WASHINGTON—When President Trump&#8217;s Federal Trade Commission hosts its <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/exclusive-federal-trade-commission-is-setting-its-sights-on-transgender-procedures-on-kids">Wednesday workshop</a> where experts are expected to speak out against the so-called &#8220;gender affirming care&#8221; industry, there will be one somewhat shocking participant: a lawyer in the office of New York Attorney General Letitia James, who has been a fierce defender of transgender procedures on minors.
Glenna Goldis serves as an assistant attorney general for James, one of the most liberal and anti-Trump attorneys general in the country. But the self-described &#8220;lefty lesbian lawyer&#8221; based out of New York City is also outspoken against the dangers of gender ideology pushed on children by transgender activists.
Goldis will participate in the workshop in her personal capacity, and she&#8217;s aware that her positions on gender ideology put her at odds with James.
&#8220;You can see in the public record that my employer has taken positions that are supportive of pediatric gender medicine,&#8221; Goldis said in a phone interview with The Daily Wire. &#8220;You can see in the public record that Letitia James&#8217; view is not my view.&#8221;
James has not only spoken in support of what she calls &#8220;gender-affirming care,&#8221; but she&#8217;s taken legal action against Trump&#8217;s efforts to protect children from transgender surgeries, hormones, and puberty blockers. James called the policies &#8220;cruel, discriminatory, dangerous, and not based on science or law,” pushing the falsehood that transgender surgeries, hormones, and puberty blockers are &#8220;medically necessary&#8221; as she argued that “every young person deserves access to medically necessary care without government interference.&#8221;
Goldis says she&#8217;s &#8220;motivated by the fact that I&#8217;ve seen so many other people silenced, especially people who are similar to me,&#8221; she explained. She says, in many ways, &#8220;we are the people who are most silenced in America right now on this issue.&#8221;
&#8220;I want to end that, I want to break the taboo,&#8221; Goldis added. &#8220;There&#8217;s a taboo out there which is just performing so much work for the gender doctors. The healthcare industry is able to make all this money and pass off all these lies because there&#8217;s a taboo against criticizing it. And so I want to smash that taboo.&#8221;
The FTC workshop appears to be the first step towards major action against the industry, which is being investigated for &#8220;unfair and deceptive&#8221; practices. The FTC often holds such events before initiating legal action against an industry to gather information and solicit the input of affected Americans, bolstering the case against its target. A memo reported on by The Daily Wire in May indicates that the FTC looks to build off the Trump administration’s efforts to crack down on radical gender ideology.
And Goldis&#8217; presence at the event signals something significant as well: that the movement against gender ideology is not merely conservatives, as left-wing activists suggest, but a cohort of politically diverse individuals united to fight back against something much bigger than political party.
That coalition includes Goldis, but it also includes detransitioners like Chole Cole and Prisha Mosley, women who attempted to transition to become men as teenagers, medical whistleblowers Jamie Reed, Eithan Haim, and Vanessa Sivadge, conservative experts and leaders like Jay Richards of the Heritage Foundation and Terry Schilling of the American Principles Project, and more.
For her part, Goldis is tired of leftists suggesting that men and women who identify as gay are in complete agreement with the transgender agenda.
&#8220;I think it&#8217;s especially important for gay people to speak out,&#8221; she told The Daily Wire. &#8220;One of the big tools that trans advocates have used since the 1990s to normalize what they&#8217;re doing and to build public support is to pretend that they have something in common with gay people. And if gay people ever speak out and say, &#8216;Well, I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s quite true,&#8217; then they get clobbered. This has been true, like I said, for decades.&#8221; 
The general public can be forgiven for &#8220;thinking that there is a connection there,&#8221; Goldis said, since activists are constantly promoting the LGBTQ moniker — &#8220;It really gets in your head, even though it&#8217;s not a particularly catchy collection of letters, but at this point in history you do recognize it.&#8221; 
She suggested that wealthy nonprofits and global lawfirms promoting transgenderism like the ACLU and Lambda Legal hire gay or lesbian spokespeople in an effort to build on this theme.
&#8220;They give awards to gay people who join their cause,&#8221; she said. &#8220;They give jobs to them. So, with all of that happening and with all that money and all the carrots and the sticks that are out there for gay people. I think it&#8217;s important to stand up to all of that.&#8221; 
&#8220;I just think our voice has to be heard, even though we don&#8217;t have a megaphone, naturally, we don&#8217;t have money, we don&#8217;t have the healthcare industry or big law coming to amplify our message of gender nonconformity being natural and something that should not be medicalized, especially in minors. We don&#8217;t have any of that.&#8221;
She pointed to her friends in the movement, like whistleblower Jamie Reid and Lauren Leggieri of the <a href="https://www.lgbcouragecoalition.org/">LGB Courage Coalition,</a> which describes itself as &#8220;a lesbian and gay advocacy group committed to promoting evidence-based medical care, ending the medicalization of gender nonconformity, safeguarding homosexual rights, and building a pathway back for LGB individuals who have undergone medicalization.&#8221;
&#8220;We&#8217;re all just going out there in our personal capacities and using our voices to stand up to the health care industry,&#8221; Goldis said.

New York Attorney General Letitia James

Attorney In Letitia James’s Office Breaks From Dems to Speak Out Against ‘Gender-Affirming Care’

Letitia James

Transgender

The advertising industry “cartel” that existed to censor online speech in the name of &#8220;brand safety&#8221; was directly involved in organizing the corporate boycott of Twitter after Elon Musk bought it, even working with foreign regulators to orchestrate its pressure campaign against the social media platform, a bombshell congressional investigation found.
The House Judiciary Committee released emails on Friday showing that the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, a now-defunct coalition created by the World Federation of Advertisers that used its control of the global advertising spending to bankrupt conservative publishers, was working with regulators in Europe and Australia to force Twitter, now X, to fall in line with its censorship demands.
X is <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/x-rumble-sue-advertising-cartel-for-allegedly-breaking-antitrust-laws-to-force-censorship">suing</a> the World Federation of Advertisers alleging that its coalition engaged in anti-competitive activity to facilitate boycotts and force tech platforms to censor content. The Friday report provides evidence that GARM was in fact intimately involved in organizing the boycott, and that it was being carried out for explicitly political reasons.
The head of GARM, Rob Rakowitz, expressed a desire in emails to stop President Donald Trump and the “contagion” he represents.
“My main thing is I need to see Trump … effectively sidelined but I am afraid the contagion is too widespread to protect infection overall,” Rakowitz wrote in a November 2022 email to an Australian official, as he was coordinating opposition to Musk’s changes at Twitter.
The report found that Rakowitz and GARM prepared statements for its members to publicly protest changes Musk was making at Twitter.
“The bird has gone from freed to fried,” Rakowitz wrote to all its members, stating that the “platform poses real risks.” The email, which describes the situation as a “crisis,” was an attempt to convey to GARM’s members that Twitter was now “unsafe” and they needed to “cease and desist” from advertising on Twitter.
“I’ve crafted a message that needs to be posted ASAP and distributed,” Rakowitz writes. “I have navigated the situation as best as we can in terms of our anticompetitive statues [sic] and have gone as close as possible as we can to saying ‘Twitter is unsafe, cease and desist.’”
The legal concerns appear to be well-founded. Trump’s Federal Trade Commission is actively investigating whether the advertising industry violated antitrust laws by coordinating through GARM.
On Monday, two of the world’s largest advertising agencies, both founding members of GARM, announced an agreement with the FTC to cease all coordination that was taking place to direct advertising dollars away from disfavored publishers. The firms, Omnicom and IPG, are also agreeing to cooperate with the Trump administration’s investigation into the coordination that took place while GARM was still in place.
READ MORE: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/exclusive-trump-ftc-secures-landmark-agreement-to-end-political-collusion-in-advertising-industry?author=Brent+Scher&amp;category=News&amp;elementPosition=0&amp;row=0&amp;rowType=Vertical+List&amp;title=EXCLUSIVE%3A+Trump+FTC+Secures+Landmark+Agreement+to+End+Political+Collusion+in+Advertising+Industry">EXCLUSIVE: Trump FTC Secures Landmark Agreement to End Political Collusion in Advertising Industry</a>
The House Judiciary Committee, led by Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), had announced an <a href="https://nypost.com/2024/12/18/business/house-probes-ad-agency-mega-merger-over-ties-to-anti-conservative-cartel/">investigation into the two firms</a> for their involvement with GARM last November.
In emails previously unveiled by Jordan’s committee, Rakowitz says the goal of GARM was to “fund the voices we want to associate with, and close down the advertising ecosystem to bad actors.”
Those “bad actors” included outlets like The Daily Wire, which was put on a “Global High Risk” blacklist by the advertising coalition and flagged, without evidence, for spreading “conspiracy theories.”
His emails, revealed in the committee’s initial report last July, revealed stunning political bias by Rakowitz and other executives. Rakowitz in one email complained that the U.S. Constitution was written “by white men exclusively.”
READ MORE: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/garm-exposed-house-judiciary-report-says-ad-coalition-broke-law-to-silence-conservatives">GARM Exposed: House Judiciary Report Says Ad Coalition Likely Broke Law To Silence Conservatives</a>
The past emails also showed that GARM aimed to “stop all paid advertisement” to Musk’s Twitter, and “bragged about” its success. In emails it celebrated the fact that Twitter was “80% below revenue forecasts” after its effort to starve advertising dollars from it.
The new report sheds light on how that effort played out. Not only was GARM urging its members (which together controlled about 90% of global advertising) to yank advertising from the platform, but it was urging regulators in the European Union and Australia to pressure Musk’s Twitter to censor content in line with GARM’s demands.
The emails show that the European Commission was working “to push Twitter to deliver on GARM asks.” And in Australia, the head of the eSafety Commission was hailing GARM’s “significant collective power” to get GARM to bend the knee.
GARM also shared confidential metrics regarding Twitter&#8217;s compliance with its standards, as part of its effort to prompt ad boycotts. Though GARM changed its policy to make the metrics public for everyone, it was done right after Musk&#8217;s purchase and done explicitly to hurt Twitter.
We know that, because Rakowitz laid out his master plan in an email to his leadership team.
&#8220;We are doubling down on where our power is; standards and transparency and allowing advertisers to make informed 
decisions,&#8221; Rakowitz said, before noting that the transparency was done strategically. &#8220;This way it&#8217;s not singling Twitter out, but we know where eyes will be.&#8221;
After the change, all Twitter&#8217;s policy changes would be visible to its members, allowing advertising firms to say they changed their ad spend because Twitter changed its standards.
&#8220;This feels damn good,&#8221; Rakowitz wrote after laying out his plan.
All of these actions took place even as members in GARM knew its actions weren&#8217;t popular. Internal emails show awareness that the American consumers it was supposed to be advertising to valued free speech over censorship of potentially &#8220;harmful&#8221; content, but GARM executives went ahead with the effort nonetheless.
A June 2020 email showed Gallup polling was circulated to GARM executives showing that 66% of consumers prioritized freedom of speech over &#8220;risks of exposure to harmful content.&#8221;
The report highlights regret from major corporate participants that they were a part of the censorship cartel, which went &#8220;too far&#8221; in its efforts to restrict speech.
Gerry D&#8217;Angelo, a Proctor &amp; Gamble executive who helped lead GARM, says the effort undermined the &#8220;business objectives&#8221; of its clients.
&#8220;If you were to ask me and say, ‘Did we go too far in those first rounds of exclusionary restrictions?’ I would say yes,” D&#8217;Angelo said, in a quote highlighted by the report. D&#8217;Angelo adds that GARM required companies &#8220;to boycott too many websites&#8221; and that the negative consequences of brand safety &#8220;never actually materialized.&#8221;
&#8220;GARM&#8217;s collusive activity not only hurt consumers, but all GARM&#8217;s members who sacrificed opportunities because they were led to believe that these brand safety precautions were both necessary and beneficial in promoting advertisers&#8217; core business objectives,&#8221; the report states.
The full report can be read below:
<iframe loading="lazy" class="scribd_iframe_embed" tabindex="0" title="GARM Report 2.0" src="https://www.scribd.com/embeds/881434966/content?start_page=1&amp;view_mode=scroll&amp;access_key=key-TuNfEkYl3JkwmDWxRZ0x" width="100%" height="600" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" data-auto-height="true" data-aspect-ratio="0.7729220222793488" data-mce-fragment="1"></iframe>
<a style="color: #098642; text-decoration: underline;" title="View GARM Report 2.0 on Scribd" href="https://www.scribd.com/document/881434966/GARM-Report-2-0#from_embed"> GARM Report 2.0 </a> by <a style="color: #098642; text-decoration: underline;" title="View Daily Wire Investigations Team's profile on Scribd" href="https://www.scribd.com/user/694252498/Daily-Wire-Investigations-Team#from_embed"> Daily Wire Investigations Team </a>

Jim Jordan/Elon Musk

EXCLUSIVE: Ad Cartel Colluded With Foreign Governments Against Elon Musk’s Twitter

Daily Wire

Elon Musk

GARM

Jim Jordan

Twitter

President Donald Trump’s top consumer protection and antitrust official has approved a massive $13.5 billion merger that will reshape the advertising industry, effectively putting the final nail in the coffin of coordination against outlets based on their political viewpoints.
The Federal Trade Commission announced Monday morning that it has decided not to block a merger between Omnicom and IPG, two rival firms which together make up a third of the world’s “Big Six” advertising agencies. But rather than rubber stamp the deal, FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson extracted a major concession: the firms have agreed to cease all coordination related to viewpoint discrimination, refrain from any coordination in the future, and submit to strict compliance mandates.
Ferguson on Monday in his <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/omnicom-ipg-ferguson-statement_0.pdf">official statement on the decision</a> said the firms have offered not only to cease coordination in any way that would steer advertising dollars away from publishers based on political viewpoints, but to cooperate with the FTC’s investigation into past collusion and submit to regular compliance reviews.
The FTC appeared poised to block the merger based on evidence of past “anticompetitive” coordination against conservative news organizations, an issue the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/02/technology/ftc-investigation-advertising-boycotts.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">commission is actively investigating</a>. Ferguson on Monday pointed the finger at the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, better known as GARM, which was disbanded in controversy after it was caught directing ad dollars away from right-of-center outlets, including The Daily Wire.
“A Congressional investigation concluded that GARM banded together the most powerful firms in their industry to choke off the vital advertising revenue of those who disagreed with them,” Ferguson said in a Monday statement, adding that GARM aimed “to destroy publishers of content of which they disapproved.”
“GARM was neither the beginning nor the end of harmful and potentially unlawful collusion in this industry,” Ferguson said, a reference to concerns that <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/exclusive-jim-jordan-investigating-ad-industry-attempt-to-create-new-garm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">GARM would reconstitute itself</a>.  “Numerous other industry groups and private organizations have publicly sought to use the chokepoint of the advertising industry to effect political or ideological goals.”
The conditions proposed by the companies, however, “mitigate” the FTC’s concerns about politically-motivated collusion in the future.
“Today, Omnicom and IPG have committed themselves to help stop that sort of coordination in their industry,” Ferguson said. “This consent agreement will help mitigate the dangers inherent in a consolidated national advertising market.”
“I hope the conditions imposed on this merger will encourage all advertising firms to adopt similar practices and thereby reduce the temptation to collude to the detriment of their customers, independent journalists, small and independent media companies, consumers, and the American public square,” he concluded.
GARM came under fire in 2024 after a congressional investigation, first reported by The Daily Wire, uncovered overt political bias in the advertising coalition that was being used to keep ad dollars away from websites that weren’t deemed “brand safe.”
READ MORE: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/garm-exposed-house-judiciary-report-says-ad-coalition-broke-law-to-silence-conservatives" target="_blank" rel="noopener">GARM Exposed: House Judiciary Report Says Ad Coalition Likely Broke Law To Silence Conservatives</a>
Internal emails from ad executives involved in the coalition, which included both Omnicom and IPG, showed that The Daily Wire was put on a “High Risk exclusion list” and “categorized as Conspiracy Theories.” Other emails show that the highest ranking official derided people “advocating for freedom of speech online” and complained that the Constitution was written “by white men exclusively.”
Daily Wire Editor Emeritus and co-founder Ben Shapiro testified to Congress that GARM was a “cartel,” and effectively made it impossible for conservatives to run an ad-based business.
“GARM acts as a cartel,” Shapiro said. “Its members account for 90 percent of ad spending in the United States–almost $1 trillion. In other words, if you’re not getting ad dollars from GARM members, it’s nearly impossible to run an ad-based business.”
<iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/04Q1cPX9n9c?si=qbfxzrpn9nfP3ZEB" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The concessions by Omnicom and IPG — which, once merged, will represent the largest ad firm in the world — are a sea change for the ad industry.
While individual companies are certainly still able to decide where they’d like to advertise, it has become standard practice in recent years for the industry to move in concert. Rather than making individual decisions, the industry giants created blacklists using biased third party “misinformation” services such as Newsguard. Entire business sectors would cut off access to disfavored publications based on exclusion lists that became industry standard.
According to the consent decree issued by the FTC on Monday, the firms have agreed to submit annual compliance reports on the matter of coordination for the next five years, as well as spot compliance reports any time the FTC requests one.
The FTC is urging publishers to alert the commission if they believe they are the “object of unlawful collusion.”
The agreement also stipulates that the firms will cooperate with the FTC on all past coordination to boycott publishers based on viewpoint.
“This Agreement requires Omnicom and IPG to cooperate with the Commission in any investigation relating to media-buying services,” Ferguson said, adding that “investigating and policing censorship practices that run afoul of the antitrust laws is a top priority of the Trump-Vance FTC.”
It is unclear whether the other four major ad firms — Publicis, WPP, Dentsu, and Havas — will take action regarding their own practices following the change by Omnicom and IPG. The ad industry has been gathered at the Cannes Lions Festival of Creativity, where the potential merger was certainly a main topic of discussion.
The public will have 30 days to submit comments to the FTC on the merger decision.

FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson Testifies During House Hearing

EXCLUSIVE: Trump FTC Secures Landmark Agreement to End Political Collusion in Advertising Industry

advertising

Censorship

Federal Trade Commission

Ferguson

WASHINGTON—The Federal Trade Commission is setting its sights on the industry pushing transgender medical procedures on minors, documents obtained by The Daily Wire show, a potential major step in the Trump administration&#8217;s efforts to crack down on radical gender ideology.
The FTC, an agency tasked with protecting American consumers, will hold a day-long workshop in July on transgender surgeries, hormones, and puberty blockers, according to an internal memo obtained by The Daily Wire. That&#8217;s a likely indicator of the agency&#8217;s intentions: the FTC often holds such events before initiating legal action against an industry to gain information, gather evidence, and solicit the input of affected Americans.
&#8220;Under the Federal Trade Commission Act, the FTC is provided broad authority to protect consumers from unfair and deceptive trade acts and practices,&#8221; the memo reads. &#8220;There is now considerable reason to believe that the doctors and medical providers pushing [gender-affirming care] on minors are knowingly deceiving parents by exaggerating [gender-affirming care&#8217;s] &#8216;benefits&#8217; and downplaying its harmful side effects.&#8221;
The Trump-appointed chairman of the FTC, Andrew Ferguson, reportedly pitched the president on using the agency to fight &#8220;against the trans agenda&#8221; before he was selected for the post, according to a document obtained by Punchbowl News in December.
Ferguson believed the FTC could &#8220;investigate the doctors, therapists, hospitals, and others who deceptively pushed gender confusion, puberty blockers, hormone replacement, and sex-change surgeries on children and adults while failing to disclose strong evidence that such interventions are not helpful and carry enormous risks,&#8221; Punchbowl reported.
The FTC declined to comment for this story. But the leadership, contents, and guests of the proposed workshop — &#8220;The Big Lie: The Dangers of Gender-Affirming Care for Minors&#8221; — strongly indicate that the commission plans to make good on those promises.
<div id="attachment_922527" style="width: 939px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/exclusive-federal-trade-commission-is-setting-its-sights-on-transgender-procedures-on-kids/ftc-chairman-andrew-ferguson-testifies-during-house-hearing" rel="attachment wp-att-922527"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-922527" class="wp-image-922527 size-large" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/05/GettyImages-2215277518-929x576.jpg" alt="" width="929" height="576" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/05/GettyImages-2215277518-929x576.jpg 929w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/05/GettyImages-2215277518-300x186.jpg 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/05/GettyImages-2215277518-768x476.jpg 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/05/GettyImages-2215277518.jpg 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 929px) 100vw, 929px" /></a>Federal Trade Commission Chairman Andrew Ferguson (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)</div>
The memo obtained by The Daily Wire was authored by FTC senior policy advisor Jon Schweppe, the former policy director for the American Principles Project, which has aggressively fought against transgender ideology. The group has had a strong influence on MAGA culture war messaging. In one instance, APP&#8217;s leader, Terry Schilling, hand-delivered polling to Trump showing how strongly Americans would back a candidate who took a stand against gender ideology.
The purpose of the workshop, according to the memo, is to build on President Trump&#8217;s executive order ending the federal government&#8217;s support for so-called &#8220;gender-affirming care&#8221; for minors. The memo notes that the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently called transgender procedures &#8220;in truth still experimental.&#8221;
While transgender advocates claim that performing transgender surgeries, hormones, and puberty blocker procedures on children will cause them to be less suicidal, the FTC memo notes that &#8220;a growing chorus of experts now publicly contradict these claims.&#8221;
<a href="https://get.dailywire.com/subscribe/plus/?utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=editorial&amp;utm_campaign=memorial&amp;utm_content=editorialmemorialday">Memorial Day Sale &#8211; Get 40% Off New DailyWire+ Annual Memberships</a>
&#8220;There are no longitudinal studies on the effectiveness of [gender-affirming care] on minors,&#8221; the memo states. &#8220;While several politicized medical organizations that promote [gender-affirming care] for minors as the best standard of medical care might claim a &#8216;consensus,&#8217; there is in truth no widespread medical consensus as to whether [gender-affirming care] is the correct course of action for gender dysphoric youth.&#8221;
Significantly, the memo notes that &#8220;while there remains a debate over the &#8216;benefits&#8217; of [gender-affirming care] for minors, the science is settled when it comes to the harms.&#8221; The document cites the &#8220;debilitating&#8221; side effects that come with giving minors puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, including infertility, developmental harm, sexual dysfunction, inability to achieve orgasm, blood clots, osteoporosis, and more.
These risks are typically downplayed by activists, but are also &#8220;widely acknowledged as medical fact,&#8221; the FTC memo states.
The proposed guest list for the conference includes a number of higher profile doctors and experts in the gender field, such as Dr. Miriam Grossman, who has written a number of books on the topic, and Dr. Jay Richards of the Heritage Foundation. Another proposed guest is Erin Friday, an attorney who co-leads &#8220;Our Duty USA&#8221; and has filed multiple lawsuits and amicus briefs on the issue following her own experience helping her daughter navigate gender dysphoria.
<div id="attachment_922529" style="width: 778px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/exclusive-federal-trade-commission-is-setting-its-sights-on-transgender-procedures-on-kids/us-news-mo-transgender-healthcare-kc-3" rel="attachment wp-att-922529"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-922529" class="wp-image-922529 size-large" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/05/GettyImages-1252215740-768x576.jpg" alt="" width="768" height="576" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/05/GettyImages-1252215740-768x576.jpg 768w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/05/GettyImages-1252215740-300x225.jpg 300w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2025/05/GettyImages-1252215740.jpg 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" /></a>Chloe Cole (Katie Bernard/The Kansas City Star/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)</div>
Other proposed guests include individuals who have spoken out about their experience undergoing devastating transgender procedures, like Chloe Cole, and a number of whistleblowers who sought to expose child gender transition practices in Missouri and Texas — and were subsequently targeted by the Biden justice department for their efforts.

FTC Chair Ferguson Testifies Before House Appropriations Subcommittee

EXCLUSIVE: Federal Trade Commission Sets Sights On Transgender Procedures On Kids

Donald Trump

Menu

FTC

Attorney In Letitia James’s Office Breaks From Dems to Speak Out Against ‘Gender-Affirming Care’

EXCLUSIVE: Ad Cartel Colluded With Foreign Governments Against Elon Musk’s Twitter

EXCLUSIVE: Trump FTC Secures Landmark Agreement to End Political Collusion in Advertising Industry

EXCLUSIVE: Federal Trade Commission Sets Sights On Transgender Procedures On Kids