<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Paranormal investigator Dan Rivera, who’s been touring the United States with a supposedly haunted Raggedy Ann doll named Annabelle, died unexpectedly at a hotel, sparking a big reaction online.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rivera, 54, was found dead in his room on Sunday at the end of his three-day stop in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, as part of his “Devils on the Run Tour” with the doll. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Pennsylvania State Police shared a more detailed report on Wednesday.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Members from PSP Gettysburg responded to a hotel in Straban Township, Adams County for a report of a deceased [man],&#8221; the report </span><a href="https://x.com/psptroophpio/status/1945469138668773605?s=46&amp;t=mwcG9TleShkOgZ4z0YNszA"><span style="font-weight: 400;">said</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">. &#8220;The decedent was discovered in his hotel room by workers.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Nothing unusual or suspicious was observed at the scene,” it added. “This case is pending autopsy results.”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The New England Society for Psychic Research (NESPR) </span><a href="https://tonyspera.com/about/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">described</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> this particular doll as “demonically possessed.” It was given to a nursing student in 1968, and she claimed that something wasn’t right with it.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Almost immediately, the roommates noticed strange occurrences with the doll and they were introduced to a medium who told them the doll was inhabited by the spirit of a young girl named Annabelle,” the organization reported. “The two roommates tried to accept the doll’s spirit and please it only to have it reciprocate maliciousness and violent intent.”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The society’s late founders, Ed and Lorraine Warren, kept the doll stored in a glass case in an effort to “contain the evil spirited entity.”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The movie “The Conjuring” is based on the story of the “haunted” doll Annabelle. Meanwhile, many people are skeptical of the claims that the doll is possessed. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A statement from NESPR stated that the tour would continue. “We believe with all our hearts that Dan would have wanted the work to continue — bringing people together, sharing knowledge, and honoring the memory of Ed and Lorraine Warren,” it said. “We will carry his spirit in everything we do.”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Colleagues of Rivera also called out commenters who tried to claim that his death was in some way staged to drum up interest for the tour. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Ghost Hunters” star Jason Hawes shared his thoughts on Facebook, saying, &#8220;The world lost a good man. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">&#8220;Dan Rivera was an Army veteran, a father of four, a husband, and someone who truly cared about people,&#8221; he wrote. &#8220;What’s even harder to see right now are the posts blaming his death on things like the Annabelle doll and attacking places like <span class="html-span xdj266r x14z9mp xat24cr x1lziwak xexx8yu xyri2b x18d9i69 x1c1uobl x1hl2dhg x16tdsg8 x1vvkbs">Ghostly Images of Gettysburg Tours</span> and other locations for having events. That needs to stop.&#8221;<br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-weight: 400;">&#8220;His family shouldn’t have to read that kind of nonsense while they’re grieving,&#8221; Hawes <a href="https://www.facebook.com/highlandpara/posts/well-said-jason-hawestaps-it-really-is-horrible-to-see-folk-attempt-to-cash-in-o/1161918589307430/">added</a>. &#8220;Some people are using his passing to push an agenda for profit, and it’s just disgusting. Dan was a family man, a respected paranormal investigator, and he left this world way too soon&#8230;Honor the man. Forget the garbage.&#8221;</span></p>


Annabelle doll

Paranormal Investigator Dies While Touring With ‘Demonically Possessed’ Annabelle Doll

Paranormal Investigator Dies While Touring With 'Demonically Possessed' Annabelle Doll

Dolls

General

Pennsylvania

Toys

U.S.

United States

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Multinational toy company Mattel has issued an apology after it was discovered that the packaging for its “</span><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/movies"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Wicked</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">” themed </span><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/toys"><span style="font-weight: 400;">toys</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> directed customers to an explicit </span><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/pornography"><span style="font-weight: 400;">pornography</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> site.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The doll collection, including fashion dolls, singing figurines, and deluxe collectible models, was pulled from the shelves at Target as of Monday and is in the process of being removed from other major retailers, such as Walmart, Macy’s, Kohl’s, Best Buy, DSW, and Amazon, per </span><a href="https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/wicked-dolls-mattel-mistakenly-link-to-adult-porn-site-1236058013/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Hollywood Reporter</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The boxes were printed with the address of the website wicked.com, which features graphic adult content, instead of the correct address, which is wickedmovie.com. The outlet noted that the wicked.com domain name has been registered to the owner since 1994.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Mattel was made aware of a misprint on the packaging of the Mattel Wicked collection dolls, primarily sold in the U.S., which intended to direct consumers to the official WickedMovie.com landing page,” a statement from Mattel issued on Sunday said. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“We deeply regret this unfortunate error and are taking immediate action to remedy this. Parents are advised that the misprinted, incorrect website is not appropriate for children. Consumers who already have the product are advised to discard the product packaging or obscure the link and may contact Mattel Customer Service for further information.”</span></p>
<p><strong><a href="https://www.amiracist.com/?_gl=1*jtghwp*_gcl_au*ODQ1NjYzNTg2LjE3Mjg5MDk3OTE.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczMDEyMDgwOS40OS4xLjE3MzAxMjA4MzkuMzAuMC4w">MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+</a></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The “Wicked” movie is a musical based on the popular Broadway show that explores the events before Dorothy arrives in Oz. The film features a high-profile cast, with Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo playing the leading roles of Elphaba and Glinda. It’s scheduled to hit theaters on November 22.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Erivo made headlines last month after her strong reaction to a fan-edited version of the movie poster, which was altered to more closely resemble the well-known Broadway poster. The actress was furious to see that her eyes were covered by her hat in the edited version circulating online, as The Daily Wire previously </span><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/wicked-actress-flips-over-movie-poster-edited-by-fans-calls-it-most-offensive-thing"><span style="font-weight: 400;">reported</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“None of this is funny. None of it is cute. It degrades me. It degrades us,” Erivo said of the altered movie poster.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“The original poster is an Illustration,” she continued. “I am a real life human being, who chose to look right down the barrel of the camera to you, the viewer …because, without words we communicate with our eyes. Our poster is an homage not an imitation, to edit my face and hide my eyes is to erase me. And that is just deeply hurtful.”</span></p>


Wicked

Kids Doll Promoting Movie Inadvertently Directs Buyers To Porn Site

Business

Children

Movies

Pornography

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Rapper T.I. and his wife, R&amp;B singer Tameka “Tiny” Harris, won $71 million in a lawsuit they brought against the toy manufacturer MGA Entertainment. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The couple claimed that MGA violated their intellectual property rights for the musical group OMG Girlz with the creation of the massively popular L.O.L. Surprise! O.M.G. dolls. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The singing group OMG Girlz included Bahja Rodriguez, Breaunna Womack, and Tiny’s daughter Zonnique Pullins. They disbanded in 2015.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The total amount of money awarded includes $17.8 million in real damages, or profits the company made on the toys, and $53.6 million in punitive damages, per </span><a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/maryroeloffs/2024/09/24/rapper-ti-and-wife-tiny-win-71-million-in-lawsuit-against-maker-of-lol-surprise-dolls-the-case-explained/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Forbes</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Jurors found that more than a dozen L.O.L. Surprise! O.M.G. dolls “infringed on the trade dress and misappropriated the name, image, and likeness of the all-female band that T.I. and Tiny formed in 2009,” per a report from <a href="https://people.com/t-i-and-tiny-awarded-71-million-in-lawsuit-against-toy-maker-8717228">People.</a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">MGA argued that it didn’t copy off the “short-lived” band or cost them business opportunities. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This lawsuit represents the third time T.I. and Tiny sued over the appearance of the dolls, accusing the company of &#8220;cultural appropriation and outright theft.” The first court case ended in a mistrial, and the second jury ruled in favor of MGA before the verdict was overturned on appeal. It’s still possible for the toy manufacturer to appeal the current ruling.</span></p>
<p><b><a href="https://www.amiracist.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.amiracist.com/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1726313279401000&amp;usg=AOvVaw115_qPFFEePDP86-Fvo-Vd">Am I Racist? Is In Theaters NOW — Get Your Tickets Here!</a></b></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Tiny had been vocal over the years with her belief that the dolls looked very similar to the OMG Girlz, even down to the exact outfits they were wearing. She posted again on the topic last week, writing on Instagram, “Do these dolls look familiar?” </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The caption said.“1 of many but biggest custom outfit in questioned! @omggirlz vs #OMGDolls last wk of court! God willing the truth will prevail!!!” </span></p>
<blockquote class="instagram-media" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/C__jdRGutSZ/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14">
<div style="padding: 16px;">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div>
<div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div>
<div style="padding-top: 8px;">
<div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"></div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;">
<div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: 8px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"></div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);"></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: auto;">
<div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"></div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"></div>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/C__jdRGutSZ/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by Majorgirl (@majorgirl)</a></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><script async src="//www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Harris celebrated her big win in court on Instagram Live outside the courthouse on Monday. “We did this for the city. We did this for the culture,” she said. “It was a fight. It was a hell of a fight. We couldn’t be more happy.”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“We wanted to thank the jurors for just seeing us through this, and just believing in what we said. They heard our story and they knew we wasn’t lying. It’s amazing,” Harris continued. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">MGA, which stands for Micro-Games America Entertainment, is a manufacturer of children&#8217;s toys and entertainment products, which was founded in 1979. Popular products include Bratz, Num Noms, Lalaloopsy, and Rainbow High dolls, in addition to their popular L.O.L. Surprise! dolls. MGA also owns Little Tikes.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">MGA was founded by current CEO Isaac Larian. The company is worth of $12.13 billion, making it the world&#8217;s largest privately owned toy company.</span></p>


TI and Tiny

Musicians T.I. And Tiny Awarded $71M In Lawsuit Against Toy Company

Courts

Entertainment

Lawsuit

Rap Music

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">I have not kept track of this officially, but I’m guessing that, of all the states in the country, California has been featured in the Daily Cancellation the most. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This is perhaps, these days, the only good thing about California. Yes the entire state is a degenerate cesspool covered in sewage, but at least it provides plenty of content for the last segment of my show. And today the good news is they have done something so stupid that it graduates to the first segment. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">As the Daily Mail reports this week, in a little over a month from now a new law will go into effect in California. Is this a law to address the homeless problem? Is it a law meant to clean up the streets, tamp down on the rampant crime, and make communities safe and livable again? No, of course not. Why would California’s lawmakers care about any of that? No, this is a law that addresses a far more pressing concern: gender-neutral toy sections. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">We know leftists see the toy industry like they see everything: an ideological battleground, another politicized arena to defeat traditional concepts of gender and usher in a new ambiguous dystopia where kids can live as amorphous, genderless blobs of nondescript matter.</span></p>
<p><a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/california/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Daily Mail</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> has more:</span></p>
<blockquote><p><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">California retailers that refuse to have a gender-neutral section for children will be fined up to $500 under </span><a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/gavin-newsom/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Gavin Newsom&#8217;s</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> new bill. The ultra-woke governor signed legislation in 2021 that would require some retail stores in the Golden State to have a gender-neutral section for children. Retailers would have to do this &#8216;regardless of whether they have been traditionally marketed for either girls or for boys,&#8217; the bill said. The legislation, Assembly Bill No. 10584, will be enacted on January 1, 2024, and if retail department stores choose not to comply, they will have to dish out a civil penalty of $250 or $500. Department stores that are subject to the new laws will have to have a total of 500 or more employees, be physically located in California and sell &#8216;childcare items or toys’… Californian Democratic Congressman Evan Low backed the bill to the Associated Press  &#8216;We need to stop stigmatizing what&#8217;s acceptable for certain genders and just let kids be kids,&#8217; he said. &#8216;My hope is this bill encourages more businesses across California and the U.S. to avoid reinforcing harmful and outdated stereotypes,&#8217; Low said.</span></em></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">So, the law will end the segregated, Apartheid-like conditions in toy stores in the state, getting rid of gender labels and allowing toys to express their true, gender-fluid identities. This is all meant to reduce “harmful stereotypes.”</span></p>
<h3><strong><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1275-california-lawmakers-focus-on-what-matters-gender-neutral-toys" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show</a></strong></h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">You may be wondering, if you’re a sane person, how exactly does the average toy section in the average store “reinforce harmful stereotypes”? In fact, you may be wondering what a “harmful stereotype” even is, or how a stereotype can be harmful. Literally all gender stereotypes — and race stereotypes, and ethnic stereotypes — are grounded in truth. That’s how they became stereotypes. Which is why you have never in your life heard a stereotype about a group of people and said to yourself, “What? I’ve never seen anyone in that group act THAT way!” Stereotypes arise when we notice that certain groups of people tend to act certain ways, generally speaking. This isn’t harmful. It’s mostly neutral. It just is what it is. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Fortunately, California state Representative Evan Low goes into more detail about this issue, trying to explain how and why “gendered toys” are dangerous: </span></p>
<blockquote><p><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Part of it is to make sure if you’re a young girl that you can find a police car, fire truck, a periodic table or a dinosaur. And then similarly, if you’re a boy, if you’re more artistic and want to play with glitter, why not? Why should you feel the stigma of saying, ‘Oh, this should be shamed’ and going to a different location?</span></em></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">First of all, this is perhaps neither here nor there, but as a parent, I believe glitter should be shamed for both boys and girls. Glitter is a plague that has been banned from my house entirely. Glitter manufacturers should be raided by the FBI, forcibly shut down, and all of their employees thrown in federal prison. Even just one ounce of glitter will produce a mess in your house that can never be cleaned up. A glitter spill is like Chernobyl — you’ll still be dealing with the after-effects three decades later. The stuff is cursed, and should be banned. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Anyway, aside from that, it appears Evan Low is laboring under the impression that, without this law in place, girls were somehow physically prohibited from entering the aisles where fire trucks and dinosaurs are sold. Or maybe he thought these items were hidden down some deep labyrinthine corridor where only those with Y chromosomes were allowed to enter. But this was not the case. Without the gender-neutral toy law, girls were easily able to find fire trucks and police cars if they wanted them. And there was nobody stopping them, or standing there pointing and laughing at them and saying, “Why are you buying that? You’re a girl!” That literally has never happened in the history of toy purchases. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This bill is, at the very best, totally unnecessary. Which ironically is something the author of the bill basically admitted back when the legislation was first passed. Watch:</span></p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="California bill would make toy sections gender-neutral" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/EwILHdGps2Y?start=18&#038;feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Stores are already doing this, which is why we need a law requiring that they do it!” That appears to be the argument. Because it has to go one way or another. Either this is a law that will impose on retailers the burdensome and utterly pointless task of rearranging their stores to make the toy sections less organized and more difficult to navigate for customers, or it’s a law mandating something that has already happened. Either the law is cumbersome and pointless, or redundant and pointless. Or, I suppose, cumbersome and redundant and pointless. I think it’s likely in that third category. But there is no scenario where the law is necessary or good.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">That’s because, among other reasons, the binary is one of the fundamental, defining, immutable realities of human existence. With it comes the obvious physical differences between the sexes. But also, as we’ve alluded to, the differences in tendencies and interests. That’s why we’ve come to associate baby dolls with girls and toy trucks with boys. They don’t gravitate to their respective toys because we have made this association. We have made the association because they gravitate that way. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Girls are natural nurturers and caretakers, boys are naturally builders and fighters. That’s why girls like the baby dolls and boys like the trucks and the action figures. If left to their own devices, almost all girls and boys will go in those separate directions. The Left doesn’t want to free boys to play with dolls or girls to play with trucks. They are already free to do that if they want to. Instead they want to engineer boys with feminine interests and girls with masculine interests. They are not actually trying to break outside of the binary at all. They’re trying instead to confuse the picture within it. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">That’s because you can’t break outside of it. Which is why it’s always funny to make note of the fact that the Left inevitably ends up accidentally reinforcing the gender binary in their efforts to deconstruct it. After all, if you walk into a section of the store and see fire trucks and baby dolls next to each other, and you say, “Oh this must be a gender-neutral section,” you are affirming the gender binary just by saying that. And laws requiring such arrangements are also affirming it. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This is the terrible fact the Left can’t get around, no matter how hard it tries. The terrible fact — which is not terrible at all, in my view — is the gender binary. There are two sexes, and those two sexes have distinct features and functions, and they have certain tendencies and proclivities, and there is literally nothing you can do to escape that fact.</span></p>
<h3><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/videos/lady-ballers" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: &#8220;Lady Ballers&#8221; on DailyWire+</a></h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This is what happens when you try to make non-binary toy sections, or non-binary people for that matter. A person who identifies as non-binary will usually end up dressing in some weird, clashing combination of male and female clothing. This person — let’s say a woman, for example — will be very careful to incorporate feminine and masculine elements in the way that she dresses and comports herself. Or at least that’s what she’ll try to do. Usually she’ll still end up looking like a woman — just a woman with a goofy sense of style. But even if she succeeds in appearing like some kind of mismatched, jumbled Mrs Potato Head Doll — with male and female elements mixed together — still she has not escaped the binary. Because still she only has male and female elements to work with. There is no third or fourth category. You can be a woman who looks like a woman, or a woman who looks a little bit like a man, or a woman who looks like some sort of avant-garde combination, but no matter what you are still stuck in the binary. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In fact the more you try to escape the binary, the more you make yourself into a reminder of it. </span></p>


George Clooney, California Governor Gavin Newsom and Senator Laphonza Butler celebrate the second year of The Roybal Film and Television Production School

Menu

Toys

Paranormal Investigator Dies While Touring With ‘Demonically Possessed’ Annabelle Doll

Kids Doll Promoting Movie Inadvertently Directs Buyers To Porn Site

Musicians T.I. And Tiny Awarded $71M In Lawsuit Against Toy Company

California Lawmakers Focus On What Matters: Gender Neutral Toys