Now we&#8217;re convinced: There&#8217;s something in the water.
A CNBC director who worked on &#8220;The Suze Orman Show,&#8221; has been arrested and charged with spying on a teen nanny using a hidden camera in a bathroom.
Dan Switzen, 44, hid the spycam in a tissue box in his Westchester, New York home, police said.
&#8220;He intentionally installed a video recording device in a tissue box located in his family&#8217;s bathroom to surreptitiously view a person dressing or undressing &#8230; at a place and time when (the victim) had a reasonable expectation of privacy without (her) knowledge or consent,&#8221; the police complaint said.
A friend of the 18-year-old au pair discovered the spycam in the bathroom on November 18, and the two took the device to police, who found &#8220;incriminating&#8221; images on the memory card. Police arrested Switzen and charged him with unlawful surveillance, a felony.
Switzen, who has worked for CNBC for 16 years, was released without bail, said his lawyer, Jeffrey Chartier, according to the <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/cnbc-director-accused-spying-teen-nanny-bathroom-cam-article-1.3723183?utm_content=buffer5baee&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_source=twitter.com&amp;utm_campaign=NYDailyNewsTw">Daily News</a>.
<blockquote>
&#8220;He&#8217;s a very decent family man. I don&#8217;t want to litigate these allegations in the press,&#8221; Chartier said. &#8220;We will defend him accordingly.&#8221;
When reached over the phone, Switzen said, &#8220;No comment at all. Thanks, bye,&#8221; before hanging up.
</blockquote>
&#8203;NBC has had a slew of sexual misconduct reports in recent weeks. The network fired &#8220;Today Show&#8221; host Matt Lauer after several women came forward, and most recently paid a Chris Matthews accuser $40,000 to end a complaint against the MSNBC host.
Mark Halperin, a political analyst who often appeared on &#8220;Morning Joe,&#8221; was also canned after reports that he rubbed his erect (but clothed) penis against female staffers and masturbated in front of one young woman.

CNBC Director Accused Of Spying On Teen Nanny With Bathroom Spycam

Chris Matthews

Mark Halperin

Matt Lauer

NBC News

On Friday, MSNBC’s Morning Joe co-host, Mika Brzezinski, <a href="http://freebeacon.com/culture/brzezinski-comments-on-halperin-sexual-assault-allegations/">spoke</a> about the suspension of Mark Halperin over allegations that he sexually harassed several women:
<blockquote>All right, before we go to break, there&#8217;s something I need to say. Over the past 24 hours, there have been more disturbing reports regarding Mark Halperin&#8217;s treatment of younger female coworkers. Behavior in these reports allegedly occurred one to two decades ago, and now, we&#8217;re looking at it, we&#8217;re talking about it. Mark and Karen have been a part of Morning Joe&#8217;s extended family for years — they&#8217;re our friends — and we believe it&#8217;s important to stand with our friends through even the most difficult of times.
But it&#8217;s even more important to demand the truth, even when the facts appear to be extremely painful. Yesterday morning, we woke up to reports of unnamed sources telling CNN that Mark made unwanted sexual advances and overtures toward them. [A] day later, more revelations pointing toward a possible pattern of unacceptable conduct.
I have spoken to and heard from some of these women. I feel their pain, and I understand the difficult position they were in because I&#8217;ve been through enough in this business to know what I hear. We are at a pivotal moment in history where unacceptable harassing behavior toward women will no longer be swept under the rug. And yes, we do remain a nation of laws where everyone is considered innocent until proven guilty, and nothing has been proven or adjudicated here, but we&#8217;re also witnessing a larger movement of women speaking up about sexual harassment because the fear of being dismissed or not believed is melting away. I&#8217;ll speak for both Joe and myself here — our hearts break for Mark and his family because he is our friend, but we fully support NBC&#8217;s decision here.
We want to know more about these disturbing allegations; we want to hear the stories; we need to know what happened; and we&#8217;re not going to avoid the story just because he is our friend. We&#8217;re going to cover it, and we&#8217;re going to pray for everybody involved.</blockquote>
<div class="embed video fluid-video"><iframe loading="lazy" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/PWCYHzp_XP8" width="720" height="385" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></div>

MSNBC’s Mika On Mark Halperin Allegations: ‘We’re Not Going To Avoid The Story Just Because He Is Our Friend’

Mika Brzezinski

Sexual Misconduct

Only one day after <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2017/10/25/media/mark-halperin-sexual-harassment-allegations/index.html">CNN reported</a> that five different women had come forth to accuse reporter Mark Halperin of sexual harassment, Emily Miller of One America News Network <a href="https://www.thewrap.com/journalist-emily-miller-accuses-mark-halperin-sexual-harassment/">alleged</a> that she was attacked by Halperin, then explained her reticence to come forward with her information.
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">To be clear, I was NOT one of the victims in this story about Mark Halperin. I was ANOTHER junior ABC employee he attacked. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MeToo?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MeToo</a> <a href="https://t.co/itV6HvEpA2">https://t.co/itV6HvEpA2</a>
— Emily Miller (@EmilyMiller) <a href="https://twitter.com/EmilyMiller/status/923544607480303621?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 26, 2017</a></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">I did not report Halperin to ABC because I thought I was the only one, and I blamed myself, and I was embarrassed and I was scared of him.
— Emily Miller (@EmilyMiller) <a href="https://twitter.com/EmilyMiller/status/923547532621426689?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 26, 2017</a></blockquote>
</div>
The Daily Beast <a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/two-more-women-accuse-mark-halperin-of-sexual-misconduct">reported </a>that CNN political analyst Mary Katharine Ham, a friend of Miller’s, confirmed that Miller told her of the alleged sexual assault years ago.
Miller also stated that the hostility Halperin directed toward her stemmed from a conversation they had regarding guns on MSNBC’s Morning Joe:
<div class="embed tweet">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">Go back and watch the episode I was on of Morning Joe. This will explain why so many of you asked why he attacked me on live TV
— Emily Miller (@EmilyMiller) <a href="https://twitter.com/EmilyMiller/status/923407085890613248?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 26, 2017</a></blockquote>
</div>
Video of Halperin and Miller below, starting at 4:05:
<div class="embed video fluid-video"><iframe loading="lazy" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/fRs2pHFANcM" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></div>

Reporter Emily Miller Accuses Mark Halperin Of Sexual Harassment

Political commentator and best-selling author Mark Halperin will be taking an unscheduled vacation from his job, as an analyst for NBC and MSNBC, as the networks investigate allegations of sexual harassment.
Late Wednesday, CNN revealed that the Game Change author had been accused of sexual assault during his time at ABC News. According to the women who spoke to CNN &#8212; all Halperin&#8217;s co-workers at the network &#8212; Halperin propositioned them for sex, but also, allegedly, grabbed their breasts, and rubbed against them so that they could feel his erect penis through his pants.
Halperin denies that he ever touched or rubbed against the women, but did admit that he pursued encounters with some of his colleagues, telling CNN:
<blockquote>
During this period, I did pursue relationships with women that I worked with, including some junior to me. I now understand from these accounts that my behavior was inappropriate and caused others pain. For that, I am deeply sorry and I apologize. Under the circumstances, I&#8217;m going to take a step back from my day-to-day work while I properly deal with this situation.
</blockquote>
That includes taking time away from his role as a senior political analyst and regular Morning Joe contributor. Mika Brzezinski addressed the allegations Wednesday morning, telling the show&#8217;s audience that, while Halperin was a &#8220;friend of the show&#8221; there appeared to be &#8220;unwanted advances and inappropriate behavior.&#8221; She went on to claim that Morning Joe will be &#8220;following this story as it develops. I&#8217;m sure we are going to be talking about it again when we know more about it.&#8221;
MSNBC, which hosts Halperin more than its sister network, released a statement to Fox News, saying the allegations were &#8220;troubling:&#8221; &#8220;We find the story and the allegations very troubling. Mark Halperin is leaving his role as a contributor until the questions around his past conduct are fully understood.&#8221;

Mark Halperin OUT At NBC, MSNBC After Sexual Harassment Allegations Surface

Morning Joe

MSNBC

Five women have accused Mark Halperin of sexual harassment while he held a powerful position while at ABC News, according to several women, who say they either experienced the alleged harassment or witnessed it.
Halperin – who’s currently an analyst for NBC News and makes regular appearances on MSNBC’s &#8220;Morning Joe&#8221; – was the political director at ABC News when the alleged incidents happened, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2017/10/25/media/mark-halperin-sexual-harassment-allegations/index.html">CNN</a> reported Wednesday evening.
CNN’s report prompted the following statement from Halperin:
<blockquote>During this period, I did pursue relationships with women that I worked with, including some junior to me. I now understand from these accounts that my behavior was inappropriate and caused others pain. For that, I am deeply sorry and I apologize. Under the circumstances, I&#8217;m going to take a step back from my day-to-day work while I properly deal with this situation.</blockquote>
The stories of the women who spoke to CNN ranged from Halperin allegedly pressuring them for sex to pressing an erection against their body.
It is important to note that none of the women who spoke to CNN reported directly to Halperin, but they did work with him and he did have &#8220;a voice in some critical personnel decisions.&#8221;
The first woman who spoke to CNN said her alleged incident with Halperin happened in &#8220;the early 2000s,&#8221; while he wielded power as the political director at ABC News.
&#8220;I went up to have a soda and talk and… he just kissed me and grabbed my boobs,&#8221; the woman recalled. &#8220;I just froze. I didn&#8217;t know what to do.&#8221;
The second woman who spoke with CNN – who was 25 years old at the time – said she experienced a similar incident in Halperin’s office during the 2004 campaign cycle.
&#8220;The first meeting I ever had with him was in his office and he just came up from behind – I was sitting in a chair from across his desk – and he came up behind me and [while he was clothed] he pressed his body on mine, his penis, on my shoulder,&#8221; the woman said.
The second woman went on to say that Halperin continued to pressure her after the incident and propositioned her for sex while on the road covering the campaign.
&#8220;It was more like him coming up too close to me and sort of along the lines of hugging me,&#8221; the second woman told CNN. &#8220;He would say, &#8216;Why don&#8217;t you meet me upstairs?&#8217; And I would say, &#8216;That&#8217;s not a good idea.&#8217; And he would push the request further.&#8221;
A third woman told CNN that Halperin trapped her in a bathroom and propositioned her to go into another bathroom with him &#8220;to do something.&#8221;
&#8220;I excused myself to go to the bathroom and he was standing there when I opened the door propositioning [me] to go into the other bathroom to do something,&#8221; the third woman told CNN. &#8220;It freaked me out. I came out of the ladies’ room and he was just standing there. Like almost blocking the door.&#8221;
Two additional women spoke to CNN about alleged incidents they had with Halperin in – in which he allegedly acted sexually inappropriate towards them – but did not want to give quotes about their experiences.

Multiple Women Accuse Former ABC News Director Mark Halperin Of Sexual Harassment

ABC News

Mark Halperin, senior political analyst for NBC News and MSNBC as well as co-host of Showtime&#8217;s The Circus, visited a Washington, D.C. elementary school to interview fifth-graders. In the process, he did his Pied Piper of Hamelin routine, leading the children to voice their distaste for President Trump while subtly underlining that attitude with his questions and responses.
Halperin began, &#8220;We&#8217;ve got a new president, you all know who the new president is, right? And so a lot of people in the country are talking about that. One word to describe President Trump&#8221;
The kids responded, &#8220;Crazy.&#8221; &#8220;Business.&#8221; &#8220;Disrespectful.&#8221; &#8220;Trouble.&#8221; Trouble, okay. &#8220;Interesting.&#8221; &#8220;Rude.&#8221; &#8220;Money or rich.&#8221; &#8220;Complicated.&#8221; &#8220;Untruthful.&#8221; &#8220;Troubling.&#8221; &#8220;Misled.&#8221; &#8220;Careless.&#8221;&#8217;&#8220;Surprising.&#8221; &#8220;Confused.&#8221; &#8220;Unexperienced.&#8221; &#8220;Truthful.&#8221; &#8220;Hard-working.&#8221; &#8220;Unpredictable.&#8221;
Halperin asked, &#8220;What do you think he&#8217;s done so far as president?&#8221;
One girl answered, &#8220;He&#8217;s started the process of building a wall.&#8221;
Halperin: &#8220;You like that or you don&#8217;t like that?&#8221;
The young girl shook her head.
Halperin, &#8220;Anybody like that?&#8221;
The one kid who was a Trump supporter answered, &#8220;Not all of the people who come in illegally are bad, but some of them will bring in, like, drugs and other stuff.&#8221;
Halperin segued, &#8220;So people who don&#8217;t like the law; why is it a bad idea?&#8221;
He got more answers on that one.
Halperin: &#8220;Tell me something else he&#8217;s done as president?&#8221;
Halperin got just what he wanted. One kid answered, &#8220;Well, he hasn&#8217;t done this but today he&#8217;s supposed to sign an executive order that&#8217;s gonna get a bunch of like the coal factories and gonna start digging gas again. It&#8217;s like very hurtful to nature.
Another kid echoed, &#8220;He doesn&#8217;t believe much in global warming and I think it&#8217;s very important for the president to care about the environment.&#8221;
That was a perfect set-up for Halperin: &#8220;Who thinks President Trump cares about the environment?&#8221;
The same lonely Trump supporter raised his lonely hand, thus making it perfectly evident how out of step he was.
The last question from Halperin was obvious in its implications: &#8220;One of the things that is confusing to a lot of people, particularly who live in Washington, where the president is not very popular, is why did Donald Trump win? I&#8217;m wondering what your guys thoughts are, why did Donald Trump win?&#8221;
First of all, it&#8217;s a pretty good guess that had Halperin been speaking of Barack Obama, it would have been &#8220;President Obama.&#8221; Second, if you&#8217;re a kid in the class who supports Trump, wouldn&#8217;t you feel just a little intimidated that Halperin told you everyone in Washington, D.C, hates Trump?
At the end, a pizza was brought in. Halperin turned to the kids as they posed for a photo: &#8220;3-2-1, say Gorsuch!&#8221;
One kid said, &#8220;What is that?&#8221;
That prompted collective laughter.
What a surprise.
Video below:
<div class="embed video fluid-video">
<blockquote data-lang="en">
Here&#8217;s a longer version of my talk w/ some very smart 5th graders about <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump">@</a><a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump">realDonaldTrump</a>&#8216;s first 100 days on <a href="https://twitter.com/SHO_TheCircus">@SHO_TheCircus</a> <a href="https://t.co/jg2fuje1gB">pic.twitter.com/jg2fuje1gB</a>
&#8212; Mark Halperin (@MarkHalperin) <a href="https://twitter.com/MarkHalperin/status/848703297884180480">April 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
</div>

WATCH: NBC Analyst Asks 5th Graders About Trump. And It’s Ridiculous.

Donald Trump

Hillary Clinton&#8217;s campaign manager and spokesperson both took to left-wing MSNBC on Monday to reiterate their boss&#8217;s prevarications over her email conduct while heading the State Department. Robby Mook and Brian Fallon repeated their shared script that emails Clinton sent and received via her private email account and server while Secretary of State were not &#8220;marked classified&#8221; at the time of their sending and receipt.
Joining Morning Joe on Monday, Mook claimed that &#8220;classified information is sent over a completely separate system,&#8221; implying the existence of some sort of technological inability to communicate classified information in an unsecured manner.

<div class="media_embed"><iframe loading="lazy" allowfullscreen frameborder="0" height="360px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/r0eMtPVHV1E" width="640px"></iframe></div>

Speaking with Tamron Hall on Monday, Fallon denied that Clinton had perjured herself in before Congress when testifying under oath that she had not sent or received classified information via her private email system as secretary of state.

<div class="media_embed"><iframe loading="lazy" allowfullscreen frameborder="0" height="360px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/t-Y4111GtII" width="640px"></iframe></div>

Political observers should note that secretaries of state are privy to some of the most sensitive governmental secrets. The secretary of state is in a position to originally communicate information that cannot be &#8220;marked classified&#8221; as it is being communicated. There is no special employee hovering over the shoulder over of a secretary of state as he or she composes emails or makes phone calls to advise whether or not the information being communicated is classified while wielding a virtual red stamp.

Secretaries of state are <a href="https://foia.state.gov/searchapp/documents/hrc_ndas/1/doc_0c05833708/c05833708.pdf">legally required</a> to exercise responsibility in protecting classified information to which they have access. Clinton was in a position to originally communicate such information given her special access to such information as head of the State Department.

Clinton, along with her campaign operatives and surrogates, continually insists that no information she sent or received via her private system was &#8220;marked classified&#8221; at the time of its transmission. If observers accept this premise as a justification of her conduct, they must strip Clinton of responsibility for being able to think beyond bureaucratic classification protocols. 

If, for example, Clinton sent or received information via her private email system related to pending or ongoing military operations, is she to be excused if the email chain was initiated without some special identification in its heading grading its sensitivity? Should she not have known better?

If details, names, locations, dates, and other operational details of the most sensitive nature were inappropriately marked by an email chain&#8217;s originator, does Clinton&#8217;s excuse of inappropriate markings absolve her of responsibility for compromising their safekeeping? Should she not have known better?

Is Clinton&#8217;s conduct excusable because her emails lacked Mission Impossible-style headings with CLASSIFIED/TOP SECRET typed out in all caps with red letters? Should she not have known better?

<div class="image"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" alt class="media-element file-default" data-fid="10622" data-media-element="1" height="3750" src="https://dw-wp-dev.imgix.net/2019/09/top_secret.jpg" width="5000" /></div>

 
FBI Director James Comey <a href="http://www.dailywire.com/news/7173/comey-covers-clinton-no-charges-are-appropriate-robert-kraychik">partly explained</a> Clinton&#8217;s negligence.

&#8220;Even if information is not marked classified in an email, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it,&#8221; said Comey. &#8220;The security culture of the State Department, in general&#8230; was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information that&#8217;s found elsewhere in the US government.&#8221;

&#8220;There is evidence that [Clinton and her colleagues] were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information,&#8221; said Comey, adding that Clinton both sent and received information of the most classified (<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/01/19/inspector-general-clinton-emails-had-intel-from-most-secretive-classified-programs.html">Special Access Programs</a>) variety. &#8220;None of these emails should have been on any kind of unclassified system.&#8221;

Despite regularly claiming that her decision to set up and use a private email system was a &#8220;mistake,&#8221; Clinton has yet to explain why. She has never been asked in any television interview why her decision was a mistake. 

Was Clinton&#8217;s conduct mistake because it led to <a href="http://www.dailywire.com/news/6854/judicial-watch-state-department-enabled-clintonian-robert-kraychik">evasion</a> of FOIA requests for her communications as secretary of state? 

Was Clinton&#8217;s conduct a mistake because it <a href="http://www.dailywire.com/news/3759/former-cia-director-i-would-lose-respect-our-robert-kraychik">compromised</a> national security? 

Was Clinton&#8217;s conduct a mistake because it politically <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/oct/13/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-damn-email-server">inconvenienced</a> her and her left-wing media allies? 

Chuck Todd, Jake Tapper, John Dickerson, George Stephanopoulos and the rest of the usual suspects refuse to ask Clinton why she describes her conduct as having been a &#8220;mistake.&#8221; Also unasked are any questions pertaining to Clinton&#8217;s motivations for setting up such a system.

Follow Robert Kraychik on <a href="https://twitter.com/kr3ch3k">Twitter</a>.

top_secret

Why Clinton’s ‘Marked Classified’ Excuse Is Absurd

Hillary Clinton

Joe Scarborough

Media

Media Bias

State Department

On MSNBC&#8217;s Hardball Tuesday, the show&#8217;s embarrassment of a host Chris Matthews said something that had it come from the mouth of a conservative would have caused a media meltdown.
During comments on the <a href="http://www.dailywire.com/news/2917/breaking-trump-will-definitely-not-participate-fox-joshua-yasmeh">absence of Donald Trump</a> at the upcoming Fox News Republican primary debate, Matthews <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/chris-matthews-who-is-going-to-watch-a-debate-between-the-two-cuban-guys/">asked</a>, &#8220;Who is going to watch a debate between the two Cuban guys?&#8221;
The &#8220;two Cuban guys,&#8221; of course, are Texas Senator Ted Cruz (who Democrats would also have you believe is really Canadian) and Florida Senator Marco Rubio. 
&#8220;Who is going to watch a debate between Rubio, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz? Who cares?&#8221; continued Matthews. &#8220;You know they&#8217;ve been fighting in this inter-league fight over who is the hawkish guy, or whatever. Who is going to watch that Thursday night?&#8221;
The left&#8217;s often overtly racist and race-baiting treatment of Cruz and Rubio has been on display a number of times. As <a href="http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/2015/11/11/chris-matthews-not-sure-if-cruz-rubio-really-hispanic-theyre-cuban-nationals">Newsbusters</a> highlighted, Matthews himself questioned their credentials as true &#8220;Hispanics&#8221; last year.
&#8220;So you&#8217;re trying to insinuate that Marco Rubio, a fellow, uh, Spanish surname, I&#8217;m not sure the right word is Hispanic for them, because they are Cuban nationals or whatever, or come from Cuba,&#8221; said Matthews during a discussion of their stances on immigration. 
Perhaps the most egregious moment involving Cruz&#8217;s ethnicity was Mark Halperin&#8217;s <a href="http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/halperin-interrogates-ted-cruz-about-his-cuban-heritage">race-baiting</a> inquisitorial <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/videos/2015-04-30/ted-cruz-my-story-resonates-with-hispanics">interview</a> with the senator in which he essentially asked Cruz to prove that he was truly Cuban. &#8220;[W]hen you filled out your application to Princeton, to Harvard Law school, did you list yourself as an Hispanic?&#8221; asked Halperin. &#8220;Do you have a favorite Cuban food, Cuban dish? &#8230; Do you like Cuban music, do you have a favorite Cuban singer?&#8221; Halperin&#8217;s treatment of Cruz was so godawful that he eventually felt compelled to <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/241631-mark-halperin-apologizes-to-ted-cruz-for-questions-about-cuban-heritage">apologize</a> publicly. 
H/t <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/chris-matthews-who-is-going-to-watch-a-debate-between-the-two-cuban-guys/">Mediaite</a>.

Chris Matthews Says Something That Would Get a Conservative Crucified

Marco Rubio

Race

Ted Cruz

Joe Scarborough, the co-host of MSNBC&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe">Morning Joe</a>,&#8221; was not alone in concluding that left-wing media bias has become entrenched in the major networks.
&#8220;Name the single Republican that has hosted a Sunday show, that has been an anchor of a news network for the big three networks over the past 50 years,&#8221; <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/mark-finkelstein/2015/11/02/scarborough-no-republican-has-hosted-network-sunday-show-or">said</a> Scarborough, &#8220;You cannot do it!&#8221; His fellow co-host and guests, including <a href="https://twitter.com/MarkHalperin?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor">Mark Halperin</a>, agreed. 
The comment came during a discussion of the disastrous CNBC debate and the larger problem of left-wing bias in the media. Scarborough argued that the leftist political leanings of George Stephanopoulos and others appeared to be just fine with networks, while conservative anchors and debate hosts were unacceptable to the big three (ABC, CBS, and NBC). 
&#8220;Name the single Republican that has hosted a Sunday show, that has been an anchor of a news network for the big three networks over the past 50 years. You cannot do it!&#8221; said Scarborough. &#8220;So we Republicans &#8230; we&#8217;re told to sit back.&#8221;
&#8220;The people that run the Sunday shows are all Democrats,&#8221; said Scarborough. &#8220;I&#8217;m not just talking about today. I&#8217;m talking about for the past 50 years. The people that have run the network newscasts &#8212; the nightly newscasts have been all Democrats. The network executives have been all Democrats.&#8203;&#8221; 
&#8220;I agree with you 100%,&#8221; said Halperin. &#8220;There&#8217;s a huge liberal media bias. Not just in the examples you&#8217;ve given but in less prominent people,&#8221; he explained, adding, &#8220;All I&#8217;m saying is find the few people who don&#8217;t fit in that category and get objective journalists.&#8221; 

<div class="media_embed"><iframe allowfullscreen frameborder="0" height="360px" width="640px"></iframe></div>

Video via <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/mark-finkelstein/2015/11/02/scarborough-no-republican-has-hosted-network-sunday-show-or">MRC TV</a>.

Menu