The online prostitution website OnlyFans has been in the news quite a lot recently. Last week a prominent OnlyFans prostitute went viral for propositioning a Five Guys employee while he was on the clock at the burger restaurant. Fortunately, the young man kept his dignity and turned her down.
This week, the same predatory degenerate — I think we should treat these people like mass shooters and try not to use their names, when possible— has now claimed that she set a “world record” by having sex with 1,000 men in a 24-hour period. Actually it was 1,057. Far be it from me to deprive her of that extra 57 strands of gonorrhea she likely contracted.
Here she is talking about her big accomplishment:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
OF Bonnie Blue says she broke the World Record by sleeping with 1,057 men in 12 hours.
I don’t think that’s an achievement… <a href="https://t.co/OOvLtZHlAx">pic.twitter.com/OOvLtZHlAx</a>
&mdash; Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) <a href="https://twitter.com/DefiantLs/status/1878895706947355081?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 13, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
You often hear people, especially conservatives, say that they feel sorry for women like this. I have to admit I don’t. I reserve all of my sympathy for whoever owns the AirBnB they used for this stunt. You’ll have to go in there with hazmat suits to fumigate that room.
Now, you may remember a few weeks ago the story of the OnlyFans prostitute who had sex with one hundred men. These are not the same people. That woman also planned to jump in bed with a thousand men, but she was apparently beaten to the punch. There is now an arms race among cyber hookers to see who can have sex with the most men in a day. Eventually someone is going to figure out a way to crack a million, which will be a pace of about 11 men a second. I don’t see how that’s physically possible right now, but someone will figure it out. This insatiable quest for sexual self-debasement will be the primary driver of scientific and technological advancement in the future, I have no doubt.
Needless to say, business over at OnlyFans is thriving. Back in the fall, it was reported that the website’s revenue for the previous year had cracked $1.3 billion. They are generating all of that money from the approximately 300 million “fan” accounts on the site. But the “fans” are all there for the hookers, or as OnlyFans refers to them: creators. This euphemism makes no sense, of course, because these women aren’t creating anything. They are selling their bodies — that which has already been created, by God Almighty — to the lowest bidder. They are profiting from their own degradation and humiliation. This is not an act of creation, but of destruction — self-destruction.
<h3><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/mws-ep-1514-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show</a></h3>
But whatever you call these women, how many are there? According to recent reports, there are currently about 1.4 million American women producing pornography for OnlyFans. 1.4 million. That number is undoubtedly a severe undercount. It doesn’t count all the women who “created” on OnlyFans in the past. And it doesn’t count the women who use other platforms to sell their bodies. All in all, it’s impossible to know exactly how many women in this country have elected to become prostitutes. We only know that the number, whatever it is, is well into the millions.
This is a truly unprecedented circumstance. Prostitution itself is not new or unprecedented. It is the world’s oldest profession, as the saying goes. And there’s nothing necessarily new about having such a high percentage of women in a given population turning to prostitution to make a living. You could almost certainly find more per capita prostitutes in most third world countries today. Historically, it’s thought that something like 1 in 5 women in 18th century London were prostitutes — 20% of the female population. There are a lot of OnlyFans “creators.” But there aren’t that many, percentage-wise. So the sheer numbers do not reveal the full scope of this problem.
As I tried to explain a few days ago, although prostitution has always been prevalent in basically all human societies, in one form or another, it has almost always been the province of young, poor, desperate women. You would have to drive down to the sections of the city where these women congregated. That’s because prostitution was not a part of polite, mainstream society. It was kept out on the fringes, in the shadows, in the dank, dark places where normal people would never want to go.
That is all changing now, and very rapidly. Suddenly, prostitution has become a career option, or a way to earn extra spending cash, for middle class and upper middle class women. The kinds of women who would never stand on a physical street corner now have the opportunity to sell their bodies on a virtual street corner. And a depressing, even terrifying, number of women have jumped at that chance. Some of them have even become multi-millionaires in the process. That is another thing that separates old fashioned prostitution from the newer variety. There are OnlyFans “creators” making $20 or $30 million a year. The highest paid star running backs in the NFL don’t make that much.
That’s not to say that most of the hookers on OnlyFans are raking in millions. The sad reality is that the vast majority are debasing and dehumanizing themselves for the sake of a few hundred bucks a month at most. They could earn as much selling homemade candles on Etsy. They could earn significantly more if they went out and got real jobs. Instead they choose to become masturbatory aides for random, unseen men. And in return they make only enough money to feed their Starbucks habit. It is hard to imagine something more pathetic than that.
But even this does not fully capture the width and breadth of this crisis. It’s not just that so many women are becoming prostitutes. And it’s not just that women who have many other options are choosing to be prostitutes anyway. It’s that, through platforms like OnlyFans, prostitution — or “sex work,” as it is euphemistically called — is now mainstream. It is a part of popular culture in a way that it never was before. It has been validated, accepted, and therefore elevated, so that prostitution is not just a common practice, but a conventional one. Prostitution may be the oldest profession but it was never considered a “normal” one. Until now.
<h3><a href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">JOIN THE MOVEMENT IN &#8217;25 WITH 25% OFF DAILYWIRE+ ANNUAL MEMBERSHIPS WITH CODE DW25</a></h3>
This didn’t happen out of the blue. The stage was set over the course of decades, with the proliferation of internet pornography. Nearly all of the moral guardrails around sex were torn down and replaced with a flimsy, woefully insufficient consent-based moral structure which says that anything is permissible so long as both parties verbally agree to it. But it turns out that just because both parties agree to something, that doesn’t make the thing good, or acceptable, nor does it mitigate the harm done by it. If you sacrifice your dignity while robbing someone else of theirs, it doesn’t matter that you consented to it. A thing is not dignified merely because it was done on purpose, with the willful acquiescence of all parties.
Most of all, we have removed shame from society. At least we have removed it from the things that are actually shameful. History shows that we can put an end to pretty much any type of conduct, or drive it into the shadows and out of public view so that very few people engage in it, simply by using shame. We stopped shaming whorish behavior, and now we have soccer moms turning to prostitution for some extra spending money. One follows from the other.
50 years ago, around half of all adults in the country smoked cigarettes. Now that number is down to about 10%. We have cast cigarette smokers out to the edges of society, and this has been accomplished largely through shame and social pressure. Our culture has relentlessly demonized cigarettes as disgusting, dangerous, and low class, and as a result cigarettes went from cool and mainstream to obnoxious and odious. It used to be that you could smoke cigarettes anywhere. Now cigarette smokers are given an eight foot wide box outside, 100 feet from entrance of any building. Society is more welcoming of sex offenders than cigarette smokers at this point.
Now, I think the anti-cigarette campaigns are quite overdone and hysterical. My point is only that when a behavior is targeted and shamed — even an addictive one — you will end up with less of it, and when it does happen, it will happen out of view, on the margins, where shameful things belong.
We cannot get rid of prostitution entirely. It will always be one of the unsightly barnacles that attaches itself to the hull of civilization. But that’s what it should be. A slimy, crustaceous thing clinging to the outside of the ship, below the water line. Not sitting up on deck, reclining on a beach chair in full view, while the wait staff serves it margaritas.
<h3><a href="https://www.amiracist.com/?_gl=1*jtghwp*_gcl_au*ODQ1NjYzNTg2LjE3Mjg5MDk3OTE.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczMDEyMDgwOS40OS4xLjE3MzAxMjA4MzkuMzAuMC4w" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MATT WALSH&#8217;S &#8216;AM I RACIST?&#8217; NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+</a></h3>
This kind of behavior should be shamed. That goes for the customers, the men. Most people aren’t hesitant to call them out, nor should they be. But it also goes for the women. The women who choose this lifestyle. They are not resorting to it out of desperation, or forced into it. We should look at that choice with disgust and contempt, not acceptance and understanding. We should treat it with shame. Which is the primary reason why OnlyFans and all similar platforms should be outlawed. Prostitution is already illegal in most jurisdictions. It makes no logical sense that prostitution should be legal only if it is done with a camera and sold for a subscription. Why should the more accessible version of the thing be legal? If anything, it should be the other way around. Though I prefer for both versions to be banned. Would banning it stop women from selling their bodies online? No, not entirely. But it would go a long way towards ostracizing the behavior so that otherwise normal and financially comfortable people would not engage in it.
There is one side of the ideological divide that wants to actively normalize the most debased forms of human behavior. And the other side which, though not seeking to normalize it, has largely lost the wherewithal and appropriate sense of moral indignation to treat shameful things as shameful. Which is why the conversation around OnlyFans so often centers on how much pity we should have for the prostitutes, and how hard their lives must be, and the deep sadness you can see in their poor little puppy dog eyes. There is almost no one stating plainly what used to be commonly understood: that this kind of conduct is disgusting and reprehensible, and we are revolted by it. That message is harsh and impolite. It also happens to be true. It is honest. And if the recent history of our culture should have taught us anything, it’s that it is better to be honest than polite.

Woman getting ready to party.

This Is How We Stop The Festering Disease Called OnlyFans

Matt Walsh

OnlyFans

Opinion

Pornography

Prostitution

Sex Workers

Social Media

Women

There is something deeply broken about our society. Egregious symptoms show that being the case.
One of those symptoms is Lily Phillips.
Lily Phillips is 23-years-old. She&#8217;s become quite prominent because she has a very lucrative OnlyFans account where she earns millions of dollars to take her clothes off and have sex.
Back in October, Lily Phillips did a stunt in which she had sex with 101 men in a day. She did a documentary about it titled, &#8220;I Slept with 100 Men in One Day.&#8221; 
In the documentary, she says, “It’s not for the weak girls, if I’m honest. It was hard. I don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;d recommend it. I think if you&#8217;re a different type of girl, it&#8217;s very like… it&#8217;s kind of like being a prostitute in a sense of like, it&#8217;s just a different feeling. I don&#8217;t know how to explain it, like.”
“It&#8217;s not like just having sex with someone,” a man says to her.
“Yeah. Yeah. Just one in, one out. Like, it feels intense,” she replies.
“Like, more intense than you thought it might,” he suggests.
“Definitely,” she answers, then breaks down in tears.
She says, “I think by the 30th, when we&#8217;re getting on a bit, I&#8217;ve got a routine of how we&#8217;re going to do this and sometimes you disassociate and it&#8217;s not like normal sex at all.” She admitted not remembering much of this. She said, “In my head right now I can think of five, six, 10 guys I remember. And that&#8217;s it. It&#8217;s just weird, isn&#8217;t it? If I didn&#8217;t have the videos, I wouldn&#8217;t have known I did 100.”
The New York Post <a href="https://nypost.com/2024/12/11/lifestyle/onlyfans-model-lily-phillips-cries-after-sleeping-with-101-men-in-a-day/">reported</a>:
<blockquote>Phillips shared that it’s not just the physical intimacy of having sex with so many men that made her feel “so bad” but also disappointing them by not being able [to] talk with them, or even being interested in doing so.
She said that conversing with them was also “hard” and recounted how one man complained that they only chatted for about two minutes when she had said beforehand that they would talk for about five minutes.</blockquote>
Then, she breaks down in tears.
But none of this is apparently stopping her from taking on a new challenge now because the money is too good. She has claimed she wants to take on a new challenge in January. She <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14166101/middle-class-graduate-sex-Lily-Phillips-OnlyFans.html">posted</a> on social media: &#8220;1,000 men in 24 hours. Male talent casting call. 18+ only. Location TBC.&#8221;
“I dreamed it up with my assistant. I can’t wait … It’s very exciting. It will be a world record. A real challenge!” she enthused.
“The current world record is held by Lisa Sparks, an adult film star who bedded 919 men in one day at a sex industry event in Poland back in 2004,” the Post noted.
The question here: Why is this wrong in our modern society? What&#8217;s the big problem for a lot of folks, particularly on the secular Left? That&#8217;s a relevant question. After all, she&#8217;s engaging in consensual activity. Why is this wrong? Why is this bad?
<h3><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-2103-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show</a></h3>
We live in a society in which consent is considered the highest and perhaps only value.
That&#8217;s because we&#8217;ve largely bought into the liberal framework for how society ought to run.
According to social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, there are six moral matrices for how we measure morality. The first is care versus harm. The second is liberty versus oppression. The third is fairness versus cheating. The fourth is loyalty versus betrayal. The fifth is authority versus subversion, and the sixth is sanctity versus degradation.
For example, care versus harm would include feeling compassion for a suffering human being. That&#8217;s one value system. Liberty versus oppression would include seeing an unjust rule being promulgated that oppresses someone versus that person being free to make their own choices.
Fairness or cheating would be if somebody cheats, it&#8217;s unfair because somebody has cheated. Loyalty versus betrayal would be if someone betrays a group. Authority versus subversion is if somebody disrespects legitimate authority, and sanctity versus degradation is if, for example, somebody does something disgusting.
Leftists and conservatives think of the world in very different ways from one another. 
Leftists are interested in only three of these six matrices: care versus harm (compassion); liberty versus oppression (individual rights and individualism); and finally, fairness versus cheating (the final outcome of a system as fair or rights as fairly distributed).
Conservatives, people on the Right, care about all six of those matrices, including notions like loyalty and betrayal, authority and subversion, and most importantly, sanctity versus degradation.
Thus, what does the Left do about somebody like Lily Phillips? Theoretically, the argument could be made that she&#8217;s harming herself, that this violates the sort of care/harm principle. That&#8217;s why what she&#8217;s doing is wrong.
But that runs directly against the liberty foundations of liberalism, because after all, she&#8217;s the one who has volunteered her consent to it. How can you tell her? Can you be paternalistic enough to suggest she has harmed herself under the rubric of leftism? And also, is it unfair that she did this if she did accept the arrangement? In fact, she sought the arrangement; she&#8217;s being paid by the tonnage for this arrangement.
For conservatives, the answer is actually quite easy. Phillips and women like her are engaging in self-harm. Liberty is not libertinism; it is bound by rules. Fairness is not implicated because she has no right to engage in this sort of conduct on a moral level. She has no moral right. She does have a legal right, but that is not the same thing as having a moral right to engage in this.
She&#8217;s being disloyal not only to any boyfriend she might have, but to the standards of her society and to humanity at large. You&#8217;re being disloyal to humanity when you violate yourself this way. She is undermining the authority of basic morality.
But most of all, and most importantly, what she is doing is disgusting.
Now, I know that word has fallen out of usage. “Disgust.” “Disgusting.” The idea in modern left-wing parlance is that if you talk about something being disgusting, it means that you&#8217;re being judgmental.
In his book “The Righteous Mind,” Haidt wrote about asking college students if it would be immoral to have sex with a frozen chicken. Liberals will initially say maybe, and then they&#8217;ll think about it and say, “No, it doesn&#8217;t violate my principles of consent. It doesn&#8217;t violate the care/harm matrix. It&#8217;s a violation of liberty to say that it is disgusting, problematic, or wrong.”
Conservatives would react, “Yes, that&#8217;s gross. It&#8217;s wrong. You&#8217;re degrading yourself.”
Disgust is useful and has kept human beings alive for eons. Originally, it evolved as a way of naturally driving people away from things that are quite bad for them. The reason human beings have a reaction of disgust when they see a snake is because snakes can kill people.
Now, that does not mean all disgust historically is proper. Sometimes human beings are disgusted by behaviors or traits that are perfectly legitimate or have arisen through no fault of the person by whom they are disgusted. So, for example, many primitive cultures found people with mental disabilities to be disgusting. In ancient Sparta, if you had a disabled baby, you left it out on a cliff somewhere.
But disgust as a general human emotion is a response to the violation of the sacred.
So what exactly is “the sacred”? 
The sacred is the thing that we as a species place beyond question. That&#8217;s what sacred means. Sacred means to declare something holy.
To be holy means to be separate from the secular. It is something that is not to be questioned. It is something that has such high value that to question it would undermine the entire society. To throw away the sacred is to throw out that which is most important in building a society.
There are some things we find so sacred that we will not violate them.
An entire community cannot come together to share the same values unless they agree on a concept of the sacred and the profane; things that are so high in value that they are not worth arguing about — and to argue about them should generate a feeling of disgust.
It is community, says Robert Nisbet, that gives to the sacred its most vital expressions everywhere: birth, marriage, death, and other moments of the human drama.
These are all of such high value that they become sacred.
In the case of Lily Phillips, what is sacred here?
The individual human soul.
You do not own your own soul. It does not belong to you. You have duties attached to the stewardship of your soul.
Your innate humanity is made in the image of God. You as a human being are sacred. You are the sacred property of the Divine.
After all, whatever disgusting substances this woman has anointed herself with can be washed off, but her soul can&#8217;t be washed off without repenting of what she has done to herself.
And she knows that. Why is she breaking down? Why is she upset? It&#8217;s not just because of the physical exertion. It&#8217;s because she made herself into a sex robot. She made herself into something profane. She engaged in profane behavior, and she should be disgusted with herself. She should be ashamed of herself.
A society should be able to look at that behavior and declare it wrong. It is not just a mere matter of moral apathy because a society that greenlights, celebrates, or pays people millions of dollars for this sort of behavior gets more of it.
It reduces the humanity of all of us to the level of the animal. It removes the sacred completely. Then, all that remains is the profane.
No community, no workable society, can be built solely on the profane. Human beings have a natural understanding of the sacred. We have a natural understanding, a desire to worship, a desire to understand there are things that are of eternal value.
<h3><a href="https://www.amiracist.com/?_gl=1*jtghwp*_gcl_au*ODQ1NjYzNTg2LjE3Mjg5MDk3OTE.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczMDEyMDgwOS40OS4xLjE3MzAxMjA4MzkuMzAuMC4w" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MATT WALSH&#8217;S &#8216;AM I RACIST?&#8217; NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+</a></h3>
This is why, by the way, when it comes to sex, the concept of consent is necessary, but it is not sufficient. Of course consent is necessary to sex, but it is not the only marker of whether sex itself is a good thing or a bad thing in regard to how people engage in it.
It&#8217;s because we&#8217;ve lost the concept of the sacred and the profane.
In the #MeToo movement, there is a phenomenon that has arisen many times where women will consent to sex with someone they should not have. They will treat themselves badly; then, they&#8217;ll wake up the next morning and decide they didn&#8217;t like it.
And they don&#8217;t have the language to even express what it is they don&#8217;t like because they already gave consent. Un-giving consent is not possible. So then they go to the language of consent again. In some cases, they&#8217;ll go so far as to say they were raped when they weren&#8217;t actually raped or the evidence shows they weren&#8217;t raped.
But they&#8217;re not wrong to feel bad about themselves.
They&#8217;re not wrong to feel bad about the decision-making. Regret is a realization of having taken something sacred and having made it profane.
The relationship between two people who love one another in a committed bond is sacred. That&#8217;s what makes sex sacred rather than profane.
If sex is treated in a profane way, a lot of the time, it will feel profane. You might wake up in the morning and feel degraded because you degraded yourself.
Then, people look for an excuse for why they feel the way they do, but they don&#8217;t even have the language to explain why they feel the way they do. This is particularly true of young women who are engaging in activities they later regret. They don&#8217;t even understand why they regret.
The answer is that we are all, men and women, capable of sullying ourselves, of disgusting ourselves. And that is a worthwhile tendency in human beings to recognize: that sometimes when we look at the behavior of somebody like a Lily Phillips, we should be upset. We should be upset that as a society we have decided an OnlyFans kind of society is fine, decent, and good.
It is not. It is not fine, decent, or good. Pornography ought to disgust us because it is disgusting. It should disgust us because it turns something that should be about commitment and love into something that is simply about rutting. Sex is meaningful — not because it is a matter of consent, but because it is a matter that has meaning attached to it and has throughout human history.
Pretending that people don&#8217;t have emotions connected to sex is one of the most ridiculous aspects of the modern feminist movement and the modern secular Left. Even Phillips acknowledges that. She says, “I didn’t even get to talk to the guys.”
That’s the most pathetic expression of the problem, but she’s not wrong. It turns out that very often, both women and men actually want to know the person with whom they are having sex because it means something beyond pure consent.
A society that boils its morality down to consent alone is a society that doesn&#8217;t even have the language to express why it&#8217;s corrupting itself. It&#8217;s why we as a society have such trouble declaring pornography is morally bad or OnlyFans is a blight.
Young men are being destroyed by OnlyFans. Young women are certainly being destroyed by OnlyFans.
And this should not be a matter of moral apathy in our society. I&#8217;m not talking about regulation or legislation. Perhaps that&#8217;s appropriate, but that&#8217;s not even the question. The question is: Do we even have the moral language anymore to look at human behavior that ought to disgust us and say it&#8217;s acceptable to be disgusted by that behavior?
It&#8217;s ok to look at what violates the nature of being made in the sacred image of God and say, “That&#8217;s bad, and I have an innate sense of being provoked by it into disgust.”
It&#8217;s ok. We were made that way, and that is a good thing.
A society that loses any concept of the sacred and trades the sacred for the profane is a society that is not long for this world. Because in the end, if we can&#8217;t place certain principles above and beyond debate and in the realm of the sacred, then we&#8217;re not going to have a society for very long.
* * *
<h3><a href="https://get.dailywire.com/gift-guide/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CHECK OUT THE DAILY WIRE HOLIDAY GIFT GUIDE</a></h3>

Front of lens camera and light shade color from two flash.

The Sickness Of OnlyFans

Ben Shapiro

Conservatives

Leftists

Democrats in <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/michigan" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Michigan&#8217;s</a> state House are attempting to ram through &#8220;radical&#8221; sex education changes in the weeks before control of the body flips back to Republicans.
Earlier this week, nearly two dozen Michigan House Democrats introduced <a href="https://legislature.mi.gov/documents/2023-2024/billintroduced/House/pdf/2024-HIB-6068.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">HB 6068</a>, which seeks to make major changes to the Revised School Code Act of 1976. The changes range from allowing schools to distribute condoms to giving schools a green light to teach students that abortion is a &#8220;method of family planning&#8221; and &#8220;reproductive health.&#8221;
One of the biggest revisions proposed in the new bill is to remove a ban on distributing &#8220;a family planning drug or device&#8221; on public school property. The proposed amendments to the 1976 law would also add leftist gender terms and require that schools &#8220;affirmatively recognize that individuals have different sexual orientations and gender identities and, when discussing or providing examples of relationships, be inclusive of various gender relationships.&#8221;
While the changes would still allow schools to teach that abstinence is a &#8220;responsible and effective method&#8221; of preventing pregnancy and infections, the bill would remove a line referring to abstinence as &#8220;a positive lifestyle for unmarried people.&#8221; The new bill also keeps in place an option for parents to pull their children out of sex ed.
Some Republicans have raised alarms about HB 6068, with Republican state Rep. Jaime Greene calling it &#8220;a clear overreach that strips away the foundational emphasis on abstinence, undermining a responsible approach to sexual health education.&#8221;
&#8220;It introduces sensitive topics like gender identity, sexual orientation, and reproductive rights, which many parents feel are completely inappropriate for young students,&#8221; Greene added in a statement.
Greene told The Daily Wire in a phone call on Thursday that &#8220;people are tired of partisan politics&#8221; and she expects many parents to opt their children out of sex education if the bill passes. Greene stressed that teaching age-appropriate sex education is still important, but said that Democrats&#8217; proposed changes to the 1976 law aren&#8217;t in line with the average Michigan resident.
&#8220;Sex ed is supposed to be teaching about biology and how your body works, how it makes a baby, not necessarily you&#8217;re identity,&#8221; she said.
The bill was referred to the Education Committee after it was introduced by state Reps. Rachel Hood, Emily Dievendorf, Samantha Steckloff, Kara Hope, Veronica Paiz, Natalie Price, Jenn Hill, Penolope Tsernoglou, Lauri Pohutsky, Regina Weiss, Felicia Brabec, Jennifer Conlin, Donavan McKinney, John Fitzgerald, Amos O&#8217;Neal, Cynthia Neeley, Julie Brixie, Carrie Rheingans, Phil Skaggs, Noah Arbit, Kimberly Edwards, and Helena Scott — all Democrats.
Hood, one of the bill&#8217;s strongest advocates, <a href="https://www.bridgemi.com/talent-education/michigan-dems-want-overhaul-sex-ed-allow-schools-distribute-condoms" target="_blank" rel="noopener">told</a> Bridge Michigan, “Comprehensive sex education takes a wider lens: enabling students to make healthy choices for themselves and their relationships — and lets these conversations begin long before sex or puberty at developmentally appropriate levels.”
Pohutsky, the Speaker Pro Tempore, said the bill &#8220;is absolutely a priority&#8221; for her to get passed in the lame duck session, which continues until the end of December. Greene blasted Democrats for continuing to push a &#8220;radical agenda&#8221; in Michigan despite losing the state House in the election.
<a href="https://www.amiracist.com/?_gl=1*jtghwp*_gcl_au*ODQ1NjYzNTg2LjE3Mjg5MDk3OTE.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczMDEyMDgwOS40OS4xLjE3MzAxMjA4MzkuMzAuMC4w" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+</a>
&#8220;Clearly Michigan spoke, and we had a major overturn in a lot of school boards as well just on the transgender issue,&#8221; she said. &#8220;We&#8217;re exploiting children for political gain and for a political ideology that has just taken off in the last couple of years and is not what most people in our country or even in the world actually believe.&#8221;
The Daily Wire has reached out to Pohutsky for comment.
Republicans took back control of the state House in the 2024 election and will hold 58 of the 110 seats at the beginning of January. If the sex ed reform bill is passed before then, it would go to the Democrat-controlled Michigan Senate, and then to the desk of Democrat Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.

sex education

Michigan Dems Push For ‘Radical’ Sex Ed Changes Before Control Of State House Flips To GOP

Michigan Dems Push For 'Radical' Sex Ed Changes Before Control Of State House Flips To GOP

Democrats

Education

Gender Identity

Michigan

Transgender

U.S.

Liberal women are vowing to go on a sex strike in protest of President Donald Trump’s 2024 election-night win.
The trend is inspired by the feminists in South Korea who started a movement called “4B” which rejects traditional gender roles and “the patriarchy”. The “4” represents no sex, no dating, no childbirth and no marriage while the “B” represents a negative as “bi” is a prefix for negative words in South Korea.
American liberal women are announcing on social media that they’re joining the movement with the intention to punish men for “voting against women’s rights.” Translated: liberal women are throwing a temper tantrum because the majority of Americans agree with commonsense restrictions on abortion opposed to allowing abortion through all nine months of pregnancy for any reason under the sun.
Ironically, liberal women who have largely rejected abstinence as an option to prevent pregnancy are now admitting it works.
X user @solitasims <a href="https://x.com/solitasims/status/1854042435695129072?s=46&amp;amp%3Bt=Jk-5UdakQacqfxlUcsYByg">posts</a>, “ladies, I’m being so fr when I say this, it’s time to close off your wombs to males. this election proves now more than ever that they hate us &amp; hate us proudly. do not reward them.” 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
ladies, I’m being so fr when I say this, it’s time to close off your wombs to males. this election proves now more than ever that they hate us &amp; hate us proudly. do not reward them.
&mdash; solita (@solitasims) <a href="https://twitter.com/solitasims/status/1854042435695129072?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 6, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
She <a href="https://x.com/solitasims/status/1854042963971858666">goes on to say</a>, “I am very much a radical feminist, I just don’t talk about it much. But I am literally so serious. Guard your womb, SERIOUSLY. IF you choose to be with a male, make sure he actually values and respects you at a human f***** being. This is ridiculous.”
The inauguration is over two months away and somehow there seems to be a “President Trump effect” that is making America more wholesome already. It seems far-fetched that a radical feminist would be encouraging women to guard their wombs and wait for a man who values and respects them, but that’s exactly what we’re witnessing. Who is going to tell them this has been a conservative talking point all along?
In some cases within the new obsession of the 4B movement, liberal women are shaving their hair to make themselves less attractive to men. X account @libsoftiktok shared a selfie-style video of a woman cutting her own hair while telling women not to have sex with, date, or talk to men.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
This woman shaved her head to protest Trump’s win and to fight the patriarchy
This might be the best meltdown yet 😂 <a href="https://t.co/9DCw0uHCRc">pic.twitter.com/9DCw0uHCRc</a>
&mdash; Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) <a href="https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1854263018865242321?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 6, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Regardless of the reason causing women to pursue abstinence to prevent pregnancy, the pro-life movement considers this a win.
It proves what we’ve been saying all along; women have always had control over their bodies. Women have always been able to abstain from casual sex. In fact, it would be real misogyny to suggest women are incapable of being responsible and accountable for their own consensual decisions.
If women elect to abstain from casual sex with men who don’t value them, unplanned pregnancies will be prevented. If there are less unplanned pregnancies, there will be less women seeking abortions.
There is no scenario where this is a negative, unless you happen to be Planned Parenthood or any other part of the $2 billion abortion industry. It must be difficult witnessing their clients and biggest supporters commit themselves to abstinence.
<blockquote class="instagram-media" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/DCHwmr_S86B/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14">
<div style="padding: 16px;">
&nbsp;
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div>
<div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div>
<div style="padding-top: 8px;">
<div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"></div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;">
<div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: 8px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"></div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);"></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: auto;">
<div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"></div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"></div>
</div>
&nbsp;
<p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/DCHwmr_S86B/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by Christine Yeargin (@christineyeargin)</a>
</div>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
As ironic and full circle as this moment is, it shines a light on the lies and manipulation of the pro-abortion Harris/Walz campaign and one of the democrats largest donors, Planned Parenthood. When President Biden was still the Democratic nominee, Planned Parenthood pledged to spend <a href="https://apnews.com/article/planned-parenthood-spending-45-million-2024-election-a6b9252fec64d1e051816ea173dab32f" target="_blank" rel="noopener">$40 million</a> to bolster Biden and leading congressional Democrats according to a statement shared with The Associated Press.
Tens of millions of dollars behind corrupt politicians are intentionally manipulating women to think their lives are at risk with any sort of abortion restriction on the books. That number increases to hundreds of millions if you include the pro-abortion referendums across the country this election cycle.
There have been political speeches, news headlines, social media posts and more fearmongering women to believe it is illegal to get miscarriage care.
The new 4B movement posts are full of the same reiterated falsehoods and misinformation.
It is worth noting there is no state in the country, including those that have restrictions on abortion, which bans miscarriage care or ectopic pregnancy treatment and there are no states that don’t have an exception for the life of the mother. Legislation for each state is very clear on this.
It is also worth noting that there have been no women killed by abortion bans, despite pro-abortion, legacy media headlines. Of the fatal cases we’ve seen highlighted in headlines, the cause of death has been a direct result of abortion or medical malpractice.
If Kamala Harris and Tim Walz cared about women, they wouldn’t have repeatedly lied on the issue of abortion, instilling fear among women across the country. If they hadn’t campaigned on abortion lies and simply told the truth, we likely wouldn’t be seeing as many women shaving their hair off and screaming obscenities in the middle of a mental break on social media.
However entertaining and ironic these videos have been to many over the past few days, no one deserves to live in politically manufactured fear.
Women deserve to know the truth. America deserves to know the truth.
* * *
Christine Yeargin is the host of <a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGZnJj6tJYhhoVUuKiA8mPQ" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Speak Out with Christine Yeargin</a>, a podcast encouraging others to boldly defend their values, the founder of a social media movement that supports vulnerable women in unplanned pregnancies, a public speaker, and a homeschool mom.
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Young woman talking in a megaphone during a protest in the street

Liberal Women Declare Sex Strike In Wake Of Trump Victory

Abortion

Liberals

News

Planned Parenthood

Pregnancy

Former Abercrombie &amp; Fitch CEO Mike Jeffries and two of his associates were reportedly arrested on Tuesday morning on federal sex trafficking charges.
Prosecutors out of the Eastern District of New York charged the men with more than a dozen counts for alleged criminal activity that happened between 2008 and 2015, CNN <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/22/business/abercrombie-ceo-mike-jeffries-arrested-sex-trafficking/index.html">reported</a>.
The men allegedly engaged in a scheme where they recruited young aspiring male models and then pressured them into performing sex acts at parties, sources told the network.
Prosecutors are expected to hold a press conference later on Tuesday when they will release details on the case.
All the defendants are expected to make their initial court appearances on Tuesday with two of the defendants, including Jeffries, scheduled to appear in federal court in Florida and the third scheduled to appear in federal court in Wisconsin.
The identities of the two other men were not immediately known.
Brian Bieber, the lawyer representing Jeffries, <a href="https://apnews.com/article/abercrombie-fitch-ceo-jeffries-sex-charges-f95f6b480dcb41e5365fa9b49f6206bd?taid=6717b12d56474d000110b28b&amp;utm_campaign=TrueAnthem&amp;utm_medium=AP&amp;utm_source=Twitter">told</a> the Associated Press that he would “respond in detail to the allegations after the indictment is unsealed, and when appropriate, but plan to do so in the courthouse — not the media.”
<a href="https://www.amiracist.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.amiracist.com/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1729077615157000&amp;usg=AOvVaw17Kprl74oE9DYOLREdiBPU">MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ COMING TO DAILYWIRE+ OCT. 28</a>
The FBI <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-67991750">opened</a> a criminal investigation into Jeffries after a report from the BBC was published last October that alleged: &#8220;Jeffries and his partner Matthew Smith had exploited young men for sex at events they hosted in their New York residences and worldwide in luxurious hotels.&#8221;
Eight men told the publication that they attended these sex parties in cities around the world where they were &#8220;direct[ed]&#8221; to engage in sexual activity with them or with each other.
After the report was published about Jeffries, who was with the company for two decades, Abercrombie &amp; Fitch was &#8220;accused in a civil lawsuit of funding a sex-trafficking operation led by Mike Jeffries and Matthew Smith between 1992 and 2014.&#8221;
The lawsuit alleged that there were more than 100 male victims.

Abercrombie & Fitch Store Opening on 5th Avenue in New York City

Former Abercrombie CEO Mike Jeffries Arrested On Federal Sex Trafficking Charges

Business

Courts

Sex Trafficking

MixCollage-07-Oct-2024-01-55-PM-524

As Americans Drown, Kamala Chats On A Brain-Dead Sex Podcast

2024 Election

Call Her Daddy

Kamala Harris

Podcast

Tim Walz

It was a normal night in St. Petersburg, Florida, when an elderly couple passed me by. Typical in Southwest Florida … until I realized the woman was wearing a mesh crop top and dog collar, and the man, a leather harness.
That was the first sign that something was … off. A few seconds later, another couple stood waiting to cross the street: a man in his 70s, arm-in-arm with a young girl, 21 at most, wearing an “I Love Daddy” t-shirt. Something DEFINITELY wasn’t right. I inquired to my friend, “What the hell is happening right now?”, without even realizing just how accurate the word “hell” was. Staring down at his phone, he replied, “Fetish Con is in town.”
Fetish Con? Did I just hear that correctly? Like, the feet-lovers and the furry people? That had to be the weirdest thing I’d ever heard. I had to go.
&#8220;Weird” didn’t do it justice, as you’re about to see. If you’re like me, you’ll want to laugh, but won’t be able to. You’ll be too busy worrying about your children, schools, our country, the consequences of the internet, and, well, life as we know it.
Let’s get into it.
<div class="image"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-787455" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/FETCON-3-432x576.jpg" alt="" width="432" height="576" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/FETCON-3-432x576.jpg 432w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/FETCON-3-225x300.jpg 225w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/FETCON-3-768x1024.jpg 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/FETCON-3-1152x1536.jpg 1152w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/FETCON-3-1536x2048.jpg 1536w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/FETCON-3-scaled.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 432px) 100vw, 432px" /></div>
As I approached the St. Petersburg Hilton, women were casually returning to their cars, topless save for the tape they wore to comply with the conference’s no-nudity policy, while men dressed in animalistic garb loitered near the entrance. The hotel&#8217;s interior was blocked from public view, with curtains guarding the entrance until tickets were purchased.
A hotel employee directed us to the vendor halls and, intriguingly, to something called &#8220;The Dungeon.&#8221; The name conjured images of childhood museum exhibits, but as I would learn a few minutes later, the reality was far from childhood innocence.
As I crossed the threshold into the event, the scene was surreal. An elderly man dressed as a baby—complete with a diaper, bib, and bonnet—sat alone. Whose grandfather was this? A mix of attendees filled the halls. Some dressed in outfits that appeared to be from Spirit Halloween and the majority dressed in…well…I don’t even think you could call them “dressed.”
Advertisements for adult sites plastered the elevator doors, while a red carpet photo op and a massive balloon display proclaimed “Fetish Con 22.” (Yes, this is the 22nd Fetish Con). As if things couldn’t get any stranger, a couple sat straddling each other on a strange piece of furniture I initially thought was hotel decor in the most vulgar display of PDA I&#8217;ve ever seen.
Off to a flying start.
Upon entering the first vendor hall, it became clear my outfit was not Fetish Con-appropriate, so I immediately purchased a pair of cat ears in an effort to blend in. The room was packed with booths offering every conceivable (and inconceivable) sexual accessory. A display sat in the back corner that allowed attendees to vote for their favorite fetish. The winner in St. Petersburg? Farting.
<div class="image"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-789003" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/IMG_7239-432x576.jpg" alt="" width="432" height="576" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/IMG_7239-432x576.jpg 432w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/IMG_7239-225x300.jpg 225w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/IMG_7239-768x1024.jpg 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/IMG_7239-1152x1536.jpg 1152w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/IMG_7239-1536x2048.jpg 1536w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/IMG_7239-scaled.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 432px) 100vw, 432px" /></div>
It was around this time that I realized these people weren’t simply into the “typical” fetishes. A young woman hung (not hung out…literally hanging) at another vendor station while being degraded by a male employee. Whose daughter is that? And I was continually met with the sight of fresh bruising on the rear-ends and necks of women at literally every turn (I’d soon find out the source). Satanic imagery was scattered throughout the halls, adding an unsettling layer to an already bizarre atmosphere.
Finally, I made it to The Dungeon.
The Dungeon required visitors to put away their phones — a rule strictly enforced by event staff.  I slipped my phone into my clear purse and the employee declared, “Any purse except that.”
That should have been my first red flag.
My cat ears couldn’t mask my shock upon entering. I was greeted by a dimly-lit room with a series of stations where attendees could engage in acts of submission and domination, each one more disturbing than the last. The two stations near the door sat empty, manned by an older male employee eagerly awaiting his next guest. The sight was enough to make me want to leave immediately.
My friend and I looked at each other and simultaneously exclaimed, “Yup, we’ve seen enough.” We made our way to the exits, but not before being handed a pamphlet promoting a production company with the title, “Have You Accepted Satan As Your Lord and Personal Savior?”
<div class="image"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-787457" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/FETCON-2-432x576.jpg" alt="" width="432" height="576" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/FETCON-2-432x576.jpg 432w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/FETCON-2-225x300.jpg 225w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/FETCON-2-768x1024.jpg 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/FETCON-2-1152x1536.jpg 1152w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/FETCON-2-1536x2048.jpg 1536w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/FETCON-2-scaled.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 432px) 100vw, 432px" /></div>
The implication was clear: this was more than just a niche community — it was a culture with its own insidious undertones.
After returning home I took to “X” to explain what I saw, carefully trying to withhold too much judgment until I had more time to process what I had just seen. My post quickly went viral, amassing over 8.5 million views.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Update: I lasted approximately 24 minutes at Fetish Con.
The first person I saw upon entering was an old man dressed as a baby, followed by countless women covered in only tape, men wearing stripper heels, and couples guiding each other around with dog leashes. I turned to my… <a href="https://t.co/YAjHXIU7cn">https://t.co/YAjHXIU7cn</a> <a href="https://t.co/xOJda54lMN">pic.twitter.com/xOJda54lMN</a>
— Billie Rae Brandt (@BillieRaeBrandt) <a href="https://twitter.com/BillieRaeBrandt/status/1822438275954426035?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 11, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> 
Since then, I’ve been inundated with messages from Fetish Con attendees, adult film stars, and fetish-community advocates. Some are from men who want to send me money — another fetish I haven’t been able to figure out.
But most of the messages were vicious, including sexual harassment and threats of violence. These messages challenged my initial belief that these people were simply troubled — they were possessed by something far darker and depraved than I could have imagined. These were people who would stop at nothing to drag the rest of us into their twisted worldview.
One of the most striking responses came from a teacher with a master’s degree in education who claimed this community as her “life.”
<div class="image"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-787461" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/Screenshot-2024-08-27-at-3.39.07%E2%80%AFPM-479x576.png" alt="" width="479" height="576" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/Screenshot-2024-08-27-at-3.39.07%E2%80%AFPM-479x576.png 479w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/Screenshot-2024-08-27-at-3.39.07%E2%80%AFPM-250x300.png 250w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/Screenshot-2024-08-27-at-3.39.07%E2%80%AFPM-768x923.png 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/08/Screenshot-2024-08-27-at-3.39.07%E2%80%AFPM.png 1102w" sizes="(max-width: 479px) 100vw, 479px" /></div>
It was a reminder that the people I encountered at Fetish Con were not just fringe members of society: they were our neighbors, our colleagues, and, perhaps most disturbingly, the ones teaching our children.
But of all the hate hurled my way during the Fetish Con saga, this was the insult that caused my lightbulb moment.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
And if you influence anything, it is probably ignorance. I am sad you didn’t take the time to see what this gathering of like minded people brings to others. Love. Joy. Friendship. 
Sometimes the family we choose is more impactful than the family we are born with.
— AuthenticallyKinky &#8211; Official Podcast @Fetishcon (@authkinkypod) <a href="https://twitter.com/authkinkypod/status/1823764398655119531?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 14, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> 
This was an attendee at Fetish Con who claimed that “sometimes chosen family is more impactful than the family we are born with.” And I guess that’s the point, isn’t it?
Why did this person leave that family and “choose” this one? Was her family really that bad? Or were they simply groomed into this culture and taught to hate their family along the way?
This culture is, increasingly, our culture. As we become more and more addicted to instant, short-term gratification, we are slowly losing our basic humanity. Excessive pornography consumption can shrink the frontal lobe, which is responsible for executive functions like decision-making and a dysregulation of the body’s dopaminergic system – in other words, your ability to break bad habits and learn new ones.
The relentless pursuit of dopamine highs dulls the appeal of “normal” sexual experiences, diminishing the capacity for meaningful relationships and driving individuals toward increasingly extreme behaviors. You get into a certain type of person, a certain type of act, then a more extreme person willing to engage in that act, then an even more extreme act… and the cycle continues until porn is your only option for gratification.
Either that, or you embed yourself in the only community that doesn’t see you as damaged and is willing to enable this cycle in a real, tangible way.
It’s easy to rationalize extreme and bizarre in a group setting — no one’s a freak at Fetish Con. But the more we tolerate this behavior, the more we allow it to enter and shape mainstream society. That’s how we end up with <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/sam-brinton-dress-wearing-ex-biden-official-who-stole-womens-luggage-gets-cushy-plea-deal" target="_blank" rel="noopener">fetish-loving</a>, non-binary kleptomaniacs working high up in the federal government. It’s how we end up with a trans-identifying man bearing his <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/biden-faces-backlash-after-trans-activist-goes-topless-at-white-house-pride-event-a-disgrace-to-our-country" target="_blank" rel="noopener">fake breasts</a> on the White House Lawn.
It’s how you wind up with Fetish Con enthusiasts teaching young children.
A few weeks ago, I got some bad news: Fetish Con had <a href="https://x.com/BillieRaeBrandt/status/1825536091711017441" target="_blank" rel="noopener">blocked me</a> on X. I guess that means I can’t attend next year. But that’s alright. I’ve seen enough to last a lifetime.
Besides, at the rate we’re going, we may all be living in Fetish Con before we know it.

MixCollage-30-Aug-2024-05-04-PM-8863

What I Saw At Fetish Con

Florida

Teachers

Here&#8217;s a side of the Clinton administration you probably don&#8217;t remember. Just a few months into Bill Clinton&#8217;s second term, the federal government announced a major initiative to fund abstinence-only sex education.
As the L.A. Times <a href="https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1997-03-01-mn-33685-story.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reported</a> back in March of 1997, Clinton&#8217;s administration allocated hundreds of millions of dollars to programs teaching that sex before marriage is, &#8220;likely to have harmful psychological and physical effects.&#8221; The Clinton-funded programs also taught that abstinence from premarital sex is, “the expected standard” of human behavior. That’s worth repeating: The Clinton administration said that abstaining from sex before marriage is the &#8220;expected standard&#8221; of human behavior.
That may sound surprising now, for obvious reasons. This was not exactly an administration that led by example on this front, or any other front. But at the time, especially in that pre-Lewinsky period, it wasn&#8217;t a particularly shocking move. From Reagan&#8217;s administration onward, there had been significant bipartisan support in Washington for teaching young people to wait until marriage before having sex. Democrats and Republicans agreed on this point: Hookup culture spreads disease and ultimately makes people unhappy. It wasn&#8217;t especially controversial, really.
As recently as 2010, CNN was running segments about how abstinence-education was effective. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="008 Abstinence Works" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/_zk6-agFjEM?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
You won&#8217;t find many reports like that on CNN anymore. Do a quick search of their website, and you&#8217;ll learn that abstinence-only education is &#8220;not evidence-based.&#8221; The science shifted, apparently, as we&#8217;ve seen so often. 
Indeed, around the year that report aired — 2010 — federal funding for abstinence-only education began to wane under the Obama administration. Donald Trump brought it back to an extent. Then the Biden administration limited this funding again, though not as much as many Leftists were hoping.
Throughout all of this back-and-forth, pretty much the only group that&#8217;s remained consistent have been Christian conservatives. We&#8217;ve warned, for decades, that hookup culture will create many catastrophic problems in society. We promoted chastity and abstinence before marriage as the only workable alternative. That&#8217;s a position we took based on Scripture, based on thousands of years of human history, and based on plain old common sense. And for that, we were dismissed and mocked as out of touch and prudish and archaic and old fashioned, again and again, over the past several decades. 
What&#8217;s interesting about all of this mockery is that now — at long last — many of the same people who dismissed Christian conservatives are now coming around to basically agreeing with us. They&#8217;re conceding that abstinence until marriage makes sense, actually. The catch is that they&#8217;re doing it for all the wrong reasons.
New York Magazine&#8217;s &#8220;The Cut&#8221; just published an <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20240622140615/https://www.thecut.com/article/women-celibate-dating-sex.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">article</a> outlining the new pro-abstinence trend that&#8217;s now so popular among young people. It&#8217;s <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20240622140615/https://www.thecut.com/article/women-celibate-dating-sex.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">entitled</a>, &#8220;A Summer Without Sex: Celibacy is all the rage right now.&#8221; 
The Cut <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20240622140615/https://www.thecut.com/article/women-celibate-dating-sex.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reports:</a>
<blockquote>Today, celebrities including Khloé Kardashian, Lenny Kravitz, Julia Fox, Kate Hudson, and Tiffany Haddish have touted the benefits of celibacy. Melissa Febos &#8230; is coming out with another memoir next year called &#8216;The Dry Season,&#8217; about a year of conscious celibacy. Other women are celebrating their dry seasons too, even to the point of competitiveness.</blockquote>
The report <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20240622140615/https://www.thecut.com/article/women-celibate-dating-sex.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">continues</a>:
<blockquote>This Great Abstaining comes amid any number of moral panics about sex, mainly related to young people: They’re texting instead of hooking up, they’re getting off the apps, they’re forgoing marriage and children, they’re deemphasizing traditional romance and instead prioritizing platonic friendships like codependent but chaste Victorian pen pals.</blockquote>
Among the reasons for this “Great Abstaining,” according to the Cut, is that many women all over the world are drawing inspiration from the &#8220;radical-feminist South Korean 4B movement.&#8221;
Women who participate in this &#8220;4B movement&#8221; promise not to do four things: date men, have sex with men, give birth, or get married. Of course, attitudes like this are only making South Korea&#8217;s population crisis even worse. The country&#8217;s birth rate is well below replacement level, and dropping fast. That&#8217;s not going to improve if no one marries or has children. But the media is presenting this as some kind of feminist victory for South Korea, even though South Korea may not exist for very long if it keeps up. South Korea’s great achievement is embracing its own extinction, we’re told.
<h4><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1393-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show</a></h4>
Take this article from Vogue, for example. They just came out with a similar piece praising women for their newfound love of celibacy. They <a href="https://www.vogue.com/article/why-are-we-all-talking-about-celibacy-lenny-kravitz" target="_blank" rel="noopener">wrote</a>:
<blockquote>Is sex-free living going to be a thing? Could it actually be liberating to take the sex out of every equation? Are we entering a second wave of sexual emancipation in which one can simply opt out altogether? Maybe this summer can be a mini-break from the near-constant awareness of our own sexuality, of how (or whether) we attract. A vacation from transmitting and receiving sexual triggers. Will more of us be looking back on 2024 as the summer I turned sexless? No more afternoon delights, no more holiday romances—a veritable Celibacy and the City.</blockquote>
It&#8217;s kind of amazing to see Vogue discover that, in fact, women can &#8220;opt out&#8221; of having random sex with strangers. This is a whole new level of &#8220;sexual emancipation,&#8221; they say. No one has ever raised this possibility before. You can actually just not give yourself away to any random dude who vaguely shows interest. This is breaking news, courtesy of Vogue magazine: Women have free will. Can you believe it?
Several other outlets have been reporting on the same trend for more than a year now, in an equally shocked tone. The Independent, for example, <a href="https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/celibacy-dating-abstinence-b2260133.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">wrote</a> last year that, &#8220;Celibacy has become all the rage among young people.&#8221; According to the Independent:
<blockquote>In recent years, &#8216;self-love&#8217; has been parodied as much as embraced. But the shift towards celibacy seems to have come from it. &#8230; The benefits from a period of celibacy are endless because, ultimately, it’s about self-development. And that’s a practice that will always provide some sort of enlightenment – regardless of your relationship status.</blockquote>
Imagine that. &#8220;The benefits from a period of celibacy are endless.&#8221; Again, across virtually all of the corporate press this is presented as something that&#8217;s just being discovered now. 
The Guardian, to give another example, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/may/21/celibacy-hetrosexual-women-boysober-4b-sex-positive-feminism" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reports</a> that &#8220;Sex-positive feminism had its moment – and now it has been replaced by voluntary celibacy.&#8221; That&#8217;s quite a headline from The Guardian, considering it was just a decade ago that The Guardian was running articles with <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/sep/24/moral-case-for-sex-before-marriage" target="_blank" rel="noopener">titles</a> like, &#8220;The moral case for sex before marriage.&#8221;
Reversals like this are everywhere all of a sudden. In recent years, outlets like <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/12/style/modern-love-why-i-took-a-vow-of-celibacy.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The New York Times</a> and <a href="https://www.thetimes.com/life-style/sex-relationships/article/im-26-and-ive-tried-the-celibacy-trend-v2c9qtvx0" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Sunday Times</a> have published lengthy first-hand op-eds written by authors who have committed to celibacy. In particular, the Sunday Times declared that &#8220;Celibacy has had a reboot, with more people abstaining from sex than ever.&#8221; And it’s important to note, if it wasn’t clear already, that in virtually all of these cases we’re talking about unmarried people abstaining from sex — abstaining from hookup culture, in other words. This is the “reboot,” the “trend,” the bright new idea that the media is suddenly celebrating.
And the trend is not just a media creation. Researchers at the University of Michigan have been tracking the sexual behavior of high school graduates for the past two decades, going back to 2004. They&#8217;ve <a href="https://news.umich.edu/american-young-adults-report-having-fewer-sexual-partners-higher-rates-of-abstention/#:~:text=Among%2021%2Dto%2D30%2D,of%20just%20over%20a%20quarter" target="_blank" rel="noopener">found:</a>
<blockquote>Among 21-to-30-year-old males, abstinence rose significantly between 2008 and 2020, from 14.4% to 23.5% — an increase of nearly two-thirds. Among females of the same age, abstinence also rose, though by less, rising from 12.8% in 2008 to 16.5% in 2020 — an increase of just over a quarter. &#8230; Young adult males now have a considerably higher rate of abstinence than young adult females.</blockquote>
There are obviously many factors that might explain this change. A lot of it is likely attributable to so-called involuntary celibacy. We know that, even as celibacy is becoming more common, chastity is becoming less common. The proliferation of internet porn makes that very clear.
So what’s happening here in many cases, it seems reasonable to conclude, is that many young single people have given up on finding love and commitment. They&#8217;ve despaired of ever forming a real romantic connection with anyone. So now they&#8217;re retreating into celibacy like a form of surrender.
The point is that it’s not an embrace of traditional values in most cases. They’ve ended up at the same place — abstinence — but have gotten there from a place of despair and defeat. 
In other cases, as in South Korea, people are apparently resorting to celibacy as some kind of strained, misguided political statement. Here&#8217;s someone by the name of Julia Fox, for instance:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="010 Julia Fox Celibate" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/2l7PE32mTH4?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
&nbsp;
As twisted as that logic is, it actually makes sense on some level. These people understand that abstinence until marriage is an expression of self-control. And they understand that there&#8217;s a lot of benefits to a society where people practice self-control. But because they&#8217;ve rejected the old code of sexual morality, they have to come up with these bizarre, incoherent rationalizations for returning to it. They have to pretend that &#8220;Roe v. Wade&#8221; is somehow relevant to whether they want to be sexually promiscuous or not. Or they have to pretend that celibacy is part of some newfound &#8220;sexual liberation&#8221; movement — that another wave of feminism is in progress, where women have discovered for the first time that they have free will.
Here’s the point in all of this. The old code of sexual morality that they rejected — the one that those Christian conservatives were promoting, while being mocked and dismissed for it — that code was grounded, all along, in the true and the beautiful: in human dignity, love, commitment, chastity. The great virtues.
Those who repudiated that message for the sake of lust and instant gratification now find themselves living sexless lives anyway. They chose the opposite lifestyle and found it unfulfilling, harmful, destructive, and severely depressing. This is precisely what Christian conservatives warned would happen. This is why we said that hook up culture is bad; that the correct order of events is to find someone, pledge your love and loyalty to them, marry them, and then be physically intimate with them. In other words, we were right all along.
But in all of the coverage of the &#8220;celibacy trend,&#8221; there is of course no acknowledgment of that fact. There&#8217;s no recognition that we had this whole thing figured out many generations ago — thousands of years ago, in fact.
Unless all of these newly &#8220;celibate&#8221; people realize that celibacy is more than a trend or a political statement — then the satisfaction that they all say they&#8217;re feeling right now will be short-lived. &#8220;The Great Abstaining,&#8221; as The Cut put it, will give way to more unhappiness and inevitably more hedonism in short order.
The only way out of this cycle is to recognize why Christian conservatives have been calling for abstinence until marriage for so long, and give them some credit for it. The Religious Right has been repeatedly and consistently mocked for predicting the future for the past several decades now. We’ve always been right. About everything. It&#8217;s time for everyone else to start listening.

The word sex education written in chalk

Christian Conservatives Proven Right Once Again As Abstinence ‘Trend’ Gains Popularity

Christian Conservatives Proven Right Once Again As Abstinence 'Trend' Gains Popularity

Abstinence

Dating

Feminism

Judeo-Christian Values

Readers Pass

The results of our pornography-drenched society are in. And they’re hideous.
Pornography has disconnected men from women. It has led to less mating – after all, why date when you can get the dopamine hit of seeing bodies in various combinations at the touch of a button – and serious, society-wide sexual dysfunction (certain studies now claim that up to 30% of young men now suffer from erectile dysfunction). It has emptied wallets and souls. The average age of first pornography viewing for males is now 12. Some 73% of teens aged 13-17 have watched pornography. The brain can respond to pornography and its attendant dopamine hits much like a drug. And just like a drug, for some, higher doses may be necessary in order to achieve the original effect.
In the last few years, the question of pornography has reared its seamy head. The availability and regulation of pornography has cut across political lines: libertarians see pornography as a harmless good, a simple and disposable product that harms no one; traditional conservatives see pornography as a damaging and soul-crushing symptom of hedonistic individualism; radical leftists see pornography as a form of female empowerment, with women “finally” controlling their own sexuality; traditional liberals see pornography as exploitation of women, a form of patriarchal domination.
Oddly enough, our pornographic society is a sex-free, relationship-free society. We date less. We get married later, if at all. We have fewer children, if any. We do not form the little platoons of society – the family – necessary for its preservation. Not all of that is pornography, of course. But the utter pervasiveness of pornography isn’t a minor factor, either.
All of this was foreseeable. In 2005, at the age of 21, I wrote a book titled &#8220;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Porn-Generation-Social-Liberalism-Corrupting/dp/0895260166/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&amp;dib_tag=se&amp;dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.FgmUDcYWQ-k9ZlvIuO-Vp3mAtqpf0gCS-q703gqFcwFQ2Iqcmi1934jgWkQvCHJ0Ec69uFf52e4Vfem5BAvl9TkHiv4XatNRmq4rAQwWqDtu2TRY3A5N5iQE59JHh7PPw4NDrnQggqkQBVXpN_iOVN16XfkAz7DmtXoXt8HK2M9XkWabmmO17A17Mi-ETB4ykgMqqsVq3v6P9cnWEfEQfKVKlOXR6MJfxpTMrYdgXMwL8elRv7z-IFFFOhC7iD31mgccTm-5cM-aUdwIg1FY_Iq4-UUgK4yZOTdL8JktDsI.4dEtzxnT8g1s-SbFTXZpYZzUZIKOGtzotAimZzBm848&amp;qid=1717512451&amp;sr=1-18" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Porn Generation</a>&#8221; – a book that was widely seen by many on both Right and Left as alarmist and prudish. That descriptor – prudish – was, at the time, one of the worst slurs you could toss at someone. It meant that you were repressed, that you were a Bible thumper. That you were – gasp! – judgmental. In the book, I wrote that pornography had become absolutely mainstream, from music to television to movies to education.
That was before the era of Kim Kardashian.
Here is what I wrote:
<blockquote>Our culture has bred hollow young men, obsessed with self-gratification. Young women are told to act like sex objects – and enjoy it…Society told the porn generation that final moral authority rests inside each of us – and in our vanity, we listened. The mainstream acceptance of pornography has become a social fact….In the absence of community-promoted traditional standards, subjectivism reigns. Nothing is expected of anyone; everyone may make his own rules about what is best. The “live and let live” societal model is a recipe for societal disaster.</blockquote>
To put it mildly, I was right.
Our society has begun to figure out that the sexual mores of a morally relativistic society are destructive – that age-old ideas about monogamy and marriage and the value of heterosexual relationships, cultivated over the course of millennia, might be more valuable than the latest slogan about the joys of licentiousness. Pornography’s obvious vacuity and the damage coincident with its ubiquity is a reminder that consent is not, in fact, the highest moral value: that just because people choose to engage in an activity does not make that activity morally good or acceptable. There can be pragmatic arguments over the nature of government power necessary to reverse the pornification of our society – do we have to delegate too much power to the government in order to squash the problem? Ought it be solved at the level of social censure rather than regulation? – but there can be no question that consent alone does not morally justify pornography. In the words of British legal theorist James Fitzjames Stephen, “It is one thing&#8230;to tolerate vice so long as it is inoffensive, and quite another to give it a legal right not only to exist, but to assert itself in the face of the world as an ‘experiment in living’ as good as another, and entitled to the same protection from law.”
<h4><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/show/the-ben-shapiro-show" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show</a></h4>
The true answer to the question of pornography has been known all along: robust social institutions, as well as local regulations that make it difficult to create and obtain. We have a duty to our children to give them a society free of the scourge of pornography and its societal externalities. The Founders knew that, which is why they never considered pornography a protected class of free speech under the First Amendment. They would have scoffed at the very idea.
In &#8220;Porn Generation&#8221; I made a series of recommendations – again, recommendations snorted at, up until the point every American child had access to smut on their cell phones. Those recommendations included better parenting, of course; more church adherence; school vouchers; boycotts against products promoting social radicalism (see, e.g., Bud Light); governmental censorship where possible; cutting off funding to universities that promote obscenity. If any of them had been pursued in 2005, our society would be markedly better off in 2024.
They weren’t. But that doesn’t mean we can’t pursue them now. Pornography is merely a symptom of a broader underlying ill: a society that promotes libertinism as liberty, ignoring that a meaningful life is about liberty within a rubric of morality and responsibility. Any society that promotes libertinism rather than traditional liberty is doomed to the scrap heap.

Ben-Article-PAID

Why Pornography Matters

Books

Culture

Founding Fathers

Freedom of Speech

Marriage

Rocker Lenny Kravitz said he’s been celibate for almost a decade, calling it a “spiritual thing” for him after not being in a serious relationship for nine years.
During an interview with <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/music/article/2024/may/30/lenny-kravitz-interview-blue-electric-light">The Guardian</a>, the 60-year-old singer talked about the dating he did after he and actress Lisa Bonet divorced in 1993, admitting that not having sex has given him a sense of control over his life.
Kravitz talked about his own father’s infidelity when he was growing up, how his dad said he’d end up cheating on his spouse, and he said his dad had ended up being right.
“After the marriage, I became more like him. I was becoming a player,” Kravitz told the outlet.
“I didn’t like it,” he added. “I didn’t want to be that guy. So I had to tackle that and it took years.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Lenny Kravitz is celibate — and hasn’t been in a serious relationship in 9 years <a href="https://t.co/oPs6q8sLhB">https://t.co/oPs6q8sLhB</a> <a href="https://t.co/wW7mZvlrqf">pic.twitter.com/wW7mZvlrqf</a>
— New York Post (@nypost) <a href="https://twitter.com/nypost/status/1796231973003825657?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 30, 2024</a></blockquote>
When pressed by the interviewer on how he tackled it, the famed rocker said, “By taking responsibility. Discipline. Not letting my own desires take over.”
Kravitz said it’s been nine years since he was in a serious relationship, and explained that he decided to remain celibate until he found the right person.
“It’s a spiritual thing,” the singer said, noting that being in a relationship now might be a struggle. “I have become very set in my ways, in the way I live.”
In 2008, Kravitz told <a href="https://www.aol.com/lenny-kravitz-still-being-celibate-191812894.html">CBS Sunday Morning</a> he believed that “in the end [being celibate]” was “going to help me to find the right person.”
”So I’m not going to waver on that,” the rocker said at the time. “That’s a promise I made to God three years ago.”
Speaking to <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/lenny-kravitz-says-hes-open-to-finding-love-ive-never-felt-how-i-feel-now/">CBS co-anchor Gayle King</a> recently, Kravitz admitted he was open to what the future may bring, whatever that might be, whether he ended up in a relationship or not.
&#8220;I find that when you don&#8217;t look is when you find it,&#8221; Kravitz said. &#8220;And I&#8217;m at a place where I&#8217;ve said this for several years: &#8216;I&#8217;m ready, I&#8217;m ready, I&#8217;m ready.&#8217; I wasn&#8217;t ready. I thought I was ready, right?&#8221;
&#8220;Well, I can say that I&#8217;ve never felt how I feel now,&#8221; he added.
Kravitz and Bonet tied the knot in 1987 and welcomed daughter Zoe to the world in 1988. The famed rocker and the actress divorced in 1993. After that, Kravitz was romantically linked with model Adriana Lima and Nicole Kidman, <a href="https://www.tmz.com/2024/05/30/lenny-kravitz-9-years-celibate-spiritual-journey-no-sex/">TMZ</a> noted.

Lenny Kravitz

‘It’s A Spiritual Thing’: Rocker Lenny Kravitz Says He’s Been Celibate For Almost A Decade

'It’s A Spiritual Thing’: Rocker Lenny Kravitz Says He’s Been Celibate For Almost A Decade

Celebrities

Entertainment

Music Industry

singer

Model and actress <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/celebrities">Julia Fox</a> discussed her decision to remain celibate, citing the 2022 overturning of Roe v. Wade as one reason she’s sticking with it. 
“Nothing good comes from having sex — including children,” the 34-year-old celeb joked during a conversation on Monday’s episode of “Watch What Happens Live with Andy Cohen.”
She added, “No, I’m just kidding.”
“I think with the overturning of Roe v. Wade and our rights being stripped away from us, this is a way I can take back the control,” Fox said. “It sucks that it has to be in that way, but I just don’t feel comfortable until things change.”
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Julia Fox Opens Up About Her Decision to Be Celibate | WWHL" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/tWGpZJaJUic?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
The model shares a 3-year-old son with ex-husband, Peter Artemiev. Fox said she’s not planning on breaking her celibacy vow anytime soon.
“It was six months, then it was a year, and then I’m like, ‘Oh, my God, it’s almost 2.5 years and it’s still going,’” she told Cohen. 
When the TV host asked if she missed having sex, Fox replied, “In the beginning, yes. But I think it’s just like getting over anything — smoking, drugs, whatever it may be. Eventually, you just forget and then all that energy that you were putting toward sex, you can put it toward other things.”
Cohen pried further, asking the actress, “Do you masturbate a lot?”
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1716386093359000&amp;usg=AOvVaw1H2hddzGHMov4jKnDi2Pr4">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
“Not as much as you would think,” Fox said. “Maybe like once or twice a month. Sometimes I’ll start and then I get tired and lose interest. I’m just so tired all the time.”
The celeb first announced she was celibate earlier this month while responding to a <a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@ferociouskatie/photo/7367755849294449963">TikTok video</a> depicting billboard ads for the dating app Bumble claiming “Celibacy is not the answer.” 
“Imagine pretending to be a Dating App FOR WOMEN and launching a million dollar ad campaign BLAMING WOMEN for a very normal reaction to men&#8217;s violence,” the original poster wrote.
Fox commented on the clip, saying, “2.5 years of celibacy and never been better tbh.”
The model, who was previously in a high-profile relationship with rapper Kanye West but maintains they never slept together, has in the past discussed her experience working in a “sex dungeon.” 
“Everyone is a freak and we know it, so it’s like I won’t judge you and you won’t judge me,” she said in 2022 of witnessing depraved sex acts at work, as The Daily Wire previously <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/kanye-wests-new-flame-julia-fox-discusses-working-in-sex-dungeons-exploring-boundaries-everyone-is-a-freak-and-we-know-it">reported</a>.

Julia Fox

Julia Fox Says She’s Celibate To ‘Take Back Control’ Since Roe V. Wade Was Overturned

Julia Fox Says She's Celibate To 'Take Back Control' Since Roe V. Wade Was Overturned

Roe v. Wade's Long And Brutal Legacy

Over the past few years, the biggest knock you&#8217;ve heard against the field of public health is that they completely mismanaged COVID, mainly by exaggerating its impact. They told us it was a potentially civilization-ending epidemic — one that justified lockdowns, mandatory shots, et cetera. In the end they were wrong, of course, and for that reason no one will ever trust one of these supposed experts again.
But the really extraordinary thing about the field of public health isn&#8217;t the epidemics they fixate on. It&#8217;s the ones they ignore. In particular, there is one ongoing public health crisis that these experts really don&#8217;t want to talk about — even though, if it continues for much longer, it will quite literally bring about the end of humanity.
I&#8217;m talking about collapsing fertility rates all over the world, which is a problem you really have to put in context if you want to understand how dire things are.
Right now, Russia, China, Hungary, Poland, Turkey, Ireland, Switzerland, Greece, Denmark, Australia, Canada, Qatar, the UAE, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, the UK, Germany, and the United States — and many others — have birth rates that are well below replacement level.
The U.S. fertility rate is at its <a href="https://twitter.com/ianbremmer/status/1783920672617443824" target="_blank" rel="noopener">lowest</a> point in nearly a century. What that means is that people aren&#8217;t having enough children to sustain the population. But not every country is affected by this crisis. There are countries where fertility is much higher than replacement level. They include such esteemed locations as Niger (one of the poorest countries on the planet), Chad, Somalia, Angola, Tanzania, Afghanistan, Zambia, Cameroon, Yemen, Iraq, Syria, and of course Haiti.
It doesn&#8217;t take a genius to see where this is heading. Third-world hellholes are reproducing, while first-world countries — the ones that sustain the global economy that keeps billions of people alive — are not reproducing. As this goes on, and third-world inhabitants continue to pour into the first-world, the distinction between these two parts of the world continues to blur until they&#8217;re completely irrelevant. Eventually everywhere will be third-world.
This is not a new problem. But to the extent political leaders have tried to solve it, by and large, they&#8217;ve failed.
<h4><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1357-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show</a></h4>
A decade ago, for example, China <a href="https://twitter.com/ChinaPowerCSIS/status/1781729541385249271" target="_blank" rel="noopener">eased</a> its barbaric one-child policy. They expected millions more births as a result. But the following year, the country saw only an additional half-million births. And the country&#8217;s birth rate has remained below replacement level ever since.
Beginning in the 90s, Japan undertook its own <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615026/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">efforts</a> to raise the birth rate, including offering more parental leave, more child care services, et cetera. The result? Nothing has improved. It&#8217;s only gotten much worse. Last year, Japan&#8217;s birth rate was the lowest on record.
It&#8217;s the same story in Hungary. Starting with Orban&#8217;s government in 2010, Hungary doubled its spending on families. And yet, last year, Hungary, like Japan, recorded its lowest number of births in history.
So whatever the problem is here, it&#8217;s clear that it cannot be resolved solely through more spending or government intervention. Simply providing some ad hoc economic incentives isn&#8217;t cutting it — although those policies are good, they aren’t sufficient. So what is the solution? You can say that the broader economy needs to improve, which is obviously a big part of it. But the declines I&#8217;m talking about have been in progress for decades. Singapore&#8217;s birth rate has been dropping since the 1980s, and their GDP per capita grew dramatically in the new millennium. It&#8217;s a similar situation in Taiwan. And birth rates in the U.S. were declining pre-pandemic, for more than a decade — even throughout <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/us-household-incomes-soared-in-2015-recording-biggest-gain-in-decades/2016/09/13/a832da44-79e0-11e6-ac8e-cf8e0dd91dc7_story.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">periods</a> in which median household incomes were setting new records.
What this means is that figuring out the root cause of this problem is more complicated than looking at economic indicators alone. It means analyzing culture, and in particular, taking a close look at prevailing attitudes towards children and families, and trying to change them. That was the main goal of the Natal Conference, which took place at the end of last year in Austin, Texas. Speakers from all over the country gathered to assess what&#8217;s gone wrong and how to fix it.
One of them was Kevin Dolan, an organizer of the event. And he made it clear that, whether you personally like the idea of having kids or not, the collapse of fertility rates will have devastating effects on you and everyone you know. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="001 Economic Problem" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/151AO19JmPs?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Whether you agree with him or not, one of the first things you notice about Kevin Dolan is that he&#8217;s not a demagogue. He didn&#8217;t hold this conference to berate anyone for not wanting to have kids. He&#8217;s not some kind of cult leader who demands that everyone sign a pledge to create a certain number of children. He&#8217;s a normal guy. And he&#8217;s trusting, too, which is why he allowed a Politico reporter to attend the event to write about it.
How did that turn out? Predictably, Politico published a hit piece that&#8217;s so bizarre, and so totally disconnected from the event, that it verges on self-parody.
Here&#8217;s how Politico wrote about the conference <a href="https://twitter.com/politico/status/1784569937391956477" target="_blank" rel="noopener">on Twitter</a>: &#8220;The far right is so obsessed with making babies, they just held a whole conference about it.&#8221;
Yes, you heard that right. Politico has uncovered the sinister Right-wing plot to have babies and ensure the survival of the human species. They caught us. We are anti-extinction. Much to our shame.
Then if you click through to the article, you&#8217;ll find this <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/04/28/natalism-conference-austin-00150338" target="_blank" rel="noopener">sinister-sounding</a> headline: &#8220;The Far Right’s Campaign to Explode the Population.&#8221;
It&#8217;s not hard to see what Politico is getting at. Basically, they&#8217;re saying that anyone who wants Western societies to produce children — which is to say, anyone who wants Western societies to continue existing — must be &#8220;far Right.&#8221; It&#8217;s reminiscent of how &#8220;freedom&#8221; has <a href="https://www.cbc.ca/radio/checkup/what-s-your-reaction-to-the-ottawa-standoff-and-the-border-blockades-1.6349636/why-the-word-freedom-is-such-a-useful-rallying-cry-for-protesters-1.6349865" target="_blank" rel="noopener">become</a> a dirty word in Canada. The people who want to destroy Western civilization aren&#8217;t doing a great job of hiding it anymore.
But if you go online to the Natal Conference&#8217;s website, you can find a bunch of speakers explaining very clearly what they think is happening in this country. They talk about everything from divorce laws to common fears people have about parenting, and the impact these considerations are having on fertility rates. None of this is a &#8220;Right-wing conspiracy.&#8221; That&#8217;s the familiar terminology they trot out whenever the Left knows that something is really happening and they want it to keep happening.
And indeed, there&#8217;s a very active anti-natalism movement right now. Spend any time on the darker corners of the internet, and you&#8217;ll find quite a few people who fully embrace depopulation as a positive good. It&#8217;s grim stuff.
In fact, mainstream media outlets routinely run stories about young people who don&#8217;t want to have kids because it will hurt the planet somehow. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="002 Climate Change Preventing Children" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/nb0QjLjRcEg?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
That&#8217;s the more socially acceptable form of the depopulation agenda, and it&#8217;s being promoted by corporate media. But the anti-natalism movement gets more organized, and more explicit, the deeper you look.
One of the leaders of this depopulation agenda is Les Knight, the founder of the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement. Here&#8217;s footage of one of his recent conferences. As you watch this, compare Knight&#8217;s presentation with the one you heard earlier at the Natal conference, just in terms of the general sanity of the speaker. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="003 Voluntary Human Extinction" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ivkmVF2R9wk?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
That&#8217;s the first land acknowledgement you&#8217;ll hear that doesn&#8217;t just acknowledge some of the tribes or whatever, but also acknowledges some of the wildlife. This is as cultish and as creepy as it gets, but you won&#8217;t see Politico running any articles on this guy being &#8220;far Left.&#8221; They&#8217;re not smearing Les Knight. Instead, quite the opposite.
The New York Times recently published <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/23/climate/voluntary-human-extinction.html">a glowing profile</a> of Knight: &#8220;For the sake of the planet, Les Knight, the founder of the Voluntary Human Extinction movement, has spent decades pushing one message: &#8216;May we live long and die out.'&#8221;
In that clip you just saw, you heard Knight mention that no one ever talks about the fact that world population is increasing, even as birth rates plummet. But there are a couple of obvious explanations for this. One is that — as I mentioned earlier — not all countries are experiencing plummeting birth rates. The most dysfunctional countries on the planet are actually reproducing at extremely high rates. Additionally, just from a statistical perspective, it takes time for lagging birth rates to show up in world population figures. There might be a lot of young couples now having kids in some places. That doesn&#8217;t mean those couples will be around in 20 years, still having children. Birth rates decline first, and then population declines. When you get to the point where the population itself is starting to decline, that’s when the catastrophe has really hit. The goal is to prevent that from happening.
Reversing this decline should not be a &#8220;Right-wing&#8221; project. Yet there are very few prominent people outside of conservative circles who are willing to talk about this at all. Elon Musk is the only notable exception. In fact, it should tell us something that Musk — one of the wealthiest and most powerful men on the planet — considers depopulation to be the greatest existential threat we face as a species.
This weekend I engaged in a back-and-forth with Musk on Twitter about the causes of this existential threat. The conversation started when someone posted this chart on social media. It shows that the number of men under 30 who report having zero sexual partners since turning 18 has increased from 8% in 2008 to 27% in 2018.
https://twitter.com/SMTuffy/status/1783781813950845313
That&#8217;s obviously a striking chart, and it demands an explanation. I responded by <a href="https://x.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1783918984208765414">saying:</a> 
<blockquote>A lot of theories to explain this but it’s very clearly like 98 percent because of porn.</blockquote>
I made that observation because the iPhone and Pornhub were both born in 2007. Male virginity rates skyrocketed pretty much from that very moment, as birth rates plunged the opposite direction.
In reply to my tweet, Musk <a href="https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1784106328971227305" target="_blank" rel="noopener">wrote this</a>: 
<blockquote>It’s not porn, which has been readily available from the days of VHS tapes, but rather the general temptation of the online world, if you’re going to blame it on anything electronic. Sex is not what matters. Lots of people are having sex that have no kids. Population implosion is what will end civilization.</blockquote>
What Musk is saying about pornography is obviously true. Pornography clearly pre-dates the year 2007. But it was nothing like the pornography that&#8217;s been available in the past decade or so.
Here&#8217;s one small data point: Playboy at its peak sold around 7 million copies a month. Pornhub — just one site — gets something like 15 times as many visitors per day. Way more people are consuming porn today, way more often, starting at way younger ages. And on top of that, the porn itself is way more graphic and debased. This isn&#8217;t the whole reason that birth rates are declining. But it is a major plank in the depopulation platform.
That&#8217;s a strong argument for continuing to ban young people from accessing online pornography, which several states have already done. It&#8217;s also a good reason for parents to limit or even eliminate their kids access to electronics. And that should just be the beginning. If all of this sounds drastic, it&#8217;s probably because you haven&#8217;t been fully informed about the scale of the problem that Western civilization is now facing. And that&#8217;s by design.
A few months ago I did a whole <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/the-origins-of-the-anti-human-depopulation-agenda" target="_blank" rel="noopener">monologue</a> on the Jaffe Memo, and the origins of Planned Parenthood&#8217;s very comprehensive campaign to depopulate the planet. Very powerful &#8220;nonprofits&#8221; and political organizations in this country don&#8217;t want you to reproduce. That&#8217;s not conspiratorial; it&#8217;s just true. They&#8217;ve put it in writing.
The good news is that this is one of the few problems in our society that pretty much everyone can help solve. It&#8217;s maybe the single most solvable crisis in history. They have to expend all this effort and push all this propaganda to discourage reproduction because it&#8217;s one of the most natural things a person can do. But the propaganda is failing now. Because of the Natal Conference and efforts like it, as well as Elon Musk and other prominent figures, there&#8217;s more attention to declining birth rates than there has been at any point in recent history. That&#8217;s why Politico and Left-wing activists are melting down. There&#8217;s nothing they want to see less than more children being born. That tells you everything you need to know about their ideology — and it also tells you how to defeat it.

Menu

Sex