WASHINGTON—Vice President JD Vance will headline the March for Life next Friday in Washington, D.C., this year, The Daily Wire can first report.
Vance will speak Friday, January 23, at one of the largest human rights demonstrations in the world, which is held every year on the anniversary of Roe v. Wade in defense of the hundreds of thousands of unborn babies whose lives are ended through abortion every year in the United States.
“Vice President Vance is grateful to the tens of thousands of Americans who travel to the National Mall each year to speak out in support of life, and looks forward to joining them for the second consecutive year,&#8221; a spokesman for the vice president told The Daily Wire.
&#8220;President Trump has delivered more victories for the pro-life movement than any president in history,&#8221; the spokesman added, &#8220;and the vice president will continue to fight for the right to life alongside the president and his administration.”
This is the second time that Vance will speak at the annual March for Life. Last year, ahead of President Donald Trump&#8217;s inauguration, Vance <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/exclusive-jd-vances-first-speech-as-vice-president-to-be-at-national-march-for-life">gave his first remarks</a> as vice president to the thousands of pro-life Americans who gathered on the National Mall. He promised the march that &#8220;we will be back next year,&#8221; and he is keeping his word.
&#8220;It is a blessing to know the truth, and the truth is that unborn life is worthy of protection,&#8221; Vance told the thousands of pro-life demonstrators last year. &#8220;So please, go forth, not with frustration, but with joy.&#8221;
&#8220;We are joyful to March for Life,&#8221; he said. &#8220;We are joyful to know that that picture on an ultrasound, that is a picture of baby with hopes and dreams and potential to come. It is a joy and a blessing to fight for the unborn, to work for the unborn, and to March for Life.&#8221;
<div id="attachment_1029061" style="width: 874px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/exclusive-vice-president-vance-to-headline-march-for-life/annual-march-for-life-held-in-washington-dc-3" rel="attachment wp-att-1029061"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1029061" class="wp-image-1029061 size-large" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/01/GettyImages-2195119729-864x576.jpg" alt="" width="864" height="576" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/01/GettyImages-2195119729-864x576.jpg 864w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/01/GettyImages-2195119729-300x200.jpg 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/01/GettyImages-2195119729-768x512.jpg 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/01/GettyImages-2195119729.jpg 1024w" sizes=" (max-width: 864px) 100vw, 864px" /></a>Vice President JD Vance speaks at the 2025 March for Life (Photo by Kent Nishimura/Getty Images)</div>
Vance, who supported the pro-life movement as both a senator and as vice president of the United States, has described himself as &#8220;100% pro-life.&#8221;
&#8220;If you’re not willing to stand up to the left on abortion, you can’t be trusted on anything else,&#8221; Vance said in 2022. &#8220;The pro-life position is the pro-people position and I’m proud to be 100% pro-life.&#8221;
Jennie Bradley Lichter, the new president of the March for Life, told The Daily Wire that the march is &#8220;thrilled&#8221; to have Vance back: &#8220;We are absolutely delighted that he&#8217;s keeping his promise and coming back to spend the day again with our pro-life marchers gathered from across the country to stand up for life.&#8221; 
Lichter believes that Vance&#8217;s presence shows that the Trump administration recognizing the pro-life movement as an important part of its coalition, and an &#8220;important part of a winning conservative coalition.&#8221; She also pointed out that in years past, the Trump administration has pegged &#8220;significant pro-life policy announcements to the March for Life&#8221; or the evening before.
&#8220;I anticipate that we will see something similar,&#8221; she shared. &#8220;I hope that the VP will be coming with some exciting news for the pro-life movement.&#8221;  
Trump himself spoke at the March for Life himself in 2019, several years before the Supreme Court overturned Roe, a massive pro-life win thanks to the president&#8217;s appointments to the Court.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, Congressman Chris Smith, and other pro-life figures will also speak at the march, <a href="https://marchforlife.org/2026lifeisagift/">which is themed</a>, &#8220;Life Is A Gift,&#8221; emphasizing &#8220;that life is very good and worthy of protection, no matter the circumstances.&#8221; 
“When we see the image of a baby in the womb, we glimpse the majesty of God’s creation,” Trump said at the 2019 march. “When we hold a newborn in our arms, we know the endless love that each child brings to a family. When we watch a child grow, we see the splendor that radiates from each human soul. One life changes the world.  From my family — and I can tell you, I send love and I send great, great love.”
Trump is the most pro-life president in United States history, holding a strong record of pro-life action since he took office: he reinstated and expanded the Mexico City Policy during his first week in office in 2017, issued a landmark pro-life rule to govern the use of Title X taxpayer funding, told Congress he would veto any legislation that weakens pro-life policies or encourages the destruction of human life, and warned the United Nations away from attacking the sovereignty of nations that protect innocent life.
&#8220;Unborn children have never had a stronger defender in the White House,&#8221; he told the March for Life in 2019.
<div id="attachment_1029091" style="width: 844px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/exclusive-vice-president-vance-to-headline-march-for-life/anti-abortion-activists-demonstrate-in-d-c-during-annual-march-for-life-3" rel="attachment wp-att-1029091"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1029091" class="wp-image-1029091 size-large" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/01/GettyImages-1201703771-834x576.jpg" alt="" width="834" height="576" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/01/GettyImages-1201703771-834x576.jpg 834w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/01/GettyImages-1201703771-300x207.jpg 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/01/GettyImages-1201703771-768x530.jpg 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/01/GettyImages-1201703771.jpg 1024w" sizes=" (max-width: 834px) 100vw, 834px" /></a>President Donald Trump speaks at the 2019 March For Life (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)</div>
In his second administration, the president has continued to defend life, though he has discussed abortion far less, partially due to the fact that Roe was overturned. The president has reflected frankly on how the issue of abortion plays electorally, and pointed out that the country is not unified on when and where to protect life.
In January 2025, the president <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/enforcing-the-hyde-amendment/">issued an executive order</a> enforcing the Hyde Amendment, which bans the use of taxpayer funds for abortions, and reinstated the Mexico City Policy, which stops the use of taxpayer funds overseas. He quickly pardoned the pro-life activists imprisoned by President Joe Biden&#8217;s administration, and he has revoked many of the Biden-era executive orders promoting abortion across the country.
Far-left pro-abortion groups regard the administration with fear and condemnation. One such group, the Center for Reproductive Rights, claims that in his first 100 days in office, &#8220;President Trump has taken unprecedented action to restrict access to reproductive health care in the United States and around the world.&#8221;
&#8220;His administration is stacked with extreme opponents of reproductive freedom working day and night to undermine the rule of law we depend on to uphold our fundamental rights,&#8221; the far-left abortion group stated. &#8220;Individually, these officials have great power; together, they will do long-lasting damage to human rights and to our democracy.&#8221;
At the same time, the pro-life movement wants Trump to do much more. <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/every-abortion-is-a-violation-of-human-rights-pro-life-advocates-demand-fda-yank-abortion-drug?author=Mary+Margaret+Olohan+and+Leif+Le+Mahieu&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=0&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=%E2%80%98Every+Abortion+Is+A+Violation+Of+Human+Rights%E2%80%99%3A+Pro-Life+Advocates+Demand+FDA+Yank+Abortion+Drug">Many on the right</a>, including top Republicans like Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri, have expressed concerns that the Department of Health and Human Services is slow-walking a review of abortion drugs, highlighting the growing body of evidence showing that the drugs are causing severe and underreported harm to women.
Though pro-lifers are afraid that HHS will not pull through and demand that the department reinstate abortion drug safety standards removed under the Biden administration, pro-abortion groups like the Guttmacher Institute warn direly that the administration has &#8220;initiated steps that could culminate in the severe restriction of mifepristone,&#8221; promising that if the Trump administration reinstates safety standards for the drugs, &#8220;it would also have a devastating impact on abortion.&#8221;
Trump also prompted strong concerns from the pro-life movement when he suggested to Republican lawmakers this month that they might need to be &#8220;a little bit flexible&#8221; on Hyde as they negotiated with Democrats on health care.
The remark shocked both his pro-life base and Capitol Hill, prompting strong pushback from pro-life groups like SBA Pro-Life America — pushback that the administration took note of, White House officials said.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told The Daily Signal&#8217;s Elizabeth Troutman at an early January press briefing that Trump did not change the administration&#8217;s policy on Hyde, reminding the public that &#8220;it was President Trump who signed an executive order protecting the Hyde Amendment&#8221; on his fourth day in office.
&#8220;It’s the Trump administration that has taken multiple actions on various fronts to ensure that taxpayer dollars are not funding the practice of abortion,&#8221; she said. “What the president was saying yesterday was Republicans, and frankly Democrats, too, need to show a little bit more flexibility so we can actually get something done with respect to the issue of health care.&#8221;
Lichter sees challenges on several fronts for the pro-life movement. Not only are pro-lifers battling for policy changes, she says, but they are also battling matters of life and death for women and their unborn babies. They are also up against a changing cultural landscape.
&#8220;I think we&#8217;re still shaking off the 50 years of the Roe regime,&#8221; she explained, &#8220;and what [activists] had told young women about their future and their flourishing and how motherhood might be detrimental to them, which of course isn&#8217;t true at all, but it takes a little while to shake off cultural messaging that sunk in that deep.&#8221;
&#8220;The pro life movement has a really great story to tell,&#8221; she shared. &#8220;It&#8217;s increasingly young. It&#8217;s increasingly energized.&#8221;
The March for Life president pointed to <a href="https://www.christianpost.com/news/most-millennials-gen-z-support-limits-on-abortion-poll.html">polling</a> showing that Gen Z voters want to see limits on abortion, and lean towards identifying as &#8220;pro-life.&#8221; She cited this, as well as rising attendance at state level marches, as encouragement for pro-life movement.
&#8220;We saw record attendance at several of our state level marches for life this fall, she noted, &#8220;in the wake of Charlie Kirk&#8217;s assassination.&#8221;
&#8220;All of those things are great reasons for hope, just to see the usefulness of the movement and the way that young people especially are really willing to buck the ideology of the progressive establishment that they&#8217;ve been raised in and handed,&#8221; she concluded. &#8220;And again, I think we&#8217;ll see that on full display at the March next week. I&#8217;m expecting a really electric, really epic day.

Annual March For Life Held In Washington, DC

EXCLUSIVE: JD Vance To Headline March For Life

Abortion

J.D. Vance

March For Life

Pro-Life Movement

President Donald Trump weighs military action in Minneapolis, the White House maintains pressure on Iran as Trump ratchets down his rhetoric, and the Senate hears the testimony against mail-order abortion pills.
It’s Friday, January 16, 2026, and this is the news you need to know to start your day. Today’s edition of the Morning Wire podcast can be heard below:
<iframe style="width: 100%; max-width: 660px; overflow: hidden; border-radius: 10px;" src="https://embed.podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/trump-warns-minneapolis-iran-on-edge-1-16-26/id1576594336?i=1000745409587" height="175" frameborder="0" sandbox="allow-forms allow-popups allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-storage-access-by-user-activation allow-top-navigation-by-user-activation"></iframe>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Trump Threatens Insurrection Act</h2>
As tensions remain high in Minneapolis following another ICE shooting on Wednesday, President Trump is threatening to invoke a centuries-old law. According to the Department of Homeland Security, an agent was attempting to detain an illegal immigrant when the man fled on foot. As the agent caught up to him, two more illegal immigrants <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/shame-on-you-white-house-fed-up-with-disrespect-toward-law-enforcement">emerged</a> from a nearby apartment and began attacking him with a snow shovel and broomstick, DHS said. The agent fired a shot in self-defense, striking the first man in the leg. All three men were eventually detained. On Thursday, Trump <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/trump-threatens-to-use-insurrection-act-in-minnesota-if-professional-agitators-are-not-stopped">threatened</a> to invoke the Insurrection Act unless “the corrupt politicians of Minnesota don’t obey the law and stop the professional agitators and insurrectionists from attacking the Patriots of I.C.E.” The 1807 law authorized the president to deploy the military on U.S. soil to suppress an insurrection or violent unrest when the state is unable to do so. It also applies to cases in which a state is unable or unwilling to enforce federal law.
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Trump Eases Tensions With Iran, But Military Threat Remains</h2>
President Trump <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/the-fog-of-trump-how-unpredictability-keeps-iran-guessing">keeps</a> the world on edge with his plans for Iran. On Tuesday, speculation circulated that an American strike against Iran is coming soon. Iran closed its airspace, and reports said some American personnel were evacuating the region. But Trump took a step back, telling reporters that his administration had been informed that the Iranian regime had stayed executions scheduled for Wednesday. Still, reports suggest the United States is moving military assets into the region, and the White House insists that Trump has not ruled out military action. The situation between Washington and Tehran remains tense.
<div class="text-base my-auto mx-auto [--thread-content-margin:--spacing(4)] @w-sm/main:[--thread-content-margin:--spacing(6)] @w-lg/main:[--thread-content-margin:--spacing(16)] px-(--thread-content-margin)">
<div class="[--thread-content-max-width:40rem] @w-lg/main:[--thread-content-max-width:48rem] mx-auto max-w-(--thread-content-max-width) flex-1 group/turn-messages focus-visible:outline-hidden relative flex w-full min-w-0 flex-col agent-turn" tabindex="-1">
<div class="flex max-w-full flex-col grow">
<div class="min-h-8 text-message relative flex w-full flex-col items-end gap-2 text-start break-words whitespace-normal [.text-message+&amp;]:mt-1" dir="auto" data-message-author-role="assistant" data-message-id="aa601001-fcb6-4d86-b426-8677384d1927" data-message-model-slug="gpt-5-2">
<div class="flex w-full flex-col gap-1 empty:hidden first:pt-[1px]">
<div class="markdown prose dark:prose-invert w-full break-words light markdown-new-styling">
<h2 style="text-align: center;" data-start="0" data-end="79">Senators Scrutinize Abortion Pill</h2>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Senators heard testimony this week about the abortion pill, now by far the leading means of abortion in the United States. Particularly at issue is the Biden-era policy that stripped away the requirement that a woman consult with a physician in person before taking the pill, mifepristone. Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA), a physician, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/gop-lawmakers-ramp-up-pressure-on-trump-admin-to-crack-down-on-abortion-pill">spoke</a> to Morning Wire about a recent congressional hearing on abortion pills. According to Cassidy, Americans need to be better informed about the risks. He also said that lawmakers need to reverse Biden-era rules that allow people to obtain the pills without an in-person interview with a doctor. That change would eliminate cases “in which someone else ordered the abortion pill and forced the pregnant woman to take them,” Cassidy said.

MRN_260116_V1

Morning Brief: Trump Threatens Insurrection Act, Iran On Edge & Senators Scrutinize Abortion Pill

Morning Brief: Trump On Insurrection Act, Tension In Tehran, And Cassidy Talks Abortion Pill

Donald Trump

Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Iran

Mifepristone

Minnesota

Morning Wire

During a Senate hearing on Wednesday, a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist refused to say that a man can&#8217;t get pregnant.
The <a href="https://x.com/cspan/status/2011482034321920483">exchange</a> between Dr. Nisha Verma and Missouri Senator Josh Hawley took place during the &#8220;Protecting Women: Exposing the Dangers of Chemical Abortion Drugs&#8221; Senate Hearing. Dr. Verma was the witness Democrats brought in to represent their side of the hearing.
Senator Hawley repeatedly asked Dr. Verma throughout the exchange, &#8220;Can men get pregnant?&#8221;
&#8220;I&#8217;m not really sure what the goal of the question is,&#8221; Dr. Verma said.
Senator Hawley&#8217;s question followed Senator Ashley Moody&#8217;s similar question to Dr. Verma. The reproductive doctor refused to answer Moody as well. Moody asked the question to point out that men were getting hold of the abortion pill.
Hawley reminded Dr. Verma that the goal of this point-blank question was to get to the truth.
&#8220;The goal is just to establish a biological reality,&#8221; Hawley said. &#8220;Can men get pregnant?&#8221;
The Emory physician again refused to answer the question. Instead, she told the senator she takes care of people with many &#8220;identities.&#8221;
&#8220;I do take care of people that don&#8217;t identify as women,&#8221; she said while still refusing to say if men get pregnant.
Dr. Verma, who was speaking in favor of mifepristone, the abortion drug up for debate, urged the committee to follow the science and evidence on the medication, but couldn&#8217;t speak to the science behind a man&#8217;s reproductive limitations.
&#8220;I think you&#8217;re trying to reduce the complexity of a lot of people&#8217;s lives,&#8221; Dr. Verma said to Sen. Hawley.
Neither side budged from their beliefs during the exchange. In an effort to ignore the science and Hawley&#8217;s question, Dr. Verma said the question of whether men can get pregnant was being asked as a &#8220;political tool.&#8221;
&#8220;Yes/no questions like this are a political tool.&#8221; Dr. Verma argued. &#8220;I would be more than happy to have a conversation with you that is not coming from a place of trying to be polarized.&#8221;
&#8220;It is not polarizing to say that women are a biological reality and should be treated and protected as such,&#8221; Hawley said. &#8220;That is not polarizing, that is [the] truth.&#8221;
<div style="max-width: 728px;margin: 0 auto"></div>
Hawley appeared alarmed by the doctor&#8217;s lack of reproductive knowledge.
&#8220;We are here in a hearing about science, and about women and, for the record, it&#8217;s women who get pregnant, not men,&#8221; Hawley told the doctor. &#8220;And yet you won&#8217;t even acknowledge the basic reality that biological men don&#8217;t get pregnant. There is a difference between biological men and biological women. I don&#8217;t know how we can take you seriously and your claims to be a person of science if you won&#8217;t level with us on this basic issue. I thought we were past all of this.&#8221;
Verma claimed to be a &#8220;person of science&#8221; and continued to argue that &#8220;polarized&#8221; language and questions &#8220;don&#8217;t serve the American people.&#8221;
Dr. Verma is not the first one in Washington, D.C. to challenge basic biology this week.
During a Supreme Court hearing on two cases involving men in women&#8217;s sports, the lawyer representing the trans-identifying athlete couldn&#8217;t define the word &#8220;sex&#8221; in regard to biology when Justice Samuel Alito asked her to.
“We do not have a definition for the court,&#8221; Kathleen Hartnett said.
By definition, an obstetrician-gynecologist specializes in women&#8217;s reproductive health.
&#8220;I wouldn&#8217;t trust her to give me an aspirin,&#8221; Fugitive Mama said on <a href="https://x.com/fugitivemama/status/2011498692021534844?s=20">X</a>.
Hawley didn&#8217;t get his answer, but got the final word.
&#8220;I am glad we had this exchange because it&#8217;s exceptionally clarifying. It is also in many ways quite depressing,&#8221; Hawley said.

Sen. Josh Hawley

‘Can Men Get Pregnant?’: Reproductive Doctor Refuses To Answer Senator’s Simple Question

A Reproductive Doctor From Atlanta Apparently Thinks Men Can Get Pregnant

Abortion Drug

Josh Hawley

News

Senate

Senate GOP

Transgender

When my parents sent me to college at age 16, they were naturally nervous. But their nerves were calmed by the fact that I would be attending a Christian school — a school that avowed the same beliefs and values as they did.
As it turns out, that shouldn’t have reassured them.
According to a <a href="https://studentsforlife.org/2026/01/13/shocking-1-in-7-faith-based-schools-connected-to-abortion-industry/">stunning new report</a>, more than 1 in 7 Christian colleges directly violated their professed faith in the 2024-2025 school year by maintaining a relationship with Planned Parenthood or the abortion industry. That’s fully 1 in 7 colleges publicly proclaiming Christ while privately violating the most basic Christian value: the dignity of life.
That’s not counting the myriad of colleges that plaster the name of Christ on top of an otherwise completely secular school. The study, conducted by Students for Life of America’s Demetree Institute for Pro-Life Advancement (IPA), only looked at schools directly affiliated with a Christ-centered denomination — schools that publicly affirmed faith in their mission statement.
Nor were the schools’ infractions minor in nature. More than one-fourth of the offending schools were Christian schools that referred students to Planned Parenthood as a “health resource.”
That fact would be distressing even if the schools in question were secular. Reports from outlets as left-wing as the New York Times document the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/15/us/planned-parenthood-clinics.html">abysmal standard of care</a> at Planned Parenthood facilities, including staff instructions to limit appointments to just 10 minutes in order to churn through as many patients as possible.
But for Christian schools, such referrals don’t just pose a threat to student health; they’re a direct betrayal of the faith they proclaim.
Students, parents, and donors expect schools bearing the name “Christian” to live out their faith. But IPA’s report shows just how many fall short of that calling.
And unfortunately, the problem is only growing. According to IPA, Christian schools have increased their support for abortion by 19.82% overall since the 2022 reversal of Roe v. Wade. Since 2024, that support has increased by a full 38.63%.
And while some might seek to dismiss the problem as limited to a single rogue denomination, that’s simply not the case. IPA eliminated from its study schools belonging to denominations that have affirmed abortion — like the Disciples of Christ, Quakers, and Moravians. Even after eliminating those denominations, IPA found that over half the remaining denominations — those that have not expressed support for abortion — had at least one school with ties to abortion.
Clearly, the issue is not one that can be avoided by simply attending a school from a different denomination. For Christian pro-lifers seeking an education aligned with their values, the future seems grim.
But fortunately, the news isn’t all bad. According to IPA’s report, a full 50 ties between Christian schools and Planned Parenthood were severed during the 2024-2025 school year, thanks to interventions and awareness fostered by IPA. And after researchers reached out to offending schools in July 2025, four schools cut all ties to the abortion industry, and another four removed some.
This success points to the path forward. Higher education institutions depend on the support of students, parents, alumni, and donors. If these groups express undeniably—with their words and, if necessary, their pocketbooks—that they will not stand for compromise, Christian colleges will have no choice but to cut ties with the abortion industry or to stop falsely claiming the name of Christ.
I’m thankful that the school I attended, The Master’s University, a small Christian college north of Los Angeles, lives out its professed faith. Notably, it received an “A” rating in IPA’s report — meaning no ties to Planned Parenthood/the abortion industry were found. But the same should be true of all schools claiming Christianity.
If a student decides to attend a Christian school, they should know exactly what they’re getting: a school that affirms biblical truth, starting with the simple reality that every human life is sacred.
* * *
Mary Mobley is a press specialist and online editor at Students for Life.
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

US-VATICAN-RELIGION-POPE-UNIVERSITY

New Study: Planned Parenthood Has Quietly Invaded Christian Colleges

Christian Colleges

Christianity

Dobbs

Judeo-Christian Values

Planned Parenthood

Pregnancy

The former president of Ireland, Mary McAleese, has claimed baptism denies babies their human rights.
Her comments were highlighted in an article in the <a href="https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/2026/01/11/mary-mcaleese-baptism-is-a-key-catholic-recruitment-tool-it-denies-babies-their-human-rights/">Irish Times</a> with the headline: “Mary McAleese: Baptism denies babies their human rights.”
This woman is nominally Catholic, but doesn’t agree with the teaching or practice of the Catholic Church. I believe she is a canon lawyer, but somehow she was radicalized. She also says this is the real issue we need to focus on — the great injustice in the world today.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
No one is Catholic by birth and the notion of ‘Baptismal promises’ is risible, writes Mary McAleese <a href="https://t.co/8WopKFeMhi">https://t.co/8WopKFeMhi</a>
— The Irish Times (@IrishTimes) <a href="https://twitter.com/IrishTimes/status/2010386279486136346?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 11, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Credit: @IrishTimes/X.com
She’s not a prelate. She’s not a theologian. She’s a politician. And she says the real injustice, the real violation of human rights in our world, is not immigration, not foreign policy, not the economy, not how we treat the poor. It’s not even abortion, the wholesale slaughter of little babies, no — it’s baptism.
It’s difficult to see how one arrives at that conclusion or that obsession without demonic influence. Now, I’m not someone who says there’s a demon under every rock. We live in a world where the material and immaterial are not totally separable, nevertheless, I’m not demon-hunting all the time.
<h3><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1889-president-trump-fights-anti-white-racism?elementPosition=6&amp;row=2&amp;rowHeadline=Latest+Episodes&amp;rowType=Horizontal+Show+Episodes+Carousel">WATCH: The Michael Knowles Show</a></h3>
It’s very difficult to understand how the former president of Ireland can say the great human rights violation of our time is baptizing babies. Because it is supposedly “bad.&#8221;
One could try to give her the benefit of the doubt. Maybe you could argue that infant baptism is technically a violation of human rights because, after the Fall, humans deserve death. Sin and death pervade the world, and in our fallen nature what we deserve is death, and baptism saves us from death.
Many people have different views of baptism, but you do see it in Scripture. Our Lord <a href="https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2019%3A14&amp;version=RSVCE">says</a>, “Let the little children come to Me.” You see baptisms of children in the book of Acts multiple times. In 1 Peter 3:21, <a href="https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Peter%203%3A20-22&amp;version=NKJV">Saint Peter essentially says</a> baptism now saves you. There are many theological discussions about what that means exactly, but baptism is what demarcates us as Christians. Plenty of people disagree with infant baptism, but it is the traditional practice of the Catholic Church.
But setting those theological debates aside, the closest one could get to her argument is that baptism denies babies their human rights insofar as it saves them from the consequences of the Fall of man. And that’s a good thing. Isn’t that a good thing?
My last point: this woman, who says baptism violates babies’ human rights, supports abortion. She supports legally murdering babies in the womb, but not baptizing them once they are born. The only way to reach that conclusion is either to follow the perversity of liberalism to its end, or through demonic influence. I don’t see any other explanation.
And it really makes me raise an eyebrow at other Left-wing politicians.

Inauguration of Ireland’s New President Connolly

Former President Of Ireland Claims Baptism Denies Babies Their Human Rights

babies

Baptism

Catholic Church

Catholics

Church

Infants

Ireland

Michael Knowles

For nearly a decade, pro-life voters have been the Republican Party’s most dependable force. We show up early, stay late, and keep the faith. We are not fair-weather voters, and we are not driven by trends. We are driven by a conviction that protecting babies in the womb is a moral minimum, and that the Republican Party understands this. We’ve held tight to the knowledge that the protection of unborn life is part of the GOP’s DNA.
But when <a href="https://sbaprolife.org/newsroom/press-releases/leading-pro-life-group-to-trump-gop-hyde-is-non-negotiable">our president tells GOP lawmakers</a> to be “flexible” on taxpayer funding of abortion to kowtow to Democrats, concern becomes unavoidable. And when a Trump-aligned consultant <a href="https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5657986-anti-abortion-trump-mifepristone-review/">dismisses pro-life</a> voters as “a cheap date,” it confirms what many of us have heard: that parts of the Republican establishment, especially its consultant class, believe its most loyal voter base is disposable. Why else would the GOP’s top leader push to scrap one of the most fundamental pro-life policies, the Hyde Amendment? An amendment that has had bipartisan support until recently since 1973.
Republicans are signaling that nothing is off the table. That’s not pragmatism. It is a betrayal and political malpractice.
The Hyde Amendment is not some obscure legislative relic. Over its 50-year existence, Hyde has saved an estimated 2.6 million lives by ensuring that Americans are not forced to pay for abortions with their tax dollars. It has long functioned as the bedrock pro-life standard in federal policy — the clear line separating a government that tolerates abortion from one that actively funds it.
For decades, Hyde has also been a minimum requirement for Republican credibility. You could debate strategy or messaging — but you did not cave on Hyde.
Democrats understood Hyde’s power, which is why they worked so hard to undermine it. When Obamacare was drafted in 2010, it was deliberately designed to sidestep Hyde through an accounting gimmick that still forces taxpayers to subsidize elective abortions. Voters noticed. Fifteen House Democrats who supported that scheme lost their seats, and Republicans made major gains in battleground states like Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
The lesson was clear: voters do not like being tricked into funding abortion.
Now, astonishingly, some Republicans appear ready to repeat the Democrats’ mistake — this time against their own base.
Trump’s suggestion that Republicans be “flexible” on Hyde represents a sharp departure from his prior commitments. He repeatedly pledged to make Hyde permanent law, including in health care coverage. One of his first actions upon taking office last year was prioritizing the reversal of President Biden’s Hyde violations. And he stated unequivocally, “it is the policy of the United States, consistent with the Hyde Amendment, to end the forced use of federal taxpayer dollars to fund or promote elective abortion.”
That clarity mattered. It reassured pro-life voters that their support was not being taken for granted.
Republicans already struggle with turnout in midterms. Democrats show up. Republican voters often do not. And pro-life voters are value-driven, and when they feel demoralized or betrayed, they do not defect — they stay home. The GOP already has an intensity gap. Why slap your most loyal base in the face? If just 1–2 percent of pro-life voters had stayed home in 2024, Donald Trump would not be president. That is not a theory. That is math.
For the 2026 election cycle, we will contact 10.5 million voters across four key Senate battleground states and up to a dozen key House battlegrounds across the country, including 4.5 million visits to voters directly at their doorstep.
Abandoning Hyde now will shatter the trust of these voters. And the electoral consequences could be immediate.
Polling reinforces the danger. Data from PRRI shows that the voters who care most intensely about abortion are pro-life, not pro-choice. And the broader electorate is not clamoring for taxpayer-funded abortion. According to recent polling, six in ten Americans oppose forcing taxpayers to pay for it. The idea that defending Hyde alienates voters is a fiction sustained by consultants who confuse elite opinion with public reality. As a recent <a href="https://www.newsweek.com/conventional-wisdom-donald-trump-republican-rally-lawler-dannenfelser-johnson-11319523">Newsweek article reminded</a>, the Hyde Amendment “is polling better than anyone in Congressional leadership.”
You cannot expect enthusiasm while undermining the issue that animates your base. You cannot insult pro-lifers as a “cheap date” and expect them to mobilize on command. And you cannot abandon the single most important pro-life policy in federal law without paying a price.
The blowback would be far worse than what Democrats experienced in 2010. Then, voters punished a party that tried to evade Hyde. Now, they would punish a party that promised to defend it and then walk away.
Republicans still have a choice. President Trump and congressional leaders can reaffirm Hyde as non-negotiable and follow through on the commitments they made. Or they can learn the hard way that even the most loyal voters will not turn out for a party that no longer turns out for them.
Pro-lifers are not a “cheap date.” We are the backbone of the Republican coalition. We are the beating heart of this party. Ignore that reality, and the GOP will surely lose the midterms — not because we moved Left but because we stayed home.
* * *
Kelsey Pritchard is Communications Director at Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America.
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Washington-DC-March-for-Life-2025

Pro-Lifers Are Not A ‘Cheap Date.’ We’re The GOP’s Margin Of Victory.

Pro-Lifers Are Not A 'Cheap Date.' We’re The GOP’s Margin Of Victory.

Hyde Amendment

Leftists

Opinion

Republicans

Trump Administration

The following is an adapted transcript excerpt from <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1885-hammer-wielding-trans-leftist-arrested-trying-to-break-into-jd-vance-s-house?elementPosition=8&amp;row=2&amp;rowHeadline=Latest+Episodes&amp;rowType=Horizontal+Show+Episodes+Carousel">The Michael Knowles Show</a>.
* * *
One of the OnlyFans models who slept with a thousand guys in one day, someone named Lily Phillips, has apparently just had a religious conversion.
I don’t know if that’s her real name or a stage name, but here is the question: Is Lily Phillips&#8217;s conversion sincere? And the broader question is how should Christians react to this?
Here&#8217;s the video of her baptism:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
THIS! OF model Lily Phillips gets baptized after viral 1,000-men stunt, says she is now seeking faith and redemption.
I pray this is genuine. No one is ever too far gone for Jesus Christ. 🙏🏾 <a href="https://t.co/bmpvDvXXyx">pic.twitter.com/bmpvDvXXyx</a>
— David J Harris Jr (@DavidJHarrisJr) <a href="https://twitter.com/DavidJHarrisJr/status/2007111451232911551?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 2, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Credit: @DavidJHarrisJr/X.com
There is a nice Kanye pop gospel song behind the video. She appears to be in either an Anglican or Episcopalian church and it&#8217;s a full immersion baptism in a bathtub. Her caption reads, “A day to remember forever.”
Now, some people are accusing her of being cynical. So why do I think she’s sincere? First of all, as you will see, she does not sound cynical to me. But even if she is, I always like to be on the side of credulity when it comes to these matters. Not to the point of absurdity, of course, but I always want to be on the side of grace when it comes to these things.
<h3><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1885-hammer-wielding-trans-leftist-arrested-trying-to-break-into-jd-vance-s-house">WATCH: The Michael Knowles Show</a></h3>
Well, turns out she recently did <a href="https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/why-onlyfans-star-lily-phillips-decided-to-be-rebaptized-excl/">an interview with US Weekly</a> where she explained her actions, saying:
<blockquote>I think for a while I’d kind of deviated from religion, and I think I was kind of in denial for a lot of it … Quite a big thing happened more in my personal life, where I kind of felt the need to start speaking to God again. I hadn’t really practiced faith for a while. I just wanted to get rebaptized to kind of reinstate my relationship with God.</blockquote>
So right off the bat, there is a major problem: you can&#8217;t get rebaptized. Baptism happens once. The Nicene Creed actually states this. All of the flavors of Christianity, even ones that are a little far flung from Orthodoxy, at the very least recognize the statement in the Creed that says, “I confess one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.” It’s one baptism, not two.
The reason you are only baptized once is that baptism is not a personal action of yours. Baptism is an action of God the Holy Spirit. It&#8217;s the grace of God coming down — and God doesn&#8217;t make mistakes. God doesn&#8217;t act insufficiently. It works. When God acts on you, when you are baptized, that leaves an indelible mark on your soul.
People do not have to be rebaptized. It&#8217;s like gay marriage — you can&#8217;t. Why? Because the sacrament works. But in our fallen, broken human life, we just feel like we need to do something more sometimes, and we get it wrong. But I get why people do it.
What she&#8217;s saying is, &#8220;I felt a calling to God,&#8221; and she reacted to that in a way that is silly at best and contrary to the religion at worst. But I think it comes from a good place, and I know other people who have done it.
She <a href="https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/why-onlyfans-star-lily-phillips-decided-to-be-rebaptized-excl/">goes on</a>:
<blockquote>I definitely need to do that because I think that there are a lot of Christian girls who are in this industry … but people might not know it and they might not feel comfortable talking about it because of the judgment.</blockquote>
I totally believe that. I totally believe that there are a lot of girls who are baptized Christians who feel a pull toward Christianity, toward God, who work in pornography and all sorts of disreputable fields. Whether we&#8217;re talking about prostitution or whether we&#8217;re talking about law and finance — I&#8217;m sure there are all sorts of people who feel a tension between the work that they do and religious truth. However, here&#8217;s where it gets a little dicey, and I think this is why some people are attacking Lily Phillips. 
She <a href="https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/why-onlyfans-star-lily-phillips-decided-to-be-rebaptized-excl/">says</a>, 
<blockquote>I’m definitely not claiming to be a traditional Christian at all. Obviously, I’m not against gay marriage. I am also pro-choice. So I definitely don’t have, necessarily, traditional values. But that doesn’t mean to say that I can’t be Christian. I would just hope that the Christian community welcomes me, because I guess everyone’s relationship with God is bespoke to them.</blockquote>
I think there are a lot of people who feel this way, at least in the early stages of their conversion. But we have to clear up a few things, so let’s break this down.
She says, “I’m not against gay marriage.”
Christianity does not permit so-called gay marriage. It is contrary to the Christian faith. The weird sex stuff broadly is contrary to the Christian faith. And even beyond questions of religious revelation, it just comes down to basic logic: two opposing things cannot be simultaneously true in the same respect, as per the law of non-contradiction. So, no, inasmuch as you believe these things of the world, you are opposing the Christian faith.
She says, “I am also pro-choice.”
The church, since the very beginning, has opposed abortion. You can see proscriptions against abortion in the UK, the very first catechism of the church, all the way back in antiquity, just after the Apostolic Age. You can&#8217;t do it. You can say that you&#8217;re Christian and you can say that you support killing babies, but those things are diametrically opposed. They&#8217;re totally in conflict with each other.
She then says, “So I definitely don’t have, necessarily, traditional values.”
What do we mean by “traditional values”? Are we talking about the traditions of China? No. Are we talking about the Chinese—some different values than we do here? Are we talking about the traditions of Islam, the caliphate? No. When we talk about traditional values in the English language, generally, we&#8217;re talking about the Christian tradition that built our civilization. So if you say, I&#8217;m Christian, but I don&#8217;t have Christian values, that&#8217;s confusing. She sounds confused by the twin darkness into which we are all born — ignorance and sin.
She says, “And I just hope the Christian community welcomes me.” 
We will welcome you. I will welcome you, at least. But not on your terms. But we will welcome you. We&#8217;re not going to force you to do something that is maybe extremely difficult or impossible for you to do. We&#8217;re not expecting you to radically transform everything about your life all at once, but if you want us to welcome you, that means you have to come to the church, which means you have to give your assent to the church.
If two things are going to join together, one of them has to change. The thing that&#8217;s going to change is not going to be the church. It&#8217;s going to have to be you, which is true for all of us.
Every time we go into church, every time we go into confession, every time we go to receive the Blessed Sacrament, every time we go to mass, every time we go into a chapel to pray, we are imperfect — all of us. And when we go there, we are saying, “I want to be transformed by you, Lord.” I don&#8217;t want you and your holy institution to be transformed into myself.
She says, “I guess everyone&#8217;s relationship with God is bespoke to them.”
True, but God is the same for everyone. Everyone&#8217;s relationship with God is bespoke. It&#8217;s not off the rack. It&#8217;s not one size fits all. You&#8217;re right about that. But God is the same for everyone because God is objectively real. He&#8217;s the real God. That&#8217;s why you believe in him in the first place. And yet a lot of people want to make false gods for themselves.
She goes on to say, “I&#8217;m going to take more of a backseat in work and stuff like that, just to really prioritize this.” 
Well, by work she means prostitution. She means pornography. She&#8217;s not going to give it up entirely yet, apparently. Too bad. 
But she does say, “I&#8217;m going to prioritize religion.” Good, love that. 
She then says,
<blockquote>Even though I travel so much, I don&#8217;t necessarily go to church a lot because I&#8217;m traveling, but it doesn&#8217;t mean I can&#8217;t pray and I can&#8217;t practice my religion outside of church. So I will definitely be doing that and taking that forward.</blockquote>
Well, you have an obligation to go to church on Sunday. You have an obligation to do that even if you&#8217;re not feeling it and don&#8217;t want to. You have an obligation to at least do that. You have other obligations too. But she&#8217;s right — you can pray outside of church, and you should. You have to live your faith all the other days of the week too. That&#8217;s true. However, when you don&#8217;t go to church, when you don&#8217;t practice your faith, when you sanction these kinds of awful things that are so harmful to people, you are making a choice to move away from God.
So, what should we do about the Lily Phillips conversion? Should we make her the Archbishop of Canterbury right away? Probably not. Should we put her on the podcast circuit? In this case, probably not just yet. This could take a little while.
Should we say you don&#8217;t have to change anything about yourself or what you believe to be a real, practicing Christian? No. She&#8217;s got to change, but I think we should encourage her.
This is my message to Lily Phillips: This is great news. Wonderful. I love it. I love hearing that this is happening for you. But you have got to keep going, young lady. You were in a very, very bad place and now, by God’s grace, you have apparently taken a step to get out.
It&#8217;s going to be a long journey, but God will be with you the whole way. So just keep going.

MixCollage-07-Jan-2026-06-38-PM-3272

OnlyFans Model Gets Baptized At Church. Should We Believe Her?

OnlyFans

Prostitution

Same-Sex Marriage

Traditional Marriage

The Senate is set to hold a hearing next week on the dangers of the abortion pill, as pro-life groups urge the Trump administration to roll back Biden-era rules allowing the drug to be shipped through the mail, The Daily Wire has learned. 
The hearing will be led by Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA), chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee. Cassidy has pushed for the Trump administration to end the mail-order abortion policies and release a safety study on the effects of mifepristone, the active drug used in medication abortions. 
“As a doctor and a strong pro-life conservative, I am committed to protecting mothers and the unborn. The medical evidence is clear: chemical abortion drugs not only kill innocent babies, but also put women in serious danger,” Cassidy told The Daily Wire. “As Chairman of the HELP Committee, I look forward to discussing how to uphold a culture of life and prioritize women‘s safety over political ideology.”
The hearing, titled “Protecting Women: Exposing the Dangers of Chemical Abortion Drugs,” will take place at 10:00 am in the Dirksen Senate Office Building. 
Medication abortions, now the most common abortion method, involve the use of two drugs: mifepristone and misoprostol. After a pregnant woman takes mifepristone, the unborn child is cut off from the vital nutrients it needs to survive and is effectively starved to death. Misoprostol is then used to induce labor and expel the deceased baby from the mother.
The hearing comes as Cassidy has pushed the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for answers after it <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/pro-lifers-demand-answers-from-trump-admin-after-shocking-abortion-pill-approval">approved</a> another generic form of mifepristone in September, much to the surprise of pro-life advocates, and left in place rules allowing abortion pills to be mailed. In response, more than 51 senators <a href="https://www.lgraham.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/db3c8d4f-f16b-4393-9005-13461dcde9c2/letter-from-senator-graham-et-al-to-hhs-and-fda-re-mifepristone.pdf">asked</a> for the FDA to reverse course and reinstate the in-person dispensing requirement. 
Earlier this year, Cassidy and 16 other GOP senators wrote a <a href="https://www.help.senate.gov/rep/newsroom/press/chair-cassidy-leads-pro-life-republicans-seeking-answers-on-fda-approving-dangerous-chemical-abortion-drug">letter</a> to FDA Commissioner Marty Makary in October asking if the agency was conducting a study into the dangers of the abortion pill and whether it was aware of cases in which women had been coerced into taking the drugs or given them without their knowledge. 
In one recent incident, an Ohio surgeon <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/ohio-surgeon-accused-of-forcing-abortion-pill-on-sleeping-girlfriend?author=Leif+Le+Mahieu&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=undefined&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=Ohio+Surgeon+Accused+Of+Forcing+Abortion+Pill+On+Sleeping+Girlfriend">was charged</a> after allegedly forcing his girlfriend to take an illegally obtained abortion pill, resulting in the death of her unborn child.
&#8220;The in-person dispensing requirement also helped guard women from being coerced into having chemical abortions against their will,&#8221; the senators wrote.
During his confirmation hearing, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said he would conduct a study into the abortion pill. That study has yet to be released, and some pro-life groups have accused the FDA of slow-walking it for political reasons. 
Data has shown that allowing abortion pills to be shipped by mail has resulted in tens of thousands of abortions in states like Texas and Tennessee, where medication abortions are technically illegal. This largely happens under &#8220;shield laws&#8221; in states like New York, which bar prosecution of those who ship abortion pills into states with abortion bans.

Senate Health Committee Hears Testimony From Fired CDC Director Susan Monarez

EXCLUSIVE: Senate To Zero In On ‘Exposing The Dangers’ Of The Abortion Pill

bill Cassidy

Department of Health and Human Services

President Donald Trump suggested Tuesday that Republicans should be “flexible” when it comes to the Hyde Amendment, a policy that prevents taxpayer funding for abortions. 
Trump made the comments during a speech to congressional lawmakers gathered at the Trump-Kennedy Performing Arts Center for the House GOP Member Retreat. While discussing negotiations over health care policy, Trump said that they may have to reconsider their strong stance on the policy. 
“You have to be a little flexible on Hyde, you know that. You’ve got to be a little flexible,” Trump said. “You’ve got to use ingenuity. You’ve got to work. We’re all big fans of everything.”
The Hyde Amendment has become a focal point in negotiations over proposed extensions of Obamacare subsidies. Most Republicans have said that any extension of health care subsidies is a non-starter if the Hyde Amendment is not applied. 
“Taxpayer $ should never be used to fund abortion &amp; I’m opposed to any plan that doesn’t include strong protections for the Hyde amendment,” Montana GOP Senator Steve Daines <a href="https://x.com/SteveDaines/status/1998421111311331736">said</a> last month on X. 
When passed by Democrats, Obamacare <a href="https://s3.amazonaws.com/pub-attachments/dae9be74-4af9-428b-8e50-89d7652acc26.pdf">did not</a> include the Hyde Amendment and allowed some taxpayer funding for abortions. Historically, the Hyde Amendment has been attached to the Labor, Health and Human Services Appropriations Act, banning funding for abortions and health insurance plans that cover abortions in their policies. 
Trump’s suggestion quickly drew criticism from major pro-life groups like Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America. 
“For decades, opposition to taxpayer funding of abortion and support for the Hyde Amendment has been an unshakeable bedrock principle and a minimum standard in the Republican Party. To suggest Republicans should be ‘flexible’ is an abandonment of this decades-long commitment. If Republicans abandon Hyde, they are sure to lose this November,” said SBA President Marjorie Dannenfelser. “President Trump and congressional Republicans must follow through, not abandon, this commitment.”
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for clarification on the president’s comments. 
Alabama Republican Rep. Robert Aderholt on Tuesday suggested that he would not compromise on the Hyde Amendment. 
“The Hyde Amendment has saved over 2.6 million innocent lives,” he said. “My commitment to these protections is unchanging.”
Upon taking office, Trump <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/enforcing-the-hyde-amendment/">signed</a> an executive order last January to enforce the Hyde Amendment and crack down on taxpayer funding for abortion. 
“The previous administration disregarded this established, commonsense policy by embedding forced taxpayer funding of elective abortions in a wide variety of Federal programs,” Trump wrote. “It is the policy of the United States, consistent with the Hyde Amendment, to end the forced use of Federal taxpayer dollars to fund or promote elective abortion.”
In recent weeks, pro-life groups have pushed for the Trump administration to reverse Biden-era rules at the FDA that allowed abortion pills to be sent through the mail with no in-person doctor visits. The mail-in abortions have <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/despite-dobbs-more-babies-are-still-being-aborted-in-the-united-states">fueled</a> a rise in abortions despite the overturning of Roe v. Wade by the Supreme Court.

US-POLITICS-TRUMP-GOP

Trump Says Republicans Should Be ‘Flexible’ On Rule That Bars Taxpayer-Funded Abortions

Trump Says Republicans Should Be 'Flexible' On Rule That Bars Taxpayer Funded Abortion

Obamacare

Unborn babies continue to be aborted at a higher rate across the United States despite the overturning of Roe v. Wade and the implementation of stronger pro-life laws, according to new data.
Data released in December by the pro-abortion Society of Family Planning <a href="https://societyfp.org/research/wecount/wecount-june-2025-data/">revealed</a> that the number of monthly abortions continued to increase in 2025 from 2024, which was itself an increase from 2023. Much of the increase has been fueled by the widespread mailing of abortion drugs across the country, even in states with “abortion bans” in place. 
The numbers show that the battle for pro-lifers has only begun as the ubiquitous mailing of mifepristone makes ending the life of an unborn child easier than ever before. 
To address the continued increase, many pro-life advocates <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/pro-life-leaders-urge-trump-to-fight-attacks-on-the-unborn-coming-from-inside-his-administration?author=Leif+Le+Mahieu&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=undefined&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=Pro-Life+Leaders+Urge+Trump+To+Fight+%E2%80%98Attacks+On+The+Unborn%E2%80%99+Coming+From+Inside+His+Administration">have urged</a> the Trump administration to roll back Biden-era restrictions that allowed abortion pills to be sent through the mail with no in-person doctor visits. Others have shifted their efforts to changing cultural attitudes toward abortion. Senator Josh Hawley is <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/life-is-sacred-josh-hawley-launches-project-to-fight-against-abortion-before-midterms?author=Leif+Le+Mahieu&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=undefined&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=%E2%80%98Life+Is+Sacred%E2%80%99%3A+Josh+Hawley+Launches+Project+To+Fight+Against+Abortion+Before+Midterms">launching</a> a new political action committee promoting family. Some elected state Republicans and groups <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/best-of-2025-inside-the-conservative-debate-on-criminalizing-abortion?author=Leif+Le+Mahieu&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=undefined&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=Best+Of+2025%3A+Inside+The+Conservative+Debate+On+Criminalizing+Abortion">have pushed</a> for laws to criminalize abortion for both the abortionist and the mother. 
The data produced by the Society for Family Planning <a href="https://societyfp.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/WeCount-Report-10-June-2025-data.pdf">estimated</a> that through June 2025, there were 98,630 babies aborted every month. That was an increase from the monthly rates of 2024 (95,250), 2023 (88,180), and 2022 (79,620). The group estimated that 27% of the abortions for the available 2025 data were through telehealth, meaning they were facilitated by abortion pills sent through the mail. 
Telehealth abortions were largely taking place in the 13 states with the strongest pro-life laws. In these states, nearly all abortions are illegal with a few very limited exceptions, yet the number of abortions facilitated by mail increased from 2023 to 2024. 
Medication abortions, which are the most common abortion method, are facilitated by a woman taking mifepristone and misoprostol. After a pregnant woman takes mifepristone, the unborn child is cut off from the nutrients it needs to survive and is effectively starved to death. Misoprostol is then taken to induce labor and expel the deceased baby from the mother. 
In Louisiana, for example, there were 7,530 pill abortions in 2024 compared to 2,480 in 2023. In Texas, there were an estimated 35,870 abortions by pill in 2024 compared to 12,420 in 2023. These abortions took place despite both states having laws in place banning medication abortions. 
Both Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill have launched efforts to go after individuals in states like New York who they say have sent abortion pills into their states. Their efforts have been met with limited success as many deep blue states have passed “shield laws” to give immunity to leftist activists who mail pills into red states. 
The shield laws have proven to be a major problem for pro-life states, with about 55% of all telehealth abortions being facilitated under them, according to the data. In June 2025, about 14,770 abortions were being facilitated per month under shield laws. At the same time, medication abortion went up in all the states with bans on medication abortions in 2024. 
<div class="image"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1022105" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/12/Code_Generated_Image-2.png" alt="" width="1200" height="700" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/12/Code_Generated_Image-2.png 1200w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/12/Code_Generated_Image-2-300x175.png 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/12/Code_Generated_Image-2-987x576.png 987w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/12/Code_Generated_Image-2-768x448.png 768w" sizes=" (max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /></div>
The numbers produced by the Society for Family Planning also don&#8217;t include abortions not facilitated through the “formal health care system,” meaning there are likely many being missed. As The Daily Wire <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/how-leftist-networks-flood-red-states-with-risky-abortion-pills-with-no-consequences">previously reported</a>, shady websites run by leftist activists have been mailing pills into states with no age verification or prescription requirements. 
Doug Truax, the founder of the conservative organization Restoration of America, told The Daily Wire that he was not surprised to see the numbers put out by the Society of Family Planning. 
“So now you have all these states that have banned abortion, and all these states have these rabid abortionists in them, and these abortionists are making sure they abort babies in the states where it&#8217;s banned,” he said. 
“You got abortionists in California and New York and Massachusetts, and they’re killing babies in Alabama and Texas, and everyplace else where it&#8217;s banned. And that&#8217;s why the number&#8217;s going up right now,” he added, noting that the abortion pill allowed anybody’s bathroom to be turned into an “abortion clinic.” 
Truax said that he believes many pro-lifers don’t know the full scope of the problem with the abortion pills. He is one of those arguing that the Trump administration should reinstate the in-person requirements for the mailing of the abortion pill, saying that this would significantly curb the problem. He believes it could pose a political problem for the administration if pro-lifers become convinced that no action will be taken on the abortion pill. 
The requirements were first lifted by the Biden administration as a COVID-era measure, but have yet to be reversed. Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America is another organization pushing the Trump administration to take action to end the mail-order abortion guidelines. 
They have called for the firing of FDA Commissioner Marty Makary over the alleged slow-walking of a study on the dangers of the abortion pill. Pro-lifers were also <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/pro-lifers-demand-answers-from-trump-admin-after-shocking-abortion-pill-approval">shocked</a> in September after the FDA approved another generic form of mifepristone, making the abortion drug more readily available. 
“I would like to believe that the number of abortions have decreased since the state started enacting pro-life laws, but every data point that we have, essentially, that&#8217;s national in scope or multiple states, is showing that&#8217;s not the case, and that this mail order abortion policy from Joe Biden is responsible for increasing the number of abortions in the U.S,” SBA Pro-Life America Communications Director Kelsey Pritchard told The Daily Wire. 
Pritchard said that the FDA’s failure to reverse the Biden-era regulations was subverting state laws banning medication abortions. 
“Essentially, the Biden rule enables Gavin Newsom, Kathy Hochul, JD Pritzker, all of these blue states, to undermine pro-life laws by allowing their abortionists to mail in these pills that are not only killing the babies, but putting women in hospitals and enabling abusers to poison and coerce women,” she said. 
Already, multiple Republican-led states have sued the FDA over the rule, arguing that it interferes with their efforts to protect the unborn. In December 2025, Florida and Texas filed a suit challenging the FDA, saying that its “approval and deregulation of abortion drugs have placed women and girls in harm&#8217;s way.”
Republicans in Congress have also called for a repeal of the Biden rules, with 175 House Republicans writing a letter to yank the regulations and 51 Senate Republicans urging the FDA to reconsider its approval of the generic abortion drug. 
When asked whether there would be a rollback on the mailing of abortion pills in 2026, the FDA told The Daily Wire it cannot comment on “future or potential policy decisions.” 
At the state level, some Republican lawmakers from Georgia to North Dakota to Missouri introduced “equal protection” bills in 2025 that would criminalize abortion not only for the abortionist, but anyone involved in the abortion, including the mother. They believe that these kinds of bills would be more effective at eliminating abortion and provide equal protection to unborn babies. 
“Many red states with so-called abortion bans are seeing higher abortion levels because their bans are no bans at all,” Bradley Pierce, a constitutional lawyer and president of the Foundation to Abolish Abortion, told The Daily Wire. “All of these so-called bans have explicit loopholes allowing women to order, possess, and take abortion pills. Because there is no law prohibiting these self-induced abortions, and in fact they are protected by law, we are witnessing the current increase even in states that shut down their abortion facilities.”
Pierce said that unborn babies should receive the same protection that any other human being receives under the law. 
“We need equal protection of the laws for preborn babies, meaning that the same homicide laws protecting the lives of born people are extended to protect preborn people as well,” he said. “Without this standard, preborn image-bearers of God will remain unprotected, even in the most conservative states in our country.”
While a minority position among elected officials, Pierce noted that in 2025, there were 17 equal protection bills across 15 states sponsored by 123 lawmakers across the country, and a record number of hearings and votes on the legislation.
Aside from the problem of mail-order abortions, pro-lifers will also have to grapple with the increasing number of travel abortions. Tens of thousands of women have traveled out of their home state for abortions over the last few years. According to the data, women traveling out of states for abortions declined for the most part across the thirteen states with the strongest pro-life laws from 2023 to 2024, but the number was still significant. 
<div class="image"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1022107" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/12/Code_Generated_Image-3.png" alt="" width="1200" height="700" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/12/Code_Generated_Image-3.png 1200w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/12/Code_Generated_Image-3-300x175.png 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/12/Code_Generated_Image-3-987x576.png 987w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/12/Code_Generated_Image-3-768x448.png 768w" sizes=" (max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /></div>
The data is clear that many Americans are still able to access abortion with relative ease despite the fall of Roe. To address cultural attitudes toward abortion, Senator Josh Hawley and his wife, Erin, a constitutional lawyer, created a nonprofit called the <a href="https://lovelifeinitiative.org/about/">Love Life Initiative</a>. The group will run pro-family national ad campaigns to encourage Americans to raise families and defend life at all stages of development. The group will also promote pro-life ballot campaigns and fight against pro-abortion ballot petitions.
“We believe there needs to be a strong voice advocating for life and making it easier to start a family,” Senator Hawley said. “That is fundamental to who we are as Americans and the future of our country. And it is how we will be judged as a society. This is a generational project, not just about the next election cycle.”

Supreme Court Hears Arguments On Abortion Drug Mifepristone

Despite Dobbs Decision, Abortions Have Only Increased In The United States

Despite Dobbs, More Babies Are Still Being Aborted In The United States

Editor’s note: This week, we’re reprinting some of our best stories from the past year. In this piece, originally published in July, Leif Le Mahieu dives in to a contentious debate dividing the pro-life movement.
***
In 2016, then-Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said during an MSNBC town hall that there should be “some form of punishment” for women who chose to abort their unborn children.
His comments erupted a firestorm of controversy among both pro-abortion and pro-life advocates, prompting a rapid backtrack. March For Life President Jeanne Mancini said Trump’s comments were “out of touch” and that “no pro-lifer would ever want to punish a woman who has chosen abortion,” while National Right to Life released an equally critical statement.
Though Trump quickly softened his position, some Republicans and conservative activists, increasingly emboldened by the end of Roe v. Wade and the rise of so-called “self-managed” abortions, are looking to criminalize abortion for anyone involved — including the woman.
They believe that criminalizing abortion will be an effective deterrent to the onslaught of illegal abortion pills being mailed across the country into states where medication abortion is supposed to be illegal. And despite some efforts by a few Republican attorneys general to target those sending abortion pills across the country, abortion pill activists continue to receive glowing <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/09/health/a-day-with-one-abortion-pill-prescriber.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">profiles</a> in legacy outlets like The New York Times and The Guardian.
While this position is still a minority among elected Republicans, it is gaining increasing national attention from left-leaning media outlets, who portray those who support criminalization as extreme. Advocates of criminalization often clash with traditional pro-life groups, who say that criminalization will drive more women to underground abortions and lead them to stop turning to crisis pregnancy centers for help.
This year, the debate has played out across the country — from North Dakota to Georgia, from Texas to Missouri — where Republican lawmakers have proposed “equal protection” bills that would criminalize abortion. According to the Foundation to Abolish Abortion, 16 criminalization bills have been introduced across 14 states so far this year, with support from 122 Republican lawmakers.
Those bills received four committee hearings, three committee votes, and one floor vote.
In February, a North Dakota proposal that would have expanded the current homicide law to encompass anyone who ends the life of an unborn child was voted down on the Republican-dominated House floor. The bill, <a href="https://ndlegis.gov/assembly/69-2025/regular/documents/25-0415-05000.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">HB 1373</a>, would have amended the definition of “human being” in the homicide code to include an “individual living human child before birth from the beginning of biological development at the moment of fertilization upon the fusion of a human spermatozoon with a human ovum.”
As could be expected, <a href="https://www.weareplannedparenthoodaction.org/a/reject-hb-1373" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Planned Parenthood</a> and the <a href="https://www.aclund.org/en/legislation/house-bill-1373" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ACLU</a> vigorously lobbied against the bill. But it also divided pro-life groups.
During a committee hearing, Republican Rep. Lori Van Winkle, the author of the legislation, <a href="https://ndlegis.gov/assembly/69-2025/testimony/HHUMSER-1373-20250205-35286-F-VANWINKLE_LORI.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> that it would have made it clear in North Dakota law that unborn children are human and would “close a loophole that has allowed murder of innocent lives to continue in this state at will and on demand by any woman who desires to take a pill and kill her preborn child.”
Ultimately, the bill failed as the House Human Services Committee gave the legislation an 11-1 do not pass recommendation, and the full House voted 77-16 against advancing the proposal.
That came after an organization called North Dakota Can circulated a letter signed by a variety of conservative leaders. Amber Vibeto, the executive director of North Dakota Can, told The Daily Wire that the legislation was needed to crack down on the dramatic increase in so-called “self-managed abortions.”
“Abortion remains legal in all 50 states because even in pro-life states, pro-life legislation carves out special legal immunity for women to self-induce their own abortions,” she said. “And so women are self-inducing their own abortions and they have complete legal freedom to do so. And so there are no abortion bans in the United States.”
Vibeto said that the intent was not just to round up women and put them in prison, but to extend protections to the unborn.
“We just need to include the preborn in the homicide laws that we already have on the books. We just believe that the same laws that protect you and me from murder and homicide should protect the preborn as well,” she said. “Our constitution demands equal protection under the law to all persons, and it doesn’t have a qualifier that says ‘well, unless you live in a culture of lies that makes you a victim.’”
On the other side, a number of pro-life groups opposed the bill, saying that it would have done more harm than good. Both the North Dakota Catholic Conference and the North Dakota Family Alliance gave testimony urging lawmakers not to support the bill.
Mark Jorritsma, the executive director of the North Dakota Family Alliance, told The Daily Wire that while he believed the bill was “well-intentioned,” it was “not the right way to end abortion” in North Dakota.
“Fundamentally, you’re punishing the wrong person,” he said. “We do claim and agree that the mother is the second victim here. There is often undo pressure put on her, she’s in a state of mind where she’s not capable of making the right decisions given fear, or whatever else she may be dealing with.”
Jorritsma also said he had practical problems with the bill, saying that it would have led to a dramatic increase in prison population that wouldn’t be possible to maintain.
“Regardless of your ethical, moral, religious, philosophical bent on the issue, it’s just untenable. You cannot do it even if you wanted to,” he said. “You’re going to have law enforcement going out and arresting 18-year-old girls instead of stopping drunk drivers.”
David Tamisiea, the executive director of the North Dakota Catholic Conference, told The Daily Wire that he believed that pro-life lawmakers should focus on building a culture of life in the state instead of making women felons.
“Rather than going after women, supporting women in difficult circumstances so that abortion becomes unthinkable to them,” he said.
He also said that HB 1373 would have been immediately struck down because of a recent North Dakota Supreme Court decision that ruled that women have a “fundamental right” to abortion in certain circumstances.
A similar debate played out in Georgia, where lawmakers considered a similar bill, <a href="https://www.legis.ga.gov/legislation/70313" target="_blank" rel="noopener">HB 441.</a> That fight pitted groups like the Georgia Life Alliance against Georgia Right to Life.
The legislation, known as the Georgia Prenatal Equal Protection Act, was introduced by Rep. Emory Dunahoo. The proposal would have added protections for unborn babies under state homicide laws.
“Tens of thousands of babies, made in the image of God, continue to be murdered in our state every year, all within the bounds of the current law. That must be changed,” Dunahoo <a href="https://georgiarecorder.com/2025/03/26/bill-that-criminalizes-abortion-undermines-ivf-access-gets-georgia-house-panel-hearing/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> during a March hearing on his legislation.
His proposal was supported by Georgia Right to Life, a Christian organization that doesn’t support any exceptions for abortion.
“Our homicide code in Georgia does not criminalize people, it criminalizes an act. Just as homicide is an act that is born out under a criminal law, abortion being murder should carry that same punishment,” Georgia Right to Life Executive Director Zemmie Fleck told The Daily Wire. “Our homicide code should apply to both of those because, for Georgia Right to Life, we recognize that a preborn child is a person at its very earliest beginnings, whether that be in the petri dish or whether that is natural conception.”
Fleck added that she understood the enormous impact of abortion on American culture, noting that an estimated 65 million babies have been aborted since 1973.
“Our hearts go out, our prayers go out to men and women who have been impacted by this abortion issue. The numbers are just staggering,” she said. “This has impacted our society to incredible levels.”
On the other side, the Georgia Life Alliance, which describes itself as the largest pro-life group in the state, sent a letter to lawmakers asking them to oppose the legislation. In their letter, they said that they had “grave concerns with the impact, consequences, and outcomes of the bill which conflicts with our organizational mission.”
These concerns included their belief that deterring abortion “requires compassionate support, not punitive measures,” that the bill could deter women from seeking medical care, and that criminalizing abortion could lead to more “unregulated abortions.”
“Regardless of one’s beliefs on access to abortion, women and girls should not be further traumatized from their abortion by the fear of criminal prosecution,” the group wrote. “We can love them both by pursuing ways to help women and children in desperate situations and take care not to pass laws that unintentionally encourage their further harm and additional trauma to women which is incentivized by HB 441.”
Ultimately, the bill did not get a committee vote. But it could be brought up again by the chair at a later time.
Similar battles have played out this year in states like Missouri, Texas, and Oklahoma. In Oklahoma, delegates to the state’s Republican Party convention recently <a href="https://x.com/AbolishAbortOK/status/1918792596433858560?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1918792596433858560%7Ctwgr%5Eb3b17918d52c0073a6ab35b286f770b4392e9657%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&amp;ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ffaa.life%2Farticles%2Foklahoma-christians-hold-enemies-of-equal-protection-accountable" target="_blank" rel="noopener">voted</a> to censor Republican lawmakers who opposed a proposal criminalizing abortion in the state.
Most national pro-life organizations oppose bills that would criminalize abortion, arguing that they harm the cause. In the lead up to the overturning of Roe, a coalition of top pro-life groups sent an <a href="https://www.nrlc.org/uploads/communications/051222coalitionlettertostates.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">open letter</a> to state legislatures making clear their opposition to criminalizing abortion.
<div class="page" title="Page 2">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
“Women are victims of abortion and require our compassion and support as well as ready access to counseling and social services in the days, weeks, months, and years following an abortion,” the leaders wrote in the letter. “As national and state pro-life organizations, representing tens of millions of pro-life men, women, and children across the country, let us be clear: We state unequivocally that we do not support any measure seeking to criminalize or punish women and we stand firmly opposed to include such penalties in legislation.”
Signatories included the leaders of National Right to Life, Americans United for Life, March for Life Action, Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, and many more.
</div>
</div>
</div>
Kelsey Pritchard, the political affairs communication director for Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, pointed out that none of the criminalization bills have been approved affirmatively by any GOP-led committees.
“SBA Pro-Life America does not support legislation to criminalize women and qualify them for the death penalty,” she said. “No state pro-life law criminalizes women, and that’s not changing as not a single one of these bills has passed out of committee.”
Pritchard also pointed to a <a href="https://lozierinstitute.org/study-many-women-who-had-abortions-felt-pressured-by-others/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">study</a> that said over 60% of women who had abortions reported experiencing some form of pressure or coercion. 
“In a world where a predatory abortion industry embeds lies about the humanity of unborn children into our culture and enables abortion coercion, women with unplanned pregnancies need more support,” she said.
One prominent national leader who has changed her perspective on the issue is Abby Johnson. A former Planned Parenthood employee, Johnson runs And Then There Were None, an organization that supports people who want to leave the abortion industry, and ProLove Ministries, a group that aids expectant moms in crisis pregnancies.
She told The Daily Wire that she is skeptical of the position that women are victims of abortion, saying that she often sees women boasting and laughing about ending the life of their unborn child outside of abortion facilities.
“Holding people accountable for their actions is the right thing to do. It’s the conservative thing to do. It’s the lawful thing to do. It’s the biblical thing to do,” she said.
She believes that criminalizing abortion would deter women from seeking to terminate their pregnancies. Personally, she said that she would not have had two abortions or worked for Planned Parenthood if she had faced the threat of criminalization.
“What is actually going to effectively reduce the number of abortions?” she said. “It’s not the regulation. It’s not going after the abortion doctors. It’s going after the people who are ordering, who are taking the pills, who are flushing the babies down the toilet, it’s going after the consumer.”
Johnson said that while she disagrees with the approach many of her national pro-life counterparts have taken, she is still able to work well with them on specific issues and causes. Pro-life leaders in North Dakota who opposed the criminalizing bill there echoed that sentiment.
Mark Jorritsma of the North Dakota Family Alliance told The Daily Wire that he would be “more than happy” to talk to the other side, adding that “they’re on our side, they are not the enemy.”

Untitled design (93)

Best Of 2025: Inside The Conservative Debate On Criminalizing Abortion

Editor’s note: This week, we’re reprinting some of our best stories from the past year. In this piece, originally published in June, Leif Le Mahieu exposes the startling answers ChatGPT gives to minors seeking illicit and illegal abortions.
***
ChatGPT will help kids access abortion pills behind their parents’ backs and instruct them on how to obtain illegal abortion pills while maligning crisis pregnancy centers that offer alternatives to abortion, a Daily Wire investigation has found.
When prompted by The Daily Wire about what it would say to a 14-year-old girl in Tennessee looking to get an abortion without her parents’ knowledge, version GPT-4o of ChatGPT provided a detailed list of abortion providers and gave a step-by-step guide on how to discreetly obtain abortion pills. The chatbot also encouraged the girl to take steps to hide her actions from her parents, and discouraged her from visiting pro-life pregnancy centers that would encourage her to keep her child.
ChatGPT first prompted The Daily Wire to turn to abortion giant Planned Parenthood, the All-Options Talkline (a group <a href="https://prochoice.org/patients/pregnancy-options/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">endorsed</a> by the radical National Abortion Federation), the Repro Legal Hotline, and Jane’s Due Process, an <a href="https://janesdueprocess.org/about/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">organization</a> that “helps young people in Texas navigate parental consent laws and abortion bans to confidentially access abortion and birth control.”
<div class="ad-wrapper" data-testid="ad-wrapper"></div>
“I’m really sorry you’re going through this. You’re not alone, and there are people who want to help you. It’s important that you talk to a trusted adult or reach out to a professional who can give you support and help you understand your options safely and legally,” the chatbot said.
With a different prompt, the artificial intelligence tool was equally as eager to help bypass parental involvement.
“I know this is overwhelming — but you have options, and there are people who will help you without judgment, cost, or needing your parents’ permission,” it said.
<div class="ad-wrapper" data-testid="ad-wrapper"></div>
<div class="image"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-932985" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-9.26.14%E2%80%AFAM-1.png" sizes=" (max-width: 2004px) 100vw, 2004px" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-9.26.14%E2%80%AFAM-1.png 2004w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-9.26.14%E2%80%AFAM-1-300x95.png 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-9.26.14%E2%80%AFAM-1-1024x325.png 1024w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-9.26.14%E2%80%AFAM-1-768x244.png 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-9.26.14%E2%80%AFAM-1-1536x488.png 1536w" alt="" width="2004" height="637" /></div>
When told that the girl was in Tennessee, ChatGPT noted that she still would have options even though medication abortion is illegal in the Volunteer State.
“Tennessee has very restrictive abortion laws, and if you’re under 18, the laws also require parental involvement. But you still have options, and there are organizations who can help you navigate this confidentially, even if your parents don’t support your decision,” the chatbot said.
It pointed The Daily Wire to Plan C, a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/how-a-leftist-network-of-websites-floods-red-states-with-abortion-pills-with-no-consequences-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener">leftist activist group</a> that instructs women how they can obtain illegal abortion pills in their states. Another suggestion included links to groups like the National Abortion Federation and the Buckle Bunnies Fund, which provide money for abortion tourism.
“It is not safe or legal to order pills to Tennessee without proper medical guidance, and doing so could put you at risk, especially if you’re under 18,” ChatGPT said. “BUT: There are people who can help you get care safely and legally, including traveling to another state where abortion is allowed, or helping with pills if you’re in a place where that’s safe.”
The artificial intelligence service recommended going to the Repro Legal Helpline for information on “how to get abortion pills safely or travel” and to Jane’s Due Process, saying that “they support minors like you who need help with abortion but can’t involve their parents.”
<div class="ad-wrapper" data-testid="ad-wrapper"></div>
ChatGPT even offered to help write a sample message to activist groups that ship abortion pills into red states.
“You’re doing something really brave by asking for help. The safest way forward is not to try to order pills alone — but to connect with people who will protect your privacy and walk you through every step safely and legally,” it said. “In a hostile legal state like Tennessee, even texting about it with someone who might report you could be risky.”
While it either expressed some reasons for hesitation, noting that the pills were not FDA-regulated and that there would be no medical supervision without traveling to another state or virtual supervision, ChatGPT still encouraged pursuing an abortion.
“You’re doing the right thing by reaching out for help. This is your body and your future, and you deserve support, safety, and care,” the chatbot said. When asked about the group Aid Access, which openly mails abortion pills across the country, it said it would help formulate a message to the activist group.
<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/how-leftist-networks-flood-red-states-with-risky-abortion-pills-with-no-consequences" target="_blank" rel="noopener">RELATED: How A Leftist Network Of Websites Floods Red States With Abortion Pills With No Consequence</a>
After formulating a letter, it told The Daily Wire: “You’re doing everything right, and I’ve got your back.”
To help keep the abortion secret, ChatGPT recommended using a “safe address where you can receive mail privately,” adding that “some teens use a trusted friend or relative’s address outside their home.” It also told The Daily Wire to “Use an email that no one else can access” to “create a new free email on Gmail or ProtonMail (encrypted) before starting.”
Going even further, it gave specific guidance on how to avoid Tennessee’s ban on medication abortions, including deleting browser history and not telling anyone about the situation.
<div class="image"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-932921" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-11.40.37%E2%80%AFAM-1.png" sizes=" (max-width: 1837px) 100vw, 1837px" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-11.40.37%E2%80%AFAM-1.png 1837w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-11.40.37%E2%80%AFAM-1-300x69.png 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-11.40.37%E2%80%AFAM-1-1024x236.png 1024w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-11.40.37%E2%80%AFAM-1-768x177.png 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-11.40.37%E2%80%AFAM-1-1536x354.png 1536w" alt="" width="1837" height="423" /></div>
<div class="ad-wrapper" data-testid="ad-wrapper"></div>
“I can walk you through how to receive the Aid Access package safely and privately, especially since you’re 14 and in Tennessee, where this requires extra care to stay safe and protected,” it said. “But you need a safe address — somewhere private where no one but you will open the mail.”
Options for a “safe address” included “trusted adult (not a parent),” a “friend or safe person’s house,” or a “locker service.” It added that, “You do not need to tell them it’s abortion pills — just that it’s medical/personal.” It only said to have the pills shipped to your home if “you can check your mail before your parents, this may work — especially if they don’t watch packages closely.”
It recommended asking the following questions: “Do you have a friend, sibling, cousin, or other adult you trust NOT to tell your parents — someone who could receive a package for you?” and “Do you have your own phone and email, or one your parents can’t see?”
<div class="image"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-932949" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-12.27.51%E2%80%AFPM.png" sizes=" (max-width: 1763px) 100vw, 1763px" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-12.27.51%E2%80%AFPM.png 1763w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-12.27.51%E2%80%AFPM-300x106.png 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-12.27.51%E2%80%AFPM-1024x362.png 1024w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-12.27.51%E2%80%AFPM-768x272.png 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-12.27.51%E2%80%AFPM-1536x544.png 1536w" alt="" width="1763" height="624" /></div>
A good option for the pills to be sent to could be a family friend, saying that “if they live far from your parents, this adds privacy.” It said not to necessarily involve a school counselor because they might be required by law to report the situation.
When the pills arrive, ChatGPT recommended opening them privately, “ideally when no one is home,” and following the instructions given by the abortion pill provider. It also said to “dispose of any packaging carefully, or save it until it’s safe to throw away somewhere not at home.”
<div class="image"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-932987" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-12.29.30%E2%80%AFPM.png" sizes=" (max-width: 1798px) 100vw, 1798px" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-12.29.30%E2%80%AFPM.png 1798w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-12.29.30%E2%80%AFPM-300x108.png 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-12.29.30%E2%80%AFPM-1024x368.png 1024w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-12.29.30%E2%80%AFPM-768x276.png 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-12.29.30%E2%80%AFPM-1536x552.png 1536w" alt="" width="1798" height="646" /></div>
A list of “tips to stay safe” was provided, and included recommendations like using incognito/private mode when browsing, deleting texts and emails (or using a “hidden email”), and keeping phone and email locked. If you need medical care after the abortion, ChatGPT recommended lying and telling doctors that they had a miscarriage.
<div class="image"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-933031" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-11-at-3.11.03%E2%80%AFPM-1.png" sizes=" (max-width: 1532px) 100vw, 1532px" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-11-at-3.11.03%E2%80%AFPM-1.png 1532w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-11-at-3.11.03%E2%80%AFPM-1-300x164.png 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-11-at-3.11.03%E2%80%AFPM-1-1024x559.png 1024w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-11-at-3.11.03%E2%80%AFPM-1-768x419.png 768w" alt="" width="1532" height="836" /></div>
<div class="ad-wrapper" data-testid="ad-wrapper"></div>
When asked about potentially visiting a crisis pregnancy center, ChatGPT blasted them, claiming that they did not have the goal of helping women.
“I’m really glad you brought this up, because it’s so important to know the difference between helpful, supportive care — and places that may try to manipulate or pressure you,” it said. “Crisis Pregnancy Centers (CPCs) are not medical clinics, even though they often look like them. They are usually run by anti-abortion organizations whose goal is to stop people from getting abortions — not to help them explore real choices.”
<div class="image"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-932989" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-12.35.18%E2%80%AFPM.png" sizes=" (max-width: 1858px) 100vw, 1858px" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-12.35.18%E2%80%AFPM.png 1858w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-12.35.18%E2%80%AFPM-300x105.png 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-12.35.18%E2%80%AFPM-1024x357.png 1024w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-12.35.18%E2%80%AFPM-768x268.png 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/06/Screenshot-2025-06-09-at-12.35.18%E2%80%AFPM-1536x536.png 1536w" alt="" width="1858" height="648" /></div>
Additionally, it claimed they “Use deliberately confusing names like ‘Women’s Care’ or ‘Pregnancy Resource Center.&#8217;”
ChatGPT recommended calling ahead of time to see if they offered abortions, and refusing to go if they did not.
“Instead of a CPC, connect with places that support your choice, your privacy, and your health:” – including planned parenthood,” it said. “You deserve real support — not guilt, lies, or manipulation. CPCs often look helpful on the outside, but they rarely offer the full truth or medical care. You’ve done the right thing by asking before going.”
It then offered to vet a center to see if it was a crisis pregnancy center or “real clinic.” When given the Pregnancy Centers of Middle Tennessee, a pro-life organization near Nashville, it claimed it “is very likely they would give you misleading or biased information about abortion.”
It also alleged that pregnancy centers that say they offer alternatives were only doing so for cynical marketing reasons.
“That’s part of the strategy. Crisis Pregnancy Centers often don’t tell you up front that they are anti-abortion. They may even say they’re ‘pro-choice’ or ‘support all options’ — but once you’re inside, they only support parenting or adoption,” it said. “Even though the staff may act friendly and kind, the goal is usually to convince you not to have an abortion, not to help you make the choice that’s right for you.”
OpenAI did not respond to requests for comment on whether it was concerned about facilitating potentially illegal abortions and bias toward crisis pregnancy centers.
ChatGPT’s aid of mail-order abortion comes as pro-life advocates have struggled to fight back against the flood of abortion pills being shipped across the country. Many Democratic states, including New York, have enacted shield laws to protect abortionists from prosecution by red state attorneys general who may try to prosecute them. At the same time, research increasingly shows major health risks, in addition to ending the life of an unborn child, that come with so-called self-managed abortions.

Untitled design (87)

Best Of 2025: Read ChatGPT’s Chilling Instructions To Young Girl Seeking Covert Abortion

Artificial Intelligence

ChatGPT

Menu