The New Yorker’s Dangerous Ambiguity About When Life Begins
Credit: YsaL via Getty Images.

DW Opinion

The New Yorker’s Dangerous Ambiguity About When Life Begins

Erroneous federal definitions already treat a woman as “almost pregnant.” The New Yorker moves the line again.

Brooke Stanton

Last week, The New Yorker published Apoorva Tadepalli’s essay “The Unsettling Ambiguity of Early Pregnancy.” Pregnancy tests, she writes, draw a “misleading, somewhat arbitrary, binary” between pregnant and not pregnant. “You can be kind of pregnant, a little bit pregnant, almost pregnant, or maybe pregnant,” she says, “and still test positive.” The essay treats implantation, the human embryo’s attachment to the uterus, after which a home test can detect hCG, as the snapshot from which we merely invent the beginning of pregnancy.

Commentators and readers recoiled from a claim that still sounds like a joke: that a woman can be “a little bit pregnant.” The outrage is reasonable. The idea is not new.

Got a tip worth investigating?

Your information could be the missing piece to an important story. Submit your tip today and make a difference.

Submit Tip