America is in a global artificial intelligence (AI) race. The stakes are historically high with economic and national security implications. As President Trump <a href="https://x.com/DavidSacks/status/1949249312363626843">declared</a> in July, “Whether we like it or not, we are suddenly engaged in a fast-paced competition to build and refine this groundbreaking technology that will determine so much about the future of civilization.”
The President, First Lady, and the Trump Administration are taking decisive steps to ensure America is prepared and positioned to win one of the most consequential competitions among nations in modern history, determining future global dominance.
On Thursday, First Lady Melania Trump hosted a meeting of the White House Task Force on Artificial Intelligence Education. Michael Kratsios, Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, serves as the chair of the task force. Other members include the Secretary of Agriculture, Secretary of Labor, Secretary of Education, Secretary of Energy, Director of the National Science Foundation, Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, Special Advisor for AI and Crypto, Assistant to the President for Policy, and Assistant to the President for the Office of the First Lady.
<div id="attachment_969609" style="width: 875px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-969609" class="size-large wp-image-969609" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/GettyImages-2233064229-865x576.jpg" alt="Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive officer of Meta Platforms Inc., from left, US President Donald Trump, First Lady Melania Trump, and Bill Gates, chair of the Gates Foundation, during a dinner with tech leaders in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, DC, US, on Thursday, Sept. 4, 2025. Trump said he would be imposing tariffs on semiconductor imports &quot;very shortly&quot; but spare goods from companies like Apple Inc. that have pledged to boost their US investments. Photographer: Will Oliver/EPA/Bloomberg via Getty Images" width="865" height="576" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/GettyImages-2233064229-865x576.jpg 865w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/GettyImages-2233064229-300x200.jpg 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/GettyImages-2233064229-768x512.jpg 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/09/GettyImages-2233064229.jpg 1024w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 865px) 100vw, 865px" />Will Oliver/EPA/Bloomberg via Getty Images</div>
The task force is providing vital leadership for implementing the actions outlined in the “<a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/advancing-artificial-intelligence-education-for-american-youth/">Advancing Artificial Intelligence Education for American Youth</a>” executive order, signed into law by President Trump on April 23. As the executive order <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/advancing-artificial-intelligence-education-for-american-youth/">states</a>, the President and First Lady recognize that “to ensure the United States remains a global leader in this technological revolution, we must provide our Nation’s youth with opportunities to cultivate the skills and understanding necessary to adapt to and thrive in an increasing digital society.” K-12 education and workforce development training are foundational avenues for this to occur.
Students need to not just learn about artificial intelligence; education in America must be modernized to incorporate this rapidly advancing technology, thereby personalizing and enhancing student learning.
While artificial intelligence tools are the latest form of student academic dishonesty, they cannot be excluded from the learning process in the future based on fear. Students must be taught and held accountable for the appropriate use. Developers are designing educational technology tools that strengthen critical thinking and other essential cognitive skills — enhancing rather than supplanting learning — to meet the quickly accelerating market demand.
With clarity and candor, the Trump Administration has <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/advancing-artificial-intelligence-education-for-american-youth/">cast the vision</a> for charting a strategic path forward: “Early learning and exposure to AI concepts not only demystifies this powerful technology but also sparks curiosity and creativity, preparing students to become active and responsible participants in the workforce of the future and nurturing the next generation of American AI innovators to propel our Nation to new heights of scientific and economic achievement.”
As part of promptly putting this plan into action, First Lady Melania Trump recently launched the <a href="https://www.ai.gov/initiatives/presidential-challenge">Presidential AI Challenge,</a> which aims to cultivate interest and expertise in artificial intelligence technology among elementary through high school students and educators. Mrs. Trump beautifully <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Presidential-AI-Challenge-Guidebook-for-Participation.pdf">articulates</a> that the “President’s National Artificial Intelligence Challenge invites every student in America — from kindergarten to 12th grade — to unleash their imagination and showcase the spirit of American innovation.” Speaking directly to students, she explains, “our extraordinary educators will guide and empower you through this process to build a brighter, stronger future for us all.”
Acknowledging that America’s K-12 education institutions are largely unprepared to step into this moment, the Trump Administration has created crucial public-private partnerships to provide resources and advanced technological expertise and tools necessary to bring this vision into reality. Already, over 135 companies and organizations have signed the “<a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/edai/">Pledge to America’s Youth: Investing in AI Education</a>.”
Google CEO Sundar Pichai <a href="https://blog.google/outreach-initiatives/education/ai-education-efforts/">announced</a> at the White House Task Force meeting that $150 million of the company’s $1 billion pledge, made in August, will support education and workforce training through AI education grants. This includes $2 million to the Flourish Fund, which provides financial support for nonprofit organizations that assist foster care youth with workforce development tools as they age out of the system. Additionally, it includes $3 million for Code.org to incorporate artificial intelligence features into its curriculum.
Winning the AI race isn’t merely aspirational. The Trump Administration is working with undeniable resolve because winning the AI race is imperative for ensuring the American Dream remains alive and thriving for future generations.
In January, the President hit the ground running, signing the “<a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/removing-barriers-to-american-leadership-in-artificial-intelligence/">Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence</a>” executive order. In July, the White House released the “<a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Americas-AI-Action-Plan.pdf">Winning the AI Race: America’s AI Action Plan</a>.” These executive orders are key, setting the stage to advance artificial intelligence nationwide through accelerating innovation, building infrastructure, and leading the world in diplomacy and security. The action plan <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/07/white-house-unveils-americas-ai-action-plan/">asserts</a>, “Winning the AI race will usher in a new golden age of human flourishing, economic competitiveness, and national security for the American people.”
President Trump has proven he can win, is winning, and will never stop working to win for the American people. And in the race for AI, as in every fight for America’s future, his leadership is driving our nation not only to lead the world, but also to secure a new era of strength and prosperity.
* * *
<a href="https://www.discovery.org/p/ingraham/">Dr. Keri D. Ingraham</a> is a Senior Fellow at Discovery Institute, Director of the American Center for Transforming Education, and a Senior Fellow at Independent Women’s Forum.
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

First Lady Melania Trump Hosts White House Task Force On AI Education

The First Lady’s Undeniable Resolve To Win The AI Race

Artificial Intelligence

Bill Gates

Donald Trump

Education

Melania Trump

Opinion

Schools

Silicon Valley

Technology

White House

Students across the country are getting ready to head back to school, and this year they’ll have the chance to take on a different kind of assignment: the first-ever Presidential AI Challenge. An outgrowth of an executive order signed by President Trump in April, the Challenge aims to inspire students, educators and community leaders to work together to ensure the next generation is ready to take on the unprecedented technological change we can expect in the near future. This goes beyond politics, and asks students to find ways to use artificial intelligence to respond to challenges in students’ local communities.
This initiative has arrived not a moment too soon. New developments in AI are announced almost daily – some promising, some disconcerting. The headlines show us every day that this world-changing technology will need governance and guardrails left firmly in qualified human hands. The Trump White House understands this, and is right to engage America’s youth. Who better to challenge our thinking on emerging tech than those who will be impacted the most?
If educators prioritize safe and ethical engagement with AI in the classroom, this could be one of the most consequential school years in decades. Generation Z is coming close to the end of their school years. Generation Alpha, in school behind them, may well be renamed by history as “Generation AI,” because they will be the first to come of age in a world with all the power of artificial intelligence at their fingertips. The sooner they start working through what that means, the better.
Different schools and communities will inspire students to meet the Presidential AI Challenge in different ways, but there are a few consistent elements that educators, community leaders, and the tech community should strive to instill in American youth so that they learn to engage with AI in responsible, ethical ways.
The first is to reconceptualize the idea of digital citizenship. It’s not just about being nice on social media anymore (although that remains important). But we must make sure students understand that AI is a tool to be used responsibly, and that being a good citizen extends to online communities. Understanding ethical standards is key, as is the constant reminder that technology should serve humanity, and not the other way around. As powerful as the technology will be, the students using it will have to remember that their human mind is still in charge.
If the human minds are to remain in charge, we will need to sharpen critical thinking skills at all educational levels. Switzerland and Sweden, for instance, have integrated these skills into all levels of their curriculum – even into continuing education in their workforce. Critical thinking will be the bedrock of ethical AI use. By fostering skills to question, analyze, and evaluate AI outputs, we empower learners to challenge assumptions and create AI systems that foster trust and respect. The use of AI as a crutch – like writing your term papers for you – is the exact opposite of this. It’s more than just lazy – it sets us back on doing the important work to keep this technology in check.
<a href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/?utm_campaign=summer&amp;utm_content=editorialsummersale&amp;utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial">End of Summer Sale &#8211; Get 40% off New DailyWire+ Annual Memberships</a>
To stop AI from replacing critical thinking, we should train students to use AI as a tool for exploration and curiosity: start with an idea in your own brain, then explore further with AI-generated insight that you never fully trust and always verify. Once outputs are created, there must always be a &#8220;human in the loop&#8221; by design, evaluating AI outputs and coming up with an original solution based on human judgment. Students can study, design, and ensure solutions reflect steps that allow humans to interject moral reasoning and human creativity.
The next generation will need to understand more than just how to interact with a chatbot in a safe, ethical, and helpful way. AI’s ripple effects will go beyond our screens, as the need for more physical data centers to power AI innovation increases. We must set an example by wrestling with policy questions, like energy access issues, in an empathetic, human-centered way. We don’t want power grids diverting power to data centers while hospitals can’t keep their machines on. AI must be used to uplift communities, as outlined in the Presidential AI Challenge.
We are poised to mark the 250th anniversary of America’s founding in a world abounding with technology that our founders could only dream of. But the same values that inspired them, a “decent respect” for freedom, human dignity, and individual rights, should guide us as we explore this uncharted technological territory. The upcoming school year, educators and students alike have a fascinating opportunity to engage with this technology in ways that align with our values.
* * *
Theresa Payton is the founder and CEO of Fortalice Solutions. She served as the White House Chief Information Officer under President George W. Bush, and co-founded the Major-Payton School of Business at Immaculata University.
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

School boy in a computer lab.

AI Heads Back To School: Students Face A Challenge That Will Shape The Future

Computer

President Trump

Public Schools

Students

Parents are fighting back after their three young three children were expelled from the Nysmith School for the Gifted after they raised concerns about antisemitic bullying and harassment — about which the headmaster and owner of the school, Kenneth R. Nysmith, allegedly did nothing.
Parents Brian Vazquez and Ashok Roy filed a lawsuit with the Virginia Attorney General&#8217;s Office of Civil Rights against the Nysmith School for the Gifted, Inc., and headmaster Kenneth Nysmith. In it, they alleged that their three children were expelled after they complained about antisemitic bullying and harassment targeting their 11-year-old daughter.
&#8220;The school had allowed anti-Semitism to take root in her class—in, for example, this picture of a social studies class project depicting the attributes of a &#8216;strong historical leader&#8217; &#8230; That photo, featuring the unmistakable face of Adolf Hitler, was shared with the entire school community. It was followed by a pattern of persistent and severe anti-Semitic harassment of Complainants’ young daughter,&#8221; the lawsuit alleges.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
A northern Virginia private school hung up a Palestinian flag in the school gym and taught the kids that H!tler was a “strong historical leader,” before expelling Jewish kids who complained. <a href="https://t.co/sSGphCJTk1">pic.twitter.com/sSGphCJTk1</a>
— Marina Medvin 🇺🇸 (@MarinaMedvin) <a href="https://twitter.com/MarinaMedvin/status/1940025635339956552?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 1, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Vazquez and Roy stated that other students began bullying their daughter because she was Jewish shortly after Hamas terrorists murdered more than 1,200 Israelis, raping and torturing men, women, and children on October 7, 2023 — and that they&#8217;d informed Mr. Nysmith of the problem at the time.
The suit alleges that children at the school put &#8220;pro-Palestine stickers on school-issued laptops and lockers&#8221; and referred to Jews as &#8220;baby-killers&#8221; who &#8220;deserve to die because of what is happening in Gaza.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
&#8220;The bullies told their daughter that everyone at the school is against Jews and Israel, which is why they hate you,&#8221; the complaint alleges.
The complaint was submitted by the complaint Louis D. Brandeis Center.
Read more here:<a href="https://t.co/9qyzHBIAoG">https://t.co/9qyzHBIAoG</a>
— Eitan Fischberger (@EFischberger) <a href="https://twitter.com/EFischberger/status/1940041573841998241?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 1, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;The bullies told their daughter that everyone at the school is against Jews and Israel, which is why they hate you,&#8221; the complaint reads.
<a class="c-link" href="https://get.dailywire.com/freedom/?utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial&amp;utm_campaign=freedom&amp;utm_content=freedomeditorial" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://get.dailywire.com/freedom/?utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial&amp;utm_campaign=freedom&amp;utm_content=freedomeditorial" data-sk="tooltip_parent" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-2388">JULY 4 SALE: Get Six Months Of DW+ Free</a>
&#8220;Mr. Nysmith promised to take action – but did nothing,&#8221; the suit alleges. &#8220;A few weeks later, after Mr. Nysmith decided to hang a Palestinian flag in the Nysmith School gym, the harassment of their daughter grew more severe. Complainants notified Mr. Nysmith that harassment of their daughter had become much worse and pleaded for his help. In response, Mr. Nysmith told them to tell their daughter to &#8216;toughen up&#8217; and abruptly ended the meeting.&#8221;
It was just two days after that meeting that Vazquez and Roy say they were informed that all three of their children were being expelled from the school.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
When the family raised concerns about this and other incidents, the school told them to &#8220;toughen up.&#8221;
Two days after that call, all three of their kids were expelled via email—right before mid-semester grades and after nearby schools&#8217; application deadlines had passed. <a href="https://t.co/Z9OGSLGcBj">pic.twitter.com/Z9OGSLGcBj</a>
— Eitan Fischberger (@EFischberger) <a href="https://twitter.com/EFischberger/status/1940041565176496164?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 1, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
In the letter terminating the students&#8217; enrollment, the headmaster put the onus on the parents, claiming that he could not see a &#8220;path forward&#8221; due to the parents&#8217; &#8220;profound lack of trust&#8221; in both him and the school.

Israeli Flag on Flagpole

Virginia School Under Fire For Expelling Kids Who Objected To Antisemitic Bullying

antisemitism

Gaza

Global Politics

Israel

Politics

Pro-Hamas

In 2007, when Hillary Clinton was <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/26/us/politics/26DEBATE-TRANSCRIPT.html">asked</a> in a Democratic primary debate whether she would be comfortable having “King and King” — a children’s picture book about a prince who marries another man — read to her second-grade child as part of the school curriculum, she responded that it was a “matter of parental discretion.”
It’s remarkable how far off the deep end the Left has gone in just a few short years.
This week, the Supreme Court will <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_calendars/MonthlyArgumentCalApril2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">hear a case</a> brought by a group of parents claiming what Clinton argued years ago: Parents should be able to decide whether or not their children read LGBTQ storybooks at school.
Oral arguments will be heard for the parental rights case Mahmoud v. Taylor, which <a href="https://becketfund.org/media/religious-parents-ask-supreme-court-to-restore-opt-outs-for-pride-storybooks/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">originated</a> when the Montgomery County Board of Education introduced LGBTQ storybooks to the elementary school curriculum and revoked its existing parental notice and opt-out policies. Muslim, Jewish, and Christian parents challenged the school district’s ban on elementary school opt-outs on the grounds that the policy burdened their constitutional right to free exercise of religion.
The diverse coalition of parents isn’t asking the school district to remove the LGBTQ storybooks from classrooms. They simply want the option to remove their children from the classroom when content is taught that conflicts with their religious beliefs. Parents are the primary educators of their children, and that vocation doesn’t stop when kids begin to attend school.
The board of education added storybooks that introduce gender ideology and sexuality to children as young as three or four years old. These storybooks are transparently part of an activist push to introduce children to same-sex relationships, transgender ideology, and LGBTQ vocabulary at a startlingly young age.
“Born Ready” features a female main character who repeatedly claims, “Inside, I’m a boy,” and whose parents immediately start treating her like a boy. “Not everything needs to make sense. This is about love,” Penelope’s mom tells her confused older brother. The book’s author, Jodie Patterson, serves on the board of the Human Rights Campaign, a radical LGBTQ advocacy group.
Another book in the Montgomery County curriculum, <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/wu2be63z1cfa0jg6fq3je/APiCjohPQCCnkdX6jXcrOIE/Book%20Covers%20%2B%20Pages/Storybooks%20(Full%20text)?dl=0&amp;e=3&amp;rlkey=te8vom170eoxvb57ivge6ecue&amp;subfolder_nav_tracking=1">titled</a> “My Rainbow,” is about a transgender-identifying boy’s desire to have long hair to fit in with “cisgender girls.” Trinity Neal, a transgender-identifying boy, and his mother, DeShanna, a nonbinary activist, wrote the story based on their experiences. DeShanna <a href="https://history.delaware.gov/lgbtq/my-rainbow-and-trinity-neals-rainbow-wig/">advocated</a> for Medicaid coverage of Trinity’s puberty blockers, resulting in the first Medicaid coverage of transgender medical procedures in their home state of Delaware. Subsequently, Trinity <a href="https://history.delaware.gov/lgbtq/my-rainbow-and-trinity-neals-rainbow-wig/">became</a> the first minor in the state to change his birth certificate’s gender marker from male to female.
“Jacob’s Room to Choose,” about a cross-dressing boy whose school accommodates him by abolishing gendered bathrooms, was <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/wu2be63z1cfa0jg6fq3je/APiCjohPQCCnkdX6jXcrOIE/Book%20Covers%20%2B%20Pages/Storybooks%20(Full%20text)?dl=0&amp;e=3&amp;rlkey=te8vom170eoxvb57ivge6ecue&amp;subfolder_nav_tracking=1">published</a> through the American Psychological Association’s children’s book imprint. APA has prominently <a href="https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2024/02/policy-supporting-transgender-nonbinary#:~:text=%E2%80%9CAPA%20also%20affirms%20the%20essential,appropriate%20youth%20self%2Dadvocacy.%E2%80%9D" target="_blank" rel="noopener">supported</a> transgender medical procedures for minors and advocated for so-called “gender-affirming care.”
The other books at the heart of Mahmoud v. Taylor are similarly written at an elementary school reading level but focus on complex adult topics of sexuality and gender identity. “Love, Violet” <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/wu2be63z1cfa0jg6fq3je/APiCjohPQCCnkdX6jXcrOIE/Book%20Covers%20%2B%20Pages/Storybooks%20(Full%20text)?dl=0&amp;e=3&amp;rlkey=te8vom170eoxvb57ivge6ecue&amp;subfolder_nav_tracking=1">focuses</a> on a same-sex relationship between elementary school classmates. “Pride Puppy” <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/wu2be63z1cfa0jg6fq3je/APiCjohPQCCnkdX6jXcrOIE/Book%20Covers%20%2B%20Pages/Storybooks%20(Full%20text)?dl=0&amp;e=3&amp;rlkey=te8vom170eoxvb57ivge6ecue&amp;subfolder_nav_tracking=1">instructs</a> readers to identify leather, underwear, a lip ring, an intersex flag, and a drag king in its illustrations.
“What Are Your Words?” <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/wu2be63z1cfa0jg6fq3je/APiCjohPQCCnkdX6jXcrOIE/Book%20Covers%20%2B%20Pages/Storybooks%20(Full%20text)?dl=0&amp;e=3&amp;rlkey=te8vom170eoxvb57ivge6ecue&amp;subfolder_nav_tracking=1">encourages</a> kids to change their pronouns, promoting confusing pairs like “ey/em,” “ze/zir,” and “xe/xir,” and using they/them pronouns to refer to individuals in the story. And “Intersection Allies,” another book <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/wu2be63z1cfa0jg6fq3je/APiCjohPQCCnkdX6jXcrOIE/Book%20Covers%20%2B%20Pages/Storybooks%20(Full%20text)?dl=0&amp;e=3&amp;rlkey=te8vom170eoxvb57ivge6ecue&amp;subfolder_nav_tracking=1">featured</a> in the case, includes a foreword by critical race theorist and activist Kimberle Crenshaw.
These storybooks are examples of radical propaganda written by progressive activists to shape the hearts and minds of the next generation. Kids may not know better than to believe what they’re taught, but American adults aren’t so convinced by these woke storybooks. Only 3% of Americans <a href="https://becketnewsite.s3.amazonaws.com/20250115160612/Religious-Freedom-Index-2024-Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">believe</a> that instruction on human sexuality and gender identity is appropriate for pre-K or kindergarten-aged children. And 77% of Americans <a href="https://becketnewsite.s3.amazonaws.com/20250115160612/Religious-Freedom-Index-2024-Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">believe</a> that parents should be able to opt their children out of gender and sexuality instruction.
Just a few years ago, I pulled my children out of Fairfax County Schools because of the progressive garbage they were being exposed to in their classrooms on a daily basis. My family is not alone. There is a large movement of parents who have made the same decision we have, but not every family is in a position to do so. Parents should undoubtedly have the right to opt their children out of reading these radical activist storybooks: Children are not wards of the state.
When public schools add storybooks that teach gender ideology as truth, the state has violated the right of parents to raise their children in their religious tradition, along with teaching them the corresponding religious beliefs about gender, human sexuality, and the meaning of marriage.
The government has no business mandating that elementary students learn radical gender ideology. Fortunately, parents will do whatever it takes to protect their children and exercise their parental rights — even if it means taking the case to the Supreme Court.
* * *
Terry Schilling is a parental rights advocate and president of the American Principles Project.
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Mixed race teacher reading to class

Will SCOTUS Back Parents When It Comes To LGBTQ Storybooks?

Books

Children

Gender

gender ideology

LGBTQ

Parental Rights in Education

Parenting

SCOTUS

Supreme Court

This is going to be my most controversial take of many months, but it&#8217;s urgent now, because there is a bipartisan group of senators with the backing of President Trump who want to end daylight saving time.
I don&#8217;t like this. I am a big supporter of daylight saving time and I&#8217;m not just saying that to be contrarian. I really like daylight saving time, and I think it is a mistake to end it.
When all the senators get together across both parties and they all agree on something, you know that thing is going to be terrible. In this case, what they want to do is lock the clock. Why? Because every person who&#8217;s never given a second thought to daylight saving time and has just scrolled through Twitter will say, “Actually, daylight saving time is really bad, because people die every year. Did you know that it actually increases deaths every year?”
To that I say, “Oh, really? How&#8217;s that?”
“Because I saw a tweet about it one time. It increases deaths because people have to wake up a little earlier. Plus, they have heart attacks,” they will say.
Well, there is a negligible uptick in deaths but that is a statistically dubious observation. What that argument ignores, however, are all of the benefits we get from daylight saving time. I guess the question you have to ask yourself, which really gets down to a difference between the Left and the Right, is “Why do we have daylight saving time in the first place?” Before we go and tear down Chesterton&#8217;s Fence, how about we ask, ”Why is that fence up in the first place?”
Most people will say, “Well, because of farming. It used to be when a lot of people were farmers, having that extra daylight was really helpful. But, you know, now most people don&#8217;t really farm, so it&#8217;s not a big deal.”
<h3><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/mks-ep-1714-member-exclusive?elementPosition=4&amp;row=1&amp;rowHeadline=The+Michael+Knowles+Show&amp;rowType=Horizontal+Show+Carousel" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Michael Knowles Show</a></h3>
Okay then, what are the other benefits of daylight saving time? Daylight saving time extends daylight in the warmer months when you want to be outside playing around. You don&#8217;t need that extra daylight in the winter months when you really don&#8217;t want to be outside much anyway.
According to the Department of Energy, daylight saving time <a href="https://energyharbor.com/en/energy-resources/energy-savings-tips/daylight-saving-time-save-energy#:~:text=To%20be%20clear%2C%20the%20U.S.,to%20turn%20on%20the%20lights." target="_blank" rel="noopener">reduces energy usage</a> and energy costs, not by a ton, but by 0.5%. That’s pretty good when you consider all the energy of the United States. There is also evidence that daylight saving time actually reduces deaths, because it reduces car crashes. That&#8217;s from <a href="https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/pdf/10.2105/AJPH.85.1.92" target="_blank" rel="noopener">a study</a> back in 1995. It also saves property and might save people&#8217;s lives because daylight saving time reduces street crime, pretty significantly. Robberies, for instance, dropped 27% during the sunset hours during daylight saving time. That&#8217;s according to a more <a href="https://jenniferdoleac.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Doleac_Sanders_DST.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">recent study</a> from 2015.
Daylight saving time increases economic activity because you can go out, and you&#8217;re more inclined to go shopping. You&#8217;re more inclined to work a little bit. It increases economic activity both domestically and internationally, because other countries use daylight saving time too.
But here’s my most basic argument for daylight saving time: it&#8217;s a tradition. It&#8217;s a kind of fun tradition. It&#8217;s a tradition that recognizes, in a particularly pronounced way, the changing of the seasons, the movement of time, the variety of life. It&#8217;s kind of fun, and kooky. People will say, “Well, we shouldn&#8217;t have to change our clocks twice a year, what a hassle. It&#8217;s not efficient.” Life is about more than efficiency, my friends. Our modern, clinical, robotic culture just wants to maximize efficiency in everything.
I am a conservative. I don&#8217;t want to maximize efficiency in everything. I like to enjoy fun, quirky little things. I enjoy our culture, and that&#8217;s a fun little cultural habit. It actually does produce economic and health benefits as well, and it kind of makes sense. And we&#8217;ve forgotten why we had daylight saving time in the first place. And like so many levelers and radicals, when we forget why a tradition exists, we just want to get rid of it. We don&#8217;t ask ourselves, “Why did that tradition arise in the first place? Why, if we maintain that tradition, have we ever tried to get rid of the tradition? How has it worked out?”
It seems like there&#8217;s a mass psychosis that&#8217;s going on that convinces everyone that we&#8217;ve been wrong for so many decades now.
I&#8217;m pro daylight saving time and you should be too. Call your congressman.

Spain Moves The Clock Forward One Hour To Adapt To Daylight Saving Time

Should We End Daylight Saving Time?

Clocks

Congress

Crime

Daylight Saving Time

Farmers

Light

Michael Knowles

U.S. Senate

By pushing its flagrant extremist agenda to the detriment of its predominantly rural, blue-collar residents, Maine’s Democrat majority reveals a deep-seated disrespect for Maine residents and an ideological misalignment with voter preferences, federal guidelines, and the timeless democratic principles that this country was built upon.
In the name of bolstering the state’s culture of equity, inclusion, and social justice, Maine Democrats have destroyed these virtues by forcing their progressive redefinition and implementation at the expense of Maine voters — a disturbing trend that is plaguing the country at large in a widespread cultural decline.
This is seen most glaringly in the transgender craze that’s possessed Maine’s elected leaders and educational bureaucracy. Countless parents, athletes, coaches, and state legislators have spoken out against Maine’s defiance of federal guidance prohibiting biological men from participating in women’s and girls’ sports. This is more than just anecdotal; <a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.dailywire.com/news/exclusive-trump-trans-athletes-womens-sports-maine__;!!PxibshUo2Yr_Ta5B!3KREuUGLNJperg_9upddiHG3dlNgmGJqVv4ICai4oQ5KUQtyca9uE7x1TOxzGCVTop8i_lBGOJbCbeIGytNsZtE$" target="_blank" rel="noopener">recent polling found</a> that a majority of Mainers (including the highly coveted independent bloc) believe high school sports should be separated by biological sex.
Maine Governor Janet Mills’ aggressive pushback against President Trump’s “<a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/keeping-men-out-of-womens-sports/__;!!PxibshUo2Yr_Ta5B!3KREuUGLNJperg_9upddiHG3dlNgmGJqVv4ICai4oQ5KUQtyca9uE7x1TOxzGCVTop8i_lBGOJbCbeIG2fwqsv0$">Keeping</a><a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/keeping-men-out-of-womens-sports/__;!!PxibshUo2Yr_Ta5B!3KREuUGLNJperg_9upddiHG3dlNgmGJqVv4ICai4oQ5KUQtyca9uE7x1TOxzGCVTop8i_lBGOJbCbeIG2fwqsv0$" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> Men Out Of Women’s Sports</a>” executive order wasn’t just a media stunt or political statement: it’s going to have a very real impact on Maine students and teachers if millions of dollars of much-needed federal funding is taken away from them as a result of the governor’s obstinate allegiance to this extremist agenda.
Yet the state’s Democrat majority persists in its radical agenda, insisting that they know better than the very constituents who elected them in the first place. It’s the reason why dozens of Maine school districts regularly withhold information from parents about their children’s gender transition process and the schools’ “gender plans” to help “affirm” students’ new identities. This condescension is both an insult to Maine residents and an astonishing abuse of parental rights — and underscores the contempt that the elected have for their electors.
Lest you think this deep disrespect for the electorate is unique to The Pine Tree State, think again. Across the country, the chattering class has been pushing a radical gender agenda against the will of families, and to the detriment of the country’s most vulnerable students. As part and parcel of this radical agenda, 12 states and the District of Columbia have declared themselves “transgender sanctuary states” to offer protections for youths seeking gender procedures while <a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://defendinged.org/investigations/list-of-school-district-transgender-gender-nonconforming-student-policies/__;!!PxibshUo2Yr_Ta5B!3KREuUGLNJperg_9upddiHG3dlNgmGJqVv4ICai4oQ5KUQtyca9uE7x1TOxzGCVTop8i_lBGOJbCbeIGIoXlfBg$" target="_blank" rel="noopener">over 1,200 school districts across both red and blue states</a> have similar parental exclusion policies on the books, impacting more than 12 million children.
This isn’t just an assault on the parent-child relationship; it’s also a weaponization of tax dollars against the very people who pay them in the first place. Parents have a right to know what happens while their children are under the care of school personnel, and willfully concealing students’ information in the name of “inclusion” and “equality” is a clear violation of federal law.
Ultimately, Maine’s Democrat leaders are more focused on pushing their coercive agenda than fighting for what Mainers truly need and want. At best, their agenda is out-of-touch; at worst, it’s tyrannical.
Maine isn’t an ideological test lab where politicians can experiment with the effects of their extremist political philosophy — it’s a state with real people with tangible needs and priorities. It’s time for the state&#8217;s leaders to relinquish the activism and get back to the business that the people of Maine elected them to conduct.
At the end of the day, Mainers — and Americans as a whole — want common-sense policies that respect their values and protect their freedoms. Politicians should listen to voters and be responsive to their needs, rather than pushing an agenda far removed from the demands of their constituents. Let Maine be a warning to other blue states: should you choose to push your radical social justice agenda, be prepared to suffer the consequences.
* * *
Nicole Neily is the President &amp; Founder of Defending Education.
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

MixCollage-26-Mar-2025-01-37-PM-9289

Maine’s Transgender Tug-Of-War Will Be Coming To A State Near You

Democrats

Federal Government

Leftists

Maine

school district

Transgender

Women's sports

Gov. Brad Little (R) came through for the families of Idaho last Thursday morning by signing House Bill 93, the <a href="https://legislature.idaho.gov/sessioninfo/2025/legislation/h0093/">Parental Choice Tax Credit bill</a>, into law shortly before the 11:46 a.m. deadline. Idaho now has a school choice program for the first time in the state’s history.
The bill enacts a $50 million private school choice tax credit program with all schoolchildren statewide eligible. Idaho becomes the 14th state in the nation to enact universal (or near-universal) school choice, joining Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia.
Upon signing the bill, Gov. Little <a href="https://gov.idaho.gov/pressrelease/gov-little-signs-house-bill-93-creating-the-parental-choice-tax-credit-program/">declared</a>, “With the passage of the $50 million Parental Choice Tax Credit program, Idaho boasts even more abundant schooling options for Idaho students and families.”
Early in February, the state House passed the bill by a vote of <a href="https://legislature.idaho.gov/sessioninfo/2025/legislation/h0093/">42-28</a>, providing hope to parents that Idaho may finally see school choice become a reality. The longtime Republican-controlled state had been void of any form of private school choice, resembling its Democratic-controlled West Coast neighbors of Washington, Oregon, and California.
On February 16, President Donald Trump weighed in with strong support by <a href="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114015581630558522">posting</a> on Truth Social: “Congratulations to Governor Brad Little, and Idaho Legislators, who are fighting to bring School Choice to their beautiful State. $50 Million Dollars to empower parents to provide the very best Education for their child – GREAT news for Idaho families. This Bill, which has my Complete and Total Support, MUST PASS!”
Then, on February 19, the Idaho Senate voted <a href="https://legislature.idaho.gov/sessioninfo/2025/legislation/h0093/">20-15</a> in favor of the bill, which sent it to the Governor’s desk for signature.
Yet, in uncanny measure for a red state governor, who already had the votes from the legislature and public support from the President of the United States, Gov. Little signaled it was not a given that he would sign the bill.
Before the bill reached his desk on February 21, Gov. Little’s Office had quickly placed an automatic voice message for all incoming calls. The message instructed callers to press one if the call relates to House Bill 93. From there, the voice recording stated that the Governor’s Office was only receiving calls from Idaho residents and only one call per household. It continued, “If you would like Gov. Little to sign House Bill 93, please press one. If you would like Gov. Little to veto House Bill 93, please press two.”
Within a few days of the bill reaching the governor, Press Secretary Joan Varsek <a href="https://www.eastidahonews.com/2025/02/thousands-of-phone-calls-flood-governors-desk-as-school-choice-bill-awaits-his-decision/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> the Governor’s office received “thousands of calls, emails, and voicemails on both sides in reference to H.B. 93.”
On Monday, the specific number of responses was released, which totaled <a href="https://www.idahoednews.org/state-policy/governors-office-received-more-than-32k-requests-to-veto-house-bill-93/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">37,457</a>. Only 13.6% of those who reached out were in support of the governor signing the bill, while 86.4% were in opposition.
Yet, these last-minute cries for a veto were far from an accurate reflection of Idahoans’ support of school choice. A <a href="https://www.clubforgrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/securepdfs/2025/02/CfG_ID_ParentalChoiceTaxCredit_PollingMemo1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">February 11-12 poll</a> showed that “nearly three-in-five Idaho voters support passing the Idaho Parental Choice Tax Credit bill.” The favorability of parental choice in education is nothing new as a 2024 poll of Idahoans by Boise State University found that <a href="https://www.boisestate.edu/sps/2024-idaho-public-policy-survey/#education" target="_blank" rel="noopener">49%</a> strongly favor or somewhat favor education funding following a student to a “private or religious” school whereas only <a href="https://www.boisestate.edu/sps/2024-idaho-public-policy-survey/#education" target="_blank" rel="noopener">41.1%</a> somewhat or strongly oppose it.
While the Governor may never reveal why he waited until just a few hours before the deadline to sign the bill or why his office set up the phone poll when the results didn’t sway him, parents with schoolchildren statewide are grateful nevertheless that he delivered.
With House Bill 93 now law, parents who opt for a different education avenue than the failing public school system will be eligible to receive a refundable tax credit of up to <a href="https://idahocapitalsun.com/2025/02/19/private-education-tax-credit-bill-heads-to-idaho-governor/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">$5,000</a> per student. The amount will increase to <a href="https://idahocapitalsun.com/2025/02/19/private-education-tax-credit-bill-heads-to-idaho-governor/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">$7,500</a> per student for those with special needs. Both amounts are thousands of dollars less than public schools spend per student, with unacceptable educational outcomes.
As evidenced by the latest National Assessment of Educational Progress Exam scores, <a href="https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/publications/stt2024/pdf/2024219ID4.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">60%</a> of fourth-grade and <a href="https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/publications/stt2024/pdf/2024219ID8.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">69%</a> of eighth-grade public school students in Idaho are not proficient in math. Reading is worse, as <a href="https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/publications/stt2024/pdf/2024220ID4.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">69%</a> of fourth-grade and <a href="https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/publications/stt2024/pdf/2024220ID8.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">68%</a> of eighth-grade public school students in Idaho aren’t proficient. That’s nearly seven out of ten children failed by the system and robbed of their future.
Idaho is long overdue for allowing parents the freedom to select a better learning option for their children. Parents should not be bound to a failing system and left hoping their child will be one of the three out of the ten students who learn to read and perform math proficiently by the eighth grade.
The Office of the Governor website, on the “About Governor Brad Little” page, <a href="https://gov.idaho.gov/our-governor/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">states</a>: “Governor Little is committed to making decisions through one lens: the lens of ensuring Idaho’s children and grandchildren have the best opportunities to stay in Idaho and for the ones who have left to choose to return.
While it may have been in the eleventh hour, Gov. Little took action, recognizing that school choice is the solution to ensuring Idaho’s children and grandchildren have the best opportunities. Continuing course without an exit option for families from schools failing to provide students with proficiency would plague not only each child’s life but the state’s future. Not to mention, families with schoolchildren who have left Idaho would not have been incentivized to return when school choice abounds in other red states.
But thanks to a monumental signature last Thursday, that won’t be the case for the Gem State.
* * *
Dr. Keri D. Ingraham is a Senior Fellow at Discovery Institute, Director of the American Center for Transforming Education, and a Senior Fellow at Independent Women’s Forum.
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Idaho State Capitol sunset, Boise

This State’s Governor Delivers On School Choice In The Eleventh Hour

Charter Schools

Idaho

Parents rights

The <a href="https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reports/mathematics/2024/g4_8/?grade=8" target="_blank" rel="noopener">American education crisis</a> has become a national emergency that demands immediate correction.
According to the new <a href="https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reports/mathematics/2024/g4_8/?grade=8" target="_blank" rel="noopener">National Report Card,</a> a staggering 72% of eighth-grade students who took the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) math exam failed to score at the proficient level. In 2019 and before COVID school shutdowns, eighth graders’ math proficiency levels were already at an unacceptable 66% — 6% lower than where they are now.
This <a href="https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reports/mathematics/2024/g4_8/?grade=8">report card</a> underscores the need for a seismic shift toward academic excellence over DEI-driven policies, wasteful spending, and misaligned priorities. It also demands that Education Secretary nominee Linda McMahon’s leadership serve as the turning point in reclaiming global math leadership through strategies like those employed by Singapore.
Fortunately, the Senate has a chance to make this vision a reality by confirming McMahon — a remarkably successful entrepreneur with a proven track record of delivering a high-quality product. This time, her mission is even more critical: ensuring American families have every opportunity to access the world-class education they deserve.
McMahon <a href="https://youtu.be/6KPixHxNJuQ?si=P3tx26tzgC8XTVXs" target="_blank" rel="noopener">acknowledged</a> during her Senate confirmation hearing that the state of American education falls far short of being world-class, stating, &#8220;We have failed in our mission&#8221; and emphasized that &#8220;we are not delivering the high-quality education our children need.&#8221;
Unlike corrupt bureaucrats who spend billions on DEI initiatives at the expense of true student achievement, McMahon embodies the spirit of American exceptionalism and is focused on restoring the once-high standards for U.S. educational institutions. Today, plummeting student achievement demonstrated by recent NRC scores has embarrassingly reduced the U.S. to <a href="https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en/full-report.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">34th place in global rankings</a>, lagging significantly behind top-performing countries such as Singapore and China.
The U.S. education system is in desperate need of an examination of conscience, which I elaborated on in <a href="https://x.com/nickineily/status/1887166519626383760" target="_blank" rel="noopener">my testimony</a> before the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/live/TB4nIgmvHwY?si=cG7FPhHJpWfMAm-O" target="_blank" rel="noopener">House Committee on Education and the Workforce</a>. The previous administration created a dumpster fire by spending over <a href="https://defendinged.org/investigations/granted/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">one billion dollars</a> prioritizing diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives over core subject areas like math.
Much to students’ detriment, identity politics have permeated classrooms across America. Agenda-driven “educators” are brainwashing our nation’s children with <a href="https://defendinged.org/incidents/chicago-public-schools-health-education-scope-and-sequence-includes-teaching-pre-kindergarteners-to-correctly-identify-body-parts-typically-considered-private-including-nipples-penis-anus-an/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">gender ideology</a>. Schools have <a href="https://defendinged.org/investigations/list-of-school-district-transgender-gender-nonconforming-student-policies/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">kept parents in the dark</a> about their child transitioning to a different gender. Boys have been <a href="https://nypost.com/2024/12/17/us-news/female-athlete-permanently-hurt-by-trans-athlete-speaks-out/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">allowed</a> to compete in girl&#8217;s sports. Schools remain <a href="https://zwly9k6z.r.us-east-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdefendinged.org%2Finvestigations%2Flist-of-school-districts-using-restorative-practices%2F/1/01000194cd2e7442-77266d75-05ae-4df9-8e19-e0e4bb8dee38-000000/lc1ogL9S6PtZZziFOT06loyjYas=411" target="_blank" rel="noopener">unsafe</a>. <a href="https://defendinged.org/investigations/corrupted/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">DEI initiatives</a> have pitted students, educators, and administrators against each other and placed race above merit at the sacrifice of standards in excellence. Foreign funding from the <a href="https://zwly9k6z.r.us-east-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdefendinged.org%2Finvestigations%2Flittle-red-classrooms-china-infiltration-of-american-k-12-schools%2F/1/01000194cd2e7442-77266d75-05ae-4df9-8e19-e0e4bb8dee38-000000/G5UNp0ro-pKBgZxaFkxm9Fl_sK0=411" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Chinese Communist Party</a> and the <a href="https://www.thefp.com/p/nyc-public-school-wipes-israel-from-the-map" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Qatar Foundation</a> threatens U.S. national security, seeks to soften attitudes towards Chinese state-directed communism and antisemitism, and spreads hate among students in schools.
If confirmed as Education Secretary, McMahon will prioritize answering to students and parents over teachers’ unions and education progressive activists—a stark departure from the Biden administration’s approach over the past four years.
Conversely, Singapore’s fundamentally different approach to education — particularly in math — yields measurable success, as reflected in the nation’s consistently best-in-the-world test scores.
McMahon’s leadership at the Department of Education could serve as a model for both federal and state policies, particularly by mirroring Singapore’s approach. In Singapore, the government actively resists identity politics, instead prioritizing national unity and meritocracy. Unlike the U.S., Singaporean schools prioritize academics and character development over <a href="https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/singapore-schools-israel-hamas-war-teachers-dont-impose-personal-views-moe-4146306" target="_blank" rel="noopener">social activism.</a> Singapore’s <a href="https://www.moe.gov.sg/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Ministry of Education</a> has made it clear that progressive gender ideology has no place in the curriculum. Parental authority is <a href="https://transgendersg.com/healthcare/minors/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">upheld</a>, and schools are discouraged from withholding information about a child’s gender transition. Likewise, school sports remain sex-based, with no widespread movement to allow men to compete in women’s competitions. Instead of DEI-style initiatives that have led to division in the U.S., Singapore promotes diversity through <a href="https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/the-gist-new-bill-passed-to-maintain-racial-harmony-us-tariffs-could-have-indirect-impact-on-spore" target="_blank" rel="noopener">racial harmony.</a> Lastly, the country remains vigilant about foreign influence, particularly from China and the Middle East, by <a href="https://www.creatrixcampus.com/blog/role-cpe-protecting-rights-and-interests-international-students-studying-singapore">strictly regulating</a> foreign funding in education.
Moreover, Singapore&#8217;s Ministry of Education developed the world-renowned <a href="https://www.singaporemath.com/pages/what-is-singapore-math">Singapore Math</a> curriculum, which focuses on deep conceptual understanding through a <a href="https://mathsnoproblem.com/en/approach/concrete-pictorial-abstract">concrete-pictorial-abstract (CPA) approach</a>. This method emphasizes mastery of fewer topics, ensuring a strong foundation for advanced math. In contrast, the failing <a href="https://www.thecorestandards.org/Math/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">U.S. Common Core</a> prioritizes multiple problem-solving strategies over mastery, often leading to confusion and a lack of deep understanding. With its broad scope and fast pace, Common Core leaves students without a solid math foundation, while Singapore Math’s structured approach leads to long-term success, as seen in Singapore’s top global rankings.
If confirmed, McMahon should draw inspiration from Singapore’s success in math education to restore U.S. leadership and reignite American exceptionalism in education. Singapore’s approach prioritizes student learning without any indoctrination and an innovative math curriculum. With achievement gaps still unacceptable six years post-COVID, it’s time for an outside-the-box leader like McMahon to close them.
* * *
Nicole Neily is the President &amp; Founder of Parents Defending Education.
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Linda McMahon, Administrator of the Small Business

Simple Math: How Linda McMahon Can Help American Students Regain Their Math Mojo

Department of Education

Mathematics

Singapore

It is National School Choice Week in America, and the latest National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) exam scores were released on Wednesday. The horrifically low student academic performance scores make the undeniable case that American government-run K-12 education is an epic failure.
According to the NAEP results provided by The Nation’s Report Card, <a href="https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reports/reading/2024/g4_8/?grade=4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">69% of fourth-grade students</a> and <a href="https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reports/reading/2024/g4_8/?grade=8" target="_blank" rel="noopener">70% of eighth-grade students</a> aren’t proficient at reading — that’s only 3 out of 10 schoolchildren learning to read soundly. When students can’t read at grade level, it significantly hinders their other academic learning.
The NAEP math scores similarly confirm that a change of course in K-12 education is desperately needed. An astonishing <a href="https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reports/mathematics/2024/g4_8/?grade=4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">61% of fourth-grade students</a> and <a href="https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reports/mathematics/2024/g4_8/?grade=8" target="_blank" rel="noopener">72% of eighth-grade students</a> aren’t proficient in math.
As a nation, we can no longer justify restricting children to these failing schools for their education. Nor can the ever-increasing astronomical spending — well over<a href="https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2024/public-school-spending-per-pupil.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> $850 billion</a> annually — on the public education system continue to support the status quo. Change is urgently needed. And that change will require competition.
As Andy Puzder, <a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5102389-trump-andrew-puzder-fast-food-chain-ceo-eu-ambassador/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">President Trump’s nomination for U.S. Ambassador to the European Union</a>, recently <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IyfK6emqCA" target="_blank" rel="noopener">explained</a>, “Competition is the only thing that increases quality and decreases price.” It’s the basics of a free market, which is long overdue in K-12 education in the United States.
With the 2025 legislative sessions now underway in almost all states and Congress, there is an opportunity to enact critically needed school choice laws. Bills should be put forth from all angles to provide parents access to alternative educational avenues from the government-run, teacher union-controlled public education monopoly.
This year, several red states will work to pass new school choice programs or expand eligibility for existing programs. Since 2021, a dozen states — <a href="https://nypost.com/2024/11/17/opinion/why-trump-was-the-candidate-for-educational-freedom/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">11 of which had a Republican trifecta at the time</a> — have signed universal or near-universal school choice into law. Thirteen <a href="https://ballotpedia.org/State_government_trifectas" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Republican trifecta states</a> have yet to pass widespread school choice programs. This is the year several of those states have a shot at successfully setting all families statewide free to select an education alternative from the public school system.
While the state-level universal education freedom wins are happening in red states for now, parents living in purple and blue states must be empowered with educational options for their children. Congress passing the <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/9462/text" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Educational Choice for Children Act</a> would be a critical step forward in this effort. The Act would allow up to two million students to receive a scholarship from a non-profit granting organization. According to the <a href="https://investineducation.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Invest in Education</a> website, “Scholarships would be funded with private donations, not federal dollars, and donors would receive a federal tax credit.”
Additionally, at the federal level, on Inauguration Day, Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) <a href="https://www.cruz.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sen-cruz-rep-hern-introduce-school-choice-legislation-prioritizing-the-right-to-a-quality-education-for-every-child" target="_blank" rel="noopener">introduced</a> the <a href="https://www.cruz.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/student_empowerment_act_20251.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Student Empowerment Act</a> to expand the allowed usage of 529 tax-deferred education savings plan funds. That would include usage for <a href="https://www.cruz.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sen-cruz-rep-hern-introduce-school-choice-legislation-prioritizing-the-right-to-a-quality-education-for-every-child" target="_blank" rel="noopener">educational expenses</a> beyond tuition, such as “school curriculum, books, tutoring, testing fees,” and educational therapies for students with disabilities. Parents could use their 529 funds for the qualifying K-12 educational expenses regardless of whether their student is enrolled in a public or private school, or homeschool.
U.S. Representative Kevin Hern (R-OK), a co-sponsor of the bill, <a href="https://www.cruz.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sen-cruz-rep-hern-introduce-school-choice-legislation-prioritizing-the-right-to-a-quality-education-for-every-child" target="_blank" rel="noopener">commented</a> that “Expanding 529 accounts is a game-changer for education, giving students, workers, and families the freedom and opportunity they deserve, whether that’s in a traditional classroom setting or homeschool. It’s time to make education more affordable and meet the evolving needs of our workforce.”
Beyond private school choice and homeschooling, parents must also have choices within the public school system. That should come in the form of states passing open enrollment laws allowing students to enroll in a different public district school within (intra-district) and outside of (inter-district) their residential assignment as space allows. Zip code must not bind a student to a certain public school. That’s not how other taxpayer-funded government services, such as public parks and libraries, work.
Public charter schools, magnet schools, and other choice schools are no different, and laws must be enacted at the state level that allow families to select these schools. Laws must also not restrict growing the supply of these sought-after public school options.
The education of our future generation is too important to allow the public education monopoly to continue to trap children in failing schools, robbing them of their future. It’s past time for the market forces of competition to reign in America’s K-12 education environment — increasing quality and decreasing price. As a nation, we must keep advancing school choice through all means. Our children deserve nothing less than access to a high-quality education.
* * *
<a href="https://www.discovery.org/p/ingraham/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Dr. Keri D. Ingraham</a> is a Senior Fellow at Discovery Institute, Director of the American Center for Transforming Education, and a Senior Fellow at Independent Women’s Forum.
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Students taking test in class

New National Test Scores Make Undeniable Case For School Choice

Elementary Schools

K-12

School Choice

Ted Cruz

Testing

The following is an edited transcript of an interview between Daily Wire Editor-in-Chief John Bickley and the president and CEO of Alliance Defending Freedom Kristen Waggoner on a <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/trump-targets-dei-gender-policies-1-25-25/id1576594336?i=1000685411732" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Saturday edition of Morning Wire.</a>
* * *
President Trump has returned to office with an extremely ambitious agenda – and has immediately taken executive action to jump start what he’s promising will be a transformative year for the nation. Among the issues he’s already begun to address is reversing the Biden administration’s policies on gender identity and Diversity Equity and Inclusion. Morning Wire sat down with the president and CEO of <a href="https://adflegal.org/">Alliance Defending Freedom</a>, a legal group that has been leading the charge on gender and DEI cases, to discuss Trump’s actions and cultural shifts on the issues.
* * *
JOHN: Joining us now to discuss Trump’s executive action on gender and DEI is Alliance Defending Freedom President and CEO Kristen Waggoner. First of all, thank you so much for coming on.
KRISTEN: Thanks for having me.
JOHN: I wanted to start with the big picture. We just witnessed a historic – on so many levels – inauguration, the biggest political comeback in American history. In terms of the larger issues that your organization in particular is really concerned with, what does this mean for the future of the country in the coming four years?
KRISTEN: We&#8217;re thrilled with the promises that President Trump has made with regard to the revolution of common sense. That&#8217;s what he referred to in his inaugural speech, that we&#8217;re going to return back toward reality, toward common sense, and the rule of law. And I think what it means for practical purposes is that he is intending to use the federal government to ensure we eradicate a toxic ideology that has wreaked havoc on Americans, both in terms of safety, opportunities, and freedom.
JOHN: Yes, let&#8217;s unpack that. I know that gender ideology has been a key priority for your organization. The Daily Wire has also been very focused on this issue. What are we seeing coming from the Trump administration on gender-related policies?
KRISTEN: The Trump administration has issued a number of executive orders that deal with gender identity as well as censorship and DEI in the federal government, and all of those come together to essentially restore the legal and scientifically sound definition of sex in federal law, meaning that we are created male and female, and that sex is neither chosen nor changed. And that will have tremendous implications, both on women&#8217;s rights, with regard to sports, fairness, privacy, locker rooms, also what our children are being taught, and in numerous other areas.
<div id="attachment_865525" style="width: 1034px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-865525" class="size-large wp-image-865525" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/Untitled-design-5-1024x576.jpg" alt="President Donald Trump signs executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House on January 20, 2025 in Washington, DC." width="1024" height="576" />Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images</div>
JOHN: The Biden administration aggressively pushed progressive gender ideology – how much has that impacted schools, local organizations – how pervasive has this actually been?
KRISTEN: Well, at <a href="https://adflegal.org/">Alliance Defending Freedom</a> we have represented scores of female athletes that have been deprived not only of fairness on the athletic field, but also privacy in locker rooms, in dorm rooms, in showers, and safety. We also have represented students who have been deprived of free speech, and counselors and teachers who have been deprived of free speech, compelled to use pronouns that don&#8217;t reflect biological truth. We have represented parents who have been deprived of decision-making authority for kids and teachers deprived of conscience rights. And we&#8217;ve even seen schools that have been deprived of certain funding mechanisms because of this ideology. President Trump has issued an order telling the agencies in the executive branch that they can, they must stop infusing all of these areas of federal law with this notion that we are created something other than male or female.
JOHN: Do we expect to still see states like California undermine this effort or are there federal levers that can push back against the attempts to continue this kind of ideologically crammed down in schools?
KRISTEN: I guarantee you, you&#8217;ll see states like California, New York, and Washington try to undermine these executive orders. And because of the way that our system of government is set out, there will be bad states that will continue to try to undermine the rights of American citizens. And there will be litigation that continues. But the difference here is they can no longer say that federal law requires this, in terms of the agency action. And now the power of the federal government in all of the places that it shows up is actually on the opposite side of this fight. And in addition, the Trump administration can go a step further, and it can deprive institutions as well as state governments of federal funding when they refuse to recognize biological reality and common sense.
<iframe style="width: 100%; max-width: 660px; overflow: hidden; border-radius: 10px;" src="https://embed.podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/trump-targets-dei-gender-policies-1-25-25/id1576594336?i=1000685411732" height="175" frameborder="0" sandbox="allow-forms allow-popups allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-storage-access-by-user-activation allow-top-navigation-by-user-activation"></iframe>
JOHN: From a legal perspective, does the federal government coming out against this ideology, does it further expose these local entities, the school boards, etc. to legal ramifications for promoting something that could be dangerous or unfair to women and girls?
KRISTEN: It should do so, assuming that the administrative agencies are putting teeth in these actions. So again, the way that the government works is the executive branch, the president sets the agenda and tells the agencies what to do. Then it&#8217;s the agencies that create the guidance and enforce what the president has said in federal law. So it will be critical that the agencies follow this direction and put real teeth into this by denying federal funding and by going after those states and those educational institutions that are not honoring the rights of Americans in this area.
JOHN: Now, Alliance Defending Freedom has been fighting on this front for a while now. Are you guys seeing progress, generally speaking, in terms of the legal arguments against gender ideology? 
KRISTEN: We are seeing progress, but there still is an uphill battle. I think my hope is that we&#8217;re turning the corner on this issue. For years, we&#8217;ve been fighting it for over 10 years now with regard to bathrooms, locker rooms, and, more recently, eight or so years on the sports front. I think we&#8217;re turning the page. But again, we have half of the states that have adopted laws to protect women and girls in sports as an example. And these are state laws. Those are being challenged and argued that they are unconstitutional. So those cases will continue, but we will continue now to have the federal government on the side of women and girls, rather than against us. I also think we can&#8217;t possibly underestimate the importance of the federal government saying there are two sexes and that you cannot choose nor change biological reality – because that will play out in many different ways across the government, and it will stop the social engineering that we&#8217;ve been seeing that&#8217;s happening through the power of the federal government.
<h3><a href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/?_gl=1*1lail3r*_gcl_aw*R0NMLjE3MzIyMDEyNDkuQ2owS0NRaUEwZnU1QmhEUUFSSXNBTVhVQk9JSkM0VnNsMFVreURxYXUxVWVEVWdOdjZkNzR2Y1pEeEZQeHVBcGl2R3BLaTdBMjVzT1p5TWFBdG1nRUFMd193Y0I.*_gcl_au*NDUxNDQ0NzYwLjE3MzY3ODI2NDY.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczNjk1NzYwMy4zNDAuMS4xNzM2OTU3NzE2LjYwLjAuMA.." target="_blank" rel="noopener">CELEBRATE #47 WITH 47% OFF DAILYWIRE+ MEMBERSHIPS + A FREE $20 GIFT</a></h3>
JOHN: Now, you mentioned at the top that DEI is a big part of what the Trump administration is trying to weed out. This is something the Biden administration heavily focused on in a way we&#8217;ve never seen before. What kinds of actions from Trump are we seeing there, and what do we expect in the coming years?
KRISTEN: The executive order that President Trump issued today on DEI is so critical because it removes DEI from federal government policies, and he was right to do so because DEI essentially is an attempt to socially engineer gender ideology and race into every facet of American life and the very first step to take that back and to, as President Trump said, have a revolution of common sense is to, again, rid the government of DEI programs because it&#8217;s a proven failure. It introduces risk, legal risk, it eliminates people advancing on the basis of merit, and it destroys unity, which President Trump has said is a high priority for him.
JOHN: The Daily Wire is very interested in the intersection of politics and culture. We&#8217;re very much believers in politics being downstream of culture, and that we have to not only fight against forces cramming down dangerous policies but we have to build and shape culture. How have cultural shifts influenced the issues of gender and DEI?
KRISTEN: They&#8217;ve been profoundly impactful. I would say that law and culture work together. You can&#8217;t have one without the other, and one doesn&#8217;t necessarily lead the other, but they both impact one another. And so I would just say, especially the work that The Daily Wire has done has been so critical in our efforts, as an example, on the gender identity front, because the principle that you&#8217;re establishing in the court before the Supreme Court, or a principle you&#8217;re establishing in a state or federal law, it has to be plausible to the American people. It has to make sense to them. And Daily Wire, for example, has been one of the first that has come out and spoken clearly, succinctly, and without fear, with courage, on the importance of biological reality. When the law doesn&#8217;t recognize the biological differences between men and women, families get hurt. And most importantly, women and girls will suffer not only from equal opportunities, but they will lose their rights.
<div id="attachment_359463" style="width: 1029px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-359463" class="size-large wp-image-359463" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2022/03/Screen-Shot-2022-03-23-at-10.07.51-PM-e1685654915193-1019x576.png" alt="Matt Walsh" width="1019" height="576" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2022/03/Screen-Shot-2022-03-23-at-10.07.51-PM-e1685654915193-1019x576.png 1019w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2022/03/Screen-Shot-2022-03-23-at-10.07.51-PM-e1685654915193-300x170.png 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2022/03/Screen-Shot-2022-03-23-at-10.07.51-PM-e1685654915193-768x434.png 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2022/03/Screen-Shot-2022-03-23-at-10.07.51-PM-e1685654915193.png 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1019px) 100vw, 1019px" />The Daily Wire</div>
JOHN: Final question. We&#8217;ve seen a flurry of activity from the Trump administration and his opening salvo on reshaping the federal government. What else are you seeing in terms of this new administration’s priorities?
KRISTEN: I think of all of the priorities that he set out, they come back to one primary theme — he&#8217;s recognizing the stifling authoritarianism that we&#8217;ve seen at home, here in the United States, and that we&#8217;re witnessing abroad. As some of our members of our international team have also said, the entire world is watching right now, and they are rooting for Americans and for President Trump to turn the corner on this – in a moment throughout the world that wants to return to the concept of inalienable rights, that wants to return to the rule of law and to a government that recognizes common sense values. So whether that&#8217;s on immigration and what&#8217;s happening at the border, whether it&#8217;s weaponization of the federal government and the justice system against one&#8217;s enemies, as we have seen, to censorship, which President Trump has said is a high priority for him to stop censorship. The world is watching and what is most important now is what happens next. And I think the whole world is cheering for him and his administration to follow through on its promises in these areas.
JOHN: Well, there was massive anticipation heading into this week – and now very high hopes for what’s ahead. Kristen, thank you so much for talking with us.
KRISTEN: Thanks for having me.
JOHN: That was Kristen Waggoner, CEO and president of Alliance Defending Freedom – and this has been a weekend edition of Morning Wire.
***

President Trump Delivers Remarks, Announces Infrastructure Plan At White House

‘There Are Only Two Sexes’: ADF’s Kristen Waggoner On Trump’s Gender & DEI Executive Orders

'There Are Only Two Sexes': ADF's Kristen Waggoner On Trump’s Gender & DEI Executive Orders

Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF)

Diversity Equity and Inclusion (DEI)

Morning Wire

Social Emotional Learning (SEL) is a relatively new term for most people, so it’s understandable that few are speaking out against this program. And while I’ve known for a long time that SEL is dangerous, I never sat down to dig into its underlying concepts until recently. It turns out that ignorance truly is bliss, because I was much more blissful before realizing the magnitude of SEL and the tentacles it sends into our children’s precious minds.
Researching SEL generally only turns up rave reviews and studies talking about how this program will solve the world’s problems. Many websites explain SEL as a method in which children learn to develop skills to self-regulate their emotions, develop healthy identities, build positive relationships, and make responsible decisions. Additionally, SEL programs always claim to be “evidence based,” creating “lifelong learners.”
Such headlines and websites make it hard to argue that SEL is a bad program for children. But peeping behind the curtain reveals that SEL is nothing more than unlicensed therapy shoved down your child’s throat on a daily basis in public school.
There are several organizations that push SEL, but <a href="https://casel.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning</a> (CASEL) is the front runner. Their website boasts that they have “been a leader of the SEL movement since first introducing the term over two decades ago.”
In the CASEL program, there are five standard competencies that students are measured against: (1) self-management, (2) responsible decision making, (3) relationship skills, (4) social awareness, and (5) self-awareness. All seamless topics, until you realize these are all about regulating emotions, which is 100% therapy.
Aside from being unlicensed therapy, SEL is a continuously improved program that aids schools in ensuring “equitable and optimal outcomes.” But in order for the program to be continuously improved upon, data is required — lots and lots of school and student data.
How do schools obtain this data? The answer is simple yet terrifying: surveys.
Some surveys require parental input, but most do not. I decided to spend time scrolling through my son’s school issued Chromebook and I quickly found a plethora of surveys on an app called &#8220;Quizizz.&#8221; After reviewing several of the surveys, it’s easy to see all these surveys are geared toward emotions – nothing to do with actual educational competencies such as reading or math.
<div class="image"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-863477 aligncenter" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/Student-1.png" alt="" width="512" height="179" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/Student-1.png 512w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/Student-1-300x105.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 512px) 100vw, 512px" /></div>
<div class="image"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-863483 aligncenter" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/student-2.png" alt="" width="512" height="136" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/student-2.png 512w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/student-2-300x80.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 512px) 100vw, 512px" /></div>
<div class="image"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-863487 aligncenter" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/student-3.png" alt="" width="512" height="139" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/student-3.png 512w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/student-3-300x81.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 512px) 100vw, 512px" /></div>
<div class="image"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-863491 aligncenter" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/student-5.png" alt="" width="512" height="138" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/student-5.png 512w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/student-5-300x81.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 512px) 100vw, 512px" /></div>
<div id="attachment_863499" style="width: 522px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-863499" class="wp-image-863499 size-full" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/student-7.png" alt="All screenshots credits: Quizizz.com" width="512" height="135" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/student-7.png 512w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/student-7-300x79.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 512px) 100vw, 512px" />All screenshots credits: Quizizz.com</div>
In addition to surveys focused on children’s emotional states, other surveys focus on school environment. Below is an example of a <a href="https://schoolguide.casel.org/resource/student-survey-how-i-feel-about-my-classroom-and-school/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">school survey</a> I found from CASEL in which students are asked a series of questions about how they feel about their classroom and school.
<div id="attachment_863501" style="width: 522px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-863501" class="wp-image-863501 size-full" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/chart-4.png" alt="Credit: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL). https://casel.org/" width="512" height="437" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/chart-4.png 512w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/chart-4-300x256.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 512px) 100vw, 512px" />Credit: CASEL.org</div>
<div id="attachment_863503" style="width: 522px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-863503" class="wp-image-863503 size-full" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/chart-5.png" alt="Credit: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL). https://casel.org/" width="512" height="436" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/chart-5.png 512w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/01/chart-5-300x255.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 512px) 100vw, 512px" />Credit: CASEL.org</div>
The questions themselves aren’t overly concerning – at least they aren’t asking kids if they are gender confused – but they are concerning in that they create doubt in a child’s mind. As <a href="https://www.abigailshrier.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Abigail Shrier</a> points out in her book, “Bad Therapy,” people are not overly happy beings. If we are constantly thinking about our emotional state, it eventually leads us to realize that we are unhappy, which leads to more serious mental health issues.
With that in mind, imagine how a child would feel after completing this survey, realizing they responded “disagree” on questions that their friends agreed with. The potential damage from a simple survey could have serious impacts on young children – all while the parent is clueless the survey is even happening. How can parents help a child understand their poor feelings after completing the survey if parents aren’t even aware of the survey in the first place?
SEL advocates claim these programs have positive and long-lasting impacts on the student’s and school’s success. They suggest that SEL improves academics, reduces negative social behaviors such as bullying, and creates positive school environments. But one of the major issues with this logic is that life will not always be a “positive climate,” so why are we fixated on children growing up in an environment they will never experience in real life?
<h3><a href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/?_gl=1*1lail3r*_gcl_aw*R0NMLjE3MzIyMDEyNDkuQ2owS0NRaUEwZnU1QmhEUUFSSXNBTVhVQk9JSkM0VnNsMFVreURxYXUxVWVEVWdOdjZkNzR2Y1pEeEZQeHVBcGl2R3BLaTdBMjVzT1p5TWFBdG1nRUFMd193Y0I.*_gcl_au*NDUxNDQ0NzYwLjE3MzY3ODI2NDY.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczNjk1NzYwMy4zNDAuMS4xNzM2OTU3NzE2LjYwLjAuMA.." target="_blank" rel="noopener">CELEBRATE #47 WITH 47% OFF DAILYWIRE+ MEMBERSHIPS + A FREE $20 GIFT</a></h3>
At its core, SEL is nothing more than social engineering and group think – make kids believe they must take control of their natural emotional reactions and project a calm, “approved” behavior to not hurt another person’s feelings. This is what I call “forced tolerance and acceptance training.” I remind my son daily that “tolerance is not a Commandment” therefore we are not called by God to tolerate beliefs and behaviors that we believe to be anti-Christian.
What happens when these SEL competencies conflict with the values of parents and religious teachings? What happens when children suddenly realize they have internal conflict between SEL teachings and those of their parents or church? How do kids resolve those feelings?
The reality is that our kids will grow up and realize the world doesn’t care about a “positive climate.” Real life is tough and it doesn’t stop because your feelings get hurt. Sadly, SEL is making our children emotionally weak, meaning they will likely crack at the slightest sign of conflict. This is exactly what Abigail Shrier documented in her book “Bad Therapy.” Children are less socially engaged than children 10+ years ago due to fear of failing.
I personally believe SEL results in major confusion for children, which ultimately is feeding the increased mental health issues we’re seeing in children. Mental health programs were not an option when I grew up. We had actively engaged parents, less violence in schools and higher graduation rates.
Maybe instead of taking billions of dollars from the federal government for these so-called mental health programs, the Department of Education should start restricting SEL in our schools. SEL is not the answer to what is plaguing our children – more parental participation and less government involvement is the answer.
* * *
Emily Jones is a native of North Alabama and leads the Madison County Chapter of Moms for Liberty. She also hosts a podcast titled <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@rightsideradio459/videos" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Controversial Mom</a> on YouTube.
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Students raise their hands during class

Why ‘Social Emotional Learning’ Is Nothing More Than Unlicensed Therapy

Why 'Social Emotional Learning' Is Nothing More Than Unlicensed Therapy

Therapy

In 2017, Americans were split almost down the middle on the question: “Is gender determined by sex at birth or one’s subjective sense of identity?” <a href="https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/06/06/gender-identity-sexual-orientation-and-the-2024-election/pp_2024-6-5_cultural-values_5-03/">Pew Research</a> found back then that the numbers were 53% on the side of biological sex and 45% on the side of “gender identity.” Seven years later, as 2024 comes to a close, that number has shifted significantly to 65% and 34%, respectively.
We’ve seen that play out in a number of ways, one of the most obvious being the 2024 Presidential election. Donald Trump aired ads that called attention to Kamala Harris and her party’s emphasis on gender identity — from men in women’s sports, to using taxpayer dollars to pay for body alteration procedures for prisoners. The New York Times <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/07/us/politics/trump-win-election-harris.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">found</a> those ads shifted some voters — especially black and Hispanic men — toward Trump. Political commentators with a finger on the pulse of the culture <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/11/democrats-dishonest-gender-conversation-2024-election/680604/">attribute</a> the unscientific, dangerous focus on gender identity as one of the reasons Trump is now the president-elect.
From my point of view as the Director of the Center for Academic Freedom at Alliance Defending Freedom, gaining momentum toward scientific reality in the face of progressive thought policing has not been an easy task. Especially in the academic realm, where we <a href="https://adflegal.org/case/meriwether-v-trustees-shawnee-state-university/?utm_source=dailywire&amp;utm_medium=oped">started</a> significantly litigating in 2018.
In that 2018 case, we represented Dr. Nicholas Meriwether, who was then a philosophy professor at Shawnee State University. Dr. Meriwether declined to use female pronouns for a male student, and as a result, the school punished him for following his convictions. Ultimately, Dr. Meriwether won the case at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and settled the case four years after it started.
However, schools at all levels around the country tried to get everyone on board with accepting gender incongruence. ADF has worked to ensure teachers, parents, and students who have a view of human sexuality based on scientific reality don’t lose their voice in the conversation.
In Virginia, high school French teacher <a href="https://adflegal.org/case/vlaming-v-west-point-school-board/?utm_source=dailywire&amp;utm_medium=oped">Peter Vlaming</a> nearly lost everything because he couldn’t refer to a female student as male in good conscience. Peter was highly respected by the school and well-loved by students. When a female student announced she was male, Peter accommodated her by using a different name and avoiding the use of pronouns. But when the school found out about this, administrators demanded that he use male pronouns to refer to the female student. Peter refused because doing so would violate his convictions about language and human sexuality. The school fired him for his stance, and through years of court battles, received almost $600,000 in a settlement for the school’s violation of his free speech.
Similar to Peter, Vivian Geraghty — a middle school English teacher in Ohio — was forced to resign after she tried to reach a compromise with her school’s officials that would allow her to respectfully decline to use terms inconsistent with the sex of two students. When Vivian raised the First Amendment issue with the school’s principal, he told her that, as a public servant, she must “set [her] religious convictions aside.” Vivian just <a href="https://adflegal.org/case/geraghty-v-jackson-local-school-district-board-education/?utm_source=dailywire&amp;utm_medium=oped" target="_blank" rel="noopener">settled</a> her lawsuit against the school this month to the tune of $450,000.
This fight over language and human sexuality is important, and it’s still not over. The University of Louisville punished, harassed, and ultimately fired <a href="https://adflegal.org/case/josephson-v-ganzel/?utm_source=dailywire&amp;utm_medium=oped">Dr. Allan Josephson</a>, who turned the university’s struggling Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology into a well-respected institution, after he spoke — in his personal capacity — at a Heritage Foundation panel about the dangers of buying into gender identity ideology for children. Dr. Josephson’s case started back in 2019, and in September of this year, the Sixth Circuit ruled that the university “should have known that Josephson’s speech was protected and that retaliating against Josephson for his speech would violate his First Amendment rights,” and sent the case back to the lower courts for jury trial.
If the recent trend in views on gender identity is any indication, Dr. Josephson’s stand for truth should ultimately result in further vindication. Teachers should not be forced to lie to their students, especially on something as important as human sexuality. In the medical community, researchers like <a href="https://adflegal.org/article/cass-review-children-deserve-better-not-experimental-treatments/?utm_source=dailywire&amp;utm_medium=oped" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Dr. Hilary Cass</a> — who was commissioned to study the effects of gender transition procedures for minors by England’s National Institute of Health — are consistently finding there is no benefit to treating a young man or woman as the opposite sex.
These brave teachers are on the front lines of standing up against a dangerous ideology. Through their courage, the rest of America is catching on. This year brought important victories in the arena of thought and language, and in 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court has an opportunity to <a href="https://adflegal.org/case/united-states-america-v-skrmetti/?utm_source=dailywire&amp;utm_medium=oped" target="_blank" rel="noopener">further protect</a> children from this unproven, unpopular ideology by allowing states to protect kids from dangerous procedures like distributing puberty blockers and removing otherwise healthy body parts. More and more Americans agree it’s the right thing to do.
 * * * 
 
Tyson Langhofer is senior counsel and director of the Center for Academic Freedom with <a href="http://www.adflegal.org/?utm_source=dailywire&amp;utm_medium=oped" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Alliance Defending Freedom</a> (<a href="https://twitter.com/ADFLegal" target="_blank" rel="noopener">@ADFLegal</a>).
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Back to school

These Brave Teachers Took A Stand For Biological Reality In 2024

Menu