A panel of judges in the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/united-kingdom" target="_blank" rel="noopener">United Kingdom</a> denied an appeal from parents to take their daughter, who suffers from a rare disease, to Italy for treatment.
The judges <a href="https://christianconcern.com/news/judges-rule-italian-intervention-to-save-indi-wholly-misconceived/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> that Italy’s desire to take 8-month-old <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/judge-orders-u-k-baby-to-be-taken-off-life-support-as-parents-fight-to-take-her-to-italy-for-treatment" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Indi Gregory</a> in for treatment under Hague Convention rules was “wholly misconceived” and “not in the spirit of the convention.” Italy has granted the infant citizenship and Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has reached out to the U.K.’s Lord Chancellor to coordinate travel to bring the young child to <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/italy" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Italy</a>.
The parents of Indi, <a href="https://christianconcern.com/cccases/indi-gregory/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">supported</a> by the Christian Legal Centre, have sought to leave the U.K. to find treatment for a rare mitochondrial disease their daughter has. Judges with the Court of Appeal denied their requests, upholding a previous ruling from Justice Robert Peel that Indi must be taken off life support.
“Claire and I are again disgusted by another one-sided decision from the judges and the Trust. The whole world is watching and is shocked at how we have been treated,” Dean Gregory, Indi’s father, said.
“Claire and I have always wanted what is in Indi’s best interests. She has human rights and we wanted her to have the best treatment possible. If the UK did not want to fund it, why can she not go to Italy and receive the treatment and care which the amazing Italian Prime Minister and government has offered,” he added.
Lord Justice Peter Jackson, Lady Justice Eleanor King, and Lord Justice Andrew Moylan also ruled against the parent’s request to bring Indi home if she had to have life support removed.
In an <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1369-old-lawyer-shoots-two-climate-activists-blocking-the-road-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">interview with Daily Wire host Michael Knowles</a> on Friday before the court’s decision was announced, Dean said that he was “embarrassed to be British” and that all he wanted to do was get treatment for his daughter.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1687352286746000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2XxW0VTdKx-2nQAhkiTR8M">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
“As a parent in the U.K., when you go to the courts, you’ve got no rights, you’re set up to fail. Everyone is against you. My daughter is not brain dead, she’s moving, she’s breathing, she’s alert,” he said. “It’s all down to money. It’s all down to cost and resources in the U.K.”
He said the doctors and courts in the U.K. didn’t think his daughter’s life was “worth the cost,” saying that Italy was doing everything it could to help while the U.K. refused. “Why can’t my country help,” he asked.
Italy’s government has said that it would pay for treatment at Bambino Gesù Pediatric Hospital in Rome.
“There is a hospital prepared to care for Indi in Rome. Indi’s parents desire to give her every chance they can. Why would anyone try to stop this happening for them and for her?” Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre, said. “To continue to deny them this opportunity is unimaginable.”

Screen Shot 2023-11-09 at 7.40.59 AM

Judges Deny Parents’ Appeal To Take Infant Daughter To Italy For Treatment, Order Life-Support Be Removed

Judges Deny Parents' Appeal To Take Infant Daughter To Italy For Treatment, Order Life-Support Be Removed

Health

Health Care

Italy

United Kingdom

World

A judge in the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/united-kingdom" target="_blank" rel="noopener">United Kingdom</a> has ruled that an 8-month-old baby girl must be taken off life support despite her parents saying she is still responsive and wishing to bring her to Italy for additional care. 
The parents of Indi Gregory, <a href="https://christianconcern.com/cccases/indi-gregory/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">supported</a> by the Christian Legal Centre, have <a href="https://christianconcern.com/ccpressreleases/indi-gregory-judge-rules-life-support-will-be-removed-tomorrow-as-hospital-bosses-threaten-to-remove-treatment-without-family-present/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">filed</a> an appeal to the order of Justice Robert Peel that Indi must be taken off life support at Queen’s Medical Centre in Nottingham or a hospice on Thursday. 
Doctors from Britain’s National Health Service have argued that treatment for Indi, who has a mitochondrial disease, should not continue, and Peel agreed, <a href="https://apnews.com/article/indi-gregory-uk-italy-ruling-0caecf4c18336004d4e3b99cfff9c327" target="_blank" rel="noopener">claiming</a> that efforts to bring Indi to Italy for treatment would not be in her best interests. With mitochondrial disease, the body has trouble turning sugar into energy meaning that the body&#8217;s cells do not work as they should. 
Peel said that Indi had “extremely limited quality of life” and was skeptical that treatments would improve her condition. Her parents say that she has responded positively to their touch and hope to try alternative treatments to help her fight the disease. 
Indi has been given Italian citizenship and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has said she would do all in her power to help Indi and her family. 
&#8220;They say there isn&#8217;t much hope for little Indi, but until the very end, I&#8217;ll do what I can to defend her life. And to defend the right of her mamma and papa to do all that they can for her,” Meloni <a href="https://www.christianpost.com/news/indi-gregory-parents-make-last-ditch-effort-to-save-daughter.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a>. 
“For the hospital and the UK Courts to simply ignore the offer from the Italian government is disgraceful,” father Dean Gregory said. “I appeal to the British government to allow Indi to come to Italy before it is too late. As a father I have never asked or begged for anything in my life, but I am now begging the British government to please help prevent our daughter’s life from being taken away.”
According to Christian Concern, the Bambino Gesù Paediatric Hospital in Rome has said that it would take Indi in for treatment and attempt a right ventricular outflow tract stent procedure, a surgery that has been proposed that may help the young child. Italy’s government also said it would pay for the treatments. 
Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre, called out British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, a member of the Conservative Party, for not speaking out in Indi’s defense. 
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1687352286746000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2XxW0VTdKx-2nQAhkiTR8M">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
“What good reason can there be to detain Indi here against the wishes of her parents when treatment is being offered in Rome,” Williams said. “The developments lay bare the difference in approach between two nations when the Italian Prime Minister has been public in her support of Indi Gregory and the right of her parents to access treatment in Rome and the British Prime Minister has remained silent.”
If Indi can&#8217;t be brought to Italy, her parents hope to bring her home for her final days, but Peel claimed that would be “dangerous” because of “the clinical complications.” 
Parents in the U.K. have previously found themselves in battles for control over medical decisions for their children. In 2018, the parents of infant Alfie Evans also <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/state-mandated-death-baby-aflies-dad-giving-him-amanda-prestigiacomo" target="_blank" rel="noopener">struggled to bring</a> him to Italy only to have their efforts rebuffed by judges.

Judge Orders U.K. Baby To Be Taken Off Life Support As Parents Fight To Take Her To Italy For Treatment

Social Issues

Big Pharma is getting more aggressive with its tactics to gain control. Why? Because it’s threatened by the increasing number of people who are becoming more aware of their ploys. Not everyone trusts their doctors quite like they did before. COVID led to the collapse of the medical mirage, so people have questions. And people want answers. We are prodding the narrative: What exactly are its intentions with our children? What is going on with the number of vaccines? What is going on with pharmaceutical care? Big Pharma is answering by passing legislation as to whether you should — or should not — have access to your children’s medical records, decisions, and medicines. <a href="https://www.carolinacarerx.org/#:~:text=CarolinaCARE%20is%20the%20home%2Ddelivery,Learn%20about%20CarolinaCARE" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CarolinaCARE</a> is the first of what I’m sure will be many instances to come of medical professionals deeming children as adults so parents lose access to their children’s medical records.
CarolinaCARE is a home-delivery pharmacy service owned by Atrium Health and based out of North Carolina. But CarolinaCARE serves multiple states that have different laws pertaining to access to health information, which includes prescriptions, so <a href="https://www.carolinacarerx.org/Documents/CarolinaCARE_Age_of_Majority_FAQs.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">they have sent out a notice</a> to their clients because they are making a change “to remain compliant with laws in all the states CarolinaCARE services to ensure continued privacy of your child’s prescription records.” 
Privacy from whom? From you, the parent. 
Starting November 1, children who are 12- to 17-years-old must create new accounts on their website so they have access to their prescriptions and medications because their parents will no longer have access. That’s correct: Parents cannot view or manage their children’s prescriptions. Written in black and white on their notice read the following words: “The laws are intended to allow minors to receive prescription medication for sensitive issues, without worrying about how their parents may react.” If you have questions, you are encouraged to read their FAQs.
<div id="attachment_646739" style="width: 522px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img aria-describedby="caption-attachment-646739" decoding="async" loading="lazy" class="wp-image-646739 size-full" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/11/Carolina-Care-text.png" alt="" width="512" height="388" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/11/Carolina-Care-text.png 512w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/11/Carolina-Care-text-300x227.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 512px) 100vw, 512px" />Screenshot: CarolinaCARE</div>
I have a lot of questions, the first being, how is that even plausible? How is it legal to essentially tell parents they are no longer parents? By making this change, CarolinaCARE is basically saying a 12-year-old is able to make a decision in terms of what prescriptions they are putting in their body. How does that happen? Children cannot do certain things until they are 18-years-old, when they become adults. So it completely defies logic that they would be able to make decisions pertaining to what prescription they should be on — prescriptions that have real-world implications. Of course, a parent should be in the room with a doctor when deciding whether or not their children should be on medication because parents are thinking about their child’s future. Adults can consider the possible impact and effects of prescriptions, whereas a child does not yet have that capability. That’s why they are children and why children have parents. Why would they do this?
My best guess is that because many adults are recognizing they should have never been put on drugs as a child, the move is going to be to take the medical decision-making power away from those adults. There has been public debate among adults about having been put on medications as a child, whether it be medications like Adderall or medications to transition them. More and more adults are openly speaking out against drugs, saying they have ruined their lives. Big Pharma knows that once people become adults, they can see that more clearly — because they aren’t 12.
<h4><a href="https://get.dailywire.com/candace/convicting-a-murderer" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: Candace Owens&#8217; &#8220;Convicting A Murderer&#8221;</a></h4>
<div id="attachment_646743" style="width: 522px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img aria-describedby="caption-attachment-646743" decoding="async" loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-646743" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/11/CAM-advert.png" alt="" width="512" height="288" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/11/CAM-advert.png 512w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/11/CAM-advert-300x169.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 512px) 100vw, 512px" />DailyWire+</div>
Yet CarolinaCARE is essentially signaling to 12-year-olds that they are now adults and can make adult decisions. So if a child professes they feel as though they are in the wrong body, a doctor could give that child prescription drugs to transition — drugs that will render that child infertile in their adult years. These are the same drugs given to pedophiles to castrate them. But children are not going to know that because they exist and think in the moment. They don’t consider what their adult life might be like; they don’t even consider what the next day will be like. They will fall prey to believing they can feel safer from their parents in making these decisions alone. 
To make matters worse (if that’s even possible), the state is getting involved because they want to further this. If this is successful and they are allowed to treat 12-year-olds as though they are adults and put them on medications that can potentially harm them in the future, they are inevitably going to be inundated with massive lawsuits against CarolinaCARE in the years to come. And I hope that there are massive lawsuits because this is absolutely despicable.
If a child turns 12 after November 1, this change will automatically take place. While this is hard news to digest, it’s news you need to be aware of, especially if you are a parent. Because while CarolinaCARE may only be in certain states now, it will be coming to a state near you.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>

06_14_2021_CandaceOwens_ep14_BTS_00039

Big Pharma’s Shocking Move To Medicate Kids Without Parental Consent

Big Pharma

Candace Owens

Children

Drugs

Parents rights

Readers Pass

The U.S. death rate for babies rose 3% last year, the first jump in two decades.
In 2022, there were 5.6 infant deaths per 1,000 live births, according to provisional data released Wednesday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). That&#8217;s 3% higher than the 5.44 infant deaths per 1,000 live births the country saw in 2021.
Last year marks the first time the infant mortality rate has jumped since 2002, when the death rate rose to 7 deaths per 1,000 live births, up from 6.8 deaths in 2001.
Some groups of infants saw significant death rate increases, including baby boys, white infants, Native American infants, and premature babies born at 37 weeks or earlier. Native American mothers saw their infant mortality rate <a href="https://abcnews.go.com/Health/infant-mortality-rate-increases-3-2022-rising-1st/story?id=104505952" target="_blank" rel="noopener">rise</a> from 7.46 infant deaths per 1,000 to 9.06 deaths in 2022. White mothers saw the death rate rise from 4.36 per 1,000 to 9.06 deaths.
Maternal complications and bacterial sepsis, two of the leading causes of infant deaths, also increased last year.
Dr. Eric Eichenwald, a Philadelphia-based neonatologist, called the new data “disturbing.”
An increase in RSV and flu infections last fall among babies that led to emergency room visits across the country “could potentially account for some of it,” Eichenwald <a href="https://apnews.com/article/infant-deaths-us-cdc-mortality-c808796da0415b6ecc0629938421e1b5#" target="_blank" rel="noopener">told</a> the Associated Press. However, he said experts can only speculate so far about why the death rate for babies suddenly increased after years of declining.
The infant mortality rate, which measures how many babies die before they reach their first birthday, has otherwise been declining in recent years. The neonatal mortality rate, which measures how many infants die less than 28 days after birth, also rose 3% last year. The neonatal mortality rate jumped to 3.58 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2022, up from 3.49 deaths in 2021.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1698343733266000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0j-_SN5ddYOUY5BqB3uxiw">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
The postneonatal mortality rate, which looks at infant deaths between 28 days old and one year old, jumped even higher, 4% up to 2.02 infant deaths per 1,000 live births, compared to 1.95 deaths  in 2021.
Overall, more than 20,500 babies died in the U.S. last year. That&#8217;s more than 610 infant deaths than during the previous year.
Georgia, Iowa, Missouri and Texas saw significant increases in their infant mortality rates last year. Only one state, Nevada, saw a decrease. Georgia saw 116 more infant deaths last year than in 2021. Texas had 251 more infant deaths.
“It would appear that some of the states could be having a larger impact on the [national] rate,” said Danielle Ely, the CDC report’s lead author.
Meanwhile, the overall death rate in the U.S. fell 5% last year. The falling death rate has been mostly attributed to the country recovering from the pandemic.
Maternal deaths also fell last year across the nation.

GERMANY-BRITAIN-WWII-BOMB

Death Rate For Babies In America Rose For First Time In 20 Years

babies

Death

Medical

U.S.

<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/boston-childrens-hospital-under-fire-again-for-video-claiming-young-kids-know-their-gender-seemingly-from-the-womb" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Boston Children’s Hospital</a>, one of the leading medical establishments in the U.S. encouraging life-altering gender procedures for minors, was reimbursed for the controversial treatments with taxpayer dollars.
From January 2015 to May 2023, Massachusetts reimbursed the Boston Children’s Hospital (BCH) $1.4 million for so-called &#8220;gender transition services,&#8221; according to documents obtained by <a href="https://dailycaller.com/2023/10/30/childrens-hospital-transgender-services/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Daily Caller</a>. The hospital, which boasts of having the first pediatric transgender surgery center in the country, has performed hundreds of gender surgeries on children since 2017 and has offered phalloplasties for 18-year-old boys and vaginoplasties for girls as young as 17, according to scrubbed pages of its <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20210914090829/https://www.childrenshospital.org/centers-and-services/programs/a-_-e/center-for-gender-surgery-program/eligibility-for-surgery" target="_blank" rel="noopener">website</a>. 
The Daily Caller reported that the Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services said it paid BCH $1.4 million for “Gender transition services (i.e., physician’s services, inpatient and outpatient, hospital services, surgical services, prescribed drugs, therapies, etc.)” between January 2015 and May 2023.
Last year, BCH was <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/pediatric-gender-clinics-scrub-their-websites-amidst-criticism-of-gender-related-treatments" target="_blank" rel="noopener">criticized</a> for offering on its website a “full suite of surgical options for transgender teens.” After public backlash to advertising its gender surgeries for children, BCH deleted a video from its YouTube channel that showed a doctor speaking positively about removing a uterus, ovaries, fallopian tubes, and cervix for an elective “gender affirming hysterectomy.”
BCH has also <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/boston-childrens-hospital-offering-gender-affirming-hysterectomies-to-kids-who-cant-even-drink-legally" target="_blank" rel="noopener">promoted</a> breast augmentations or double mastectomies in the name of gender affirmation for girls as young as 15. According to the National Institutes of Health, BCH performed 204 “gender affirmation” surgeries between 2017 and 2020, The Daily Caller reported. Those operations included 65 chest surgeries, with the youngest patient being 15 years old. 
Earlier this year, Oren Ganor, the co-director of BCH’s Center for Gender Surgery, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/boston-childrens-hospital-official-expand-training-for-gender-affirming-surgeries" target="_blank" rel="noopener">co-wrote an article</a> that called for increasing training for gender surgeries. 
“With certain states restricting gender-affirming surgeries, residency programs in states with more favorable regulations must ensure they increase training efforts to accommodate increased caseloads of gender-affirming surgeries that will likely result,” <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2801614">wrote</a> Ganor along with Harvard graduate Shawheen Rezaei. 
BCH has not responded to a request for comment.
<a class="c-link c-link--focus-visible" href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://onelink.to/dwapp" data-sk="tooltip_parent" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-36259">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
As leftists continue to push for gender surgeries to be readily available to minors, many taxpayers are now funding the life-altering procedures. Last week, The Daily Wire reported that Pennsylvania also <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/pennsylvania-spent-over-20-million-on-transgender-medical-services-for-children-and-youth-report">spent</a> nearly $20 million in tax dollars on puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and gender surgeries for children between 2015 and July of this year. The money was provided through Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), according to records obtained by the Pennsylvania Family Institute. 
Florida recently took action to stop Medicaid providers from using taxpayer dollars for transgender procedures. In August, the Sunshine State <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/exclusive-florida-fines-medicaid-providers-for-using-tax-dollars-to-cover-trans-treatments-for-minors" target="_blank" rel="noopener">fined</a> five Medicaid insurers for violating state law against using taxpayer funds to provide coverage for transgender procedures.

Boston Childrens Hospital

Boston Children’s Hospital Was Reimbursed $1.4M In Taxpayer Dollars For ‘Gender Transition Services’: Report

Boston

Boston Children's Hospital

Gender

Massachusetts

Transgender

Elderly people may have an increased risk of stroke caused by blood clots in the brains if they receive both the COVID booster and a flu shot in the same visit, a new study suggests.
Older adults who received both shots in the same visit last year <a href="https://abcnews.go.com/Health/flu-covid-shot-reasonable-amid-safety-review-potential/story?utm_source=facebook&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=dhfacebook&amp;utm_content=null&amp;id=104308950" target="_blank" rel="noopener">had</a> a 20-35% increased stroke risk, according to the <a href="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.10.10.23296624v1.full.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">study</a>, which was funded by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
The results <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/25/health/covid-flu-vaccine-stroke-risk-study/index.html#:~:text=Vaccines%20for%20Covid%2D19%20and,according%20to%20a%20new%20study." target="_blank" rel="noopener">showed</a> about three strokes for every 100,000 doses given.
The study <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/25/health/covid-flu-vaccine-stroke-risk-study/index.html#:~:text=Vaccines%20for%20Covid%2D19%20and,according%20to%20a%20new%20study." target="_blank" rel="noopener">suggested</a> the increased stroke risk may be primarily driven by the flu shots rather than the COVID vaccines. Nevertheless, the results have sparked concerns.
The study examined the Medicare claims of more than 5.3 million adults age 65 and older who received a bivalent Pfizer or Moderna COVID vaccine.
Those age 65 or older who got a bivalent vaccine and a high-dose flu shot at the same time had an increased risk of blood clots in their brains. The high-dose flu shot is only <a href="https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/flu/expert-answers/fluzone/faq-20058032" target="_blank" rel="noopener">approved</a> for people 65 and older.
Those 85 and older who got the Pfizer vaccine also had a higher risk of stroke caused by blood clots even without taking the flu shot at the same time, the study found.
The study also found a very slight increase in stroke risk for those 65 and older who had only gotten a high-dose flu shot, about one to two strokes per 100,000 doses.
<a class="c-link c-link--focus-visible" href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://onelink.to/dwapp" data-sk="tooltip_parent">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
The study is not yet peer-reviewed and is observational, meaning it can only show associations, not prove cause and effect. Some experts <a href="https://abcnews.go.com/Health/flu-covid-shot-reasonable-amid-safety-review-potential/story?utm_source=facebook&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=dhfacebook&amp;utm_content=null&amp;id=104308950" target="_blank" rel="noopener">cautioned</a> that the results are preliminary and could have another explanation such as elderly people being at higher risk for stroke already because of their age.
The study was triggered by a January public communication from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and FDA stating that one of their vaccine safety monitoring studies had suggested a small risk of stroke for older adults who received a Pfizer COVID shot and a high-dose flu shot on the same day.
&#8220;The review conducted in this preprint paper is part of our ongoing safety surveillance efforts, which utilize a variety of data sources,&#8221; the Food and Drug Administration told ABC, adding that the agency remains confident in the COVID vaccine.
Pfizer recently released a <a href="https://www.ispot.tv/ad/5bRp/pfizer-inc-covid-19-shot-two-things-at-once-featuring-travis-kelce" target="_blank" rel="noopener">commercial</a> promoting getting the COVID vaccine and the flu shot at the same time, or &#8220;two things at once.&#8221;
The ad spot features Travis Kelce, a tight end for the Kansas City Chiefs, who shows the camera two Band-Aids on his arm for the two shots.
&#8220;Travis, did you know you can get this season&#8217;s COVID-19 shot when you get your flu shot?&#8221; a woman asks the NFL player in the ad.
&#8220;Huh, two things at once,&#8221; Kelce responds. The ad then shows Kelce performing a series of two activities at once such as grilling while mowing the lawn and riding a hot air balloon while speaking on the radio.
The Kansas City Chiefs did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Covid-19 Boosters Vaccinations Underway Across Germany

Elderly Who Got COVID And Flu Shots In Same Visit May Have Higher Stroke Risk, FDA-Funded Study Suggests

COVID

COVID-19 Vaccine

Stroke

Thousands of <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/economy" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Walgreens</a> employees walked off the job this week, saying they are overworked and underpaid.
Walgreens locations <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/09/business/walgreens-walkouts-cvs-pharmacy/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">closed</a> in Arizona, Washington, Massachusetts, and Oregon, and potentially other states as well, based on social media posts from pharmacy staff and customers.
The anonymous organizer of the walkout, who has worked at Walgreens for over a decade, <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/investigations/2023/10/09/walgreens-walkout-pharmacists-protest-working-conditions/71122866007/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">estimated</a> that several hundred pharmacists and pharmacy technicians joined the walkout.
The pharmacy workers claim that unsafe working conditions are putting their patients at risk, as well as themselves. Employees have described being the only pharmacist on staff for a 12-hour shift or having 300 prescriptions to fill while they are working alone. They are also dealing with insurance companies, vaccination appointments, patient calls, and flu and COVID tests.
Meanwhile, customers waiting for their prescriptions often get frustrated.
“When you’re a pharmacist, a missed letter or a number that’s wrong in a prescription could kill somebody,” the organizer <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/10/09/walgreens-pharmacy-strike-vaccine/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a>.
“The company has cut hours drastically while continuing to pile more work and new programs on top of us. Customers are not being taken care of. Our patients are not being cared for. It is not safe,” the organizer <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/investigations/2023/10/09/walgreens-walkout-pharmacists-protest-working-conditions/71122866007/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">added</a>.
A Walgreens spokesman <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/investigations/2023/10/09/walgreens-walkout-pharmacists-protest-working-conditions/71122866007/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> the walkout had a &#8220;minimal&#8221; effect and that only a &#8220;small number&#8221; of pharmacies experienced disruptions.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
The Walgreens workers are <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/10/09/walgreens-pharmacy-strike-vaccine/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">demanding</a> that the pharmacy giant hire more staff, implement mandatory training hours, offer payroll transparency, and give notice when staff will be cut or when a position opens.
Walgreens employees are not unionized, so the walkout effort was organized on a subreddit for pharmacy workers.
The walkout was inspired by a similar walkout by CVS employees in several Kansas City stores several weeks ago, the organizer said. CVS employees are not unionized either.
The protest also comes after more than 75,000 employees with health care behemoth Kaiser Permanente walked off the job for three days, also citing staffing shortages.
Walgreens spokesman Fraser Engerman <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/10/09/walgreens-pharmacy-strike-vaccine/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> the company acknowledges that recent years have been “unprecedented” and “a very challenging time,” and the company also understand the “immense pressures felt across the U.S. in retail pharmacy right now.”
“We are engaged and listening to the concerns raised by some of our team members,&#8221; Engerman said. &#8220;We are committed to ensuring that our entire pharmacy team has the support and resources necessary to continue to provide the best care to our patients while taking care of their own well-being.”
The Walgreens spokesman also added that the company is making &#8220;significant investments in pharmacist wages and hiring bonuses&#8221; to attract and retain employees in Walgreens stores that are harder to staff.

California Scenics

Walgreens Pharmacy Workers Walk Off The Job

General

Labor Unions

Around 75,000 Kaiser Permanente health care workers went on strike this week hoping to get better pay and benefits in what has been described as the largest health care strike in U.S. history.
Unions representing the workers are hoping to pressure executives at Kaiser to invest in attracting more workers as hospitals have struggled to maintain sufficient staffing levels. The strike has <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2023/10/04/health-care-workers-strike-at-kaiser-permanente.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">impacted</a> hospitals and medical facilities in California, Colorado, Oregon, Virginia, Washington, and Washington, D.C.
Thousands of vocational nurses, emergency department technicians, radiology technicians, X-ray technicians, respiratory therapists, medical assistants, pharmacists, and others began the strike on Wednesday. The strike is expected to continue until Friday. 
&#8220;Frontline healthcare workers are awaiting a meaningful response from Kaiser executives regarding some of our key priorities including safe staffing, outsourcing protections for incumbent healthcare workers, and fair wages to reduce turnover,” Caroline Lucas, executive director of the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions, <a href="https://www.axios.com/2023/10/04/kaiser-permanente-union-strike-health-care-workers" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> in an email statement on Wednesday. 
Lucas told CNBC that many health care workers were burning out and leaving the industry. 
“We have folks getting injured on the job because they’re trying to do too much and see too many people and work too quickly. It’s not a sustainable situation,” she said. 
Kaiser spokeswoman Hilary Costa said Wednesday evening that the workers union and company executives had reached some points of agreement. According to Costa, Kaiser had agreed to wage improvements, better medical and health plans, and education assistance programs. 
&#8220;We remain committed to reaching a new agreement that continues to provide our employees with market-leading wages, excellent benefits, generous retirement income plans, and valuable professional development opportunities,&#8221; Costa said. 
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
Kaiser, the largest non-profit health care organization in America, has a <a href="https://thehill.com/business/4238729-kaiser-permanente-strike-what-to-know/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">total</a> of 305,000 employees, meaning that about 25% of its workforce has been on strike. 
“Kaiser has not been bargaining with us in good faith and so it’s pushing us to come out here and strike,” radiologic technologist Jacquelyn Duley <a href="https://apnews.com/article/kaiser-health-care-workers-strike-b8b40ce8c082c0b8c4f1c0fb7ec38741" target="_blank" rel="noopener">told</a> the Associated Press. “We want to be inside just taking care of our patients.”
The health care strike comes amid a string of other labor strikes, including from the United Auto Workers and Hollywood Screen Actors Guild.

U.S.-CALIFORNIA-BALDWIN PARK-HEALTH FACILITIES-WORKERS-STRIKE

Thousands Of Health Care Workers Strike As Hospitals Face Staffing Shortages

strike

<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/health-care" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rite Aid</a> reportedly plans to close hundreds of stores as it mulls how to get ahead of billions of dollars in debt and a slew of opioid-related lawsuits.
The pharmacy retail giant is looking at shuttering about 400 to 500 of its more than 2,100 stores in a bankruptcy process, The Wall Street Journal <a class="color-link" title="https://www.wsj.com/articles/rite-aid-planning-to-shut-down-hundreds-of-stores-in-bankruptcy-de7967db" href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/rite-aid-planning-to-shut-down-hundreds-of-stores-in-bankruptcy-de7967db" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" data-ga-track="ExternalLink:https://www.wsj.com/articles/rite-aid-planning-to-shut-down-hundreds-of-stores-in-bankruptcy-de7967db" aria-label="Wall Street Journal">reported</a>. Bondholders <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/pamdanziger/2023/09/27/drugstore-downsizing-cvs-walgreens-and-rite-aid-to-close-nearly-1500-stores/?sh=4ee32de6e560" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reportedly</a> want to close even more stores.
Rite Aid has <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2023/09/22/rite-aid-proposes-closing-about-a-quarter-of-its-stores-in-bankruptcy-report-says/?sh=4ea53cfe5796" target="_blank" rel="noopener">proposed</a> either selling the stores or handing them over to creditors, the Journal reported, citing people familiar with the company&#8217;s bankruptcy negotiations.
The company is dealing with more than $3.3 billion in debt and more than a thousand federal lawsuits accusing Rite Aid of knowingly filling illegal opioid prescriptions.
One of those lawsuits <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/united-states-files-complaint-alleging-rite-aid-dispensed-controlled-substances-violation" target="_blank" rel="noopener">is from</a> the Justice Department, which alleges Rite Aid filled hundreds of thousands of illegal prescriptions, including those with &#8220;obvious red flags,&#8221; and intentionally deleted internal notes about suspicious prescribers.
“These practices opened the floodgates for millions of opioid pills and other controlled substances to flow illegally out of Rite Aid’s stores,” Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/united-states-files-complaint-alleging-rite-aid-dispensed-controlled-substances-violation" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> in March when the suit was filed.
Rite Aid has denied the allegations.
“Given the conversations remain ongoing, no decisions have been made at this time and we are focused on reaching an agreement with our financial stakeholders that will make Rite Aid stronger,” a Rite Aid spokesperson said, Forbes <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2023/09/22/rite-aid-proposes-closing-about-a-quarter-of-its-stores-in-bankruptcy-report-says/?sh=4ea53cfe5796" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reported</a>.
Rite Aid has been plagued by stores failing to generate profits in recent years and has struggled to compete with bigger chains like CVS, Walgreens, and Walmart&#8217;s pharmacies.
Last year, Rite Aid <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucejapsen/2022/04/14/rite-aid-expects-more-closures-of-unprofitable-stores/?sh=389cded16585" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> it would close 145 “unprofitable stores” as part of a plan to “significantly reduce costs.”
CVS and Walgreens, which operate around 9,000 stores each, do not have the same slate of problems as Rite Aid, but both pharmacy chains are also working on closing locations.
CVS <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/18/investing/cvs-store-closures/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> in 2021 that it would close 900 stores by 2024. The closures <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/18/cvs-store-closures-to-shut-about-300-stores-a-year-over-next-three-years.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">were set</a> to start in the spring of last year at a rate of about 300 per year.
<a class="c-link c-link--focus-visible" href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://onelink.to/dwapp" data-sk="tooltip_parent">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
Walgreens <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/30/investing/walgreens-150-store-closings/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> in June that it plans to close 150 locations across the country and even more abroad to cut costs.
Rising retail theft is another factor for pharmacies. Theft cost the retail sector $112.1 billion last year, 19% higher than in 2021, <a href="https://nrf.com/media-center/press-releases/retail-crime-accounted-over-112-billion-industry-losses-2022-according" target="_blank" rel="noopener">according</a> to a National Retail Federation report.
Shoplifting has become rampant in some cities <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/retail/2023/09/27/retail-theft-lost-inventory-statistics-2022/70975031007/#" target="_blank" rel="noopener">like</a> Los Angeles, San Francisco, and New York, and pharmacies have been a common target since the riots of 2020.
Some drug stores <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/pamdanziger/2023/09/27/drugstore-downsizing-cvs-walgreens-and-rite-aid-to-close-nearly-1500-stores/?sh=4ee32de6e560" target="_blank" rel="noopener">resorted</a> to putting products in transparent locked cases. However, this tactic often results in a sales drop of 15% to 25%, <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurendebter/2022/04/02/stores-locking-things-up-rising-theft/?sh=67d4042511ca" target="_blank" rel="noopener">according</a> to the head of a company that sold security devices to Walgreens.
The security devices are an inconvenience since they require customers to flag down an employee and rely on them to unlock the product. They also indicate to customers that the store might not be safe.
Other factors are disrupting the chain pharmacy business model as well, <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/pamdanziger/2023/09/27/drugstore-downsizing-cvs-walgreens-and-rite-aid-to-close-nearly-1500-stores/?sh=4ee32de6e560" target="_blank" rel="noopener">including</a> a rise in independent pharmacies, pharmacies in grocery stores, and online prescription filling.

In this photo illustration the stock trading graph of Rite

Rite Aid To Shutter Hundreds Of Stores In Bankruptcy: Report

Business

Economy

Opioid Crisis

2024 presidential candidate <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/nikki-haley">Nikki Haley</a> offered three ways she aims to reshape healthcare during the <a href="https://rumble.com/gop-debate">second GOP debate</a> on Wednesday.
Univision’s Ilia Calderón asked her the question, &#8220;Healthcare is the leading cause of bankruptcy for American families, accounting for two-thirds of all personal bankruptcies. As president, how will you protect Americans who get sick from financial ruin?&#8221;
Haley, who is a former governor of South Carolina and United Nations ambassador, first responded by pondering aloud, &#8220;How can we be the best country in the world and have the most expensive healthcare in the world?&#8221;
After sharing a story about her mother&#8217;s experience in a hospital, Haley offered a three-point plan of attack, saying, &#8220;When I am president, we will break all of it.&#8221;
She spoke in favor of boosting transparency, tackling the issue of tort law that she argued makes doctors nervous about getting sued, and increasing competition in healthcare to give patients more choice.
Another candidate, North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum, was given time to respond to Haley&#8217;s answer on healthcare.
Burgram argued the &#8220;real problem&#8221; was not being addressed, and said the federal government was getting involved in healthcare in a similar way that it is with championing electric vehicles.
&#8220;Every time the federal government&#8217;s involved, whether it&#8217;s higher education, healthcare, or now the auto industry, things get more expensive and less competitive,&#8221; he said.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
The second debate was taking place in Simi Valley, California. The other candidates who participated included Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, former Vice President Mike Pence, Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina, and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy. Former President Donald Trump, who leads in the polls, opted not to attend.
Moments before Haley spoke about healthcare, Pence was pressed on his promise to <a href="https://twitter.com/Mike_Pence/status/1691833477312680445">repeal</a> Obamacare mandates, to which he said it was his intention to make the federal government &#8220;smaller by returning to the states those resources and programs that are rightfully theirs under the 10th Amendment of the Constitution.&#8221; Pence said this would include funding for Obamacare and other programs.
DeSantis, when asked about insurance coverage, called for tackling &#8220;Big Pharma, Big Insurance, and Big Government&#8221; while giving &#8220;more power for the people and the doctor-patient relationship.&#8221;

Nikki Haley

Nikki Haley Offers Three Ways To ‘Break’ Healthcare Piggybank

Nikki Haley Offers Three Ways To 'Break' Healthcare Piggybank

2024 Election

Politics

Republicans

After doctors found an aggressive malignant tumor in Tasha Kann&#8217;s brain, the medical team advised the young mother to abort her unborn child and immediately start cancer treatments. Kann, leaning on her faith in God, told the doctors no.
The Michigan woman suffered a debilitating migraine while she was pregnant with her second baby back in 2022, she <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/health/pregnant-woman-brain-cancer-refuses-abortion-killing-baby-wouldnt-have-saved-me" target="_blank" rel="noopener">told</a> Fox News. Soon after, a medical team diagnosed Kann, then 20-weeks pregnant, with anaplastic astrocytoma grade III.
&#8220;We recommend that you get an abortion,&#8221; Kann recalled doctors telling her. &#8220;They all looked at me and told me my best chances of survival would be to get an abortion and start treatment immediately — which might give me five to eight years of survival.&#8221;
But for the faithful Christian woman, abortion was not an option.
&#8220;I told them absolutely not,&#8221; Kann said, adding that she felt &#8220;disgusted&#8221; that this was something she&#8217;d be recommended to do. &#8220;If the cancer was already as bad as they said, killing my baby wouldn’t have saved me anyway.&#8221;
Kann recalled having &#8220;deep conversations with Jesus,&#8221; and said, &#8220;I knew that if I held onto the Lord and his promises, He would keep my baby safe.&#8221;
Indeed, Kann gave birth to a healthy baby girl named Gracey in October. &#8220;Every single day, I look at my beautiful baby and think about how easy it was for them to tell me to abort — like she was nothing,&#8221; she told Fox.
Kann is still struggling with her cancer, but is continuing to fight with the support of her family.
In another instance of a mother sacrificing for her child, a woman named Ellie Whittaker was similarly <a href="https://www.liveaction.org/news/pregnant-mom-cancer-free-refused-abortion/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">advised</a> to abort her child after doctors diagnosed her with cancer. In Whittaker&#8217;s case, she had Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, stage two.
“The doctor advised I have an abortion because cancer treatment could cause problems for the baby,” Whittaker <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8926313/Mother-21-stopped-chemo-nine-months-birth-daughter.html?fbclid=IwAR10obBJZxPstbI6aYEujNkPRhmN2o7gzh-h82HYI2mmr0S2onUT1gVJhI8" target="_blank" rel="noopener">told</a> The Daily Mail. “There was no way I was going to give her up so I chose to delay it.”
<a href="https://www.liveaction.org/news/pregnant-mom-cancer-free-refused-abortion/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">According</a> to LiveAction, Whittaker was possibly going to have cancer treatments at around 27 weeks, when it would be less likely to cause harm to her child. But Whittaker&#8217;s scans showed that she could push off treatment until after she gave birth.
Whittaker gave birth to a healthy baby in March of 2020, and underwent aggressive cancer treatment. After 20 rounds of Chemo, she learned she was cancer-free.
“I lived with it for so long it’s weird that it’s finally gone — I can’t believe it,” she said. “Everyone’s supported me in many ways. I had to wait two weeks for the results from my final scan which was agony. I’m so pleased it’s gone and I can focus on being a mum.”

Close-up of pregnant woman’s belly

Doctors Told Woman To Abort Her Baby So She Could Treat Her Aggressive Brain Cancer. She Said No.

Abortion

Cancer

A 19-year-old female has been effectively sentenced to her death after a judge decided that the experts know best, rejecting the young woman&#8217;s pleas to live.
The Christian teenager — whom the world is only allowed to know as &#8220;ST,&#8221; per the courts — <a href="https://christianconcern.com/news/judge-rules-conscious-19-year-old-cant-make-end-of-life-decisions/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">suffers</a> from a rare genetic mitochondrial disease, which causes chronic muscle weakness, loss of hearing, and damage to the kidneys; she&#8217;s currently dependent on regular dialysis, a feeding tube, and other intensive care. Notably, though, ST&#8217;s mental capacity is not affected by the disease.
The teenager wants to fight until her last day, and has repeatedly told medical professionals that she wants to seek experimental treatment outside of the U.K. The U.K.&#8217;s National Health Service (NHS), though, wants to remove the teen from life-saving medical treatment, which would condemn her to death, potentially in a matter of days.
In fact, the NHS Trust, apparently perturbed that this youth wouldn&#8217;t take their advice and just die already, went to court in April to argue that the teen is not capable of making her own medical decisions. The Trust, comprised of NHS bureaucrats, successfully argued before a judge that the teen was delusional for not agreeing with her doctors that she has no hope and needs to just agree to die.
Here&#8217;s what the judge, Mrs. Justice Roberts, wrote in her judgment, which was issued in late August:
&#8220;In my judgment [&#8230;] ST is unable to make a decision for herself in relation to her future medical treatment, including the proposed move to palliative care, because she does not believe the information she has been given by her doctors.&#8221;
The judge went on to say that ST isn&#8217;t merely making an &#8220;unwise&#8221; decision, which she would supposedly permit. But the teen is instead making an unacceptable choice, in the judge&#8217;s view, since in ST&#8217;s thought process, she is not affirming that her doctors are correct.
In other words, ST has committed a thought crime by not trusting the experts. And, thus, she is &#8220;delusional&#8221; and barred from making her own medical decisions.
Keep in mind, two psychologists — two experts, if you will — have determined that ST is in control of her mental faculties and can make these vital decisions for herself.
&#8220;Despite all the difficulties which currently confront her, ST is able to communicate reasonably well with her doctors with assistance from her mother and, on occasion, speech therapists,&#8221; the judge acknowledged. &#8220;I heard evidence from two consultant psychiatrists whose conclusions in relation to her capacity in both domains are set out in full written reports. &#8230; the two most recent capacity reports from Dr C and Dr D (both consultant psychiatrists who assessed ST in the days leading up to the hearing) suggested that she had capacity to make these choices for herself. The Trust, relying on the evidence of her treating clinicians, takes a different view.&#8221;
Those two experts&#8217; opinions, apparently, don&#8217;t hold as much weight as the NHS Trust.
According to Catholic news outlet <a href="https://www.thetablet.co.uk/news/17580/-perilous-ruling-on-dying-19-year-old-s-capacity-to-decide" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Tablet</a>, her parents also disagree with the judge, “We are very distressed by this injustice, and we hope that, by Jesus’s grace, this will be corrected on appeal.”
Now, the Court of Protection gets to decide what to do with ST&#8217;s care, and it&#8217;s not looking good.
Notably, ST&#8217;s diagnosis is the same diagnosis as a London infant named <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/charlies-law-parents-baby-charlie-gard-getting-amanda-prestigiacomo" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Charlie Gard</a>. In Gard&#8217;s tragic case, courts ordered the baby&#8217;s parents, Connie Yates and Chris Gard, to bypass possibly life-saving experimental treatment for their infant son; they were forced to watch baby Charlie die in a London hospital.
Charlie, just a baby, couldn&#8217;t speak for himself. But in ST&#8217;s case, she can — and she continues to do so.
&#8220;By the time you read this, I could be dead. That&#8217;s according to my doctors who, for the last year, have repeatedly told me that I have had only days to live. But I am a fighter and will continue to fight,&#8221; the defiant teen <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12496945/EXCLUSIVE-doctors-insist-time-died-fight-Extraordinary-battle-19-year-old-woman-suffering-Charlie-Gard-condition-battling-medics-attempts-condemn-death.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">told</a> The Daily Mail this week.
Related: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/guardian-charlie-gard-children-do-not-belong-their-amanda-prestigiacomo" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Ethics Professor On Charlie Gard: ‘Children Do Not Belong To Their Parents’</a>
ST noted that she is unable to publicly speak about her case, as per the court order supposedly meant to protect her. This means it&#8217;s been impossible for ST to fundraise for the potential or receive experimental treatment, which has been offered to her in both Canada and the U.S. And at the very least, it keeps her family financially strapped as they continue to try to appeal and fight for their daughter&#8217;s life.
&#8216;They&#8217;ve done everything they can to stop me telling this story,&#8221; ST said. &#8220;I have found myself trapped in a medical and legal system governed by a toxic paternalism which has condemned me for wanting to live.&#8221;
Still, the resilient teen, buoyed by her tight family and her Christian faith, is determined to fight until the end.
&#8220;I am in a race against time to escape from this system and the certain death it wishes to impose on me,&#8221; she said. &#8220;But I am a fighter and will continue to fight. I trust in God and will not give up hope.&#8221;
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>

Back view of patient woman sitting on bed in hospital ward, looking away at window and hope everything will be better. –

Trust The Experts: England’s NHS Moves Forward To Kill Teen Who’s Desperately Asking To Live

England’s NHS Moves Forward To Kill Teen Who’s Desperately Asking To Live

England

Euthanasia

Menu

Streaming Now