News

25 Years Later, The Ideology Of 9/11 Lives On

"The difference between the Brotherhood and Al Qaeda and ISIS is just in the tactics. The ideology is the same. The goals are the same.”

Gideon Askowitz
Listen
Listen
3 min
25 Years Later, The Ideology Of 9/11 Lives On
(Photo by Visual News/Getty Images)

The ideology that spawned America’s worst terror attack lives on through the Muslim Brotherhood, experts are warning.

Recently, the Trump administration has begun targeting the Muslim Brotherhood’s international financial network, and some Republican lawmakers are calling on the administration to prevent CAIR from receiving federal grants. The Muslim Brotherhood shares the same underlying principles of groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS, according to Lorenzo Vidino, director of the Program on Extremism at The George Washington University.

“The difference between the Brotherhood and Al Qaeda and ISIS is just in the tactics. The ideology is the same. The goals are the same,” Vidino recently said at the Manhattan Institute’s 9/11 program. He called the founders of al-Qaeda, including Osama bin Laden, “impatient brothers” who “were no longer satisfied with the gradualist approach of the Brotherhood, the century-long plan to Islamize society, infiltrate the system, and eventually gain power.”

 

While early panels at the Manhattan Institute’s 9/11 program focused on how ISIS continues to inspire lone wolf attacks throughout the West, the later half of the evening examined a subtler form of Islamism and the challenges it poses to America.

The Muslim Brotherhood was initially conceived in Egypt and its founders were adherents of Salafi Islam. Their founding goal was to globalize Islam and build a caliphate. Vidino also described the debates through which al-Qaeda and other groups broke off from the Brotherhood as “the endless debate within Islamist movements … between ballots over bullets.” The Muslim Brotherhood has at times engaged in both, such as with its founding of Hamas.

According to the panelists, the Muslim Brotherhood poses a unique security challenge for America. Since they often operate by funding charities, or nonprofits, or sponsoring academics that share their worldview to influence the next generation, not all of the officials can easily be designated as terrorists without substantially changing U.S. law.

Mariam Wahba, a Coptic Christian who fled from the Egyptian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, bemoaned how professors at Fordham had defended the Muslim Brotherhood when she attended the school. She believed the popularity of the “tentifada” protest movements on college campuses was a symptom of broader Muslim Brotherhood influence on American campuses.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is one such Islamic charity with links to the Muslim Brotherhood. Texas attorney general and Republican senate candidate Ken Paxton is suing CAIR-Texas over its operations in his state. The suit outlines extensive connections between CAIR and other violent Islamic groups, including its founding as a camouflage tool for the Islamist movement.

Vidino noted that in the Arab world the Muslim Brotherhood is widely proscribed as a terrorist organization, and that President Trump recently designated four branches of the Brotherhood as terrorist organizations. He lauded an “Al Capone approach” whereby officials scrutinize any individual known to be affiliated with the Brotherhood and find other crimes they committed and prosecute them to the fullest extent possible.

Create a free account to join the conversation!

Already have an account?

Log in

Got a tip worth investigating?

Your information could be the missing piece to an important story. Submit your tip today and make a difference.

Submit Tip