquote>
Journalist Megyn Kelly reacted to the video, noting Williams&#8217; tremendous success in America.
&#8220;Serena Williams is triggered by cotton, I guess because it used to be picked by slaves, and she&#8217;s a black American? It&#8217;s 2025,&#8221; Kelly said. &#8220;Serena Williams is estimated by Forbes to be worth $350 million. She&#8217;s married to a very, very rich man, too.&#8221;
<a href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/?utm_campaign=fall40&amp;utm_content=fallsale&amp;utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial">Get 40% off new DailyWire+ annual memberships with code FALL40 at checkout</a>
&#8220;But she is an oppressed, direct descendant of slaves, I guess, and that&#8217;s how she sees herself to this day, because, I guess, &#8216;generational trauma,&#8217; as the kids call it,&#8221; Kelly continued. &#8220;She can&#8217;t walk by a cotton plant in a luxury hotel to go promote Kim Kardashian&#8217;s Skims line without feeling &#8216;trauma&#8217; that she has to videotape and post on [Instagram].&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Megyn Kelly reacts to Serena Williams&#8217; bizarre post on cotton at a luxury hotel.
&#8220;Serena Williams is triggered by cotton I guess because it used to be picked by slaves and she&#8217;s a black American? It&#8217;s 2025. Serena Williams is estimated by Forbes to be worth $350 million.&#8221; <a href="https://t.co/wRENsBClAu">pic.twitter.com/wRENsBClAu</a>
— Girl patriot (@Girlpatriot1974) <a href="https://twitter.com/Girlpatriot1974/status/1971801473391657305?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 27, 2025</a></blockquote>
This is not the first time Williams has seemed to complain about alleged racism. The tennis superstar, who is worth hundreds of millions of dollars, blasted an image of a luxury Paris hotel restaurant last year to her 10 million followers while suggesting the restaurant &#8220;denied&#8221; her service because she&#8217;s black.
<div class="css-1lul109 eo63h7k1">
“Yikes [Peninsula Paris] I’ve been denied access to rooftop to eat in a [sic] empty <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/restaurant" target="_blank" rel="noopener">restaurant</a> of nicer places but never with my kids,” she posted August 5, 2024. “Always a first. #Olympic2024.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Yikes <a href="https://twitter.com/peninsulaparis?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" target="_blank" rel="noopener">@peninsulaparis</a> I’ve been denied access to rooftop to eat in a empty restaurant of nicer places 🫠 but never with my kids. Always a first. 🙄<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Olympic2024?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" target="_blank" rel="noopener">#Olympic2024</a> <a href="https://t.co/lEGJR5WoEn" target="_blank" rel="noopener">pic.twitter.com/lEGJR5WoEn</a>
— Serena Williams (@serenawilliams) <a href="https://twitter.com/serenawilliams/status/1820507655250850058?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" target="_blank" rel="noopener">August 5, 2024</a></blockquote>
</div>
However, a spokesperson from The Peninsula Paris responded to the accusation and said the restaurant was simply booked up.
“Dear Mrs. Williams, Please accept our deepest apologies for the disappointment you encountered tonight. Unfortunately, our rooftop bar was indeed fully booked and the only unoccupied tables you saw belonged to our gourmet restaurant, L’Oiseau Blanc, which was fully reserved,” the restaurant’s official account <a href="https://x.com/peninsulaparis/status/1820533467358371858" target="_blank" rel="noopener">posted</a>. “We have always been honored to welcome you and will always be to welcome you again. The Peninsula Paris.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
We have always been honored to welcome you and will always be to welcome you again.
The Peninsula Paris
— The Peninsula Paris (@peninsulaparis) <a href="https://twitter.com/peninsulaparis/status/1820533513420239099?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 5, 2024</a></blockquote>
Williams recently made headlines for teaming up with Ro, a telehealth company that offers GLP-1 weight loss drugs. The mother of two is featured in marketing campaigns aimed at normalizing the drugs, and she&#8217;s openly discussed using them for weight loss herself.
Related: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/serena-williams-trashes-open-christian-harrison-butker-at-espy-awards?author=Amanda+Prestigiacomo&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=undefined&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=Serena+Williams+Trashes+Open+Christian+Harrison+Butker+At+ESPY+Awards">Serena Williams Trashes Open Christian Harrison Butker At ESPY Awards</a>

2025 Vanity Fair Oscar Party Hosted By Radhika Jones – Arrivals

Serena Williams Spirals Over Apparently Racist Decor At NYC Hotel

Celebrities

New York City

Serena Williams

Tennis

U.S.

Charlie Kirk was an alt-right extremist.
Certainly, that’s what many in the so-called mainstream conclude from the collection of carefully culled remarks we are being fed by algorithms designed to maximally outrage us. These preternaturally powerful algos are fueled by bot armies, bad faith domestic players, sociopathic social media business practices, and hostile foreign regimes that seek to divide America.
How many hours of original Charlie Kirk footage do the algos have from which to select? An AI breakdown of Mr. Kirk’s content between podcasts, radio shows, YouTube videos, speeches, debates, and interviews estimates the total time somewhere between 5,000 and 8,000 hours.
If we put this in the context of a job, assuming an eight-hour workday with no breaks, that translates to 625 to 1,000 consecutive work days.
At the upper end, that is two years and nine months of talking.
How many moments of this man’s life have people watched before making up their minds that his assassination must be qualified or even celebrated?
Suppose deep machine learning cast its all-powerful eye on the last 8,000 hours that any of us spoke to find out-of-context moments to maximally denigrate, vilify, and dehumanize us. Do we really believe our character couldn’t be assassinated just as readily?
Do we really believe anyone’s reputation could survive that level of scrutiny and cherry picking?
Yours? Mine? Our family members? Classmates and colleagues? The leaders we support? The athletes and musicians we admire?
Of course not.
But this is the world that we’ve built and allowed. And now it is clearer than ever: Ours is a radicalized culture.
A culture that reduces people to their mistakes, jokes, stupid remarks, contradictions, hypocrisies, blind spots, and contentious assertions is a culture that allows zero tolerance for being human.
A culture that views legitimate political disagreement as an us-versus-them battle with existential stakes, that demonizes the opposition and views them not as factions and individuals but as a monolith.
Why is it radical? Because it remains ossified and immovable, allowing neither nuance nor learning.
A quick online spin shows us the ways that Charlie Kirk, a complex and good man, imperfect like every last one of us, has been hammered flat and dehumanized.
He’s racist… despite running a Young Black Leadership Summit for years, despite his avowed and articulate admiration of black luminaries like Frederick Douglass, Booker T. Washington, and Thomas Sowell, despite his mentoring of many young black activists and leaders, and despite his voter mobilization efforts for the black community.
He’s anti-gay… despite welcoming gays into the conservative movement with love and grace, despite his taking fire from actual homophobes and arguing to persuade them, despite his deep friendships with many gay people.
He’s transphobic… despite his multiple kind and respectful discussions with trans students in which he welcomed them and encouraged them toward health and meaning.
He’s a misogynist… despite the fact that he ran a Young Women’s Leadership Summit, elevated women on his podcasts and events, encouraged women to engage politically, uplifted female chapter leaders and ambassadors, and spoke to podcast audiences, which at times skewed 60-65% female.
He’s a violent extremist… despite his countless denunciations of violence and coercion, despite his refusal to fight when challenged, despite his exemplification of debate and discourse.
He’s alt-right… despite the fact that his opinions are not far from average Catholic and Christian views from a single generation ago, despite the fact that he was a bulwark against extremism on his own side, despite the reality that he was hated by Groypers, Nazis, terrorists, and white supremacists.
There seems to be a genuine belief among many that everything Charlie Kirk did was for power, manipulation, and control. A belief that his movement is all grift and corruption. A belief that for him and everyone in his orbit — and what an orbit it was — there was no wisdom, no grace, no care for people or the nation. Nothing genuine, only Machiavellian plans for an evil takeover.
How does this happen?
Our radicalizing media, social and otherwise, has strangled our curiosity, forbidding exploration of opposing notions, ideas, and thinkers. It tells us that we cannot risk contamination with information that might provide nuance and context. It tells us that anyone seeking to offer a different perspective is captured, brainwashed, not to be trusted. It tells us that if we modify our position, we will be outcast as a traitor, despised, one of “them.”
We all know the feeling. A stubborn ping in the chest, a compulsion at the back of our lizard brain that whispers: I’m on the right side of this issue, I just know it. I’m on the right side of history, I just know it. He’s a bad guy, I just know it. I don’t need to see or hear anything else that might disprove or alter my opinion, I just know it.
I just know it. And won’t be told otherwise.
That is what radicalization sounds like.
Terrifying to see in the mirror. Terrifying and shameful.
And it prevents many from gazing with open eyes and an open heart on a tableau that can only be described as biblical. A husband and father shot before his wife and young children at a free speech event on a college campus beneath a sign that says, Prove Me Wrong, in front of 3,000 kids, live-streamed to tens of thousands more. Terrified by the gunshot, his three-year-old daughter ran to him, crying, “Daddy.”
What would have been our overwhelming national reaction to this moment in a time before social media and cable news?
Not moral confusion, equivocation, political expediency — certainly not gleeful malice.
The difference between then and now is our widespread radicalization from being fed selective information 24-7.
This is what it looks like.
It looks like us.
And it will destroy America if we don’t stop it.
Because when we are blinded by radicalization, we are also blind to who our real enemies are.
Our foreign adversaries are feeding this division. Profiteering social media companies with teams of addiction specialists are laser-focused on exploiting our kids. Nihilists who wish only chaos, pain, and destruction.
There are alt-right extremists. Charlie Kirk was not one of them. 

He was the embodiment of how you teach conservative young men and women not to become alt-right extremists.
When challenged to fight by a grown man in front of 2,000 kids, Mr. Kirk said, “The only thing that is preventing us in this country from going to civil war is debate and dialogue… In fact, a mark of civilization is that we don’t have to go to blows and bullets, that we can have discourse and debate… We are going to remain peaceful.”
Again and again this week, I have been told:
Charlie was part of the problem. 
He was a peddler of hate.
He said some horrendous things.
Do you really want to defend him?
That is not a good hill for you to die on.
Is it?
For a man I never met?
For a thinker I considered to be, on many topics, a beneficial adversary?
For the principles he evinced — debate not fists, discussion not bullets, gratitude not grievance, love not hate?
Yes.
It is.
This is a hill for us to die on.
Just like he did.
* * *
Gregg Hurwitz is the New York Times #1 internationally bestselling author of 26 thrillers including the Orphan X series. His novels have won numerous literary awards and have been published in 33 languages. Gregg currently serves as the Co-President of International Thriller Writers (ITW). Additionally, he’s written screenplays and television scripts for many of the major studios and networks, and is an award-winning documentary producer. Gregg also wrote comics for AWA (including the critically acclaimed anthology NewThink), DC, and Marvel, and poetry. Currently, Gregg is working against polarization in politics and culture. To that end, he&#8217;s penned dozens of Op/Eds and pieces for The Wall Street Journal, The Guardian, The Bulwark, Salon, and others, and pieces of creative content which have won numerous industry awards and achieved several hundred million views on digital TV platforms. He also helped write the opening ceremony of the 2022 World Cup.
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Digital silhouette iot technology pixel glitch man

‘Do You Really Want To Defend Him?’ Algorithms, Outrage, And The Death Of Charlie Kirk

algorithm

assassination

Big Tech

Charlie Kirk

Conservatism

Democrats

Leftists

Silicon Valley

Social Media

The Italian journalist under fire online for a controversial #MeToo and Black Lives Matter question at the Venice Film Festival is now defending herself.
Federica Polidoro sat down with “After the Hunt” stars Julia Roberts, Andrew Garfield, and Ayo Edebiri for an interview to promote the project. One moment from the conversation, posted to the ArtsLifeTV YouTube channel, has gone viral, with critics accusing Polidoro of being “racist” for directing one of her questions specifically to Roberts and Garfield, who are white, while being accused of excluding Edebiri, who is black.
“Now that the #MeToo era and the Black Lives Matter are done, what do we have to expect in Hollywood and what we lost, we lost something with the politically correct era?” she asked.
Despite the question not being directed at her, Edebiri jumped in to answer it.
“I know that that’s not for me, and I don’t know if it’s purposeful that it’s not for me, but I just am curious,” the star of “The Bear” said.
She went on, “I don’t think it’s done. I don’t think it’s done at all,” as Roberts chimed in with her agreement.
Edebiri went on: “I think maybe hashtags might not be used as much, but I do think that there’s work being done by activists, by people, every day, that’s beautiful, important work that’s not finished, that’s really, really, really active for a reason, because this world is really charged. And that work isn’t finished at all. Maybe if there’s not, like, mainstream coverage in the way that there might have been, daily headlines in the way that it might have been eight or so years ago, but I don’t think it means that the work is done. That’s what I would say.”
Garfield chimed in, agreeing that the Black Lives Matter and #MeToo movements “are still absolutely alive, as you say, just maybe not as labeled or covered or magnified as much.”
The exchange triggered widespread backlash online, with many commenters accusing Polidoro of asking an insensitive question while being dismissive of the only black actor participating in the interview.
Following the resulting backlash, Polidoro took to Instagram to defend herself in a lengthy post.
<blockquote class="instagram-media" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOUHWCuCEmv/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14">
<div style="padding: 16px;">
&nbsp;
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div>
<div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div>
<div style="padding-top: 8px;">
<div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"></div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;">
<div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: 8px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"></div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);"></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: auto;">
<div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"></div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"></div>
</div>
&nbsp;
<p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOUHWCuCEmv/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by Federica Polidoro 🎥 Film Journalist &amp; Theorist (@federica__polidoro)</a>
</div>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
“I am not aware of any protocol that dictates the order in which questions must be asked in an interview,” the journalist wrote in part. “Censoring or delegitimizing questions considered ‘uncomfortable’ does not fall within the practice of democracy.”
“To those who unjustly accuse me of racism, I would like to clarify that in my work I have interviewed people of every background and ethnicity, and my own family is multi-ethnic, matriarchal, and feminist, with a significant history of immigration,” she continued. 
“I have collaborated for over 20 years with numerous national and international publications of all political orientations, always approaching my work with openness and professional rigor. In my view, the real racists are those who see racism everywhere and seek to muzzle journalism, limiting freedom of analysis, critical thinking and the plurality of perspectives.”
“After the Hunt” is a psychological thriller about a college professor (Roberts) whose student (Edebiri) makes an accusation against one of her colleagues (Garfield). The film’s tagline is, “Not everything is supposed to make you uncomfortable.”

Julia Roberts, Andrew Garfield, and Ayo Edebiri

Reporter Under Fire For Directing BLM Question Only To White Actors Says Backlash Is Censorship

Black Lives Matter

Entertainment

Hollywood

Journalism

Media

MeToo

World

Comedian Druski, who is black, is being criticized for disguising himself in “whiteface” and filming himself pretending to be a racist NASCAR fan.
The 30-year-old entertainer, whose real name is Andrew Desbordes, covered his face and upper body in very realistic paint to make himself appear to be a Caucasian man with a farmer’s tan sunburn. He wore no shirt under a pair of overalls, and accentuated the look with an American flag cowboy hat, American flag tattoos, a mullet, and a beard and mustache combo.
Clips of the skit have gone viral, with the X clip of the bit racking up 84 million views.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
That Guy who is just Proud to be AMERICAN🇺🇸 <a href="https://t.co/Xcc5ZJypqz">pic.twitter.com/Xcc5ZJypqz</a>
— DRUSKI (@druski) <a href="https://twitter.com/druski/status/1963017485114040343?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 2, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The comedian targets certain people in the video, spitting at the feet of a passing black man and stopping another black man to say, “Are you lost, boy?” and spitting again. 
“Here’s to love. Here’s to honor. If you can’t come in her, come on her,” Desbordes says in a mock toast in the clip. The comedian also shouts the lyrics to Bruce Springsteen’s “Born in the U.S.A.” while driving in a vehicle. 
Reactions to the skit were mixed in the comments, including from Druski’s fans.
“Notice how no white folk acted like you were? And WHY did you spit at the feet of black people? I wish you would go back and ask them how many times that happened that day — you treated them worse than any white person did I assure you,” one popular comment <a href="https://x.com/ThinkArchimedes/status/1963020832143196176">said</a>. “Always have to invent the racism.”
“So what you’re telling me is that blackface is back in style now?” one person <a href="https://x.com/chooseliberty_/status/1963268412081139755">wondered</a>.
Others supported the skit.
“If you can’t laugh at this, you’re a loser,” one person argued.
“Best video on the internet,” another commenter agreed.
“Deadass, some of y’all will find racism in literally everything and that’s pathetic,” another person <a href="https://x.com/saintz_tweet/status/1963040809919640025">said</a>. “If you’re really out here calling Druski racist, it just shows how slow and hypocritical y’all are. Bro’s just doing the classic Key &amp; Peele move … holding up a mirror to white folks acting extra. Like, it’s comedy, not a hate crime.”

Druski

Comedian Druski Wears ‘Whiteface,’ Mocks NASCAR Fans In Viral Comedy Skit

Comedian Druski Wears 'Whiteface,' Mocks NASCAR Fans In Viral Comedy Skit

comedian

NASCAR

CNN anchor Dana Bash brought in House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries for a Sunday morning interview on &#8220;State of the Union,&#8221; and he spent most of his time declaring President Donald Trump&#8217;s recent actions and policy positions to be racially motivated.
Jeffries was particularly concerned with Trump&#8217;s efforts to reframe a number of exhibits that are part of the Smithsonian Museums in the nation&#8217;s capital — exhibits that Trump said work overtime to paint the United States in a less than flattering light.
Jeffries claimed that Trump was &#8220;behaving like a racial arsonist&#8221; and attempting to whitewash America&#8217;s history with regard to slavery.
&#8220;It&#8217;s extraordinary that he would make such a historically ignorant statement,&#8221; Jeffries complained, adding, &#8220;The Smithsonian should continue to hold the line and make sure that this very painful part of American history is not erased.&#8221;
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
House Democratic Leader <a href="https://twitter.com/hakeemjeffries?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@hakeemjeffries</a> reacts to Trump&#8217;s review of the Smithsonian museums: Donald Trump is &#8220;behaving like a racial arsonist. &#8221; <a href="https://t.co/vJcH32CSFQ">pic.twitter.com/vJcH32CSFQ</a>
— State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) <a href="https://twitter.com/CNNSOTU/status/1959617204892144005?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 24, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
From The White House <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/08/president-trump-is-right-about-the-smithsonian/">website</a>:
<blockquote>The exhibits marked by the Trump administration as part of the problem were not the ones that directly addressed slavery — but rather those that attacked &#8220;white culture &#8220;The National Museum of African American History and Culture debuted a series to educate people on “a society that privileges white people and whiteness” — defining so-called “white dominant culture“ as “ways white people and their traditions, attitudes, and ways of life have been normalized over time” and portraying “the nuclear family,” “work ethic,” and “intellect” as white qualities rooted in racism.</blockquote>
Jeffries also pivoted to race when the discussion turned to the recent redistricting fight in Texas, blaming Trump — who supported the new map — and claiming that the Republican-driven map was also rooted in racism.
&#8220;This is a racial, partisan gerrymander ordered by Donald Trump as part of an effort to rig the midterm elections,&#8221; he claimed.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
.<a href="https://twitter.com/hakeemjeffries?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@HakeemJeffries</a> on what&#8217;s happening on Texas redistricting: &#8220;this is a racial, partisan gerrymander ordered by Donald Trump as part of an effort to rig the midterm elections.&#8221; <a href="https://t.co/jG30xxrDKK">pic.twitter.com/jG30xxrDKK</a>
— State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) <a href="https://twitter.com/CNNSOTU/status/1959632824543449179?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 24, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) Holds News Conference

Hakeem Jeffries: Everything Trump Is Doing Is Racist

Donald Trump

Hakeem Jeffries

Redistricting

Texas

Actress and comedian Amanda Seales — who described herself as a &#8220;radical black woman&#8221; and an &#8220;artistic intellectual,&#8221; among other things — debated 20 black conservatives, and while many made good points, one in particular stood out when he challenged her claim that reparations were both &#8220;just and necessary.&#8221;
Seales made the assertion on &#8220;Surrounded,&#8221; a debate series presented by political YouTube channel Jubilee, and the 20 conservatives stepped up one at a time to take the seat opposite her and engage in debate.
The second to sit across from Seales was one of the youngest in the group and he introduces himself as &#8220;Matt Nuclear&#8221; before stating that he felt privileged to be debating such a beautiful black woman.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
“You can give every low-income black American a $50,000 ‘reparations’ check—and it’s not going to fix anything. It’s not going to increase the median household income in ten years.
We had the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882—basically put them under apartheid here in the United… <a href="https://t.co/M5TFUny9yP">pic.twitter.com/M5TFUny9yP</a>
— Natalie Jean Beisner (@NJBeisner) <a href="https://twitter.com/NJBeisner/status/1957121369227038825?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 17, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;I disagree that reparations are necessary,&#8221; he cut to the chase immediately. &#8220;I think the most important thing that&#8217;s necessary right now for the black community would be the stopping of violence, especially black on black violence. I don&#8217;t see how reparations are going to solve anything.&#8221;
Seales dramatically lowered her head, raising a hand to her forehead and sighing loudly.
<a href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/?utm_campaign=summer&amp;utm_content=editorialsummersale&amp;utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial" target="_blank" rel="noopener">End of Summer Sale – Get 40% off New DailyWire+ Annual Memberships</a>
&#8220;You can give everyone here like a $50,000 check – especially the people that are in the streets who are committing violent crimes consistently — a $50,000 check, it’s not going to fix anything. It’s not going to increase the median household income in ten years by 10% or 20%.&#8221;
&#8220;For example, we had the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882,&#8221; he continued. &#8220;We prevented Chinese people from getting citizenship and even entering the country. We discriminated against them and basically put them under apartheid, even here in the United States, yet they have the highest median household income. How is that possible? How come they don’t complain and feel entitled consistently to beg for reparations and beg for this when they are killing each other 90% of the time — which is the rate that black people kill each other, according to the FBI?&#8221;
&#8220;Oh, young Matt,&#8221; Seales did not attempt to hide her exasperation.
&#8220;Yet white people are the oppressors,&#8221; he interjected.
&#8220;I&#8217;m not sure where your education came from, but they lied to you,&#8221; Seales claimed, despite the Straight Arrow News-provided fact-check attached to the published video that largely verified Nuclear&#8217;s statements.
&#8220;Stats don&#8217;t lie, though,&#8221; he protested.
&#8220;Statistics lie all the time,&#8221; Seales insisted, suggesting that the numbers were being manipulated specifically to keep black Americans oppressed. &#8220;So let&#8217;s start there.&#8221;
She went on to claim that there was no comparison to be made because the Chinese immigrants had come to America of their own volition, and then claimed that efforts were still being made to keep black people from &#8220;existing in their true citizenship,&#8221; but never explained what that would look like.
When Nuclear pushed back, she interrupted, &#8220;Are you acting right now? Do you really believe this?&#8221;
When he pointed to decades of FBI data that showed black people were more likely to be killed by other black people than by white people, she laughed at him.
She treated the others who debated her throughout the in similar fashion, repeatedly interrupting and talking over them while demanding that they show her respect and allow her to finish her every point. At one point, she even demanded that Nuclear talk to her like he would talk to his mother.
According to the comments on YouTube, many felt that Seales had been the one not showing respect for the others.
&#8220;She insulted almost every one of them and demanded respect for shouting them down each time,&#8221; one wrote.
Another added, &#8220;&#8216;Are you shaking your head no at me?&#8217; Says the one who literally rolled her eyes at everything they said.&#8221;
&#8220;The disrespect of this woman is insufferable. Demanding respect while not giving any, rolling her eyes constantly, cutting people off, insulting almost every single one of them and never stating any facts. Every time she said something the SAN fact check proved her wrong. I pray that she doesn&#8217;t get into ANY politics again,&#8221; another said.
WATCH:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="1 Black Radical vs 20 Black Conservatives (ft. Amanda Seales)" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/jRcejaxTsFM?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Celebrities Visit SiriusXM – May 14, 2024

‘It’s Not Going To Fix Anything’: Black Conservative Debates ‘Artistic Intellectual’ Over Reparations

'It's Not Going To Fix Anything': Black Conservative Debates Self-Described 'Artistic Intellectual'

Debates

Reparations

Systemic Racism

Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) claimed that black voters, even if their values leaned in a conservative direction, could not bring themselves to associate with Republicans because they &#8220;can&#8217;t hang out with the KKK.&#8221;
Crockett, whose congressional seat may be in jeopardy if Republicans in her state succeed in passing their newly-redrawn district map, claimed that black voters might agree with Republicans on issues but would vote against them because they believe the party writ large is &#8220;racist.&#8221;
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
🚨NEW: Jasmine Crockett:
&#8220;Most black people are not Republicans simply because we just is like, &#8216;Y&#8217;all racist. I can&#8217;t hang out with the KKK and them.'&#8221;
&#8220;Most black people have very conservative values — but the reality is that, like, we just can&#8217;t side with, like, the… <a href="https://t.co/RofjGp28Jk">pic.twitter.com/RofjGp28Jk</a>
— Jason Cohen 🇺🇸 (@JasonJournoDC) <a href="https://twitter.com/JasonJournoDC/status/1956053607964663930?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 14, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;I talk to black folk all the time, as somebody who&#8217;s the child of a preacher,&#8221; she said. &#8220;Listen, most black people are not Republicans simply because we just is like, &#8216;Y&#8217;all racist. I can&#8217;t hang out with the KKK and them.'&#8221;
<a class="c-link" href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/?utm_campaign=summer&amp;utm_content=editorialsummersale&amp;utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/?utm_campaign=summer&amp;utm_content=editorialsummersale&amp;utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial" data-sk="tooltip_parent">End of Summer Sale &#8211; Get 40% off New DailyWire+ Annual Memberships</a>
&#8220;That&#8217;s really what it is,&#8221; she continued. &#8220;But when we think about who we are as black people, and we think about where we come from — most black people have very conservative values, right? But the reality is that, like, we just can&#8217;t side with, like, the neo-Nazis and them!&#8221;
&#8220;We like, &#8216;We not dealing with y&#8217;all like that,&#8217; right?&#8221; she concluded.
It&#8217;s not the first time that Crockett has attempted to tie Republicans to the white supremacy of the Ku Klux Klan, despite the group being founded by southern Democrats in 1865 to resist Republicans. In early May, she claimed that Republicans were predisposed to violence.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
NEW: Rep. Jasmine Crockett says Republicans are &#8220;inherently&#8221; violent because the KKK aligns with the Republican Party.
Dumbest woman in Congress.
&#8220;Bebe, bebe, y&#8217;all got the white supremacist galore, okay? Like, all of them, you got the proud boys, you got, you got the neo… <a href="https://t.co/UNDbAuco8D">pic.twitter.com/UNDbAuco8D</a>
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) <a href="https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1920586098310541780?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 8, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;So like inherently in, like, who you are, y&#8217;all are violent like, y&#8217;all. And, and most of your violence has to do with people that&#8217;s got a little bit of melanin,&#8221; she claimed.

US Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX)

Jasmine Crockett: Black Voters Aren’t Republicans Because They Can’t ‘Hang Out With The KKK’

Jasmine Crockett: Black Voters Aren't Republicans Because They Can't 'Hang Out With The KKK'

Jasmine Crockett

Ku Klux Klan (KKK)

Neo-Nazis

Recording artist Lizzo got in on the trend of mocking the viral American Eagle ad with Sydney Sweeney, but most of her followers were not amused.
The 37-year-old rapper shared what appears to be an AI image of herself clad head to toe in denim to Instagram that included the caption, “My jeans are black.” The image also had text on it that said, “If the Democrats won the election.”
Comments on the image mostly criticized Lizzo for having beef with the Sweeney ad, pointing out that it wasn’t racist or hateful to put white people in advertisements.
<blockquote class="instagram-media" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/DMxynrMxlJl/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14">
<div style="padding: 16px;">
&nbsp;
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div>
<div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div>
<div style="padding-top: 8px;">
<div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"></div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;">
<div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: 8px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"></div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #F4F4F4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);"></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: auto;">
<div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"></div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"></div>
</div>
&nbsp;
<p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/DMxynrMxlJl/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by Lizzo (@lizzobeeating)</a>
</div>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
“Lizzo this is embarrassing,” one person wrote. “Sydney being the face of the ad doesn&#8217;t take away from other ethnicities or beauty. Get real.”
“This is so weird. So companies are no longer allowed to use any white models to model their products?” another wrote.
“This promotes division and smells of racism and relevancy. Do better,” another wrote.
Many commenters also noted how Lizzo failed to tag the original creator of the <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/DMvO-grx3Zw/?hl=en">image</a>, Kevin Flynn, who runs the account “whitepeoplehumor.” She also cropped out his name when reposting the ad recreation on her personal Instagram account.
The argument stems from American Eagle’s viral ad campaign featuring Sweeney posing provocatively with a sports car while helping advertise the retailer&#8217;s denim. In one of the ads, Sweeney says, “Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality, and even eye color. My jeans are blue.”
This messaging has led to absolute crashouts by mainstream media and leftist social media influencers, who insist the Sweeney ads are nothing but “<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/leftists-crash-out-over-whiteness-of-sexy-sydney-sweeney-jean-ads">Nazi propaganda</a>.”
Backlash got so bad that American Eagle responded, but instead of apologizing, they doubled down. 
‘Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans’ is and always was about the jeans. Her jeans. Her story,” the company <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/american-eagle-refuses-to-cave-doubles-down-in-response-to-sydney-sweeney-ad">posted</a> on Friday to their Instagram.
“We’ll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way,” AE continued. “Great jeans look good on everyone.”

Lizzo and Sydney Sweeney

Lizzo Weighs In On Sydney Sweeney Ad With Jeans Image, Gets Dragged By Followers

advertising

Business

Economy

Lizzo

Sydney Sweeney

A decades-old court order that blocked the federal government from using tests to measure job applicants&#8217; skills was terminated by a D.C. judge on Friday, setting the stage for an overhaul of the federal workforce that could be one of President Donald Trump&#8217;s most lasting achievements.
In 1981, Angel Luevano sued the federal government over the Professional and Administrative Career Examination, a test that helped identify the best and brightest out of the tens of thousands who apply for government jobs each year. Luevano argued that the test kept too many blacks and Hispanics out of government, and, in the waning days of President Jimmy Carter&#8217;s administration, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) agreed to pause the test for five years.
Forty-four years later, the &#8220;Luevano Consent Decree&#8221; was somehow still intact. In January, the Trump administration filed a brief <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/feds-cant-hire-for-competence-because-jimmy-carter-said-it-was-racist-trump-wants-to-fix-that">challenging the agreement</a> — a feat which required reopening a decades-closed court case in which the original judge had died. The administration argued that it was doubtful the decree was ever appropriate, and that, with Supreme Court case law outlawing affirmative action, it was certainly not now.
Angel Luevano is still alive, and agreed to terminate the consent decree, <a href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69731384/luevano-v-director-office-of-personnel-management/">court papers</a> show. Luevano was represented by lawyers from Hispanic and black civil rights groups, two of whom did not return a request for comment.
For almost half a century, the federal government has operated like a college that didn&#8217;t look at SAT scores when admitting students. Rescinding the Luevano Consent Decree could take the government from safety-school status to Ivy League.
&#8220;We&#8217;re making civil service great again,&#8221; OPM Director Scott Kupor told The Daily Wire Friday.
The move opens the door to technocratic hiring assessments that allow the government to hire applicants who objectively demonstrate the most aptitude. Kupor told The Daily Wire in an interview that the move means Americans may start getting better service at government agencies, with government being more helpful and responsive.
&#8220;The lasting opportunity here is: can we change the culture of the workforce in the federal government? Can we make it a high-performance culture? That will definitely be the president&#8217;s legacy, if we can make that successful,&#8221; he said.
After the demise of the Professional and Administrative Career Examination and similar tests, the government began relying on &#8220;self-assessments&#8221; to sift through job applicants, as it was the only measure that saw a sufficient number of minorities enter government. Applicants simply declared how good they were at a task, with no attempt to verify it or compare them to other applicants. That led to a hiring process that rewarded boasting and fabrications as much as merit.
Kupor said the de facto prohibition on government checking people&#8217;s competency before hiring them had become crippling in the modern age, with people using artificial intelligence or simply copy-and-paste to take a job advertisement&#8217;s requirements and send an application asserting that they had all those skills.
The inability to use objective measures to sort the most qualified applicants from a large pool — as virtually all other large employers do — has profoundly impacted the caliber of government employees. The Luevano Consent Decree was perhaps one of the largest applications ever of the philosophy known as &#8220;disparate impact,&#8221; which holds that anything that produces racially unbalanced outcomes must inherently be racist. But the fallout went beyond just minorities, leaving little way to differentiate a brilliant white job applicant from an incompetent white applicant.
The government was represented by Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon of the Department of Justice&#8217;s Civil Rights Division.
OPM General Counsel Andrew Kloster told The Daily Wire in an interview that the government did not make any concessions to reach the agreement. &#8220;They just flat out agreed,&#8221; he said. &#8220;It would not have happened without the original named plaintiff agreeing to it and the judge agreeing to accept it.&#8221;
&#8220;This is really kind of an understanding that disparate impact as a way to measure things is not the law of the land anymore. You have to actually show real discrimination. The explicit argument was that the objective tests themselves were racially biased, and obviously that&#8217;s bogus.&#8221;
It is yet to be decided whether OPM will institute a general aptitude test across agencies. But many specific job categories are likely to have their own tests. If the government is hiring, say, computer programmers, it won&#8217;t simply ask them how good they are at a programming language. Instead, it will administer a coding test to rank applicants on a uniform scale.
The hiring process used by government agencies for decades resulted in hiring that was, at best, random, and at worst, allowed the sort of cronyism and favoritism that the consent decree was supposed to avoid, Kupor said.
&#8220;We&#8217;re going to be able to attract really, really good people, because they&#8217;re going to be fairly tested for their merit,&#8221; he said. &#8220;It also really does eliminate a lot of potential for a bias in the hiring process if you actually use objective standards.&#8221;
&#8220;This is a win for fairness, as well as a win for getting American people the ability to get people with the appropriate skills into the right jobs.&#8221;

Scott Kupor And Eric Matthew Ueland Testify In Their Senate Nomination Hearing

For The First Time In 40 Years, The Federal Government Can Judge Applicants By Merit

Federal Government

federal workforce

Jimmy Carter

Office of Personnel Management

Racial Bias

Left-wing critics are continuing to crash out over an American Eagle Outfitters ad campaign for their fall jean collection with actress Sydney Sweeney, deeming the ads racist and Nazi-coded.
As covered by <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/new-sexy-sydney-sweeney-ad-campaign-has-internet-celebrating-the-end-of-woke?author=Amanda+Prestigiacomo&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=2&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=New+Sexy+Sydney+Sweeney+Ad+Campaign+Has+Internet+Celebrating+The+End+Of+‘Woke’">The Daily Wire</a>, the ad campaign plays on the concept of good genetics and blue jeans &#8212; using the tagline, &#8220;Sydney Sweeney has good jeans.&#8221;
In one of the ads, Sweeney says, “Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality, and even eye color. My jeans are blue.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
Sydney Sweeney x American Eagle, oh my god. <a href="https://t.co/tDkeGT9R7G">pic.twitter.com/tDkeGT9R7G</a>
— Sydney Sweeney Daily (@sweeneydailyx) <a href="https://twitter.com/sweeneydailyx/status/1948497621095477712?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 24, 2025</a></blockquote>
An MSNBC op-ed <a href="https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/sydney-sweeney-american-eagle-ad-whiteness-rcna221630">said</a> the American Eagle ads were evidence of the &#8220;unbridled cultural shift toward whiteness,&#8221; which the author suggested was &#8220;ugly and startling.&#8221;
&#8220;The internet has been quick to condemn the advertisement as noninclusive at best and as overtly promoting &#8216;white supremacy&#8217; and &#8216;Nazi propaganda&#8217; at worst,&#8221; the op-ed reads, calling some of this criticism &#8220;fair.&#8221;
&#8220;These critics point to the copy and the implication of calling a white person superior because of their genes,&#8221; the piece continues, adding that the &#8220;campaign feels regressive and not retro, offensive and not cheeky.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Whiteness is ugly… this is the ideology of the left <a href="https://t.co/CsnON2D7lO">pic.twitter.com/CsnON2D7lO</a>
— Ryan James Girdusky (@RyanGirdusky) <a href="https://twitter.com/RyanGirdusky/status/1950179077325021446?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 29, 2025</a></blockquote>
Good Morning America also threw a fit over the ads:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Holy crap, Good Morning America on Disney owned ABC ran a story this morning saying the Sydney Sweeney clothing ad is connected to Nazis. Legacy media is dead: <a href="https://t.co/IcPmRJr8R0">pic.twitter.com/IcPmRJr8R0</a>
— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) <a href="https://twitter.com/ClayTravis/status/1950198687344288224?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 29, 2025</a></blockquote>
A writer posted on Instagram that the campaign is promoting &#8220;eugenics&#8221; and &#8220;Nazi propaganda.&#8221; &#8220;And it&#8217;s BLATANT,&#8221; the person said. &#8220;Like, you don&#8217;t even need media literacy. It&#8217;s that on-the-nose obvious.&#8221;
<div id="attachment_953695" style="width: 1034px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-953695" class="wp-image-953695 size-large" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/07/Screenshot-2025-07-29-at-12.03.04-PM-1024x324.png" alt="" width="1024" height="324" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/07/Screenshot-2025-07-29-at-12.03.04-PM-1024x324.png 1024w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/07/Screenshot-2025-07-29-at-12.03.04-PM-300x95.png 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/07/Screenshot-2025-07-29-at-12.03.04-PM-768x243.png 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/07/Screenshot-2025-07-29-at-12.03.04-PM.png 1234w" sizes=" (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" />Screenshot: Threads via Instagram</div>
Another woman criticized American Eagle for using Sweeney in the ad, since the actress looks like she &#8220;walked straight off a Nazi propaganda poster.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
Here’s another Democrat losing her mind over Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle ad—calling it an ad for eugenics and claiming Sweeney looks like she “walked straight off a Nazi propaganda poster.”
Self-loathing white liberal women are a rotting cancer eating away at America—and… <a href="https://t.co/4loa14UsQB">https://t.co/4loa14UsQB</a> <a href="https://t.co/iYPfdtnNRY">pic.twitter.com/iYPfdtnNRY</a>
— I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 (@ImMeme0) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImMeme0/status/1949715980172558377?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 28, 2025</a></blockquote>
The ads were called &#8220;fascist weird&#8221; and &#8220;Nazi propaganda weird&#8221; by another female critic.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
You CANNOT make this sh*t up!
A self-proclaimed “trans man” — aligned with the same party that supports pornographic books in school libraries, teaching s*x ed to elementary kids, pushing gender changes for toddlers, and bringing children to s*xualized drag shows — is now… <a href="https://t.co/rHEDnZ0PAG">pic.twitter.com/rHEDnZ0PAG</a>
— I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 (@ImMeme0) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImMeme0/status/1949361617843507308?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 27, 2025</a></blockquote>
On the contrary, the ads are creating a lot of buzz online about the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/new-sexy-sydney-sweeney-ad-campaign-has-internet-celebrating-the-end-of-woke?author=Amanda+Prestigiacomo&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=2&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=New+Sexy+Sydney+Sweeney+Ad+Campaign+Has+Internet+Celebrating+The+End+Of+‘Woke’">death of “woke” marketing</a> &#8212; and the American Eagle stock is on the rise.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
And the stock’s up 25%.
American Eagle is betting they can sell jeans to normal people, not a tiny minority of deranged harpies. <a href="https://t.co/K3ePyToBBp">https://t.co/K3ePyToBBp</a> <a href="https://t.co/vpzRT0I83P">pic.twitter.com/vpzRT0I83P</a>
— Douglass Mackey (@DougMackeyCase) <a href="https://twitter.com/DougMackeyCase/status/1949964734830117051?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 28, 2025</a></blockquote>
Related: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/new-sexy-sydney-sweeney-ad-campaign-has-internet-celebrating-the-end-of-woke?author=Amanda+Prestigiacomo&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=2&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=New+Sexy+Sydney+Sweeney+Ad+Campaign+Has+Internet+Celebrating+The+End+Of+‘Woke’">New Sexy Sydney Sweeney Ad Campaign Has Internet Celebrating The End Of ‘Woke’</a>

Leftists Crash Out Over ‘Whiteness’ Of Sexy Sydney Sweeney Jean Ads

Leftism

As news broke that a mass shooter with a high-powered rifle had opened fire on people in a skyscraper in Midtown Manhattan, CNN anchor Erin Burnett and CNN Chief Law Enforcement and Intelligence Analyst John Miller both speculated that the gunman was “possibly white,” catalyzing anger on social media.
Surveillance images quickly surfaced after the mass shooting, showing the dark-complexioned, mustachioed gunman walking into the building at 345 Park Avenue with a rifle, wearing sunglasses and dark clothes. The Daily Wire is not publishing the gunman’s name due to a company policy against contributing to the unintentional glorification of mass shooters.
“People don&#8217;t walk around with guns like that. But was his face visible? I mean, do they — they have any idea at this point who he is?” Burnett asked Miller.
“They do not know who he is,” Miller stated. “They know he is a male, possibly white. He&#8217;s wearing sunglasses. He appears to have a mustache. And that picture has been distributed to every police officer in New York City particularly, has been sent to the phones of the search teams inside that building because whenever they encounter a group of people, the first thing they have to figure out is, is that individual among these people hiding among victims or pretending to be an office worker, because one thing you don&#8217;t want to have happen is to have this kind of cordon where you&#8217;re trying to evacuate people in groups as you can get them to a safe corridor and have this person slip out with them.&#8221;
“Male, possibly white, mustache, sunglasses in that building,” Burnett repeated. Later. She repeated, “There were a few things that really stood out there among them that they did get. They do know what he looks like. Sunglasses, mustache, male, possibly white &#8230;”
Ironically, later in the broadcast Miller stated, “One of the cautions here, as you know, from having done so many of these, Erin, unfortunately, is that we always have to be mindful of the idea that between people who are watching, listening information that&#8217;s being sent over social media, that we have to be a little bit guarded on specifics.”
“You share what you can from your sources. Some of it obviously, you must protect,” Burnett stated.
Social media slammed Burnett. One post stated, “CNN anchor Erin Burnett stated live on the air that the obviously not white man, quote, was ‘possibly white.’ Embarrassing attempt to politicize this tragedy.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
A devastating shooting occurred in New York City, leaving 4 dead, including a police officer.
CNN anchor Erin Burnett stated live on the air that the obviously not white man, quote, was “possibly white.” Embarrassing attempt to politicize this tragedy. <a href="https://t.co/3T2dGA08ud">pic.twitter.com/3T2dGA08ud</a>
&mdash; Armstrong Williams 🇺🇸 (@Arightside) <a href="https://twitter.com/Arightside/status/1950138865412411758?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 29, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Another post stated, “@ErinBurnett  knows exactly what she’s doing here. Incredible misinformation and irresponsible, purposeful race-baiting. If you don’t know for sure, you don’t say it. Unless, of course your job is to mislead, stir-up confusion, obfuscation and to bury facts.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
.<a href="https://twitter.com/ErinBurnett?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ErinBurnett</a> knows exactly what she’s doing here. Incredible misinformation and irresponsible, purposeful race-baiting. If you don’t know for sure, you don’t say it. Unless, of course your job is to mislead, stir-up confusion, obfuscation and to bury facts. <a href="https://t.co/JMRDxTg7qJ">pic.twitter.com/JMRDxTg7qJ</a>
&mdash; Ross Dyer (@RossDyerTV) <a href="https://twitter.com/RossDyerTV/status/1949984927706931566?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 29, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/pqJdFP-etb0?si=eEmJ9lIDY7nkpol7" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
One month before the 2024 election, Burnett remained silent when her guest Democratic strategist guest, Aisha Mills, bridled, “As a black lesbian who Donald Trump doesn’t believe has genes as good as his, is he going to attempt to exterminate me?” and railed to CNN senior political commentator David Urban, “I’m not going to be lectured by some white man who doesn’t know what he’s talking about.” Urban responded, “Shame on you, Aisha,” prompting Burnett to state, “Let me just say I appreciate — OK, I appreciate both of you, I know it&#8217;s obviously getting heated. I think — I think what people appreciate about both of you is you mean what you say and you say what you mean. You&#8217;re both very genuine people.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
CNN guest: “I’m not going to be lectured by some white man…”
The blatant racism isn’t the most noteworthy part, it’s Erin Burnett refusing to condemn it on her own show. 
 <a href="https://t.co/lQmsYxdB2P">pic.twitter.com/lQmsYxdB2P</a>
&mdash; Cabot Phillips (@cabot_phillips) <a href="https://twitter.com/cabot_phillips/status/1844188406181777895?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 10, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

2014 Concordia Summit – Day 1

‘Purposeful Race-Baiting’: CNN’s Burnett Slammed For Saying NYC Mass Shooter Was ‘Possibly White’

Menu