The <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/supreme-court">Supreme Court</a> unveiled a formal ethics code this week amid <a href="https://www.newsweek.com/key-allegations-against-clarence-thomas-democrats-call-probe-1819296">scrutiny</a> from the media and Congress over concerns that the justices have failed to <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/longtime-thomas-friend-hits-back-at-democratic-probe-into-financial-records" target="_blank" rel="noopener">properly disclose gifts</a> and did not recuse themselves in cases in which they might have a conflict of interest.
A <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/Code-of-Conduct-for-Justices_November_13_2023.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">15-page document</a>, featuring a statement at the top and a &#8220;Code of Conduct&#8221; below, was <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/press/pressreleases/pr_11-13-23" target="_blank" rel="noopener">posted</a> to the high court&#8217;s website on Monday. All nine members, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, signed off on adhering to the five &#8220;canon&#8221; rules.
The five canons, many of which included subsections, said a justice &#8220;should uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary,&#8221; &#8220;should avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all activities,&#8221; &#8220;should perform the duties of office fairly, impartially, and diligently,&#8221; &#8220;may engage in extrajudicial activities that are consistent with the obligations of the judicial office,&#8221; and &#8220;should refrain from political activity.&#8221;
A &#8220;statement of the Court&#8221; offered a brief explanation for drawing out an ethics code without getting into specific media reports on ethical questions and a lack of transparency that have <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/clarence-thomas-cites-safety-concerns-for-private-jet-travel-after-dobbs-leak" target="_blank" rel="noopener">dogged conservative</a> justices, including Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, as well as <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/04/politics/sonia-sotomayor-neil-gorsuch-book-recusal-supreme-court-cases/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">liberal Justice</a> Sonia Sotomayor in recent months while fueling an <a href="https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/releases/durbin-announces-judiciary-committee-will-no-longer-vote-to-authorize-subpoena-for-robin-arkley-following-cooperation-in-supreme-court-ethics-investigation" target="_blank" rel="noopener">investigation led by the Democrat-led Senate Judiciary Committee</a>.
&#8220;The undersigned Justices are promulgating this Code of Conduct to set out succinctly and gather in one place the ethics rules and principles that guide the conduct of the Members of the Court,&#8221; the statement said.
&#8220;For the most part these rules and principles are not new: The Court has long had the equivalent of common law ethics rules, that is, a body of rules derived from a variety of sources, including statutory provisions, the code that applies to other members of the federal judiciary, ethics advisory opinions issued by the Judicial Conference Committee on Codes of Conduct, and historic practice,&#8221; the statement added.
&#8220;The absence of a Code, however, has led in recent years to the misunderstanding that the Justices of this Court, unlike all other jurists in this country, regard themselves as unrestricted by any ethics rules,&#8221; the statement said. &#8220;To dispel this misunderstanding, we are issuing this Code, which largely represents a codification of principles that we have long regarded as governing our conduct.&#8221;

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reveals Ethics Code For Justices

Clarence Thomas

Ethics

John Roberts

Judiciary

Samuel Alito

Sonia Sotomayor

U.S.

Soviet-born Rep. <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/gop-rep-spartz-who-emigrated-from-ukraine-takes-implicit-shot-at-biden-ive-been-to-the-southern-border-three-times" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Victoria Spartz</a> (R-IN) laid into Attorney General <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/garland-testifies-he-cant-recollect-contact-with-fbi-hq-about-hunter-biden-probe" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Merrick Garland</a> during a Wednesday hearing on Capitol Hill, saying American citizens were living in fear that their own Justice Department might target them for prosecution.
Spartz — who was born in Ukraine while it was still under Soviet control — referenced her upbringing and pressed Garland on what she believed was his role in creating a similar political climate in the United States.
&#8220;As someone who grew up in the Soviet Union, I’m disturbed by the fact that so many hardworking Americans—including my constituents—are afraid of political persecution by our own government,&#8221; Spartz captioned her video of the exchange on X. &#8220;Unfortunately, it does not seem like AG Garland is.&#8221;
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
As someone who grew up in the Soviet Union, I’m disturbed by the fact that so many hardworking Americans—including my constituents—are afraid of political persecution by our own government.
Unfortunately, it does not seem like AG Garland is.
Watch <a href="https://twitter.com/JudiciaryGOP?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JudiciaryGOP</a> 👇 <a href="https://t.co/L0QprNW6uK">pic.twitter.com/L0QprNW6uK</a>
&mdash; Rep. Victoria Spartz (@RepSpartz) <a href="https://twitter.com/RepSpartz/status/1704606198018818291?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 20, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Spartz began by acknowledging Garland&#8217;s personal history – his family fleeing to the United States from Belarus for a life free of persecution – and then pivoted to her own.
&#8220;I grew up in a very similar country, Ukraine now,&#8221; Spartz said. &#8220;And when I came here as a young person, I believed in the value as an American not to be afraid of my government.&#8221;
&#8220;But I wanted to tell you and I wanted to share with you and get your thoughts on that,&#8221; she continued. &#8220;Are you aware that a lot of Americans are now afraid of being prosecuted by your department? Are you aware about that? Are you aware of that? I&#8217;m just saying are you aware or not?&#8221;
Garland paused, cleared his throat, and then immediately placed the blame on anyone who questioned or criticized the Justice Department. He said, &#8220;I think that constant attacks on the Department and saying —&#8221;
<a class="c-link c-link--focus-visible" href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://onelink.to/dwapp" data-sk="tooltip_parent">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
&#8220;It&#8217;s not attacks,&#8221; Spartz pushed back. &#8220;Let me give you an example, you talk about January 6th people, some people came on January 6th &#8230; there were some people that came on January 6th here, you know, that had bad intent. But a lot of good Americans from my district came here because they are sick and tired of this government not serving them. They came with strollers and the kids, and there was a chaotic situation because the proper security wasn&#8217;t provided.&#8221;
Spartz went on to say that the FBI had then hunted down people who had simply been there with their kids, prompting fears that they were going to be the ones on the hook.
&#8220;You are in charge of the department,&#8221; Spartz addressed Garland directly, noting that investigations into former President Donald Trump had moved very quickly while investigations into President Joe Biden&#8217;s family and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had moved very slowly.
&#8220;All of your agents need to be tested for amnesia, no one recalls anything,&#8221; she said, comparing the U.S. Justice Department to the Soviet KGB. &#8220;I couldn&#8217;t believe it happened in the United States of America.&#8221;

Attorney General Garland Testifies Before House Judiciary Committee

Soviet-Born Congresswoman Torches Garland: Americans Are ‘Afraid Of Being Prosecuted By Your’ DOJ

Soviet-Born Congresswoman Torches Garland: Americans Are 'Afraid Of Being Prosecuted By Your' DOJ

Congress

Department of Justice

Merrick Garland

Politics

Senator <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/all-of-this-was-false-josh-hawley-rips-into-ag-garland-over-senate-testimony" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Josh Hawley</a> (R-MO) grilled public defender Richard Federico during a Wednesday hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, pressing him on a prior trial in which he&#8217;d asked for a light sentence in a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/democrat-ex-mayor-pleads-guilty-to-140-counts-of-child-porn-facing-decades-behind-bars" target="_blank" rel="noopener">child pornography</a> case.
Biden nominated Federico, a U.S. Navy Reserve officer and federal public defender based in Kansas, to serve on Denver&#8217;s 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals — but Hawley had some questions about his record.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
A Biden judicial nominee is seeking a lifetime appointment to the bench but can’t answer why he was way more lenient than the federal government in sentencing a man guilty of child porn distribution.
“Do you think that that’s a sentence that does justice to his victims?” <a href="https://t.co/wI12YY13pE">pic.twitter.com/wI12YY13pE</a>
&mdash; Senator Hawley Press Office (@SenHawleyPress) <a href="https://twitter.com/SenHawleyPress/status/1699454067846623739?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 6, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Hawley began by laying out the details of the case he was referring to, noting that the sentencing guidelines recommended up to 240 months — or 20 years — in prison. The recommended range, he said, was from 210 months to 240 — but Federico had asked for just 105 months.
&#8220;Now, the government in this case said that it was being very lenient,&#8221; Hawley added, noting that prosecutors had called for 189 months and suggesting that they could have started with a much higher number given the type of crime involved. The Missouri Senator opted not to go into detail about the nature of the case, saying that it was too reprehensible to discuss.
Federico pushed back, saying that he had prosecuted as many child pornography cases as he had defended and, therefore, understood what the victims were going through.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
&#8220;So what would you say to the victims in this case, who — let&#8217;s just review — and I&#8217;m not going to read the specifics because it&#8217;s too revolting, but let me just — here — this is from the pre-sentence report,&#8221; Hawley continued.
&#8220;&#8216;This particular defendant&#8217; — this is sanitized, but it&#8217;s still unpleasant — &#8216;the defendant used multiple mediums to access, obtain, and distribute depictions of child rape, bondage, and sexual exploitation,'&#8221; Hawley read. &#8220;&#8216;He used dating websites to meet people offering children for sex. He used email to send depictions of child sexual exploitation to his cohorts.'&#8221;
&#8220;Why 100 months?&#8221; Hawley asked. &#8220;I mean, listen, you could have recommended any number of — I get you wanted to defend your client, sure, but you could have chosen 175. You could have agreed with government, 189, which was characterized already below guidelines and quite lenient.&#8221;
Noting once again that Federico had recommended only 105 months — less than 10 years — Hawley asked, &#8220;Do you think that that’s a sentence that does justice to his victims?&#8221;

Senate Moves Ahead With Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court Nomination

Josh Hawley Grills Biden Judicial Nominee For Going Soft On Client Convicted In Child Porn Case

Child pornography

Executive

Joe Biden

Josh Hawley

Judge

<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/supreme-court">Supreme Court</a> Justice <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/clarence-thomas">Clarence Thomas</a> reported taking private jet flights in the spring of last year because of security concerns that followed the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/leak-of-scotus-draft-on-roe-v-wade-stuns-nation-this-leak-is-the-gravest-most-unforgivable-sin">leak of a Dobbs draft opinion</a>.
The information appears in a <a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23932793-clarence-thomas-2022-financial-disclosure">financial disclosure</a> for calendar year 2022 that was released on Thursday. It describes the rationale for the method of travel to Dallas in May of that year and states that the trip was paid for by Republican donor Harlan Crow, a longtime friend to Thomas.
&#8220;Because of the increased security risk following the Dobbs opinion leak,&#8221; the report said, &#8220;the May flights were by private plane for official travel as filer’s security detail recommended noncommercial travel whenever possible.&#8221;
The report said the purpose of the reimbursement, which included meals as well as transportation, was for Thomas being a keynote speaker at the American Enterprise Institute&#8217;s Conference at Old Parkland. Also revealed were other trips paid for by Crow in 2022. The report additionally offers details about financial and real estate matters dating back several years to clear up what it said were prior omissions attributed to mistakes or to offer extra information outside a covered period on issues that have <a href="https://www.propublica.org/article/clarence-thomas-harlan-crow-real-estate-scotus">garnered attention in the media</a>.
POLITICO <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/leak-of-scotus-draft-on-roe-v-wade-stuns-nation-this-leak-is-the-gravest-most-unforgivable-sin">obtained and published</a> a draft opinion by Justice Samuel Alito in May 2022 indicating Roe v. Wade would be overturned. More than a month later, on June 24, the Supreme Court released Alito’s majority opinion in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization and Planned Parenthood v. Casey cases, which overturned the 1973 Roe decision and returned the issue of abortion to the states.
In delivering remarks at the Heritage Foundation in October, Alito said the leak &#8220;made those of us who were thought to be in the majority in support of overruling Roe and Casey targets for assassination, because it gave people a rational reason to think they could prevent that from happening by killing one of us.&#8221;
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1693504018745000&amp;usg=AOvVaw1RMMjCvCBOBYdpkw5O_njE">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
Indeed, a man was <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/police-id-armed-man-who-said-he-wanted-to-kill-supreme-court-justice-kavanaugh-report">arrested in June of 2022 and charged</a> with allegedly attempting to murder fellow conservative Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. And GOP lawmakers have <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/gop-senators-confront-garland-on-protesters-outside-homes-of-supreme-court-justices">pressed</a> Attorney General Merrick Garland on enforcing a federal law against protests outside Supreme Court justices’ homes.
Chief Justice John Roberts tasked the Supreme Court’s marshal, Gail Curley, with investigating the leak. The inquiry <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-supreme-court-releases-final-report-from-investigation-into-who-leaked-dobbs-draft">culminated in a report</a> in January that failed to identify who was responsible.
Thomas and <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/668317219/Alito-2022-Financial-Disclosure">Alito</a> released their 2022 financial disclosure reports on Thursday after receiving 90-day extensions. They have faced <a href="https://www.newsweek.com/key-allegations-against-clarence-thomas-democrats-call-probe-1819296">growing scrutiny</a> from congressional Democrats over concerns that the justices had failed to properly disclose gifts and paid-for trips, spurred by <a href="https://www.npr.org/2023/06/21/1183456911/justice-alito-propublica-singer">reports from ProPublica</a>. The filings come after the Judicial Conference <a href="https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/new-gift-disclosure-rules-extend-to-us-supreme-court-justices">issued a new guidance in March</a> that reinforced personal hospitality disclosure rules.
A statement delivered to reporters by Elliot Berke, an attorney who assisted Thomas, <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-08-31/justice-clarence-thomas-discloses-trips-paid-for-by-gop-donor">said</a> the new disclosure report &#8220;answers — and utterly refutes — the charges trumped up in this partisan feeding frenzy.&#8221;

Clarence Thomas Cites Safety Concerns For Private Jet Travel After Dobbs Leak

Abortion

Dobbs

House Judiciary Chairman <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/jim-jordan" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jim Jordan</a> announced in a Thursday letter an inquiry into Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis over her investigation into former President <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/donald-trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a> and the 2020 election. 
Jordan’s letter to Willis comes as Trump is set to arrive at a Fulton County jail on Thursday evening where he will get fingerprinted and possibly have his mugshot taken. Trump is facing 13 charges, including allegations of racketeering, for his actions in the aftermath of the 2020 election in Georgia.
“Your indictment and prosecution implicate substantial federal interests, and the circumstances surrounding your actions raise serious concerns about whether they are politically motivated,” Jordan <a href="https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/2023-08-24-jdj-to-da-willis-re-trump-investigation.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">wrote</a>.
&#8220;Turning first to the question of motivation, it is noteworthy that just four days before this indictment, you launched a new campaign fundraising website that highlighted your investigation into President Trump. Additionally, the forewoman of the special grand jury you convened to investigate President Trump earlier this year bragged during an unusual media tour about her excitement at the prospect of subpoenaing President Trump and getting to swear him in,” the letter said.
Jordan was referring to statements from grand jury foreman Emily Kohrs, who made <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-deranged-sounding-georgia-grand-jury-foreman-throws-election-case-against-trump-into-legal-jeopardy" target="_blank" rel="noopener">comments on CNN</a> that some legal experts said would complicate the case against Trump.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Foreman for Trump&#39;s Georgia Grand Jury is a piece of work… <a href="https://t.co/srF85GtyU2">pic.twitter.com/srF85GtyU2</a>
&mdash; Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) <a href="https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1628414645500534784?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 22, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Jordan also wants to know if there was any coordination with special counsel Jack Smith, who has brought indictments against Trump in Washington, D.C., and in Florida.
“There are questions about whether and how your office coordinate with DOJ Special Counsel Jack Smith during the course of this investigation, and Congress has an interest in any such activity that involves federal law enforcement agencies, and officials that fall under its oversight,” the letter said.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
Trump is charged in the Georgia case along with 18 other co-defendants, including Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Mark Meadows, Jenna Ellis, and Sidney Powell, who have all turned themselves in for processing.
Eastman, a constitutional law expert and former legal adviser to Trump, warned on Tuesday that the case “will have — and is already having — profound consequences for our system of justice.”
“I am here today to surrender to an indictment that should never have been brought,” Eastman <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-attorney-behind-2020-eastman-memo-gives-constitutional-smackdown-after-turning-himself-in" target="_blank" rel="noopener">told the press</a> after surrendering on Tuesday. “It represents a crossing of the Rubicon for our country, implicating the fundamental First Amendment right to petition the government for redress of grievances.”
Willis has requested that the trial against Trump begin as soon as October 23.

House Oversight Committee Hears Testimony From IRS Whistleblower Gary Shapley

Jim Jordan Presses Fulton County DA Over Motives Behind Trump Georgia Prosecution

2020 Election

Courts

Donald Trump

Georgia

Jack Smith

Jim Jordan

The Knesset, Israel’s Parliament, approved an amendment to the country’s Basic Law on Monday, standing staunchly against the Israeli Left, which has exploded in anger at seeing its control over the political arena erode.
The 64-0 vote, with all members of the right-wing bloc voting for the amendment and all members of the opposition boycotting the vote, was to curb the nation’s “reasonableness standard.” That standard enabled judges in Israel to apply a “reasonableness standard” to block decisions by elected officials that they believe are beyond the scope of what a responsible and reasonable authority would do.
The standard thereby gave the justices a de facto veto on most if not all government policies. The Israeli Supreme Court has always been dominated by leftists, and unlike the United States and other Western countries, enables justices on the court to pick their successors, thus giving the Left permanent control of the judiciary and thus control over government decisions.
The Left has somehow twisted its loss of control as a threat to democracy and launched protests around the country.
“We started by correcting the cause of reasonableness, as part of the important reform to correct the entire judicial system,” Minister of National Security Itamar Ben Gvir stated, according to <a href="https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/373960">Israel National News</a>. “The time has come to return the power to the public and stop the rule of the junta. Correcting the cause of reasonableness is an extremely important step, but we must pass the entire reform. Changing the Judicial Selection Committee, the cancellation of the Override Clause, changing the powers of the Attorney General. Bringing democracy back to Israel.&#8221;
Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich added, “64 supporters against 56 opponents to the reduction of the cause of reasonableness. Tonight, democracy won.”
Minister of Aliyah and Integration Ofir Sofer agreed, saying, “Tonight, we passed an important amendment to the cause of reasonableness in the first reading. An amendment that will allow the government ministers to implement the policy for which we were elected. I congratulate Minister Yariv Levin and the chairman of the Constitution Committee, Simcha Rothman, and call on the members of the opposition to behave responsibly and heed the call of the Minister of Justice to negotiate for the benefit of the State of Israel.”
The opposition hurled criticism at the amendment; Former Prime Minister and opposition leader Yair Lapid called the right-wing government, “thieves in the night,” threatening, “Millions of Israelis will take to the streets tomorrow.”
Yisrael Beitenu chairman Avigdor Liberman echoed that the amended law poses “serious damage to democracy.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
I am not the biggest Bibi fan. 
But can we just stop and honor a man who is so freaking driven in his service to Israel that he had heart surgery and then put on a suit, got in a car, and is now running negotiations like a super-boss from his Knesset seat like he just woke up… <a href="https://t.co/CrZS4leWoQ">pic.twitter.com/CrZS4leWoQ</a>
&mdash; Malkah Fleisher 🕎 (@MalkahFleisher) <a href="https://twitter.com/MalkahFleisher/status/1683452988159930368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 24, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Israeli parliament approves controversial bill limiting âreasonableness standardâ

Israel Passes Judicial Reform In Face Of Mass Left-Wing Protests

Benjamin Netanyahu

Democracy

Israel

Protests

Ray Epps, the alleged January 6 provocateur who has avoided arrest by the feds, was at the center of a fiery exchange Wednesday between a Republican congressman and FBI Director Christopher Wray.
Representative Troy Nehls (R-TX) grilled Wray during an oversight hearing before the House Judiciary Committee, asking him point blank if the FBI would arrest Epps.
Nehls mentioned two other January 6 defendants, whom he said were arrested for breaching Capitol grounds, as well as a defendant who was arrested for &#8220;disorderly and destructive conduct&#8221; which included yelling &#8220;Go, go, go!&#8221; as rioters tried to enter the Capitol.
&#8220;These three never went into the Capitol. They never assaulted anyone,&#8221; Nehls said, adding that there is &#8220;very little difference&#8221; between the actions of Ray Epps and those defendants.
&#8220;Now look into the camera, sir, when you answer my next question,&#8221; Nehls said. &#8220;Are you going to arrest Mr. Epps, yes or no?&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Rep. Nehls asks FBI Director Wray if he will arrest Ray Epps, and says:
&quot;If you don&#39;t arrest Mr. Epps, there&#39;s a reason behind it. I believe you know what it is, and it appears to me you are protecting this guy. I strongly recommend you get your house back in order.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/NSPDLlKYKW">pic.twitter.com/NSPDLlKYKW</a>
&mdash; The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) <a href="https://twitter.com/TPostMillennial/status/1679215119300001792?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 12, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;I&#8217;m not going to engage here in a discussion about individual people who are or are not going to be prosecuted,&#8221; Wray responded.
&#8220;Can I get a commitment?&#8221; an exasperated Nehls asked. &#8220;I&#8217;m an old law dog. I understand a little bit about probable cause.&#8221;
&#8220;You can see him. I almost think he&#8217;s inciting a riot,&#8221; Nehls continued, noting that many people have questioned whether Epps has a connection to the feds.
&#8220;There&#8217;s a lot of cloud over this,&#8221; the congressman said.
&#8220;My point is this,&#8221; Nehls said. &#8220;You arrested a lot of folks for unlawful activity. You just saw the video, and I will tell you, Mr. Wray, if you don&#8217;t arrest Mr. Epps, there&#8217;s a reason behind it, I believe you know what it is, and it appears to me you are protecting this guy. I strongly recommend you get your house back in order.&#8221;
Epps was a central figure in the Capitol riot from the beginning.
The 62-year-old Marine veteran from Arizona is seen in multiple video clips from January 6 and the day before trying to whip up other <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/donald-trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Trump</a> supporters to “go into the Capitol” the next day.
“I’ll say it. We need to go into the Capitol,” Epps says in one clip.
The crowd of Trump supporters then starts chanting, “Fed! Fed! Fed!” at Epps.
At least four times on video, Epps repeats his call to action to &#8220;go into the Capitol.&#8221;
Then, while the vast majority of MAGA supporters were still near the National Mall where Trump was speaking, Epps is seen at the front of the very first crowd that breached the security perimeter around the Capitol. Moments before the crowd pushes past Capitol police officers, Epps whispers something into fellow protester Ryan Samsel’s ear. Later in January, Epps and Samsel both told the FBI separately that Epps had been <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/05/us/jan-6-ray-epps-evidence.html">encouraging</a> Samsel to relax because the cops were just “doing their job.”
Epps also texted his nephew that he “orchestrated” the riot.
“I was in the front with a few others, I also orchestrated it,” the text from Epps <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHEEGxQKg20" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reads</a>.
Epps was initially on the FBI’s wanted list for January 6, but he was suddenly dropped, fueling conspiracies that he might be protected by the feds. Thousands of others who behaved much less provocatively remained on the list, including at least <a href="https://www.ktvb.com/article/news/crime/boise-woman-sentenced-for-role-in-us-capitol-riot-pamela-hemphill-january-6-2021/277-3aa12194-5a54-4abe-88a2-d644cf5043aa" target="_blank" rel="noopener">two</a> <a href="https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/jun/23/anna-morgan-lloyd-indiana-grandmother-sentenced-ca/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">grandmas</a> who were sentenced.
No charges were ever filed against Epps for his role in the riot.
Last month, 60 Minutes did a fawning <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHEEGxQKg20" target="_blank" rel="noopener">interview</a> with Epps. The New York Times did a glowing <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/13/us/politics/jan-6-conspiracy-theory-ray-epps.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">profile</a> of him in July.

FBI Director Wray Testifies Before House Judiciary Committee

Congressman Challenges FBI Director On Whether He’ll Arrest Ray Epps: ‘You Are Protecting This Guy’

Congressman Challenges FBI Director On Whether He'll Arrest Ray Epps: 'You Are Protecting This Guy'

Capitol Riot

Christopher Wray

January 6

Ray Epps

U.S. House of Representatives

Israel’s democratically elected legislature, the Knesset, is in the midst of voting on a series of laws that would scale back the power of the unelected judiciary and place more power in the elected body. Tens of thousands of Israelis along with Israel’s usual detractors are up in arms, calling this &#8220;tyranny&#8221; and the “end of democracy.”
To start, those who continue to push the “end of democracy” narrative are objectively counterfactual, counterproductive, and over-reactionary. When a democratically elected body makes efforts to wrangle back power from those appointed by a committee controlled by the Bar Association and the judiciary itself, it is, in fact, putting more “power” into the hands of the “people.” In simple terms, making the political system more “democratic.”
Democratic governments around the world take many different forms, from constitutional republics, like the United States, to parliamentary systems, like the United Kingdom, and many variations there between. Israel is just shy of 75 years young, and is still in the nascent stages of forming what its democracy will look like. For instance, while its founders set out to form a constitution, none has yet been put in place. The entire process the democratically-elected government is going through is at the very core of democracy.
While it’s hard to see it through the hysterics, Israel’s proposed judicial reforms are, in fact, imperfect in their current state. However, this is the case when most laws are initially proposed. This is why there is a process, in most (or all) democracies in the world, Israel included, that allows for debate, input, discussion, and ultimately amendments. Those opposing the judicial reforms would be better served by pushing for constructive dialogue rather than destructive protests. Calls for the Knesset to change direction simply because of the nightly protests should fall on deaf ears, as a well-functioning government should never cave to what would essentially be mob rule.
Taking a quick step back, the proposed judicial reforms aim to accomplish five things: (1) Changing the process of selecting judges, so as to give the governing coalition of the Knesset a majority in the judicial selection committee; (2) Prohibiting the Supreme Court from making decisions based “on reasonability” rather than on laws passed by the Knesset; (3) Changing legal opinions of general counsels of government departments, appointed by the attorney general, from binding to advisory; (4) Raising the standard for the Supreme Court to strike down a law passed by the Knesset to 11 out of the 15 judges; and (5) Providing the Knesset the capacity to override a decision by the Supreme Court that strikes down a law passed by the Knesset with a majority of the Knesset members. Of course, the proposals are more nuanced than the above-outlined, but these are the general strokes of the proposals.
That judicial reforms are needed is the broad consensus view. The self-elected judiciary has become hyper-political, if not hostile, to the government, to the ultra-Orthodox, and to the conservative majority. The Supreme Court has also unilaterally expanded its own power by granting itself powers of judicial review and making key decisions based on its subjective interpretation of “reasonability,” and general, undefined concepts of dignity and liberty. The impact of the Supreme Court’s rulings is even more far reaching, given that the Israeli Supreme Court is a Court of first instance, in that almost anyone can file claims directly with the Court on a host of issues. At bottom, an unelected branch of government has run amok and the Knesset is looking to rein it in through these reforms.
The only truly controversial or delicate provision in the proposed reforms, in my opinion, is the “override clause.” The fact that the Knesset is seeking to include an override clause is not a problem per se. Given the past relationship between the branches, and the importance given by the elected body to ensuring that those elected by the people have final say on critical issues, the ability to override the Court’s decision makes sense. Israel would not be alone in implementing an express “override clause.” Canada, a country which no one would seriously charge as “non-democratic,” has a similar law, which permits the Parliament to pass a law “notwithstanding” their Court’s having found that law to be unconstitutional.
Still, for purposes of political stability, which is critical for the social and economic well-being of any nation, the issues which should qualify for override should be very limited and an override should only pass with a supermajority of the Knesset. These limitations would all but guarantee that the override would only be used sparingly and could not be abused by any party to satisfy the political whims of the day.
Finally, the governing coalition should learn from the mistakes of the Democrat-controlled U.S. Senate in 2013, when they removed the 60-vote filibuster for the president&#8217;s nominees, requiring only a simple majority instead. This was a shrewd move in the short term to get President Obama’s nominees seated, but when control of the Senate shifted back to the Republicans, Democrats quickly regretted that the Republicans could pass through the president&#8217;s nominees without the support of a single Democrat.
In Israel today, it is hard to see when and how the political Left could return to power. But, politics lives on a pendulum, and when (not if) political control inevitably shifts in Israel, those in control of the Knesset today will regret having a law in place which requires only a simple majority to override the Supreme Court.
At the end, the Likud party and its coalition partners should not make any decisions based on the hysterical protests and threats of its detractors. Still, the government shouldn’t rush through the reforms without robust and honest debate about its impact. Particular care should be taken to limit the override clause so as to protect the integrity of the Supreme Court while providing the supermajority of the Knesset the ability to have final say on critical issues that go to the heart of the Jewish and Democratic State of Israel.
Gabriel Groisman is a partner at LSN Partners in Miami, Florida, a Jewish rights leader and the former mayor of Bal Harbour, Florida
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Protests Continue Over Proposed Judicial Overhaul In Israel

Israel Is Reforming Its Judiciary. It’s Not Perfect, It’s Democracy. 

Middle East

World

President <a href="http://www.dailywire.com/topic/joe-biden/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Joe Biden</a> claimed on Wednesday that he was going to &#8220;debunk&#8221; some of the myths he&#8217;d heard circulating about domestic oil production in the United States — but the Republicans of the House Judiciary Committee thought otherwise.
Biden addressed his administration&#8217;s continuing struggle to keep gas prices under control — especially as the midterm elections loomed ever closer — and as he outlined the White House&#8217;s strategy, he also claimed that his administration had not taken any action to stop or slow domestic production.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Biden: &quot;Let&#39;s debunk some myths: My administration has not stopped or slowed U.S. oil production.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/jSMdBi64Gl">pic.twitter.com/jSMdBi64Gl</a>
&mdash; Greg Price (@greg_price11) <a href="https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1582787867654295552?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 19, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;We&#8217;re calling it a &#8216;Ready and Release&#8217; plan,&#8221; Biden said of the administration&#8217;s idea to release more oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. &#8220;This allows us to move quickly to prevent oil price spikes and respond to international events.&#8221;
&#8220;Secondly, we need to responsibly increase American oil production without delaying or deferring our transition to clean energy,&#8221; the president continued.
Biden then pivoted to address what he said were &#8220;myths&#8221; about American oil production, saying, &#8220;Let&#8217;s debunk some myths here. My administration has not stopped or slowed U.S. oil production. Quite the opposite. We&#8217;re producing 12 million barrels of oil per day by the end of this year we will be producing one million barrels a day more than the day which I took office.&#8221;
The Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee minced no words in their reply to Biden&#8217;s claims: &#8220;Liar.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Liar. <a href="https://t.co/XSTIj8jnjq">https://t.co/XSTIj8jnjq</a>
&mdash; House Judiciary GOP (@JudiciaryGOP) <a href="https://twitter.com/JudiciaryGOP/status/1582792404234432512?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 19, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
A tweet from @Rasmussen_poll gave a little more context, sharing a headline showing exactly what the Biden administration had done to stop or slow U.S. oil production. &#8220;Yes, let&#8217;s debunk some myths about your administration,&#8221; the caption read.
Dated just a week after Biden was sworn in as president, the CNBC headline read, &#8220;Biden suspense oil and gas leasing in slew of executive actions on climate change.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Yes, let&#39;s debunk some myths about your administration &#8211; <a href="https://t.co/Rm972jDEbV">https://t.co/Rm972jDEbV</a> <a href="https://t.co/HTuFW7GfTM">pic.twitter.com/HTuFW7GfTM</a>
&mdash; Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) <a href="https://twitter.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1582816942804520961?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 19, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;Someone tell the DOJ so that they stop litigating Louisiana v. Biden seeking to stop and slow U.S. oil production,&#8221; Ted Frank added.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Someone tell the DOJ so that they stop litigating Louisiana v. Biden seeking to stop and slow US oil production. <a href="https://t.co/PeVugACGYX">https://t.co/PeVugACGYX</a>
&mdash; (((tedfrank))) (@tedfrank) <a href="https://twitter.com/tedfrank/status/1582809123523289090?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 19, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;If gaslighting were an actual hydrocarbon Biden would be able to supply the whole world,&#8221; Nan Hayworth <a href="https://twitter.com/NanHayworth/status/1582804767478534144" target="_blank" rel="noopener">tweeted</a>.
Indiana Congressional candidate <a href="https://dailywire.com/news/indiana-republican-claims-opponent-illegally-obtained-her-military-records-and-politico-published-them/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jennifer-Ruth Green</a> added, &#8220;Joe Biden canceled the Keystone XL pipeline and halted all oil and gas leases on federal lands in just his first week in office. He reversed our energy independence and all he can do now is lie.&#8221;

President Biden Makes Announcement On Energy Policy

Biden Claims To ‘Debunk’ Myths About Oil Production — House Judiciary GOP Offers One Word Response

Biden Claims To 'Debunk' Myths About Oil Production — House Judiciary GOP Offers One Word Response

House Republicans

Oil and Gas

The <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/judiciary">United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia</a> has <a href="https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/524B3B5CED10789D8525889900538BAB/$file/21-5289-1958452.pdf">ruled</a> that Congress has the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/constitution">constitutional</a> authority to request the tax returns of former <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/donald-trump">President Donald J. Trump</a>.
Since 2019, the House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee has <a href="https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/524B3B5CED10789D8525889900538BAB/$file/21-5289-1958452.pdf">attempted</a> to gain access to Trump&#8217;s tax returns from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), along with the returns from several of his businesses. While Trump was president, the Department of Treasury stated that it would not comply with the request on several legal grounds. Congress sued, and as the lawsuit made its way through court, Trump lost re-election to then-candidate Joe Biden. After Biden&#8217;s inauguration, Congress again requested Trump&#8217;s tax returns in June 2021. This time, Biden&#8217;s Treasury Department stated it would comply.
Trump&#8217;s legal team intervened to block the committee from obtaining his records. However, the U.S. District Court of D.C. dismissed Trump&#8217;s assertions, and in turn, his team appealed the case.
The U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court&#8217;s ruling on Tuesday.
In reaction to the decision, the Ways and Means Committee&#8217;s official account tweeted, &#8220;We expect to receive the requested tax returns and audit files immediately.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
🚨 🚨 🚨 BREAKING: The DC Court of Appeals has just ruled that the law is on our side in seeking Trump&#39;s tax returns. We expect to receive the requested tax returns and audit files immediately.<a href="https://t.co/FYzFzYrxF8">https://t.co/FYzFzYrxF8</a>
&mdash; Ways &amp; Means Committee (@WaysMeansCmte) <a href="https://twitter.com/WaysMeansCmte/status/1557029202158915585?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 9, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
As part of Trump&#8217;s opposition to Congress, his legal team argued that the request for his tax returns was &#8220;politically motivated.&#8221;
However, the court <a href="https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/524B3B5CED10789D8525889900538BAB/$file/21-5289-1958452.pdf">found</a> that the committee &#8220;has identified a legitimate legislative purpose that it requires information to accomplish. At this stage, it is not our place to delve deeper than this. The mere fact that individual members of Congress may have political motivations as well as legislative ones is of no moment.&#8221;
&#8220;Indeed, it is likely rare that an individual member of Congress would work for a legislative purpose without considering the political implications,&#8221; the court added. &#8220;The statements of individual Committee members and members who are not part of the Committee provided by the Trump Parties do not change this. The courts do not probe the motives of individual legislators. These motives are explicitly protected by the Speech or Debate Clause.&#8221;
Trump&#8217;s team also argued that the request violated &#8220;the separation of powers principle,&#8221; but the court did not agree with that objection either.
&#8220;The 2021 Request seeks information that may inform the United States House of Representatives Committee on Ways and Means as to the efficacy of the Presidential Audit Program,&#8221; the court <a href="https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/524B3B5CED10789D8525889900538BAB/$file/21-5289-1958452.pdf">said</a>. &#8220;Further, the Request did not violate separation of powers principles under any of the potentially applicable tests primarily because the burden on the Executive Branch and the Trump Parties is relatively minor.&#8221;
Trump&#8217;s legal team can appeal the decision.
This is a developing story; Please check back for updates.
&nbsp;

LIV Golf Invitational – Bedminster – Day One

Federal Appeals Court Rules Congress Can Go After Trump’s Tax Returns

Federal Appeals Court Rules Congress Can Go After Trump's Tax Returns

Court

Judicial Branch

<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/florida">Florida’s</a> new ban on on <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/abortion">abortion</a> after 15 weeks will remain in force while ongoing litigation over its constitutionality plays out in the courts.
Leon County Circuit Judge John Cooper issued a temporary injunction on the law last week, finding that it violated Florida’s constitution. The state appealed, which, under Florida’s court rules, triggered a stay of the injunction and allowed the law to stay in effect. Judge Cooper denied a request by abortion clinics and a physician to vacate the stay.
In their emergency motion, the plaintiffs were adamant that the injunction needed to continue.
&#8220;Every day that HB 5 (the law) remains in effect, Florida patients in desperate need of post-15-week abortion services are being turned away and forced to attempt to seek abortions out of state, if they are able to do so; to attempt abortions outside the medical system; or to continue pregnancies against their will,&#8221; the motion said.
Judge Cooper declined to do so. Pointing out the “very high burden” set by the 1st District Court of Appeals for vacating stays during the appeals process, Cooper <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/miami/news/florida-abortion-law-remain-effect-court-battle/">wrote</a> that &#8220;courts are obliged to follow binding precedent even if they might wish to decide the case differently&#8221; and noted that direction from the appeals court meant that automatic stays may only be vacated &#8220;under the most compelling circumstances.&#8221;
The law in question, HB 5, was passed in early March and drew ire of the <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/03/04/statement-by-vice-president-kamala-harris-on-florida-house-bill-5/">White House</a> and pro-abortion forces across the country — Florida’s Governor, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/ron-desantis">Ron DeSantis</a>, has regularly clashed with the Biden Administration on policy, especially on hot button issues such as <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/24/politics/biden-desantis-coronavirus/index.html">COVID restrictions</a> and <a href="https://www.newsweek.com/biden-takes-aim-desantis-transgender-executive-order-1716293">gender ideology</a>.
The law was challenged on the grounds that it violated a privacy provision in the Florida Constitution. Without the new restrictions, abortion in Florida would remain legal up through the first 24 weeks in pregnancy, and its <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/30/politics/florida-abortion-law/index.html">55 abortion clinics</a> could remain in operation and offer their services to women from neighboring states, many of which have <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-multiple-states-ban-abortion-after-scotus-ruling">trigger laws</a> that have or will ban abortion outright following the recent overturning of <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/search/news?query=trigger%20laws&amp;page=1&amp;refinementList%5Btaxonomies.post_tag%5D%5B0%5D=Roe%20v.%20Wade%27s%20Long%20And%20Brutal%20Legacy">Roe v. Wade</a>, or else have even more stringent restrictions on abortion than the proposed Florida law.
Florida has a very high rate of abortions per capita, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, and the overwhelming majority take place during the first trimester, and would remain legal even under the new restrictions. Since the overturn of Roe v. Wade Governor DeSantis has <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/24/gov-ron-desantis-calls-to-expand-pro-life-protection-after-historic-abortion-ruling-00042333">voiced</a> his desire to “expand pro-life protections” in the state, although the governor’s office has <a href="https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/why-ron-desantis-avoiding-talking-about-abortion-n1296843">declined</a> to outline specifics beyond the current 15 week ban.

70FE7BF6-7229-47DA-A97A-2B0A0884DF48_1_201_a

Florida Abortion Restrictions To Remain In Effect During Legal Battle

Florida

Ron DeSantis

A prominent gun control measure proposed by both Democratic and Republican lawmakers is unlikely to withstand judicial scrutiny, considering recent precedent.
Many of the perpetrators of recent mass shootings were below the age of 21, including the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-shooting-at-texas-elementary-school-leaves-at-least-15-dead">Uvalde</a>  and <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/buffalo-mass-shooting-suspect-had-been-flagged-as-troubled-a-year-ago-report">Buffalo</a> shooters, aged 18, and the <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/police-respond-shooting-parkland-florida-high-school-n848101">Parkland</a> shooter, aged 19.
<a href="https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/does-customer-have-be-certain-age-buy-firearms-or-ammunition-licensee">Federal law</a> already prohibits the sale of pistols to citizens under 21, but young adults can purchase rifles in <a href="https://www.thetrace.org/2022/05/uvalde-mass-shooting-ar15-age-restriction/">44 states</a> — and some are <a href="https://www.thecity.nyc/2022/5/25/23142050/hochul-raise-age-ar15-rifles-gun-control">calling for new legislation</a> that would change that.
Representative Adam Kinzinger <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/gop-congressman-claims-raising-age-to-purchase-guns-to-21-is-a-no-brainer">called the proposed measure</a> a “no-brainer”, stating that. “We know that the human brain develops and matures a lot between the ages of 18 and 21. We just raised, without really so much as a blink, the age of purchasing cigarettes federally to 21.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger tells <a href="https://twitter.com/jonkarl?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@jonkarl</a> that raising minimum age for gun purchases to 21 “is a no brainer&quot; to him.
“If you look at the Parkland shooting, you look at Buffalo, you look at this shooting, these are people under the age of 21.” <a href="https://t.co/Ndo3NsrFp7">https://t.co/Ndo3NsrFp7</a> <a href="https://t.co/mBpxDBiyJF">pic.twitter.com/mBpxDBiyJF</a>
&mdash; This Week (@ThisWeekABC) <a href="https://twitter.com/ThisWeekABC/status/1530916688153169920?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 29, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
However, earlier this month the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals <a href="https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-05-11/federal-court-rules-california-ban-on-gun-sales-to-people-under-21-unconstitutional">struck down</a> a very similar restriction in California, which banned the sale of semi-automatic rifles to young adults, with the 2-1 majority <a href="https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2022/05/11/20-56174.pdf">arguing</a> that the policy constituted an arbitrary violation of the 2nd amendment rights of adult citizens.
“America would not exist without the heroism of the young adults who fought and died in our revolutionary army,” Judge Ryan D. Nelson wrote for the majority. “Today we reaffirm that our Constitution still protects the right that enabled their sacrifice: the right of young adults to keep and bear arms.”
With <a href="https://www.wbur.org/news/2022/05/27/supreme-court-gun-control-massachusetts-impacts">consensus</a> on the bench shifting towards a broader defense of gun rights, age based restrictions on the right to purchase long guns seem unlikely to stand.
Adam Winkler, a law professor  commenting on the California case for the Los Angeles Times, called the 9th circuit’s ruling “ a harbinger of things to come,” stating that “In the coming years, the courts seem certain to strike down numerous gun safety measures in the name of the 2nd Amendment.”

Guns

Proposed Gun Sale Ban For Citizens Under 21 Unlikely To Withstand Judicial Review

California

Gun Control

Gun Rights

Gun Sales

Menu

Streaming Now