Many Americans are about to own SpaceX even if they didn&#8217;t participate in Friday’s Initial Public Offering. 
Starting this Friday, SpaceX will be appearing in many personal and retirement investment accounts through diversified index funds that track the broader stock market. The company will be added to the CRSP U.S. Total Market Index, a benchmark tracked by numerous 401(k)s, IRAs, pension plans, and target-date retirement funds. Many employer-sponsored retirement plans offer Vanguard total-market funds that replicate the index, giving millions of Americans exposure to SpaceX.
Others will gain exposure to SpaceX 15 trading days after its IPO, when the Nasdaq-100 adds the company to the index. The Invesco QQQ ETF, which tracks the Nasdaq-100, will then add SpaceX to its holdings. QQQ is one of the most heavily traded exchange funds in the world.
While SpaceX will be just one of the 100 companies in the Nasdaq-100, Nasdaq is giving it an outsized weighting. Because most of SpaceX&#8217;s shares remain owned by insiders, only a limited number are available for public trading. To account for that small public float, Nasdaq is applying a factor of three to SpaceX&#8217;s float-adjusted value, increasing its weight in the index and requiring funds such as QQQ to buy more of the stock than they otherwise would.
The S&amp;P 500, one of the world&#8217;s most widely followed stock indexes, will not add SpaceX immediately. The S&amp;P 500 <a href="https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/indexnews/announcements/20260604-1483731/1483731_spdji-us-indices-megacaps-results-20260604.pdf">does not allow</a> eligible companies into its fund until it&#8217;s traded on an eligible exchange for at least 12 months. The S&amp;P 500 has a 12-month wait time to help mitigate potentially adding a company at an inflated valuation and avoid potentially large price swings. 
Another group that could potentially end up owning SpaceX is Tesla shareholders. Elon Musk has reportedly <a href="https://fortune.com/2026/06/12/spacex-tesla-merger-gwynne-shotwell-hints-elon-musk-ipo/">floated</a> the possibility of a merger between Tesla and SpaceX. If such a deal were pursued, SpaceX&#8217;s larger valuation could make it the acquiring company. In an all-stock or cash-and-stock transaction, Tesla shareholders could receive SpaceX shares in exchange for their Tesla stock, effectively making them SpaceX investors.
While the S&amp;P 500 did not change its rules to allow SpaceX in early, the Nasdaq and the <a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/spacex-set-fast-entry-into-us-global-indexes-under-new-ftse-rules-2026-05-26/">FTSE Russell</a> did make accommodations prompting a stern letter from Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA).  
“Traditionally, index providers — including your firms — have maintained rules for the inclusion of companies on their <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/newsletters/2026-05-26/index-funds-can-t-say-no-to-spacex">indexes</a>, which are meant to protect passive investors and maintain the credibility of each <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/newsletters/2026-05-26/index-funds-can-t-say-no-to-spacex">index</a>,” wrote Warren. “The changes to your index rules to accommodate these large companies, however, have the potential to destabilize markets and create significant risks for American investors, especially retirees and other individuals that rely on index funds for their savings.”
Supporters of rule changes argue that SpaceX should be allowed into major indexes because it qualifies regardless of its recent IPO and is a “Made in the USA stock that is sizable and belongs in benchmarks,” according to TD Securities Head of Index and Market Structure Research Peter Haynes. 
“What this is doing is setting a precedent that the S&amp;P 500 will not add OpenAI and Anthropic when those IPOs happen,” added Strategas Securities Chief ETF Strategist Todd Sohn.

SpaceX Listed On Nasdaq Exchange

Didn’t Buy SpaceX On Friday? You Might Already Be Invested.

Elizabeth Warren

Elon Musk

Stock Market

Mythology surrounds Marie Antoinette, a French royal so removed from the struggles of common people that she allegedly couldn’t fathom why they were upset about not having bread.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) plays a similar role in the debate over private equity in 401(k)s — and the irony is chocolate cake rich.
Call her Sen. Antoinette. Warren tells average American workers, “Let them eat index funds,” while she herself indulges in higher-returning investments for her own retirement.
Warren is crusading against <a href="https://www.banking.senate.gov/newsroom/minority/warren-statement-on-trump-department-of-labor-proposed-rule-to-shove-risky-assets-into-americans-retirements">the Trump administration’</a>s Labor Department-proposed rule, currently open for public comment, that would expand access to private-market investments in 401(k) plans.
Independent Women is submitting public comment and <a href="https://www.independentwomen.com/401kfreedom/">gathering comments from others</a> until the June 1 deadline in support of this rule.
Warren <a href="https://www.banking.senate.gov/newsroom/minority/warren-seeks-answers-from-empower-retirement-on-threats-to-americans-401ks-from-private-equity-and-private-credit">badgered Empower Retirement</a>, the country’s second-largest retirement services provider, for encouraging contribution plans for retirement savers in private equity and private credit. Warren called PE investments a “Wall Street time bomb,” and warned darkly that allowing working people access to such investments serves no one “other than private funds.”
The senator from Massachusetts appointed herself guardian of the little guy’s nest egg. There’s just one problem: the little guys she’s protecting can’t have what she has.
Start with Warren’s own <a href="https://static.notus.org/5a/3b/03b4d0df403888ae808a5235fd3c/elizabeth-warren-2024.pdf">financial disclosure</a>. Her largest retirement asset — between $1 million and $5 million — sits in TIAA-CREF Traditional, a guaranteed-principal fund available almost exclusively to university professors and academic elites. It offers something no ordinary 401(k) holder can access: a promise that you’ll never lose your principal, a guaranteed minimum interest rate, and a lifetime income stream. Warren collected $88,423 in retirement income from it in 2024 alone. That’s not a 401(k). That’s a golden parachute stitched together by decades of Ivy League employment.
Pure hypocrisy: among Warren’s disclosed holdings is a <a href="https://static.notus.org/5a/3b/03b4d0df403888ae808a5235fd3c/elizabeth-warren-2024.pdf">TIAA Real Estate Account</a>, valued between $500,000 and $1 million. A private real estate fund. An alternative investment of the very asset category she insists is too risky, too opaque, and too Wall Street for average Americans’ retirement accounts. Sen. Antoinette holds alternatives for herself while pulling up the drawbridge for everyone else.
And it doesn’t stop there. Massachusetts, her home state, has<a href="https://financebuzz.com/elizabeth-warren-trumps-401k-rule-retirement-savings-risk"> private equity throughout its public pension system</a>. And Harvard, where she built her career, has <a href="https://nhjournal.com/attack-on-private-equity-access-for-all-highlights-warrens-hypocrisy/">39% of its massive endowment parked in private equity</a>, managed by a board stacked with executives from Blackstone, General Atlantic, and other titans of the industry she vilifies on the Senate floor.
In other words: private equity for me, not for thee.
The national picture makes this even more glaring. Roughly<a href="https://www.investmentcouncil.org/new-study-private-equity-delivers-the-strongest-returns-for-retirees-across-america/"> 89% of public pension funds</a> across America invest in private equity. Some 34 million public sector workers — teachers, firefighters, police officers — depend on these returns to fund their retirements. When the American Investment Council studied 200 public pension funds, it found private equity delivered a<a href="https://www.investmentcouncil.org/new-study-private-equity-delivers-the-strongest-returns-for-retirees-across-america/"> median annualized return of 13.5%</a> over 10 years, outperforming every other major asset class in those portfolios.
While government employees and academic elites enjoy these returns, private-sector workers — the people actually in 401(k) plans — are largely locked out. They’re stuck with the menu their employers offer, typically public stocks and bond funds. President Donald Trump’s<a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/08/democratizing-access-to-alternative-assets-for-401k-investors/"> executive order</a> aims to change that, instructing federal agencies to explore letting workers access alternative assets under strict fiduciary guardrails and professional management.
Sen. Antoinette hasn’t explained why a Massachusetts schoolteacher’s pension deserves access to private equity returns that a Massachusetts private-sector worker cannot touch, nor why her own TIAA Real Estate Account is a prudent holding while a similar alternative investment in a worker’s 401(k) is a “time bomb.” She ignores the core unfairness she is defending: a multi-tiered retirement system where public employees, Ivy League academics, and the wealthy elite feast on alternative investments while everyone else is banned “for their own good.”
There is a legitimate debate to be had about fees, liquidity, and investor protections — and it’s one worth having. But that is a debate about how to extend access responsibly, not whether to extend it at all. Warren isn’t engaging in the former. She’s blocking the latter.
Warren spent her career positioning herself as the scourge of a rigged system that protects the connected at the expense of everyone else. On this issue, she is the rigged system. She benefits from guaranteed returns, private real estate funds, and <a href="https://nhjournal.com/attack-on-private-equity-access-for-all-highlights-warrens-hypocrisy/">PE-backed pensions</a> that she wants to deny to the very workers she claims to champion.
It’s time to end the double standard Warren champions and expand retirement freedom and affordability for everyday Americans.
***
Carrie Sheffield is director of the Center for AI and Technology at<a href="https://www.independentwomen.com/"> Independent Women</a> and author of ”<a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1546004386">Motorhome Prophecies: A Journey of Healing and Forgiveness</a>.”

Warsh Confirmation Hearing

‘Let Them Eat Cake’: Elizabeth Warren’s Marie Antoinette Moment

DW Opinion

Retirement funds

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Sunday blamed the Biden Administration&#8217;s rejection of the Spirit-Jet Blue merger for the company&#8217;s collapse.
Over the weekend, Spirit Airlines customers woke up to a blunt message inside the airline’s app: every scheduled flight is canceled, effective immediately.
Shutting down operations has disrupted travel for thousands. The low-cost airline had dozens of routes, including nonstop flights between major cities such as Dallas-Fort Worth, Baltimore, Fort Lauderdale, Nashville, New Orleans, and Newark. 
<a href="https://x.com/MurfamPost/status/2050556560795996373?s=20">Viral videos on social media</a> show empty and deserted Spirit check-in counters at airports across the country.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
Spirit Airlines is shut down at Orlando International Airport. <a href="https://t.co/SgIfidaKp4">pic.twitter.com/SgIfidaKp4</a>
— Murfam Post 📷🎥🖋 (@MurfamPost) <a href="https://twitter.com/MurfamPost/status/2050556560795996373?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 2, 2026</a></blockquote>
Spirit&#8217;s downfall has renewed debate over President Joe Biden&#8217;s administration and efforts to block the proposed JetBlue–Spirit merger.
&#8220;This is just more of the mess we inherited from the Biden administration,&#8221; Bessent said. &#8220;Thanks to<a href="https://x.com/SenWarren"> @SenWarren,</a><a href="https://x.com/PeteButtigieg"> @PeteButtigieg,</a> and all of their friends in the Biden Administration who backed their enthusiastic opposition to the Spirit-Jet Blue merger, dozens of regional airports will now lose service, and thousands of jobs will now be lost.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Had Spirit Airlines been allowed to merge with Jet Blue, it would have given them much more resiliency.
Thanks to <a href="https://twitter.com/SenWarren?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SenWarren</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/PeteButtigieg?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@PeteButtigieg</a>, and all of their friends in the Biden Administration who backed their enthusiastic opposition to the Spirit-Jet Blue merger, dozens of… <a href="https://t.co/JhtKcAEnFu">pic.twitter.com/JhtKcAEnFu</a>
— Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent (@SecScottBessent) <a href="https://twitter.com/SecScottBessent/status/2050985465138786771?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 3, 2026</a></blockquote>
In March 2024, the Department of Justice under President Biden celebrated when a district court judge in Massachusetts blocked JetBlue from acquiring Spirit, saying the deal would&#8217;ve hurt consumers.
“Today’s decision by JetBlue is yet another victory for the Justice Department’s work on behalf of American consumers,”<a href="https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-statements-jetblue-terminating-acquisition-spirit-airlines"> Attorney General Merrick Garland said at the time.</a> “The Justice Department proved in court that a merger between JetBlue and Spirit would have caused tens of millions of travelers to face higher fares and fewer choices. We will continue to vigorously enforce the nation’s antitrust laws.”
Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), a vocal critic of the proposed merger, also took a victory lap.
&#8220;I&#8217;ve warned for months that a JetBlue-Spirit Airlines merger would have led to fewer flights and higher fares,&#8221; she said on social media in March 2024. &#8220;This is a Biden win for flyers!&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
I&#8217;ve warned for months that a <a href="https://twitter.com/JetBlue?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JetBlue</a>&#8211;<a href="https://twitter.com/SpiritAirlines?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SpiritAirlines</a> merger would have led to fewer flights and higher fares.<a href="https://twitter.com/JusticeATR?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JusticeATR</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/USDOT?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@USDOT</a> were right to stand up for consumers and fight against runaway airline consolidation.
This is a Biden win for flyers! <a href="https://t.co/lJFGS3ucv3">https://t.co/lJFGS3ucv3</a>
— Elizabeth Warren (@SenWarren) <a href="https://twitter.com/SenWarren/status/1765190540427935859?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 6, 2024</a></blockquote>
The company&#8217;s downfall came days after a<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/spirit-airlines-officially-shuts-down-see-the-message-stranded-customers-woke-up-to"> last-ditch effort</a> to save the airline fell apart. A roughly $500 million bailout push led by the Trump administration failed after disagreements between the Trump administration and key bondholders stalled any deal. The collapse will also result in at least 15,000 people losing their jobs,<a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/us/airlines-scramble-help-stranded-spirit-passengers-after-budget-carrier-collapses-2026-05-02/"> according to Reuters. </a>
&#8220;If JetBlue had merged with Spirit, we would have all these jobs that were lost yesterday; we had 30 regional airports who have lost service,&#8221; Bessent said. &#8220;The reason we were here was because the Biden Administration opposed the merger. We shouldn&#8217;t of been here in the first place.&#8221; 
On Saturday, Sen. Warren blamed the war in the Middle East for the low-cost airline suspending operations. 
&#8220;Spiking fuel prices from Trump’s war was the nail in the coffin for twice-bankrupted Spirit airline,&#8221; Warren said. &#8220;FWIW, JetBlue merger failed because a judge, appointed by Ronald Reagan, said the deal was illegal. Republicans are desperate to shift blame from higher costs hitting families.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
I&#8217;ve warned for months that a <a href="https://twitter.com/JetBlue?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JetBlue</a>&#8211;<a href="https://twitter.com/SpiritAirlines?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SpiritAirlines</a> merger would have led to fewer flights and higher fares.<a href="https://twitter.com/JusticeATR?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JusticeATR</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/USDOT?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@USDOT</a> were right to stand up for consumers and fight against runaway airline consolidation.
This is a Biden win for flyers! <a href="https://t.co/lJFGS3ucv3">https://t.co/lJFGS3ucv3</a>
— Elizabeth Warren (@SenWarren) <a href="https://twitter.com/SenWarren/status/1765190540427935859?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 6, 2024</a></blockquote>

Senator Elizabeth Warren

Scott Bessent Blames Elizabeth Warren, Biden Admin For Spirit Airlines Collapse

Business

Joe Biden

Spirit Airlines

In a move that perfectly encapsulates the staggering double standards of the modern Democratic Party, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) endorsed Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner, whose chest was once adorned with a Totenkopf tattoo, the infamous &#8220;Death’s Head&#8221; symbol utilized by the Nazi SS, after leading the charge to crucify Pete Hegseth during his confirmation process over his &#8220;Deus Vult&#8221; tattoo.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Grateful for <a href="https://twitter.com/ewarren?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ewarren</a>&#39;s support. Let&#39;s get to work. <a href="https://t.co/cwTkUYoZQV">pic.twitter.com/cwTkUYoZQV</a>
&mdash; Graham Platner for Senate (@grahamformaine) <a href="https://twitter.com/grahamformaine/status/2034656430347690043?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 19, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
For context, Deus Vult is a centuries-old Christian phrase meaning &#8220;God wills it.&#8221; To Warren and the pearl-clutching Left, this Latin expression of faith was &#8220;associated with right-wing extremism&#8221; and therefore disqualifying for public service.
&#8220;You were also removed from President Biden&#8217;s inauguration because of concerns that you were an insider threat after reports that your &#8216;Deus Vult&#8217; tattoo &#8216;was a Christian expression associated with right-wing extremism,'&#8221; Warren wrote in January 2025. &#8220;We cannot have a Defense Secretary whose fellow servicemembers feel concerned enough about to report as a potential insider threat.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
When Pete Hegseth was going through is confirmation hearing, Elizabeth Warren wrote an entire letter about how his &quot;Deus Vult&quot; tattoo made him &quot;a right wing extremist&quot; unfit for service.
She just endorsed the guy with the Nazi tattoo. <a href="https://t.co/2mK7Y46Cav">https://t.co/2mK7Y46Cav</a> <a href="https://t.co/dgktaz1KSt">pic.twitter.com/dgktaz1KSt</a>
&mdash; Greg Price (@greg_price11) <a href="https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/2034713277284978975?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 19, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Yet Warren is now backing Platner, a man who literally wore a Nazi symbol on his skin. Even more damning are <a href="https://jewishinsider.com/2025/10/graham-platner-ss-tattoo-maine-senate/">reports</a> from former acquaintances who recall Platner identifying the symbol by its German name at a Capitol Hill bar back in 2012. While Platner now claims he was just a &#8220;very inebriated&#8221; Marine who picked a &#8220;terrifying-looking skull&#8221; off a wall in Croatia, his own former political director, Genevieve McDonald, wasn&#8217;t buying the &#8220;oops&#8221; defense. She <a href="https://image.jewishinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/21135315/PHOTO-2025-10-21-19-24-33.jpg?_gl=1*8mzwfc*_ga*MTY2ODY1ODY1OS4xNzc0MDEyNTA0*_ga_7HK4TGWTHS*czE3NzQwMTI1MDMkbzEkZzAkdDE3NzQwMTI1MDMkajYwJGwwJGgw*_gcl_au*Njg0NDMwMDY1LjE3NzQwMTI1MDQ.&amp;_ga=2.183929638.1028941276.1774012504-1668658659.1774012504">torched him</a> on social media, noting that as a military history buff, Platner &#8220;knows damn well what it means.&#8221;
Warren’s endorsement of Platner — a man who has also <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/elizabeth-warren-makes-endorsement-in-maines-bruising-democratic-senate-primary?author=Cameron+Arcand&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=undefined&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=Elizabeth+Warren+Makes+Endorsement+In+Maine%E2%80%99s+Bruising+Democratic+Senate+Primary">described himself</a> as a &#8220;communist&#8221; on Reddit and referred to police as &#8220;bastards&#8221; — exposes the hollow nature of her &#8220;principled&#8221; stands. When a conservative veteran has a Christian tattoo, Warren sounds the alarm on &#8220;extremism.&#8221; When a populist Democrat has a Nazi-affiliated tattoo and a history of praising communism, she calls him the &#8220;real deal&#8221; and a &#8220;fighter.&#8221;
For Elizabeth Warren, the &#8220;threat&#8221; isn&#8217;t found in the symbols of history’s most hateful regimes; it’s found in anyone who disagrees with her political agenda. If you’re a Republican, a Latin phrase is a hate crime. If you’re a Democrat, a Totenkopf is just a youthful indiscretion.
It’s a masterclass in left-wing cynicism, proving once again that for the senior senator from Massachusetts, &#8220;standards&#8221; are only something you apply to your enemies.

Warren Endorses Democrat Who Had ‘Nazi’ Tattoo After Smearing Hegseth Over Christian Imagery

graham platner

Nazis

Pete Hegseth

Tattoos

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) endorsed populist veteran Graham Platner in Maine&#8217;s Democratic Senate primary on Thursday, further intensifying an already contentious race against Gov. Janet Mills.
Platner has also been backed by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), while Mills is supported by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY). The winner will face incumbent Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) in the November general election, which is expected to be competitive and costly.
“Graham Platner is the real deal,” Warren <a href="https://x.com/grahamformaine/status/2034603306404765726">said</a> in a video announcement. “He’s a fighter, and he’s ready to take that fight to Washington.”
Warren argued that Platner could help Democrats reclaim the Senate majority, currently held by Republicans, 53-47.
“Graham Platner has the grit to go against the grain and to fight for what is right,&#8221; she added, saying Platner exhibits the “fighting spirit that the Democratic Party needs now more than ever.”
Platner’s campaign faced numerous scandals last fall, including old Reddit posts from 2013 in which he described himself as a “communist” and made demeaning comments about women. He has since apologized for the remarks. He also faced scrutiny over a tattoo that critics said resembled a Nazi symbol, which he later covered.
The Mills campaign made the past Reddit comments a key focus of a new <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/attack-ad-targets-democrat-over-vulgar-past-comments-about-women?author=Cameron+Arcand&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=4&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=Attack+Ad+Targets+Democrat+Over+Vulgar+Past+Comments+About+Women">ad</a> released earlier this week, specifically highlighting posts saying women should “act like an adult for f*** sake” and “not get so f***ed up they wind up having sex with someone they don’t mean to.”
“Just no way I could vote for you,” a woman says in the ad.
In response, Platner re-shared a previous apology video from October and said in a post on X that he “was horrified&#8221; by the comments and &#8220;did not recognize the man on the other side of the posts.”
Samantha Cantrell, a National Republican Senatorial Committee spokesperson, said that “Chuck Schumer&#8217;s handpicked candidate is so unpopular in Maine that Elizabeth Warren just endorsed a guy with a Nazi tattoo.”
Despite the past controversies, most polling averages show Platner leading Gov. Mills ahead of the June 9 primary, according to RealClearPolling. The Cook Political Report has the general election race ranked as a “toss-up.”
Collins, who has represented Maine since 1997, won re-election in 2020 with roughly 51% of the vote, defeating Democrat Sara Gideon, who received about 42%.

2024 Democratic National Convention: Day 4

Elizabeth Warren Makes Endorsement In Maine’s Bruising Democratic Senate Primary

2026 election

Congress

janet mills

Maine

Senate

Susan Collins

There&#8217;s a coalition of people who are uniting to take down the United States.
These people are cowards, plus liars, plus people who despise America.
It&#8217;s a coalition of scavengers.
There are the cowards who mouth platitudes about how much they really didn&#8217;t like the Ayatollah, but then they spend their days talking about how the United States couldn&#8217;t and shouldn&#8217;t ever do anything about that.
There are the liars who literally craft stories out of nothing in order to undermine America.
And finally, there are the actual American haters who are often both cowards and liars, and really, really just despise America and her pursuit of our national interests in the world.
That coalition is now coming together, but it&#8217;s not going to win because President Trump is going to win this war.
<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-2380-the-ben-shapiro-show?elementPosition=1&amp;row=0&amp;rowHeadline=Recent+Episodes&amp;rowType=Horizontal+Show+Episodes+Carousel"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-large wp-image-974957" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/511983dad25841c8b1ec058d75769bbe-1024x171.webp" alt="DailyWire+" width="1024" height="171" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/511983dad25841c8b1ec058d75769bbe-1024x171.webp 1024w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/511983dad25841c8b1ec058d75769bbe-300x50.webp 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/511983dad25841c8b1ec058d75769bbe-768x128.webp 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/511983dad25841c8b1ec058d75769bbe-1536x256.webp 1536w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/511983dad25841c8b1ec058d75769bbe-2048x341.webp 2048w" sizes=" (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a>
Let&#8217;s start with the cowards. These are the people who pretend they didn&#8217;t like the Ayatollah very much, but they&#8217;re really, really upset when anyone takes action. So, for example, they&#8217;re really, really mad that international law — the precious gewgaw of the pseudo-intellectuals — has somehow been violated.
Yes. If we don&#8217;t have Myanmar&#8217;s approval of a military strike on the ayatollahs or China&#8217;s approval — and if there is one country we need approval from, it is China, currently oppressing a billion people — or Russia —which is currently engaged in an aggressive war of conquest in Ukraine while throwing dissenters out of random third-story balconies at hotels — we need Russia&#8217;s approval?
That&#8217;s international law. And if we don&#8217;t have their approval, the mullahs must remain immune.
Here is the pathetic Mark Carney <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBFuFwPrdpY">of Canada:</a>
<blockquote>The current conflict is another example of the failure of the international order. Despite decades of UN Security Council resolutions, the tireless work of the International Atomic Energy Agency, and the succession of sanctions and diplomatic frameworks. Iran&#8217;s nuclear threat remains. And now the United States and Israel have acted without engaging the United Nations or consulting allies, including Canada.</blockquote>
Who gives a sh*t? Really? You guys can’t even win a hockey match.
My favorite part of that is when Carney suggests the IAEA has been thwarted for decades, and U.N. resolutions have been ignored for decades, and now the United States and Israel won&#8217;t even go to the U.N.
He just said why those organizations are trash and do nothing. But oh, my gosh, we didn’t turn to Canada with its vast military prowess. Do we need to drop maple syrup on the Iranians?
New York City’s mayor, Zohran Mamdani, who has been happy to express support for terror supporters throughout his entire career, is now hiding behind international law as cover for his consistent opposition to Western strength.
Asked if Iran was “better off without the Ayatollah,” he <a href="https://x.com/Acyn/status/2028907502436532281?s=20">answered</a>:
<blockquote>I&#8217;ve said before that the Iranian government has engaged in systematic repression of its own people, even killing thousands of Iranians who were seeking to express the most basic forms of dissent earlier this year. It is a brutal government. And I&#8217;ve also said that while I may be a young mayor, I am old enough to remember the devastating consequences of our country pursuing a war with the intent of regime change in that very same region, not that many years ago.</blockquote>
The answer should be, &#8220;Yes.&#8221; 
Even if you have questions about what comes next, the answer should be yes. Yes, Iran is better off without Ayatollah Khamenei. But according to Mamdani, the important thing is saying that the ayatollah is really bad — but the minute anybody does anything, that is so much worse. We have to make sure that Khamenei stays in place because, after all, “the Iraq war.”
This Iraq War syndrome nonsense that has been promoted by the Left and then the horseshoe Right together, that every war is Iraq, every single intervention is Iraq, is ahistorical and absurd and tripe.
In 2015-2016, candidate Donald Trump ran on the platform that the Iraq war was bad — which was a controversial opinion inside the Republican Party at the time. The idea that he is now going to engage in a new, long-lasting occupation — not the first three weeks of the Iraq War, where the United States kicked the living hell out of Saddam Hussein and ended his regime, but what came after that, is ludicrous.
By the way, the first three weeks of the Iraq War were, by every available metric, a win for the United States. It was what came after that became problematic.
The argument of the cowards and liars is that Trump is going to engage in Bush-style nation-building in Iran.
Then there are the cowards who slander Israel to somehow imply that Israel is the bad guy in the conflict between Israel and Iran.
Take Gavin Newsom, who is absolutely slimy. As I said before, the man takes more positions on politics than the Kama Sutra. This is the same guy who, in an interview with me, freely admitted that Israel had not committed genocide in Gaza. Last night, however, he went on with the “Pod Save America” bros, knowing he had to please their Israel-hating asses.
Thus, he immediately started <a href="https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/politics-news/gavin-newsom-israel-apartheid-state-1236521231/">talking about</a> how Israel is an apartheid state.
False.
20% of the Israeli population is Arab Muslim. They&#8217;re on the Supreme Court. They are in the medical system. A huge percentage of Israeli doctors are Arab Muslims. They&#8217;re in every area of Israeli society.
How can it be apartheid for Israel to have delegated certain parts of land to, for example, the Palestinian Authority, a terror-supporting group?
But Gavin Newsom knows he has to mouth these platitudes to his far-Left friends if he wants the nomination, because the Democratic Party — as Senator John Fetterman said yesterday on my show — is moving dramatically away from Israel.
Here&#8217;s Gavin Newsom <a href="https://x.com/clashreport/status/2029085070321938865?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2029085070321938865%7Ctwgr%5E4fb64ae5ce1adc6ac7ef128a0ea3c54c4dfb046a%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&amp;ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fnews%2Fpolitics-news%2Fgavin-newsom-israel-apartheid-state-1236521231%2F">telling lies</a> and being a coward, speaking of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu.
<blockquote>He&#8217;s got his own domestic issues. He&#8217;s trying to stay out of jail. He&#8217;s got an election coming up. He&#8217;s potentially on the ropes. He&#8217;s got folks, the hard line, that want to annex the West or the West Bank. I mean, (Thomas) Friedman and others are talking about it, appropriate, sort of an apartheid state. They couldn&#8217;t even, I mean, we&#8217;re talking about regime change. For two years, they haven&#8217;t even been able to solve the Hamas question.</blockquote>
Asked about rethinking our military support for Israel. He replied, “It breaks my heart, because the current leadership in Israel is walking us down that path where I don&#8217;t think you have a choice. But that consideration, I mean to say this is in America&#8217;s interest at a time when affordability crisis levels, where you had an administration literally got elected, saying this is exactly the opposite of what they would ever consider doing. The fact that we are in this now regional war, all these proxies.”
He is a coward and a liar.
The fact of the matter is that blaming the attack on Iran on Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister, is a lie. There&#8217;s complete solidarity in Israel from Left to Right on what Israel is doing right now. From Yair Lapid, who is on the Left, to Naftali Bennett, the chief rival to Netanyahu, to Yair Golan on the far, far, far Left, everyone agrees on this.
But when you are a coward, and you&#8217;re afraid of your own party, you have to start lying.
And then there are the actual liars, the people making actual stories up out of nothing. Stories they know aren&#8217;t true, but they push them anyway. The catastrophists aren&#8217;t actually worried about World War III or a long-standing boots on the ground occupation, but try to lie to Americans that they are.
Thus, Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), who has had his own shady history with the truth when it comes to his purported military service, said <a href="https://x.com/yashar/status/2028975539214782618">he&#8217;s worried</a> that we&#8217;re going to put boots on the ground.
Does he mean that there might be special operators on the ground? Because if we&#8217;re talking about special operators on the ground, welcome to the real world, where the United States has special operators on the ground all over the world, everywhere from Asia to Africa and the Middle East.
But that&#8217;s not what he was implying. He was implying a gigantic airlift of hundreds of thousands of troops, a gigantic boots on the ground footprint. It&#8217;s a lie. It is untrue.
It&#8217;s astonishing to watch this while he is wearing the American flag/Ukraine flag pin on his lapel.
“I am more fearful than ever after this briefing that we may be putting boots on the ground, and that the troops from the United States may be necessary to accomplish the objectives that the administration seems to have, but I also am no more clear on what the priorities are going to be given this regime going forward,” he <a href="https://x.com/yashar/status/2028975539214782618">hyperventilated</a>.
These are lies. It&#8217;s not true.
Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), directly from the Native American reservation, from her teepee, says that <a href="https://youtu.be/DxrTqQEZ69s">there is no plan</a>.
And she would know because, after all, she is a military leader and expert.
“I just left a classified briefing on Iran,” she huffed. “And here&#8217;s what I can say: It is so much worse than you thought. The Trump administration has no plan in Iran. This illegal war is based on lies and it was launched without any imminent threat to our nation. Donald Trump still hasn&#8217;t given us a single clear reason for this war, and he seems to have no plan for how to end it either. Like a lot of you, I am really angry. I am angry at what Donald Trump is doing, and I feel grief for those already killed in this unnecessary conflict. And I will keep doing everything I can to fight to end this war.” 
What a liar she is. What an absolute liar. President Trump hasn&#8217;t explained it? What&#8217;s been happening for the past 50 years?
This notion that no one knows why, that what has happened is some mystery out of the blue?
No one believes that.
The idea that there&#8217;s no plan here is horsesh*t. There is a plan here, and the military is laying it out, but the liars are going to lie.
Finally, there are the American haters. There are a lot of people who live in America who truly hate America.
There&#8217;s an easy way to tell who hates America.
If you call America a terrorist organization for killing one of the world&#8217;s most evil dictators, for example, I know you hate America.
If you say that the United States is the worst terror organization in the world, you don&#8217;t like America, period, because that is such an overt lie.
That is such a moral calumny that there can only be one explanation, and it is your deep and abiding hatred for America&#8217;s role in the world.
To make that argument, you have to deliberately obscure the difference between actual terrorists who deliberately seek to kill innocent people and nation states seeking to avoid civilian casualties, often while fighting those actual terrorists.
That is the point for people who hate America: To reduce America to the level of its enemies in order to uphold those enemies. 
You also hate America if you claim that the president of the United States is merely a tool of foreign interests without any evidence whatsoever. You are promoting lies directly mirroring those of the Iranian terrorist government, in direct contravention of truth and of the Trump administration&#8217;s own words.
President Trump was asked directly whether it was Israel that was leading him around. He <a href="https://x.com/realDailyWire/status/2028877941808005217">fired back</a>, “I might have forced their hand. You see, we were having negotiations with these lunatics, and it was my opinion that they were going to attack first. They were going to attack if we didn&#8217;t do it, they were going to attack first. I felt strongly about that. And we had great negotiators, great people, people that do this very successfully and have done it all their lives, very successful. And, based on the way the negotiation was going, I think they were going to attack first.”
Another game that the Coalition of Scavengers is playing here with regard to President Trump is that what he&#8217;s doing right now is wildly unpopular with the American people.
According to CBS News, 85% of Republicans support the president&#8217;s strikes on Iran. 
According to Fox News, 84% of Republicans support the strikes on Iran. 
According to The Washington Post, 81% of Republicans support the strike on Iran. 
According to Reuters/Ipsos, 82% of Republicans support the strikes on Iran.
So, it doesn&#8217;t sound like much of a split inside the Republican Party.
Military households approve of the current action against Iran by a 20-point margin, 60-40. One of the great ironies of all the people on the Left and the horseshoe Right who claim to speak in the name of the military is that they very rarely actually talk to people who are in the military. The military is quite conservative and hawkish when it comes to actual effectuating of American foreign policy.
The lesson of all this?
Be a lion, not a scavenger.

Lions

Cowards, Liars, And The Anti-American Alliance

Ben Shapiro

Conservatives

Democrats

Gavin Newsom

Iran

Israel

Leftists

podcasts

Richard Blumenthal

Zohran Mamdani

President Donald Trump urged Congress on Wednesday to pass legislation capping credit card interest rates at 10% for the next year, a proposal that has drawn criticism from Republican lawmakers.
Trump pressed Congress to take action on credit card interest rates during a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Last week, the president pressured banks and credit card companies to lower interest rates for one year, but he didn&#8217;t address how he would force them to comply. A deadline had been set for Jan. 20, but institutions have yet to follow Trump&#8217;s directive.
&#8220;The profit margin for credit card companies now exceeds 50%, and they charge Americans interest rates of 28%, 30%, 31%, 32%. Whatever happened to usury?&#8221; Trump <a href="https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2013983796039647649">said</a> on Wednesday. &#8220;So, to help our citizens recover from the Biden disaster all caused by this horrible president, I&#8217;m asking Congress to cap credit card interest rates at 10% for one year.&#8221;
&#8220;And this will help millions of Americans save for a home,&#8221; he added.
Leftist Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who has pushed for capping credit card interest rates, said last week that Trump <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/14/warren-trump-credit-card-interest-rate-affordability.html">called her</a> to discuss the issue. Warren said that she told Trump &#8220;he had not lifted a finger to try to get something through on credit card interest rate caps.”
Democratic socialist Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Republican Josh Hawley of Missouri also support the idea. Both senators introduced a bill last year to cap credit card interest rates at 10% for five years. Leftist Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Florida Republican Anna Paulina Luna introduced a similar bill in the House, but the legislation has not made any progress in Congress.
When Trump publicly floated the idea of capping interest rates last week, Republican leaders in the Senate and House poured cold water on the proposal. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) said last Tuesday, &#8220;The president is the ideas guy,” adding, “I wouldn’t get too spun up about ideas that are out of the box, that are proposed or suggested,&#8221; POLITICO <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/13/trump-credit-cards-congress-republicans-00725477">reported</a>.
&#8220;You&#8217;ve got to be very careful if you go forward in that,&#8221; Johnson continued. &#8220;In our zeal to bring down costs, you don&#8217;t want to have negative secondary effects. The problem is, if you do that, then the credit card companies, the negative secondary effect is that they would just stop lending money, and maybe they cap what people are able to borrow at a very low amount.&#8221;
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) said, “That’s not something I’m out there advocating for.&#8221; Thune told NBC News that he believes Trump is getting bad advice.
&#8220;He may be getting advice on some of those issues, like, for example, the 10% cap on credit cards,” he said. “Don’t know where that came from. I don’t know. I don’t know the answer.”
Now that Trump has called on Congress to act on capping credit card interest rates, Republican leaders could find themselves in a tougher spot if they continue to publicly oppose his plan.
JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, who is also in Davos, <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/21/jamie-dimon-trump-credit-card-rate-cap-vermont-massachusetts.html">said</a> on Wednesday that a cap on credit card interest rates &#8220;would be an economic disaster.&#8221;
“In the worst case, you’d have a drastic reduction of the credit card business” for 80% of Americans, Dimon said, according to CNBC. He then quipped that the United States should test the idea in Warren&#8217;s and Sanders&#8217; home states of Massachusetts and Vermont, &#8220;and see what happens.&#8221; The banker added that those on &#8220;the Left&#8221; who push for price controls “will learn a real lesson, and the people crying the most won’t be the credit card companies.&#8221;
“It’ll be the restaurants, the retailers, the travel companies, the schools, the municipalities, because people miss their water payments,” Dimon said. “It would be something else to watch.”

Donald Trump

Trump Urges Congress To Cap Credit Card Interest Rates As Republican Leaders Push Back On Plan

Trump Calls On Congress To Cap Credit Card Interest Rates As Republican Leaders Push Back On Plan

Bernie Sanders

credit cards

Economy

Jamie Dimon

Josh Hawley

Republicans

Two weeks ago, Bloomberg anchor Lisa Abramowicz, discussing the sale of Nvidia H200s to China with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/will-president-trump-sell-advanced-ai-chips-to-china">asked</a>, “Is it more of a national security risk to give China some of these high-powered chips, or is it more of a national security risk to not have United States tech in China?”
Lutnick replied, saying that very question was sitting on the president’s desk. On Monday, President Trump delivered his answer.
“I have informed President Xi, of China, that the United States will allow Nvidia to ship its H200 products to approved customers in China, and other Countries, under conditions that allow for continued strong National Security,” the president announced. “President Xi responded positively! 25% will be paid to the United States of America.”
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for clarification on whether that 25% will be paid by foreign governments, strictly Chinese buyers, or the AI companies themselves. In August, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/morning-brief-trumps-d-c-takeover-a-china-chip-deal-border-wall-2-0">reports</a> surfaced of a separate arrangement in which Nvidia and AMD would share 15% of their profits with the United States government.
President Trump emphasized that Nvidia’s most advanced chips, Blackwell and Rubin, would not be included in H200 export authorization.
The decision drew an immediate rebuke from Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA). “After his backroom meeting with Donald Trump and his company’s donation to the Trump ballroom, CEO Jensen Huang got his wish to sell the most powerful AI chip we’ve ever sold to China.”
Warren called for Huang to “testify publicly and under oath” in front of Congress.
50% off DailyWire+ annual memberships will not return for another year, so don’t miss this deal! Join now at <a class="c-link" href="http://dailywire.com/cyberweek" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="http://DailyWire.com/cyberweek" data-sk="tooltip_parent">DailyWire.com/cyberweek</a>.
Trump defended the move, insisting it would not compromise national security. “We will protect national security, create American jobs, and keep America’s lead in AI,” he stated.
Earlier this month, Samuel Hammond, the chief economist at the Foundation for American Innovation, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/will-president-trump-sell-advanced-ai-chips-to-china">told</a> The Daily Wire, “Permitting H200 exports to China would be a world-historic mistake. America’s current lead in AI would be radically diminished with very little to show for it.”
AI Czar David Sacks, speaking at the Salesforce Dreamforce conference, described the export policy as a complicated endeavor.
“What we ship to China is complicated,” he said, noting that current policy permits less advanced chips to be sold abroad, but that the fight in Washington is where that line is drawn. “Some people want to draw that line very, very restrictively.”
Sacks has not yet commented on the H200 decision — but earlier on Monday, he weighed in on the president’s forthcoming “One Rule” executive order. “There must be only one rulebook if we are going to continue to lead in AI,” Trump said, warning that “we are beating all countries at this point in the [AI] race, but that won’t last for long if we are going to have 50 States involved in the rules and approval process.”
Addressing concerns on the AI preemption, Sacks stated that with 50 different AI models for 50 different states, America will end up with a &#8220;regulatory morass worse than Europe.&#8221; The AI czar <a href="https://x.com/DavidSacks/status/1998125180753944985">added</a>, &#8220;If we want America to win the AI race, a confusing patchwork of regulation will not work.&#8221;
Further details on the &#8220;One Rule&#8221; executive order, as well as clarification on the H200 sale to China, are expected later this week.

Moscow, Russia – April 7, 2019: NVIDIA video chip on the motherboard

Trump Answers High-Stakes Question On AI And China

Artificial Intelligence

Communist China

Global Politics

National Security

Nvidia

World

The Trump administration notched a victory when a Kentucky federal judge temporarily blocked the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau from implementing a rule critics say puts Americans&#8217; financial data at risk.
The 1033 Rule, proposed under President Joe Biden&#8217;s CFPB Director Rohit Chopra, <a href="https://www.consumerfinance.gov/personal-financial-data-rights/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">requires</a> banks to &#8220;make available to consumers, upon request, transaction data and other information concerning a consumer financial product or service that the consumer obtained from the covered entity.&#8221;
Forcht Bank, the Kentucky Bankers Association, and the Bank Policy Institute sued to block the rule, saying it exceeded the CFPB’s authority and would force the institutions to hand over large amounts of sensitive data, creating security and liability risks. Judge Danny C. Reeves of the United States District Court for Kentucky concluded the rule could cause more harm than good.
&#8220;The public could arguably lose some benefit from the Rule not being enforced at the set compliance deadlines,&#8221; said the judge. &#8220;However, the plaintiffs also contend that enforcement of the current Rule puts consumers at risk due to security risk as to their banking information.&#8221;
The <a href="https://bpi.com/joint-statement-on-courts-decision-to-stay-section-1033-compliance-deadline/">Bank Policy Institute</a> issued a statement saying the organization was grateful for the court&#8217;s decision.
&#8220;This is a common-sense procedural step,&#8221; said the Bank Policy Institute. It &#8220;doesn’t interfere with the rulemaking process but ensures banks won’t be forced to invest time and resources preparing for a rule that is currently being rewritten.”
&#8220;This preliminary injunction marks a pivotal moment for those who value consumer privacy and limited-government issues,&#8221; a source familiar with the matter told The Daily Wire. &#8220;The Trump administration now has a unique opportunity to advance a new 1033 rule that gets the government out of the way and unleashes innovation.”
Under Vought&#8217;s leadership, the CFPB issued <a href="https://www.consumerfinance.gov/personal-financial-data-rights/">an advance notice of proposed rulemaking,</a> inviting the public to give input to form the basis of the final rule. Once input has been provided, the CFPB will share a draft of the rule.
The CFPB is now analyzing public comments and data around four key issues related to the implementation of the 1033 rule: who should be allowed to access financial data on a customer&#8217;s behalf, whether companies should be allowed to charge data sharing fees, how big are the security risks of sharing financial data, and how big are the privacy risks.
The Bank Policy Institute writes that the current rule &#8220;unlawfully mandated banks to share sensitive consumer data with third-party fintechs and aggregators; it required no oversight of third parties using bank customer data,&#8221; among other issues.
Earlier this year, Chopra was notified that he had been <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-fires-rohit-chopra-director-of-the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau/">fired by the president</a> via an email from the White House. President Trump appointed Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to lead the agency in interim before handing the reins over to Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought.
Rethinking the CFPB has been a priority of the Trump administration&#8217;s since the start of his term. In February, the White House issued a statement stating that the agency &#8220;has long functioned as another woke, weaponized arm of the bureaucracy that leverages its power against certain industries and individuals disfavored by so-called elites.&#8221;
The Trump administration accused the CFPB of &#8220;supporting radical advocacy groups, threatening banks for refusing to lend to illegal immigrants, targeting a Chicago small business after it complained about the city&#8217;s rampant crime, and mining American citizens&#8217; personal financial information.&#8221;
On The Charlie Kirk Show, Vought discussed the importance of putting a stop to the agency&#8217;s ability to weaponize &#8220;the tools of financial laws against small mom and pop lenders and other small financial institutions.&#8221;

The Trump Administration Just Took A Huge Step Toward Reforming The CFPB

Banks

Money

Politics

Trump Administration

Democrats have repeatedly insisted that they did not shut the government down over a demand for healthcare for illegal aliens, and several of them have expressed their displeasure at the media outlets willing to call them out on <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/yes-democrats-want-to-give-illegals-free-healthcare-here-are-the-facts">that lie</a>.
Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) got testy with &#8220;CBS Mornings&#8221; host Tony Dokoupil on Thursday, claiming that it wasn&#8217;t &#8220;strictly true&#8221; when he challenged her directly on the issue.
&#8220;So, Senator, you know, Republicans say what you’re really fighting for is taxpayer dollars for, as they put it, illegal aliens. I know that’s not strictly true but there is a provision –&#8221; Dokoupil began.
&#8220;Oh, excuse me, not strictly true,&#8221; Warren&#8217;s protest was immediate.
&#8220;It’s not directly true, but –&#8221; Dokoupil tried again.
&#8220;It is a flat-out lie. It is a flat-out lie,&#8221; Warren insisted. &#8220;There is nothing in Medicaid, nothing in Medicare, that permits one undocumented immigrant to get one dollar of assistance. None.&#8221;
&#8220;Sorry, in the Democratic counteroffer the proposal for funding, there is a restoration of Medicaid benefits for certain noncitizens that had been taken away in the &#8216;Big, Beautiful Bill,&#8217; as Republicans put it,&#8221; Dokoupil pushed back.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
WATCH: Democrat Senator Elizabeth Warren explodes when ‘CBS Mornings’ co-host Tony Dokoupil points out Democrats do, in fact, want to provide health care to “noncitizens…on the taxpayer dime.”
Warren snapped back by declaring “it’s not strictly true” and “a flat-out lie”….… <a href="https://t.co/fOSqgcSdUI">pic.twitter.com/fOSqgcSdUI</a>
— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) <a href="https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1973743570755506319?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 2, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
On CNN, a very similar scene played out between anchor Jake Tapper and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY).
&#8220;Here&#8217;s a provision &#8230; it shows you want to give illegal aliens healthcare,&#8221; Tapper noted.
<a class="c-link c-link--focus-visible" href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/?utm_campaign=fall40&amp;utm_content=fallsale&amp;utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/?utm_campaign=fall40&amp;utm_content=fallsale&amp;utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial" data-sk="tooltip_parent" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-1322">Get 40% off new DailyWire+ annual memberships with code FALL40 at checkout!</a> 
&#8220;It&#8217;s a lie!&#8221; Jeffries protested.
&#8220;It&#8217;s a lie — but, what you support does bring back funding for emergency Medicaid to hospitals, which pays for undocumented immigrants &#8230; and a provision for people seeking asylum and &#8216;temporary protected status,&#8217; noncitizens &#8230; why even include that?&#8221; Tapper asked.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
🚨 HOLY CRAP! Hakeem Jeffries REGRETS going on CNN, Jake Tapper just embarrassed him. <a href="https://t.co/KmdS9gMxJN">pic.twitter.com/KmdS9gMxJN</a>
TAPPER: Here&#8217;s a provision&#8230;it shows you want to give illegal aliens healthcare&#8230;
JEFFRIES: It&#8217;s a lie!
TAPPER: It&#8217;s a lie &#8211; BUT, what you support DOES bring back…
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) <a href="https://twitter.com/EricLDaugh/status/1973515804919345641?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 1, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) attempted to claim that she&#8217;d never heard anyone in her party calling for providing healthcare for illegals — and Fox News host Lawrence Jones responded with video evidence of members of her party doing exactly that.
&#8220;I haven&#8217;t heard anybody in my party saying illegal immigrants should get access to the health insurance marketplace,&#8221; she said.
Jones showed a clip of Democrats on the 2020 debate stage, and then replied, &#8220;That&#8217;s literally every member of your party from moderate to more progressive that have said that in the past.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Democrat Sen. Jeanne Shaheen: I haven&#8217;t heard anybody in my party saying illegals should get taxpayer-funded health care!
*ROLLS THE TAPE*
Fox: &#8220;That&#8217;s literally every member of your party from moderate to more progressive&#8230;&#8221; <a href="https://t.co/ziu6pMhLKO">pic.twitter.com/ziu6pMhLKO</a>
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapidResponse47/status/1973728411085578487?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 2, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Republicans shared the receipts in a post to X, highlighting the relevant portion of the resolution: &#8220;It’s right there on paper. Democrats are fighting for healthcare for illegal aliens, NOT the American people.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
It’s right there on paper.
Democrats are fighting for healthcare for illegal aliens, NOT the American people. <a href="https://t.co/HIRQyu9lZK">https://t.co/HIRQyu9lZK</a> <a href="https://t.co/qaj4KGzBIj">pic.twitter.com/qaj4KGzBIj</a>
— GOP (@GOP) <a href="https://twitter.com/GOP/status/1973800680055009462?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 2, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
And it&#8217;s not a new position, either. Several people posted videos and still photos from one of the 2020 Democratic primary debates, when every Democrat on the stage raised a hand to confirm that all of their healthcare plans would include coverage for &#8220;undocumented immigrants.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
The question was:
Raise your hand if your healthcare plan covers illegal immigrants. <a href="https://t.co/xS4WYIZCo5">pic.twitter.com/xS4WYIZCo5</a>
— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) <a href="https://twitter.com/RichardGrenell/status/1973540060529303939?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 2, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

US-VOTE-2020-DEMOCRATS-DEBATE-POLITICS-ELECTION

Dems Peeved That Media Sees Through Their ‘No Healthcare For Illegals’ Lie

Dems Peeved That Media Sees Through Their 'No Health Care For Illegals' Lie

Government Shutdown

Hakeem Jeffries

illegal alien

Illegal Immigration

Jake Tapper

Media

President Donald Trump took questions from reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday, and when the topic turned to Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), the president quickly went off script.
The question that prompted Trump&#8217;s outburst — during which he suggested, among other things, that someone ought to give Warren a drug test — came from a LindellTV reporter who asked about the Massachusetts Senator&#8217;s repeated insistence that the Trump administration would cut Social Security.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
.<a href="https://twitter.com/POTUS?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@POTUS</a>: &#8220;Elizabeth Warren said she was an Indian. We call her Pocahontas—she&#8217;s a liar&#8230; I watched her the other night, she&#8217;s all hopped up endorsing a communist in New York City, and she was all excited and jumping up and down. She&#8217;s gotta take a drug test, she really does.&#8221;🤣 <a href="https://t.co/cqpz5pkNse">pic.twitter.com/cqpz5pkNse</a>
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapidResponse47/status/1956051966531920190?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 14, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;Democrats like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren continue to peddle the lie and the claim that you’re trying to cut Social Security despite your repeated promises to protect it. Why do you think they keep pushing this misinformation, and literally terrorizing the elderly in America that sadly keep watching the very misleading mainstream media?&#8221; the reporter asked.
Trump first paused to praise the reporter for asking a question he liked, saying, &#8220;I love your question, I should have called you almost first.&#8221;
Pivoting to address Warren and Sanders, he added, &#8220;It’s so vicious what they do. Elizabeth Warren said she was an Indian. We call her Pocahontas. She’s a liar. She lied her whole career. Based on the fact that she was Indian, she was able to get into certain colleges, get certain jobs, get into certain universities to work there. She’s a liar and a mean person. She’s a nut job.&#8221;
<a href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/?utm_campaign=summer&amp;utm_content=editorialsummersale&amp;utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial" target="_blank" rel="noopener">End of Summer Sale – Get 40% off New DailyWire+ Annual Memberships</a>
&#8220;I watched her the other night. She was all hopped up, endorsing a communist in New York City. And she was all excited and jumping up and down,&#8221; Trump continued, referencing Warren&#8217;s appearance alongside Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic Socialist poised to become the next Mayor of New York City. &#8220;She’s gotta take a drug test! She really does, she’s gotta take a drug test. There’s no way somebody can act that way and be normal.&#8221;
Trump went on to criticize Warren&#8217;s actions with regard to banks in the midwest, claiming that she had &#8220;put ’em out of business&#8221; and adding, &#8220;She’s a mean, horrible human being.&#8221;
&#8220;Bernie Sanders is Bernie Sanders. I don’t mind him so much,&#8221; Trump turned to comment on Sanders then. &#8220;He’s just a liberal guy, very liberal guy, wacky guy. He’s still sharp. I got to tell you, you know, he’s 86, or 87, or something. He’s still sharp. You compare that to Joe Biden &#8230; So I don’t mind Bernie Sanders. With him, you know what you’re getting.&#8221;

‘She’s All Hopped Up’: Trump Says Elizabeth Warren Needs To Be Drug-Tested

'She's All Hopped Up': Trump Says Elizabeth Warren Needs To Be Drug-Tested

Drugs

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) defended self-described Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani during a CNBC appearance on Monday, claiming that raising taxes on the rich was the best way to make New York City &#8220;vibrant&#8221; and &#8220;workable&#8221; again.
Warren got into a heated exchange with &#8220;Squawk on the Street&#8221; host David Faber over Mamdani, New York City&#8217;s Democratic mayoral nominee, and his plan to make things in the city more &#8220;affordable&#8221; for the working class by heaping additional taxes on the wealthy and businesses.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
ELIZABETH WARREN: What Zohran is saying is &#8216;I want people to be able to afford to live in NYC&#8217;
FABER: But raising taxes in order to do it?
WARREN: Oh my goodness! Oh dear! Are you worried that billionaires are going to go hungry? <a href="https://t.co/9FHkAKSv4X">pic.twitter.com/9FHkAKSv4X</a>
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) <a href="https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1952379215233396850?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 4, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;What Zohran is saying is, &#8216;I want people to be able to afford to live in New York City.&#8217; That’s what keeps it a vibrant city,&#8221; Warren insisted.
&#8220;Nobody disagrees with that, Senator. But raising taxes in order to do it? Why is that the answer?&#8221; Faber wanted to know.
Warren did not defend the plan to raise taxes, but instead asked, &#8220;Oh dear, are you worried that billionaires are going to go hungry?&#8221;
&#8220;No, I’m worried that they’re going to leave and spend their money elsewhere,&#8221; Faber pointed out.
Warren protested, claiming that people had threatened to leave over higher taxes, but made it clear that she didn&#8217;t believe they were likely to follow through on those threats.
&#8220;They’ve threatened to do that over and over—&#8221; she said
&#8220;And they have! And Goldman Sachs, when they create new jobs, they do it in Dallas. And Blackstone won’t build a new headquarters [in New York City]. I could go on and on,&#8221; Faber replied.
One day later — after Warren campaigned alongside Mamdani in New York and claimed he was exactly what the Democratic Party should look like — The New York Post responded with a brutal, front-page skewering of the pair.
&#8220;Today&#8217;s cover: Far left Sen. Warren gushes over NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani — as other high-profile Dems stay silent,&#8221; the outlet&#8217;s post on X read. The headline, along with a front-page blurb, alluded to <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/mamdani-said-he-was-african-american-on-columbia-university-application">dishonest claims</a> made in the past by <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-elizabeth-warren-uncomfortably-answers-amanda-prestigiacomo">both politicians</a>.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Today&#8217;s cover: Far left Sen. Warren gushes over NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani — as other high-profile Dems stay silent <a href="https://t.co/yT79CjKaE7">https://t.co/yT79CjKaE7</a> <a href="https://t.co/dlMUGwF2xN">pic.twitter.com/dlMUGwF2xN</a>
— New York Post (@nypost) <a href="https://twitter.com/nypost/status/1952682444093636657?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 5, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;AFRICAN AMERICAN MEETS NATIVE AMERICAN,&#8221; the headline blared in all capital letters, followed by, &#8220;Mamdani and Warren in liars&#8217; summit.&#8221;
Another blurb on the front page added insult to injury: &#8220;Most national Democrats have refused to endorse socialist Zohran Mamdani, but he does have one ally — Elizabeth Warren, who appeared by his side yesterday. The two share the belief that bigger government is the answer to everything — and that lying about your ethnicity on your college application is perfectly fine.&#8221;

US-NEWS-NYC-MAYOR-MAMDANI-DEMOCRATS-NY

Elizabeth Warren Goes To The Mat For Mamdani, But It’s The New York Post With The Takedown

Elizabeth Warren Goes To The Mat For Mamdani, But It's The New York Post With The TKO

CNBC

Democratic Socialism

Menu