MSNBC staffers and stars are reportedly “in a panic” after the media giant Comcast confirmed reports that it was looking to spin off its cable news outlets.
Stars of the left-leaning network like Katy Tur, Rachel Maddow, and Chris Jansing reportedly joined a tense meeting led by NBCUniversal chairman Mark Lazarus to discuss what news of the spinoff meant, with staff curious about if MSNBC would have to change its name, logo, and headquarters, the <a href="https://nypost.com/2024/11/20/media/msnbc-staffers-in-a-panic-as-nbc-parent-comcast-plans-to-spin-off-channel-and-possibly-change-its-name/?utm_campaign=nypost&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_source=twitter">New York Post</a> reported.
Those with knowledge about the meeting said Lazarus didn’t offer much information about what it meant for them or whether there would be any changes, the outlet noted.
“Everyone is in a panic because everything is up in the air,” one MSNBC source told the outlet.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
MSNBC staffers ‘in a panic’ as NBC-parent Comcast plans to spin off channel — and possibly change its name <a href="https://t.co/zZqHkEjmiB">https://t.co/zZqHkEjmiB</a> <a href="https://t.co/VXk65kLGkY">pic.twitter.com/VXk65kLGkY</a>
— New York Post (@nypost) <a href="https://twitter.com/nypost/status/1859368209922580706?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 20, 2024</a></blockquote>
“People don’t really know what’s going on,” another source said. “They had the election, holidays are coming up. People are tired and just trying to get through.”
It comes following a <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/20/business/comcast-msnbc-cnbc-spinoff.html?smtyp=cur&amp;smid=tw-nytimes">report</a> Wednesday by The New York Times that Comcast would spin off its cable news outlets MSNBC and CNBC along with channels like Oxygen, E!, Syfy, and the Golf Channel, for the new company.
The changes will reportedly not affect the broadcast newsgroup NBC News, NBC Sports, Telemundo, or streaming service Peacock and Bravo, which will still be under the umbrella of NBC Universal, the outlet noted.
<a href="https://www.amiracist.com/?_gl=1*jtghwp*_gcl_au*ODQ1NjYzNTg2LjE3Mjg5MDk3OTE.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczMDEyMDgwOS40OS4xLjE3MzAxMjA4MzkuMzAuMC4w" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.amiracist.com/?_gl%3D1*jtghwp*_gcl_au*ODQ1NjYzNTg2LjE3Mjg5MDk3OTE.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczMDEyMDgwOS40OS4xLjE3MzAxMjA4MzkuMzAuMC4w&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1731788460608000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2J6FP5xFjcYYu1LwRGUFj3">MATT WALSH&#8217;S &#8216;AM I RACIST?&#8217; NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+</a>
Those in the meeting said Lazarus likened the new company to a “well-funded start-up” which was reportedly good news to MSNBC stars.
An insider said Maddow told the NBC chairman, “It’s great to have you here on day one.”
And Tur reportedly said she “liked the sound of a ‘well-funded start-up.&#8217;”
While MSNBC president Rashida Jones told staff that “change is always complicated.”
“I don’t think anyone knows anything,” a source with knowledge told the outlet. “I think they have a year to figure this out.”
The news comes amid reports that ratings for cable news outlets like MSNBC and CNN have plummeted following the results of the 2024 election and President-elect Donald Trump’s victory, as previously <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/msnbc-and-cnn-ratings-plummet-following-trumps-landslide-victory">reported</a>.
Related: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/msnbc-and-cnn-ratings-plummet-following-trumps-landslide-victory" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MSNBC And CNN Ratings Plummet Following Trump’s Landslide Victory</a>

2022 MSNBC Midterms Election Coverage

‘Everyone’s In A Panic’: MSNBC Staff Upset After Comcast Confirms It’s Looking To Spinoff Cable News

'Everyone's In A Panic': MSNBC Staff Upset After Comcast Confirms Looking To Spinoff Cable News 

Entertainment

Joe Scarborough

Media

MSNBC

NBC News

Ratings

&#8220;Morning Joe&#8221; host Mika Brzezinski made another stop on the apology tour as she and her husband and cohost Joe Scarborough attempt to do damage control and appease their left-leaning audience after they dared to take a meeting with President-elect Donald Trump.
Brzezinski and Scarborough announced during Monday morning&#8217;s broadcast that they had met with the president-elect at Mar-a-Lago in an effort to reopen the lines of communication after not speaking for a number of years. The move prompted critics on the left to say that they shouldn&#8217;t have offered Trump that kind of legitimacy — and critics on the right to wonder why, after they had compared him to Adolf Hitler, Trump would give them the time of day.
In the days since the pair have offered several explanations for their decision to meet with Trump — and they have repeatedly assured their audience that they still don&#8217;t agree with him on many things — and Wednesday was no exception.
&#8220;People are really scared,&#8221; Brzezinski told The Daily Beast editor-in-chief Joanna Coles and her <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/mika-defends-mar-a-lago-visit-musk-trump-road-trip/id1767675909?i=1000677726300" target="_blank" rel="noopener">podcast</a> cohost Samantha Bee.
&#8220;I’ve been surprised at the backlash,&#8221; she said of their meeting. &#8220;And the way I look at it is, people are really scared. And it’s one of the reasons we went in there is people are really scared about Donald Trump’s comments that, you know, political adversaries, a lot of people are scared because of what has happened with abortion. These are all issues that are important to me and in some ways personal to me, but definitely personal to the people I really care about.&#8221;
<a href="https://www.amiracist.com/?_gl=1*jtghwp*_gcl_au*ODQ1NjYzNTg2LjE3Mjg5MDk3OTE.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczMDEyMDgwOS40OS4xLjE3MzAxMjA4MzkuMzAuMC4w" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+</a>
Brzezinski went on to say that she believed it was part of her job to talk to people who might disagree or even attack her personally and that she felt she had made a mistake in not speaking with Trump over the last several years.
&#8220;Well, I mean, it’s my job to interview and talk to people I disagree with, feel threatened by or who have hurt my feelings in some way. So here’s how I do it. I do my job. I mean, do I really not go in there because he tweeted about me bleeding badly from the facelift at Mar-a-Lago, I don’t know, eight, nine years ago?&#8221; she asked. &#8220;I mean, we haven’t talked in seven years. And I will say that’s a problem, too. So I’m worried about myself and how I conduct myself in this media universe that we’re in, taking stock of everything that has happened. I don’t regret anything I’ve said during the campaign, and I stand by it. But I’m also looking at how to do things differently. And I would never turn down an opportunity to gain insider information. Never. So how I handle mean tweets or the personal stuff is that that’s just not something I’m supposed to worry about. That’s my job.&#8221;

The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon – Season 8

The Apology Tour Continues: ‘Morning Joe’ Host Is Still Doing Damage Control Over Trump Meeting

The Apology Tour Continues: 'Morning Joe' Host Is Still Doing Damage Control Over Trump Meeting

2024 Election

Donald Trump

Mika Brzezinski

Morning Joe

Politics

Leftist activist and TV personality <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/rosie-odonnell">Rosie O’Donnell</a> expressed her fury over <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/msnbc">MSNBC</a> hosts recently traveling to Florida to meet with President-elect <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/donald-trump">Donald Trump</a>.
The comedian <a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@rosie/video/7438776026525732138?lang=en">vented</a> about the meeting on TikTok. “Turn off the TV, because it’s like, impending doom, impending doom,” O’Donnell says in the clip. “But without a warning, they’re just like, ‘Well, Trump nominated so and so.’ Not like, ‘Holy s***, people. You’re not gonna believe this. We gotta do something.’ That’s what the newscaster should be saying. But they’re not. Hopeless.”
She continued, “So Mika [Brzezinski] and Joe [Scarborough] went down to Mar-a-Lago to kiss the ring. So, last time I ever watch ‘Morning Joe,’ period. End of statement. Unreal, unreal. For months you were telling us he’s the worst thing that could happen to this country and democracy. And then you go kiss his ring. Despicable. Despicable you; both of you.”
O’Donnell was referencing the meeting Brzezinski and Scarborough had with Trump on Friday, which has generated a lot of criticism from Democrats. That meeting was the first time they had spoken face to face with Trump in seven years, The Daily Wire previously <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/morning-joe-hosts-blistered-over-attempt-to-restart-communications-with-trump">reported</a>, and it was done in an effort “to restart communications.”
&#8220;Morning Joe&#8221; co-hosts Scarborough and Brzezinski, who are married, said they talked to Trump about several controversial issues, from immigration to abortion, and did not agree on much but stressed that having open communication was the main goal.
&#8220;For those asking why we would go speak to the president-elect during such fraught times, especially between us, I guess I would ask back – why wouldn’t we?&#8221; Brzezinski said. &#8220;Five years of political warfare has deeply divided Washington and the country. We have been as clear as we know how in expressing our deep concerns about President Trump’s actions and words in the coarsening of public debate.&#8221;
<a href="https://www.amiracist.com/?_gl=1*jtghwp*_gcl_au*ODQ1NjYzNTg2LjE3Mjg5MDk3OTE.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczMDEyMDgwOS40OS4xLjE3MzAxMjA4MzkuMzAuMC4w" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+</a>
&#8220;But for nearly 80 million Americans, election denialism, public trials, January 6, were not as important as the issues that moved them to send Donald Trump back to the White House with their vote,” she continued. “Joe and I realize it’s time to do something different, and that starts with not only talking about Donald Trump, but also talking with him.&#8221;
Other MSNBC hosts were also outraged that the meeting happened, with contributor Jennifer Rubin calling it &#8220;disgusting&#8221; on Bluesky, the social media platform started by Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey that’s become popular with leftists.
Host Katie Phang <a href="https://x.com/KatiePhang/status/1858520409710182606">posted</a> on X, &#8220;Normalizing Trump is a bad idea. Period.&#8221;
Jon Stewart, host of Comedy Central&#8217;s &#8216;The Daily Show,&#8217; answered Brzezinski&#8217;s rhetorical question about why wouldn’t they meet with Trump. “Uh…Because you said he was Hitler.”
Even conservatives are questioning the motives of the meeting. Nikki Haley, who lost the GOP presidential nomination to Trump, weighed in, <a href="https://x.com/NikkiHaley/status/1858573360256393618">posting</a> on X Monday, “Let’s be clear, Joe and Mika didn’t suddenly see the light, they saw their ratings. They realized they needed Trump for their survival.”

Rosie O’Donnell

Rosie O’Donnell Melts Down Over MSNBC Hosts Meeting With Trump: ‘Despicable’

Rosie O'Donnell Melts Down Over MSNBC Hosts Meeting With Trump: 'Despicable'

Rosie O'Donnell

Well, folks, it&#8217;s time for Joe and Mika version 3.0.
On Monday, there was a big announcement on Morning Joe that had a lot of heads spinning. Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski, who are now a married couple (although, when they first started the show, they were married to other people), decided that it was time for a little <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/trump-reveals-what-was-discussed-in-meeting-with-scarborough-brzezinski">kiss and make up</a> with Donald Trump.
Let’s take a bit of a trip down memory lane with Joe and Mika to understand just how astonishing and dishonest this is.
In 2015 and 2016, Joe and Mika were largely responsible for Trump receiving the Republican nomination. They had him on the air all the time. They sat with him as primary results came in. They were so close that Joe Scarborough was actually asked by radio host Hugh Hewitt if he would be Donald Trump&#8217;s vice presidential  nominee.
Then, after Trump got the nomination and he didn&#8217;t keep making time for Joe and Mika, they decided they were going to favor Hillary Clinton instead, for political reasons. They became quite vicious about President Trump, and they remained vicious for years.
<h3><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-2088-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show</a></h3>
Here are a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-2088-member-exclusive">few excerpts</a> of what they had to say about President Trump over the course of the next eight years or so:
<blockquote>Donald Trump keeps <a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@msnbc/video/7359172651140615466">talking</a> about how America sucks, and before he got elected, America sucked, and then he got elected, suddenly America was great. Then he lost. Now America sucks again. You&#8217;re voting for a guy like that?
What rises to the threat of democracy that we have ever seen in America since the Civil War if what Donald Trump has done over the past four years does not?
Trump is literally <a href="https://www.facebook.com/mrctv/videos/msnbc-attacks-trump-on-his-mental-capabilities/26187969194119963/">crazy</a> on stage and I say it not in a good way. Not well, not fit, not mentally capable.
I mean, you talk to people who served with him … they will tell you now the guy was completely ignorant on policy. It was frightening. It was scary. It was depressing.
It&#8217;s going to be <a href="https://archive.org/details/MSNBCW_20240913_100000_Morning_Joe">very hard</a> for the former president to convince anybody except for diehard MAGA — the types of people who will follow him anywhere — it’s going to be very hard for him to convince most Americans that he had a modicum of sense.
This is what voters know <a href="https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/10/24/mika_brzezinski_trumps_obsession_with_hitler_is_huge_news_he_is_killing_women.html">right now</a>: that he is killing us and talking about us women. He is killing us. He is putting us at risk. He is making us afraid to have babies. He is putting our reproductive health at risk. And some women have died already because of this.</blockquote>
They just went on and on and on.
Eight years of “Donald Trump Is Orange Hitler.” Eight years of it. They spent eight long years talking about how he was the threat to the republic. But they were standing in the breach.
Now, after Trump won, it turns out that they want to be friends again.
So Morning Joe&#8217;s team <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/video/6364855233112" target="_blank" rel="noopener">apparently went to Mar-a-Lago</a>. And on Monday, they opened their show by recounting their visit to make kissy-face, nice-nice with President-elect Donald Trump.
<blockquote>Mika: Joe and I went to Mar-a-Lago to meet personally with President-elect Trump. It was the first time we have seen him in seven years.
Joe: Now, we talked about a lot of issues, including abortion, mass deportation, threats of political retribution against political opponents, and media outlets. We talked about that a good bit. And it’s going to come as no surprise to anybody who watches this show, has watched it over the past year or over the past decade, that we didn&#8217;t see eye to eye on a lot of issues and we told him so.
Mika: What we did agree on was to restart communications. My father often spoke with world leaders with whom he and the United States profoundly disagreed. That&#8217;s a task shared by reporters and commentators alike.</blockquote>
They are walking this thing back. And then, of course, they have to maintain that they are just doing this for the sake of their <a href="https://x.com/simonateba/status/1858512927889699060" target="_blank" rel="noopener">journalistic objectivity</a>.
<blockquote>Joe: Well, of course, you look at the results of the election too, a new approach I think is needed, where, again, we speak truth to power. We push back hard, like we push back hard, whether it was with Barack Obama, whether it was with George W. Bush, whether it was obviously with Donald Trump or Joe Biden.</blockquote>
You didn&#8217;t push back hard with Joe Biden. And you just called Donald Trump “Hitler” for eight years.
So what does this say about the legacy media?
This: They are unbelievable garbage liars. They are such liars. How do you go on bended knee to Hitler?
<h3><a href="https://www.amiracist.com/?_gl=1*jtghwp*_gcl_au*ODQ1NjYzNTg2LjE3Mjg5MDk3OTE.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczMDEyMDgwOS40OS4xLjE3MzAxMjA4MzkuMzAuMC4w" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MATT WALSH&#8217;S &#8216;AM I RACIST?&#8217; NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+</a></h3>
This is the same as Joe Biden sitting in the Oval Office with Donald Trump grinning ear to ear after suggesting not only that Trump was Hitler, but also that his supporters were Hitler supporters. It showed that he was lying that entire time, that it had all been an act of demonization, of demagoguery.
It&#8217;s the same thing when it comes to Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski, and so much of the legacy media.
The only entity whose credibility was destroyed in this entire process were the people of the legacy media.
The Left wonders why trust in legacy media has completely cratered?
It&#8217;s because of things like this.

Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough

Joe And Mika Bend The Knee

Ben Shapiro

Legacy Media

President-elect Donald Trump confirmed on Monday that MSNBC &#8220;Morning Joe&#8221; hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski met with him privately at his Mar-a-Lago estate in southern Florida, calling the discussion &#8220;extremely cordial.&#8221;
Trump told <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-says-media-vital-making-america-great-again-vows-work-free-fair-open-press" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Fox News</a> that he met with the MSNBC hosts on Friday morning after Scarborough and Brzezinski had requested to talk with him. The &#8220;Morning Joe&#8221; anchors told viewers on their show Monday morning the meeting was their first face-to-face discussion with Trump in seven years, saying that they agreed with Trump &#8220;to restart communications.&#8221;
Trump said the leftist hosts &#8220;congratulated me on running a ‘great and flawless campaign, one for the history books,’ which I really believe it was, but it was also a campaign where I worked long and hard — perhaps longer and harder than any presidential candidate in history.&#8221;
&#8220;We talked about various Cabinet members — both announced and to be announced. As expected, they like some very much, but not all,&#8221; Trump added. &#8220;The meeting ended in a very positive manner, and we agreed to speak in the future.&#8221;
Brzezinski said that Trump appeared &#8220;cheerful,&#8221; &#8220;upbeat,&#8221; and &#8220;interested in finding common ground with Democrats on some of the most divisive issues.&#8221; She added that she and her co-host, who is also her husband, continue to hold &#8220;deep concerns&#8221; about a second Trump administration but acknowledged that nearly 80 million Americans made their voices heard about the issues that matter most to them and sent Trump back to the White House.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Joe and Mika went to Mar a Lago to talk with Trump over the weekend. First face-to-face meeting in seven years. &#8220;We didn&#8217;t see eye-to-eye on a lot of issues and we told him so,&#8221; <a href="https://twitter.com/JoeNBC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JoeNBC</a> says. &#8220;What we did agree on – was to restart communications,&#8221; <a href="https://twitter.com/morningmika?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@morningmika</a> says. <a href="https://t.co/lyWZWK4CwX">pic.twitter.com/lyWZWK4CwX</a>
— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) <a href="https://twitter.com/brianstelter/status/1858471489906815033?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 18, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> 
Brzezinski and Scarborough were blasted by conservatives on social media who pointed out that the &#8220;Morning Joe&#8221; hosts routinely boosted the Democrats&#8217; narrative that Trump poses a &#8220;threat&#8221; to the country. CNN contributor Scott Jennings <a href="https://x.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1858491506014695890?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1858491506014695890%7Ctwgr%5Edc78a75a0e0e421e98042db9c5bf8d45cf995c74%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&amp;ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailywire.com%2Fnews%2Fmorning-joe-hosts-blistered-over-attempt-to-restart-communications-with-trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">wrote</a>, &#8220;Hitler getting a lot more meeting requests than I would’ve thought.&#8221;
Trump told Fox News that he has &#8220;an obligation to the American public, and to our country itself, to be open and available to the press,&#8221; but warned that &#8220;if [he&#8217;s] not treated fairly &#8230; that will end.&#8221;
&#8220;The media is very important to the long-term success of the United States of America,&#8221; he added.
<a href="https://www.amiracist.com/?_gl=1*jtghwp*_gcl_au*ODQ1NjYzNTg2LjE3Mjg5MDk3OTE.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczMDEyMDgwOS40OS4xLjE3MzAxMjA4MzkuMzAuMC4w" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+</a>
The president-elect said many news outlets are reaching out to him and said he is willing to give second and third chances to media voices that have treated him poorly.
&#8220;And while many others are calling for meetings, I am not looking for retribution, grandstanding or to destroy people who treated me very unfairly, or even badly beyond comprehension,&#8221; Trump said. &#8220;I am always looking to give a second and even third chance, but never willing to give a fourth chance — that is where I hold the line.&#8221;

Trump Reveals What Was Discussed In Meeting With Scarborough, Brzezinski

Executive

The hosts of MSNBC&#8217;s flagship morning show &#8220;Morning Joe&#8221; announced on Monday that they were attempting to mend fences with President-elect Donald Trump — but not everyone was ready to simply forget their years of pointedly negative coverage.
Hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski explained during Monday morning&#8217;s broadcast that they had met with Trump at Mar-a-Lago over the weekend — the first time they had spoken face to face in seven years — and that while they had not agreed on a number of issues, they had agreed that it was past time &#8220;to restart communications.&#8221;
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Joe and Mika went to Mar a Lago to talk with Trump over the weekend. First face-to-face meeting in seven years. &#8220;We didn&#8217;t see eye-to-eye on a lot of issues and we told him so,&#8221; <a href="https://twitter.com/JoeNBC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JoeNBC</a> says. &#8220;What we did agree on – was to restart communications,&#8221; <a href="https://twitter.com/morningmika?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@morningmika</a> says. <a href="https://t.co/lyWZWK4CwX">pic.twitter.com/lyWZWK4CwX</a>
— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) <a href="https://twitter.com/brianstelter/status/1858471489906815033?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 18, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Brzezinski began by attacking Trump&#8217;s cabinet picks thus far, saying that she agreed with many concerned people she&#8217;d spoken to and &#8220;they are scary.&#8221; Still, she said they had visited Mar-a-Lago to speak with Trump when they got the chance.
Scarborough noted that they had discussed a number of issues with Trump, from abortion to deportations and threats of political retribution — and that, unsurprisingly, they had not agreed on many things.
Brzezinski also revealed that Scarborough had made a personal call to Trump the morning after the first attempt on his life at the rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.
<a href="https://www.amiracist.com/?_gl=1*jtghwp*_gcl_au*ODQ1NjYzNTg2LjE3Mjg5MDk3OTE.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczMDEyMDgwOS40OS4xLjE3MzAxMjA4MzkuMzAuMC4w" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+</a>
&#8220;Joe and I realized it&#8217;s time to do something different and that starts with not only talking about Donald Trump, but also talking with him,&#8221; Brzezinski added.
But still, there were those on the Right who felt that &#8220;Morning Joe&#8221; was offering too little too late.
&#8220;Hitler getting a lot more meeting requests than I would’ve thought,&#8221; CNN Republican pundit Scott Jennings posted.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Hitler getting alot more meeting requests than I would’ve thought 🙄 <a href="https://t.co/xRMi3Zet8d">https://t.co/xRMi3Zet8d</a>
— Scott Jennings (@ScottJenningsKY) <a href="https://twitter.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1858491506014695890?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 18, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;So all that stuff about Trump being a fascist, etc was a load of crap. MSNBC viewers are the biggest dupes on earth,&#8221; another said.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
So all that stuff about Trump being a fascist, etc was a load of crap.
MSNBC viewers are the biggest dupes on earth. <a href="https://t.co/mYiU6BDOp0">https://t.co/mYiU6BDOp0</a>
— RBe (@RBPundit) <a href="https://twitter.com/RBPundit/status/1858491849117212983?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 18, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;Annals of shamelessness: They call Trump a fascist, and much, much more, and then, just 22 days after his &#8216;Nazi-like&#8217; rally, they fly to Florida for an audience. Afterward, they say, &#8216;We didn&#8217;t see eye-to-eye on a lot of issues,&#8217; but they want to &#8216;restart communications.&#8217; What?&#8221; Byron York said.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Annals of shamelessness: They call Trump a fascist, and much, much more, and then, just 22 days after his &#8216;Nazi-like&#8217; rally, they fly to Florida for an audience. Afterward, they say, &#8216;We didn&#8217;t see eye-to-eye on a lot of issues,&#8217; but they want to &#8216;restart communications.&#8217; What? <a href="https://t.co/TUhJM9ofSD">https://t.co/TUhJM9ofSD</a>
— Byron York (@ByronYork) <a href="https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1858485850356498858?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 18, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;&#8216;Tangerine Hitler is a fascist who will kill all his enemies&#8217; said the foes who visited his plush resort, sat down with him, and laughed while sharing a mojito,&#8221; another commented.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
“Tangerine Hitler is a fascist who will kill all his enemies” said the foes who visited his plush resort, sat down with him, and laughed while sharing a mojito <a href="https://t.co/cBLDI7b9iQ">https://t.co/cBLDI7b9iQ</a>
— Razor (@hale_razor) <a href="https://twitter.com/hale_razor/status/1858505318637981719?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 18, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough and Mika went to Mar-a-Lago to meet with Trump and agreed to &#8216;reset&#8217; their relationship. Proving yet again that Democrats never actually thought Trump was Hitler or a fascist dictator. If you were propagandized, it’s ok. You got played. Usual dem playbook,&#8221; another said.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough and Mika went to Mar-a-Lago to meet with Trump and agreed to “reset” their relationship.
Proving yet again that Democrats never actually thought Trump was Hitler or a fascist dictator.
If you were propagandized, it’s ok.
You got played. Usual dem… <a href="https://t.co/wTAHnNKQws">https://t.co/wTAHnNKQws</a>
— Tony Seruga (@TonySeruga) <a href="https://twitter.com/TonySeruga/status/1858493929207013778?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 18, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon – Season 9

‘Morning Joe’ Hosts Blistered Over Attempt To ‘Restart Communications’ With Trump

'Morning Joe' Hosts Blistered Over Attempt To 'Restart Communications' With Trump

Imagine being a strategist for the Democrat Party right now. You&#8217;re tasked with conducting a post-mortem analysis of an election in which virtually every single demographic group in the country, in all 50 states, turned very sharply against you. Tens of millions of Americans ignored the endorsements of modern-day oracles like Taylor Swift and Queen Latifah and voted for the candidate you&#8217;ve been calling a Hitler-loving &#8220;threat to democracy.&#8221; How do you even begin to catalog all of the various failures that led your party to this point? 
Up until now, the prevailing excuse in the Democrat Party has been pretty clear. As I&#8217;ve <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/why-millions-of-minority-voters-are-ditching-the-democratic-party" target="_blank" rel="noopener">outlined</a> before, many Democrats are happy to dismiss the entire country as racist and sexist. In fact, Hispanics are apparently racist against themselves. This is the kind of theory you come up with when you don&#8217;t want to actually talk to Hispanic people, or be anywhere near them for that matter. But you have to find some way to explain why they might want to build a wall and enforce the law, so you conclude that they must hate themselves. That must be it.
At the same time, there is at least one Democrat-aligned group that’s taking a different and more serious approach. I&#8217;m talking about something called Blueprint, which I hadn&#8217;t heard of until a day ago. Blueprint <a href="https://blueprint2024.com/about/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">describes</a> itself as a &#8220;vital tool&#8221; that can help Democrats win elections in the future. This is a Left-wing group that basically tries to craft messaging for the DNC.
Over the past week, Blueprint has employed pollsters and strategists to figure out how Democrats lost so badly on Election Day. They&#8217;ve been tasked with sifting through the wreckage to identify what caused the implosion. And what they&#8217;ve found is remarkable. Even given all the endless polls and analysis we&#8217;ve been subjected to this month, this one stands out.
I hadn&#8217;t seen these results until Charlie Kirk <a href="https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1855081000386412677" target="_blank" rel="noopener">pointed</a> them out the other day, in a post on X. He posted this chart of Blueprint&#8217;s findings. It shows all the issues that voters cared about in this election, ranked by their level of relative importance. They calculated this by asking voters to compare a bunch of issues, in a kind of round-robin analysis.
<div id="attachment_828081" style="width: 407px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-828081" class="wp-image-828081 size-large" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/11/Gb6RtOvbwAAS_Sl-397x576.jpeg" alt="Chart courtesy: Blueprint2024.com. https://blueprint2024.com/polling/why-trump-reasons-11-8/" width="397" height="576" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/11/Gb6RtOvbwAAS_Sl-397x576.jpeg 397w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/11/Gb6RtOvbwAAS_Sl-207x300.jpeg 207w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/11/Gb6RtOvbwAAS_Sl-768x1115.jpeg 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/11/Gb6RtOvbwAAS_Sl.jpeg 882w" sizes="(max-width: 397px) 100vw, 397px" />Chart courtesy: Blueprint2024.com.</div>
As you can see, there are a lot of issues on that list. Voters had many options to choose from. And according to Blueprint&#8217;s findings, swing voters who ultimately voted for Trump — meaning, the people who determined the outcome of this election — were very unhappy with Kamala Harris&#8217; focus on transgender issues. In fact, Kamala&#8217;s views on topics like transgenderism, at the expense of substantive issues, was the number-one, most important issue on these swing voters&#8217; minds.
Just so we&#8217;re clear on the terms, Blueprint defines a &#8220;swing voter&#8221; as:
<blockquote>those who are undecided in the presidential race, have changed their voting preference since 2020 (voting Democrat in one election and Republican in the other), or are independents who either indicate they split their votes between Democrats and Republicans, or who hold either favorable or unfavorable views of both Trump and Harris.</blockquote>
If you go to Blueprint&#8217;s <a href="https://blueprint2024.com/polling/why-trump-reasons-11-8/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">crosstabs</a>, here&#8217;s what they found specifically about this group of voters. Among swing voters who ultimately voted for Trump, the top reason for voting for Trump over Kamala was:
<blockquote>Kamala Harris is focused more on cultural issues like transgender issues rather than helping the middle class.</blockquote>
That was the single most important issue for these swing voters, relative to all the others. The next most important issue was inflation, followed closely by illegal migration.
This is a finding that, if you had floated it as a possibility prior to the election, would&#8217;ve gotten you laughed out of the room. But now that Democrats realize that most voters think they&#8217;re crazy, they&#8217;re finally talking about it. Democrat-aligned pollsters are openly recognizing that transgenderism — including the associated government policies that have been championed by trans activists and the Biden-Harris administration — is a massive problem for the Democrat Party.
<h3><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1484-on-demand-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show</a></h3>
And yet, this is a problem that — certainly at least in a pre-”<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/videos/what-is-a-woman" target="_blank" rel="noopener">What Is A Woman?</a>” world — very few Republicans wanted to touch. In fact, plenty of Republicans still don&#8217;t want to talk about this. It&#8217;s an issue that for years I was personally ridiculed for pursuing, including by many on the Right. Even among people who believe we&#8217;re on the correct side of the whole debate, a lot of them still said it was a waste of time to talk about it.
These people think that so-called &#8220;culture war issues&#8221; are a side show. They&#8217;re &#8220;irrelevant distractions,&#8221; supposedly. But they aren’t. Culture is everything. It’s the stuff that a nation is made of. And that matters politically. People vote for culture. People don&#8217;t just vote based on candidates&#8217; personalities, or on specific proposals. They vote for the country they want to live in. And now, a critical mass of those voters have decided that they don&#8217;t want to live in a country that can&#8217;t even define the word &#8220;woman.&#8221;
To be clear, this result isn&#8217;t saying that transgenderism was at the top of voters&#8217; minds all by itself. Instead, what this result reveals is that trans issue is about much more than just transgenderism. It’s symptomatic of something larger and deeper. Voters see the trans agenda as an assault on truth and basic common sense, which is exactly what it is. It&#8217;s a destructive set of beliefs that serves only to derail human progress while harming a lot of people.
Trans ideology requires that Americans affirm what is not true and reject objective reality, on the theory that this is somehow the more &#8220;humane&#8221; approach. But there&#8217;s nothing humane or sustainable about lying — especially when the point of the lying is to obscure something as fundamental as human biology and human nature. If you tolerate lies about that, then you will tolerate lies about anything. 
If a white guy wants to identify as black, then you can&#8217;t object. 
If a politician wants to claim that crime is down when it&#8217;s clearly not, then you can&#8217;t complain about that, either. 
If the government wants to claim the economy is doing fine when no one can find a job or afford groceries, then you have to shut up and take it.
Once reality is subjective, you can&#8217;t communicate anymore in any meaningful way, much less fix problems. All you can do is spiral down further and further into delusions. Trans ideology is built on the premise that we all have our own truth. That there is no objective reality or universal truth that we are all expected to acknowledge.
<h3><a href="https://www.amiracist.com/?_gl=1*jtghwp*_gcl_au*ODQ1NjYzNTg2LjE3Mjg5MDk3OTE.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczMDEyMDgwOS40OS4xLjE3MzAxMjA4MzkuMzAuMC4w" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MATT WALSH&#8217;S &#8216;AM I RACIST?&#8217; NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+</a></h3>
If we accept trans ideology, we accept this premise. And if we accept this premise, we have tacitly accepted every other Left-wing premise, because now we have no basis to deny any of it. We cannot call anything untrue. Now there is nothing that can be called untrue. Which means there is also nothing that can be called true. This is the fundamental reason why the fight against trans ideology matters. It’s the case that some of us have been making for many years, even against the objections of our own side. But now the voters see it and agree. And it’s one of the main reasons why Democrats were just obliterated in the election.
The Trump campaign understood that this issue would resonate with voters. That’s why they released this ad, which may have been the single most effective ad in the entire campaign. In fact it may be one of the best ads ever produced by a political campaign. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="2024 Trump &#039;Nonsense&#039; Ad" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/lhnHt1NB0M0?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
&nbsp;
When she spoke to Fox News — in the only hostile interview she participated in during the entire campaign — Kamala was asked directly about this ad. She had the opportunity to disavow all of this nonsense. She could&#8217;ve admitted that it was a terrible idea to use taxpayer money to fund sex changes for illegals, or for anyone else. She could&#8217;ve acknowledged that people can&#8217;t change their gender or pick their pronouns. She also could&#8217;ve laid out a clear definition of the word &#8220;woman&#8221; — which is a pretty important word to define, since she was campaigning to be the first woman president.
In other words, Kamala had the opportunity to do what the African tribesmen did when I spoke to them in &#8220;<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/videos/what-is-a-woman" target="_blank" rel="noopener">What is a Woman?</a>&#8220;. She could have laughed in the face of this absurdity, as anyone with common sense would do. She could have demonstrated to Americans that she&#8217;s not going to surrender the federal government to a small number of radical, anti-truth activists. But Kamala didn&#8217;t do any of that.
Instead, here&#8217;s how she addressed this ad when Bret Baier brought it up:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="003 Kamala asked" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/QPorxQKxNJ4?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
So she mocks the Trump campaign for spending so much money on the ad. This is the candidate whose campaign raised a billion dollars and ended up in debt by tens of millions of dollars because they hired a bunch of celebrity influencers who, it turns out, have no influence. Yet she’s lecturing the Trump campaign on how they should&#8217;ve spent their money. Maybe the Trump campaign should&#8217;ve gone bankrupt in order to get Megan Thee Stallion to twerk on stage. That strategy obviously worked out so well for Kamala.
And then Kamala goes on to dismiss the whole issue as unimportant. She claims that Americans don&#8217;t really care about all of this trans stuff. But they do. They care about it because they care about truth. And they care about truth because if you don’t have that, literally nothing else matters.
Already, there are some signs that Left-wing media is coming around, ever so begrudgingly, to this reality. Here&#8217;s Joe Scarborough, for example. 
<iframe loading="lazy" title="ff" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ZWOTcqyMwNE?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
You can imagine how well this monologue went over among the various LGBTQ alphabet activist groups and publications. 
The Advocate, for example, wrote an entire article attacking Scarborough for this. They <a href="https://www.advocate.com/voices/morning-joe-transphobia-trump-election" target="_blank" rel="noopener">stated </a>that, 
<blockquote>&#8220;If you voted for Donald Trump and against Kamala Harris because you had something against the trans community, you were beyond an outlier. You were not even a blip on the radar. So why are people like Joe and Mika callously targeting the trans community for Harris’s loss? And why are they doing it so brazenly? Instead of discussing the real reasons why Harris lost to Trump, they trash innocent human beings. The most vulnerable in society.&#8221;</blockquote>
So again, they assume this is a fringe issue, when it&#8217;s obviously not. They think voters who are tired of trans nonsense are a &#8220;blip on the radar.&#8221; But the truth is — as this Blueprint poll demonstrates — Americans don&#8217;t want to affirm lies anymore. They are tired of having their culture held hostage by these people. It doesn&#8217;t matter how much you try to berate these voters for &#8220;trashing innocent human beings&#8221; or whatever. Something is either true or it&#8217;s not. Affirming the truth is not &#8220;trashing&#8221; anyone. It&#8217;s the bare minimum necessary to ensure that society can continue to function.
On CNN, they still haven&#8217;t come around to this realization. Instead, they just hosted a live on-air struggle session after a guest pointed out that Americans don&#8217;t like the idea of boys competing in women&#8217;s sports. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="005 CNN denial boys and girls fight" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/pjp2FY0IGHE?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
&nbsp;
Yes, it&#8217;s now a &#8220;slur&#8221; to refer to a boy as a boy. If a 12-year-old boy says he feels like a girl, you don&#8217;t get to substitute your bigoted opinions for the well-informed judgment of a preteen. Who do you think you are? All you get to do is nod your head and ask a doctor to pump his body full of sterilizing hormones. This is the position of CNN. It&#8217;s the position of the woman hosting this show. But it&#8217;s the position of a vanishingly small amount of the electorate.
That clip goes on for a while, by the way. The first guy says something that&#8217;s obviously true — that boys are competing in women&#8217;s sports, and they shouldn&#8217;t be — and then gets relentlessly heckled for it. He&#8217;s eventually told that the &#8220;American Medical Association&#8221; says that children can change their gender, so therefore, you don&#8217;t get to have an opinion on the topic. You have to accept their judgment or else you&#8217;ll get banned from CNN, just like the last guest who tried to speak his mind on this same panel.
This is the divide that the Democrats are experiencing right now as a party. This is the choice they have. They can either choose to acknowledge reality, or they can double down on absurdities and falsehoods. If they go with the absurdities and falsehoods, then they&#8217;re going to keep haranguing Americans, calling for censorship, and screaming at an audience that&#8217;s rapidly becoming nonexistent. Whatever they decide, it&#8217;s now clear that voters have made up their minds. On Tuesday, swing voters decided that affirming reality is the single most important issue in this country. This is the political victory that we&#8217;ve been seeking from the moment we began fighting the deranged excesses of gender ideology several years ago. And now it’s here. But as long as the Left keeps pushing it, the fight will continue.

young person with a transgender pride flag

How Kamala’s Focus On Gender Ideology Cost Her The Election

Democrats

gender ideology

Illegal Immigration

Inflation

Kamala Harris

Matt Walsh

Opinion

Transgender

MSNBC&#8217;s Joe Scarborough expressed shock on Thursday when he learned how expensive the cost of butter was for many Americans, prompting him to ask if it was wrapped in gold.
The moment came on the network&#8217;s &#8220;Morning Joe&#8221; show with his wife, co-host Mika Brzezinski, as they discussed why President-elect Donald Trump beat Vice President Kamala Harris.
&#8220;I want to talk about the economy for a second,&#8221; he said. &#8220;A few weeks ago, three weeks ago, somebody who was going to be voting for Kamala Harris came up to me and said, &#8216;Oh my god, Trump&#8217;s going to win.&#8217; I go, &#8216;Why is that?&#8217; He goes, &#8216;I just, I went to the grocery store, butter is over $3.'&#8221;
&#8220;I kind of laughed and I said, &#8216;Well, that&#8217;s kind of reductive, isn&#8217;t it?&#8217; I said it to myself,&#8221; he continued. &#8220;To him, I smiled, and I said, &#8216;Good point.&#8217; But it actually, everything we&#8217;re hearing after the election is&#8211;&#8221;
Brzezinski then interrupted and pointed out that butter actually costs $7, not $3.
<a href="https://www.amiracist.com/?_gl=1*jtghwp*_gcl_au*ODQ1NjYzNTg2LjE3Mjg5MDk3OTE.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczMDEyMDgwOS40OS4xLjE3MzAxMjA4MzkuMzAuMC4w" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+</a>
&#8220;Butter is $7?&#8221; Scarborough asked. What, is it framed in gold?&#8221;
&#8220;Okay, well, yeah, okay, well, anyway, my point is this, the rent is too damn high, and this guy was saying the cost of butter is way damn too high,&#8221; he said. &#8220;And so I thought it was a bit reductive.&#8221;
&#8220;It ended up being just the point, that if you look at the cost of groceries, if you look at the cost of gas, if you look at the cost of things compared to four years ago, it was a very simple answer for working-class Americans: things just cost too much,&#8221; he added.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
On today&#8217;s Morning Joe, Scarborough is still trying to square how Kamala Harris lost so bad and was SHOCKED to learn about the high price of groceries.
Scarborough was floored when a friend told him butter was $3 and he almost fell out of his chair when Mika Brzezinski told him… <a href="https://t.co/6MelvWoput">pic.twitter.com/6MelvWoput</a>
— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) <a href="https://twitter.com/SteveGuest/status/1854509215395594541?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 7, 2024</a></blockquote>

National Action Network’s Women’s Empowerment Luncheon

Scarborough Shocked To Learn How Much Butter Costs: ‘Is It Framed In Gold?’

As the mainstream media grapples with <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/kamala-harris">Kamala Harris</a>’ big loss, many are trying to figure out what went wrong. <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/msnbc">MSNBC</a> host <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/joe-scarborough">Joe Scarborough</a> put forth the theory that Democrats allowed their party to become too involved with cultural issues, including men competing in women’s sports.
Scarborough brought up the topic of pro-Palestinian protestors on college campuses as another example of Leftist extremism. 
“Let’s dig a little deeper because you have that stacked on top of what happened on college campuses this fall, stacked on top of what’s been happening on college campuses over the past four or five years,” he said. “I have said this on the air, and every time I’ve said it, people said, ‘Oh, you’re just saying that because you’re a white conservative.’ No, I’m just saying it because every Democrat that we have ever sat down [to] dinner with over the past five years who have kids that go to colleges, say their kids are afraid to speak in class because they’ll be canceled.”
Scarborough added, “If any of you out there say, &#8216;Oh, that’s just like a conservative, white, southern guy &#8230;&#8217; That’s why you’re losing. That’s why you’re losing. Because that’s what I heard. And I didn’t hear it from Republicans. I didn’t hear it from Trumpers. I heard it from Democrats over the past three or four years. Their kids were afraid to talk in class and say something unpopular because they would be canceled. And it’s an epidemic.”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
LOL: <a href="https://twitter.com/JoeNBC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JoeNBC</a> (the day after the election): &quot;Democrats should be smarter on the women&#39;s athletics thing. 85% of Americans oppose men transitioning after puberty and competing against women. And I&#39;m not just saying this the day after the election.&quot;<a href="https://t.co/QXIa5qgV2Q">pic.twitter.com/QXIa5qgV2Q</a>
&mdash; Mary Margaret Olohan (@MaryMargOlohan) <a href="https://twitter.com/MaryMargOlohan/status/1854170559405314412?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 6, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The “Morning Joe” co-host also pointed to the Democrats’ position on transgender-identifying athletes.
“By the way, by the way, as we’ve said on this show a thousand times, Democrats should be smarter on the women’s athletics thing,” Scarborough went on. 
“Eighty-five percent of Americans oppose men transitioning after puberty and competing against women. And I’m not just saying this the day after the election. I’ve been saying this for years. This is not a hard call. You can show compassion and you can show grace. And as the Republican governor of Utah said, ‘Let’s figure out a way to do this.’ But one way we don’t do this is by allowing men who transition after puberty [to compete] against young girls who have been working their entire lives to be as good as they can be. And then they get destroyed in the pool, on the track, etc., etc., etc.”

MSNBC Host Says Kamala Lost Because Dems Pushed Trans Issues

Leftism

Transgender Athletes

Doug Emhoff, the husband of Vice President Kamala Harris, claimed in an MSNBC interview that aired in part on Friday that recent allegations that have been made against him were nothing more than a &#8220;distraction.&#8221;
Emhoff made the remarks in an interview with Joe Scarborough on &#8220;Morning Joe&#8221; while discussing what he claimed was &#8220;misinformation and disinformation&#8221; being spread by former President Donald Trump against his wife.
&#8220;He&#8217;s spreading it about you, saying that tabloid stories about your personal life, saying it should be front and center,&#8221; Scarborough said.
Scarborough&#8217;s remarks appear to be a reference to a series of Daily Mail reports about Emhoff, including a report where he was <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/doug-emhoff-accused-of-hitting-ex-girlfriend-in-the-face-at-high-profile-event-report">accused</a> of hitting his ex-girlfriend in the face.
&#8220;He&#8217;s saying it about your wife and making incredibly crude and lewd suggestions about her past life,&#8221; Scarborough continued. &#8220;I&#8217;m just wondering, how do you all stay centered? How do you stay disciplined and not really go off and not really push back hard at these things?&#8221;
Emhoff responded: &#8220;We don&#8217;t have time to be pissed off. We don&#8217;t have time to focus on it. It&#8217;s all a distraction. It&#8217;s designed to try to get us off our game.&#8221;
When asked if the allegations threw him off, he said they did not and that he and Harris are hyper-focused on the election right now.
&#8220;All that other stuff you&#8217;re talking about bounces off. It&#8217;s just a distraction,&#8221; he later claimed. &#8220;We&#8217;re not going to let it distract us.&#8221;
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Telling word choice:
Second Gentleperson Doug Emhoff calls the allegations that he hit his ex-girlfriend in the face “a distraction.”
That’s not a denial. Doug is a lawyer. His decision to pivot when asked about DV was a deliberate decision. 
<a href="https://t.co/dMBpkOZqYE">pic.twitter.com/dMBpkOZqYE</a>
— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) <a href="https://twitter.com/SteveGuest/status/1844740714057371872?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 11, 2024</a></blockquote>

Second Gentleman Douglas Emhoff speaks as he joined

Doug Emhoff Appears To Respond To Accusations He Hit A Woman: ‘It’s All A Distraction’

Doug Emhoff

Elections

The Daily Mail

&#8220;Morning Joe&#8221; regular Katty Kay conceded on Friday that Vice President Kamala Harris does not poll well with men — across a number of demographics — and she suggested a possible solution the campaign might implement in order to bridge that gap.
Kay argued that Harris&#8217; campaign — which has not been terribly forthcoming with regard to answering questions from the press or outlining actual policies that were likely to be implemented in a Harris administration — could have her husband, Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff, and her running mate, Governor Tim Walz (D-MN), do more from the campaign trail.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
.<a href="https://twitter.com/KattyKay_?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@KattyKay_</a>: &quot;The real struggle for the Harris campaign is young men, older men, men of color, white men. And they&#39;re doing all they can. The debate next week will be really interesting to see how Tim Walz reaches out to that group.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/mwL41t104d">pic.twitter.com/mwL41t104d</a>
&mdash; Morning Joe (@Morning_Joe) <a href="https://twitter.com/Morning_Joe/status/1839626156888183170?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 27, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;Either the concern or the upside, depending on how you look at this from the Harris campaign&#8217;s point of view, is that Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin people think will break the same way,&#8221; she said of Harris&#8217; focus in the swing states. &#8220;That&#8217;s what they&#8217;ve done traditionally ever since 1980, I think there&#8217;s one exception, so if they lose Pennsylvania, what would that then mean for Wisconsin and Michigan? If they win Wisconsin and Michigan, does that then mean they&#8217;re going to win Pennsylvania?&#8221;
Kay then pointed out that the major problem facing the Harris campaign was &#8220;men.&#8221;
&#8220;But it&#8217;s men, I think the real struggle for the Harris campaign, is young men, old men, men of color, white men — and they are doing all they can, you can see – I think we&#8217;ll see the debate next week will be really interesting to see how Tim Walz reaches out to that group. Doug Emhoff &#8230; he is making a concerted effort in his own way to reach out to that group. They know that&#8217;s where they — they know that&#8217;s where they have a weakness.&#8221;
&#8220;No self-respecting man buys Tim Walz’s schmalzy Midwest Dad schtick. Mr Stolen Valor is as phony as his boss and even weirder. (Who gets married on the anniversary of a massacre? The Manchurian candidate.)&#8221; Miranda Devine commented via X.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
No self-respecting man buys Tim Walz’s schmalzy Midwest Dad schtick. Mr Stolen Valor is as phony as his boss and even weirder. (Who gets married on the anniversary of a massacre? The Manchurian candidate.) <a href="https://t.co/lqhTn1NdK1">https://t.co/lqhTn1NdK1</a>
&mdash; Miranda Devine (@mirandadevine) <a href="https://twitter.com/mirandadevine/status/1839662264984428754?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 27, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Gates McGavick added, &#8220;&#8216;Guys, male voters aren&#8217;t buying our campaign&#8217;/ &#8216;All good. Get Walz on stage and have him wave like a maniac on speed.'&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
&quot;Guys, male voters aren&#39;t buying our campaign&quot;
&quot;All good. Get Walz on stage and have him wave like a maniac on speed&quot; <a href="https://t.co/jQlqmoCbwC">https://t.co/jQlqmoCbwC</a> <a href="https://t.co/UOj37beqxI">pic.twitter.com/UOj37beqxI</a>
&mdash; Gates McGavick (@GatesMcgavick) <a href="https://twitter.com/GatesMcgavick/status/1839671661278187755?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 27, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;Ohhhh yeah, Tim Walz will absolutely solve that Man Problem,&#8221; Nan Hayworth said.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Ohhhh yeah, Tim Walz will absolutely solve that Man Problem <a href="https://t.co/sIXEojlPaA">https://t.co/sIXEojlPaA</a>
&mdash; Nan Hayworth, M.D. (@NanHayworth) <a href="https://twitter.com/NanHayworth/status/1839698552966062121?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 27, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;Hard to believe that a political party built around demonizing men is having trouble with male voters of all ages, colors, ethnicities, etc,&#8221; William Jacobson responded in a post to X.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Hard to believe that a political party built around demonizing men is having trouble with male voters of all ages, colors, ethnicities, etc. <a href="https://t.co/kWxsmYi9xA">https://t.co/kWxsmYi9xA</a>
&mdash; William A. Jacobson (@wajacobson) <a href="https://twitter.com/wajacobson/status/1839655240003367139?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 27, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&nbsp;

2024 Democratic National Convention: Day 4

Kamala Polls Badly With Men, And ‘Morning Joe’ Has … The Solution?

Tim Walz

MSNBC host Joe Scarborough claimed on Wednesday that anyone who truly believed in &#8220;American capitalism&#8221; should be worried that former President Donald Trump would bring about an &#8220;imperial presidency&#8221; if re-elected in November.
Scarborough, a former Republican, briefly leaned into his conservative background and claimed that Trump posed a greater risk to the concept of &#8220;smaller government&#8221; — and therefore a greater risk to the free market and capitalism — than his Democratic opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
MSNBC&#8217;s <a href="https://twitter.com/JoeNBC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JoeNBC</a>: &#8220;If you are a capitalist, if you believe in American capitalism,&#8221; you must support <a href="https://twitter.com/KamalaHarris?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@KamalaHarris</a> <a href="https://t.co/fqKK7R7GgJ">pic.twitter.com/fqKK7R7GgJ</a>
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) <a href="https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1831305309916115167?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 4, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;This argument that was made yesterday by an economic reporter: &#8216;Don&#8217;t worry about the insurrection, worry instead about tax code,&#8217; and I think regulations,&#8221; Scarborough began. &#8220;Really that underlines about that I&#8217;ve made on this show before and I&#8217;m going to make again. If you are a capitalist, if you believe in American capitalism, as I believe in American capitalism, unapologetically believe in American capitalism. It has lifted more people out of poverty than any other economic system ever. It has its problems, the sharp edges always need to be rounded off where it doesn&#8217;t get in the way of competition and the free markets. But if you believe in American capitalism, you should be worried about Donald Trump being elected.&#8221;
<a href="https://www.amiracist.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.amiracist.com/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1724361346607000&amp;usg=AOvVaw1ZhyOQfEkxcMH_D1Ago3CQ">Tickets for “Am I Racist?” are on sale NOW! Buy here for a theater near you.</a>
Scarborough went on to explain that he believed in smaller government and argued that Trump — who spent much of his first term in the Oval Office cutting regulations and reducing government power over individuals — would necessarily bring about a more oppressive &#8220;imperial presidency&#8221; if he were to be elected again.
&#8220;That&#8217;s what you get in corrupt nations,&#8221; Scarborough continued. &#8220;Where you have a strong man who picks winners and losers. That&#8217;s when competition, that&#8217;s when the free market, that&#8217;s when the invisible hand is slapped by the autocrat running the state. And that&#8217;s when capitalism loses.&#8221;
Scarborough made no comment about Democrat pushes to ban gas stoves or mandate the shift to electric vehicles but simply repeated that Trump would seize control of everything.

‘Morning Joe’ Is Not Kidding: ‘If You Believe In American Capitalism,’ Kamala Is The Way

'Morning Joe' Is Not Kidding: 'If You Believe In American Capitalism,' Kamala Is The Way

Menu