The hosts of ABC&#8217;s &#8220;The View&#8221; took aim at podcast giant <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/joe-rogan" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Joe Rogan</a>, claiming that his podcast was an unreliable source of information because Rogan &#8220;believes in dragons.&#8221; They went on to suggest that because their network, ABC News, occasionally sent them fact checks or legal notes, their program was a more legitimate news source.
The topic came up after cohost Sunny Hostin was forced to read her second legal note in the space of a week after she and the others repeatedly trashed President-elect Donald Trump&#8217;s cabinet picks — and Behar was also obviously less than thrilled: &#8220;Just call the show &#8216;Legal Note&#8217; from now on.&#8221;
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Joy Behar falsely claims The View gets fact-checked by ABC News, and points to the legal notes as an example. But on their podcast last year executive producer Brian Teta claimed the notes are &quot;not a correction.&quot; LINK: <a href="https://t.co/QwzUsKn0r6">https://t.co/QwzUsKn0r6</a> <a href="https://t.co/ATcReWpifm">pic.twitter.com/ATcReWpifm</a>
&mdash; Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) <a href="https://twitter.com/NickFondacaro/status/1859638029498871980?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 21, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Sara Haines suggested people should be wary of the potential for social media, especially to spread misinformation, adding that they should &#8220;triple check&#8221; things before simply accepting them as true.
&#8220;That’s why people like our show because they know we are checked by ABC News,&#8221; Behar claimed.
&#8220;Checked by everybody,&#8221; Whoopi Goldberg agreed.
&#8220;And if we’re wrong, we have the legal note here,&#8221; Behar said, indicating former federal prosecutor and cohost Sunny Hostin. &#8220;We went from Walter Cronkite basically to this guy Joe Rogan who believes in dragons! I checked it!&#8221;
&#8220;He believes in dragons?&#8221; Hostin asked.
<a href="https://www.amiracist.com/?_gl=1*jtghwp*_gcl_au*ODQ1NjYzNTg2LjE3Mjg5MDk3OTE.*_ga*MTc2NzM0NDQ2NS4xNzI4OTA5Nzkx*_ga_CZKR9ZYKJP*MTczMDEyMDgwOS40OS4xLjE3MzAxMjA4MzkuMzAuMC4w" target="_blank" rel="noopener">MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+</a>
Behar was adamant: &#8220;He believes in dragons!&#8221;
&#8220;Did you triple source that?&#8221; Haines wanted to know.
&#8220;Yes, I did and he also thinks that dragons — I guess like dinosaur-type animals — would roam the Earth when people did. So this is the type of really, really bad information that’s going out there,&#8221; Behar complained.
What Rogan <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4WDBuS1-eE" target="_blank" rel="noopener">actually said</a> was that he was &#8220;fascinated&#8221; by the things that did not exist but still appeared across cultures — like dragons. He then explained that he believed people had seen something real, like a large lizard, which inspired exaggerations and stories that led to the legends. On the notion of fire-breathing dragons that hoarded treasure, Rogan&#8217;s assessment was simple: &#8220;Bulls***.&#8221;
Despite that, when video of Behar&#8217;s wild claim began circulating on X — and someone pointed out that &#8220;The View&#8221; had labeled him a &#8220;dragon believer,&#8221; Rogan announced: &#8220;That’s my new official X description.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
That’s my new official X description. <a href="https://t.co/rJ4Fozzmcd">https://t.co/rJ4Fozzmcd</a>
&mdash; Joe Rogan (@joerogan) <a href="https://twitter.com/joerogan/status/1859656754671575457?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 21, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The hosts of &#8220;The View,&#8221; who were not fact-checked despite a number of whoppers on Thursday&#8217;s show alone, are responsible for spreading such blatant misinformation on a regular basis that Goldberg was even <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-effective-immediately-abc-suspends-whoopi-goldberg-over-wrong-and-hurtful-holocaust-comments" target="_blank" rel="noopener">suspended</a> for a time for claiming that the Holocaust was &#8220;not about race.&#8221;

Joe Rogan

‘The View’ Tries To Discredit ‘Dragon Believer’ Joe Rogan, And He Hits Right Back

'The View' Tries To Discredit 'Dragon Believer' Joe Rogan, And He Hits Right Back

ABC News

Fact Check

Media

Politics

The View

For all the differences between the presidential and vice presidential debates, there was one glaring similarity: the moderators weren&#8217;t able to keep their mouths shut. In the first debate, the rules allowed the moderators to &#8220;fact-check,&#8221; whatever that means exactly. In the second debate, the rules didn&#8217;t allow &#8220;fact-checking.&#8221; But in both cases, the moderators couldn&#8217;t help themselves. They weighed in, over and over again. And every single time, they interjected to help whatever Democrat was standing at the podium. And the format of these &#8220;fact-checks&#8221; was always the same, too. The moderators would wait for Donald Trump or JD Vance to stop speaking. Then they&#8217;d hastily recite a rehearsed, one-line &#8220;correction.&#8221; And then they&#8217;d immediately try to change the subject so that Trump or Vance couldn&#8217;t respond.
This would be disgraceful even if these moderators were telling the truth. The whole point of a debate is to hear from the candidates, not the moderators. But even if you disagree on that point — even if you think it&#8217;s good for the moderators to intervene when they think a candidate is lying — it&#8217;s still not clear why they would refuse to let the candidates respond to their &#8220;fact checks.&#8221; This wasn&#8217;t an accident; it was how they approached every single one of these fact checks, across two debates and two sets of moderators. And it&#8217;s worth figuring out why that is.
It could be that many on the Left don&#8217;t engage in any kind of critical thought anymore. They just look at the consensus view — as reflected by the &#8220;fact check&#8221; — and declare no further questioning is allowed. They genuinely can&#8217;t conceive of a situation in which the consensus might be mistaken. On the other hand, it could also be that, in this context, the moderators realized their &#8220;fact-checks&#8221; would fall apart under any form of scrutiny. And indeed, with every day that passes, that&#8217;s exactly what&#8217;s happening. One by one, every single one of these &#8220;fact-checks&#8221; from these two debates is collapsing.
These are not small errors I&#8217;m referring to. Take for example this moment from the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. Trump was asked about his position on abortion, and he gave a long answer. And then the moderator, Linsey Davis, fired off a one-line fact-check before pivoting immediately to Kamala Harris. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/-xUEAF2iR-A?si=0bKHKiSeM2y2CAde" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
At the time, a lot of people pointed out the obvious problem with this fact-check. Donald Trump never actually said that it was legal to kill babies after they were born. But he did say it was happening. And he cited a very specific and well-known piece of evidence: The former governor of Virginia, Ralph Northam, strongly suggested to a radio show in 2019 that in certain cases, such as &#8220;fetal abnormalities,&#8221; his bill would <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/world/fact-check-virginia-governors-2019-comments-about-abortion-bill-are-missing-co-idUSKBN27D2GS/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">allow doctors</a> to kill children after they&#8217;re born:
<blockquote>If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.</blockquote>
Defenders of Ralph Northam recognized how demonic this quote is. So for the past several years, they have insisted that he wasn&#8217;t talking about euthanizing children who survived failed abortions. And they claimed the governor wasn&#8217;t actually talking about allowing newborn infants to die for no medical reason, either. Presumably, that&#8217;s the spin Linsey Davis had in mind when she corrected Donald Trump during this debate. She declared, with authority, that there is &#8220;no state&#8221; in the entire country where it&#8217;s legal to kill children after they&#8217;re born.
What was missing from her fact check is what John Solomon at Just The News has now <a href="https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/tueaftwalzs-history-born-alive-abortions-opens-door-trump-gop-flip" target="_blank" rel="noopener">proven</a> — which is that children are being born alive in this country, and then doctors are allowing them to die without even attempting any life-saving intervention. It turns out that, until 2023, the state of Minnesota kept records on how many infants were born alive during failed abortions. Those records showed that from 2019 to 2021 — during Tim Walz&#8217;s tenure as governor — at least eight infants were born alive following a botched abortion. Not a single one of these infants received &#8220;life-saving care.&#8221; Two infants in 2021 received &#8220;comfort care.&#8221; All eight of the children died.
None of the doctors involved were ever investigated or charged for any of this — even though, at the time, Minnesota law <a href="https://www.ncregister.com/news/tim-walz-born-alive-abortion">required</a>, “responsible medical personnel” to use “[a]ll reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice” to “preserve the life and health of the born alive infant.”
But just to cover his bases, Tim Walz changed the law in 2023. Now the law doesn&#8217;t require lifesaving measures at all for infants who survive abortions. Instead it requires that doctors &#8220;care for the infant who is born alive,&#8221; without specifying exactly what that care entails. The law also gets rid of the reporting requirement for the state health agency, so no one can learn how many children are being killed — or allowed to die — after they&#8217;re born.
<h4><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1456-member-exclusive" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show</a></h4>
If you look at the records Solomon found, you can see why Democrats might want to cover them up. They&#8217;re as ghoulish as you can imagine. Here&#8217;s the <a href="https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2024-08/MNAbortionReportJuly2020.pdf">July 2020 report</a> from Minnesota, for example.
<blockquote>In one instance, fetal anomalies were reported but residual cardiac activity was present at 2 minutes. Care of fetus was transferred to the second medical doctor. No measures taken to preserve life were reported and the infant did not survive. &#8230; In one instance, comfort care measures were provided as planned and the infant did not survive. &#8230; In one instance, the infant was pre-viable. No measures taken to preserve life were reported and the infant did not survive.</blockquote>
Notice the <a href="https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2024-08/MNAbortionReportJuly2020.pdf">report</a> doesn&#8217;t even bother to clarify whether lifesaving measures could have saved some of these infants. That&#8217;s not a piece of information the health department decided to track, for some reason. But the report is very clear on the fact that children who survived abortions were consistently allowed to die in the state of Minnesota without any attempt by a doctor to save them. &#8220;No measures taken to preserve life&#8221; is a consistent theme here. You don&#8217;t get any more information than that. And rather than provide any more transparency on this point, the state, under Tim Walz, has gone ahead and shut down record-keeping entirely.
The Dispatch looked into this reporting, and <a href="https://thedispatch.com/article/claims-about-children-born-alive-after-abortion-attempts-in-minnesota-are-true/">they confirmed</a> it&#8217;s all accurate.
<blockquote>[Charlie] Kirk and Solomon’s claims are correct. Minnesota Department of Health documents show that eight infants were born alive during abortion procedures between 2019 and 2022, and, in 2023, Walz signed legislation that repealed most of a statute designed to protect infants born alive after an abortion attempt.</blockquote>
So the truth is that Linsey Davis either has no idea what she was talking about, or she was deliberately lying. Either way, it&#8217;s beyond reprehensible that no mainstream media organization in this country has bothered to do any investigative reporting on this topic. Apparently, only John Solomon is interested in the question of whether or not children are being systematically killed — or &#8220;allowed to die&#8221; — after they&#8217;re born. The most we can expect from ABC is a drive-by &#8220;fact-check&#8221; during a presidential debate with a lot of snark and no substance whatsoever.
To get a sense of how big the problem is, I went back and looked at every single fact-check from these two debates. And every single one of them was either obviously false or extremely misleading. I already <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/ep-1449-the-matt-walsh-show">covered</a> the FBI&#8217;s crime numbers, which supposedly show that violent crime is down. The moderator, David Muir, cited those statistics in his &#8220;fact-check&#8221; without providing any context — including the missing law enforcement agencies who didn&#8217;t report data, or the DOJ&#8217;s report showing that crime has actually surged under the Biden-Harris administration. Then there was his claim that &#8220;no credible reports&#8221; indicated animals were being eaten in Springfield. Watch:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4O382w20rpk?si=ATftcnAizEufZIia" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
So the city manager says it&#8217;s not &#8220;credible&#8221; to suggest that domesticated animals are being killed in the &#8220;migrant community.&#8221; And the moderator and Kamala Harris mock Donald Trump for saying he saw those reports on television. It turns out that, back in March, the Springfield city manager himself did say that there were &#8220;quite a few&#8221; credible reports of &#8220;horrid things&#8221; happening to domesticated animals in Haitian communities in the town. Watch:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Springfield City Manager back in March: I have heard residents complaining about Haitians eating the town animals.
Would be a shame if we tagged <a href="https://twitter.com/ABC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ABC</a>.
 <a href="https://t.co/dxiQyGwScH">pic.twitter.com/dxiQyGwScH</a>
&mdash; End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) <a href="https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1836193221614932393?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 17, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
So that&#8217;s another fact-check that was just a complete lie. And actually, Trump called it out in real-time. He said the city manager was probably just trying to give a political answer when ABC News called. And that&#8217;s exactly what was happening.
Let&#8217;s go down the list. There was also this fact-check from the other day:
<iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ioYlkDYBOSw?si=XiJriD2-orj3hDIu" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
This was another drive-by fact-check that the candidates weren&#8217;t allowed to respond to. And it&#8217;s also completely false, as I&#8217;ve outlined many times before. 
Here&#8217;s how Chris Martz — the same meteorology student I mentioned the other day — <a href="https://x.com/ChrisMartzWX/status/1841291822846370094" target="_blank" rel="noopener">responded to</a> this particular fact-check. 
<blockquote>There is absolutely zero evidence that climate change makes hurricanes larger in size (i.e., diameter). There is little evidence that hurricanes are becoming stronger. The number of category 3-5 hurricanes globally exhibit no statistically significant trend since 1980. This is backed by peer-reviewed research. &#8230; There is no evidence that hurricanes are becoming deadlier because of better warning coordination. Deaths are down [by more than] 75% since 1900 because of that.</blockquote>
<div id="attachment_807403" style="width: 648px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-807403" class="wp-image-807403 size-full" src="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/10/GY2VGW2WEAcOhDp.jpeg" alt="Colorado State University" width="638" height="522" srcset="https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/10/GY2VGW2WEAcOhDp.jpeg 638w, https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2024/10/GY2VGW2WEAcOhDp-300x245.jpeg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 638px) 100vw, 638px" />Colorado State University</div>
Chris Martz, again, is a meteorology student. And he knows enough to check the actual data before he makes wildly false claims about what &#8220;scientists say.&#8221; So what exactly is the excuse of a major media organization for doing this, in front of 40 million people?
Whatever that excuse is, they&#8217;re still doing it, long after the debate is over. Around midnight, CBS News posted <a href="https://x.com/CBSNews/status/1841346121949401372" target="_blank" rel="noopener">this</a>:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
During the vice presidential debate, Senator JD Vance claimed Vice President Harris “became the appointed border czar.” CBS News Confirmed rates this as false. Here’s why. <a href="https://t.co/Nz888H6x8i">https://t.co/Nz888H6x8i</a> <a href="https://t.co/qzJbHC4s3F">pic.twitter.com/qzJbHC4s3F</a>
&mdash; CBS News (@CBSNews) <a href="https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/1841346121949401372?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 2, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The fact-check claims that Harris was just assigned to investigate the &#8220;root causes&#8221; of migration, rather than to oversee enforcement of the law. But if you pull up articles from CBS&#8217; own website, you&#8217;ll find out very quickly that they&#8217;re lying. Here&#8217;s <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kamala-harris-immigration-lead-mexico-border-biden-administration/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">an article</a> from 2021, for example.
<blockquote>Harris to lead administration&#8217;s efforts to stem migration at border &#8230; President Biden announced Wednesday he had tapped Vice President Kamala Harris to lead the administration&#8217;s efforts to stem migration at the southern border.</blockquote>
At this point, I&#8217;m honestly looking for a single &#8220;fact-check&#8221; that pans out. From what I can tell, none of them have any validity whatsoever. It&#8217;s actually kind of incredible. And of course, there was no fact-check that was more incredible than this one, which I highlighted the other day:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
BREAKING: The CBS Moderators just tried to &quot;Fact-Check&quot; JD Vance, but he stopped them in their tracks and FACT-CHECKED them instead. They then proceeded to mute his mic
THESE PEOPLE ARE DISGUSTING. <a href="https://t.co/thdFNAfXA0">pic.twitter.com/thdFNAfXA0</a>
&mdash; George (@BehizyTweets) <a href="https://twitter.com/BehizyTweets/status/1841291463226712485?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 2, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
This was egregious for all of the reasons that I&#8217;ve shown you. Yes, the moderators decided to break the rules to enter the debate on behalf of Kamala Harris. Yes, JD Vance was right that, to the extent these tens of thousands of Haitians are &#8220;legally&#8221; in the country, it&#8217;s only because the federal government has decided to bend the rules and award them mass amnesty. And yes, it&#8217;s comical that the moderator doesn&#8217;t fact-check Tim Walz&#8217;s claim that this has been going on, to the same extent, since the 90s.
But in retrospect, you can kind of see why the moderators decided to cut the microphones. After all, every single one of their fact-checks up to this point had been wrong. Some of them were called out in real-time, while others fell apart immediately on social media. And now, after all of that, they realized that yet another one of their fact-checks was blowing up in their faces. So they pressed the panic button.
At this point, the only viable solution is to eliminate moderators from future debates entirely. They&#8217;ve inserted themselves repeatedly into the discussion, only to spread falsehoods and confuse the issues. And they haven&#8217;t been wrong about insignificant topics, either. They&#8217;ve been wrong about whether illegal aliens are killing animals. They&#8217;ve been wrong about how many Americans are being victimized every year by violent criminals. And they&#8217;ve been wrong about whether children are being allowed to die after they&#8217;re born. These &#8220;mistakes&#8221; only go in one direction for a reason, which is that they&#8217;re not mistakes at all. The truth is that there are very powerful forces in this country that want to enable these atrocities. And after these moderators are all discarded along with their useless &#8220;fact-checks,&#8221; we need to make sure those ghouls never hold power again.

CBS Hosts Vice Presidential Debate

Why Debate ‘Moderators’ Prove That The Media Is The True Enemy Of The American People

Why Debate 'Moderators' Prove That The Media Is The True Enemy Of The American People

2024 Election

Abortion

Debates

Democrats

Donald Trump

JD Vance

Kamala Harris

Leftists

Legacy Media

Matt Walsh

Opinion

Tim Walz

CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale delivered a <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/14/politics/fact-check-harris-campaign-social-media/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">brutal</a>, eight-part takedown of the @KamalaHQ X account, which has been named as the Vice President&#8217;s official rapid response account, noting that it had &#8220;made a habit of misleadingly clipping and inaccurately captioning video clips to attack former President Donald Trump.&#8221;
&#8220;Fact check: Harris campaign social media account has repeatedly deceived with misleading edits and captions,&#8221; the headline read, noting that the account then blasted those misleading edits out to more than 1.3 million followers on X, formerly Twitter.
From the CNN article:
<blockquote>The Harris campaign deploys @KamalaHQ as a kind of irreverent attack dog, using jocular posts to draw attention to controversial, incorrect, or dubious comments by Trump and his allies. But the account, which the Harris campaign calls its “<a href="https://x.com/KamalaHQ/status/1815212766912803099" target="_blank" rel="noopener">official rapid response page</a>,” has itself made inaccurate comments on multiple occasions.</blockquote>
Dale then laid out a series of eight examples of the @KamalaHQ account doing just that.
In the first case, they edited video of Trump to make it appear as though he had forgotten where he was.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Trump: Would that be okay, North Carolina?
(He is in Pennsylvania) <a href="https://t.co/TcymR609Rg">pic.twitter.com/TcymR609Rg</a>
— Kamala HQ (@KamalaHQ) <a href="https://twitter.com/KamalaHQ/status/1824917619503239193?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 17, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
But the full video of that Pennsylvania rally showed that there was a small group of attendees who were there from North Carolina — and that Trump, aware of that, pointed them out several times throughout the rally and referred to that section of the audience as &#8220;North Carolina&#8221; when he did so.
The @KamalaHQ account made a similar post last week, claiming again that Trump had forgotten what state he was in. This time, unedited footage showed that he was clearly referencing the migrant crisis affecting Pennsylvania during a rally in Arizona.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Trump: “Pennsylvania, remember this when you have to go to vote”
(He is in Arizona) <a href="https://t.co/lMEJwwvQ3I">pic.twitter.com/lMEJwwvQ3I</a>
— Kamala HQ (@KamalaHQ) <a href="https://twitter.com/KamalaHQ/status/1834363376916484344?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 12, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
A third example from @KamalaHQ showed a clip of Trump, claiming he was saying &#8220;nothing was done wrong&#8221; in Charlottesville in 2017. The full video showed Trump clearly stating that he was not referring to the neo-Nazis or the counterprotestors who killed Heather Heyer, but  to his own comment about there being &#8220;fine people on both sides&#8221; — which he and numerous outlets, CNN included, have said did not include white nationalists.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Trump says “nothing was done wrong” in Charlottesville in 2017 when neo-Nazis chanted “Jews will not replace us” and killed an innocent woman <a href="https://t.co/rQEuzPp3KP">pic.twitter.com/rQEuzPp3KP</a>
— Kamala HQ (@KamalaHQ) <a href="https://twitter.com/KamalaHQ/status/1834656890350932410?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 13, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;I think he (Muir) corrected me 11 times. Of the 11 times, I don’t think he had the right to correct me at all. Didn’t correct her once. Like on Project 2025, I have no idea about — had nothing to do with me, he didn’t correct her, he knew that,&#8221; Trump said. &#8220;Charlottesville — nothing was done wrong. All you had to do is read my statement one more sentence and you would’ve seen that. Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Jesse (Watters), all of them, they — Greg Gutfeld — they all took that and they corrected it many times. But they keep coming with the same lies.&#8221;
And while Harris&#8217; campaign did not respond to CNN on the first two examples, they did attempt to defend the Charlottesville reference.
&#8220;He’s saying he did ‘nothing wrong’ in relation to him saying ‘very fine people’ who did what is described in the tweet,&#8221; the campaign said in an email.
A fourth example showed the account deceptively editing a comment from vice presidential candidate and Senator JD Vance (R-OH) regarding veterans&#8217; health care.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Q: Would you consider privatizing veterans health care?
Vance: I think I’d consider it <a href="https://t.co/wmjJq59vNJ">pic.twitter.com/wmjJq59vNJ</a>
— Kamala HQ (@KamalaHQ) <a href="https://twitter.com/KamalaHQ/status/1834244633372619063?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 12, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
When asked whether he&#8217;d consider privatizing health care for veterans, @KamalaHQ claimed that he responded, &#8220;I think he&#8217;d consider it.&#8221;
&#8220;I think I’d consider — and Donald Trump was really good at this, doesn’t get enough credit for this particular innovation — giving veterans more choice. Right? So let’s say you’re in a rural hospital. Your closest VA is 120 miles away. Why force a veteran to drive two-and-a-half hours to that VA facility when he can get cheaper and good care right in his backyard? Right? So I do think that we ought to open up choice and optionality for veterans. You know, I think that there is areas where the VA actually works very well, so I wouldn’t say get rid of the whole thing. I would say give people more choice, I think you’ll save money in the process, you’ll also give veterans a lot more optionality.&#8221;
Harris&#8217; campaign also pushed back on this fact-check, claiming that they never said he meant to privatize everything. But as Dale noted, they still cut off the video before he explained exactly what he intended to &#8220;consider,&#8221; suggesting that the privatization of all veterans&#8217; care was the only thing on the table.
Dale outlined four additional examples, each of which involved @KamalaHQ either posting video clips without relevant context or overtly mischaracterizing things that Trump said in order to attack him.

TOPSHOT-US-VOTE-POLITICS-HARRIS

Plot Twist: CNN Drops Brutal Fact-Check On Kamala’s Campaign HQ

Plot Twist: CNN Drops Brutal Fact-Check On Kamala's Campaign HQ

TIME Magazine issued an embarrassing correction to its post-debate report about how former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris fared against each other on Tuesday night.
Breitbart columnist John Nolte <a href="https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2024/09/11/nolte-time-issues-humiliating-correction-admitting-kamala-supports-taxpayer-funded-gender-surgery-for-illegals/">noted</a> that the left-wing publication initially <a href="https://archive.is/VmxAA#selection-883.0-892.0">reported</a>:
<blockquote>The former President &#8230; falsely claimed that Harris “wants to do transgender operations on illegal aliens in prison.”</blockquote>
Trump made the factually correct statement when talking about the litany of issues that Harris has flip-flopped on since becoming the Democrat Party&#8217;s presidential nominee.
&#8220;She did things that nobody would ever think of,&#8221; Trump said. &#8220;Now she wants to do transgender operations on illegal aliens that are in prison. This is a radical Left liberal that would do this.&#8221;
Trump&#8217;s comment came after CNN recently <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/harris-pledged-to-use-taxpayer-money-to-fund-sex-change-surgeries-for-illegal-aliens-in-detention-report">unearthed</a> a questionnaire Harris filled out for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) during her failed 2020 presidential campaign. She was asked if she, as president, would use “executive authority to ensure that transgender and non-binary people who rely on the state for medical care – including those in prison and immigration detention – will have access to comprehensive treatment associated with gender transition, including all necessary surgical care.”
She answered, “Yes.”
<a href="https://www.amiracist.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.amiracist.com/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1723831707612000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0pyrv88A5nsmWM2F2Wr9As">Tickets for “Am I Racist?” are on sale NOW! Buy here for a theater near you.</a>
Harris explained her answer by claiming that it was “important that transgender individuals who rely on the state for care receive the treatment they need, which includes access to treatment associated with gender transition.”
“Transition treatment is a medical necessity, and I will direct all federal agencies responsible for providing essential medical care to deliver transition treatment,” she claimed.
TIME issued the following correction to their report:
<blockquote>
The original version of this story mischaracterized as false Donald Trump&#8217;s statement accusing Kamala Harris of supporting “transgender operations on illegal aliens in prison” As a presidential candidate in 2019, Harris filled out a <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/09/politics/kfile-harris-pledged-support-in-2019-to-cut-ice-funding-and-provide-transgender-surgery-to-detained-migrants/index.html">questionnaire</a> saying she supported taxpayer-funded gender transition treatment for detained immigrants.
</blockquote>
However, the edit that the publication made inside the piece was still insufficient as they simply removed the word &#8220;false&#8221; so the sentence now reads: &#8220;The former President &#8230; claimed that Harris &#8216;wants to do transgender operations on illegal aliens in prison.'&#8221;
The fact that the publication still uses the word &#8220;claimed&#8221; to hedge Trump&#8217;s statement shows that they are intent on casting doubt on the veracity of what he said, even though it&#8217;s a position that Harris put in writing.

TOPSHOT-US-VOTE-POLITICS-DEMOCRATIC-CONVENTION

TIME Corrects Report On Kamala Wanting Taxpayer-Funded Trans Surgeries For Illegal Aliens

Presidential Debate

Prison

TIME

Time Magazine

transgender surgery

The Washington Post gave Democrat Gov. <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/tim-walz" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Tim Walz</a> (MN) &#8220;four Pinocchios&#8221; in a Thursday fact-check for lying about Republican Sen. <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/jd-vance" target="_blank" rel="noopener">JD Vance</a> (OH) during a recent campaign event.
Walz, who&#8217;s been slated to be Kamala Harris&#8217; VP pick, claimed Vance, Donald Trump&#8217;s VP pick, is not pro-worker and has &#8220;never cast a vote on a pro-worker bill in his life.&#8221;
“I’ll tell you, [Trump&#8217;s] running mate, I don’t know if that was a value-add to this campaign or not, but he’s one of four senators, four, that has never cast a vote on a pro-worker bill in his life. Not once,&#8221; Walz said Tuesday to a union audience. &#8220;A stopped clock’s right twice a day, this guy can’t get it right once, not once, for workers.”
“The only thing those two guys know about working people is how to work to take advantage of them,&#8221; the governor added.
<a href="https://www.amiracist.com/">Tickets for “Am I Racist?” are on sale NOW! Buy here for a theater near you.</a>
The Post <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/15/walzs-false-claim-that-vance-never-voted-any-pro-worker-bills/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> they were &#8220;struck&#8221; by such false language from Walz and suggested he borrowed the talking point directly from a far-Left interest group. The Democrat earned four Pinocchios for the remarks &#8212; the most a false rating can receive.
&#8220;We were struck that Walz said that Vance was one of four senators who had never cast a vote for a pro-worker bill,&#8221; the fact-check said. &#8220;That was rather specific and sounded as if he was borrowing from a legislative scorecard compiled by an organization or interest group.&#8221;
Walz&#8217;s &#8220;source&#8221; for the attack &#8220;was a union report card that covered only two bills in one year,&#8221; the Post continued. &#8220;Vance has voted for at least two bills that helped workers and had union support.&#8221;
Walz&#8217;s claim that Vance knows nothing about working people was also untrue, the fact-check said, noting it was literally the &#8220;subject of his book,&#8221; &#8220;Hillbilly Elegy.&#8221;
<a href="http://www.amiracist.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH THE TRAILER FOR &#8216;AM I RACIST?&#8217; — A MATT WALSH COMEDY ON DEI</a>
Since becoming a senator, Vance has pushed pro-worker and pro-family legislation. Notably, just last month, the Republican was praised by Teamsters President Sean O&#8217;Brien for caring about working people and supporting pro-worker legislation.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Teamsters President Sean O&#8217;Brien is impressed with VP pick JD Vance:
&#8220;He&#8217;s been great on Teamster issues. He&#8217;s been right there on all our issues.&#8221; <a href="https://t.co/c0eip1yGfZ">pic.twitter.com/c0eip1yGfZ</a>
— The American Conservative (@amconmag) <a href="https://twitter.com/amconmag/status/1812960210853462137?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 15, 2024</a></blockquote>
This was not Walz&#8217;s first fib against Vance. Walz suggested a false, vulgar smear about Vance and a &#8220;couch&#8221; was true during his first rally with Vice President Kamala Harris. The comment was so false and egregious that CNN&#8217;s Jake Tapper brought it up on his show, calling it a &#8220;gross smear.&#8221;
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
CNN&#8217;s Jake Tapper Revolted By Couch-Sex-Involved &#8216;Gross Smear&#8217; Of Trump VP Pick Vance: &#8216;What Happened To We Go High?&#8217; <a href="https://t.co/8VaJeevpxM">https://t.co/8VaJeevpxM</a> via <a href="https://twitter.com/Mediaite?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@mediaite</a> <a href="https://t.co/UiiCXIE83M">pic.twitter.com/UiiCXIE83M</a>
— Tommy moderna-vaX-Topher (@tommyxtopher) <a href="https://twitter.com/tommyxtopher/status/1821565579700101509?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2024</a></blockquote>
Related: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/jake-tapper-slams-walz-for-repeating-gross-smear-targeting-jd-vance" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jake Tapper Slams Walz For Repeating ‘Gross Smear’ Targeting JD Vance</a>

4 Pinocchios: WaPo Fact-Checks Tim Walz’s Latest Lie About JD Vance

Elections

Washington Post

Rep. Mike Waltz (R-FL) tore into CNN senior fact-checker Daniel Dale over his on-air declaration that Waltz was wrong about the Biden administration leaning in to developing and building electric tanks for the U.S. Army.
Waltz made the comment during his speech at the Republican National Convention (RNC), where he talked about military strength and readiness and argued that under President Joe Biden — and under the thumb of the climate agenda — American military priorities were all wrong.
Dale responded by claiming that Waltz — a combat veteran and a Green Beret — was wrong about the Biden administration&#8217;s push to build electric tanks.
Waltz pushed back first in a post on X, sharing an article from Inside Defense with the comment, &#8220;&#8216;The Army intends to field all-electric tanks by 2050, a top service energy and environment official told Inside Defense.&#8217; You can retract your &#8216;fact-check&#8217; from TV last night on my speech.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<a href="https://t.co/pTAot3EdhS">https://t.co/pTAot3EdhS</a>
— Rep. Mike Waltz (@michaelgwaltz) <a href="https://twitter.com/michaelgwaltz/status/1814018442699141150?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 18, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Waltz took it a step further during a follow-up appearance on CNN, where he argued that Dale should not have delivered a fact-check on national television if he did not have all of the facts himself.
WATCH:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
CNN “fact checker” <a href="https://twitter.com/ddale8?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ddale8</a> should actually CHECK HIS FACTs before going on live national television after my RNC speech and questioning my credibility about Biden‘s electric tanks! <a href="https://t.co/mPx9Sm4RiZ">pic.twitter.com/mPx9Sm4RiZ</a>
— Rep. Mike Waltz (@michaelgwaltz) <a href="https://twitter.com/michaelgwaltz/status/1814349435398127967?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 19, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Waltz brought Dale into the conversation, prompting his interviewer to read back what he&#8217;d said about Biden &#8220;focusing on building electric tanks&#8221; and noting that it appeared to come from an Army climate strategy plan that mentioned going electric with tactical vehicles.
&#8220;Wrong,&#8221; Waltz cut him off, citing a Bloomberg report and testimony from the Secretary of the Army — along with a budget report indicating that funding was being set aside for development — and argued that Dale should sit down with some of the same people he had if he really wanted the facts.
The interviewer tried to object, saying that Dale would probably be happy to speak with anyone — but Waltz pointed out that he should have done so before he called into question the &#8220;credibility&#8221; of a sitting member of Congress on live television.
&#8220;Getting to the truth is a process,&#8221; the interviewer hedged.
Waltz made it clear that he was having none of it, adding, &#8220;But literally minutes after my speech, he&#8217;s telling the world I&#8217;m misleading. There&#8217;s no way he could review the Army&#8217;s budget, the research and development, the testimony that I personally received under oath – or how about just Google and get the facts?&#8221;

2024 Republican National Convention: Day 1

‘How About Just Google?’: GOP Rep. Fact-Checks CNN Fact-Checker In Brutal Segment

'How About Just Google?': GOP Rep. Fact-Checks CNN Fact-Checker In Brutal Segment

Joe Biden

Mike Waltz

Military

Republican National Convention

A <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/fact-checking" target="_blank" rel="noopener">fact-checker</a>&#8216;s assessment of a claim about noncitizens registering to vote has prompted blowback from Republican lawmakers who are pushing election integrity legislation.
The spat took off on Tuesday after <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/politifact" target="_blank" rel="noopener">PolitiFact</a> gave House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) a <a href="https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2024/may/20/mike-johnson/mike-johnsons-false-claim-that-immigrants-paroled/?utm_medium=Social&amp;utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1716295642-1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">&#8220;False&#8221; rating</a> for saying that migrants released on parole can register to vote at their local welfare office or the DMV.
&#8220;It&#8217;s illegal for noncitizens to vote. If parolees register, election officials would vet their applications,&#8221; the fact-checker said in a <a href="https://x.com/PolitiFact/status/1792924207136866347" target="_blank" rel="noopener">post</a> to X summarizing the review.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Speaker Mike Johnson said immigrants who came to the U.S. under humanitarian parole programs can register to vote at DMV and “welfare” offices. It&#39;s illegal for noncitizens to vote. If parolees register, election officials would vet their applications. <a href="https://t.co/lM7WA42hoi">https://t.co/lM7WA42hoi</a> <a href="https://t.co/4InAxjndUM">pic.twitter.com/4InAxjndUM</a>
&mdash; PolitiFact (@PolitiFact) <a href="https://twitter.com/PolitiFact/status/1792924207136866347?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 21, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Johnson made the comment earlier this month while <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGeQRt1WDRo" target="_blank" rel="noopener">promoting companion bills</a>, dubbed the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, that <a href="https://roy.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-roy-leads-fight-save-american-elections" target="_blank" rel="noopener">would require proof of U.S. citizenship for voter registration</a>.
Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX), whose version of the legislation <a href="https://cha.house.gov/_cache/files/9/4/9481c1c3-fbbe-43da-be01-8160304debbd/7B3AAB700E4EC1DBC9A2D00FF651F2B8.notice-5.23.24.pdf.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">may be considered</a> by a committee later this week, fired back at PolitiFact on X while taking a shot at the Biden administration for its handling of the migrant crisis.
&#8220;Whether it’s at the DMV or welfare offices, non-citizens have myriad opportunities to register to vote, as non-citizens are obviously eligible for government benefits under current federal and state policies,&#8221; Roy <a href="https://x.com/RepChipRoy/status/1792963711805853842" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> in a thread on X.
&#8220;Biden&#8217;s mass release of millions of illegal aliens into the U.S. – including over 1 million via parole – will only make this worse,&#8221; he added.
&#8220;But even if the ideological operatives at Politi-&#8216;fact&#8217; want to torture the statistics to say that this somehow isn&#8217;t a problem, then nobody should mind if we put safeguards in place to prevent it from becoming one — that is, unless you actually want noncitizens voting in federal elections,&#8221; Roy concluded.
Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), who introduced the Senate version of the SAVE Act, also took a crack at PolitiFact.
&#8220;Politifact rates a true claim false, yet again, simply because the writer doesn’t like it,&#8221; his verified senator account <a href="https://x.com/SenMikeLee/status/1792960860593484204" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said on X</a>.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1700760801843000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2PQrVSrJfhxNb4LcARqniG">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
&#8220;Illegals can easily register to vote across America. Politifact wrongly pretends that &#8216;it is illegal&#8217; is somehow an argument against this fact,&#8221; the account continued.
The senator also responded through his <a href="https://x.com/BasedMikeLee/status/1792981567591059714" target="_blank" rel="noopener">&#8220;BasedMikeLee&#8221; personal account</a>.
&#8220;States are prohibited, under [the Supreme Court&#8217;s] interpretation of the [National Voter Registration Act], from requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote in federal elections,&#8221; he said.
&#8220;So yes, while it is in fact &#8216;illegal for noncitizens to vote&#8217; in federal elections, that’s not the end of the matter,&#8221; Lee added. &#8220;#PassTheSAVEAct.&#8221;

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, and Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah

Republicans Dismantle Fact-Check On Non-Citizens Registering To Vote

Chip Roy

Congress

Media Bias

Migrants

Mike Johnson

Mike Lee

PolitiFact

Voting

Fact-checking website <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/snopes" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Snopes</a> has updated its assessment of the contents of a stolen diary that belonged to President <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/joe-biden" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Joe Biden</a>’s daughter, Ashley Biden, to say they have been verified.
An article published in early April explored the claim that Ashley Biden&#8217;s diary &#8220;describes actions taken toward her by her father when she was a child as &#8216;probably not appropriate.'&#8221;
Whereas the article <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20240405205118/https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ashley-biden-diary-claims/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">initially said</a> the claim had been &#8220;Unproven,&#8221; a <a href="https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ashley-biden-diary-claims/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">revised version</a> published at the end of the month changed the rating to &#8220;True.&#8221;
A note affixed to the top of the article cites an April 8 letter to a New York judge requesting jail time for one of the two people <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/woman-gets-sentenced-to-prison-for-selling-ashley-bidens-diary" target="_blank" rel="noopener">convicted of stealing</a> Ashley Biden&#8217;s diary in the run-up to the 2020 election.
&#8220;I will forever have to deal with the fact that my personal journal can be viewed online,&#8221; Ashley Biden wrote in the letter, which The New York Times <a href="https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/654c5f7182bca1ee/6fe57478-full.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">published online</a>.
Snopes said previous versions of the fact-check noted &#8220;strong evidence&#8221; that the diary existed but argued no source had authenticated the contents of the pages that were published online.
<a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/217072/cotton-probes-for-doj-employees-spilling-beans-on-investigation-into-missing-ashley-biden-diary/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Alleged pages</a> from the first daughter&#8217;s diary, including one talking about being &#8220;hyper-sexualized&#8221; at a young age and &#8220;showers w/ my dad (probably not appropriate),&#8221; were <a href="https://nationalfile.com/official-national-file-statement-regarding-fbi-interest-in-ashley-bidens-probably-not-appropriate-showers-diary/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">published</a> by a website called National File.
The earlier iteration of the Snopes fact-check claimed &#8220;the authenticity of photographs purported to be from a diary is a separate question from the factual existence of a diary.&#8221;
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1712242396228000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3WzjrNXCr1KblP2z8dS_jB">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
With the latest assessment, the update note concluded, &#8220;Ashley Biden&#8217;s letter to the court, in Snopes&#8217; view, provides that authentication.&#8221;
In her letter to the court, Ashley Biden said her journal was part of her efforts to heal after being the victim of a crime in her early 20s.
Ashley Biden claimed that she was targeted because her father had been running for president, and the publicity the diary had drawn led her to be &#8220;constantly re-traumatized by it.&#8221;
She also said: &#8220;Repeatedly, I hear others grossly misinterpret my once-private writings and lob false accusations that defame my character and those of the people I love.&#8221;

Joe and Ashley Biden

Snopes Changes Fact-Check Rating On Contents Of Ashley Biden’s Diary From ‘Unproven’ To ‘True’

Snopes Changes Fact-Check Rating On Contents Of Ashley Biden's Diary From 'Unproven' To 'True'

Biden

Executive

Project Veritas

Snopes

<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/washington-post" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Washington Post&#8217;s</a> resident fact-checker was treated to a virtual earful over his Wednesday piece claiming that the Hamas-controlled health ministry in Gaza had a &#8220;good track record&#8221; when it came to accurately reporting death tolls.
Fact-checker Glenn Kessler was responding to statements from Biden administration officials — and President Joe Biden himself &#8212; who had said that he had &#8220;no confidence&#8221; in the numbers coming out of any organization controlled by Hamas terrorists.
&#8220;I have no notion that the Palestinians are telling the truth about how many people are killed. I’m sure innocents have been killed, and it’s the price of waging a war,&#8221; Biden said. &#8220;I have no confidence in the number that the Palestinians are using.&#8221;
Kessler, however, <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/11/01/bidens-dismissal-reported-palestinian-death-toll/?utm_medium=social&amp;utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_campaign=wp_main" target="_blank" rel="noopener">appeared to argue</a> that the health ministry could be trusted. He explained that the Biden administration had cited the Gaza Health Ministry in the past and that the United Nations cited their numbers as well.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Fact Checker: The president said he had “no confidence” in the figures issued by the Hamas-run health ministry, but it has a good track record on reporting death tolls. <a href="https://t.co/5xh4k2zq5d">https://t.co/5xh4k2zq5d</a>
&mdash; The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) <a href="https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1719698820664021205?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 1, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
But critics were not buying Kessler&#8217;s argument, and said so via X.
&#8220;This piece on the accuracy of Hamas Health Ministry&#8217;s casualty figures, which produced 27 seconds after Israeli strikes, is predicated on the idea that the UN, which operates in Gaza only with the understanding that Hamas exerts editorial control over it, is a reliable narrator,&#8221; Noah Rothman said, adding, &#8220;It was only about two weeks ago the UN announced that Hamas had stolen a shipment of fuel but then speedily deleted the announcement. No one with any experience covering UNRWA needs to ask why.&#8221;
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
It was only about two weeks ago the UN announced that Hamas had stolen a shipment of fuel but then speedily deleted the announcement. No one with any experience covering UNRWA needs to ask why <a href="https://t.co/Mg8roMeCoF">https://t.co/Mg8roMeCoF</a>
&mdash; Noah Rothman (@NoahCRothman) <a href="https://twitter.com/NoahCRothman/status/1719744121445785642?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 1, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;FACT CHECK: Alderaan Death Toll Greatly Exaggerated, Says Generally Reliable &amp; Unbiased Galactic Empire Health Ministry,&#8221; Dan McLaughlin <a href="https://twitter.com/baseballcrank/status/1719746850788434145" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a>.
Another <a href="https://twitter.com/BlameBigGovt/status/1719778166531637461" target="_blank" rel="noopener">added</a>, &#8220;Democracy dies in useful idiocy.&#8221;
&#8220;What on earth is happening at WaPo where they think terrorists are reliable sources,&#8221; Steve Guest posted, tagging one of President Biden&#8217;s spokesmen (@AndrewJBates46) and adding, &#8220;I&#8217;m happy to assist in fighting back against this insane fact check. Your guy has this one right. Yes, WaPo is coming to the defense of Hamas terrorists to attack your boss.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
What on earth is happening at WaPo where they think terrorists are reliable sources?<a href="https://twitter.com/AndrewJBates46?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@AndrewJBates46</a> &#8211; I&#39;m happy to assist in fighting back against this insane fact check. Your guy has this one right.
Yes, WaPo is coming to the defense of Hamas terrorists to attack your boss. <a href="https://t.co/UZPcvb9iRK">https://t.co/UZPcvb9iRK</a>
&mdash; Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) <a href="https://twitter.com/SteveGuest/status/1719758399557050780?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 1, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

US-INTERNET-MEDIA-TAKEOVER-AMAZON-WASHINGTONPOST

WaPo Fact-Checker Dragged For Saying Hamas Has ‘Good Track Record’ On Reporting Death Tolls

WaPo Fact-Checker Dragged For Saying Hamas Has 'Good Track Record' On Reporting Death Tolls

Gaza

Glenn Kessler

Hamas

Israel

Palestinians

U.S.

Daily Wire Editor Emeritus Ben Shapiro exposed the powerful global entities working to deplatform and demonetize conservative voices in a new <a href="https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1686109381761318912?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Twitter thread</a>. 
Shapiro explained in the Monday thread how the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/world-economic-forum" target="_blank" rel="noopener">World Economic Forum</a> (WEF), the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA), and NewsGuard were all working together to crack down on so-called “misinformation” and dictate what media is “safe” for advertising.  
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
🧵Here’s how the World Economic Forum is quietly working to demonetize and deplatform right-of-center voices, including <a href="https://twitter.com/realDailyWire?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDailyWire</a>, using authoritarian tactics and hall monitor “fact-checkers” like <a href="https://twitter.com/NewsGuardRating?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@NewsGuardRating</a>. <a href="https://t.co/xgukS5n6d5">https://t.co/xgukS5n6d5</a>
&mdash; Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) <a href="https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1686109381761318912?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 31, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The WFA, which <a href="https://wfanet.org/knowledge/item/2017/01/30/Agency-Trading-Desks-still-dominate-programmatic-but-advertisers-are-demanding-a-new-more-transparent-relationship" target="_blank" rel="noopener">represents</a> 90% of “global marketing communications,” launched the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) in 2019. Soon after, the World Economic Forum <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/ben-shapiro-takes-on-corporations-behind-censorship" target="_blank" rel="noopener">adopted</a> GARM as one of its “flagship” projects. 
“GARM is an unholy alliance between huge advertisers and social media companies like Google’s YouTube, China’s TikTok, Meta’s Facebook &amp; Instagram, and even Twitter/X and Snapchat. GARM developed something they call the ‘brand safety floor &amp; suitability framework,’” Shapiro explained. 
The Daily Wire co-founder said the framework might be fine if it stuck to things like blocking child pornography, but it also included cracking down on viewpoints that GARM found objectionable. 
“But their authoritarian nature kicked in, &amp; they decided to ban cultural commentary they don&#8217;t approve of, like when we say men can&#8217;t be women,” Shapiro said. 
“Legacy media, new media, and even independent podcasters are subject to these rules. If you violate them and say true things the elites don&#8217;t like, they can blacklist you, demonetize you, or deplatform you,” he added. 
Shapiro said that he doesn’t think that WEF chairman Klaus Schwab believes that transgender-identifying influencer Dylan Mulvaney is actually a woman, but that supporting that position degrades family and social fabric, “making power easier to take from the top.” He added that it also makes the activists marching against capitalism now on the side of the powerful. 
One of the organizations that “helps” advertisers meet GARM standards is NewsGuard, which rates American media on supposedly apolitical criteria. According to NewsGuard, it helps <a href="https://www.newsguardtech.com/press/newsguard-offers-targeted-services-free-audits-to-help-brands-meet-new-garm-misinformation-standards/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">identify</a> so-called “misinformation” that is “inappropriate for advertising support.”
“The little compliance crusaders at NewsGuard engage in performative virtue signaling by going around issuing scores to media outlets based on their allegedly ‘apolitical’ criteria,” Shapiro said. 
The partnership has made even some lawmakers concerned. House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-OH) subpoenaed officials from GARM and the WFA, saying that the two appeared to be facilitating “collusion among their members in a manner that may violate U.S. antitrust law.”
The end goal of the initiatives, Shapiro explained, is to control information and restrict what people can and cannot be exposed to.
“There are certain industries where a violation of antitrust law isn’t going to result in disaster. The Left’s increasing desire to monopolize news and commentary isn&#8217;t one of them. Take the time to know the players like your freedom depends on it, because it does,” Shapiro concluded. 
WATCH: 
<iframe loading="lazy" title="These Global Organizations Want To CONTROL You | Facts Ep. 1" width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/L7YKAqey0e8?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Greentech Festival 2020 – Day 1

Ben Shapiro Details The Global Entities Working To ‘Demonetize And Deplatform’ Conservative Voices

Ben Shapiro

Klaus Schwab

World

World Economic Forum

The Republican National Committee shared a comprehensive list of President <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/joe-biden" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Joe Biden&#8217;s</a> biggest whoppers on Tuesday, from his repeated claims that he drove an 18-wheeler to his insistence that a 2004 house fire — which was reportedly contained to his kitchen — had very nearly killed his wife and a couple of fire-fighters.
The list, which the RNC shared on Tuesday, detailed &#8220;21 made-up stories Biden has told about himself as president.&#8221;
First on the list was Biden&#8217;s claim that he &#8220;used to drive&#8221; an 18-wheeler.
&#8220;I used to drive a tractor trailer … I only did it for part of a summer,&#8221; Biden said in 2021 — but <a href="https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/dec/03/joe-biden/no-joe-biden-wasnt-tractor-trailer-driver/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">according to Politifact</a>, there is no evidence he ever did that. He did ride in a tractor-trailer once as a senator, however, and he drove a bus one summer during law school.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
1. Biden claimed — on multiple occasions — he “used to drive” an 18-wheeler.
Biden **rode** in an 18-wheeler once nearly 50 years ago. He’s never driven one.<a href="https://t.co/o7Za8LaR4J">https://t.co/o7Za8LaR4J</a>
&mdash; RNC Research (@RNCResearch) <a href="https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1612899797408563200?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 10, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Whopper number two was Biden&#8217;s claim that he spoke with the <a href="https://dailywire.com/news/biden-claims-he-spoke-to-insulin-inventor-theres-just-one-problem/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">inventor of insulin</a> — but of the several people credited with the discovery of artificial insulin, two were dead prior to Biden&#8217;s birth and there is no evidence that he ever had any contact with the others.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
3. Biden claimed he “had a house burn down with my wife in it” and said they “almost lost a couple firefighters.”
In 2005, Biden’s house had a “small” fire that was contained to the kitchen and “there were no injuries.”<a href="https://t.co/smEweQxg4E">https://t.co/smEweQxg4E</a>
&mdash; RNC Research (@RNCResearch) <a href="https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1612899801410011137?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 10, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Number three was Biden&#8217;s <a href="https://dailywire.com/news/biden-claims-he-lost-an-awful-lot-in-house-fire-jill-biden-reported-the-small-kitchen-fire-that-was-doused-in-20-minutes/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">repeated claim</a> that a <a href="https://dailywire.com/news/fire-department-responds-to-biden-account-of-2004-fire-calls-incident-insignificant/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2004 fire</a> in Delaware nearly burned the house down with his wife in it and could have claimed the lives of a couple of the firemen as well — but local reporting suggests that the fire was quickly contained to the kitchen and that no one was injured.
Next on the list was Biden’s claim that he had grown up in the Puerto Rican community in Delaware — where in 1970, Puerto Ricans accounted for 0.39% of the population.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
5. Biden said he remembered “spending time” and “going to” the Tree of Life synagogue after the 2018 shooting.
The synagogue said Biden never visited.<a href="https://t.co/9z0C8jo0fl">https://t.co/9z0C8jo0fl</a>
&mdash; RNC Research (@RNCResearch) <a href="https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1612899805625196554?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 10, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Then came Biden’s claim that he visited Pittsburgh’s Tree of Life Synagogue after the shooting — despite the synagogue having no record of any such visit — and Biden’s assertion that he had served as a liaison to Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir during the Six Day War. That claim was problematic due to the fact that Biden was not yet a senator — and Meir was not yet PM — when that war took place.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
7. Biden claimed his “first job offer” came from Boise Cascade, an Idaho lumber company.
The company said they have “no record of President Biden’s application or of him having worked for the company.”<a href="https://t.co/xLYMpUa1z9">https://t.co/xLYMpUa1z9</a>
&mdash; RNC Research (@RNCResearch) <a href="https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1612899809563656192?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 10, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Next came Biden’s “first job offer” — which he said came from an Idaho lumber company that has no record of him applying for a job — and his “first arrest,” which he said was for a civil rights protest. However, there are no records showing that Biden was ever arrested or even attended such a protest.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
9. Biden claimed that he had a conversation with an Amtrak conductor in 2012 or 2013 about traveling over 1 million miles on Air Force Two.
The conductor retired in 1993, passed away in 2014, and Biden didn’t reach 1 million miles on AF2 until 2015.<a href="https://t.co/92RvdxUtFc">https://t.co/92RvdxUtFc</a>
&mdash; RNC Research (@RNCResearch) <a href="https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1612899813468545034?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 10, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Biden’s now-infamous Amtrak story — in which he claimed to have discussed reaching the million-mile mark with a conductor who died before he reached that milestone — was fib number nine.
Coming in at number ten was Biden’s claim that he was “appointed to the Naval Academy in 1965” — despite the fact that he graduated from the University of Delaware in that same year.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
11. Biden claimed oil refinery pollution is the reason “I and so damn many other people I grew up have cancer.”
Biden doesn’t have cancer. He *had* skin cancer, but the cause was sun exposure — not pollution. <a href="https://t.co/cKFXXoZNCp">https://t.co/cKFXXoZNCp</a>
&mdash; RNC Research (@RNCResearch) <a href="https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1612899818463961089?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 10, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Then came Biden’s claim that he <a href="https://dailywire.com/news/breaking-biden-appears-to-claim-he-has-cancer-from-oil-refineries/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">got cancer</a> from oil-refinery pollution — he did have skin cancer, but that was attributed to sun exposure — and his insistence that he was a full professor at University of Pennsylvania. Records show he never actually taught a class.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
13. Biden claimed his “great-grandpop was” a coal miner — something he has been saying for decades. 
He wasn’t.<a href="https://t.co/qbKkOW64V5">https://t.co/qbKkOW64V5</a>
&mdash; RNC Research (@RNCResearch) <a href="https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1612899824277266437?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 10, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Next came the claim that his “great-grandpop was a coal miner” (he was not) and his assertion that as VP, he had finally gotten an overdue <a href="https://dailywire.com/news/biden-claims-his-uncle-won-purple-heart-during-world-war-ii-battle-but-details-make-bidens-story-impossible/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Purple Heart</a> for his Uncle Frank. Biden’s Uncle Frank passed away before he was elected Vice President, and did not earn a Purple Heart.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
15. Biden claimed he hit a ball 368 feet “off the wall” at his second Congressional baseball game.
Biden actually went 0-2, according to a 1974 newspaper article. <a href="https://t.co/dXbPJJrfEP">pic.twitter.com/dXbPJJrfEP</a>
&mdash; RNC Research (@RNCResearch) <a href="https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1612899828475863040?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 10, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Biden also claimed (whopper #15) to have hit a long ball “368 feet off the wall” at his second Congressional Baseball game — where in reality, he was 0 for 2.
Keeping with the sports theme, number 16 was Biden’s claim that his grandfather was an All-American football star at Santa Clara University — but NCAA and SCU records suggest otherwise.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
17. Biden claimed he “could have been an All-American” football player.
Biden played on the *freshman* football team for part of *one* semester in college. That’s it. <a href="https://t.co/rgBhoddAwp">pic.twitter.com/rgBhoddAwp</a>
&mdash; RNC Research (@RNCResearch) <a href="https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1612899832854618120?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 10, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Biden went on to claim (number 17) that he could have been an All-American, but he played on the freshman team for only one semester. He also said (number 18) that he “almost” walked on to an NFL team and could have made it in the pros.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
19. Biden claimed he was “shot at” overseas — something he also lied about in 2007.
It never happened.<a href="https://t.co/kX424rAwhE">https://t.co/kX424rAwhE</a>
&mdash; RNC Research (@RNCResearch) <a href="https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1612899837552517120?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 10, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Number 19 revisited Biden’s 2007 claim that he was “shot at” while traveling overseas and number 20 was a flashback to his time as a county councilman. He told a story about a woman who called and asked him to remove a dead dog from her lawn, and despite claiming one time that he put it on her doorstep, he said another time that he had removed it.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
21. Biden repeatedly claimed he was “involved” in the civil rights movement.
None of that is remotely true. Biden even admitted in 1987 he was “not an activist.”<a href="https://t.co/ijty46nY83">pic.twitter.com/ijty46nY83</a>
&mdash; RNC Research (@RNCResearch) <a href="https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1612899842207916035?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 10, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
And rounding out the list at number 21 was the president’s oft-repeated claim that he was actively involved in the civil rights movement — despite no evidence that he was involved at all.

President Biden Marks Two Year Anniversary Of January 6 Insurrection

RNC Drops Comprehensive List Of Biden’s Whoppers, Fish Stories, And Fibs

RNC Drops Comprehensive List Of Biden's Whoppers, Fish Stories, And Fibs

Republican National Committee (RNC)

Two <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/big-tech" target="_blank" rel="noopener">tech giants</a> on Tuesday announced a $13 million grant to fund <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/fact-checking" target="_blank" rel="noopener">global fact-checking</a> projects. 
<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/google" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Google</a> and YouTube <a href="https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2022/google-and-youtube-partner-with-poynters-international-fact-checking-network-on-13-2-million-grant-for-the-global-fact-checking-community/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> they would provide financial support to the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), an arm of the Poynter Institute, to support “fact-checking initiatives” through 2025. 
“The world needs fact-checking more than ever before. This partnership with Google and YouTube infuses financial support to global fact-checkers and is a step in the right direction,” said Baybars Örsek, the IFCN’s executive director. “And while there’s much work to be done, this partnership has sparked meaningful collaboration and an important step.”
About $12 million of the grant will go to the group’s Global Fact Check Fund, which will disburse money to fact-checking groups from around the world that adhere to its Code of Principles. These include groups in the U.S., Brazil, Nepal, Ukraine, Norway, Spain, Taiwan, South Africa, and India.
Örsek added that IFCN was “grateful to Google and YouTube for their commitment to bolster fact-checkers in an ever-increasing environment of mis- and disinformation.”
According to the Poynter Institute, some funds will go toward a foundation to establish a “neutral and independent selection committee” and other expansions of the fact-checking program. 
The IFCN was established in 2015, and its advisory board <a href="https://ifcncodeofprinciples.poynter.org/board" target="_blank" rel="noopener">includes</a> individuals from various organizations, including PolitiFact and The Washington Post. 
Olivia Ma, who manages Google’s Global News Program and Ecosystem, said that the company believed it had a role in combating “misinformation” and guiding people toward making “informed decisions.” 
“Combating misinformation is an ongoing global challenge for society. We take seriously our role in helping to fight misinformation by continually investing in products, programs and partnerships that help people access high-quality information,” Ma said. 
Some have raised concerns about the growing emphasis on fact-checking in recent years, with critics questioning whether the motivation is to suppress conservative or differing viewpoints. For example, the theory that the novel coronavirus may have leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China, was initially widely maligned by certain fact-checkers as the origin of the respiratory virus. However, Facebook later reversed course, saying that the theory was now up for debate and had not been thoroughly discredited. At around the same time, PolitiFact <a href="https://www.politifact.com/li-meng-yan-fact-check/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">retracted</a> a fact-check it had run on the claim saying that the theory was now more “disputed.” 
This year, Brian Riedl, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a former PolitiFact source, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/meet-the-former-politifact-fact-checker-who-quit-over-left-wing-bias-wanted-me-to-help-them-nail-republicans" target="_blank" rel="noopener">told</a> The Daily Wire that the fact-checking group wanted him to &#8220;help them nail Republicans.” Riedl also claimed PolitiFact would start with a &#8220;rating&#8221; of a claim and then work backward to justify that rating.

Google Opens Cloud Hub In Krakow, Poland

‘The World Needs Fact-Checking’: Tech Giants Giving $13 Million To Fund Global Fact-Checking Initiatives

Tech Giants Giving $13 Million Toward Global Fact-Checking Initiatives

Fake News

Google

YouTube

Menu