A federal judge has ruled Friday that a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/tennessee" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Tennessee</a> law intended to shield children from sexually explicit performances is unconstitutional. 
U.S. District Judge Thomas Parker said a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/judge-blocks-tennessee-law-protecting-children-from-viewing-sexually-explicit-performances" target="_blank" rel="noopener">law that blocked</a> children from being exposed to “adult cabaret” performances, including sexually explicit <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/drag-queen" target="_blank" rel="noopener">drag shows</a>, was “unconstitutionally vague and substantially overbroad.”
“There is no question that obscenity is not protected by the First Amendment. But there is a difference between material that is ‘obscene’ in the vernacular, and material that is ‘obscene’ under the law,” Parker <a href="https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/trump-appointed-federal-judge-rejects-tennessees-anti-drag-99811024" target="_blank" rel="noopener">wrote</a>. “Simply put, no majority of the Supreme Court has held that sexually explicit — but not obscene — speech receives less protection than political, artistic, or scientific speech.”
Parker, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump, said that the law would also allow “discriminatory enforcement.”
“Whether some of us may like it or not, the Supreme Court has interpreted the First Amendment as protecting speech that is indecent but not obscene,” Parker said. 
According to a <a href="https://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/BillInfo/Default.aspx?BillNumber=SB0003&amp;ga=113" target="_blank" rel="noopener">summary</a> of the law, which was signed by Governor Bill Lee, it “creates an offense for a person who engages in an adult cabaret performance on public property or in a location where the adult cabaret performance could be viewed by a person who is not an adult.” 
The definition of adult cabaret performance in the law includes “male or female impersonators.” 
The law came before Parker after Friends of George’s, a <a href="https://www.friendsofgeorges.org/season/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">self-described</a>“LGBTQ theatre company” based in <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/memphis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Memphis</a> filed a suit challenging the law.
<a class="c-link" href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://onelink.to/dwapp" data-sk="tooltip_parent" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-2517">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
“I am disappointed with the judge’s decision on Senate Bill 3, which ignored 60 years of Supreme Court precedent allowing regulation of obscene entertainment in the presence of minors. Sadly, this ruling is a victory for those who support exposing children to sexual entertainment,” <a href="https://twitter.com/SenJohnson/status/1665004030047789056/photo/1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> Senate Majority Leader Jack Johnson (R-Franklin), the author of the bill. 
Johnson said he hoped that Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti would appeal the decision. 
“Despite the Court’s perplexing reading of the law, I am confident — and have always been — that this legislation does nothing to suppress the First Amendment,” Johnson added, saying that he would continue working to “protect the children of Tennessee.” 
In the last year, footage has emerged from around the country, including in Texas, that has appeared to show children present at sexually explicit drag shows, prompting some lawmakers to introduce legislation. Montana Governor Greg Gianforte signed similar legislation last month that seeks to shield children from explicit performances.

Key Speakers At Conservative Political Action Conference

Tennessee Law Shielding Kids From Sexually Explicit Performances Ruled ‘Unconstitutional’

Courts

Drag Queens

Drag show

Free Speech

Memphis

Politics

Tennessee

A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that a free speech group lacks standing to challenge the constitutionality of Virginia Tech’s bias policies.
In a 2-1 decision, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals <a href="https://richmond.com/news/state-and-regional/crime-and-courts/virginia-tech-bias-policy-upheld-by-appeals-court/article_b2ae724f-e3ef-5681-8326-47a736ddc303.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">upheld</a> Virginia Tech’s Bias Intervention and Response Team (BIRT) and Informational Activities Policy (IAP), ruling against <a href="https://speechfirst.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Speech First</a>, a civil rights organization dedicated to protecting college students’ free speech rights.
“Here, Speech First has failed to demonstrate that a single one of the district court’s numerous findings of fact is clearly erroneous,” wrote Senior Judge Diana Gribbon Motz for the majority. “Speech First offers only speculation in support of its argument that it has suffered an injury in fact.”
BIRT <a href="https://www.insidehighered.com/news/quick-takes/2023/06/02/court-speech-first-has-no-standing-challenge-bias-policies" target="_blank" rel="noopener">allows</a> individuals to report students for any “expression made against a person or group” that the university considers motivated by bias. Speech First argued that Virginia Tech, through BIRT, created an “elaborate bureaucratic regime that burdens the exercise of free speech,” according to the court opinion.
The <a href="https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/212061.p.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">dissent</a>, written by Judge J. Harvey Wilkinson, focused on the “real-world consequences” of the court’s decision.  Wilkinson argued that the BIRT’s reporting system has a “chilling effect” on the First Amendment and that due to the policy, a “reasonable student” would “keep her head down, sit silently, and avoid the potential fallout” in class when controversial topics are discussed.
The court majority denied this claim, arguing that because the meetings initiated by the BIRT were voluntary, the reporting system could not be regarded as punishing free speech. Further, Motz wrote, “Just as universities may legitimately strive to promote intellectual curiosity, so too they may legitimately strive to promote civility and a sense of belonging among the student body. That is what Virginia Tech’s Bias Policy seeks to achieve.”
IAP is a regulation on who can hand out flyers and leaflets on campus, requiring approval from the Student Engagement and Campus Life Office. For a student’s leafleting activities to be approved, he or she must be sponsored by one of the university’s registered student organizations.
Speech First challenged the IAP, arguing the policy was akin to “prior restraint” policies struck down by courts in the past and a speaker-based restriction on speech in violation of the First Amendment. The majority disagreed, writing that the IAP is a “reasonable” regulation, motivated not by a desire to regulate speech but a system that “ensures fair and equitable access” to [Virginia Tech’s] finite resources.”
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1685202016677000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3BHv9qMQC3OwHMBCkGZXpF">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) — who filed an <a href="https://www.thefire.org/research-learn/speech-first-inc-v-timothy-sands" target="_blank" rel="noopener">amicus brief</a> supporting Speech First — <a href="https://www.thefire.org/colleges/virginia-polytechnic-institute-and-state-university?_page=1">gives</a> Virginia Tech a “yellow” free speech rating, meaning that the university has “at least one ambiguous policy that too easily encourages administrative abuse and arbitrary application.” Among these policies are Virginia Tech’s “Discriminatory Harassment,” “Bias-Reporting,” “Offenses Against People,” and “Usage and Event Approval” policies, among others.
The two judges ruling in favor of the university — Senior Judge Motz and Judge Albert Diaz — were appointed by Democrats (President Bill Clinton and President Barack Obama, respectively), while the dissenting judge — Judge Wilkinson — was nominated by Republican President Ronald Reagan.

Political art, Concept idea of free speech freedom of expression and censored, surreal painting, portrait illustration , conceptual artwork illustration

Court Rules Against Free Speech Group, Upholds Virginia Tech Bias Policy

College

Education

U.S.

Virginia Tech

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita is leading an 18-state lawsuit against the Biden administration over its handling of the border crisis.
The <a href="https://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/INAG/2023/05/31/file_attachments/2513571/Lawful%20Pathways%20Filed%20Complaint.pdf">lawsuit</a> specifically focuses on a new policy called the “<a href="https://www.dhs.gov/news/2023/05/11/fact-sheet-circumvention-lawful-pathways-final-rule">Circumvention of Lawful Pathways</a>,” which the Department of Homeland Security says intends to “expand safe and orderly pathways for migrants to lawfully enter the United States.” The rule was put in place following the expiration of Title 42 in early May and led to a massive influx at the southern border that the Biden administration has <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/border-app-releases-almost-80000-foreign-nationals-into-u-s-in-last-four-months">struggled</a> to contain.
The lawsuit argues that the policy, which is also referred to as the Circumvention Rule, does not attempt to resolve the border issue but rather “tries to define the problem away by re-characterizing what would be illegal crossings as ‘lawful pathways.&#8217;”
It also claims that the Circumvention Rule is “​​a half measure and a smoke screen” that is “riddled with exceptions” before going on to charge that “it is part of the Biden Administration’s broader effort to obfuscate the true situation at the Southwest Border.”
The lawsuit specifically charges that the purpose of the Circumvention Rule is to encourage “an increasing number of migrants’ to use the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/border-app-releases-almost-80000-foreign-nationals-into-u-s-in-last-four-months">CBP One app</a> to make bogus asylum claims, all while avoiding the bad optics of crowds of illegal aliens” lining up along the border.
“In a truly Orwellian twist, the federal government has depicted this latest measure as a tool for reducing illegal immigration,” Rokita said in a press release. &#8220;This new rule would make it even easier to illegally immigrate into the United States.”
Rokita also pointed out that the border has seen record numbers of illegal crossings.
<a class="c-link c-link--focus-visible" href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://onelink.to/dwapp" data-sk="tooltip_parent">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
 “We&#8217;re now seeing more than 10,000 illegal border crossings occurring within some 24-hour periods,&#8221; he said. “These are the highest numbers ever, and a large portion of these people are hardened criminals and cartel members. We cannot long endure this kind of invasion.”
While the effort is being led by Rokita, the other states that have joined the lawsuit include Tennessee, North Dakota, Alaska, Mississippi, South Carolina, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Iowa, Kentucky, Virginia, New Hampshire, Utah, Wyoming, Montana, Missouri, and Oklahoma.
A recent <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hosting-migrants-poll-2023-05-21/">poll</a> from CBS News found that 63% of Americans disapprove of the Biden administration’s handling of the border, while 37% say they approve.

Illegal Border Crossing

Indiana Attorney General Leads 18-State Lawsuit Challenging Biden’s Border Policies

Indiana Attorney General Leads 18-State Lawsuit Challenging Biden's Border Policies

Biden Administration

Border

Border Crisis

Illegal Immigration

Immigration

Jury selection begins Wednesday in the trial of a former school officer accused of failing to confront the mass killer who gunned down 14 students at a public school in Parkland, Florida, in 2018.
Scot Peterson, who was tasked with protecting Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, is charged with <a href="https://www.local10.com/news/national/2023/05/30/florida-deputy-faces-trial-for-alleged-failure-to-confront-parkland-school-shooter/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">seven counts of felony child neglect</a> related to four murdered students and three others who were injured on the third floor during the shooting. The Daily Wire is not naming the shooter due to company policy about not giving notoriety to mass killers.
<a href="https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/officer-accused-hiding-during-parkland-30110196" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Victims’ parents</a> dubbed Peterson “the coward of Broward,” expressing their support for the prosecution. Andrew Pollack, the father of one of the victims, stated that Peterson “wouldn&#8217;t have gone in with full body armor and a bazooka.” Pollack&#8217;s 18-year-old daughter, Meadow, was murdered during the shooting.
Peterson, 60, also faces three counts of misdemeanor culpable negligence and a perjury charge for allegedly lying to investigators.  If convicted, Peterson could face nearly a century in prison for the child neglect charges alone and would lose his $104,000 pension.
The National Association of School Resource Officers stated that Peterson’s prosecution is a first. His trial begins as Texas authorities investigate the officers who didn’t confront the Uvalde gunman who killed 19 students and two teachers at an elementary school last May. None of the Texas officers have been charged.
Robert Jarvis, a Nova Southeastern University professor, stated that Peterson deserved to be terminated from his job but described his prosecution as an “overreach” and said Peterson “is being used as a scapegoat” for the “many people [who] failed on February 14,” the day of the tragedy.
Peterson <a href="https://www.local10.com/news/national/2023/05/30/florida-deputy-faces-trial-for-alleged-failure-to-confront-parkland-school-shooter/">reportedly</a> entered the building with his gun drawn 73 seconds before the shooter arrived, but he retreated rather than confront the shooter.  Peterson then reportedly hid from the gunman in a spot with his weapon drawn for 48 minutes – 45 minutes after the shooting ended.  
He said he thought the shots were coming from a sniper outside, and Peterson’s attorney, Mark Eiglarsh, said 22 defense witnesses also thought the shots were coming from outside the building.
<a class="c-link c-link--focus-visible" href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://onelink.to/dwapp" data-sk="tooltip_parent">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
Oral arguments are scheduled to begin on June 14.  For Peterson to be convicted of child neglect, prosecutors must show that he was a “caretaker” of the children under Florida law. Florida is one of a <a href="https://www.kcra.com/article/trial-of-former-deputy-accused-of-failing-to-confront-parkland-shooter/44049451" target="_blank" rel="noopener">handful of states</a> that allow a six-member jury to try non-capital offenses.
The judge, Martin Fein, noted that courts have traditionally interpreted the Florida statute broadly, finding babysitters and even kidnappers as “caretakers.”  Eiglarsh argues that most police officers are exempt from this classification and that the shooter’s weapon was far superior to Peterson’s.

US-CRIME-SCHOOL-SHOOTING

Trial Begins For Former School Resource Officer Accused Of Hiding Outside During Parkland Shooting

Florida

Parkland Shooting

School Shooting

Oath Keepers founder <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/oath-keepers-founder-convicted-of-seditious-conspiracy-over-capitol-riot" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Stewart Rhodes</a> received the longest prison sentence to date stemming from the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/january-6" target="_blank" rel="noopener">January 6</a>, 2021, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/capitol-riot" target="_blank" rel="noopener">riot at the U.S. Capitol</a>.
<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/oath-keepers-founder-convicted-of-seditious-conspiracy-over-capitol-riot" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Convicted</a> by a Washington, D.C., jury in November on seditious conspiracy and other charges, the 58-year-old Rhodes was sentenced on Thursday to 18 years behind bars.
“I dare say, Mr. Rhodes – and I never have said this to anyone I have sentenced – you pose an ongoing threat and peril to our democracy and the fabric of this country,” said District Judge Amit Mehta, <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/25/politics/oath-keepers-sentencing-stewart-rhodes-kelly-meggs/index.html#:~:text=Stewart%20Rhodes%2C%20the%20founder%20and,a%20decade%20for%20seditious%20conspiracy." target="_blank" rel="noopener">according to CNN</a>.
The report said prosecutors had sought a 25-year prison sentence.
“This is terrorism,” declared prosecutor Kathryn Rakoczy, who argued for a longer sentence because of &#8220;the threat of harm and historic nature of attempting to stop the certification of an election for the first time in American history.&#8221;
Rhodes and other members of the Oath Keepers were accused of coordinating what became the breach of the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, disrupting lawmakers as they met to certify Joe Biden&#8217;s presidential victory.
“I’m a political prisoner, and like President Trump, my only crime is opposing those who are destroying our country,” Rhodes told the judge before being sentenced, per CNN.
He also insisted that no member of the Oath Keepers took part in the actual violence at the U.S. Capitol on January 6 and argued that defendants are being &#8220;grossly overcharged.&#8221;
<a class="c-link c-link--focus-visible" href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://onelink.to/dwapp" data-sk="tooltip_parent" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-54558">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
Roughly 28 months after the chaos on January 6, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia says more than <a href="https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/28-months-jan-6-attack-capitol" target="_blank" rel="noopener">1,033 arrests</a> have been made in connection to January 6 and notes some 570 defendants have pleaded guilty, including four to a federal charge of seditious conspiracy.
Former President Donald Trump, who is seeking re-election in 2024, recently said he would <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/trump-brings-rigged-election-fight-to-cnn-town-hall" target="_blank" rel="noopener">likely pardon</a> a large portion of the January 6 defendants if given a second term.
Asked <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/11/politics/transcript-cnn-town-hall-trump/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">during a CNN town hall</a> whether he would pardon those convicted of seditious conspiracy, he said, &#8220;I don’t know. I’ll have to look at their case, but I will say in Washington, D.C., you cannot get a fair trial, you cannot. Just like in New York City, you can’t get a fair trial either.&#8221;

Stewart Rhodes

Oath Keepers Leader Gets Longest January 6 Sentence To Date

Capitol Riot

January 6

Washington D.C.

An Indiana high school counselor fired for speaking out about the school district&#8217;s transgender student policy is now suing the district.
Kathy McCord <a href="https://adflegal.org/press-release/indiana-school-counselor-fired-speaking-about-gender-identity-policy" target="_blank" rel="noopener">filed</a> a <a href="https://adflegal.org/sites/default/files/2023-05/McCord-v-South-Madison-2023-05-18-Complaint.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">lawsuit</a> in federal court last week against the South Madison Community Schools Corporation near Indianapolis.
The lawsuit alleges that the school district violated her First Amendment rights by retaliating against her for voicing her disagreement with the district&#8217;s &#8220;Gender Support Plan.&#8221;
McCord, who has spent 37 years in education, was fired from Pendleton Heights High School in March after <a href="https://www.dailysignal.com/2023/01/24/breaking-indiana-school-places-counselor-who-leaked-secret-transgender-policy-on-leave/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">revealing</a> details about the strategy, which involved concealing a student&#8217;s new gender identity from their parents.
Initially, McCord went along with the policy despite her qualms.
“I prayed about it a lot … and I went along with it at that time,” McCord later said.
On August 16, McCord sent an email to teachers who had a student in their classes who was adopting a new gender identity.
Her email informed the teachers that the student would like to go by &#8220;he/him&#8221; pronouns and a new name, but the student&#8217;s family was not supportive of the gender transition, so &#8220;any correspondence home or in reference to the student&#8221; should use the student&#8217;s old name.
&#8220;Please make sure to make a note of this in your sub folder,&#8221; McCord wrote to the teachers.
Later though, McCord began to feel differently.
“But when it started back up in the fall of ’22, I just felt like when that email came out, that God really reached out and said, this happened, now you’ve got to deal with it. I just didn’t feel like it was something I could let go and not simply answer the questions,&#8221; the former counselor said.
“I just felt like I had to do more for this situation as it’s unfolding across the country,” McCord said.
Days after McCord&#8217;s email came to light, dozens of concerned parents and other community members showed up at the December 8 school board meeting.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Tonight at 7pm, parents will be showing up to the SMCSC Admin building in Pendleton, IN, to protest the firing of Kathy McCord—a counselor who revealed and denounced a hidden transgender policy at the school. <a href="https://t.co/AqwFeclWsx">pic.twitter.com/AqwFeclWsx</a>
&mdash; Tony Kinnett (@TheTonus) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheTonus/status/1631404015681511425?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 2, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
At that meeting, the school board <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7S2-UKSwAQ&amp;t=3317s" target="_blank" rel="noopener">struggled</a> to answer questions from the public about where the policy came from and who in the district was responsible for overseeing it.
&#8220;So my kid needs permission to ingest a cough drop, but they can change their gender at school without my consent, notifying me?&#8221; one man asked. &#8220;That is crazy. Do you see the absurdity in that?&#8221;
<div class="c-message_kit__blocks c-message_kit__blocks--rich_text">
<div class="c-message__message_blocks c-message__message_blocks--rich_text" data-qa="message-text">
<div class="p-block_kit_renderer" data-qa="block-kit-renderer">
<div class="p-block_kit_renderer__block_wrapper p-block_kit_renderer__block_wrapper--first">
<div class="p-rich_text_block" dir="auto">
<div class="p-rich_text_section"><a class="c-link c-link--focus-visible" href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://onelink.to/dwapp" data-sk="tooltip_parent" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-49392">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Another employee at Pendleton Heights High School, teacher Amanda Keegan, ended up resigning in part to protest the gender policy.
“When I had to look at that parent, and feel like I was lying to that parent … I was sick to my stomach. I can’t lie to parents. I can’t do that again,” Keegan <a href="https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/12/05/indiana-school-compels-counselors-teachers-to-hide-gender-support-plans-from-parents/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">told</a> The Daily Signal in December.
McCord is being represented by the conservative legal group Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF).
&#8220;Kathy knows that kids do best when schools and parents work together. But South Madison’s harmful policy leaves parents in the dark,&#8221; <a href="https://adflegal.org/press-release/indiana-school-counselor-fired-speaking-about-gender-identity-policy" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> ADF Senior Counsel Vincent Wagner.
&#8220;South Madison violated Kathy’s rights by forcing her to contradict her religious beliefs and participate in this policy. Schools can’t keep secrets from parents about their children’s mental health and wellbeing,&#8221; Wagner said.

Pupils Return To The Classroom For The New School Year

Indiana School Counselor Fired For Speaking Out About School Gender Policy Files Federal Lawsuit

Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF)

Gender

Indiana

Public Schools

Transgender

Former President <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/donald-trump" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Donald Trump</a> responded on Tuesday to E. Jean Carroll&#8217;s move this week asking a federal judge to amend her defamation lawsuit against the former president by asking for an additional $10 million because of comments that he made about her during a CNN town hall event.
&#8220;I don’t know E. Jean Carroll, I never met her or touched her ￼(except on a celebrity line with her African American husband who she disgustingly called the &#8216;Ape,&#8217;), I wouldn’t want to know or touch her, I never abused her or raped her or took her to a dressing room 25 years ago in a crowded department store where the doors are LOCKED, she has no idea when, or did anything else to her, except deny her Fake, Made Up Story, that she wrote in a book,&#8221; Trump posted on social media. &#8220;IT NEVER HAPPENED, IS A TOTAL SCAM, UNFAIR TRIAL!&#8221;
&#8220;The Carroll case is part of the Democrats playbook to tarnish my name and person, much like the now fully debunked Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax, the 51 Intelligence Agents, FBI/Twitter Files, and so much more,&#8221; he continued. &#8220;It is being funded and tried by Democrat operatives, although this was denied by them, and when they got caught in the lie, the Clinton appointed judge would not let us use it in trial. Time will prove him to be highly partisan &amp; very unfair. Where’s the dress she said she had?&#8221;
A federal jury in New York found Trump liable on May 9 of committing battery against Carroll and later defaming her when he vociferously denied her claim that he raped her in a department store dressing room in the 1990s. The defamation lawsuit involved Trump’s comments from a Truth Social post in October 2022, referring to Carroll’s allegations as a “complete con job” and saying that she “is not my type.”
Nine members of a civil trial jury ordered Trump to pay $5 million to Carroll in damages — taking just two and half hours of deliberation to reach the unanimous verdict — two weeks ago.
Attorneys representing Carroll, 79, proposed amendments on Monday to the first of her two defamation lawsuits against Trump, which would hold the former president liable for remarks made at a CNN broadcast on May 10.
“Trump’s defamatory statements post-verdict show the depth of his malice toward Carroll since it is hard to imagine defamatory conduct that could possibly be more motivated by hatred, ill will, or spite,” the lawyers wrote in the complaint. “This conduct supports a very substantial punitive damages award in Carroll’s favor both to punish Trump, to deter him from engaging in further defamation, and to deter others from doing the same.”
During the town hall, the former president called the verdict a “fake story” and denied he knew Carroll.
<a class="c-link c-link--focus-visible" href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://onelink.to/dwapp" data-sk="tooltip_parent" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-11618">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
“She’s a whack job,” Trump said, adding, “What kind of a woman meets somebody and brings them up, and within minutes you’re playing hanky-panky in a dressing room.”
According to Reuters, attorneys for Carroll said in a letter to U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan on Monday that because “Trump’s alleged defamatory statements were essentially the same, the only open issues are whether he was immune for making the first statement, and if not what damages he owes.”
Attorneys for Trump filed a notice of appeal in New York on May 11, contesting the federal jury’s verdict that found him liable for committing battery and defamation.

Donald Trump at UFC 287: Pereira v Adesanya 2

Trump Responds To Newest Legal Action From E. Jean Carroll

Donald Trump

E. Jean Carroll

Attorneys for investment bank <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/jp-morgan" target="_blank" rel="noopener">JPMorgan Chase</a> accused <a href="http://dailywire.com/topic/democrats" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Democratic</a> officials in the U.S. <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/virgin-islands" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Virgin Islands</a> of engaging in “quid pro quo” relationships with late financier <a href="http://dailywire.com/topic/jeffrey-epstein" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jeffrey Epstein</a> in an explosive Tuesday legal filing shared with The Daily Wire.
Lawyers for the U.S. Virgin Islands <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/u-s-virgin-islands-sues-major-bank-for-allegedly-turning-blind-eye-to-epstein" target="_blank" rel="noopener">filed</a> a lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase late last year claiming that the financial institution, which worked with Epstein from 1998 to 2013, financially benefited from his underage sex trafficking schemes. The filing from JPMorgan Chase, which is opposed to an attempt from U.S. Virgin Islands attorneys to toss the company’s defenses, alleged that the government of the territory was the entity which “most directly failed to protect public safety” and “most actively facilitated” the criminal activity.
“Epstein could have lived anywhere in the world. He chose USVI,” the document said. “Discovery obtained in this case reveals why. For two decades, Epstein maintained a quid pro quo relationship with USVI’s highest ranking officials.”
Attorneys for the investment bank added that Epstein, who committed suicide in his jail cell in 2019, allegedly granted officials “money, advice, influence and favors” as they provided him with tax incentives, effectively “looking the other way when he walked through USVI airports accompanied by girls and young women.”
The court document accused Stacey Plaskett, the U.S. Virgin Islands non-voting delegate to Congress, of meeting with Epstein in his Manhattan townhouse less than a year before his arrest in 2019. Attorneys added that U.S. Virgin Islands First Lady Cecile De Jongh allegedly helped to foster a political culture in the Democratic Party of the Virgin Islands which “allowed Epstein to remain unchecked in exchange for his sponsorship and financial contributions.”
Lawyers additionally contended that Epstein “exerted influence” over the territory’s attempts to update sex offender penalties in 2011. “Even as to the regulations USVI did enforce, it did so incompetently,” the complaint added. “While the USVI did conduct site visits of Epstein’s residence, those inspections were cursory at best.”
U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff previously <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/epstein-victim-allowed-to-sue-big-banks-for-allegedly-enabling-sex-offender-we-will-leave-no-stone-unturned" target="_blank" rel="noopener">tossed</a> most charges against JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche Bank in the proposed class action lawsuit submitted by officials from the U.S. Virgin Islands and an unnamed Epstein victim. Deutsche Bank <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/big-bank-will-pay-massive-sum-to-settle-epstein-victim-lawsuit" target="_blank" rel="noopener">agreed</a> last week to pay $75 million to settle a lawsuit accusing the company of failing to recognize the sex trafficking scheme.
JPMorgan Chase continued their relationship with Epstein even after he pleaded guilty to two counts of soliciting prostitution from a teenage girl in 2008.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1684938422021000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2-zHdFAayHoZkU-_PcCeh4">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
The disgraced financier had a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/jpmorgan-chase-had-deeper-ties-to-jeffrey-epstein-than-previously-acknowledged-report" target="_blank" rel="noopener">deeper</a> relationship with employees of the investment bank than the company previously admitted, according to a recent <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/jpmorgan-jeffrey-epstein-525febe3?mod=hp_lead_pos1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">report</a> from The Wall Street Journal. Mary Erdoes, a senior lieutenant to veteran JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, visited Epstein’s townhouse in 2011 and 2013, unnamed people familiar with the matter told the outlet, and corresponded with him about a charitable fund JPMorgan Chase was seeking to launch.
John Duffy, who formerly led JPMorgan Chase’s private bank, reportedly visited the townhouse in 2013 for a meeting. The company renewed an authorization one month later, permitting Epstein to borrow funds against his account despite multiple warnings from compliance officers. Justin Nelson, a banker who worked with Epstein at JPMorgan Chase, traveled to a New Mexico ranch owned by the pedophile in 2016 and participated in a handful of meetings at the Manhattan townhouse between 2014 and 2017.

Jeffrey Epstein’s Private Island In The Caribbean Has Gone Quiet

Virgin Islands Democrats Let Epstein ‘Remain Unchecked,’ Received Money And Favors, JPMorgan Lawyers Allege

Virgin Islands Democrats Let Epstein 'Remain Unchecked,’ Received Money And Favors, JPMorgan Lawyers Allege

Democratic Party

Jeffrey Epstein

JP Morgan

Lawsuit

Sex Crimes

A judge in <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/arizona" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Arizona</a> rejected the final part of <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/kari-lake" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Kari Lake</a>&#8216;s legal challenge of her 2022 governor&#8217;s race defeat on Monday.
Lake&#8217;s team failed to show that Maricopa County, which includes the capital of Phoenix and is Arizona&#8217;s most populous county, did not properly perform signature verifications for early ballots, <a href="https://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/5187/638203827030806202" target="_blank" rel="noopener">the ruling</a> determined.
The court did not find &#8220;clear and convincing evidence or a preponderance of evidence&#8221; of misconduct in violation of the law and sufficient to overturn the results of the contest, wrote Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson.
Thompson&#8217;s ruling also contained an order that said it was &#8220;confirming&#8221; the election of Democrat Katie Hobbs as the governor.
Lake&#8217;s team <a href="https://twitter.com/KariLakeWarRoom/status/1659665768391528451" target="_blank" rel="noopener">argued during the trial</a> that signatures were reviewed so quickly — many in less than two or three seconds — that the process could not meet the legal standard. The Republican <a href="https://twitter.com/Garrett_Archer/status/1660832820644782080" target="_blank" rel="noopener">may yet appeal the decision</a>. On Twitter, Lake posted <a href="https://twitter.com/KariLake/status/1660856338400915457" target="_blank" rel="noopener">a GIF</a> saying, &#8220;FIX THIS BROKEN SYSTEM,&#8221; and <a href="https://twitter.com/KariLake/status/1660851611340529666" target="_blank" rel="noopener">tweeted</a> about a &#8220;big announcement&#8221; on Tuesday.
A former journalist who made election integrity a top priority of her campaign, Lake sued after the results showed that she lost the November contest to Hobbs by roughly 17,000 votes in the governor&#8217;s race. Hobbs was sworn in as governor in early January, and in the months since the November election, media reports have said Lake is <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/kari-lake-is-considering-senate-run-making-some-republicans-nervous-85a80081" target="_blank" rel="noopener">mulling a Senate bid</a> and former President Donald Trump is considering her as a <a href="https://www.axios.com/2023/03/07/trump-kari-lake-vice-president-candidates-2024" target="_blank" rel="noopener">possible vice presidential running mate</a>.
Lake&#8217;s 2022 election complaint raised allegations of misconduct and illegal votes with issues ranging from mail-in ballots, chain-of-custody, and problematic ballot printers. In March, Arizona&#8217;s Supreme Court <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/arizona-supreme-court-gives-kari-lakes-signature-verification-claim-a-shot" target="_blank" rel="noopener">sent the last-remaining claim</a> regarding signature verification back to the trial court, where Thompson <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/24/kari-lake-loses-lawsuit-over-her-defeat-in-arizona-governors-race.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">previously threw out</a> Lake’s challenge.
Maricopa County officials have <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/maricopa-county-arizona-officials-apologize-vote-tabulator-problems-say-7-ballots-affected" target="_blank" rel="noopener">acknowledged</a> issues with the 2022 election but insisted <a href="https://www.azfamily.com/2023/02/17/appeals-court-denies-kari-lakes-election-contest-2022-election/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">every valid vote</a> in the contest had been counted.
<a class="c-link c-link--focus-visible" href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://onelink.to/dwapp" data-sk="tooltip_parent" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-5911">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
&#8220;Wild claims of rigged elections may generate media attention and fundraising pleas, but they do not win court cases,&#8221; Maricopa County Chairman Clint Hickman said in a <a href="https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/AZMARIC/bulletins/35c0661" target="_blank" rel="noopener">statement</a> responding to Thompson&#8217;s ruling on Monday.
&#8220;When &#8216;bombshells&#8217; and &#8216;smoking guns&#8217; are not backed up by facts, they fail in court.  This is justice, and this is what happened today in Kari Lake’s election contest,&#8221; he added.

Kari Lake

Judge Dismisses Final Claim In Kari Lake’s 2022 Election Challenge

Judge Dismisses Final Claim In Kari Lake's 2022 Election Challenge

2020 Election

Arizona

Election Fraud

Former President Donald Trump&#8217;s social media company is seeking $3.78 billion in damages in a defamation lawsuit against The Washington Post for publishing &#8220;an egregious hit piece&#8221; earlier this month that accused the company of securities fraud and other wrongdoings.
Trump Media and Technology Group (TMTG), the owner of Truth Social, filed the <a href="https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2023-05/Complaint%20-%205.20.23_0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">lawsuit</a> on Saturday in a Sarasota County, Florida, state court house, which accuses The Post&#8217;s article of causing an &#8220;enormous&#8221; loss that created an &#8220;existential threat&#8221; to the social media platform.
&#8220;WaPo has been on a years-long crusade against TMTG characterized by the concealment of relevant information in its possession—a bitterly ironic truth for a publication whose motto is &#8216;Democracy Dies in Darkness,'&#8221; the lawsuit reads.
Trump launched Truth Social last year as an alternative to Twitter and other social media platforms for conservative users who said they were censored and discriminated against for their political views.
According to the lawsuit, the legacy media outlet published the online article headlined, <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/05/13/trump-truth-social-loan-questions/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">&#8220;Trust linked to porn-friendly bank could gain a stake in Trump&#8217;s Truth Social&#8221;</a> on May 13, 2023, which stated TMTG failed to disclose key details about a proposed merger to the Securities and Exchange Commission and shareholders.
&#8220;The clickbait headline of the WaPo Article&#8230; immediately grabbed the common mind of readers, falsely insinuating that TMTG was involved in shady business dealings,&#8221; the suit claims.
The article alleged a series of accusations involving a bank in the Caribbean islands that offered $8 million in loans to TMTG.
&#8220;[TMTG] borrowed money from a bank best known for servicing the adult entertainment, pledged a stake in the company for the loan and didn&#8217;t tell the SEC,&#8221; the article says.
<div class="c-message_kit__blocks c-message_kit__blocks--rich_text">
<div class="c-message__message_blocks c-message__message_blocks--rich_text" data-qa="message-text">
<div class="p-block_kit_renderer" data-qa="block-kit-renderer">
<div class="p-block_kit_renderer__block_wrapper p-block_kit_renderer__block_wrapper--first">
<div class="p-rich_text_block" dir="auto">
<div class="p-rich_text_section"><a class="c-link c-link--focus-visible" href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://onelink.to/dwapp" data-sk="tooltip_parent" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-125150">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
The lawsuit says The Post published nine false claims and circulated the misinformation to its 2.5 million subscribers and 20 million Twitter followers.
“In order to further spread the smear and increase the damage to TMTG, WaPo engaged agents from both within and outside the company to broadly republish the defamation,” the complaint alleges.
A spokesperson for The Post declined to comment on the lawsuit.
&nbsp;

US-INTERNET-MEDIA-TAKEOVER-AMAZON-WASHINGTONPOST

Trump’s Social Media Company Files $3 Billion Defamation Lawsuit Against Washington Post

Trump's Social Media Company Files $3 Billion Defamation Lawsuit Against Washington Post

Defamation

Legacy Media

Washington Post

Several <a href="http://dailywire.com/topic/social-media" target="_blank" rel="noopener">social media</a> influencers filed a <a href="http://dailywire.com/topic/lawsuit" target="_blank" rel="noopener">lawsuit</a> against the state of <a href="http://dailywire.com/topic/montana" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Montana</a> asserting that a recent <a href="http://dailywire.com/topic/tiktok" target="_blank" rel="noopener">TikTok</a> ban constitutes a violation of the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/first-amendment" target="_blank" rel="noopener">First Amendment</a>.
Lawmakers in Montana passed a statute which prohibits app stores from making TikTok available for download in the state, a move which occurs as federal <a href="http://dailywire.com/topic/national-security" target="_blank" rel="noopener">authorities</a> contend that the platform, which is owned by <a href="http://dailywire.com/topic/china" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Chinese</a> technology firm ByteDance, may grant members of the Chinese Communist Party access to users&#8217; data in the United States.
The <a href="https://www.dwt.com/-/media/files/2023/05/20230517--alario-et-al--1-complaint.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">lawsuit</a>, which was filed in federal court on Wednesday by the law firm Davis Wright Tremaine, said that the state is improperly discriminating against some forms of speech shared through the platform and lacks the ability to enforce laws related to national security.
“Montana has no authority to enact laws advancing what it believes should be the United States’ foreign policy or its national security interests, nor may Montana ban an entire forum for communication based on its perceptions that some speech shared through that forum, though protected by the First Amendment, is dangerous,” the lawsuit said. “Montana can no more ban its residents from viewing or posting to TikTok than it could ban the Wall Street Journal because of who owns it or the ideas it publishes.”
Plaintiffs in the lawsuit include Samantha Alario, who owns a small business that sells swimwear; Heather DiRocco, a former Marine who discusses mental health with fellow veterans; Carly Ann Goddard, who creates content related to life on her ranch; Alice Held, a student who shares her outdoor adventures related to mountain climbing and biking; and Dale Stout, who makes humorous videos. Each of the individuals earn revenue with their TikTok accounts and contend that the prohibition deprives them of their property rights.
Montana Republican Gov. Greg Gianforte, on the other hand, said that the law was <a href="https://news.mt.gov/Governors-Office/Governor_Gianforte_Bans_TikTok_in_Montana" target="_blank" rel="noopener">intended</a> to protect “private data and sensitive personal information from being harvested by the Chinese Communist Party.” The bill was sponsored by Montana Republican State Sen. Shelley Vance, who <a href="https://www.kbzk.com/news/local-news/supporters-of-tiktok-ban-in-montana-say-threats-outweigh-benefits" target="_blank" rel="noopener">remarked</a> that TikTok is a “major threat to our national security.”
Jamal Brown, a spokesman for TikTok who previously worked in the Biden administration, said that more than 200,000 people and 6,000 businesses use the platform in Montana. “We want to reassure Montanans that they can continue using TikTok to express themselves, earn a living, and find community as we continue working to defend the rights of our users inside and outside of Montana,” Brooke Oberwetter, another spokesperson for TikTok, told media outlets.
Beyond the national security concerns, some lawmakers have drawn <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/tiktok-ceo-reveals-the-details-of-platforms-massive-censorship-operation" target="_blank" rel="noopener">attention</a> to the censorship practices implemented by TikTok and called for a mandatory divestiture of the platform from ByteDance. Shou Zi Chew, the chief executive of TikTok, insisted in his <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/tiktok-ceo-swears-company-is-not-an-agent-of-china" target="_blank" rel="noopener">testimony</a> before the House Energy and Commerce Committee two months ago that a forced sale of TikTok to an American company would not resolve the issues.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1684589317714000&amp;usg=AOvVaw1FVPs4FVXUkFALjuqPU2xe">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
“I am well aware that the fact that ByteDance has Chinese founders has prompted concerns that our platform could be used as or become a tool of China or the Chinese Communist Party,” the executive remarked. “Divestment doesn’t address the fundamental concerns that I have heard, as a change in ownership would not impose any new restrictions on data flows or access. This is not an issue of nationality.&#8221;
Leif Le Mahieu contributed to this report.

TikTok

Social Media Influencers Sue Montana Over Statewide TikTok Ban

Influencers Sue Montana Over Statewide TikTok Ban

China

First Amendment

Montana

National Security

Deutsche Bank agreed to pay $75 million to settle a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/lawsuit" target="_blank" rel="noopener">lawsuit</a> accusing the company of failing to recognize the sex trafficking conducted by <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/jeffrey-epstein" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Jeffrey Epstein</a>, the deceased pedophile hedge fund manager who was once a client of the firm.
Lawyers for an alleged Epstein victim, identified only as Jane Doe in court documents, filed a lawsuit against Deutsche Bank earlier this year and claimed that the German financial institution knowingly benefited from the Epstein trafficking scheme. Deutsche Bank received most of the Epstein hedge fund’s business after his partnership with <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/jp-morgan" target="_blank" rel="noopener">JPMorgan Chase</a>, the largest investment bank in the United States, concluded in 2013.
Edwards Pottinger, one of the law firms representing the victim and other women, said in a <a href="https://apnews.com/article/deutsche-bank-epstein-lawsuit-settlement-637de5a37de933edfefd9a98832bfa8a" target="_blank" rel="noopener">statement</a> that the settlement with Deutsche Bank “will allow dozens of survivors of Jeffrey Epstein to finally attempt to restore their faith in our system knowing that all individuals and entities who facilitated Epstein’s sex trafficking operation will finally be held accountable.” Boies Schiller Flexner, another law firm which represents the victims, likewise said that “the scope and scale of Epstein’s abuse, and the many years it continued in plain sight, could not have happened without the collaboration and support of many powerful individuals and institutions.”
U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/epstein-victim-allowed-to-sue-big-banks-for-allegedly-enabling-sex-offender-we-will-leave-no-stone-unturned" target="_blank" rel="noopener">tossed</a> most charges against JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche Bank earlier this year in the proposed class action lawsuits from the Epstein accuser, who was joined by officials from the U.S. Virgin Islands, where Epstein owned an island estate called Little St. James before his apparent suicide in 2019. Lawyers are allowed to contend that the firms benefited from the sex trafficking scheme by providing Epstein with financial services.
“Epstein’s sex trafficking operation was impossible without the assistance of JPMorgan Chase, and later Deutsche Bank, and we assure the public that we will leave no stone unturned in our quest for justice for the many victims who deserved better from one of America’s largest financial institutions,” lawyers for the U.S. Virgin Islands and the Epstein victim previously said.
Epstein worked with JPMorgan Chase between 1998 and 2013 despite pleading guilty to two counts of soliciting prostitution from a teenage girl in 2008.
The disgraced late financier had a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/jpmorgan-chase-had-deeper-ties-to-jeffrey-epstein-than-previously-acknowledged-report" target="_blank" rel="noopener">deeper</a> relationship with employees of the investment bank than the company previously admitted, according to a recent <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/jpmorgan-jeffrey-epstein-525febe3?mod=hp_lead_pos1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">report</a> from The Wall Street Journal. Mary Erdoes, a senior lieutenant to veteran JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, visited Epstein’s townhouse on the Upper East Side of Manhattan in 2011 and 2013, unnamed people familiar with the matter told the outlet. Erdoes also corresponded with Epstein via email about a charitable fund JPMorgan Chase was seeking to launch.
John Duffy, who formerly led JPMorgan Chase’s private bank, reportedly visited the townhouse in 2013 for a meeting. The company renewed an authorization one month later, permitting Epstein to borrow funds against his account despite multiple warnings from compliance officers. Justin Nelson, a banker who worked with Epstein at JPMorgan Chase, traveled to a New Mexico ranch owned by the pedophile in 2016 and participated in a handful of meetings at the Manhattan townhouse between 2014 and 2017.
<a class="c-link c-link--focus-visible" href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://onelink.to/dwapp" data-sk="tooltip_parent" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-78601">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
Dimon is scheduled to be deposed behind closed doors this month. Attorneys uncovered communications from employees who mentioned a “Dimon review” into the firm’s relationship with Epstein, according to a <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/f5e7d581-6369-4b0b-92f4-b5fe9a55b2f2" target="_blank" rel="noopener">report</a> from the Financial Times based on unnamed sources.
Lawyers for the U.S. Virgin Islands issued a <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/u-s-virgin-islands-subpoenas-elon-musk-for-docs-in-its-lawsuit-against-jpmorgan-chase-in-epstein-case-report" target="_blank" rel="noopener">subpoena</a> against Elon Musk this week for alleged documents related to the legal proceedings against JPMorgan Chase. The Tesla and SpaceX chief executive, who is not accused of wrongdoing, denies that he had any such documents.

Epstein and Maxwell

Big Bank Will Pay Massive Sum To Settle Epstein Victim Lawsuit

Deutsche Bank Will Pay $75 Million To Settle Epstein Victim Lawsuit

Banks

Business

Menu