Anyone who hasn't been trapped in carbonite for the last ten years knows very well that the mainstream media is in the tank for Hillary Clinton. Just as Breitbart acts as a third arm of the Trump campaign, the old guard (NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, The New York Times, The Washington Post, etc) act as Pravda for Hillary Clinton.
Because of WikiLeaks, what was once widely-held speculation is now pen-to-paper fact. The media does everything it can to protect Hillary Clinton, and an email recently released by WikiLeaks, allegedly obtained from John Podesta's hacked account, simply confirms this:
From: Nick Merrill...
Subject: Elizabeth Warren/HRC Meeting
Hi All, The NYT (Jonathan Martin and Maggie Haberman) reached out this morning to tell us that they are aware of a meeting HRC had with Senator Warren at her house back in December. They plan to write imminently, so wanted everyone to be aware that this could pop soon.
New York Times journalists Jonathan Martin and Maggie Haberman actually went out of their way to tell Nick Merrill, Hillary Clinton's traveling press secretary, that they were gearing up to write a piece about an innocuous meeting between Hillary and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA). Merrill then emailed the rest of Clinton's team.
The most absurd aspect of this is that the article didn't contain a bombshell of any kind; there was no talk of an endorsement, there were no "back room deals" being made, but the alleged journalists at The New York Times are so infatuated with the Clintons, they apparently feel the need to forewarn the candidate about any possible issue, no matter how trivial--and it was truly trivial.
But they're not biased.