Over the last few months, roughly two dozen whale corpses have washed up on the Atlantic Coast of the United States. The unexplained increase in fatalities is happening as the state of <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/new-jersey" target="_blank" rel="noopener">New Jersey</a> is constructing a massive offshore wind farm, which some conservationists claim is affecting whale navigation.
Federal scientists insist that no evidence has directly linked the construction to the spike in beached whales, but some local lawmakers, environmentalist groups, and conservative commentators have insisted the wind turbines are the obvious culprit and are demanding action.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has tracked 184 “<a href="https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-life-distress/2016-2023-humpback-whale-unusual-mortality-event-along-atlantic-coast" target="_blank" rel="noopener">unusual mortality events</a>” for Humpback whales in the area since 2016 — roughly 25 per year, but over the past few months, there have been <a href="https://www.newscientist.com/article/2360641-why-are-so-many-whales-getting-stranded-on-us-beaches/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">at least 22 large whales</a> stranded in the region, including 15 humpbacks, rivaling last year’s annual total.
“It’s an alarming surge,” said Sheila Dean, director of the Marine Mammal Stranding Center in New Jersey.
Roughly a third of the corpses have washed up on the shores of New York and New Jersey — that’s significant because a massive wind farm is being constructed off New Jersey’s coast. The state has committed $10 billion to the project, which they hope will generate 11 Gigawatts of power by 2040. But now, there’s a growing effort to stop the project.
Thousands of protesters gathered on Sunday — “international whale day” — at Pleasant Point Beach in New Jersey to lobby for a moratorium on offshore wind developments. The group spearheading the effort, Clean Ocean Action, was initially supportive of smaller wind projects, but has expressed concerns over the impact larger developments could have.
<div id="attachment_505219" style="width: 310px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img aria-describedby="caption-attachment-505219" decoding="async" loading="lazy" class="wp-image-505219 size-medium" src="https://www.dailywire.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Wind-Kills-Whales-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/02/Wind-Kills-Whales-300x200.jpg 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/02/Wind-Kills-Whales-864x576.jpg 864w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/02/Wind-Kills-Whales-768x512.jpg 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/02/Wind-Kills-Whales-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/02/Wind-Kills-Whales-2048x1366.jpg 2048w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/02/Wind-Kills-Whales-1800x1200.jpg 1800w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/02/Wind-Kills-Whales-1200x800.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />Photo by Kena Betancur/VIEWpress</div>
“At this point, there is no evidence to support speculation that noise resulting from wind development-related site characterization surveys could potentially cause mortality of whales,” according to the <a href="https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/new-england-mid-atlantic/marine-life-distress/frequent-questions-offshore-wind-and-whales">official website of the NOAA</a>, “and no specific links between recent large whale mortalities and currently ongoing surveys. We will continue to gather data to help us determine the cause of death for these mortality events.”
While investigations have not connected the construction of the wind farm to the excess fatalities, some employees of the NOAA had raised concerns about the risks it may pose before the surge began.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
Sean Hayes, chief of the protected species branch at NOAA’s Northeast Fisheries Science Center, <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-18/why-are-whales-dying-in-new-jersey-some-blame-wind-farms" target="_blank" rel="noopener">warned</a> regulators last year that “additional noise, vessel traffic and habitat modifications due to offshore wind development will likely cause added stress [to whales and] result in additional population consequences.”
Whales and other cetaceans often rely on echolocation, a sort of natural sonar, to sense their surroundings, and excess noise could distort their perceptions and lead them into dangerous waters.
Advocates of the turbines have argued that the ships involved only account for 2% of the total traffic in the area — the port of New York and New Jersey is the <a href="https://container-news.com/top-10-the-busiest-container-ports-in-the-united-states/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">third busiest</a> in the United States — and whatever minor marine disruptions that are created would be offset by a decline in greenhouse emissions.
<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dozens-nj-mayors-call-immediate-offshore-wind-moratorium-latest-whale-deaths" target="_blank" rel="noopener">30 mayors of coastal communities</a> in the area, and several sitting members of Congress, including Chris Smith (R-NJ), Jeff Van Drew (R-NJ), and <a href="https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-wind-farms-killing-whales-environmentalism-sean-hannity-1781312" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Marjorie Taylor Greene</a> (R-GA) have called for a moratorium on the project. Tucker Carlson of Fox News also <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=foVo6GP8Vmw" target="_blank" rel="noopener">highlighted</a> the issue to a national audience.
The office of Governor Phil Murphy put out a statement in response to the public outcry, expressing sympathy for concerned environmentalists while insinuating that some critics were not concerned with whales at all and were merely capitalizing on the situation to shut down a project they had already opposed.
“We know that many residents, both in our shore communities and across the state, share our genuine concern for marine life and its survival,” the statement said. “But we also know that there are those out there who are motivated not by a concern for our environment but by their own political ideologies and opposition to the very efforts that will preserve and protect our environment for generations to come.”
Other observers were even less charitable.
“It’s just a cynical disinformation campaign,” Greenpeace oceans director John Hocevar told <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/02/11/whale-deaths-and-windmills/11178432002/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">USA Today</a>.
Still, while the cause of the surge in stranded whales has not been firmly established, the phenomenon is indisputable.
“I’ve gotten lots of information from different sources,” said Kim Wetzel, 57, an Ocean City resident who attended Sunday’s rally, “and you can’t argue with the fact that 10 whales have washed up.”

US-ANIMAL-WHALE

Wind Farm Blamed For Surge In Dead Whales On U.S. Atlantic Coast

Animals

Energy

Greenpeace

Nature

Science

Whale

The New York Times has a long history of selectively praising undercover journalists. If those undercover journalists reveal information which fits the Times’ preferred narrative &#8212; such as exposing oil companies or the meat industry &#8212; the Times’ accepts the undercover work without hesitation. But if undercover journalists reveal something the Times doesn’t like &#8212; such as Planned Parenthood’s treatment of aborted baby parts or anything making mainstream media outlets look bad &#8212; they insist the videos are “deceptive” or illegally obtained.
This difference was recently highlighted by the Times’ <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/30/climate/exxon-greenpeace-lobbyist-video.html">fawning feature story</a> about undercover tapes produced by Greenpeace’s “journalism” arm Unearthed. The tapes purport to show a lobbyist for Exxon describing how the oil and gas company had sought out certain U.S. senators in an effort to fight President Biden’s climate agenda.
The lobbyist also appeared to admit what everyone should already know &#8212; when big companies support a policy that would hurt them, they’re doing it because either they know the policy will never become reality or because they can withstand the harm while their smaller competitors can’t. This lobbyist said on a recorded call that Exxon’s public support for a carbon tax was simply “a great talking point” because the company didn’t think it’d ever become a reality.
Exxon disowned the lobbyist in a statement to the Times, yet the story was picked up as yet another “oil companies bad” narrative from the Times and other outlets, who worship at the altar of climate change.
The Times admits in its article that the lobbyist thought he was speaking to a recruiter, but it was actually a secretly recorded phone call from Greenpeace U.K. It also refers to the quoted statements as mere “excerpts.” The videos that have been publicly released are pieced together with narration and are not raw, uncut videos.
In the past, with conservative undercover journalists, the Times would refer to such tactics as deceptive. Indeed, in a story last year about James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas videos, they wrote:
<blockquote>Mr. O’Keefe and Project Veritas have a long history of releasing manipulated or selectively edited footage purporting to show illegal conduct by Democrats and liberal groups.” (Emphasis added.)</blockquote>
The same could be said of the Greenpeace videos.
Further, Greenpeace admitted that it completely lied about who they were when speaking to the lobbyist, something that violates the Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ). The SPJ states that one must verify secretive reporting before releasing it and “Avoid undercover or other surreptitious methods of gathering information unless traditional, open methods will not yield information vital to the public” (emphasis added).
But again, the Times and other outlets did not care about this when it was Greenpeace violating the ethics guidelines.
The left-leaning Brookings Institute also <a href="https://www.brookings.edu/blog/techtank/2021/07/07/why-secret-video-recordings-are-damaging-for-democracy/">called out</a> Greenpeace’s tactics as well, while also taking a shot at conservatives using similar tactics.
“Whoever the culprit, using secret video recordings to embarrass opponents is undermining the health of our already ailing American democracy. Doing so sets a bad precedent for surreptitious activity and erodes trust in civic life,” wrote Darrell M. West, Brookings’ vice president and director of governance studies.
In the case of David Daleiden and his Planned Parenthood videos, the state of California went after him for allegedly violating state law because he posed as a biotechnology representative in order to obtain the recordings. A California jury later ruled in favor of Planned Parenthood, including the abortion giant’s claim that Daleiden violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.
As we all know, nothing like this will be done to Greenpeace because their deceptively edited videos made by misrepresenting themselves targeted the “right” people.
The views expressed in this piece are the author&#8217;s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

NEW YORK TIMES

New York Times Just Fine With Greenpeace Undercover Videos After Years Of Deriding James O’Keefe, David Daleiden

James O'Keefe

Media Bias

New York Times

Planned Parenthood

On Monday night, one of the founders of the environmental group Greenpeace stated that the &#8220;Green New Deal&#8221; pushed by the Democratic Party and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) would trigger the end of civilization. Patrick Moore described exactly how the &#8220;Green New Deal&#8221; would lead to catastrophe, from half the population starving to the elimination of every tree on the planet. He also took a shot at Ocasio-Cortez, pointing out that without fossil fuels, &#8220;How do you get the food to the center of New York, to Manhattan, where AOC is from? You don&#8217;t.&#8221;
Moore was appearing on Fox News with Tucker Carlson, who noted that Moore had already expressed his hostility to the radical plan, then turned to Moore and queried, &#8220;So, you&#8217;re one of the founders of the most famous environmental organizations in the world, and you think the &#8216;Green New Deal&#8217; sounds terrifying. Tell us why.&#8221;
Moore responded:
<blockquote>
Well, because it would be basically the end of civilization if 85% of the world&#8217;s and also 85% of the U.S.&#8217;s energy in the form of coal, oil, natural gas were phased out over the next few years, like ten years. We do not have anything to replace them with. Yes, if we went into a crash course of building nuclear reactors, we could replace them for producing electricity. But that isn&#8217;t going to happen because the Greens are against nuclear and they are even against hydroelectric dams which at least is renewable. But they don&#8217;t support that either. So basically they are opposed to approximately 98.5% of all the electricity that we are using and nearly 100% of all of the vehicle and transportation and ships and planes energy that we are using.
So when I tweeted the other day, and it had a huge response, over three million impressions on Twitter, I said, you don&#8217;t have a plan to feed eight billion people without fossil fuels or get the food into the cities, where it&#8217;s needed. That requires large trucks, and there&#8217;s not going to be any electric trucks any time soon hauling forty tons of food into the supermarkets where the people in the cities probably think it originates, in the supermarket. But it does not.
It&#8217;s coming from farms out in the country, where a few million people are growing the food for all the rest of the population. And if we ban fossil fuels, first, agricultural production would collapse in a very short period of time.
There&#8217;s these things called tractors and they use fuel, and all the other implements on the farm, and then there&#8217;s the transportation.
So when you have no fuel, how do you get the food to the center of New York, to Manhattan, where AOC is from? You don&#8217;t. Then the people there will begin to starve and that will spread out as a rot from the center of the metropolises all across the country, and half the population will die in a very short period of time.
And as I also pointed out, there wouldn&#8217;t be a tree left on this planet. Say this was a worldwide thing, because the United States is not going to ban fossil fuels if no one else does; but say the Paris Agreement came into effect, fully all around the world and everybody banned fossil fuels, there wouldn&#8217;t be a tree left on this planet because that would be all there was for fuel, for heating and cooking, as they did in the old days, when there was hardly anybody on the planet compared to what there is today.
So just that one point, never mind the insanity of banning aircraft and fossil fuel-using vehicles.
</blockquote>
Carlson responded simply, &#8220;Well, you&#8217;ve just completely blown my mind. And I knew some of that, but the way you put it was really stirring.&#8221;
Video below:
<div class="embed video fluid-video"><iframe loading="lazy" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/edslpDKzdxc" width="560"></iframe></div>

WATCH: Greenpeace Founder Blows Carlson’s Mind, Warns ‘Green New Deal’ Would Lead To ‘End of Civilization’

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Environmentalism

Tucker Carlson

Members of the anti-science activist group Greenpeace risked their lives Wednesday for a futile publicity stunt, climbing a 270-foot crane in downtown Washington DC to unfurl a giant 35 foot-by-75-foot orange and black anti-Trump banner that read: “Resist.” The banner was visible from the White House.
<div class="image"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" src="https://www.dailywire.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/greenpeace_2_0.jpg" alt="" width="780" height="476" /></div>
In recent months, far-left agitators have appropriated terms like “resist” and “revolution,” farcically conjuring up the image of jungle-dwelling anti-imperialist guerillas intent on detonating makeshift explosives near government buildings, to oppose the supposedly “fascist” reign of President Donald J. Trump.
Greenpeace’s “protest” had all the hallmarks of a contemporary leftist exercise in moral preening. For one, the disruptive act did nothing to change the reality on the ground. Trump is still president. Both houses of Congress are still controlled by the Republican Party. But more importantly, the self-styled environmentalist group’s theatrics only managed to harm everyday people, rather than those frolicking the halls of powers. The group was allegedly protesting the Trump administration&#8217;s decision to green light the Keystone XL pipeline and Dakota Access pipeline projects.
DC residents were blocked from getting to work, thanks to the “resistance” fighters.
<div class="image"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" src="https://www.dailywire.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/greenpeace_0.jpg" alt="" width="780" height="432" /></div>
“D.C. police waited out the seven protesters, shutting down traffic at a major intersection through the morning commute and into the evening and suspending work on new offices for Fannie Mae at 15th and L streets NW,” <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/handful-of-protesters-climb-270-foot-tall-crane-in-downtown-dc-disrupt-traffic/2017/01/25/a9346920-e2ff-11e6-ba11-63c4b4fb5a63_story.html?utm_term=.2f1096f22d41">reports</a> The Washington Post. “The action is one of several protests in the District since just before the presidential inauguration, and more are planned in the coming weeks.” Great job sticking it to the man.
The protesters were apparently all expert climbers equipped with safety harnesses and helmets, according to Greenpeace. They remained suspended 270-feet in the air for several hours until all seven activists finally came down from the crane only to be arrested by police waiting down below. “They were charged with second-degree burglary, unlawful entry, and destruction of property,” notes The Post.
<div class="image"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" src="https://www.dailywire.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/greenpeace_3.jpg" alt="" width="780" height="518" /></div>
When the protest finally ended at 10 pm, taxpayer-funded emergency services, including firemen, paramedics, and police officers, had been stuck playing the waiting game for 18 hours.
Fortunately, nobody was hurt during the stunt.
Despite the seemingly impish nature of Wednesday’s stunt, Greenpeace’s usual modi operandi are far from innocuous.
Indeed, the activist group is infamous for its “resistance” against genetically modified organisms, or GMOs. Propagating anti-science rhetoric and alternative facts, Greenpeace has waged a war against the scientific community and its unequivocal endorsement of GMOs as a safe and sustainable.
Perhaps the most vocal votary of the anti-science Left, Greenpeace has attempted to infect the body politic with ignorance and fear-mongering to peddle a conspiratorial agenda about “Frankenfoods.”
Unfortunately, the group’s activism isn’t just restricted to rhetoric.
Comprised of mostly over-privileged and well-fed white Westerners, Greenpeace has worked to disrupt the development and distribution of Golden Rice, a Vitamin A-infused GMO rice product that was hailed by scientists as a panacea to curing children in underdeveloped regions of the world, including sub-Saharan Africa, of blindness and death due to Vitamin A deficiency.
<a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2013/08/26/golden_rice_attack_in_philippines_anti_gmo_activists_lie_about_protest_and.html">Vandalizing farms and harassing impoverished Golden Rice farmers in the Philippines and elsewhere</a>, Greenpeace activists delayed the developmental process only to deprive desperate, dying children of the life-saving product.
In addition, the group initiated a PR war against NGOs and charities, like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, devoted to distributing the product to the poorest regions of the world.
“By 2002, <a href="http://irri.org/golden-rice">Golden Rice</a> was technically ready to go. Animal testing had found no health risks. Syngenta, which had figured out how to insert the Vitamin A–producing gene from carrots into rice, had handed all financial interests over to a <a href="http://irri.org/">non-profit organization</a>, so there would be no resistance to the life-saving technology from GMO opponents who resist genetic modification because big biotech companies profit from it,” <a href="https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/golden-rice-opponents-should-be-held-accountable-for-health-problems-linked-to-vitamain-a-deficiency/">explains</a> Scientific American’s <a href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/author/david-ropeik/">David Ropeik</a>. “Except for the regulatory approval process, Golden Rice was ready to start saving millions of lives and preventing tens of millions of cases of blindness in people around the world who suffer from <a href="http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/vad/en/">Vitamin A deficiency</a>.”
Today, the distribution of Golden Rice is limited, largely due to the disruptive actions of anti-GMO groups like Greenpeace.
Ropeik continues (emphasis added):
<blockquote>…two agricultural economists, one from the Technical University of Munich, the other from the University of California, Berkeley, have quantified the price of that opposition, in human health, and the numbers are truly frightening.
Their <a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=6&amp;fid=9136417&amp;jid=EDE&amp;volumeId=-1&amp;issueId=-1&amp;aid=9136416&amp;bodyId=&amp;membershipNumber=&amp;societyETOCSession=&amp;fulltextType=RA&amp;fileId=S1355770X1300065X">study</a>, published in the journal Environment and Development Economics, estimates that the delayed application of Golden Rice in India alone has cost 1,424,000 life years since 2002. That odd sounding metric – not just lives but ‘life years’ &#8211; accounts not only for those who died, but also for the blindness and other health disabilities that Vitamin A deficiency causes. The majority of those who went blind or died because they did not have access to Golden Rice were children.
These are real deaths, real disability, real suffering, not the phantom fears about the human health effects of Golden Rice thrown around by opponents, none of which have held up to objective scientific scrutiny. It is absolutely fair to charge that opposition to this particular application of genetically modified food has contributed to the deaths of and injuries to millions of people. The opponents of Golden Rice who have caused this harm should be held accountable.</blockquote>
Greenpeace&#8217;s opposition to Golden Rice has been so egregious that <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/06/29/more-than-100-nobel-laureates-take-on-greenpeace-over-gmo-stance/?utm_term=.877c1b219824">107 Nobel laureates actually penned a letter</a> in the summer of 2016, condemning the activist group&#8217;s macabre remonstrations.
&#8220;We urge Greenpeace and its supporters to re-examine the experience of farmers and consumers worldwide with crops and foods improved through biotechnology, recognize the findings of authoritative scientific bodies and regulatory agencies, and abandon their campaign against &#8216;GMOs&#8217; in general and Golden Rice in particular,&#8221; the letter reads.
The letter campaign was organized by Richard Roberts, the chief scientific officer of New England Biolabs and Phillip Sharp, winner of the Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine.
“We’re scientists. We understand the logic of science. It&#8217;s easy to see what Greenpeace is doing is damaging and is anti-science,&#8221; Roberts <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/06/29/more-than-100-nobel-laureates-take-on-greenpeace-over-gmo-stance/?utm_term=.877c1b219824">explained</a> in an interview with The Post. “Greenpeace initially, and then some of their allies, deliberately went out of their way to scare people. It was a way for them to raise money for their cause.&#8221;
The <a href="http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/vad/en/">World Health Organization (WHO) details the deleterious health effects of Vitamin A deficiency:</a> “Vitamin A deficiency (VAD) is the leading cause of preventable blindness in children and increases the risk of disease and death from severe infections. In pregnant women VAD causes night blindness and may increase the risk of maternal mortality. Vitamin A deficiency is a public health problem in more than half of all countries, especially in Africa and South-East Asia, hitting hardest young children and pregnant women in low-income countries. Crucial for maternal and child survival, supplying adequate vitamin A in high-risk areas can significantly reduce mortality. Conversely, its absence causes a needlessly high risk of disease and death.”
Death and blindness from Vitamin A deficiency are entirely preventable. And yet, innumerable children in dire need of the vitamin have no means of accessing cheap foods with enough Vitamin A to keep them healthy.
“An estimated 250 million preschool children are vitamin A deficient and it is likely that in vitamin A deficient areas a substantial proportion of pregnant women is vitamin A deficient,” notes WHO. “An estimated 250 000 to 500 000 vitamin A-deficient children become blind every year, half of them dying within 12 months of losing their sight.”
Sadly, Greenpeace isn’t alone in its dangerous anti-science crusade.
From promoting anti-vaccine hysteria to peddling homeopathy in lieu of conventional medicine to sabotaging the development of life-saving GMO products, the anti-science Left is destroying lives with a near fanatical, if not cult-like, zeal.
Rather than climbing tall cranes to protest a democratically elected president and block rush hour traffic, perhaps the folks at Greenpeace should sit down, shut up, and stop needlessly contributing to the deaths and disabilities of children in countries far less fortunate than the United States.

greenpeace_2_0

Greenpeace Unfurls Giant Anti-Trump Banner From Crane. Trump Still President.

Donald Trump

Leftism

Social Justice

White House

A Greenpeace activist obsessed with global warming found one place she could live for 12 months without melting: inside a <a href="http://https://breaking911.com/an-activist-has-spent-a-year-in-a-freezer-to-oppose-global-warming/">commercial freezer</a>.
Jade Martens, 26, decided that Barack Obama simply wasn&#8217;t doing enough to combat carbon dioxide emissions, and resolved to stay a free woman in the freezer, rather than to die from global warming, thus residing in the freezer to protest Obama&#8217;s passivity.
The 6&#8242;x3&#8242;x4&#8242;, chest freezer, which lies in the San Francisco Congress Center, <a href="http://www.weaselzippers.us/236613-moonbat-locks-herself-in-a-freezer-for-one-year-to-oppose-global-warming/">features</a> Martens eating, sleeping, and relieving herself. She stands up at various times during the day to stretch.
Martens told <a href="http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/activist-spends-one-year-in-freezer-to-denounce-global-warming/">reporters</a>, &#8220;The government and the corporations aren&#8217;t doing anything for the environment. Somebody had to do something, so I decided to take action myself. I hope that my actions can help raise awareness about global warming, and can eventually bring some political change. This is an important political action for which I have already made a lot of sacrifices. There is no way I am going to abandon now! The stakes are too high, I can&#8217;t give up. I am doing this for Mother Earth!&#8221;
<blockquote>
&#8220;The stakes are too high, I can&#8217;t give up. I am doing this for Mother Earth!&#8221;
Jade Martens, Greenpeace activist
</blockquote>
She concluded, &#8220;My sacrifice is necessary for a better world&#8221;.
A Danish film maker named Hans Mitzbërg has said he will film a documentary about Martens. She certainly can boast that she shares <a href="http://www.dailywire.com/news/374/hillary-poor-frigid-woman-does-not-sweat-hank-berrien">one quality</a> with Hillary Clinton.