Models in 2022 bear little resemblance to the models of twenty or even ten years ago. 
While the former fashion elite were criticized for looking emaciated and promoting unrealistic beauty standards, today’s models take celebrating realness to the next level. It’s not uncommon to encounter billboards promoting obesity, c-section scars, insulin pumps, amputations, skin conditions, and a slew of other unique factors.
Adding diversity and uniqueness to the modeling industry is a welcome change for many who were sick of airbrushed images that made men and women feel bad about themselves. But did the pendulum swing too far the other way?
Take plus-sized model Yumi Nu, who recently made headlines for nabbing the coveted spot on the cover of the 2022 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue. “I was processing the surprise of it not being a real interview and that this was actually the SI cover reveal. I could not speak. I had full body chills. I was shaking, I was crying. They really got me good,” Nu said of finding out she would appear on the magazine cover.
Not everyone loved the image, though. Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson’s Twitter response went viral from both people who agreed with his take and critics who thought he was being too harsh.
“Sorry. Not beautiful,” Peterson <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/sorry-not-beautiful-jordan-peterson-blasts-sports-illustrated-over-plus-sized-swimsuit-issue-cover-model">shared in response</a> to a New York Post headline about Nu. “And no amount of authoritarian tolerance is going to change that.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Sorry. Not beautiful. And no amount of authoritarian tolerance is going to change that. <a href="https://t.co/rOASeeQvee">https://t.co/rOASeeQvee</a>
&mdash; Dr Jordan B Peterson (@jordanbpeterson) <a href="https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/1526279181545390083?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 16, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&nbsp;
In a follow up, he wrote, “It’s a conscious progressive attempt to manipulate &amp; retool the notion of beauty, reliant on the idiot philosophy that such preferences are learned &amp; properly changed by those who know better … but don’t let the facts stop you.”
Nu is certainly not the first plus-sized model to grace the cover of a magazine. In February 2021, Cosmopolitan magazine received backlash for their “This is healthy! 11 women on why wellness doesn’t have to be one size fits all,” cover series, which features morbidly obese women posing in workout clothes. 

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Why is Cosmopolitan trying to kill obese people, who are particularly vulnerable to Covid? <a href="https://t.co/cZhRpnldUV">pic.twitter.com/cZhRpnldUV</a>
&mdash; Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) <a href="https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1345982450464276481?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 4, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&nbsp;
This was all happening as data came out proving the irrefutable link between COVID-19 death rates and obesity, a previous report from The Daily Wire <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/covid-19-proves-the-danger-of-the-body-positive-celebration-of-obesity">stated</a>. Apparently, 73% of the half a million Americans who died from COVID-19 from the pandemic’s beginning and 2021 were obese or overweight, the CDC confirmed. 
 Whether it be plus-sized models or other distinctions, there is no question that intentional representation in modeling has exploded in recent years.
Sports Illustrated also selected a mom who proudly showed off her c-section scar in a swimsuit spread. The publication wrote on <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/Cda3TF5uzae/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;ig_rid=aad4440f-7576-4809-a141-92e1fe2e14e1">social media</a>: “We are proud to partner with @fridamom to celebrate all moms who bare C-Section scars by featuring @kellyhues in #SISwim22- the FIRST woman to expose her C-Section scar in magazine’s history!”
Cover model Kelly Hughes wrote on Instagram,“I am speechless and so honored to be in @si_swimsuit2022 as the FIRST woman to expose her c-section scar in magazines history!”, The Daily Wire originally <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/sports-illustrateds-new-swimsuit-cover-shows-model-baring-pelvis-for-c-section-scar">reported</a>. “This partnership with @fridamom #paywithchange partnership to normalize and embrace the changes with a woman’s body especially when becoming a mom is so amazing to be a part of.”
“I struggled with insecurities from my scar being that I’m a model and my incredibly difficult recovery but it wasn’t until I ‘embraced my scar that I experienced the true power in it,’” Hughes continued.
Frida Mom also shared the photo of Hughes on Instagram, saying, “We’ve partnered with @si_swimsuit to feature a model showing her C-Section Scar – for the first. time. ever. To @kellyhues &amp; all the C-Section moms, wear that scar with pride. It’s proof you’re strong as a mother.”
Sports Illustrated models aren’t the only ones sharing their uniqueness. Supermodel Kate Moss’s daughter Lila Moss, 19, appeared in a joint campaign for Versace and Fendi. The teen modeled luxury handbags and openly showed her continuous blood glucose monitoring device on her upper-right arm, which she wears to control her Type 1 diabetes.
The glucose monitor could also be seen as Lila walked the runway for the brands in September 2021.
During an interview in 2020, the model <a href="https://thekit.ca/beauty/celebrity-beauty/lila-moss-interview-2020/">told</a> The Kit: “I think not many people know that I have diabetes. It&#8217;s not visible from the outside, so no one would really know just by looking at you.”
Even the most notoriously homogenous fashion brands have jumped on the diversity bandwagon. Victoria’s Secret, a women’s intimates brand that is routinely mocked for promoting impossible beauty standards, recently debuted a transgender model to show off their merchandise. TikTok star Emira D’Spain partnered with the brand in February 2022.
“I don’t need a man to buy me flowers,” D&#8217;Spain said in a promotional video, concluding: “Valentine’s Day may be about love, but it also includes loving yourself.”
“My entire platform is built on confidence and self-love,” D’Spain said in a <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2022/02/01/emira-dspain-first-black-trans-model-victorias-secret/9304018002/">statement</a> to USA TODAY at the time. 
She continued: &#8220;I want to empower young trans women and men around the world to show them that the beauty and fashion industries are changing, especially if you are a POC. I am so grateful to work with Victoria’s Secret and hope this paves the way for those after me.&#8221;
As trans representation becomes more prevalent in pop culture, the modeling industry is following along. Recently, Calvin Klein proudly debuted a pregnant trans “man” who posed for their Mother’s Day campaign.
 “Today, in support of women and mothers around the world, we highlight the reality of new families,” the company shared in the Instagram description, as previously <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/calvin-klein-includes-pregnant-trans-man-in-ad-campaign">reported</a> by The Daily Wire.
The post goes on to describe examples of non-traditional families. “@k.vventzel is a South African painter and mother to Wild. @erikafeeh and @roberto_bete are expecting parents from Brazil. Roberto is due to give birth to his and Erika’s son Noah any day now. @venedaacarter is a prominent fashion consultant. Her family is Bobbi and Weston,” the caption continued.
Comments were very supportive to the brands professed zero tolerance policy on negativity.
“We embrace this platform as an inclusive and respectful environment for individualism and self-expression. At Calvin Klein, we tolerate everything except intolerance— any intolerant commentary will be removed, and any accounts issuing hateful statements may be blocked,” the company posted in the comments. 
“We look forward to continuing a positive and inclusive dialogue in partnership with our community.”
It seems impossible that the world will go back to the days of super thin, impossibly unblemished models of prior decades. However, <a href="https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1525544541243293696">people are beginning to wonder</a> how much more “real” the modeling industry can get.
Amanda Harding is an entertainment writer for The Daily Wire. She has years of industry experience and a keen eye for what’s trending in the world of entertainment. She previously wrote for Showbiz Cheat Sheet.
The views expressed in this piece are the author&#8217;s own and not necessarily those of The Daily Wire.

Readers Pass – Harding – Changing Faces of Models16x9

Obesity, C-Section Scars, And Pregnant Men: Meet The High Fashion Models Of 2022 

Cosmopolitan Magazine

Obesity

Readers Pass

Sports Illustrated

Woke Culture

Body positivity activist and model Tess Holliday will be featured on the cover of Cosmopolitan U.K.&#8217;s October issue, set to hit newsstands on Friday.
Holliday, a key figure in the pro-obesity movement, gushed over the swimsuit cover on Twitter. &#8220;I&#8217;m literally a COSMO GIRL!! Can&#8217;t believe I&#8217;m saying that!&#8221; she said, adding, &#8220;If I saw a body like mine on this magazine when I was a young girl, it would have changed my life.&#8221;
<div class="embed">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
Phew, I&#8217;m literally a COSMO GIRL!! Can&#8217;t believe I&#8217;m saying that! 
Thank you <a href="https://twitter.com/CosmopolitanUK?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@CosmopolitanUK</a> for this incredible opportunity If I saw a body like mine on this magazine when I was a young girl, it would have changed my life 
Issue hits stands 8/31! <a href="https://t.co/sBYWY7nEwZ">pic.twitter.com/sBYWY7nEwZ</a>
&#8212; Tess Holliday (@Tess_Holliday) <a href="https://twitter.com/Tess_Holliday/status/1034807072687177729?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 29, 2018</a></blockquote>
</div>
Progressive outlets like The Huffington Post were also pleased with the cover. &#8220;Tess Holliday is everything the fashion industry needs. She doesn&#8217;t conform to the (metaphorically and literally) narrow standard of beauty that&#8217;s been set by society, she&#8217;s a role model for others who have felt excluded in this way, and she&#8217;s downright honest,&#8221; <a href="https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/tess-holliday-cosmopolitan_us_5b87b572e4b0162f471fcdf7">said</a> HuffPo&#8217;s Ron Dicker.
Holliday made waves when her #EffYourBeautyStandards campaign on Instagram went viral, racking up millions of copycat hashtags. &#8220;I created [the campaign] out of frustration,&#8221; the model <a href="https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/body/a22849266/tess-holliday-cosmopolitan-uk-cover-interview-october-2018/">told</a> Cosmopolitan U.K. &#8220;I was angry and sad that people kept commenting on my pictures saying, &#8216;You&#8217;re too fat to wear that!&#8217; or &#8216;Cover up! No one wants to see that!&#8217; And then one night I was lying in bed and thought, &#8216;F*** that!&#8217; So I posted an image with four photographs of myself wearing things that fat women are often told we &#8216;can&#8217;t wear&#8217;, and encouraged others to do the same.&#8221;
As the <a href="https://www.pluralist.com/posts/1335-women-s-health-magazine-slammed-for-putting-severely-obese-woman-on-cover">Pluralist</a> reports, Holliday falls under the most severe of the CDC&#8217;s obesity categories, &#8220;morbidly obese.&#8221; &#8220;At a &#8203;reported weight of 280 pounds and 5 feet, 5 inches tall, Holliday would fall under the most severe category of obesity, &#8203;according to the Center for Disease Control&#8217;s Body Mass Index calculator,&#8221; the outlet reports.
An individual is considered to be <a href="https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/highland/bariatric-surgery-center/questions/morbid-obesity.aspx">morbidly obese</a> if he or she is &#8220;100 pounds over his/her ideal body weight, has a BMI of 40 or more, or 35 or more and experiencing obesity-related health conditions, such as high blood pressure or diabetes.&#8221; Among the health issues related to extreme obesity are Type 2 Diabetes, high blood pressure/heart disease, osteoarthritis, sleep apnea, depression, and infertility.
But as people have raised concerns about glamorizing severely unhealthy lifestyles, industry leaders have embraced Holliday, suggesting that you can&#8217;t really tell somebody&#8217;s health from looking at them, even if they are morbidly obese.
&#8220;Holliday identifies as a fat woman; we chose to give her a platform because she has insightful things to say about thriving in a world that devalues bodies of size,&#8221; said Editor-in-chief of Self magazine Carolyn Kylstra, adding, &#8220;You don&#8217;t know how healthy or unhealthy a person is just by looking at them, you don&#8217;t know what their health goals and priorities are, and you don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;ve already done or are planning to do for their health going forward.&#8221;
Kylstra also slammed those who are skeptical of normalizing obesity for their &#8220;concern trolling,&#8221; which is &#8220;counterproductive&#8221; and &#8220;abusive.&#8221;
&#8220;And moreover, you should know that concern trolling&#8212;using a person&#8217;s perceived health to justify making them feel bad about themselves&#8212;isn&#8217;t just counterproductive, it&#8217;s abusive,&#8221; she wrote.
<div class="embed">
<blockquote data-instgrm-captioned data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/BkfZA7yHvVC/?utm_source=ig_embed" data-instgrm-version="9">
<div>
<div>
<div> </div>
</div>
<a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/BkfZA7yHvVC/?utm_source=ig_embed" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">We&#8217;re thrilled to share our first ever digital cover, featuring model, author, and fat-positivity activist Tess Holliday (@tessholliday). From editor-in-chief @carolynkylstra&#8217;s editor&#8217;s letter: &#8220;Holliday identifies as a fat woman; we chose to give her a platform because she has insightful things to say about thriving in a world that devalues bodies of size. We also chose to feature her because size representation is necessary, especially for a national health media brand that can help guide the conversation about what it means to be healthy and how to make health accessible. You don&#8217;t know how healthy or unhealthy a person is just by looking at them, you don&#8217;t know what their health goals and priorities are, and you don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;ve already done or are planning to do for their health going forward. And moreover, you should know that concern trolling&#8212;using a person&#8217;s perceived health to justify making them feel bad about themselves&#8212;isn&#8217;t just counterproductive, it&#8217;s abusive.&#8221; Tap the link in bio to read the rest of the letter. &#8212; Photographer: @catherineservel, Wardrobe Styling: @marpeidro, Hair: @christianmarc at @forwardartists using @randco, Makeup: @kristinhilton at @thewallgroup, Manicure: @nailsbyemikudo at @opusbeauty | #TeamSELF</a>
A post shared by <a href="https://www.instagram.com/selfmagazine/?utm_source=ig_embed" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> SELF</a> (@selfmagazine) on Jun 26, 2018 at 7:01am PDT
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
Unfortunately, the #EffYourBeautyStandards campaign will not shield you from heart disease.

‘Cosmo’ Covergirl Is ‘Morbidly Obese’ Body Acceptance Model

It appears the socially conservative right has racked up a small win against the liberal agenda.
Walmart stores will no longer carry trashy feminist Cosmopolitan Magazine in their checkout lines as the result of pressure from a socially conservative group that advocated for such a removal due to Cosmo&#8217;s unsavory sexual content marketed to young girls.
National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE) applauded the win in a press release.
&#8220;This is what real change looks like in our #MeToo culture, and NCOSE is proud to work with a major corporation like Walmart to combat sexually exploitative influences in our society,&#8221; <a href="https://www.thecut.com/2018/03/walmart-removing-cosmopolitan-magazine-checkout-lines-ncose.html?utm_source=msn&amp;utm_medium=f1&amp;utm_campaign=feed-full">said</a> executive director Dawn Hawkins.
&#8220;Further, Cosmo targets young girls by placing former Disney stars on its covers, despite the enclosed sexually erotic articles which describe risky sexual acts like public, intoxicated, or anal sex in detail,&#8221; she added. &#8220;Customers should not be forced to be exposed to this content when they are trying to check out at the store.&#8221;
As noted by NCOSE, Cosmopolitan has run a host of age-inappropriate content for their readers, from <a href="https://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/advice/a6676/anal-sex-beginners-guide/">promoting anal sex</a> (without even acknowledging the serious safety risks) to <a href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/dear-cosmopolitan-your-evil-sexual-advice-is-literally-destroying-countless">cheating</a> to <a href="https://www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/a9598266/abortion-stigma-pro-choice/">abortion</a>.
New York Magazine&#8217;s The Cut reports, &#8220;NCOSE was founded in the early 1960s by interfaith clergy members as a group called &#8216;Morality in Media.'&#8221; The organization describes itself as &#8220;the leading national organization exposing the links between all forms of sexual exploitation such as child sexual abuse, prostitution, sex trafficking and the public health crisis of pornography.&#8221;
NCOSE-backer Victoria Hearst, whose family owns Cosmo&#8217;s parent company, told the New York Post in 2015, &#8220;God told me to work to get Cosmo out of the hands of children, so that&#8217;s what I am doing.&#8221;
Walmart released a statement to The Cut, stating that the decision was &#8220;primarily a business decision&#8221; but that &#8220;the concerns raised were heard.&#8221;
&#8220;As with all products in our store, we continue to evaluate our assortment and make changes. Walmart will continue to offer Cosmopolitan to customers that wish to purchase the magazine, but it will no longer be located in the checkout aisles. While this was primarily a business decision, the concerns raised were heard,&#8221; said the Walmart spokesperson.

WIN: Walmart Will No Longer Carry Feminist Trash ‘Cosmo’ At Checkout Lines. Here’s Why.

Feminism

Many people were rightly horrified this week as Cosmo set out to <a href="http://www.dailywire.com/news/23101/love-wins-cosmo-pushes-incest-paul-bois">romanticize </a>incest. The article, &#8220;This Is What It&#8217;s Like To Fall In Love With Your Brother,&#8221; was originally published a little while ago but got renewed attention over the past few days when Cosmo tweeted it.
The piece tells the story of Melissa and Brian, long-lost siblings who connected as adults and began a sexual relationship almost immediately. Brian left his wife to be with his sister. Melissa remains with her husband as she has sex with her brother. The incestuous lovebirds say they have a &#8220;connection.&#8221; They love each other, and, as we know, love is love is love. They insist that what they&#8217;re doing isn&#8217;t incest; rather, it&#8217;s an expression of something called &#8220;Genetic Sexual Attraction.&#8221; There is a whole &#8220;community&#8221; of GSA folks, and, as we&#8217;ve learned, once people have organized around a certain form of sexual deviance and called it a &#8220;community,&#8221; normalization is basically complete.
If GSA sounds familiar, by the way, you may be remembering a <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3725551/Mother-36-son-19-fell-love-met-year-gave-adoption-baby-say-willing-risk-JAIL-defend-love.html">story </a>from last year about a mother and son who fell desperately in love after spending most of their lives apart. Or you may be remembering this <a href="http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2015/01/what-its-like-to-date-your-dad.html">story </a>about a teenage girl who plans to marry her own father. They all offer the exact same justifications as Melissa and Brian, and Melissa and Brian offer the same justifications that the LGBT camp has been shouting at us for years.
The campaign to normalize incest (sorry, &#8220;genetic sexual attraction&#8221;) is fully underway. But please don&#8217;t call it a slippery slope. There is no slope. Not anymore. We&#8217;ve slid down it. The invention of gay &#8220;marriage&#8221; and the mainstreaming of &#8220;transgenderism&#8221; were not stops along the slope, preceding things like incest, pedophilia, and polygamy. On the contrary, they were what happened when we got to the bottom. These are not the next frontiers. These frontiers have been traversed; we just didn&#8217;t notice it when it happened.
Saying incest is below gay &#8220;marriage&#8221; on some sort of cultural slope is like saying euthanasia is below abortion. No, abortion is the worst thing. We started with it. Abortion may be more accepted and commonplace than euthanasia, but that&#8217;s only because the agents of the Culture of Death leaped over euthanasia in their effort to win the big prize. Now that they&#8217;ve won it, it&#8217;s no trouble at all to circle back and cover the steps they hurdled along the way. Abortion is less a slope than it is a foundation. Upon it, the death cultists can build the rest of the structure.
The same process is happening in the realm of marriage and sexuality. With gay &#8220;marriage,&#8221; the Left utterly demolished the marital institution and rebuilt it in the form of some alien thing that the world had never before seen. They established the one rule: if two people (or three, or seven, or whatever) &#8220;love each other,&#8221; they must be accepted, celebrated, and allowed to &#8220;marry.&#8221; Marriage has nothing at all to do with procreation, nothing at all to do with family, and nothing at all to do with spiritual covenants before God. That was the ultimate goal. By achieving it, they already achieved incest, polygamy, and pedophilia. The foundation was established for all of that, all at once.
If we were going down a slope in logical fashion and hitting every point along the way, the normalization of incest would have come first, before they won the final prize of perverting and reshaping the most essential human institution of marriage. They jumped that step and went for the Big Thing, just as they did with abortion, but that&#8217;s because they don&#8217;t need to make the specific case for incest if they successfully make the case to obliterate marriage itself. Clueless conservatives thought they could surrender on marriage and redraw the line somewhere else. &#8220;No further!&#8221; they shouted like fools, not realizing that by giving up on marriage they gave up on their right to draw any lines anywhere at all. Marriage was the line. It was the last and most important one, anyway. It was the capital city, and we abandoned it to the enemy.
It&#8217;s especially absurd, now, when conservatives fret that polygamy may be next. &#8220;Hold the line here,&#8221; they cry, &#8220;we mustn&#8217;t let the polygamists in!&#8221; Why not? Polygamy is bad but it definitely isn&#8217;t as bad as what we already find acceptable in our culture. A polygamous marriage isn&#8217;t nearly as unnatural as a homosexual &#8220;marriage.&#8221; At least a polygamous marriage can still be procreative, and at least there&#8217;s some historical precedent for it. Calling gay &#8220;marriage&#8221; a gateway to polygamy is like calling intravenous heroin a gateway to weed. Let the polygamists join the party, then. Our objections to them make no sense and don&#8217;t matter if we&#8217;re willing to accept gay &#8220;marriage.&#8221; Besides, many of us have been practicing polygamy for decades already. We&#8217;ve just been doing it successively, divorcing one spouse before finding another and another and another. It is of no consequence whether a man takes five wives at once or one at a time. Arguably, the polygamist is better because he&#8217;s honest about what he&#8217;s doing.
It&#8217;s like if you give your husband permission to have affairs but then react with horror when you find him watching porn. Even if you never specified that porn was also permissible, you nonetheless gave it your blessing when you flung open the doors to infidelity. Porn is part of the affair package, and not the worst part. Whatever logic makes an affair okay certainly covers porn in the bargain. Most women, if they&#8217;re going to make the horrendous mistake of loosening the monogamy rules to any extent, would start with permitting porn. Then, when their husband begins having physical affairs, as he is very likely to do, they may accurately say that it was a slippery slope. He slid from the bad thing to the even worse thing. He went from the gateway drug to the heroin needle. But if you allow the even worse thing to start with, you&#8217;ve allowed the bad thing whether you explicitly stated it or not. The gateway is far in the rearview.
Here we are, then, recoiling in horror at forms of perversion we implicitly invited into the mainstream several years ago, worrying that a less evil thing may follow behind the more evil thing we&#8217;ve already learned to accept. So, what manner of deviancy could actually be called worse than what our culture currently accepts and celebrates? What is actually below our current position on the slope? I don&#8217;t know, necrophilia? Bestiality, perhaps? Maybe when people start marrying sex dolls then we can say we&#8217;ve truly reached a new low.
Whoops. <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/09/married-to-a-doll-why-one-man-advocates-synthetic-love/279361/">That&#8217;s already happening</a>.
Nowhere to go but up now, I guess. (Please allow me this optimistic delusion).

WALSH: We Aren’t Sliding Down A ‘Slippery Slope.’ Our Culture Is Already At The Bottom.

Sexual Abuse

Cosmopolitan magazine decided to be woke on Tuesday when they published a piece by writer Rebecca Nelson titled &#8220;7 Women Who Could Be Our First Female President.&#8221; The <a href="http://www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/a10212918/female-presidential-candidates-2020-election/">article</a> highlights several high profile women said to be possible candidates for the White House. 
The magazine acknowledges former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton&#8217;s humiliating defeat at the hands of President Donald Trump and gives a list of possible candidates. 
<ul>
<li>Kirsten Gillibrand, senator from New York who is known for trying to obstruct President Trump&#8217;s cabinet picks. </li>
<li>Kamala Harris, junior senator from California who was recently chastised for interrupting witness testimony during hearings. </li>
<li>Elizabeth Warren, also known as Fauxcahontas, the Massachusetts senator and fake Native American who has made a name for herself as a hard leftist. </li>
<li>Amy Klobuchar, Minnesota senator who has little national recognition, but is on the list nonetheless to replace Michelle Obama.</li>
<li>Tammy Duckworth, Illinois senator who is also a disabled veteran. </li>
<li>Sheryl Sandberg, a businesswomen who was a member of the Clinton Administration and worked for Facebook at one point. </li>
<li>Finally, there is Oprah. The media mogul has hinted at a possible try for the White House, but has since ruled out a run. </li>
</ul>
Notice the lack of an elephant in the room? Every single person listed is a member of the Democrat Party or at least a major donor. Not one is a Republican. It sends out a confirmation that the media does not believe conservative women are equal to their leftist counterparts. 
Nelson addressed this on Twitter after being called out for the obvious bias. She claimed that the article was about 2020 specifically and not a hypothetical election. GOP women would not challenge Trump in the next cycle, she declared.
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
yes, they certainly do! but no GOP women are likely to challenge Trump in 2020, which is what this article is about <a href="https://t.co/3gg7QMBCN0">https://t.co/3gg7QMBCN0</a>
&#8212; Rebecca Nelson (@rebeccarnelson) <a href="https://twitter.com/rebeccarnelson/status/879794504357818369">June 27, 2017</a></blockquote>
</div>
Her tweet was in response to Future Female Leaders (FFL), an organization for conservative women. The group criticized the article on Twitter, saying &#8220;Yes, Cosmo, GOP women exist.&#8221; In response, <a href="http://futurefemaleleader.com/">FFL</a> released their own list of GOP women who could become the first female president; a diverse group of women who each have the experience to be commander-in-chief. 
<ul>
<li>Nikki Haley, former South Carolina governor and current U.N. ambassador; she has shown courage within the preeminent international institution, standing up to countries for their anti-Israel bias. </li>
<li>Mia Love, the congresswoman who is the first African-American elected to the House of Representatives from the state of Utah. </li>
<li>Condoleezza Rice, the former Secretary of State has been mentioned as a potential candidate, but has declined to run, preferring teaching to politics since leaving the Bush Administration. </li>
<li>Carly Fiorina, former CEO of Hewlett-Packard and 2016 GOP presidential candidate. She was among the second tier nominee group, but was promoted to primetime following a surge in the polls. </li>
<li>Joni Ernst, senator from Iowa who also served as a Lt. Colonel in the Iowa National Guard before entering politics. </li>
<li>Elise Stefanik, representative from New York and the youngest woman elected to Congress at the age of 30 in 2014. She is constitutionally too young at the moment, but only has a few years to go. </li>
<li>Susanna Martinez, former governor of New Mexico who was the first woman and first Hispanic female to serve in that position. </li>
</ul>
The Comopolitan article is another example of the mainstream media ignoring the contributions of conservative women in the realm of politics. They ignore these seven impressive women and countless others who would serve with distinction as president. 
Check out the original tweet from FFL where they called out Cosmopolitan for their lack of diversity in political thought:
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
Nikki Haley. 
Mia Love. 
Condoleezza Rice. 
Carly Fiorina. 
Joni Ernst. 
Elise Stefanik. 
Susana Martinez &amp; more. 
Yes, Cosmo, GOP women exist. <a href="https://t.co/WLgXV5dzNv">https://t.co/WLgXV5dzNv</a>
&#8212; FutureFemaleLeaders (@FFL_of_America) <a href="https://twitter.com/FFL_of_America/status/879762807700545537">June 27, 2017</a></blockquote>
</div>

7 GOP Women Cosmo Ignores As Presidential Material

Carly Fiorina

Conservatism

Democratic Party

Donald Trump

Elizabeth Warren

Hillary Clinton

Nikki Haley

Oprah Winfrey

Taking a beat from giving the world <a href="http://www.cosmopolitan.com/how-to-give-a-blow-job/">oral sex advice</a> and telling us &#8220;<a href="http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/news/a42468/things-women-think-when-theyre-face-sitting/">things women think when they&#8217;re face-sitting</a>,&#8221; feminist magazine Cosmopolitan decided they&#8217;d take a go at politics (<a href="http://www.dailywire.com/news/14645/hot-cosmo-features-9-reasons-constitutional-ben-shapiro">never a good idea at Cosmo</a>) to show us all how stereotyping is wrong. 
So on Tuesday, the magazine searched for a helpful Muslim to sing the praises of. When one was spotted, a nice &#8220;Muslim&#8221; man giving out free rides to Ariana Grande concert-goers following the devastating radical Islamic terrorist attack that left at least 22 dead and over 50 injured in the U.K., they ran with it, underscoring the nothing-to-do-with-Islam narrative. 
Turns out, the kind &#8220;Muslim&#8221; man is actually a Sikh, as is stated on the tweet Cosmo asked to use within their story. 
That&#8217;s right, Cosmo thinks Sikhs are Muslims.
But, like, they both sometimes wear something on their heads, presumably thought the hordes of feminists, finding, writing, approving and publishing the piece. 
Here&#8217;s the disaster in four easy steps: 
Step one: First, Cosmo spots a &#8220;Sikh cab driver,&#8221; posted by social entrepreneur Harjinder S Kukreja, who is kindly offering rides to those affected by the gruesome terrorist attack. 
<div class="image"><img decoding="async" alt src="https://dw-wp-dev.imgix.net/2019/09/step_one_2.jpg" /></div>
Step two: Cosmo asks if they can use the photo. 
<div class="image"><img decoding="async" alt src="https://dw-wp-dev.imgix.net/2019/09/step_two.jpg" /></div>
Step three: Cosmo runs a story titled, &#8220;Muslim Taxi Drivers Took Kids Trying To Escape the Manchester Ariana Grande Concert Home for Free.&#8221; The face plastered to the story? The Sikh man. 
<div class="image"><img decoding="async" alt src="https://dw-wp-dev.imgix.net/2019/09/step_three__2.jpg" /></div>
Step four: Delete the post entirely after you are mercilessly called out. After all, a nice Sikh man doesn&#8217;t deserve any attention for his kind deed; he doesn&#8217;t fit your #NotAllMuslims narrative! 
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
The bimbo squad at <a href="https://twitter.com/Cosmopolitan">@Cosmopolitan</a> can&#8217;t tell the difference between Muslims &amp; Sikhs <a href="https://t.co/t1sOSsKn6Y">https://t.co/t1sOSsKn6Y</a>
&#8212; Dinesh D&#8217;Souza (@DineshDSouza) <a href="https://twitter.com/DineshDSouza/status/867207547266244608">May 24, 2017</a></blockquote>
</div>
Oh, Cosmo, never change.

step_one_2

Cosmo Praises ‘Muslim’ For Helping Manchester Concert-Goers. Then Something Hilarious Happens.

Islam

Radical Islam

Radical Islamic Terror

Religion

This week in feminism, Cosmopolitan magazine explains why men are sexist if they enjoy giving their female partners sexual pleasure. Yes, really. 
<div class="embed video fluid-video">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
Why Guys Get Turned on When You Orgasm &#8212; and Why That&#8217;s a Bad Thing <a href="https://t.co/kWKwKFRaFp">https://t.co/kWKwKFRaFp</a> <a href="https://t.co/5AbY69yA8N">pic.twitter.com/5AbY69yA8N</a>
&#8212; Cosmopolitan (@Cosmopolitan) <a href="https://twitter.com/Cosmopolitan/status/844888499484610560">March 23, 2017</a></blockquote>
</div>
&#8220;It&#8217;s not enough that men are already having more orgasms than women. To make matters worse, a new study published in the Journal of Sex Research found &#8212; aside from deriving pleasure from their own orgasms, obviously &#8212; men also derive a specific sort of masculine pleasure from making female partners orgasm,&#8221; complains Cosmo Sex &amp; Relationships editor Hannah Smothers.
Naturally, men enjoy sex more when their female partner has an orgasm; this is what the study has dubbed &#8220;masculinity achievement.&#8221;
Smothers says that there&#8217;s &#8220;nothing wrong with feeling good about making your partner feel good&#8221; &#8212; before explaining why it&#8217;s actually &#8220;sexist.&#8221; 
First, the researchers conclude that the increased attention spent on women&#8217;s orgasms is actually also benefiting men: &#8220;Despite increasing focus on women&#8217;s orgasms, research indicated that the increased attention to women&#8217;s orgasms may also serve men&#8217;s sexuality, complicating conceptualizations of women&#8217;s orgasms as women-centric.&#8221;
This is not good, since we all know how evil men are.
Second, it&#8217;s sexist because men enjoying their significant other&#8217;s orgasm &#8220;ties into cultural ideas of women as passive recipients of whatever men give them.&#8221;
<blockquote>
&#8220;One reason is that it might pressure some heterosexual men to feel like they have to &#8216;give&#8217; women orgasms, as if orgasm is something men pulled out of a hat and presented to women,&#8221; they wrote. &#8220;This ties into cultural ideas of women as passive recipients of whatever men give them.&#8221;
</blockquote>
The Cosmo editor also notes that said enjoyment allegedly perpetuates sexist tropes relative to the female orgasm, such as &#8220;women feeling pressured to fake orgasms in order to appease a male partner, or in their words, &#8216;to protect men&#8217;s feelings.'&#8221;
The researchers conclude, according to Smothers, that &#8220;When women&#8217;s orgasms begin to serve as a masculinity achievement for male partners, the orgasms cease to be about women&#8217;s liberation or sexual pleasure. They just become another opportunity for men to flex, or &#8216;shore up their sense of masculinity.'&#8221;
The <a href="http://&lt;blockquote class=&quot;twitter-tweet&quot; data-lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;&lt;p lang=&quot;en&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;Yes, women, forego sexual pleasure. It&amp;#39;ll only turn on the men, and men are bad! &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/hashtag/FeministTaliban?src=hash&quot;&gt;#FeministTaliban&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://t.co/bfz0oVKcof&quot;&gt;https://t.co/bfz0oVKcof&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&amp;mdash; Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/844969482439188480&quot;&gt;March 23, 2017&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;script async src=&quot;//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js&quot; charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;">Feminist Taliban</a> have spoken! Sexist men must stop enjoying giving women pleasure.
We look forward to Cosmo&#8217;s &#8220;Why It&#8217;s Sexist that Guys *Don&#8217;t* Get Turned On When You Orgasm&#8221; article, next week. 
<div class="embed video fluid-video">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
I look forward to <a href="https://twitter.com/Cosmopolitan">@Cosmopolitan</a>&#8216;s piece next week titled, &#8220;Why It&#8217;s Sexist that Guys *Don&#8217;t* Get Turned On When You Orgasm&#8221;. <a href="https://t.co/cocwe27HON">https://t.co/cocwe27HON</a>
&#8212; Harry Khachatrian (@Harry1T6) <a href="https://twitter.com/Harry1T6/status/845003603215630340">March 23, 2017</a></blockquote>
</div>

Cosmo: Men Are Sexist If They Enjoy Giving Their Female Partner Sexual Pleasure

Sexism

From dining out on <a href="http://www.dailywire.com/news/1337/left-stop-eating-authentic-ethnic-food-you-racist-amanda-prestigiacomo">ethnic food</a> to joining the local <a href="http://www.dailywire.com/news/1326/university-suspends-yoga-class-youll-never-guess-amanda-prestigiacomo">yoga studio</a>, the political left has been there to call us all racists, because, apparently, engaging in culture other than your own is &#8220;cultural appropriation.&#8221; Thankfully, as the stunning presidential election of Republican Donald Trump has indicated, the American people have rejected such grievance-based intolerant identity politicking.
Still, the left has learned no lessons through defeat, simply doubling down on their old antics, as insufferable feminist magazine Cosmopolitan illustrated on Wednesday. 
In a piece fittingly titled &#8220;Why Can&#8217;t Victoria&#8217;s Secret Stop Designing Racist Lingerie?&#8221; Cosmo <a href="http://www.cosmopolitan.com/style-beauty/fashion/a8384630/why-cant-victorias-secret-stop-designing-racist-lingerie/?src">scolds </a>iconic fashion designer and billion-dollar manufacturer of women&#8217;s clothing Victoria&#8217;s Secret for&#8212;wait for it&#8212;being super-racist. Author Helin Jung explains that the recent Victoria&#8217;s Secret fashion show featured models wearing lingerie inspired from Asian cultures. Gasp! Further, a Nepalese woman designed their jewelry, which was also Asian-inspired. Pure. Unadulterated. Racism. 
&#8220;[D]on&#8217;t let yourself be hoodwinked by Victoria&#8217;s Secret&#8217;s brazen attempt to re-label what is clearly cultural appropriation by turning it into a celebration of &#8216;culture,'&#8221; warns Jung. &#8220;The brand and its creative leads shamelessly cherry-picked imagery, breaking apart aesthetic references from wherever they wanted and stitching them back together again. They&#8217;re telling us it&#8217;s worldliness. It&#8217;s not, it&#8217;s a hack job.&#8221;
A hack job!
Jung goes on, explaining that the sporting of Chinese-inspired garments is &#8220;condescending&#8221; to the Chinese. 
&#8220;But the Orientalism on display here doesn&#8217;t show an understanding or an attempt at dialogue,&#8221; she writes. &#8220;It doesn&#8217;t close any gaps. What condescension, for Victoria&#8217;s Secret to think that by wrapping a model in a dragon, it could connect directly with a new consumer in China.&#8221;
<div class="image"><img decoding="async" alt class="media-element file-default" data-fid="14408" data-media-element="1" src="https://dw-wp-dev.imgix.net/2019/09/untitled_1-5.jpg" /></div>
Finally, Jung addresses the reality that celebrating other cultures and their beauty, as is the case with Victoria&#8217;s Secret here, is actually a good, inclusive, tolerant act of so-called &#8220;multi-culturalism.&#8221; But, of course, the feminist rejects this notion, proceeding to castigate the brand as racist, and greedy to boot. 
&#8220;With its positive, pre-emptive spin about globalization and multi-culturalism, Victoria&#8217;s Secret seems to have anticipated my response,&#8221; Jung concedes. &#8220;The brand is leading with the notion that we&#8217;re all members of the human race, therefore everything belongs to everyone.
&#8220;The fact is that even as the world gets more connected, a sexist, patriarchal, mostly white corporation continues to take what it wants for its own gain. Its exploitation of these cultural references is meant to lead directly to profits. And I&#8217;m not buying it,&#8221; she concludes. 
In sum, everything is racist, even multiculturalism.

untitled_1

Leftists Lose It: Victoria’s Secret is ‘Racist’!

Race

Racism

Feminist Cosmopolitan Magazine <a href="https://twitter.com/cosmopolitan/status/762461107076214784">never ceases to amaze</a> the coherent thinker. But on Tuesday, they really stepped up their game, feigning moral outrage over Fox News host Jesse Watters&#8217; allegedly racially insensitive man-on-street reporting in New York City&#8217;s Chinatown by ridiculing him for his whiteness.
Good on Cosmo! Everyone knows the best way to combat perceived racial insensitivity (although most viewed this as harmless political comedy) is to bash someone for their race. Or something.
The feminist magazine titled their white-bashing piece, &#8220;Sentient Sleeve of Saltines Shocked to Discover Asian People Living in New York City&#8217;s Chinatown.&#8221;
<div class="media_embed">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
Sentient sleeve of saltines shocked to discover Asian people living in New York City&#8217;s Chinatown <a href="https://t.co/qvN0K8iHzw">https://t.co/qvN0K8iHzw</a> <a href="https://t.co/tluBHjFC4C">pic.twitter.com/tluBHjFC4C</a>
&#8212; Cosmopolitan (@Cosmopolitan) <a href="https://twitter.com/Cosmopolitan/status/783790801511862273">October 5, 2016</a></blockquote>
</div>
Complaining that Watters&#8217; Thursday night reporting for Fox News&#8217; The O&#8217;Reilly Factor was insensitive to Asian-Americans, Cosmo branded Watters as a &#8220;Wheat Thin crumb lodged in someone&#8217;s basement desktop computer keyboard.&#8221; (Yes, the &#8220;cracker&#8221; jokes were super repetitive.)
&#8220;The nearly five-minute-long clip features Watters, the human equivalent of a Wheat Thin crumb lodged in someone&#8217;s basement desktop computer keyboard, bullying non-native speakers under the guise of on-the-street reporting,&#8221; whined Cosmo. &#8220;It is spliced with clips from nuanced Asian films like Karate Kid while a jazzy oriental riff plays in the background.&#8221;
Cosmo was increasingly distraught that Watters jokingly asked someone if China could &#8220;take care of North Korea for us?&#8221; Another question that riled them up: &#8220;How do they dance in China,&#8221; to which two young girls giggled and began dancing.
The horror!
The magazine also took issue with Watters &#8220;looking smug AF&#8221; when he complimented the people he interviewed to host Bill O&#8217;Reilly:
<blockquote>
&#8220;They&#8217;re such a polite people,&#8221; he continued, looking smug AF, &#8220;they won&#8217;t walk away or tell me to get out of here. They just sit there and say nothing.&#8221;
Not to be a total white man, but actually, Jesse, you&#8217;re wrong.
</blockquote>
Cosmo then held back from ripping on Watters&#8217; white skin momentarily in order to continue their outrage over his racial insensitivity: &#8220;There&#8217;s been a huge backlash to the clip so far, with the Asian American Journalists Association calling out the offensive segment, as have the Washington Post, CNN, Salon, and many more. Kinda wild that Asians didn&#8217;t just sit back and say nothing this time, huh? Square that circle.&#8221;
Yikes.
Here&#8217;s the takeaway from the incoherent feminists at Cosmo: If you find someone to be doing something you disagree with, do the same exact thing to them, all while clutching your pearls and claiming victimhood.
<blockquote>
&#8220;There&#8217;s been a huge backlash to the clip so far, with the Asian American Journalists Association calling out the offensive segment &#8230;&#8221;
Cosmopolitan 
</blockquote>
Here&#8217;s stupid cracker white-boy Watters with his offensive segment:
<div class="media_embed"><iframe loading="lazy" allowfullscreen frameborder="0" height="389px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/PJmnLzw8NA4" width="692px"></iframe></div>
Watters would later explain that the segment was all in good fun (duh), and apologized if he had inadvertently offended anyone.
<div class="media_embed">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
As a political humorist, the Chinatown segment was intended to be a light piece, as all Watters World segments are.
&#8212; Jesse Watters (@jessebwatters) <a href="https://twitter.com/jessebwatters/status/783778709182550016">October 5, 2016</a></blockquote>
</div>

<div class="media_embed">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
My man-on-the-street interviews are meant to be taken as tongue-in-cheek and I regret if anyone found offense.
&#8212; Jesse Watters (@jessebwatters) <a href="https://twitter.com/jessebwatters/status/783778748042805248">October 5, 2016</a></blockquote>
</div>

Cosmo Accuses Fox Host Of Racial Insensitivity. So They Bash Him For His Whiteness.

Fox News

Jesse Watters

Actress Amy Brenneman had an abortion in college, and she says she has &#8220;never, not once&#8221; regretted it.
In a nauseating <a href="http://www.lifenews.com/2016/03/01/actress-amy-brenneman-i-have-never-not-once-regretted-aborting-my-baby/">interview</a> with Cosmopolitan magazine &#8212; a news outlet that compared an abortion <a href="http://www.dailywire.com/news/3782/heres-what-cosmopolitan-just-likened-abortion-its-amanda-prestigiacomo">&#8220;to fixing a computer&#8221;</a> &#8212; Brenneman recounted the circumstances of her abortion.
&#8220;In the spring of my junior year at Harvard, my period was late,&#8221; Brenneman said. &#8220;I had been in a relationship for almost two years with a loving and supportive boyfriend. We used birth control, but it malfunctioned. When I learned I was pregnant, I knew immediately and without question that I wanted an abortion. I had no desire to be a mother at that time &#8212; I wanted to finish college and start my career.&#8221;
The NYPD Blue star described the abortion as being painless and said her first thought was &#8220;I get my life back!&#8221;
&#8220;I was grateful that I lived in a country where forced birth was not the law of the land and where motherhood was not a lifelong consequence for a contraception slip,&#8221; Brenneman said.
Brenneman continued:
<blockquote>
I have never, not for one moment, regretted my abortion. My husband of 20 years and I became parents when we had built a home to nurture our children. Indeed, being a parent has only strengthened my commitment to reproductive justice as access to legal abortion allows children a fighting chance to be born into families that desire them and can support them.
</blockquote>
Brenneman said she was inspired to tell her story because Nancy Keenan, president of the pro-abortion NARAL, told her that the pro-abortion argument was losing to the pro-life argument because of stories, so she told her story to &#8220;connect and learn by the specifics of stories, our own and others&#8217;.&#8221;
There is no other word to describe Brenneman&#8217;s abortion &#8212; and how proud she is of it &#8212; than evil. The fact is , as Brenneman readily admits, she had her abortion for no other reason than convenience. Personal responsibility and adoption do not appear to have played into her decision. As she proudly stated, her first thought was &#8220;I get my life back!&#8221;
But, of course, her life was not the only one in the equation. As LifeSiteNews&#8216;s Micaiah Bilger <a href="http://www.lifenews.com/2016/03/01/actress-amy-brenneman-i-have-never-not-once-regretted-aborting-my-baby/">writes,</a> &#8220;Perhaps the stories that make the most impact are the ones that aren&#8217;t told at all. Our knowledge of all the stories that could have been but were lost. The would-be stories of 58 million unborn babies who never had the chance to have one because they were aborted.&#8221;
Maybe Brenneman wouldn&#8217;t be so jovial about her abortion if she knew that her aborted baby likely looked something like this:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
Take a look. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/StopTheSham?src=hash">#StopTheSham</a> <a href="https://t.co/J1QMn0Br7M">pic.twitter.com/J1QMn0Br7M</a>
&#8212; Amanda (@AmandaPresto) <a href="https://twitter.com/AmandaPresto/status/705039842682519552">March 2, 2016</a></blockquote>
(h/t: <a href="http://www.weaselzippers.us/259718-video-actress-says-she-never-regrets-having-an-abortion/">Weasel Zippers</a>)
<div class="embed video fluid-video"><iframe loading="lazy" width="480" height="270" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/2urGkBw2AEQ?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>

Actress Amy Brenneman ‘Never, Not Once’ Regretted Aborting Her Unborn Baby

Abortion

Hollywood

On Monday, Cosmopolitan magazine, salivating over an abortion propaganda video created by the <a href="https://www.aclu.org/">ACLU</a>, likened getting an abortion to fixing a computer. Neither should have any obstacles; abortion should be as mainstreamed and simple as asking Jake from tech support to enable your Wi-Fi networks. 
The video shows a young woman calling tech support after some sort of computer malfunction. After she requests a &#8220;female computer service,&#8221; she is asked if she really wants the service and is directed to wait 72 hours for more assistance.
The audio recording implies that men cannot have a say in the ending of a baby&#8217;s life because they &#8220;don&#8217;t know anything&#8221; about &#8220;lady computer users,&#8221; and suggests that letting women know the risks of abortion are unnecessary and &#8220;false.&#8221;
&#8220;[A]re you sure that&#8217;s what you want? Sure I don&#8217;t anything about you, or lady computer users, or how they work. But because I disapprove of your choices, here are some false, but scary implications of your actions,&#8221; says the recording, ridiculing life-saving legislation.
&#8220;Because I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re capable of making decisions for yourself, we&#8217;re going to make you make a separate, totally unnecessary trip to the service center before we allow you to come back and get the services you need,&#8221; concludes the &#8220;state representative&#8221; in the video.
&#8220;This is some bullshit!&#8221; screams the woman in response, presumably angry that she couldn&#8217;t kill her baby sooner.
&#8220;In short, it&#8217;s amazing and perfect, and you should watch it immediately,&#8221; Cosmopolitan disturbingly touts the video comparing the murder of a child to getting your computer fixed.
Some information the massively influential trash magazine left out of their pro-abortion video, according to research via <a href="http://www.lifenews.com/2013/08/27/eight-facts-most-people-dont-know-about-how-abortion-hurts-women/">Life News</a>, is that about &#8220;31 percent of women having abortions report suffering physical health complications,&#8221; &#8220;10 percent suffer immediate, potentially life-threatening complications,&#8221; and 65 percent suffer from symptoms of PTSD. Moreover, suicide rates become six times higher after an abortion and a woman increases her risk of a future miscarriage by 60 percent post abortion.
Last checked, Cosmo, getting a computer fixed never ended a life, left a woman who &#8220;fixed&#8221; it severely <a href="http://www.lifenews.com/2010/09/28/nat-6733/">depressed</a> or with physical complications including up to death. But you know, I could be wrong.
Here&#8217;s a quick walk-through of a D&amp;E abortion procedure (occurs within 13-24 weeks of a pregnancy) by a former abortionists; which again, seems a bit different than fixing you computer.
<div class="media_embed"><iframe loading="lazy" allowfullscreen frameborder="0" height="480px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/jgw4X7Dw_3k" width="854px"></iframe></div>

<div class="embed video fluid-video"><iframe loading="lazy" width="480" height="270" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/GQQZi7y72RY?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>

Here’s What Cosmopolitan Just Likened Abortion To. It’s Callous And Gross.  [Video]

ACLU

Sadness swept over Cosmopolitan Magazine on Thursday evening when they found out that millions of babies (about <a href="http://bound4life.com/statistics/">57.5 million</a> in the U.S. since Roe v. Wade) have been murdered via abortion.
No, just kidding. They were terribly torn up over babies being born. The horror.
Cosmo hit a new low when they literally tweeted out a sad face emoji while delivering the news that more babies in Texas were being born since the defunding of Planned Parenthood within the state.
Note: The tweet which featured the sad face emoji has since been deleted by the cowards at Cosmopolitan Magazine. See below:
<div class="media_embed">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
Texas women are having more babies since Planned Parenthood was defunded <a href="https://t.co/KfVu4IQHFe">https://t.co/KfVu4IQHFe</a> <a href="https://t.co/lkDuH6Tblz">pic.twitter.com/lkDuH6Tblz</a>
&#8212; Cosmopolitan (@Cosmopolitan) <a href="https://twitter.com/Cosmopolitan/status/695349108756709377">February 4, 2016</a></blockquote>
</div>
Here is a screenshot of the tweet before it was deleted.
<div class="media_embed">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<a href="https://twitter.com/LifeSite">@LifeSite</a>: W/sad-face emoticon, are Cosmo&#8217;s editors anti-Texas, anti-Texas women, anti-babies, or anti-Texas babies? <a href="https://t.co/cKh59LaICG">pic.twitter.com/cKh59LaICG</a>
&#8212; Kirk Mahoney (@KirkMahoney) <a href="https://twitter.com/KirkMahoney/status/695655262628114432">February 5, 2016</a></blockquote>
</div>
The article posted by the gross magazine laments the &#8220;1.9 percent increase in the birthing rate in counties that once had state-funded Planned Parenthood clinics during that same time period of 2011 to 2014.&#8221;
Cosmo continues, connecting the alleged drop in &#8220;highly effective contraception options&#8221; for low-income women to the &#8220;consequence&#8221; of an &#8220;uptick in the birthrate.&#8221;
<blockquote>
If there were any remaining doubts about how cutting Planned Parenthood funding affects women, those should be pretty much cleared up by this new data. When Texas removed Planned Parenthood from its state Medicaid family-planning program, low-income women who qualified for the program were no longer able to afford some of the most highly effective contraception options. And the subsequent consequence was an uptick in the birthrate.
</blockquote>
The supposed &#8220;bittersweet&#8221; up-side to the tragedy of more babies being birthed rather than killed is that Texas can stand as evidence of such horror and act as a deterrent for policies which would save more babies&#8217; lives.
<blockquote>
The bittersweet, not-so-silver lining in this is that Texas has basically served as a giant testing ground for policies that federal legislators have been promising constituents and trying to get passed on a national level for years. What&#8217;s happening in Texas is a preview of what happens when you take away health care from women. The effects would only be felt harder if you took health care away on a national scale.
</blockquote>
It is clear that Cosmo is very upset over babies being born. What is also clear from the magazine that views itself as very pro-women, is that babies being murdered and the <a href="http://www.usccb.org/about/pro-life-activities/life-issues-forum/life-issues-forum-11-09-02.cfm">emotional</a> and <a href="http://americanpregnancy.org/unplanned-pregnancy/abortion-side-effects/">physical</a> damage often tied to women who undergo abortion are not issues they view as bothersome in any way.
Of course, this very same outlet which is hell-bent on a &#8220;woman&#8217;s right to choose&#8221; (to murder her child), is also pro-<a href="http://www.dailywire.com/news/3174/cosmopolitan-magazine-celebrates-islamic-barbie-amanda-prestigiacomo">Hijarbie</a>. Because, you know, #FemaleEmpowerment.

Menu