<div>
This article is part of <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/upstream" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Upstream</a>, The Daily Wire’s new home for culture and lifestyle. Real human insight and human stories — from our featured writers to you.
***
&#8220;Margo’s Got Money Troubles,&#8221; a novel-turned TV series about a 19-year-old single mom who turns to OnlyFans to get by, has attracted plenty of attention and acclaim — especially with its star-studded cast that includes Elle Fanning, Nick Offerman, Nicole Kidman, and Michelle Pfeiffer. 
</div>
<div>
We’ve come a long way since “Pretty Woman,” but why is a story about a 19-year-old driven to OnlyFans by financial desperation so popular? 
Rufi Thorpe, the author of &#8220;Margo’s Got Money Troubles,&#8221; told <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/14/entertainment/onlyfans-economy-margo-cassie-euphoria" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/14/entertainment/onlyfans-economy-margo-cassie-euphoria&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1781272699067000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3hQeCv1SS_V5FcVFCnT1yk">CNN</a> she believes OnlyFan’s “rising cultural relevance” is because “people are trying desperately to afford their rent.” The article explains that financial struggles in a harsh economy have led OnlyFans to be more “accepted” and less “stigmatized.” Thorpe has also been clear that she supports the destigmatization of the sex industry, <a href="https://m.dailyhunt.in/news/india/english/mashable-epaper-mashable/to%2Bget%2Bmargos%2Bgot%2Bmoney%2Btroubles%2Bright%2Brufi%2Bthorpe%2Bhad%2Bto%2Bearn%2Bthe%2Btrust%2Bof%2Bonlyfans%2Bcreators-newsid-n709795228" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://m.dailyhunt.in/news/india/english/mashable-epaper-mashable/to%252Bget%252Bmargos%252Bgot%252Bmoney%252Btroubles%252Bright%252Brufi%252Bthorpe%252Bhad%252Bto%252Bearn%252Bthe%252Btrust%252Bof%252Bonlyfans%252Bcreators-newsid-n709795228&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1781272699067000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0CfR8xFnYN7goshQyHyeI9">saying</a> that her goal with the novel was to “explore sex work as work.” 
</div>
<div>
But it is a failing position to accept that financial necessity should drive women to OnlyFans and that society should refrain from condemning OnlyFans as a result. 
</div>
<div>
To be clear: I certainly don’t believe women who turn to OnlyFans out of economic desperation should be condemned; it is the systems and individuals who exploit their desperation that deserve our censure. 
Consider an analogy: A landlord approaches a woman in his building who is struggling to pay her rent. “If you send me nude photos a few times a week,” the landlord says, “I’ll forgive your debts. Otherwise, you’re out on the streets.” 
</div>
<div>
Does it make your skin crawl? 
How about this one: A CEO arranges a private meeting with a female employee. Behind closed doors, he explains the offer: “Come into my office at the end of every workday and do a strip tease. If you do that, I’ll double your wages.” 
</div>
<div>
In contexts like these, most people recognize that coercing sexual consent through financial necessity — or even financial opportunity — is exploitative and abusive. There’s a good reason for this. It’s because sexual consent is a uniquely sensitive type of consent, which must be given completely freely. Generally speaking, it is not wrong to pay someone to do a job that they may not really desire. But sexual consent warrants a particularly high standard of freedom and autonomy. As such, it is wrong to use money (or any other means) to pressure someone into accepting sexual situations that they do not authentically desire.
</div>
<div>
As a society, we largely understand this — hence our reactions of repulsion to the landlord and CEO examples. But for some reason, when it comes to OnlyFans and the commercial sex industry, there’s a clear double standard. 
</div>
<div>
Society is increasingly happy to accept and even celebrate the sex industry. Social media and mainstream TV are full of glamorized stories of women who went from making minimum wage to raking in millions on OnlyFans. And this, the popular narrative goes, is empowering to women. 
</div>
<div>
But leveraging a woman’s economic need to coerce her into unwanted sex acts is not empowering. It’s exploitative. 
</div>
<div>
It’s worth noting that very few women actually make good money on OnlyFans. In fact, the average creator earns only <a href="https://ofstats.net/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://ofstats.net/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1781272699068000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0l8V_pf2M2tpDa38eGNlPj">$131 per month</a>. However, even if it were true that OnlyFans was the answer to women&#8217;s financial problems, the question becomes: How did we end up with a society where accepting sexual exploitation is a woman&#8217;s best option to support herself? 
</div>
<div>
As Thorpe and the CNN note, the struggling economy certainly plays a role. But it’s far from the entire answer. If it&#8217;s just the economy, why aren’t men flocking to OnlyFans to make money? Why are the vast majority of people selling content on OnlyFans women and the vast majority purchasing content men? 
</div>
<div>
This is about much more than the economy. It’s about a society that has commodified women as sex objects. A society that tells women their primary worth is in their ability — nay, their obligation — to please men sexually. And a society that withholds or grants financial rewards on the basis of women fulfilling that obligation.
</div>
<div>
I’m reminded of a man who once said to me, “Pornography is empowering to women because it’s one of the only jobs where a woman can make more money than a man.” 
At the time, I was simply rendered speechless. But I’ve long wished I could go back and say what I really thought about his absurd argument.
</div>
<div>
A world where the only way a woman can make more money than a man is to strip for those leering men is not a world that’s empowering to women. That’s not a system that was created by and for women. It’s a system that was created by and for men. 
</div>
<div>
The hard truth is that the sex trade has always been a misogynistic industry whose sole purpose is to cater to male sexual entitlement. It has never been about what’s best for women. 
</div>
<div>
Even the glamorized OnlyFans is not exempt from that fact. Diving deeper into common experiences on the platform <a href="https://endsexualexploitation.org/wp-content/uploads/Proof-Compilation_2023-DDL_OnlyFans.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://endsexualexploitation.org/wp-content/uploads/Proof-Compilation_2023-DDL_OnlyFans.pdf&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1781272699068000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3cLJI5uYKuRHWXSWswjTXT">shows</a> creators face a <a href="https://endsexualexploitation.org/wp-content/uploads/Proof-Compilation_2023-DDL_OnlyFans.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://endsexualexploitation.org/wp-content/uploads/Proof-Compilation_2023-DDL_OnlyFans.pdf&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1781272699068000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3cLJI5uYKuRHWXSWswjTXT">myriad of serious harms</a> at the hands of subscribers, pimps, traffickers, and even the OnlyFans corporation itself. These women deal with stalking, rape, abuse, threats of physical violence, financial exploitation, psychological manipulation, death, suicide, mental health harms — you name it. 
</div>
<div>
Embracing the sex industry as “empowering” does not erase its fundamentally misogynistic and exploitative nature. It simply obscures it.
***
Lily Moric is the communications and content strategist with the <a href="https://x.com/NCOSE">National Center on Sexual Exploitation</a>, the leading national nonprofit organization exposing the links between all forms of sexual exploitation such as child sexual abuse, prostitution, sex trafficking, and pornography.
</div>

Margos_Got_Money_Troubles_Photo_010802

The OnlyFans Success Story That’s Missing A Dark Reality

OnlyFans

Upstream

In a shocking turn of events, porn star and podcast host “Lena the Plug” Nersesian and &#8220;No Jumper&#8221; podcast host “Adam22” Grandmaison are reportedly getting divorced, as TMZ <a href="https://www.tmz.com/2026/06/03/lena-the-plug-files-for-divorce-from-adam22/">reported</a>.
Lena filed the divorce documents citing “irreconcilable differences” in L.A. County on Monday, the outlet noted. She is also reportedly petitioning for custody of the couple’s 5-year-old daughter, with Grandmaison being granted “reasonable” visitation rights. They’ve been married since 2023 and reported their date of separation as April 15, 2026.
The couple is well known for having both a podcast and a popular OnlyFans account after launching content on Instagram, YouTube, and Pornhub. They’ve been reviled for years due to depraved behavior, including Grandmaison allowing his wife to sleep with a “bigger” man, Jason Luv, and Lena filming pornographic content while pregnant. 
“Those were my record months for sure,” the porn star said of filming during pregnancy. “I was not gonna stop working!”
The pair was known for over-the-top publicity stunts, too, including picking up a cashier at Target to engage in a threesome. They used such stunts to drum up followers on their OnlyFans.
Despite having many followers on OnlyFans, Nersesian wrote in the divorce filing that she has no job and that her only income is $3,000 per month from Grandmaison, per TMZ. &#8220;I have no access to any financial resources in this marriage or actual financial information, so all amounts entered are estimates,” the documents reportedly say. 
In 2022, Grandmaison bragged that he and Nersesian were making $1 million per month from OnlyFans and more from other business ventures, The Daily Mail <a href="https://www.dailymail.com/tvshowbiz/article-12318167/Who-Lena-Plug-OnlyFans-star-shot-fame-husband-let-sleep-bigger-man-did-porn-pregnant-threesome-Target-cashier-earns-1million-month.html">reported</a>.
Grandmaison reposted the TMZ story to his Instagram story yesterday when the news broke, adding a caption that said, &#8220;All black women who want to date me please DM me I will buy you a car.&#8221; He later shared an Instagram story that said, &#8220;freedom.&#8221;
Nersesian hasn’t posted anything since the news went public, but two days ago, she reflected on aging in an Instagram post shared for her birthday.
“A few years ago, I was terrified of turning 30. I thought getting older meant something was ending. Instead, it’s been the opposite,” she <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/DZDvhJTyFIx/">wrote</a> in the caption. “I’ve learned more about myself, built a life I’m proud of, and found a level of contentment I didn’t know was possible.”

Lena the Plug Adam 22

Influencer Who Pimped Out Wife For OnlyFans Bucks Headed For Divorce

divorce

Internet

Pornography

A hard truth that Hollywood culture and the media routinely try to deny was dropped by an unlikely source — an OnlyFans girl.
A woman who sells her body on the tragically popular website OnlyFans admitted in a video that no &#8220;high value man&#8221; will ever date an &#8220;OnlyFans girl,&#8221; leaving one desperately lonely and crippled with anxiety.
The post from Athena Pariss, who has well over a million followers on social media, opens with a clip of late conservative Charlie Kirk explaining that men &#8220;look so lowly on OnlyFans girls.&#8221;
&#8220;It&#8217;s so true. As someone being in the OF [OnlyFans] industry for the last three years, I truly think that it&#8217;s a give and exchange,&#8221; Pariss said, adding that when you &#8220;make a deal with the &#8230; dark side,&#8221; you might gain financial freedom, &#8220;but in exchange, your love life suffers greatly.&#8221;
Pariss <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/DYJ_AmuOEqZ/">said</a> she&#8217;s been single for four years and never had a boyfriend while doing OnlyFans. Men will sleep with her, she said, but no one will &#8220;claim&#8221; her as their girlfriend. She said she&#8217;s experienced real darkness since she started selling her body on the website and detailed horrifying sexual abuse from men. In one instance, she says she was raped.
&#8220;The darkness that you open yourself up to when you do something like this — it comes in depression and anxiety and isolation,&#8221; she continued. &#8220;It&#8217;s all spiritual.&#8221;
&#8220;Every high-value man that I have ever met, he has told me that he will never claim me. They will hook up with you, they will never claim you,&#8221; Pariss said. &#8220;They will never bring you home to their parents.&#8221;
&#8220;I do agree that high-value men will look low on women [who do OF],&#8221; she continued. &#8220;It makes you believe that you are an extremely low value person, and that you are not capable of loving because of the career choice that you have made.&#8221;
<div id="attachment_1102405" style="width: 650px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1102405" class="wp-image-1102405 size-full" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/05/Screenshot-2026-05-26-at-8.48.17-PM.png" alt="" width="640" height="836" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/05/Screenshot-2026-05-26-at-8.48.17-PM.png 640w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/05/Screenshot-2026-05-26-at-8.48.17-PM-230x300.png 230w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2026/05/Screenshot-2026-05-26-at-8.48.17-PM-441x576.png 441w" sizes=" (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" />Athena Pariss on Instagram</div>
Over the past few weeks, Pariss has posted videos on social media about how she has started to read the Bible. In one video, she <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/DYHrRtXuDah/">said</a> she was abused as a child and strongly believes that girls get into the industry because they are looking for self-worth.
&#8220;It&#8217;s some sort of abuse that happened in childhood — whether it&#8217;s sexual abuse, whether it&#8217;s physical abuse, it&#8217;s some sort of lack of unconditional love that you receive when you&#8217;re a child, and when that manifests and you continue to have these experiences, you get older, and in your mind, you think that your sex is your value.&#8221;
&#8220;The world promotes self. That we must be selfish, we must idolize ourselves,&#8221; Pariss captioned the video. &#8220;We must put our careers in front of relationships and families. But what does our soul crave? Community, family, unconditional love &#8230; maybe that’s why I’ve been so empty for so long &#8230; too busy filling worldly needs rather than soul. As I read the Bible, I understand more of what our soul craves.&#8221;
&nbsp;
<blockquote class="instagram-media" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYHrRtXuDah/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14">
<div style="padding: 16px;">
&nbsp;
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div>
<div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div>
<div style="padding-top: 8px;">
<div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"></div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;">
<div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: 8px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"></div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);"></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: auto;">
<div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"></div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"></div>
</div>
&nbsp;
<p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYHrRtXuDah/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by Athena Peros (@athenaparissss)</a>
</div>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
Related: <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/its-all-a-lie-former-onlyfans-insider-reveals-dirty-secrets/id1576594336?i=1000707839753">“It’s All a Lie” Former OnlyFans Insider Reveals Dirty Secrets</a>

Screenshot 2026-05-26 at 8.59.12 PM

OnlyFans Girl Drops Warning: No Man Will Date You

OnlyFans Girl Drops Warning For Others: No Man Will Date You

Dating

Relationships

OnlyFans creators are big mad at “Euphoria” for making sex work look seedy and gross. 
Several prominent “content creators,” including former “Boy Meets World” actress Maitland Ward and popular OnlyFans personality Sydney Leathers have publicly slammed Sydney Sweeney for her character Cassie’s storyline on the HBO series. 
In this season, Cassie creates an OnlyFans to help fund her upcoming wedding. She acts out strange fetishes, including dressing as a dog on a leash and a baby in a diaper, plus sends one fan her underwear. These antics have the real OnlyFans creators seeing red.
“There’s just a lot that’s ridiculous and cartoonish about it,” Leathers <a href="https://variety.com/2026/tv/news/sydney-sweeney-euphoria-onlyfans-hbo-sex-worker-nude-1236741946/">told</a> Variety in an interview published Sunday. “There’s so much that they have her doing that is not even allowed on OnlyFans, and that alone is infuriating: the age-play stuff where she’s dressed as a baby in a diaper, for example. Credit card processors have very strict rules that you have to abide by, and the rules are getting stricter all the time.”
Ward also expressed her frustration over OnlyFans creators being portrayed in a negative way. 
“In the climate we’re in, that they dressed her up as a baby to make pornographic OnlyFans content was beyond troubling and again serves to perpetuate stereotypes that sex workers have no moral compass and that they will do anything for money,” she told the outlet. “And there’s always this untrue stigma that somehow sex work is synonymous with sex trafficking and abuse. And they just said, let’s make a joke of it. That is so funny. I’m not laughing.”
Showrunner Sam Levinson <a href="https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-features/euphoria-season-3-premiere-feature-sam-levinson-interview-1236561251/">told</a> The Hollywood Reporter back in April that the story arc was never meant to be flattering. 
“[Cassie] has got her dog house and her little dog ears and the nose, and that has its own humor, but what makes the scene is the fact that her housekeeper is the one filming it,” he said at the time. “What we wanted to always find is the other layer of absurdity that we’re able to tie into it so that we’re not too inside of her fantasy or illusion — the gag is to jump out, to break the wall.”
“Some of these scenes we only lit with these ring lights that she would use. When you’re inside, it’s a beautiful, glowing front light, but then you jump out of it and it’s just a pool of light and everything surrounding it is dark. It’s just gnarly and jarring,” Levinson continued. “We wanted to capture what she’s trying to show the audience and be inside of it, but then also pull back wider and see how depressing it is.”
In the latest episode, which aired on Sunday, Sweeney’s character weighs in on politics and appears to lean Right. During a fictional press tour, Cassie tells an online talk show host, &#8220;If a man today were to say that he wants a girlfriend who can cook or clean, he might as well be screaming the N-word.&#8221;
Someone off camera replies, &#8220;You sound like a Democrat,&#8221; which makes Cassie laugh and say, “I’m not retarded.”
At another point, Cassie says, &#8220;I just feel like American men have been treated like second-class citizens … In the past, men used to be hunters, gatherers, and protectors. Now, they’re being forced to walk around on their tippy toes. It’s not natural.&#8221; 
Her manager, Maddy, offers her take on the situation. “You know what’s funny?” she asks Cassie. “The angrier these idiots get, the more money you make.”
Many commenters pointed out how Cassie’s storyline mimics what people really think about Sweeney’s personal politics, which she refuses to confirm. They believe she’s secretly conservative, especially following the viral <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/sydney-sweeney-says-trumps-support-was-surreal-during-viral-jeans-ad-controversy">American Eagle jeans ad controversy</a>.

Sydney Sweeney

OnlyFans Creators Rage Against Sydney Sweeney Over Sex Work ‘Stigma’

Entertainment

Sex Workers

Television

This article is part of <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/introducing-upstream-a-lifestyle-and-culture-section-of-the-daily-wire">Upstream,</a> The Daily Wire’s new home for culture and lifestyle. Real human insight and human stories — from our featured writers to you.
***
One of OnlyFans’ top earners is a <a href="https://www.gq.com/story/sophie-rain-profile">Christian virgin</a>. Allegedly. <a href="https://www.ndtv.com/offbeat/onlyfans-creator-sophie-rain-claims-she-earned-101-million-from-platform-i-have-no-reason-to-lie-10904715">Sophie Rain</a> wants us to think she’s 21 years old, loves the musical “Hamilton,” and aspires to be a marine biologist. Claiming never to go nude (paying subscribers <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ask/comments/1kycq0y/comment/nba6bh5/?utm_source=share&amp;utm_medium=web3x&amp;utm_name=web3xcss&amp;utm_term=1&amp;utm_content=share_button">say otherwise</a>), she’s managed to rake in roughly <a href="https://brobible.com/culture/article/sophie-rain-earnings-since-she-began-selling-content/">$100 million</a> on the adult platform. “I think God has a plan for everyone, and clearly if I wasn’t meant to be doing this, he would have made it known by now,” <a href="https://www.gq.com/story/sophie-rain-profile">she says</a>. She’s <a href="https://nypost.com/2025/06/14/lifestyle/onlyfans-sophie-rain-reveals-her-2025-earnings-virginity/">waiting for marriage</a> to give it up in person.
Cashing in on the <a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/nexstar_media_wire/5735168-how-much-are-americans-spending-on-onlyfans-new-report-has-the-answer/">$2.63 billion</a> up for grabs from OnlyFans users in the U.S., Rain crafts a barely legal girl-next-door persona with <a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@sophieraiin/video/7614980794880199967">makeup</a> tutorials and flirty lifestyle content where she repurposes animal print <a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@sophieraiin/video/7620504027972799757">thongs</a> as ponytail holders. But before anyone tries to out-do the <a href="https://people.com/onlyfans-model-made-43-million-last-year-to-her-it-doesnt-conflict-with-christian-values-exclusive-8758383#:~:text=Not%20to%20mention%20that%20for,out%20how%20old%20they%20are.%22">$5 million</a> that someone named “Charles” paid her, you should know she isn’t easily won over by material things. “I would be happy with something thoughtful. Like, a Labubu,” she tells the <a href="https://youtu.be/EDetnjVyedc?t=139">Full Send Podcast</a>. Wonder how many Labubus she could get for her <a href="https://www.complex.com/pop-culture/a/maggie-ekberg/sophie-rain-car-collection">$1.5 million</a> car collection and waterfront digs in <a href="https://people.com/onlyfans-model-made-43-million-last-year-to-her-it-doesnt-conflict-with-christian-values-exclusive-8758383#:~:text=Not%20to%20mention%20that%20for,out%20how%20old%20they%20are.%22">Miami</a>. 
<a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-66615008">Adult webcam</a> tycoon and OnlyFans founder <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/23/leonid-radvinsky-the-owner-of-onlyfans-has-passed-away/">Leonid Radvinsky</a> died of cancer last week, having amassed his <a href="https://www.the-sun.com/news/16126042/leonid-radvinsky-net-worth-onlyfans-wife-katie-chudnovsky/">$4.7 billion</a> fortune by skimming a <a href="https://ofcpa.pro/need-to-know-about-the-20-onlyfans-percentage-cut">20% commission</a> off OnlyFans creator earnings. <a href="https://nypost.com/2026/03/24/us-news/onlyfans-owner-leonid-radvinsky-died-days-before-public-found-out-pal/">Sophie Rain</a> honored his enduring legacy, recalling, “That man built something that changed my entire life. Like, I grew up on food stamps and now I can take care of my whole family because of a platform he created. I will never forget that.” 
<a href="https://kyivindependent.com/ukrainian-born-onlyfans-owner-dies-at-43/">Ukrainian-born</a> Radvinsky, a reclusive father of four children with his wife <a href="https://gfcs.com.au/leonid-radvinsky-wife/">Katie Chudnovsky,</a> gets all the credit for <a href="https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2026-03-24/leonid-radvinsky-man-who-changed-porn-with-onlyfans-dies-at-43">transforming the porn industry</a> by letting the objects of its affection put a price on their parts. That <a href="https://www.riverfronttimes.com/onlyfans-2024-earnings-data/">subscription model</a> rocketed OnlyFans ahead of other popular social platforms because creators actually made money. Much more than the average porn star&#8217;s <a href="https://www.comparably.com/salaries/salaries-for-porn-star">$70,000</a> annual salary.
The inner workings of the <a href="https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/onlyfans-sex-origins/">Ukraine-based company</a> remain obscure. Slightly less sketchy for creators, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keily_Blair">Irish-born</a>, Oxford-educated lawyer OnlyFans CEO Keily Blair creates a comfy landing as the face of the brand.
&#8220;We don&#8217;t have to be everyone&#8217;s cup of tea; we&#8217;re happy to be someone&#8217;s glass of champagne,&#8221; <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cs1BWF9Q69g">Blair says</a>. She claims, &#8220;Adult content appears on a lot of other &#8216;traditional&#8217; social media platforms, but without the safety and controls that we have in place to help keep our community safe.&#8221;
The platform’s elite <a href="https://ofstats.net/">0.1%</a> of creators amass the most jaw-dropping riches, with familiar stars from outside the skin biz leading the charge. “Keeping Up With The Kardashians” fans might recognize Rob Kardashian’s baby mama, rapper and socialite <a href="https://people.com/rob-kardashian-shows-support-for-ex-blac-chyna-11932949">Blac Chyna</a>, who shares too much information with OnlyFans in exchange for a reported <a href="https://ofstats.net/#:~:text=Since%202019%2C%20the%20OnlyFans%20creators,there%20are%20377.5%20OnlyFans%20users.">$20 million</a> per month. Former star of Disney’s “Shake It Up” actor and singer <a href="https://people.com/bella-thorne-taking-control-new-chapter-exclusive-interview-8760560">Bella Thorne</a> puts it all out there as her <a href="https://ofstats.net/#:~:text=Since%202019%2C%20the%20OnlyFans%20creators,there%20are%20377.5%20OnlyFans%20users.">$11 million</a> monthly side-hustle. (She earned <a href="https://www.billboard.com/music/pop/bella-thorne-1-million-first-day-onlyfans-9440360/#:~:text=Bella%20Thorne%20Is%20the%20First%20Person%20to,Million%20in%20Her%20First%20Day%20on%20OnlyFans.">$1 million</a> on her first day.) 
As the exotic dancer-turned-rapper behind the five-time platinum hit “<a href="https://www.facebook.com/EricAlperPR/posts/cardi-bs-money-is-now-5x-platinum-in-the-us-selling-5-million-copies-released-in/1372890524506620/">Money,</a>” Cardi B’s monthly OnlyFans payout comes in just under <a href="https://ofstats.net/#:~:text=Since%202019%2C%20the%20OnlyFans%20creators,there%20are%20377.5%20OnlyFans%20users.">$10 million</a>. And in possibly the (blessedly) least sexy offering, music industry titans DJ Khaled and Fat Joe joined OnlyFans as a solo act, sharing what they called “<a href="https://www.complex.com/music/a/cmplxtara-mahadevan/fat-joe-dj-khaled-launch-joint-onlyfans-account">the light</a>”— and hopefully none of their bathing suit areas. 
Morals aside, the true story on how much those booty shakes’ll get ya on the platform puts a new spin on &#8220;NSFW.&#8221; The top 1% of earners take home about <a href="https://ofstats.net/#:~:text=Top%20OnlyFans%20Creators%20by%20Earnings%20Blac%20Chyna,an%20estimated%20$20%20million%20in%20monthly%20earnings.">$49,000</a> a year — a little more than your run-of-the-mill starting <a href="https://www.nea.org/resource-library/educator-pay-and-student-spending-how-does-your-state-rank#:~:text=The%20report%20also%20found%20that:%20*%20Inflation%2Dadjusted,$46%2C526%20*%20**National%20Average%20Teacher%20Salary**%20$72%2C030">teacher’s salary</a>. If you’re considering returning your Amazon Basics tripod and ring light, brace yourself. The real people numbers are even more shocking than OnlyFans <a href="https://www.huckmag.com/article/the-untold-lives-of-mature-onlyfans-performers">over-65</a> content. 
Even though OnlyFans has attempted to diversify by promoting <a href="https://www.riverfronttimes.com/onlyfans-offering-business-classes/#:~:text=The%20company%20is%20backing%20more,hub%20for%20all%20things%20spicy.">business courses</a>, cooking content, <a href="https://influencers.feedspot.com/comedian_onlyfans_instagram_influencers/">comedy</a>, and fitness classes (some of which aren’t topless), for most of us, the foreseeable payday is barely worth a peek at an ankle. The average OnlyFans creator makes an average of <a href="https://ofstats.net/">$131 per month</a>, which won’t even cover a daily Starbucks <a href="https://pos.toasttab.com/blog/on-the-line/how-much-is-a-cup-of-coffee">latte habit</a>. 
Ah, too bad you already went full frontal on the MILF content you’re not telling your family about. As Britney Spears once advised, “<a href="https://genius.com/2209338/Britney-spears-work-bitch/You-want-a-hot-body-you-want-a-bugatti-you-want-a-maserati-you-better-work-bitch-you-want-a-lamborghini-sip-martinis">You want a Maserati? You better work, b*tch</a>” — but maybe at a 9-to-5 that contributes to your 401(k).
The “<a href="https://www.deseret.com/2023/9/11/23859829/onlyfans-porn-degradation-culture-reframed/">soft prostitution</a>” of OnlyFans is often pegged as the catalyst behind creator stunts like Bonnie Blue’s quest to sleep with <a href="https://www.nydailynews.com/2026/02/10/bonnie-blue-breaks-world-record-unprotected-sex/">1,000 men in 12 hours</a>, and the depression and <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20250826230420/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12119-022-10009-3">loneliness</a> that sex workers commonly experience. But even if Roxie_KittenAngel doesn’t stick around OnlyFans long enough to feel those effects, chances are, she made exactly not-enough-dollars doing it. 
Valued at <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-05-23/onlyfans-owner-is-said-to-explore-a-sale-at-8-billion-valuation">$8 billion</a> 10 years after it was founded, OnlyFans continues to blow up. It seems that branding itself as a so-called empowered-Girls Gone Wild kind of creative sex space, where consenting adults take full <a href="https://buildd.co/p/onlyfans-business-model">control of their spiciest content and get rich doing it,</a> still works. So is it worth trading your dignity for an anonymous fan’s <a href="https://dataglobehub.com/onlyfans-statistics-and-insights/">$4.99</a> monthly subscription? 
“I had no idea what I was getting into … And then once I had done it, I figured there was no reason to stop, since the photos were already out there,” a verified former OnlyFans creator, who reportedly made $20,000 a month, told <a href="https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https://www.businessinsider.com/downsides-and-regrets-of-doing-onlyfans-2023-9">Business Insider</a>. &#8220;I did something I thought would help me feel empowered as a woman, but instead it left me traumatized.&#8221; Contrasting with the safe space OnlyFans claims to create, she added, &#8220;I would also receive terrible messages that were so degrading and I didn&#8217;t see any filtering system on OnlyFans to block them.&#8221;
Having been raised in a Christian home, she ultimately found a way back to Jesus through prayer, admitting, “I don&#8217;t think I could&#8217;ve left it all behind on my own, but I&#8217;ve found strength through my faith … I think I experienced what I did so that I could have a platform to share my story with other girls who are going through it.”
Now an outspoken advocate against the platform, Nala Ray made <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/health-wellness/2025/12/04/nala-ray-onlyfans-anti-porn-faith-advocate/87572291007/">$14 million</a> on OnlyFans in five years. She drove a Ferrari, Bentley, and a Lambo, bringing in $300,000 a month. When asked what lie convinced her to start creating content, Ray told <a href="https://youtu.be/COTlj6w3bUU?t=283">Uncensored W/ Brittni De La Mora</a>, &#8220;The first month on OnlyFans, I made, like, $87,000. I quit my job immediately … I just kept selling more and more of myself to my fans.&#8221;
&#8220;Honestly, I couldn&#8217;t feel much at all. I could feel angry, but I didn&#8217;t cry for years,&#8221; <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/health-wellness/2025/12/04/nala-ray-onlyfans-anti-porn-faith-advocate/87572291007/">she explained</a>, admitting to relying on alcohol and marijuana just to get through the day. &#8220;Anytime I would have to do major scenes, I&#8217;d have to drink myself into oblivion to just do it.&#8221;
Once she finally summoned the courage to leave OnlyFans after being <a href="https://nypost.com/2024/03/28/lifestyle/pastors-daughter-leaves-onlyfans-career-behind-after-finding-jesus-and-new-boyfriend/">baptized</a>, even other Christians labeled her as <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Catholicism/comments/1gw1k2e/whats_your_take_on_nala_ray_and_andrew_wilson/">a grifter</a>. While she describes herself as a work in progress, she hopes to encourage others to walk away from the soul-crushing riches of adult entertainment.
&#8220;The ones who are glamorizing [this lifestyle] are men trying to run women’s lives and take a percentage out of … you showing your body on the internet. It’s just like having a pimp,&#8221; <a href="https://nypost.com/2024/03/28/lifestyle/pastors-daughter-leaves-onlyfans-career-behind-after-finding-jesus-and-new-boyfriend/">she said</a>. &#8220;But it makes me want to fight all the more to help women understand that this is not where you want to go.&#8221;

GettyImages-157501466

OnlyFans Made A Few Stars Rich, But What Most Creators Actually See Is Another Story

Celebrity

Money

Leonid Radvinsky, the owner of OnlyFans, has died at age 43 following a battle with cancer, the company announced Monday.
“We are deeply saddened to announce the death of Leo Radvinsky. Leo passed away peacefully after a long battle with cancer,” the subscription platform said in a statement. “His family have requested privacy at this difficult time.”
The Ukrainian-American billionaire entrepreneur purchased Fenix International, the parent company of OnlyFans, in 2018, according to The New York Post. He served as the company&#8217;s director and majority owner until his death. 
Radvinsky was known for staying out of the spotlight and had not publicly announced his illness. He was a graduate of Northwestern University with a degree in economics and is survived by his wife, Katie Chudnovsky, and their four children. The family resided in Florida.
He famously declined interviews and did not attend industry events. <a href="https://www.wsj.com/business/media/only-fans-leonid-radvinsky-profile-706c914d">According to</a> The Wall Street Journal, employees were required to sign nondisclosure agreements limiting unauthorized disclosures about the company and its operations. At the time of his death, Radvinsky’s net worth was estimated at $7.8 billion. 
The tech entrepreneur is credited with turning OnlyFans into the massively successful company that it is today. Under his leadership, OnlyFans grew into a highly profitable platform that allows creators to sell subscription-based content directly to users, including pornographic material. 
Critics say the model has expanded access to producing and distributing adult content and played a role in normalizing sex work.
<a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15671345/OnlyFans-Leo-Radvinsky-dead-cancer-43-billionaire-founder.html">Reports</a> indicated that Radvinsky had explored a potential sale of the company but had not finalized a deal.

OnlyFans Billionaire Owner Dead At 43

Death

Florida

Online porn

The following is an adapted transcript excerpt from <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1885-hammer-wielding-trans-leftist-arrested-trying-to-break-into-jd-vance-s-house?elementPosition=8&amp;row=2&amp;rowHeadline=Latest+Episodes&amp;rowType=Horizontal+Show+Episodes+Carousel">The Michael Knowles Show</a>.
* * *
One of the OnlyFans models who slept with a thousand guys in one day, someone named Lily Phillips, has apparently just had a religious conversion.
I don’t know if that’s her real name or a stage name, but here is the question: Is Lily Phillips&#8217;s conversion sincere? And the broader question is how should Christians react to this?
Here&#8217;s the video of her baptism:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
THIS! OF model Lily Phillips gets baptized after viral 1,000-men stunt, says she is now seeking faith and redemption.
I pray this is genuine. No one is ever too far gone for Jesus Christ. 🙏🏾 <a href="https://t.co/bmpvDvXXyx">pic.twitter.com/bmpvDvXXyx</a>
— David J Harris Jr (@DavidJHarrisJr) <a href="https://twitter.com/DavidJHarrisJr/status/2007111451232911551?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 2, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Credit: @DavidJHarrisJr/X.com
There is a nice Kanye pop gospel song behind the video. She appears to be in either an Anglican or Episcopalian church and it&#8217;s a full immersion baptism in a bathtub. Her caption reads, “A day to remember forever.”
Now, some people are accusing her of being cynical. So why do I think she’s sincere? First of all, as you will see, she does not sound cynical to me. But even if she is, I always like to be on the side of credulity when it comes to these matters. Not to the point of absurdity, of course, but I always want to be on the side of grace when it comes to these things.
<h3><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1885-hammer-wielding-trans-leftist-arrested-trying-to-break-into-jd-vance-s-house">WATCH: The Michael Knowles Show</a></h3>
Well, turns out she recently did <a href="https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/why-onlyfans-star-lily-phillips-decided-to-be-rebaptized-excl/">an interview with US Weekly</a> where she explained her actions, saying:
<blockquote>I think for a while I’d kind of deviated from religion, and I think I was kind of in denial for a lot of it … Quite a big thing happened more in my personal life, where I kind of felt the need to start speaking to God again. I hadn’t really practiced faith for a while. I just wanted to get rebaptized to kind of reinstate my relationship with God.</blockquote>
So right off the bat, there is a major problem: you can&#8217;t get rebaptized. Baptism happens once. The Nicene Creed actually states this. All of the flavors of Christianity, even ones that are a little far flung from Orthodoxy, at the very least recognize the statement in the Creed that says, “I confess one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.” It’s one baptism, not two.
The reason you are only baptized once is that baptism is not a personal action of yours. Baptism is an action of God the Holy Spirit. It&#8217;s the grace of God coming down — and God doesn&#8217;t make mistakes. God doesn&#8217;t act insufficiently. It works. When God acts on you, when you are baptized, that leaves an indelible mark on your soul.
People do not have to be rebaptized. It&#8217;s like gay marriage — you can&#8217;t. Why? Because the sacrament works. But in our fallen, broken human life, we just feel like we need to do something more sometimes, and we get it wrong. But I get why people do it.
What she&#8217;s saying is, &#8220;I felt a calling to God,&#8221; and she reacted to that in a way that is silly at best and contrary to the religion at worst. But I think it comes from a good place, and I know other people who have done it.
She <a href="https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/why-onlyfans-star-lily-phillips-decided-to-be-rebaptized-excl/">goes on</a>:
<blockquote>I definitely need to do that because I think that there are a lot of Christian girls who are in this industry … but people might not know it and they might not feel comfortable talking about it because of the judgment.</blockquote>
I totally believe that. I totally believe that there are a lot of girls who are baptized Christians who feel a pull toward Christianity, toward God, who work in pornography and all sorts of disreputable fields. Whether we&#8217;re talking about prostitution or whether we&#8217;re talking about law and finance — I&#8217;m sure there are all sorts of people who feel a tension between the work that they do and religious truth. However, here&#8217;s where it gets a little dicey, and I think this is why some people are attacking Lily Phillips. 
She <a href="https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/why-onlyfans-star-lily-phillips-decided-to-be-rebaptized-excl/">says</a>, 
<blockquote>I’m definitely not claiming to be a traditional Christian at all. Obviously, I’m not against gay marriage. I am also pro-choice. So I definitely don’t have, necessarily, traditional values. But that doesn’t mean to say that I can’t be Christian. I would just hope that the Christian community welcomes me, because I guess everyone’s relationship with God is bespoke to them.</blockquote>
I think there are a lot of people who feel this way, at least in the early stages of their conversion. But we have to clear up a few things, so let’s break this down.
She says, “I’m not against gay marriage.”
Christianity does not permit so-called gay marriage. It is contrary to the Christian faith. The weird sex stuff broadly is contrary to the Christian faith. And even beyond questions of religious revelation, it just comes down to basic logic: two opposing things cannot be simultaneously true in the same respect, as per the law of non-contradiction. So, no, inasmuch as you believe these things of the world, you are opposing the Christian faith.
She says, “I am also pro-choice.”
The church, since the very beginning, has opposed abortion. You can see proscriptions against abortion in the UK, the very first catechism of the church, all the way back in antiquity, just after the Apostolic Age. You can&#8217;t do it. You can say that you&#8217;re Christian and you can say that you support killing babies, but those things are diametrically opposed. They&#8217;re totally in conflict with each other.
She then says, “So I definitely don’t have, necessarily, traditional values.”
What do we mean by “traditional values”? Are we talking about the traditions of China? No. Are we talking about the Chinese—some different values than we do here? Are we talking about the traditions of Islam, the caliphate? No. When we talk about traditional values in the English language, generally, we&#8217;re talking about the Christian tradition that built our civilization. So if you say, I&#8217;m Christian, but I don&#8217;t have Christian values, that&#8217;s confusing. She sounds confused by the twin darkness into which we are all born — ignorance and sin.
She says, “And I just hope the Christian community welcomes me.” 
We will welcome you. I will welcome you, at least. But not on your terms. But we will welcome you. We&#8217;re not going to force you to do something that is maybe extremely difficult or impossible for you to do. We&#8217;re not expecting you to radically transform everything about your life all at once, but if you want us to welcome you, that means you have to come to the church, which means you have to give your assent to the church.
If two things are going to join together, one of them has to change. The thing that&#8217;s going to change is not going to be the church. It&#8217;s going to have to be you, which is true for all of us.
Every time we go into church, every time we go into confession, every time we go to receive the Blessed Sacrament, every time we go to mass, every time we go into a chapel to pray, we are imperfect — all of us. And when we go there, we are saying, “I want to be transformed by you, Lord.” I don&#8217;t want you and your holy institution to be transformed into myself.
She says, “I guess everyone&#8217;s relationship with God is bespoke to them.”
True, but God is the same for everyone. Everyone&#8217;s relationship with God is bespoke. It&#8217;s not off the rack. It&#8217;s not one size fits all. You&#8217;re right about that. But God is the same for everyone because God is objectively real. He&#8217;s the real God. That&#8217;s why you believe in him in the first place. And yet a lot of people want to make false gods for themselves.
She goes on to say, “I&#8217;m going to take more of a backseat in work and stuff like that, just to really prioritize this.” 
Well, by work she means prostitution. She means pornography. She&#8217;s not going to give it up entirely yet, apparently. Too bad. 
But she does say, “I&#8217;m going to prioritize religion.” Good, love that. 
She then says,
<blockquote>Even though I travel so much, I don&#8217;t necessarily go to church a lot because I&#8217;m traveling, but it doesn&#8217;t mean I can&#8217;t pray and I can&#8217;t practice my religion outside of church. So I will definitely be doing that and taking that forward.</blockquote>
Well, you have an obligation to go to church on Sunday. You have an obligation to do that even if you&#8217;re not feeling it and don&#8217;t want to. You have an obligation to at least do that. You have other obligations too. But she&#8217;s right — you can pray outside of church, and you should. You have to live your faith all the other days of the week too. That&#8217;s true. However, when you don&#8217;t go to church, when you don&#8217;t practice your faith, when you sanction these kinds of awful things that are so harmful to people, you are making a choice to move away from God.
So, what should we do about the Lily Phillips conversion? Should we make her the Archbishop of Canterbury right away? Probably not. Should we put her on the podcast circuit? In this case, probably not just yet. This could take a little while.
Should we say you don&#8217;t have to change anything about yourself or what you believe to be a real, practicing Christian? No. She&#8217;s got to change, but I think we should encourage her.
This is my message to Lily Phillips: This is great news. Wonderful. I love it. I love hearing that this is happening for you. But you have got to keep going, young lady. You were in a very, very bad place and now, by God’s grace, you have apparently taken a step to get out.
It&#8217;s going to be a long journey, but God will be with you the whole way. So just keep going.

MixCollage-07-Jan-2026-06-38-PM-3272

OnlyFans Model Gets Baptized At Church. Should We Believe Her?

Abortion

Catholic Church

Christianity

Michael Knowles

Prostitution

Same-Sex Marriage

Traditional Marriage

On the surface, Victoria Sinis is indistinguishable from so many other marketing professionals.
Young, vivacious, and personable, the twenty-something Australian seems like she does PR for a cosmetics company or a trendy tech startup.
But Sinis’ job was something else entirely. For eight months, she trolled social media sites for girls who seemed underage or “barely legal,” and coaxed them into posting explicit content on OnlyFans.
The job was easier than it may seem. All she had to do was lie.
“If we had approached them with the truth and said, ‘Hey, do you want to sign up to do porn? We’ll take 20% of your income. You’re probably not going to earn a lot. You&#8217;re going to have to do some really extreme things. You&#8217;d be like, ‘No!’” Sinis told The Daily Wire.
Instead, she and the other recruiters messaged potential porn performers about their positive “vibe,” and invited them to lavish parties on yachts or fly them in to stay at villas in exotic locales.
Recruiters “show girls this lifestyle, and then say, ‘Would you like to be an OnlyFans creator and maximize your earnings?’” Sinis says.
While influencers parade high-rise apartments and luxury vacations on social media, the average OnlyFans creator earns about $180 a month.
“There’s a cultural myth that you can just sell feet pics and buy a Mercedes,” Sinis says. “But it’s a full-time job for very little return. We had girls post 20 videos a day across five accounts. We had SEO experts, lighting setups, even script templates.”
Sinnis worked at an OnlyFans agency, one of thousands of such companies that have sprung up to exploit both performers and their customers, who believe they’re purchasing access to these women.
While precise statistics are hard to come by, it has been estimated that there are roughly 3,000-5,000 such small agencies globally, and around 300-500 larger, <a href="https://www.creditdonkey.com/best-onlyfans-agency.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">more established agencies</a> with significant client rosters and operations. Along with the 20% they pay to OnlyFans, managed performers also have to fork over a hefty commission of their usually meager earnings to them.
The existence of these agencies reveals the demand for adult content on OnlyFans, which was launched in 2016 with the promise that it would allow celebrities and influencers to monetize their content by selling it directly to fans.
At first, OnlyFans did not allow “not safe for work” content. But the platform lifted that prohibition in 2017, and the adult performers began flocking to the site. As COVID lockdowns fueled digital consumption in 2020, that trend only grew.
Today, it&#8217;s estimated that between <a href="https://social-rise.com/blog/onlyfans-statistics">70% and 80%</a> of OnlyFans’ 3 million creators are considered “not safe for work.”
Sinis joined her agency shortly after graduating with a marketing degree. She’d been working in hospitality, but when some friends approached her to join their company, she thought it seemed harmless. And she enjoyed working with her clients, women her agency euphemistically called “content creators,” many of whom she describes as funny and sweet.
As a recruiter, Sinis was tasked with convincing young women who had already built up a following posting risqué photos on Instagram or TikTok to take it one step further to overt “sex work.”
Her employer had a very specific target in mind.
“We recruited based on how young [the women] looked,” Sinis told The Daily Wire. Because girls who looked like they could plausibly be labeled “teen,” “fresh 18,” or “barely legal” made the most money, she and her fellow recruiters cold-messaged girls who looked underage or newly-adult and dazzled them with promises of potential wealth.
<a href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/?utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial&amp;utm_campaign=memorial&amp;utm_content=editorialmemorialday&amp;_gl=1*1qdq03s*_gcl_au*MTYyNDg0MTE0OS4xNzQxODk4NTMz*_ga*MTEzOTk1NjkxNi4xNzI2MzI1MDQz*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*czE3NDgzNzg2NDgkbzEwMDMkZzEkdDE3NDgzODEwMTckajU4JGwwJGgw" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Get 40% Off New DailyWire+ Annual Memberships</a>
TikTok channels like The BOP House (short for Baddies on Point), which features a host of OnlyFans girls living in an L.A. mansion, boasting of their seven- and eight-figure earnings, have helped make the pitch easy. Convinced that they can earn massive incomes selling their bodies, some young tween and teen girls, Sinis says, are already filming pornographic content to prove their “experience” to OnlyFans recruiters, hopeful they might one day occupy the digital successor to Hugh Hefner’s Playboy Mansion.
What recruiters don’t mention: these girls won’t make much at all, unless they’re willing to film the most explicit and extreme content.
At Sinis’ agency, creators were asked what “level” of content they were comfortable filming. The scale ran from posing in lingerie (Level 1) to “everything but anal” (Level 4), and finally, violent sex and other hardcore acts (Level 5).
“Very quickly, we dropped Level 1 because it didn’t make money,” she says. That meant all the girls they recruited pretty much started at Level 2 — implied nudity. The recruiter’s job was to convince the women to advance through the levels.
“It isn’t, ‘You must do this,’” Sinis explains. “It’s more subtle than that. We would say things to the girls like, ‘This custom request for some explicit performance is worth $500. Are you sure you want to pass that up?’”
“We call it consent but really we were slowly wearing the women down. When a girl would say no to a custom video, and then get offered $1,000, we would continue to push them with, ‘Hey, we’re just checking in. Totally up to you though.’ But it’s not. It’s coercion.”
Some custom requests weren’t even sexual — just dark. One man, for instance, wanted a fake video of a man hanging off a ledge while a woman stepped on his fingers. These darker requests were what finally caused Sinis to question the work she was doing.
“When virtual sadism doesn’t cut it, what’s next — real violence?” she asks. “We are feeding violent, sexualized fantasies. And then we’re surprised when those fantasies spill into the real world.”
After visiting a church service one weekend and thinking of all the women she helped bring into porn, she tendered her resignation.
“I was crying every day, unable to open my laptop when I got to work,” she says. “I kept asking my coworkers, &#8216;Do you think it’s okay, what we do?&#8217;”
What they do is feed delusions — not just to the women they recruit, but to the men who subscribe.
OnlyFans’ appeal is that, unlike other pornographic websites, it allows subscribers to have a seeming personal interaction with performers. But subscribers who “chat” with performers often aren’t interacting with the women on screen.
“We hired chatters, cheap labor from the Philippines, who worked 12- to 16-hour days pretending to be these women,” Sinis says. These workers are given scripts and trained in the “girlfriend experience,” keeping men emotionally tethered, often believing they have genuine relationships with the creators.
“It plays on male loneliness, on their emotional vulnerability,” Sinis tells The Daily Wire. “We exploited men for profit just as much as we did the women performing.” This included training the “chatters” on upselling custom requests.
Sinis believes these men, often married or isolated, aren’t paying for explicit content so much as the sense of intimacy and validation it gives them.
“I had a guy tell me he thought he had a real connection. I had to break it to him: it’s all scripted. You&#8217;re talking to a stranger, quite possibly another man, on another continent.”
Nowhere are these false relationships more harmful than with young men. Children, on average, first see pornography at age 12, though some are exposed to explicit content as young as seven. Studies show that rising pornography consumption is fueling an epidemic of emotional withdrawal, and causing a sharp drop in dating and relationships among Gen Z males.
“I met a 13-year-old boy in Georgia who broke down in tears telling me he watches porn and no one knows,” Sinis recalled. “The shame, the secrecy — it’s soul-crushing.”
Since leaving the industry, Sinis has begun to consider how we might roll back the damage that porn is doing to society. As someone who’s been on the inside, her prescription for change isn’t limited to legislation, though she supports age verification laws like those passed in Utah.
Instead, she advocates for cultural revolution: equipping parents, educating children early, and building a counter-narrative that emphasizes the importance of marriage, family, and faith.
“We need to stop shaming young men and women, and start attacking the real enemy: the $97 billion porn industry that’s consuming them both,” she says.
“This world has light and darkness,” Sinis said. “And OnlyFans feeds the darkness.&#8221;

OF Blue – Elordi – They Regret Posting on ‘OnlyFans’

A Former OnlyFans Recruiter Reveals The Dark World Of Amateur Pornography

Human Trafficking

Social Media

Last year, Nala Ray said she stopped selling her body on <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/onlyfans" target="_blank" rel="noopener">OnlyFans</a>, which is largely a subscription-based pornography website, after she turned her life over to God.
Since she <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/onlyfans-model-quits-platform-after-making-millions-says-she-found-god">spoke about leaving pornography</a> on &#8220;The Michael Knowles Show,&#8221; Ray has been the subject of much hate and criticism, namely being accused of lying about her conversion to Christianity and still profiting off of pornography. Returning to Knowles’ show &#8220;<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/show/michael" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Michael &amp;</a>,&#8221; in an <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvZMg3n9URQ" target="_blank" rel="noopener">interview</a> released Saturday, Ray addressed her critics and discussed how she and her husband, a fellow Christian named Jordan Giordano, hope to help others.
Knowles first asked Ray if her conversion to Christianity was fake, and had he been “duped,” as Ray’s critics say.
“Something about you drove people up a wall,” Knowles said about the reaction to his first conversation with Ray. “I&#8217;ll tell you, the first thing that people came at me with, they said, ‘Michael, this girl &#8230; lied – maybe she didn&#8217;t lie about getting married … but she lied about quitting porn, her porn site is still active. She lied about her conversion. She&#8217;s not really Christian. She lied about everything. And she duped you, Michael. You weren&#8217;t mean enough to her.’”
“So what do you say?” Knowles asked. “Was I duped?”
“No, you absolutely were not,” Ray answered. “I feel like even in our first interview, you felt how genuine it was and you even remarked on that. And I feel like from one believer to another, you can just sense the spirit behind that.”
“I don&#8217;t know why people thought I became more famous because I was Christian now, or how they think that becoming a Christian is going to sell more on OnlyFans,” she added, while Knowles noted that someone quitting porn and vice for God is a &#8220;good story.&#8221;
“At the end of the day, it was just a sacrifice I made, and it was between me and God,” Ray said. “And I could say that I was a Christian and continue doing OnlyFans, but we know that there&#8217;s no truth behind that. Or, I could truly give my life to God and see what He has for me by sacrificing OnlyFans, and people in my life, the money, the fame, all of that just to follow Christ.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
&#8220;You Lied About Everything?&#8221; Michael &amp; The Prodigal Daughter 2 | Nala Ray <a href="https://t.co/qbVzxCUk9u">pic.twitter.com/qbVzxCUk9u</a>
— The Michael Knowles Show (@MKnowlesShow) <a href="https://twitter.com/MKnowlesShow/status/1885704664509026338?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 1, 2025</a></blockquote>
Knowles then inquired about the current status of Ray’s OnlyFans account.
“I had full intent to delete my OnlyFans,” Ray said. “I even showed [Giordano], and we were right next to each other when I pushed the delete button back in, like, January [last year]. What happened was, I had so many subscribers – OnlyFans won&#8217;t allow you to close your account until every single subscriber has unsubscribed, like they physically have to push the button. But what they don&#8217;t know is that people sometimes are very inactive on OnlyFans. So I am still waiting for the site to be completely shut down.”
“However, you can&#8217;t do anything,” she continued. “I can&#8217;t even log in anymore. Everything&#8217;s deleted off the site. There&#8217;s no price to get in – nothing. So OnlyFans has disabled the site, but it&#8217;s not down yet, if that makes sense.”
OnlyFans disables creators’ accounts if there are still active subscribers; once the last active subscription expires, accounts will be <a href="https://www.wikihow.com/Delete-Onlyfans-Account">permanently deleted</a>.
Ray said she makes “zero” from the account while it’s disabled. “The subscription price is zero,” she said.
Addressing another criticism, Ray said she initially raised the subscription price after her content was removed and her account was disabled, attempting to encourage subscribers to leave and dissuade new subscribers (though it appears new subscribers are not allowed on disabled accounts). “The price was only raised for a very short period of time,” she said. “We were like, crap, it’s been like three days and not working.” Since then, the price has been set to $0, she said.
Ray made millions of dollars during her time on the platform, but says most of that is now gone.
“You mentioned financial problems,” Knowles said to Ray. “But you made a ‘bazillion’ dollars in pornography – so how do you have financial problems?”
“What happened was I made 14 million [gross] … and netted $9 million,” Ray responded. “OnlyFans takes 20% of what you make, and then the agency that I was working with … they took a hefty, like 45%. And I was living in California, which also takes so much in taxes.”
“So it got cut up like three times and I&#8217;m left with what I&#8217;m left with,” she said. “We had a really nice little [nest egg], and then we had to liquidate that because taxes came in for this year from last year, and I made money in 2023, and then this big life-change happened in January.”
“Then there goes the money,” Knowles said, to Ray&#8217;s agreement.
“All right, so you&#8217;re out of money,” Knowles continued. “People have criticized you because they say you made all this money and now you&#8217;ve converted. And because God saves you through His free grace, well, that&#8217;s good. … [But] where&#8217;s the penance? They say you should give all your money away.”
“I don&#8217;t know what they want me to give away at this point, because I&#8217;ve given away all of my designer things, I sold my Porsche, I don&#8217;t live in the same home anymore,” Ray said. “And so I&#8217;m like, what else do you want me to give?”
Ray told Knowles that she’s also currently paying a third party to remove her pornographic content from the internet. She said she’s having a lot of success, but admitted that there will always be a “crumb” of her content still out there.
“I guess the takeaway for a girl who&#8217;s doing it is, you can fix a lot of this,” Knowles said. “But the warning to the girl who isn&#8217;t doing it yet is, there&#8217;s always going to be some crumb. You’re better not to do it at all, actually.”
Ray also said that she wishes she could apologize face-to-face with the wives of men who viewed her content, and to anyone else she hurt.
“There have been many times where I&#8217;ve just been sitting down in my Bible time where I feel the hearts of the people who I hurt, the hearts of the women who caught their husband watching me,” she expressed. “It&#8217;s very heavy. It&#8217;s a burden – and I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m sorry enough. I&#8217;ve said I&#8217;m sorry a couple of times on camera, but I just feel like that&#8217;s so impersonal. If I could, I&#8217;d love to say it to people in front of their face.”
Ray and her husband, who’s been creating Christian content online since 2021, both said they feel called to spread the word of God and help others. For Ray, she’s working to get girls off of OnlyFans and develop relationships with them. For Giordano, he’s working with men who struggle with pornography, a struggle he’s personally navigated.

Nola Ray

Nala Ray Addresses Her Critics After Leaving OnlyFans For Christ

Religion

U.S.

The online prostitution website OnlyFans has been in the news quite a lot recently. Last week a prominent OnlyFans prostitute went viral for propositioning a Five Guys employee while he was on the clock at the burger restaurant. Fortunately, the young man kept his dignity and turned her down.
This week, the same predatory degenerate — I think we should treat these people like mass shooters and try not to use their names, when possible— has now claimed that she set a “world record” by having sex with 1,000 men in a 24-hour period. Actually it was 1,057. Far be it from me to deprive her of that extra 57 strands of gonorrhea she likely contracted.
Here she is talking about her big accomplishment:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
OF Bonnie Blue says she broke the World Record by sleeping with 1,057 men in 12 hours.
I don’t think that’s an achievement… <a href="https://t.co/OOvLtZHlAx">pic.twitter.com/OOvLtZHlAx</a>
&mdash; Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) <a href="https://twitter.com/DefiantLs/status/1878895706947355081?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 13, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
You often hear people, especially conservatives, say that they feel sorry for women like this. I have to admit I don’t. I reserve all of my sympathy for whoever owns the AirBnB they used for this stunt. You’ll have to go in there with hazmat suits to fumigate that room.
Now, you may remember a few weeks ago the story of the OnlyFans prostitute who had sex with one hundred men. These are not the same people. That woman also planned to jump in bed with a thousand men, but she was apparently beaten to the punch. There is now an arms race among cyber hookers to see who can have sex with the most men in a day. Eventually someone is going to figure out a way to crack a million, which will be a pace of about 11 men a second. I don’t see how that’s physically possible right now, but someone will figure it out. This insatiable quest for sexual self-debasement will be the primary driver of scientific and technological advancement in the future, I have no doubt.
Needless to say, business over at OnlyFans is thriving. Back in the fall, it was reported that the website’s revenue for the previous year had cracked $1.3 billion. They are generating all of that money from the approximately 300 million “fan” accounts on the site. But the “fans” are all there for the hookers, or as OnlyFans refers to them: creators. This euphemism makes no sense, of course, because these women aren’t creating anything. They are selling their bodies — that which has already been created, by God Almighty — to the lowest bidder. They are profiting from their own degradation and humiliation. This is not an act of creation, but of destruction — self-destruction.
<h3><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/mws-ep-1514-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show</a></h3>
But whatever you call these women, how many are there? According to recent reports, there are currently about 1.4 million American women producing pornography for OnlyFans. 1.4 million. That number is undoubtedly a severe undercount. It doesn’t count all the women who “created” on OnlyFans in the past. And it doesn’t count the women who use other platforms to sell their bodies. All in all, it’s impossible to know exactly how many women in this country have elected to become prostitutes. We only know that the number, whatever it is, is well into the millions.
This is a truly unprecedented circumstance. Prostitution itself is not new or unprecedented. It is the world’s oldest profession, as the saying goes. And there’s nothing necessarily new about having such a high percentage of women in a given population turning to prostitution to make a living. You could almost certainly find more per capita prostitutes in most third world countries today. Historically, it’s thought that something like 1 in 5 women in 18th century London were prostitutes — 20% of the female population. There are a lot of OnlyFans “creators.” But there aren’t that many, percentage-wise. So the sheer numbers do not reveal the full scope of this problem.
As I tried to explain a few days ago, although prostitution has always been prevalent in basically all human societies, in one form or another, it has almost always been the province of young, poor, desperate women. You would have to drive down to the sections of the city where these women congregated. That’s because prostitution was not a part of polite, mainstream society. It was kept out on the fringes, in the shadows, in the dank, dark places where normal people would never want to go.
That is all changing now, and very rapidly. Suddenly, prostitution has become a career option, or a way to earn extra spending cash, for middle class and upper middle class women. The kinds of women who would never stand on a physical street corner now have the opportunity to sell their bodies on a virtual street corner. And a depressing, even terrifying, number of women have jumped at that chance. Some of them have even become multi-millionaires in the process. That is another thing that separates old fashioned prostitution from the newer variety. There are OnlyFans “creators” making $20 or $30 million a year. The highest paid star running backs in the NFL don’t make that much.
That’s not to say that most of the hookers on OnlyFans are raking in millions. The sad reality is that the vast majority are debasing and dehumanizing themselves for the sake of a few hundred bucks a month at most. They could earn as much selling homemade candles on Etsy. They could earn significantly more if they went out and got real jobs. Instead they choose to become masturbatory aides for random, unseen men. And in return they make only enough money to feed their Starbucks habit. It is hard to imagine something more pathetic than that.
But even this does not fully capture the width and breadth of this crisis. It’s not just that so many women are becoming prostitutes. And it’s not just that women who have many other options are choosing to be prostitutes anyway. It’s that, through platforms like OnlyFans, prostitution — or “sex work,” as it is euphemistically called — is now mainstream. It is a part of popular culture in a way that it never was before. It has been validated, accepted, and therefore elevated, so that prostitution is not just a common practice, but a conventional one. Prostitution may be the oldest profession but it was never considered a “normal” one. Until now.
<h3><a href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">JOIN THE MOVEMENT IN &#8217;25 WITH 25% OFF DAILYWIRE+ ANNUAL MEMBERSHIPS WITH CODE DW25</a></h3>
This didn’t happen out of the blue. The stage was set over the course of decades, with the proliferation of internet pornography. Nearly all of the moral guardrails around sex were torn down and replaced with a flimsy, woefully insufficient consent-based moral structure which says that anything is permissible so long as both parties verbally agree to it. But it turns out that just because both parties agree to something, that doesn’t make the thing good, or acceptable, nor does it mitigate the harm done by it. If you sacrifice your dignity while robbing someone else of theirs, it doesn’t matter that you consented to it. A thing is not dignified merely because it was done on purpose, with the willful acquiescence of all parties.
Most of all, we have removed shame from society. At least we have removed it from the things that are actually shameful. History shows that we can put an end to pretty much any type of conduct, or drive it into the shadows and out of public view so that very few people engage in it, simply by using shame. We stopped shaming whorish behavior, and now we have soccer moms turning to prostitution for some extra spending money. One follows from the other.
50 years ago, around half of all adults in the country smoked cigarettes. Now that number is down to about 10%. We have cast cigarette smokers out to the edges of society, and this has been accomplished largely through shame and social pressure. Our culture has relentlessly demonized cigarettes as disgusting, dangerous, and low class, and as a result cigarettes went from cool and mainstream to obnoxious and odious. It used to be that you could smoke cigarettes anywhere. Now cigarette smokers are given an eight foot wide box outside, 100 feet from entrance of any building. Society is more welcoming of sex offenders than cigarette smokers at this point.
Now, I think the anti-cigarette campaigns are quite overdone and hysterical. My point is only that when a behavior is targeted and shamed — even an addictive one — you will end up with less of it, and when it does happen, it will happen out of view, on the margins, where shameful things belong.
We cannot get rid of prostitution entirely. It will always be one of the unsightly barnacles that attaches itself to the hull of civilization. But that’s what it should be. A slimy, crustaceous thing clinging to the outside of the ship, below the water line. Not sitting up on deck, reclining on a beach chair in full view, while the wait staff serves it margaritas.
<h3><a href="https://www.amiracist.com/?_gl=1*jtghwp*_gcl_au*ODQ1NjYzNTg2LjE3Mjg5MDk3OTE.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczMDEyMDgwOS40OS4xLjE3MzAxMjA4MzkuMzAuMC4w" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MATT WALSH&#8217;S &#8216;AM I RACIST?&#8217; NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+</a></h3>
This kind of behavior should be shamed. That goes for the customers, the men. Most people aren’t hesitant to call them out, nor should they be. But it also goes for the women. The women who choose this lifestyle. They are not resorting to it out of desperation, or forced into it. We should look at that choice with disgust and contempt, not acceptance and understanding. We should treat it with shame. Which is the primary reason why OnlyFans and all similar platforms should be outlawed. Prostitution is already illegal in most jurisdictions. It makes no logical sense that prostitution should be legal only if it is done with a camera and sold for a subscription. Why should the more accessible version of the thing be legal? If anything, it should be the other way around. Though I prefer for both versions to be banned. Would banning it stop women from selling their bodies online? No, not entirely. But it would go a long way towards ostracizing the behavior so that otherwise normal and financially comfortable people would not engage in it.
There is one side of the ideological divide that wants to actively normalize the most debased forms of human behavior. And the other side which, though not seeking to normalize it, has largely lost the wherewithal and appropriate sense of moral indignation to treat shameful things as shameful. Which is why the conversation around OnlyFans so often centers on how much pity we should have for the prostitutes, and how hard their lives must be, and the deep sadness you can see in their poor little puppy dog eyes. There is almost no one stating plainly what used to be commonly understood: that this kind of conduct is disgusting and reprehensible, and we are revolted by it. That message is harsh and impolite. It also happens to be true. It is honest. And if the recent history of our culture should have taught us anything, it’s that it is better to be honest than polite.

Woman getting ready to party.

This Is How We Stop The Festering Disease Called OnlyFans

Matt Walsh

Opinion

Women

An <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/onlyfans">OnlyFans</a> content creator was recorded propositioning a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/restaurant">fast food</a> employee for sex, but she was turned down after the worker told her he was “a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/christianity">Christian</a> man.”
Bonnie Blue, 25, is a controversial OnlyFans creator who targets 18 and 19-year-olds to have sex with her. 
Viewers had mixed reactions when Blue shared the video on her TikTok account. In the clip, the content creator enters a Five Guys branch and asks an employee where she can find “five guys” and inquires whether he’s “on the menu.”
&#8220;I can’t see it on the menu, but where are the five guys from?&#8221; she asks.
The worker replies, &#8220;The… huh?&#8221; 
She clarifies her statement, saying, &#8220;I didn’t know if it was like a special room, or you can take me out back?&#8221;
The worker again responds with confusion and says, &#8220;Uh, I don’t know what’s happening.&#8221;
&#8220;What about after your shift? I mean, I’d want to give you, you know, a good rating,&#8221; she says. 
The worker responds, &#8220;I’m a Christian man, and I’m waiting until marriage.&#8221; 
Bonnie Blue says, &#8220;I’m asking what’s on your menu, that’s all.&#8221; He responds, &#8220;Genuinely, I feel like I’m dreaming right now. I can hand you the menu if you want.&#8221;
The OF star doesn’t give up, saying, &#8220;Are you on it?&#8221; to which he replies, &#8220;No, I’m not.&#8221; 
She replies, &#8220;Oh, that’s a shame.&#8221;
The employee later shared the exchange on his X account, writing, “Bonnie Blue recording me at work was not on my bingo card for this year, but here we are, I guess.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Bonnie blue recording me at work was not on my bingo card for this year but here we are I guess <a href="https://t.co/klBsJk0wyb">pic.twitter.com/klBsJk0wyb</a>
&mdash; •ola• (@harry_1514) <a href="https://twitter.com/harry_1514/status/1876414293996151062?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 6, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The comments were filled with support and praise for the Five Guys worker refusing her overtures.
<a href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/">JOIN THE MOVEMENT IN ’25 WITH 25% OFF DAILYWIRE+ ANNUAL MEMBERSHIPS WITH CODE DW25</a>
“Good for you for standing your ground and saving yourself for marriage! Not many are like that,” one person <a href="https://x.com/GodIsGood116_/status/1876744780530471181">wrote</a>. “My wife and I both waited for marriage too and it was definitely a lot better than being used products for others.”
“this is so predatory &#8211; if this was a man, everyone would be outraged,” another commenter <a href="https://x.com/taylor_vahey/status/1876719815890464884">said</a>. “not acceptable to do to someone at their job.”
“Well done brother. God has better plans for you, have faith,” another said.
In an <a href="https://metro.co.uk/2024/11/05/bonnie-blue-sex-barely-legal-teens-predatory-educational-21928983/">interview</a> with Metro last November, Blue said: “People are calling me a predator anyway. So it makes no difference if I’m a guy or a female, because my hate has been through the roof in terms of death threats and non-stop abuse.”
“If I was forcing them off the street, dragging them up, then yeah, call me a predator, but it’s not the case,” she added, claiming that 18-year-olds “choose to contact her.”

Five Guys

Five Guys Employee Goes Viral For Turning Down OnlyFans Creator: ‘I’m A Christian Man’

Five Guys Employee Goes Viral For Turning Down OnlyFans Creator: 'I'm A Christian Man'

Restaurant

Social Issues

TikTok

viral video

World

There is something deeply broken about our society. Egregious symptoms show that being the case.
One of those symptoms is Lily Phillips.
Lily Phillips is 23-years-old. She&#8217;s become quite prominent because she has a very lucrative OnlyFans account where she earns millions of dollars to take her clothes off and have sex.
Back in October, Lily Phillips did a stunt in which she had sex with 101 men in a day. She did a documentary about it titled, &#8220;I Slept with 100 Men in One Day.&#8221; 
In the documentary, she says, “It’s not for the weak girls, if I’m honest. It was hard. I don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;d recommend it. I think if you&#8217;re a different type of girl, it&#8217;s very like… it&#8217;s kind of like being a prostitute in a sense of like, it&#8217;s just a different feeling. I don&#8217;t know how to explain it, like.”
“It&#8217;s not like just having sex with someone,” a man says to her.
“Yeah. Yeah. Just one in, one out. Like, it feels intense,” she replies.
“Like, more intense than you thought it might,” he suggests.
“Definitely,” she answers, then breaks down in tears.
She says, “I think by the 30th, when we&#8217;re getting on a bit, I&#8217;ve got a routine of how we&#8217;re going to do this and sometimes you disassociate and it&#8217;s not like normal sex at all.” She admitted not remembering much of this. She said, “In my head right now I can think of five, six, 10 guys I remember. And that&#8217;s it. It&#8217;s just weird, isn&#8217;t it? If I didn&#8217;t have the videos, I wouldn&#8217;t have known I did 100.”
The New York Post <a href="https://nypost.com/2024/12/11/lifestyle/onlyfans-model-lily-phillips-cries-after-sleeping-with-101-men-in-a-day/">reported</a>:
<blockquote>Phillips shared that it’s not just the physical intimacy of having sex with so many men that made her feel “so bad” but also disappointing them by not being able [to] talk with them, or even being interested in doing so.
She said that conversing with them was also “hard” and recounted how one man complained that they only chatted for about two minutes when she had said beforehand that they would talk for about five minutes.</blockquote>
Then, she breaks down in tears.
But none of this is apparently stopping her from taking on a new challenge now because the money is too good. She has claimed she wants to take on a new challenge in January. She <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14166101/middle-class-graduate-sex-Lily-Phillips-OnlyFans.html">posted</a> on social media: &#8220;1,000 men in 24 hours. Male talent casting call. 18+ only. Location TBC.&#8221;
“I dreamed it up with my assistant. I can’t wait … It’s very exciting. It will be a world record. A real challenge!” she enthused.
“The current world record is held by Lisa Sparks, an adult film star who bedded 919 men in one day at a sex industry event in Poland back in 2004,” the Post noted.
The question here: Why is this wrong in our modern society? What&#8217;s the big problem for a lot of folks, particularly on the secular Left? That&#8217;s a relevant question. After all, she&#8217;s engaging in consensual activity. Why is this wrong? Why is this bad?
<h3><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-2103-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show</a></h3>
We live in a society in which consent is considered the highest and perhaps only value.
That&#8217;s because we&#8217;ve largely bought into the liberal framework for how society ought to run.
According to social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, there are six moral matrices for how we measure morality. The first is care versus harm. The second is liberty versus oppression. The third is fairness versus cheating. The fourth is loyalty versus betrayal. The fifth is authority versus subversion, and the sixth is sanctity versus degradation.
For example, care versus harm would include feeling compassion for a suffering human being. That&#8217;s one value system. Liberty versus oppression would include seeing an unjust rule being promulgated that oppresses someone versus that person being free to make their own choices.
Fairness or cheating would be if somebody cheats, it&#8217;s unfair because somebody has cheated. Loyalty versus betrayal would be if someone betrays a group. Authority versus subversion is if somebody disrespects legitimate authority, and sanctity versus degradation is if, for example, somebody does something disgusting.
Leftists and conservatives think of the world in very different ways from one another. 
Leftists are interested in only three of these six matrices: care versus harm (compassion); liberty versus oppression (individual rights and individualism); and finally, fairness versus cheating (the final outcome of a system as fair or rights as fairly distributed).
Conservatives, people on the Right, care about all six of those matrices, including notions like loyalty and betrayal, authority and subversion, and most importantly, sanctity versus degradation.
Thus, what does the Left do about somebody like Lily Phillips? Theoretically, the argument could be made that she&#8217;s harming herself, that this violates the sort of care/harm principle. That&#8217;s why what she&#8217;s doing is wrong.
But that runs directly against the liberty foundations of liberalism, because after all, she&#8217;s the one who has volunteered her consent to it. How can you tell her? Can you be paternalistic enough to suggest she has harmed herself under the rubric of leftism? And also, is it unfair that she did this if she did accept the arrangement? In fact, she sought the arrangement; she&#8217;s being paid by the tonnage for this arrangement.
For conservatives, the answer is actually quite easy. Phillips and women like her are engaging in self-harm. Liberty is not libertinism; it is bound by rules. Fairness is not implicated because she has no right to engage in this sort of conduct on a moral level. She has no moral right. She does have a legal right, but that is not the same thing as having a moral right to engage in this.
She&#8217;s being disloyal not only to any boyfriend she might have, but to the standards of her society and to humanity at large. You&#8217;re being disloyal to humanity when you violate yourself this way. She is undermining the authority of basic morality.
But most of all, and most importantly, what she is doing is disgusting.
Now, I know that word has fallen out of usage. “Disgust.” “Disgusting.” The idea in modern left-wing parlance is that if you talk about something being disgusting, it means that you&#8217;re being judgmental.
In his book “The Righteous Mind,” Haidt wrote about asking college students if it would be immoral to have sex with a frozen chicken. Liberals will initially say maybe, and then they&#8217;ll think about it and say, “No, it doesn&#8217;t violate my principles of consent. It doesn&#8217;t violate the care/harm matrix. It&#8217;s a violation of liberty to say that it is disgusting, problematic, or wrong.”
Conservatives would react, “Yes, that&#8217;s gross. It&#8217;s wrong. You&#8217;re degrading yourself.”
Disgust is useful and has kept human beings alive for eons. Originally, it evolved as a way of naturally driving people away from things that are quite bad for them. The reason human beings have a reaction of disgust when they see a snake is because snakes can kill people.
Now, that does not mean all disgust historically is proper. Sometimes human beings are disgusted by behaviors or traits that are perfectly legitimate or have arisen through no fault of the person by whom they are disgusted. So, for example, many primitive cultures found people with mental disabilities to be disgusting. In ancient Sparta, if you had a disabled baby, you left it out on a cliff somewhere.
But disgust as a general human emotion is a response to the violation of the sacred.
So what exactly is “the sacred”? 
The sacred is the thing that we as a species place beyond question. That&#8217;s what sacred means. Sacred means to declare something holy.
To be holy means to be separate from the secular. It is something that is not to be questioned. It is something that has such high value that to question it would undermine the entire society. To throw away the sacred is to throw out that which is most important in building a society.
There are some things we find so sacred that we will not violate them.
An entire community cannot come together to share the same values unless they agree on a concept of the sacred and the profane; things that are so high in value that they are not worth arguing about — and to argue about them should generate a feeling of disgust.
It is community, says Robert Nisbet, that gives to the sacred its most vital expressions everywhere: birth, marriage, death, and other moments of the human drama.
These are all of such high value that they become sacred.
In the case of Lily Phillips, what is sacred here?
The individual human soul.
You do not own your own soul. It does not belong to you. You have duties attached to the stewardship of your soul.
Your innate humanity is made in the image of God. You as a human being are sacred. You are the sacred property of the Divine.
After all, whatever disgusting substances this woman has anointed herself with can be washed off, but her soul can&#8217;t be washed off without repenting of what she has done to herself.
And she knows that. Why is she breaking down? Why is she upset? It&#8217;s not just because of the physical exertion. It&#8217;s because she made herself into a sex robot. She made herself into something profane. She engaged in profane behavior, and she should be disgusted with herself. She should be ashamed of herself.
A society should be able to look at that behavior and declare it wrong. It is not just a mere matter of moral apathy because a society that greenlights, celebrates, or pays people millions of dollars for this sort of behavior gets more of it.
It reduces the humanity of all of us to the level of the animal. It removes the sacred completely. Then, all that remains is the profane.
No community, no workable society, can be built solely on the profane. Human beings have a natural understanding of the sacred. We have a natural understanding, a desire to worship, a desire to understand there are things that are of eternal value.
<h3><a href="https://www.amiracist.com/?_gl=1*jtghwp*_gcl_au*ODQ1NjYzNTg2LjE3Mjg5MDk3OTE.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczMDEyMDgwOS40OS4xLjE3MzAxMjA4MzkuMzAuMC4w" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MATT WALSH&#8217;S &#8216;AM I RACIST?&#8217; NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+</a></h3>
This is why, by the way, when it comes to sex, the concept of consent is necessary, but it is not sufficient. Of course consent is necessary to sex, but it is not the only marker of whether sex itself is a good thing or a bad thing in regard to how people engage in it.
It&#8217;s because we&#8217;ve lost the concept of the sacred and the profane.
In the #MeToo movement, there is a phenomenon that has arisen many times where women will consent to sex with someone they should not have. They will treat themselves badly; then, they&#8217;ll wake up the next morning and decide they didn&#8217;t like it.
And they don&#8217;t have the language to even express what it is they don&#8217;t like because they already gave consent. Un-giving consent is not possible. So then they go to the language of consent again. In some cases, they&#8217;ll go so far as to say they were raped when they weren&#8217;t actually raped or the evidence shows they weren&#8217;t raped.
But they&#8217;re not wrong to feel bad about themselves.
They&#8217;re not wrong to feel bad about the decision-making. Regret is a realization of having taken something sacred and having made it profane.
The relationship between two people who love one another in a committed bond is sacred. That&#8217;s what makes sex sacred rather than profane.
If sex is treated in a profane way, a lot of the time, it will feel profane. You might wake up in the morning and feel degraded because you degraded yourself.
Then, people look for an excuse for why they feel the way they do, but they don&#8217;t even have the language to explain why they feel the way they do. This is particularly true of young women who are engaging in activities they later regret. They don&#8217;t even understand why they regret.
The answer is that we are all, men and women, capable of sullying ourselves, of disgusting ourselves. And that is a worthwhile tendency in human beings to recognize: that sometimes when we look at the behavior of somebody like a Lily Phillips, we should be upset. We should be upset that as a society we have decided an OnlyFans kind of society is fine, decent, and good.
It is not. It is not fine, decent, or good. Pornography ought to disgust us because it is disgusting. It should disgust us because it turns something that should be about commitment and love into something that is simply about rutting. Sex is meaningful — not because it is a matter of consent, but because it is a matter that has meaning attached to it and has throughout human history.
Pretending that people don&#8217;t have emotions connected to sex is one of the most ridiculous aspects of the modern feminist movement and the modern secular Left. Even Phillips acknowledges that. She says, “I didn’t even get to talk to the guys.”
That’s the most pathetic expression of the problem, but she’s not wrong. It turns out that very often, both women and men actually want to know the person with whom they are having sex because it means something beyond pure consent.
A society that boils its morality down to consent alone is a society that doesn&#8217;t even have the language to express why it&#8217;s corrupting itself. It&#8217;s why we as a society have such trouble declaring pornography is morally bad or OnlyFans is a blight.
Young men are being destroyed by OnlyFans. Young women are certainly being destroyed by OnlyFans.
And this should not be a matter of moral apathy in our society. I&#8217;m not talking about regulation or legislation. Perhaps that&#8217;s appropriate, but that&#8217;s not even the question. The question is: Do we even have the moral language anymore to look at human behavior that ought to disgust us and say it&#8217;s acceptable to be disgusted by that behavior?
It&#8217;s ok to look at what violates the nature of being made in the sacred image of God and say, “That&#8217;s bad, and I have an innate sense of being provoked by it into disgust.”
It&#8217;s ok. We were made that way, and that is a good thing.
A society that loses any concept of the sacred and trades the sacred for the profane is a society that is not long for this world. Because in the end, if we can&#8217;t place certain principles above and beyond debate and in the realm of the sacred, then we&#8217;re not going to have a society for very long.
* * *
<h3><a href="https://get.dailywire.com/gift-guide/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CHECK OUT THE DAILY WIRE HOLIDAY GIFT GUIDE</a></h3>

Menu