On the surface, Victoria Sinis is indistinguishable from so many other marketing professionals.
Young, vivacious, and personable, the twenty-something Australian seems like she does PR for a cosmetics company or a trendy tech startup.
But Sinis’ job was something else entirely. For eight months, she trolled social media sites for girls who seemed underage or “barely legal,” and coaxed them into posting explicit content on OnlyFans.
The job was easier than it may seem. All she had to do was lie.
“If we had approached them with the truth and said, ‘Hey, do you want to sign up to do porn? We’ll take 20% of your income. You’re probably not going to earn a lot. You&#8217;re going to have to do some really extreme things. You&#8217;d be like, ‘No!’” Sinis told The Daily Wire.
Instead, she and the other recruiters messaged potential porn performers about their positive “vibe,” and invited them to lavish parties on yachts or fly them in to stay at villas in exotic locales.
Recruiters “show girls this lifestyle, and then say, ‘Would you like to be an OnlyFans creator and maximize your earnings?’” Sinis says.
While influencers parade high-rise apartments and luxury vacations on social media, the average OnlyFans creator earns about $180 a month.
“There’s a cultural myth that you can just sell feet pics and buy a Mercedes,” Sinis says. “But it’s a full-time job for very little return. We had girls post 20 videos a day across five accounts. We had SEO experts, lighting setups, even script templates.”
Sinnis worked at an OnlyFans agency, one of thousands of such companies that have sprung up to exploit both performers and their customers, who believe they’re purchasing access to these women.
While precise statistics are hard to come by, it has been estimated that there are roughly 3,000-5,000 such small agencies globally, and around 300-500 larger, <a href="https://www.creditdonkey.com/best-onlyfans-agency.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">more established agencies</a> with significant client rosters and operations. Along with the 20% they pay to OnlyFans, managed performers also have to fork over a hefty commission of their usually meager earnings to them.
The existence of these agencies reveals the demand for adult content on OnlyFans, which was launched in 2016 with the promise that it would allow celebrities and influencers to monetize their content by selling it directly to fans.
At first, OnlyFans did not allow “not safe for work” content. But the platform lifted that prohibition in 2017, and the adult performers began flocking to the site. As COVID lockdowns fueled digital consumption in 2020, that trend only grew.
Today, it&#8217;s estimated that between <a href="https://social-rise.com/blog/onlyfans-statistics">70% and 80%</a> of OnlyFans’ 3 million creators are considered “not safe for work.”
Sinis joined her agency shortly after graduating with a marketing degree. She’d been working in hospitality, but when some friends approached her to join their company, she thought it seemed harmless. And she enjoyed working with her clients, women her agency euphemistically called “content creators,” many of whom she describes as funny and sweet.
As a recruiter, Sinis was tasked with convincing young women who had already built up a following posting risqué photos on Instagram or TikTok to take it one step further to overt “sex work.”
Her employer had a very specific target in mind.
“We recruited based on how young [the women] looked,” Sinis told The Daily Wire. Because girls who looked like they could plausibly be labeled “teen,” “fresh 18,” or “barely legal” made the most money, she and her fellow recruiters cold-messaged girls who looked underage or newly-adult and dazzled them with promises of potential wealth.
<a href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/?utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial&amp;utm_campaign=memorial&amp;utm_content=editorialmemorialday&amp;_gl=1*1qdq03s*_gcl_au*MTYyNDg0MTE0OS4xNzQxODk4NTMz*_ga*MTEzOTk1NjkxNi4xNzI2MzI1MDQz*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*czE3NDgzNzg2NDgkbzEwMDMkZzEkdDE3NDgzODEwMTckajU4JGwwJGgw" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Get 40% Off New DailyWire+ Annual Memberships</a>
TikTok channels like The BOP House (short for Baddies on Point), which features a host of OnlyFans girls living in an L.A. mansion, boasting of their seven- and eight-figure earnings, have helped make the pitch easy. Convinced that they can earn massive incomes selling their bodies, some young tween and teen girls, Sinis says, are already filming pornographic content to prove their “experience” to OnlyFans recruiters, hopeful they might one day occupy the digital successor to Hugh Hefner’s Playboy Mansion.
What recruiters don’t mention: these girls won’t make much at all, unless they’re willing to film the most explicit and extreme content.
At Sinis’ agency, creators were asked what “level” of content they were comfortable filming. The scale ran from posing in lingerie (Level 1) to “everything but anal” (Level 4), and finally, violent sex and other hardcore acts (Level 5).
“Very quickly, we dropped Level 1 because it didn’t make money,” she says. That meant all the girls they recruited pretty much started at Level 2 — implied nudity. The recruiter’s job was to convince the women to advance through the levels.
“It isn’t, ‘You must do this,’” Sinis explains. “It’s more subtle than that. We would say things to the girls like, ‘This custom request for some explicit performance is worth $500. Are you sure you want to pass that up?’”
“We call it consent but really we were slowly wearing the women down. When a girl would say no to a custom video, and then get offered $1,000, we would continue to push them with, ‘Hey, we’re just checking in. Totally up to you though.’ But it’s not. It’s coercion.”
Some custom requests weren’t even sexual — just dark. One man, for instance, wanted a fake video of a man hanging off a ledge while a woman stepped on his fingers. These darker requests were what finally caused Sinis to question the work she was doing.
“When virtual sadism doesn’t cut it, what’s next — real violence?” she asks. “We are feeding violent, sexualized fantasies. And then we’re surprised when those fantasies spill into the real world.”
After visiting a church service one weekend and thinking of all the women she helped bring into porn, she tendered her resignation.
“I was crying every day, unable to open my laptop when I got to work,” she says. “I kept asking my coworkers, &#8216;Do you think it’s okay, what we do?&#8217;”
What they do is feed delusions — not just to the women they recruit, but to the men who subscribe.
OnlyFans’ appeal is that, unlike other pornographic websites, it allows subscribers to have a seeming personal interaction with performers. But subscribers who “chat” with performers often aren’t interacting with the women on screen.
“We hired chatters, cheap labor from the Philippines, who worked 12- to 16-hour days pretending to be these women,” Sinis says. These workers are given scripts and trained in the “girlfriend experience,” keeping men emotionally tethered, often believing they have genuine relationships with the creators.
“It plays on male loneliness, on their emotional vulnerability,” Sinis tells The Daily Wire. “We exploited men for profit just as much as we did the women performing.” This included training the “chatters” on upselling custom requests.
Sinis believes these men, often married or isolated, aren’t paying for explicit content so much as the sense of intimacy and validation it gives them.
“I had a guy tell me he thought he had a real connection. I had to break it to him: it’s all scripted. You&#8217;re talking to a stranger, quite possibly another man, on another continent.”
Nowhere are these false relationships more harmful than with young men. Children, on average, first see pornography at age 12, though some are exposed to explicit content as young as seven. Studies show that rising pornography consumption is fueling an epidemic of emotional withdrawal, and causing a sharp drop in dating and relationships among Gen Z males.
“I met a 13-year-old boy in Georgia who broke down in tears telling me he watches porn and no one knows,” Sinis recalled. “The shame, the secrecy — it’s soul-crushing.”
Since leaving the industry, Sinis has begun to consider how we might roll back the damage that porn is doing to society. As someone who’s been on the inside, her prescription for change isn’t limited to legislation, though she supports age verification laws like those passed in Utah.
Instead, she advocates for cultural revolution: equipping parents, educating children early, and building a counter-narrative that emphasizes the importance of marriage, family, and faith.
“We need to stop shaming young men and women, and start attacking the real enemy: the $97 billion porn industry that’s consuming them both,” she says.
“This world has light and darkness,” Sinis said. “And OnlyFans feeds the darkness.&#8221;

OF Blue – Elordi – They Regret Posting on ‘OnlyFans’

A Former OnlyFans Recruiter Reveals The Dark World Of Amateur Pornography

Human Trafficking

Internet

OnlyFans

Pornography

Social Media

Last year, Nala Ray said she stopped selling her body on <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/onlyfans" target="_blank" rel="noopener">OnlyFans</a>, which is largely a subscription-based pornography website, after she turned her life over to God.
Since she <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/onlyfans-model-quits-platform-after-making-millions-says-she-found-god">spoke about leaving pornography</a> on &#8220;The Michael Knowles Show,&#8221; Ray has been the subject of much hate and criticism, namely being accused of lying about her conversion to Christianity and still profiting off of pornography. Returning to Knowles’ show &#8220;<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/show/michael" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Michael &amp;</a>,&#8221; in an <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvZMg3n9URQ" target="_blank" rel="noopener">interview</a> released Saturday, Ray addressed her critics and discussed how she and her husband, a fellow Christian named Jordan Giordano, hope to help others.
Knowles first asked Ray if her conversion to Christianity was fake, and had he been “duped,” as Ray’s critics say.
“Something about you drove people up a wall,” Knowles said about the reaction to his first conversation with Ray. “I&#8217;ll tell you, the first thing that people came at me with, they said, ‘Michael, this girl &#8230; lied – maybe she didn&#8217;t lie about getting married … but she lied about quitting porn, her porn site is still active. She lied about her conversion. She&#8217;s not really Christian. She lied about everything. And she duped you, Michael. You weren&#8217;t mean enough to her.’”
“So what do you say?” Knowles asked. “Was I duped?”
“No, you absolutely were not,” Ray answered. “I feel like even in our first interview, you felt how genuine it was and you even remarked on that. And I feel like from one believer to another, you can just sense the spirit behind that.”
“I don&#8217;t know why people thought I became more famous because I was Christian now, or how they think that becoming a Christian is going to sell more on OnlyFans,” she added, while Knowles noted that someone quitting porn and vice for God is a &#8220;good story.&#8221;
“At the end of the day, it was just a sacrifice I made, and it was between me and God,” Ray said. “And I could say that I was a Christian and continue doing OnlyFans, but we know that there&#8217;s no truth behind that. Or, I could truly give my life to God and see what He has for me by sacrificing OnlyFans, and people in my life, the money, the fame, all of that just to follow Christ.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
&#8220;You Lied About Everything?&#8221; Michael &amp; The Prodigal Daughter 2 | Nala Ray <a href="https://t.co/qbVzxCUk9u">pic.twitter.com/qbVzxCUk9u</a>
— The Michael Knowles Show (@MKnowlesShow) <a href="https://twitter.com/MKnowlesShow/status/1885704664509026338?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 1, 2025</a></blockquote>
Knowles then inquired about the current status of Ray’s OnlyFans account.
“I had full intent to delete my OnlyFans,” Ray said. “I even showed [Giordano], and we were right next to each other when I pushed the delete button back in, like, January [last year]. What happened was, I had so many subscribers – OnlyFans won&#8217;t allow you to close your account until every single subscriber has unsubscribed, like they physically have to push the button. But what they don&#8217;t know is that people sometimes are very inactive on OnlyFans. So I am still waiting for the site to be completely shut down.”
“However, you can&#8217;t do anything,” she continued. “I can&#8217;t even log in anymore. Everything&#8217;s deleted off the site. There&#8217;s no price to get in – nothing. So OnlyFans has disabled the site, but it&#8217;s not down yet, if that makes sense.”
OnlyFans disables creators’ accounts if there are still active subscribers; once the last active subscription expires, accounts will be <a href="https://www.wikihow.com/Delete-Onlyfans-Account">permanently deleted</a>.
Ray said she makes “zero” from the account while it’s disabled. “The subscription price is zero,” she said.
Addressing another criticism, Ray said she initially raised the subscription price after her content was removed and her account was disabled, attempting to encourage subscribers to leave and dissuade new subscribers (though it appears new subscribers are not allowed on disabled accounts). “The price was only raised for a very short period of time,” she said. “We were like, crap, it’s been like three days and not working.” Since then, the price has been set to $0, she said.
Ray made millions of dollars during her time on the platform, but says most of that is now gone.
“You mentioned financial problems,” Knowles said to Ray. “But you made a ‘bazillion’ dollars in pornography – so how do you have financial problems?”
“What happened was I made 14 million [gross] … and netted $9 million,” Ray responded. “OnlyFans takes 20% of what you make, and then the agency that I was working with … they took a hefty, like 45%. And I was living in California, which also takes so much in taxes.”
“So it got cut up like three times and I&#8217;m left with what I&#8217;m left with,” she said. “We had a really nice little [nest egg], and then we had to liquidate that because taxes came in for this year from last year, and I made money in 2023, and then this big life-change happened in January.”
“Then there goes the money,” Knowles said, to Ray&#8217;s agreement.
“All right, so you&#8217;re out of money,” Knowles continued. “People have criticized you because they say you made all this money and now you&#8217;ve converted. And because God saves you through His free grace, well, that&#8217;s good. … [But] where&#8217;s the penance? They say you should give all your money away.”
“I don&#8217;t know what they want me to give away at this point, because I&#8217;ve given away all of my designer things, I sold my Porsche, I don&#8217;t live in the same home anymore,” Ray said. “And so I&#8217;m like, what else do you want me to give?”
Ray told Knowles that she’s also currently paying a third party to remove her pornographic content from the internet. She said she’s having a lot of success, but admitted that there will always be a “crumb” of her content still out there.
“I guess the takeaway for a girl who&#8217;s doing it is, you can fix a lot of this,” Knowles said. “But the warning to the girl who isn&#8217;t doing it yet is, there&#8217;s always going to be some crumb. You’re better not to do it at all, actually.”
Ray also said that she wishes she could apologize face-to-face with the wives of men who viewed her content, and to anyone else she hurt.
“There have been many times where I&#8217;ve just been sitting down in my Bible time where I feel the hearts of the people who I hurt, the hearts of the women who caught their husband watching me,” she expressed. “It&#8217;s very heavy. It&#8217;s a burden – and I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m sorry enough. I&#8217;ve said I&#8217;m sorry a couple of times on camera, but I just feel like that&#8217;s so impersonal. If I could, I&#8217;d love to say it to people in front of their face.”
Ray and her husband, who’s been creating Christian content online since 2021, both said they feel called to spread the word of God and help others. For Ray, she’s working to get girls off of OnlyFans and develop relationships with them. For Giordano, he’s working with men who struggle with pornography, a struggle he’s personally navigated.

Nola Ray

Nala Ray Addresses Her Critics After Leaving OnlyFans For Christ

Christianity

Michael Knowles

Religion

U.S.

The online prostitution website OnlyFans has been in the news quite a lot recently. Last week a prominent OnlyFans prostitute went viral for propositioning a Five Guys employee while he was on the clock at the burger restaurant. Fortunately, the young man kept his dignity and turned her down.
This week, the same predatory degenerate — I think we should treat these people like mass shooters and try not to use their names, when possible— has now claimed that she set a “world record” by having sex with 1,000 men in a 24-hour period. Actually it was 1,057. Far be it from me to deprive her of that extra 57 strands of gonorrhea she likely contracted.
Here she is talking about her big accomplishment:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
OF Bonnie Blue says she broke the World Record by sleeping with 1,057 men in 12 hours.
I don’t think that’s an achievement… <a href="https://t.co/OOvLtZHlAx">pic.twitter.com/OOvLtZHlAx</a>
&mdash; Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) <a href="https://twitter.com/DefiantLs/status/1878895706947355081?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 13, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
You often hear people, especially conservatives, say that they feel sorry for women like this. I have to admit I don’t. I reserve all of my sympathy for whoever owns the AirBnB they used for this stunt. You’ll have to go in there with hazmat suits to fumigate that room.
Now, you may remember a few weeks ago the story of the OnlyFans prostitute who had sex with one hundred men. These are not the same people. That woman also planned to jump in bed with a thousand men, but she was apparently beaten to the punch. There is now an arms race among cyber hookers to see who can have sex with the most men in a day. Eventually someone is going to figure out a way to crack a million, which will be a pace of about 11 men a second. I don’t see how that’s physically possible right now, but someone will figure it out. This insatiable quest for sexual self-debasement will be the primary driver of scientific and technological advancement in the future, I have no doubt.
Needless to say, business over at OnlyFans is thriving. Back in the fall, it was reported that the website’s revenue for the previous year had cracked $1.3 billion. They are generating all of that money from the approximately 300 million “fan” accounts on the site. But the “fans” are all there for the hookers, or as OnlyFans refers to them: creators. This euphemism makes no sense, of course, because these women aren’t creating anything. They are selling their bodies — that which has already been created, by God Almighty — to the lowest bidder. They are profiting from their own degradation and humiliation. This is not an act of creation, but of destruction — self-destruction.
<h3><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/mws-ep-1514-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show</a></h3>
But whatever you call these women, how many are there? According to recent reports, there are currently about 1.4 million American women producing pornography for OnlyFans. 1.4 million. That number is undoubtedly a severe undercount. It doesn’t count all the women who “created” on OnlyFans in the past. And it doesn’t count the women who use other platforms to sell their bodies. All in all, it’s impossible to know exactly how many women in this country have elected to become prostitutes. We only know that the number, whatever it is, is well into the millions.
This is a truly unprecedented circumstance. Prostitution itself is not new or unprecedented. It is the world’s oldest profession, as the saying goes. And there’s nothing necessarily new about having such a high percentage of women in a given population turning to prostitution to make a living. You could almost certainly find more per capita prostitutes in most third world countries today. Historically, it’s thought that something like 1 in 5 women in 18th century London were prostitutes — 20% of the female population. There are a lot of OnlyFans “creators.” But there aren’t that many, percentage-wise. So the sheer numbers do not reveal the full scope of this problem.
As I tried to explain a few days ago, although prostitution has always been prevalent in basically all human societies, in one form or another, it has almost always been the province of young, poor, desperate women. You would have to drive down to the sections of the city where these women congregated. That’s because prostitution was not a part of polite, mainstream society. It was kept out on the fringes, in the shadows, in the dank, dark places where normal people would never want to go.
That is all changing now, and very rapidly. Suddenly, prostitution has become a career option, or a way to earn extra spending cash, for middle class and upper middle class women. The kinds of women who would never stand on a physical street corner now have the opportunity to sell their bodies on a virtual street corner. And a depressing, even terrifying, number of women have jumped at that chance. Some of them have even become multi-millionaires in the process. That is another thing that separates old fashioned prostitution from the newer variety. There are OnlyFans “creators” making $20 or $30 million a year. The highest paid star running backs in the NFL don’t make that much.
That’s not to say that most of the hookers on OnlyFans are raking in millions. The sad reality is that the vast majority are debasing and dehumanizing themselves for the sake of a few hundred bucks a month at most. They could earn as much selling homemade candles on Etsy. They could earn significantly more if they went out and got real jobs. Instead they choose to become masturbatory aides for random, unseen men. And in return they make only enough money to feed their Starbucks habit. It is hard to imagine something more pathetic than that.
But even this does not fully capture the width and breadth of this crisis. It’s not just that so many women are becoming prostitutes. And it’s not just that women who have many other options are choosing to be prostitutes anyway. It’s that, through platforms like OnlyFans, prostitution — or “sex work,” as it is euphemistically called — is now mainstream. It is a part of popular culture in a way that it never was before. It has been validated, accepted, and therefore elevated, so that prostitution is not just a common practice, but a conventional one. Prostitution may be the oldest profession but it was never considered a “normal” one. Until now.
<h3><a href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">JOIN THE MOVEMENT IN &#8217;25 WITH 25% OFF DAILYWIRE+ ANNUAL MEMBERSHIPS WITH CODE DW25</a></h3>
This didn’t happen out of the blue. The stage was set over the course of decades, with the proliferation of internet pornography. Nearly all of the moral guardrails around sex were torn down and replaced with a flimsy, woefully insufficient consent-based moral structure which says that anything is permissible so long as both parties verbally agree to it. But it turns out that just because both parties agree to something, that doesn’t make the thing good, or acceptable, nor does it mitigate the harm done by it. If you sacrifice your dignity while robbing someone else of theirs, it doesn’t matter that you consented to it. A thing is not dignified merely because it was done on purpose, with the willful acquiescence of all parties.
Most of all, we have removed shame from society. At least we have removed it from the things that are actually shameful. History shows that we can put an end to pretty much any type of conduct, or drive it into the shadows and out of public view so that very few people engage in it, simply by using shame. We stopped shaming whorish behavior, and now we have soccer moms turning to prostitution for some extra spending money. One follows from the other.
50 years ago, around half of all adults in the country smoked cigarettes. Now that number is down to about 10%. We have cast cigarette smokers out to the edges of society, and this has been accomplished largely through shame and social pressure. Our culture has relentlessly demonized cigarettes as disgusting, dangerous, and low class, and as a result cigarettes went from cool and mainstream to obnoxious and odious. It used to be that you could smoke cigarettes anywhere. Now cigarette smokers are given an eight foot wide box outside, 100 feet from entrance of any building. Society is more welcoming of sex offenders than cigarette smokers at this point.
Now, I think the anti-cigarette campaigns are quite overdone and hysterical. My point is only that when a behavior is targeted and shamed — even an addictive one — you will end up with less of it, and when it does happen, it will happen out of view, on the margins, where shameful things belong.
We cannot get rid of prostitution entirely. It will always be one of the unsightly barnacles that attaches itself to the hull of civilization. But that’s what it should be. A slimy, crustaceous thing clinging to the outside of the ship, below the water line. Not sitting up on deck, reclining on a beach chair in full view, while the wait staff serves it margaritas.
<h3><a href="https://www.amiracist.com/?_gl=1*jtghwp*_gcl_au*ODQ1NjYzNTg2LjE3Mjg5MDk3OTE.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczMDEyMDgwOS40OS4xLjE3MzAxMjA4MzkuMzAuMC4w" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MATT WALSH&#8217;S &#8216;AM I RACIST?&#8217; NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+</a></h3>
This kind of behavior should be shamed. That goes for the customers, the men. Most people aren’t hesitant to call them out, nor should they be. But it also goes for the women. The women who choose this lifestyle. They are not resorting to it out of desperation, or forced into it. We should look at that choice with disgust and contempt, not acceptance and understanding. We should treat it with shame. Which is the primary reason why OnlyFans and all similar platforms should be outlawed. Prostitution is already illegal in most jurisdictions. It makes no logical sense that prostitution should be legal only if it is done with a camera and sold for a subscription. Why should the more accessible version of the thing be legal? If anything, it should be the other way around. Though I prefer for both versions to be banned. Would banning it stop women from selling their bodies online? No, not entirely. But it would go a long way towards ostracizing the behavior so that otherwise normal and financially comfortable people would not engage in it.
There is one side of the ideological divide that wants to actively normalize the most debased forms of human behavior. And the other side which, though not seeking to normalize it, has largely lost the wherewithal and appropriate sense of moral indignation to treat shameful things as shameful. Which is why the conversation around OnlyFans so often centers on how much pity we should have for the prostitutes, and how hard their lives must be, and the deep sadness you can see in their poor little puppy dog eyes. There is almost no one stating plainly what used to be commonly understood: that this kind of conduct is disgusting and reprehensible, and we are revolted by it. That message is harsh and impolite. It also happens to be true. It is honest. And if the recent history of our culture should have taught us anything, it’s that it is better to be honest than polite.

Woman getting ready to party.

This Is How We Stop The Festering Disease Called OnlyFans

Matt Walsh

Opinion

Prostitution

Sex Workers

Women

An <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/onlyfans">OnlyFans</a> content creator was recorded propositioning a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/restaurant">fast food</a> employee for sex, but she was turned down after the worker told her he was “a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/christianity">Christian</a> man.”
Bonnie Blue, 25, is a controversial OnlyFans creator who targets 18 and 19-year-olds to have sex with her. 
Viewers had mixed reactions when Blue shared the video on her TikTok account. In the clip, the content creator enters a Five Guys branch and asks an employee where she can find “five guys” and inquires whether he’s “on the menu.”
&#8220;I can’t see it on the menu, but where are the five guys from?&#8221; she asks.
The worker replies, &#8220;The… huh?&#8221; 
She clarifies her statement, saying, &#8220;I didn’t know if it was like a special room, or you can take me out back?&#8221;
The worker again responds with confusion and says, &#8220;Uh, I don’t know what’s happening.&#8221;
&#8220;What about after your shift? I mean, I’d want to give you, you know, a good rating,&#8221; she says. 
The worker responds, &#8220;I’m a Christian man, and I’m waiting until marriage.&#8221; 
Bonnie Blue says, &#8220;I’m asking what’s on your menu, that’s all.&#8221; He responds, &#8220;Genuinely, I feel like I’m dreaming right now. I can hand you the menu if you want.&#8221;
The OF star doesn’t give up, saying, &#8220;Are you on it?&#8221; to which he replies, &#8220;No, I’m not.&#8221; 
She replies, &#8220;Oh, that’s a shame.&#8221;
The employee later shared the exchange on his X account, writing, “Bonnie Blue recording me at work was not on my bingo card for this year, but here we are, I guess.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Bonnie blue recording me at work was not on my bingo card for this year but here we are I guess <a href="https://t.co/klBsJk0wyb">pic.twitter.com/klBsJk0wyb</a>
&mdash; •ola• (@harry_1514) <a href="https://twitter.com/harry_1514/status/1876414293996151062?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 6, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The comments were filled with support and praise for the Five Guys worker refusing her overtures.
<a href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/">JOIN THE MOVEMENT IN ’25 WITH 25% OFF DAILYWIRE+ ANNUAL MEMBERSHIPS WITH CODE DW25</a>
“Good for you for standing your ground and saving yourself for marriage! Not many are like that,” one person <a href="https://x.com/GodIsGood116_/status/1876744780530471181">wrote</a>. “My wife and I both waited for marriage too and it was definitely a lot better than being used products for others.”
“this is so predatory &#8211; if this was a man, everyone would be outraged,” another commenter <a href="https://x.com/taylor_vahey/status/1876719815890464884">said</a>. “not acceptable to do to someone at their job.”
“Well done brother. God has better plans for you, have faith,” another said.
In an <a href="https://metro.co.uk/2024/11/05/bonnie-blue-sex-barely-legal-teens-predatory-educational-21928983/">interview</a> with Metro last November, Blue said: “People are calling me a predator anyway. So it makes no difference if I’m a guy or a female, because my hate has been through the roof in terms of death threats and non-stop abuse.”
“If I was forcing them off the street, dragging them up, then yeah, call me a predator, but it’s not the case,” she added, claiming that 18-year-olds “choose to contact her.”

Five Guys

Five Guys Employee Goes Viral For Turning Down OnlyFans Creator: ‘I’m A Christian Man’

Five Guys Employee Goes Viral For Turning Down OnlyFans Creator: 'I'm A Christian Man'

Restaurant

Social Issues

TikTok

viral video

World

There is something deeply broken about our society. Egregious symptoms show that being the case.
One of those symptoms is Lily Phillips.
Lily Phillips is 23-years-old. She&#8217;s become quite prominent because she has a very lucrative OnlyFans account where she earns millions of dollars to take her clothes off and have sex.
Back in October, Lily Phillips did a stunt in which she had sex with 101 men in a day. She did a documentary about it titled, &#8220;I Slept with 100 Men in One Day.&#8221; 
In the documentary, she says, “It’s not for the weak girls, if I’m honest. It was hard. I don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;d recommend it. I think if you&#8217;re a different type of girl, it&#8217;s very like… it&#8217;s kind of like being a prostitute in a sense of like, it&#8217;s just a different feeling. I don&#8217;t know how to explain it, like.”
“It&#8217;s not like just having sex with someone,” a man says to her.
“Yeah. Yeah. Just one in, one out. Like, it feels intense,” she replies.
“Like, more intense than you thought it might,” he suggests.
“Definitely,” she answers, then breaks down in tears.
She says, “I think by the 30th, when we&#8217;re getting on a bit, I&#8217;ve got a routine of how we&#8217;re going to do this and sometimes you disassociate and it&#8217;s not like normal sex at all.” She admitted not remembering much of this. She said, “In my head right now I can think of five, six, 10 guys I remember. And that&#8217;s it. It&#8217;s just weird, isn&#8217;t it? If I didn&#8217;t have the videos, I wouldn&#8217;t have known I did 100.”
The New York Post <a href="https://nypost.com/2024/12/11/lifestyle/onlyfans-model-lily-phillips-cries-after-sleeping-with-101-men-in-a-day/">reported</a>:
<blockquote>Phillips shared that it’s not just the physical intimacy of having sex with so many men that made her feel “so bad” but also disappointing them by not being able [to] talk with them, or even being interested in doing so.
She said that conversing with them was also “hard” and recounted how one man complained that they only chatted for about two minutes when she had said beforehand that they would talk for about five minutes.</blockquote>
Then, she breaks down in tears.
But none of this is apparently stopping her from taking on a new challenge now because the money is too good. She has claimed she wants to take on a new challenge in January. She <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14166101/middle-class-graduate-sex-Lily-Phillips-OnlyFans.html">posted</a> on social media: &#8220;1,000 men in 24 hours. Male talent casting call. 18+ only. Location TBC.&#8221;
“I dreamed it up with my assistant. I can’t wait … It’s very exciting. It will be a world record. A real challenge!” she enthused.
“The current world record is held by Lisa Sparks, an adult film star who bedded 919 men in one day at a sex industry event in Poland back in 2004,” the Post noted.
The question here: Why is this wrong in our modern society? What&#8217;s the big problem for a lot of folks, particularly on the secular Left? That&#8217;s a relevant question. After all, she&#8217;s engaging in consensual activity. Why is this wrong? Why is this bad?
<h3><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-2103-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show</a></h3>
We live in a society in which consent is considered the highest and perhaps only value.
That&#8217;s because we&#8217;ve largely bought into the liberal framework for how society ought to run.
According to social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, there are six moral matrices for how we measure morality. The first is care versus harm. The second is liberty versus oppression. The third is fairness versus cheating. The fourth is loyalty versus betrayal. The fifth is authority versus subversion, and the sixth is sanctity versus degradation.
For example, care versus harm would include feeling compassion for a suffering human being. That&#8217;s one value system. Liberty versus oppression would include seeing an unjust rule being promulgated that oppresses someone versus that person being free to make their own choices.
Fairness or cheating would be if somebody cheats, it&#8217;s unfair because somebody has cheated. Loyalty versus betrayal would be if someone betrays a group. Authority versus subversion is if somebody disrespects legitimate authority, and sanctity versus degradation is if, for example, somebody does something disgusting.
Leftists and conservatives think of the world in very different ways from one another. 
Leftists are interested in only three of these six matrices: care versus harm (compassion); liberty versus oppression (individual rights and individualism); and finally, fairness versus cheating (the final outcome of a system as fair or rights as fairly distributed).
Conservatives, people on the Right, care about all six of those matrices, including notions like loyalty and betrayal, authority and subversion, and most importantly, sanctity versus degradation.
Thus, what does the Left do about somebody like Lily Phillips? Theoretically, the argument could be made that she&#8217;s harming herself, that this violates the sort of care/harm principle. That&#8217;s why what she&#8217;s doing is wrong.
But that runs directly against the liberty foundations of liberalism, because after all, she&#8217;s the one who has volunteered her consent to it. How can you tell her? Can you be paternalistic enough to suggest she has harmed herself under the rubric of leftism? And also, is it unfair that she did this if she did accept the arrangement? In fact, she sought the arrangement; she&#8217;s being paid by the tonnage for this arrangement.
For conservatives, the answer is actually quite easy. Phillips and women like her are engaging in self-harm. Liberty is not libertinism; it is bound by rules. Fairness is not implicated because she has no right to engage in this sort of conduct on a moral level. She has no moral right. She does have a legal right, but that is not the same thing as having a moral right to engage in this.
She&#8217;s being disloyal not only to any boyfriend she might have, but to the standards of her society and to humanity at large. You&#8217;re being disloyal to humanity when you violate yourself this way. She is undermining the authority of basic morality.
But most of all, and most importantly, what she is doing is disgusting.
Now, I know that word has fallen out of usage. “Disgust.” “Disgusting.” The idea in modern left-wing parlance is that if you talk about something being disgusting, it means that you&#8217;re being judgmental.
In his book “The Righteous Mind,” Haidt wrote about asking college students if it would be immoral to have sex with a frozen chicken. Liberals will initially say maybe, and then they&#8217;ll think about it and say, “No, it doesn&#8217;t violate my principles of consent. It doesn&#8217;t violate the care/harm matrix. It&#8217;s a violation of liberty to say that it is disgusting, problematic, or wrong.”
Conservatives would react, “Yes, that&#8217;s gross. It&#8217;s wrong. You&#8217;re degrading yourself.”
Disgust is useful and has kept human beings alive for eons. Originally, it evolved as a way of naturally driving people away from things that are quite bad for them. The reason human beings have a reaction of disgust when they see a snake is because snakes can kill people.
Now, that does not mean all disgust historically is proper. Sometimes human beings are disgusted by behaviors or traits that are perfectly legitimate or have arisen through no fault of the person by whom they are disgusted. So, for example, many primitive cultures found people with mental disabilities to be disgusting. In ancient Sparta, if you had a disabled baby, you left it out on a cliff somewhere.
But disgust as a general human emotion is a response to the violation of the sacred.
So what exactly is “the sacred”? 
The sacred is the thing that we as a species place beyond question. That&#8217;s what sacred means. Sacred means to declare something holy.
To be holy means to be separate from the secular. It is something that is not to be questioned. It is something that has such high value that to question it would undermine the entire society. To throw away the sacred is to throw out that which is most important in building a society.
There are some things we find so sacred that we will not violate them.
An entire community cannot come together to share the same values unless they agree on a concept of the sacred and the profane; things that are so high in value that they are not worth arguing about — and to argue about them should generate a feeling of disgust.
It is community, says Robert Nisbet, that gives to the sacred its most vital expressions everywhere: birth, marriage, death, and other moments of the human drama.
These are all of such high value that they become sacred.
In the case of Lily Phillips, what is sacred here?
The individual human soul.
You do not own your own soul. It does not belong to you. You have duties attached to the stewardship of your soul.
Your innate humanity is made in the image of God. You as a human being are sacred. You are the sacred property of the Divine.
After all, whatever disgusting substances this woman has anointed herself with can be washed off, but her soul can&#8217;t be washed off without repenting of what she has done to herself.
And she knows that. Why is she breaking down? Why is she upset? It&#8217;s not just because of the physical exertion. It&#8217;s because she made herself into a sex robot. She made herself into something profane. She engaged in profane behavior, and she should be disgusted with herself. She should be ashamed of herself.
A society should be able to look at that behavior and declare it wrong. It is not just a mere matter of moral apathy because a society that greenlights, celebrates, or pays people millions of dollars for this sort of behavior gets more of it.
It reduces the humanity of all of us to the level of the animal. It removes the sacred completely. Then, all that remains is the profane.
No community, no workable society, can be built solely on the profane. Human beings have a natural understanding of the sacred. We have a natural understanding, a desire to worship, a desire to understand there are things that are of eternal value.
<h3><a href="https://www.amiracist.com/?_gl=1*jtghwp*_gcl_au*ODQ1NjYzNTg2LjE3Mjg5MDk3OTE.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczMDEyMDgwOS40OS4xLjE3MzAxMjA4MzkuMzAuMC4w" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MATT WALSH&#8217;S &#8216;AM I RACIST?&#8217; NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+</a></h3>
This is why, by the way, when it comes to sex, the concept of consent is necessary, but it is not sufficient. Of course consent is necessary to sex, but it is not the only marker of whether sex itself is a good thing or a bad thing in regard to how people engage in it.
It&#8217;s because we&#8217;ve lost the concept of the sacred and the profane.
In the #MeToo movement, there is a phenomenon that has arisen many times where women will consent to sex with someone they should not have. They will treat themselves badly; then, they&#8217;ll wake up the next morning and decide they didn&#8217;t like it.
And they don&#8217;t have the language to even express what it is they don&#8217;t like because they already gave consent. Un-giving consent is not possible. So then they go to the language of consent again. In some cases, they&#8217;ll go so far as to say they were raped when they weren&#8217;t actually raped or the evidence shows they weren&#8217;t raped.
But they&#8217;re not wrong to feel bad about themselves.
They&#8217;re not wrong to feel bad about the decision-making. Regret is a realization of having taken something sacred and having made it profane.
The relationship between two people who love one another in a committed bond is sacred. That&#8217;s what makes sex sacred rather than profane.
If sex is treated in a profane way, a lot of the time, it will feel profane. You might wake up in the morning and feel degraded because you degraded yourself.
Then, people look for an excuse for why they feel the way they do, but they don&#8217;t even have the language to explain why they feel the way they do. This is particularly true of young women who are engaging in activities they later regret. They don&#8217;t even understand why they regret.
The answer is that we are all, men and women, capable of sullying ourselves, of disgusting ourselves. And that is a worthwhile tendency in human beings to recognize: that sometimes when we look at the behavior of somebody like a Lily Phillips, we should be upset. We should be upset that as a society we have decided an OnlyFans kind of society is fine, decent, and good.
It is not. It is not fine, decent, or good. Pornography ought to disgust us because it is disgusting. It should disgust us because it turns something that should be about commitment and love into something that is simply about rutting. Sex is meaningful — not because it is a matter of consent, but because it is a matter that has meaning attached to it and has throughout human history.
Pretending that people don&#8217;t have emotions connected to sex is one of the most ridiculous aspects of the modern feminist movement and the modern secular Left. Even Phillips acknowledges that. She says, “I didn’t even get to talk to the guys.”
That’s the most pathetic expression of the problem, but she’s not wrong. It turns out that very often, both women and men actually want to know the person with whom they are having sex because it means something beyond pure consent.
A society that boils its morality down to consent alone is a society that doesn&#8217;t even have the language to express why it&#8217;s corrupting itself. It&#8217;s why we as a society have such trouble declaring pornography is morally bad or OnlyFans is a blight.
Young men are being destroyed by OnlyFans. Young women are certainly being destroyed by OnlyFans.
And this should not be a matter of moral apathy in our society. I&#8217;m not talking about regulation or legislation. Perhaps that&#8217;s appropriate, but that&#8217;s not even the question. The question is: Do we even have the moral language anymore to look at human behavior that ought to disgust us and say it&#8217;s acceptable to be disgusted by that behavior?
It&#8217;s ok to look at what violates the nature of being made in the sacred image of God and say, “That&#8217;s bad, and I have an innate sense of being provoked by it into disgust.”
It&#8217;s ok. We were made that way, and that is a good thing.
A society that loses any concept of the sacred and trades the sacred for the profane is a society that is not long for this world. Because in the end, if we can&#8217;t place certain principles above and beyond debate and in the realm of the sacred, then we&#8217;re not going to have a society for very long.
* * *
<h3><a href="https://get.dailywire.com/gift-guide/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CHECK OUT THE DAILY WIRE HOLIDAY GIFT GUIDE</a></h3>

Front of lens camera and light shade color from two flash.

The Sickness Of OnlyFans

Ben Shapiro

Conservatives

Leftists

After making $9 million on the pornography-streaming site OnlyFans, Nala Ray told The Daily Wire host Michael Knowles that she&#8217;s found God and quit the biz.
Ray sat down for a wide-ranging interview with Knowles, who dug into her own past as the daughter of a pastor and how she initially got into pornography — and what finally made her decide to let it all go.
<h3>WATCH:</h3>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
&quot;$9 Million on OnlyFans &amp; God Saved Me&quot; | Michael &amp; Nala Ray <a href="https://t.co/kPP2eCm12Y">pic.twitter.com/kPP2eCm12Y</a>
&mdash; The Michael Knowles Show (@MKnowlesShow) <a href="https://twitter.com/MKnowlesShow/status/1776686310004249037?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 6, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The former model detailed a series of losses — from losing her home in a tornado at a young age to going through her parents&#8217; divorce, all by age 11 — and how her family fundamentally changed when her parents remarried a few years later and her father became a pastor.
The years that followed were also tumultuous, as churches they were part of went through painful splits that she said were much like divorces on a grander scale. It wasn&#8217;t until she was old enough to get her first job — at a Hardees — that she said she finally felt like she had some autonomy.
The move into pornography, she explained, came as the result of an innate fascination with the human body and its beauty.
&#8220;I love the human body, I think it&#8217;s artwork,&#8221; she explained. &#8220;When I started this journey on OnlyFans, I was very pro — like — nudity. Because I love the human body, I think we&#8217;re beautiful, truly. I have a different form of that love now, for — it&#8217;s more I love what God created instead of just nudity.&#8221;
&#8220;What do you see as the distinction?&#8221; Knowles asked, and Nala&#8217;s response was immediate: &#8220;Perversion.&#8221;
Nala said that what ultimately brought her to Christ was the fact that she felt &#8220;numb&#8221; — and that she believed there had to be something more. &#8220;It was difficult for me to feel things. Like sadness, I felt like I had never cried. I could get angry, and my temper was probably a little worse than it should have been, but crying was not a big thing for me. I didn&#8217;t feel very emotional, I felt very numb to things.&#8221;
She went on to say that she wouldn&#8217;t take anything back — although she admitted she felt shame for the things she did while on the pornography platform – because it was what had &#8220;shaped&#8221; her and brought her to where she is today. And that, she said, might help her to reach young people who were thinking about joining the platform.
&#8220;I feel like my testimony is very strong now,&#8221; she explained, referencing Saul who had persecuted Christians before his Damascus road conversion. &#8220;He got radically changed on the road to Damascus, completely changed &#8230; and became a living, walking testimony to people who were just like him.&#8221;
&#8220;Why I say I wouldn&#8217;t take it back is because God could absolutely use me if I never would have gotten on OnlyFans. I don&#8217;t need to have that testimony to be able to reach people,&#8221; she continued. &#8220;But if you were a young girl thinking about starting an OnlyFans and being influenced by this current generation to start an OnlyFans, would you listen to the person that&#8217;s never been on OnlyFans or never had any direct connection to it saying, &#8216;Don&#8217;t do it, don&#8217;t do it,&#8217; or would you listen to the person at the top of the hill who&#8217;s saying, &#8216;There&#8217;s a cliff after this&#8217;?&#8221;

Screenshot 2024-04-07 at 6.27.58 PM

Onlyfans Model Quits Platform After Making Millions, Says She Found God

Faith

Jesus Christ

Online porn

The winning Daytona motorcycle racing team sported the logo of OnlyFans, the subscription platform known best for its pornographic content, during last weekend&#8217;s races.
HSBK Warhorse Racing, the U.S. racing team backed by Italian motorcycle manufacturer Ducati, announced its new OnlyFans sponsorship just days before the team won a race at Daytona.
&#8220;Super excited to announce our partnership with OnlyFans this year!&#8221; the team announced in an Instagram post that has since been deleted.
<div id="attachment_709543" style="width: 774px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-709543" class="size-large wp-image-709543" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/03/unnamed-1-1-764x576.jpg" alt="" width="764" height="576" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/03/unnamed-1-1-764x576.jpg 764w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/03/unnamed-1-1-300x226.jpg 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/03/unnamed-1-1-768x579.jpg 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/03/unnamed-1-1.jpg 1440w" sizes="(max-width: 764px) 100vw, 764px" />OnlyFans bikes unveiled ahead of Daytona race</div>
Warhorse HSBK Racing <a href="https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?ref=watch_permalink&amp;v=955844786060864" target="_blank" rel="noopener">unveiled</a> bikes painted in OnlyFans&#8217; blue and white with the pornography-rife platform&#8217;s logo splashed across them at a March 2 <a href="https://www.roadracingworld.com/news/motoamerica-onlyfans-racing-warhorse-ducati-team-unveiled-at-mount-airy-casino/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">launch</a> party in Pennsylvania. The team&#8217;s top driver, Josh Herrin, wore a helmet bearing the OnlyFans logo during his Saturday <a href="https://www.hsbkracingteam.com/racing-news/josh-herrin-and-the-warhorse-hsbk-racing-ducati-team-show-perfection-for-the-2024-daytona-200-win/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">win</a> of the Daytona 200 motorcycle race, <a href="https://www.news-journalonline.com/picture-gallery/sports/motorsports/2024/03/09/daytona-200-motorcycle-classic/72916510007/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">photos</a> show.
Herrin <a href="https://www.roadracingworld.com/news/motoamerica-onlyfans-racing-warhorse-ducati-team-unveiled-at-mount-airy-casino/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> at the unveiling event for the OnlyFans sponsorship that he had played a part in snagging OnlyFans as a team sponsor.
&#8220;I think it&#8217;s an amazing opportunity. It&#8217;s cool. This is now the second company that I&#8217;ve brought in as a title sponsor,&#8221; Herrin said, drawing laughter from the audience, which also hollered at him, &#8220;Take your shirt off!&#8221;
<blockquote class="instagram-media" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/C4TKZhhsZtG/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14">
<div style="padding: 16px;">
&nbsp;
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div>
<div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div>
<div style="padding-top: 8px;">
<div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"></div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;">
<div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: 8px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"></div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);"></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: auto;">
<div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"></div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"></div>
</div>
&nbsp;
<p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/C4TKZhhsZtG/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by Josh Herrin (@josh_herrin)</a>
</div>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
OnlyFans is known primarily for attracting x-rated content creators, mainly women, who sell subscriptions to pornographic photos and videos of themselves. Meanwhile, the Daytona motorcycle races are known to draw families with young children, including many fathers and sons attending together.
Teens, ages 13 to 17, make up 5% of the millions of hours people spend watching superbike race content, according to <a href="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/03/MA-Overview-with-extra-slides-2.23.pdf">marketing materials from MotoAmerica</a>, the organization that promotes the Daytona motorcycle races. The marketing materials obtained by The Daily Wire also include photos of young boys.
&#8220;Bring the family for our Kids Zone and free carnival games!&#8221; MotoAmerica <a href="https://www.motoamerica.com/daytona-200/?doing_wp_cron=1710262342.3803451061248779296875" target="_blank" rel="noopener">says</a> on its website, promoting three-day camping for this year&#8217;s Daytona 200 motorcycle races.
Kids 12 and under get in free at some MotoAmerica events in <a href="https://motoamerica.tixonlinenow.com/superbikesalabama/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Alabama</a> and <a href="https://motoamerica.com/atlanta/?doing_wp_cron=1710331403.1392381191253662109375" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Georgia</a>.
Children as young as five can also qualify for MotoAmerica&#8217;s Mission Mini Cup, which was <a href="https://motoamerica.com/mini-cup/?doing_wp_cron=1710261589.7876260280609130859375" target="_blank" rel="noopener">developed</a> to &#8220;introduce young people beginning as young as five years old to the sport of motorcycle road racing.&#8221;
<div id="attachment_709545" style="width: 794px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-709545" class="size-large wp-image-709545" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/03/1-784x576.png" alt="" width="784" height="576" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/03/1-784x576.png 784w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/03/1-300x220.png 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/03/1-768x564.png 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/03/1-1536x1129.png 1536w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/03/1.png 1682w" sizes="(max-width: 784px) 100vw, 784px" />MotoAmerica marketing materials featuring children</div>
The Daytona motorcycle races draw audiences of hundreds of thousands, both in person at the track and on television. They reach millions more on social media.
More than 200,000 Americans attended MotoAmerica&#8217;s superbike championship series last year, and 3.7 million households watched it on television, according to the marketing materials.
Ducati North America said in a statement provided to The Daily Wire that, &#8220;We acknowledge Warhorse HSBK Racing’s decision to reconsider the livery/layout of the bikes used at the Daytona race. Warhorse HSBK has an important presence in the American championship and we appreciate their commitment to the sport of motorcycle racing.&#8221;
HSBK Warhorse Racing and MotoAmerica failed to respond to a request for comment.

In this photo illustration, an Only Fans logo seen displayed

Days Before Winning At Daytona, Ducati-Backed Team Unveiled New Sponsor: OnlyFans

OnlyFans Sponsors Winning Daytona Team In Race That Markets To Kids

Florida

Sports

<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/rachel-dolezal" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rachel Dolezal</a>, a white woman who was famously accused of faking being black, has been fired from an Arizona elementary school after her OnlyFans came to light.
Dolezal, 46, was employed as an after school teacher at Sunrise Drive Elementary School in Tucson, but she has now lost her job there, an email from the school district shows.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
EXCLUSIVE: Families at the elementary school that just fired Rachel Dolezal just received this email from the school. 
&quot;We received information that a Sunrise Drive employee had an OnlyFans account &#8230; That person is no longer employed by the Catalina Foothills School District&quot; <a href="https://t.co/olKNnjJTGj">pic.twitter.com/olKNnjJTGj</a>
&mdash; Daily Wire (@realDailyWire) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDailyWire/status/1757889294851572056?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 14, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
NAACP leader claims she&#39;s black. According to her parents and birth certificate &#8211; she&#39;s white. <a href="http://t.co/n7nfc1LblW">http://t.co/n7nfc1LblW</a> <a href="http://t.co/uVhKpjlq4Q">pic.twitter.com/uVhKpjlq4Q</a>
&mdash; Victor Blackwell CNN (@VictorBlackwell) <a href="https://twitter.com/VictorBlackwell/status/609375920311377920?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 12, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Dolezal&#8217;s public social media page linked to her OnlyFans account.
&#8220;Yesterday afternoon, we received information that a Sunrise Drive employee had an OnlyFans account, which had content that was contrary to our district&#8217;s staff social media use and ethics policies. That person is no longer employed by the Catalina Foothills School District,&#8221; the school district wrote in an email to parents.
&#8220;We are committed to maintaining a learning environment where our presence on social media is consistent with our professional obligations,&#8221; the district said.
Back in 2015, Dolezal made national headlines when her background as the child of white parents came to light. She was accused of faking being black for personal gain, even changing her appearance and voice accordingly.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1700760801843000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2PQrVSrJfhxNb4LcARqniG">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
The revelations resulted in Dolezal losing her position as head of the NAACP chapter in Spokane. She was also dismissed as an African studies professor at Eastern Washington University.
Dolezal eventually admitted she had been &#8220;born white to white parents&#8221; but said she identified as black.
Her parents <a href="https://nypost.com/2015/06/12/naacp-leader-has-pretended-to-be-black-for-years-family/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">confirmed</a> at the time that they were Caucasian and “primarily European descent, though there’s a small amount of American Indian.”
In 2017, Dolezal <a href="https://nypost.com/2017/03/01/rachel-dolezal-changes-her-name-to-west-african-moniker/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">changed</a> her name to Nkechi Diallo, which means &#8220;gift of god&#8221; in West African.
Payroll records <a href="https://www.outkick.com/culture/rachel-dolezal-is-an-onlyfans-model-teaching-at-a-school-after-pretending-to-be-black-to-run-naacp-chapter" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reported</a> earlier this week by Outkick indicated Dolezal was making $19 an hour at Sunrise Drive Elementary. Photos <a href="https://www.outkick.com/culture/rachel-dolezal-is-an-onlyfans-model-teaching-at-a-school-after-pretending-to-be-black-to-run-naacp-chapter" target="_blank" rel="noopener">posted</a> on Facebook show Dolezal working with small children.
Meanwhile, her OnlyFans sells for $9.99 a month, and some of her posts get more than 100 likes.
On her OnlyFans, she advertises content like an &#8220;18-image explicit collection AND a video of self-pleasure to orgasm under the Christmas tree,&#8221; as well as &#8220;35 pics of DaBoo-Tay &amp; 2 videos of the TaTa’s.&#8221;
Dolezal can be seen posing in explicit pictures, including one where a picture of a black Santa Claus hangs on the wall in the background.
Despite Dolezal&#8217;s controversial history, she showed up in March to Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs&#8217; (D) signing of an executive order banning racial discrimination based on a person&#8217;s hair.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
One surprise appearance at <a href="https://twitter.com/katiehobbs?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@katiehobbs</a>’ <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/CROWNAct?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#CROWNAct</a> signing, Nkechi Amare Diallo, formerly known as <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/RachelDolezal?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#RachelDolezal</a> who gained popularity for her controversial trans-racial identity. <a href="https://t.co/H8TRszYWoF">pic.twitter.com/H8TRszYWoF</a>
&mdash; Kyra Trent (@KyraTrent) <a href="https://twitter.com/KyraTrent/status/1636876678915051520?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 17, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Notably, Dolezal did not always claim to be black. In 2002, Dolezal sued Howard University, a historically black school, alleging that she was denied scholarship funds because she was white.

In this photo illustration, the OnlyFans logo seen displayed

Rachel Dolezal Fired From Elementary School After Only Fans Surfaces

General

Only Fans

Race

Rachel Dolezal

Until a few weeks ago, I had never even seen <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TmejMmwPhw" target="_blank" rel="noopener">the Whatever podcast</a>, and my limited knowledge of this show was that the host, Brian Atlas, sits with young women to discuss dating and relationships, and he occasionally invites a conservative to join the conversation. I found out that for the particular episode I was booked for, I would be sitting in a circle with sex workers to discuss their jobs. Not only did I not understand why I had been booked on the show, but I was also dreading the whole ordeal. I didn’t really think I was a fit for a show to sit across from women who would be talking about their OnlyFans careers and various sex work they do. I thought I would feel a lot of anger sitting with them, but, as it turns out, anger is not what I felt for these proud prostitutes.
When I sat down with these ladies, they each described what they did for a living. One was a singer and leans more conservative, but this was definitely not the case for the others. Two were on OnlyFans and two were prostitutes who claimed they save marriages because of the work they do as prostitutes and sex therapists. That’s correct. They believe they sleep with women’s husbands to save marriages.
<div id="attachment_647451" style="width: 522px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-647451" class="size-full wp-image-647451" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/11/unnamed4.png" alt="" width="512" height="285" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/11/unnamed4.png 512w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/11/unnamed4-300x167.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 512px) 100vw, 512px" />Whatever Podcast.</div>
One legal prostitute shared with the table that she has found it difficult to date and she’s “run into a lot of insecure men” because they “can’t handle” what she does for work. Brian interjected to clarify her statement, asking if the men were insecure or if they didn’t want to date her because she is currently an active prostitute. She explained she hasn’t been dating anyone while working at the brothels, the Bunny Ranch, or the Mustang Ranch; she has only dated between jobs. When she was pressed on what makes these men insecure, she said her exes would cry about her going into work at the strip club: “I’ve had guys try to control, like, what I wear and say that I can’t work at strip clubs or do OnlyFans or whatever.” Brian interjected again: “Is it because they’re insecure or is that just them having boundaries and standards?” Her argument was that these men knew what she did for a living when they met, so if they had a problem with it, they shouldn’t have gotten involved with her in the first place.
I realized in the middle of this conversation that while I had thought I was going to feel angry sitting with these women, I actually just felt a tremendous amount of sadness for them. This particular girl is 22 years old, and she sleeps with five to ten men a night, and I listened to her justify why her relationships are not working out — because, in her eyes, the men dating her are insecure — and it’s heartbreaking. She can’t see the reason these men don’t want her engaging in this type of work is that they care about her. They want to see her get out of this lifestyle. While a man probably shouldn’t have been drawn to her in the first place considering her line of work, the point is that once they try to get her out, she sees it as an indicator that he is insecure, not that he thinks she’s better than the career she has.
Unsurprisingly, money was an underlying theme in their reasoning for doing this work. Furthermore, they speak derogatively about men in general, seeming to have a fundamental lack of understanding of what a quality man even is and where to find him. Later in the interview, the same 22-year-old who thinks her exes are insecure said she plans to get out of sex work after she’s made plenty of money. She fully plans to get married and live happily ever after. I explained that when they are older and men find out they used to be prostitutes, their prospects are going to drop dramatically in number — not because men are insecure, but because they have standards. Though men are having to work harder than generations past to find a high-quality woman — a woman who wants to stay in the home, dress conservatively, raise children, and not sleep with tons of men — for the most part, they’re willing to do it.
<div id="attachment_647453" style="width: 522px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-647453" class="size-full wp-image-647453" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/11/55candace.png" alt="" width="512" height="287" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/11/55candace.png 512w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/11/55candace-300x168.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 512px) 100vw, 512px" />Whatever Podcast.</div>
I was adamant that the career they have chosen is going to follow them the rest of their life. This, of course, was not a point well received at the table so this same girl created a what-if scenario regarding my own husband. She posed a scenario to me: If my husband were to come to me and ask to engage in some perverse sex act with him, what would I do? She assumes most women’s answer would end up being to go see her so she can engage in that act with him thus sparing the wife but still pleasing the husband. I explained to her that one of the beautiful parts of a marriage is that I knew who my husband was when we married, so this scenario would never happen. But she continued on, asking what I would do if “things changed and maybe he wants to start exploring.” I responded that people don’t just wake up one day and think of these things; they pick them up in some perverse world and they’re not normal. She pressed further, wanting to know what I would do and if divorce would be on the table. My answer? “I would think that that individual would probably need therapy — and not the kind that you give,” as I pointed to the woman in her 40s who says she’s a sex therapist and sleeps with other women’s husbands.
While this 22-year-old seemed to be trying to trigger me, I wasn’t triggered. Rather, I felt disturbed that she was even coming up with such a scenario. But I realized her entire reality has been warped because she works in a brothel and sees up to ten clients per day — clients who probably represent to her what all men are like. It’s never occurred to her that she is seeing the most debased, pathetic men in society. It’s not your average man who goes into a brothel. It is certainly not an average happily married man who has such perverse thoughts. Yet for her, she sees that as the norm because it has become her reality. She believes that all men are like the men she sees and want what they want.
<h4><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/show/candace" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: Candace Owens</a></h4>
This is where society is today, and it’s why I devote so much time to speaking about the ills of what is happening in it. This girl’s mind is utterly polluted because of what she experiences every single day. A major part of the problem is the soft pornography we have all become accustomed to; it’s what you see as you scroll through Instagram and see models showing so much skin. It’s images that are desensitizing us all. We don’t even flinch anymore when we see an ad with a woman holding a purse who is half naked because we have become accustomed to seeing this type of image absolutely everywhere.
The culmination of such a society has brought us to women who are quite literally prostituting themselves because they know they can make a quick buck. But no matter how much they make, that money is going to come at a cost — which I do not mean paradoxically. If you want to make  half a million dollars in your early to late 20s, you are going to realize later that no one wants to marry you. No one wants to have children with you. No one will respect you for the rest of your life. There is a great possibility you will end up alone — and that is deeply saddening.
At the root of all of this is a lack of faith — atheism, which goes hand-in-hand with narcissism. The focus becomes all about me and what I can do for myself. Worst of all, these women view faith as a form of perversion. In our conversation, I noticed one of the women was wearing a cross above a shirt that read “made in hell.” This particular woman was the angriest of the group, probably because she is in her early thirties and is likely realizing she has less time to find a husband and even fewer prospects. I asked her about her necklace and shirt pairing and told her I was confused. She said the stone matched her shirt and she didn’t know why she was wearing the cross: “I don’t know. I don’t think of it as religious.” In the middle of her fumbling around for an answer, she expressed that she didn’t think the cross was religious, but simply thought it was cute.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
This whole episode just shows how the West has lost the battle faith-wise. People openly mock Christianity, just like this woman. When I got up to leave, I looked across the table to the 22-year-old in the orange and told her I was going to pray for her, and she rejected my prayer. She said she did not want me to pray for her. What kind of person rejects a prayer? You might not believe in prayers, and you might not pray yourself, but to openly reject a prayer? I would never reject a prayer, no matter the faith of the person who offers it.
When I left that podcast, I still prayed for those young women. They need it, and all of us need it.

Candace_416x9 copy 25

Sex Work Is Legal, Prostitutes Make Millions, And Faith Is Nonexistent Among Workers

Candace Owens

Podcast

Readers Pass

The <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/minneapolis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Minneapolis Police Department</a> has confirmed an investigation into a female officer after a man says he recognized the woman from her graphic OnlyFans account about ten minutes after she pulled him over for a traffic violation.
The officer, who has not been publicly named, has allegedly operated an OnlyFans account for an undetermined amount of time, and the page allegedly includes graphic sex acts on film and explicit photos. The officer reportedly does not identify herself as an MPD officer on the subscription site.
&#8220;We were doing a little talking and checking and I was like, ‘Man, she got an OnlyFans page. I’m on her OnlyFans page,'&#8221; the man who was pulled over <a href="https://www.fox9.com/news/minneapolis-pd-officer-outed-as-onlyfans-model-after-pulling-over-subscriber" target="_blank" rel="noopener">told</a> FOX 9. &#8220;You can’t arrest me no more; I’ve seen your private parts.&#8221;
The driver said the officer has sex with a man he assumes is her husband on camera, and allows the content to be viewed by paying members.
&#8220;I wouldn’t want her to be arresting me and I just saw you and your husband last night for $29.99 have sex on OnlyFans,&#8221; he said. &#8220;I just can&#8217;t respect you or the precinct that you’re working at.&#8221;
The man said you have to be a &#8220;VIP&#8221; member to see her videos, which include &#8220;full sex.&#8221;
The Minnesota Law Enforcement Code of Ethics <a href="https://www.stpaul.gov/books/12000-law-enforcement-code-ethics#:~:text=With%20no%20compromise%20for%20crime,violence%20and%20never%20accepting%20gratuities." target="_blank" rel="noopener">states</a>, &#8220;I will keep my private life unsullied as an example to all; maintain courageous calm in the face of danger, scorn, or ridicule; develop self-restraint; and be constantly mindful of the welfare of others. Honest in thought and deed in both my personal and official life, I will be exemplary in obeying the laws of the land and the regulations of my department.&#8221;
FOX 9 has also highlighted that the Minnesota Police Officers Standards and Training Policy states that &#8220;officers shall not, whether on or off duty, exhibit any conduct which discredits themselves or their agency or otherwise impairs their ability or that of other officers or the agency to provide law enforcement services to the community.&#8221;
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
The police chief has confirmed the female officer is currently under investigation to see if she has violated any policies. &#8220;We take any allegations of policy violations seriously and the Chief has ordered an investigation,&#8221; the department said.
&#8220;If all we&#8217;re talking about is naked pictures behind a paywall, the mayor has no issue. However, the chief will determine if there are any policy violations,&#8221; Democrat Mayor of Minneapolis Jacob Frey commented.
Related: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/meet-the-women-who-regret-onlyfans" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Meet The Women Who Regret OnlyFans</a>

Unrecognizable man is pulled over for speeding

Man Recognizes Cop From OnlyFans: ‘You Can’t Arrest Me No More; I’ve Seen Your Private Parts’

Man Recognizes Cop From OnlyFans, Department Opens Investigation 

Law Enforcement

Minneapolis

<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/trace-cyrus-rips-into-only-fans" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Trace Cyrus</a>, guitarist for the band Metro Station and brother to pop star <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/miley-cyrus-at-30-time-to-grow-up" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Miley Cyrus</a>, is getting real about the sexes and warning young women to stay away from <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/onlyfans" target="_blank" rel="noopener">OnlyFans</a>, a subscription-based platform known for its sexual content.
On August 30, Trace, 34, posted a message on X (formerly Twitter) about girls who have an OnlyFans account and cannot find meaningful relationships. He said women need to know the risks of selling their bodies and emphasized that real happiness would come with family, children, and a good husband.
“There [are] so many girls that do OnlyFans that have lost their chance of ever settling down with a good guy with morals,” he wrote in the post. “They will try and call those men insecure for having standards.&#8221;
&#8220;They get a lot of attention from guys on OF [OnlyFans] so they think they have options,&#8221; Trace continued. &#8220;But any guy who is so desperate to see sexual content they are willing to pay for it is a desperate loser. A lot of successful guys will sleep with those girls but they don’t want to wife them.&#8221;
&#8220;I see a lot of these girls speaking out on this now saying they can’t get a serious relationship,” Trace said. “It’s because men see the value in those girls strictly for sex. They don’t look at those women and equate their value as a future wife, mother, or loyal partner.”
&#8220;I know some amazing girls that are genuinely good people that do OF,&#8221; the musician continued. &#8220;I just think this independent mindset of not needing a man is extremely toxic and leads to a very lonely future.&#8221;
&#8220;I hope more girls continue to speak up about this so other girls know the risk of getting into it,&#8221; he closed the post. &#8220;Having a good man and a family will bring you more happiness in old age than OF ever could.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Only Fans. <a href="https://t.co/vR6PAzvQZQ">pic.twitter.com/vR6PAzvQZQ</a>
&mdash; Trace Cyrus (@TraceCyrus) <a href="https://twitter.com/TraceCyrus/status/1696976239704023283?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 30, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The post went viral, racking up nearly 16 million views &#8212; and with that came both support and criticism. To critics, Trace has refused to apologize or back down.
<a class="c-link c-link--focus-visible" href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://onelink.to/dwapp" data-sk="tooltip_parent" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-59113">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
As <a href="https://pagesix.com/2023/08/31/miley-cyrus-brother-trace-shames-women-with-onlyfans-accounts/#" target="_blank" rel="noopener">noted</a> by PageSix, a former &#8220;Teen Mom&#8221; reality star who now has an OnlyFans account seemed to accuse Trace of sexism. The musician sarcastically responded, “I’ve been defeated. The most intelligent woman of this generation has put me in check. I retract my original statement. Every woman in the world should have an OnlyFans.”
Trace later posted, “I stand on everything I said. I’ll never read another response to anything I post on here. Most of you have made it clear you’re not intelligent enough to make a rebuttal to my statement without verbal abuse and name calling.”
WATCH: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/trace-cyrus-rips-into-only-fans" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Trace Cyrus Rips Into Only Fans</a>

Trace Cyrus, Miley Cyrus

‘Extremely Toxic’: Miley Cyrus’ Brother Trace Warns Women To Stay Away From OnlyFans, Gets Frank About Men

Miley Cyrus’ Brother Trace Warns Women To Stay Away From OnlyFans, Gets Frank About Men

Celebrities

Miley Cyrus

<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/candace-owens">Candace Owens</a> joined the popular “<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TmejMmwPhw" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Whatever</a>” podcast Thursday night and weighed in on a viral TikTok video of a single woman who bragged about being childless.
In the TikTok video, the woman talked about sleeping in on a Saturday morning before taking time to make shakshuka, a North African dish that includes eggs and tomato sauce, and explained how her lifestyle was all thanks to not having children. The video went viral online after Daily Wire podcast host Matt Walsh shared it on X, formerly Twitter.
While one of the panelists on the podcast defended the woman, saying she seemed sad about being single, Owens disagreed and said she was intentionally making motherhood look less appealing and it was all on “brand” for her.
The influencer, whose name is Julia Mazur, frequently posts videos on TikTok about her life as a single and childless 29-year-old woman.
“She’s obviously a narcissist,” Owens said in reply. “Let’s not pretend this is one video she made. It’s her brand on TikTok. It’s her brand on social media.”
Owens added that Mazur could have talked about what she did during her day without mentioning that she is childless. Owens said Mazur&#8217;s inclusion of that detail proved she was pushing a certain lifestyle choice. 
“The fact that she has to correlate it to, &#8216;and this makes me better than people that have children&#8217; is the problem,” Owens added. “&#8230; If you’re a man watching this, don’t marry this woman. She’s basically telling you she’s selfish. She’s telling you she’s a narcissist. Everything she says is about me, me, me… Even if you’re single, you don’t have to make your whole day revolve around you.”
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1694271417371000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0PLikBYdCi-jK-0C-P9dx2">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
“That particular woman that you just looked at is a selfish b**** and men should not marry her,” Owens concluded. 
At another point in the conversation, the topic turned to OnlyFans and sex work, which several of the panelists participate in. When Owens was asked her thoughts on those women’s futures, she replied that it’s true that women could make a lot of money doing sex work but it wasn’t to their long-term advantage. 
“The truth is that high-value men don’t want to date women that are sex workers… or women that are freely available on the internet for other men to see,” Owens said. She added that when everyone has access to a woman, nothing is “sacred,” giving examples of resurfaced videos of Nina Agdal saying vulgar things and Emily Ratajkowski being cheated on.
“Other men don’t want to share; they don’t want to share their wife,” Owens added.
On the same podcast appearance, Owens discussed her newly released documentary, “Convicting a Murderer,” which explored more details about the Steven Avery murder case. Owens said she set out to shatter a “deceptive media narrative” because “people believe that everything they watch is real.”
The first two episodes of “Convicting a Murderer” are exclusively available on <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/show/convicting-a-murderer">DailyWire+</a>. 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
.<a href="https://twitter.com/RealCandaceO?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RealCandaceO</a> talks about tomorrow&#39;s launch of <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ConvictingAMurderer?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ConvictingAMurderer</a> on the <a href="https://twitter.com/whatever?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@whatever</a> podcast: <a href="https://t.co/fE7LZdTOSG">pic.twitter.com/fE7LZdTOSG</a>
&mdash; Daily Wire (@realDailyWire) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDailyWire/status/1699995962607829387?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 8, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Candace Owens Joins ‘Whatever’ Podcast, Slams Viral TikTok Woman Who Bragged About Being Childless: ‘Men Should Not Marry Her’

Marriage

Menu