When first-year university student Henry Nowak was slaughtered by a foreigner named Vickrum Digwa in the streets of Southampton, England, late last year, the indigenous people of Britain — which is to say, the white people — finally began to rise up. And as they learned more details about the case, their anger grew.
Henry Nowak had been stabbed simply because he passed a Sikh on the sidewalk, noticed the large blade hanging in front of his clothing, and began recording with his cellphone. That was it.
For the crime of filming a Sikh without permission, Nowak was butchered. And as he lay dying, Nowak’s killer taunted him, hid the murder weapon, and admitted aloud that he had no viable self-defense claim.
Digwa also informed police that Nowak had “attacked him racially” — whatever that means. It wasn’t true. But as we all saw, it was convincing enough for the police. Instead of getting medical assistance for Nowak — which he desperately needed — they handcuffed him.
The British government immediately recognized that Nowak’s murder posed a major threat to their power, mainly because they were obviously complicit in his death. They had allowed the foreigner’s family into the country, for no reason other than to replace the native population. And then, when the foreigner stabbed a British citizen, they took the killer’s side.
Making matters worse, in the following days, a man was nearly beheaded by an African in Belfast. We all saw that footage as well.
And shortly after that, a 17-year-old girl was stabbed several times in the neck by a Pakistani in Lancashire. It was all caught on video. She was walking along the side of the road, and the cowardly foreigner ambushed her from behind. For British authorities, it was yet another crisis to contain.
🌏 news 🤔
This is truly shocking absolute savage 17year old girl stabbed repeatedly by an another sick invader
Government is a joke falling to protect the great British people just wait for the gaslighting
We demand detention centres immediately and mass Remigration pic.twitter.com/QhuhhQXbYk
— knights Templar 🏴 (@72crusader72) June 13, 2026
Source: @72crusader72/X.com
They’re globalists committed to the managed decline of the West, so they would never dream of closing the borders or beginning large-scale deportations. Instead, they view all these attacks as a PR problem to solve, so that mass migration can continue unimpeded. But as far as PR problems go, it’s a doozy. How exactly do you calm down a population that has every reason to revolt and take their country back in order to protect their children from violent foreign invaders? It’s a hard question to answer.
So it was notable (and more than a little conspicuous) that, as demonstrators were taking to the streets over the murder of Henry Nowak, the British government received assistance from an unlikely source — Henry Nowak’s father.
While Nowak’s father strongly criticized the police department for treating his son like a criminal, he also went out of his way to affirm that Britain’s open-border policies had nothing to do with the murder. He stated that “inclusivity” was a virtue and repeatedly blamed “knife crime” rather than foreign migration. He made it sound like Britain is falling apart because of the existence of knives, rather than the foreigners who are using those knives to butcher innocent white people.
Watch:
🚨NEW: Henry Nowak’s father *directly* calls out the disgusting behaviour of Hampshire police.
“Instead of being treated as a dying victim, the police arrested him for assault”
“That was the last thing he heard”
Hampshire police are a DISGRACE!
RELEASE THE FOOTAGE! pic.twitter.com/2t6WrjQS9d— Lee Harris (@LeeHarris) June 1, 2026
Source: @LeeHarris/X.com
Knives have been standard-issue utensils in British households since the 1600s. And yet, “knife crime” only became an epidemic in the past few decades. It became an issue precisely at the same time the government opened the borders. Everyone knows this isn’t a coincidence. It’s common sense.
Blaming the abstract villain of “knife crime” is a farce — it’s actually hard to believe that anyone can make this claim with a straight face.
But Nowak’s father apparently disagrees. And coincidentally enough, his message happened to align with the propaganda coming from the British government. A member of Parliament in Britain recently published this op-ed in the Guardian titled, “I’m a Sikh MP. Here’s why we should all heed the words of Henry Nowak’s father.”
The UK Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, said something very similar: “When we have a terrible case like Henry’s case, we react calmly, as his family have done.”
David Lammy, the deputy prime minister, agreed. This is from an op-ed that was recently published in The Observer, which really leaned into the propaganda:
David Lammy said yesterday that he told JD Vance, his US counterpart, that his comments on Henry Nowak were wrong. The US is again showing unusual level of interest in UK affairs, after Vance blamed the murder of Nowak, a British teenager, on “the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants.” Vickrum Digwa, who killed Nowak in December and was jailed for at least 21 years, was born in Southampton. Nowak’s father does not want his son’s death “to be used to create further division, hatred or tension.” For [the] Reform [party], Vance and others, these words seem to mean nothing.
A couple of things are happening here. First, they’re suggesting that Digwa isn’t really a foreigner because “he was born in Southampton.” But he’s absolutely a foreigner. His parents weren’t born in the UK. No one in the family made any effort to assimilate. In fact, even after Digwa killed a white British student, his mother helped him hide the murder weapon. His brother lied to the police for him.
So no, the fact that Digwa was “born in Southampton” is not relevant. He’s not British. He’s not a Westerner. He and his family never should have been allowed into the UK. And everyone like him needs to go back to where they or their families came from — whether they were “born” in the UK or not.
Secondly, look at how crass these people are as they scramble to hide behind Nowak’s father. They quote what the father said, and then they attack anyone who doesn’t obey the father’s wishes. Quote: “For Vance and others, [the father’s] words seem to mean nothing.”
Well, no, they don’t mean “nothing.” They’re wrong. They mean the wrong thing. They represent an ideology that must be rejected before more white people get massacred in Britain, and before the country becomes uninhabitable. What’s being heavily implied here, of course, is that when the victim’s father says something, everyone is under an automatic obligation to do whatever he says.
The British government is doing everything it can to take advantage of the natural instinct most decent people have, which is to be respectful when someone suffers an incomprehensible loss. And the British government wants to hide behind the father’s statements and use them as a shield against all criticism — including criticism of their disastrous open-borders policy, which is destroying the entire country in real-time.
Even the Conservative Party in Britain — supposedly the “opposition” — is in lockstep on this.
Here’s reporting from the BBC:
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch met Nowak’s family earlier on Thursday and she said that they did not want anger to “tear communities apart”. … “They have asked that we work across political parties and religions to rebuild trust in the police,” she said. “That trust has been broken because of what happened, and I agree with them on that.
This should make you pause and think for a second. If the British government is so eager to use the words of the victim’s family in order to deflect criticism from themselves, and if they believe the family’s words have so much persuasive power, then why wouldn’t the government affirmatively make contact with the victim’s family and try to craft their public statements for them in advance? In other words, the government is acting like it’s responding to the father’s words. But what are the chances that the government planted those words in the first place?
It’s more likely than you might think. A new story in the Daily Mail has highlighted the existence of a secretive government agency that reaches out to the families of murder victims, particularly victims who were killed by foreigners, and works to influence their reaction. It’s very similar to a federal agency that exists in this country, which we’ll discuss in a moment. In the UK, the agency is known as the “Research, Information and Communications Unit,” or RICU.
The agency was founded back in 2007 by a former MI6 agent named Charles Farr, who modeled RICU after the Information Research Department, a Cold War-era propaganda department in Britain.
Originally, the stated goal of the RICU was to run proactive counter-terrorism operations targeting British Muslims. To give one example, the agency secretly launched a program called “Help for Syria,” which distributed leaflets to hundreds of thousands of homes in the UK. The message was that, instead of visiting Syria — where they might become radicalized — young people should donate to refugee programs instead. The British government never disclosed that it was behind “Help for Syria.” They were running an op on their own citizens.
Watch:
This kind of thing doesn’t happen naturally. The government directs media organizations to do it.
The source told the Daily Mail that RICU was activated as the riots began in Belfast last week, after an African attempted to behead a white man in the middle of the road.
We don’t know precisely how they responded, but their techniques run the gamut from “using undercover operatives to lay flowers at the scene of terrorist attacks,” planting stories in the media about the wonders of immigrant communities, and dispatching propagandists to schools in order to promote the blessings of diversity.
And while I don’t personally have any evidence that this agency spoke directly to Nowak’s father, after reading this article in the Daily Mail, it seems much more likely than not:
A source said: “They are working with the Police Service of Northern Ireland’s C3 intelligence unit to identify those posting the online ‘calls to protest’ in Belfast and other areas, as well as giving strategic messages to the police to ensure that the protesters were portrayed as unsympathetic thugs, rather than activists, and effecting behavioural change.’ … The source said that the unit had also been advising the police in Southampton following the horrific murder of Henry Nowak by Vickrum Digwa – who falsely claimed he had been racially abused and had acted in self-defence – saying: ‘RICU made sure that the liaison team dealing with the family were well briefed.’ It has also been claimed that the unit intervenes to write statements by the families of victims of potentially racially linked incidents to stop them from inflaming tensions further with their remarks. The source said: ‘You can see their fingerprints all over the statements released by the families of victims in these volatile situations – they usually have a similar tone.'”
Every aspect of this report is important, but the key line is: “RICU made sure that the liaison team dealing with the family [of Henry Nowak] were well-briefed.” In other words, as the family was grieving, highly-trained propaganda agents from the British government descended on their home and began feeding them a very familiar script.
Did these agents mention to the parents of Henry Nowak that “knife crime” was the real enemy? Did they talk about the virtues of “inclusivity,” and how we should welcome even more foreigners with open arms?
These are questions that the British government must answer immediately. Instead of ignoring this reporting, which is what they’re doing, they need to provide a full accounting of RICU and everything it’s ever done. That should be the bare-minimum expectation here.
This covert effort to bury the truth and present fake narratives to the public as a way of covering up domestic terrorism is not unique to the UK.
Writing in the magazine “Human Events” as well as Infowars, the anonymous writer using the name “Raw Egg Nationalist” has extensively covered the equivalent program in the United States, which is run by an organization called the “Community Relations Service,” or CRS for short. (As you may have noticed, appropriately enough, all of these propaganda agencies have very dystopian names). Much of what I’m about to say comes from his reporting.
The CRS — like all bad ideas — came about during the 1960s as part of the Civil Rights Movement. In fact, the CRS was explicitly created by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. According to its mission statement, the job of the CRS was to serve as “the only Federal agency dedicated to assisting State and local units of government, private and public organizations, and community groups with preventing and resolving racial and ethnic tensions, incidents, and civil disorders, and in restoring racial stability and harmony.” The CRS and its several-dozen taxpayer-funded employees get to work whenever there’s a racial incident, quote, “providing facilitated dialogue, mediation, training, and consultation” to help communities “come together, develop solutions to the conflict, and enhance their capacity to independently prevent and resolve future conflict.”
After the Matthew Shepard hoax — he was killed in a drug deal by his gay lover, but Democrats insisted it was a hate crime — Congress expanded the authority of the CRS even further — giving them the authority to handle issues related to gender and sexuality, in addition to race. So if a trans-identifying mass shooter, say, massacres a bunch of children, CRS would have jurisdiction.
The federal government parachutes into small towns that have just been terrorized by “diversity,” approaches grieving families that can’t possibly think straight, and tells them what to say, supposedly for the good of the country.
Think of how insane this is. The government goes to extraordinary lengths, using your tax dollars, to coddle foreigners at every opportunity. The feds shower them with welfare, payments for fake daycares, discounted housing loans, everything. And then, when one of these foreigners decides to slaughter an American citizen, the government presses those citizens into service. While they’re grieving, the government puts them to work, making sure that no one gets the wrong ideas about “newcomers” or “migrants” or whatever they call them.
The CRS was deployed twice to Minneapolis after George Floyd’s overdose, per CBS News. What exactly did they do there? They certainly didn’t “tamp down on unrest.” They oversaw the worst race riots in decades. It seems quite possible that, instead of trying to pacify rioters, the CRS did everything it could to provoke them. It would be part of their established pattern of behavior to go to the Minneapolis Police Department and local media outlets and tell them not to blame George Floyd for his own death (even though he clearly overdosed). Is that what happened? It would explain a lot. Let’s continue reading. This is from CBS, once again:
At one point the [CRS] office employed 600 professional staff, including mediators and community outreach experts, in regional offices in Philadelphia, Dallas, Seattle, Detroit, Los Angeles, Atlanta and Boston … In a speech in July 2024, Justin Lock, a former director of the Community Relations Service, lauded the office’s accomplishments. Lock said the office had been “at the intersection of some of the most critical moments in our nation’s journey toward justice.” “In 2020, when Americans marched in solidarity with the people of Brunswick, Georgia; Louisville, Kentucky; and Minneapolis, Minnesota, following the deaths of Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor and George Floyd, CRS engaged with communities as an impartial, confidential facilitator, helping stakeholders identify and implement solutions that help communities to heal and move forward,” Locke said.
So they weren’t just present for the George Floyd riots. They also oversaw the Ahmaud Arbery riots and the Breonna Taylor riots. Presumably, they’ve been involved in every major riot in modern American history. There’s no evidence that they prevented any kind of racial tension or violence whatsoever. Instead, there’s a mountain of evidence that the CRS exists to lie to the public about what’s happening to their country — to create the conditions where foreigners and black criminals can run rampant, with total impunity.
The alleged conservative majority in Congress isn’t skeptical about any of this. Even though the Trump administration has effectively dissolved the agency, Congress has just appropriated $20 million to the CRS, saying that there’s a need for the “conflict resolution and violence prevention activities of the Community Relations Service.” So we have a very unusual situation here — an agency that’s been dissolved and has no employees, just received tens of millions of dollars in federal funding. Presumably, the idea is that — whenever a federal judge orders the Trump administration to reopen the CRS, or whenever a Democrat takes over the White House, the CRS will be ready to go.
It’s yet another area where the Republican-controlled Congress, which is supposed to advance the president’s agenda, has been undermining it. But for now, at least, the CRS is defunct. It is a cancer that, in one form or another, has been spreading across the Western world, and we can’t allow it to re-establish itself ever again. When your government is spending millions of dollars to run interference for foreigners who murder native-born citizens, and to write fraudulent scripts for white people to read (particularly grieving white people who have just lost a family member), your government is not legitimate. Until all of these programs are eradicated for good, the next time you see a grieving family — people whose lives have just been changed forever because of open borders — you have to wonder if you’re hearing their words, or the government’s.
It’s an explicitly anti-white psy-op that the worst people in the country are desperately trying to resurrect because they’re too cowardly to speak for themselves and defend their own disastrous policies.
They feel the need to speak through the relatives of slaughtered Americans. They see white people getting beaten to death with rocks in Maine, stabbed at track meets in Texas, and beheaded in the streets of Belfast, and all they see is a PR problem. That’s how CRS, RICU, and every other similar agency perceives all of these murders. It’s how they want you to see these murders, too — even if one of your relatives is killed.
They’re doing something almost unbelievably insidious, which is to turn the native population against itself — to use desperate, brutalized white people as spokesmen for their own replacement. Most people wouldn’t imagine their government would stoop to that level, but that’s exactly what’s going on.
Every single employee at these agencies, and anyone in the government who sympathizes with them, belongs in prison. That will be a lot of work, to be sure. It’ll require years of investigations. And we’ll never know when that work is completed. But we can be sure of one thing — The next time a “newcomer” slaughters a random white guy in the street, and you hear the same refrain about “knife crime” and “inclusivity” coming from his family, you’ll know that we have much more work to do.
.png)
.png)
