Republicans in the House and Senate are pushing to defund NPR after a now-former editor wrote an essay exposing the liberal bias of the outlet and reports broke on leftist comments made by CEO Katherine Maher. 
Republican Reps. Jim Banks (IN), Claudia Tenney (NY), and Bob Good (VA) all introduced their own legislation to end funding for the outlet. Banks introduced <a href="https://banks.house.gov/uploadedfiles/defund_npr_act.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">his measure</a> on Friday, taking aim at Maher and calling NPR “low grade propaganda.”
“NPR’s new CEO is a radical, left-wing activist who doesn’t believe in free speech or objective journalism,” Banks said in a statement. “Hoosiers shouldn’t be writing her paychecks. Katherine Maher isn’t qualified to teach an introductory journalism class, much less capable of responsibly spending millions of American tax dollars.”
Recently, clips of Maher <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/white-male-westernized-npr-president-said-she-opposed-wikipedias-free-and-open-mission" target="_blank" rel="noopener">posted by</a> journalist Chris Rufo show Maher saying that the “number one challenge” for her in fighting so-called disinformation was the First Amendment, which she called a “fairly robust protection of rights.” She also claimed that former President Donald Trump was a racist and <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/new-ceo-of-npr-is-everything-wrong-with-the-news-media" target="_blank" rel="noopener">posted</a> about her desire to go on a road trip with Vice President Kamala Harris eating “nuts and baklava.”
Tenney, who <a href="https://tenney.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-tenney-moves-defund-npr#:~:text=%22My%20legislation%2C%20the%20Defund%20NPR,bias%20in%20our%20news%20media." target="_blank" rel="noopener">introduced</a> the “Defund NPR Act of 2024” said that the outlet had become a “partisan propaganda machine.” 
“As a former newspaper owner and publisher, I understand the importance of non-partisan, balanced media coverage, and have seen first-hand the left-wing bias in our news media,” she said. “NPR is using American taxpayer dollars to manipulate the news and lie to the American people on behalf of a political agenda. It’s past time the American people stop footing the bill for NPR, and the partisan, left-wing activists that control it.&#8221;
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1713635892817000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3lXMk_jhNQC8Fngje8e8XV">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
Good <a href="https://good.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-good-calls-defunding-biased-npr" target="_blank" rel="noopener">introduced</a> similar legislation alongside eight co-sponsors, saying that it was “egregious” for taxpayers to be backing partisan news coverage. 
The lawmakers&#8217; push comes after now-former senior business editor Uri Berliner <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/we-lost-americas-trust-npr-veteran-says-network-has-lost-its-way" target="_blank" rel="noopener">wrote an essay</a> in the Free Press saying that the network had lost the trust of Americans because of its coverage of things like gender ideology and refusal to cover the Hunter Biden laptop story in the lead up to the 2020 election. 
Berliner, who resigned days after the essay was published, said that NPR lacked serious viewpoint diversity. 
“It’s frictionless — one story after another about instances of supposed racism, transphobia, signs of the climate apocalypse, Israel doing something bad, and the dire threat of Republican policies,” he wrote.

NPR To Cut 10% Of Staff As Advertising Revenue Falls

‘Partisan Propaganda Machine’: Republicans Push To Defund NPR Over Political Bias

House Republicans

Jim Banks

Leftism

Legacy Media

If you don&#8217;t remember &#8220;Car Talk,&#8221; it was a radio show that lasted more than three decades on NPR, until it ended in 2012. The idea was that people called in with practical questions and dilemmas relating to their cars, and then the hosts dispensed advice — whether it was about car maintenance or repair or whatever. The show no longer exists, though, because the NPR that broadcast that show for 35 years no longer exists. The idea of a show that actually addresses people&#8217;s problems in real life, based on knowledge of how markets and automobiles or anything else actually works, has been unthinkable to the management of NPR for some time. Shows that cover the news from an objective factual perspective, to the extent possible, are also out of style. Instead, for the past decade, NPR has been controlled by activists who have devoted themselves to two primary pursuits. 
The first pursuit is blanketing the airwaves with identity politics at every conceivable opportunity. That&#8217;s why they run segments on diverse gender representation in <a href="https://www.npr.org/2022/06/10/1104266396/lgbtq-communitys-battle-for-the-dinosaur-emoji-key-moments-from-jan-6-hearing" target="_blank" rel="noopener">dinosaur emojis</a> for example. 
The second pursuit has been shutting down stories that are inconvenient for the politicians who are voting to spend your money to finance NPR&#8217;s operation. Infamously, NPR&#8217;s executive editor, Terence Samuel, claimed that the Hunter Biden laptop scandal wasn&#8217;t a &#8220;<a href="https://twitter.com/NPRpubliceditor/status/1319281101223940096" target="_blank" rel="noopener">real story</a>.&#8221; He said it was a &#8220;distraction.&#8221; And instead of firing Samuel, NPR promoted him. American University even invited Samuel to deliver a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFvV24PWfF4&amp;lc=Ugz7bLd9ECugl009UZF4AaABAg" target="_blank" rel="noopener">lecture</a> entitled, &#8220;How Journalism Can Save Itself and Democracy.&#8221;
It&#8217;s harder to think of a better way to summarize what NPR has become. They aren&#8217;t simply bumbling propagandists. They&#8217;re also incredibly self-satisfied and narcissistic. They believe that they alone can save American democracy. And they think that, in order to do that, they need to control what kinds of information you can see. It&#8217;s not that they thought the Hunter Biden laptop story was &#8220;unvetted&#8221; or &#8220;Russian disinformation&#8221; or whatever the excuse was. They always knew it was factually accurate. But just because something is factually accurate, in NPR&#8217;s eyes, doesn&#8217;t make it true. According to NPR, truth is subjective; whatever&#8217;s most expedient politically for them is what&#8217;s true.
For a long time now, this position — which really amounts to nihilism — was unstated at NPR, at least publicly. But now it&#8217;s explicit, thanks to a new CEO and president by the name of Katherine Maher who recently took over at NPR. Maher very clearly does not believe that the truth is objective. She also doesn&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s worth trying to find out what the truth may be. This is an extraordinary position for the chief executive of a publicly funded news organization to have, but it&#8217;s what Katherine Maher believes. 
This is a speech of hers that&#8217;s been making the rounds this week. It&#8217;s from back when she was running Wikimedia, which is mainly known for Wikipedia. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="002 Truth" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/WWEiwvNwsGM?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
&nbsp;
This is what passes for good public speaking these days. But she speaks in a robotic, sing-songy voice that makes it sound like she’s a kindergarten teacher lecturing a bunch of 5-year-olds. She has the tone of someone who believes firmly in the superiority of her own intellect, even though what she’s saying is so abjectly stupid. 
She says truth is subjective, and that everyone in the room has his or her own &#8220;truth.&#8221; But here&#8217;s the problem. Truth exists because reality exists. Either something is a part of reality or it isn&#8217;t. To deny objective truth is to deny reality. And you can&#8217;t even deny reality without asserting a reality — the reality that there is no reality. So the relativistic view is not only false, but so false as to be incomprehensible if you think about it for more than two seconds.
Maher&#8217;s remarks are the same idiot relativism that you can hear from any freshman philosophy student, but she goes to great pains to make her take seem nuanced and innovative. She talks in circles and ends back at &#8220;there are many different truths.&#8221; She says this even after acknowledging that the truth exists. Again, those are two contradictory ideas, but that doesn&#8217;t bother Maher for a second. Like most of our overeducated elite class, she&#8217;s incapable of speaking without a parade of cliches while making tedious and absurd ideas sound far more complex than they really are. 
<h4><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1350-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show</a></h4>
Also according to Maher, we have &#8220;glorious chronicles to the human experience in many different cultures&#8221; because we have &#8220;many different truths.&#8221; But that&#8217;s not what these &#8220;glorious chronicles&#8221; show us. Instead, they show us that the truth is objective and eternal. Different cultures and people across time have had different ways of perceiving the truth — talking about it, accessing it, embracing it, or rejecting it, yes. But the truth remains the same. That is what makes the study of history, and different cultures through history, so fascinating. It is precisely because all of these different people across time and space lived in the same reality, and yet had wildly different ways of existing in it, and responding to it. 
Katherine Maher doesn&#8217;t seem to understand this, or at least she pretends not to. She repeats her theory of truth at every possible opportunity. Here&#8217;s some more footage from a conference two years ago. Maher begins by explaining that Galileo was prosecuted for saying that the Earth and planets revolve around the Sun, which is a basically accurate if wildly oversimplified retelling of that historical episode — although it doesn&#8217;t prove what Maher seems to think it does. Then she makes an incredible statement. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="003 Truth is Changing" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/dP5g369_nvs?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
&#8220;The truth, by definition, is malleable,&#8221; says Maher. Really? By whose definition exactly? You can make the case that postmodernists thinkers and their precursors — like Machiavelli, Nietzsche, and Rousseau — might agree with that statement. But you won&#8217;t hear many traditional thinkers (prior to, say, Heidegger) saying that the truth is &#8220;malleable.&#8221; So why should we adopt the postmodern belief and not the traditional one? There has to be some reason to side with one school of thought and not another.
In any event, if truth is merely &#8220;malleable&#8221; — if there&#8217;s no knowable, essential structure to it — then definitions themselves are just language games. There&#8217;s no significance to any of it. It&#8217;s just a power struggle. When you get down to it, that&#8217;s really what Maher is saying. She&#8217;s asserting that &#8220;the truth&#8221; is &#8220;malleable&#8221; as an act of political will because she doesn&#8217;t believe in any objectively true definitions. She keeps saying, over and over again, the words &#8220;the truth,&#8221; only to make it clear that she has no idea what that is.
And from that very shaky foundation, Maher starts to derive some very shaky corollaries. At one point, Maher implies that people don&#8217;t trust the media anymore not because the media lied to them, but because people have different mistaken &#8220;truths&#8221; that they&#8217;re clinging to. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="004 Misinformation" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/IqICz5BBR5A?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
It&#8217;s another revealing statement that Maher makes without any justification. She&#8217;s implying that democracies aren&#8217;t (or can&#8217;t be) xenophobic or nationalist. But the Greeks were both. Greek democracies were very much “xenophobic” — if that’s how you want to put it — and nationalist in nature. There&#8217;s no doubt about that. So why is democracy the goal here? Is that even her goal?
Really, her only given justification for thinking our traditional conception of truth is inadequate, and needs to be reworked, is that the &#8220;truth&#8221; we have now is the product of a history which is also political. &#8220;History is written by victors&#8221; is one of the many cliches she invokes throughout her speeches. And she says that excludes various potential sources of knowledge like &#8220;indigenous&#8221; perspectives and practices, or women with their &#8220;emotional intelligence.&#8221;
But that&#8217;s not incompatible with the reality that &#8220;the truth&#8221; is real, is universal, and many aspects of it have been uniquely uncovered by Western thought, science, and technology. Even if you bought into Maher&#8217;s talking points about a “plurality of perspectives” being better than &#8220;one alone&#8221; for getting at &#8220;the truth,&#8221; the fact remains that it took 2,000 years of Western, Eurocentric, supposedly white supremacist, heteronormative, misogynist history for us to reach the point at which these minor tail-end improvements she&#8217;s suggesting could be made. 
It took 2,000 years of history to create the civilization that Maher is now critiquing. And if she thinks this new approach will cause some kind of &#8220;scientific revolution,&#8221; it won&#8217;t. The more likely outcome is that it will destroy the civilization that was built over thousands of years. That is the point after all. And this is the essence of what we call wokeness. The Left likes to put conservatives on the spot by demanding a definition of “woke.” Well, here it is — the rejection of truth as a category. That’s what wokeness is, when boiled down to its most fundamental parts.
As for Maher, it&#8217;s tempting to dismiss all of this footage as the ramblings of a single woman who has no idea what she&#8217;s talking about. But it&#8217;s a bit more significant than that. Maher was selected to lead NPR, after an allegedly careful vetting process. There&#8217;s no way that NPR didn&#8217;t scrutinize her beliefs, which Maher has expressed many times over the last few years in public social media posts and numerous speeches.
On Twitter, Chris Rufo has exposed some of the more deranged posts from this woman. There are really too many to mention, but suffice it to say, she&#8217;s like a woke AI bot that churns out the least original woke liberal woman talking points you can possibly imagine. She uses the word &#8220;folx,&#8221; with the &#8220;x&#8221; at the end. She says &#8220;Latinx.&#8221; She called Donald Trump a racist and cried with joy when Biden took office, of course. She wrote that she once dreamed of going on a road trip with Kamala Harris eating &#8220;nuts and baklava.&#8221; She expresses her happiness when she logs into the public WiFi at a COVID clinic and the password is &#8220;HeSheThey,&#8221; recognizing the lived experience of nonbinary patients. She calls the Internet &#8220;sexist.&#8221; 
At one point, she apologized for using the phrase “people who identify as women,” because it&#8217;s a form of “trans-erasure.&#8221; She writes about the importance of &#8220;transit justice&#8221; and vegetarian Thanksgiving, and rants about the &#8220;male gaze&#8221; and &#8220;late-stage capitalism,&#8221; even as she drew a salary of $800,000 a year. There are many more examples; Chris Rufo&#8217;s feed has categorized many of them.
To burnish her intellectual credentials even further, Maher even <a href="https://x.com/njhochman/status/1780638504097022442">sat on a panel</a> with Lizzo at a Ted conference where tickets cost more than $10,000. The name of Lizzos&#8217; talk was, &#8220;The Black history of twerking — and how it taught me self-love.&#8221; 
But Maher doesn&#8217;t need lessons on self-love, she has that covered. What she&#8217;s looking for now is power. 
In a video posted by the Atlantic Council and unearthed by Rufo, Maher explains that the First Amendment — which you&#8217;d think journalists would support, since it&#8217;s the one thing keeping journalists out of prison — is not a sacred constitutional principle. Instead, she says, it&#8217;s a &#8220;challenge&#8221; to be overcome. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="005 Katherine Maher Vs First Free Speech" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/MGpZJt5uU2s?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
The only people who view the First Amendment as a &#8220;challenge&#8221; are government censors who want to shut down any dissent by force. And now that she&#8217;s running a state-funded media outlet, that&#8217;s exactly what Maher is. She&#8217;s a state-funded censor.
To that end, she no longer believes in transparency. The irony is that, when she was running Wikimedia, Maher kept talking about the importance of showing people everything that&#8217;s going on inside the company. Every edit on Wikipedia, she said, is public for a reason. Disclosure is sometimes &#8220;painful,&#8221; she said, but it&#8217;s necessary. 
Transparency is key, she said at the time. But apparently this is one of the malleable &#8220;truths&#8221; that Katherine Maher has decided to discard. As you&#8217;ve probably heard, she just forced out an NPR whistleblower who <a href="https://nypost.com/2024/04/17/media/npr-editor-uri-berliner-resigns-after-bombshell-expose-reveals-networks-pervasive-left-wing-bias/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">wrote</a> a damning <a href="https://www.thefp.com/p/npr-editor-how-npr-lost-americas-trust" target="_blank" rel="noopener">column</a> in the Free Press about the organization&#8217;s corruption and overwhelming bias. She <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/npr-suspends-editor-who-accused-network-of-bias-issues-final-warning" target="_blank" rel="noopener">suspended</a> this 25-year veteran of NPR without pay because he pointed out that the organization is now completely one-sided. 
For example, the whistleblower wrote:
<blockquote>Concerned by the lack of viewpoint diversity, I looked at voter registration for our newsroom. In D.C., where NPR is headquartered and many of us live, I found 87 registered Democrats working in editorial positions and zero Republicans. None.</blockquote>
That&#8217;s not the kind of transparency that the new NPR CEO appreciates, apparently. She&#8217;s happy to talk about how NPR employs too many white men. But she definitely doesn&#8217;t want to talk about political bias, or how useless NPR has become. It used to be that NPR at least pretended to be embarrassed about this. In 2011, NPR&#8217;s CEO at the time, Vivian Schiller, resigned after a Project Veritas sting exposed what she thought about conservatives in the Tea Party movement. To summarize: she didn’t like them. Schiller had to resign once her views came to light. Back then, NPR believed that the appearance of fairness was at least a little important.
But that was the &#8220;Car Talk&#8221; era of NPR. Now they believe their CEO can categorically reject the idea that there&#8217;s any truth to report on. This is a belief system that&#8217;s now in vogue in newsrooms all over the country. It&#8217;s a big reason for the rise of transgenderism, COVID hysteria, and all the media&#8217;s lying we had to endure under the previous administration. 
This is the belief system that insists that men can become women, because the meaning of the words &#8220;men&#8221; and &#8220;women&#8221; are subjective. And it will spell the end of Western civilization unless we reject it. That is, of course, the point of everything Katherine Maher is saying. In the absence of truth, there is only a struggle for power. And right now — and hopefully not for much longer — it&#8217;s people like Katherine Maher who have that power.

Day 2 – Web Summit 2019 Lisbon

New CEO Of NPR Is Everything Wrong With The News Media

Activists

National Public Radio (NPR)

Progressivism

Readers Pass

Woke Culture

In 1995, there were two very different versions of the O.J. Simpson trial playing out. For most of the country, the trial was a spectacle. A lot of crazy stuff happened — so much that most people don&#8217;t remember all of it.
Overnight, for example, the National Enquirer tabloid <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/1994/10/24/us/the-enquirer-required-reading-in-simpson-case.html">morphed</a> into a crack legal publication that broke several exclusive stories about the proceedings. They had 20 reporters working on the case, coming up with transcripts and scoops that everyone else missed. And of course, Norm Macdonald made so many jokes about the case that he was fired from SNL because of it. In the decades since, there hasn&#8217;t been any trial remotely like it — covered wall-to-wall, for months, by pretty much every channel in America. It was entertainment.
At the same time, in black areas of Los Angeles, and in major cities all over the country, the O.J. Simpson trial wasn&#8217;t just a spectacle. It was also about revenge for the Rodney King acquittals and police corruption more generally. That&#8217;s been discussed quite a bit over the last 30 years.
What&#8217;s gotten less attention is that, with the O.J. trial, for the first time, it became widely acceptable to think about the deaths of white people as necessary collateral damage to exact this kind of political revenge.
There was no social media at the time, and cable news was pretty sanitized. So no one with a major television platform came right out and directly said this. But they didn&#8217;t need to. It was obvious, especially if you looked at how little concern there was among O.J. supporters for Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman and their families.
<h4><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1346-the-matt-walsh-show" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show</a></h4>
Nicole Brown, as you might remember, was repeatedly beaten by O.J. before she divorced him. And then he hunted her down and nearly cut her head off. Everyone knew this, but not everyone cared. It was apparent from the reactions when O.J. was acquitted. It was euphoria, and it broke down along racial lines. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="004 Videos of people celebrating verdict" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/UZCTIAPknPk?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
&nbsp;
It&#8217;s pretty disturbing footage, especially since at the time it didn&#8217;t cause a lot of outrage. Thousands of people all over the country, most of them black, celebrated the acquittal of someone who obviously just murdered two people. At the time, serious people understood that this was jury nullification. But no one really explored the implications. What does a country look like, over the long term, when murdering white people is seen as acceptable, for any reason? What happens when the media and major political figures endorse this barbarism?
No one seemed to care, even after a juror from the O.J. trial came right out and admitted, many years after the fact, that 90% of the jurors knew that O.J. was guilty. But the jurors acquitted him anyway, because they were driven by a desire for &#8220;payback.&#8221; Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="005 Why Acquit OJ" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/qDjbVQR04Bk?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
&nbsp;
She knows it&#8217;s wrong to let a killer go free, but she did it anyway. So did the rest of the jury.
This has all been known for a while now. What&#8217;s less widely known is that the Los Angeles DA at the time, a Democrat named Gil Garcetti, engineered this acquittal. An attorney named Dilan Esper has <a href="https://x.com/dilanesper/status/1297642386340712448" target="_blank" rel="noopener">cataloged</a> all the ways that Garcetti rigged the trial in favor of O.J. The big one is that he didn&#8217;t try the case in Brentwood, which is in West Los Angeles. That would have been the logical place to hold the trial because Simpson had lived in Brentwood for two decades. But Brentwood is almost exclusively white. And Garcetti recognized that, for O.J. to have the best chance of acquittal, given the racial politics of the case, he needed to pick a new venue. So he chose downtown Los Angeles — where he was able to secure an overwhelmingly black jury with just a couple of white people on it.
Garcetti made several other decisions to swing the case for O.J. For example, he declined to pursue the death penalty after publicly meeting with Johnnie Cochran — who was just about to join O.J.&#8217;s defense team. That was a significant decision because a death penalty jury has to answer &#8220;yes&#8221; to the question of whether they&#8217;d be OK with sentencing someone to death. That weeds out a lot of Left-wing jurors immediately. So Garcetti chose not to do it.
Additionally, Garcetti chose to present the prosecution&#8217;s entire case during pretrial hearings, giving the defense a chance to scope out all of the witnesses well in advance of trial. As Esper points out, this ultimately worked to the defense&#8217;s advantage in a major way. O.J.&#8217;s lawyers picked up on one inconsistency in the pretrial testimony — relating to the amount of blood collected by police investigators — and made it a major part of their defense.
These were not errors, or sloppy work by the prosecutors. These were intentional efforts by Garcetti to avoid convicting O.J. Simpson, which would have ended his political career. Pretty much every black voter in Los Angeles would have voted to remove Garcetti if O.J. was found guilty. Indeed, even after O.J. Simpson was found not guilty, Garcetti refused to prosecute him for perjury in the civil trial, even though it was clear O.J. Simpson lied several times. That&#8217;s how committed Garcetti was to keeping O.J. Simpson out of jail.
Again, anyone paying attention during this whole saga understood everything that was going on at the time. This is not new information. What is new is that, now that O.J. Simpson is dead — he <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/o-j-simpson-dead-at-76-following-battle-with-cancer" target="_blank" rel="noopener">died yesterday</a> of cancer —  mainstream news outlets are just coming right out and admitting it. They&#8217;re acknowledging that O.J. Simpson was guilty, but that he simply couldn&#8217;t be convicted because of race politics. 
Here for example is a CNN journalist explaining on-camera yesterday that in 1995, a lot of black people loved to see a black man get away with murdering two white people. She catches herself mid-way through, but it&#8217;s clear what she&#8217;s saying. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="006 CNN celebrates verdict" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/hL_t3wgdT6Y?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
We&#8217;d have a much better understanding of today&#8217;s race politics, and how to put an end to it, if we could have admitted this back in 1995. A lot of people wanted to see a black man get away with murder. The two white people were simply collateral damage.
A professor named Marc Lamont Hill spelled this out <a href="https://x.com/marclamonthill/status/1778461905268412472" target="_blank" rel="noopener">very clearly</a> yesterday:
<blockquote>O.J. Simpson was an abusive liar who abandoned his community long before he killed two people in cold blood. His acquittal for murder was the correct and necessary result of a racist criminal legal system. But he’s still a monster, not a martyr.</blockquote>
In other words, you can kill white people without penalty. As long as the criminal legal system is racist — and people like Marc Lamont Hill believe it&#8217;s irredeemably, irreparably racist forever — then it&#8217;s fine to basically decapitate white people. That&#8217;s according to someone who collects a paycheck paid by the government of New York to teach the next generation.
Yesterday, Hill elaborated on his reasoning, essentially saying that O.J. had every right to kill his victims because a police officer involved in the case used a racial slur at some point in the past. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="007 Mark Lamont Hill" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Jkc3uYKGUKs?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
You&#8217;ll notice there&#8217;s no regard whatsoever in Marc Lamont Hill&#8217;s mind for the two victims. Their families aren&#8217;t entitled to justice, all because a detective on their murder case used a racial slur. If you use the n-word, then any white person who&#8217;s tangentially related to you deserves to die. That&#8217;s basically what he&#8217;s saying. A lot of people thought this in 1995, but they didn&#8217;t say it in public. That&#8217;s changing.
The reason several mainstream outlets spent yesterday eulogizing O.J. Simpson as some kind of victim is that they approve of what he did. There&#8217;s no other way to spin it.
The New York Times, for example, <a href="https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1778446276440264921" target="_blank" rel="noopener">wrote</a> that quote, &#8220;A jury in the murder trial &#8230;. cleared Mr. Simpson, but the case ruined his world.&#8221; They quickly edited that out of the piece when people pointed out that he stabbed two people to death and therefore &#8220;ruined&#8221; their worlds, too. 
For its part, NPR wrote the following <a href="https://www.yahoo.com/news/o-j-simpson-coverage-york-230410329.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">headline</a> on something called &#8220;Threads:&#8221; &#8220;BREAKING NEWS: The football great Orenthal James Simpson, known as O.J., has died.&#8221;
The Associated Press, meanwhile, <a href="https://x.com/AP/status/1778583977718165987" target="_blank" rel="noopener">tweeted</a>: &#8220;Legendary athlete, actor and millionaire: O.J. Simpson&#8217;s murder trial lost him the American dream.&#8221;
Those are all real headlines. Everyone knows exactly what&#8217;s going on here. The only way to get glowing headlines like this from the corporate media is if you kill people they don&#8217;t like. It&#8217;s the same reason The Washington Post <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50205592" target="_blank" rel="noopener">described</a> that ISIS leader as an &#8220;austere religious scholar.&#8221; O.J. Simpson killed members of a disfavored demographic, so they&#8217;re mourning him as a victim, not the people he killed.
This kind of attitude was everywhere yesterday. There was no focus on the victims whatsoever. CBS News interviewed one of O.J.&#8217;s lawyers from the 1995 trial, named Carl Douglas. In the interview, he comes out and declares what he saw as a main benefit of the trial. Again, it had nothing to do with justice or finding the truth or the &#8220;real killers.&#8221;
Instead, it was about showing to the world that black lawyers can get defendants off, too. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="008 The Era of The Time" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ZuocpqCpKXU?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
&#8220;And whatever you think of this verdict, for Black Americans, it was not speaking about O.J. Simpson per se.&#8221;
That about sums it up, straight from one of O.J.&#8217;s lawyers. The O.J. trial was not about O.J. Simpson. The trial was arguably the beginning, or at least a landmark moment on the way towards, our current era of racial insanity. The race hustlers of the time rallied around O.J. not because they thought he was innocent but because they saw him as an agent of revenge. And Democratic Party elites in Los Angeles like Gil Garcetti did everything they could to ensure O.J.&#8217;s acquittal so that he could serve that function.
But nobody was more explicit than CNN contributor Ashely Allison, a former senior advisor in the Obama White House. Listen to what she chose to say out loud on national television yesterday:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="014 CNN OJ Relatable To Black" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/xTO8tcq_o00?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
“He represented something for black Americans because it was two white people who’d been killed.” That’s what black Americans connected with, according to this woman. They felt affinity with O.J. because he brutally slaughtered white people. Talk about saying the quiet part out loud. Although, as we’ve seen, it’s hardly the quiet part anymore.
This mentality has metastasized over time, helped along by Barack Obama, leading to the rise of BLM, and culminating in Floyd and the 2020 riots, and then the post-Floyd era of DEI. Now, 30 years later, so-called &#8220;race relations&#8221; have deteriorated to the point that the race hustlers finally feel comfortable coming out and telling us what their motives were all along.
Yes, O.J. Simpson is dead. But the legacy of that trial, particularly the racial violence and distrust that it normalized, is still very much alive.

O. J. Simpson sits in Superior Court in Los Angele

The Media Says The Quiet Part Out Loud: O.J. Was Their Hero Because He Killed White People

Blacks

Los Angeles

Matt Walsh

Murder

O.J. Simpson

Opinion

Race

Former President <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/donald-trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a>, who is running another campaign for the White House, demanded this week that funding be cut from <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/national-public-radio-npr" target="_blank" rel="noopener">National Public Radio (NPR)</a> after a longtime NPR editor <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/we-lost-americas-trust-npr-veteran-says-network-has-lost-its-way" target="_blank" rel="noopener">accused</a> the network of espousing left-wing bias.
&#8220;NO MORE FUNDING FOR NPR, A TOTAL SCAM! EDITOR SAID THEY HAVE NO REPUBLICANS, AND IS ONLY USED TO &#8216;DAMAGE TRUMP.&#8217; THEY ARE A LIBERAL DISINFORMATION MACHINE. NOT ONE DOLLAR!!!&#8221; Trump <a href="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/112248653824267212" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> in a post to Truth Social on Wednesday.
The Free Press published an <a href="https://www.thefp.com/p/npr-editor-how-npr-lost-americas-trust" target="_blank" rel="noopener">op-ed</a> on Tuesday in which NPR Senior Business Editor Uri Berliner argued NPR &#8220;lost America&#8217;s trust&#8221; with its increasingly liberal bent. Despite his critique, Berliner said &#8220;defunding&#8221; was not the way to address the &#8220;missteps&#8221; he outlined.
&#8220;As the country becomes more fractured, there’s still a need for a public institution where stories are told and viewpoints exchanged in good faith. Defunding, as a rebuke from Congress, wouldn’t change the journalism at NPR. That needs to come from within,&#8221; he said.
Multiple times during his presidency, Trump <a href="https://deadline.com/2020/02/donald-trump-public-media-pbs-npr-1202856498/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">proposed</a> reining in funding for public media, but Congress did not take him up on the cuts. If he is re-elected this year, that could change. As noted in a <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2024/04/11/trump-tightens-stranglehold-on-congressional-gop-00151629" target="_blank" rel="noopener">POLITICO report</a> after the House <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/house-blocks-fisa-spy-bill-opponents-demand-warrant-requirement" target="_blank" rel="noopener">blocked the advancement of a FISA bill</a> that Trump opposed, the former president is &#8220;tightening his stranglehold on the congressional GOP’s policy agenda.&#8221;
When NPR <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/npr-ditches-twitter-over-actions-that-undermine-our-credibility" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ditched</a> Twitter (now X) last year after being slapped with labels linking it to the U.S. government, the network <a href="https://www.npr.org/2023/04/12/1169269161/npr-leaves-twitter-government-funded-media-label" target="_blank" rel="noopener">insisted</a> it &#8220;receives less than 1 percent of its $300 million annual budget from the federally funded Corporation for Public Broadcasting.&#8221; Still, on its website, NPR says federal funding is <a href="https://www.npr.org/about-npr/178660742/public-radio-finances" target="_blank" rel="noopener">&#8220;essential&#8221;</a> and that ending it &#8220;would result in fewer programs, less journalism — especially local journalism—and eventually the loss of public radio stations, particularly in rural and economically distressed communities.&#8221;
In his op-ed, Berliner talked about how the &#8220;rise of advocacy took off&#8221; when Trump got elected to the White House in the 2016 election when he defeated Hillary Clinton.
&#8220;As in many newsrooms, his election in 2016 was greeted at NPR with a mixture of disbelief, anger, and despair. (Just to note, I eagerly voted against Trump twice but felt we were obliged to cover him fairly),&#8221; Berliner said. &#8220;But what began as tough, straightforward coverage of a belligerent, truth-impaired president veered toward efforts to damage or topple Trump’s presidency.&#8221;
Berliner discussed how NPR interviewed Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) dozens of times, during which he often spoke about there being evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia, but the network offered up &#8220;notably sparse&#8221; coverage when Robert Mueller&#8217;s special counsel report released in 2019 found &#8220;no credible evidence of collusion&#8221; and let Russiagate &#8220;fade&#8221; from its programming.
&#8220;It is one thing to swing and miss on a major story. Unfortunately, it happens,&#8221; Berliner said. &#8220;You follow the wrong leads, you get misled by sources you trusted, you’re emotionally invested in a narrative, and bits of circumstantial evidence never add up. It’s bad to blow a big story.&#8221;
The editor shared an anecdote about the Hunter Biden laptop story, which emerged prior to the 2020 election, saying it was &#8220;newsworthy. But the timeless journalistic instinct of following a hot story lead was being squelched. During a meeting with colleagues, I listened as one of NPR’s best and most fair-minded journalists said it was good we weren’t following the laptop story because it could help Trump.&#8221;
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1700760801843000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2PQrVSrJfhxNb4LcARqniG">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
Berliner also said he found 87 registered Democrats and zero Republicans working editorial positions in D.C., where NPR is headquartered, but when he shared the data in a staff meeting and suggested there was a diversity problem, &#8220;the response wasn’t hostile. It was worse. It was met with profound indifference.&#8221;
NPR Editor-in-Chief Edith Chapin <a href="https://twitter.com/BenMullin/status/1777773343267062201" target="_blank" rel="noopener">released</a> a statement saying that she and her colleagues on the leadership team &#8220;strongly disagree with Uri’s assessment of the quality of our journalism and the integrity of our newsroom processes.&#8221; She also said, &#8220;We&#8217;re proud to stand behind the exceptional work that our desks and shows do to cover a wide range of challenging stories.&#8221;

Former President Donald Trump

Trump Calls For Cutting NPR Funds After Editor Accuses Network Of Bias

Donald Trump

Media

Media Bias

Politics

Trump Administration

More information has been revealed on the death of Nex Benedict, the 16-year-old girl whose death was exploited by the media to pretend anti-trans bigotry led to her death.
Originally, the media suggested she was gender non-binary. They claimed she was abused by other students at her high school, beaten up in a bathroom, and then died due to injuries from the fight.
It turns out, not one element of that was true. It turns out, Benedict started the fight in the bathroom. It turns out, Benedict had returned to her normal state of health after that fight.
And it turns out, Benedict committed suicide. So every major element of the mainstream media’s report was false.
New details have now come to light about the life of Nex Benedict, which demonstrate as per usual, when young people commit suicide, it is not because society is mean to them due to their gender non-binary status; it is largely because there are extreme mental health co-morbidities with that identification.
<h4><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1936-the-biggest-conspiracy-theory-of-all-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show</a></h4>
That is particularly true in this case — a tragic, horrifying case. As RedState <a href="https://redstate.com/chad-felix-greene/2024/03/27/nex-benedict-n2172000" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reported</a>:
<blockquote>Now that we have the full autopsy report for Dagney (Nex) Benedict, many of the questions surrounding her overdose have been answered. The full report, released by the Chief Medical Officer and Board of Medicolegal Investigations on March 27th, 2024, confirms what the earlier Medical Examiner’s Office reported on March 13th, 2024. There were “massive” amounts of Diphenhydramine, more commonly known over the counter as Benadryl,” in Dagney’s blood.
Dr. Paul Wax, the Executive Director of the American College of Toxicology, reviewed the results and confirmed she could have consumed 50 to 100 pills to reach that toxicity level. Her routine medication, fluoxetine, for bipolar disorder was present and may have contributed, a second authority concluded. Her death was intentionally self-inflicted.
The report indicated, “The 11 pages released indicate handwritten notes ‘suggestive of self-harm’ were found in Nex&#8217;s room by family members, and that the teen has a history of ‘bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety, self-harm (cutting).’
While advocacy groups remain insistent that her distress sourced from bullying at school, Dagney did not indicate this in her last notes. The Owasso Police Department released a statement saying, “Although the notes do not make any reference to the earlier fight or difficulties at school, the parents indicated that Benedict reported being picked upon for various reasons while at school.”
As is usual in these cases, there is much more to the story. A hint was provided by the Washington Post on February 21st, 2024, that never made it beyond that report. Describing Dagney’s funeral, the article states that Dagney&#8217;s cousin spoke “along with her mother and Benedict. Nex’s biological mother was among the mourners; their father, who is in prison for abuse, was not.” </blockquote>
So where was Dad? What happened to the father? RedState continues the story, saying:
<blockquote>On July 17th, 2019, when Dagney was 11 years old, an arrest warrant was issued for James Everette Hughes, Dagney’s father. He was arrested on July 31st, 2019, in Sebastian County, AR. The charge was for rape of a minor under the age of 14, during the time period between May 2017 and August 2017, when Dagney was nine years old. Among many witnesses was Sue Benedict, the grandmother who would adopt Dagney in 2019. 
Hughes would accept a plea deal to sexual assault in the second degree on November 27th, 2019. He was sentenced to five years in prison with ten years suspended. He would be placed on the sex offender list and have no contact with his daughter. He was arrested again on January 25th, 2024, by the Little Rock Police Department for failing to comply with reporting as a sex offender.</blockquote>
That was two weeks before Dagney took her own life. The details of the rest of this story are difficult to read.
<blockquote>Hughes’ new case, in Pulaski County, AR, 60CR-24-894: State v. James Everette Hughes, was filed on March 5th, 2024 for the offense of failing to register as a sex offender or report address change. … Case details are difficult to read, and the following information is graphic. In the report, Dagney, age 11, would tell investigators her father anally raped her when she was nine years old. She reported he had molested her for years prior.</blockquote>
This is obviously a story of horrific physical sexual abuse of a child by her own father that resulted in confusion, mental illness, and problems that deserve nothing but sympathy.
But the media treated this as a case of conservative anti-trans bigotry, which is insane, sick, and wrong. Will the media walk any of what they did back here?
Of course not because their original story backs their particular narrative. That particular narrative is that America is a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad place.
And their proof of that is that Nex Benedict, a young girl, committed suicide and that she must have done so because society was too mean to her — as opposed to the very specific circumstances of what appears to be a deeply tragic life.

Vigil Held At Stonewall In New York City For Nex Benedict, Non-Binary Teen Who Died In Oklahoma

The Death Of Nex Benedict: The Media Lies To Vilify America

Ben Shapiro

Oklahoma

Suicide

Teenagers

Transgender

NBC News released a statement on Tuesday afternoon announcing that former Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairwoman <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/author/ronna-mcdaniel" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Ronna McDaniel</a> is out at the network just days after the company announced that they had hired her to be a contributor.
NBC News Chairman Cesar Conde made the announcement in a memo to employees after multiple on-air hosts at MSNBC lashed out at the company during their news shows.
&#8220;There is no doubt that the last several days have been difficult for the News Group. After listening to the legitimate concerns of many of you, I have decided that Ronna McDaniel will not be an NBC News contributor,&#8221; he said. &#8220;No organization, particularly a newsroom, can succeed unless it is cohesive and aligned. Over the last few days, it has become clear that this appointment undermines that goal.&#8221;
&#8220;I want to personally apologize to our team members who felt we let them down. While this was a collective recommendation by some members of our leadership team, I approved it and take full responsibility for it,&#8221; he continued. &#8220;Our initial decision was made because of our deep commitment to presenting our audiences with a widely diverse set of viewpoints and experiences, particularly during these consequential times.&#8221;
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1700760801843000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2PQrVSrJfhxNb4LcARqniG">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
Conde said that the network was committed to its &#8220;principle that we must have diverse viewpoints on our programs,&#8221; which means that they will &#8220;redouble&#8221; their efforts to &#8220;seek voices that represent different parts of the political spectrum.&#8221;
The problems at NBC News created additional problems for McDaniel as Creative Artists Agency, the Hollywood talent agency that negotiated her deal, ended its relationship with her, according to <a href="https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/politics-news/nbc-news-ronna-mcdaniel-contributor-1235860170/">The Hollywood Reporter</a>.
McDaniel is now focused exploring her legal options following her termination from the network.
Related: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/nbc-news-to-fire-former-rnc-chair-ronna-mcdaniel-after-on-air-hosts-revolt-report">NBC News To Fire Former RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel After On-Air Hosts Revolt</a>

RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel Speaks At The Ronald Reagan Presidential Library

NBC Releases Statement Announcing Ronna McDaniel Is Out Just Days After Hiring

Business

NBC News

Ronna Romney McDaniel

All my life I’ve been in the business of observing the world and writing or talking about what I see and experience. And one of the things I can tell you is that it isn’t easy to communicate the truth with complete accuracy. There are always going to be small discrepancies between what you report and what actually happened.
For instance, last week, in a speech in Ohio, Donald Trump promised that if he was re-elected president, he would stop China from undermining our automobile industry. Then he added, “That’s if I get elected. If I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath.”
The New York Times, a former newspaper, reported on the speech in a story headlined: “Trump Vows Nationwide Slaughter if not Returned to Power,” in which Times reporter Prissy Credential wrote,  “Pushing his campaign rhetoric to unprecedented levels of violence, former president Donald Trump swore he would unleash a bloodbath on America if he was not re-installed in the White House this November, an obvious threat to re-enact the January 6th, 2021, insurrection at the Capitol, the worst Constitutional crisis since the Civil War of the 1860s, when 700,000 Americans lost their lives, and Trump bathed in their blood, an unthinkably horrific act made famous by the 16th Century Hungarian Countess Elizabeth Bathory who imitated Trump by torturing and murdering more than 600 virgins and bathing in their blood, an act that inspired Bram Stoker in the writing of “Dracula,” which describes how Donald Trump would disguise himself as a coachman and ride out of the crumbling Trump Castle in the dead of night, whipping his six sin-black Trump horses into a lather as he descended on innocent villagers, morphing from a billionaire real estate mogul into a gigantic bat in order to plunge his teeth into the throats of innocent and shapely women and drain their lives away while they lay helpless in his clutches if he is not re-elected to the presidency. That’s why, in 2017, thousands of women took to the streets wearing pink hats and shrieking out of faces distorted by feminist rage to the point of repulsive ugliness in order to protest the 400-year rampage during which Trump fueled his soulless immortality with female blood, which many feminists consider not merely homicidal but also sexist and racist in its privileging of blond white women with large breasts nearly exposed by their open nightgowns so that the thick scarlet drool dripping from Trump’s gore-soaked mouth could be seen by his demonic red eyes to be running in disgusting rivulets over their tremulous white flesh if he is not returned to office. Experts estimate that Trump’s insatiable thirst for human blood, combined with the supernatural longevity of his terrifyingly animated corpse, may have resulted in as many as 200,000 deaths over the centuries, or about a third of those Trump would have slaughtered on January 6th if it had been the Civil War, which it was as bad as, thus leaving a body count of almost a million people in the bloodbath Trump is threatening if he is not returned to the White House where he would impose a tariff on Chinese cars instead of murdering millions and bathing in their blood.”
<h4><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1173-goodbye-candace-because-christ-really-is-king-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Andrew Klavan Show</a></h4>
Now, those of you who have journalistic training may have noticed that, here and there, the Times reporting veered from absolute accuracy in order to convey a deeper impression of the intent behind Trump’s words. Questioned about this journalistic practice, Times editor-in-chief Blithering Prevarication the Third explained, “Blood! Look! Blood, blood everywhere! Dripping, running, staining, oh God, mother, blood!” Mr. Third’s remarks were followed by a lengthy period of inarticulate sobbing, after which he became so upset that he vomited, which the paper plans to run tomorrow as its lead editorial.
Giving a more in-depth account of the Times’ impressionist reporting, Columbia School of Journalism Professor Vladimir Mohammed, who holds the J-School’s Walter Duranty Chair of Intentionally Rampant Mendacity, said “America is simply going to have to choose whether it can endure seven more months of Trump and the horrific atrocities we’re going to imagine he’ll commit. And that’s if he’s not elected. If he is elected, it’ll be a bloodbath.”
* * *
Andrew Klavan is the host of “The Andrew Klavan Show” at The Daily Wire. He is the bestselling author of the Cameron Winter Mystery series. The third installment, “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/House-Death-Cameron-Winter-Mysteries-ebook/dp/B0BW1ZTVP9?ref_=ast_author_dp" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The House of Love and Death</a>,” is now available. Follow him on X: @andrewklavan
This excerpt is taken from the opening satirical monologue of “<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1173-goodbye-candace-because-christ-really-is-king-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Andrew Klavan Show</a>.”
The views expressed in this satirical article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

US-VOTE-POLITICS-TRUMP

Media Attempts To Interpret ‘Bloodbath’ Comment By Man In Red Hat

Media Attempts To Interpret 'Bloodbath' Comment By Man In Red Hat

Andrew Klavan

Joe Biden

Satire

Donald Trump&#8217;s best friends are in the legacy media.
I don&#8217;t mean that Donald Trump is friends with people in the legacy media, I mean they are helping him.
Members of the legacy media have been playing this incredibly stupid game since 2015, and the reason they play this game with Trump is because they play it all the time with other Republican politicians.
The game goes like this: Donald Trump says something that uses a bit of inflammatory language in a completely non-inflammatory context, the media then proceed to cut out the inflammatory language from the non-inflammatory context and then blow it up.
They&#8217;ve been doing this with Republicans for as long as I&#8217;ve been alive.
The weird thing about doing it with Trump is that Trump frequently says wild things. They don&#8217;t even have to do it with Trump. What they end up doing, however, is essentially showing the American public they are willing to say anything about Trump.
<h4><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1927-bloodbath-the-fake-news-strikes-again-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show</a></h4>
The latest example comes courtesy of the entire legacy media who decided to jump on a clip of Donald Trump at a political rally over the weekend — while the media is in a sheer state of panic about the 2024 race. They should be.
According to the Real Clear Politics <a href="https://www.realclearpolling.com/latest-polls/election">polling average</a>, Donald Trump is currently almost two points up in the national average. He&#8217;s currently leading in every single battleground state. Joe Biden is in deep trouble and so the media are looking for some sort of headline that is going to gin up the Democratic base.
Thus, they have to find something that says Donald Trump is a severe danger and he is going to overthrow the Republic; that there will be blood in the streets, the case that Joe Biden has been making since 2020. They say that Donald Trump isn&#8217;t just a problem — he’s a threat to the very nature of the Republic.
Joe Biden gave the worst speech I can remember, standing in front of a blood-red Independence Hall and suggesting his political opponents were going to overthrow our democracy.
That is the line the entire media have been told to repeat over and over and over for the duration of this election cycle.
And so they decided over the weekend they found the golden ticket. They found the clip of Donald Trump promising violence in the streets.
Here’s what actually Trump said:
<blockquote>Mexico has taken over a period of 30 years 34% of the automobile manufacturing business in our country. Think of it, went to Mexico. China now is building a couple of massive plants where they are going to build the cars in Mexico and think, they think, that they&#8217;re going to sell those cars into the United States with no tax at the border? 
Let me tell you something to China. If you&#8217;re listening, President Xi — you and I are friends, but he understands the way I deal — those big monster car manufacturing plants that you&#8217;re building in Mexico right now, and you think you&#8217;re going to get that you&#8217;re going to not hire Americans and you&#8217;re going to sell the cars to us now, we&#8217;re going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you&#8217;re not going to be able to sell those. 
If I get elected now, if I don&#8217;t get elected, it&#8217;s going to be a bloodbath for the whole — That&#8217;s going to be the least of it. It&#8217;s going to be a bloodbath for the country. That&#8217;ll be the least of it. But they&#8217;re not going to sell those cars.</blockquote>
He&#8217;s literally talking about his plan to place a tariff on Chinese imports. That&#8217;s his plan, right? Tariffing Chinese cars imported via Mexico into the United States. And he says that if he gets elected, it&#8217;ll be good for the economy; and if he doesn’t, then there will be an economic bloodbath.
Now, that&#8217;s the sort of language that occurs constantly in American politics. Democrats often use the word “bloodbath” in a variety of contexts, talking about political bloodbaths and economic bloodbaths.
No one assumes what they mean is that there will be actual murder in the streets with the blood flowing freely into the gutters.
The word “bloodbath” happens a lot in American politics because it means a slaughter. We use violent language a lot because it&#8217;s evocative, but it doesn&#8217;t mean that somebody&#8217;s about to get killed or there&#8217;s going to be a civil war.
Obviously Trump was talking about an economic bloodbath, but — what did the media do? When Donald Trump said, “If I&#8217;m not elected, there will be a bloodbath,” they took that <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/medias-wall-to-wall-coverage-of-trump-bloodbath-comment-delivers-zero-context" target="_blank" rel="noopener">out of context</a> and then proceeded to claim that what Trump was saying is that if he was not elected, that there would be a full-scale insurrectionist civil war in the United States with bodies in the streets.
Nancy Pelosi <a href="https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2024/03/17/sotu-pelosi-on-trump.cnn">said</a>, 
<blockquote>We just have to win this election because he&#8217;s even predicting a bloodbath. What does that mean? He&#8217;s going to exact a bloodbath. There&#8217;s something wrong here. How respectful I am of the American people and their goodness. But how much more do they have to see from him to understand that this isn&#8217;t what our country is about?</blockquote>
Jen Psaki, former press secretary for Joe Biden, <a href="https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/03/17/psaki_the_full_context_of_trumps_bloodbath_comment_is_that_he_supports_insurrection.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a>:
<blockquote>The full context is that this is much bigger than one single speech. This embrace of political violence, this dehumanizing language. This is what Donald Trump has been preaching for years. In January, he warned that there will be, “Bedlam in this country if his criminal prosecution derailed his campaign.” In 2020 he reportedly asked his defense secretary about shooting people who were protesting the death of George Floyd, saying, “Can&#8217;t you just shoot them, just shoot them in the legs or something.” And of course, his very words inspired violence on January 6, 2021, when he told a crowd of his supporters to walk down the Capitol and fight like hell because, “You&#8217;ll never take back our country with weakness.”
Trust me, I could go on and on and on. We all know by now that Trump&#8217;s allusions to political violence are not merely rhetorical. His supporters take them literally. That&#8217;s part of the big problem here. And he knows that, too. So, no, we did not miss the full context. This was not some meandering yesterday comment. This is his message.</blockquote>
This is always the game with Trump: Take a comment and then spin it up to its greatest possible allusion while ignoring all possible context.
But you know why it helps Donald Trump?
Because everyone starts ignoring the media: they’re the boy who cried wolf. 
And if Trump does say something that really is egregious, there&#8217;s no place to go because the media already turned the dial up to 11.
<h4><a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a></h4>

MixCollage-18-Mar-2024-04-43-PM-4687

The Legacy Media Helps Trump With This Stupid Game 

2024 Election

Fake News

MSNBC

Former President Donald Trump slammed the media on Monday after multiple outlets ran out of context headlines on a prediction he made about there being a “bloodbath” in the auto industry job market due to President Joe Biden’s policies. 
NBC News, CBS News, Rolling Stone, and other outlets published headlines on Trump&#8217;s &#8220;bloodbath&#8221; comments excluding the fact that he was referring to American auto workers being hurt by Biden&#8217;s trade policies. Trump made the remarks during a speech in Ohio on Saturday. 
<iframe class="truthsocial-embed" style="max-width: 100%; border: 0;" src="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/112116580305482725/embed" width="600" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><script src="https://truthsocial.com/embed.js" async="async"></script>
“The Fake News Media, and their Democrat Partners in the destruction of our Nation, pretended to be shocked at my use of the word BLOODBATH, even though they fully understood that I was simply referring to imports allowed by Crooked Joe Biden, which are killing the automobile industry,” Trump <a href="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/112116580305482725" target="_blank" rel="noopener">posted</a> on his Truth Social platform. “The United Auto Workers, but not their leadership, fully understand what I mean.” 
Trump also took a shot at Biden&#8217;s electric vehicle policies, which he said would lead to no cars being made in the United States. 
“With the Electric Car Mandate being pushed by Biden, there soon won’t be any cars made in the USA &#8211; UNLESS I’M ELECTED PRESIDENT, IN WHICH CASE AUTO MANUFACTURING WILL THRIVE LIKE NEVER BEFORE!!! MAGA2024,” he said. 
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
During his Ohio rally, Trump <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/complete-propaganda-media-and-biden-campaign-blasted-over-coverage-of-trumps-bloodbath-prediction" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> that China was building manufacturing plants in Mexico to sell cars in the United States &#8220;with no tax at the border.&#8221;
“Let me tell you something to China, if you’re listening President Xi, and you and I are friends, but he understands the way I deal,” he continued. “Those big monster car manufacturing plants that you’re building in Mexico right now and you think you’re going to get that, you’re going to not hire Americans and you’re going to sell the cars to us?”
“No. We’re going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you’re not going be able to sell those cars. If I get elected. Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath for the country. That will be the least of it,&#8221; he said. 
After the speech, NBC News ran a headline saying, &#8220;Trump says there will be a ‘bloodbath’ if he loses the election,” while CBS News said, “In Ohio campaign rally, Trump says there will be a ‘bloodbath’ if he loses November election.&#8221; Biden’s campaign also commented, <a href="https://twitter.com/BidenHQ/status/1769163262283706801" target="_blank" rel="noopener">releasing a statement</a> on the “bloodbath” remark without a single mention of cars but repeated mentions of violence.
RELATED: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/complete-propaganda-media-and-biden-campaign-blasted-over-coverage-of-trumps-bloodbath-prediction">&#8216;Complete Propaganda&#8217;: Media And Biden Campaign Blasted Over Coverage Of Trump&#8217;s &#8216;Bloodbath&#8217; Prediction</a>

Trump Slams ‘Fake News Media’ After Spin On Auto Industry ‘Bloodbath’ Prediction

Auto Companies

Misinformation

There&#8217;s a new religion in the United States: secular Leftism.
And it demands that you ignore facts. Instead, you just look at the narrative presented and then believe it. This is what the #MeToo movement was about. It didn&#8217;t matter if you asked for ancillary facts to support a contention; it didn&#8217;t matter if you weren&#8217;t even really doubting the contention and just wanted some evidentiary support.
No, you needed to believe all women.
When it comes to DEI, it&#8217;s the same sort of schtick. You&#8217;re supposed to believe DEI is good for business, that it&#8217;s good for everyone, that it has positive externalities.
Intersectionality? Same sort of thing. 
These are narratives, and the narratives must be believed. The media loves seizing on particular stories they believe drive the narrative and then ignoring all of the facts of those stories in order to achieve the narrative.
The latest example of this nonsense comes courtesy of a terrible story out of Oklahoma in which a 16-year-old girl who called herself “gender non-binary” died. Her name was Nex Benedict. According to the media, she collapsed the day after an altercation in a girls bathroom at a public high school.
This confused teenager died in tragic circumstances, but we don&#8217;t actually know how this person died. The one thing that we do know, according to the autopsy now, is that this person was not actually murdered in the bathroom. The original reports out of this Oklahoma school were that this person had an altercation in a girls bathroom with other girls and then was effectively beaten to death, or, at least, injured so badly she ended up dying the next day.
<h4><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1911-the-anti-trans-hate-crime-that-wasn-t-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show</a></h4>
So the media ran with the story. Not only did they run with the story, but they also used this story as a prop in order to push against two particular political elements.
The first is Chaya Raichik, aka Libs of TikTok, whose great sin in the modern political world has been to take clips of the Left doing things and expose them to broader public view so people notice. It’s not even her advocacy they hate; it&#8217;s the fact that people are doing something publicly, wanting attention, and then she gives them attention — but the attention they get is from people who don&#8217;t provide a warm round of applause for all of their insanity.
Raichik serves on the statewide library advisory board for the state of Oklahoma.
This meant the media were now going to try to pin the death of this young lady on her because they&#8217;ve been trying to blame pretty much everything on her for the last couple of years. If there&#8217;s a bomb threat at a hospital that provides “gender affirming care” after Raichik reveals what exactly they do at the hospital, they blame it on her.
When a girl dies in disputed circumstances in an Oklahoma high school, they try to blame Raichik. The basic idea is that she&#8217;s a “stochastic terrorist,” a term they&#8217;ve been using for her for the last couple of years. It&#8217;s a term that means nothing. It&#8217;s a term in which they suggest that without inciting, she is, in fact, responsible for incitement — despite the fact that she’s never called for violence against anybody.
But they&#8217;re going to claim she is responsible for violence that is done by anybody who might theoretically see material that she posts, including material of people who publicly posted the material themselves. Thus, she&#8217;s target number one.
Target number two is a law in the state of Oklahoma that says you have to go to the school bathroom that corresponds with your biological sex. You cannot be a boy and go into the girls bathroom just because you claim you are a girl. And if you&#8217;re a girl and you claim that you&#8217;re gender non-binary, you can&#8217;t walk into the boys bathroom and start using the urinal.
So the media jumped on this case immediately; it became national news when Benedict died.
There are many people who die across the country every day in the United States, and many of them are clearly murdered. We&#8217;re not talking under disputed circumstances. We are talking, every day in the United States, many, many people are murdered. The fact that people of color, minorities, young black males, get murdered disproportionately pretty much every day in the United States gets zero media coverage because that would not promote the narrative the Left wishes to promote, which is that basically everything in the United States is a result of American racism because it turns out that the vast majority of those people who are being killed are also being killed by other young black males.
The media don&#8217;t cover that. The facts don&#8217;t matter to them. Only the narrative matters.
The narrative in the Oklahoma case seemed to be one the Left could use, so they jumped in with both feet. Teen Vogue, which has suddenly become a source of information, pushed a <a href="https://www.teenvogue.com/story/nex-benedict-everything-we-know-about-16-year-old-oklahoma-students-death" target="_blank" rel="noopener">piece</a> saying:
<blockquote>Nex Benedict, a 16-year-old Oklahoma high school sophomore, was beaten by three girl classmates in the bathroom of Owasso High School on Feb. 7. On Feb. 8, Nex – who identified within the Two Spirit, transgender, and gender nonconforming (2STGNC) umbrella – was declared dead at the hospital.
Now LGBTQ+ Oklahomans are mourning the loss of a straight-A student, a Minecraft fan, and animal lover – a teenager – in a school district previously targeted by Libs of TikTok’s Chaya Raichik; Raichik now sits on the statewide library advisory board. In 2023, Oklahoma censured the state’s only nonbinary representative — not to mention signing into law a bill forcing public school students to use the bathroom associated with their gender assigned at birth; advocates are currently closely watching several anti-trans pieces of legislation.
Before Benedict’s name was made public, a source who claimed to be the mother of Benedict’s best friend told a local outlet the cause of death was “complications from brain trauma,” and that “three older girls were beating the victim and her daughter in the girl’s bathroom.” (We are not linking because the story uses Benedict’s deadname. According to Freedom Oklahoma, it’s not presently clear which pronouns Benedict used, so this story will refrain from using pronouns for Nex.)
The media are not interested in reporting actual facts. And if you read these stories, you have no idea if this person is a biological girl or if this person is a biological boy.</blockquote>
But again, obscuring information is what the legacy media do. Teen Vogue continues:
<blockquote>The anonymous source also alleged that Benedict couldn’t “walk to the nurses’ station” without assistance and that the school did not call an ambulance, while the school claims they were unaware of the fight until informed by a parent.
Texts allegedly sent by Nex after the fight to a family member … began, “I got jumped at school 3 on 1 had to go to the ER… They had been bullying me and my friends and I got tired of it so I poured some water on them and all 3 came after me. School did not report to the police and is probably getting sued.”
Benedict’s grandmother Sue, who also adopted Nex, brought Nex to the hospital after the fight, then home again; the next day, Nex was brought back to the hospital and was pronounced dead. Sue told The Independent that Nex was suspended for two weeks from school on the day of the fight; Sue also mentioned that Nex had been bullied throughout this school year.</blockquote>
So everybody on the Left ran with this story; it became front-page news across the country.
But as it turns out, this person may not have died as a result of the actual beating. USA Today <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/02/22/nex-benedict-case-oklahoma/72695904007/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reported</a> on this yesterday, saying, “As police continued Thursday to probe the death of an Oklahoma teen … authorities announced a preliminary autopsy showed the student&#8217;s death was not the result of ‘trauma.’”
They have not yet released the results of a toxicology report, so we have no information on whether drugs or anything else was involved.
What we do know is that the autopsy does not attribute the death to trauma.
<h4><a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a></h4>
But it doesn&#8217;t matter. The cat is already out of the bag. The story already has legs and it&#8217;s already running because this is the way our legacy media work.
So this becomes just another hate crime against a person who apparently was involved in an ongoing altercation with these other girls, pouring water on them; they were beating her up.
Again, bullying of any sort is truly terrible and shouldn&#8217;t be tolerated at any school. But the media attempts to turn this into a weapon against the basic idea that biological sex exists or against legislation suggesting girls should be protected from boys in the girls bathroom.
There&#8217;s no evidence whatsoever that the Oklahoma law that says the girls should go to the girls bathroom is responsible for this.
USA Today continued in their report:
<blockquote>A news story that went viral about Nex&#8217;s death included allegations that teachers failed to summon medical care for the teenager after the altercation, and that Nex was so badly injured in the fight that they could not walk on their own. Police and school officials said the claims were false.
In a statement on Facebook, the Owasso Police Department said each student involved in the fight &#8220;walked under their own power to the assistant principal’s office and nurse’s office&#8221; after it was broken up. A registered nurse at the school then assessed the health of each student involved in the fight, according to police. Though she determined that &#8220;ambulance service was not required,&#8221; the nurse recommended that Nex &#8220;visit a medical facility for further examination,&#8221; the statement said. Nex was taken to the hospital that afternoon.</blockquote>
None of this matters to the Left. 
The narrative is more important.
How many race stories about supposed systemic American racism by police have turned out to be lies, whether it is the “hands up don&#8217;t shoot” narrative of Michael Brown or whether it was the supposedly racial killing of George Floyd (that provided zero evidence whatsoever that anything that happened was motivated by race)? Zero evidence was even alleged or presented in court in that case that proved racism, beyond which it is pretty obvious George Floyd died of medical complications and not because of the mishandling by Derek Chauvin according to autopsy reports.
Another example: the death of Matthew Shepard being attributed to homophobia.
It doesn&#8217;t matter once the narrative is set. The media is populated by people on the far Left. Those people on the far Left have a story they want to tell about the way the world works. And if the evidence does not line up with the story, they just ignore the evidence, and they tell the story they want to tell in pursuit of the ends they want to pursue.

Screenshot 2023-12-08 at 3.38.40 PM copy

Secular Leftism, Ignoring Facts, And Pushing The Narrative

Bullying

Diversity Equity and Inclusion (DEI)

Libs of Tik Tok

Leftist blogger Timony Burke was arrested by federal law enforcement officials on Thursday and charged with 14 crimes for allegedly illegally accessing videos of former <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/fox-news" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Fox News</a> host Tucker Carlson while he was still at the network.
The federal indictment says that Burke worked with a co-conspirator, who was not named, to hack Fox News&#8217; systems and leak damaging unaired footage of Carlson&#8217;s interview with Kanye West that showed the now-disgraced rapper making anti-Semitic remarks. Other unaired footage of Carlson was also <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/fbi-raids-democrat-politicians-home-over-hack-of-tucker-carlson-report" target="_blank" rel="noopener">leaked</a> to Media Matters.
Burke &#8220;played multiple roles in the conspiracy, including utilizing compromised credentials to gain unauthorized access to protected computers, scouring those protected computers for electronic items and information, obtaining and stealing electronic items and information deemed desirable, organizing and exploiting some of those electronic items and information, and intercepting and disclosing the contents of wire, oral, and/or electronic video communications,&#8221; the indictment <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.424438/gov.uscourts.flmd.424438.1.0_1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a>.
Burke was charged with one count of Conspiracy; six counts of Intentionally Accessing Protected Computer Without Authorization; five counts of Intentional Interception of a Wire, Oral, or Electronic Communication; and two counts of Intentionally Disclosing Illegally Intercepted Wire, Oral, or Electronic Communication.
The FBI raided Burke&#8217;s home — which he shares with his wife, far-Left Tampa City Council member Lynn Hurtak — in May 2023.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1700760801843000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2PQrVSrJfhxNb4LcARqniG">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
“It’s not hacking, it’s just good investigative journalism,” claimed Burke&#8217;s attorney, Michael Maddux, before entering court on Thursday. “We obviously emphatically deny these charges and we’re looking forward to the opportunity to defend him and exonerate him.”

Tim Burke

Blogger Who Allegedly Hacked Fox News Arrested On 14 Federal Charges

Crime

Fox News

Tucker Carlson

U.S.

<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/cbs-news" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CBS News</a> reportedly seized the personal confidential files of acclaimed reporter Catherine Herridge when the network decided to fire her last week, sparking shock amongst employees inside the company who said that they&#8217;ve never seen this happen before.
Law professor Jonathan Turley <a href="https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4481433-cbs-faces-uproar-after-seizing-investigative-journalists-files/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">wrote</a> on Friday that following the shock of her dismissal from the network, concerns mounted after he learned that &#8220;CBS officials took the unusual step of seizing her files, computers and records, including information on privileged sources.&#8221;
&#8220;The position of CBS has alarmed many, including the union, as an attack on free press principles by one of the nation’s most esteemed press organizations,&#8221; Turley said. &#8220;I have spoken confidentially with current and former CBS employees who have stated that they could not recall the company ever taking such a step before.&#8221;
Turley said that sources inside the company were concerned about who was pressuring the network to fire Herridge, which reportedly came amid a wave of layoffs.
Multiple sources who were either current or former employees at CBS News told Turley that they had never heard of a situation like this and that employees always would leave with all of their belongings.
One source told the New York Post that the move was &#8220;unprecedented,&#8221; while another effectively said that the company was run by stupid people who &#8220;don’t understand the ramifications of their actions.&#8221;
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1700760801843000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2PQrVSrJfhxNb4LcARqniG">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
The cuts reportedly impacted 800 jobs, roughly 3% of Paramount’s total workforce. Paramount CEO Bob Bakish told employees in an internal memo that the drastic cuts are necessary for the financial health of the company.
“These adjustments will help enable us to build on our momentum and execute our strategic vision for the year ahead — and I firmly believe we have much to be excited about,” Bakish wrote, according to Yahoo Finance.
The downsizing has turned some employees against Bakish after he was paid $32 million last year despite the company’s struggles.
The cuts bled into CBS News, which employs about 2,000 people. Roughly 20 people received notice that they were being let go, including some of the news outlet’s top talent such as Herridge.
Herridge, formerly a reporter for Fox News, is under pressure from U.S. District Court Judge Christopher Cooper to divulge her sources in a series of stories she wrote for Fox involving a federal investigation of a Chinese American scientist. Herridge has so far refused to give up her sources and faces the possibility of being held in contempt of court. She could also be fined as much as $5,000-a-day.
Herridge’s case has been closely watched by news organizations and First Amendment advocates over its implications for the future of anonymous reporting of sensitive stories.
While at CBS News, Herridge has continued to break stories on national security and significant legal issues.
Tim Pearce contributed to this report.

Paramount’s White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner After Party

CBS Seized Confidential Files From Fired Reporter Who Was Pursuing Hunter Biden Story: Reports

CBS News

Hunter Biden

Menu