Last week, the House Oversight Committee released a bombshell letter to the Archivist of the United States at the National Archives and Records Administration, asking for all records and emails related to a particular email address. The email address was not the official email address that Joe Biden used when he was vice president of the United States. Instead, it was a secret email address that he allegedly used at that time.
We have known about a series of names that were found in Hunter Biden’s laptop since 2021. One of those names was “Robert L. Peters.” Robert L. Peters, it turns out, was a pseudonym — the committee has now identified it as then-Vice President Biden. You start to get into dicey territory when you have official members of the federal government using alternative email addresses or pseudonymous email addresses in order to email.
Hillary Clinton had a private email server. There have been other people in the past who have had private email addresses. If those private email addresses are dealing with private business, that’s one thing. But if they are dealing with outside business activities and the pseudonyms were being used as a Chinese firewall to screen those outside business activities from any sort of discovery, that’s a real problem.
The committee wrote:
Attached to this email, and made available on the NARA website, is a document that indicates at 9:00 a.m. on May 27, 2016, Vice President Biden took a call with the president of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko. It is concerning to the Committee, however, that this document was sent to “Robert L. Peters”—a pseudonym the Committee has identified as then Vice-President Biden. Additionally, the Committee questions why the then-Vice President’s son, Hunter Biden—and only Hunter Biden—was copied on this email to then-Vice President Biden.
The committee questioned why Hunter Biden — and only Hunter Biden — was copied on this email to then-Vice President Biden. They’re saying that Joe Biden was using a false email address to email his son about a call he had just had with the then-head of Ukraine.
WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show
Joe Biden has long been a deeply corrupt human being. His corruption goes all the way back to his first Senate race. There were serious allegations that in his first Senate race, people related to the Biden campaign worked alongside members of the local union to prevent the dissemination of a newspaper that contained an insert for his Republican opponent, that the union was basically told to create a picket line.
The newspaper didn’t go out that day, thus boosting Biden to his first senatorial victory in Delaware. From then on, it’s been an unbroken series of scandals involving Biden, family members, and money. The scandals range from family members, who were absolutely not credit worthy, receiving money from banks who lent money they shouldn’t have because they knew he was the senator from Delaware; to his sons receiving jobs they certainly should not have had; to Hunter Biden running around in foreign precincts, picking up bags of cash under the Biden name.
Joe Biden has always hidden behind plausible deniability: I was never directly involved; I was not involved in any way, shape, or form. But it’s been perfectly obvious to everybody that he was deeply involved in every way, shape, and form. After all, how does a man who earned approximately $200,000 a year for his entire career in the Senate end up buying mansions worth millions?
How does that happen? How does he end up with these giant houses? How is all that money flowing? How does Hunter Biden, one of the most derelict human beings ever to walk the Earth, clear millions and millions of dollars over the course of the last decade for being a complete ne’er-do-well. How does Joe Biden’s brother James clear a bunch of money? How does his brother Frank clear a bunch of money? How are all these people now extremely wealthy? How does that happen — unless Biden is actively interested in them doing really well by using his name.
He knows that they’re using his name.
But…
This would be the first evidence that Joe Biden was directly involved. We have a lot of indirect evidence that he was involved, ranging from testimonies by Devon Archer to Tony Bobulinski, and pictures of Joe with various business dignitaries that Hunter was cultivating. But this would be actual communications to Hunter Biden about the business, which would be the first that we have seen at this point in writing.
Wait until the White House brushes this off, saying, “What are you even talking about? We have no obligation to turn over those emails. How do you know they’re even about Petro Poroshenko? How do you know what those are about? Those are private emails.”
The arrogance and level of duplicity is astonishing.