criminal justice

News Flash: Bad kids deserve punishment

In other news: no surfboards in desert

Feminists aren't even hiding it anymore

An Omani Muslim pilot tries to hijack a plane flying to Israel, a former American Idol star and Non-Denominational pastor is convicted of murdering his wife, and Sunny Hostin of The View has emerged as the voice of reason in the Cornell Seven case.

For some, this is a fate worse than death

The enthusiasm really ties the story together

This term gives them too much credit

Lois Gibson is the world record holder for most identifications by a forensic artist. Today, I'll be speaking with her about her near death experience that led to her pursuing this line of work, as well as her involvement in the Nancy Guthrie case.

The left wants body cams gone

The Lindsay Clancy Holdout Reveal Libs Never Saw Coming

This Lindsay Clancy detail is irrelevant

Scum

Women are arguing against their own sanity.

Should 20-25% of women be exempt from prosecution?

Dennis Prager joins PragerU Co-Founder and Executive Director Allen Estrin to discuss the larger moral questions raised by the Lindsay Clancy case. Dennis explains what the Torah teaches about the seriousness of taking a human life, why even accidental killing carries consequences, and why punishment should communicate society’s moral values. He also answers audience questions about the insanity defense, feelings versus values, public speaking, sinful thoughts versus actions, learning Hebrew, and why cities tend to lean left. Join PragerUnited today and submit your question for Dennis to answer during an upcoming episode.

The Lindsay Clancy murder trial is on the brink of a mistrial after jurors told the judge they remain deadlocked on the seventh day of deliberations. But in a last-ditch "Hail Mary," Clancy’s defense attorney was given one hour to seek an emergency stay from an appeals court before the judge officially declares a mistrial and dismisses the jury.

Juries have long been apart of our justice system. In the age of TikTok brain rot and moral peril, do juries still work?

The snowball has started rolling

These are dark times

The Clancy jury continues to deliberate. The Lindsay Clancy case will divide the sane and the insane.

These people can vote

Ridiculous

As the jury deliberates in the Lindsay Clancy trial, a disturbing question is emerging: Should mothers who kill their children receive lesser punishment simply because they recently gave birth? I had no idea about the infanticide laws across the Western world. And once you see how other countries handle cases like this you will be SHOCKED. Under Britain’s Infanticide Act, a mother who kills her child under the age of one can face a lesser charge if her mental state was affected by childbirth or lactation—and prison sentences in these cases are rare. Postpartum psychosis is real—but does it excuse murder? And should America follow the UK’s example?