Supreme Court Must Protect Citizen-Journalists From Oregon’s Censorship
Photo by Laura Buckman for The Washington Post via Getty Images.

Opinion

Supreme Court Must Protect Citizen-Journalists From Oregon’s Censorship

Why Project Veritas’s fight against Oregon’s restrictive recording law matters to every American who cares about free speech.

Benjamin Barr

Right now, the U.S. Supreme Court faces a crucial test: deciding whether states can criminalize undercover journalism simply because those in power dislike being recorded. At stake is more than just one organization’s right to expose wrongdoing — it’s about safeguarding free speech and transparency in an era increasingly defined by censorship and institutional distrust.

Project Veritas, known for undercover exposés revealing abuses within powerful institutions, recently petitioned the Supreme Court to challenge Oregon’s restrictive recording law. This statute demands that anyone recording in even the most public of places notify everyone else that they are being recorded. But there’s a rub: the state doles about permission slips making it easier to record some subjects, but not others. In short, Oregon law says you can easily record police abuse but not a school administrator admitting to indoctrinating students.

Got a tip worth investigating?

Your information could be the missing piece to an important story. Submit your tip today and make a difference.

Submit Tip