The Obama State Department headed by then-Secretary John Kerry interfered with the FBI and other law enforcement that wanted to take action against Iranian targets.
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, <a href="https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/grassley-report-reveals-obama-biden-state-departments-refusal-to-exact-justice-against-iranian-terrorists" target="_blank" rel="noopener">released</a> a report on Tuesday detailing whistleblower testimony and documents that show the Obama State Department’s interference in law enforcement matters involving Iran. The interference began during the time that the Obama administration pursued a deal on nuclear energy and weapons with Iran.
The Iowa Republican called the report “chilling” in a statement and accused the Obama administration of “jeopardiz[ing] our national security.” The report says that the interference only stopped with President Donald Trump’s ascension to the White House in 2017.
“Democrats’ historic refusal to get tough on Iran emboldened its regime and allowed Tehran to continue funding global acts of terrorism, like what we saw on October 7, 2023,” Grassley said. “We should all be breathing a sigh of relief President Trump is back in the White House to restore American strength on the world stage and hold Iran accountable for its evil acts.”
One FBI official said that Kerry “personally” interfered with the Department of Justice on one occasion, ordering officials to “stand down on an arrest,” according to the report.
“The State Department and Obama-Biden administration officials persistently and systematically derailed criminal and national security investigations, creating a shadow amnesty program that protected scores of additional Iranian criminals,” one whistleblower said. “FBI offices abandoned dozens of Iran-related investigations and U.S. Attorneys shut down prosecutions after recognizing the State Department and DOJ obstruction would thwart effective enforcement efforts.”
The report contains whistleblower testimony and FBI emails that detail State Department interference with law enforcement in ways that benefited targeted Iranian officials. Those Iranians included officials with warrants and those targeted by U.S. sanctions.
“According to unclassified FBI email records, before and after the Iran Nuclear Deal was finalized, the State Department prevented the FBI and other U.S. law enforcement agencies from enforcing U.S. sanctions and export control violations against Iranians and actively obstructed their pursuit to arrest these individuals,” the report says.
Whistleblower disclosures said, &#8220;Obama-Biden administration officials in the State Department and DOJ refused to allow already-indicted criminals investigated for years from being arrested on lawfully issued arrest warrants.’”
While the interference took place, the State Department led by Kerry was negotiating the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), also known as the Iran nuclear deal. The deal was pitched by the Biden administration as a way to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon, though critics said the deal had weak oversight that made Iran’s path to a weapon easier.

John Kerry, Barack Obama

Obama Admin Thwarted U.S. Prosecution Of Iranian Officials Amid Nuclear Deal Talks: Report

Barack Obama

Iran

Iran Nuclear Deal

John Kerry

United States

<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/john-kerry" target="_blank" rel="noopener">John Kerry</a>, who served as President Joe Biden&#8217;s Special Presidential Envoy for Climate up until March of this year, said late last week that a climate emergency needed to be declared.
Kerry made the remarks on Thursday at a recent John F. Kennedy Jr. Forum as the 29th United Nations climate change conference (COP29) concluded.
“I think, personally, we&#8217;re on the brink of needing to declare a climate emergency, which is what we really have,” Kerry said. “And we need to get people to behave as if this really is a major transitional challenge to the whole planet, to everybody.”
Kerry said that it was America&#8217;s responsibility to pay for energy infrastructure in Africa because the U.S. is the world&#8217;s leading economy.
&#8220;People in Africa who don&#8217;t have electricity need to choose the right kind of electricity and we need to help them be able to afford it and do it,&#8221; he said. &#8220;We have the largest economy in the world — $24 trillion or $23 trillion economy, maybe more by now.&#8221;
<a href="https://get.dailywire.com/gift-guide/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CHECK OUT THE DAILY WIRE HOLIDAY GIFT GUIDE</a>
&#8220;The next closest is China at about $18 trillion,&#8221; he continued. &#8220;And, the next closest to the two of us — Germany and Japan at $4 trillion. That’s how far it drops down. You don’t think we have some sort of obligation out of that to be responsible? I think we do.&#8221;
He said that the U.S. needs &#8220;to make it happen&#8221; because &#8220;nobody lives as an island in this process, on this planet.&#8221;
&#8220;And no one country has enough money to deal with the climate crisis,&#8221; he said.
He claimed that &#8220;the economics of climate work favors people who are feeling the pinch of inflation.&#8221;
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
John Kerry: &#8220;We&#8217;re on the brink of needing to declare a climate emergency, which is what we really have. And we need to get people to behave!&#8221;
WATCH: <a href="https://t.co/Rg6mMUch6y">pic.twitter.com/Rg6mMUch6y</a>
— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) <a href="https://twitter.com/SteveGuest/status/1861512833500094651?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 26, 2024</a></blockquote>

FRANCE-TECHNOLOGY-FAIR-VIVATECH

John Kerry: We Need To ‘Declare A Climate Emergency’ And ‘Get People To Behave’

Biden Administration

Climate Change

Politics

Social Issues

Today&#8217;s Democrats, led by Kamala Harris, Barack Obama and Joe Biden, are not just tiptoeing around the edges of censorship; they&#8217;re creating an Orwellian nightmare where the state is being called upon to regulate speech and to determine what is fit to be heard in the public square.
The Media Research Center took a stroll down <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/every-21st-century-democratic-presidential-nominee-supports-restricting-free-speech" target="_blank" rel="noopener">memory lane</a> to measure the seismic shift in attitudes toward the First Amendment for Harris and the other Democratic nominees of the 21st century, including Biden, Hillary Clinton, Obama, John Kerry and Al Gore.
According to the MRC study, each of these six candidates previously stood for free speech rights. Now, they claim that constitutionally protected speech is a threat to democracy. Their tortuous logic is inexplicable, but their previous quotes have not yet been whitewashed by the Left’s ever-faithful tech behemoth, Google.
In 2006, Gore <a href="https://youtu.be/ZNuEKePNCgw?si=p-UifGYw5A7Fzl9c&amp;t=2643" target="_blank" rel="noopener">scolded</a> the Bush administration for allegedly trying to “silence dissenting views” by censoring information “inconsistent with its stated ideological goals.” Fast forward to 2023, and Gore <a href="https://thehill.com/policy/technology/4344366-al-gore-calls-social-media-algorithms-digital-ar-15s/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">suggests</a> social media algorithms should be “banned,” calling them the “digital equivalent of AR-15s.”
In 2011, Clinton <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acDcUQoeFxY">vowed</a> to protect free speech &#8220;with the force of law.&#8221; But just last month, <a href="https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/tim-graham/2024/09/17/hillary-maddow-americans-who-boost-trump-propaganda-are-criminals" target="_blank" rel="noopener">she said</a> that Americans should be “criminally charged” for spreading what she dubbed “propaganda.” She later warned, “[i]f they don’t moderate and monitor the content, we lose total control.”
In 2015, Obama <a href="https://youtu.be/mi5da2AhDCY?si=o22sDubaS4hTFrSq&amp;t=190" target="_blank" rel="noopener">affirmed</a> that government propaganda “runs contrary to everything we believe.” Yet, in <a href="https://archive.is/k29vX#selection-2011.0-2014.0" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2022</a>, Obama called on Americans to “pick a side” regarding whether social media companies should be forced to censor Americans.
In 2015, Kerry rebuked censorship, affirming that “freedom must win out over censorship.” A year earlier, he <a href="https://youtu.be/X2JrqxACZp8?si=siES2GzodJEg2GRg&amp;t=304" target="_blank" rel="noopener">condemned</a> the very acts committed by his own party today: “Imagine if I couldn&#8217;t talk to you today simply because my government had shut down or censored the internet.” But now Kerry unashamedly attacks the First Amendment “as a major block.”
In 2017, Biden passionately <a href="https://youtu.be/fe8iSYHOg5A?si=6HlO0KKTuQihJ4Wo&amp;t=4555" target="_blank" rel="noopener">defended</a> free speech rights for all: “[W]e hurt ourselves badly when we don&#8217;t allow the speech to take place. … The First Amendment is one of the defining features of who we are in the Bill of Rights. And to shut it down in the name of what is appropriate is simply wrong.” In that same year, Harris similarly tweeted, “The free and open internet is a cornerstone of our society and must be protected at all costs.”
But like their predecessors, Biden and Harris have flip-flopped, deciding instead that the best way to combat ideas they dislike is not through debate, but through deletion. In the guise of combatting mis- and dis-information, they created the largest censorship regime in U.S. history, spanning 10 federal departments and six additional regulatory agencies.
For example, the State and Homeland Security Departments have partnered repeatedly to censor conservatives in the media. The Pentagon has also used our tax dollars to bludgeon advertisers, cajoling them not to work with conservative media outlets.
Independent agencies are at it, too. The Federal Communications Commission is punishing free-speech advocate Elon Musk while rewarding anti-free speech zealot George Soros. And the National Science Foundation is competing with the Energy Department to be the wizard behind the censorship curtain.
This isn&#8217;t about mis-information; it&#8217;s about power. Democratic leaders have traded the mantle of freedom for the chains of control, embracing the tech titans as partners and enforcers of their narrative. Once heralded as the new public square, social media platforms have become a digital dungeon where speech is policed not by law, but by algorithm.
<h3><a href="https://www.amiracist.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MATT WALSH&#8217;S &#8216;AM I RACIST?&#8217; COMING TO DAILYWIRE+ OCT. 28</a></h3>
While elites in the Democratic Party play the role of speech censors, conservatives have joined with traditional Democrats in a coalition to protect speech rights. This coalition is led mostly by former Democrats, including Donald Trump, Elon Musk and two former presidential candidates, Robert F. Kennedy and Tulsi Gabbard.
Trump’s running mate JD Vance <a href="https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/free-speech/tom-olohan/2024/10/02/vp-debate-cbs-jd-vance-denounces-true-threat-democracy" target="_blank" rel="noopener">articulated</a> the correct perspective on speech in the vice presidential debate: “I believe we actually do have a threat to democracy in this country, but unfortunately, it&#8217;s not the threat to democracy that Kamala Harris and Tim Walz want to talk about: It is the threat of censorship.”
Vance is sounding a wake-up call that resonates like the siren many of us heard as school children during nuclear-war fallout drills. We&#8217;re not just at risk of losing an argument; we&#8217;re at risk of losing America.
The next president of the United States will take the oath of office, swearing to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” The media must do their job and ask each of the candidates whether they can take this oath, without snickering and crossing fingers.
* * *
L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center.
Dan Schneider is the vice president of Media Research Center&#8217;s Free Speech America.
The views expressed in this piece are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

President Biden And Vice President Harris Address Gun Violence In America

The Left’s Betrayal Of The First Amendment

Al Gore

Democrats

Hillary Clinton

Joe Biden

Kamala Harris

Media Research Center

Opinion

Since 2020, every candidate the Democratic Party has nominated for president since 2000 has actively backed restrictions on <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/free-speech" target="_blank" rel="noopener">free speech</a> online, according to a new analysis from the Media Research Center shared with The Daily Wire. 
“Since the 2020 election cycle, no less than seven of the most recent 10 presidential nominees have called for censorship and/or government regulation of political speech,” MRC researcher Luis Cornelio found wrote in his analysis.
MRC Free Speech For America analyzed the comments and positions of every presidential candidate since 2000. The group found that every Democrat — and just one Republican — who ran for office in that time frame has backed some kind of restriction on speech since 2020, whether banning &#8220;misinformation&#8221; or pushing for the government to crack down on free expression.
That includes former President Barack Obama, President Joe Biden, and Vice President Kamala Harris, the last of whom has advocated censorship for years. Harris has <a href="https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1829651058269806658" target="_blank" rel="noopener">pushed</a> for social media companies to remove posts from former President Donald Trump and demanded more government oversight and regulation for social media companies. 
“They are directly speaking to millions and millions of people without any level of oversight or regulation, and that has to stop,” Harris told CNN in 2019. 
The report found that former President Donald Trump had taken steps to promote free speech, citing his efforts in 2020 to define Section 230 — a provision that largely gives tech companies immunity for what third parties allow on their platforms — in a way that protected the First Amendment.
Mitt Romney, who ran for president in 2012, is the only Republican the MRC found to have “voiced support for censorship and against the American principles of free speech online.” 
The Biden-Harris administration <a href="https://mrcfreespeechamerica.org/blogs/free-speech/gabriela-pariseau-christian-baldwin/2024/06/25/mrc-free-speech-america-exposes" target="_blank" rel="noopener">used</a> several federal agencies to censor speech related to the COVID-19 vaccine, MRC previously documented. This came as Biden claimed that Facebook was “killing people” by allowing posts critical of the COVID vaccine.
“They’re killing people — I mean they’re really, look, the only pandemic we have is among the unvaccinated,” Biden <a href="https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/tim-graham/2021/07/17/networks-promote-biden-claiming-facebook-killing-people-covid">said</a> on July 16, 2021. “And they’re killing people.”
Hillary Clinton, who has long blamed her 2016 loss to Trump on so-called Russian disinformation, has proposed arresting Americans for spreading “propaganda.” 
“I think there are Americans who are engaged in this kind of propaganda, and whether they should be civilly or even in some cases, criminally charged is something that would be a better deterrence,” Clinton <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxrngjBER3E">said</a> on MSNBC last month.
Earlier this month, Clinton urged for social media companies to “moderate” posts, <a href="https://mrcfreespeechamerica.org/blogs/free-speech/donald-perkins/2024/10/07/hillary-clinton-pushes-censorship-expresses-fear-losing">saying</a> on CNN that if “they don’t moderate and monitor content, we lose total control.”
“We should be, in my view, appealing something called Section 230, which gave platforms on the internet immunity because they were thought to be pass-throughs that they shouldn’t be judged for the content that is posted—but we now know that was an overly simple view,” she said.
Obama <a href="https://archive.is/k29vX">said</a> back on April 21, 2022 that protecting “democracy” meant more government regulations for online speech.
“Each of us, whether we work at a tech company or consume social media, whether we are a parent, a legislator, an advertiser on one of these platforms, now’s the time to pick a side,” Obama said at Stanford&#8217;s Cyber Policy Center. “We have a choice right now. Do we allow our democracy to wither or do we make it better?”
<h3><a href="https://www.amiracist.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MATT WALSH&#8217;S &#8216;AM I RACIST?&#8217; COMING TO DAILYWIRE+ OCT. 28</a></h3>
Last month, John Kerry, who lost the White House to George W. Bush in 2004, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/john-kerry-if-democrats-win-we-can-change-first-amendment-to-fight-disinformation" target="_blank" rel="noopener">asserted</a> that the First Amendment was a major impediment to fighting alleged online misinformation.
“But look, if people only go to one source, and the source they go to is sick, and, you know, has an agenda, and they’re putting out disinformation, our First Amendment stands as a major block to be able to just, you know, hammer it out of existence,” he said during a World Economic Forum meeting.
Vice President Al Gore, who has made a fortune pushing fear about climate change, compared social media algorithms to AR-15 rifles in December 2023 and called for them to be banned if they lead people in a certain direction.
“If you have social media that is dominated by algorithms that pull people down these rabbit holes that are a bit like pitcher plants, these algorithms, they are the digital equivalent of AR-15s,” Gore said. “They ought to be banned, they really ought to be banned. It’s an abuse of the public forum.”
Romney, the only Republican on the list, was included because of comments he made during a congressional hearing in July 2023 where he seemed to endorse federal government employees pressuring tech companies to restrict certain posts.
“Employees of the federal government have First Amendment rights, too,” Romney said. “Censorship is when the government shuts something off. This is arguing to try to convince somebody else to shut it off and that’s the right people have whether they’re in government or outside of government.”

MixCollage-23-Oct-2024-12-19-PM-7030

Every 21st Century Democratic Presidential Nominee Supports Restricting Free Speech

Donald Trump

First Amendment

Free Speech

Mitt Romney

<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/elon-musk">Elon Musk,</a> Robert F. Kennedy Jr, and more blasted former Democrat presidential candidate John Kerry who said during a recent event that the “First Amendment stands as a major block” to stamping out &#8220;disinformation&#8221; in the United States.
Speaking to the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/john-kerry-if-democrats-win-we-can-change-first-amendment-to-fight-disinformation">World Economic Forum</a> (WEF) on Green Energy, Kerry said “if Democrats” can win the 2024 election the party can “change” the 1st Amendment to fight what he labeled “disinformation.”
“But look, if people only go to one source, and the source they go to is sick, and, you know, has an agenda, and they’re putting out disinformation, our First Amendment stands as a major block to be able to just, you know, hammer it out of existence,” Kerry said. “So what we need is to win the ground, win the right to govern, by hopefully winning enough votes that you’re free to be able to implement change.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
John Kerry is saying he wants to violate the Constitution <a href="https://t.co/im1BJNlfNI">https://t.co/im1BJNlfNI</a>
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1840604961459122181?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 30, 2024</a></blockquote>
Reacting to clips of Kerry’s comments, the billionaire owner of X (formerly known as Twitter) <a href="https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1840604961459122181">Musk</a>, wrote that “John Kerry is saying he wants to violate the Constitution.”
He followed it up with a <a href="https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1840622115285881292">second post</a> agreeing with another person who wrote that, if former President Donald Trump loses the election, “it will be the last one,” adding “And they will destroy the Constitution.”
The former Democrat-turned-independent presidential candidate RFK Jr. <a href="https://x.com/RobertKennedyJr/status/1840763072249487600">wrote</a>, “John Kerry is correct. The 1st Amendment DOES stand as a major roadblock to them right now.”
Dr. Jordan Peterson <a href="https://x.com/jordanbpeterson/status/1840233889643585965?s=51&amp;t=yVg_AIbZC0FnyCtU4qPVYw">added</a>, “I don&#8217;t know how<a href="https://x.com/JohnKerry"> @JohnKerry</a> can say such things without bursting into flames.&#8221;
Another person <a href="https://x.com/philhollowayesq/status/1840235678610735305?s=51&amp;t=yVg_AIbZC0FnyCtU4qPVYw">continued</a>, “John Kerry says the quiet part out loud. ‘The 1st Amendment stands as a major roadblock for us right now.’ The 1A and the entire Bill of Rights was designed as a &#8216;roadblock&#8217; against a tyrannical government. It’s a feature, not a bug.”
While a fifth person <a href="https://x.com/amuse/status/1840024798568587453?s=51&amp;t=yVg_AIbZC0FnyCtU4qPVYw">wrote</a>, “John Kerry explaining how free speech stands in the way of consensus around the WEF’s preferred narrative, describes how governments will need to stamp out voices that dissent.”
Others <a href="https://x.com/alexberenson/status/1840782687893668303?s=51&amp;t=yVg_AIbZC0FnyCtU4qPVYw">pointed out</a> that when “a man at the very top of the Democratic Party — a former Democratic presidential candidate — no longer even pretends to believe in the First Amendment. Watch and be afraid.”
Related: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/elon-musks-reacts-to-theater-pulling-am-i-racist-far-left-fascists-love-censorship" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Elon Musk Reacts To Theater Pulling ‘Am I Racist?’: ‘Far Left Fascists Love Censorship’</a>

Elon Musk, RFK Jr. Blast John Kerry Who Complained, ‘First Amendment Stands As A Major Block’

Elon Musk, RFK Jr. Blast John Kerry Who Complained 'First Amendment Stands As A Major Block'

Democrat

Elon Musk

Entertainment

First Amendenet

News

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Democrat <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/john-kerry" target="_blank" rel="noopener">John Kerry</a>, who served as President Joe Biden&#8217;s U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, said last week that the First Amendment was in the way of Democrats&#8217; desire to fight &#8220;disinformation.&#8221;
Kerry made the extreme remarks during a discussion with the World Economic Forum on Green Energy when asked by an audience member what could be done to fight online disinformation.
&#8220;You know there&#8217;s a lot of discussion now about how you curb those entities in order to guarantee that you&#8217;re going to have some accountability on facts, etc.,&#8221; he said. &#8220;But look, if people only go to one source, and the source they go to is sick, and, you know, has an agenda, and they&#8217;re putting out disinformation, our First Amendment stands as a major block to be able to just, you know, hammer it out of existence.&#8221;
&#8220;So what we need is to win the ground, win the right to govern, by hopefully winning enough votes that you&#8217;re free to be able to implement change,&#8221; he added.
He said that the problem was unique to democracies because there was an &#8220;absence of a sort of truth arbiter, and there’s no one who defines what facts really are.&#8221;
<a href="https://www.amiracist.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.amiracist.com/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1726313279401000&amp;usg=AOvVaw115_qPFFEePDP86-Fvo-Vd">Am I Racist? Is In Theaters NOW — Get Your Tickets Here!</a>
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
&#8220;Our First Amendment stands as a major block to the ability to be able to hammer [disinformation] out of existence. What we need is to win&#8230;the right to govern by hopefully winning enough votes that you’re free to be able to implement change.&#8221;
No thanks.<a href="https://t.co/SLGHOLVjCr">pic.twitter.com/SLGHOLVjCr</a>
— Colin Wright (@SwipeWright) <a href="https://twitter.com/SwipeWright/status/1840231811554664541?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 29, 2024</a></blockquote>

COP28 UNFCCC Climate Conference: High-Level Segment Day Two

John Kerry: If Democrats ‘Win,’ We Can ‘Change’ First Amendment To Fight ‘Disinformation’

Elections

Misinformation

Not too long ago, being labeled a &#8220;flip-flopper&#8221; was a big deal in presidential politics. Whatever your policy positions might be, the worst possible sin was to be indecisive about them. If you remember what happened to John Kerry back in 2004, you know what I&#8217;m talking about. A day before his first debate with George W. Bush, no one was asking John Kerry about his position on the Iraq War, or his views on taxes or anything like that. Instead, Kerry was being asked about his image as a flip-flopper.
And he was forced to <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/30/politics/campaign/kerry-says-flipflop-image-doesnt-reflect-the-truth.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">admit</a>, in an interview with The New York Times, that it was a major vulnerability. Kerry claimed that his positions had really been consistent, but at the same time he acknowledged that the Bush campaign had succeeded in portraying him as indecisive and untrustworthy. That&#8217;s why 60% of voters <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/05/washington/the-2004-campaign-the-poll-poll-finds-kerry-assured-voters-in-in.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> Kerry &#8220;told people what they wanted to hear rather than what he really believed.&#8221; And ultimately, whether you think Kerry&#8217;s reputation for flip flopping was deserved or not, it&#8217;s a big part of why he lost the election.
Twenty years later, it&#8217;s now abundantly clear that the &#8220;flip flopper&#8221; label doesn&#8217;t scare Democrats anymore. And the corporate press isn&#8217;t concerned about it, either.
In the span of just a month, Kamala Harris&#8217; team has systematically reversed pretty much every major policy proposal she&#8217;s ever supported in her career. These changes are so significant, and so completely unexplained, that they would have immediately destroyed Kamala Harris&#8217; candidacy if she were running 20 years ago. But this country has changed a lot in two decades — or at least the Kamala Harris campaign is betting it&#8217;s changed a lot. So, day by day, they&#8217;re proceeding to revise her entire platform.
<h4><a href="https://www.amiracist.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Tickets for “Am I Racist?” are on sale NOW! Buy here for a theater near you.</a></h4>
For example, Harris&#8217; campaign now <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/30/kamala-harris-fracking" target="_blank" rel="noopener">claims</a> she no longer wants to ban fracking, even though as recently as 2019, she said she supported a total fracking ban as part of the Green New Deal. 
The campaign also <a href="https://nypost.com/2024/08/27/us-news/harris-campaign-now-says-vp-does-not-support-electric-vehicle-mandate-in-latest-flip-flop/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">says</a> Harris no longer supports an electric vehicle mandate, even though in 2019, Harris co-sponsored the Zero-Emission Vehicles Act. That bill would have required that 100% of new vehicles be &#8220;electric or hydrogen powered&#8221; by 2040. And if any manufacturer tried to make a gas-powered car after 2040, the EPA could shut them down. According to the text of the bill, “After model year 2040, the [Environmental Protection Agency] Administrator may issue an injunction on the manufacture of any passenger vehicles other than zero emission vehicles by a vehicle manufacturer.&#8221;
But yesterday, that all changed. Harris&#8217; &#8220;rapid response director&#8221; sent out a so-called &#8220;fact-check&#8221; email that began: “FACT: Vice President Harris does not support an electric vehicle mandate.&#8221; Instead, the email states that Harris supports “ground-breaking subsidies and tax credits for electric vehicles.”
So they&#8217;re dressing up a major policy reversal as a &#8220;fact-check.&#8221; They&#8217;re implying that you&#8217;re the one who&#8217;s mistaken, when really they&#8217;re trying to pull a sleight of hand. And there are other reversals too, on everything from abolishing private health insurance to closing immigrant detention centers to defunding the police and so on.
<h4><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1432-the-matt-walsh-show" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show</a></h4>
Kamala Harris&#8217; campaign has offered no explanation for these changes. But everyone knows what the explanation is: she wants to win the election, and she understands that California Leftism isn&#8217;t popular outside of California. She does not have principles. She only has internal polling — and apparently, it&#8217;s not looking good.
To that end, the Kamala Harris campaign has just announced its most dramatic policy reversal yet. Contrary to everything Kamala Harris has said for the past five years, her campaign has just come out in support of Donald Trump&#8217;s border wall. Yes, you heard that correctly. The Kamala Harris campaign is making a very direct play for John Kerry&#8217;s title as the most flagrant and notorious flip-flopper in the modern history of the Democrat Party. Out of nowhere, our border czar Kamala Harris is now all for &#8220;building the wall.&#8221;
As Axios <a href="https://www.axios.com/2024/08/27/kamala-harris-flip-flops-border-wall?utm_campaign=editorial&amp;utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_medium=social" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reported</a> this week:
<blockquote>Harris flip-flops on building the border wall. &#8230; If she&#8217;s elected president, Kamala Harris pledges to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on the wall along the southern border — a project she once opposed and called &#8216;un-American&#8217; during the Trump administration.</blockquote>
Specifically, Harris has announced her support for the recent bipartisan &#8220;border security bill,&#8221; which requires that hundreds of millions of dollars are spent to continue building the wall on the southern border.
On the Sunday shows the other day, there were a few signs this reversal was coming. At one point, ABC anchor Jon Karl noticed that Kamala Harris&#8217; campaign was running ads that prominently featured Trump&#8217;s border wall, as part of an effort to show that Kamala Harris is supposedly tough on illegal immigration (which she previously said she wants to decriminalize). Watch:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
🚨 ABC just CALLED OUT Kamala Harris for using video of President Trump’s border wall in her new ads
If even *ABC* is calling her out for her hypocrisy, you know it’s REALLY bad 🤣 <a href="https://t.co/R9DakoOKw5">pic.twitter.com/R9DakoOKw5</a>
&mdash; Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) <a href="https://twitter.com/nicksortor/status/1827867924583137432?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 26, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
At first that looked like some lazy editing mistake. After all, this is the same border wall that Kamala Harris said in 2020 was a, &#8220;complete waste of taxpayer money&#8221; that &#8220;won&#8217;t make us any safer.&#8221; It&#8217;s the same border wall that Kamala Harris said in 2017 was a &#8220;stupid use of money&#8221; that she would &#8220;block any funding for.&#8221; It&#8217;s the same wall that the Biden administration — with Kamala Harris as VP — sabotaged the minute they took office. They immediately killed all border wall construction. Watch:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Kamala will never be able to run away from this
She and Biden wasted billions of taxpayer dollars — and costed countless lives — to halt border wall construction for politics
The steel bollards are rusting in piles to this day <a href="https://t.co/rzcy4A4Bkk">https://t.co/rzcy4A4Bkk</a> <a href="https://t.co/4n6R1BrQ7K">pic.twitter.com/4n6R1BrQ7K</a>
&mdash; johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) <a href="https://twitter.com/_johnnymaga/status/1828414013585199365?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 27, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
So Biden-Harris ran on killing the wall. They got elected and stopped the construction of the wall. And now Kamala Harris wants to get back in and restart construction of the wall.
Already, it&#8217;s pretty clear how the corporate press and the Harris campaign plan to spin this. They&#8217;re probably going to suggest that taking down the wall was Joe Biden&#8217;s call, and Kamala Harris had nothing to do with it. Last night, Politico laid the groundwork for that kind of messaging. They ran <a href="https://x.com/politico/status/1828558004301508855" target="_blank" rel="noopener">this headline</a>: &#8220;Vance tries to tether Harris to Biden during Michigan rally.&#8221; Yes, Vance dared to draw a connection between the president and his vice president. Can you imagine?
One of the many problems with this approach is that Kamala Harris is on tape, again and again, disparaging the border wall as Trump&#8217;s &#8220;medieval vanity project.&#8221; She laughed repeatedly at the idea that a wall could possibly deter illegal aliens from entering the country. Watch:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Kamala Harris on the border wall over the years:
2017: &quot;Asking taxpayers to pay for a border wall is a terrible idea.&quot;
2018: &quot;Funding Trump’s unrealistic border wall would be a gross misuse of taxpayer money.&quot;
2019: &quot;Trump&#39;s border wall is stupid.&quot;
2020: &quot;As I said, Trump&#39;s… <a href="https://t.co/RxWrRZ1MRh">pic.twitter.com/RxWrRZ1MRh</a>
&mdash; Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) <a href="https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1828453900221063538?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 27, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Notice how Kamala Harris tries to sell the bit at the end — about how she was a prosecutor, and she&#8217;s an expert in transnational criminal gangs, and how she knows &#8220;that wall ain&#8217;t gonna stop them.&#8221; It&#8217;s supposed to come off as a natural, unrehearsed, jovial moment. We&#8217;re supposed to believe that Kamala Harris is speaking in a folksy way about her experience as a prosecutor because she&#8217;s being genuine and unscripted.
But this wasn&#8217;t an unscripted moment. She did the exact same routine several times before, on tape. Here&#8217;s one example:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="004 Kamala laughs at wall" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/HPiVMNu72dE?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
It&#8217;s all fake and scripted. Kamala Harris understands only the words she&#8217;s rehearsed, and nothing more. If that moderator had asked Kamala Harris how exactly transnational gangs bypass walls, she probably would have no idea what to say. She&#8217;d just freeze and stare straight ahead for hours. Without her canned talking points, the Democrats&#8217; presidential nominee is completely unable to articulate a single thought, even one that&#8217;s supposedly based on her personal experience.
That&#8217;s probably why the Harris campaign has just announced that Kamala Harris is going to have Tim Walz sitting next to her during her first unscripted interview as the Democrats&#8217; presidential nominee. That interview will take place Thursday with a friendly news outlet (CNN) and it&#8217;ll be taped, so any particularly embarrassing moments can be edited out of the final broadcast. But apparently, a taped interview with CNN isn&#8217;t easy enough for Kamala Harris, so she needs to have Tim Walz by her side throughout the whole thing. After well over a month of preparation, she still can&#8217;t do a solo interview.
Neither can Tim Walz, apparently. According to <a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/tim-walz-doesnt-know-what-kamala-believes-because-she-doesnt-either/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Politico</a>: 
<blockquote>One of the issues that Harris world is currently working to address is how to deploy running mate TIM WALZ in the media. The danger in sending him out to do big solo interviews is that he might not have a full command of where Harris is on every issue. As someone pointed out to us last night, Harris talks about the &#8216;opportunity economy,&#8217; but if Walz were asked to define it, would he know how.</blockquote>
In other words, neither Kamala Harris nor Tim Walz can sit for an interview alone, without any assistance. Kamala Harris&#8217; problem is that she can&#8217;t articulate a coherent thought. Meanwhile, Tim Walz has no idea what Kamala Harris&#8217; policies are. So the solution they&#8217;ve landed on is to send them both out at once, to a friendly media outlet that hopefully won&#8217;t ask about the whole border wall flip-flop. Because if CNN does ask about that, there&#8217;s also plenty of tape of Tim Walz mocking the idea of a border wall. Watch:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Kamala is now saying she wants to build a border wall. Does she know her running mate said he would help illegals get ladders to scale a border wall if Trump built one? <a href="https://t.co/EQVTGoutRQ">pic.twitter.com/EQVTGoutRQ</a>
&mdash; Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) <a href="https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1828444145813422279?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 27, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
If they want to conduct anything approaching an impartial interview on Thursday, CNN has an obligation to play all of this tape. Then they have an obligation to ask Kamala Harris and Tim Walz what changed. Why exactly do they now support spending tens of millions of dollars on a wall that they once called a useless vanity project? It would be interesting to hear Kamala Harris explain that in her own words.
But of course, that won&#8217;t happen.
The most we&#8217;ll get is another canned, scripted soundbite from Kamala Harris that totally contradicts her old canned, scripted soundbite about the wall. She might tell us all about how, as a prosecutor, she learned that walls do indeed work. They stop transnational criminal gangs all the time! That&#8217;s why they set up walls at the DNC. It&#8217;s why they set up walls around the Capitol for Joe Biden&#8217;s inauguration. It&#8217;s why there are walls around Joe Biden&#8217;s many homes.
<h4><a href="http://www.amiracist.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH THE TRAILER FOR &#8216;AM I RACIST?&#8217; — A MATT WALSH COMEDY ON DEI</a></h4>
Whatever soundbite they&#8217;ll come up with, Kamala Harris will deliver it with a laugh and some faux sincerity. And in all likelihood, the CNN anchor will nod along and pretend to be convinced.
But everyone watching at home — the ones who are open-minded and honest — will realize that Kamala Harris isn&#8217;t really speaking to them. Her handlers are. And as Kamala&#8217;s handlers adopt Donald Trump&#8217;s platform, piece by piece, while rejecting everything Kamala Harris herself once claimed to believe, their candidate is starting to look about as trustworthy as John Kerry. With just over two months to go until the election, more than any poll or focus group, that&#8217;s about as bullish a sign as the Trump campaign can possibly hope for.

The US/Mexico border fence in Nogales, Arizona USA

This Is The Most Egregious Kamala Flip-Flop Yet

2024 Election

Border Wall

Readers Pass

Southern Border

Tim Walz

Whistleblowers have informed top Republican senators that former President Barack Obama&#8217;s State Department blocked the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/fbi" target="_blank" rel="noopener">FBI</a> from executing arrest warrants against illegal aliens in the U.S. who were financially backing Iran&#8217;s efforts to develop weapons of mass destruction.
Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Ron Johnson (R-WI) <a href="https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2024/05/2024-05-21-CEG-RHJ-to-State-State-Department-Iran.pdf?_gl=1*13n7zxe*_ga*MTkxODM0ODU5LjE2OTQ5OTkyMDk.*_ga_RH94J2NTVM*MTcxNjQxNjkxOC4yLjEuMTcxNjQxNjkxOC4wLjAuMA.." target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> that for nearly 20 years, Republican and Democrat administrations imposed sanctions on “Iranian individuals, companies, and organizations for involvement in nuclear proliferation, ballistic missile development, support for terrorist groups, and human rights abuses.”
They noted that even one of Obama&#8217;s executive orders and a law passed during the Obama-era, the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015, were created to hold Iran accountable.
However, whistleblowers informed the senators that while the Obama-Biden administration publicly committed to &#8220;prevent[ing] Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons by raising the cost of Iran’s defiance of the international community,&#8221; former Secretary of State John Kerry worked to undermine those efforts.
&#8220;Kerry actively interfered with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) executing arrest warrants on individuals in the U.S. illegally supporting Iranian efforts, including financial efforts, to develop weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and its ballistic missile program,&#8221; the letter said. &#8220;The records show that Justice Department and FBI leadership, to include then-Attorney General Lynch and then-FBI Director Comey, failed to take the necessary steps to stop Kerry’s obstructive efforts against law enforcement.&#8221;
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1700760801843000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2PQrVSrJfhxNb4LcARqniG">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
The letter continued:
<blockquote>For example, unclassified FBI email records from August 25, 2017, detailed at least eight instances connected to the Iran deal where the “FBI/DOJ/USG could have moved forward with the cases but the State Department chose to block them.” According to the records, in six of these instances, the FBI lost the opportunity to arrest the main subject. The email says that one of the lost main subjects was noted to be “on the Terrorism Watch List” and another “returned to Iran.” The email further says that in another instance the State Department “blocked [FBI’s] plan to arrest while the subject was mid-flight and the subject was forced to leave the US immediately upon arrival.” The email also provides that at least two targets were arrested only after “State lifted their block…since the new [Trump] Administration took office.”</blockquote>
The letter said that these efforts to obstruct law enforcement were done &#8220;due to political reasons,&#8221; the letter said.
The letter said that Kerry&#8217;s efforts to obstruct law enforcement became such an issue that then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch had to meet with Kerry about the matter.
&#8220;The records provided to our offices show that the Obama/Biden administration’s State Department, under the leadership of John Kerry, actively and persistently interfered with FBI operations pertaining to lawful arrests of known terrorists, members of Iranian proliferation networks, and other criminals providing material support for Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs,&#8221; the letter said. &#8220;The records also show that DOJ and FBI leadership apparently allowed it to happen until the Trump administration altered course.&#8221;
Related: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/shock-obama-helped-hezbollah-secure-bogus-iran-ryan-saavedra" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Obama Helped Hezbollah To Secure Bogus Iran Deal. Here Are The Key Takeaways From Politico’s Report.</a>

John Kerry ‘Actively And Persistently Interfered With FBI’ Arresting Terrorists, Criminals Supporting Illegal Iranian Weapons Programs: Whistleblowers

Global Politics

President Joe Biden&#8217;s Climate Czar said this week that he believes people would feel better about Russia&#8217;s war in Ukraine if Russia took steps to reduce its emissions.
The remarks from John Kerry, which happened during his final press conference, came as he stepped down from the role after serving throughout Biden&#8217;s first term in office.
&#8220;I believe that Russia has the ability to be able to make enormous changes if it really wanted to,&#8221; Kerry said. &#8220;I mean, if Russia has the ability to wage a war illegally and invade another country, they ought to be able to find the effort to be responsible on the climate issue. Unfortunately, because of the actions that Russia took in an unprovoked, illegal war against another nation, we have not been engaged in discussions with Russia.&#8221;
&#8220;Sadly, and I say sadly because it’s a loss for the world not to be able to have Russia acting constructively on this issue,&#8221; he continued. &#8220;But we need every country, including Russia — Russia is one of the largest emitters in the world — if Russia wanted to show good faith, they could go out and announce what their reductions are going to be and make a greater effort to reduce emissions now. Maybe that would open up the door for people to feel better about what Russia is choosing to do at this point in time.&#8221;
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
WRONG‼️
The climate crisis can’t be solved by “feeling better” about Kremlin military atrocities in Ukraine if Russia curbs emissions, just like it can’t be solved deploying solar tech built by slave labor in China, or you can forget any <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/JustTransition?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#JustTransition</a><a href="https://t.co/PlOCz8qb8D">pic.twitter.com/PlOCz8qb8D</a>
&mdash; Dr. Benjamin L. Schmitt🇺🇸🇺🇦🇪🇺🇹🇼 (@BLSchmitt) <a href="https://twitter.com/BLSchmitt/status/1765575181005676796?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 7, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Kerry was widely mocked online over his remarks.
&#8220;John Kerry believes that killing Ukrainian civilians would be more well-received in the world if Russia would reduce its carbon footprint,&#8221; <a href="https://twitter.com/mikepompeo/status/1765767139468661091">said</a> former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. &#8220;Sick. Dangerous. And totally immoral to suggest you can conduct wars of aggression in Europe so long as you support the green agenda. Team Biden’s globalist faith sacrifices European lives on the altar of climate extremism.&#8221;
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) <a href="https://twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1765472230014697773">said</a>, &#8220;At this point, the Biden admin is like a continuous SNL skit.&#8221;
&#8220;By John Kerry’s logic, the world’s villains could improve their image by reducing their carbon footprint,&#8221; <a href="https://twitter.com/BasedMikeLee/status/1765554852015301046">said</a> Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT).

Climate Czar John Kerry: People Would ‘Feel Better’ About Russia Invading Ukraine If Russia ‘Reduced Emissions’

Carbon Emissions

Russia

Ukraine

Ukraine-Russia War

Special Climate Envoy John Kerry is expected to step down from his role in the coming weeks — and hit the campaign trail alongside President Joe Biden to tout the Biden administration&#8217;s efforts with regard to climate change.
Axios <a href="https://www.axios.com/2024/01/13/john-kerry-biden-campaign-climate-2024" target="_blank" rel="noopener">first reported</a> that Kerry, 80, was planning to shift into campaign mode on Saturday — mainly because he said that the climate was a key issue, and he feared that green initiatives would lose any momentum they may have had if Biden were to lose his 2024 re-election bid.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Breaking News: John Kerry will step down as U.S. special envoy for climate, two people familiar with his plans said. He is widely expected to get involved in the 2024 presidential campaign. No successor has yet been tapped. <a href="https://t.co/9rB7rqJ0W4">https://t.co/9rB7rqJ0W4</a> <a href="https://t.co/GepYxA5zJX">pic.twitter.com/GepYxA5zJX</a>
&mdash; The New York Times (@nytimes) <a href="https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1746260339350499423?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 13, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Kerry, according to Axios, informed the president of his &#8220;plans to help tell the climate story in the context of Biden&#8217;s campaign&#8221; during a meeting at the White House last week to recap last month&#8217;s COP28 climate conference.
He reportedly thanked Biden for choosing him to take on the role of Climate Envoy — and congratulated the president on his efforts to aid the climate agenda in his own policies and championed legislation.
The New York Times <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/13/climate/john-kerry-climate-envoy.html?smid=tw-share" target="_blank" rel="noopener">also reported</a> on Kerry&#8217;s likely next steps, saying that he was expected to remain in his current role at least long enough to attend next week&#8217;s World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland — as well as the International Energy Agency&#8217;s upcoming meeting in Paris in February.
Kerry, who previously served as Secretary of State under former President Barack Obama, will not be the only Obama administration alum on the campaign trail for Biden. Former Secretary of State <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/hillary-clinton-to-take-larger-role-in-bidens-re-election-campaign-and-even-democrats-are-laughing" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Hillary Clinton</a> is also expected to stump for Biden in the coming months.
&#8220;Clinton is popular with women and key parts of the Democratic base and remains a fundraising draw who can help ensure Biden has the money to get his message out. There is still a two-for-the-price-of-one theme when it comes to her family: Husband Bill Clinton made a cameo at the fundraising event at their Washington home,&#8221; NBC News reported.
But as some have noted on social media, both Clinton and Kerry also have something else in common: they both lost their own presidential bids. Clinton lost to former President Donald Trump in 2016 — after losing the 2008 primary to Obama — and Kerry lost to George W. Bush in 2004.

John Kerry Preparing To Step Down As Climate Czar, Will Hit The Campaign Trail Instead

Unless you’re a climate warrior or an energy wonk, you probably weren’t aware of last week’s end of the 28th edition of the “Council of the Parties,” better known as COP28, held this year in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Don’t be surprised if you weren’t one of over 84,000 delegates – more than double the previous record – who got an invite. It’s probably because you are not a raging hypocrite. COP28 attendees spent the better part of two weeks in deep discussion over the “existential threat” of a so-called “climate crisis,” and how the world needs to respond before it is too late to save the planet from imminent doom.
When you add to the expansive delegate count the thousands more non-delegate support staff, media, climate-warrior groupies, and casual onlookers, the ultimate outcome is that <a href="https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/COP28.PLOP__0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">over 100,000</a> people – who all claim to love Mother Earth more than anything – felt the need to inundate Dubai rather than jump on Zoom sessions or conference calls to discuss how to save the planet. Remember, Zoom is good enough for kids locked out of schools, but not good enough for climate junkets.
Delegates spent two weeks in Dubai staying in 5-star resorts, feasting on gourmet meals, drinking top-shelf alcohol, being driven around in stretch limousines, “laboring” in air-conditioned conference facilities, and engaging in unknown debauchery when not working to rid the earth of traditional energy solutions, like coal, oil, and natural gas.
When not engaged in extracurricular activities, COP28’s delegates created a bunch of work-product to justify their junket.
First on the menu, pun intended, was an <a href="https://nypost.com/2023/11/28/lifestyle/un-calling-on-americans-to-cut-down-on-meat-consumption/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">effort to cancel meat</a>. Keep in mind, they just want to cancel your holiday meal, not their own. Then, the delegations <a href="https://unfccc.int/event/adaptation-fund-high-level-contributor-dialogue" target="_blank" rel="noopener">pledged</a> hundreds of millions of dollars toward helping developing nations impacted by the “crisis.” Forget that these dollars will never be used to help those nations grow their GDPs nor their energy independence; instead, the World Bank will administer the money to the ruling class in those countries. What could possibly go wrong giving more money and power to the elite?   
The most celebrated output from COP28 was a <a href="https://unfccc.int/news/cop28-agreement-signals-beginning-of-the-end-of-the-fossil-fuel-era" target="_blank" rel="noopener">final agreement</a> calling for the “beginning of the end” of all fossil fuel development. This “global stockade” – signed by delegations representing more than 200 countries is, according to the United Nations, the vehicle by which “[p]arties take actions towards…the phase-down of unabated coal power, phasing out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies, and other measures that drive the transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems, in a just, orderly and equitable manner&#8230;”
Let’s take this in for a minute: 84,000 delegates spent two weeks living in luxury, and their takeaway was that fossil fuels – which, between coal, natural gas, and oil power over 80% of the world today – are the enemy of the planet?
News flash: none of the climate hypocrites, COP28 delegates, would be meeting in Dubai in the first place without fossil fuels. None of them – not a single one – made it there, stayed there, communicated to their home countries, families or each other while there, enjoyed their lavish lifestyle while there or made it home from there without direct or byproduct use of fossil fuels.
So, the next time you hear about the good work being done at the COP events – and make no mistake, we’ll see COP29, COP 39, COP49, and so on – remember that they are giant parties designed to bring powerful, wealthy ideologues together to rage against the very products that have made their powerful, wealthy lives possible.
COP should stand for the “Council of the Pointless.”
* * *
Rick Whitbeck is the Alaska State Director for Power The Future, a national nonprofit organization that advocates for American energy jobs. Contact him at Rick@PowerTheFuture.com and follow him on X: @PTFAlaska.
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Menu