President Donald Trump may have replaced a portrait of former President Barack Obama with an artist&#8217;s rendering of the moment he stood and raised his fist — shouting, &#8220;Fight! Fight! Fight!&#8221; — after a would-be assassin shot him at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.
The White House shared a short video on Tuesday showing tourists walking through the halls near the new painting, which showed Trump with his face bloodied and his fist in the air, surrounded by U.S. Secret Service agents.
&#8220;Some new artwork at the White House,&#8221; the caption read.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Some new artwork at the White House 👀 <a href="https://t.co/l6u5u7k82T">pic.twitter.com/l6u5u7k82T</a>
&mdash; The White House (@WhiteHouse) <a href="https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1910764795382349948?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
It was Katie Pavlich who tipped people off as to what might have been moved to accommodate the new acquisition: &#8220;I’m pretty sure this is where the Obama portrait was.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
I’m pretty sure this is where the Obama portrait was. <a href="https://t.co/VSduieUK0l">https://t.co/VSduieUK0l</a>
&mdash; Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) <a href="https://twitter.com/KatiePavlich/status/1910768365028663576?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
A few suggested in the comments that the new art might be hanging across from the Obama portrait rather than in its place, but the reactions flooded in all the same.
&#8220;Wow &#8211; a much-needed upgrade from the last piece displayed there! Never forget,&#8221; Jenn Pellegrino said.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Wow &#8211; a much-needed upgrade from the last piece displayed there! Never forget. ✊🏻🇺🇸 <a href="https://t.co/RWyBAKjmOj">https://t.co/RWyBAKjmOj</a>
&mdash; Jenn Pellegrino 🇺🇸 (@JennPellegrino) <a href="https://twitter.com/JennPellegrino/status/1910822065780760804?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Trump also raised eyebrows after it was revealed early on that he had hung a framed copy of the New York Post&#8217;s cover page featuring his <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/trump-hangs-mugshot-outside-oval-office-so-bad-a-that-its-surreal" target="_blank" rel="noopener">mug shot</a>.
&#8220;New office art just dropped,&#8221; Trump&#8217;s rapid response team posted in mid-February.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
New office art just dropped <a href="https://t.co/XNVfdmEHEG">pic.twitter.com/XNVfdmEHEG</a>
&mdash; Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapidResponse47/status/1890385341481152734?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 14, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;They framed Donald Trump’s mug shot and put it on the White House wall. This is so bad a** that it’s surreal,&#8221; one person posted in response to the framed mug shot.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
They framed Donald Trump’s mug shot and put it on the White House wall.
This is so bad ass that it’s surreal.<a href="https://t.co/Zm3GUl97J4">pic.twitter.com/Zm3GUl97J4</a>
&mdash; Philip Anderson (@VoteHarrisOut) <a href="https://twitter.com/VoteHarrisOut/status/1890459351334195677?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 14, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;Democrats really thought the Trump arrest and mugshot would end him politically. Instead he now has the mugshot picture hung just outside the Oval Office,&#8221; OutKick&#8217;s Clay Travis added.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Democrats really thought the Trump arrest and mugshot would end him politically. Instead he now has the mugshot picture hung just outside the Oval Office. <a href="https://t.co/3w8lLfDKQe">pic.twitter.com/3w8lLfDKQe</a>
&mdash; Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) <a href="https://twitter.com/ClayTravis/status/1890467839884103951?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 14, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;Everyone who walks into the Oval office has to see Trump’s epic mugshot,” Libs of TikTok posted. “It’s a reminder of what they did to him and why he won.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Everyone who walks into the Oval office has to see Trump’s epic mugshot.
It’s a reminder of what they did to him and why he won. <a href="https://t.co/22qJKDSgqC">pic.twitter.com/22qJKDSgqC</a>
&mdash; Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) <a href="https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1890461193980031157?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 14, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
And from the Media Research Center: &#8220;Legendary! President Trump hangs his mugshot in the White House. Can’t wait for the leftist media meltdown.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
Legendary! President Trump hangs his mugshot in the White House.
Can’t wait for the leftist media meltdown.<a href="https://t.co/JdQrfSOHkC">pic.twitter.com/JdQrfSOHkC</a>
&mdash; Media Research Center (@theMRC) <a href="https://twitter.com/theMRC/status/1890517044036010195?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 14, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Donald Trump Injured During Shooting At Campaign Rally In Butler, PA

Trump May Have Replaced Obama’s Portrait In The White House. Here’s What’s Hanging There Now.

Trump May Have Replaced Obama's Portrait In The White House. Here's What's Hanging There Now.

assassination attempt

Barack Obama

Executive

Politics

White House

President Donald Trump announced on Friday that he had terminated most members of the Board of Trustees at the Kennedy Center — including Chairman David Rubenstein — and had taken over the role himself.
Trump made the announcement in a post to his social media platform Truth Social, and added that he also planned to make immediate changes to some of the events that were held there — beginning with drag shows that were intended for an audience of children.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
<a href="https://t.co/kCZzFUAMVB">pic.twitter.com/kCZzFUAMVB</a>
&mdash; Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapidResponse47/status/1887995325022867825?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 7, 2025</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
&#8220;At my direction, we are going to make the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C. , GREAT AGAIN,&#8221; Trump began. &#8220;I have decided to immediately terminate multiple individuals from the Board of Trustees, including the Chairman, who do not share our Vision for a Golden Age in Arts and Culture.&#8221;
&#8220;We will soon announce a new Board, with an amazing Chairman, Donald J. Trump,&#8221; the president&#8217;s post continued, and he then pivoted to give some insight as to why he had made the call to change the center&#8217;s direction.
&#8220;Just last year, the Kennedy Center featured Drag Shows specifically targeting our youth — THIS WILL STOP,&#8221; he said, adding, &#8220;The Kennedy Center is an American Jewel, and must reflect the brightest STARS on its stage from all across out Nation. For the Kennedy Center, THE BEST IS YET TO COME!&#8221;
News broke around the same time that, in another similar post to Truth Social, Trump had revoked former President <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/trump-revokes-bidens-security-clearance-cites-poor-mental-acuity" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Joe Biden&#8217;s security clearance</a>. Citing Biden&#8217;s obviously deteriorating mental acuity, Trump mentioned the report compiled by Special Counsel Robert Hur — in which Biden was described as forgetful at best.
&#8220;The Hur Report revealed that Biden suffers from ‘poor memory’ and, even in his ‘prime,’ could not be trusted with sensitive information. I will always protect our National Security — JOE, YOU’RE FIRED. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!&#8221; Trump&#8217;s statement read in part.

President Trump

Trump Dumps Kennedy Center Board, Puts Immediate End To Drag Shows For Kids

Donald Trump

Drag Shows

Two <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/climate-change" target="_blank" rel="noopener">global warming</a> protesters who threw cans of tomato soup over the glass frame of Vincent Van Gogh’s “Sunflower&#8221; painting have been sentenced to time in prison for their actions.
On Friday, a London court sentenced Anna Holland, 22, and Phoebe Plummer, 23, from the activist group Just Stop Oil, to two years and 20 months in prison for their so-called protest against fossil fuels at a museum in London in 2022, <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/27/climate/just-stop-oil-climate-activists-prison-van-gough-soup-intl/index.html">CNN</a> reported.
Both Holland and Plummer were found guilty of criminal damage to the pieces of art&#8217;s gold-colored frame.  Judge Christopher Hehir blasted the two for their actions against the “cultural treasure,” which he said could have been “seriously damaged or even destroyed” by them by throwing soup on the paintings and then glueing their hands to the museum wall. The “Sunflowers” painting is valued at nearly $85 million.
“Soup might have seeped through the glass. You couldn’t have cared less if the painting was damaged or not,” Hehir said in court. “You had no right to do what you did to ‘Sunflowers.’”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
🥫 BREAKING: 3 YEARS 8 MONTHS COMBINED IN PRISON FOR THROWING SOUP
⛓️ Phoebe and Anna have just been sentenced to 2 years and 20 months in prison respectively after throwing soup over the glass frame of Van Gogh&#8217;s &#8216;Sunflowers&#8217;.
🚔 Phoebe received a further 3 months for… <a href="https://t.co/JBjCgObiic">pic.twitter.com/JBjCgObiic</a>
— Just Stop Oil (@JustStop_Oil) <a href="https://twitter.com/JustStop_Oil/status/1839648995200704932?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 27, 2024</a></blockquote>
Plummer was also sentenced to an additional 3 months in prison for her part in a “slow march” in the road in October 2023 in London.
“You clearly think your beliefs give you the right to commit crimes when you feel like it,” Hehir said. “You do not.”
<a href="https://www.amiracist.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.amiracist.com/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1726313279401000&amp;usg=AOvVaw115_qPFFEePDP86-Fvo-Vd">Am I Racist? Is In Theaters NOW — Get Your Tickets Here!</a>
Shortly after the sentences were handed down, more vandals from the same protest group shared a clip of three peeople  throwing cans of soup over the glass on not one but two Vincent Van Gogh paintings “in the &#8216;Poets and Lovers&#8217; exhibition at the National Gallery,” per the post on <a href="https://x.com/JustStop_Oil/status/1839670072530317423">X</a>.
The London judge is the same person who handed down sentences in July to five other so-called climate activists in the U.K. from Just Stop Oil or its allied group, Extinction Rebellion.
The court found the vandals guilty of “conspiring intentionally to cause a public nuisance,” after it had recruited people to climb structures along the M25 — a major traffic route around London — in November 2022, the outlet noted.
Hehir sentenced four out of five of the activists to four-year jail terms, while the group’s co-founder, Roger Hallam, was handed a five year sentence.
Related: <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-global-warming-protesters-vandalize-one-of-worlds-most-iconic-art-masterpieces" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: Global Warming Protesters Vandalize One Of World’s Most Iconic Art Masterpieces</a>

Screen Shot 2022-10-14 at 7.39.45 AM

Climate Change Soup-Throwers Sentenced To Time In Prison

Crime

Global Warming

London

Prison

Protestors

The following is a transcript excerpt from Dr. Jordan Peterson’s <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/episode/1-introduction-to-the-idea-of-god-new" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Biblical Series</a>, which explores the psychological significance of the Bible. In <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNIC-GZzj48" target="_blank" rel="noopener">this segment</a>, he addresses the complex and powerful nature of dreams, comparing it to artists’ talent at portraying more information than has yet to be articulated. He considers the questions: Where does information in a dream come from? What draws us to music? How long have humans been observing each other? And, the eternal question of human beings: How do you live in the world? You can explore more in Dr. Peterson’s <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/watch/jordan-peterson" target="_blank" rel="noopener">extensive catalog</a>, available on DailyWire+. 
I think the theory that dreams are merely the consequence of random neuronal firing is absolutely absurd because there is nothing random about dreams. They are structured and complex, and they are not like snow on a television screen or static on a radio. They are complicated. I have often seen people have very coherent dreams that have a perfect narrative structure. They are fully developed in some sense. So, that theory just does not go anywhere with me. I cannot see that as useful at all. I am more likely to take the phenomena seriously and say there is something to dreams.
You dream of the future; then you try to make it into a reality. That seems to be important. Or maybe you dream up a nightmare and try to make that into a reality; people do that too if they are hellbent on revenge, for example, and full of hatred and resentment. That manifests itself in terrible fantasies. Those are dreams; then people go act them out. These things are powerful. Whole nations can get caught up in collective dreams. That is what happened to Nazi Germany in the 1930s. It is an absolutely remarkable, amazing, horrific, destructive spectacle. The same thing happened in the Soviet Union. And the same thing happened in China. We have to take these seriously and try to understand what is going on.
Carl Jung believed that dreams could contain more information than was yet articulate. I think artists do the same. People go to museums, and they look at paintings — Renaissance paintings or modern paintings — and they do not exactly know why they are there. I was in a room in New York full of Renaissance art, the greatest painters. I thought maybe that room was worth a billion dollars or something outrageous because there were about 20 paintings in there. Priceless. Why are those paintings worth so much? And why is there a museum in the biggest city in the world devoted to them? And why do people from all over the world come and look at them? What are those people doing? One of them was of the assumption of Mary — a beautifully painted, absolutely glowing work of art — with 20 people standing in front of it looking at it. What are those people up to? They do not know. Why did they make a pilgrimage to New York to come and look at that painting? It is not like they know. Why is it worth so much? I know there is a status element to it too, but that begs the question, why do those items become such high-status items? What is it about them that is so absolutely remarkable? We are strange creatures.
I was trying to figure out, in part, where does the information that is in a dream come from? Because it has to come from somewhere. You can think about it as a revelation because it is as though it springs out of the void, and it is new knowledge and it is a revelation. You did not produce it. It just appears. I am scientifically minded, and I am quite a rational person, and I like to have an explanation for things that is rational and empirical before I look for any other kind of explanation. I do not want to say that everything that is associated with divinity can be reduced in some manner to biology or to evolutionary history or anything like that, but, insofar as it is possible to do that reduction, I am going to do that. And I am going to leave the other phenomena floating in the air because they cannot be pinned down. In that, I would put the category of mystical or religious experience, which we do not understand at all.
<h4><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/show/the-jordan-b-peterson-podcast" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WATCH: The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast on DailyWire+</a></h4>
Artists observe one another. They observe people, and they represent what they see. They transmit a message of what they see to us, and they teach us to see. We do not necessarily know what it is we are learning from them, but we are learning something, or, at least, we are acting like we are learning something. We go to movies, we watch stories, and we immerse ourselves in fiction constantly. That is an artistic production. For many people, the world of the arts is a living world, and that is particularly true if you are a creative person. It is the creative, artistic people who move the knowledge of humanity forward, and they do that with their artistic productions first. They are on the edge. The dancers, the poets, the visual artists, and the musicians do that, and we are not sure what they are doing.
Why do you like music? It gives you a deep intimation of the significance of things — and no one questions it. You go to a concert, you are thrilled, and it is a quasi-religious experience, particularly if people really get themselves together and get the crowd moving. There is something incredibly intense about it. It makes no sense whatsoever. It is not an easy thing to understand. Music is deeply patterned, and patterned in layers, and I think that has something to do with it because reality is patterned in layers. So I think music represents reality in some fundamental way, and we get into the sway of that and sort of participate in being. That is part of what makes it such an uplifting experience. But we do not really know that is what we are doing. We just go do it. And it is nourishing for people, young people in particular. Lots of them live for music. It is where they derive all their meaning, their cultural identity, everything that is nourishing comes from their affiliation with their music that is part of their cultural identity. That is an amazing thing.
The question still remains: Where does the information in dreams come from? I think it comes from watching the patterns everyone acts out. We watch that forever, and we have some representations of those patterns. That is part of our cultural history; that is what is embedded in stories, in fictional accounts of the story between good and evil, the bad guy and the good guy, the romance. These are canonical patterns of being for people, and they deeply affect us because they represent what it is we will act out in the world. Then we flesh that out with the individual information we have about ourselves and other people. It is as though there are waves of behavioral patterns that manifest themselves in the crowd across time, that great dramas are played on the crowd across time. The artists watch that, get intimations of what that is, and they write it down and tell us, and then we are a little clearer about what we are up to.
Take, for example, a great dramatist like Shakespeare. We know what he wrote is fiction, and then we say fiction is not true. But then you think, well wait a minute, maybe it is true like numbers are true. Numbers are an abstraction from the underlying reality, but no one in their right mind would really think numbers are not true. You could even make a case that the numbers are more real than the things they represent because the abstraction is so insanely powerful. Once you have mathematics, you are just deadly. You can move the world with mathematics. So, it is not obvious that the abstraction is less real than the more concrete reality. But if you take a work of fiction, like Hamlet, and say it is true because it is fiction, then you think, wait a minute, what kind of explanation is that? But maybe it is more true than nonfiction because it takes the story that needs to be told about you, and it extracts that out and says, “Look, here is something that is a key part of the human experience as such.” It is an abstraction from this underlying noisy substrate, and people are affected by it because they see the thing that is represented is part of the pattern of their being. That is the right way to think about it.
With these old stories, these ancient stories, it seems to me that process has been occurring for thousands of years. It is like we watched ourselves, and we extracted out some stories. We imitated each other, we represented that in drama, and then we distilled the drama, we got a representation of the distillation, and then we did it again at the end of that process. God only knows how long that took. They have traced some fairytales back 10,000 years in relatively unchanged form, and it certainly seems to me that the archaeological evidence suggests that the really old stories the Bible begins with are at least that old and likely embedded in the pre-history that is far older than that. You might think, well, how can you be so sure? The answer to that, in part is, cultures that do not change, like the ancient cultures, did not change as fast; they stayed the same. That is the answer. They keep their information moving generation to generation; that is how they stayed the same. We know again in the archaeological record there are records of rituals that have remained relatively unbroken for up to 20,000 years; it was discovered in caves of Japan that were set up for a particular kind of bear worship that was also characteristic of Western Europe. So these things can last for very long periods of time.
We are watching each other act in the world, and the question is: How long have we been watching each other? The answer to that, in some sense is, as long as there have been creatures with nervous systems. That is a long time. That is some hundreds of millions of years, perhaps longer than that, that we have been watching each other trying to figure out what we are up to across that entire span of time. Some of that knowledge is built right into our bodies, which is why we can dance with each other, for example, because understanding is not just something that you have as an abstraction; it is something that you act out. That is what children are doing when they are learning to rough and tumble play. They are learning to integrate their body with the body of someone else in a harmonious way, learning to cooperate and compete. That is all instantiated right into their body. It is not abstract knowledge; they do not know that they are doing that. They are just doing it. We can even use our body as a representational platform. So, we have been studying each other for a long time, abstracting out what it is that we are up to.
What should we be up to? That is an even more fundamental question. If you are going to live in the world, and you are going to do it properly, what does properly mean and who is it that you might go to about that? That is the right question. It is what everyone wants to know. How do you live in the world? Not, what is the world made of? How do you live in the world? It is the eternal question of human beings, and I guess we are the only species that has ever really asked that question because all the other animals just go and do whatever they do. But not us. It is a question for us. 
* * *
To continue, listen or watch more content with Dr. Jordan Peterson on <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/watch" target="_blank" rel="noopener">DailyWire+</a>.
<a href="https://www.jordanbpeterson.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Dr. Jordan B. Peterson</a> is a clinical psychologist and professor emeritus at the University of Toronto. From 1993 to 1998 he served as assistant and then associate professor of psychology at Harvard. He is the international bestselling author of “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Maps-Meaning-Architecture-Jordan-Peterson/dp/0415922216/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&amp;qid=&amp;sr=" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Maps of Meaning</a>,” “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/12-Rules-Life-Antidote-Chaos/dp/0345816021/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&amp;qid=&amp;sr=" target="_blank" rel="noopener">12 Rules For Life,</a>” and “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Beyond-Order-More-Rules-Life/dp/0593084640/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&amp;dib_tag=AUTHOR&amp;dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.nbV0WtVit9busCddbjMST-Oe7hjueQrxfqnQ4L3HXXUFdIaqlEBr0sp9HQWIq9ut9NlHDAFA0YQoDWVZfDtKNJI7VvlzWv2rMhs2KcAAIIppPRMWq4GIiFerkrssvBABAjeKlg3OFs3H8IHs5D8ktJ5uBg3K-SZ4hpKltaKkrhY6j-RKn-tTkBz29JZXP3Rhm9SB14rHUX1nol5d4z4Fi6f8fwhxXWCVGgkvOHSqG6E.iVF1NljuBEwrpumO9rQBh9FotnzaIo4K7K8HvNnC46k&amp;qid=&amp;sr=" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Beyond Order.</a>” You can now <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/podcasts/the-jordan-b-peterson-podcast" target="_blank" rel="noopener">listen to</a> or <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/watch/jordan-peterson" target="_blank" rel="noopener">watch</a> his popular lectures on DailyWire+.
Be sure to <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Who-Wrestle-God-Jordan-Peterson/dp/0593542533/?_encoding=UTF8&amp;pd_rd_w=38kcw&amp;content-id=amzn1.sym.f911c8db-3a2b-4b3e-952f-b80fdcee83f4&amp;pf_rd_p=f911c8db-3a2b-4b3e-952f-b80fdcee83f4&amp;pf_rd_r=133-1833056-3520340&amp;pd_rd_wg=3zvBk&amp;pd_rd_r=93a1419a-853b-4c49-a764-cbaa90d3073a&amp;ref_=aufs_ap_sc_dsk" target="_blank" rel="noopener">PRE-ORDER</a> Dr. Peterson’s newest book: “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Who-Wrestle-God-Jordan-Peterson/dp/0593542533/?_encoding=UTF8&amp;pd_rd_w=38kcw&amp;content-id=amzn1.sym.f911c8db-3a2b-4b3e-952f-b80fdcee83f4&amp;pf_rd_p=f911c8db-3a2b-4b3e-952f-b80fdcee83f4&amp;pf_rd_r=133-1833056-3520340&amp;pd_rd_wg=3zvBk&amp;pd_rd_r=93a1419a-853b-4c49-a764-cbaa90d3073a&amp;ref_=aufs_ap_sc_dsk" target="_blank" rel="noopener">We Who Wrestle with God</a>” (Portfolio/Penguin. November 19, 2024.)

Dr. Jordan B. Peterson

The Eternal Question Of Human Beings: How Do You Live In The World? 

Carl Jung

Jordan B. Peterson

Music

Psychology

Readers Pass

Shakespeare

An art piece based on <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/justin-timberlake">Justin Timberlake</a>’s mugshot is on display in the same Hamptons town where he was arrested for a DWI last month.
The 43-year-old singer’s mugshot inspired a limited-edition <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/arts">art piece</a> shown at the Romany Kramoris Gallery in Sag Harbor, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/new-york">New York</a>. The new installation, reportedly available for purchase in several colors, comes courtesy of artist Godfrey Lohman. A report from <a href="https://pagesix.com/2024/07/02/entertainment/justin-timberlake-mugshot-is-art-at-sag-harbor-gallery-happy/">Page Six</a> noted that tourists have been lining up to catch a glimpse of the piece.
“My reaction was, ‘Oh my God!’ That’s great! It’s just great!” gallery owner Romany Kramoris told Page Six. The so-called “Queen of Sag Harbor” also mentioned that the gallery had sold “two or three” of the art pieces, which cost $520 each. Kramoris added that “a lot of people are coming back.” 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Justin Timberlake’s mugshot turned into art at Sag Harbor gallery after Hamptons DWI bust <a href="https://t.co/ag37JMtduV">https://t.co/ag37JMtduV</a> <a href="https://t.co/8niBDtOkL3">pic.twitter.com/8niBDtOkL3</a>
— Page Six (@PageSix) <a href="https://twitter.com/PageSix/status/1808267195383697699?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 2, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
“[Timberlake’s mugshot] is our most contemporary piece! It’s au courant,” another gallery employee told the outlet.
Timberlake was charged with one count of driving while intoxicated and two citations, including one for running a stop sign and another for failure to keep in lane, in the early hours of June 18.  
A police report obtained by <a href="https://people.com/justin-timberlake-had-one-martini-when-pulled-over-refused-breathalyzer-police-report-8665607">People magazine</a> noted that the pop singer’s &#8220;eyes were bloodshot and glassy, a strong odor of an alcoholic beverage was emanating from his breath, he was unable to divide attention, he had slowed speech, he was unsteady afoot and he performed poorly on all standardized field sobriety tests.&#8221; 
He also refused to take a breathalyzer test.
Documents also said Timberlake claimed, “I had one martini and I followed my friends home.”
According to reports, the young arresting officer did not recognize Timberlake as a celebrity.
“He didn’t recognize him or his name,” the source said. Another witness claimed, “Justin said under his breath, ‘This is going to ruin the tour.’ The cop replied, ‘What tour?’ Justin said, ‘The world tour.’”
Timberlake’s court appearance is currently set for July 26, when he’s scheduled to perform on his Forget Tomorrow World Tour stop in Poland. The “Cry Me a River” singer also has tour dates in the U.S. later this month.

Justin Timberlake

Justin Timberlake’s Mugshot Inspired A Portrait On Display In Hamptons Art Gallery

Art Based On Justin Timberlake's Mugshot Displayed In Hamptons Gallery 

Celebrities

New York

U.S.

A new <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/arts" target="_blank" rel="noopener">portrait</a> of <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/kate-middleton" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Kate Middleton</a>, Princess of Wales, is causing a stir and getting mostly negative reactions online.
The painting was commissioned by the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/united-kingdom" target="_blank" rel="noopener">British</a> outlet Tatler and graces the cover of their new July issue. It was created by British-Zambian artist Hanna Uzor. The portrait depicts Catherine during her appearance at the first state banquet of King Charles III’s reign.
“The July cover of the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/royal-family">Princess of Wales</a> is the latest in a series of portraits commissioned by Tatler. Each has heralded a new era within the Royal Family, celebrating the strength and dignity of those dedicating their life to public duty,” the magazine’s X post of the image said.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
The July cover of the Princess of Wales is the latest in a series of portraits commissioned by Tatler. Each has heralded a new era within the Royal Family, celebrating the strength and dignity of those dedicating their life to public duty <a href="https://t.co/AyxCT262tY">https://t.co/AyxCT262tY</a> <a href="https://t.co/M6K44s60GJ">pic.twitter.com/M6K44s60GJ</a>
— Tatler (@Tatlermagazine) <a href="https://twitter.com/Tatlermagazine/status/1793220299636301863?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 22, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Uzor never met the princess, but said she used photos and videos to create the painting. 
“When you can’t meet the sitter in person, you have to look at everything you can find and piece together the subtle human moments revealed in different photographs: do they have a particular way of standing or holding their head or hands? Do they have a recurrent gesture?,” the artist said in a statement, per <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/23/style/catherine-princess-wales-tatler-scli-intl/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CNN</a>. 
“All my portraits are made up of layers of a personality, constructed from everything I can find about them,” Uzor added.
<blockquote class="instagram-media" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/reel/C7QzpgFofGN/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14">
<div style="padding: 16px;">
&nbsp;
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div>
<div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div>
<div style="padding-top: 8px;">
<div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"></div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;">
<div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: 8px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"></div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);"></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: auto;">
<div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"></div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"></div>
</div>
&nbsp;
<p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/C7QzpgFofGN/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by Tatler (@tatlermagazine)</a>
</div>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
Online critics were not impressed with the final result, calling it terrible to the point of being disrespectful to the Princess of Wales.
“This is dreadful &#8211; somehow, I’m not sure the artist is a fan of the Princess &#8211; it looks like a bad GCSE [high school] project,” one commenter on X wrote.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1716488494520000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2dyxfpdB0XAtZIqaVVdwYr">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
“This looks nothing like the Princess of Wales. It’s so awful, it’s disrespectful,” another person echoed.
A third commenter <a href="https://x.com/CatherineInFL/status/1793342807802790089" target="_blank" rel="noopener">wrote</a>, “This is shockingly bad. Was the intention to erase the Princess of Wales and replace her with a pretend person? The disrespect to the Princess shouldn&#8217;t be acceptable.”
The new royal family portrait comes just after royal fans responded negatively to an official portrait of King Charles III, which was revealed earlier this month, as The Daily Wire previously <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/first-portrait-of-king-charles-iii-mocked-on-social-media-looks-like-hes-going-straight-to-hell" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reported</a>. The 8.5 by 6.5-foot painting by British artist Jonathan Yeo included a bold red background.
“It looks like he’s bathing in blood,” one popular Instagram comment said of the king&#8217;s portrait.
“Looks like he’s going straight to hell,” another royal follower agreed.

Kate Middleton

‘Shockingly Bad’: Critics Slam New Kate Middleton Portrait

'Shockingly Bad': Critics Slam New Kate Middleton Portrait

Royal Family

United Kingdom

Buckingham Palace unveiled the first official <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/arts">portrait</a> of <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/prince-charles">King Charles III</a> to mixed reactions from the public. 
The 8.5 by 6.5-foot painting was done by British artist Jonathan Yeo, who is also responsible for depicting other high-profile subjects like former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, actress Nicole Kidman, and education activist Malala Yousafzai.
King Charles is shown wearing the uniform of the Welsh guards. A butterfly is approaching his shoulder. The most striking aspect of the portrait is the swirling red background, which critics say is their main concern.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
The first official painted portrait of King Charles III since his coronation has been unveiled at Buckingham Palace. <a href="https://t.co/XLBMg1WxgE">pic.twitter.com/XLBMg1WxgE</a>
&mdash; Historic Vids (@historyinmemes) <a href="https://twitter.com/historyinmemes/status/1790688574880489498?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 15, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
“It looks like he’s bathing in blood,” one popular comment on social media said.
Another Instagram commenter wrote, “I would have loved this if this was any other color than red. He really captured the essence of him in the face, but the harshness of the red doesn’t match the softness of his expression.” 
“Looks like he’s going straight to hell,” a third social media user wrote.
“All the blood spilled around the world under the Royal Family&#8217;s command,” a fourth commenter echoed.
Yeo told the BBC that King Charles’s wife, Camilla, was a fan of the finished product. “Yes you’ve got him,” she allegedly said after seeing the painting. 
The artist said King Charles was “mildly surprised by the strong color, but otherwise he seemed to be smiling approvingly.” 
&#8220;I do my best to capture the life experiences and humanity etched into any individual sitter’s face, and I hope that is what I have achieved in this portrait,&#8221; Yeo said in a <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/C68_S5iMWZg/?hl=en&amp;img_index=2">statement</a> shared by the royal family. &#8220;To try and capture that for His Majesty The King, who occupies such a unique role, was both a tremendous professional challenge, and one which I thoroughly enjoyed and am immensely grateful for.&#8221;
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1715771734791000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3RAccFxpm5CI2m5KR1E_Ul">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
Yeo said on his <a href="https://www.jonathanyeo.com/new-index-41">website</a> that he was inspired by the Welsh Guards&#8217; red uniform. 
“The vivid color of the glazes in the background echo the uniform’s bright red tunic, not only resonating with the royal heritage found in many historical portraits but also injecting a dynamic, contemporary jolt into the genre with its uniformly powerful hue, providing a modern contrast to more traditional depictions.”
“The butterfly approaching King Charles&#8217;s shoulder in the portrait adds a layer of narrative depth, symbolizing both his known advocacy for environmental causes and his personal transformation,” Yeo added.

Charles portrait

First Portrait Of King Charles III Mocked On Social Media: ‘Looks Like He’s Going Straight To Hell’

First Portrait Of King Charles III Mocked On Social Media: 'Looks Like He’s Going Straight To Hell'

General

King Charles III

World

<a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/beyonce">Beyoncé</a> fans were delighted to see an advertisement for her upcoming <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/music">album</a>, &#8220;Cowboy Carter,&#8221; being projected onto the <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/arts">Guggenheim Museum</a> in New York City just over a week before its March 29 release. The only problem is that the projection was not authorized by the venue.
Advertisements for the album were seen projected on several museums besides the Guggenheim, including the Whitney Museum, New Museum, and the Museum of Art and Design.
Museum reps shared in a <a href="https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/promotion-beyonce-cowboy-carter-album-guggenheim-whitney-new-museum-1234700495/">statement</a> with ARTnews that they did not authorize their building for that usage. They said Guggenheim staff “was not informed about and did not authorize this activation. However, we invite the public — including Beyoncé and her devoted fans — to visit the museum May 16–20 when we present projections by artist Jenny Holzer on the facade of our iconic building to celebrate the opening of her major exhibition.”
The projected image said, “This ain’t a country album. This is a ‘Beyoncé’ album,” and included the album’s title and release date.
The Grammy Award-winning singer also posted a photo of the Guggenheim’s coordinates to her Instagram Story on Wednesday night, per <a href="https://www.billboard.com/music/music-news/beyonce-cowboy-carter-nyc-museums-ad-1235638373/">Billboard</a>.
The Guggenheim referenced Beyoncé’s new song, “Texas Hold ‘Em,” when <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/C4xphCdu6ux/?hl=en">posting</a> Franz Marc’s 1910 painting “Three Horses Drinking” to Instagram on Thursday morning. The image caption began with, “This ain’t Texas,” which is a line from the song. The museum&#8217;s social account also shared an image of the unauthorized projection in Instagram Stories, adding a text overlay that said, “Hey beyonce!,” with a bee emoji.
Earlier this week, Beyoncé shared the official album cover for Cowboy Carter and discussed some of her motivation behind it on Instagram earlier this week.
<blockquote class="instagram-media" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/C4s6Zr7rlwA/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14">
<div style="padding: 16px;">
&nbsp;
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div>
<div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div>
<div style="padding-top: 8px;">
<div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"></div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;">
<div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: 8px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"></div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);"></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: auto;">
<div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"></div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"></div>
</div>
&nbsp;
<p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/C4s6Zr7rlwA/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by Beyoncé (@beyonce)</a>
</div>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>
“I feel honored to be the first Black woman with the number one single on the Hot Country Songs chart. That would not have happened without the outpouring of support from each and every one of you. My hope is that years from now, the mention of an artist’s race, as it relates to releasing genres of music, will be irrelevant,” she wrote in the caption. 
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1711210359473000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3YNnfVFaEB92Xp3n1uhyua">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
“This album has been over five years in the making,” the post continued. “It was born out of an experience that I had years ago where I did not feel welcomed…and it was very clear that I wasn’t. But, because of that experience, I did a deeper dive into the history of Country music and studied our rich musical archive. It feels good to see how music can unite so many people around the world, while also amplifying the voices of some of the people who have dedicated so much of their lives educating on our musical history.”

Beyonce

Guggenheim Museum Rep Says They ‘Did Not Authorize’ Beyoncé Album Promotion Projected On Their Building

Guggenheim Museum Rep Says They 'Did Not Authorize' Beyoncé Album Promotion Projected On Their Building

Country Music

New York City

An art museum in <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/england" target="_blank" rel="noopener">England</a> has issued a warning to patrons that images of a British countryside in paintings can evoke what it labeled &#8220;dark,&#8221; &#8220;nationalist feelings.&#8221;
The Fitzwilliam Museum, owned by the University of Cambridge, decided to overhaul some of its displays, something that the museum&#8217;s director Luke Syson insisted is not being &#8220;woke.&#8221;
&#8220;I would love to think that there’s a way of telling these larger, more inclusive histories that doesn&#8217;t feel as if it requires a push-back from those who try to suggest that any interest at all in [this work is] what would now be called &#8216;woke,'&#8221; Syson told the Telegraph, as reported by <a href="https://www.yahoo.com/news/paintings-british-countryside-evoke-dark-140508085.html">Yahoo</a> News.
The paintings have been moved around into categories in an effort to make the museum &#8220;inclusive.&#8221;
&#8220;Being inclusive and representative shouldn&#8217;t be controversial; it should be enriching,&#8221; Syson said.
One of the signs in the Nature Gallery, showing the work of artist John Constable&#8217;s paintings of English hills, noted that the artwork can stir feelings of &#8220;pride towards a homeland.&#8221;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
&#8220;The Fitzwilliam Museum has suggested that paintings of the British countryside evoke dark &#8220;nationalist feelings&#8221;. The museum, owned by the University of Cambridge, has undertaken an overhaul [&#8230;] in a move that its director insisted was not “woke”.&#8221;<a href="https://t.co/1t09LcYqEP">https://t.co/1t09LcYqEP</a>
— Kristian Niemietz (@K_Niemietz) <a href="https://twitter.com/K_Niemietz/status/1768550114660958412?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 15, 2024</a></blockquote>
&#8220;Landscape paintings were also always entangled with national identity,&#8221; the sign read.
&#8220;The countryside was seen as a direct link to the past, and therefore a true reflection of the essence of a nation,&#8221; it added. &#8220;Paintings showing rolling English hills or lush French fields reinforced loyalty and pride towards a homeland.&#8221;
However, another part of the sign told visitors that &#8220;there is a darker side&#8221; to the images of the British countryside. 
&#8220;The darker side of evoking this nationalist feeling is the implication that only those with a historical tie to the land have a right to belong,&#8221; it added.
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1700760801843000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2PQrVSrJfhxNb4LcARqniG">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
Constable is known for his famous landscapes of the Suffolk countryside, the <a href="https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/artists/john-constable#:~:text=Constable%20is%20famous%20for%20his,worked%20up%20in%20the%20studio.">National Gallery</a> in London noted. Interestingly enough, as popular as his paintings are now, the London Gallery noted that &#8220;they were not particularly well received in England during his lifetime.&#8221;
In another part of the museum, the sign for the new Identity Gallery told patrons that portraits of wealthy and uniformed sitters &#8220;became vital tools in reinforcing the social order of a white ruling class, leaving very little room for representations of people of color, the working classes or other marginalized people,” the outlet noted.
And that, &#8220;portraits were often entangled, in complex ways, with British imperialism and the institution of transatlantic slavery.&#8221;
In the Migration and Movement gallery, signage noted that &#8220;while some people chose to leave their homes, global conflict, discrimination and European colonialism meant others fled or were exiled by force.&#8221;

Museum Painting

Art Museum Warns That Images Of British Countryside Can Evoke ‘Dark’ ‘Nationalist’ Feelings

England

Museum

Wokeness

The Biden administration may have lied to the public about an ethics agreement related to <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/hunter-biden" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Hunter Biden</a>’s art career, according to House Oversight and Accountability Chairman James Comers (R-KY).
The committee on Tuesday <a href="https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-statement-on-interview-with-hunter-bidens-art-gallerist%EF%BF%BC/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">interviewed</a> Georges Bergès, Hunter’s art gallerist, and asked him about who was purchasing Hunter’s art and what his relationship was with the White House. According to Comer, Bergès said that he never made any ethics agreement with the White House, which has claimed there was an ethics agreement between the gallerist and the Biden administration to not discuss the sales. 
“The Biden White House appears to have deceived the American people about facilitating an ethics agreement governing the sale of Hunter Biden’s art. Hunter Biden’s gallerist never had any communication with the White House about such an agreement to make sure there was any sort of ethics compliance at all, and he provided information to the committee revealing how Hunter Biden’s amateur art career is an ethics nightmare,” Comer said. 
Bergès said that Hunter &#8220;knew the identities of the individuals who purchased roughly 70% of the value of his art, including Democrat donors Kevin Morris and Elizabeth Hirsh Naftali,&#8221; according to Comer. 
“The vast majority of Hunter Biden’s art has been purchased by Democrat donors, one of whom was appointed by President Biden to a prestigious commission after she purchased Hunter Biden’s art for tens of thousands of dollars shortly after Joe Biden’s inauguration. The White House has a lot of explaining to do about misleading the American people,” Comer said. 
Naftali, <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/foreign-post-handed-to-hunter-bidens-art-buyer-is-notorious-for-corruption-used-to-buy-foreign-influence">who paid Hunter Biden</a> for a piece of his hyper-expensive artwork, was appointed by President <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/joe-biden">Joe Biden </a>to the Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad. 
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1702741302552000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0j7iIgqNi0bR5AgQ4rgPM4">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
Morris, who previously helped pay Hunter’s unpaid taxes, reportedly purchased $875,000 worth of art from Hunter in January 2023. “However, Kevin Morris only paid Mr. Bergès 40% commission of the $875,000 purchase and Hunter Biden and Kevin Morris figured out the financial implications. Mr. Bergès admitted he has never done an art deal like that before,” House investigators noted. 
According to Comer, Bergès was introduced to Hunter by Hollywood video producer Lanette Phillips, who has hosted fundraisers for President Joe Biden. Bergès also reportedly told House lawmakers that he had met with the president in person and over the phone and was at a wedding at the White House. 
The interview was conducted as part of the House investigation into corruption and influence peddling within the Biden family.

Hunter Biden Dec 13

‘An Ethics Nightmare’: Hunter Biden Art Gallerist Interviewed By House Investigators

Biden Administration

Hunter Biden

James Comer

Joe Biden

If you want these happy little trees, you’ll need a lot of green. Beloved TV artist Bob Ross’s first-ever on-air <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/arts">painting</a> is up for sale and costs almost $10 million.
The late host of <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/pbs">PBS</a>’s “The Joy of Painting” became massively popular for his friendly, calm demeanor and his insistence that anyone can become an artist. Now Modern Artifact Gallery in <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/minneapolis">Minneapolis</a> is selling “A Walk in the Woods,” the first of over 400 paintings Ross made on the show. Ross painted it for the premiere episode which aired on January 11, 1983.
“It is season one, episode one of what you would call the rookie card for Bob Ross,” gallery owner Ryan Nelson said of the work, per <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/21/bob-ross-first-tv-painting-sale-a-walk-in-the-woods">The Guardian</a>. Nelson added that he doesn’t expect the work to sell quickly because of the cost. 
“What this piece represents is the people’s artist,” the gallery owner continued. “This isn’t an institution that’s telling you that Bob Ross is great. It’s not some high-brow gallery telling you that Bob Ross is great. This is the masses, the population in the world that are saying that Bob Ross is great.”
“A Walk in the Woods” was originally sold for an undisclosed amount to a volunteer to raise funds for the local PBS station. The painting was displayed in her home for almost four decades before she contacted Nelson about purchasing it. He bought it last year, then gave it the “not for sale” price of $9.89 million, the outlet noted. 
“Ryan would prefer to take [the painting] out, tour it around to museums and things like that so people can enjoy it and appreciate it,” Nelson’s publicist said. “He will take offers but he’s not in a hurry to sell it.”
<a href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-9096" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://onelink.to/dwapp&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1695395728952000&amp;usg=AOvVaw12JISV27yB7ZDLvfG_xsWJ">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP</a>
Ross, who died in 1995, had a passion for removing pretentious attitudes from the art world. As he said in the first episode, “We have avoided painting for so long because I think all of our lives we’ve been told that you have to go to school half your life, maybe even have to be blessed by Michelangelo at birth, to ever be able to paint a picture. And here, we want to show you that that’s not true. That you can paint a picture.”

painter

Bob Ross’s First Ever On-Air Painting On Sale For $9.8M

Bob Ross's First Ever On-Air Painting On Sale For $9.8M

Minneapolis

Television

A Danish <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/arts">artist</a> is being asked to return money he was given to complete an art installation after he submitted two blank canvases as the finished project.
The Kunsten Museum of Modern Art in <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/topic/denmark">Denmark</a> lent artist Jens Haaning 532,549 Dutch krone, equivalent to about $76,400, so he could recreate two earlier pieces that physically depicted the average income of a Danish citizen versus an Austrian citizen, per <a href="https://www.npr.org/2023/09/18/1200192209/danish-artist-jens-haaning-blank-canvases-ordered-to-repay-loan-kunsten">NPR</a>. 
But rather than affixing the money to the canvases, Haaning pocketed the cash and turned in blank canvases he dubbed “Take the Money And Run.” 
The museum initially accepted the canvases and displayed them as part of its “Work It Out” show in 2021, expecting the artist to return the money afterward. But he refused, which resulted in a lengthy court battle.  
Haaning has now been ordered to return the money plus $11,000 in legal fees. The ruling deducted roughly $5,700 from the amount owed to reflect Haaning&#8217;s artist&#8217;s fee and viewing fee because the exhibit did proceed with his two blank canvases included.
Museum director Lasse Andersson, at first, was amused by the stunt. &#8220;Jens is known for his conceptual and activistic art with a humoristic touch. And he gave us that – but also a bit of a wake up call as everyone now wonders where did the money go,&#8221; he told <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/artist-jens-haaning-take-the-money-and-run-ordered-return-cash-denmark/">CBS News</a> in 2021. 
But he also warned the artist that they did need the money back.
&#8220;We are not a wealthy museum,&#8221; Andersson told The Guardian in 2021. &#8220;We have to think carefully about how we spend our funds, and we don&#8217;t spend more than we can afford.&#8221;
The museum had extracted the funds from a building maintenance fund to give to Haaning. “I believe he will give it back to us. He is a well-regarded artist. But if we don’t get it back, we will have to file charges against the artist,” the director said at the time. Andersson said the museum’s contract with Haaning required him to return the money in January 2022, which he failed to do.
<a class="c-link c-link--focus-visible" href="https://onelink.to/dwapp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://onelink.to/dwapp" data-sk="tooltip_parent" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-69115">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP</a>
According to Haaning&#8217;s press release in 2021, &#8220;the idea behind [it] was to show how salaries can be used to measure the value of work and to show national differences within the European Union.&#8221; The artist changed the title to &#8220;Take the Money and Run&#8221; as a means of addressing &#8220;artists&#8217; rights and their working conditions in order to establish more equitable norms within the art industry.&#8221;
“The work is that I have taken their money,” Haaning told the national Danish broadcaster DR in September 2021. “It’s not theft. It is breach of contract, and breach of contract is part of the work.”
“I encourage other people who have working conditions as miserable as mine to do the same. If they’re sitting in some sh**y job and not getting paid, and are actually being asked to pay money to go to work, then grab what you can and beat it,” he added.

Haaning

Danish Artist Ordered To Repay Museum $76K After Turning In Blank Canvases Called ‘Take The Money And Run’

Danish Artist Ordered To Repay Museum $76K After Turning In Blank Canvases Called 'Take The Money And Run'

Courts

Denmark

Lawsuit

Menu

Art