<p>A recently posted op-ed by two professors — an associate professor of Mathematics at Carnegie Mellon University and an assistant professor of Molecular Biology at the University of Pittsburgh — calls for greater &#8220;honesty in pandemic modeling,&#8221; which, they suggest, too often conceals the fact that after lock-downs and other extreme social distancing measures are lifted, the number of infections will rapidly rise again.</p>
<p>The problem, Carnegie Mellon&#8217;s Wesley Pegden and Pittsburgh&#8217;s Maria Chikina explain in an <a href="https://medium.com/@wpegden/a-call-to-honesty-in-pandemic-modeling-5c156686a64b">analysis</a> posted on Medium Sunday, is that many of the models that have been shaping the narrative on COVID-19 mitigation efforts only present &#8220;the effects of mitigations over a limited time-frame,&#8221; when &#8220;most of the impact of the epidemic would occur outside of that time-frame.&#8221; In so doing, the models appear to show that extreme social distancing measures for a given period of time will save a large number of lives, but they often fail to show what happens after the measures are lifted (emphasis theirs):</p>
<blockquote>
<p id="0ae8" class="hc hd ap ce he b eq je es jf hh jg hj jh hl ji hn dq" data-selectable-paragraph="">There is a simple truth behind the problems with these modeling conclusions. <strong class="he jl">The duration of containment efforts does not matter</strong>, if transmission rates return to normal when they end, and mortality rates have not improved. This is simply because <strong class="he jl">as long as a large majority of the population remains uninfected, lifting containment measures will lead to an epidemic almost as large as would happen without having mitigations in place at all.</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p id="c064" class="hc hd ap ce he b eq hf es hg hh hi hj hk hl hm hn dq" data-selectable-paragraph="">The professors acknowledge that there can be real benefits in using mitigations efforts as a form of &#8220;delay tactic.&#8221; &#8220;For example, we may hope to use the months we buy with containment measures to improve hospital capacity, in the hopes of achieving a reduction in the mortality rate,&#8221; they write. &#8220;We might even wish to use these months just to consider our options as a society and formulate a strategy.&#8221;</p>
<p data-selectable-paragraph="">However, they argue, &#8220;<strong class="he jl">mitigations themselves are not saving lives</strong> in these scenarios; instead, it is what we do with the time that gives us an opportunity to improve the outcome of the epidemic&#8221; (emphasis theirs).</p>
<p data-selectable-paragraph="">In their analysis, the professors point to a few popular examples of models claiming to show extreme social distancing measures, including lock-downs, saving a large number of lives. One of these is a <a class="bx fg fh ho fj fk" href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/03/25/opinion/coronavirus-trump-reopen-america.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer">recent model</a> publicized by Nicholas Kristof of The New York Times. The overarching message of the model is that &#8220;social distancing for 2 months instead of 2 weeks could dramatically drop the number of COVID-19 infections,&#8221; Chikina and Pegden write.</p>
<p data-selectable-paragraph="">But what happens when you look at the number of infections in the months <em>after</em> the window of time shown in the model? By October, the professors calculated, Kristof&#8217;s model would show a 50% <em>increase</em> in the number of infections if no extreme measures had been imposed in the first place:</p>
<blockquote>
<p data-selectable-paragraph="">Two months of mitigations have not improved the outcome of the epidemic in this model, it has just delayed its terrible effects. In fact, because of the role of weather in the model presented in the Kristof article, <strong class="he jl">two months of mitigations actually results in 50% more infections and deaths than two weeks of mitigations</strong>, since it pushes the peak of the epidemic to the winter instead of the summer, whose warmer months this model assumes causes lower transmission rates.</p>
</blockquote>
<p data-selectable-paragraph="">The professors found the same pattern of simply pushing the spike in cases forward in their own <a class="bx fg fh ho fj fk" href="http://math.cmu.edu/~wes/covid.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer">models</a> on &#8220;epidemic trajectories for COVID-19 assuming no mitigations at all, or assuming extreme mitigations which are gradually lifted at 6 months, to resume normal levels at 1 year&#8221; (graphs below via Chikina and Pegden):</p>
<figure class="hq hr hs ht hu hv co cp paragraph-image">
<div class="hw hx da hy ai">
<div class="hw hx da hy ai">
<div class="co cp jj">
<div class="ie r da if">
<div class="jk r">
<div class="hz ia s t u ib ai av ic id"></div>
<div class="image"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="mw pn s t u ib ai ik" role="presentation" src="https://miro.medium.com/max/1920/1*8cgeZcxDxueAZPAYE8fuIw.png" sizes=" 700px" srcset="https://miro.medium.com/max/1104/1*8cgeZcxDxueAZPAYE8fuIw.png 552w, https://miro.medium.com/max/1400/1*8cgeZcxDxueAZPAYE8fuIw.png 700w" width="960" height="448" /></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div><figcaption class="ci fw il im in cq co cp io ip cd dj" data-selectable-paragraph=""><em>With no mitigations we see nearly 500,000 deaths relatively quickly.</em></figcaption><div class="hw hx da hy ai">
<div class="co cp jj">
<div class="ie r da if">
<div class="jk r"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</figure>
<figure class="hq hr hs ht hu hv co cp paragraph-image">
<div class="hw hx da hy ai">
<div class="hw hx da hy ai">
<div class="co cp jj">
<div class="ie r da if">
<div class="jk r"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="mw pn s t u ib ai ik" role="presentation" src="https://miro.medium.com/max/1920/1*QRGFaF1fMj14BMkT2FsZrQ.png" sizes=" 700px" srcset="https://miro.medium.com/max/1104/1*QRGFaF1fMj14BMkT2FsZrQ.png 552w, https://miro.medium.com/max/1400/1*QRGFaF1fMj14BMkT2FsZrQ.png 700w" width="960" height="448" /></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div><figcaption class="ci fw il im in cq co cp io ip cd dj" data-selectable-paragraph=""><em>With mitigations which let up between 6 months and a year we still see nearly 500,000 deaths, just later.</em></figcaption><div class="hw hx da hy ai">
<div class="co cp jj">
<div class="ie r da if">
<div class="jk r"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</figure>
<p id="d93f" class="hc hd ap ce he b eq hf es hg hh hi hj hk hl hm hn dq" data-selectable-paragraph="">&#8220;Unfortunately, extreme mitigation efforts which end (even gradually) reduce the number of deaths only by 1% or so;&#8221; they write, &#8220;as the mitigation efforts let up, we still see a full-scale epidemic, since almost none of the population has developed immunity to the virus.&#8221;</p>
<p data-selectable-paragraph="">So is short-term modeling useless and are mitigation efforts only delaying the inevitable? No, the professors explain, but both need to be presented and approached with honesty and transparency:</p>
<blockquote>
<p data-selectable-paragraph="">In particular, we suggest that <strong class="he jl">no model whose purpose is to study the overall benefits of mitigations should end at a time-point before a steady-state is reached. </strong>This is not the same as saying that modelers must assume that the epidemic remains a threat until herd immunity is reached. Indeed, it is perfectly reasonable to model the effects of mitigation strategies if we assume that a vaccine will be available in 18 months, or that mortality 6 months from now could be reduced by new treatments, or that hospital capacity might be increased with the time bought by mitigations. <strong class="he jl">But these are all assumptions that can and should be made explicit and quantitative in a model that attempts to estimate effects on overall mortality.</strong> Without making assumptions explicit, it is impossible to debate whether they are reasonable, or to estimate the sensitivity of the model’s conclusions.</p>
</blockquote>
<p data-selectable-paragraph=""><a href="https://medium.com/@wpegden/a-call-to-honesty-in-pandemic-modeling-5c156686a64b">Read Chikina and Pegden&#8217;s op-ed here</a>.</p>
<p data-selectable-paragraph=""><strong>Related: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/study-coronavirus-death-rate-lower-than-previously-reported">Study: Coronavirus Death Rate Lower Than Previously Reported</a></strong></p>

<script async src="https://www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script async src="https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js"></script><div data-widget-host="revcontent" data-pub-id="165152" data-widget-id="290588"></div><script src="https://delivery.revcontent.com/165152/290588/widget.js"></script>

Professors Push Back On Pandemic Models: Be Honest About What Happens After Lockdowns Are Lifted

CONTINUE READING

One Of Most Sacred Sites For Jews & Christians To Be Fully Opened To Public: ‘Miracle’ Pool Of Siloam

Tuesday | October 5th, 2021

Monday | October 4th, 2021

Friday | October 1st, 2021

Monday | September 27th, 2021

Saturday | September 25th, 2021

News and Commentary

COVID

A video goes viral showing a baby being refused his mother by two gay "dads". This is just the tip of the iceberg, which is why we will have an important discussion today about surrogacy. 

Hour 1

The Matt Walsh Show

Ep. 1765 - This Video Is One Of The Worst Things I've Seen In A Long Time 

The Strait of Hormuz officially opens for business (kind of), the Pope makes “shocking” comments on immigration, and President Trump promises UFO disclosure at TPUSA. 


The Michael Knowles Show

Ep. 1956 -  Pope Leo's "SHOCKING" Immigration Comments EXPLAINED

A false miscreed has corrupted our leadership class.


The Andrew Klavan Show

Ep. 1275 - Dumb, Dumber and Progressive

President Trump announces a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel, a murder-suicide involving former Democratic Lieutenant Governor Justin Fairfax shakes Virginia, and France and Britain hold a conference to secure the Strait of Hormuz – after the Iranian conflict ends. Get the facts first with Morning Wire.

- - -

Ep. 2738

- - -

Wake up with new Morning Wire merch: https://bit.ly/4lIubt3

- - -

Today's Sponsors:

Alliance Defending Freedom - Visit https://JoinADF.com/WIRE or text 'WIRE' to 83848 to learn more.

Pocket Hose - Text MORNING to 64000 to get a FREE pocket pivot and their 10-pattern sprayer with the purchase of ANY size Copper Head hose. Message and data rates may apply.

Morning Wire

U.S. Expands Hormuz Blockade & VA Fairfax Deaths Investigated | 4.17.26

U.S. Expands Hormuz Blockade & VA Fairfax Deaths Investigated | 4.17.26 [Member Exclusive]

A ceasefire goes into effect between Israel and Lebanon, a tragic murder-suicide rocks Virginia, and Dairy Queen deploys AI in the drive-thru. Get the facts first with Evening Wire.
- - -
Ep. 2737
- - -
Wake up with new Morning Wire merch: https://bit.ly/4lIubt3 
- - -
Today’s Sponsor:

Alliance Defending Freedom - Visit https://JoinADF.com/WIRE or text “WIRE” to 83848 to learn more.


Menu

— News and Commentary —

Professors Push Back On Pandemic Models: Be Honest About What Happens After Lockdowns Are Lifted