MSNBC host <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/joy-reid" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Joy Reid</a> suggested that the criminal trials against former President Donald Trump amounted to a racial reckoning of sorts, claiming that the &#8220;DEIs&#8221; were &#8220;bringing it home.&#8221;
Reid made the comments on Monday as the New York hush-money trial was just beginning, saying that she thought it was &#8220;wonderfully poetic&#8221; to see black public officials like Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis leading the cases against Trump.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Joy Reid suggests that the criminal cases brought against Trump is racially-based vengeance by black officials:
&quot;Go DEI. My DEIs are bringing it home.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/r9THOyWMGn">pic.twitter.com/r9THOyWMGn</a>
&mdash; End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) <a href="https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1780345671163273582?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 16, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;But for me, there is something wonderfully poetic about the fact … the first person to actually criminally prosecute Donald Trump is a black Harvard grad,&#8221; Reid said. &#8220;The very kind of person that his former staff, the people who worked for him, Steven Miller, etc., want to never be at Harvard Law School. But he was. And he came out and graduated, and he’s prosecuting you, Donald.&#8221;
Reid went on to reference Willis in Georgia and New York Attorney General Letitia James, noting their roles in other cases against the former president.
&#8220;And a black woman is doing that same exact thing in Georgia and a black woman forced you to pay a $175 million fine,&#8221; Reid said, calling into question the status of the bond that was posted on Trump&#8217;s behalf. &#8220;The people who put it up, that might not be legit.&#8221;
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1700760801843000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2PQrVSrJfhxNb4LcARqniG">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
&#8220;Donald Trump is being held to account by the very multicultural, multiracial democracy that he’s trying to dismantle. … It says something good about our country that we’re still capable of having that happen. Go, DEI. My DEIs are bringing it home,&#8221; she crowed.
Trump, like many Republicans, has <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2024/03/03/trump-plans-crush-dei-affirmative-action/72774345007/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">railed against</a> the focus on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) practices, telling voters in New Hampshire earlier this year, &#8220;We will terminate every diversity, equity, and inclusion program across the entire federal government.&#8221;
Governor Ron DeSantis (R-FL) has also taken steps to <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/oklahoma-governor-joins-desantis-bans-using-funds-for-dei-at-all-state-agencies-universities" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ban DEI programs</a> in Florida colleges and state offices.

Los Angeles Red Carpet Premiere Event For Hulu’s “The 1619 Project” – Arrivals

Joy Reid Suggests Trump Trials Are A ‘Poetic’ Racial Reckoning

Joy Reid Suggests Trump Trials Are A 'Poetic' Racial Reckoning

Diversity Equity and Inclusion (DEI)

Donald Trump

Joy Reid

Media

MSNBC

Politics

I’m sure I have canceled MSNBC talking head Joy Reid before. I can’t remember specifically at this moment because all of the ignoramuses discussed during my Daily Cancellation segment blend together in my mind, forming one big, loud, ball of stupid. I can only assume that Joy has been featured multiple times because she is so aggressively, obnoxiously terrible in every way a person can be terrible.
There are evil people who think they’re virtuous and there are dumb people who think they’re smart: Joy Reid falls into both categories. She even looks the part, with the bleach blond, short cropped hair and permanent scowl she looks like the kind of middle aged woman who yells at the pizza delivery guy because the pizza doesn’t have pepperoni on it, even though it’s not the delivery guy’s fault, and even though she didn’t order pepperoni. The point is, I’m not especially a fan of Joy Reid. But today we have to pay her some special attention once again, unfortunately. In fact, we are covering this today because the Joy Reid segment in question takes a certain turn that makes it even more relevant.
So, Joy took to her low-rated cable news show last night to call out the alleged racist conservatives who have been engaging in alleged racist conspiracy theories surrounding the Baltimore bridge collapse. We talked about the conspiracy theory angle yesterday, but Joy takes this in a different direction. It would probably be easiest just to play the segment and walk through all the many ways that she gets things wrong. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="004 Right Wing Conspiracy" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/MmIQV-IloCg?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
&nbsp;
Actually, Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) didn’t suggest it was an intentional attack. And even if she did, that’s not a conspiracy theory. Intentional attacks on infrastructure are a well known threat. There’s nothing outlandish about suggesting that it may have happened. But she’s not even suggesting. That tweet that Joy briefly flashes on the screen says: “There should be a serious investigation into the horrifying tragedy of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Maryland. Is this an intentional attack or an accident? Praying for the victims, survivors and families.”
Which part of that tweet is conspiratorial or outlandish? In fact, I can’t imagine a more measured and normal way to respond in a situation like this. Is Joy Reid suggesting that it’s inappropriate to even wonder whether the incident was intentional? That’s odd, because the people investigating the crash also wondered about that. So far they’re saying they don’t think it was, but that’s obviously an angle they pursued immediately. 
Are they conspiracy theorists too? Joy doesn’t say. Let’s continue:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="005 DEI" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/F3ptjOcCoC8?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
A few points here. Number one, it is fashionable to be openly racist in this country, just not against black people. But Joy Reid herself proves, and what comes next in this segment will again demonstrate, that racism against white people is indeed very fashionable.
Second, she is showing us tweets to prove whatever point she’s trying to make. As we’ve seen, the first tweet she displayed from Marjorie Taylor Green totally contradicted her point. She wants to demonstrate that conservatives are being wildly conspiratorial about this. So she showed us a tweet where Marjorie Taylor Green was completely measured and utterly reasonable. Next we see a tweet from some congressional candidate I’ve never heard of. And then we see one from an anonymous account on X called “I am yes you are no” with a cartoon profile photo. You know, that guy. That world famous conservative thinker named “I am yes you are no.”
<h4><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1335-the-mayor-of-baltimore-attacks-white-people-as-the-city-deals-with-bridge-collapse-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show</a></h4>
Now, obviously, Joy is correct that it doesn’t require DEI to get a black man elected mayor in Baltimore. Every Baltimore mayor for the past 30 years, except one, has been black. They’ve also all been terrible, as the city has plunged into decades of crime, violence, and rampant drug use, but that’s a topic for another day. But she is right that the joking nickname given to this guy by an anonymous cartoon Twitter account is not technically accurate.
As to the suggestion that DEI might have something to do with the bridge collapse itself, that may not be accurate. We still don’t know. We may never know for sure. There are many factors that played into this incident — factors that are still being investigated — and at this point it’s just not possible to say for sure whether or not DEI policies played a part. But if people immediately speculate about the role of DEI in incidents like this, it’s not because those people are so terrible. It’s because DEI is so terrible. The fact remains that DEI policies have deliberately and systematically lowered standards across the board in virtually every industry, all in the name of making every industry less white. That is a fact. It has happened. It is happening. Joy Reid supports and promotes these policies. And now we are witnessing the collapse of competence across the country because of it. 
That doesn’t mean that every catastrophe is linked to this campaign of destruction in the name of diversity. But it does mean that it’s perfectly reasonable to wonder whether any particular catastrophe is linked to it. And it also means that inevitably some people will draw that connection even before it has been factually established. That’s what happens when you come up with a racist policy that intentionally makes everything worse in every conceivable way. The problem here is the policy. Not the random Twitter accounts that Joy Reid is crying about.
But it wasn’t enough to have Joy Reid cry about them on her own. She also brought the mayor of Baltimore on the air to respond. You would think that the man has a crisis to attend to and would be too busy to spend time doing an interview to respond to a joking tweet from an anonymous Twitter account, but you would be wrong. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="006 Right Wants To be Racist" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/CgEXNyMQVws?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
I’m going to skip right past the mayor’s statement that it requires courage to say the n-word. Something tells me that if any white person did say it in his presence, he would have a lot of things to say in response, and praising them for their courage would not be one of the things. The bigger headline here is this part. He said: “Me being in this position means that their way of thinking, their way of life of being comfortable while everyone else suffers is at risk. And they should be afraid because that’s my purpose in life.”
Just to recap the situation here. The mayor of Baltimore, in the midst of a major disaster, has taken the time to go on a political talk show to play the victim because someone tweeted something mean about him. And then, in the middle of this little pageant, he proceeded to issue a threat, and even declare that his “purpose” is to put “at risk” the livelihood of these people he’s threatening. You might hope that his primary purpose right now is to figure out what to do about the fact that a bridge that carried 30 thousand commuters a day is now lying at the bottom of the Patapsco River. But apparently not.
And who is the “they” that he’s talking about here? He says that “their way of life is at risk.” And “they should be afraid.” I suppose the most charitable interpretation is that he’s talking about people he deems racist. Even that would be disturbing. An elected official — a mayor in particular — should not be threatening anyone for having thoughts he disagrees with. Much less should he be declaring that they should be afraid and that he intends to put their “way of life” at risk. 
It’s worse than that, though, because Mayor Brandon Scott of Baltimore has obviously demonstrated himself to be a typical far-Left race-baiting Democrat. We would know that even without these statements on MSNBC, simply because that’s the only kind of person who gets elected to lead cities like Baltimore these days.
Far-Left, race-baiting Democrats believe — and will tell you this explicitly, if they’re in an honest mood — that all white people are inherently racist. They certainly believe that all white conservatives are inherently racist. Which means any threat issued obliquely against racists is intended for a particular racial group. This was an anti-white statement, make no mistake about it. Just as DEI is anti-white. Which means that Mayor Scott really has earned the moniker “DEI Mayor” after all, just for a slightly different reason.

Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge Collapses After Being Struck By Cargo Ship

The Mayor Of Baltimore Attacks White People As The City Deals With Bridge Collapse

Baltimore

Francis Scott Key Bridge

Matt Walsh

Racism

Readers Pass

MSNBC host Joy Reid used her cable news platform on Wednesday to claim that officials in Texas — who have taken steps to secure the southern border where President Joe Biden&#8217;s administration has refused to act — are attempting to &#8220;resist segregation.&#8221;
Reid complained about Republican lawmakers, arguing that they preferred to keep the border crisis as a talking point rather than working with Democrats to solve the problem — but she left out the fact that Republicans in Texas were simply <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/abbott-texas-has-constitutional-right-to-defend-its-borders-from-invasion-supersedes-all-federal-law" target="_blank" rel="noopener">attempting to enforce the federal laws</a> that the Biden administration was not enforcing.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
MSNBC&#39;s Joy Reid compares <a href="https://twitter.com/chiproytx?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@chiproytx</a>&#39;s call to protect the southern border to &quot;the old Southerners who said that we will resist integration by any means necessary&quot;. To the racial demagogue, everything looks like racism. <a href="https://t.co/a876itUHCb">pic.twitter.com/a876itUHCb</a>
&mdash; Jorge Bonilla (@BonillaJL) <a href="https://twitter.com/BonillaJL/status/1750358635534848375?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 25, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;There is no better example of what MAGA World wants for the rest of America than Texas,&#8221; Reid said, claiming that Governor Greg Abbott (R) had ordered the Texas National Guard to implement &#8220;draconian measures meant to secure the border.&#8221;
She went on to describe the scene, saying that Texas state officials had been &#8220;setting up buoys with buzz saws, barring federal agents from assisting with border control, and passing legislation that makes it a state crime to cross the border.&#8221;
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1700760801843000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2PQrVSrJfhxNb4LcARqniG">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
Reid went on to attack Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX), saying that he was &#8220;a member of a body and party that could actually do something about immigration &#8230; They just refuse to do it because many Republicans now see calling for zero tolerance on the border as the only way to animate their base.&#8221;
She concluded the thought by claiming that Texas Republicans sounded &#8220;like the old southerners who said that we will resist integration by any means necessary.&#8221;
Reid&#8217;s comments echo those coming directly from the White House, where Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has defended the Biden administration&#8217;s repeated attempts to prevent Texas from securing its own border — and even <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/white-house-doubles-down-on-statement-blaming-texas-for-drowned-migrants" target="_blank" rel="noopener">blamed Texas officials</a> for the drowning deaths of three migrants, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/white-house-fact-checked-by-own-officials-on-migrant-drowning" target="_blank" rel="noopener">despite the fact</a> that the migrants had been dead for more than an hour before Mexican authorities told anyone it had happened.

Joy Reid: Texas Is No Different Than The Deep South Resisting Integration

Border

Border Crisis

Border Patrol

National Guard

Texas

When Ron DeSantis abruptly canceled his media appearances over the weekend, it led to a lot of speculation that he&#8217;d be ending his presidential campaign. On Sunday, that&#8217;s exactly what happened. Facing the prospect of a distant third-place finish in the New Hampshire primary, DeSantis bowed out and endorsed Donald Trump.
On one hand, the disappointment from DeSantis&#8217; supporters is understandable. He&#8217;s a fantastic governor who&#8217;s more effective at advancing conservative policies than any other politician alive today. There&#8217;s no doubting that.
At the same time, there&#8217;s also no question that it&#8217;s a good thing the primary effectively ended this weekend, as opposed to an even more protracted war of infighting among conservatives. Millions more dollars won&#8217;t be wasted on pointless attack ads. Donald Trump will be the party&#8217;s nominee, no matter how often Nikki Haley reminds us that she&#8217;s a woman and a &#8220;person of color&#8221; who was bullied just for being brown on the mean streets of Bamberg, South Carolina.
This thing is over — and that means that the Right can unite against its real enemies — powerful forces in society who hate this country, despise its people, and who seek to destroy our families and corrupt our children.
One of the clearest examples of this effort is the sheer scale and dishonesty of the Left&#8217;s fraudulent war against what they call &#8220;book bans.&#8221; As City Journal has noted, politicians at every level of government — from Governor Chris Sununu in New Hampshire to former representative Liz Cheney in Wyoming — have <a href="https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-left-twists-the-meaning-of-book-ban" target="_blank" rel="noopener">claimed</a> that schools are censoring classic reading materials, particularly in school libraries, at the behest of the Republican Party. Joe Biden has even <a href="https://www.npr.org/2023/06/08/1180941627/biden-pride-month-book-bans" target="_blank" rel="noopener">appointed</a> a &#8220;book ban coordinator&#8221; to pursue civil rights cases against libraries that offend the LGBTQ cult with their censorship. Biden also launched his re-election bid eight months ago with a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChjibtX0UzU" target="_blank" rel="noopener">video</a> falsely implying that Florida had banned the book &#8220;To Kill a Mockingbird.&#8221; That simply wasn&#8217;t true, as even the Associated Press later <a href="https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-florida-schools-to-kill-a-mockingbird-201081596097" target="_blank" rel="noopener">admitted</a>.
The truth is that this campaign against &#8220;book bans&#8221; is nothing more than a crusade to put pornography in schools. That&#8217;s been clear for a while now. We&#8217;ve all seen the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z146klZXeOw" target="_blank" rel="noopener">footage</a> of parents repeatedly getting thrown out of school board meetings, just for reading passages from the pornographic books in their child&#8217;s school libraries. There&#8217;s dozens of those videos out there at this point. This is about exposing children to smut. Everyone sees that.
<h4><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1298-it-s-time-to-unite-against-the-real-enemy-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show</a></h4>
What&#8217;s changed is that now, with the election rapidly approaching, the forces pushing this degeneracy are emboldened. They&#8217;re dropping the pretense that they&#8217;re worried about &#8220;discrimination&#8221; or &#8220;teaching history&#8221; or whatever. They are at this point all but coming right out and saying that they want to expose children to pornographic materials. And they&#8217;re doing it with the express support of the largest media conglomerates on the planet.
If you doubt that, watch this <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GtGRPls40o" target="_blank" rel="noopener">remarkable footage</a> from MSNBC the other day. This is from Joy Reid&#8217;s show. It remains one of the great marvels of the world that Joy Reid, despite being viscerally unpleasant to listen to or look at, and despite having nothing important to say, and having never offered an even mildly interesting insight into any topic ever in her entire life, still has a show — that, for yet another week, has not been canceled. But then again, this is MSNBC. They specialize in giving extraordinarily annoying and unappealing and stupid people TV shows. Al Sharpton still has a show on that network, after all, last I checked.
Anyway, back to Joy Reid. She was interviewing the co-founder of the group &#8220;Moms for Liberty,&#8221; a woman named Tiffany Justice. Before we get to the clip, here&#8217;s the backstory: What&#8217;s bothering MSNBC is that Moms for Liberty doesn&#8217;t want a book called &#8220;All Boys Aren&#8217;t Blue: A Memoir-Manifesto,&#8221; written by LGBTQ activist George Johnson, to be available for children to check out from school libraries. This is a book that includes <a href="https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-left-twists-the-meaning-of-book-ban" target="_blank" rel="noopener">descriptions</a> of anal rape and incest which are too graphic for me to share with you. This is the disadvantage we find ourselves in when it comes to this issue. You really need to hear specifically what’s in these books to fully appreciate just how deranged these people are for wanting to put these books in schools. But the material is so objectionable and disgusting that I simply will not share it. So you can go look it up for yourself and see. Suffice it to say that the book contains very, very detailed accounts of rape, sodomy, and other things.
There are hundreds of thousands of books in circulation that do not have any of that sort of content. There is no reason why this book, especially, of all books, needs to be in a school library.
This is a book that, according to local <a href="https://www.alreporter.com/2024/01/08/moms-for-liberty-sends-letter-to-lawmakers-urging-action-on-libraries/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reports</a>, is available in the young adult nonfiction section of two libraries in Huntsville, Alabama. These sections are for children between the ages of 12 and 18, which is roughly in line with the publisher&#8217;s age recommendation for this book. According to Moms for Liberty, there are records of a child as young as 9-years-old checking out &#8220;All Boys Aren&#8217;t Blue&#8221; from the library.
What&#8217;s incredible is that, in this interview, Joy Reid doesn&#8217;t dispute anything about the content of the book, or how obscene it is. She doesn&#8217;t concede that maybe 9-year-old children shouldn&#8217;t be reading this. Instead she goes out of her way to defend the book.
Joy Reid begins by complaining that parents are going online and sharing passages from the book that she says are somehow &#8220;taken out of context.&#8221; 
Then she makes a very familiar argument. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="008 Moms For Liberty Expertise" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/uVtAnC786bE?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>
&#8220;You&#8217;re not an expert, unlike whoever gave this pornographic book an award. Therefore, shut up; you don&#8217;t get to have an opinion.&#8221; That&#8217;s what she&#8217;s saying. 
You may have noticed that it&#8217;s become a common rhetorical tactic on the Left, whether they&#8217;re talking about climate change or transgenderism or &#8220;book bans&#8221; or pretty much anything. In the absence of any guiding moral principles, they&#8217;re now fully reliant on the expert class, to the point that they can&#8217;t think for themselves anymore — and they don&#8217;t want you to think for yourself, either. We&#8217;re at the point where they don&#8217;t want you to object to pornography in the children’s section without first getting an expert&#8217;s approval. Just think about this for a moment. Joy Reid is claiming that you cannot object to children being exposed to books about anal rape unless you are an expert. Which raises the question: expert in what? What the hell kind of expert do you need to be to understand the simple common sense fact that 12-year-olds don’t need to be reading graphic sexual content? How long until they tell you that you&#8217;re not allowed to object to full-on child pornography or pedophilia unless you’re an “expert”? Based on their logic, at this rate, it probably won&#8217;t be long. In fact, that’s basically where we are, right now.
Of course, in that clip, Joy takes this approach to a new level of absurdity, when she demands that Tiffany Justice name the author of the book &#8220;All Boys Aren&#8217;t Blue.&#8221; And I guess, because Justice couldn&#8217;t provide the guy&#8217;s full name quickly enough, we&#8217;re supposed to conclude that she&#8217;s not an &#8220;expert&#8221; in the book. And therefore, she&#8217;s excluded from having any opinion on the topic. Because, you know, you can’t object to children being exposed to sexual content unless you can give the full name of the person who created the sexual content. Makes total sense, if you have brain damage.
Speaking of brain damage, what follows from Joy Reid next, as you probably could&#8217;ve guessed, is the usual disingenuous &#8220;parental rights&#8221; argument.
The idea is that parents should be able to expose their children to whatever they want, and reasonable people shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to step in and prevent that. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="009 No Ones Right To Ban This Book" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/5WGSSSXubho?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>
So to recap, the conversation began with Joy suggesting that the &#8220;context&#8221; of the book makes it acceptable somehow. But she never explained what &#8220;context&#8221; would justify showing a child a graphic description of anal rape and incest. Now she circles back to her original point, in a roundabout way. She implies that some children could benefit from reading this story because they&#8217;d feel &#8220;seen&#8221; and represented in the pages. And if parents want to encourage that, then we&#8217;re supposed to go along with it.
She actually says that. Again, just to be clear, this is not a book that encourages kids to take up sports, or solve mysteries, or learn about space flight. This book is exposing children as young as 9-years-old to graphic scenes of anal rape. According to the corporate press, children should read books like this and see themselves in them. As Tiffany Justice pointed out, the implications of that are pretty dark, to say the least. This gets to the heart of what this whole debate is about, which is the Left&#8217;s attempt to legitimize deviant sexual contact with children. It&#8217;s not hard to conclude that the reason they want to show children these books about graphic underage sex is that they see no problem with children engaging in this kind of behavior.
That could be why — throughout this whole interview — Joy never once condemns the contents of this book. She doesn&#8217;t say that some children probably shouldn&#8217;t read it. Instead, she falls back on this idea that parental rights are absolute, and we should never be able to dictate what other parents can and can&#8217;t do.
Notice the incoherence of this argument. First, Joy says that no one can have an opinion about this book unless they&#8217;re an expert, and they&#8217;ve read it cover-to-cover and can name the author&#8217;s full name and give his date of birth and social security number. Then, a few minutes later, Joy says that every parent should have the right to show their kid this book, and their decision must be respected no matter what.
This is what&#8217;s called a contradiction, and people who understand basic principles of logic can spot it right away. But people like Joy, and the rest of the corporate press, are too concerned with ideology to bother with principles. That&#8217;s why, rather than present any kind of argument for why children need to read about anal sex, Joy concludes the interview by launching into bizarre personal attacks on Moms for Liberty. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="010 Why These Few Ban Books" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7zpWB3SfN2w?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>
I have no idea if any of these allegations are true. From what Tiffany Justice says, they seem shaky, but honestly it doesn&#8217;t matter. They&#8217;re a painfully transparent attempt to distract from the issue that this whole interview was about. Even if all of that is true — even if Moms for Liberty is full of the worst people on the planet — even if they’re all serial killers and Nazis and super villains — does that suddenly make it appropriate to supply children with reading material about anal rape? It makes no sense. But this is all Joy Reid can do. She doesn&#8217;t want to talk about the books, or why she wants children to read them. Instead, she just wants to attack the people who are pointing out what&#8217;s in these books.
<h4><a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a></h4>
It&#8217;s hard to put into words the depth of evil that&#8217;s on display here. This isn&#8217;t just one race hustler on MSNBC talking like this. It&#8217;s pretty much all of the corporate press, along with the Biden administration, who are committed to pushing this smut in schools. It&#8217;s going to take an equally forceful, concerted effort to stop them from succeeding.
In fact, this month lawmakers in Florida <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/florida-gop-lawmakers-seek-ban-rainbow-flags-schools-saying-re-bad-stu-rcna134475" target="_blank" rel="noopener">introduced</a> a bill that represents a very good start. The legislation would ban teachers and government employees from displaying the so-called &#8220;pride&#8221; rainbow flag, or associated lapel pins, in public buildings and schools, for obvious reasons: the flag is a symbol of a radical religious cult that&#8217;s specifically used to target children and indoctrinate them into an ideology that seeks, at every turn, to sexualize and corrupt them. Soon, if the bill passes, the symbol — which became omnipresent sometime in the past decade — will be gone.
It&#8217;s simple and effective proposals like this that have made Florida under Ron DeSantis an attractive state for conservative families to live in. He&#8217;s not campaigning for president anymore, but he&#8217;s still going to be a leader in this fight, which could not be more urgent at this point.
What&#8217;s needed now — especially as the primary effectively comes to a close — is for every conservative to unite and join in.

Drag Story-Time Event Held In Austin, Texas, Week Ahead Of Restrictive Bill Going Into Effect

It’s Time To Unite Against The Real Enemy

It's Time To Unite Against The Real Enemy

Books

Children's Books

LGBTQ

Public Schools

Woke Culture

Sirius XM radio host Megyn Kelly laid into MSNBC host Joy Reid over a Friday evening interview that aired on &#8220;The Reidout.&#8221;
During the interview in question, Reid repeatedly attempted to attack Moms for Liberty co-founder Tiffany Justice — and in doing so, she found herself defending pornographic materials in schools and in the hands of children.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Moms For Liberty Founder to MSNBC host Joy Reid:
“In what context is a strap on dildo acceptable in a public school?”
🎥 <a href="https://twitter.com/TPostMillennial?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TPostMillennial</a> 
 <a href="https://t.co/r4rUibSbmf">pic.twitter.com/r4rUibSbmf</a>
&mdash; Oli London (@OliLondonTV) <a href="https://twitter.com/OliLondonTV/status/1749061995989484007?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 21, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Reid began the segment by complaining about some books — particularly some with explicit LGBTQ+ themes — being &#8220;banned,&#8221; but Justice pushed back immediately, noting that there was no actual ban in effect.
&#8220;No one is banning books. Write the book, print the book, publish the book put the book in the public library, sell the book, right? We&#8217;re talking about a public school library,&#8221; she said, saying that it wasn&#8217;t a ban so much as a move to ensure that inappropriate materials would not end up in the hands of young children.
Reid continued down the same path, however, complaining that conservatives were advocating book bans without knowing what was actually in the books or by taking certain key words from those books &#8220;out of context&#8221; in order to make them sound offensive.
&#8220;In what context is a strap-on dildo acceptable for public schools? Tell me what the context around a strap-on dildo or the rape of a minor child by a teacher?&#8221; Justice asked in response.
Justice was not alone in her assessment of the book Reid mentioned — &#8220;All Boys Aren&#8217;t Blue.&#8221; Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) read an excerpt of the book aloud on the Senate floor during a hearing last September, prompting an awkward response from Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias.
&#8220;Those words are disturbing coming from your mouth,&#8221; Giannoulias said to Kennedy — but he said nothing about the fact that Illinois allows children access to those same &#8220;disturbing&#8221; words.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Sen. Kennedy reads passages from pornographic books Genderqueer and All Boys are Blue.
The Illinois Sec. of State Alexi Giannoulias responds by saying &quot;those words are disturbing coming from your mouth.&quot;
His state&#39;s new law stops parents from being able to remove it from… <a href="https://t.co/eDehdhctQL">pic.twitter.com/eDehdhctQL</a>
&mdash; Greg Price (@greg_price11) <a href="https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1701628434894446999?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 12, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Reid went on to argue that Moms for Liberty should not have the right to &#8220;ban&#8221; such books, saying that stories like the one in question might allow an LGBTQ child to &#8220;feel seen.&#8221; Instead, she asserted that the parents of those children should have the right to demand that their children have access to them.
The argument continued, and Justice suggested that perhaps the more explicit books should be kept where younger students would not stumble across them by accident.
&#8220;Maybe we can just put all the books with all the graphic sexual content — the dildos, the raping &#8230;&#8221; she began, but Reid interrupted.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1700760801843000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2PQrVSrJfhxNb4LcARqniG">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
&#8220;I&#8217;m so sorry, excuse me, excuse me, excuse me! I have seen tapes of what Moms For Liberty does, and you all go into school board meetings and you read graphic stuff,&#8221; Reid complained, suggesting that parents drawing attention to the graphic content was more egregious than the content itself.
&#8220;Joy, this is a disingenuous conversation,&#8221; Justice shot back. &#8220;America used to understand that there&#8217;s a thing called age-appropriate content.&#8221;
Kelly&#8217;s response to the entire exchange — and Reid&#8217;s position in particular — was simple: &#8220;This idiot actually wanted to know what &#8216;expertise&#8217; [Justice] has to object to minors in school reading about strap-on dildos &amp; incestual pedophilia.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
This idiot actually wanted to know what “expertise” <a href="https://twitter.com/4TiffanyJustice?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@4TiffanyJustice</a> has to object to minors in school reading about strap-on dildos &amp; incestual pedophilia. <a href="https://t.co/kv2xi7toey">https://t.co/kv2xi7toey</a>
&mdash; Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) <a href="https://twitter.com/megynkelly/status/1749260353978925540?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 22, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Megyn Kelly

Megyn Kelly Torches ‘Idiot’ Joy Reid Over Interview Defending Pornography In Schools

Megyn Kelly Torches 'Idiot' Joy Reid Over Interview Defending Pornography In Schools

Pornography

Schools

U.S.

Republican presidential candidate <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/nikki-haley" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Nikki Haley</a> fired back at MSNBC&#8217;s Joy Reid on Tuesday after Reid claimed that Haley underperformed in Iowa because the Republican Party is racist.
Reid made her remarks after Haley, who had been labeled as the &#8220;surging&#8221; candidate ahead of Iowa, finished third in the state, which came despite her political operation spending more money there than any other candidate.
&#8220;It’s the elephant in the room,&#8221; said Reid. &#8220;She’s still a brown lady that’s got to try to win in a party that is deeply anti-immigrant, and which accepts the notion you can say immigrants are poisoning the blood of our country. She’s getting birthered by Donald Trump, and I don’t care how much the donor class likes her — which will ramp up a lot the better she does in New Hampshire — it’s still a challenge.&#8221;
Haley responded during a Fox News segment on Tuesday morning, saying that Reid &#8220;lives in a different America than I do.&#8221;
&#8220;I mean, yes, I&#8217;m a brown girl that grew up in a small rural town in South Carolina who became the first female minority governor in history, who became a U.N. ambassador, and who is now running for president. If that&#8217;s not the American dream, I don&#8217;t know what is,&#8221; she said. &#8220;You can sit there and give me all the reasons why you think I can&#8217;t do this. I will continue to defy everybody on why we can do this, and we will get it done.&#8221;
When a Fox News host asked Haley if the Republican Party was racist, Haley responded: &#8220;No, we&#8217;re not.&#8221;
&#8220;We&#8217;re not a racist country,&#8221; she said. &#8220;We&#8217;ve never been a racist country. Our goal is to make sure that today is better than yesterday. Are we perfect? No, but our goal is to always make sure we try and be more perfect every day that we can.&#8221;
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1700760801843000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2PQrVSrJfhxNb4LcARqniG">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
&#8220;I know I faced racism when I was growing up, but I can tell you today is a lot better than it was then,&#8221; she added. &#8220;Our goal is to lift up everybody, not go and divide people on race or gender or party or anything else. We&#8217;ve had enough of that in America. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m so passionate about doing this. I don&#8217;t want my kids growing up where they&#8217;re sitting there thinking that they&#8217;re disadvantaged because of a color or gender. I want them to know that if they work hard, they can do and be anything they want to be in America.&#8221;
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
&#8220;We&#8217;ve never been a racist country.&#8221;
— Nikki Haley rejects Joy Reid&#8217;s claim that Haley placed third in the Iowa caucuses because she is &#8220;a brown lady &#8230; in a party that is deeply anti-immigrant,&#8221; and rejects any claim that the GOP is a racist party <a href="https://t.co/a3yRqK82em">pic.twitter.com/a3yRqK82em</a>
— The Recount (@therecount) <a href="https://twitter.com/therecount/status/1747333013862490148?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 16, 2024</a></blockquote>

Nikki Haley Begins New Hampshire Campaign With Event In Bretton Woods

Nikki Haley Fires Back At Joy Reid After She Claims Haley Lost Iowa Due To Racism: ‘We’ve Never Been A Racist Country’

Nikki Haley Fires Back At Joy Reid After She Claims Haley Lost Iowa Due To Racism: 'We've Never Been A Racist Country'

Elections

Nikki Haley

MSNBC host Joy Reid summarily declared that &#8220;white Christians&#8221; were to blame after multiple media outlets projected a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/trump-projected-to-win-iowa-caucuses" target="_blank" rel="noopener">decisive victory</a> for former President Donald Trump in Monday evening&#8217;s Iowa caucuses.
Reid pointed out the fact that 61% of Iowans are white Christians — compared to 41% of all Americans — and then claimed that they primarily supported Trump because they believed God had given the United States to them and Trump would help them to get it back.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Joy Reid of MSNBC is complaining because there are too many white Christians in Iowa <a href="https://t.co/yLqFdZeZzU">pic.twitter.com/yLqFdZeZzU</a>
&mdash; Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) <a href="https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1747102011013697838?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 16, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Reid explained that before the caucuses, she had sought the advice of one Robert &#8220;Robbie&#8221; Jones — who is the president and founder of Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) and author of &#8220;The Hidden Roots of White Supremacy.&#8221;
&#8220;&#8216;[White Christians] see themselves as the rightful inheritors of this country, and Trump has promised to give it back to them,'&#8221; Reid quoted Jones as saying.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
&#8220;All the things that we think about, about electability, about what are people gaming out, but none of that matters when you believe that God has given you this country, that it is yours, and that everyone who is not a white, conservative Christian is a fraudulent American, is a less real American,&#8221; Reid extrapolated on Jones&#8217; comments. &#8220;Then you don’t care about electability. You care about what God has given you.&#8221;
The remainder of <a href="https://www.mediaite.com/politics/joy-reid-blames-nikki-haleys-third-place-iowa-finish-on-racism-shes-still-a-brown-lady-in-a-deeply-anti-immigrant-party/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Reid&#8217;s analysis</a> continued in that same vein — she claimed that racism in the Republican Party was the reason for former Governor Nikki Haley&#8217;s (R-SC) third-place finish behind Trump and Governor Ron DeSantis (R-FL).
&#8220;It’s the elephant in the room. She’s still a brown lady that’s got to try to win in a party that is deeply anti-immigrant, and which accepts the notion you can say immigrants are poisoning the blood of our country,&#8221; Reid said. &#8220;She’s getting birthered by Donald Trump, and I don’t care how much the donor class likes her — which will ramp up a lot the better she does in New Hampshire — it’s still a challenge.&#8221;

Joy Reid Blames ‘White Christians’ For Trump Domination In Iowa

Joy Reid Blames 'White Christians' For Trump Domination In Iowa

Christians

Iowa Caucuses

MSNBC host <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/joy-reid" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Joy Reid</a> attempted to set a rhetorical trap for her guest — an Israeli official — and ended up mired in it herself when she suggested that Israeli forces would employ a different strategy if they were targeting Hamas terrorists in Israel rather than in Gaza.
Reid set up the question to Mark Regev, former Israeli Ambassador to the United Kingdom, asking whether Israel would &#8220;drop 2,000-pound bombs&#8221; on a hospital inside their own borders to take out a Hamas leader — with the implication being that Israel cared less about collateral damage and the possibility of civilian casualties when the civilians were Palestinians.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Joy Reid proposes a ridiculous hypothetical to an Israeli official asking: If Hamas&#39;s top leader in Gaza &quot;was hiding in Israeli territory, hiding in a hospital there&#8230;would Israel drop 2,000-pound bombs on that hospital?&quot; In reality, the IDF used ground forces to take al Shifa. <a href="https://t.co/Ed61urkzrk">pic.twitter.com/Ed61urkzrk</a>
&mdash; Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) <a href="https://twitter.com/NickFondacaro/status/1734621101660004373?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 12, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;Let me ask you this question,&#8221; Reid began. &#8220;If you were to discover, the Israeli military were to discover that Yahya Sinwar, who is the Hamas militant who planned the 10/7 attacks, was actually hiding in Israeli territory, hiding in a hospital there with his militants, with his men — would Israel drop 2,000-pound bombs on that hospital?&#8221;
&#8220;We probably — if it was inside Israel and we had control of the ground, we&#8217;d send in our special forces as we have in the past when you&#8217;ve got sort of terrorist situations, and we would eliminate him,&#8221; Regev replied.
&#8220;And you would not do that in Gaza,&#8221; Reid doubled down, again implying that Israeli forces were not taking care to minimize civilian casualties.
&#8220;We actually — no, we have. We have sent ground forces into Gaza,&#8221; Regev pushed back. &#8220;We&#8217;re losing soldiers in very difficult firefights between us and the Hamas terrorists. We will reach Sinwar, it&#8217;s only a matter of time.&#8221;
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1700760801843000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2PQrVSrJfhxNb4LcARqniG">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
Reid quickly moved to accuse Israel of a &#8220;violation of the Geneva conventions,&#8221; arguing it was a war crime to force captured Hamas terrorists to strip down to their underwear.
Regev pushed back on that as well, telling Reid, &#8220;So, can I say that the reason they have been asked to strip, except for their underwear, is because Hamas, of course, has been one of the pioneers of the use of explosive vests. And we have had too much experience with people from Hamas blowing themselves up and in the process, killing Israelis around them. And that we would ask people who have surrendered to strip off temporarily. That is a necessity of difficult combat with a terrorist group that has used this tactic repeatedly in the past. Too many Israelis have died from Hamas terrorists who have exploded themselves with explosive vests.&#8221;
Israel Defense Forces did, as Regev said, send <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/idf-raids-main-gaza-hospital-housing-hamas-underground-hq-delivers-medical-supplies-to-doctors">special forces operators</a> in on the ground to execute the raid on Gaza&#8217;s Shifa Hospital that took place in mid-November.
In addition, multiple sources have confirmed that Israel Defense Forces have repeatedly taken great pains to <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/john-kirby-its-very-rare-for-a-modern-military-to-go-as-far-as-israel-does-to-prevent-civilian-casualties">avoid civilian casualties</a> whenever possible.

Joy Reid Tries To Hit Israeli Official With ‘Gotcha’ Question, Gets Caught In Her Own Trap

Joy Reid Tries To Hit Israeli Official With 'Gotcha' Question, Gets Caught In Her Own Trap

Gaza

Hamas

Israel

Sen. <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/john-fetterman-calls-on-bob-menendez-to-resign-from-u-s-senate" target="_blank" rel="noopener">John Fetterman</a> (D-PA) weighed in on the growing calls for Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) to resign in the wake of federal indictments for bribery, claiming that fictional mobster Tony Soprano was the last man to stash that much cash in New Jersey.
<a href="https://www.mediaite.com/tv/fetterman-compares-menendez-to-tony-soprano-its-not-a-close-call-he-needs-to-go/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Fetterman</a>, who was the first of a number of Democrats to call for Menendez to step down, joined MSNBC host Joy Reid on &#8220;The ReidOut&#8221; to discuss the situation on Tuesday evening.
Reid posed the question to <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/john-fetterman-delivers-nasty-insult-to-gop-leaves-msnbc-host-stammering" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Fetterman</a>, asking how he felt about being the first to call for a member of his own party to resign — and the Pennsylvania senator said that given the charges against Menendez, he was surprised no one else had beaten him to it.
&#8220;Honestly, I was actually surprised that I was the first one. I mean, it’s so black and white. I mean, it’s so clear,&#8221; Fetterman told Reid. &#8220;The last time there’s ever been a man with so much cash in their home in New Jersey was Tony Soprano. You know?&#8221;
&#8220;I mean, it’s not a — it’s not a — it’s not a close call, and if you were looking for the most incriminating kinds of evidence, nobody could even come up with gold bars in a mattress,&#8221; Fetterman continued. &#8220;So, and again, he’s entitled to have his day in court, but he is not entitled to remain in the Senate and he needs to go.&#8221;
Reid continued to press, asking whether Fetterman had spoken to any of his colleagues about what they might have to say on the subject — and he argued that while he couldn&#8217;t speak for any of them, he was not going to budge in his assessment.
&#8220;New Jersey is a safe, blue seat, and they have a governor ready to appoint somebody that’s ready to step in and make the kind of votes that he needs to do. And again, it’s never been about him. It’s about the Senate and the integrity, and he needs to go,&#8221; he said.
Reid also asked Fetterman about the recently-relaxed Senate dress code — which most have attributed to his steadfast refusal to wear anything dressier than a hoodie and gym shorts — and he argued that it was less important than other issues the Senate was facing.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1695922680238000&amp;usg=AOvVaw1td8rZHHPiCaFajmmCGDcy">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
.<a href="https://twitter.com/JohnFetterman?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JohnFetterman</a>⁩: “⁦<a href="https://twitter.com/tedcruz?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@tedcruz</a>⁩ could show up dressed like Spiderman &amp; I would be a-OK w/ that. I do think we have more important kinds of things to be worrying about, you know, whether it’s gold bars in a mattress or whether it’s the shutdown or the impeachment” <a href="https://t.co/Fkt1AhTNiL">pic.twitter.com/Fkt1AhTNiL</a>
&mdash; Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) <a href="https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1706987342114746557?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 27, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;Ted Cruz could show up dressed like Spiderman and I would be A-OK with that,&#8221; Fetterman joked. &#8220;I do think we have more important kinds of things to be worrying about, you know, whether it’s gold bars in a mattress or whether it’s the shutdown or the impeachment.&#8221;

Tech CEOs Attend Sen. Schumer’s Senate AI Forum

John Fetterman On Menendez: The Last Guy To Stash That Much Cash In Jersey Was Tony Soprano

Bob Menendez

John Fetterman

Senate

In the light of recent Supreme Court decisions upholding the Constitution, Democrats are seeking ways to get the Court to stop doing that.
The controversy began after the court issued rulings forbidding racism in college admissions, allowing people to express opinions of which the state disapproves, and denying Joe Biden the right to steal our money to pay for college loans we didn’t take out. The Democrat party feels these decisions are unfair because without racism, censorship, and stealing people’s money, there would be no Democrat party. Then Democrats would no longer be able to help people and would lose their jobs and be forced to live on the streets with all the people they&#8217;ve helped.
Young people especially are pressuring the Biden administration to take measures to stop the court from enforcing the Constitution. The young people argue that some stupid 18th century document written on weird crinkly brown paper in a font that isn’t even on their cell phones should not outweigh the uninformed opinions of a bunch of self-certain cretins who have enough time on their hands to create elaborately produced TikTok videos about purple Grimace milkshakes and then wonder why they can’t pay back their student loans.
One Democrat suggestion on how to fix the court’s upholding-the-Constitution problem involves expanding the court from nine justices to nine justices, three Barack Obama bobble-head dolls, and one Bose Soundlink playing &#8216;Don’t Feel Right&#8217; at full volume to distract from Democrat&#8217;s racism, censorship, and stealing your money.
Another suggestion is that Congress should pass a new code of ethics for the court, so they can impeach any justices who have ethics.
Still yet another idea came from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who delivered an impassioned speech in Congress while the men in the chamber attempted to click on her, hoping to see more pictures of women with large breasts, only to be disappointed by some boring slideshow of black-and-white photographs of turn of the century New York. Miss Ocasio-Cortez said, “I have some very serious thoughts about how to curtail the power of the court and I believe…” But then everyone stopped listening to her because, really, who cares about turn-of-the-century New York?
Another suggestion came from Rhode Island Senator and thuggish lowlife Sheldon Whitehouse who wrote a letter to Chief Justice John Roberts saying, “As the Supreme Court is an essential part of our democracy, it would be a shame if it was sprayed with machine gun bullets tomorrow unless the court delivers the correct decisions to my office before noon in an unmarked brown paper bag.” In a statement released to the press, Senator Ted Cruz criticized Whitehouse, saying his letter constituted a subtle threat against the court. Senator Whitehouse responded to the statement by sending the press a pair of Cruz’s pants wrapped around a dead fish.
Amazingly, the news media has reiterated the Democrat party&#8217;s ideas without the Democrats moving their lips even once. In fact, NPR smeared Clarence Thomas for fake ethics violations even while Nancy Pelosi was drinking a glass of water. MSNBC Host Joy Reid protested the Supreme Court’s anti-racism decision by saying she could never have gotten into Harvard if it weren’t for affirmative action, as if anyone had ever thought for even a moment that Joy Reid could have gotten into Harvard without affirmative action. The Washington Post, where &#8216;Democracy dies in Darkness&#8217; after the Washington Post pushes it down a flight of stairs into darkness, has repeatedly tried to sell the narrative that Joe Biden will lose the votes of young people if he doesn’t destroy the freedom of the court, although it might also help if Biden stopped firing buckshot at young people and screaming “Get off my lawn.”
Meanwhile, the court is facing another session of important cases that will decide, for instance, whether states can require you to show proof of age before pretending to listen to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, whether the second amendment guarantees the right of Supreme Court justices to bear arms while exchanging gunfire with Sheldon Whitehouse, and whether the first amendment protects the right of the Washington Post to say ‘Democracy Dies in Darkness’ or if, coming from the Washington Post, that’s actually kind of a threat.
*  *  *
Andrew Klavan is the host of “<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/show/the-andrew-klavan-show" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Andrew Klavan Show</a>” at The Daily Wire. He is an award-winning novelist, Hollywood screenwriter, and popular satirist. Klavan is the author of &#8220;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/When-Christmas-Comes-Andrew-Klavan/dp/1613162405/ref=pd_bxgy_sccl_2/132-9473875-2662038?pd_rd_w=x29DZ&amp;content-id=amzn1.sym.26a5c67f-1a30-486b-bb90-b523ad38d5a0&amp;pf_rd_p=26a5c67f-1a30-486b-bb90-b523ad38d5a0&amp;pf_rd_r=X7J7YCZYPAH29407AXTY&amp;pd_rd_wg=M65Ef&amp;pd_rd_r=c2bb5bb5-dd27-434d-9ca1-f2098f486a81&amp;pd_rd_i=1613162405&amp;psc=1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">When Christmas Comes</a>&#8221; and &#8220;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Strange-Habit-Mind-Cameron-Mysteries/dp/1613163517/ref=pd_bxgy_sccl_1/132-9473875-2662038?pd_rd_w=lnVGk&amp;content-id=amzn1.sym.26a5c67f-1a30-486b-bb90-b523ad38d5a0&amp;pf_rd_p=26a5c67f-1a30-486b-bb90-b523ad38d5a0&amp;pf_rd_r=13RV0285EXYKN2D57RST&amp;pd_rd_wg=jW34u&amp;pd_rd_r=e0bb3c70-62ea-4448-8be5-a7cf1bba3f5e&amp;pd_rd_i=1613163517&amp;psc=1">Strange Habit of Mind,</a>&#8221; the first two novels in the USA Today best-selling Cameron Winter Mystery series. The third installment, &#8220;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/House-Death-Cameron-Winter-Mysteries-ebook/dp/B0BW1ZTVP9?ref_=ast_author_dp">The House of Love and Death</a>,&#8221; releases on October 31, 2023, and is now available for <a href="https://www.amazon.com/House-Death-Cameron-Winter-Mysteries-ebook/dp/B0BW1ZTVP9?ref_=ast_author_dp" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Pre-order</a>.
Follow Klavan on Twitter: @andrewklavan
This excerpt is taken from the opening satirical monologue of “<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1138-can-the-west-be-won-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Andrew Klavan Show.</a>”
The views expressed in this satirical article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

US-JUSTICE-SUPREME-COURT-GROUP-PHOTO

The Supreme Court’s ‘Upholding-The-Constitution’ Problem

Andrew Klavan

Clarence Thomas

Constitution

Joe Biden

Satire

<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/transgender" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Transgender</a> activist Charlotte Clymer asserted that conservatives such as Daily Wire host <a href="http://dailywire.com/topic/michael-knowles" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Michael Knowles</a> contradict the teachings of <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/jesus-christ" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jesus</a> by speaking against radical gender ideology.
Clymer, a man who claims to be a woman, remarked in an <a href="https://twitter.com/MSNBC/status/1641304330031583233" target="_blank" rel="noopener">interview</a> with MSNBC host <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/joy-reid" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Joy Reid</a> that conservatives are seeking to “weaponize” the recent murder of three children and three staff members by a transgender shooter at a Christian elementary school in Nashville, Tennessee, to advance policies against the sexualization of children.
“I think children are only unsafe at drag shows when a shooter shows up to kill them. That’s where the threat is,” Clymer said. “I would challenge anyone just to get to know trans people. We are a vibrant, diverse community, diverse as anyone else. I’m from the great state of Texas. I served in the military, I go to church every Sunday, and my faith is very important to me.”
“But God made me in her image. God made me transgender,” the activist added. “To see these people so cynically weaponize this and exploit these children’s deaths and their teachers’ deaths, it breaks my heart. I wonder what those families are thinking right now.”
Reid asked Clymer about Knowles advocating for a “complete eradication of transgenderism from public life,” which multiple leftist media outlets falsely <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/im-just-not-really-a-genocide-kind-of-guy-michael-knowles-addresses-libel-at-buffalo" target="_blank" rel="noopener">construed</a> to mean a “genocide” of people identifying as transgender rather than opposition to the ideology. Reid also noted comments from Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who recently <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/video/6321590129112" target="_blank" rel="noopener">contended</a> that proponents of radical gender ideology are “at war” with Christians.
“I can’t see Christ in their words. That’s for damn sure,” Clymer responded, adding that he could not determine “where the biblical principles of loving your neighbor and walking the walk with Christ” factored into the affirmation of historic Christian doctrine regarding human sexuality.
Nashville police officers have confirmed that a 28-year-old woman who identified as a man killed three 9-year-old children and three adults on Monday at The Covenant School, which is associated with the conservative evangelical Covenant Presbyterian Church. Authorities <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/nashville-christian-school-shooter-identified-as-transgender-authorities" target="_blank" rel="noopener">revealed</a> that the shooter, who will not be named in accordance with Daily Wire policy, executed a “targeted attack” and left behind a “manifesto.”
Clymer, who formerly worked as press secretary of the Human Rights Campaign and communications director of Catholics for Choice, has previously <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/lgbtq-advocate-champions-censoring-opponents-hank-berrien" target="_blank" rel="noopener">called</a> for “directly harmful” beliefs to be removed from the public square. Knowles was <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/michael-knowles-suspended-from-twitter-after-posting-bible-verse-in-response-to-nashville-school-shooting" target="_blank" rel="noopener">suspended</a> from Twitter this week amid what appears to be a crackdown against conservative accounts criticizing or simply alluding to the Trans Radical Activist Network’s recent call for a “Day of Vengeance” on Saturday, April 1, mere days after the attack in Nashville.
Knowles linked on the platform to a Daily Wire <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/trans-activists-called-for-day-of-vengeance-before-nashville-shooting" target="_blank" rel="noopener">article</a> about the “Day of Vengeance” and included a reference to Romans 12:19, in which the apostle Paul exhorts Christians to refrain from seeking personal retribution: “Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, ‘Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.’”
Twitter’s rebuke of the post, a screenshot of which was <a href="https://twitter.com/mattwalshblog/status/1640903825128058881?s=46" target="_blank" rel="noopener">shared</a> on the platform by fellow Daily Wire host Matt Walsh, told Knowles to delete the post and said that the social media company does not permit users to “share abusive content, harass someone, or encourage other people to do so.” Knowles was provided with a button through which he could delete the post.
Twitter accounts belonging to Daily Wire News and Daily Wire investigative reporter Luke Rosiak were also suspended this week for posting about the “Day of Vengeance.” Trans Radical Activist Network meanwhile <a href="https://twitter.com/ResistanceTrans" target="_blank" rel="noopener">retains</a> access to its account on the platform.

Charlotte Clymer

‘God Made Me In Her Image’: Transgender Activist Claims Michael Knowles Blasphemes Christ By Opposing Gender Ideology

Transgender Activist Claims Michael Knowles Blasphemes Christ By Opposing Gender Ideology

Christianity

Jesus Christ

Michael Knowles

Social Issues

Transgender

MSNBC host <a href="http://www.dailywire.com/topic/joy-reid/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Joy Reid</a> delivered a monologue on Wednesday claiming that Republicans are so afraid of progress that they actually hate the 20th century and everything it stood for.
Arguing that Republicans were desperate to plot a course &#8220;setting back the clock&#8221; on things like abortion and keeping pornographic materials out of the hands of elementary-school-aged children, Reid said that the obvious conclusion was that Republicans simply hated the 20th century.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
JOY REID: &quot;Republicans really hate the 20th Century. From setting back the clock on women&#39;s reproductive rights, to&#8230;their zeal for banning books.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/MsoquX1ByT">pic.twitter.com/MsoquX1ByT</a>
&mdash; Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) <a href="https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1628559062227877889?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 23, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;Republicans really hate the 20th century,&#8221; Reid announced, throwing up her hands for emphasis.
&#8220;From setting back the clock on women&#8217;s reproductive rights, to trying to ban the mere act of learning about black history and the Civil Rights movement, to their zeal for banning books about anything related to the advancements of the last century,&#8221; she continued. &#8220;Books by black authors, and gay authors, and any book questioning their rose-colored view of America&#8217;s distant past.&#8221;
&#8220;In fact, it is quite clear why they don&#8217;t want you to read a book,&#8221; Reid declared. &#8220;Because if you did, you&#8217;d know how the future they want is a return to the frequently very unpleasant history that they don&#8217;t want you to learn.&#8221;
What Reid did not mention was that Republicans had not made efforts to ban certain books outright — but rather, had objected to <a href="https://dailywire.com/news/oklahoma-lawmaker-proposes-bill-that-would-let-parents-ban-sexually-explicit-books-from-public-schools/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">certain volumes</a> being placed in libraries at schools where young children might have access to them before they reached an appropriate age. There also has been no broad movement in Republican circles to ban broad swaths of books by black or gay authors, despite Reid&#8217;s claim to the contrary.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
She also claimed that Republicans objected to schools <a href="https://dailywire.com/news/black-florida-democrat-sides-with-ron-desantis-on-ap-african-american-history-course-i-think-its-trash/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">teaching black history</a> and the history of the Civil Rights movement — when the opposition from the Republican Party and from parents across the country has primarily been to lesson plans that adopt the tenets of <a href="https://dailywire.com/news/debunking-critical-race-theory/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Critical Race Theory</a> and promote teaching through an ideological lens rather than an objective one.

Joy Reid Delivers Wild Rant Claiming Republicans Hate The 20th Century

Republican

Menu