It can be difficult to keep track of all the news — especially when every day seems to bring new horrors beyond all human comprehension — but it was just two months ago that one of the largest psy-ops in modern American political history was exposed. 
In a federal indictment, the Trump administration presented evidence showing that the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), a prominent and very powerful left-wing activist group, was secretly giving millions of dollars to people who were closely associated with — and working on behalf of — &#8220;white supremacists&#8221; and &#8220;Nazis.&#8221; 
In public, the SPLC claimed that white supremacy was the greatest threat facing the country, and they raised a lot of money from leftists in order to defeat racism. They also pressured federal agencies and social media platforms — successfully, in many cases — to harass and censor anyone they deemed racist.
But in private, as alleged in this indictment, the SPLC was funneling huge amounts of money to people associated with the Ku Klux Klan, Aryan Nations, and National Socialist Party of America. 
In other words, because the demand for white supremacy greatly exceeds the supply in this country, the SPLC helped create some more supply.
By far, SPLC&#8217;s most successful psy-op was the so-called &#8220;Unite the Right&#8221; rally in Charlottesville, which took place in August 2017. This event immediately became a part of left-wing mythology. It was their ace-in-the-hole against Donald Trump — proof positive that he was a white supremacist. The rally was supposedly the reason Joe Biden ran for president. Kamala Harris repeatedly mentioned it. 
<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/the-matt-walsh-show-1799"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-995295 size-full" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/11/Walsh-Banner.avif" alt="" width="1024" height="171" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/11/Walsh-Banner.avif 1024w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/11/Walsh-Banner-300x50.jpg 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/11/Walsh-Banner-768x128.jpg 768w" sizes=" (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a>
Every claim that the Left made about this event was a lie. First, they claimed that everyone in attendance was a white supremacist. But that wasn&#8217;t remotely true. Most of the attendees were protesting the removal of a Robert E. Lee statue, which was a righteous cause. 
Robert E. Lee is a great man of history and an American icon. And as Trump pointed out, the Left was never going to stop with his statue. They were on a mission to destroy the statues of all American heroes, which is exactly what they did. 
Then the Left claimed that Donald Trump called neo-Nazis &#8220;very fine people,&#8221; when he explicitly said the opposite. Additionally, the Left pushed the narrative that a white supremacist had deliberately run over a crowd of protesters — even though evidence showed that his vehicle was surrounded by a mob and attacked. He pressed the accelerator to escape the violence. 
The driver of the vehicle had entered his home address on his GPS. He was distraught to learn that people had died. Responding officers believed the incident was an accident — none of which mattered to the media, which never reported any of this.
But the SPLC&#8217;s role in the rally, according to the DOJ&#8217;s indictment, wasn&#8217;t understood until recently. As it happens, one of the organizers of the &#8220;Unite the Right&#8221; rally was on the SPLC&#8217;s payroll. This informant helped plan the &#8220;Unite the Right&#8221; rally and &#8220;attended the event at the direction of the SPLC.&#8221; He also &#8220;made racist postings under the supervision of the SPLC and helped coordinate transportation to the event for several attendees.” 
From 2015 to 2023, the SPLC paid this individual more than a quarter-million dollars. Yes, the worst Neo-Nazi rally in memory — really, the only Neo nazi rally in memory — the one that dominated the news cycle for weeks, and became a permanent part of American political discourse — was organized by someone on the Left&#8217;s payroll. 
For the SPLC, and the Democrat Party more generally, the return on investment was immediate and enormous. The SPLC&#8217;s revenue ballooned from $51 million to $133 million, thanks to massive donations from Apple, JPMorgan Chase, and other major corporations. Spotify and Facebook, along with other social media platforms, began crackdowns on so-called &#8220;hate speech.&#8221; 
Of course, Donald Trump was forever branded as the new Hitler — someone who had publicly endorsed violent tiki-torch mobs, even though he did no such thing. Only now — many years later — are federal prosecutors alleging that the SPLC was involved in the operation. 
In the process, according to the DOJ, the SPLC defrauded its donors. The donors were told their money was going to &#8220;fight white supremacy,&#8221; but in reality, their money was going toward Nazi fundraising and false flag operations.
All this to say, it would be difficult to imagine that the year could get any worse for the SPLC. 
The SPLC&#8217;s entire racket requires that people can pretend to take them seriously, as some kind of impartial arbiter of the truth, when they decree that someone is &#8220;racist&#8221; and &#8220;dangerous.&#8221; 
For example, when then-President Joe Biden&#8217;s FBI began investigating &#8220;radical traditional Catholics,&#8221; the FBI cited the SPLC. The FBI knew that the SPLC was lying, but that didn&#8217;t matter. All that mattered was that, in the FBI&#8217;s estimation, the SPLC was &#8220;trustworthy enough&#8221; to cite in a memo, as a pretext to crack down on Catholics. 
Along the same lines, if you ended up on the SPLC&#8217;s &#8220;hate list,&#8221; then many corporations and advertisers would avoid you. You&#8217;d get blackballed. And that&#8217;s not even getting into the fact that, once you were tagged by the SPLC, an army of angry left-wing nutcases would also descend on you. 
I was on their list, along with Turning Point USA. So was the Family Research Council — which was shot up by a gunman who was inspired by the SPLC&#8217;s hate list. He explicitly told the police that the SPLC&#8217;s hate list inspired his attack.
Just a few years later, the SPLC is no longer &#8220;trustworthy enough&#8221; for any serious person to even pretend to take seriously. Their cover has been blown. If the FBI (or a major corporation) wants to harass you on the basis of some false accusation of racism, the SPLC isn&#8217;t helpful anymore. So really, they have no reason to exist.
But as if that&#8217;s not bad enough, somehow, the case against the SPLC has become even more devastating and utterly humiliating. The DOJ filed what&#8217;s called a &#8220;superseding indictment&#8221; in the case, which is basically an indictment that revises the original. 
In this new indictment, the DOJ alleges that a high-level SPLC official — the director of their &#8220;intelligence project&#8221; — was sleeping with an informant in a white supremacist group called the &#8220;National Alliance.&#8221; The group was founded by William Luther Pierce, who wrote &#8220;The Turner Diaries,&#8221; which inspired the Oklahoma City bombings. 
On top of that, according to the indictment, the SPLC was funneling more than a million dollars to this particular &#8220;white supremacist,&#8221; while their &#8220;intelligence director&#8221; was sleeping with him.
Here&#8217;s an apparent picture of the intelligence director:
<div id="attachment_1119055" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1119055" class="wp-image-1119055" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/06/GettyImages-904354508-300x219.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="365" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/06/GettyImages-904354508-300x219.jpg 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/06/GettyImages-904354508-790x576.jpg 790w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/06/GettyImages-904354508-768x560.jpg 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/06/GettyImages-904354508.jpg 1024w" sizes=" (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" />Photo by Amanda Edwards/Getty Images</div>
The New York Post <a href="https://nypost.com/2026/06/16/us-news/splc-employee-who-paid-neo-nazi-lover-1-2-million-unmasked/">reports</a> that the SPLC official in question is &#8220;believed to be Heidi Beirich, a 58-year-old fascism expert who was the director of intelligence at [the SPLC] between 2012 and 2019.&#8221; 
Think about how on-the-nose this is. The SPLC was going around saying &#8220;f*ck fascists,&#8221; and what do you know? They were f*cking fascists. And funding them too. 
Someone needs to turn this story into a romantic comedy screenplay immediately. And if they won&#8217;t, I&#8217;ll do it myself. I&#8217;ve already started pre-production in my mind, and the only snag I can identify — although admittedly it&#8217;s a big one — is that Philip Seymour Hoffman isn&#8217;t alive to play the woman.
<div id="attachment_1119007" style="width: 486px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1119007" class="wp-image-1119007 size-large" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/06/GettyImages-56318159-476x576.jpg" alt="" width="476" height="576" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/06/GettyImages-56318159-476x576.jpg 476w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/06/GettyImages-56318159-248x300.jpg 248w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/06/GettyImages-56318159-768x928.jpg 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/06/GettyImages-56318159.jpg 847w" sizes=" (max-width: 476px) 100vw, 476px" />Photo by Kevin Winter/Getty Images</div>
Take a look and tell me the resemblance isn&#8217;t uncanny. I&#8217;m generally opposed to the use of holograms in movies, but in this case, it may be worth it. And it&#8217;s not just because she looks exactly like Philip Seymour Hoffman. The more you read the DOJ&#8217;s allegations, which include a Watergate-style break-in, the more you&#8217;ll agree with me that he&#8217;s the perfect casting choice here. Even if he&#8217;s dead.
From the <a href="https://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/USAvSouthernPovertyLawCenterIncDocketNo226cr00139MDAlaApr212026Co/10?doc_id=XB0H5P6F3M86N8OADFM88PGUJP">new indictment</a>: 
<blockquote>At the direction of the SPLC, [the informant] infiltrated the neo-Nazi organization, the National Alliance. While receiving donors&#8217; money [from the SPLC], the informant was also fundraising for the National Alliance. The money the informant raised helped the National Alliance carry out its extremist activities. </blockquote>
So, in other words, the SPLC was paying a guy to raise money for a Nazi group. They&#8217;re so opposed to Nazis that they install secret operatives inside Nazi organizations in order to help the Nazis raise money. Oh, and they sleep with the Nazis too. 
So you&#8217;re probably asking yourself: What exactly makes this guy an &#8220;informant&#8221;? Aren&#8217;t they just paying a Nazi to be a Nazi? As it turns out, indeed, this informant did perform some undercover work — which appears to be very illegal:
<blockquote>In 2014, the informant broke into the headquarters of an extremist organization and stole approximately 25 boxes of documents. The informant transported these documents across state lines from West Virginia to North Carolina. The informant broke into the headquarters again and returned the originals [after copies were made]. The SPLC official used the copies, knowing they were stolen, as the basis for a story published on &#8216;Hatewatch.'&#8221; The SPLC used this story to solicit more donations. The SPLC official paid approximately $6,000 in donors&#8217; money to a separate individual to falsely take responsibility for the burglary.</blockquote>
So the woman allegedly used donor money to pay someone else to take the fall for her boyfriend. The Hatewatch article that the SPLC wrote, allegedly based on stolen documents, is called &#8220;Chaos at the Compound.&#8221; It&#8217;s still online. According to <a href="https://www.splcenter.org/resources/hatewatch/chaos-compound/">the article</a>:
<blockquote>Randolph Dilloway, 49, an accountant with almost a decade of experience, was secretly hired by Alliance Chairman Will Williams in December to conduct a forensic audit of the organization’s bank statements, member dues documents and federal income tax filings. &#8230; Terrified of his former employer, Dilloway contacted the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) on May 6. Active in the neo-Nazi, white supremacist scene for more than a decade, Dilloway moved to the NA headquarters compound last winter and was given full, unsupervised access to offices holding dozens of boxes of poorly-filed financial documents and data disks associated with the group’s various business entities going back to 1985. &#8230; Among the thousands of pages of documents, database files, transaction records and digital media provided by Dilloway to the SPLC, the disturbing email exchanges he had with Kalamaros and Williams outlining possible financial improprieties earlier this year seem to suggest the Alliance attorney was advising them to ignore evidence of tax fraud and embezzlement to avoid being audited by the IRS.</blockquote>
So you can see what&#8217;s going on here. The SPLC is doing what it usually does — it&#8217;s providing a pretext for federal agencies to shut down groups they don&#8217;t approve of. The FBI presumably couldn&#8217;t get a warrant to look into the financial records of this particular white supremacist group. So the SPLC steps up to the plate. They break into the offices, steal the documents, and then publicize them. And then, once that happens, the FBI (and the IRS) have probable cause to get their search warrant and to launch their investigations.
The SPLC is just one propaganda outfit among many on the Left, all of which have the exact same goal. When one falls, the others pick up the slack. When their narrative is exposed as fraudulent, they just keep pushing it, as if nothing happened. And the media will go along with it, every single time, from the national networks to the local news stations. 
We are up against people who are so fixated on the elimination of their political enemies that they&#8217;ve lost all sense of self-awareness and shame, if they had any to begin with. 
And while they think that&#8217;s a strength — and historically, it has been a strength — the truth is, it&#8217;s now become a massive liability. 
Once you start ignoring Nazi tattoos on your Senate candidates, once your &#8220;anti-hate group&#8221; is having sex with Nazis, and once your mayor is pretending to weep about a gay Asian communist lighting a cross on fire — the shark has officially been jumped. 
People can&#8217;t possibly have patience for this kind of overt, shameless lying anymore. 
And with just a few months until some very important elections in this country, in a rare bit of good news for conservatives, that&#8217;s a very good place for us to be.

2016 Winter TCA Tour – Day 3

The SPLC Hits An All New Low With Cringe Sex Scandal

Donald Trump

Philip Seymour Hoffman

Radical Left

Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC)

White Supremacy

Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX) forced a witness for the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) into an uncomfortable corner during a Tuesday hearing, pressing him on Maine&#8217;s Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner and the Nazi-inspired tattoo about which he&#8217;d claimed ignorance.
Gill pressed Bryan Fair, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the SPLC, on Platner&#8217;s tattoo and whether the organization would condemn it.
WATCH:
<div style="max-width: 728px; margin: 0 auto;">
<iframe style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; max-width: 100%; width: 100%; margin: 20px auto 5px; border: 0;" src="https://player.mux.com/1cMAC4G5fGBzIzFdSY01KDCKtH2V2v00k2?metadata-video-content-type=embed_video&amp;metadata-video-id=994406c8-43c2-4c2f-8cf0-fe68bce5771f&amp;metadata-video-stream-type=on-demand&amp;metadata-video-title=2026-06-09%20Rep.%20Gill%20on%20Platner%20Nazi%20Tattoo&amp;poster=https%3A%2F%2Fdailywireplus-v2.imgix.net%2Fimages%2Fembedded-videos%2F4dd3c339-7a49-4ce1-bd09-e6838f9490fc.png&amp;autoplay=false&amp;accent-color=%23DB3D3B&amp;primary-color=%23ffffff&amp;secondary-color=%23000000" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
Credit: x: @RepBrandonGill
</div>
&#8220;Do you have an opinion on this tattoo?&#8221; Gill began, holding up a photo of Platner&#8217;s chest with the Totenkopf clearly visible.
&#8220;I&#8217;m not an expert on tattoos, no I don&#8217;t,&#8221; Fair replied.
Gill offered some &#8220;background&#8221; information on the displayed image, saying, &#8220;This is a tattoo on Maine Democrat Senate candidate Graham Platner&#8217;s chest — that&#8217;s the Nazi SS death head tattoo. Do you have any opinions on that?&#8221;
&#8220;If it&#8217;s what you say, if it&#8217;s a Nazi symbol, we oppose Nazis,&#8221; Fair replied.
&#8220;I agree, we do oppose Nazis,&#8221; Gill said. &#8220;Do you think that if somebody got a Nazi tattoo on their chest that&#8217;s indicative that they might be a Nazi?&#8221;
Fair attempted to evade the question, suggesting that Gill should ask Platner why he&#8217;d gotten the tattoo. Platner has claimed that he did not know the tattoo had Nazi connections until recently, but several people who have been close to him have said that he was well aware of the connections and referred to the ink as &#8220;my Totenkopf.&#8221;
&#8220;You don’t think that that&#8217;s indicative that perhaps he holds Nazi sentiment?&#8221; Gill tried a different tack.
Fair acknowledged, &#8220;It may well be.&#8221;
&#8220;Do people that aren’t Nazis normally get Nazi tattoos on their chest?&#8221; Gill asked one more question.
&#8220;I assume they don’t,&#8221; was Fair&#8217;s reply.
&#8220;Do you think that somebody that has a Nazi tattoo on their chest should service in the United States Senate?&#8221;
&#8220;I wouldn’t vote for that person,&#8221; Fair conceded.
Gill pressed again: &#8220;Do you think that this should disqualify him from serving politically in the Senate?&#8221;
&#8220;I’m not sure where the lines of questions are going,&#8221; Fair protested, repeating that the SPLC as an organization would not support Nazis.
Platner is likely to become Maine&#8217;s official Democrat nominee for Senate after Tuesday&#8217;s primary — especially since Governor Janet Mills (D-ME) suspended her campaign more than five weeks earlier due to a lack of funding — despite a series of damning reports detailing his troubling behavior in <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/ex-platner-staffer-calls-bs-on-dems-excuse-for-nazi-tattoo-troubling-behavior">past relationships</a> and social media posts attacking a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/didnt-deserve-to-live-leftist-candidate-appears-to-mock-wounded-soldier-in-resurfaced-post">Purple Heart</a> recipient, among other things.

Former US Special Counsel Jack Smith Testifies Before House Judiciary Committee

Brandon Gill Corners SPLC Witness Over Platner’s Nazi Tattoo

Brandon Gill

graham platner

nazi tattoo

Politics

The head of the Southern Poverty Law Center played a masterclass in evasion on Capitol Hill Tuesday, refusing to answer basic yes-or-no questions from House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) about explosive allegations that the Left-wing nonprofit used donor cash to secretly bankroll extremist activities across America.
Bryan Fair, the SPLC&#8217;s interim president and CEO, hid behind his lawyers at nearly every turn — repeatedly deflecting to &#8220;counsel in the Middle District of Alabama&#8221; — as Jordan methodically walked through the superseding federal indictment against the organization.
According to the indictment, the SPLC used donor money to pay confidential &#8220;field sources&#8221; to infiltrate extremist groups — but the scheme allegedly went far beyond mere surveillance. Jordan pressed Fair on charges that the group&#8217;s operatives actually hosted extremist rallies, grew existing chapters of hate groups, recruited new members into those organizations, and even purchased materials for cross burnings. Fair&#8217;s response to nearly every charge was a variation of &#8220;our counsel will respond to all the allegations.&#8221;
&#8220;It seems to me if the answer is no, you could just say no,&#8221; a visibly frustrated Jordan told Fair, who acknowledged only that &#8220;we&#8217;ve alleged that those allegations are false.&#8221;
<div style="max-width: 728px; margin: 0 auto;">  <iframe style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; max-width: 100%; width: 100%; margin: 20px auto 5px; border: 0;" src="https://player.mux.com/tWfxdeKPFQddJO5ufbvG1NgmEznFdMgg?metadata-video-content-type=embed_video&amp;metadata-video-id=220455eb-787e-405e-8abf-b1549bc55f42&amp;metadata-video-stream-type=on-demand&amp;metadata-video-title=The%20SPLC%20CEO%20had%20plenty%20to%20say%20%E2%80%94%20until%20Jim%20Jordan%20asked%20one%20&amp;poster=https%3A%2F%2Fdailywireplus-v2.imgix.net%2Fimages%2Fembedded-videos%2Fad575244-7c56-4eb5-a221-672f28296e47.jpg&amp;autoplay=false&amp;accent-color=%23DB3D3B&amp;primary-color=%23ffffff&amp;secondary-color=%23000000" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></div>
&nbsp;
The indictment also names a web of alleged shell companies — Fox Photography, North West Technologies, Tech Writers Group, Rare Books Warehouse, Imagery Ink, J&amp;J Electronics, Center Investigative Agency, and Kelly&#8217;s Marine — which Jordan suggested were used to launder payments to field sources and keep the paper trail obscured. Fair claimed knowledge of the companies came only through attorney-client privileged conversations, and refused to say whether they were fronts.
The reported total price tag for the alleged program? A staggering $4 million funneled to field sources, according to the indictment.
Then came the gut-punch moment. Jordan asked whether the SPLC&#8217;s fundraising spiked after the deadly 2017 Charlottesville rally — where, the indictment alleges, one of its own paid field sources helped coordinate transportation for participants. Fair acknowledged donations surged, but credited President Donald Trump&#8217;s 2016 election rather than Charlottesville. Jordan pointed out the group&#8217;s haul jumped from $51 million to $133 million in a single year.
Fair finally offered one voluntary admission: the SPLC ran the program &#8220;to protect our staff and to protect the public.&#8221; The group has since announced it is shutting down the field source program.
Jordan&#8217;s parting shot — asking Fair if he knew the president of the National Socialist Party — was met with the now-familiar refrain: &#8220;That&#8217;s an allegation in the indictment that will be responded to by counsel.&#8221;

MixCollage-09-Jun-2026-12-32-PM-4231

The SPLC CEO Had Plenty To Say — Until Jim Jordan Asked One Specific Question

Jim Jordan

Alveda King — niece of civil rights icon Martin Luther King Jr. — scorched the Southern Poverty Law Center before the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, demanding answers over explosive allegations that the nonprofit watchdog secretly bankrolled the very extremists it claimed to fight.
&#8220;I am troubled by the conduct and messaging of organizations that claim to fight hatred while profiteering from division,&#8221; King told lawmakers.
At the heart of her testimony is a federal superseding indictment alleging that individuals tied to organizations the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) itself had labeled as hate groups — including white supremacist, neo-Nazi, and Ku Klux Klan outfits — <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/splc-bankrolled-klan-robes-and-cross-burning-events-feds-say">received</a> hundreds of thousands, and in some cases more than a million dollars in payments connected to the Montgomery, Alabama-based organization.
&#8220;Americans who faithfully donate their hard-earned money — many of them senior citizens like me — deserve transparency and accountability about how those funds are being used,&#8221; King said.
<div style="max-width: 728px; margin: 0 auto;">  <iframe style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; max-width: 100%; width: 100%; margin: 20px auto 5px; border: 0;" src="https://player.mux.com/Q2AI3KbMWnk9p7ozADNTnBLa5dbSJzqG?metadata-video-content-type=embed_video&amp;metadata-video-id=b54a4fe3-24d2-46fb-963d-1859491e2d34&amp;metadata-video-stream-type=on-demand&amp;metadata-video-title=MLK%20Jr.'s%20niece%20just%20tore%20into%20the%20SPLC's%20playbook&amp;poster=https%3A%2F%2Fdailywireplus-v2.imgix.net%2Fimages%2Fembedded-videos%2Fdd1fb11a-aacc-435b-b585-9646d1d48e62.jpg&amp;autoplay=false&amp;accent-color=%23DB3D3B&amp;primary-color=%23ffffff&amp;secondary-color=%23000000" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></div>
&nbsp;
The rebuke carried unmistakable moral weight coming from King, 75, whose family lineage is a living testament to America&#8217;s racial history. Her grandmother&#8217;s roots trace to the west coast of Africa. Her grandfather&#8217;s family came from Ireland. Her mother carried Cherokee heritage. Her uncle gave his life for civil rights. She knows something about hatred — and about fighting it honestly.
&#8220;America is not a collection of competing tribes,&#8221; she declared. &#8220;America is one people under God.&#8221;
The SPLC has long been a lightning rod for controversy far beyond Tuesday&#8217;s hearing. In 2019, co-founder Morris Dees was ousted amid <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-reckoning-of-morris-dees-and-the-southern-poverty-law-center">allegations</a> of sexual harassment and racial discrimination within the organization itself — an extraordinary scandal for a group that built its brand on fighting bigotry. Dozens of staffers signed a letter warning that the workplace culture contradicted its public mission.
Former employees and investigative reporters have accused the SPLC of operating what Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) has <a href="https://x.com/FoxNews/status/2064355296416334091">called</a> a &#8220;scam&#8221; — using inflammatory &#8220;hate group&#8221; designations to drive fundraising rather than to combat genuine extremism.
Critics also charge the SPLC has weaponized its hate-group list against mainstream conservative and religious organizations, lumping them alongside actual neo-Nazis to suppress political opposition under cover of civil rights work.
King didn&#8217;t mince words on that score either. &#8220;I reject racism. I reject hatred. I reject white supremacy,&#8221; she said — before pivoting: &#8220;But I also reject the notion that Americans who hold traditional Christian beliefs should be treated as threats or terrorists simply because we disagree with a prevailing political thought.&#8221;
King, a Fox News contributor, former Georgia state legislator, and founder of Alveda King Ministries, closed with a riff on her uncle&#8217;s most famous speech.
&#8220;Today I still have a dream,&#8221; she said. &#8220;I dream that one day we will move beyond black power and white power and embrace God&#8217;s power and human dignity.&#8221;
<div>
&#8220;We must speak out for truth and against the forces that would manufacture hate, fear, division, and violence simply to line their pockets and further their political ambitions,&#8221; she concluded.
</div>
Her uncle would have recognized the cadence. The target, he might not have anticipated.

Key Speakers At America First Agenda Summit

MLK’s Niece Blasts SPLC Before Congress: Manufacturing Hate ‘To Line Their Pockets’

Martin Luther King Jr.

The Justice Department claimed Tuesday that the Southern Poverty Law Center paid Ku Klux Klan members to remain active in the Klan and reimbursed expenses relating to cross-burnings, Klan robes, and recruitment.
The allegations came in a superseding indictment filed in federal court in Alabama that expands on an <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/lefty-anti-hate-group-paid-white-supremacist-to-plan-infamous-charlottesville-rally-indictment">April case</a> accusing the SPLC of wire fraud, bank fraud, and a conspiracy to commit money laundering. 
According to prosecutors, the SPLC paid more than $4.1 million to confidential informants embedded within white nationalist and extremist organizations between 2010 and 2023 while concealing the payments from donors through a network of shell entities and fraudulent bank accounts.
Two Ku Klux Klan members approached the SPLC in 2010 seeking to leave the organization because they feared for their safety, the indictment said. Rather than helping them exit, prosecutors say the SPLC paid the pair $1,200 per month plus expenses to remain active in the Klan and provide information.
<iframe loading="lazy" class="scribd_iframe_embed" tabindex="0" title="SPLC Superseding Indictment June 2 2026" src="https://www.scribd.com/embeds/1046582874/content?start_page=1&amp;view_mode=scroll&amp;access_key=key-VtGlzrTWIss852LJzjQh" width="100%" height="600" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" data-auto-height="true" data-aspect-ratio="0.7735849056603774"></iframe>
<a style="color: #098642; text-decoration: underline;" title="View SPLC Superseding Indictment June 2 2026 on Scribd" href="https://www.scribd.com/document/1046582874/SPLC-Superseding-Indictment-June-2-2026#from_embed"> SPLC Superseding Indictment June 2 2026 </a> by <a style="color: #098642; text-decoration: underline;" title="View Caleb Taylor's profile on Scribd" href="https://www.scribd.com/user/628922993/Caleb-Taylor#from_embed"> Caleb Taylor </a>
According to the indictment, the men used donor-funded reimbursements for activities that included recruiting new Klan members, producing white robes and hoods, publishing extremist literature, establishing new chapters, and organizing rallies. 
The indictment further alleges the SPLC reimbursed expenses incurred for &#8220;cross-burning events, to include the wood and fuel used.&#8221;
Federal prosecutors say the payments were routed through a shell company called &#8220;Rare Books Warehouse&#8221; and other fictitious entities designed to conceal the true source of the money. 
&#8220;The SPLC&#8217;s paid informants engaged in the active promotion of racist groups at the same time that the SPLC was denouncing the same groups on its website,&#8221; prosecutors said.
The SPLC has pleaded not guilty to all charges and denies wrongdoing. Attorney Abbe Lowell, representing the organization, <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/southern-poverty-law-center-superseding-indictment/">said</a> Tuesday that the new filing &#8220;changes nothing&#8221; and argued the group&#8217;s informant program helped prevent violence and save lives. 
The expanded indictment claims the SPLC maintained a covert network of paid sources inside extremist organizations dating back decades. Those sources allegedly included a Ku Klux Klan Imperial Wizard, a leader connected to the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, and members of other white nationalist groups.
According to prosecutors, one source linked to Unite the Right received approximately $270,000 from the SPLC between 2015 and 2023. Prosecutors allege another source received roughly $1.2 million, including payments connected to the theft of documents from the neo-Nazi National Alliance that were later used in SPLC reporting.
The Justice Department argues that the case is not about the practice of using informants itself but rather the alleged deception involved in obtaining donor money and concealing how those funds were distributed.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche previously accused the organization of funding the very extremism it claimed to combat. &#8220;To that end, they were doing the exact opposite of what they told their donors they were doing — not dismantling extremism but funding it,&#8221; Blanche said when the original indictment was announced.
The superseding indictment also highlights the organization&#8217;s financial growth during the period in question. Prosecutors noted that SPLC revenue increased from approximately $38.7 million in 2010 to more than $129 million in 2023, while net assets grew from roughly $238 million to nearly $787 million.
The case remains pending in federal court in the Middle District of Alabama.

&lt;&gt; on July 11, 2009 in Pulaski, Tennessee.

SPLC Bankrolled Klan Robes And ‘Cross-Burning’ Events, Feds Say

Ku Klux Klan (KKK)

“This is not 1960 anymore. It’s 2026.”
Rep. Wesley Hunt delivered that blunt message during a fiery hearing Wednesday as Republicans unloaded on Democrats and the controversial Southern Poverty Law Center over years of “Jim Crow 2.0” rhetoric surrounding voter ID laws and election integrity measures.
And Hunt was clearly done being polite about it.
The Texas Republican tore into Democrats for repeatedly comparing modern voting laws to segregation-era America, arguing that today’s political rhetoric has completely lost touch with what actual Jim Crow looked like.
Sitting beside giant side-by-side images showing segregation-era scenes next to modern Americans simply showing ID at voting booths, Hunt described what actual racial discrimination looked like in America.
“Jim Crow was a time when black Americans could not sit in classrooms with white Americans,” Hunt said. “It was colored-only water fountains. It was beatings in the streets. It was lynchings.”
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Wesley Hunt levels Democrats with one brutal Jim Crow reminder" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ORPiJA15S2M?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Then the hearing got personal.
Hunt recalled how his own father had to enter restaurants through the back door in New Orleans just to buy a sandwich because black Americans were barred from using the front entrance.
“That is precisely why it is so offensive to compare that era of legalized discrimination and racial terror to showing a photo ID at the voting booth,” Hunt said.
The hearing itself centered around growing backlash involving the SPLC after outrage erupted over a recent Department of Justice indictment over accusations that donor funds were funneled toward organizations linked to racist or extremist activity.
Republicans argued the controversy raises serious questions about whether the SPLC has spent years profiting off fear and political division while presenting itself as an authority on extremism.
Hunt did not hold back.
“The Democrat Party survives on manufacturing grievance,” he said. “They want emotional manipulation. They want outrage. They want division.”
The congressman also pointed to something Democrats rarely know how to respond to: black Republicans consistently winning in majority-white districts.
Hunt noted that he, along with fellow Republican lawmakers Byron Donalds (R-FL), John James (R-MI), and Burgess Owens (R-UT), all represent overwhelmingly white constituencies.
“Nobody cares about what we look like,” Hunt said. “We are being judged not by the color of our skin but by the content of our character.”
For conservatives frustrated by years of “Jim Crow 2.0” rhetoric surrounding voter ID laws, the hearing quickly became another reminder of how dramatically the conversation around race and voting has shifted since Democrats first sounded alarms over Georgia’s election law years ago.
Back then, critics predicted widespread voter suppression and comparisons to segregation-era America dominated headlines for months.
Instead, Georgia later posted record turnout numbers — including strong minority participation.
Now Republicans like Hunt are increasingly arguing that comparing modern voter ID laws to actual segregation is not just inaccurate, but deeply insulting to Americans who truly lived through Jim Crow.

House GOP Capitol Hill Club Jan 22

Wesley Hunt Levels Democrats With One Brutal Jim Crow Reminder

Democrats

Voter ID

Wesley Hunt

While it is an honor to testify before Congress, it can also be frustrating. <a href="https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/05/20/jasmine-crocketts-unhinged-tirade-against-me/">House members</a> will ask you yes-or-no questions, without allowing you to elaborate. They want to prove their own points, and sometimes they prevent you from making yours.
I testified before the House Judiciary Committee about <a href="https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/05/19/poverty-palace-how-is-splc-wealthier-than-ymca-planned-parenthood/">the Southern Poverty Law Center</a> (SPLC) on Wednesday, and Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA) asked me if I was familiar with the name Michael Donald.
I knew the exact point he was going to make — that when a Ku Klux Klan group horrifically lynched Michael Donald in 1981, the SPLC represented Donald’s bereaved mother, Beulah Mae, and sued that Klan group into bankruptcy.
It’s one of the SPLC’s favorite stories, and it is indeed noble — the first half, anyway.
But that’s not the whole story, and when I tried to tell the full story, Hank Johnson cut me off.
That’s his prerogative — he got five minutes to question me, and it is not my place as a witness to interrupt him.
The story matters because the SPLC built its massive fundraising engine off the clout it earned by rightly suing chapters of America’s most notorious hate group into bankruptcy. Today, the SPLC has weaponized its reputation. It publishes a “hate map” that plots mainstream conservative and Christian nonprofits alongside Klan chapters — a map the SPLC says reveals the “infrastructure upholding white supremacy.”
This “hate map” kills two birds with one stone: it demonizes conservatives who oppose the SPLC’s agenda, and it also exaggerates the amount of hate in America, which helps the <a href="https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/04/26/splc-hate-inflation-strategy/">SPLC fundraise</a> off supposedly combating this “hate.”
A <a href="https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/o-neil-testimony_0.pdf">federal grand jury indicted the SPLC</a> on fraud charges based on the claim that the SPLC was actually propping up Klan groups by directing money to members. The SPLC did not deny the payments, but said it was paying “informants” to prevent violent threats before they happen. The indictment suggests, however, that these “informants” weren’t just tipping off the SPLC but acting on the SPLC’s direction in ways that strengthened the groups.
Hank Johnson wanted to bring up the Michael Donald case to highlight the SPLC’s noble history and to suggest the indictment puts the Trump administration on the side of “hate.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
THE REST OF THE STORY
I&#8217;m glad Hank Johnson brought up Michael Donald. A Klan group l*nched Donald in 1981, and the SPLC rightly represented his bereaved mother in court. But that&#8217;s not the whole story&#8230;
The story&#8217;s second half shows SPLC corruption.<a href="https://t.co/bpMUAIRrFi">https://t.co/bpMUAIRrFi</a> <a href="https://t.co/A3v8vl8nRD">pic.twitter.com/A3v8vl8nRD</a>
— Tyler O&#8217;Neil (@Tyler2ONeil) <a href="https://twitter.com/Tyler2ONeil/status/2057464199828131887?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 21, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
As I wrote in my first book, “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Making-Hate-Pay-Corruption-Southern/dp/1642934399">Making Hate Pay</a>: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center” (first published in 2020 and updated this month), the Michael Donald case highlights some of the very corruption that would ultimately lead the SPLC to become a far-left smear factory.
Contrary to popular belief, the SPLC wasn’t founded during the civil rights movement, but afterward. Also, contrary to popular belief, Morris Dees and Joseph Levin didn’t found the SPLC to go after the Klan or white supremacy — they founded it as a public-interest law firm to represent poor people in the South.
In fact, when Dees redirected the SPLC’s efforts to focus almost entirely on opposing the Klan, the legal team quit en masse in 1985. SPLC lawyers said suing the Klan into bankruptcy wasn’t the SPLC’s original mission, that it was too easy — they compared it to “shooting fish in a barrel” — and that Dees prioritized this because he focused on fundraising more than helping the less fortunate.
In 1987, a jury held the United Klans of America liable for Michael Donald’s death and ordered the group to pay $7 million in restitution to Beulah Mae Donald, in a clear victory for justice.
Yet this wasn’t the 1920s Klan or the 1950s Klan. By the 1980s, anti-black racism had significantly declined, and the United Klans of America had little in the way of assets. The group owned a building and sold it for a little over $50,000.
Beulah Mae Donald received that money, but what did she do with it? She gave $37,500 to the SPLC, which had given her a loan for her home. Meanwhile, the SPLC went to its donors and raked in millions.
Beulah Mae Donald tried to make a documentary about her story, but Morris Dees edged her out.
Don’t get me wrong: representing Beulah Mae Donald was one of the high-water marks of the SPLC’s storied career. But Dees’s focus on fundraising and his desire for the spotlight taints even this noblest of SPLC stories.
I tried to sum up this story in a few words while responding to the honorable representative from Georgia, but Hank Johnson cut me off.
The real truth about Beulah Mae Donald is just too inconvenient for his narrative — just like the full truth about the SPLC’s corrupt demonization of conservatives is inconvenient for <a href="https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/04/23/democrats-beclown-themselves-defending-splc-amid-kkk-funding-scandal/">Democrats beclowning themselves</a> by trying to defend it.
***
Tyler O’Neil is senior editor at The Daily Signal and the author of two books: “<a href="https://amzn.to/3Kmvi0u">Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center</a>” and “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Woketopus-Money-Manipulating-Federal-Government/dp/B0DFVK74TZ/">The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government</a>.”

SPLC hate map

The SPLC Is Absolutely Corrupt. The Democrat Response Is: Shut Up

DW Opinion

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has spent years being treated by mainstream media as the go-to expert on hate groups and extremism. Now it is facing an 11-count federal indictment for wire fraud, lying to a bank, and money laundering.
As Wall Street Journal columnist James Taranto recently put it, the SPLC does not act like a neutral watchdog. It behaves more like a competitor to real journalism, with every incentive to hype threats because “hate pays.”
The real test is whether the institutions that have propped it up will finally take these charges seriously. So far, the response has been disappointing. The indictment claims the SPLC secretly funneled millions of dollars to leaders of the very white-supremacist groups it claims to track, including more than $270,000 to an organizer of the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville. That rally gained instant notoriety, and it became prime fodder for left-leaning media that endlessly replayed former President Joe Biden’s misleading claim about Trump saying there were “very fine people on both sides.”
Three of the Big Four news apps — Google, Yahoo, and MSN — completely ignored the April 21 indictment. Apple News featured just two stories on the scandal, both from left-leaning outlets. As for the other three apps, the story did not crack their top 20 headlines in the days after it broke. Wikipedia went even further than ignoring it. Editors buried the indictment deep in the SPLC’s page, 65 paragraphs down under a mild “criticism” heading. Efforts to move it higher, including into the lead section, were quickly shot down. One editor said it had “no place so far up.” Key details, like the payments to the Unite the Right organizer, were stripped out as “UNDUE.”
They also removed references to the indictment from the Unite the Right rally page itself, despite the obvious connection, and blocked it from the list of groups the SPLC labels as hate groups. This protective editing stands in sharp contrast to how quickly Wikipedia highlights indictments against Republicans and conservatives.
It is not just dishonest coverage. Wikipedia still treats the SPLC as a “generally reliable” source, letting editors cite it over 7,000 times. Meanwhile, right-leaning outlets like Breitbart, Fox News, the New York Post, and The Daily Wire are heavily restricted or blacklisted. After the indictment, editors shut down debates about the SPLC’s special status and even topic-banned a dissenting editor.
The bias runs deep. The SPLC’s “extremist” files and hate lists still get prominent placement on pages about conservatives like Charlie Kirk, Matt Walsh, Jack Posobiec, Moms for Liberty, and the Alliance Defending Freedom. At the same time, the SPLC is accused of quietly paying an Imperial Wizard of the United Klans of America and a leader of the National Socialist Party of America while publicly condemning them.
Wikipedia matters because it dominates Google search results and AI summaries. Google has given millions to the Wikimedia Foundation, and tech giants like Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft partner with it. When these platforms downplay damaging news about a favored group while keeping its power to label enemies intact, tens of millions of people get a distorted picture every day.
This fits a broader pattern tracked by the Media Research Center’s Free Speech America project. Our monitoring of the Big Four news apps shows consistent favoritism toward liberal sources. Paired with Wikipedia’s practices, it shows how big tech amplifies left-leaning gatekeepers and sidelines stories that do not fit the narrative. In short, major news aggregators and Wikipedia have buried the SPLC indictment. They have protected one of the Left’s most powerful smear machines from real accountability while it keeps attacking conservatives online.
When the information gatekeepers suppress a major federal corruption case against an organization that shapes so much of our public debate, they erode trust across the board. Millions of Americans end up seeing a cleaned-up version of reality that serves the SPLC’s defenders, not the truth.
***
David Bozell is president of the Media Research Center.

Wikipedia

How The SPLC Gets Big Time Protection From Big Tech — And Why It Matters

Big Tech

Media Bias

The third <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cew7wez72vxo">assassination attempt</a> on the president’s life, this time by left-wing extremist Cole Allen, has once again exposed the blind spot among academics and journalists when it comes to left-wing violence.
I’ve experienced this in academia. When Portuguese professor Pedro Zuquete was trying to publish his <a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-30897-0">Handbook of Left-Wing Extremism</a>, to which I am a contributor, he repeatedly hit brick walls. One reviewer for a publisher grudgingly admitted that the volume filled a gap and that there were no handbooks on left-wing extremism in existence, but focused mainly on ideology: “Chapter 15 … equates BLM and Antifa as a ‘destructive’ force of extremism, but shows no indication that a balanced investigation of the context and causes of these movements will be provided.”
Needless to say, there is no such equivocation or calls for “context” and understanding when it comes to interrogating right-wing extremism. Jeffrey Bale and Tamir Bar-On <a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/fighting-the-last-war-9781978792296/">convincingly argue </a>that a moral panic around fascism has been consistently manufactured since 1945 by Western intellectuals. Lazy and nebulous definitions of terms such as “fascism,” “racism,” and “far-right” go unchallenged by their peers, reinforcing a continuous “fascist scare.”
While a staple of left-wing discourse is that words lead to violence – think ‘hate speech’ or <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17539153.2024.2305742#abstract">‘stochastic terrorism’</a> — and that this justifies censorship and cancel culture, such reasoning falls away when it comes to expressing hatred toward conservatives. In fact, left-wing assassins like Luigi Mangione, or those who condone political violence such as <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/22/opinion/shoplifting-political-protest-microlooting-whole-foods.html">Hasan Piker</a>, are viewed by many progressive elites as chic radicals.
The media practices a blatant double standard in its treatment of Left and Right violence, exhibiting the classic features of what psychologist Keith Stanovich terms <a href="https://direct.mit.edu/books/monograph/5183/The-Bias-That-Divides-UsThe-Science-and-Politics">myside bias</a>. The pattern has accelerated in the past decade. For instance, a big data <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/4/167">study </a>of content from major American and British newspapers by David Rozado and me revealed that superlative adjectives like “extreme,” “far,” and “radical” were used far more often to describe the Right than the Left, with this lopsided rhetoric taking off in the mid-2010s.
Mainstream institutions and outlets continue to have a log in their eye when it comes to leftist extremism. After the latest attempt on President Donald Trump’s life, the Economist ran a <a href="https://x.com/TheEconomist/status/1967966886320050373">story</a> arguing that most political violence comes from the political right. Batya Ungar-Sargon <a href="https://www.batya-us.com/p/debunking-the-data-that-claims-to">tore</a> the analysis apart, showing that the source material used by the Economist comes from progressive organizations whose coding decisions memory-hole leftist violence while manufacturing right-wing incidents. This cooks the results to serve up the right conclusion. For instance, the source data failed to record two previous assassination attempts on Trump or the murder of Charlie Kirk. It omitted the dozens killed and over $2 billion in property damage due to George Floyd rioting, but somehow saw fit to record 10 drug-related crimes committed by the Aryan Nations. Pro-Palestinian violence is not coded as leftist but as ethnonationalist.
Hating conservatives does not appear to fall under the definition of “hate” recorded by self-styled “anti-hate” expert groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) or their fellow-travelers in Britain (Hope Not Hate) and Canada (Canadian Anti-Hate Network, or CAHN). These well-funded activist groups have repeatedly laundered partisan radicalism as dispassionate analysis.
The SPLC, currently <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/federal-grand-jury-charges-southern-poverty-law-center-wire-fraud-false-statements-and">under investigation</a> by the Department of Justice, was successfully <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/06/maajid-nawaz-v-splc/562646/">sued </a>for $3.4 million by British Muslim writer Maajid Nawaz, whom the SPLC smeared as an “anti-Muslim extremist.” The SPLC learned nothing, continuing to routinely label mainstream conservatives like Chris Rufo, Dinesh D’Souza, or the late David Horowitz as extremists. This is a stock-in-trade of these organizations. In Britain, Hope Not Hate <a href="https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/08/05/nick-lowles-hope-not-hate-apologise-tweet-acid-attack/">claimed </a>that a Muslim woman was the victim of a far-right “acid attack” during the 2024 Southport riots, with over 100,000 retweets, which it was later forced to retract. In the febrile atmosphere of the riots, this could have stoked Muslim attacks against whites. In Canada, CAHN, which regularly smears conservatives, <a href="https://nationalpost.com/opinion/jonathan-kay-if-there-really-are-300-neo-nazi-groups-in-canada-why-cant-anyone-name-them">failed to name</a> the 300 phantom far-right “hate groups” they claimed existed in Canada. Meanwhile, the organization has been <a href="https://nationalpost.com/opinion/jon-kays-legal-victory-exposes-canadian-anti-hate-networks-anti-conservative-agenda">exposed </a>as having Antifa ties.
These organizations ignore anti-conservative leftist extremism while stretching the definition of “hate” to include mainstream conservatives. Yet due to progressive bias and elite credulity, they can hide behind the “expert” label and are regularly cited as a credible source by journalists, courts, and governments.
Despite this, there is growing evidence that the left is becoming more violent. YouGov <a href="https://yougov.com/en-us/articles/52960-charlie-kirk-americans-political-violence-poll">found </a>that 25% of “very liberal” Americans say violence can be justified to achieve political goals compared to 3% of “very conservative” Americans. After the first Trump assassination attempt, I <a href="https://manhattan.institute/article/third-of-democrats-wish-donald-trump-had-been-killed">discovered </a>using a <a href="https://dimewiki.worldbank.org/List_Experiments">list experiment</a> survey that one-in-three Democrats wished he had been killed. Young leftists are especially prone to such thinking. Increasingly, young educated progressives do not believe that <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00031224211041094">morality is absolute</a>, but rather relative. They are <a href="https://noahcarl.medium.com/who-doesnt-want-to-hear-the-other-side-s-view-9a7cdf3ad702">much more likely </a>to cut ties to friends and family who do not share their political views. In a recent survey, <a href="https://research.skeptic.com/violence-is-often-necessary-to-create-social-change-agreement-by-generation-and-political-orientation/#:~:text=Follow%2520us:-,%25E2%2580%259CViolence%2520is%2520often%2520necessary%2520to%2520create%2520social%2520change.%25E2%2580%259D%2520%255B,the%2520use%2520of%2520political%2520violence.">nearly half</a> of Gen-Z liberals agreed with the statement, “Violence is often necessary to create political change.”
While men and gun owners are more likely to be violent and on the Right, this is counterbalanced by the fact that leftist young men support political violence at greater rates than conservative young men. The <a href="https://rankings.fire.org/">Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE)&#8217;s </a>massive annual college student surveys show that ‘very liberal’ and ‘democratic socialist’ male students are significantly more likely to agree that violence is an acceptable form of protest than conservative or moderate male students. Minority and LGBT students are also significantly more likely to endorse political violence.
Though our institutions are blind to it, a new intolerant strain of the Left is on the rise, and with it support for vandalism, looting, and violent groups like <a href="https://www.littlebrown.co.uk/titles/andy-ngo/unmasked/9781546059585/">Antifa </a>or Black Lives Matter.
***
Eric Kaufmann is a professor of politics at the University of Buckingham.

Web Summit Qatar 2026 – Day Three

The Left Is Swimming In Radical Chic Violence, Blind To Their Extremism

Academia

Hate-Group

The Southern Poverty Law Center labeled Moms For Liberty a hate group just days before its national conference, causing protests to descend on the event and inundate attendees with threats of violence.
Over 600 parents, conservative leaders, and five presidential candidates — including Donald Trump — gathered for four days at the Philadelphia Downtown Marriott Hotel for the <a href="https://portal.momsforliberty.org/summit23/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Moms for Liberty</a> National Summit 2023. Just three weeks before, the SPLC added the grassroots parents&#8217; group to its list of extremist groups. Tina Descovich, co-founder and CEO of Moms For Liberty, told The Daily Wire that the pushback was almost immediate — and frightening.
“Their label sent thousands of protesters to our event, protestors smashed in windows of the venue the night before, and spray-painted over historical displays,&#8221; Descovich said. &#8220;They surrounded the venue for days. Philly PD had to call in the riot force and extra equipment. The following months and weeks were filled with continued threats and harassment.&#8221;
“Adding us right before our 2023 National Summit, where we hosted five presidential candidates, was not an accident; it was calculated and coordinated,” Descovich added.
The SPLC has come under renewed scrutiny after the Justice Department last week released a sweeping indictment of the controversial leftist group. The SPLC is alleged to have funneled millions to hate groups like the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/trump-hints-at-major-2020-move-if-splc-found-guilty-of-fraud?row=0&amp;elementPosition=0&amp;rowType=Web+Search+Overlay" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Ku Klux Klan</a> from 2014 to 2023. The group claims it was paying informants, but critics say the SPLC was simply propping up its own targets — most notoriously by allegedly helping fund the infamous 2017 &#8220;Unite The Right&#8221; rally in Charlottesville, Virginia.
&#8220;Once the SPLC labeled us, it gave people in my community and even extended family justification for really vile behavior towards me. I tried to protect my kids from the hate I received, but it wasn’t long before even they knew I was a target for people’s hate,&#8221; Kit Hart, Moms For Liberty membership engagement coordinator, told The Daily Wire. &#8220;It’s something no innocent mom should be subjected to.&#8221;
&#8220;A group of us had dinner reservations offsite and the moment we exited the building, we were berated and screamed at,&#8221; Hart recalls. &#8220;The protestors had been waiting all day for members of our organization to leave the doors of the hotel to shove signs in our faces, curse at us and show every sign of aggression you can think of. As we were walking to our Uber, we needed to be escorted by security.&#8221;
An LGBTQ+ group called The Agenda PAC obtained the hotel room numbers of Moms For Liberty members, and while they slept, left door hangers on their hotel rooms that said &#8220;Please Disturb: Fascism In Progress. Did you know a designated hate group is staying at this hotel?&#8221;
Pennsylvania State Representative Malcolm Kenyatta, who is currently a Vice Chair of the Democratic National Committee, <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2022-election/new-political-group-forms-campaign-anti-lgbtq-candidates-rcna45710" target="_blank" rel="noopener">chaired</a> The Agenda PAC.
A heavy police presence was stationed outside the hotel for the duration of the conference to keep attendees safe. Protesters, carrying pride flags and signs with hateful messages such as &#8220;Ban The Fascists,&#8221; &#8220;F*ck Nazi&#8217;s,&#8221; and &#8220;<a href="https://whyy.org/articles/philadelphia-moms-for-liberty-summit-protest-photos/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Klanned Kookie Karens</a>,&#8221; camped outside the hotel for the duration of the conference and harassed women as they entered or exited. One group of moms was <a href="https://x.com/scarlett4kids/status/2048178067299017024?s=46&amp;t=ZAoIkqhiKpZyQayFV_2XbQ" target="_blank" rel="noopener">swarmed</a> by a group of protesters when they tried to leave the hotel in an Uber. Several protesters were <a href="https://whyy.org/articles/philadelphia-moms-for-liberty-summit-people-arrested-during-protests/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">arrested.</a>
Despite the tensions and security concerns, the planned programming was uninterrupted, and President Trump commented on the SPLC label during his speech.
&#8220;The radical Left is even slandering Moms for Liberty as a so-called hate group,&#8221; President Trump stated during<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_D7iYcQACU" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> his speech</a>. &#8220;Can you imagine Moms for Liberty, a hate group? I&#8217;m telling you, these people are sick.&#8221;
The conference gained attention from national media outlets, which<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/29/us/politics/moms-for-liberty-republicans.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> consistently</a> associated Moms For Liberty with the <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/06/30/moms-for-liberty-convention-philadelphia-protests/70363926007/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">SPLC</a> hate group label. A group of Democratic Pennsylvania state senators used the SPLC label to fuel their <a href="https://epgn.com/2023/05/11/philadelphia-marriott-facing-criticism-for-hosting-right-wing-summit/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ongoing campaign</a> to get the 2023 summit canceled. The politicians sent a <a href="https://x.com/SenatorSaval/status/1672011058834206721/photo/1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">letter</a> to the Museum of the American Revolution, where a welcome event for the summit was held, asking that it cut ties with Moms For Liberty.
“Moms for Liberty, put plainly, is a hate group. This is not hyperbole — on June 6, 2023, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) designated Moms for Liberty a hate group, and specifically, as an ‘anti-government extremist group,'&#8221; the letter reads. “The Museum’s leadership has demonstrated a lack of judgment in agreeing to host a hate group. Fortunately, the mistake can be fixed with a simple and elegant solution: cancel the Moms for Liberty event scheduled for June 29.”
This reporter was present at the June 2023 summit and can easily recall the throngs of protesters and increased security. To avoid harassment from the mob of protesters outside of the hotel, attendees exited the Marriott hotel from a discreet side entrance and were covertly bused to the museum, where we were greeted by a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XuDs2bbVJE" target="_blank" rel="noopener">raucous crowd</a> screaming from behind a metal barricade, &#8220;Get the f*ck out of here&#8221; and &#8220;Philly is a trans city.&#8221; Police officers acted as a human shield and formed a path that allowed us a safe entrance to the museum.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
The door hangers on each hotel room door in Philadelphia tonight where the Moms for Liberty hate convention is taking place are incredible. <a href="https://t.co/KKREKXCLas">pic.twitter.com/KKREKXCLas</a>
— Adam Parkhomenko (@AdamParkhomenko) <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamParkhomenko/status/1674642405985861633?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 30, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The impact of the SPLC’s extremist label extended far past the summer of 2023 and continues to weigh on parents today. The SPLC has an interactive &#8220;<a href="https://www.splcenter.org/hate-map/?hm_year=2024">hate map</a>,&#8221; and Moms for Liberty chapters make up the single <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/splcs-favorite-conservative-targets-get-the-last-laugh">largest</a> bloc of any organization on it, putting a target on the back of each local group.
“Every day since the SPLC added Moms for Liberty to its hate map, our organization has had a dangerous target on our back. Members have been doxed, cancelled, and threatened,” Descovich told The Daily Wire. &#8220;The fabricated lies told by the SPLC have caused extensive harm to our organization and our members.&#8221;
For the past three years, Moms For Liberty Wisconsin leader Scarlett Johnson has also been harassed, defamed, and feared for her own safety after being labeled a far-right extremist by the SPLC.
“I lived this. I was harassed, doxxed, and even sued. And almost every article, every interview, every news segment about me included the same line — that I’m part of Moms for Liberty, a group the SPLC labeled as extremist,” Johnson told The Daily Wire. “That label followed me everywhere. It changed how people looked at me, spoke to me, and treated me.&#8221;
&#8220;It was the slow, grinding loss of normalcy that no one ever gives back,&#8221; she added.
Johnson said the SPLC label didn’t just draw the ire of leftists, but made some local Republicans hesitant to be affiliated with her and the group. Rachel Carroll Rivas, deputy director for research, reporting, and analysis at the SPLC, admitted that was the group&#8217;s goal in a June 2023 interview with <a href="https://www.npr.org/2023/06/07/1180486760/splc-moms-for-liberty-extremist-group" target="_blank" rel="noopener">NPR</a>.
“Carroll Rivas said she hopes that adding Moms for Liberty and similar groups to its extremist list will help inform communities, reporters and politicians who are just learning about them,&#8221; NPR reported. &#8220;And, perhaps, that it might tarnish association with those organizations.&#8221;
Johnson told The Daily Wire she is thankful SPLC is being investigated, but the reputational damage they’ve caused can&#8217;t be undone.
“Not everyone understands what the SPLC is or how those labels get used — but politicians and media repeated it without question,” Johnson told The Daily Wire. “And when you repeat something like that over and over, it doesn’t just shape a narrative. It hardens into something people act on.”
The SPLC did not respond to The Daily Wire&#8217;s request for comment.

Republican Presidential Candidates Speak At The Moms For Liberty Summit

The SPLC Burn Book That Damaged The Lives Of Everyday Parents

Parental Rights in Education

Philadelphia

This article is part of <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/introducing-upstream-a-lifestyle-and-culture-section-of-the-daily-wire" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Upstream,</a> The Daily Wire’s new home for culture and lifestyle. Real human insight and human stories — from our featured writers to you.
***
As we celebrate America’s 250th anniversary, it seems our nation is falling apart. Assassinations have claimed the lives of <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/unthinkable-charlie-kirk-31-assassinated">Charlie Kirk</a>, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/lawmakers-spouses-gunned-down-in-targeted-shootings">Melissa and Mark Hortman</a>, and UnitedHealthcare CEO <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/the-murder-of-brian-thompson-how-individual-acts-of-evil-get-justified">Brian Thompson</a>. President Donald Trump has now survived three assassination attempts in the past two years, including the incident at the White House Correspondents&#8217; Dinner this past weekend. While political violence has long been part of our country’s history, this recent wave reflects a deeper deterioration of America’s core values. But the origins of this cultural and spiritual rot are not a mystery.
Since the early 2010s, America’s polarization has been furthered by individuals and interest groups profiting from emotional outrage. Groups such as the Southern Poverty Law Center, which was recently exposed for fraudulently siphoning money to the white supremacists it was publicly fighting, have engaged in malicious smear campaigns designed to make us suspicious of one another. This political stratification, deepened by online echo chambers, has spawned a new generation of violent radicals.
One of these radicals, 31-year-old Cole Tomas Allen, checked into the Washington Hilton Hotel on Friday with the alleged intention of carrying out a mass assassination at the White House Correspondents&#8217; Dinner the next day. The event has been held for over 100 years to celebrate America’s press freedom.
The sound of shots fired outside the banquet hall brought the celebration to an abrupt end. Journalists and attendees hid below tables as administration officials were quickly swept away. Erika Kirk, widow of the late Charlie Kirk, was seen leaving in tears. The shooter was quickly subdued by security officials and taken into custody.
As news broke, Americans around the country were likely struck with deja vu. This shooter is one among many who have attempted to silence political opponents with bullets in the past few years.
Cole Tomas Allen does not fit the American imagination of a mass shooter. He was not a bullied, anti-social teen or a crazed maniac, as far as we know. He blended into society as a well-educated teacher and video game developer who participated in No Kings protests and donated to Kamala Harris. His manifesto offered more insight into his motivations for carrying out the attack. 
“I apologize to everyone who was abused and/or murdered before this, to all those who suffered before I was able to attempt this, to all who may still suffer after, regardless of my success or failure,” he <a href="https://katu.com/news/local/read-the-full-manifesto-by-shooter-at-white-house-correspondence-dinner">wrote</a> to family members. “I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.” Allen evidently feared being morally complicit in Donald Trump’s presidency and viewed everyone in attendance at the dinner as fair targets for being in his proximity.
The grandiose sense of self and catastrophic views expressed in his manifesto are eerily similar to the rhetoric repeated daily across social media platforms and news stations. For years, Americans across the political spectrum have been spoon-fed paranoid and hyperbolic narratives about their political opponents. On the Left, this was particularly aided by groups such as the Southern Poverty Law Center.
The SPLC gained prominence in the 2010s for its <a href="https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/">&#8220;Extremist Files,&#8221;</a> which frequently equated conservative groups such as PragerU and figures such as Daily Wire host Matt Walsh with neo-Nazi and far-right organizations. Soon its practice of labeling moderate political and religious opinions as hateful, racist, and bigoted trickled into the language of mainstream media, college classrooms, and our homes. This language is often used to justify violence against conservatives.
According to the federal <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.almd.90265/gov.uscourts.almd.90265.1.0.pdf">indictment</a> released last week, the SPLC took things further than mischaracterizations. The group paid $3 million to leaders and organizers in the KKK, the American Nazi Party, and others between the years 2014 and 2023 without the consent of donors. The group now faces 11 counts of wire fraud, false statements, and conspiracy to commit money laundering.
When the Southern Poverty Law Center was unmasked last week as the Scooby-Doo villain hiding under the KKK hood, it called into question how much of our political reality has been falsely constructed or magnified for financial gain. The SPLC <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/22/us/southern-poverty-law-center-doj.html">claimed</a> the money was used to save lives through information gathering and infiltration, but Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/federal-grand-jury-charges-southern-poverty-law-center-wire-fraud-false-statements-and">said</a>, “The SPLC is manufacturing racism to justify its existence.”
As political rhetoric and violence continue to heat up, we must ask ourselves: Where does this end?
If we continue to fan the flames of political hysteria, America will not see another 250 years. This great experiment in peaceful democracy and diversity of thought could disappear because we’ve lost the understanding that our civic responsibilities secure our rights. When shots ring out, people harden their hearts as if they are at war. Journalists and politicians will likely continue to turn up the heat, but we must do something different. We must extend an olive branch of understanding to one another and love our neighbors. If we don’t, we risk losing it all.
***
Maggie Anders is a video journalist and commentator at Young Voices. Her work explores international political movements, history, pop culture, economics, the cost-of-living crisis, and Gen Z social issues.

GettyImages-1304923265

The Moment That Shattered The Night Started Long Before The First Shot

Political Violence

Upstream

White House Correspondents’ Dinner

Conservatives have long been ahead of the curve on corporate-culture agendas. Conservative investors were <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/the-year-the-dei-tide-turned?author=Isaac+Willour&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=15&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=The+Year+The+DEI+Tide+Turned">raising skepticism</a> about Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion initiatives years before executive orders signaled the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/americas-defense-sector-is-ditching-dei-at-the-best-possible-moment?author=Isaac+Willour&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=0&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=America%25E2%2580%2599s+Defense+Sector+Is+Ditching+DEI+At+The+Best+Possible+Moment">end</a> of the post-George Floyd racialism push. At Bowyer Research, we’ve been <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/corporations-that-pushed-gender-ideology-owe-america-an-explanation?author=Isaac+Willour&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=10&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=Corporations+That+Pushed+Gender+Ideology+Owe+America+An+Explanation">engaging</a> with companies about the increasingly real risk surrounding gender-affirming care for years — it’s only been recently that the culture at large has seemed to be <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/corporate-america-quietly-backs-away-from-gender-ideology-for-children?author=Isaac+Willour&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=1&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=Corporate+America+Quietly+Backs+Away+From+Gender+Ideology+For+Children">catching on</a>. But sometimes, the events of the real world are so monumental that there’s very little delay between investor scrutiny and brand movement. Case in point: the very rapid fall of the Southern Poverty Law Center as a guide in corporate America.
For those who have not been paying attention, the Department of Justice recently <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/federal-grand-jury-charges-southern-poverty-law-center-wire-fraud-false-statements-and">indicted</a> the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) over allegations of “wire fraud, false statements, and conspiracy to commit money laundering.” If true, it’s a massive scandal for a group that has fundraised for decades by framing its mission as fighting white supremacy. But the indictment, and the allegations associated with it, are just the latest in the group’s social downfall. The outcome of that indictment will not determine the future of the SPLC in corporate America. That part is already in motion.
Formed in 1971 as a legal organization aimed at combating Jim Crow, the SPLC has gone from a leading opponent of racism to one of the most disingenuous, misleading, and blatantly politicized organizations in America. Its “hate map” <a href="https://www.splcenter.org/hate-map/">claims</a> to “track hate and anti-government groups” across the nation (interesting phrasing, given that the SPLC also<a href="https://www.splcenter.org/resources/guides/trump-cabinet/"> asserts</a> that the Trump administration “uses its power to roll back civil rights [and] deepen racial injustice.” In reality, it lists mainstream conservative and religious groups like the Family Research Council and Turning Point USA as on par with genuine hate groups.
There are many issues with this blatantly political smear job, but perhaps the most disturbing is the way that those mainstream groups became the target of violence after being placed on the list. Family Research Council? Victim of a 2012 shooting by a gunman who<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/us/christian-nonprofit-family-research-council-remains-splcs-hate-map-10-years-terrorist-attack"> told investigators</a> the SPLC’s resources<a href="http://www.apple.com"> informed</a> his targeting. Turning Point USA, specifically Charlie Kirk? Shot in the neck in front of his wife and kids, with the shooter<a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/tyler-robinson-text-messages-roommate-charlie-kirk-shooting-suspect-rcna231732"> explaining</a> his rationale as “some hate can’t be negotiated out.”
Against that backdrop — politicization and an eyebrow-raising correlation with violence — it’s not a surprise that corporate America is <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/how-the-southern-poverty-law-center-poisoned-corporate-america?author=Isaac+Willour&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=3&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=How+The+Southern+Poverty+Law+Center+Poisoned+Corporate+America">moving away</a> from the SPLC. After engagement from conservative investors, including David Bahnsen and The Heritage Foundation, results are coming in. Brands as big as <a href="https://www.heritage.org/press/salesforce-ends-reliance-splc-after-heritage-shareholder-proposal">Salesforce</a> and <a href="https://x.com/1792Exchange/status/2047307820136104309">Texas Instruments</a> have moved away from using the SPLC’s metrics to guide charitable policies. Platforms like Meta have <a href="https://bowyerresearch.substack.com/p/meta-hits-the-unlike-button-on-political">clarified</a> that they do not rely on SPLC to determine objectionable content. To be clear, not every brand has done so. Companies like Starbucks, Disney, PayPal, and Amazon are still dodging investor scrutiny on their use of politicized “hate group” measures. Chances are, however, that the DOJ’s indictment may spur more movement from corporate America.
There’s more movement to be had. 1792 Exchange has <a href="https://1792exchange.com/press-releases/1792-exchange-corporate-america-must-fully-disassociate-from-disgraced-indicted-southern-poverty-law-center/">identified</a> over 200 major companies that likely use the SPLC’s “hate list” to vet charitable recipients. Charitable providers like Benevity, which process billions in employee donations annually, use SPLC data to screen nonprofit recipients. As more and more companies back away from the SPLC, now is the moment for providers like Benevity to demonstrate leadership in forwarding the goal of political neutrality for its corporate clients. Using a “hate map” that treats TPUSA and the Klan as morally equivalent doesn’t do that.
This is an argument that companies are coming around to. Many didn’t realize the extent of the SPLC’s bias until investor <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/why-the-pro-sanity-coalition-is-winning-again-in-corporate-america?author=Isaac+Willour&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=4&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=Why+The+Pro-Sanity+Coalition+Is+Winning+Again+In+Corporate+America">coalitions</a> urging political neutrality appeared. I recently told one company, “This probably isn’t a perspective you hear from activists. It’s a conversation that should have happened years ago. But we’re here now. So let’s have the conversation.”
The reality, apparent to entities across the political landscape, is that the Southern Poverty Law Center is the reputational risk gift that keeps giving gifts no one wants. The scope of this issue is unbelievably broad. The SPLC doesn’t just owe a general sense of accountability to the public. However, weaponizing the legitimate human desire to fight hate to serve political ends would be damaging enough. It doesn’t even end with a debt of accountability to the many mainstream, non-hateful groups, such as ADF, TPUSA, American Family Association, and Moms For Liberty, whom they’ve smeared as somehow equivalent to racial supremacists and violent extremists. They owe a debt of accountability to every company that’s used their list to guide charitable policies. The SPLC’s “hate list” wasn’t merely the anti-hate mechanism it was billed as. It was a Trojan Horse that helped inject politics into corporate America. It helped perpetuate the lie that faith and right-of-center politics are tantamount to genuine hatred. This lie not only damages America’s social fabric but also creates genuine danger for real people.
Undoing that damage takes work, conservatives who can handle the details, and corporate courage to choose neutrality over activism. But that’s how we turn outrage into cultural change. That is the fundamental task of this moment. You cannot destroy hate with more hate. It takes the kind of love that pushes for meaningful change.
***
Isaac Willour is the director of corporate engagement at Bowyer Research, America&#8217;s leading pro-fiduciary proxy consulting &amp; corporate engagement firm. A graduate of Grove City College, Isaac is an award-winning journalist, Young Voices contributor, and frequent commentator on ESG, DEI, &amp; the culture war. He can be found on X <a href="https://x.com/IsaacWillour">@IsaacWillour</a>.

Wall Street Sign

The SPLC Does Not Define Hate Groups — Corporate America Shouldn’t Act Like It Does

Corporate America

Menu