Clancy

Lindsay Clancy Defenders Are Just As Sick As She Is

Depression

Feminism

Illegal Immigation

Lindsay Clancy

postpartum depression

TikTok

The Lindsay Clancy Case Isn’t A ‘Who-Dun-It.’ Why Are TikTok Moms Pretending It Is?

anti-depressants

Big Pharma

Social Media

A clip of a bride reacting strongly to being called by her new husband’s last name went viral this week, with commenters saying it’s proof of how society disrespects men.
The viral post is overlaid with text that reads, “When they forget to tell the officiant that she isn’t changing her name…” The video begins with the officiant saying, “Ladies and gentlemen, it is my honor to present the newly married couple, Mr. &amp; Mrs. Brandon Key!” 
At that moment, the bride whipped her head around in shock, said something to the officiant, and he quickly rolled his eyes before changing course and introducing the bride by her maiden name.
The interaction inspired discourse about name changes for women. It also raised questions about a man&#8217;s role in modern relationships. Many clip viewers noted the groom’s submissive-looking behavior in the video.
“Some really basic red flags that guys can look for ahead of marriage. So much heartache and misery could be avoided. Here’s one of the most basic red flags. If she won’t take your last name, don’t marry her. Very simple. Marriages where the woman keeps her maiden name are 50 percent more likely to end in divorce. There’s a reason for that,” Daily Wire host Matt Walsh <a href="https://x.com/MattWalshBlog/status/2087211116740968957">wrote</a> on X.
Daily Wire host Michael Knowles reacted too, writing, &#8220;&#8216;A quarrelsome wife is like the constant dripping of a leaky roof.&#8217; (Prov. 19:13) ‘Better to live in a desert than with a quarrelsome and nagging wife.’ (Prov. 21:19)&#8230; ‘A headstrong wife is regarded as a b*tch.&#8217; (Sir. 26:25).”
“If a bride doesn&#8217;t take the husband’s last name … and she makes a scene and corrects the officiant during the ceremony like a girlboss … that “marriage” is doomed,” one person <a href="https://x.com/TaylorRMarshall/status/2087201984185028991">said</a>. “The groom has his hand in his pocket and knows he has been publicly neutered.”
“The issue in this video isn&#8217;t whether she takes her husband&#8217;s last name or not. The issue is she makes a scene out of it instead of just going with it in the moment. This is unlikely to be a happy marriage,” another commenter <a href="https://x.com/Supersonics67/status/2087233288276738495">observed</a>.
Currently, about <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/marriage-was-supposed-to-mean-us-then-came-identity-politics">80% of married women</a> in America still take their husbands’ last names. Feminists have resisted this norm for decades, claiming it’s another symptom of the evil patriarchy.

Marriage

WATCH: Bride Freaks Out After Being Called By Her New Husband’s Last Name

Culture

viral video

There was a huge announcement yesterday. 
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — no longer So Fresh, So Face — and the heir apparent to Bernie Sanders, announced she is running for president in 2028. 
She did not do so by announcing it formally, but by doing two other things: she broadcast freezing her eggs on Instagram, and she laughed off Woke 1.0 as if it were no big deal.
Welcome to the 2028 Democratic presidential campaign, where biology is an obstacle to your happiness, and we&#8217;re substituting third-worldism for Woke 1.0. 
This is her announcement that she was putting her natural biology on hold to pursue the presidency.
She&#8217;s 36 years old. She&#8217;s perfectly healthy. She&#8217;s been in a relationship with this dude she is not married to for the last five years, for a reason no one can discern. She could just go have a baby the fun and easy way. Instead, she&#8217;s choosing IVF – freezing the eggs and then later undergoing in vitro fertilization.
<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ben-shapiro-show-ep-2482?elementPosition=1&amp;row=0&amp;rowHeadline=Recent+Episodes&amp;rowType=Horizontal+Show+Episodes+Carousel"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-981859" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/10/ben-banner.avif" alt="" width="1024" height="171" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/10/ben-banner.avif 1024w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/10/ben-banner-300x50.jpg 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/10/ben-banner-768x128.jpg 768w" sizes=" (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a>
IVF is really expensive. It is time-consuming. It is tough on the body for a healthy 36-year-old woman. Let&#8217;s say that you wanted to do it the old-fashioned, natural way. The chances of conceiving and having a healthy baby within one year of starting to try are somewhere between 75 and 80%. Now, let&#8217;s say you harvest that same 36-year-old woman&#8217;s eggs. The chances of a live birth per IVF round are around 40%. And the process is really, really not pleasant. 
But Ocasio-Cortez went on national TV and showed what she is doing.
It was a little crazy.
Let&#8217;s start at the beginning with the public — and very weird — announcement that she was freezing her eggs. 
Yes, we&#8217;re allowed to say it&#8217;s weird. It’s her decision, but deciding to Instagram your egg freezing is weird.
She stated:
<blockquote>So I&#8217;m aware that just by me choosing to not keep this private, there may be a consequence. But you know what? I&#8217;m okay with that. This is a choice that I am making to feel more in control of my life. And if people want to make assumptions about my decision, let them make those assumptions. I feel empowered to make this choice. I think it&#8217;s a very privileged position that I&#8217;ve been able to make.</blockquote>
We&#8217;re going to take the bait because we&#8217;re going to explain what the hell she&#8217;s doing, which is clearly bait.  This is all girlboss: real girl-bossing is when you inject yourself with hormones on Instagram Live to start a process that will cost tens of thousands of dollars to take control of your own life because biology is unfair and mean. 
And if a man comments, it is because he is sexist in some way. 
Now again, she&#8217;s the one who chose to make this public. It&#8217;s an obvious trap; this is the game that she is playing: to post, wait for people to comment, and then claim that they’re sexist for commenting.
We all know the game. It&#8217;s a really stupid game, but she&#8217;s also doing it publicly because she is saying something important about American society. She injected herself with hormones on Instagram Live for egg freezing. People do this privately. Why is she doing this in front of millions of people?
“Don&#8217;t be weird about this,” she admonished those watching.
You&#8217;re being weird about this. Why are you talking to me? Why am I watching this? This is none of my business. You&#8217;re the one live-streaming medical procedures on Instagram. You&#8217;re being weird. Are we allowed to say you&#8217;re being weird? 
She’s announcing her presidential run. 
She suggested that this is all because of men, you see, because men run for office and people don&#8217;t wonder if they want to have children. 
Most men running for higher office already have a family because they&#8217;re mostly in their 40s or older and they&#8217;ve been married for a while.
Nobody is asking whether a man is going to get pregnant during his campaign because men can&#8217;t — despite what the Left thinks — get pregnant.
The most powerful feminist thing she could do, if she really wanted to be totally feminist, is run for president and be pregnant at the same time, because then she could say, “Why are you bothering me just because I&#8217;m pregnant?”
When the Left says “right to privacy,” they never mean “Leave us alone. We just want our right to privacy.” They mean “We want you to approve of every decision we make and imitate it in public policy.”
Why isn’t she doing this the natural way? She is not doing this for medical reasons; she is not doing this because she is having fertility issues. This makes a mockery of those who are truly having fertility issues and are pursuing this process for medical reasons. 
This is not a decision to feel “empowered,” unless by empowered you somehow mean that biology itself is an obstacle to “living your fullest life,” which is a leftist idea.
The leftist idea is that biology itself, like normal maturation, is unfair and cruel. This is why they treat puberty as some sort of biological obstacle.
It&#8217;s why they are now treating pregnancy as some sort of biological barrier for women to overcome. 
I can&#8217;t think of anything more anti-woman than the idea that pregnancy is a biological burden on women and that it is something horrible to be overcome. 
It is a superpower. It is unbelievable. It&#8217;s an incredible gift.
Demeaning that so that you can compete in a &#8220;man&#8217;s world&#8221; is terrible.
She is trying to valorize herself for putting off pregnancy indefinitely, expensively, and more dangerously than the natural way. She doesn&#8217;t want you asking about whether she&#8217;s going to get pregnant while she&#8217;s running. Thus, she&#8217;s preemptively saying she won&#8217;t get pregnant.
She&#8217;s making the point that biology is unfair, womanhood is inherently unfair, and that there is no moral issue with fertilizing embryos you will discard.
This is all part and parcel of a broader agenda: Rebelling against reality by assuming that if we just fix reality, Utopia is right there. 
Which brings us to Ocasio-Cortez’s second big presidential announcement. She said Woke 1.0 was so over. It&#8217;s no longer “cool” or even “fetch” or anything like that.
The problem for the Left is that Americans ended up rejecting Woke 1.0. That is because Americans don&#8217;t believe that the Declaration and Constitution are rooted in racism. 
The reason woke died is because it was taken to the logical extreme, which is that everything was discrimination. 
Now there is a different phase. Think of the faces of Woke 2.0. Who are they?
Zohran Mamdani, Abdullah El-Sayed, and Hasan Piker.  
The leftist Edward Said said that America&#8217;s failure is that we are basically a corrupt empire whose capitalism corrupted the earth, and everything that happens everywhere else on earth that&#8217;s bad and at home is due to our terrible free market system.
And who better to represent America as a corrupt empire than victims of that corrupt empire? People from outside America who can come back to America and tell us what we do wrong.
Woke 1.0 forced Americans to say, “Am I racist or am I not?” Woke 2.0 is, “Is American capitalism inherently corrupting and bad? Is the West&#8217;s system of freedoms and free markets inherently imperialistic, colonialist, genocidal, and racist?”
It&#8217;s easier to pitch woke 2.0 than woke 1.0. Why? Americans have been convinced over the course of the last 25 years or so that America is the bad guy, that we and our allies are fundamentally evil, that our foreign policy decisions of the past two decades and maybe longer, going all the way back to World War II, according to some, are actually terrible and horrible, and we&#8217;re the bad guys in the world.
Add the economic angst right now, combine those two things, and you get woke 2.0, Ocasio-Cortez’s new program. It is about hatred of America.
Ocasio-Cortez is trying to capitalize on all of this. 
Her idea of Utopia is women freezing eggs and a communist agenda.
It’s more than weird.
It’s a Utopia that we should reject with all the strength we have.

GettyImages-1009938924

The New AOC Is More Dangerous Than The Old One

Ben Shapiro

Opinion

When I talk publicly about how raising my baby is beautiful, not oppressive, feminists get mad. We never said that! they claim. To that I can only ask, Have you read second-wave feminist literature? Second-wave feminists did, in fact, call motherhood oppressive.
And ever since the &#8217;60s, the media&#8217;s advertising for the role hasn&#8217;t been particularly good. Culture followed the feminists&#8217; lead by portraying motherhood in an unfavorable light — both in obvious and more subtle ways. The prevailing messages always seem to reiterate the same point: Having children will ruin your life and strip you of your freedom forever.
It&#8217;s just as evident in today&#8217;s media as it was decades ago. While on maternity leave, I started watching three different shows. Each one introduced a pregnancy storyline, and in every case, the female lead chose to abort her baby. For one, it wasn&#8217;t the right time. For another, it would ruin her career. For the third, she wouldn&#8217;t be able to attend her dream school.
The state of modern television is just one of the many examples of the oppressive messaging that still permeates the media. Motherhood is portrayed as such a terrible fate that it is presented as better to terminate the life of your baby than to become a mother. As a new mom, holding my sleeping baby, I turned off each of those shows. The juxtaposition between what the media was telling me and what I was actually experiencing was striking.
Motherhood has far exceeded my already high expectations. Looking at my son&#8217;s face, I couldn&#8217;t find the oppression. It unlocked a million new horizons — new highs and even new lows — but most importantly, it brought a precious new human being into my life, one I have the privilege of raising and calling my own. There is no &#8220;sentence&#8221; more beautiful than that.
So, from my nursery rocking chair, I recorded a simple video on social media saying so.
<blockquote class="instagram-media" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbRln54ufKE/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14">
<div style="padding: 16px;">
&nbsp;
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div>
<div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div>
<div style="padding-top: 8px;">
<div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"></div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;">
<div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: 8px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"></div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);"></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: auto;">
<div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"></div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"></div>
</div>
&nbsp;
<p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbRln54ufKE/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by Reagan Conrad Rohrbach (@reaganconrad)</a>
</div>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
Since then, women have made their own videos highlighting moments from their lives as mothers using my video’s audio, while another corner of the internet has taken personal offense. Many feminists responded with videos declaring, &#8220;We never said that.&#8221; That&#8217;s odd because I didn&#8217;t even use the word feminist. But perhaps they recognized that the language I criticized did, in fact, stem from their movement.
&#8220;They&#8221; did, in fact, say that.
It wasn&#8217;t difficult to dive into feminist literature from the 1960s and 1970s and find numerous direct quotes from influential figures saying that motherhood is oppressive. Shulamith Firestone wrote in her 1970 book &#8220;The Dialectic of Sex,&#8221; &#8220;The heart of a woman&#8217;s oppression is her childbearing and childrearing roles.&#8221;
Other notable examples include quotes from prominent feminist writers equating fetuses to parasites and describing domestic life as &#8220;comfortable concentration camps.&#8221; The list goes on and on, so much so that I made an entire video outlining my findings.
<iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ZFzcCzjdB-A?si=UxIe1jJeSUKY1COI" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
Perhaps one takeaway from the current outrage is that many people are no longer reading the rhetoric of their movement&#8217;s icons from decades ago. Or perhaps they want to distance themselves from their more radical predecessors and present a more peaceful picture of what their movement represents.
Probably not, but one can hope. Considering that the modern feminist movement still celebrates what I view as one of the most heinous practices in the United States, I doubt it. It always comes back to abortion.
For a movement to justify such an act, motherhood must still be portrayed, directly or indirectly, as oppression. Only if motherhood is seen as a fate worse than death does the argument for ending an unborn child&#8217;s life become coherent (though still deeply flawed). They may not say it as bluntly anymore, but I believe the core tenets from sexual revolution authors to modern-day influencers remain the same.
As for me, I&#8217;ll stick with another message for the masses: Motherhood is the most important role I will ever have, and it is not oppression. Motherhood is simply the best.
***
This article is part of <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/upstream" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Upstream</a>, The Daily Wire’s new home for culture and lifestyle. Real human insight and human stories — from our featured writers to you.

GettyImages-464447213

The Cultural Lie That Turned Motherhood Into A Burden

Abortion

Children

family

Motherhood

Upstream

There are two competing visions playing out in our culture right now. One prizes traditional values, marriage, matrimony, and the worth of a soul. The other peddles promiscuity and lust, urging women to trade their innocence for a hollow imitation of freedom. 
 
Two video clips that recently went viral perfectly embody this divide. In the first, octogenarian philosophy professor Peter Kreeft was on The Daily Wire&#8217;s &#8220;Pints with Aquinas,&#8221; <a href="https://www.instagram.com/itsallpolitics__/?hl=en">explaining</a> that a man should marry a woman for her soul, not her physical appearance, because even staring at his wife&#8217;s corpse, he found her most beautiful. He understood that the body fades, but the thing worth loving, the eternal part, never does. The second clip represents that latter, destructive philosophy: Brianna &#8220;Chickenfry&#8221; LaPaglia, on her crudely titled podcast Plan Bri, <a href="https://www.mediaite.com/media/podcasts/erika-kirk-is-a-fcking-clown-barstool-star-brianna-chickenfry-rages-at-charlie-kirks-widow-in-stunning-diatribe/">calling</a> Erika Kirk a &#8220;f*cking clown&#8221; for daring to promote the nuclear family, traditional values, and faith.
Chickenfry, a 27-year-old media personality, is best known for her failed relationship with singer Zach Bryan, swearing aggressively, and posting videos of herself hungover. She claims to be a champion of female power and progress, and ridicules Erika Kirk and TPUSA for apparently &#8220;preying&#8221; on young women. Chickenfry is everything wrong with our current culture, wrapped in a ring light and a vape cloud. She rails against &#8220;bad influence&#8221; while being one of the worst exemplars of young women.
Chickenfry (hilariously asinine that this is how she&#8217;s referenced) fulminated that Kirk is a lazy trad wife, putting women behind &#8220;five hundred million steps.&#8221; Hm. Well, it takes the average joe 137 years to hit 500 million steps, so apparently by discussing the beautiful harmony of marriage between man and woman, recognizing the importance of strong and stable men leading a family, and encouraging women to find the love of their life and have babies with them, we young, impressionable, naive ladies who hear this nonsensical talk have been sent back to 1889! Ahh! The horror! Instead, women should apparently imbibe from the infinite wisdom of Brianna Chickenfry, who is on a self-proclaimed &#8220;d*ck break&#8221; as of this week, and who needs to slurp on a flavored nicotine vape stick every three minutes to fire up the neurons in her brain that produce such extraordinary sagacity.
She also claimed on &#8220;Plan Bri,&#8221; the show that is literally named after Plan B, a drug women take post-sex to undo what sex is for, that &#8220;Turning Point is preying on women whose frontal lobes aren&#8217;t developed,&#8221; that Kirk is a &#8220;hypocrite&#8221; who should go take care of her family, and that she is simply the &#8220;f*cking worst.&#8221;
A truly darling woman, the epitome of class and grace, Chickenfry is.
Yet by her own logic, women under 25 shouldn&#8217;t be listening to Erika Kirk talk about family or faith. Instead, these underdeveloped mushball ladies should form their thoughts, feelings, and actions based on Brianna&#8217;s advice. I mentioned earlier she&#8217;s on a &#8220;d*ck break.&#8221; This is news to me, because on June 21, I was unfortunately exposed to a <a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@itgirl_/video/7653913186038566158">video</a> of her saying she wants to have &#8220;like, a hooker summer,&#8221; because she&#8217;s never done the &#8220;be a whore thing.&#8221; Because she&#8217;s &#8220;so scared.&#8221;
*Sighs.* Lots to, like, unpack there.
This all matters because this is the caliber of role models young women are exposed to on the internet, and it’s detrimental to them and society. Chickenfry, Alex Cooper of “Call Her Daddy,” a rotating cast of OnlyFans influencers, and a thousand of their carbon copies are reaching girls at scale, selling the same script: it’s okay to sleep around. It’s okay to relinquish your goods for the next man you meet on the street. It’s okay to talk crassly and openly about sex, lust, cheating, and then turn around and claim that all men are evil. In fact, it’s more than okay. It’s preferred.
To these women, this is the height of female empowerment. &#8220;Experimenting&#8221; with whoever, wherever, whenever. Then telling other women to do it too. Because it&#8217;s &#8220;freeing&#8221; not to be tied down to a man. It&#8217;s &#8220;true feminism&#8221; not to be exclusive with just one guy. It&#8217;s &#8220;emancipating&#8221; to sleep with whoever you want, and then abort the resulting child the moment that child becomes an inconvenience rather than a blessing.
But these nostrums don&#8217;t survive contact with reality and proven biology. They lead to unhappiness, loneliness, and unfulfillment. Alex Cooper, after preaching infidelity and anti-men quackery for years, ended up married with a baby on the way. OnlyFans creators are warning newcomers that the business wrecks their odds at real relationships and normal employment. Chickenfry herself has had her heart broken publicly, and she&#8217;s obviously angry about it, yet the gospel she&#8217;s preaching to teenage girls is a blueprint for the same heartbreak, just with extra steps.
But she let the quiet part slip. She claims she wants to have a “hooker summer,” but she&#8217;s scared. Where does that fear come from? The instinctive understanding that we are not rag dolls to be thrown around. Women are not built for detachment. We can put on a face and act tough, but our biology doesn&#8217;t understand &#8220;hooker summer.&#8221; Our biology craves one love.
Erika Kirk is not a &#8220;f*cking clown.&#8221; She&#8217;s a widowed mother of two. She&#8217;s a workhorse and was a traditional spouse. She&#8217;s a God-fearing, forgiving, honorable woman who experienced more loss and grief than most of us will ever know. She&#8217;s promoting an idea that has been proven true across every era of human history: that one of the greatest things we can ever do as human beings is to get married and raise kids, to find a person whose soul you can love eternally, no matter how wrinkly, worn, and withered their flesh may become, straight into the next life.
I hope Chickenfry finds her rooster. I hope her platform grows into something that promotes goodness, monogamy, and the harmonious and sacred union of man and wife. Until then, I&#8217;ll pray for her, the same way I suspect Erika Kirk already does.

Vanity Fair And TikTok Celebrate Vanities: A Night For Young Hollywood In Los Angeles

Erika Kirk Isn’t The Clown Here

Brianna Chickenfry

DW Opinion

Erika Kirk

Plan Bri

Sociologists and other complete wastes of space are working around the clock to try to determine why women are no longer having babies, aside from the fact that babies wake them up all the time and crap all over everything.
The birthrate has been dropping everywhere except in sub-Saharan Africa and Israel. If present trends continue, scientists predict the world&#8217;s population will soon be reduced to nothing but black people and Jews, blissfully enjoying an earthly paradise, where every basketball player can find an accountant, although no one will know how to tie a Windsor knot.
Some researchers feel that the so-called birth dearth is the result of the widespread use of online pornography. Columbia University sociologist Dr. Roland Fapmeister has been studying the effects of porn for the last seven years, ten, and eleven hours a day.
In a report to the United Nations panel titled, &#8220;Why There Are So Many Damned Israelis All Over the Place,&#8221; Dr. Fapmeister said:
<blockquote>
There can be no doubt that many men have come to prefer porn to actual sex, because the women in porn have such spectacular bodies it’s enough to make a man insane with desire so that he can’t stop coming back again and again and again to watch these magnificent creatures do anything you want in bed, and with real enthusiasm too, they don’t just roll their eyes and play along and then make snide remarks about how they could have married Bill Burley from High School, who was a real man. Afterwards, you can turn them off, so they don’t start complaining about why you haven’t taken out the garbage or how come you can’t get a real job instead of locking yourself in the bathroom for hours, making disgusting grunting noises that make them think you’re up to something creepy, even when you tell them it’s scientific research, for crying out loud.
</blockquote>
Dr. Fapmeister says the porn sites most appealing to men are those that depict women doing things real women often won’t do, like making dinner or showing them some respect.
Feminist sociologist Dr. Shrill Screamington says the baby famine is actually a good thing. It’s a sign of female empowerment, proving that women are no longer chained to staying at home serving husbands who love them but can instead stay in the office serving employers who could back their Mercedes over them and never notice the bump. The employer, however, might think the parking lot needs resurfacing, text his personal assistant about it, and wonder why she never gets back to him.
Dr. Screamington says that while it is true that feminism has led many women to spend their youths in a fluorescent hell of cubicle drudgery until they find themselves languishing in a solitary middle age marked by a sense of unspeakable emptiness made all the more unbearable by the unacknowledged but inescapable fact that it’s the result of their own self-certain but altogether misguided choices, including that nose ring that sent all the best marriage prospects running for their lives, there have also been many feminist triumphs. For instance, Americans are now so comfortable with seeing females in power that over 150 women are serving in Congress despite the fact that each and every one of them is crazier than a hamster on LSD.
At The New York Times, a former newspaper, sex columnist Susan Horwich agrees with the feminist position. In a recent speech to the &#8220;Society for Increasing Human Misery in the Name of Fairness,&#8221; Ms. Horwich said her weekly Times columns will continue to urge women to abandon institutions like marriage and religion that have imprisoned them in traditional roles as homemakers and mothers, and instead live lives of sterile promiscuity until there are no babies at all and the earth is a smoking ruin filled with nothing but basketball players and accountants, at which time, Satan will return to carry Ms. Horwich like a lover into an eternity of flames, as he promised he would when she sold him her soul in return for the Times job.

Feminist

The Triumph Of Feminism: Loneliness And Bad Nose Rings

Pornography

sociology

The New York Times

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) is drawing renewed attention online after appearing at an Eid al-Adha celebration in New York City wearing a hijab alongside New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani.
Video from the Wednesday event in the Bronx — portions of which fall within Ocasio-Cortez’s congressional district — showed the congresswoman speaking onstage while wearing the Islamic head covering as Mamdani stood behind her in a kurta styled after an Arsenal soccer jersey.
<iframe loading="lazy" title="AOC wears hijab for Eid, one of Islam’s holiest holidays" width="422" height="750" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/55dSVypBSKo?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
The appearance quickly circulated online given Ocasio-Cortez’s status as one of the Democratic Party’s most outspoken leftist figures and self-described feminists in Congress.
Eid al-Adha is one of Islam’s holiest observances and commemorates the Prophet Ibrahim’s (Abraham’s) willingness to sacrifice his son in obedience to God. The holiday began this week and is being celebrated by Muslims worldwide through Friday.
Ocasio-Cortez has <a href="https://www.newsweek.com/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-abortion-ban-alabama-woman-sexuality-feminism-1426902">spent years warning</a> that women’s rights and personal freedoms are under threat in America, frequently attacking conservatives over what she characterizes as patriarchal politics and authoritarian social policies.
Mamdani, the country’s highest-profile Muslim politician, has continued generating controversy recently over his <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/mamdanis-latest-slap-in-the-face-to-jewish-voters?author=Hank+Berrien&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=undefined&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=Mamdani%E2%80%99s+Latest+Slap+In+The+Face+To+Jewish+Voters">anti-Israel</a> activism and <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/mamdani-wants-to-decide-who-deserves-to-keep-their-property?author=Brecca+Stoll&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=undefined&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=Mamdani+Wants+To+Decide+Who+Deserves+To+Keep+Their+Property">socialist</a> political positions.
The event itself was aimed at outreach toward Muslim voters and communities in New York City, where both Mamdani and Ocasio-Cortez maintain strong support among activists.
The clip of the two politicians at the Bronx celebration rapidly gained traction across social media platforms Wednesday evening, becoming the latest flashpoint in ongoing cultural and political fights surrounding identity, religion, and Democratic politics.

SEE IT: Feminist AOC Wears Symbol That Oppresses Women

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Muslims

New York City

Zohran Mamdani

Actress Milly Alcock is once again reacting to criticism of her upcoming female-led superhero movie, “Supergirl,” by blaming Christian dads and saying she’s glad to have triggered them.
The 26-year-old <a href="https://variety.com/2026/film/features/milly-alcock-supe">spoke</a> to Variety last week about backlash ahead of the film&#8217;s release next month, insisting much of the criticism stems from her being a woman.
“I guess women know that this is just how it’s always been, unfortunately,” Alcock told the outlet. “And it’s from a lot of people whose profiles have no photo, who are burner accounts. Or someone’s name and then ‘Dad of four, Christian,’ which is hilarious to me.&#8221; 
&#8220;But I mean, whose opinion do you really care about? If you’re p***ing the right kind of people off, you’re doing OK,” she added.
This led to more reactions on social media. 
“I miss the days when actors and actresses wanted you to see their movies. Now they do everything they can to make you not want to go. Sometimes even before the first scene is shot,” one person <a href="https://x.com/SimonPhoenix77/status/2057885125480792300">observed</a>.
“In other words, they&#8217;re preemptively creating the narrative that this movie&#8217;s failure was caused by fan backlash to these comments rather than the movie itself being terrible. Got it,” another <a href="https://x.com/ChristandGuitar/status/2057808024635359667">said</a>.
DC Studios co-chairman and CEO Peter Safran praised Alcock&#8217;s handling of the criticism.
“I called her and just said, ‘You’re doing great! You’re handling it beautifully. You’re never going to make everybody happy. Just be true to yourself,’” he told Variety. “And I really do think she’s handling it well. I would also recommend, don’t wallow in it. It never makes you feel good.”
The “Supergirl” star preemptively <a href="https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/story/milly-alcock-vanities">blamed potential criticism</a> of the film on misogyny during a Vanity Fair interview published in March in a tactic described as “pre-release critical armor.”
“It definitely made me aware that simply existing as a woman in that space is something that people comment on,” Alcock said when asked about the “inevitable backlash” she’d face. 
“We have become very comfortable having this weird ownership of women’s bodies. I can’t really stop them. I can only be myself,” Alcock added.
The remarks were compared to Rachel Zegler’s controversial comments ahead of Disney’s “Snow White” being released.
Alcock also described &#8220;Supergirl&#8221; as a more personal story centered on Kara Zor-El, who she says is “given this incredible responsibility and doesn’t know how to deal with it.” 
“She’s not trying to save the world — she’s just trying to save her own,” Alcock told Vanity Fair. “This film is an excellent reminder that the world can be crumbling around you, but you can be the hero of your own story.”
The interview inspired many negative reactions on social media, with critics calling out Alcock for complaining about backlash that hadn’t even happened yet.
“These movies are so bad that they have to start attacking the fans before the movie even comes out,” one person <a href="https://x.com/NewsPolitics/status/2039035489760460880">said</a> at the time.

Milly Alcock

‘Supergirl’ Star Says She’s Glad To Trigger ‘Christian’ Dads

Celebrities

Entertainment

Hollywood

Movies

Actress Olivia Munn is complaining that a male co-star objected to a scene in which her character saves his, leading to a dispute on set. 
The 45-year-old ranted about the unnamed colleague during a recent appearance on “The Drew Barrymore Show.” 
“There have been a few times where I’ve been filming something, and my character was either like CIA, or a cop, or something, and there’s been scenes where my character has been the one to save the other character,” Munn told the talk show host, noting that the scene involved her and the co-star fighting side by side in a bunker. 
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Olivia Munn Gets Candid About Aggressive Breast Cancer and How it Inspired Her to Let Down Her Guard" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/AWemBThqhgc?start=223&#038;feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
“If you read the script, it was that he was guarding his side, I was guarding my side, then we switch sides and then there’s a guy that was coming for him who was gonna shoot him in the back, so I shoot him,” she went on. “And then we’re about to shoot and, somehow, I guess he didn’t read the script, and in that moment, he realized, ‘Wait, wait, wait. Hold on. She can’t save me. No, no. She can’t save me.’”
Munn claimed that her colleague was “combative with the director” and held up production for close to an hour. The actress lamented that he had “no insecurity about being obnoxious and everyone hearing this and being like, ‘She can’t save me! We’re not doing this.’”
“Finally, after like 45 minutes of just stopping down, I said, ‘OK, how about instead of my character saving you, it’s just that we switch because it’s time for us to switch and so this is my guy to get,’” she told Barrymore. “And he was like, ‘OK.’”
Online commenters called out Munn for her complaints, criticizing what they view as a double standard in Hollywood.
“So it’s totally cool for a woman to feel like she doesn’t need to be saved by a man, but it’s bad if a man thinks he doesn’t need to be saved by a woman? Did I get that right?” one popular reaction <a href="https://x.com/Variety/status/2042056151936987227">said</a>.
“And if Olivia Munn refused to be ‘damseled’ in a scene, you bet your bippy it would be a tale of female empowerment,” another <a href="https://x.com/Scribe_Light/status/2042056424440918201">agreed</a>.
Many commenters called Munn out for not naming names, leading them to question the story entirely.
Calling out colleagues without naming them has become a bit of a pattern for the “X-Men: Apocalypse” star. Last summer, she <a href="https://variety.com/2025/film/news/olivia-munn-male-director-ruin-career-1236445139/">complained about</a> a director she worked with on HBO’s “The Newsroom” who she claimed tried to sabotage her.
“I was on the one-yard line for the movie, and my manager calls me and says, ‘Hey, you’re gonna get the role. But first, I guess there’s another director who they know and he says that on “The Newsroom” you were late all the time and really combative,’” Munn said at the time. 
“I lived seven minutes from there. I was never late. I was like, ‘I know who this is.’ He just was trying to bash me. And I told my reps, ‘Please tell the directors this.’ And then I still got the role. But I will always remember that just because of our conflicts of how we approached a role, he wanted to ruin my chances of getting anything else.”

Olivia Munn

Olivia Munn Calls Out Male Co-Star Who Refused To Be Rescued By A Woman

California Governor Gavin Newsom Interview On The Circuit

How Gavin Newsom’s Entire Political Career Is About To Be Destroyed — By His Wife

How Gavin Newsom's Entire Political Career Is About To Be Destroyed — By His Wife

2028 presidential election

California

Gavin Newsom

governor

Harvey Weinstein

Tradwives

Woke Culture

Women

The party that put biological men on women’s podiums, erased the word “woman” from federal guidance, and whose Supreme Court Justice couldn’t define the word “woman” — is now outraged that Donald Trump fired two underperforming cabinet secretaries. Who happened to be women.
The moment President Donald Trump removed Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi from their posts, progressive media conveniently remembered what a woman is and erupted with righteous fury. These are the same commentators who mocked these women for wearing crosses and appearing on television. They spent years calling them racist, unqualified MAGA props. And the same movement that cannot define what a woman is now claims to be their defender, finally discovering their inner feminist. And who is the mascot of this movement but none other than Jennifer Seibel Newsom, who, unsurprisingly, preaches that Trump has launched a “War on Women.”
This narrative doesn’t survive contact with reality.
Seibel’s narrative doesn’t abide the fact that a group of men was the first out the door. Matt Gaetz was forced out eight days before he ever took office. Mike Waltz, the first Senate-confirmed appointee actually fired, exited in May 2025 after the Signal chat scandal. (He was subsequently reassigned as UN Ambassador.) Just this week, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth ousted Army Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George — a four-star general with over 35 years of service — in the middle of an active conflict with Iran. Dan Bongino served as FBI Deputy Director, delivered results including cracking a four-year-old cold case on the January 6th pipe bombs, and departed on his own terms. These are not the headlines of an administration waging war on women. These are the headlines of an administration that holds everyone accountable.
Look at who is still in the room. Susie Wiles — the first female White House Chief of Staff in American history — is running the operation while battling breast cancer. Karoline Leavitt, the youngest Press Secretary ever, is nine months pregnant and still at the podium. Brooke Rollins, Linda McMahon, and Tulsi Gabbard are all still delivering. Trump built a cabinet with eight women in top-tier roles at the outset — roughly one-third of his team, more than most Republican presidents before him. These women aren’t relinquishing power. They hold some of the most consequential jobs in the federal government because they earned them.
What exactly are Noem and Bondi guilty of? Noem’s tenure included congressional testimony blowups and a $220 million self-promotional ad campaign that looked more like a reelection vehicle than a border enforcement effort. Bondi frustrated the White House with slow progress on the Epstein files and pursuing cases against Trump’s political opponents — the core of her mandate. This administration declared war on DEI from day one and fired Biden holdovers because they undeniably obstructed the agenda. Noem and Bondi were held to that same standard.
Now consider the source of the outrage. Jennifer Seibel Newsom’s monologue lamenting the “devaluation of women” fell on deaf ears — after all, she spent two years slamming these same women. The media now mourning Noem and Bondi called them unqualified MAGA Barbie bigots throughout their entire tenures. Where was the feminist solidarity then?
Compare that to Biden’s record: a vice president famously “unburdened by what has been” — because she’d accomplished virtually nothing. A health secretary who insisted men could become women. A diversity agenda that counted biological males as women. They padded the numbers while magically erasing the category entirely.
What the Left is really angry about isn’t that two women were fired. It’s that this White House refuses to play Identity Politics. That refusal exposes the  hollowness of their so-called “empowerment.” Real power isn’t handed out by quota. It’s earned. Susie Wiles didn’t become the first female Chief of Staff because of a diversity mandate. She got there because she’s the best in the room.
Jennifer Seibel Newsom can lecture us about the patriarchy. But she might start by explaining why the movement she represents spent two years trying to destroy the very women she’s now defending.

Menu